WEBVTT - BI Weekend: US Earnings, Disney’s Succession

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 4>These are two.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm normal Linda filling in for

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Alex Steele.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show we dig inside the big business

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>stories from PACTE, Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 5>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 5>hundred and thirty industries are analysts covered worldwide.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at why the coffee giants Bucks has

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>withdrawn its guidance for twenty twenty five plus.

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 5>We'll dive into the telecommunication space and look at earnings

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 5>from AT and T.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 2>But first we look at earnings from the shipping giant UPS.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 5>This week, the company reported that it returned to sales

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 5>and profit growth for the first time in nearly two years.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 5>UPS benefited from higher volumes, more profitable packages, and studying

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 5>labor costs for more.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Nora and I were joined by Lee Klascow, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Senior Transport, Logistics and shipping analysts.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 5>We first asked Lee for his take on UPS's most

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 5>recent quarter.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so UPS had a pretty good print. May also,

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, indicated that earnings might be a little better

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 6>than expectations are in the fourth quarter. UPS has been

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 6>kind of a show me story. They've been doing a

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 6>lot of self help things, but a lot of those

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 6>initiatives really haven't bubbled up to the bottom line or

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 6>the revenue numbers, just given the difficult backdrop. And what

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 6>we saw was earnings per share for growth finally inflected

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 6>positively after seven quarterly declines. So things seem to be

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 6>working for UPS, and you know, we expect earnings expectations

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 6>for the fourth quarter and probably next year to move

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 6>higher on kind of the progress that they've made thus far.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 5>Hayley, I mean, you mentioned that difficult backdrop as we're

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 5>thinking about the future. I mean, how much of a

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 5>move higher do you really anticipate as we're thinking about

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 5>the year end, should investors start to see some gains here?

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 6>Well, we don't do buy hoole sell recommendations of Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 6>but you know, what we can tell you is that

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 6>the company are doing the right things to see their

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 6>margins expand. And you know, our view is that margin

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 6>expansion could be more than where where the market currently

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 6>is at. And a lot of that has to do

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 6>with a lot of the cost savings that they've been

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 6>able to generate. They've been able to you know, shut

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 6>down various shifts, sorting shifts, They've been able to close

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 6>some facilities and just do more with the network that

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 6>they have. That and if you fast forward that, you know,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 6>maybe you know, volumes could start to improve a little

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 6>more meaningfully from here. You know, they expect a better

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 6>peak season this year, albeit probably not as robust as

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 6>they were probably planning for three months ago, but the

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 6>peak season is expected to grow. And the reason for

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, them tempering the outlook for the peak season

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 6>is given the fact that the peak season is condensed

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 6>the peak season for those that don't know is from

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 6>Black Friday to Christmas Eve and because of that condensed

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 6>peaks time. You know, a lot of retailers think that

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 6>some consumers might be going to the stores versus ordering

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 6>online and making that gamble whether or not you get

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 6>it under the tree in time.

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 7>Hay Lee.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>We love talking to you for a variety of reasons,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>not the least of which is the companies you covered

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>lead give us a real sense of how the underlying

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>economy is doing, whether it's stuff's being shipped by rail

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>or truck or air cargo. What's GPS telling you about

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of underlying activity that they're seeing.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, first and foremost, I love talking to you as well, Paul,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 6>But you know what I think they're telling us is

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 6>the consumer is doing okay. You know, it's not doom

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 6>and gloom going into the holiday season. I think that

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, you are going to see growth. Like I

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 6>said earlier, that growth might be a little more tempered,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 6>but you know, we are seeing a return to kind

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 6>of seasonality, which is really good because it's not just

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 6>going to impact the parcel providers. It's going to impact

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 6>the truckload providers, you know, like the night swifts and

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 6>the warners of the world. It's going to impact the

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 6>intermodal providers like the JB Hunts and the hub groups

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 6>of the world, and the railroads as well. So, you

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 6>know what we're hearing about the consumer and the fact

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 6>that B to B volume grew for the first time

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 6>in a long time within their domestic business is also

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 6>telling me, you know, that that things might be might

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 6>be a little better in twenty twenty five. So you know,

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 6>we're pretty optimistic that demand should be increasing across most

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 6>of the modes that we cover, and you know, twenty

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 6>twenty five and our view was going to be a

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 6>much better year than twenty twenty four was.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 5>And I do know back in about April, I remember

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 5>that UPS became USPS's primary air cargo provider. Is that

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 5>still a topic of conversation. How much has that really

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 5>added to the business if at all?

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So it is a great business win for them.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, FedEx walked away from it for various reasons

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 6>and UPS decided to pick it up. It's going to

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 6>be consistent volumes at a consistently good margin. And you

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 6>know what they're doing is they're really restructuring their overall

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 6>business they've been getting out of businesses that are a

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 6>lot more volatile. They just sold their freight brokerach business,

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 6>which was called Coyote to RXO, and then that was

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 6>earlier last month, and then in twenty twenty one they

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 6>sold their less than truckload business UPS Freight to TFI

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 6>and those were not great businesses for UPS. And now

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 6>UPS can really focus on being a parcel provider. And

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 6>to answer your question, what the US postal service business

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 6>can also do, It's going to build density and density

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 6>is the name of the game in any transportation company,

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 6>and so they can build off that density with other volumes.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Lee Klasgow, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and Shipping analyst.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 5>We move next to earnings from ev giant Tesla.

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Tesla's expectations for earnings in the third quarter. The company

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>also forecasted as much as thirty percent growth in vehicle

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 2>sales next year. This reflects the rebound and demand for

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Tesla's electric vehicles.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>For more, Paul and I were joined by Craig Trudell,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Global Autos Editor. We first asked Craig for his

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 5>take on Tesla's most recent.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 4>Results Oftentimes it's not necessarily the case that you can

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 4>count on both earnings and the vision to be positive.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 4>In this case, both were working in Musk's favor. I

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 4>think the earnings were much better than expected. I do

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 4>think that those expectations came down quite a bit over

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.119
<v Speaker 4>the last year year and a half, but they sort

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 4>of they did exceed expectations by pretty significant measures. And

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 4>the profit margins in particular, or something that everybody keeps

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 4>a very close eye on their automotive profit margins when

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 4>you back out the credits that they sell to other

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 4>automakers for regulatory purposes, those in particular, I feel like,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 4>are you know, just quarter in and quarter out what

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 4>everybody looks at? That was a big beat. And then

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 4>I think Musk was as self assured as I've ever heard.

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 4>He's never won lacking in confidence. And for him to

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.679
<v Speaker 4>throw out, you know, twenty to thirty percent sales increase

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 4>for next year, I think was very surprising. For nine

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 4>ten months into the year, and they've delivered fewer vehicles

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty four than they did in twenty twenty three.

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Craig, So when I'm walking around New York City

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 5>every so often I will see, to my surprise, a

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 5>cyber truck. What is the leadst on that? What do

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 5>they say in earnings? What can we expect there?

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>They said that it was gross margin positive for the

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 4>first time in the recent quarter, and so we're almost

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 4>we're roughly a year into the launch of that vehicle.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 4>I would say that's a little on the early side,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 4>just relative to how Tesla has you know, done with

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 4>with new vehicle launches in the past. So that is

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 4>another another positive I think, you know, in terms of volume,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 4>it's it's still quite low relative to the Model Y

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 4>and the Model three. That is still where you see

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 4>the vast majority of Tesla's deliveries, so much so that

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 4>Tesla has even yet to break out that that vehicle.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 4>And in terms of you know, quarterly results, and so

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 4>I think we have a rough idea of how many

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 4>they've sold. Ironically, based on the recalls that the company

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>has had to do with the vehicle. It's it's as

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 4>of the latest recall was, which was just a few

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago, it was around twenty seven thousand units, I believe,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 4>So you know, that's that's pretty small for a company

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 4>that you know, may sell somewhere in a one point

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 4>eight million vehicles this year.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Where is the focus from the company here in terms

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>of they seems like they have a lot of balls

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 2>in the air, obviously, the car business itself, robotaxis, artificial intelligence,

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>what are they? What does Elon want investors to focus on?

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you think? I think that's actually really one of

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 4>the most interesting things here. And I think Liam Denning's

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 4>column for Bloomberg Opinion, you know, does a great job

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 4>of laying out this idea that you know, Musk's emphasis

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 4>has really been on, you know, don't bother with the

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 4>here and now, forget the near term earnings. The sort

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 4>of big potential for this company has to do with,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, selling self driving cars and humanoid robots and

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 4>things that you know, we've heard Elon talk about time

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 4>and time again, but not actually deliver. And I think,

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, if if you're sort of looking at this

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 4>company sort of class half full, it's I'm less concerned

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 4>than I am today about the here and now of

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 4>this company and the earnings power of Tesla and it's

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 4>it's current business and therefore, you know, more encouraged that

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 4>that they have, you know, the ability and the time

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 4>and the financial wherewithal to go out and pursue those

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, big stretch goals that Musk has stepped for

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 4>the company, and you know, depending on who you ask,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 4>you know may or may not be able to actually

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 4>follow through on his various predictions.

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, from an equity perspective, this stock has been all

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 5>over the place this year. What's the goal case here?

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 5>What are people saying? How much legs do they have

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 5>to run? Can the stock go much further? What's the

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 5>consensus there?

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 4>You're absolutely right. I mean back in April, this was

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 4>a stock that was down forty three percent for the year,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 4>and so for for them to have you know, come

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 4>all the way back, they it's sold off quite a bit,

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, after the Robotaxi unveiling just a few weeks ago,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 4>and you know, we we've now seen the shares to

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 4>go positive again for the year. I think whether or

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 4>not the the company can can actually grow next year

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 4>with deliveries, I think is really important. Because even Musk,

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 4>who's you know, sort of perpetually said, you know, next

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 4>year will be our year for autonomy, even he is saying,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 4>you know that this cyber cab that they showed a

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks ago isn't going to be ready in

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty six, and so we need this company to bring,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, more affordable vehicles to market, to make teslas

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 4>more accessible to more consumers and get back to when

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 4>it's you know, growing again. To put it simply, and

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think it's still unclear what exactly they

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 4>have to offer that's going to help them get there.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Craig Trudell, Bloomberg Global Autos Editor.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 5>Coming up, we'll discuss what we can expect and Walt

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Disney's succession planning.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>in depth research and data on two thousand companies and

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>be a b I go on the terminal.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 5>I'll Paul Sweeten and I'm normal. DUP, this is Bloomberg.

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affle Card Playing and

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul and I'm normal. Enda, filling in for Alex Steel.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>We move next to earnings from the coffee chains Starbucks.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 2>This week, the company reported sales that plunged for the

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>third consecutive quarter.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 5>Starbucks also pulled its guidance for twenty twenty five. This

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 5>comes as a new CEO, Brian Nichol, tries to assess

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 5>his business and develop a turnaround plan for more.

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Guest host Emily Grafao and I were joined by Michael Halen,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Restaurant and food service analyst. We first

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 2>asked Michael what exactly is going on at Starbucks.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 8>They played catch up a bit once the hiring of

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 8>Brian Nichol was announced. You know, Brian Nichols started last month,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 8>and you know he's moving quickly.

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 7>He's making a lot of management changes, and he's.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 8>Aggressively making moves to simplify operations. You know, they're going

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 8>to rationalize menu items, make it easier to execute, and

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 8>try to bring.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 7>Hospitality back to the coffee shops right.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 8>They want to free up their employees, their partners as

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 8>they like to call them, to get back to knowing

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 8>the names of their customers right and being able to

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 8>greet them with a smile and friendly service, right, and

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 8>so's that's going to be job one, and then from

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 8>there they're going to expand on the marketing side.

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 7>You know, Starbucks has historically.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 8>Only marketed to its rewards members, right, and Brian nicol

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 8>wants to expand that to everyone, right.

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 7>And we think that's a smart plan.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 8>We think they've been under investing in marketing for a

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 8>long time and we expect it to pay dividends as

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 8>early as fiscal twenty twenty five.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 9>What is the company said to explain the seven percent

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 9>decline in same store sales? Because before you came on,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 9>we were talking about how you have to wait in

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 9>a really long line to get your Starbucks.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.359
<v Speaker 10>There's less foot traffic.

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Right every doing it.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 9>There's I guess, well maybe some teams in the store,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 9>but there's less people in the store. What have they

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 9>said about really what's driving that decline?

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 8>Part of what new CEO Brian Niccholas said is is

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 8>like it's largely about the experience. You know, it's become

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 8>largely transactional. Right, They've lost that customer service feel. They've

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 8>had the trouble executing the orders. You know, a big

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 8>part of it is, you know. And then he also

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 8>mentioned that, you know, all of these new menu items

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 8>that they added to try to bring people in didn't work, right.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 8>And then pricing has gotten ahead of itself at Starbucks

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:32.479
<v Speaker 8>as well.

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 7>And then China, China.

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 8>There's a huge price gap between the prices that they're charging.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 8>Sometimes they're charging three times as much as as some

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 8>of their smaller.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 7>Competitors like Luck and Coffee and k Coffee.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 8>So, you know, prices has also been a big part

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 8>of their issue, and it's something that they're they're going

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 8>to address right away.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've seen some crazy graphics in various articles

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>showing the permutations of the different orders that one could have,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and if you're bar barber, it's virtually impossible to learn

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 2>all these Is there a sense that they got to

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>simplify just the menu a little bit.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they issued a video and that was a big

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 8>point of emphasis. It was like making the jobs of

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 8>their bearistas a lot easier and their employees a lot easier, right,

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 8>and so you know, when an employee stressed, it's very

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 8>hard for them to provide the customer with a good experience, right,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 8>So this all flows downhill.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 7>So making the Barista's jobs easier.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 8>Making it more enjoyable environment for them is going to

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 8>flow down to the consumer and then it's going to

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 8>result in better traffic and same source sales.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 9>I was curious to get your thoughts, you know, Brian

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 9>Nichols said. The company said that they're pulling back this

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 9>guidance because the CEO needs more time to kind of

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 9>think through all this. How unprecedented is that just thirty seconds?

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 11>Uh?

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 7>No, it would be This is very common.

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 8>Any any good CEO worth his soult is going to

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 8>suspend guidance so they have more time to get their

0:15:58.560 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 8>initiatives in place.

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 7>This is huge.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 8>Companies can take a long time for momentum to start

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.119
<v Speaker 8>building in the right direction, and this is a wise.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 5>Move our thanks to Michael Halen Bloomberg Intelligence senior restaurant

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 5>and food service analysts.

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>We move next to the Median entertainment space and Walt Disney.

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 5>This week, Disney named a former Morgan Stanley CEO, James Gorman,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 5>chairman of the board. The company also said it will

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 5>appoint a new CEO in early twenty twenty six.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Nor and I were joined by Githa Rong Andathan Bloomberg

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence analyst on US Media. We first asked Githa for

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 2>her thoughts on the latest with Disney's succession plan.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 12>So I think this is the number one issue for

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 12>this company right now. I mean, succession planning has obviously

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 12>not been Disney's strong suit. You know, they had botched

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 12>succession attempts now multiple times, this is important. I mean,

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 12>you have arguably one of the best executives in the

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 12>business in James Gorman, who led such a smooth, orderly transition,

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 12>you know, in his own CEO transition, just did it

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 12>in five months with all internal candidates. So if it's

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 12>going to be orchestrated by him, I think obviously he's

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 12>been on the succession planning committee. It's his number one priority,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 12>and I think it definitely gives investors a lot of confidence.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 12>The one thing, though, that you know, you have to

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 12>mention here is that the early twenty twenty six time

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 12>frame that they have announced in terms of the new

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 12>CEO appointment, I think that's a little bit later than

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 12>what investors were expecting. I think most investors were expecting

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 12>it to happen in twenty twenty five.

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, things have really been tumultuous as we think

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 5>about succession plans. What are investors looking for from a

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 5>successor here?

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 12>So right now, all that we know is that you

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 12>have the four internal chiefs, you know, So you have

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 12>the parks chief Josh Tomorrow, you have ESPN's Jimmy Pittaro,

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 12>and you have the two big creative heads on the

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 12>TV and the film side, Dana Walden and Alan Bergman,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 12>who are all front runners. So, you know, leading a

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 12>company like Disney is really really challenging because you know,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 12>you had a parks guy in Bob Chapek who was

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 12>leading the company, and obviously that turned out not so

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 12>well because you know, the creative side was completely neglected.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 12>And now you have Barbiger kind of coming back in

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 12>and cleaning up all those relationships that were broken with

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 12>the Hollywood community. So it's going to be interesting to

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 12>see whom he really picks. Obviously, the two front runners

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 12>here are Dana Walden, who is a very well known,

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 12>very well respected TV executive. She has deep, deep ties

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 12>in Hollywood. She actually came over from Fox. She has

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 12>built a lot of credibility within the industry, but she

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 12>has absolutely no experience with the parks business. And remember,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 12>parks brings in almost fifty five to sixty percent of

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 12>Disney's profits, so this is critical to the future of

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 12>the company. Josh Tomorrow on the other side, of course,

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 12>he's an out and out parks guy, has absolutely no

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 12>experience with creative so this is where it gets really

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 12>really challenging. So it's going to be interesting to see

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 12>whether Barbiger things having that creative element is more important

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 12>or whether it's again going to be a parks pick

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 12>like Bob Schapeck.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 2>So Githa, you know, probably the end of the day,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 2>only one person counts, and it's not James Gorman, It's

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 2>not the board, it's Bob Eiger. What do you think

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 2>he wants to do? Will he be ready to go

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 2>when this happens.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 12>I think he will be ready to go. The question

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 12>is does he want to stick with an internal candidate?

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 12>I mean we you know you know this very well, Paul.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 12>He's been doing this now for a very very long time.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 12>You know, there was first, of course the Jay Rozzulo thing.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 12>Then of course there was Bob Japek. There's always kind

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 12>of been this proclivity towards an internal candidate. But having

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 12>said that, for the CFO, they did look outside with

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 12>Hugh Johnston. So again it's it's going to be interesting

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 12>to see what happens and what he really wants to prioritize.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 12>If he thinks this time around the creative element is

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 12>going to be more important, or whether he wants more

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 12>of an operations kind of person. But I think yes,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 12>he will, he will go. His contract ends in December

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty sixth.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 5>Our thanks to GEETHA. Rogenathan Bloomberg Intelligence analysts on US media.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 2>This week we focused on a Bloomberg Big Takes we're

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>entitled Cracked Skull, Broken Bones show Rivian's Plant Danger.

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 5>You can find it on Bloomberg dot Com and The Terminal.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 5>The story looks at how interviews with factory workers show

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 5>serious safety issues at Rivian's only US plant.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 2>For more, guest host Emily Grafao and I were joined

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 2>by Kyle Porter, Bloomberg Industrials reporter. We first asked Kyle

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.719
<v Speaker 2>to discuss his findings at Rivian.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 11>They're really struggling to build a safety culture that they

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 11>can be proud of. In short, there's been numerous incidents,

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 11>some of which you start that in the headline, or

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 11>those which we didn't put into the story. Or this,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 11>which I haven't been investigated by OSHA. If you talk

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 11>to people out there in normal Illinois, a lot of

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 11>them go to work every day because it's the best

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 11>paid employer in the region, but they don't feel safe.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 2>So I mean again, they only have one plant here.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering, how did Rivian like if I were starting

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.239
<v Speaker 2>up a new hotalk cup and I'd just go over

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to Ford or GM or Stalantis steal a bunch of

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>their factory people and say, hey, guys, start building my

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>car here. How did Rivian do it? How is Rivian

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of I guess learning on the job if you will.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 11>Well, Rivian got a deal. The original the plan that

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 11>they have they purchased the sixteen million dollars been abandoned

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 11>by Mitsubishi when they were trying to make an electric

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 11>car in the US, so it's sort of all fell

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 11>into place. There were still workers from the time that

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 11>it was owned by Mitsubishi that could come in and work,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 11>so they felt that they could get some muscle memory.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 11>And then at the start they you know, it was

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 11>designed to be a very niche comaker, and then they

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 11>got the Amazon deal. Things exploded and they had to

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 11>ramp up.

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>So what's the company responding, like, how they've kind of

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 2>respond to this and do they have any policies in

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 2>place to try to address this, because I'm just looking

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.719
<v Speaker 2>at another great graphic. Get you having a story that

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>just shows a number of serious violation sited and Ruvin's

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 2>at the top of that list.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 11>Yes it is, and as you pointed out, it's only

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 11>one factory with eight thousand staff. Most of the companies

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 11>on that list have multiple sites and tens of thousands

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 11>of workers.

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I just want to know kind of have the companies

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 2>responding here.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 11>They're responded in great detail to us. It's fair to say.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 11>They pointed out that most of the serious citations that

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 11>they were issued were ultimately downgraded or in a couple

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 11>of cases, dismiss which is true of most people that

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 11>go through the citation process. And they pointed as to

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 11>things that they've done to improve their safety processes. And indeed,

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 11>Osher itself has commended the company for being open and

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 11>looking to improve itself in safety.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 2>So is any materially different than say a Tesla factory

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>or you know the other EV makers.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, it currently only builds two types of vehicle. You

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 11>have the Amazon truck, and then you have the R one,

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 11>which comes into several bottles. It's a ne SUV in

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 11>a truck, and they're looking to ramp that up with

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 11>an expansion with the R two next year. So it's smaller.

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 11>It's I think it's aiming to produce now. They actually

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 11>cut their forecast this year about fifty thousand vehicles, so

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 11>the scale of it is much smaller.

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Does Rivin have the money to invest in their plants

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>into the safety because well, you look at the the

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>stocks of some of these companies that are just so volatile,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 2>and I wonder if they even really have the money

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 2>to invest in safety protocols.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 11>It's a question to ask the company that they say

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 11>that they have a real commitment to safety and they

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 11>are investing in it.

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it is making an evy?

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 2>It seems like they're not building an internal combustion engine,

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 2>so they're not actually building an engine.

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 7>There is it?

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 2>I would think the process is a lot different. Is

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it any more or less dangerous as the industry said

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>versus say, a you know, traditional guess assembly plant.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 11>Given that you're building this thing from scratch, you know,

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 11>from the engine upwards there's a lot of process that

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 11>has to be learned. There's a lot of things that

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 11>need to be learned. Indeed, one of the things that

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 11>the company was cited for was a movement vehicle that

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 11>the engineers are designed and you know, wasn't safe for

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 11>employees to use. They were telling employees to be careful

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 11>until I she cited them and they figured out a

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 11>way to do it differently. And you could replicate that

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 11>across a thousand examples, from how you attach the doors

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:01.959
<v Speaker 11>to how you put the glass in. You could go

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 11>on and on and on, and Rivian's had to work

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 11>out new and different ways of doing all these things

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 11>for these new bespoke vehicles.

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 2>But the employees, I guess they are. Are they aware

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>of the hazards when they take these jobs.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 11>That's a very good question. It's rapidly becoming a company town.

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 11>Most of the people that we spoke to for the

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 11>story are one of several family members who work at

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 11>the plant. They all talk about how when the plant

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 11>first opened, it was very small, very welcoming. You saw

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 11>members of senior management. It felt like a family. And

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 11>as production as ramp up, that's gone away and there's

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 11>been a pressure just to produce.

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Kyle Porter, Bloomberg Industrials Reporter and.

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Coming up on the program, well look at where we

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 5>stand with nuclear reactor technology.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal, Paul Sweeney.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 5>And I'm normal. Dup, this is Bloomberg.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty M.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Paul Sweeney and I'm Normalinda filling in for Alex Steele.

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 5>We moved next to the telecommunications space. Both AT and

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 5>T and Verizon both reported third quarter earnings this week.

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 2>AT and T said it gained more mobile subscribers and

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>analysts expected well steady focus on its fiber optic network

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and fixed wireless service.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 5>But Verizon reported quarterly revenue that missed analyst expectations. The

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 5>company said it was weighed down by lackluster sales of

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 5>hardware such as mobile phones.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 2>For more, guest host Emily Grafeo and I were joined

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 2>by John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence senior telecom analyst. We first

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>asked John for his take on what he saw from

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 2>AT and T this quarter.

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 13>Mob Bell delivered It is what I would say. They

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 13>actually had a very steady quarter. The one thing I've

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 13>always liked about AT and T is they are the

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 13>steady hand in the telecom space, unlike technology. For example,

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 13>in telecom, I always say a millimeter is a mile.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 13>You know, if they edged out expectations on key metrics

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 13>particularly and wireless and so, you know, steady as she

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 13>goes really a good story. And it continues to be

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 13>based on what I saw this quarter.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 9>So they gain more mobile subscribers in the third quarter

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 9>than analysts expected. Where is that coming from? Is that

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 9>people switching from a competitor to AT and T?

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Emily, So what we're seeing in telecom is the

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 13>market is largely saturated, So when you see gains at

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 13>AT and T, it's typically coming from other carriers. We're

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 13>also seeing a big migration coming out of the prepaid

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 13>business as carriers like AT and T take their best

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 13>credits out of that category and sort of elevate them

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 13>into the low end of the post paid space. The

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 13>other thing we're seeing our second line, So a lot

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 13>of people are actually getting second cell phones or adding

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 13>an additional line to their phone, and so we're getting

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 13>what I termed second line growth as well. So it's

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 13>really a combination of those factors that's at work there.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>So John kind of zoom out a little bit. Look

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 2>at the wireless space in general. We've got you know, Verizon,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>AT and T, T Mobile. I mean, it's got three big,

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>big players, and the pie is not growing a whole lot,

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. So how do investors think about where

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to lay their wireless that's here between those three names, So.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 13>Let me take it from the top. T Mobile continues

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 13>to be the growth name in the space. They have

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 13>I think, the strongest brand they've been out there with

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 13>a consumer friendly brand. It's very splashy, it resonates well

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 13>with the young people. When you look at those net

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 13>news subscribers coming in every quarter. Team mobile just continues

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 13>to be quartered and quarter out. As I said a

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 13>moment Ago, AT and T is this steady hand. They're

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 13>growing steadily, they're executing very well. And then at the

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 13>low end of that spectrum is Verizon. They've had some trouble,

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 13>they've been losing share in recent quarters. They're starting to

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 13>make the turn. So it's going to be interesting to

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 13>see the industry dynamics here as Verizon on the margin

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 13>gets better I think in coming quarters. So we're watching that.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 13>But in terms of how the stack lays out, now,

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 13>that's that's where it is.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 10>How are you thinking about AT and T and these

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 10>other wireless providers versus the traditional telecom companies because we've

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 10>learned in at least the AT and T earnings reports

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:02.959
<v Speaker 10>they're trying to get more into that traditional telecom business

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 10>laying out broadband fiber. Is it working.

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So if you look at the history of telecom,

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 13>AT and T and for Verizon are the old regional

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 13>bell operating companies. There are a number of them put together, actually,

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 13>and so they both still have a wireline business, a

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 13>fixed line network that they're using now to deliver and

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 13>really grow in the broadband space, and that is causing

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 13>convergence with the cable industry. Right the cable operators are

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 13>now getting into wireless, and telcos are all leaning into

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 13>broadband and having very good success building share and taking

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 13>share from the cable guys. So that's going to continue

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 13>to play out in coming quarters. And I think the

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 13>competitive edge that the telcos have is a lot of

0:29:55.720 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 13>their networks are built on fiber, and so fiber is

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 13>the best long term solution for broadband. It's the highest

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 13>capacity and it stands up very well to environmental pressures.

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>How did the cable companies, then, John, compete? What's their

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>competitive I guess strengths versus AT and T and Verizon.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 13>I think so great question, Paul. You know, on the

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 13>broadband front, they're trying to upgrade their networks to what's

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 13>called doss for it's going to give them the ability

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 13>to offer the same upload and download speeds, which they

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 13>can't do now. The download speeds are very fast, but

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 13>the upload speeds are rather slow, so you don't get

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 13>that the metrical service, but hopefully coming soon. And I

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 13>think on the wireless side, they're capturing a lot of

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 13>share at the low end of the market. They're coming

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 13>in with some very compelling offers and it's working and

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 13>they're taking share from the telecoms.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 5>And wireless to John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence senior telecom analysts.

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg and EF

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>previously known as New Energy Finance.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 5>They're the team at Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 5>energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings, and

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 5>agriculture sectors.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 14>This week we.

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Took a look at nuclear power and for the first

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 2>time in seventeen years, there are no nuclear reactors under

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 2>construction in the US.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 5>For more, Paul and I were joined by Chris Gadomski,

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 5>be an EF lead nuclear analyst. We first asked Chris

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 5>where we stand with nuclear reactor technology.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 14>Think about a football team or a basketball team and

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 14>you're sitting your best player on the bench, and there's

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 14>a lot of issues with regards to nuclear energy, but

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 14>it is a very, very robust technology that can provide

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 14>the twenty four to seven type of baseload power that

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:59.719
<v Speaker 14>many customers are looking for and interested in having. We

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 14>are are for the first time since two thousand and

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 14>seven without a reactor under construction, which is very, very discouraging,

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 14>especially in the context of the fact that China has

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 14>got something like twenty seven to twenty eight reactors under construction,

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 14>and Russia is building twenty two or twenty three reactors

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 14>around the world in six different countries. So what has

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 14>happened to the US nuclear industry. We've kind of dropped

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 14>the ball on large reactor construction. And there's a lot

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 14>of hope and a lot of cheerleading that some of

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 14>these advanced reactors are being developed by a whole slew

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 14>of companies will carry the day and provide an alternative

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 14>nuclear solution.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Talk us through just how long it takes to license

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 5>and build a lot of these larger reactors.

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 14>So though the AP one thousand that was built in

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 14>Vogel at a budget a cost of thirty four billion dollars,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 14>it took about fifteen years to license and build. And

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 14>that's quite a long period of time. What utility executive

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 14>is going to look around and say, listen, let me

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 14>grab another one of these and spend that type of

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 14>cash and wait that long, Especially since the new technologies

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 14>intermittent renewables are coming on and they provide an alternatives,

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 14>and there's a lot of change in the utility industry

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 14>and the electric power industry, and hence it becomes a

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 14>pretty risky proposition to place a bet billions of dollars

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 14>for a technology that's not going to come and return

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 14>an investment for several different years. And there's several examples

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 14>not only in the US, but also in Europe where

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 14>this is going on.

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Some of these smaller modular reactors that we hear about

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 2>that kind of seems like a reasonable solution to me.

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to build this monster generator. I do

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 2>something smaller for maybe lower cost, presumably cheaper all the

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff.

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 14>Well, the question is is that we anticipate that those

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 14>reactors may be more expensive on a per kill a

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 14>wide basis, but the risk that they present to a

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 14>utility executive signing to invest this technology is less. You

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 14>can build them sequentially so that you get a cash

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 14>flow after the first one is up and running and

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 14>now you're building the second one, as opposed to waiting

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 14>the many years to get that. We anticipate that licensing

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 14>and building an SMR and will take about five to

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 14>six years, two years in the licensing process and three

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 14>or four years optimistically for construction. We don't anticipate any

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 14>of these advanced reactors coming online in North America until

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 14>twenty thirty.

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 10>How does this compare internationally.

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 14>Well, the US is a leader in the development of

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 14>advanced reactors and SMRs. There's only two SMRs that operate

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 14>around the world, one in China, one in Russia, and

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 14>only two under construction, one in China and one allegedly

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 14>in Russia. They're supposed to break around soon. We have

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 14>a very interesting development in Wyoming with terror Power developing

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 14>or replacing a coal plant with an advanced reactor, which

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 14>is very, very exciting. But they have not received a

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 14>construction permit for that reactor yet and they're still doing

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 14>preliminary work, and we anticipate that coming online around the

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 14>twenty thirties.

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 2>What's the feeling within the halls of Congress about this

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 2>power source? Is there any support for nuclear power or

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 2>is ideologically divided or where are we on this?

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 14>It's certainly changing from being very very questioning and very

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 14>very nervous about it to be more accepting of the

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 14>technology because they realize the certain advantages of nuclear power.

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 14>I live in a solar powered house in California. I

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 14>get all of my electricity from solar energy. But when

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 14>you think about powering a large city or so, you

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 14>need something more than just intermittent renewables. Renewables are very

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 14>good solution for part of the problem, but they're not

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 14>a solution for the entire problem. So to displace some

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 14>of the fossil fuel that we see being used now,

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 14>we need to have a clean, carbon free source of

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 14>nuclear power. SMRs have greater flexibility, easier to bring online,

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 14>and hopefully they'll have a role to play in the future.

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 10>Well, let's talk about AI.

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 5>We think about data centers and the demand there, and

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 5>when we think about nuclear supplying these data centers. I

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 5>know you mentioned that this should be a pretty much

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 5>a post twenty thirty phenomenon, apart from the revival of

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 5>Three Mile Island by twenty twenty eight. Can you talk

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 5>a bit more about that.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 14>Yes, several studies that suggest that there's a tremendous demand

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 14>growth for nuclear power between now and twenty thirty. There

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 14>are some questions will that growth continue after twenty thirty

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 14>or will plateau for a while. I wish I could

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.760
<v Speaker 14>say that there'll be a solution from the advanced nuclear

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 14>community before twenty thirty, but if it is, it's just

0:36:58.239 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 14>going to be first of a kind one or two

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 14>WHO reactors, and the challenge is developing a supply chain

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 14>that can deliver a fleet of these advanced reactors to

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 14>really respond to the growing demand for electricity from the

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 14>data centers.

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 5>Our thanks to Chris Kadomski, be any app lead Nuclear Analysts.

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal