WEBVTT - Blitzkrieg! 0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.920 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio. 0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:11.039 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly 0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.760 source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now 0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.960 along with the guys from Guillotine Leagues dot com, here's 0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:21.840 your host, Paul Chargian. 0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.920 It's the first big draft weekend of Fantasy football twenty 0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:29.760 twenty three, and we are here to help. I am 0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.600 Paul Chargy. In my cost today are Brian Johnson and 0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.879 Scott Fish. Scott, I barely even know what you look like. 0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.760 I know I wasn't fired as most people thought. Thor 0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.400 did not replace me. I'm still here. 0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.440 It's touching, gum. I'll be honest. 0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.559 Okay, you might, Okay, I don't want to bank on 0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:45.360 that quite Yeah. 0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:46.440 Maybe I spoke too soon. 0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:46.800 You might. 0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.519 You might want to be careful with that. So much 0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.680 great stuff to get to today. We're gonna go through 0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.880 all the things we're learning and training camp all thirty 0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.440 two teams like we do at the start of every 0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.640 of all of our preseason shows. We're gonna describe the 0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.880 toughest decision you need to make in every round one 0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.760 through ten. When this this guy comes up, you're on 0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.759 the clock. This is the tough decision. Thumbs up, thumbs down. 0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.400 We'll go through three tough questions like we always do. 0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.480 Scott will take us through vacated targets. What are the 0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:19.600 teams that have a big opening for targets players who 0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.720 left their team from last year. Brian will talks to 0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.119 us about running back touches that are vacated. So these 0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.920 are opportunities that are up for grab for somebody new, 0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:29.399 love it. 0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.760 Or some bodies Oh. 0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.920 Oh, all right, tip tipping your hand a little bit. 0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:36.920 Offensive lines, the best and worst. We care only about 0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.520 the best and the worst. The rest are in the middle. 0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.440 We'll talk about the ones you gotta be careful about 0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.640 and the ones that you want to be sure to 0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.520 help help your favorite players. 0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.520 And then we'll give out our sleepers. So lots to 0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:48.800 get to. 0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.160 I love your analysis, best, worst and middle. 0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.320 The other thirty twenty two teams just in the middle. 0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:57.080 Yep, there it is. 0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:58.120 That's right, all right. 0:01:58.160 --> 0:01:59.960 So let's let's break down what we've learned and train 0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.000 camps in preseason action from each of the team. Scott, 0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.360 We're going to begin with you and the Arizona Cardinals. 0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.400 Yeah, I guess the most recent news this week, the 0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.480 Arizona Cardinals acquired Josh Dobbs, who people are now speculating 0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.000 might be then might have a chance to start over 0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.280 Cole McCoy to start the season. That's the big no, 0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.840 big news. Dobson McCoy basically become last round super flex 0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.960 draft picks. Dobson McCoy. That sounds like a whiskey bar. 0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:27.359 Sounds like a law firm. 0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.240 Oh that too, that too. I think with all the 0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.280 trades the Cardinals have made there on their way to 0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:34.880 Caleb Williams next year. 0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:36.799 That I'll sign point that way. 0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.120 Although that Houston pick is going to be worth as 0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.400 much as people think, I'm telling you he's going to be. Okay, Brian, 0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.119 what do we learn from the Atlanta Falcons training camp 0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:46.800 in preseason? 0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.960 Falcons played the Steelers on Thursday night. They were shut out, 0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.880 but none of their starters played. But that means Bjon 0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.960 Robinson should have played in that game because he still 0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.760 listed number three at running back on their depth chart. 0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.160 He's not their third running back. But again, would you 0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:09.640 have any great okay, very nice addition to the Jean Robinson. 0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:11.840 He's going to be the starter, but again, be a 0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.760 little wary. I don't know Arthur Smith. He's a pain 0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.720 in the ass when it comes to fantasy football. 0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.600 So ifill can make a fantasy potential fantasy star not. 0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.400 Perform, it's it is so again, Bijon is going top 0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:25.480 three among running backs. 0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.880 We live up to that ADP. Only time will tell. 0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.120 In Baltimore, this roster is filled with injured guys on 0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.520 the men who we don't have really any data on. 0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.680 So it's frustrating, but that's the scenario we've got. You're 0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.760 gonna have to largely draft on faith. 0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:40.320 With JK. 0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.280 Dobbins, Rashad Bateman, and Obj. None are expected to get 0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.440 any preseason in game action at all. Dobbin says he's 0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:51.720 in great shape. He said that last preseason. Rashad Bateman 0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.440 says he's ninety nine percent recovered, so he's he left 0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.800 the door open just a little bit. I'm saying there's 0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.400 a chance, uh and OBG OBJ seems to be rending 0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.240 towards the start of the season. But probably to me 0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.120 that OBJ were this far into training camp and OBJ 0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.920 is still getting like two days of rest off. 0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.400 He's had eighteen months of rest Offish. 0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.640 I'm nervous about I don't like. I don't like guys 0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.200 rolling into the seven and needing rest at this stage. 0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:19.800 Let's go to the Buffalo Bills. 0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.920 What'll we learned running back room stuff? The Bills believe 0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.320 James Cook can be a bellcow. They also signed Tyd 0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.920 Johnson this week to replace Nahim Heines's role of one 0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.760 point two touches per game. Damian Harris returned to practice 0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.000 for some limited work. We're not sure when he's gonna 0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:36.600 be ready yet. 0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:38.599 All right, Carolina, what have we learned there? 0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.920 DJ Shark dealing with a hamstring injury right now. Sadly, 0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.680 the song remains the same with Chark hasn't played a 0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.719 full season in his career, just fifteen games played over 0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.120 the last two years for DJ Shark. So it looks 0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.520 like your guy, Adam Thielin is the wide receiver to 0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.920 roster right now based on ADP. Jonathan Mingo certainly in 0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.520 the mix, of course, but DJ Shark looking a little 0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:02.360 iffy for Week one. 0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.560 Mingo's had some really good and really bad plays at 0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.760 various times. Well, we'll see how that pans out. But 0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.719 I feel like Thieland's being dramatically underdrafted, like six. 0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.919 Lot of available targets there a lot. 0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.200 Right, Well, maybe we'll talk more about the show in Chicago. 0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.560 Hard to draft Chase Claypool, but he is the starting 0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.359 receiver and an emerging offense here. He's been down with 0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.920 the hamstring injury since August ninth, but they say he's 0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:27.400 going to be ready for the start of the season. 0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.839 Who might not be though key offensive lineman Tevin Jenkins 0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.640 has a leg injury. His availability for the starter is 0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.440 not clear. And last thing I'll mention about Chicago. Based 0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.960 on preseason action, the Bears backfield looks like a true committee. 0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:47.120 Khalil Herbert probably is the is the start, but it 0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:47.760 may not matter. 0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.960 Johnson's had some sizzling moments, but it's unclear how big 0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.520 his role is going to be early in the season. 0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.000 They've both had some really good moments. They both ranked 0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:56.280 highly on the Scoot Index. 0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.840 For me, so oh, very big on the Scoot Index. 0:05:59.160 --> 0:05:59.919 Very scoot end. 0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.760 Yes, if there's nothing I like to index more than scoots. 0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.080 Cincinnati, what have we learned? 0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.520 Sounds like Chris Evans will take the backup role, but 0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.800 also the pass game work, lightning the load a little 0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.320 bit for Joe Mixon, who was not found not guilty 0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.560 this last week of aggravated menaicine. We'll see if that 0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.800 brings any kind of suspension. Sometimes even not guilty verdicts 0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:23.719 bring that with the NFL. 0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.160 And you still got a pending legal case over the 0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.640 shooting of a neighbor boy, so that's. 0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:29.200 Still out there. 0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:34.000 Ye Ah, it's never quite easy with Joe mixing Cleveland Browns. 0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:34.480 What have we learned? 0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.800 Brian Jerome Ford could be ready for Week one. He 0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.040 suffered a hamstring injury a couple of weeks ago. He 0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.400 was an intriguing backup option for Nick Chubb, of course, 0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.760 but Cleveland didn't bring in any any you know, backa 0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.040 or a running back help while Ford was out. His 0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.760 ADP Jerome Ford's that is, has dropped more than two 0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.479 rounds over the last two weeks. I think one of 0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.600 the the must handcuffs if you draft Nick Chubb, but 0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.760 also an enticing just stash play. He's gonna have a 0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.880 role in this offense when healthy, even if Chubb. If 0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.080 Chubb is healthy, so just keep here on your own Ford, 0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.280 He's coming at a great discount right now. I'm certainly 0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.200 scooping scooping up some shares. 0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:13.840 Dallas Cowboys. 0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.400 Dak Prescott said that tight end Jake Ferguson will become 0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.880 quote a big time player in this league. I'm in 0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.480 Ferguson is a top the depth chart ahead of rookie 0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.600 Luke Schoonmacher and Dalton Schultz. Was you know, was the starter. 0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:32.640 Obviously he's gone. Ferguson could walk into at least Scheltzian production, 0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.720 and so there is a lot of upside for a 0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:35.680 guy going off the. 0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:36.440 Board very late. 0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:37.720 We'll talk about that one later too. 0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.440 That sounds like a spot for some vacated targets Denver Broncos. 0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:42.119 What have we learned? 0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.400 Uh? Two pass game notes. Jerry Judy expected to miss 0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.680 several weeks after I drafted him twice this week. I mean, 0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:51.520 my bad. 0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:53.240 You should have know. 0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.960 I may have cursed him. Actually that's probably how it works. 0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.040 You should have been bleeding the clock if you're drafting him. 0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.840 If jig a couple of times last week, So like, 0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.160 maybe maybe I'm just guilty of. 0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:07.920 This not draft Damian Pierce. 0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.480 I will try not to. It's a hamstring injury for 0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.800 him and those ken Linger. They already lost Hammler and 0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.760 Tim Patrick, so it'll be a lot of Tim Sutton, 0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.160 and this week Sean Payton mentioned that Great Dulcic will 0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.360 play the joker role, moving all over the formation to 0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.800 exploit mismatches, which I found a little interesting interesting comment there. 0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.720 You know, we get this stuff every preseason. I know 0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.480 some player they're like, oh, we're gonna over the field, 0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.760 and what that most usually means is like two plays 0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:37.679 or you. 0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.440 Know, or Dulsage's case, he'll move to all the spots 0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.840 of the wide receivers who can't play in Week one, 0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.200 maybe to tack onto Oh I'm with you, I'm not. 0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.880 I'm not in on Dulcie. I'm just reporting what was said. 0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.880 I understand tack onto that door real quick, Mark Quez 0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.360 Callaway a deep dart throw. Keep your eye on what 0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.080 former saint Yeah, Sean Payton, Beckham. 0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.800 Is just a straight vertical speed. 0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.959 Give me some three catches to Detroit Lyons. 0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.640 What do we learn, Brian, i'man Rossaint Brown returned to 0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.000 practice on Wednesday. Suffered a scare last week with an 0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.240 ankle injury. We know you love some God Scott, most 0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.040 of us too. He's in line for a great. 0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:16.920 My number five wide receiver. Do you have him even 0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:17.480 higher than that? 0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.920 I don't know. I'd have to check, all right. 0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.840 If he wasn't stopped at the one yard line. 0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.679 To do because I've been to I took him in 0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.480 the first round last week in the league. 0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.800 I've taken him first round of Gullantine leagues. But those 0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.040 are eighteen, those are eighteen. 0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.080 You know, he took them one to eleven. 0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:32.360 Wow, I like it. 0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.760 You mentioned it last week. He got stopped at the 0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.760 one yard line like five or six times last year. 0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.560 If that didn't happen, he would He's probably wide receiver three. 0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.640 But and quickly though, no one's talking about what other 0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.800 wide receiver to draft. People are still drafting Jamison Williams, 0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.880 who's going to miss the first six games by week 0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.880 week nine, So you get two games in the first 0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.600 nine weeks from James and Williams. People need to start 0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.559 talking about Josh Reynolds. In my mind, Marvin Jones going 0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.880 ahead of Reynolds with Jones's dust, Josh Reynolds should be 0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:02.439 getting drafted in the later rounds right now. 0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.439 Yeah, this could be a top five, top seven scoring 0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.480 offense and their number two receivers going undrafted. 0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.440 I think you're wrong about Jamison Williams. He averages forty 0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.000 one yards per catch. It he scores on every. 0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.280 Play against the Vikings. 0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.199 Yes, he scores in every parlay play or. 0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:20.840 Sorry, I had to do it. 0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.600 Jamison Broom, Green Bay Packers. Romeo Dobbs looks like the 0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.240 best receiver in Green Bay. He's had the strongest OTA's 0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.199 training camp preseason games. He scored in the first preseason game, 0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.360 then in the second preseason game put up forty two 0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.280 yards on a reception. His ADP Romeo Dobbs way down 0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.400 at wide receiver sixty one going off the board in 0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:40.320 round fifteen. 0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.280 If only he was as fast as Luke Musgrave though, 0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.960 yef only and if. 0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.360 It comes down to that, you know, we did the 0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.960 teammates game last week. Christian Watson's ADP is round five, 0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.280 Wide receiver twenty four. Give me Dobbs at wide receiver 0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.400 sixty one in round few fifteen. Absolutely he's I think 0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.120 he's a better all around receiver, doesn't have the same upside. 0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.760 Let's go to the Houston Texans, Scott, what have we learned? 0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.520 CJ. Stroud is being listed as the starter, but no 0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.439 definitive announcement yet. But I think we can all pretty 0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.880 much assume that's going to happen. Damian Pierce played one 0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.680 hundred percent of the first team's fourteen offensive snaps in 0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.280 the last preseason game, netting one point five fantasy points. 0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.120 I'm just joking because charge is here. It's didn't get 0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.120 didn't get much on those. But I love that he's 0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.000 playing every single snap and he looks to be a 0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.440 a bell horse or a workcou or whatever you want 0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.559 to call it. 0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:34.320 I don't know. 0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:35.600 I think I think. 0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.200 I think my horse is gone, no, or my cow 0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.360 is gone. We had the cow bell, but it didn't 0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:41.560 We had a broken cow bell. 0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.160 Yeah, all of State Fair. 0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.160 Do we still have one in the room. We used 0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:45.840 to have one in the room. 0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.840 Yeah, we used to have the cow bell. Somebody sent 0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.320 us which was awesome. We had a Fantasy Football weekly 0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.439 cow bell because we had a listener who made cow bells. 0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.880 That was awesome. Indianapolis Colts, Brian, what have we learned? 0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.520 A new twist in the Jonathan Taylor saga. He's been 0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.280 a granted permission to seek a trade. So I don't 0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.120 think the Colts are actually trying to trade him. They're 0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:06.839 just saying, go ahead and try it. Try and find 0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.160 someone who wants to trade for you in are ridiculous 0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.400 first round pick demands his dead No, they will not 0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.800 get that. His deadline is supposedly Tuesday to get a 0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:16.360 deal done. 0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.079 I don't know. Is this the new way teams are operating. 0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.400 They did that with Lamar Jackson. They're like, it's all 0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.040 they sign him. And then they did that with Austin Eckler. Okay, 0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.000 go find a trade, and they did and they resign him. 0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.920 Is I think what happens is Jonathan Taylor's people go 0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:30.480 to the Colts, they say trade us, and the Colts 0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.240 come back two days later they go, nobody wants you, 0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.920 and they go, ha, we think plenty of people want him. 0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.120 Let us go for work out of trade. And so 0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.120 then they call thirty one teams and try to find 0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.600 a landing spot for Jonathan Taylor. And I think that's 0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:42.880 I think that's what's happened here. 0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:43.120 Now. 0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.560 The reason I think Taylor's got a better chance of 0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.080 moving than most players here is these suicides do not 0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.959 like each other. It's emotional. The team does not want 0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.280 Jonathan Taylor. Jonathan Taylor does not want to be on 0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.719 that team, and that provides a motivation to get him 0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:57.240 out of Indy. 0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.560 That is that you don't normally get. 0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.839 Say when Austin Neckler is looking for more money, and 0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:03.880 it's like, you know, you know, I'll go wherever I 0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:04.880 have to go to get more money. 0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:06.640 They like Austin, I'll go. He's a good dude. 0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.560 Dolphins, anybody, Dolphins, Jacksonville, Jaguars. 0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.040 Let's go there, Not the Dolphins. 0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.440 No, I'm just saying, Dolphins, Taylor to the Dolphins. They've 0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:16.480 been interest interested. 0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.559 I don't want that in a rookie draft field with 0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.760 the lead tight end prospects. Jaguars tight end Brenton Strange 0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.720 as the highest rookie PFF grade of the preseason. Nobody 0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.400 even totally off Radars now he's just a deep dynasty 0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.400 stash because they re signed Evan Ingram to a fat 0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:31.880 new deal. 0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.360 But you never know, and. 0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.120 You know, stranger things have happened. 0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.240 So and then with more with the Jaguars later we 0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.000 might talk about a certain running back little later. 0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.400 Oh boy, let's get a couple more teams in. 0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.200 How can we go a show without you talking about 0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.080 a Jaguars running back? Though it's a specific. 0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.040 One and it is it is, It is not going 0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.520 to happen. I don't think Kansas City Chiefs. 0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:58.000 Scott Isaiah Piccheco finally practicing in fall after offseason torn 0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.760 labraham and broken hand surgeries. Hey, we're like twins. I've 0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.040 torn my labor and broken my hand, and like Tonya 0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.040 Chief Tony Pollard broke his peebela last year, I've broken 0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.240 I'm basically an NFL running back. So many similarities. It's 0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.439 on caddy anyway. Pacheco may finally play in the third 0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.920 preseason game to get some game action reps, but you 0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:20.840 should feel a little better about drafting him now. 0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.960 Las Vegas Raiders Brian so Josh Jacobs has not officially 0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.800 signed his franchise tag yet, but no, they expect him to, 0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.240 but something worth keeping an eye on. 0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:37.800 And also, Aiden O'Connell, rookie quarterback, might take Jimmy G's 0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:42.640 job at but Super Flex League's great last round pick 0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.160 mustache right now, aid In o'conn O'Connell. 0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.000 Would you rather have Aidan O'Connell or d t R. 0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.840 They're both backups now, they're both backups. Now dt Robson has. 0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.240 Got down to run. That's that's his nickname. Dt R. 0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:56.960 I like that. 0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.200 I like that when we come back, will continue to 0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.120 philly you on what we've learned in training camps, plus 0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.360 plenty more to go between now and the end of 0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:31.600 the show Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly 0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.600 Paul Chargie and Brian Johnson Scott. 0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:34.720 Fish with you. 0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.000 You can get my cheechee available for free Guillotine at 0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.800 leagues dot com. And while you're there, it's the funnest, 0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.280 freshest way to play fantasy football. We are all in 0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.080 multiple Guillotine leagues. Got two graph drafts going right at 0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:45.520 this moment. 0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:46.160 I'm on the clock. 0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:47.880 In fact, in one of them. I need to make 0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.120 a move. Sure, that's the league you and I are in, Scott, 0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:51.960 I know I'm on the clock. It'd be nice if 0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.520 I actually make a pick, right. 0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:53.800 Yeah. 0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.720 Yeah. It's tough for you though, because I stole Damien 0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:57.400 Pierce from you and. 0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:57.960 The whole thing. 0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.160 That's right, the whole thing with ravel the whole straft 0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:02.600 strategy unraveled when you did that. 0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.120 Well, thanks for the invite. I'll take it as you 0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:06.000 guys are just scared. 0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.920 Yeah, well that too, that too. Guillotine leagues. You know 0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:09.400 how it works. 0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.120 You start the season with eighteen up to eighteen teams 0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:13.160 because there's eighteen. 0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:14.960 Weeks in the season, no headhead. 0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.480 Instead, every week the low snoring team gets chopped, all 0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.080 their players go to the waiver wire while the rest 0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.080 of us build superstar rosters. All you have to do 0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.400 is not finish last in any week of the season. 0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.520 Lots of fun, totally new way to play Guillotine leagues 0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:30.080 dot Com. 0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.040 Let's go back to the. 0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.600 Things we've learned in training camp in preseason games. The 0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.640 Los Angeles Rams. I think I think we're up next 0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:38.360 to Los Angeles. 0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.160 Sure, I'll do the rams and you can. You can 0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.800 figure it out over there. Cooper Cup resumed practice this 0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.400 week and said if there was a game today, he 0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.120 could play, which which tracks with what a lot of 0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.440 the doctors have said about his injury. It's looking like 0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.360 it's also looking like Kyron Williams may not just take 0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.920 over the RB two role. He could take over the 0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.880 pass game work as Yeah, Iron Williams Brian Sleeper from 0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:03.440 last week. 0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.280 I've bookmarked your comments from last week in my head. Jeffrey, 0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:06.960 I'm coming for you. 0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.200 He looked mundane last year. That is a stone cold fact. 0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.560 Los Angeles Chargers the battle to back of Boston Eckler 0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.280 appears to be tilting towards Isaiah Spiller, who's looked better 0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.440 in game action, and Quentin Johnson has looked very sharp 0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.679 both in practice and game action. He's shaping up to 0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:22.840 be the team's third receivers. 0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.199 Early as Week one, you might have skipped over me. 0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.760 Okay, it's just I started with the wrong team, Miami Dolphins. 0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.960 Well, we talked about it earlier, is all it's all about. 0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.040 They are apparently the front runner to trade for Jonathan 0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.520 Taylor right now, which would certainly muck up the Dolphins 0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.240 backfield and likely that the Colts backfield, because you would 0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.919 have to imagine that one or two running backs would 0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.520 be shipped over back to the Colts if Taylor were 0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.080 to be traded to the Dolphins. So we'll have to 0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:49.240 see what happens there, all. 0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.120 Right, Minnesota Vikings. When he's not dinged up, Jordan Addison 0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.480 continues to impress. He's making acrobatic catches, he's beating coverage, 0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.919 he's winning contested catches. He looks like a lot to 0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.119 start Week one in the role that Adam thee and 0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.040 left behind, and he's gonna face single coverage all season. 0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.080 He could be sitting on a very big year, and 0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.159 he could also be sitting on Adam Feelin's goal to 0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.280 go routes. Feeling an elite pass catcher in the end 0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.840 zone in short yardage that those routes could go to Addison. 0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:16.520 TJ. 0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.040 Hockinson's been dealing with an ear infection in a back issue. 0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:20.880 He's on track to start the opener, though. 0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.040 Minnesota lost eighteen goal to go attempt past attempts. 0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.280 Wow, that's mostly feeling. 0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.160 Yep, that's some opportunity. 0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.760 Seventh round rookie Dwayne McBride is getting drafted in some leagues. 0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:38.120 He may not have a roster to get to this point. 0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.359 So notice on that. Let's go to the New England Patriots. 0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.119 Not much here, I think the only notable thing is 0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.440 Mike Oseki has returned to practice for those very large 0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.720 or deep leagues that are drafted. Patriots tight ends apparently. 0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.760 I'm assuming you touched on the Ezekiel Elliott stuff last week, so. 0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.440 We did, alright, move We'll move on New Orleans Saints. 0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:58.280 What have we learned, Brian? 0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.399 You're excited about this charge? Rashid Shaheeda, Yeah, yea. 0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.399 On Wednesday he was dealing with a growing injury somewhat 0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.920 limited return, but hopefully he's good to go week one. 0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.240 But Michael Thomas continues to look pretty good in camp. 0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.679 So there are some intriguing weapons in New Orleans aside 0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.920 from Alvin Kamara until Week four, but Michael Thomas would nice, 0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.320 would be nice to see him return to somewhat of 0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:24.240 his his prime. 0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.919 New York Giants Darren Waller has looked very natural in 0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.360 this offense. He's the best receiver on the team tight 0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.360 end three, or he's my tight end three. 0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:32.879 There we go. 0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.040 Historically it has been very productive inside the five yard line. 0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:41.400 Since twenty twenty, Darren Wallace turned eleven targets into seven touchdowns. 0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.120 That is a high conversion rate. 0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:43.600 We love that. 0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.359 Now they gonna mention Isaiah Hodgins. This is a Brian 0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.399 Johnson early tout from this offseason. He's a lock to 0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.080 start on the outside where he's gonna avoid that logjam 0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.760 of slot receivers like Paris Campbell and Wendel Robinson and 0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.960 Cole Easley and Jamison Crowder. So there's that and Hodgen. 0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.080 He has looked very polished in preseason action, so love him. 0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.560 I think he's a He's a really intriguing sleeper. Let's 0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:07.480 go to the New York. 0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.919 Jets wide receiver room stuff. Corey Davis retired opening up 0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.320 the death depth chart A tiny crack, like a very little, 0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.480 itty bitty crack for a few targets there. Alan Lazard 0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.320 expected to be ready for Week one after his ac 0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.439 joint spray in a few weeks ago, and b writers 0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.320 are claiming Randall Copp could play a big role in 0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.680 the offense after a good daytime nap hitting the buffetian 0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.920 I played with his grand kids. Still, if I come 0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:35.280 on out there, have a. 0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.880 Dinner at four o'clock. Yeah, old country buffet. Yeah, that's 0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:38.960 probably Randall. 0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.440 Cox still has the dreamiest eyes in the NFL, though. 0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.600 He was ten years younger than you. Why making these jokes? 0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.200 Philadelphia Eagles? What have we learned? Brian? 0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.280 The Eagles played the Colts on Thursday night. No one 0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.119 of notes suited up for Philly except for Dan Arnold. 0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.200 That's a note caught two passes for ten yards, also 0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.240 a beautiful block near the They got Trey Sermon into 0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:01.720 the end zone. 0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.600 All but the should have cementing his spot on the roster. 0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.520 But in all seriousness, if you're drafting Dallas Goddard, which 0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.080 is I'm all for that. Yep, there's no need to 0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.400 draft another tight end really okay, because you're gonna ride 0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.680 Goddard up until their week ten by. But if something 0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.800 were to happen that Dallas Goddard, Dan Arnold is going 0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.439 to be you laugh. Now, he's going to be a 0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.120 viable option in that Eagles offense. 0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.800 You've been right so many times. Why would we doubt you. 0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.640 Let's let's conservatively say there are five thousand fantasy football 0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.320 podcasts and and shows out there. We talk about Dad 0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.160 Arnold more than all of that. 0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.840 That we are number by your Dan Arnold leader. 0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:43.360 I'm unulittling anybody. 0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.920 It's gonna be Mark Andrews and Isaiah like Liams. 0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:47.200 Yeah, yeah, that's. 0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.360 That's a sheep, Dan Arnold, is it is. It's a sheep. 0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.240 It's gonna it's gonna comebody locking. 0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:53.760 Up that handcuff. 0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:54.160 All right? 0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:54.280 Oh? 0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.720 They are Steelers. The first team offense. They've concluded their preseason. 0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.040 The first team offense. Look five drives, five touchdowns, Kenny 0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.880 Pickett looks notably more comfortable and poised in the pocket. 0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.680 Alan Robinson and this was something Brian talked about I 0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.800 don't know, maybe a month ago, he's locked in as 0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.199 the starter. Now, look, it was bad last year and 0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.960 they needed him, and I'm not very optimistic, but you know, 0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:19.520 you're in deep enough leagues where you're just trying to 0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:23.199 find starters. At wide receiver, Alan Robinson's gonna be one 0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.760 of It's gonna be one of the starters. Let's go 0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:26.760 to San Francisco. 0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.000 Set their QB depth chart as QB one, Perty, QB two, Donald, 0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.600 QB three Trey Lance, to the surprise of literally nobody 0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.359 who knows ball, the forty nine ers may explore options 0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.800 for Trey Lance, so he might see another team. We'll see. 0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.080 Well, his name is quite literally three. 0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.399 Right, Trey Trey writing was on the wall all along. 0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.160 Seattle Seahawks. What have we learned? 0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:50.400 Brian? 0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.320 Unfortunately, Jackson Smith and Jigba broke his wrist last week 0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.359 in preseason action, underwent surgery earlier this week out and 0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.520 estimated three to four four weeks. That's sort of a 0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.919 ballpark timetable undraftable in guillotine leagues. The Seahawks have a 0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:11.000 round week five, by so I doubt we see JSN 0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:14.720 until week six. In my personal non medical opinion, but 0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.119 a risky pick in guillotine leagues for sure. But his 0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.800 adp as has slid, But I think it makes sense 0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.960 that they hold him out through that Week five by 0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.920 so I think it's we're looking at a two month 0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.080 absence for the highest touted rookie wide receiver right now 0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:29.280 in Tampa Bay. 0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.520 Baker Mayfield named the starter, and he's got a pretty 0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.000 soft set of matchups early in the season. Week one 0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:38.159 against Minnesota's rebuilt pass defense, and there's four of his 0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.479 first six starts for Baker Mayfield and the Tampa Bay 0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.280 Buccaneers strongly positive matchups. So you know, I could see 0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.280 him in super flex or he might be our take 0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.879 a chance on me quarterback from time to time in 0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.119 that first six weeks of games for Baker Mayfield. But 0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.560 I also want to mention this bad news on the 0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.720 hoped return for Tampa Bay center Ryan Jensen. You remember 0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.320 last year he suffered an ACL, an MCL and a 0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.439 PCL and then decided not to have surgery because he's 0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.200 thirty two years old and he was contemplating retirement. He's 0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.440 and he's trying to come back after no surgery, and 0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.320 it doesn't look like it's gonna happen. They he's not 0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.360 able to fly, so they can't travel. 0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:17.919 With him right now. 0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.280 So you know, an already bad offensive line could get 0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.520 a lot worse if Ryan Jensen's not able to go 0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.800 this year, and that could be the case. In Tampa, 0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.960 Tennessee Titans, Scott. 0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.119 Trey Ann Burks now injured, may not be ready for 0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.960 Week one, and Kyle Phillips also down and may miss 0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.040 several weeks into the season, giving giving way to DeAndre 0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.000 Hopkins and Chicka Konku maybe possibly feasting early in the 0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:46.639 next in the first few weeks of the season. 0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:48.840 Chick needs to hold the balls that are thrown to him. 0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:49.640 That would be helpful. 0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.879 Yes, I have Taj Spears also looking good, likely the 0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.960 backup and for sure downfield passed routes, a lot of 0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:56.600 them in camp. 0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:58.440 Spears is fascinating, isn't he? 0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.639 Gosh Oh Vikings Joint practices man, he looked good. 0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.320 Washington Commander's our final. 0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:09.640 Stop wide receiver Terry McLaurin, now uncertain for Week one 0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.000 after suffering a turf toe injury in the Monday night 0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.679 game against the Ravens, a game the Commanders were treating 0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.520 like the Super Bowl. I'm just like screaming at my TV. 0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:21.119 They played their starters. 0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.120 They played their starters, and they played him too hard, 0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.160 like Sam Howell, like trying to run in a touchdown 0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.000 standing upright, almost got killed. 0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.240 Why denigrating Sam Howe. 0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.680 I'm not denigrating him. I'm saying, put him in bubble wrap. 0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:39.679 They've lost McLaurin for the short term, so I know 0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.679 it's an offense. We're all excited about but Terry McClure 0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:44.720 and looking very dicey for week one. 0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:49.040 Diami Brown. We all know that. We all know that. 0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.600 But I took him over Terry McLaurin this week. 0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:53.760 Yeah, that's our angle. 0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:54.520 I rank him there. 0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.080 I'm not saying Brown over Dotson Dotson, of course, but 0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:58.440 Brown now in the mix. 0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:00.400 Mclaurin's dinged up come back. 0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.800 The toughest decision you're gonna need to make in every 0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.480 round will help you walk through tricky spots in your 0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:30.639 fantasy draft. When we come back Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome 0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.360 back Fantasy Football Weekly. 0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:35.320 Here's an idea for your league. 0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.720 Take your regular old standard fantasy league, take all the 0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:43.400 same people. Run a shadow guillotine league. Same people see 0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.480 if you get the same outcome, totally different way to 0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.119 play all the same people you already like in your 0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.800 private league. We've got private leagues at just three dollars 0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.280 per team, so it's cheap to play. Yeah, and why 0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:59.840 not super fun? You already like those people in theory? Eh, 0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.040 Now we're talking riff Raft would be very big into that. 0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.800 Not totally clear which one that is he would, Yes, 0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.960 I think he'd be totally into that. Toughest decision every round. 0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.640 I want to go through each round of the draft. Well, 0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.240 depends on how long your draft is, and talk about 0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.959 the hardest decision and tell me which way you're going 0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.040 in each round. Now, depending on where you pick in 0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:22.960 each round, you may or may not have each of 0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.919 these faces, each of these dilemmas where you pick. But 0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:31.240 based on today's average draft position, these are all players 0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.720 that are going in these rounds. We begin in round one. 0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.439 Do you trust Cooper Cupp to return to form? 0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.640 We begin with Scott Yes. 0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.360 Healthwise, Many injury specialists like Stefani Bell and many others 0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.240 have said he'll be fined, is it fine? And is 0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.240 on track? He himself said this week he could play 0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.560 right now if it called upon it. I think he'll 0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.000 be just fine. He was second last year in fantasy 0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:02.439 points per game, behind only Justin Jefferson, and that was 0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.560 a fairly bad offense last year. So I feel fine 0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.359 about taking him in the first. I have other options. 0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.520 I rank him like sixth, so like I have other 0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.920 options I'd rather have, but I'd be fine with. 0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.920 This one of the healthful on Ross Saint Brown. 0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:17.400 It is okay. Yeah. 0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.840 So the way I said is can you trust Cooper Cup? 0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.600 You say yes, I can trust Ryan. Round one. Can 0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.280 I trust Cooper Cup to return to form? 0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.399 I can't fully trust him. I know I'm not. 0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.320 The ankle injury that cut his season short last year 0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.760 not a concern. He suffered a hamstring injury a couple 0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.959 of weeks ago in camp, obviously not related to the ankle. 0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.320 But Cup just turned thirty years old. That's getting a 0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.440 little old. And if we're talking returning to form of 0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.840 Triple Crown form in twenty twenty one when he led 0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.560 the league and catches yards and touchdowns receiving, of course, 0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.920 I'm not so sure. I'm not saying he can't, but 0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.280 one hundred percent guarantee not for me and guys like 0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.600 I'm on Ross, Ain't Brown, Ceedee Lamb, Garrett Wilson. I'm 0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.680 a little more comfortable drafting them over Cooper Cup right 0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:05.800 now in a vacuum. 0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:07.800 Part of the reason I trust Cooper Cup is the 0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:09.800 entire offense is built around him. It's really good and 0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.680 Sean McVay has proven repeatedly that he can do that. 0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.200 He can scheme an offense to get Cooper Cup open, 0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.760 and he's there. He's their offense. You know, it comes, 0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.680 it moves entirely through Cooper Cup. And because he's such 0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.640 an important part of that. If you take the health 0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.760 off the table and it looks like he's gonna be okay. 0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.520 I gotta trust Cooper Cup. Let's go to round two. 0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:34.400 Does Dereck Henry have one last good year left in him? 0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:34.880 Brian? 0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.040 I have to say, quite the thing there. I don't 0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:40.680 know where that came. 0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:42.760 I wonder if that's mine. It might have been, says 0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.840 mine is muted, So that was weird. 0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.440 I was all right, Robbie Fes, thank you. 0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.120 I want him to, but I have to say he 0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.240 doesn't because he was my love the player hate the 0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.040 adp running back from last week, twenty nine years old 0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.200 and two hundred something days. I forget what it was, 0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:02.880 but it's seven more days from what I. 0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.800 Said last week. Tajy Spears. 0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.080 We all, most of us saw his electric touchdown run 0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.200 against the Vikings last week, arguably the best backup running 0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.040 back Tennessee has had since Derek Henry has been their 0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.280 starter and the Titans. This isn't Henry's fault. These thirty 0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.400 second ranked offensive line by Pro Football Focus right now. 0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.240 It's not like the glory days from a few years ago. 0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.280 So I'm gonna I want him to have one good 0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.120 year left in him, but I'm going to play it 0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.760 as if he doesn't. You gotta fear the cliff at 0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.080 his age and with that poor offensive line and just 0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:40.000 an overall dull offense, that's scaring me. So I'm gonna say, no, 0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:41.360 he doesn't. But I hope I'm wrong. 0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:42.280 Scott. 0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.360 Does Dereck Henry have one good year left in him? 0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:46.120 Second round? 0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:50.760 So good? Probably great? I don't think so. So second 0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.400 round I just can't. I cannot pull that trigger with 0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:59.080 the other options that are out there. Brian basically stated 0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:00.840 several of the things that I was going to stay. 0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.479 You know, Tajy Spears taking the downfield running routes, all 0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.320 that pass game work he got last year. That was 0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.280 a one year in his career anomaly that Taji Spears 0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.080 is going to take away from him. The offensive line 0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.000 was mentioned. Good year, maybe not a great year. Not 0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:16.520 a second round running back here. 0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.760 He'll continue to get goal line work and that that 0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:19.560 counts for something. 0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.680 And he led the league in twenty plus yard rushes 0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:22.200 and stah. 0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.680 I mean, it's it, but there were too many times 0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.360 last year when I was watching Derrick Henry saying to 0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.480 myself that ain't the same guy that I had seen 0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:31.400 in the years before. 0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:32.320 That ain't him. 0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.040 That is not him. 0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:34.760 I don't know who that guy is, but that's okay. 0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.720 It's Derek Henry. There's nobody else spilt like Derek. 0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.160 Yeah, I was going to say, he looks very unique. 0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:40.000 That's impressive. 0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.600 I'd rather get out one year too early than one 0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.080 year too late, because by getting out one year too early, 0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:46.720 I can just go take Ceede Lamb instead. 0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:48.520 Right round three. 0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:54.440 How much will Zeke impact Remandre Stevenson Scott. 0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.840 It's not none, but it's also not a bowel loosening 0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:02.880 sense of exp level. BAC's essential dread. It's some he's 0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:04.840 a better pass blocker, he's a better goal line in 0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.880 short yardage back at least the last two years. The 0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.760 numbers bear that out. He's like top five. I don't 0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.440 think he's the better pass catcher anymore. Maybe in the past, 0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.680 but not recently. He hasn't been as efficient the last 0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.920 couple of years. But it's in the skill set I 0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.520 think Stevenson's. It's not like he's taking those roles either, 0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.000 because Stevenson is no slouch in those areas. It's not 0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.120 like you know, Brian Robinson to mckissic last year type 0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.280 situation where one is a clear role. Stevenson can do 0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.360 those things. Zeke is just gonna take some of it. 0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.040 I will say, I don't think Zeke takes as much 0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.880 as Harris did last year. So maybe it is none, 0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:41.800 maybe it is none. I'm gonna go back to none 0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.040 because I think Zeke takes a little less than Harris 0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:44.720 did last year. 0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.360 All right, let's uh, Brian round three. How much does 0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:52.080 Zeke impact Ramandre Stevenson third round ADP. 0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.920 Well, there is an impact because before signing Zeke, Remandre 0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:57.560 was a late second round pick. 0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.880 Now he's mid to late third. So the impact is there. 0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.880 I'm buying that dip, so I'm essentially with Scott where 0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.840 I'm not too worried about Zeke. He will factor in 0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.240 at the goal line a little bit, but not so 0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:09.160 much in the past game. 0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.640 So yeah, the impact is on what we thought of 0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.239 Stevenson three weeks ago, right, three weeks ago, I'm not 0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:16.440 compared to call. 0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.760 In on Stevens. I think Adam was like running back six. 0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.760 I mean I was, I was, all, yeah, so minimal, 0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.080 minimal impact for me, though, I still think Remandre has 0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.160 top five running back potential even with Zeke in town. 0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.360 Now, allow me to elucidate the goal line impact here. 0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.520 Ramandre Stevenson has not been very good at the goal. 0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.560 One career numbers about thirty five percent converting carries inside 0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.280 the five into touchdowns. Last year, just two of twelve 0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.880 attempts inside the five turned into touchdowns for Stevenson. Meanwhile, 0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:47.440 Zeke obviously awesome forty six career touchdowns from inside the five. 0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.760 Top five in the NFL, and conversion rate in short 0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.360 yardage and goal line situations over the last two years. 0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.480 You know, Zeke has always been good there. He'll be 0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.200 good there now, and that what worries me about Stevenson. 0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.719 Is he's sitting on another six touchdown season. 0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.440 That would you know? That would pull that would pull the. 0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:07.560 Overall productivity down quite round four. If I take Justin 0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.400 Fields a round four, am I getting the same upside 0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:15.360 as Jalen Hurts and Josh Allen, But two rounds later, Brian. 0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.719 Rushing wise, yes, Fields might have the highest upside of 0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.920 the of those three, but passing wise, so overall, I 0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.520 don't know. Granted, Fields had no one to throw to 0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.840 last year. They've got Dj Moore now that helps things. 0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:34.120 But Fields was under three thousand passing yards last year. 0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:38.160 Allen and Hurts guaranteed four thousand yards if healthy, at 0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.319 least bare minimum, and I don't think we see that 0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.279 from Fields. As a passer, I expect his numbers to 0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.920 go up. So not the same upside. It's close, but 0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.279 you're gonna You're gonna have more upside with Hurts and 0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.960 Allen overall rushing and passing Scott. 0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.280 If I'm taking Fields in round four, am I getting 0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.000 the same upside as Jalen Hurts and Josh Allen have, 0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:58.560 But I'm doing it two rounds later. 0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.400 I like the phrasing this because the downside is remarkably right. 0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.720 It's very different downside as far the upside, just based 0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.560 on last year, justin Fields would have to add one 0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.400 thousand plus passing yards and eight to ten more passing 0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.600 touchdowns just to get to their level last year. And 0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:16.840 last year wasn't even Josh Allen's best year, so his 0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.880 upside's even more than last year. And Jalen Hurts, I 0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.160 think he's got more upside than he had last year 0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.920 because twenty two passing touchdowns with more weapons. I think 0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.279 he can actually do better this year. I don't think 0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.600 it's the same upside, but it might be closer than 0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.239 some people think. I guess my answer is no, it's 0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.319 not the same upside. It doesn't quite reach there. 0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:38.399 It's not quite the same. 0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.400 Yeah, but it's not that far off pa upside exactly 0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.200 that far off. If we get roughly the same output 0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.399 from Hurts and Allen that we had last year, let's 0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.560 go to round five. The last of the elite tight 0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.560 ends fall into round five. That's Kittle, Goddard, Waller all 0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.160 going off the board Round five, Scott and I love 0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.640 WALLERP Do I need to grab one here? Do I 0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:00.200 have to take one of them, one of the three. 0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:01.520 If I don't have a tight end yet and it's 0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.480 round five, those guys are here, do I have to 0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:03.959 take one? 0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:04.360 Scott? 0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.320 I love the phrasing this question because I answered something 0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.560 similar earlier this week on another show, and I said, 0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.359 virtually this exact quote. In round five, Waller is an 0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.879 auto smash. I absolutely take my tight end three right 0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.560 there in Waller because I feel like there's a slight 0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.759 drop off and then there's a huge drop off of 0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.040 other guys. I just you know, I'm gonna have to 0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.120 piece something together. I want. I want Waller and his 0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:27.720 his upside. 0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.240 There, Brian, it's round five, the last of the elite 0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:31.520 tight ends are falling in here? 0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:32.640 Do you have to grab one? 0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:32.879 Here? 0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:34.719 I love Darren Waller too. 0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.640 By the way, lest you forget twenty nineteen, one of 0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.920 my sleepers unknown Darren Waller. I said, go out and 0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:43.160 draft Darren Waller in the last round. That's ultimate peacock there. 0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.080 I actually play in a league with Darren Waller. 0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:46.960 So oh, there you go. 0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.719 What who do you not play in a league? 0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.279 Those guys charge that. 0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.759 I finally, now now back to your question, do you 0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:53.759 need to grab one? 0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:54.560 No? 0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.640 It'd be nice to grab one. I don't think you 0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:57.800 need to grab one. 0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.440 Just because I love Gerald Everett so much and he's 0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.359 got top eight potential so you can get him much later. 0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.879 And there are some other intriguing options later on chick 0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.400 Okonkwo before mentioned. I think he's got a ton of upside. 0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.840 Juwan Johnson. I don't think he's getting enough love in 0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.360 New Orleans. So it depends on that the ebbs and 0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.359 flow of every draft. It'd be nice to get one 0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.799 of those guys, especially Waller. But to me, I don't 0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:20.400 think you need to grab one. And I know you're 0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.000 gonna disagree with me charge, but it's okay, not the 0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:23.520 fint time. 0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.080 Let's just say it's Week eight. I'm playing against Brian. 0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.880 I've got Darren Waller, He's sloughed the tight end position 0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:31.880 to Gerald Everett. 0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:33.400 It's Sunday morning. 0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:35.319 I'm rolling out of bed with a bounce in my 0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.399 step because I've got the second highest scoring tight end 0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:43.360 in fantasy football. Meanwhile, Brian's sphincter tightening on Sunday morning, 0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.520 because is this the typical game we're gonna get out 0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.000 of Gerald Everett that we've gotten most of his career 0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:50.960 is this is gonna be one of those two catch 0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.440 eighteen yard games that Gerald Everett loves to give you, 0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.799 and it certainly could be. They all he is is 0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:01.360 the fifth receiving option on his team. He's going to 0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.640 have down games. You don't want to have to roll 0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.000 into every Sunday wondering about whether or not your tight 0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:12.800 end Cole Kamet, Gerald Everett, Juan Johnson, whoever is sitting 0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:13.960 on a one catch game. 0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.279 Well, if you're basing this scenario off last year, Darren 0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:21.120 Waller is inactive in week eight, So there's that round six. 0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.759 Deshaun Watson is going in this round. If I take him, 0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.880 Should I immediately be drug tested? 0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:32.680 Brian absolutely, like all tests, not just drug test. This 0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.719 is one of the worst full mental capacity. This is 0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.399 one of the worst the worst picks you can make. 0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.640 Watson is going off the board at QB nine at 0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.160 this point, and this is after the top two tiers 0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:49.959 are gone, which ends at Trevor Lawrence has picked sixty three. 0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:54.439 Watson is going to pick eighty six. But you don't 0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:56.360 want to be the taking the first guy in this 0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.839 third tier where you can get Anthony Richardson around later 0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.959 Zak Prescott, Daniel Jones, Kirk Cousins coming off the board 0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.160 cheaper than Deshaun Watson, who you don't know what we're 0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.600 getting with Deshaun Watson anymore. You're not getting the twenty 0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.880 nineteen version of him with the Texans. 0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:14.120 No, just don't do it. 0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.920 It's round six, Scott, Deshaun Watson's going off the board 0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.480 this round. If I take him, should I be drug tested? 0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.359 You're taking the guy who averaged one hundred and eighty 0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:26.759 three yards in one touchdown per game last year? Like no, yeah, 0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.720 I mean wouldn't. I wouldn't drug test you. But also 0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.080 he's not even a single digit round pick for me. 0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.759 I don't understand his adp at all. I understand that 0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.799 he's you know, the offense is supposed to be more 0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:41.799 opened up for him this year, and he's been given 0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.680 the keys to the Kingdom and whatnot, but absolutely not. 0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:46.839 I don't know that he's the top five potential guy 0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:48.000 that he used to be in Houston. 0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:50.120 I do, and the answer is no. 0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:50.800 Okay. 0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.520 Also, if if I'm going to be drug tested, no, 0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:55.160 you can't hold the cup. 0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.120 Round seven? Wasn't asking that? 0:39:58.400 --> 0:39:59.400 Are we sure? 0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:03.280 David mcntgomery's gonna take all those Jamal Williams goal line carries. 0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.839 Scott No, I mean, like all of them thirty eight 0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.680 carries on goal to go plays last year. Like if 0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.160 he got that would be amazing. Now, if the question was, 0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.120 you know, is he gonna get half of them and 0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:19.320 convert a third of them for seven touchdowns? I'm okay 0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.440 with that. But no, he's not gonna get thirty eight 0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.080 carries on goal to go plays? 0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.600 All right, Brian, it's round seven. Are we sure David 0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:30.000 Montgomery's gonna get all of those Jamal Williams goal line carries. 0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:33.719 He's not gonna get as many carries as Williams did 0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:38.520 like Scott. No, the question is all of them he's going, Well, 0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.600 how it's worried he is going to get all of 0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:41.680 them for the Lions. 0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:42.440 It's not gonna be. 0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.800 Jamiir Gibs and I gotta I gotta steal some stats 0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.960 from Jamie Calandro like Twitter. Yeah, Jamie's a good guy. 0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:53.759 Jamiir Gibbs negative point five to five rush yards over 0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.480 expectation in college is the worst of any top twenty 0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.920 five running back prospect over the last three years. 0:40:59.160 --> 0:40:59.480 Wow. 0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.080 By the way, he subbed two hundred pounds, so he's 0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.160 not built for goal line work. He has a stuff 0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.240 rate over twenty five percent, which is not good at all. 0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.280 It's gonna be Montgomery at the goal line. Not hating 0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.320 on Gibbs too much. He's gonna be a fine player, 0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.280 intriguing PPR prospect, going to be utilized all over the field. 0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.040 But Montgomery's gonna be the guy at the goal line. 0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.839 Gibbs does rate highly on the scoot index, but not 0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.400 on the stuff rate. Apparently, Brian's right. 0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.399 There's nobody else to take a goal line carry that's 0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:30.240 just built for it. Craig Reynolds, isn't Jermar Jefferson, Benny Snell, 0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:31.440 no chance. 0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:32.720 Benny Snell's on the Lions. 0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:32.920 Yeah. 0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:33.920 I don't even know who. 0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:34.800 Knew he was on the Lions. 0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.840 He is, so yeah, this is it's gonna be David 0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.759 Montgomery's work. And because they were successful running inside the 0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.000 five with that great offensive line at Detroit, I think 0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.400 they keep doing it here. Let's go to round eight, Brian, 0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.000 if I take Tua Tungo via Loa is my number 0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:56.560 one quarterback round eight? How quickly do I need to 0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:58.360 back up that pick with another quarterback. 0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:00.200 Not quick at all. 0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:01.880 You wait and you wait, and I don't even know 0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.000 if you back him up, because if you're drafting Tua, 0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.839 you're shooting for the moon, right arguably the top wide 0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.120 receiver duo in the NFL and Tyreek Hill and Jalen Waddle. 0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.000 If something were to happen to Tua, if he gets 0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:15.799 his bell wrong once, it's bad news. 0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:16.560 It's probably over. 0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.280 You go and grab Mike White off the waiver wire, 0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:21.640 or at the very least, you're waiting till the last round. 0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:25.160 If you're drafting Tua, you're all in. So you wait. 0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:26.840 You don't draft a backup, and you just hope he 0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:27.359 stays healthy. 0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.479 All right, Scott, if I take two in round eight 0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.719 as my number one quarterback, how quickly should I make 0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:33.839 a backup quarterback pick? 0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:36.839 Not quickly at all, based especially based on how drafts 0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:38.480 are going. But I have to give credit to my guy, 0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:41.200 Shane Hallam, who had a kind of a thought what 0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:42.600 he thought was a hot take, and I'm like, that 0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.640 seems like a decent take. He spent this a lot 0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.680 of this off site in offseason practicing how to get 0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.560 hit and how to avoid concussions, and he might be 0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:55.480 more aware of that than other quarterbacks, so I'm not 0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:57.879 sure we need to worry that much. But mostly it's 0:42:57.920 --> 0:42:59.959 the kind of thing where you can wait several rounds 0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.200 and get safe guys like GoF or cousins, or wait, 0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:05.200 really you know, much later and get a guy like 0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.560 Sam Howe, who I love, and have that be your backup. 0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.399 You don't have to turn around right away and get 0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:10.920 a backup. 0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:13.600 You said sign. 0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.279 All you have to do is say Sam and I'm in. 0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.480 We're yeah. We are at Washington Show this year between 0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.719 Howell and Dotson. I know we have a draft together, 0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:24.440 and it's really annoying that we like a lot of 0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:24.879 the same thing. 0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:26.799 Now, it's going to be a problem coming up in 0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:30.719 two days. Two days, that's not good. When we come 0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.640 back three tough questions, you'll want to play along. So 0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:35.320 if you can go three and ozer with our panel 0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.279 of experts, and while you're thinking about your own draft, 0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.760 you might want to check against my cheat sheet available 0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:42.919 for free at Guillotine leagues dot com. You can also 0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:44.560 join a public league, private league, and we have a 0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:48.439 high stakes variant of Guillotine Leagues called Super Chop one 0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:52.359 hundred and forty four teams twelve twelve team league. Win 0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.200 your twelve team league, you get you get to cash 0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:56.680 out right then, plus you get to go to the 0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:58.920 playoffs for the super big pots at the end of 0:43:58.960 --> 0:43:59.279 the year. 0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:01.919 Chop at Guillotine leagues dot com. 0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:02.560 We'll come back more. 0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:26.040 Fantasy Football Weekly Hour number two coming up next, It's 0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:29.839 time for three tough questions. Fantasy Football Weekly continues Paul 0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.319 Charchi and Brian Johnson Scott Fish. You can follow us 0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.560 on Twitter at Paul Charchion at b t x J 0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:39.440 and Scott fish is at Scott Fish twenty. 0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.440 Three twenty four Junior man Ken Griffy Jr. 0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.279 There's twenty four there it is. Well, I follow you. 0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:47.279 I don't have to type in. 0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:48.919 That's that's true. That's true. 0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:50.719 Ish, you know, I just you know, it's like phone numbers. 0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.239 Who knows some of his phone number anymore? Yeah, you 0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:54.920 know when I was a kid and I said to 0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.000 dial them and. 0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:57.799 Let me look here. I have yours on me. Let 0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.640 me look it up and say it just great. 0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.839 And I would love to help you sort out your 0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:03.759 lineup problems. 0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.239 Please hear my phone nuver, please call. 0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.239 All right, let's let's jump in here. 0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.120 Tough question Number one. 0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:15.320 The preseason is the last time to change league rules. 0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:20.279 Which league rules are so bad they are deal breakers 0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:20.839 for you? 0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:22.040 We begin with Scott. 0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.480 You know, I'm the kind of guy who's created and 0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.080 played in some of the crazy rules, craziest rules you 0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.160 can imagine out there. I'm usually good with whatever, but 0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.960 there are a few I generally don't like, and usually 0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:37.840 it's the ones that constrain team's flexibility and ability to 0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:40.560 manage their own rosters. I feel like we're only supposed 0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:42.200 to give one for this, and if I'm gonna only 0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:45.560 give one, it's positional limits. I absolutely hate them. Like 0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:47.640 you can only have two quarterbacks on your team, you 0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:50.040 can only have four running backs on your team. I 0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.160 hate that stuff. I get it in a thirty two 0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:54.600 teamer where each team should only have one quarterback, but 0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:58.240 in a normal ten or twelve team league, positional limits 0:45:58.280 --> 0:45:59.360 just irk the crap out of me. 0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.799 Brian preseeds isn't The preseason is the last chance for 0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:08.360 leagues to change home modify their rules. What league rules 0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:10.400 are so bad they are deal breakers for you? 0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:11.520 Uh? 0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.680 The main one is vetoing trades. Whether it's a weak vote, 0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.120 or commissioner does it. It never works out well, and 0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:22.479 it's usually it's total bs. If there's collusion involved, then 0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.799 someone will step in the commission overrule it. 0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:28.960 So that that's why, by the way. 0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:29.480 It never happens. 0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:31.799 You know, for every league that is that's got this 0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:35.120 horrifying trade veto rule, how many of them actually have 0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:39.000 a legitimate collusion situation where somebody's like. 0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:42.640 Oh, let's heck make it. Especially in friends leagues, it 0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.280 never happens. Oh and by the way, off balance trades 0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.279 ruin the integrity. That doesn't happen either, unless it's right 0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:51.319 before the playoffs or something. But that really doesn't happen either. 0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:53.879 And this isn't really a rule. But you're not You're 0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:56.200 not allowed to complain about a slow draft. You should 0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:59.080 not be texting, tweeting, emailing people that are on the clock. 0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:00.480 Just deal with it, you say, sign up for a 0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.879 slow draft. Quit whining, you big babies. Sorry I had 0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:04.480 to put it out there. 0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:08.319 You're wrong. The trade veto is an absolute deal breaker. 0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:10.920 You know, there's you cannot be in a league everyone 0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:14.440 should vetos because everybody is just there to try to 0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:20.280 value perfectly balance balance. A trade between mutually agreed parties 0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:21.200 is a done deal. 0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:23.960 We have our own values, and the most of the 0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:26.160 reasons people want to veto something is because it's not 0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:26.919 good for their team. 0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:27.440 That's right. 0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:31.239 Second rule that you are absolute deal breakers. Any waiver 0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.520 claim system that is in blind bidding, I'm not doing. 0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.560 I'm not rewarding the worst team. They're not going first, whatever, whatever, 0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:40.320 anything else than blind bidding. It's the only fair way 0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:43.719 and the only strategic way to award free agents is 0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:45.719 blind bidding. I'm not playing any I'm not playing any 0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:48.000 reverse waiver worse the first any of that stuff ever. 0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:51.760 Again, even rolling waivers really favors the better teams because 0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:53.839 they can sit and wait until their waiver. They don't 0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:55.239 need to pick up players, and they can wait till 0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.040 they have the first pick and then pounced on. 0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:00.920 That's right, exactly, exactly, it's all desire. Any other system 0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:04.439 only makes it better for the teams that are already good. Yep, 0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:10.480 there's another one I'm tempted on. I'm close super flex. 0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:12.680 I mean, if I'm in a twelve team league, ten 0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.279 team league, twelve team league, super flex, I'm to the 0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:17.319 point where I don't think I ever want to be 0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:18.800 in another one quarterback league. 0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:22.920 I've talked about this on shows. My son he has 0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.480 this home league draft this weekend as well. Ten kids. 0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:28.680 They've all played in several leagues. My son's played for 0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:31.319 three years. None of them have played in a one 0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.600 quarterback league. It's to the point where I'm like, is 0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.640 that the six point touchdown leagues that we used to 0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:40.080 like for them in thirty years that they're gonna be like, oh, 0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:42.160 I remember the days of one quarterback? Yeah? 0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:43.800 I think there is gonna be possible. 0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:48.680 Tough question Number two, Who will lead the Buffalo Bills 0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:50.920 in rushing touchdowns? 0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:55.640 Brian all Right, here's a breakdown of the Bills rushing 0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:59.880 touchdown leaders last year. Josh Allen had seven, Devin Singletary five, 0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:04.000 James Cook two, Isaiah McKenzie wide receiver one. We know 0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.480 it won't be McKenzie or Singletary, they're no longer with 0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:11.520 the team. Buffalo signed Damien Harris to essentially replace Devin Singletary. 0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:15.400 But even if you gave James Cook the five rushing 0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.360 touchdowns from Singletary that ties Allen was seven, you have 0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.839 to imagine Harris is gonna factor in at the goal 0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.280 line at some point, So it's gonna be Allen, especially 0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:27.560 because the tush push is going to take over the league. 0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.040 It's a copycat league. We saw the Eagles do it 0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.160 a ton last year. Josh Allen certainly built for the 0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:36.319 toush push. So I'm gonna go with Josh Allen again, 0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:37.800 even they don't want to beat him up at the 0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:38.360 goal line. 0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:39.880 He's their best option. 0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.600 All right, Scott who will lead the Buffalo Bills and 0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:43.919 rushing touchdowns this year? 0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:46.279 So much like Brian I went down the same road. 0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.440 Josh Allen had six to nine every year of his career, 0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:51.480 eight nine to eight in his first three years, then 0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:54.640 six and seven after he signed his big contract. They 0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:56.440 seem to run it a little less with him at 0:49:56.440 --> 0:50:00.560 the goal line. Damian I would say Damien Harris. Harris, 0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:03.000 but I'm not sure how many games he's going to play. 0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:06.120 He's only played more than ten games once in his career, 0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.440 only had more than three touchdowns once in his career. 0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.280 A dark horse is the oldest running back in the NFL, 0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:15.359 Latavius Murray, who had six touchdowns last year. James Cook 0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:18.640 had two touchdowns rushing last year on very limited work, 0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.440 but it feels like there might be just enough split 0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:25.239 to keep Josh Allen at six seven eight touchdowns and 0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.400 be the slight leader in that clubhouse. 0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:31.320 Josh Allen the past two years has scored eight times 0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:34.200 on twenty carries inside the five. It's not a great 0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.839 conversion rate, somewhere around forty percent, right. The previous two 0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:41.080 years he had scored four more touchdowns on four fewer attempts, 0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:44.239 So his effectiveness as a rusher at the stripe is 0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:44.799 going down. 0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:46.600 But I also noted. 0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:48.839 The Eagles tousch push that worked so well for Jalen 0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:50.440 Hurts last year. Teams are going to do that, and 0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:53.400 Jalen Hurts, you know, is built, and Josh Allen had 0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:54.840 that similar big body build. 0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:57.279 Like he couldn't get on the marching zone on that 0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:58.239 Vikings game. 0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:00.000 Oh thank god he could on that game. 0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:01.080 But I. 0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:04.719 Really want to say Damien Harris, who's been great here, 0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:08.200 twenty three career rushes inside the five scored twelve times. 0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:11.160 It's a fifty two percent conversion rate. That's excellent for Harris, 0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:13.840 and I think the Bills may very well want to 0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:15.879 start dialing back some. 0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:18.080 Of those two have already started. 0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:18.720 Josh Allen. 0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:22.680 Yeah, I think the tush push is going to give 0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:25.040 the edge to Josh Allen, but Damien Harris is going 0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:26.799 to be close. I think this could be like, you 0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:30.360 know nine, Josh Allen eight, Damien Harris, It's going to 0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:31.040 be close in there. 0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.360 I think Allen's the safest bet, but a couple of 0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:34.279 them wouldn't surprise me. 0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:36.480 Tough question number three. 0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:40.600 Should leagues among friends have a loser punishment? 0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:44.320 Scott Okay, So I posed this to my home league 0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:47.239 this last week in an email and have not had 0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:51.919 a response yet from that. I think a super light 0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.480 one is fun but cool, fun and cool. I would 0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.759 like to have something like that. But this honestly really 0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.000 depends on your league. I don't think it's a should 0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:03.759 there shouldn't they. I think it's completely league dependent. If 0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.880 your league is really cool with it, great, it's fun, 0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:09.240 it can be, it can be fun. The super hardcore 0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:11.600 ones I'm really not in on. But if that's your league, 0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:14.520 that's your league. So I'm not gonna say yes, you should. 0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:17.600 I'm not gonna say no, you shouldn't. I'd say it's 0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:20.640 league dependent. I really don't have a straight up yes, 0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:22.319 you absolutely should answer for this. 0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:25.319 It was not opposed as a yes no answer. Kay, 0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:29.320 So that's okay, all right, Brian. Should leagues among friends 0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:30.480 have a loser punishment? 0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:33.759 Yeah, absolutely, if everyone everyone agrees to it, and it 0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:38.320 mitigates some problems in both redraft and like dynasty formats 0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:41.200 and redraft, you're always gonna have a couple teams that 0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:44.120 just totally fall off stop paying attention, and that messes 0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:45.400 with the competitive. 0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:46.520 Balance of the whole league. 0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:49.319 If you have a punishment for last place, that'll keep 0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.560 those owners engaged. And in dynasty leagues you always have 0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.400 a couple of teams that are just tanking purposefully to 0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.560 get better draft picks, so the next year at least, 0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:00.200 that won't mess with the competitive balance either. If you 0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.760 have a loser punishment, So as long as everyone agrees 0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:05.080 to it, everyone gets a kick out of seeing them 0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:05.960 on Twitter and whatnot. 0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:09.279 So yeah, sure, I'm excited to hear Charge's answer on this. 0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:11.960 Well, one thing that you're hitting on that's really important. 0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:14.680 We like things that keep people engaged. Yes, so that 0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:18.120 your bad teams are still fighting to take you know, 0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:20.640 have wins at the end of the year. So fundamentally 0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:23.839 I like that, But you have to fit the personality. 0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:23.840 Of your league. 0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:26.680 If you're in a family league, you can't have Aunt 0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.000 Susan streaking home depot. 0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:31.839 That's you know that's not going to turn out for it. 0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:34.640 Well, but can you make on Susan eat a dozen 0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:36.560 blazon wings at the draft next year? 0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:39.200 Maybe you can. Depends on our ibs. 0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:41.680 If you're in a league. 0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:45.959 Of smack talking, booze fuel degenerates by all means, whip 0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:47.400 them out, Susan, I mean, and. 0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:50.880 I think it really just depends on your league entirely. 0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:55.080 So it Scott, you got the correct answer. It depends 0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.719 on your league. But I'm fundamentally down with anything that 0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:02.600 helps encourage people to to stay active with a bad 0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:03.759 team at the end of the year. 0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:07.000 I had an idea for the local Minnesota audience for 0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:10.040 a last place punishment. You have to go tailgate for 0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:12.759 a Vikings game in December. But the Vikings are not 0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:14.640 playing in Minnesota, they're on the road, so you're just 0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.960 going tailgating an empty parking lot all by yourself. Got 0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:19.920 to fire up the grill, see if you can get 0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:20.560 anyone to join you. 0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:24.680 We've talked a lot about Washington commanders looking forward to 0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:26.839 day that they're not the commanders, by the way, that'll 0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.680 be fantastic. Well, we haven't talked about it all. It's 0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:35.279 all passing game, it's all our guy, Sam Howell, what 0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:40.200 about the running game. Does Bijeon Robinson have the ability 0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:43.000 to get materially better than he was last year? 0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:45.080 You mean Robinson? 0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:48.640 Sorry, don't make that mistake in the first round the 0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:49.040 other way? 0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:52.600 Yeah, no kidding, no kidding, only only one letter. Brian 0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:55.839 Robinson get better then last year? 0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:59.359 Yeah, oh yeah, absolutely. Like you know how I feel 0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:01.359 about the Washington offense. I'm kind of in on their 0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:04.640 players for fantasy, but in twelve games last year, I 0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:07.720 mean not let's not start there. But Gibson is sliding 0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:09.879 in the Michissic role. Mckissic's gone. I think it's gonna 0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:11.800 be a two WAT split instead of a three WAT split. 0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:16.200 Robinson's had the Robinson will have the whole offseason this year, 0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:20.000 doesn't have to deal with a gunshot wound. You have 0:55:20.080 --> 0:55:22.960 to imagine he's gonna beat two rushing touchdowns, which is 0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:27.200 what he had last year. Material better. Yeah, he'll be 0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:29.680 better than his RB thirty three or whatever last year. 0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:32.560 Yeah, you got to be excited about new offensive coordinator 0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:36.120 Eric Bienemy for that offense as a whole, and Robinson 0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:38.880 Scots had only twelve games, he only had nine catches 0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:42.480 in those twelve games. He had four catches I believe 0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:44.880 in the last preseason games, so we nearly matched or 0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:47.560 about half of his total last year. He should be 0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:50.600 more involved in the past game. And again this offense 0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:55.080 as a whole should be improved more so than last year. 0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:58.800 So out yeah, he'll be material materially better this season. 0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:03.160 Going back to our toughest decisions in every round, we 0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:06.839 want to talk of, just briefly, what if you round 0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:09.560 ten need a quarterback, Yes, you don't have any. Would 0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.759 you rather have Gino Smith or Anthony Richardson. You're taking 0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:14.560 the shirt thing, you're taking the upside. 0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:17.840 Anthony Richardson, he's my QB nine because guys like Hurts 0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:20.600 and Jackson in recent years kind of broke the league scoring. 0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:23.200 If they hit, I will take him over some of 0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:26.600 those safe guys that come right after him, the Gino Smith's, 0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:31.320 the Goffs, the Rogers, the Dacks. I can back Richardson 0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:33.759 up with one of those right after if I want to. Yeah, 0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:34.680 I want the game. 0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:36.040 Breaker, all right, you want the game you're playing for 0:56:36.040 --> 0:56:38.760 the upside. Yeah, I can know a lot of standard leagues. 0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:40.279 That does make sense. You got to be the best 0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:42.080 out of twelve teams. You need some things to. 0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:44.319 Break your way. Anthony Richardson could be that guy. 0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:45.360 Stay tuned. 0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:48.080 We come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. We'll talk about 0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:51.839 some of the vacated targets and running back touches on teams. 0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:56.000 And who could fill the void. Stay tuned. Fantasy Football Weekly. 0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:20.840 Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Chargian, Scott Fish, Brian Johnson with you. 0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:24.640 If you're not listening to our Guillotine League podcast, we 0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:25.360 encourage you to do that. 0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:28.800 It's called Chop Gayoten League Podcast, the only Guillotine League podcast. 0:57:29.040 --> 0:57:33.120 We give you lots of strategy advice for this time 0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.680 of year, and then during the season we give you 0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:39.480 very specific bidding advice on the key free agents that 0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:43.160 may have been chopped in your league and other salient topics. 0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:46.840 That's the Chop Podcast. We encourage you to listen and subscribe. 0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:48.160 Can I come on next week? 0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:48.880 Please? 0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:49.520 That would be great. 0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:50.200 Want to do it that? 0:57:50.280 --> 0:57:51.720 Let's do it all right, let's do it, let's talk 0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:54.120 about it all right. You'll be the featured guest Boom 0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:56.360 on the next episode of Chop kick Brian. 0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.520 Right off the show for that's it, sorry, Brian. 0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:00.760 Beginning of the end for Brian's on Chop. 0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:04.160 I'll just bring Ruby over to play with Pepper. That 0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:05.240 would be. That's all we need. 0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:08.480 Little musical chairs. Were taking by job here, I'll take 0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:09.480 Bryant's job there. 0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:11.840 Let's talk about vacated targets. 0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:15.120 This is it's really rare, identifying opportunities on teams where 0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:16.600 they've lost pass catchers. 0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:18.080 Scott and some. 0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:21.400 New players could step into those vacated targets. 0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:24.920 Yep. Absolutely. I'm not going to go most to least 0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:27.080 like we've done in the past. I'm going to touch 0:58:27.080 --> 0:58:29.080 on a few that interest me a little bit more 0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:31.840 that sometimes there's ones that are just too obvious what's 0:58:31.920 --> 0:58:34.000 going to happen. But the first one I'm going to 0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:37.160 start with is at the top. Actually it's the Houston Texas. 0:58:37.240 --> 0:58:40.480 They lost over three thousand air yards, three hundred and 0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:44.400 seventy five targets, sixty four percent of their targets inside 0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:48.400 the ten. What's there now, there's Nico Collins and Tank Dell, 0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:51.440 which are getting all the hype right now. Robert Woods 0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:53.480 and John Metchi are there. It's awesome to see John 0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:55.880 Metchi come back. I don't know that I believe in 0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:59.240 Robert Woods after watching the last year and a half 0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:02.440 of him. But there's also a touch of Dalton Schultz, 0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:05.439 which which could be interesting, uh the amount of tight 0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:07.360 end targets that were also lost there. But I think 0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:10.280 it's mostly Nico Collins and Tank Dell. Tank Dell who 0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:13.920 has been noted to have quite a rapport with c. J. 0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:17.320 Stroud in preseason, and Nico Collins, mostly because Charge and 0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:19.080 I are trying to will this to happen. 0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:21.960 Really after three you many times, if you and I 0:59:22.080 --> 0:59:24.320 named Nico Collins has sort of our take a chance. 0:59:24.280 --> 0:59:29.640 Or sleepers or whatever. Absolutely, this time, this time, this time, 0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:31.840 we didn't meet it those other times. This is the 0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:34.520 time we meet it. Especially with how he turned out 0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:35.240 the end the last season. 0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:36.840 Does Robert Woods do anything for you? 0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:39.760 I had a last pick of my draft opportunity on 0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:40.720 Robert Woods. 0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:43.280 I did it too, and I needed I needed a receiver. 0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.120 Yeah, I actually kind of regret it now, But I 0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:49.280 mean there's opportunity. There's an opportunity. That's that's what that's 0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:51.640 the key for it. So last round, Yeah, I get it. 0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:52.080 I get it. 0:59:52.680 --> 0:59:54.440 Uh, there are probably some other guys now that I'm 0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:57.120 a little more in on than him, but yeah, I 0:59:57.200 --> 0:59:59.720 get it. The Green Bay Packers also, it's kind of 0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:02.240 obvious they lost Lazard and Cobb and others in the 1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:05.640 Aaron Rodgers gang. They lost Robert Tunyan, which leaves it 1:00:05.800 --> 1:00:10.000 wide open for Lookie rookie Luke Muskrave. The peck lost 1:00:10.040 --> 1:00:13.160 seventy four tight end targets. He's really probably the only 1:00:13.200 --> 1:00:15.600 guy there for that. There's also a decent amount of 1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:18.480 buzz for taking up those two hundred and fifty plus 1:00:18.480 --> 1:00:21.440 targets that were lost For Jayden Reed, he seems like 1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:23.959 he's locked down that slot guy roll over in Green Bay. 1:00:24.640 --> 1:00:29.880 Jordan Love obviously seems to love Romeo Dobbs, so he's 1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:32.240 probably gonna take up a decent amount. But late in 1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:34.440 year drafts Luke Musgrave is going to take up almost 1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:36.280 all that tight end target work, it seems like. But 1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:39.200 it's a really late, late laid pick if you really 1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:40.080 sloughed the position. 1:00:40.280 --> 1:00:43.360 Talked about Romeo Dubs Early Dobbs earlier in the show, 1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:44.440 and we're big. 1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:47.360 For're especially where he's getting drafted. It's all wrong. 1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:50.400 Yeah, this really goes from last week, but the show 1:00:50.480 --> 1:00:52.680 last week. But I'm with you. I'd take Dobbs at 1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:55.800 his ADP way over Watson in his though I do 1:00:56.000 --> 1:00:58.680 you know, I think Watson gonna be good over to 1:00:58.720 --> 1:01:01.200 the Cowboys mostly want to mention this because they lost 1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:04.640 basically all their tight end targets, and you mentioned it earlier. 1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:06.800 I was gonna go I thought about making him my 1:01:06.880 --> 1:01:10.240 sleeper the week. I really really liked taking Jake Ferguson 1:01:10.520 --> 1:01:13.080 right at the end of my drafts because we've seen 1:01:13.160 --> 1:01:19.960 some Dawson. Dawson, are some Schultz his Schultz Dalton Dalton, Yeah, 1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:23.760 Dalton Schultz have those five six, seven catch games. He 1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:26.240 could be there, you know, tight end one. It looks 1:01:26.280 --> 1:01:28.560 like he's got the edge on that roll in. If 1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:30.720 he gets eighty to one hundred targets, which is what 1:01:30.840 --> 1:01:34.200 they lost, that's that's good for a guy that goes 1:01:34.280 --> 1:01:35.320 last round of your draft. 1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:37.080 Yeah, at that point, it does make sense. 1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:38.360 There's a lot of d tight ends. 1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:42.760 There's two Dalton's a Dawson Darrens. 1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:44.240 It's like a law firm out there. 1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:48.480 And and if he loves the Dallas, Dallas. 1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:49.640 Dan. 1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:52.920 Let's just keep listening things that start with D for 1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:56.440 the next hour. Tight end specifically, but okay, all right, 1:01:56.560 --> 1:01:58.680 all right, same with the Lions for their tight ends. 1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:01.160 They lost a ton of targets at the running back 1:02:01.160 --> 1:02:03.080 and tight end position. We kind of know where the 1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:05.440 running back ones are going to go. That's probably Gibbs 1:02:05.680 --> 1:02:09.000 at the tight end position. We're looking at Iowa tight end. You, alum, 1:02:09.280 --> 1:02:12.720 Sam Laporta soaking up possibly most of that missing eighty 1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:15.280 two targets. And this is this is a team that 1:02:15.360 --> 1:02:19.240 actually utilizes their tight end. Even after TJ. Hawkinson left 1:02:19.280 --> 1:02:23.640 last week. Last year, uh brock Wright scored four touchdowns. 1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:26.520 They give their tight end some work. And if Sam 1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:29.440 Laporta takes up those targets and that especially that red 1:02:29.520 --> 1:02:32.520 zone touchdown work, he's not a bad guy to look 1:02:32.560 --> 1:02:34.240 at as your tight end two or tight end one. 1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:36.720 If you really messed up who which I've done it. 1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:37.240 I took. 1:02:37.440 --> 1:02:39.200 I had the option to take any tight end of 1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:42.480 my in a dynasty in a dynasty draft, and I 1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:48.680 decided on I think he's just I think he's got more. 1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:52.000 He's got more opportunity. It's it's like the Addison in 1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:55.040 Jigba situation, where in Jigba is probably the more talented, 1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:57.560 but Addison's got a little more opportunity. It's probably the 1:02:57.560 --> 1:02:58.160 same situation. 1:02:58.360 --> 1:03:00.880 Might very well. Yeah, any other Ke targets. 1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:03.720 I can go to the Titans where they lost ninety 1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:06.720 seven wide receiver targets and seventy six tight end targets 1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:09.520 ten hills back, so that might even increase those numbers 1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:12.600 a little bit. Hopkins should take basically all of the 1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:16.200 ninety seven and I would imagine but with the injuries 1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:19.439 to Burk's and Phillips chick A konk Wu, who had 1:03:19.560 --> 1:03:22.160 I believe thirty six targets last year and they lost 1:03:22.160 --> 1:03:24.840 seventy six tight end targets, he could be sitting on 1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:27.760 eighty to one hundred targets himself right there, which is 1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:29.840 a decent spot for chig. 1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:30.760 Yeah. 1:03:30.400 --> 1:03:32.240 I don't know what to think of him because the 1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:34.800 were flashes really looks really good and then he's dropping 1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:36.760 passes and he looks like a wrong spot. 1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:38.480 And I don't know about Chike yet. 1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:41.320 Yeah, we'll see. But let's move over to the Panthers 1:03:41.360 --> 1:03:44.360 real quick, lost half their targets, sixty two percent of 1:03:44.360 --> 1:03:46.880 their air yards and DJ Hark dealing with a hammy injury. 1:03:47.600 --> 1:03:51.040 All really speaks well to Adam Thielen, who you mentioned. 1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:53.880 I believe last week as a guy that he has 1:03:54.000 --> 1:03:57.480 become the main target there in camp and there's over 1:03:57.480 --> 1:04:01.400 two hundred plus targets available, so he might walk in 1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:04.360 two hundred. No, nobody had one hundred and seven last year. 1:04:04.360 --> 1:04:05.960 And if you tell me he walks into one hundred 1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:07.640 and seven of those two hundred this year could be, 1:04:07.680 --> 1:04:09.520 wouldn't shock me at all. Wouldn't shock me at all 1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:11.040 for him to be the goal line guy too. 1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:14.560 Yeah, absolutely, yeah, Adam Zeelnd justin Jefferson's not on that 1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:17.120 roster to soak up one hundred and forty targets, So 1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:19.720 you know there's a feeling could easily go. 1:04:19.640 --> 1:04:20.280 Past the hundred. 1:04:20.360 --> 1:04:21.160 Absolutely yeah. 1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:21.960 He had last year. 1:04:22.120 --> 1:04:24.800 Absolutely yeah. And on Feeling's old team, the Vikings, they 1:04:24.800 --> 1:04:27.080 lost two hundred targets, one hundred and seven or Thelans. 1:04:27.280 --> 1:04:30.080 If you combine Thelon and Osborne's targets, that's one hundred 1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:33.160 and ninety seven for Addison and Osborne to share this year. 1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:34.400 kJ Osbourne is still there. 1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:37.160 Yeah, That's why I said, if you add Osborne's targets 1:04:37.160 --> 1:04:39.720 to Thelans that were lost. That's one hundred and ninety 1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:41.960 seven for Addison and Osborne to share. 1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:43.800 I get you, Okay, gotcha. 1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:46.360 It's not a bad spot where you could you could 1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:48.960 take Addison and back them up with Osborne at the 1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:51.360 very end of your draft to kind of head your bet. 1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:55.040 But you're likely thinking Addison's going to win that role 1:04:55.080 --> 1:04:57.200 and take one hundred plus targets out of that offense. 1:04:57.520 --> 1:04:59.320 All right, Brian, Let's go over to running back to 1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:02.920 good job, Scott running back? Touch up this vacated running 1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:05.520 back touches, So touches, we're talking about. 1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:07.640 A catch, catch, and a carry and combined. 1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:10.080 Yep, not targets are not factored into that. So this 1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:10.959 is touching the ball. 1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:14.120 All right. Let's see where are the vac Where are 1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:15.040 the vacated spots. 1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:17.200 Yeah, we're gonna have a couple of crossover teams that 1:05:17.280 --> 1:05:19.400 have totally overhauled their offenses, and we're gonna start with 1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:21.280 the Lions who had a ton of vacated targets. They 1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:24.000 got a ton of vacated touches. Four hundred and twenty 1:05:24.000 --> 1:05:27.560 one vacated running back touches. That's eighty three percent of 1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:31.080 their touches from last year ninety I'm sorry, ninety seven 1:05:31.120 --> 1:05:34.240 percent of their touches from inside the five are vacated. 1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:36.200 Most of those went to Jamal Williams, who we talked 1:05:36.200 --> 1:05:39.760 about before. He's now at the Saints. DeAndre Swift now 1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.400 with the Eagles. To replace those two, Detroit signed David 1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:46.160 Montgomery and they drafted Jamir Gibbs with the thirteenth overall pick. 1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:49.120 Sunk a ton of draft capital into him. Again, we 1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:52.760 touched on this subject earlier. Right now, Gibbs going way 1:05:52.840 --> 1:05:56.600 earlier than Montgomery and drafts. Gibbs is RB ten versus 1:05:56.720 --> 1:06:01.000 RB twenty five from David Montgomery. We all believe Montgomery's 1:06:01.040 --> 1:06:03.600 going to get the goal line work, the early down work. 1:06:04.040 --> 1:06:06.479 And Montgomery's a good receiving back too. He was top 1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:10.200 ten in both yards per catch and yards per route 1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:13.360 run among running backs last year with the Bears. And again, 1:06:13.400 --> 1:06:14.960 you have to assume he gets the goal line work. 1:06:15.040 --> 1:06:17.760 So I don't get why Montgomery's going so much later 1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:20.000 than Gibbs. We talked about this in the teammates he 1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:23.040 would rather draft last week too. It's Montgomery for me 1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:25.560 all the way Gibbs will factor in, but you have 1:06:25.600 --> 1:06:30.120 to love Montgomery's supposed role in this Lion's offense going 1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:33.440 into this season. The next team we're going to talk about, 1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:36.680 Scott mentioned them too, totally overhauled their whole offense is 1:06:36.760 --> 1:06:40.120 the Carolina Panthers. Yeah, three hundred and twenty six vacated 1:06:40.200 --> 1:06:43.240 running back touches. That sixty eight percent of their touches 1:06:43.240 --> 1:06:45.600 from last year, Seventy nine percent of their touches from 1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:48.200 inside the five are vacated. 1:06:47.760 --> 1:06:49.760 And Chuba Horvard I don't even know if he counts. 1:06:50.640 --> 1:06:52.480 He's still there, but he's still there. 1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:55.840 So we have to factor in Christian McCaffrey from last year. 1:06:55.840 --> 1:06:57.720 He didn't finish the season as a Panther, he was 1:06:57.760 --> 1:06:59.400 traded to the forty nine Ers, but he counts in 1:06:59.480 --> 1:07:02.840 this convo. YEP, Dante Foreman accounted for a lot of 1:07:02.880 --> 1:07:03.480 those touches. 1:07:03.480 --> 1:07:04.040 He's gone. 1:07:04.080 --> 1:07:08.160 So Carolina has signed Miles Sanders to fill that void. 1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:11.600 He's been dealing with a hamstring injury in camp, but 1:07:11.800 --> 1:07:14.280 should be good to go for Week one. But Sanders 1:07:14.280 --> 1:07:17.680 has somewhat of a checkered past regarding injuries. He did 1:07:17.760 --> 1:07:20.040 play seventeen games with the Eagles last year, but just 1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:23.640 twelve games played in each of the two seasons prior 1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:24.200 for Philly. 1:07:24.200 --> 1:07:25.440 And as you mentioned, Cuba. 1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:28.360 Hubbard is there, and if something were to happen to Sanders, 1:07:28.440 --> 1:07:31.800 he is going to be their bell cow basically. So 1:07:32.320 --> 1:07:35.200 if I'm forced to pick one, I'm going Cuba way 1:07:35.280 --> 1:07:38.520 late because Sanders right now with RB twenty one is 1:07:38.560 --> 1:07:39.960 way too rich for my bloody. 1:07:39.960 --> 1:07:41.440 He's not rich enough for my blood. 1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:44.920 Oh yeah, we'll disagree there, but either way, there's a 1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:48.680 ton of vacated touches for running back, So Sanders into Chubbard. 1:07:48.760 --> 1:07:51.200 Yeah, but if he doesn't get Hubbard get hurt. 1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:52.760 If he doesn't get hurt, mile. 1:07:52.640 --> 1:07:55.120 Sanders is sitting on all of those carries he is. 1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:57.160 I mean, he's not gon get one hundred percent of 1:07:57.280 --> 1:07:59.960 the touches, but Hubbard will factor. But yeah, if Sanders 1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:03.240 stays healthy, he will pay off for that RB twenty 1:08:03.280 --> 1:08:06.440 one value right now, so I can cannot argue that. 1:08:06.840 --> 1:08:10.040 And speaking of Sanders, his former team, the Eagles two 1:08:10.120 --> 1:08:13.120 hundred and seventy nine vacated touches. That's sixty seven percent 1:08:13.600 --> 1:08:15.880 of their touches vacated from last year, but just thirty 1:08:15.920 --> 1:08:18.360 percent of their touches from inside the five because it 1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:22.559 was all Jalen Hurts and the Toush push. All those 1:08:22.600 --> 1:08:25.280 touches basically went to Miles Sanders, who we just talked about. 1:08:25.720 --> 1:08:28.639 We know he's in Carolina now. Philly made two notable 1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:32.720 additions to their backfield and signing Rashad Penny from Seattle 1:08:33.040 --> 1:08:36.479 formerly from Seattle, and trading for DeAndre Swift. But Kenneth 1:08:36.520 --> 1:08:40.040 Gainwell still in town and right now they're calling him 1:08:40.040 --> 1:08:40.479 the starter. 1:08:40.840 --> 1:08:43.240 The quote und vote doesn't mean much featured. 1:08:42.880 --> 1:08:45.040 Back, and he's the cheapest when it comes to adp 1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:49.519 People were worried that Penny could get cut. He did 1:08:49.520 --> 1:08:51.800 not play in Thursday night's preseason game. That bodes well 1:08:51.800 --> 1:08:54.640 for him, so he should make the team. But uh, 1:08:55.120 --> 1:08:57.200 this is a scenario where I'm taking the cheapest guy 1:08:57.600 --> 1:08:58.280 if you must. 1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:00.960 But it's almost a backfield to avoid Rashad Penny. 1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:02.639 I think it is a backfield to a point. 1:09:02.880 --> 1:09:08.360 Rashad Penny had a play last weekend's preseason game where 1:09:08.360 --> 1:09:11.200 he broke through the line and then just needed to 1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:15.520 like hit the Jets, and he couldn't. He was lumbering, 1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:18.000 dropped the piano, Rashot Penny. 1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:20.479 He was running in mud. He was running in mud. 1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:23.920 I'm nervous about Rashad Penny and he's my least favorite 1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:25.960 at adp out of this whole group, and I've punished 1:09:26.000 --> 1:09:30.599 him on my cheat sheet. What's the next team vacated 1:09:30.640 --> 1:09:31.559 running back touches? 1:09:31.680 --> 1:09:33.559 I certainly expect you to weigh in on this one. 1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:36.639 Chart to the Minnesota Vikings three hundred and three vacated touches, 1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:39.320 seventy four percent of the running back touches vacated from 1:09:39.400 --> 1:09:41.960 last year, sixty percent of the touches from inside the 1:09:42.200 --> 1:09:44.879 five yard line. Of course those were all Dalvin Cooks. 1:09:45.160 --> 1:09:47.880 He's a jet now, so will all these touches go 1:09:47.920 --> 1:09:50.360 to Alexander Madison. That's what people are expecting. But ty 1:09:50.439 --> 1:09:51.519 Chandler is in the mix. 1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:53.320 Is in the mix, I think more of a way 1:09:53.320 --> 1:09:56.640 than that people realize, especially nationally, they don't understand the 1:09:56.720 --> 1:09:58.760 ty Chandler looks, like he said, is the third down 1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:03.439 back right now, and he's just got some zip, some burst, 1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:07.080 some elusiveness that Alexander Madison doesn't have. 1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:08.080 And I think this thing. 1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:09.920 I think as the season wears on, we're going to 1:10:09.920 --> 1:10:12.280 see more and more Ty Chandler does, the coaches get 1:10:12.320 --> 1:10:15.200 more and more comfortable with him and his responsibilities as 1:10:15.200 --> 1:10:18.920 a young player. So I don't, uh, that's that's how 1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:20.120 I see this thing shaken out. 1:10:20.000 --> 1:10:22.800 In miss It's another take the cheapest guy scenario. Pretty 1:10:22.840 --> 1:10:25.519 much get Ty Chandler in a much greater discount than 1:10:25.600 --> 1:10:26.519 Alexander Madison. 1:10:26.640 --> 1:10:29.839 Undrafted in some leagues altogether, which I think is a mistake. 1:10:30.280 --> 1:10:34.479 Speaking of undrafted running back, I love in Tampa Bay 1:10:34.720 --> 1:10:38.080 who has who have two hundred and seventy two vacated touches, 1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:40.519 Fifty eight percent of their running back touches vacated from 1:10:40.560 --> 1:10:43.840 last year, seventy seven percent vacated from inside the five. 1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:47.439 Those are all basically Leonard four nets is Sean Tucker, 1:10:47.479 --> 1:10:48.960 who will talk about a little more people. 1:10:49.000 --> 1:10:49.800 He's flying under a. 1:10:49.800 --> 1:10:52.439 Lot of radars, getting a little little steam right now. 1:10:52.439 --> 1:10:55.759 But Rachad White entering a second season, he's the presumed starter. 1:10:56.920 --> 1:10:59.200 Not so sure that's going to be the case. Maybe 1:10:59.200 --> 1:11:01.360 in week one, that's going to last the whole season. 1:11:01.400 --> 1:11:04.280 We'll talk a little bit more about Sean Tucker, but 1:11:04.360 --> 1:11:08.320 not worried about Chase Edmonds or Ronald Jones for the bucks. 1:11:08.400 --> 1:11:09.840 Now it's either Tucker or White. 1:11:09.840 --> 1:11:11.679 But well, Ronald Jones is back on the bucks. 1:11:11.880 --> 1:11:12.559 I believe so. 1:11:12.680 --> 1:11:14.960 I don't think it so, and I somewhere else does. 1:11:15.120 --> 1:11:16.960 Even if he is, it doesn't matter, it does You're right, 1:11:17.040 --> 1:11:19.439 it does not matter what Chase Edmonds is. But Chase 1:11:19.520 --> 1:11:21.639 Edmonds dead to me, broke my heart into a million 1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:23.880 pieces last year, totally non factor. 1:11:24.240 --> 1:11:28.000 And we have time for one more team should Robbie, No, 1:11:28.160 --> 1:11:28.479 we should. 1:11:28.680 --> 1:11:30.760 Robbie's telling me we should break. So we're gonna take 1:11:30.800 --> 1:11:35.120 a break when we come back. Offensive lines the five 1:11:35.200 --> 1:11:36.840 best that you need to know. These are guys that 1:11:37.160 --> 1:11:37.559 you know the. 1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:38.400 Offensive line matters. 1:11:38.439 --> 1:11:41.040 Jamal Williams doesn't score seventeen touchdowns last year. I he's 1:11:41.040 --> 1:11:43.400 not running behind one of the great offensive lines. The 1:11:43.439 --> 1:11:46.639 five worst who's got to do it all on their own. 1:11:47.080 --> 1:11:49.200 We'll tell you the worst and best offensive lines and 1:11:49.680 --> 1:11:51.960 release this week's sleeper when we come back to the 1:11:51.960 --> 1:12:16.200 final segment Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. 1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:19.320 Paul Charchi and Scott Fish and Brian Johnson with you. 1:12:21.240 --> 1:12:21.799 Very excited. 1:12:21.840 --> 1:12:23.880 It's the first big weekend of drafts. I mean, this 1:12:23.920 --> 1:12:27.599 is when it really starts to kick off this weekend. 1:12:27.840 --> 1:12:29.759 Now from here to really the start of the season, 1:12:30.520 --> 1:12:32.719 it's all drafting time these three weeks. 1:12:32.760 --> 1:12:34.680 This is the big This is the big part right here. 1:12:34.920 --> 1:12:38.360 Yes, everyone waits for the preseason to be over. Basically 1:12:38.400 --> 1:12:41.720 everyone plays Saturday. I think there's one game on Sunday night, 1:12:41.760 --> 1:12:45.040 but after that then there's no more excuses anyone. 1:12:45.400 --> 1:12:47.080 If you don't have a home league, get one, Try 1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:49.280 try to find one, Try to try to make one. 1:12:49.640 --> 1:12:51.920 I have a home league. We're getting like this awesome 1:12:51.960 --> 1:12:55.960 mobile pub, like from uh our Twitter. I can't can 1:12:56.000 --> 1:12:58.200 I pluck. I'm not gonna like it's not an ad 1:12:58.280 --> 1:13:00.760 or anything. I paid full price I got. We got 1:13:01.040 --> 1:13:03.519 this mobile pub from Get my Puppets, a Twin Cities 1:13:03.560 --> 1:13:05.840 company here, Like we're gonna put it like it's a 1:13:05.880 --> 1:13:08.000 bar thing that you put in your driveway and we're cool. 1:13:08.040 --> 1:13:08.840 We're gonna have all that. 1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:10.639 Yeah, we're gonna have a we're gonna. 1:13:10.400 --> 1:13:12.000 Have a drink beer at you're at your draft. 1:13:12.080 --> 1:13:16.320 Yes, yes, it's getting my pub. You better comp that 1:13:16.160 --> 1:13:17.400 that pub for fish now. 1:13:17.600 --> 1:13:20.519 No, No, we paid full price, but it's uh yeah, 1:13:20.560 --> 1:13:22.880 it's uh, it's gonna be fun. Get Get a home league. 1:13:22.920 --> 1:13:24.040 Do some fun things with it. 1:13:24.560 --> 1:13:25.799 Draft in person drafting. 1:13:25.920 --> 1:13:28.479 Yeah, all of our members are coming, even from out 1:13:28.479 --> 1:13:31.000 of state. All of them are coming in drafting in person. Yes, 1:13:31.160 --> 1:13:32.439 giant draft board. It's awesome. 1:13:32.520 --> 1:13:34.240 Yeah, it's the best, it's the best. 1:13:34.400 --> 1:13:38.639 Uh save me then, yeah that was yeah, I just yeah. 1:13:38.520 --> 1:13:40.200 Save me the Dan Arnold sticker please. 1:13:40.479 --> 1:13:41.439 Yeah. 1:13:41.520 --> 1:13:42.960 Yes, go to offensive lines. 1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:47.120 Okay, Scott starts with the five best offensive lines in 1:13:47.120 --> 1:13:50.640 the NFL, and it's very important because the touchdowns just 1:13:50.640 --> 1:13:52.920 come easier if if your line is great, your quarterbacks 1:13:53.000 --> 1:13:53.920 got more time in the podcast. 1:13:55.439 --> 1:13:59.040 Yes, yes, So it's never gonna be perfect with offensive 1:13:59.040 --> 1:14:01.840 line play. They're a little tough to predict the times, 1:14:01.880 --> 1:14:04.960 but they do matter. Great players can sometimes overcome one, 1:14:05.479 --> 1:14:08.559 overcome them. Sometimes great O lines have split touches that 1:14:09.000 --> 1:14:11.200 you know you have to deal with. But overall, hot 1:14:11.240 --> 1:14:13.479 take it's better to have a good offensive line, super 1:14:13.520 --> 1:14:17.599 hot take right. Last year, the top six PFF ranked 1:14:17.640 --> 1:14:21.439 offensive lines going into the season had seven running backs 1:14:21.640 --> 1:14:24.160 on those six teams rank in the top twenty or higher. 1:14:24.320 --> 1:14:28.080 Like finishes a RB twenty or higher, those six O 1:14:28.240 --> 1:14:31.719 lines actually had five top twelve backs. It's so much easier, 1:14:31.760 --> 1:14:35.479 like you have pretty good chance of hitting. Even with 1:14:35.520 --> 1:14:40.240 teams sharing touches, It's hard to leave out the six 1:14:40.360 --> 1:14:43.559 ranked Cowboys who actually had two backs in the top twenty. 1:14:44.120 --> 1:14:47.479 From that top that top range, even the seventh and 1:14:47.560 --> 1:14:50.799 eighth eighth ranked teams had each had a top fifteen 1:14:50.880 --> 1:14:53.719 ranked quarterback. So like, if you're a top O line, 1:14:54.040 --> 1:14:56.960 top eight or so O line, you're gonna have you're 1:14:57.000 --> 1:14:58.640 gonna have a good players. So what I did is 1:14:58.680 --> 1:15:02.800 I grabbed a few opinions from you know, PFF, FTN, PFN, 1:15:02.960 --> 1:15:06.800 Sharp Football, you know, Fantasy Pro, like a bunch of 1:15:06.800 --> 1:15:09.840 different sites. I aggregated it to see like, okay, this 1:15:09.960 --> 1:15:12.479 is pretty universally what we think are going to be 1:15:12.800 --> 1:15:14.120 going to be a top team and the. 1:15:14.200 --> 1:15:15.880 Top you got a lot of subscriptions. 1:15:16.320 --> 1:15:19.559 Yeah, yeah, So the I looked to a lot of places. 1:15:19.880 --> 1:15:23.320 What I found is the top eight offensive line ranks 1:15:23.560 --> 1:15:27.080 were very consistent, like mixed around, but the top eight 1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:31.200 were pretty consistent throughout. Let's let's hit through them. Let's 1:15:31.240 --> 1:15:34.120 let's see where they are. Number one almost universally the 1:15:34.600 --> 1:15:39.519 Philly Yes, the Eagles absolutely. Unfortunately, their fantasy rusher doesn't 1:15:39.560 --> 1:15:42.759 play courter of it or play running back. But despite 1:15:42.800 --> 1:15:46.439 having Sanders had it having a decent year time split, 1:15:47.040 --> 1:15:49.320 they still had some good running back production. They did 1:15:49.360 --> 1:15:52.400 have a running back in the top twenty. Even with 1:15:52.520 --> 1:15:55.800 their top run their top score from the rushing perspective 1:15:55.800 --> 1:15:58.240 in the goal line being a quarterback. 1:15:57.880 --> 1:15:59.439 Especially when they play goal giants. 1:15:59.600 --> 1:16:04.120 They yeah, Boston Scott next up the Lions number two 1:16:04.160 --> 1:16:07.519 pretty consistently. And who do they have now doing their 1:16:07.560 --> 1:16:11.519 goal line work? David Montgomery. There's a little reason to 1:16:11.520 --> 1:16:14.479 love Gibbs too. But David Montgomery and Gibbs, if you 1:16:14.560 --> 1:16:16.280 got a top all line like that, that might be 1:16:16.360 --> 1:16:19.000 the Pollard and Elliott from last year, where you're seeing 1:16:19.000 --> 1:16:24.160 two of them hit the top twenty. The Browns rank 1:16:24.280 --> 1:16:27.519 third if you average aggregated out average it out. Hunt 1:16:27.600 --> 1:16:30.599 is now gone pretty much. Time for wheels up for Chubb. 1:16:30.680 --> 1:16:33.720 I think, yeah, that rhymes. I like it, wheels up 1:16:33.720 --> 1:16:34.160 for Chubb. 1:16:34.320 --> 1:16:37.240 Yeah, that's a lot of great players on that line, right. 1:16:37.439 --> 1:16:44.280 Yeah, you know he's old now, but you've got Bittonio Wyatt, Teller, 1:16:44.439 --> 1:16:46.559 Jack Conklin. I mean this has been a good offensive 1:16:46.600 --> 1:16:47.920 line for a long time. 1:16:48.160 --> 1:16:51.000 Yeah, I said, Chubb is on my RB one right now. 1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:55.439 We talked about Jason Jerome Ford earlier. He's dropped like 1:16:55.479 --> 1:16:57.519 a rock since his hamsteing injury, but it should be 1:16:57.560 --> 1:16:59.120 good to go Week one, A guy you definitely want 1:16:59.120 --> 1:17:00.880 to keep your eye on with it, draft chub or not. 1:17:01.600 --> 1:17:05.000 So coming in. Next on the list is the Baltimore Ravens, 1:17:05.280 --> 1:17:09.160 where you have JK. Dobbins, who's you know, coming off injury. 1:17:09.439 --> 1:17:14.400 There's contract talks, there's Harbaugh making interesting comments about those 1:17:15.000 --> 1:17:18.439 contract tops. But if he is the main guy there, 1:17:18.960 --> 1:17:21.439 he's got a top a line to potentially, you know, 1:17:21.560 --> 1:17:26.080 finish top twelve, top twenty or top twelve whatever. Next 1:17:26.080 --> 1:17:28.519 in line, this this one is going to be clear 1:17:28.520 --> 1:17:33.160 as day. The Atlanta Falcons, who had a bottom six 1:17:33.240 --> 1:17:38.000 offensive line going into last year. However, two of their players, 1:17:38.040 --> 1:17:39.760 a draft pick from two years ago into draft pick 1:17:39.800 --> 1:17:42.800 from last year, really break out. His stars on that 1:17:42.880 --> 1:17:43.759 offensive line. 1:17:45.479 --> 1:17:46.320 Caleb McGary. 1:17:46.360 --> 1:17:49.639 I think Caleb McGary and Chris Linstrom really really broke 1:17:49.680 --> 1:17:52.240 out last year to propel them into now what is 1:17:52.280 --> 1:17:55.559 considered a top offensive line. And you have Bjeon Robinson 1:17:56.400 --> 1:17:58.640 the spot. Yeah, end of story. You're not finding a 1:17:58.680 --> 1:18:02.000 sleeper there to break in, but it should give you 1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:04.840 more excitement about drafting him in the first round, knowing 1:18:04.880 --> 1:18:07.960 that he's got a pretty defensive, pretty good offensive line 1:18:07.960 --> 1:18:08.599 in front of him. 1:18:08.680 --> 1:18:08.960 Charge. 1:18:09.000 --> 1:18:11.800 What's your over under for rushing touchdowns for John new 1:18:11.840 --> 1:18:12.759 Smith this season? 1:18:14.000 --> 1:18:16.439 Point five? Yeah, we'll take you thus about right. Yeah, 1:18:16.600 --> 1:18:17.880 I bet he'll work one in. 1:18:18.160 --> 1:18:21.880 Yeah. Really, a lot of tight ends you should point 1:18:21.920 --> 1:18:24.519 five is a good line. It's a good line. Next 1:18:24.600 --> 1:18:27.800 on the list the Chiefs kind of interesting split a 1:18:27.800 --> 1:18:30.439 lot of their backfield last year. There were injuries last year. 1:18:30.479 --> 1:18:33.800 Their top bit top back last year finished as RB 1:18:33.920 --> 1:18:36.599 thirty four as Pacheco. Who should be the lead dog 1:18:36.640 --> 1:18:39.040 this year? Can you get enough workload? He's got the 1:18:39.040 --> 1:18:42.519 offensive line. Can you get the workload? Though? Next in 1:18:42.600 --> 1:18:46.679 line the Packers. Same story yearly. However, Dylan's efficiency really 1:18:46.760 --> 1:18:50.479 tailed off last year in comparison to previous years. Aaron 1:18:50.560 --> 1:18:53.000 Jones still the guy. I don't know if we're gonna 1:18:53.000 --> 1:18:54.559 see two. I think I think it might just be 1:18:54.600 --> 1:18:56.800 Aaron Jones this year. I'm a little out on Dylan 1:18:56.840 --> 1:18:57.200 this year. 1:18:57.320 --> 1:18:59.960 Yeah, Well, Dylan does get all the goal line where 1:19:00.160 --> 1:19:02.960 Aaron Jones had three carries for zero touchdowns inside the 1:19:03.000 --> 1:19:03.679 five last. 1:19:03.520 --> 1:19:05.479 Year back to Johns, they get the same mone off 1:19:05.479 --> 1:19:06.360 back to John Smith. 1:19:06.360 --> 1:19:09.120 Why yes, real quick, you better smash that point five 1:19:09.160 --> 1:19:12.480 over going back to twenty nineteen, rushing touchdown. 1:19:12.080 --> 1:19:14.000 Totals one two to one. 1:19:14.560 --> 1:19:16.479 So if you find that line, oh, the house is 1:19:16.479 --> 1:19:17.559 a bad line all. 1:19:17.479 --> 1:19:19.200 Day on that point five take the over. 1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:21.439 Good luck finding that line, by the way, the John 1:19:21.479 --> 1:19:23.400 hu Smith rushing touchdown line, it's gonna be tricky to 1:19:23.439 --> 1:19:24.720 track down, all right, Brian. 1:19:25.120 --> 1:19:27.120 No, is there another one? No, there's another one. But 1:19:27.160 --> 1:19:29.160 we're gonna stay with me for the worst. 1:19:29.200 --> 1:19:30.439 Oh, I'm sorry, I thought no. 1:19:30.520 --> 1:19:33.680 Scott volunteered to do this, and I actually stole. 1:19:33.439 --> 1:19:35.160 It from him. I didn't want him to talk about 1:19:35.200 --> 1:19:37.040 the worst ones. But I do have one more. It's 1:19:37.160 --> 1:19:40.240 Dallas Cowboys. They're the last of that top eight. It's 1:19:40.360 --> 1:19:43.280 very clear Tony Pollard's everybody loves him. He's gonna be 1:19:43.280 --> 1:19:45.120 the guy. But is there enough room for Deuce Vaughan 1:19:45.240 --> 1:19:47.639 for two backs to make the top twenty for back 1:19:47.680 --> 1:19:49.599 to back years? The Dallas Cowboys. 1:19:49.840 --> 1:19:50.200 I don't know. 1:19:50.200 --> 1:19:51.559 I'm gonna go No. I don't think I was just 1:19:51.560 --> 1:19:52.040 built for that. 1:19:52.080 --> 1:19:52.320 I don't. 1:19:52.320 --> 1:19:54.080 I don't think so either, And By the way, Ronald 1:19:54.160 --> 1:19:56.519 Jones is on the Cowboys, not the Bucks, which I 1:19:56.520 --> 1:19:57.200 said earlier. 1:19:57.240 --> 1:19:59.080 He started his career with the Bucks. 1:19:59.120 --> 1:20:01.880 Talking Jones, but no one cares about Ronald Jones anyway, 1:20:01.880 --> 1:20:03.200 Sorry Ronald, nothing personal. 1:20:04.280 --> 1:20:06.559 Oh boy, we got a quick eye. Was wrong on there. 1:20:07.960 --> 1:20:10.920 So go let's go in going to the the worst 1:20:11.040 --> 1:20:14.599 offensive lines, the worst ranked ones by that same by 1:20:14.600 --> 1:20:17.880 that same aggregate I put together going back a few years, 1:20:18.360 --> 1:20:21.920 I tracked what do you need to do to be 1:20:22.040 --> 1:20:24.960 a stud running back or a good fantasy producing running 1:20:25.000 --> 1:20:28.439 back but have a terrible offensive line. It's tough, and 1:20:28.680 --> 1:20:31.479 there was a very clear trend that started to emerge 1:20:31.520 --> 1:20:35.120 as I looked through it. I'm going to name a 1:20:35.120 --> 1:20:37.360 few of the players and see if see, if you can, 1:20:37.840 --> 1:20:42.519 you can see the trend. So we have we had 1:20:42.600 --> 1:20:44.879 Naji Harris a couple of years ago with the Steelers. 1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:50.440 We had Derrick Henry Sae Kwon Barkley with the Giants. 1:20:50.800 --> 1:20:54.120 We had Josh Jacobs last year. Really, you need to 1:20:54.120 --> 1:20:59.559 be an absolute stud or get a crawd too. Yes, yes, 1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:02.040 so if you want to overcome a battle line, it 1:21:02.320 --> 1:21:06.080 like almost everyone in the last three years, is like volume, volume, 1:21:06.160 --> 1:21:09.960 volume or just a stud quarterback or stud running back. 1:21:10.120 --> 1:21:13.160 All right, So do these teams who are currently do 1:21:13.240 --> 1:21:15.640 they have that? Do they have that? That's what I 1:21:15.680 --> 1:21:18.320 want you to ask yourself when you listen to these teams. 1:21:19.000 --> 1:21:22.639 Tennessee Titans, do they have that? They are consistently ranked. 1:21:22.439 --> 1:21:24.200 One of the two theory, Yes, but we all think 1:21:24.240 --> 1:21:25.679 Tajy Sharp's can have a bigger role. 1:21:25.720 --> 1:21:30.000 But mostly yes, Spears, sorry Spears, And we were worried 1:21:30.080 --> 1:21:32.040 that he has no like a cl or MCLs. 1:21:32.160 --> 1:21:33.280 But that means he can't. 1:21:33.080 --> 1:21:35.439 Tear them right, G point Yeah, great points. 1:21:35.439 --> 1:21:36.679 So I'm over that that worry. 1:21:37.000 --> 1:21:40.640 Los Angeles Rams. Do you feel cam Akers? Is the 1:21:40.760 --> 1:21:43.800 volume or the I don't know. They's certainly not a 1:21:43.840 --> 1:21:46.280 Hall of Famer, you know the end of last year 1:21:46.280 --> 1:21:48.680 he was pretty dang good, it was. But does he 1:21:48.720 --> 1:21:50.280 get the I don't know that he gets the volume. 1:21:50.280 --> 1:21:53.639 I don't think it's there. Okay, Washington Commanders, I think 1:21:53.680 --> 1:21:55.400 it's too much of a split, and neither of them 1:21:55.400 --> 1:22:00.599 fit that category, correct. Tampa Bay Buccaneers. I don't so either. 1:22:00.760 --> 1:22:03.519 Now you could see the volume if Rashad White was 1:22:03.560 --> 1:22:06.200 gonna steal that job and be everything. But Sean Tucker 1:22:06.200 --> 1:22:08.679 has come on and split first team reps. I don't 1:22:08.680 --> 1:22:12.040 know that they have that or the offensive opportunities anymore. 1:22:12.360 --> 1:22:12.960 I don't either. 1:22:13.600 --> 1:22:17.599 Last one New York Giants. I think they might. 1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:18.840 They've got they've got to go. 1:22:18.920 --> 1:22:20.240 I think I think they have the one. 1:22:20.600 --> 1:22:21.160 He's pretty good. 1:22:21.240 --> 1:22:24.240 But if you're if you're looking at offensive lines going 1:22:24.280 --> 1:22:26.920 into the season, if you're looking at some of those 1:22:26.960 --> 1:22:30.000 bad ones they really need to overcome. It's it's got 1:22:30.040 --> 1:22:31.599 to be a stud. It's got to be volume. And 1:22:31.640 --> 1:22:34.600 I think that Derrick Henry and Saquon Barkley are the 1:22:34.600 --> 1:22:35.720 only two that fit that bell. 1:22:35.880 --> 1:22:40.960 And Barkley's got Daniel Jones whose mobility helps him tremendously, 1:22:41.000 --> 1:22:44.639 and you know, keeping the defense honest, Let's go. 1:22:44.600 --> 1:22:47.479 To our sleepers. Let's unveil our sleepers. Great great work 1:22:47.520 --> 1:22:49.439 on that, Scott, thank you very much the effort into that. 1:22:49.479 --> 1:22:49.679 Thanks. 1:22:49.680 --> 1:22:52.759 What's the worst offensive lines? Uh? We begin with Brian 1:22:52.960 --> 1:22:54.200 who is your sleeper of the week. 1:22:54.439 --> 1:22:56.800 Well, I alluded to him earlier, and even though it 1:22:56.840 --> 1:22:58.680 is O line is not going to be good, I 1:22:58.920 --> 1:23:01.000 agree with that, But when if you're taking him in 1:23:01.040 --> 1:23:03.759 the last round of your draft. I love Sean Tucker, 1:23:04.520 --> 1:23:08.679 rookie running back for Tampa Bay. Prior to the NFL Draft, 1:23:09.200 --> 1:23:11.960 most draft knicks had Tucker pegged as a top ten 1:23:12.040 --> 1:23:14.280 running back going in the draft, but he didn't. He 1:23:14.280 --> 1:23:16.599 didn't test at the Combine or his pro day because 1:23:16.600 --> 1:23:19.240 of a heart condition. But that seems to be in 1:23:19.280 --> 1:23:20.160 the rear view mirror. 1:23:20.200 --> 1:23:20.920 So if he. 1:23:20.840 --> 1:23:23.200 Didn't have that and he did test at the Combine 1:23:23.200 --> 1:23:25.839 and in his pro day, he certainly would have been drafted. 1:23:26.240 --> 1:23:28.960 He went to Syracuse in twenty twenty one. He was 1:23:29.000 --> 1:23:32.960 a beast, ran for fifteen hundred plus yards and twelve touchdowns. 1:23:33.360 --> 1:23:36.160 More than a thousand yards came after contact, which is 1:23:36.200 --> 1:23:39.479 just like mind boggling to me for Tucker. And then 1:23:39.960 --> 1:23:42.200 in twenty twenty two he took a slight step back 1:23:42.240 --> 1:23:44.880 as a rusher. This was his junior, by the way, 1:23:44.880 --> 1:23:47.160 and he declared early, so in dynasty league he's a 1:23:47.200 --> 1:23:49.800 young guy. But in twenty twenty two he became way 1:23:49.840 --> 1:23:52.559 more involved in the pass game. He tied Jamiir Gibbs 1:23:52.560 --> 1:23:55.120 for the most targets among running backs in the twenty 1:23:55.160 --> 1:23:56.360 twenty three draft class. 1:23:56.400 --> 1:23:58.760 So he has that belcow. 1:23:58.360 --> 1:24:01.240 Potential and really, right now, you just look Rachad White 1:24:01.240 --> 1:24:04.599 as his only competition for the starting role, and Tucker 1:24:04.640 --> 1:24:07.320 has been taking He's been splitting reps with the first 1:24:07.360 --> 1:24:11.960 team offense this week, so he could take that job. 1:24:12.000 --> 1:24:13.880 And the Bucks are not going to be good, no, 1:24:14.200 --> 1:24:15.880 so they're gonna want to see what they have in Tucker. 1:24:15.920 --> 1:24:18.160 He's gonna get a good amount of run probably starting 1:24:18.160 --> 1:24:20.320 in week one, and he could outright just steal that 1:24:20.439 --> 1:24:22.519 job from White, who doesn't have a secure hold on it. 1:24:24.720 --> 1:24:27.040 I have to make it official, even though I'm gonna 1:24:27.040 --> 1:24:29.120 go like four straight shows talking about Tank Bigsby. 1:24:29.160 --> 1:24:29.559 Don't care. 1:24:30.000 --> 1:24:31.880 Wait, you haven't used him as a sleep Oh. I 1:24:31.920 --> 1:24:35.599 have not officially designated him as my sleeper. Yet We're 1:24:35.640 --> 1:24:36.799 going to Tank Bigsby. 1:24:37.160 --> 1:24:37.760 I'm sorry to. 1:24:37.680 --> 1:24:39.719 Repeat myself, but we have new listeners all the time. 1:24:40.640 --> 1:24:43.640 Travis Etn not a goal line back. He converted just 1:24:44.040 --> 1:24:47.320 three touchdowns from inside the five three carries inside the 1:24:47.360 --> 1:24:50.200 five last year into touchdowns despite being the workhorse. 1:24:49.840 --> 1:24:50.760 All year long. 1:24:51.400 --> 1:24:54.679 Also, Etn averages two catches for eighteen yards last year. 1:24:55.080 --> 1:24:57.840 Tank is better built for goal line use. He's better 1:24:57.920 --> 1:25:01.800 built for receptions and touchdowns. Receptions receiving yards are better 1:25:01.880 --> 1:25:04.280 fantasy point accumulators than rushing yards are. 1:25:04.600 --> 1:25:05.639 That's what we're here for. 1:25:06.120 --> 1:25:12.280 Tank Bigsby will score more points than Travis Etn this year. 1:25:13.040 --> 1:25:16.559 Laying it down right now, Tank Bigsby Baby. 1:25:17.840 --> 1:25:19.920 All right, Scott your sleeper of the week. 1:25:20.240 --> 1:25:22.639 So what I originally wanted to do was something we've 1:25:22.680 --> 1:25:25.720 done before, where it's it's a guy that's you know, 1:25:26.400 --> 1:25:28.639 high enough at ADP that he's probably not a sleeper. 1:25:28.640 --> 1:25:32.240 He's definitely people talk about him in Johann Dotson because 1:25:32.360 --> 1:25:34.320 I absolutely love him for this year. He's not your 1:25:34.320 --> 1:25:37.400 typical sleeper because people know about him. I'm actually taking 1:25:37.479 --> 1:25:40.479 him above Terry McLaurin, and I was doing so before 1:25:40.520 --> 1:25:43.920 the foot injury. Yeah, before the toe injury. But I 1:25:43.960 --> 1:25:46.599 can't go that route. I gotta go deeper. Everybody knows 1:25:46.640 --> 1:25:49.240 about Johan Dotson. I'm gonna go all the way down 1:25:49.280 --> 1:25:53.679 to wide receiver seventy one. Tank Dell we talked about. 1:25:53.479 --> 1:25:57.280 Earlier is why this tank it's a double tank s 1:25:57.880 --> 1:26:01.120 it's a tank, double tank attack, double tank splitz creag 1:26:01.720 --> 1:26:03.080 on Fantasy Football Weekly. 1:26:03.200 --> 1:26:05.240 Oh boy, the tank bank has grown. 1:26:05.880 --> 1:26:09.320 Wide Receiver seventy one feels ridiculous for me, for a 1:26:09.360 --> 1:26:12.800 person for a wide receiver that might be the wide 1:26:12.840 --> 1:26:16.559 receiver one or wide receiver two on their NFL team. Uh, 1:26:17.080 --> 1:26:21.599 he's his seventeenth round ADP is ridiculous for a player 1:26:21.640 --> 1:26:25.160 who's been touted all up, making great players, all live, 1:26:25.360 --> 1:26:29.679 all off season, and supposedly the favorite target of CJ. Stroud. 1:26:29.960 --> 1:26:33.360 They have so many vacated targets it feels like he's 1:26:33.400 --> 1:26:36.760 gonna walk into seventy eighty ninety one hundred and ten 1:26:36.800 --> 1:26:39.680 targets with barely even trying. 1:26:39.720 --> 1:26:42.160 All right, tank and tank, Tank and tank. 1:26:42.360 --> 1:26:44.640 We talked earlier in the show about loser punishments. Let 1:26:44.680 --> 1:26:46.599 me tell you about the two my two favorite loser 1:26:46.600 --> 1:26:47.439 punishments I've. 1:26:47.280 --> 1:26:49.040 Ever heard of. Okay, number one. 1:26:49.160 --> 1:26:52.040 Yes, it's a group in Washington, Yes, where the winner 1:26:52.600 --> 1:26:56.240 gets to send the loser to the location of his 1:26:56.400 --> 1:26:59.600 or her choice. Okay, on Super Bowl Sunday in the 1:26:59.640 --> 1:27:03.320 Continent US. So the loser has been sent to Devil's 1:27:03.360 --> 1:27:06.479 Tower in the middle Wyoming. Okay, on on Super Bowl Day, 1:27:06.760 --> 1:27:10.200 they've been sent to International Falls, Minnesota, the northernmost point 1:27:10.200 --> 1:27:11.400 in the continental US. 1:27:11.960 --> 1:27:14.599 And it would happen to be like negative fourteen that day. 1:27:15.240 --> 1:27:16.439 I would like that you would like that. 1:27:16.680 --> 1:27:19.519 It's that's that is a great loser punishment and you 1:27:19.520 --> 1:27:20.479 got to pay your own freight. 1:27:20.520 --> 1:27:21.599 By the way, that sucks. 1:27:21.640 --> 1:27:22.520 The other one. 1:27:23.960 --> 1:27:26.080 You have to go to open mic night as the 1:27:26.120 --> 1:27:31.840 loser and cold read jokes written by the rest. 1:27:31.560 --> 1:27:32.160 Of the league. 1:27:32.280 --> 1:27:35.360 Yeah, it's it's crazy that because that is what my 1:27:35.439 --> 1:27:36.920 home league is doing for next year. 1:27:37.560 --> 1:27:38.400 You know, say. 1:27:40.000 --> 1:27:43.840 That could be really dicey that you have to open 1:27:43.920 --> 1:27:46.559 envelopes and read the jokes for the first time at 1:27:46.600 --> 1:27:47.040 open mic. 1:27:47.120 --> 1:27:49.320 Wonderful, wonderfl That's. 1:27:48.880 --> 1:27:50.439 That's some loser penalty right there. 1:27:50.880 --> 1:27:53.240 Guillete leagues dot com all my cheat sheets available for 1:27:53.280 --> 1:27:56.720 free and also, love of God, Joining Gullotine League is 1:27:56.760 --> 1:27:58.760 the most fun you're gonna have playing fantasy football. I 1:27:58.960 --> 1:28:01.479 promise you're gonna love a super fun new format. You're 1:28:01.479 --> 1:28:03.799 gonna have a great time with it. It's a totally 1:28:03.880 --> 1:28:05.720 unique way to play. If you've been playing the same 1:28:05.760 --> 1:28:08.320 way for thirteen years, this is your chance to shake 1:28:08.360 --> 1:28:11.360 it up, play a whole new style of fantasy football 1:28:11.360 --> 1:28:13.559 at kyatam leagues dot com. Talk to you next week, 1:28:13.560 --> 1:28:20.760 everybody for more Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly is 1:28:20.760 --> 1:28:24.400 a production of iHeartRadio For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit 1:28:24.439 --> 1:28:27.920 the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to 1:28:27.960 --> 1:28:28.839 your favorite shows.