WEBVTT - Episode 4: The Donor

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:21.476
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin so Jake.

0:00:21.676 --> 0:00:24.516
<v Speaker 2>When we started reporting this series, I set out to

0:00:24.516 --> 0:00:29.516
<v Speaker 2>speak with one of Santos's donors because I thought it

0:00:29.516 --> 0:00:32.716
<v Speaker 2>would be interesting to talk to someone who chose to

0:00:32.756 --> 0:00:33.676
<v Speaker 2>support Santos.

0:00:34.396 --> 0:00:36.636
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I totally didn't think you're gonna get anyone

0:00:36.676 --> 0:00:37.716
<v Speaker 3>to talk to you on the record.

0:00:38.876 --> 0:00:42.876
<v Speaker 2>Me too, But also, I mean, Santos's donors play a

0:00:42.916 --> 0:00:46.036
<v Speaker 2>significant role in the indictments against him, so I was

0:00:46.076 --> 0:00:49.556
<v Speaker 2>hopeful I would get someone on the record. And now,

0:00:49.636 --> 0:00:53.876
<v Speaker 2>with George Santos pleading guilty in federal court, we won't

0:00:53.876 --> 0:00:57.436
<v Speaker 2>have a trial, and so there's many people we won't

0:00:57.436 --> 0:01:02.916
<v Speaker 2>hear from. But today you're gonna hear from someone who

0:01:03.316 --> 0:01:06.956
<v Speaker 2>was subpoenaed, someone who was expecting to have to testify

0:01:07.036 --> 0:01:12.796
<v Speaker 2>about George Santos, who once upon a time was his ally.

0:01:14.436 --> 0:01:19.516
<v Speaker 4>I met George at an event in Maddictuck, out east

0:01:19.636 --> 0:01:25.076
<v Speaker 4>on Long Island, probably in twenty twenty one. It was hot,

0:01:25.156 --> 0:01:26.516
<v Speaker 4>so it must have been the summer.

0:01:27.276 --> 0:01:28.716
<v Speaker 1>This is Kathy Soref.

0:01:29.476 --> 0:01:33.156
<v Speaker 4>It was an event that was held by someone I

0:01:33.196 --> 0:01:36.876
<v Speaker 4>didn't know, but I had been invited to this, probably

0:01:36.956 --> 0:01:44.236
<v Speaker 4>because of my history of supporting conservative candidates.

0:01:44.796 --> 0:01:48.076
<v Speaker 2>She's a Republican donor who lives on Long Island on

0:01:48.116 --> 0:01:48.676
<v Speaker 2>the north.

0:01:48.436 --> 0:01:51.316
<v Speaker 3>Shore, the North Shore like Gatsby Country.

0:01:51.556 --> 0:01:52.476
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly.

0:01:53.596 --> 0:01:59.076
<v Speaker 2>Kathy has voted for every Republican presidential candidate since Gerald Ford.

0:01:59.596 --> 0:02:02.916
<v Speaker 2>When I interviewed Kathy at her house, there was a

0:02:02.956 --> 0:02:05.996
<v Speaker 2>lot going on. I got the sense that Kathy's house

0:02:06.276 --> 0:02:11.716
<v Speaker 2>is always buzzing with activity. And also just me calling

0:02:11.756 --> 0:02:15.476
<v Speaker 2>it a house is really underselling it, because this place

0:02:15.596 --> 0:02:16.076
<v Speaker 2>was massive.

0:02:16.636 --> 0:02:17.396
<v Speaker 1>Outside.

0:02:17.716 --> 0:02:21.836
<v Speaker 2>There are these colorful sculptures of animals all over the property,

0:02:21.956 --> 0:02:26.756
<v Speaker 2>like think pink, blue, purple. The house is at the

0:02:26.916 --> 0:02:30.996
<v Speaker 2>end of a private road, and when I parked outside,

0:02:31.076 --> 0:02:34.396
<v Speaker 2>I noticed there was room to park. I guess at

0:02:34.476 --> 0:02:37.076
<v Speaker 2>least ten cars outside the front door.

0:02:38.276 --> 0:02:40.676
<v Speaker 4>What do you call the house the Villa Gorilla?

0:02:40.876 --> 0:02:42.396
<v Speaker 1>Where did that name come from?

0:02:42.956 --> 0:02:47.356
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's disputed. My nephews take credit for it, but

0:02:47.796 --> 0:02:51.196
<v Speaker 4>I think that Douglas named it that after a Warren

0:02:51.316 --> 0:02:52.036
<v Speaker 4>Zevon saw.

0:02:52.676 --> 0:02:56.596
<v Speaker 2>Douglas is her husband. So all this to say, she's

0:02:56.636 --> 0:02:59.756
<v Speaker 2>got a great house for parties. Anyway, back to the

0:02:59.796 --> 0:03:04.316
<v Speaker 2>moment when Kathy first met George Santos. She told me

0:03:04.436 --> 0:03:07.956
<v Speaker 2>that before she actually met him in person, at that

0:03:08.196 --> 0:03:11.676
<v Speaker 2>Republican fundrase r out east on the Island, she got

0:03:11.676 --> 0:03:12.276
<v Speaker 2>a phone call.

0:03:13.116 --> 0:03:15.556
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how much of a coincidence it was,

0:03:15.636 --> 0:03:19.596
<v Speaker 4>but I received a phone call from George asking for

0:03:20.716 --> 0:03:25.196
<v Speaker 4>money because he was announcing his candidacy.

0:03:25.396 --> 0:03:27.636
<v Speaker 3>Before that even met. He just like cold called.

0:03:27.396 --> 0:03:30.476
<v Speaker 1>Her, yes, well, out of the blue.

0:03:30.636 --> 0:03:33.476
<v Speaker 3>Like he'd just gotten a whiff of what she might

0:03:33.516 --> 0:03:34.196
<v Speaker 3>do for him.

0:03:34.756 --> 0:03:35.516
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:03:36.316 --> 0:03:39.876
<v Speaker 2>And then when she arrives at the fundraiser, guess who

0:03:39.916 --> 0:03:40.676
<v Speaker 2>she's sitting with.

0:03:41.276 --> 0:03:45.956
<v Speaker 4>We were seated at the same table. George described himself

0:03:46.116 --> 0:03:50.876
<v Speaker 4>as being independently well to do and felt that he

0:03:51.316 --> 0:03:55.876
<v Speaker 4>it was his civic duty to participate in public service.

0:03:56.356 --> 0:03:58.756
<v Speaker 2>And Kathy told me that she liked him even from

0:03:58.756 --> 0:04:03.156
<v Speaker 2>that first meeting, even if he wasn't her perfect candidate.

0:04:03.676 --> 0:04:12.596
<v Speaker 4>George is not your average type and certainly not my

0:04:13.036 --> 0:04:18.396
<v Speaker 4>ideal political candidate, but for a Republican running in Democrat

0:04:18.596 --> 0:04:23.116
<v Speaker 4>New York, I thought he would be he would win. So,

0:04:23.716 --> 0:04:28.156
<v Speaker 4>you know, I said that I would support him and

0:04:28.236 --> 0:04:32.036
<v Speaker 4>give him, you know, a couple of events which I

0:04:32.156 --> 0:04:35.796
<v Speaker 4>did to help him introduce him to other people. So

0:04:35.916 --> 0:04:40.036
<v Speaker 4>I expended a lot of my own personal political capital,

0:04:40.876 --> 0:04:46.596
<v Speaker 4>meaning my friends and connections who participate in conservative politics,

0:04:47.236 --> 0:04:50.916
<v Speaker 4>and they supported George for the same reason that I did.

0:04:51.956 --> 0:04:54.156
<v Speaker 3>What does she mean by that? What is her reason?

0:04:54.476 --> 0:04:56.996
<v Speaker 2>I think she meant that he was a candidate who

0:04:56.996 --> 0:05:00.356
<v Speaker 2>could maybe win in New York and in that district.

0:05:00.836 --> 0:05:02.956
<v Speaker 1>You know, she found him quite charming.

0:05:03.876 --> 0:05:06.436
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's kind of a weird guy, but he's kind

0:05:06.476 --> 0:05:13.716
<v Speaker 4>of oddly charismatics, whip it smart, a very very quick thinking,

0:05:15.116 --> 0:05:20.356
<v Speaker 4>he has a lot of social references, and he's very palsy.

0:05:21.716 --> 0:05:24.556
<v Speaker 2>And Kathy isn't the only one who saw something promising

0:05:24.756 --> 0:05:28.996
<v Speaker 2>in this new young candidate. She was just one of

0:05:29.436 --> 0:05:33.876
<v Speaker 2>many donors who contributed to the Santos campaign. Donors who

0:05:33.916 --> 0:05:38.156
<v Speaker 2>were deceived and in some cases defrauded, And these donors

0:05:38.156 --> 0:05:40.156
<v Speaker 2>have played a huge role in his unraveling.

0:05:41.196 --> 0:05:44.636
<v Speaker 1>The man who flew under the radar for so long and.

0:05:44.636 --> 0:05:47.716
<v Speaker 2>Seemingly got away with a lot of lies and half

0:05:47.756 --> 0:05:52.676
<v Speaker 2>truths and deceit has finally had to face some real consequences.

0:05:54.756 --> 0:06:04.396
<v Speaker 2>This is Deep Cover George Santos Episode four, The Donor. So,

0:06:05.236 --> 0:06:10.076
<v Speaker 2>as you're aware, Santos was indicted twice, but I want

0:06:10.116 --> 0:06:13.116
<v Speaker 2>to talk for a moment about that first indictment that

0:06:13.236 --> 0:06:15.316
<v Speaker 2>came down in May of twenty twenty three.

0:06:16.596 --> 0:06:17.356
<v Speaker 1>We were shocked.

0:06:17.956 --> 0:06:23.236
<v Speaker 5>My phone is literally blowing up in the worst way possible.

0:06:23.796 --> 0:06:26.676
<v Speaker 5>Inquiries about saying, is George going to jail? What's going on?

0:06:26.876 --> 0:06:30.596
<v Speaker 5>And it's just I thought, my reputation is so screwed.

0:06:31.316 --> 0:06:36.516
<v Speaker 2>That's Nesa Woomer. She was Santos's communications director. So this

0:06:36.636 --> 0:06:41.756
<v Speaker 2>indictment is for thirteen counts. The charges range from money

0:06:41.796 --> 0:06:47.036
<v Speaker 2>laundering to stealing public money, wire fraud, and making false

0:06:47.076 --> 0:06:51.756
<v Speaker 2>statements to Congress. And it's in that moment that everyone

0:06:51.836 --> 0:06:55.316
<v Speaker 2>can see for the first time, really what sort of

0:06:55.476 --> 0:07:00.076
<v Speaker 2>criminal allegations George Santos is facing. These are things that

0:07:00.116 --> 0:07:03.636
<v Speaker 2>go beyond the stories that he told about his personal

0:07:03.676 --> 0:07:07.916
<v Speaker 2>life or some fabrications on his resume. A lot had

0:07:07.956 --> 0:07:12.116
<v Speaker 2>been speculated. Things come into sharp focus when the charges

0:07:12.156 --> 0:07:12.516
<v Speaker 2>come out.

0:07:13.236 --> 0:07:17.556
<v Speaker 5>I'm disgusted. I'm thoroughly disgusted. I thought, okay, now we're

0:07:17.556 --> 0:07:21.316
<v Speaker 5>in you know, wire fraud and money laundering. You know,

0:07:22.076 --> 0:07:24.756
<v Speaker 5>respect is gone. It became it was too much and

0:07:24.796 --> 0:07:25.796
<v Speaker 5>it became too toxic.

0:07:26.436 --> 0:07:30.836
<v Speaker 2>And directly following that indictment, Santos faces a vote from

0:07:30.836 --> 0:07:35.756
<v Speaker 2>the House. Someone introduces a resolution to expel him. Essentially

0:07:35.756 --> 0:07:38.516
<v Speaker 2>to oust him from Congress, and I'm.

0:07:38.436 --> 0:07:44.316
<v Speaker 6>Personally in favor of this individual's expulsion from this House. Regretably, however,

0:07:44.916 --> 0:07:47.236
<v Speaker 6>I'm in the understanding that we currently do not have

0:07:47.276 --> 0:07:50.276
<v Speaker 6>the two thirds support from members of this House to

0:07:50.396 --> 0:07:51.436
<v Speaker 6>expel that individual.

0:07:51.996 --> 0:07:54.396
<v Speaker 2>So, just to break down what's happening here, you're hearing

0:07:54.396 --> 0:07:58.636
<v Speaker 2>from a Republican also from New York, who is not

0:07:58.676 --> 0:08:01.796
<v Speaker 2>happy with Santos. But at this moment in time, the

0:08:01.836 --> 0:08:05.116
<v Speaker 2>Republicans have the majority in the House, and it seems

0:08:05.116 --> 0:08:08.716
<v Speaker 2>like politically there are quite a few Republicans who don't

0:08:08.716 --> 0:08:10.476
<v Speaker 2>want to put that into jeopardy.

0:08:10.916 --> 0:08:12.436
<v Speaker 3>Just to be clear here, this is a district that

0:08:12.476 --> 0:08:15.076
<v Speaker 3>could swing back to blue in theory.

0:08:15.196 --> 0:08:18.476
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so the House votes to keep Santos in office

0:08:19.276 --> 0:08:23.396
<v Speaker 2>for now. But in this moment, Nesa is done. You know,

0:08:23.476 --> 0:08:26.476
<v Speaker 2>she's asked around for advice and they've all basically told

0:08:26.516 --> 0:08:27.196
<v Speaker 2>her the same thing.

0:08:28.236 --> 0:08:28.956
<v Speaker 4>They just said.

0:08:29.516 --> 0:08:31.636
<v Speaker 5>If I were you, or if I was advising a client,

0:08:32.196 --> 0:08:35.596
<v Speaker 5>I would resign. The longer you stay, the longer it's

0:08:35.636 --> 0:08:36.516
<v Speaker 5>going to hurt you.

0:08:37.876 --> 0:08:42.036
<v Speaker 2>NASA resigns right after that unsuccessful vote to oust Santos

0:08:42.036 --> 0:08:42.716
<v Speaker 2>from Congress.

0:08:43.396 --> 0:08:47.156
<v Speaker 3>So I'm curious back in twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two,

0:08:47.996 --> 0:08:51.996
<v Speaker 3>the donors that George Santos was courting people like Kathy.

0:08:52.196 --> 0:08:55.676
<v Speaker 3>Do you get the sense that she had any idea

0:08:55.956 --> 0:08:57.476
<v Speaker 3>what this guy was really up to.

0:08:58.156 --> 0:09:00.956
<v Speaker 2>Kathy has said to me that she had no clue

0:09:01.116 --> 0:09:04.756
<v Speaker 2>about what George Santos was up to, and I believe

0:09:04.796 --> 0:09:07.036
<v Speaker 2>her on that. I mean, she had no reason not

0:09:07.076 --> 0:09:10.276
<v Speaker 2>to trust him in that moment. I do get the

0:09:10.276 --> 0:09:15.276
<v Speaker 2>sense that Kathy and George Santos formed a friendship in

0:09:15.316 --> 0:09:16.556
<v Speaker 2>the time that they knew each other.

0:09:17.556 --> 0:09:21.316
<v Speaker 4>He came to my house several times. He would drop.

0:09:21.436 --> 0:09:26.756
<v Speaker 4>He claimed to live near here. He told me that

0:09:27.236 --> 0:09:30.596
<v Speaker 4>his mother died of cancer. He told me that his

0:09:30.716 --> 0:09:31.756
<v Speaker 4>mother went to Harvard.

0:09:32.756 --> 0:09:34.396
<v Speaker 1>He told you that his mother went to Harvard.

0:09:34.196 --> 0:09:38.956
<v Speaker 4>Yes, he did. And he also told me that he

0:09:39.076 --> 0:09:40.596
<v Speaker 4>had survived cancer.

0:09:41.516 --> 0:09:43.476
<v Speaker 1>That George had survived cancer.

0:09:43.876 --> 0:09:47.276
<v Speaker 4>Right, he did tell me that, did he give? I

0:09:47.356 --> 0:09:49.756
<v Speaker 4>didn't go into it because when someone says, oh, yes,

0:09:49.836 --> 0:09:52.876
<v Speaker 4>I'm a cancer survivor, I didn't say, well, what kind

0:09:52.956 --> 0:09:56.076
<v Speaker 4>did you have? I just was kind of stunned. I said, oh,

0:09:56.076 --> 0:10:00.556
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry. That added to his story and appeal that

0:10:00.596 --> 0:10:01.676
<v Speaker 4>he's a survivor.

0:10:01.836 --> 0:10:04.876
<v Speaker 3>You see It's like it's like a jazz musician. He's

0:10:04.916 --> 0:10:08.796
<v Speaker 3>just improvising. I haven't heard these these Santos stories yet.

0:10:08.796 --> 0:10:12.396
<v Speaker 2>This is yes, wow, yeah, this is the first time

0:10:12.396 --> 0:10:14.636
<v Speaker 2>I had heard a lot of this too. And I

0:10:14.676 --> 0:10:17.916
<v Speaker 2>think that maybe some of these stories were cherry picked

0:10:17.916 --> 0:10:19.116
<v Speaker 2>for Kathy.

0:10:19.196 --> 0:10:20.396
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean that you think that some of

0:10:20.436 --> 0:10:22.316
<v Speaker 3>these stories might have been cherry picked for Kathy?

0:10:23.196 --> 0:10:27.276
<v Speaker 2>Like these are things that George Santos thought would impress Kathy,

0:10:28.396 --> 0:10:31.196
<v Speaker 2>and I should say. Kathy would later tell me it

0:10:31.236 --> 0:10:35.516
<v Speaker 2>was actually Yale that his mother attended, not Harvard, and

0:10:35.556 --> 0:10:39.276
<v Speaker 2>that she actually isn't all that impressed by an Ivy

0:10:39.316 --> 0:10:44.756
<v Speaker 2>League education. But regardless, I see this as George Santos

0:10:45.076 --> 0:10:49.596
<v Speaker 2>trying to play the role trying to impress Kathy. I see,

0:10:49.756 --> 0:10:53.396
<v Speaker 2>And George needs someone like Kathy to like him, right,

0:10:53.516 --> 0:10:57.396
<v Speaker 2>because Kathy is a door to connections to more money,

0:10:57.876 --> 0:11:01.476
<v Speaker 2>Which brings us back to this event that Kathy decides

0:11:01.516 --> 0:11:04.836
<v Speaker 2>she's going to throw for George at the Villa Gorilla.

0:11:05.676 --> 0:11:08.876
<v Speaker 2>She couldn't remember the exact date, but thinks it was

0:11:09.236 --> 0:11:11.996
<v Speaker 2>ing the twenty twenty two campaign. She told me she

0:11:12.076 --> 0:11:15.196
<v Speaker 2>sent out printed invites, and of course I wanted to

0:11:15.196 --> 0:11:16.196
<v Speaker 2>hear every detail.

0:11:17.636 --> 0:11:21.396
<v Speaker 1>Santos stood at the door. He was like the welcome wagon.

0:11:21.916 --> 0:11:24.316
<v Speaker 4>He was greeting everyone, and we were standing in the

0:11:24.356 --> 0:11:27.356
<v Speaker 4>front hall and I would introduce him to everyone. It

0:11:27.476 --> 0:11:30.876
<v Speaker 4>was casual. Then we were inside and outside, and then

0:11:31.116 --> 0:11:33.676
<v Speaker 4>he gave this talk in the living room. George was

0:11:34.036 --> 0:11:35.316
<v Speaker 4>very funny and engaging.

0:11:35.956 --> 0:11:38.476
<v Speaker 3>It's funny the image of him standing at the door

0:11:38.516 --> 0:11:42.116
<v Speaker 3>to this mansion as if he were welcoming guests to

0:11:42.196 --> 0:11:44.876
<v Speaker 3>his own home. I mean it just that seems so

0:11:44.996 --> 0:11:47.636
<v Speaker 3>believable to me and so kind of fitting for this

0:11:47.716 --> 0:11:48.956
<v Speaker 3>guy's aspirations.

0:11:49.316 --> 0:11:50.596
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and who.

0:11:50.396 --> 0:11:53.476
<v Speaker 3>Were the people at Villa Gorilla that evening?

0:11:54.356 --> 0:11:59.116
<v Speaker 4>My focus is next generation, So we had quite a

0:11:59.116 --> 0:12:03.716
<v Speaker 4>few young people here from the area. Maybe we had

0:12:03.756 --> 0:12:07.236
<v Speaker 4>thirty people. But I'm sure he raised a fair amount

0:12:07.236 --> 0:12:12.556
<v Speaker 4>of money. I had several of my local, longtime friends

0:12:12.596 --> 0:12:17.556
<v Speaker 4>who showed up for it. It was tremendously horrible for

0:12:17.676 --> 0:12:19.076
<v Speaker 4>me of what happened.

0:12:21.676 --> 0:12:25.196
<v Speaker 2>What happened, meaning when she eventually learned what Santos was

0:12:25.236 --> 0:12:29.516
<v Speaker 2>really up to. When the New York Times story came out.

0:12:29.076 --> 0:12:32.876
<v Speaker 4>The guy hood winked everyone. For me, I'm furious because

0:12:32.996 --> 0:12:35.996
<v Speaker 4>I spent some of my friends that I asked to

0:12:36.036 --> 0:12:39.636
<v Speaker 4>support George. I mean all of them, they know me,

0:12:39.876 --> 0:12:42.596
<v Speaker 4>so they're you know, and they were hoodwinked and know

0:12:42.676 --> 0:12:46.076
<v Speaker 4>that I was hoodwinked. But they were upset that they

0:12:46.116 --> 0:12:50.316
<v Speaker 4>were dragged into this and it was my responsibility.

0:12:50.676 --> 0:12:50.916
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:12:51.036 --> 0:12:53.876
<v Speaker 4>I am mad at myself for not doing my own

0:12:53.956 --> 0:12:54.756
<v Speaker 4>due diligence.

0:12:56.196 --> 0:12:58.796
<v Speaker 3>Does Kathy see herself as a victim?

0:13:00.236 --> 0:13:04.076
<v Speaker 2>Kathy told me that she considers herself that she was

0:13:04.116 --> 0:13:08.036
<v Speaker 2>defrauded by George Santos, but she does not think that Santos,

0:13:08.676 --> 0:13:11.516
<v Speaker 2>you know, stole from her. She does not think that

0:13:12.676 --> 0:13:16.116
<v Speaker 2>her credit card information was misused in any way. And

0:13:16.996 --> 0:13:22.236
<v Speaker 2>the reason that's irrelevant distinction is because Santo's did steal

0:13:22.516 --> 0:13:25.756
<v Speaker 2>from some of his donors by charging their credit cards

0:13:26.396 --> 0:13:30.196
<v Speaker 2>without their consent for large sums of money.

0:13:31.556 --> 0:13:35.716
<v Speaker 4>He did not steal from me. I probably in total,

0:13:35.876 --> 0:13:38.876
<v Speaker 4>besides the and it probably cost me a few thousand

0:13:38.956 --> 0:13:42.836
<v Speaker 4>dollars to give him an event. I probably in addition,

0:13:44.276 --> 0:13:46.236
<v Speaker 4>maybe it was about six thousand dollars.

0:13:46.436 --> 0:13:48.916
<v Speaker 2>I've seen Newsday did like a review of federal election data,

0:13:48.956 --> 0:13:50.836
<v Speaker 2>and I think they pegged you at like seven thousand.

0:13:51.156 --> 0:13:53.596
<v Speaker 4>Well maybe some you know, I don't really keep track

0:13:53.636 --> 0:13:55.956
<v Speaker 4>of it. I gave him a check. I think maybe

0:13:55.956 --> 0:13:58.676
<v Speaker 4>one time I gave him a credit card. I don't remember.

0:13:58.796 --> 0:14:00.396
<v Speaker 4>I don't I'd have to go through all of my

0:14:00.436 --> 0:14:03.476
<v Speaker 4>right papers again. But it was, you know, nominal, like

0:14:03.516 --> 0:14:05.036
<v Speaker 4>one thousand dollars at a time.

0:14:05.716 --> 0:14:07.636
<v Speaker 2>I have to ask the question, do you know of

0:14:07.716 --> 0:14:12.516
<v Speaker 2>anyone who attended a fundraiser at your house may have

0:14:12.556 --> 0:14:13.836
<v Speaker 2>had their credit card information?

0:14:14.156 --> 0:14:17.236
<v Speaker 4>I don't know for a fact any of that.

0:14:18.556 --> 0:14:22.076
<v Speaker 2>So to be clear, Kathy does not know if anyone

0:14:22.196 --> 0:14:26.116
<v Speaker 2>in her orbit that she had at the fundraiser was

0:14:26.236 --> 0:14:29.756
<v Speaker 2>part of this credit card fraud scheme, whether they were

0:14:29.916 --> 0:14:33.116
<v Speaker 2>targets for that. But I can say that the indictment

0:14:33.516 --> 0:14:40.556
<v Speaker 2>lays out some other examples in detail, and Santos goes

0:14:40.596 --> 0:14:45.196
<v Speaker 2>on a spending spree with his donor's credit cards. More

0:14:45.276 --> 0:14:46.836
<v Speaker 2>on that after the break.

0:14:55.716 --> 0:14:59.676
<v Speaker 3>So credit card fraud, it's a pretty big deal. How

0:14:59.756 --> 0:15:01.916
<v Speaker 3>much are we talking about money wise here?

0:15:02.436 --> 0:15:06.196
<v Speaker 2>So there's one example in particular that's laid out in

0:15:06.236 --> 0:15:11.156
<v Speaker 2>the indictment, And to protect this person's ident, it's anonymized,

0:15:11.236 --> 0:15:16.236
<v Speaker 2>so they're only referred to as contributor number twelve. So

0:15:16.636 --> 0:15:20.556
<v Speaker 2>this all begins when contributor number twelve sends their credit

0:15:20.556 --> 0:15:25.116
<v Speaker 2>card info to the Santos campaign and the Santos team

0:15:25.276 --> 0:15:29.156
<v Speaker 2>charges it for more than they should on that day.

0:15:29.956 --> 0:15:32.596
<v Speaker 2>And this is an issue for two reasons, the first

0:15:32.636 --> 0:15:37.836
<v Speaker 2>being that contributor number twelve did not authorize this overcharge,

0:15:38.076 --> 0:15:42.316
<v Speaker 2>but also it's over the limit of what's allowed, which

0:15:42.836 --> 0:15:46.956
<v Speaker 2>back in twenty twenty two was twenty nine hundred dollars

0:15:47.516 --> 0:15:50.716
<v Speaker 2>that you could give once for the primary and then

0:15:50.956 --> 0:15:52.316
<v Speaker 2>again in the general election.

0:15:52.676 --> 0:15:55.676
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so in theory, that's fifty eight hundred for the two.

0:15:56.676 --> 0:15:59.676
<v Speaker 3>Now what's the deal with contributor number twelve? How much

0:16:00.076 --> 0:16:01.796
<v Speaker 3>over was this person charged?

0:16:02.636 --> 0:16:07.396
<v Speaker 2>So Contributor number twelve was charged fifteen thousand, eight hundred dollars,

0:16:07.436 --> 0:16:12.116
<v Speaker 2>so almost sixteen thousand in contributions, which is ten thousand

0:16:12.236 --> 0:16:14.276
<v Speaker 2>over what is technically allowed.

0:16:15.196 --> 0:16:21.476
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, is that is that a mistake? You

0:16:21.636 --> 0:16:26.596
<v Speaker 3>want to say, like, right, did this happen more than once?

0:16:27.596 --> 0:16:28.076
<v Speaker 1>It did?

0:16:29.316 --> 0:16:35.516
<v Speaker 2>So Santos and his team attempted over forty thousand dollars

0:16:35.556 --> 0:16:38.396
<v Speaker 2>of contributions from Contributor twelve over the course of a

0:16:38.436 --> 0:16:42.756
<v Speaker 2>few months, so they repeatedly charged his card. And then

0:16:44.076 --> 0:16:48.716
<v Speaker 2>we see an even more brazen act when the indictment

0:16:48.756 --> 0:16:51.756
<v Speaker 2>lays out that Santos just started sending money to his

0:16:51.796 --> 0:16:58.036
<v Speaker 2>own personal account directly, again without any authorization from Contributor

0:16:58.116 --> 0:17:03.396
<v Speaker 2>number twelve. So in one case, they used their credit

0:17:03.396 --> 0:17:08.356
<v Speaker 2>card billing information to transfer more than eleven thousand dollars

0:17:08.436 --> 0:17:10.916
<v Speaker 2>to Santos's personal bank account.

0:17:11.276 --> 0:17:12.956
<v Speaker 3>He's like a kid in a candy store with no

0:17:12.956 --> 0:17:14.276
<v Speaker 3>one watching, it seems like.

0:17:15.236 --> 0:17:17.596
<v Speaker 2>And this is also the first time in the indictment

0:17:17.636 --> 0:17:22.916
<v Speaker 2>we hear about something that prosecutors call company number one.

0:17:24.036 --> 0:17:26.436
<v Speaker 2>At a certain point during the twenty twenty two campaign,

0:17:27.476 --> 0:17:31.516
<v Speaker 2>Santos uses the credit card billing information of Contributor twelve,

0:17:32.596 --> 0:17:36.956
<v Speaker 2>charges twelve thousand dollars and it hits the account of

0:17:37.116 --> 0:17:38.196
<v Speaker 2>Company number one.

0:17:38.756 --> 0:17:39.956
<v Speaker 3>What is company number one?

0:17:40.636 --> 0:17:44.396
<v Speaker 2>So the House Ethics Report and other reporting has identified

0:17:44.436 --> 0:17:50.716
<v Speaker 2>Company number one as red Stone Strategies. Red Stone Strategies

0:17:51.396 --> 0:17:54.636
<v Speaker 2>is all over this indictment as company number one.

0:17:54.676 --> 0:17:57.676
<v Speaker 3>And let me guess it was formed just before the election.

0:17:58.756 --> 0:18:02.316
<v Speaker 2>It was formed in November twenty twenty one, so yes,

0:18:02.636 --> 0:18:05.356
<v Speaker 2>around the time that Santos is mounting his campaign for

0:18:05.396 --> 0:18:06.516
<v Speaker 2>the twenty twenty two election.

0:18:07.116 --> 0:18:08.236
<v Speaker 1>It was formed in Florida.

0:18:08.556 --> 0:18:12.196
<v Speaker 2>Santos is a major stakeholder of Redstone Strategies gets tried

0:18:12.236 --> 0:18:15.276
<v Speaker 2>to distance himself, but his fingerprints appear to be all

0:18:15.276 --> 0:18:18.716
<v Speaker 2>over this company. And so, basically, going back to contributor

0:18:18.836 --> 0:18:21.716
<v Speaker 2>number twelve for a moment, they are charged twelve thousand

0:18:21.756 --> 0:18:26.476
<v Speaker 2>dollars to Redstone Strategies, and then it seems like what

0:18:26.596 --> 0:18:29.236
<v Speaker 2>prosecutors allegend the indictment is that most of that twelve

0:18:29.276 --> 0:18:35.276
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars goes from Redstone Strategies directly to Santos's personal

0:18:35.276 --> 0:18:35.876
<v Speaker 2>bank account.

0:18:35.996 --> 0:18:42.996
<v Speaker 3>Again, okay, so I have a question about contributor number twelve.

0:18:43.556 --> 0:18:46.756
<v Speaker 3>How did this person not notice that their credit card

0:18:46.876 --> 0:18:51.996
<v Speaker 3>was being charged excessively by tens of thousands of dollars?

0:18:52.036 --> 0:18:53.996
<v Speaker 3>Like at my house when I see like an Amazon

0:18:54.116 --> 0:18:57.436
<v Speaker 3>charge for nine ninety nine that I don't recognize, I'm like, huh, so,

0:18:57.516 --> 0:18:58.476
<v Speaker 3>what's going on here?

0:18:59.356 --> 0:19:01.316
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good question.

0:19:01.396 --> 0:19:03.956
<v Speaker 2>I wish I had an answer for you, okay, And

0:19:03.996 --> 0:19:06.876
<v Speaker 2>I should say that there are two other donors who

0:19:06.916 --> 0:19:09.996
<v Speaker 2>each made contributions of twenty five one thousand dollars to

0:19:10.076 --> 0:19:15.316
<v Speaker 2>Redstone Strategies. That is a problem for multiple reasons, and

0:19:16.036 --> 0:19:20.676
<v Speaker 2>Redstone Strategies was not set up to accept political contributions,

0:19:21.396 --> 0:19:24.236
<v Speaker 2>it was not actually registered with the proper authorities.

0:19:24.876 --> 0:19:25.996
<v Speaker 3>Where does that money go?

0:19:26.796 --> 0:19:29.116
<v Speaker 2>So they were told that money would go to pay

0:19:29.196 --> 0:19:34.116
<v Speaker 2>for advertising, but it looks like that money almost all

0:19:34.156 --> 0:19:37.276
<v Speaker 2>of it, So fifty thousand dollars total went directly to

0:19:37.316 --> 0:19:40.836
<v Speaker 2>Santosi's personal accounts. In the indictment, they say that that

0:19:40.956 --> 0:19:45.996
<v Speaker 2>went to cash withdrawals, personal purchases of luxury designer clothing,

0:19:46.436 --> 0:19:50.916
<v Speaker 2>credit card payments, a car payment, payments on personal debts.

0:19:51.236 --> 0:19:53.876
<v Speaker 2>The House report gets even more specific. They claimed that

0:19:53.956 --> 0:19:56.676
<v Speaker 2>some of that fifty thousand dollars was actually spent at

0:19:56.796 --> 0:20:00.556
<v Speaker 2>or Mez, the fancy designer store, over four thousand dollars.

0:20:00.516 --> 0:20:02.956
<v Speaker 3>Right, which is a legitimate business expense if you're going

0:20:02.996 --> 0:20:05.396
<v Speaker 3>to convinced owners at the Villa Gorilla that you are

0:20:05.436 --> 0:20:05.756
<v Speaker 3>the man.

0:20:07.036 --> 0:20:10.196
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe he thought that that was just you know,

0:20:10.276 --> 0:20:13.916
<v Speaker 2>so much of Santos's campaign was trying to keep up

0:20:13.916 --> 0:20:18.676
<v Speaker 2>appearances and court the Kathyes of the world right and

0:20:18.756 --> 0:20:21.796
<v Speaker 2>show them that he was on their level, and so

0:20:21.876 --> 0:20:25.476
<v Speaker 2>maybe he felt like he needed to engage in this

0:20:25.556 --> 0:20:30.076
<v Speaker 2>kind of spending to keep up this persona By the

0:20:30.116 --> 0:20:33.236
<v Speaker 2>time that that second indictment is out and the House

0:20:33.276 --> 0:20:37.116
<v Speaker 2>ethics report has been published. A lot of people are

0:20:37.156 --> 0:20:42.036
<v Speaker 2>just done with George Santos. For at least some Republicans

0:20:42.076 --> 0:20:45.636
<v Speaker 2>in Congress, they've seen enough, and they have one more

0:20:45.716 --> 0:20:51.076
<v Speaker 2>vote to oust him from Congress. In December of twenty twenty.

0:20:50.796 --> 0:20:55.796
<v Speaker 7>Three, two thirds voting in the affirmative, the resolution is adopted.

0:20:55.956 --> 0:20:58.196
<v Speaker 7>The cheer announces to the House that in light of

0:20:58.236 --> 0:21:00.836
<v Speaker 7>the expulsion of the gentleman from New York, mister Santos,

0:21:01.236 --> 0:21:03.556
<v Speaker 7>the whole number of the House is now four hundred

0:21:03.556 --> 0:21:04.036
<v Speaker 7>and thirty four.

0:21:04.876 --> 0:21:08.516
<v Speaker 3>Hold up, Amy, So what does this mean for Republicans

0:21:08.556 --> 0:21:11.076
<v Speaker 3>in the House, Like, what's going to happen with Santos's seat?

0:21:11.716 --> 0:21:14.516
<v Speaker 2>So there was actually already a special election held for

0:21:14.676 --> 0:21:18.916
<v Speaker 2>Santos's seat earlier this year and the Democrat won, so

0:21:20.076 --> 0:21:23.476
<v Speaker 2>ultimately one less Republican in the House because of all

0:21:23.516 --> 0:21:23.756
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:21:25.636 --> 0:21:27.756
<v Speaker 4>He was working in his own self interest and he

0:21:27.876 --> 0:21:32.956
<v Speaker 4>succeeded bizarrely and becoming a congressman.

0:21:34.036 --> 0:21:36.196
<v Speaker 2>You can still hear Kathy trying to make sense out

0:21:36.196 --> 0:21:41.236
<v Speaker 2>of this, figuring out how this happened and who is

0:21:41.276 --> 0:21:57.556
<v Speaker 2>to blame more on that in a minute, I was

0:21:57.596 --> 0:22:00.396
<v Speaker 2>struck by one thing that Kathy said in particular, towards

0:22:00.396 --> 0:22:02.076
<v Speaker 2>the end of our conversation.

0:22:02.516 --> 0:22:05.556
<v Speaker 4>He would never have won as himself, which is another

0:22:05.956 --> 0:22:12.396
<v Speaker 4>commentary on societ. I mean, George none of himself. He's

0:22:13.036 --> 0:22:15.716
<v Speaker 4>a smart guy. I don't think he went to college,

0:22:15.756 --> 0:22:18.996
<v Speaker 4>but I mean it's I mean, in the future, I

0:22:19.036 --> 0:22:22.396
<v Speaker 4>think that college is going to be passe. And George,

0:22:22.436 --> 0:22:24.876
<v Speaker 4>if he was left to what he could actually do.

0:22:24.996 --> 0:22:28.036
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he's pretty smart and talented, but he didn't

0:22:28.036 --> 0:22:31.956
<v Speaker 4>have the credentials, so he lied about his credentials, and

0:22:31.996 --> 0:22:35.196
<v Speaker 4>he didn't have the money, so he stalled. Or I

0:22:35.236 --> 0:22:38.836
<v Speaker 4>just shouldn't say he stole. He's accused of stealing to

0:22:40.676 --> 0:22:46.196
<v Speaker 4>to you know, it's the old Machiavellian means to an end.

0:22:47.836 --> 0:22:51.956
<v Speaker 3>Well, he never would have won as himself, is what

0:22:52.036 --> 0:22:57.476
<v Speaker 3>she says. Yeah, it's interesting. I mean, if I'm hearing

0:22:57.556 --> 0:23:01.156
<v Speaker 3>her right, she's almost saying like maybe, like at some

0:23:01.196 --> 0:23:03.276
<v Speaker 3>point in the future, the things that he needed, like

0:23:03.516 --> 0:23:06.036
<v Speaker 3>going to college, is going to become passe. It's not

0:23:06.076 --> 0:23:08.036
<v Speaker 3>going to be this kind of bar to entry. She's

0:23:08.116 --> 0:23:10.996
<v Speaker 3>kind of seeing future where some of the old benchmarks

0:23:10.996 --> 0:23:14.316
<v Speaker 3>for what makes a good congressman or whatever or not there.

0:23:14.956 --> 0:23:18.356
<v Speaker 3>And it's almost like she's saying he was ahead of

0:23:18.356 --> 0:23:20.036
<v Speaker 3>his time and so he just had to lie to

0:23:20.076 --> 0:23:23.076
<v Speaker 3>get around the kind of bars to entry that existed,

0:23:23.436 --> 0:23:25.676
<v Speaker 3>but that he actually was smart enough and charming enough

0:23:25.716 --> 0:23:30.036
<v Speaker 3>to that he had those kind of core aspects of

0:23:30.036 --> 0:23:31.676
<v Speaker 3>what it would take, but he just couldn't get in

0:23:31.716 --> 0:23:35.556
<v Speaker 3>because he didn't meet these other thresholds that are we

0:23:35.596 --> 0:23:39.236
<v Speaker 3>still insist upon. I don't know. It's like she's almost

0:23:39.276 --> 0:23:40.876
<v Speaker 3>like sympathetic to him in this moment.

0:23:41.756 --> 0:23:42.436
<v Speaker 1>Oh, completely.

0:23:42.476 --> 0:23:46.596
<v Speaker 2>And I found this fascinating because in this moment she's

0:23:46.676 --> 0:23:49.436
<v Speaker 2>very self aware, I think, and that's what I hear

0:23:49.556 --> 0:23:52.956
<v Speaker 2>is just you know, society wouldn't have accepted him as himself.

0:23:53.516 --> 0:23:56.836
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because she says it's a commentary on society

0:23:56.996 --> 0:23:59.836
<v Speaker 3>that society never would have accepted George for who he was.

0:24:00.196 --> 0:24:02.116
<v Speaker 3>But what she's really saying is I never would have

0:24:02.116 --> 0:24:04.556
<v Speaker 3>accepted George for who he was. I mean she in

0:24:04.596 --> 0:24:07.996
<v Speaker 3>this case, she is the gatekeeper. Yeah, she's the gatekeeper

0:24:07.996 --> 0:24:13.076
<v Speaker 3>of this society completely. And I am certain, or I

0:24:13.116 --> 0:24:16.676
<v Speaker 3>feel certain, that George Santos understood that deep in his bones.

0:24:17.396 --> 0:24:20.836
<v Speaker 3>And if that is true, I wonder if he held

0:24:22.476 --> 0:24:27.276
<v Speaker 3>a contempt that fueled his ability and his willingness to

0:24:27.356 --> 0:24:29.276
<v Speaker 3>brazenly lie.

0:24:29.476 --> 0:24:34.116
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're still see, so you're still fixated on the

0:24:34.156 --> 0:24:36.156
<v Speaker 2>why George Santos did this?

0:24:36.796 --> 0:24:40.556
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in the end, that's the question that I think

0:24:40.636 --> 0:24:43.276
<v Speaker 3>is gonna Yeah, that's the question that stays with me.

0:24:43.396 --> 0:24:46.516
<v Speaker 3>At least I keep thinking that, like, maybe there's kind

0:24:46.556 --> 0:24:51.396
<v Speaker 3>of deeper explanations to what he did then maybe at

0:24:51.396 --> 0:24:52.116
<v Speaker 3>first blush it.

0:24:52.116 --> 0:24:56.156
<v Speaker 2>Seems Yeah, Look, I think that it's interesting to parse

0:24:56.196 --> 0:24:58.516
<v Speaker 2>that out, and we could we could spend the next

0:24:58.516 --> 0:25:02.276
<v Speaker 2>twenty years arguing about the why. But for me, the

0:25:02.316 --> 0:25:05.996
<v Speaker 2>more interesting question is how does something like this happen?

0:25:08.036 --> 0:25:11.076
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't think under standing the psychology of George

0:25:11.076 --> 0:25:15.396
<v Speaker 2>Santos is going to prevent the next George Santos. I

0:25:15.436 --> 0:25:18.156
<v Speaker 2>think understanding the forces that put him in this position

0:25:18.556 --> 0:25:22.036
<v Speaker 2>and allowed him to get away with seemingly so many

0:25:23.156 --> 0:25:28.556
<v Speaker 2>lies and crimes without consequence for quite some time that

0:25:28.676 --> 0:25:30.876
<v Speaker 2>is the bigger issue to be addressing here, And so

0:25:30.956 --> 0:25:35.116
<v Speaker 2>how do you prevent that from happening again? I mean,

0:25:35.156 --> 0:25:39.236
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting when Kathy first hears about the New York

0:25:39.276 --> 0:25:44.796
<v Speaker 2>Times reporting, she's furious, but not even with Santos as

0:25:44.836 --> 0:25:48.196
<v Speaker 2>much as she's angry with the Republican Party in Nasa

0:25:48.316 --> 0:25:50.716
<v Speaker 2>County and one guy who is the head of the

0:25:50.756 --> 0:25:53.756
<v Speaker 2>Republican committee named Joe Cairo.

0:25:54.196 --> 0:25:57.476
<v Speaker 4>Well, what the hell? What about picking up the goddamn

0:25:57.596 --> 0:26:05.676
<v Speaker 4>telephone and calling Brooke, calling NYU, calling Goldman Sachs. And

0:26:05.716 --> 0:26:09.876
<v Speaker 4>this was not the first campaign, this was the second campaign.

0:26:10.436 --> 0:26:13.876
<v Speaker 4>And so to me, I mean, Joe Cairo should be

0:26:13.996 --> 0:26:18.036
<v Speaker 4>fired out, you know, as far as I'm concerned. I mean,

0:26:18.196 --> 0:26:21.796
<v Speaker 4>I am furious with him. I mean, George pulled the

0:26:21.796 --> 0:26:25.316
<v Speaker 4>wool over his eyes. It's like, uh, you know, mister

0:26:25.476 --> 0:26:27.356
<v Speaker 4>Ripley meets catch me if you can.

0:26:28.476 --> 0:26:32.196
<v Speaker 2>I asked Joe Cairo for comment about this. He conceded

0:26:32.236 --> 0:26:35.596
<v Speaker 2>that there were some shortcomings in the vetting process. He

0:26:35.676 --> 0:26:39.636
<v Speaker 2>once told a reporter quote, I guess unfortunately we rely

0:26:39.956 --> 0:26:43.276
<v Speaker 2>on the person to be truthful to us. But I

0:26:43.316 --> 0:26:46.996
<v Speaker 2>will also say that there's no real requirement for these

0:26:46.996 --> 0:26:51.676
<v Speaker 2>committees to vet members of Congress. So it really comes

0:26:51.676 --> 0:26:54.636
<v Speaker 2>down to the parties and journalists and whoever else is

0:26:54.636 --> 0:26:59.036
<v Speaker 2>paying attention to root out problems with these candidates who

0:26:59.036 --> 0:27:01.996
<v Speaker 2>are running for office. And I think that that's what

0:27:02.076 --> 0:27:04.596
<v Speaker 2>this story lays bare, that this is potentially a weak

0:27:04.636 --> 0:27:06.836
<v Speaker 2>point in this whole process.

0:27:07.596 --> 0:27:10.236
<v Speaker 3>There are some federal jobs where they do vet people.

0:27:10.316 --> 0:27:11.716
<v Speaker 3>I know, I have a buddy who was a Foreign

0:27:11.756 --> 0:27:15.236
<v Speaker 3>Service officer, and they did all kinds of background check

0:27:15.276 --> 0:27:17.236
<v Speaker 3>on him. They even call me. I mean, there's a

0:27:17.276 --> 0:27:20.476
<v Speaker 3>lot of federal government jobs where they vet people, but

0:27:20.596 --> 0:27:23.316
<v Speaker 3>I guess this is not one of them. And it's

0:27:23.316 --> 0:27:30.796
<v Speaker 3>interesting because Kathy she's furious at Joe Cairo, the Republican

0:27:30.956 --> 0:27:33.516
<v Speaker 3>operative who kind of made the introduction, because he didn't

0:27:33.556 --> 0:27:36.436
<v Speaker 3>do this due diligence. And I get that on some level,

0:27:36.516 --> 0:27:38.916
<v Speaker 3>like Kathy's job is to raise the money, it's not

0:27:38.956 --> 0:27:41.876
<v Speaker 3>to vet the candidates. So she did her job right,

0:27:41.996 --> 0:27:44.996
<v Speaker 3>She opened her house, she called her friends, all this

0:27:45.076 --> 0:27:45.516
<v Speaker 3>and that.

0:27:45.676 --> 0:27:47.796
<v Speaker 2>Right, because I think it goes further than that that

0:27:47.876 --> 0:27:51.876
<v Speaker 2>this was a personal relationship that she had with George Santos.

0:27:51.876 --> 0:27:55.196
<v Speaker 2>So she feels angry with the party for not vetting

0:27:55.236 --> 0:27:59.396
<v Speaker 2>this guy better, while also being sort of shocked that

0:27:59.436 --> 0:28:03.196
<v Speaker 2>she's been lied to so extensively by this person, that

0:28:03.236 --> 0:28:05.876
<v Speaker 2>she trusted, this guy that she let into her world.

0:28:06.716 --> 0:28:10.236
<v Speaker 4>I'd never had anyone lie to me so bald facedly.

0:28:11.236 --> 0:28:15.076
<v Speaker 3>When the scandal breaks, does she hear from George, does

0:28:15.116 --> 0:28:18.276
<v Speaker 3>he like call up to check in or anything.

0:28:18.916 --> 0:28:21.876
<v Speaker 4>George was fishing around to see if I was going

0:28:21.916 --> 0:28:23.596
<v Speaker 4>to be on his side, and I said, I never

0:28:23.596 --> 0:28:24.676
<v Speaker 4>want to speak to him again.

0:28:25.396 --> 0:28:27.236
<v Speaker 3>Wait, did she tell him that to his face?

0:28:27.796 --> 0:28:32.036
<v Speaker 2>Kathy told me that one of Santos's staffers reached out

0:28:32.076 --> 0:28:35.716
<v Speaker 2>to her to kind of feel her out, but she

0:28:35.796 --> 0:28:37.396
<v Speaker 2>says in that moment, I'm done.

0:28:37.596 --> 0:28:38.916
<v Speaker 1>I'm never talking to you again.

0:28:39.836 --> 0:28:43.596
<v Speaker 2>It was clear to her she could see plainly that

0:28:43.716 --> 0:28:46.396
<v Speaker 2>he had lied to her to her face, and she

0:28:46.436 --> 0:28:50.156
<v Speaker 2>wasn't willing to tolerate that. I think Kathy really feels

0:28:50.156 --> 0:28:53.916
<v Speaker 2>burned twice because she was duped by this guy, but

0:28:54.036 --> 0:28:58.236
<v Speaker 2>also because she opened up her doors and her network

0:28:58.316 --> 0:29:02.516
<v Speaker 2>and those people were also duped by George Santos, and

0:29:02.556 --> 0:29:05.796
<v Speaker 2>she feels responsible. The moment for Kathy where I think

0:29:05.836 --> 0:29:09.636
<v Speaker 2>this becomes incredibly serious is when the indictment comes down

0:29:10.156 --> 0:29:11.956
<v Speaker 2>and she has to relive this all over again.

0:29:12.996 --> 0:29:13.236
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:29:13.276 --> 0:29:18.716
<v Speaker 4>I was horrified. It was incredulous. I immediately wrote a

0:29:18.756 --> 0:29:23.276
<v Speaker 4>letter of apology to my friends, saying it was my

0:29:23.396 --> 0:29:29.596
<v Speaker 4>responsibility for not doing my independent due diligence.

0:29:30.916 --> 0:29:33.436
<v Speaker 2>You know, Kathy is clearly not happy with the Republican

0:29:33.476 --> 0:29:36.836
<v Speaker 2>Party in New York. She made that extremely clear in

0:29:36.876 --> 0:29:41.596
<v Speaker 2>our interview, but I think she also feels how a

0:29:41.636 --> 0:29:44.356
<v Speaker 2>lot of people have felt, how did.

0:29:44.156 --> 0:29:45.356
<v Speaker 1>We not see it?

0:29:47.756 --> 0:29:50.636
<v Speaker 2>There are numerous places in this story where you can

0:29:50.676 --> 0:29:54.756
<v Speaker 2>feel like this is a story of the system working, right,

0:29:54.796 --> 0:29:58.396
<v Speaker 2>that you have journalists, and you have watchdog groups, and

0:29:58.476 --> 0:30:02.596
<v Speaker 2>you have investigators both within the House and within the

0:30:02.636 --> 0:30:06.236
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice that all do their jobs. And that's

0:30:06.316 --> 0:30:08.356
<v Speaker 2>why we know as much as we know at this

0:30:08.436 --> 0:30:12.436
<v Speaker 2>point about Santos and the extent of his schemes. Right,

0:30:14.636 --> 0:30:17.596
<v Speaker 2>I'm still stuck on the question of how did this

0:30:17.876 --> 0:30:20.356
<v Speaker 2>go on for so long undetected?

0:30:20.556 --> 0:30:22.436
<v Speaker 3>I mean, because like, look, and this is not to

0:30:22.476 --> 0:30:26.196
<v Speaker 3>diminish this is not to take away from any of

0:30:26.236 --> 0:30:29.836
<v Speaker 3>the investigations that went on, But at the end of

0:30:29.876 --> 0:30:36.396
<v Speaker 3>the day, the unraveling of this occurs by doing some

0:30:36.636 --> 0:30:41.756
<v Speaker 3>very simple things. Calling up Baroke College and saying, hey,

0:30:41.996 --> 0:30:45.156
<v Speaker 3>did this guy go here? Calling up Goldman Sachs and

0:30:45.196 --> 0:30:48.956
<v Speaker 3>saying did this guy work here? Or looking at his

0:30:48.996 --> 0:30:53.596
<v Speaker 3>campaign finance records online which are publicly available. Right, all

0:30:53.596 --> 0:30:57.956
<v Speaker 3>of which is to say, this isn't Watergate, this isn't

0:30:58.116 --> 0:31:01.276
<v Speaker 3>deep throat where there's like some guy in a bench

0:31:01.636 --> 0:31:05.836
<v Speaker 3>who's like revealing some secrets that otherwise would be totally inaccessible.

0:31:06.876 --> 0:31:10.956
<v Speaker 3>This is information that is relative accessible and just for

0:31:11.036 --> 0:31:15.476
<v Speaker 3>whatever reason, folks had not been picking up the phone

0:31:15.916 --> 0:31:17.996
<v Speaker 3>and looking over the reports. And I'm not pointing a

0:31:17.996 --> 0:31:20.236
<v Speaker 3>finger to anyone saying, oh, anyone fell out there, but

0:31:20.276 --> 0:31:23.716
<v Speaker 3>I'm just I'm just noting that that's that's the thing

0:31:23.756 --> 0:31:27.196
<v Speaker 3>that's so striking about this story. It's not that the

0:31:27.236 --> 0:31:32.356
<v Speaker 3>information was inaccessible or contained by one impossible to access source.

0:31:33.156 --> 0:31:36.196
<v Speaker 3>It was just that no one bothered to pick up

0:31:36.196 --> 0:31:40.156
<v Speaker 3>the phone. And that's kind of crazy.

0:31:40.276 --> 0:31:44.996
<v Speaker 2>So, and this might surprise you, because it was surprising

0:31:44.996 --> 0:31:50.956
<v Speaker 2>to me. Someone did pick up the phone his own campaign,

0:31:52.036 --> 0:31:54.196
<v Speaker 2>and a report was commissioned.

0:31:54.396 --> 0:31:58.516
<v Speaker 3>Wait and when WHOA sorry, this is crazy? Who commissioned this?

0:31:58.996 --> 0:32:02.556
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty one, the Santos campaign commissioned a vulnerability

0:32:02.596 --> 0:32:07.676
<v Speaker 2>report on their candidate. It's quite common in politics these days. Yeah,

0:32:07.956 --> 0:32:10.236
<v Speaker 2>you know, you would do opposition research where you're trying

0:32:10.236 --> 0:32:13.276
<v Speaker 2>to learn about the other candidate, but there's also what

0:32:13.316 --> 0:32:16.396
<v Speaker 2>they call a vulnerability study or a vulnerability report, which

0:32:16.436 --> 0:32:20.516
<v Speaker 2>is how can I best prepare for attacks that my

0:32:20.556 --> 0:32:25.716
<v Speaker 2>opponent might work, and so the report costs nearly seventeen

0:32:25.796 --> 0:32:31.876
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars. The results come back and they find a

0:32:31.916 --> 0:32:33.916
<v Speaker 2>lot of the same things that had been laid out

0:32:33.996 --> 0:32:35.516
<v Speaker 2>that would later come to light in the New York

0:32:35.516 --> 0:32:39.676
<v Speaker 2>Times report, what like that he had faced multiple evictions

0:32:40.036 --> 0:32:42.236
<v Speaker 2>and that there was no record of his college degrees.

0:32:42.316 --> 0:32:45.276
<v Speaker 2>So again, like a lot of the things that we

0:32:45.916 --> 0:32:49.476
<v Speaker 2>the public would learn about in December of twenty twenty

0:32:49.476 --> 0:32:52.436
<v Speaker 2>two were known to his campaign over a year prior.

0:32:53.716 --> 0:32:57.236
<v Speaker 2>There's reporting to indicate that members of his team left

0:32:57.356 --> 0:33:01.516
<v Speaker 2>after that report came through, and Santos maintained to his

0:33:01.556 --> 0:33:04.836
<v Speaker 2>team at that time that he had diplomas that he

0:33:04.876 --> 0:33:08.996
<v Speaker 2>could show them. It's the same familiar Santo's refrain of

0:33:09.196 --> 0:33:12.356
<v Speaker 2>I have answers, I have receipts, but that never materializes.

0:33:13.356 --> 0:33:16.036
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, throughout this story there are so

0:33:16.156 --> 0:33:19.716
<v Speaker 2>many moments of when this whole thing could have collapsed. Yeah,

0:33:20.156 --> 0:33:23.516
<v Speaker 2>because there were people who knew and walked away and

0:33:23.676 --> 0:33:26.836
<v Speaker 2>washed their hands of it and for whatever reason did

0:33:26.876 --> 0:33:29.116
<v Speaker 2>not come forward to out this guy.

0:33:29.636 --> 0:33:30.796
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you thought, I mean, and now I

0:33:30.876 --> 0:33:34.476
<v Speaker 3>understand why Kathy gets so mad for not vetting him. Also,

0:33:34.516 --> 0:33:38.396
<v Speaker 3>seventeen thousand dollars, Amy does we should have said call

0:33:38.516 --> 0:33:41.076
<v Speaker 3>out to listeners. We hear deep Cover will do it

0:33:40.756 --> 0:33:42.556
<v Speaker 3>for one quarter of that price.

0:33:42.796 --> 0:33:45.916
<v Speaker 1>We will call Beroke College for a fraction of that.

0:33:46.356 --> 0:33:48.396
<v Speaker 3>Give me five hundred bucks, and I will call all

0:33:48.436 --> 0:33:50.396
<v Speaker 3>the places the guy claimed to work and tell you

0:33:50.436 --> 0:33:52.116
<v Speaker 3>if that's not true, and you'll have it back in

0:33:52.196 --> 0:33:52.876
<v Speaker 3>six hours.

0:33:52.956 --> 0:33:54.956
<v Speaker 2>I know, I really want to talk to somebody who

0:33:55.036 --> 0:33:55.916
<v Speaker 2>worked on that report.

0:33:55.956 --> 0:33:57.196
<v Speaker 1>So these are still like I still have.

0:33:57.236 --> 0:34:00.636
<v Speaker 2>Questions here, right, Yeah, I mean I was really hoping

0:34:00.676 --> 0:34:02.836
<v Speaker 2>that this would go to trial so we could air

0:34:02.876 --> 0:34:06.636
<v Speaker 2>out all of the specifics, like who is contributed number twelve?

0:34:06.716 --> 0:34:09.316
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't know that I'll get an answer to that.

0:34:10.116 --> 0:34:13.996
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering. You said you talked to Kathy after this.

0:34:15.116 --> 0:34:18.996
<v Speaker 3>What's her feeling because she said she was expecting to testify,

0:34:19.196 --> 0:34:21.236
<v Speaker 3>So how does she feel about how did she feel

0:34:21.276 --> 0:34:22.156
<v Speaker 3>about the plea?

0:34:22.716 --> 0:34:22.996
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:34:23.036 --> 0:34:27.396
<v Speaker 2>So, actually wasn't sure if Kathy was going to speak

0:34:27.396 --> 0:34:28.916
<v Speaker 2>with me again, but I got her on the phone

0:34:28.916 --> 0:34:29.436
<v Speaker 2>this morning.

0:34:30.836 --> 0:34:34.956
<v Speaker 8>It was good news for me that George pleaded guilty

0:34:35.316 --> 0:34:37.996
<v Speaker 8>on Monday, because now I don't.

0:34:37.796 --> 0:34:39.556
<v Speaker 4>Have to go and testify.

0:34:40.476 --> 0:34:43.956
<v Speaker 8>Good thing that George went ahead and wasn't so arrogant

0:34:44.076 --> 0:34:48.116
<v Speaker 8>as to continue this and that at least he's passing

0:34:48.276 --> 0:34:53.676
<v Speaker 8>up and you know, hopefully he will serve his sentence,

0:34:54.396 --> 0:34:57.836
<v Speaker 8>be repentant, and hopefully he'll learn his lesson and will

0:34:57.876 --> 0:34:59.516
<v Speaker 8>stop lying to eating and feeling.

0:35:00.876 --> 0:35:02.756
<v Speaker 2>If he apologized to you, would you forgive him?

0:35:03.956 --> 0:35:04.476
<v Speaker 8>Not now?

0:35:05.596 --> 0:35:06.116
<v Speaker 4>Not now?

0:35:07.436 --> 0:35:10.516
<v Speaker 8>You know you don't again you we believe him until

0:35:10.636 --> 0:35:15.276
<v Speaker 8>it's like you want to see what he actually does.

0:35:20.436 --> 0:35:23.716
<v Speaker 3>This series was produced by Amy Gaines McQuaid, Izzy Carter

0:35:23.876 --> 0:35:27.876
<v Speaker 3>and Joey fish Ground. Our editor is Karen shakergi Our

0:35:27.916 --> 0:35:33.716
<v Speaker 3>executive producer is Jacob Smith. Mastering by Jake Gorsky, fact

0:35:33.796 --> 0:35:37.196
<v Speaker 3>checking by Anica Robbins. Our show art was designed by

0:35:37.196 --> 0:35:40.716
<v Speaker 3>Sean Carney. Music in this series is from Luis Gara

0:35:41.036 --> 0:35:45.676
<v Speaker 3>Jake Gorsky An Epidemic Sound Special thanks to Sarah Nix,

0:35:45.916 --> 0:35:51.196
<v Speaker 3>Eric Sandler, Sarah Bruger, Carrie Brody, Jake Flanagan, Lydia Gene Kott,

0:35:51.476 --> 0:35:55.996
<v Speaker 3>Jordan McMillan, Ben Nat f Haffrey, Kira Posey, Owen Miller,

0:35:56.196 --> 0:36:00.996
<v Speaker 3>Christina Sullivan, Sophie Crane, Fara Day Grunge and Greta Cohen.

0:36:01.476 --> 0:36:06.236
<v Speaker 3>Additional thanks to Switch and Board Studio, Janelle Forsyth, Britta Glanis,

0:36:06.876 --> 0:36:10.996
<v Speaker 3>Jason McQuaid and Karen Gaine. I'm Jake Halpern