WEBVTT - Look a Man in His Eyes

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are solely

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>those of the podcast author or individuals participating in the podcast,

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and do not represent those of iHeartRadio or their employees.

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>This podcast also contains subject matter which may not be

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>suitable for everyone listening to.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Discretion is advised. Radical is released every Tuesday and brought

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>to you absolutely free, but if you want to add

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>free listening and early access to next week's episode, subscribe

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to tenderfoot Plus. For more information, check out tenderfootplus dot com.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Enjoy the episode Campsite Media. At a court hearing less

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>than a week after September eleventh, the judge overseeing a

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Ma'am Jamil Alamine's case gave both sides a chance to

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>speak at length. Reading the transcript of the hearing, the

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>lofty lefelanguage that we often hear in court rooms, it

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>seemed even more elevated that day, like everyone was speaking

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 2>for posterity, calling on their deepest beliefs to make sense

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of the events. Jack Martin, the lead defense attorney for

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>a Ma'am Jamil, he stepped up to the podium facing

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the judge. He noted for the record that in the

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>aftermath of nine to eleven, there had been a tacks

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>on Muslim Americans and that maschids across the country had

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>been desecrated and defiled. As lawyers, Martin said, we must

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>be realists. We must recognize that our judicial system is

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 2>far from perfect, hardly immune from the temper of the times.

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>He asked that the trial be postponed. In court, a

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 2>Maam Jamil usually wore a white thobe and a coofe,

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>but at this hearing he chose to wear his jail clothes,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>apparently so he wouldn't attract threats and his Muslim garb.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>He stepped up to the podium. I stand ready and

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>seeking resolution of an unjust situation. He said, I am

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 2>innocent of all of your charges. A Maam Jamille said

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>he wanted the trial to move forward despite the Islamophobic

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>fervor in America, but he would submit to his lawyer's

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>recommendations that it be postponed. Then he used the moment

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to speak his mind. He had been silent from addressing

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the public by a gag order, but the judge let

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>him talk over the prosecutor's objections. His remarks were grandiose

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and prophetic at times. He seemed to be talking about

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>himself like a martyr. I am told that a trial

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 2>at this time is not wise. He said that fear

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>of silenced reason, that the cry for vengeance is too loud,

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>that the thirst for blood must be quenched, that the

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>orgy of murder must be played out, that all the

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 2>people must be made to eat and drink of it.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 2>If your trying and killing me satisfies your taste for

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the Muslim blood and spares the life of Muslim women

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and children. Though I do not complain about my situation,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm advised that because of patriotism in this country, I

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>am unable to have a fair trial. Shouldn't it be

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the opposite in a land that has said that freedom

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>is the pinnacle of its moral argument, that life, liberty,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 2>and the pursuit of happiness is its banner of moral authority,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 2>that justice is its master virtue, the scales upon which

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>is weighed its law and order. Or is that just

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a dream speech. At one point, AmAm Jamil apparently turned

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>away from the judge and faced the prosecutor's table as

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>if speaking to them. The judge told a manage Meil

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 2>to face her. He continued, justice in law marches to

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>two different drummers. Justice in law are two different in

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 2>distinct conversations. I'm reminded that freedom is not free. I'm

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>reminded of a quote from Huey P. Long, who was

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>once governor of Louisiana, when he was asked would fascism

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>come to America, and he replied, yes, fascism will come

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to America, but it will be called patriotism. Imagine a

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of justice built on a divine awareness that knows

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>people's true intentions and sees the causes and effects of

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 2>people's actions across vast histories. AmAm Jamil evoked the justice

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>like this that day in court, with all of its

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>religious overtones. He seemed to say, if it is justice

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 2>in this grander, all knowing sense, that I be executed

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>even though I am innocent, I accept my faith. Not

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>only that, hurry up and get on with it. But

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>there was also a contradiction. He believed that a court

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of law could set him free if only people would

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>consider the facts as he saw them. From Camside Media,

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Tenderfoot TV, and iHeart podcasts, This is Radical, I'm Mostly

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Secret Episode four, Look a Man in his Eyes. The

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>prosecution like a Ma'am Damiel's defense team didn't think a

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>fair trial would be possible. The judge agreed, and she

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>postponed the case until January of two thousand and two.

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>A Mam Jamil's trial was scheduled to begin nearly two

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 2>years after the shootout in the West End. When people

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 2>are charged with crimes, most eventually plead guilty. I watched

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 2>this play out countless times when I was covering the

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 2>courts for the New York Times. But in death penalty

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>cases like a Ma'am jimials, the option of negotiating a

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>pleading was essentially taken off the table. Even defendants who

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>knew they fucked up and were inclined to take responsibility,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>they could still be sentenced to death, so they would

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>end up in court defending their lives, working with their

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.799
<v Speaker 2>lawyers to pull some kind of story together for the jury.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Who has the winning story? That's not necessarily the same

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 2>question as whose story is the most true? I wonder

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 2>if seeking the death penalty if it can actually hide

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>more truth than it reveals. The lead prosecutor for the

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Fulton County District Attorney's Office was a man named Robert McBurney.

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 2>A man who had devoted his working life to the

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>criminal court system.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not perfect. Their biases and plenty of examples where

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 3>because of someone's race or lack of means or gender

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>that things went horribly wrong, and we need to stay

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 3>focused on those and do what we can to correct them.

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 3>But by and large, once you get into court, so

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 3>it's not saying on the policing side say, once you

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 3>get into court, we've got a system that works pretty well.

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Not long after he finished law school back in the nineties,

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 2>McBurnie took a job with the Fulton County DA. A

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>few years later, he left to join a private law firm,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 2>but he realized it wasn't his thing.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>And I got a call from the lead investigator on

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>the Olamine case in the District Attorney's office and said, hey,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 3>would you come back if I could get you on

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the Olamine case. And I thought that I'd be interesting

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the fascinating case, lots of moving parts. Fbis involved this

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 3>and that, and so I kicked it around for a

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit, and I missed being a prosecutor. I like

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 3>being a prosecutor, And so I returned to the DA's

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 3>office and picked that up.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>AmAm Jamil's case was the biggest of mcburney's relatively young career.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Prosecuting a single case became his full time job. He

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>could hardly have stepped into a role with higher stakes.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>There would be two phases to the trial. In the

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>first phase, a jury would decide if mam Jamil was

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>innocent or guilty, and if they convicted him, then in

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>a second phase, the same jury would choose whether he

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>should spend the rest of his life in prison or

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>if the State of Georgia should execute him. A mam

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Jamil's lead attorney, Jack Martin, He said that because it

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 2>was a death penalty trial, he and the defense team

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>they had to adjust their strategy.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Do you have to worry not only about what he

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 4>can do to gain a client acquitted, but also what

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 4>happens if he gets convicted? How do we make sure

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 4>you don't get the death penalty?

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>If the defense were to take a big risk, like

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>putting forward a theory that was too outlandish or a

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 2>witness who wasn't totally credible, they might lose the trust

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>of the jury. And then if a man Jamil got convicted,

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the jury might not believe defense lawyers When they argue

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>that a Mam Jamil should keep his life. Let me

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 2>set the scene for you a little. The courtroom was

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 2>a modern looking one, tan carpeted floors, brown theater style

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 2>seats in the gallery, not the old Hartwood benches, computer

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>monitors on the tables. A Maam Jamil and his white

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>thob and coofy sat at a table next to his

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 2>legal team. The lawyers wore suits and ties. A man

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Jamil's wife Karema and their young son Kyrie. They sat

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>close to each other behind the defense table. Members of

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the Weston Mass Gifts showed up two. The courtroom was full.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>You knew court was officially in session each day When

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the bailiffs commanded all rise, everyone in the courtroom was

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>expected to stand up and share respect when the judge entered.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Same thing when the jury walked in. But a Mam

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Jamil wouldn't do it.

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 4>He said, this is contrary to my religion. Don't stand

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 4>for anybody but Dalla. And the judge was spuried accommodating

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 4>about that. She said, that's no big deal, you don't

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 4>have to stand.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 2>The courtroom was tense, even more so than a typical

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>trial nine eleven wasn't that far off. The gallery was

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 2>full of people from a community that was wary of

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.599
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement, and the Sheriff's office responsible for security in

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the court building. It was the same office that Deputy

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Kinchen had worked for and Deputy English was still working for.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 2>The judge must have sensed this. She ordered that if

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement came to the trial of Spectators, they couldn't

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>wear their uniforms. But that didn't stop the new Black

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Panther Party from showing up one day wearing all black fatigues,

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and so when it was time for opening statements, this

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>was how the courtroom felt when Robert mcfernie and his

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 2>team laid out their case.

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 4>For the jury.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 2>The prosecution argument began with a recitation of some of

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>what English called out as he lay in the field

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>next to the mast it please don't shoot me anymore.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Don't shoot me anymore. From there their argument went like this.

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Kenchin and English were just doing their job. They went

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to the West End with a warrant to arrest them,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Ma'am Jamil, And when Kenchin pulled her car up in

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 2>front of Amm Jamil's black Mercedes and the deputies got

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 2>out a Mam Jamil fired at the deputies. Here's the prosecutor,

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Robert McBurney.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>He produced not a small gun but an assault rifle,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 3>killed one deputy and severely injured another. We know where

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Kinchin was. He didn't get very far and English was

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>able to testify as to where he started and then

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 3>he collapsed in the field over by the mass.

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Jit At the hospital, English had idea to Mam Jamil

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 2>in a photo lineup and that was still his story.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Then there was the state's physical evidence. Dozens of shell

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>casings and bullets were recovered from the scene in the

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>West End, and after AmAm Jamil was arrested in Loudon County, Alabama,

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>FBI agents found guns in the woods, presumably that AmAm

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Jamil had dropped while fleeing federal agents. Ballistics analysts found

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 2>that those guns matched bullets that killed Kenchin and wounded English,

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and there was more physical evidence from Lowndes County.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>He fled in a Mercedes that was found in Alabama

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 3>with bullet holes that were consistent with his gun as

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>well as the deputy's guns.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>So for McBurnie and his prosecution team, the physical evidence

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>clearly matched English's testimony.

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 3>Based on the entrance wounds for Kinschin, the entrance wounds

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 3>for English, all of the bullet holes in the Mercedes.

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 3>It really wasn't all that controversial as to who was

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>standing where. What was controversial was who was the person

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 3>standing next to the Mercedes, And I don't think that

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 3>was controversial. That was Alaman.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>It was a strong case, but there were still opportunities

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 2>for the defense to create doubt in the minds.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 5>Of the jury.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 2>AmAm Dmil's defense team. Their strategy was to point out

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>all the inconsistencies in the prosecution's case to show their

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>evidence was flawed. I hardly need to remind you in

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 2>this trial episode of the podcast that the prosecution needed

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a Maam Jamil

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 2>shot Deputy Kenchin and Deputy English, and that a Maam

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Jamil's lawyers they didn't need to prove he was innocent.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>They just needed to create enough doubt in the minds

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of the jury. Really, even one juror to pull off

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>that argument. It required a good amount of skepticism, especially

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of law enforcement. A Maam Jamil's lawyers they were defense attorneys,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>so sure they were inclined to be skeptical of official accounts.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>But the defense team's investigator, wa Tani tahimba his skepticism.

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 2>It was on a whole another level. Whata Tani and

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a Maam Jamil are around the same age. Watani spent

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>time in Los Angeles when he was young.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 6>I was directly impacted by the Watch rebellion. You know,

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 6>the National Guard was like an occupying army for us.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 6>Became very obvious that we were oppressed. Put guns on

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 6>ers and tell us to go back in the house

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 6>with dusted don curfew. All those kind of things raised

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 6>your consciousness. And so I was a young man coming

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 6>up into my consciousness. In the nineteen.

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Sixties, Whatatani joined the Black Power movement, and like a

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Ma'am Jamil, he was surveilled by the FBI. That didn't

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>inspire a lot of trust and law enforcement. Watani and

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>a Maam Jamil knew each other before this case. In

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>the late eighties, Whatatani moved to Atlanta started working as

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>a criminal investigator, always on the defense side, the side

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>against the state. He worked a lot for my dad. Actually,

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>most if not all, of Watani's clients were black. They

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>called him unk and he built relationships with them, talked

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 2>about novels with them on occasion. It was sort of

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a continuation of his work in the movement. Months before

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the trial began, whata Tani was doing his thing, interviewing

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>potential witnesses and gathering new evidence. He knew that testimony

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>from English would be key to the prosecution's case. Remember

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>that it was the morning after the shootout, when English

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 2>was still in the hospital recovering from surgery, that a

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 2>detective from the Atlanta Police Department first interviewed him. Watani

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 2>learned that English had received the total of ten milligrams

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 2>of morphine and during the prior twenty four hours he

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>had also lost a lot of blood. An expert said

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 2>his mental faculties would have been impaired. But the morning

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 2>after surgery, the detective he decided English was ready to

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 2>tell him what happened the night before an English id

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to man Jamil in the photo lineup. Watani looked for

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 2>any outside information that might have influenced English's id between

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the night he was shot in the West End and

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that morning in the hospital. Almost immediately after the shootout,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta's local TV stations they were all over the story.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 6>The English in the hospital watching the news, and so

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 6>they are talking about Jamil, and he sees the one news.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 6>So I went to talk to the doctors and people

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 6>in the staff there, and they said they confirmed he

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 6>was watching into television. And then I came back and

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 6>the guy retracted. He says, well, I really can't, can't.

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 6>I don't really.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Remember now the doctor retracted, Yes.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 6>Doctor retracted it. One of the sheriffs took the stand

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 6>to testify. She said that when she acad in it,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 6>she unplugged the television so he would not be able

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 6>to see and and misidentify anybody. So, you know, like

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 6>what gives her the presence of mind? I said, let

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 6>me just unplug this television.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 2>But Tani didn't tell me the name of the doctor

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 2>who attracted his statement. And I'm not sure that I

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 2>would have gotten a conclusive answer to this question all

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>these years later. So it's hard for me to make

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>much of this one way or the other, except that

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>with Tani, he really did not trust English's identification of

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a man Jamil. At the trial, after both sides gave

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>their winning arguments, the prosecution called English to the stand

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>their first witness. He sat to the right of the

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>judge wearing his tan uniform in a dark brown tie.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>The lead prosecutor, Robert McBurney examined his witness. English rehashed

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>his account of that night he and Kinchin were in

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the West End.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 5>With a warrant.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>They pulled up on a black Mercedes and English asked

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the man getting out of the car to show his

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>right hand. Then the man pulled out a rifle and

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>started firing. McBurney asked English, what went through your mind

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 2>when you saw that assault rifle pointed at you. English

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 2>lost his composure, started crying, wiped tears from his eyes

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 2>with his thumb in one of his fingers. He took

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a deep breath, um that I was about to die

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 2>when he started shooting. I thought about my kids, thought

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>about my wife, and I asked myself as I was running,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 2>what have I done to deserve this? Holding a clipboard,

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>McBurney moved to stand behind the defense table, not far

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>from what Tani and behind a Ma'am Jamial who sat

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>almost perfectly still expressionless. Is this the man who had

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the assault rifle that night? McBurney asked, as English looked

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 2>at a Mam Jamial. Yes it is, Sir, said English,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 2>did you see anyone else that night with an assault rifle? No, sir,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>is this the man who fired the assault rifle at you? Yes,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>it is, said English. Jack Martin did the cross examination methodically.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Martin had English recount his memories of the shootout, but

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 2>Martin tried to undermine his credibility. He read back to

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>English inconsistencies between his testimony and statements he had made

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>to law enforcement. One of the inconsistencies was that English

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>said he prided himself on his marksmanship, and he was

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>sure he shot a man Jamial. But remember when a

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 2>man Jamial was arrested in Alabama, he was uninjured. And

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>then in an interview with a detective, English said this

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>about his encounter with the shooter. Quote, my mom always

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 2>told me, look a man in his eye, Always look

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 2>a man in his eyes. I looked him in his eyes.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember them, gray eyes. I remember that face, that

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 2>cold face. So I couldn't forget that. But a man

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Jamil didn't have gray eyes. His eyes were brown. English

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 2>stood to reenact the details of his encounter with the shooter.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>When Martin asked about the shooter's eye color, English insisted

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 2>that Mamjamial was wearing yellow glasses, suggesting that was the

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>reason he thought of Mam Jamial's eyes were gray. Martin

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 2>pointed out that and the statements English gave to detectives

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 2>he didn't mention anything about yellow glasses. Martin kept pressing

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the point, and the prosecutor mcburniey he objected, claiming Martin

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 2>was being argumentative. Eventually, Martin moved on. Wa Tani watched

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 2>English's testimony from the defense table.

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 5>Did the English.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Testimony is that memorable to you at all? Or do

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 2>you remember how you were feeling about that?

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 6>I thought he was lying, but that was my good feeling. Yeah,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean he saw him on television and he looked

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 6>at this stuff, and they say, I'll never forget those

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 6>gray eyes. I believe that's what happened. And they use

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 6>the gray eyes to try to emphasize, Oh, yeah.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 5>It's him, because it's so unique that a black person

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 5>would have great because it's unforgettable.

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 6>On the paper.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>But that thing, what you saw ful the paper, what

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Tani is talking about. He means the warrant. On the warrant,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a man Jamil's eye color was listed incorrectly, as so

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 2>English's whole story about his mama telling him to look

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a man in the eyes sounds kind of funny. It

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 2>created a suspicion that he might have been trying to

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 2>pin the shooting on a man Jamial. After English's testimony

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 2>later in the trial, the prosecution called the ballistics analyst

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.959
<v Speaker 2>from George's crime lab to the witness stand. McBurney questioned

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the analyst he held up the nine milimeters pistol and

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 2>the Ruger Many fourteen semi automatic rifle found close to

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>where a Mam Jamial was captured. The rifle was a

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>unique and powerful gun. Even though it was semi automatic,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>it could still be fired rapidly, and it had a

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>retractable stock so it could be compact fired from the

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>hip or extended and fired like a rifle typically is

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 2>from the shoulder. The analyst said that a bullet from

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the rifle must have hit Kinchin with the caveat that

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>if there was another ruger Many fourteen at the scene,

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>she couldn't tell the difference between the two, and the

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 2>analyst testified that a bullet from the pistol the same

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>one Bernie held up in the courtroom, that it hit

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Deputy Kenchin.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Period.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's the defense attorney Jack Martin.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 4>The gun evidence was very problematic for us. It was

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 4>a difficult thing for us to overcome. But you know,

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 4>we had some explanations for it, but it was more difficult,

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 4>including why would he take it all the way to Alabama.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Ama Jimil's defense team had argued before the trial that

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the ballistics evidence shouldn't be included at all, but the

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>judge decided to allow it. Now, all they could do

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 2>was cross examine the analysts. It got really technical about

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 2>gas projection and surface markings, that type of stuff. But

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the thing is, there are serious questions about the veracity

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 2>of the kinds of ballistics evidence that was presented.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 4>To say that this gun is the gud who fired

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 4>this book is very, very difficult. There were questions about

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 4>whether this was a valid conclusion from a scientific point

0:22:58.800 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 4>of view.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Ballistics just happens to be something I know a little

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>bit about. When I was an investigative reporter at Pro Publica,

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 2>I worked on a team looking into the validity of

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the so called forensic sciences. The project eventually ran under

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the headline The Real CSI, which was meant to be

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a corrective to how CSI and other crime dramas hold

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>out ballistics analysis and other methods as infallible truth. The

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 2>work was inspired by a huge report put out by

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 2>the National Academy of Sciences on ballistics analysis. The Academy concluded, quote,

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the decision of the tool mark examiner remains a subjective

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 2>decision based on unarticulated standards and no statistical foundation. The

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 2>report went on to say that it has never been

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>conclusively proven that a particular gun leaves unique markings on

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the bullets at fires. But according to Jack Martin, it

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 2>was always going to be tough to convince the jury

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>that this evidence wasn't reliable. Do you think from your

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 2>experiences as a lawyer, do juries tend to believe ballistics evidence?

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and they shouldn't.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 2>This kind of ballistics evidence matching a bullet or a

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>shell casing to a particular gun. It's still widely admissible

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 2>in US courts. But after three weeks of testimony and

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 2>cross examinations and objections and squabbling over evidence, there was

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 2>almost time to turn the case over to the jury.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>In my reporting on this story, I swung back and

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 2>forth between thinking maybe a Mama Jemil didn't shoot those

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 2>deputies and yes, he definitely did. One bit of information

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 2>would lead me one way, and then another would turn

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 2>me around in the uncertainty. And when I was thinking

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 2>I'd never get to the bottom of what happened, I

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>figured that maybe the story I was supposed to tell

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 2>was more about a Maam Jimil himself. Who was this

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>man who I encountered as a kid, who people believed

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 2>was even capable of shooting two cops. But then I

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 2>would get sucked back into an obsessive and maybe even

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 2>a foolish desire to figure out what actually happened that night.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 2>We all know that the facts at any trial are

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 2>subject to dispute, but it's also the case that so

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>many facts are never even considered. Prosecutors and defense lawyers

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>construct narratives out of little slivers of life. As the

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 2>trial neared its climax, there were still unanswered questions on

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 2>both sides. That's a big part of why I got

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 2>sucked into this case. So much had been left off

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the table. When I interviewed Watani Tahimba about his work

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>as an investigator and about a Ma'am Jamil's trial, it

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 2>was the first time in my reporting that I felt

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 2>close to hearing for myself some straight up truth about

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>that night, not close enough to actually uncover the information itself.

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I just detected that something real was there. It was

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a little jolt that said keep on digging. But Tani

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and I were talking about how as an investigator he

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>works closely, almost intimately, with truth that goes unsaid.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't know who I was talking to about this recently,

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 5>but it was I think maybe it was my wife actually,

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 5>and she was saying, do you think that defendants tell

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 5>the truth to their lawyers? And it's the same kind

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 5>of thing. Do they tell the truth to their investigators?

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 2>My answer to her was not all the time, Like.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 6>I don't know in fact, and I don't always ask them,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 6>see I don't. I don't ever ask them did you

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 6>do this? I never asked that, you know, say that's

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 6>what the police say, that's what the state was saying,

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 6>we got some problems here. This is the area that

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 6>we definitely got some issues here, you know, so we

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 6>do it like that. But I've had can't say give

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 6>me a whole story, say what do you think about that?

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Said?

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>What do I think about that?

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Said?

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 6>What do you think about that? That kind of intue me,

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 6>it's your story. I'm not help you to do this.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 6>You tell me your story. I'll show you where your

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 6>stuff is bad. You know, we tighten it up. But yeah,

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 6>so yeah, it's interesting in it. It's it's none of

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 6>them are there saying? You know?

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 5>It would have been that same kind of scenario with

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 5>the Mam Jamil. It wouldn't have been like, did you

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 5>do this?

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean we have a relationship. I could ask

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 6>me to, but I wouldn't do that.

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Ma'am Jamil had pleaded not guilty. He said he was innocent,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 2>but he didn't have an alibi. So if he didn't

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 2>shoot the deputies, then who did? It would have had

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 2>to be someone else, someone who with Tani would have

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk to as an investigator. Would you have

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>been previous conversations with the Mam Jamil the client himself,

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to kind of give you guidance about where you should

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 2>go or not.

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 6>Go as an investigator? You know, yeah, we have privileged

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 6>conversations with our client as well as with the other attorneys.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 2>And did he point you in one way or the other.

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 6>We have privileged conversations.

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 3>I can't say.

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Right that right there, that's it there's something there. Who

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>knows Maybe wa Tani doesn't even know what it is.

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 2>There's some truth there, even if it's unset. The prosecution

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 2>left some big questions out there too. Robert McBurnie and

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 2>his team, they decided not to explain why they thought

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a man Jimial shot the deputies. They had no obligation

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 2>to describe a motive.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Certainly, it was a topic of interest amongst those of

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>us on the prosecution team of why someone who at

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 3>that point in his life had become a community icon

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and was revered or feared pick your term in the

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 3>West End, why not simply go with these deputies to

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 3>deal with a stolen car allegation and be done with it.

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Mcburnie's theory was that a Mam Jamil had something in

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the trunk of the Mercedes guns, maybe that he didn't

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 2>want English and kinsin to find when they pulled up

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>on him.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 3>That's as good as it got. It was senseless regardless.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 3>It really doesn't matter what was in the trunk to

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 3>shoot to kill two deputies who are simply doing their job.

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 3>And there was nothing in this case about you know,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 3>these deputies were approaching him aggressively or he was defending

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 3>himself that that was never the defense, because of course

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 3>he didn't do it was the defense.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 2>But those are all things that did not come up

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>at the trial. As the time approached for closing arguments

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 2>and the defense was finishing with their witnesses, a man

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Jamil and his lawyers had to decide if he should testify.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Based on the Constitution the Fifth Amendment, it was his

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 2>right to refuse to take the stand, and if he

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>decided not to McBurney in the prosecution, they weren't allowed

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>to bring it up. Jack Martin worried that if a

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Mam Jamial testified, the armed robbery conviction he caught in

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 2>New York in the seventies would come up and the

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>jury would hold it against him. So in the end,

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a Mam Jamil didn't take the stand. McBurney gave his

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>closing argument. First, he ran through the case the prosecution

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 2>had laid out during testimony, and then McBurney said to

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the jury, I want to leave you with a few

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>questions you should have for the defendant. He was using

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 2>a PowerPoint presentation and he put up a slide.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 3>The label of the slide was questions for the Defendant

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 3>and It was basically, how can you explain all these things?

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 3>And then it rattled off some questions, how do you

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 3>explain the shellcasing on the Mercedes? How do you explain

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>the bullet taken out a Deputy Kinchin that matches this gun.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 3>It basically thinks that you cannot explain.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 4>I was amazed and it just troubled me, and it

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 4>sort of the thought crossed my mind, said they must

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 4>be fairly desperate to be making that type of argument.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Jack Martin objected. He asked for a mistrial because of

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Mamjamial's Fifth Amendment rights were violated. The judge said no,

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and McBurney changed the title of that slide. Then the

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>judge explained to the jury that a Mam Jamial had

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 2>no obligation to testify, that the jury shouldn't draw any

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 2>conclusion from a man Jamial's choice not to take the stand.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 2>McBurney finished the first part of his argument, and then

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>it was the defense's turn. They said that English's idea

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of a Mammed Meal didn't hold up, that a Mam

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Jamil didn't have gray eyes and he wasn't shot like

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 2>English said he was. And the defense pointed out the

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>link between the bullets, the guns, and a man demial.

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't as convincing as it might seem. Then McBurney

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>had a chance to deliver a final closing speech. He

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 2>rebutted the defense arguments point by point, and he approached

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the climax of his argument. You watched what happened in

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 2>this courtroom. Who wouldn't stand up for you? Don't stand

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 2>for him. The defendant is guilty of the murder of

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Deputy Ricky Kinchin. McBurney said, he's guilty of each and

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 2>every count in the indictment, and you need to hold

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:20.719
<v Speaker 2>him accountable. Don't stand for him. Remember that a Ma'am Jamil,

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>unlike many others in the courtroom, hadn't risen. When the

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 2>judge and jury entered for religious reasons, Martin objected to

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 2>mcburney's language and again asked for a mistrial. The judge

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 2>denied the request, but she did tell the jury that

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a Maam Jamial's beliefs shouldn't be held against him. The

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 2>jury was sent away to deliberate. These days, McBurney is

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the most well known judges in Georgia. He

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 2>oversaw a special grand jury's investigation and to alleged election

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 2>interference by former President Donald Trump. I asked McBurnie whether

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 2>he went too far in his closing argument. A district

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 2>court judge went as far as saying that it was

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 2>a I think serious and repeated constitutional violation the argument

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that you made. And I don't think that you've had

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to kind of state publicly what you were

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 2>thinking and your thoughts about how it went down, But

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>we would love to hear that.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Sure, So my friends like to bring this one up

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 3>all the time. I made a mistake. It was an honest,

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 3>good faith mistake, and I own it, and I have

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 3>been owning it for many years now. But it was

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 3>a mistake as opposed to an attempt to get the

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 3>jury to think about Wait a minute, Alameine didn't testify.

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 3>They knew that that would have been the most fascinating

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 3>part of the trial is to have this very charismatic, silent,

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 3>brooding person testify, and he didn't. But I didn't talk

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 3>about that in my closing I shouldn't have talked about it.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 3>And that was a very long answer, but it's just

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 3>to emphasize how I think in the grand scheme of things,

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 3>minor my mistake was.

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 2>The defense team and the district court judge. I mentioned

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 2>they didn't consider the mistake to be so minor. I

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 2>also asked mc bernie about his reference to a man

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Jamil not standing during the trial. That wasn't a mistake,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 2>he said, not at all.

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't owe him respect. I treated him as I

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 3>ought to, and he got a phenomenal defense team, great judge,

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and a very very fair trial. The fact that I

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 3>didn't hold his hand and tell him I thought he

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 3>was a swell guy. I don't lose sleep over that one.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 2>After less than a day of deliberation, the jury found

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a man Jamil guilty on all accounts. But the trial,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't over yet. A man Jamil and his defense team,

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 2>they still had to fight to keep him alive.

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 7>And now you have to come in front of that

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 7>same jury and say, Okay, let's assume you got it right.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 7>Let's assume you made the correct decision. I have a

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 7>second argument for you. He should live.

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 2>That on the next episode of Radical. Radical is a

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 2>production of Camside Media, Tenderfoot TV, and iHeart Podcasts. Radical

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 2>was reported and written by Johnnykauffman and me Mosey's Secret

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Johnnykaufman is our senior producer. Sheba Joseph is our associate producer.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Editing by Eric Benson, Johnny Kaufman, Emily Martinez and Matt Cher.

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Fact checking by Sophie Hurwitz, Kayln Lynch and Layla Dos.

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Original music by Kyle Murdoch and by Ray Murray of

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Organized Noise. Sound design and mixing by Kevin Seaman. Recording

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 2>by Ewan led trom Ewen and Sheba Joseph. Campside Media's

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 2>operations team is Doug Slaywan, Ashley Warren, Elijah Papes, Destiny Dingle,

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and Sabina Mera. The executive producers at Campside Media are

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Josh Dean Vanessa, Gregoriatis, Adam Hoff, and Matt Cher. For

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Tenderfoot TV, executive producers are Donald Albright and Paine Lindsay.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 2>The executive producers at iHeart Podcasts are Matt Frederick and

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Alex Williams, with additional support from Trevor Young,