WEBVTT - 528 | Mailbag Wednesday!

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>This is a lot.

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 2>He's time to say your legs.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>The girls. Frizzy sits here. We will sit in.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Jos the Gunner.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>It's the mail bag. Welcome to the Just Baseball Show.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 2>It is Wednesday, August twenty third. That's arm Lady and

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Peter Apple, and we are here to answer all

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the great questions that you left on our Instagram at

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Just Baseball Show and on our Twitter at just BB

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>on Underscore Media, I get dms all the time. How

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>do I submit questions? Remember, we drop those the morning

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 2>before we will do the show. So for a Wednesday show,

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>we dropped them on Tuesday morning. You leave all of

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the questions in the comments, and then we picked the

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>best seven and we had a ton to choose from

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>arm Laton. But before we get to any of those questions,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 2>we are brought to you by bet mgm, the King

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>of sportsbooks. Use promo code just Baseball when you sign

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>up a deposit into your newly created account. Download the

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 2>Betmgmsports app on iOS or Android, or visit betmgm dot com.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Plase your first bet offer and receive up to one

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars back in bonus bets if it loses, and

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 2>if the bet does lose, your bonus bets will be

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 2>available once the wager is settled. Gambling problem call or

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>text one eight hundred gambler and must be twenty one

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>or older. Arm We were talking as we configured our list.

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot of bangers, A lot of bangers.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a fun one because I think we're

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>at the point now where we can really start diving

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>into the playoff race. You know, I know we already

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 3>have been doing that, but I think, you know, from

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 3>a mail bag perspective. And then also we get to

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 3>mix in just some fun philosophical like I almost call

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 3>these like off season type questions, but they're they're nice

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>palette cleansers this time of year that you know, just

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 3>stuff that that you know, you could probably end up

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>debating about, and it probably will start some debates and

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>uh listeners, group chats, you know when when when we

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>get through some of this with two of the questions

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that we have in here. So yeah, I'm excited to

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 3>talk a little bit more about the playoff hunts players,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 3>key players, and then some some kind of fun I

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't say whimsical, but like fun philosophical type questions about

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 3>like kind of building a team and.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Stuff like that. Definitely, and if you're watching this on YouTube,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 2>quick shameless plug. A lot of people watch these mail

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>bag episodes on YouTube, hit that subscribe button, hit the

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 2>like button, and comment anything that we said that it's

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 2>crazy or if you agree with us. ARM, without further ado,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I say, we get straight into it, because, like I said,

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of great questions, and we will be talking

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 2>like you and I normally do. We say we'll probably

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>do fifty five minutes to an hour, ends up being

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>four hours. So let's just get straight into it. The

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>first question, who is the most impactful player for every

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>current playoff team? This was to ask by at just

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 2>underscore Lions on Twitter. ARM. I have the teams loaded

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>up and they said playoff team, contending team. So what

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to do? In the American League and the

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 2>National League, there are the of course first playoff teams,

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>as in the leaders of each division. But instead of

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>going through every team that could possibly be within contention,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I say we limit it to the first four wild

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 2>card teams. So all three first place teams and then

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the first four in the wildcard hunt start. In the

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>American League, East the first place, Orioles. Who's the most

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 2>impactful player for the Orioles.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>That's funny we're starting with, like, I think one of

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the more debatable ones where there's a lot of different directions.

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>I think you can go with Baltimore because here's one

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 3>thing before we get into this is it is it

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 3>more like impactful in terms of like this is like

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>their best player or the player that could make the

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 3>biggest difference, right, Because if you're looking at like we'll

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 3>get to the Dodgers in a second, I don't really

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>have any questions about what Mooki bats or Freddie Freeman

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 3>are gonna do. Would it be more impactful for somebody

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>else to step up? You know what I'm saying. What's

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>the way that you kind of interpret this one?

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>The way I interpret it is if they're in a

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>playoff race and this team were to get or this

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>player were to get injured and they would be out,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>you feel a lot less positive about their chances of winning.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>So the most important player it doesn't necessarily.

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Mean most talented.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Or more or not even most productive technically, you know,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>it could just be the most impactful. So with the Orioles,

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 3>I think we might have the same answer here. For me,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be Adelie Rutchman, right, because when you

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>look at the drop off from you know, an Adlie

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>to a James McCann, like, that's a big difference. You

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>talk about the offensive side of things with just did

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 3>an episode about how they are They're winning percentages like

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 3>two x. When Adalie Rutchman is on the field, not

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 3>only is he a key bat for them, but I

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 3>think what he does defensively, what he brings to the table,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the way he handles.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The staff, also as a switch hitter as well.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 3>I think you got to go Adelie Rutchman with the

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Orioles and I would be extremely concerned about them if

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 3>he got hurt. To your point, I don't know if

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 3>there's anybody else where. I'm like fully fully changing my

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>outlook on them if they went down.

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You took the words right out of my mouth. Minnesota wins.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a more interesting one because you could go

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>to a pitcher, whether that be Sonny Gray or Pablo Lopez,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>or you could find someone offensively. And my answer might

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 2>surprise some people because this player has not lived up

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>to his enormous contract that he signed in the off season.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 2>But I think potentially the most impactful player for the

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Twins has to be Carlos Korea because right there leading

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>this division right now, and it's hard to pick a

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>certain pitcher, like is Sonny Gray more important or impactful

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 2>than Pablo Lopez or Joe Ryan or Bailey Ober Probably

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 2>not Dallas Kyleston. Yeah, Dallas Kichel Buxton is not quite

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the answer because he's just so hit or miss at

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>this point. But if Carlos Korea is on and we've

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>only seen it in spurts this year, I think he's

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the most impactful player. But then again, I'm kind of

0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>going back on my original point of if Carlos Korea

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>was hurt for the Twins, he's kind of not been

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 2>that great for them this year. But that's the first

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 2>name that comes to my mind when I think impactful

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>for the Twins.

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but you know, we're talking about playoff contenders, and

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Carlos Correa is already one of the most accomplished postseason

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 3>players in the history of the game. Like I don't like,

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm floored every time I look at the all time

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>leaders and ex playoff stat and Correa is among the best.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's like what, He's only been.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Here for like five six years, So I think that's

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the number one answer, because one, even with him not

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 3>playing well, like, he's still one of their most consistent,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, back to ball guys, he's still been somewhat

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 3>productive and he's still a pretty solid defender. And again,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>what you get in the postseason. For the sake of

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>being different, I'm gonna go with Pablo Lopez here because

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I love the way he's been throwing the baseball and

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, yes, you've got Sonny Gray. I trust

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Bailey Ober in the regular season, but now with the

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>way the rotation kind of looks, it's like, Okay, you

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 3>trust Pablo Lopez, you trust Sonny Gray, but now, like,

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>who gets the Ballgame three that you really trust is

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 3>a kenam Eta? Is it Bailey Ober? Like those guys

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>might be able to hold it down, but it's not

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the same level of hey, like go out and shove

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>that I can feel with Lopez or Gray when they're

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>on so offensively, I'm with.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>You with Carlos Correa.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 3>But for the sake of being different, and also because

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I do think that Lopez has turned into a really

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 3>important piece for them, I'll go Pablo Lopez.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Here the first place. Rangers have a obvious answer, but

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to go obvious. Marcus Semion, I think

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 2>is the most impactful player for the Rangers. First off,

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 2>He's played every single day, So the Rangers don't know

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 2>what it's like playing without Marcus Semion. They stayed afloat

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 2>without Corey Seeger. Now Cory Seger is putting up a

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>historic season for a shortstop. Offensively, he is amazing, But

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I think Marcus Semion is the most important player to

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>get this offense going. Without him, they don't really have

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>a leadoff type hitter, right. You could go to Ezekiel Duran,

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>but I'd much rather have Marcus Semion. With how balanced

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and deep the Rangers offense is. If they were to

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>lose Semion, I think it'd be more impactful to their

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>team than it would be losing Corey Seger, even though

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Seeger is the better player.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, it's interesting.

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 3>I like the point of they don't really know what

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 3>it's like not to play with Marcus Semien. I think

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 3>if Marcus Semion, god forbid, went down, I think Bruce

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Bochi would still write his name in the lineup because

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 3>he's so used to just like having him in there

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 3>every single day.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Seger.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean what he's doing offensively is otherworldly, But

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 3>like you said, they've been performing without him. I look

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>at the rotation though with this team, and I'm like, man,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 3>who do I really trust? And all in an underrated

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 3>aspect of I think someone that if he went down

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>they'd be in trouble is Jordan Montgomery. I know that

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 3>sounds crazy, but again, like I want to try to

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 3>give a different answer than than what you gave, and

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that this is right there too. Jamn just

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>went eight shutty against Arizona. Arizona, who's been playing good ball,

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 3>by the way, and his four starts with Texas so far,

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 3>it's been six innings, two runs, six innings, two runs,

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 3>six innings, one run, eight innings, shutty.

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And you look at this rotation. Yes, they got Max

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Schurzer at this point. I know you guys were talking

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 3>I think I almost trust Jamon right now more than

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I trust Max Schurzer, as crazy as that sounds. And

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 3>then you look get like John Gray, Sure he's fine,

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Keeney, you know, sure he has his moments. Dane

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Dunning like it's been a nice story. Who do you

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 3>trust in this rotation right now? For me, I'll trust Mat.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll die on the Max Schurzer Hill. I understand that

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>you signed up to die on the Max Schurzer hill.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 3>But right now, I think big game. You know we

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 3>need to win one. I think I've given the ball

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 3>to jam On and if they lost him, I'd be

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 3>real nervous.

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 2>Outside of Max Scherzer, I know they lost that game

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to the Diamondbacks. When Joran Montgomery threw those eight shutout innings,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 2>it really happened because he threw eight shutout there, winning

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>one zero, and then a rolled as Chapman gave up

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the home run to Ketel marte In. I think it

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 2>was the bottom of the ninth inning, and then they

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 2>ended up losing four to three. But that start in itself,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>those eight innings were so impactful because the series before

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>against the Brewers, none of the starters got past the

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 2>fifth inning. That bullpen was completely taxed. Right they went

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to will Smith, even though will Smith had been getting

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a ton of work in the past couple of days,

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and he ended up blowing in an extra innings. So

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Montgomery did all that he could. They needed length.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 2>That's what he gave him. And not only did he

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 2>give him length eight Shutty love that answer from you.

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Now we go to the four teams in the wild

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>card in the American League, and number one is the

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay Rays, who are four and a half games up.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 2>This one, for me, I'm going between two different players,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>but I think with all the injuries to the starting rotation,

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Glass now has to be the answer because if

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>they were to lose Tyler Glass now and then it's Eflyn, Sevally,

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Zach Lettel that just and Zach Efflin's been fantastic, right,

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>but Tyler Glass now injects a little bit more life

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 2>than as Zach Efflyin does.

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>That together can just go you can go win you

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a ball game. That's say like he will win you

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a ball game if he's.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, put the team on his back. That's what glassnow

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>can do. Efflyn has done that in spurts. But game one,

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>who do you think is getting the ball? Tyler Glass now,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 2>the big damn horse with the six foot eight curve

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>ball from hell. I mean, he is just a bad

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 2>man and if they were if he were to go down,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>it's great.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a wrap.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 3>I can't even give you, like a Devil's advocate different

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 3>answer because as much as I'd like to say, like

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Yandy Diaz or whatever, like, we've learned very like it's

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 3>abundantly clear that the Rays will find a way to

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 3>kind of platoon and piece it together and put together

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>a good offensive team. And like you know, they've brought

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 3>up a Ronda and Mead, and I don't know if

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>these rookies will perform right away, and they definitely won't

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 3>replace Yandy Diaz, but at least I feel decent about

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>that contingency plan. I don't feel good about whoever the

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 3>hell they're bringing up to replace Tyler Glass now in

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 3>that rotation. I don't even feel good about what they're

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 3>doing right now with the rotation. So yeah, I can't

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 3>even give a different answer. As much as we're going

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 3>to try to give two different perspectives as we fly

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 3>through these teams, it's Glass now, and it's not particularly

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 3>close and they need him to be right.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>You can make a good argument for YONDI Diez, but

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I agree it's Glass now. So moving on, the Houston

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Astros are a half game above the Seattle Mariners in

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Wildcard chase. As we speak here today, the Astros is

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>an interesting one because you look at their rotation. Javier

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>continues to disappoint Framburger. I mean, if he were to

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 2>go down, that would be pretty impactful. But you do

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 2>have Verlander and JP Frantz like I keep pointing to

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the expected numbers and the peripherals, and he just keeps saying,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>fuck you, I don't care. I'm just gonna keep shoving.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>So they have enough. And of course Hunter Brown the

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>bullpen knows we got to pick a hitter. Now, Jordon

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>went out, but they still did okay. I think for

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>an all around game and the clutch factor too, Kyle

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Tucker is the dog because not only has he been

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the best offensive players in the American League,

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>he is one of the best defenders in the outfield.

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>So just from an all around game, and then we've

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>seen Kyle Tucker play center field, right, he won't have

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>to because Chas McCormick is now hitting fifth and he's

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>been his beast. But I just think the best overall

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>player now, Jordan is the best hitter. Altuve is the

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>spark plug, Bregman is the model of consistency, but the

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 2>best all around player, and if he were to go down,

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Kyle Tucker.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I'm with you on that. Kyle Tucker is the

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>glue of this team now. And you know Al Twove

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, awesome, Bregman, awesome. But I think those

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 3>guys are I think it'd be severely underselling them to

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 3>say like they're like, you know, the Robbins at this point,

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 3>because they're you know, there's a good chance at Al Twove's. Yeah,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 3>he just picked up his two thousand and ted He's

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 3>well on his way to the Hall of Fame and

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 3>is still playing at an extremely high level. But you know,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing Kyle Tucker just enter his prime. And we're

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 3>talking about now with three straight for win seasons, I

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>think Kyle Tucker is the most important guy offensively for them.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>But I'm still a little concerned about this rotation, man.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Like it just I agree with you, like they have

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>had guys piece it together to get them through the

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 3>regular season, but we know what this Astros teammates World

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Series or bust as it's always going to be. And

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Framber's the guy that's gotten them there and put together.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 3>The quality starts on the big stage every single time,

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 3>it feels like and he's been a little bit inconsistent.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I think if you take Framber out of this rotation,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I am a lot more worried about this team in

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>the postseason, just because again you mentioned Javier struggles. You know,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Brown's been solid and France has been really solid,

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 3>better than solid, But again in the postseason, I don't

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust those guys at the same level. Like

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>you could have Framber Valdez limp into the playoffs and

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm still feeling good when I give him the ball

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 3>in the first, you know, in the first postseason game,

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>and for me, that's that's gonna be the guy that

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 3>I need to have any optimism around the the Houston Astros.

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not much of a consolation prize, but Michael Brantley

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 3>coming back mate helped the offense a little bit. We

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 3>don't know what we're going to get from him, but yeah,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Framber is just that dog. He's for me, he's the

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 3>most consistent arm in baseball, even though he's had a

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Of a hiccup lately.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 2>If it wasn't for JP Frantz, I would have chosen Framberg. Yeah, seriously.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I know that's like a crazy sentence, but.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, imagine if you said that's just that sentence in

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 3>a vacuum like in April, I would have just been like, what, nurse.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 2>I think it's maybe the easiest outside of Baltimore. Julio

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Rodriguez makes this team go. Yeah, I can't even should

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 2>we move on?

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean come on, I mean look look at look

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 3>look at what he's doing right now, look at what

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the Mariners are doing. It's that simple, that's ridiculous. So

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>like you can plug and play.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Toronto Blue Jays, I think there are two key answers here.

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 2>If Kevin Gosman were to go down, this team may

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 2>be screwed. But at the same time, like Kucci has

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>been great, Barrios has been great, Bassett has been pretty

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 2>damn good. Not at to the level of those two,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 2>but still solid. I think Bob Bashett is so important

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 2>for this Blue Jays team, dude, because if he went down,

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 2>the rest of this Blue Jays lineup has simply not

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 2>hit to the level of expectations that fans everywhere thought

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>they would, especially Blue Jays fans. You could point to

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 2>George Springer and Vladdie and Chapman. But all three of

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>those guys have got great seasons. Bashett is the guy

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that's keeping this team.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>It's funny, man, I look at the I look at

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the lineup and you kind of go through it and

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like we Merrifield is great, but Brandon Belt disappointing.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 3>I know he Homer twice the other day, Vad Guerrero

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Junior disappointing, George Springer somewhat disappointing, Matt Chapman pretty much

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 3>since the second month of the season, disappointing, Alejanjo Kirk, disappointing,

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Dalton Varshow disappointing. And it's relative right. They haven't been disasters,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 3>but none of those guys have performed to the way

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 3>that you want to see them perform. Bo Bashett has

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 3>performed and continues to get better and better, and this

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 3>looks like another guy who's kind of entering that prime.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Offensively, it's it's Bashett on the pitching side, though, Man,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Chris Bassett's a good regular season arm. Kakuchi's a good

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 3>regular season arm. But I mean, I need I need

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 3>a guy that I can really trust. It's it's got

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 3>to be Kevin Gosman. So for me, I think it's

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 3>a tie between Gosman and Bashett and and I think

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 3>it's them and then nobody else. Like, I don't think

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 3>it's close with anybody else. I'm one hundred percent on

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the on the Bichette train, but Gosman as well.

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's it for the American League. Let's move on

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 2>to the National League and we'll start with the first

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>place Braves. This is a challenging one arm because I

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>think you can could give an answer and all would

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>make sense, right, because they're all so good. But man,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I look at this rotation. But then again, like I'm

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>about to say, like I want to pick a pitcher,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 2>but if Freed goes down, he's been down kind of

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 2>for the entire year. But I'm more thinking about the

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>playoff hunt. Right, if it's just Streider, Morton and Elder,

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna have to really really hit. So for me,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 2>and kind of similar to what you were talking about

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 2>with Framber in the playoffs, Freed in the playoffs has

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>been amazing. So while the Braves have been so amazing

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 2>without Freed, I think Freed is so important to the

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Braves in the playoffs. You could say a Kunya, sure,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 2>but damn they can just put Ozzie Albi's in the

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 2>leadoff spot and I'm sure they would still hit. You

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>could get Olsen, they still got Murphy and Riley. You

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 2>could take out Riley, they still got Olsen. So I

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>can't pick an offensive player. I think the answer, if

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you were to choose a player on offense, would be

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>a Kunya, and I think you'd be right. But I

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 2>think if this team were to be without freedom, I'm

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>looking at that rotation going into October, I'm a lot

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 2>more scared about the Braves than if they were to

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 2>lose a Kunya, which is crazy and I don't even

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>know if I believe it.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I thought you were gonna pick Nicky Lopez.

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I should pick Nicki Lope. Like if we were to

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 2>if we were to do our top five, Nicki Lopez

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 2>would be like three.

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not like three.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 3>No, they won a World Series without Ronald Acuna junior man.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's not to diminish him. Like he's he's like

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the MVP favorite. He's unbelievable. He's everything that you could

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 3>want out of a baseball player. I agree, though, Like

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I still think this offense is a fucking wagon without

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Ronald Acunya Junior, Like, look at it, look at what

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Matt Olson's doing, look at what Murphy's doing, look at

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 3>what Ozuna's gonna hit thirty bombs this year. Like it's

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 3>crazy what they're getting. I would go with with Free, Well,

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I think you could say Strider or Freed.

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I trust Freed more.

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Obviously Stryder's kind of working through some things in terms

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 3>of consistency, So I'm with you Max Freed is the answer.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's a guy that is just as consistent

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>as they come on the bump and a lefty that

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 3>just I think rises to the occasion every single time.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Moving on to the National League Central, the Milwaukee Brewers

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 2>arm this is easy. If they don't have Christian Yelich.

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 2>This team is not hitting anything like William Katurz, Willia Domes. Please,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 2>nice hitters, please. Christian Yelich has put up a near

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 2>MVP level season. If he's out of the light up,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers are not hitting anybody, no matter who steps

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 2>on the mount.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh what you don't like?

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 3>South Fridlick's been awesome, but just like a playoff lineup

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 3>of like Carlos Santana, Salfrie Lick, Rowdy Telez, Andrew Monastario,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Terrang.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And Tyrone Taylor like, and Joey Weimer like.

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 3>I like a lot of those players long term, But

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 3>for the playoffs in twenty twenty three, I don't know

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 3>about that.

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm with you, Yelich.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the big reason why the Brewers are where

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 3>they are, maybe this is the best I think the

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Brewers are looked in a little bit is because they

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 3>have Christian Yelich looking like Christian Yelich. So yeah, without

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 3>a doubt, I think you could go with You know,

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>if Brandon Woodrooff wasn't back, Corbyn.

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Burns is the answer.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 3>But now Woodroff is back, Peralta is starting to show

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 3>more flashes of Freddy Peralta, and you know, Miley and

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and Houser plugged in and been fined, and then the

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Bullpen has really stepped up in a lot of ways

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>and been really solid this year. Yeah, I think you

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 3>gotta go with with a Christian Yelich here.

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>The Dodgers is almost impossible because if you say Mookie Betts,

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>you're correct. If you say Freddy Freeman, you're correct. So

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 2>just to not say either of those, I'm gonna go

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>with Clayton Kershaw. I think Clayton Kershaw is so unbelievably

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 2>important to this Dodgers team, and that's why I see

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I think they've limited his innings right moving forward, Right,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 2>they need him as healthy as possible because you look

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 2>at Julio Arius and while he's also been a stud

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs, he hasn't been that great this regular season.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 2>And those studley performances followed second in National League SYNG voting, right,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 2>followed incredible regular seasons. He's not a guy who I'm

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 2>incredibly hyped to see in Game one. Right. Walker Buehler

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 2>comes on the Just Baseball Show every Monday. We love him.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 2>He's incredibly important towards the Dodgers' success, but it's hard

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 2>to add him because he hasn't pitched the game for

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 2>them this year.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he would tell you, like, yeah, give

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 3>me the give me the ball game one, I'm going

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 3>seven shutout, like I think he knows he can, but

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 3>you don't know what you can physically do as you

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 3>come back from your second TJ. So I mean that's

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>that's a question as well.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's very fair. And then you look at the rotation.

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>This is the weakest Dodgers rotation, you know, not not

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 3>by any faults of their own, similar to the Rays,

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>where it's just been guys going down left and right,

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 3>and you know, now Gonsolin goes down as well. We

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 3>know May's been out for a while. Of course, Kershaw

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 3>is the best of the bunch. I think you could

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 3>say Arius just because of what he's capable of doing

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 3>in the postseason, but he's looked like a subdued version

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 3>of himself. And I don't even think it would be

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 3>crazy to say Bobby Miller, because that guy's been nails

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 3>over the course of the year. But Kershaw is the

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 3>number one answer. But I think you can kind of

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 3>pick anybody in the rotation. I'm gonna pick the Hall

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 3>of Famer, so I'm with you.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Basically the answer should be any of their starters, because

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 3>even lance Lynn, like he has been a godsend for them.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 3>This pitching staff would be in absolute hell right now

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 3>if it weren't for lance Lynn and Bobby Miller's stepping

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 3>up and plugging in, which is crazy to say about

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 3>the La Dodgers, but that's where they're at the Phillies.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 2>You can talk about the rotation and this guy doesn't

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 2>really feeld. But if Bryce Harper is not in the lineup,

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not very excited about the Phillies And I don't

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 2>even care, don't even care on if Bryce Harper in

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the lineup, I feel a lot less confident about the Phillies.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 2>And you could talk about, well, there's more impactful like Wheeler.

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 2>If they don't have Wheeler, you know, the rotation looks

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 2>really really thin. If they don't have you know, Trey

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Turner or no, it's Bryce Harper. That's my answer.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean Harper's I mean, like again, the word him,

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the adjective descriptor like it gets the way too much.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 3>He is legitimately him, he has been him since he's

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 3>been sixteen. That guy's as important as they come. But

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 3>when I look at this rotation as well, Michael Lorenzen

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 3>being acquired definitely helps hedge a lot of my concern

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 3>around this rotation.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And I like the back end of this this bullpen.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 3>But if you get a short start from a guy

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 3>like I could just see things kind of get away

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 3>relatively quickly. And I've just I don't trust Aaron Nola

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 3>at all. I know he's coming off one of his

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 3>best starts that we've seen, and even then he gave

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 3>up a pair of long balls.

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately they were you know, solo shots.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with Wheeler on this one, just because

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>he might be the only arm I trust.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>In a big game right now.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 3>I know Lorenzins looks good, but I know you don't

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 3>trust Taiwan Walker and Christopher Sanchez like Ranger Suarez continues

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 3>to get banged up and just can't stay on the field.

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with Zach Wheeler because in a big game,

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 3>this guy's probably end up thrown on short rests, like

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna need him to pretty much carry that pitching staff.

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 3>But again, if you say Bryce Harper is the answer

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>to anything as it pertains to success, it's not going

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 3>to be incorrect.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Ever.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Ever, the Chicago Cubs, now, I think Cody Bellinger has

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 2>been amazing for them, not just offensively, but his defense

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 2>is center field and then himI Even's sliding over the

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>first base when needed. But the addition of Himrik Candelario

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>has been huge. You can talk about Dansby Swanson because

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>while He's a one to fifteen WRC plus guy. The

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 2>defense at shortstop is all world Nico Horner the definition

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 2>of solid for the Cups. But that's the point, right,

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 2>they have a lot of different important pieces on offense.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 2>If Justin Steele ain't on the bump, they're screwed.

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 2>We've gotten some good starts from Javier Asad, who I like,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Stroman is banged up. Ty On is as hit or

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>miss as any major league starter. Right now, Justin Steele

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is so important to the Cub's success. If he is

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to go down, they are screwed.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean they're already trying to figure out who's

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>gonna plug in for Stroll, Right, It's like True Smiley.

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 3>If Smiley doesn't work, it's gonna be was 'n Esky.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 3>If it was n Esky doesn't work, they might bring

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 3>up Jordan Wicks from TRIPAA. Like that is that is

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>a tough spot to be Hendrick's assad. Again, those are

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 3>guys that I think can get you through the regular

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 3>season and keep you afloat when they're on. But this

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 3>offense has been performing, and yeah, Bellinger's I think Bellinger

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 3>is the most important. I think obviously the most important

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 3>guy in their lineup, and he's playing like an MVP,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think I don't think they're where they

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 3>are without him, But you know, you do have some

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 3>contingency plans at least, whereas your contingency plan to Justin

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Steel is kind of like it's a rap. Your contingency

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 3>plan to Justin Steel is Jordan Wicks. So you get

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 3>you take one of the best left handed pitchers in

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Major League Baseball this year, and now you bring up

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 3>a really solid pitch ability guy in trip a A.

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the drop off.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Whereas Beer, yeah, like Wess like like those guys are

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>not filling in for Justin Steele. If Bellinger were to

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 2>go down, they're able to mix and match. Maybe you

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>plug Morell.

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Out there, or you just somebody around you make things happen,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 3>like you have an outfield that still includes Ian Happ,

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 3>says Azuki, And you know, I think they find a

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 3>way to.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Make that work in a vacuum.

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Bellinger is a more valuable player, but as

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 3>it pertains to the roster, I'm with you.

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's got to be Justin Steele.

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco Giants are interesting because they have a lot

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of pitching, and they've been good in bullpen games, but

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 2>there's not one offensive piece on this team that if

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 2>he were to go down, I would be much more

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 2>concerned about the offense. A couple of names that come

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>to mind. Wilmer Flores has been just on a heater

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 2>all year, Hiro Estrada has been good, Confordo's been good,

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Peterson has been good. But if Logan Web goes down,

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 2>say good night, bro.

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Look at the roster resource for the Giants on Fangrass

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>right now. It's actually fucking nuts. It's Logan Web. It's

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 3>a red line of Kyle Harrison will start on Tuesday,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 3>August twenty second, and then it's Alex That's the whole

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 3>fucking roster resource.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I have nothing to add, dude, are you kidding me?

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Like they're bringing up a prospect who could be great?

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Harrison long term? He's walking and this is going

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 3>to age poorly. I'm sure he's gonna throw a no

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 3>hitter today. He's walking nearly seven per nine at the

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 3>triple A level. I've never seen a roster resource like this.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 3>It's two names and a guy in red with a

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 3>little asterisk next to it.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, that's all we have to say. That's all

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 2>we have to say. And then the last team, the

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Arizona Diamondbacks. Again, I'm gonna go to another pitcher. If

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.959
<v Speaker 2>this team news is Zach Allen, it's over. And it's

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 2>easy because like Christian Walker has been fantastic, Corden Carroll

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 2>is obviously incredibly impactful, could tell Marte has been great

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 2>this season, Lord Screel Junior or Gabriel Breno. We could

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>keep going like, we could just keep listing offensive players

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and if one of them were to go down, it

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>would stink sucks. But if they lose, if they lose

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the prohibitive favor to win the National League, siye young,

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 2>they are done.

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, oh, you don't like Brandon thought, Meryll

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Kelly and Slaye JACONI.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I like maryle Kelly.

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I do like Mary Kelly a lot too, but I

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 3>don't like Merril Kelly like that to your point, you know,

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 3>you could to the people that would say, well, Corbyn Carroll,

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 3>he's playing like one of the best players in the league.

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Corbyn Carroll since he kind of messed that shoulder up,

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 3>has not played well. He's been well off of his

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 3>season numbers, and they're eight and two in their last ten.

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 3>They're playing great ball. All of a sudden, when we

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 3>thought the d Backs were dead, they're right back in it.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>You know. I was just on on the morning after

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 3>with our friend Ben Stevens and Yeah, he was saying, like,

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 3>who stands out to you in that?

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And that hunts?

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like the fact that the d Backs have

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>come back from the dead with their best offensive player

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 3>not really playing right now and the acquisition of Tommy

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 3>fam and you know, I think he's fitting really well

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 3>to help them against leftist Yeah, I think they're they're

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 3>fine offensively. Is that callen out of that rotation? It's

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 3>a It's a damn rap.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a rap, all right. So now we move on

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 2>to our next question, which is going to be a

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 2>fun one. The question is, if you get to create

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 2>your franchise with any three players, who would they beat?

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Could be veterans, all stars, prospects, et cetera. Asked by

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Tully P. Toolly on Twitter. So basically, what we're gonna

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>do this is a snake draft. We're gonna go back

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and forth and we're gonna draft the three best players

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 2>that we want to start a franchise with. The only

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 2>caveat is no show Hao Tawny, and you have to

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 2>draft a pitcher, yeap arm Instead of doing a snake draft,

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll just go back and forth. Yes, because we only

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>have to pick three two hitters, one pitcher.

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>You go first, Okay, Number one, I gotta go Ronald

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Acunya Jr. I'm going youth. I'm going and getting I'm

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 3>getting a young MVP. Like it's it's that simple. I

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 3>got them forever. Uh, It's it's a no brainer to

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 3>get Ronald here for me.

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 2>My first pick is Mookie Betts. He's very similar to Junr.

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 2>He actually has the highest F four in all of

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Major League Baseball. We're talking about home runs. He's one

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 2>of the league leaders in home runs. But on top

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 2>of it, plays in all world defensive right field.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>He's just that dude. Give me Mookie Bets.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm pissed now because I thought you were gonna make

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 3>my life easier. I got I gotta take Jay Rod

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:26.720
<v Speaker 3>with the next pick. I'm leaning j Rod because look

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 3>you look at Since the start of the twenty twenty

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 3>two season, j Rod is second among all players in

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 3>f War, I like behind only show. Hey, TONI so

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 3>second among all players in f War. I gotta go

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 3>with the guy that's what twenty What is he twenty two? Now,

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't even All of these guys are so ridiculously young.

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 3>If they're younger than me, I try to forget what

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:54.479
<v Speaker 3>their exact age is. I'm going with the guy that's

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 3>extremely young, fought off a slow start, is playing out

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 3>of his freaking mind, had one the best rookie campaigns

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 3>we've seen. Give me j Rod as a center fielder

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 3>who you know can just absolutely defend the hell out

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 3>of it out there too.

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>So for my next pick, it's interesting because I have

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to go with a hitter or I could go with

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 2>my pitcher. Now you know what, I am gonna go

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 2>with my pitcher. Now for my second pick, I'm taking

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 2>all reliable, mister durable, every fifth day punching out guys.

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Give me Garrett Cole. Yeah, Garret Cole is gonna make

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty two starts a year. He's old though, he's gonna

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 2>throw two hundred innings, but he's not battled. Right now,

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 2>give me Garret Cole.

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 3>That's fair, that's fair. I so my thing is like

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to there's a sliding scale here of like

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 3>dominance and youth, and it's like, Okay, this guy might

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 3>not be quite as good, but he's young and I

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 3>got him on my franchise.

0:35:58.200 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But like Garrett Cole is.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 3>Gonna he's gonna throw two hundred innings, I think till

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 3>he like gets bored. I really think he's just going

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 3>to be one of those guys. So now I have

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 3>to take a picture. And you know, with I've made

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 3>it well documented, especially in the call up, how much

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 3>I cannot tolerate like picture risk. And you could go

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.919
<v Speaker 3>like Uri Perez and say, like you know, oh, he's

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty years old, and then this wonder can and like, okay,

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 3>what he just did to the Dodgers. I need durability.

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 3>That is like number one for me. I need durability.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go with my Homer pick. I'm going

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 3>to go Sandy al Contra because you look at the age,

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 3>you look at what he's able to do.

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even when this guy.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 3>Was struggling, like struggling through the first half of the year,

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 3>he was still among the top twenty pitchers in f

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 3>war because he still gave you six innings he's or

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 3>seven innings like he made a gave up four earned,

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 3>but at least your bullpen didn't get destroyed. You know,

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 3>you're just talking about the Rangers. Like Max Schurzer. He

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 3>used to be like this, but you know, struggled, only

0:36:58.120 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 3>went three and two thirds. They had to pull him.

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Like Sam even when he's bad, we'll get out and

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 3>give you six or seven. Now he's come, you know,

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 3>full circle, and since the All Star break has been

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 3>cy young Sandy again, and I think that's who he's

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be. Talk about another guy that's I think,

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 3>same conversation with Garrett Cole in terms of two hundred

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 3>innings every year, knock on wood, you never have to

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 3>worry about health, gets ground balls, gets enough with and

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 3>again every fifth day, I know that he's going to

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 3>preserve my bullpen and there's a chance that he may

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 3>just go the distance. Sandy al Contra is a throwback

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 3>starter that I mean, I would love to start my

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 3>franchise with.

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think you're hearing you know in this draft

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 2>that arm and I really rely on durability being there

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 2>every day. And I'm trying to decide between three players

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to decide between jord On Alvarez, Aaron Judge,

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 2>and Freddie Freeman. And who is the one name that

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 2>is there every day, always hitting. It's Freddy Freeman. That

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 2>is my next pick. He is third in Major League

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Ball and four among all hitters I know. The one

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I turn on a Dodgers game, Freddie Freeman is going

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 2>two for four and he might even steal you a bag.

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:15.399
<v Speaker 2>He's just so consistent, so reliable. Aaron Judge is more

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 2>talented of an all around player. Jordan Alvarez is a

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 2>better hitter, maybe maybe, but maybe like maybe not really

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 2>at this point. Freddy Freeman is just that dude.

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you're going to take a guy over the

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 3>age of thirty to start your franchise, you should take

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 3>the guy who defies the age curve. And I think

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Freddie Freeman absolutely defies the age car He actually reversed

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the age curve. I've never seen it before. He's reverse

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 3>who knowed that the age curve?

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm a guy that likes to like lean young.

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 3>Can I tell you someone that I seriously was considering here?

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely?

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 3>And I was so pumped that you brought him up

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 3>earlier Kyle Tucker. I was seriously considering because Kyle Tucker

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 3>might not win me MVPs. But I know that if

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 3>I have Kyle Tucker on my ball club, and again

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 3>he's young, I got ten plus years of four to

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 3>five win seasons every single year moving forward. Like even

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 3>if Kyle Tucker, I think he's gonna keep improving. We've

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 3>been kind of waiting for that MVP ascension. It hasn't

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 3>happened yet, but like the last three seasons, man, it's absurd.

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty one four point seven f F four one

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 3>forty five WRC plus, thirty home runs, twenty twenty two

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.479
<v Speaker 3>four point eight f four thirty home runs, one twenty

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 3>nine WRC plus, and then this year so far four

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 3>point two f four, twenty four home runs a one

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 3>forty five WRC plus.

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Sign me the fuck up for that every single year?

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me?

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 3>With the defense, as you mentioned, the ability to play center,

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 3>he's stealing bags more than ever, by the way, he

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 3>had twenty five bags last year, twenty four already this year,

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 3>Like this, dude is a walking model of consistency and

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 3>by the way, walking more than he ever has, striking

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 3>out less than he ever has. I really considered Kyle

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 3>Tucker with the pick set of j Rod, But you know, Jay,

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.879
<v Speaker 3>Rodd's younger and I could still keep getting better.

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 2>You went younger, and I there was a part of

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 2>me that wanted to lean younger, right. I was even

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 2>thinking about potentially taking Bobby with Junior, that was one

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 2>of the best players in baseball. I was thinking about

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 2>taking Adleie Rutchman, but you're betting on betting on Carrol.

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 2>But it's just like the best bets in sports, Mookie bets,

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Cole and Freddie Freeman are going to be there

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 2>every day just hitting home runs and impacting the game

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 2>on all different facets and also being leaders in the clubhouse.

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 2>They are just the gold standard. I think ronalccuney Junior

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 2>should be the first overall pick because I think outside

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 2>of Otani, he is the most talented, gifted player that

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>we have in the game, and he's also been incredibly

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 2>durable outside of an ACL injury, but he even played

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 2>on one leg last year and was still a good

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 2>player and now healthy. He's the runaway MVP. But when

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I do say runaway, the only people that are competing

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>with him are Mookie Bets and Freddie Freeman, a couple

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 2>other guys that I considered Francisco Lindor. At this point,

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 2>there is no shortstop that is close. Yeah, when you

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 2>rank shortstops, Lindor is one. He is fifth in Major

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 2>League Baseball in f war twenty three bombs, twenty stolen bases,

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 2>world class defense at besides catcher, the most impactful defensive position. Yeah, pitchers.

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Gosman every fifth day is getting his And I'll continue

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 2>to say that. I think Gosman is as safe of

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.959
<v Speaker 2>a pitcher. What's funny? I mean, when are we gonna

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 2>give Logan Webb his respect? Is just a guy who

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:36.720
<v Speaker 2>has a two to nine ERA every year. It just

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 2>puts up a fifty eight percent ground ball rate and

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 2>you just know what you're gonna get. Now. I'd like

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to see him in a very hit or friendly ballpark, right,

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.839
<v Speaker 2>he gets to play out there at Oracle where the

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 2>weather is normally good for pitchers, and the and the

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 2>park is huge. But at the same time, like he

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 2>just keeps the ball on the ground so it doesn't

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 2>really matter. Was there anybody else that came across your

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 2>big board and you were like, I had to take him?

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I seriously considered Corbin, and honestly, if it weren't for

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.919
<v Speaker 3>like the repetitive shoulder stuff, I would have I would

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 3>have taken him. But like you know, he had the

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 3>surgery his his first professional season. Now since that thing

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 3>like sublex again, he's I don't think it reportedly sublex,

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 3>but whatever that was where he was holding holding his

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 3>arm and I was like gasping for air, freaking out

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 3>about him, you know it just he hasn't been the

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 3>same since, and I'm like worried that that could be

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 3>a repetitive thing.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a smaller dude.

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 3>But I definitely considered Corbin Carrol because he's one of

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 3>my favorite players in a long, long, long time.

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>But now I would say.

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 3>It was Bobby White, like you said, Yuri Perez was

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 3>a serious consideration, but like.

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I want to see him stretched out.

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to see, you know, it's doings, see.

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Him doing a little bit more. Grayson Grace Rodriguez.

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Ever since he's gotten called up three point zero three

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 2>e R in terms of stuff plus, which grades the

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 2>physical characteristics of each pitch like velocity, spin rate, all

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff, ranked sixth, right by behind Corbyn Burns.

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 2>He has been a train engine for the Baltimore Oriols.

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking about young pitchers. Grayson Rodriguez needs to

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 2>be in that conversation. And one more name for you.

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was gonna say I had one more too.

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 3>That's playing out of his mind right now.

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Talking about durability. Who's there every day, Marcus Semeon, Yeah,

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the engine that goes Yeah, he's just he's becoming my

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 2>favorite player in baseball. It's just he's just so relized, heable,

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 2>so reliable, and so good. Like he's not just like

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. He's one of the best players in baseball.

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Great defensively, does everything you need on the baseball field.

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I love him. I love Marcus Semeon. I'm I'm I'd

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 2>get on a knee for Marcus. I would.

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 3>The last one I would say is Gunnar Henderson. You know,

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 3>slow start. I think a little bit of a reach,

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of area. You're going young and starting

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 3>a franchise, totally get it. But like shit, he I'm saying,

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 3>not going young and starting a franchise. Gunner Henderson is

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 3>I think could kind of play his way into that conversation.

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 3>He like cycle Pluss the other day, yeah, which was

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 3>which was sick, But no, I know that one's a

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a reach. But at twenty he just

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 3>turned twenty two, like, holy shit, and he can play.

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 3>He's been playing third short like he's an awesome talent too.

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 3>But I agree he's a little bit more of a

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 3>reach than the other guys.

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, Question number three, which teams that are out

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 2>of the hunt this year? Are you most optimistic could

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:27.760
<v Speaker 2>make a playoff push in twenty twenty four? A's by

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Riley mcelwine two on Instagram mcee l W A I

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>N two. Sorry people, I'm horrible with names, but thank you, Riley.

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Mclwayanne mcawayne, arm who's the first team that comes to

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 2>your mind?

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just.

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 3>This is gonna be the new fucking Angels, the padres

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Man like, it has to be like they're gonna be

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 3>the new La Angels and they're gonna fucking ruin my

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 3>life every single year because I've always been on them.

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 3>But in terms of sheer talent, like come on, like

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 3>it's gotta be. There's no team that has been more

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 3>loaded and been sixty and sixty six that I can

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 3>remember than the Padres. So like the boring answer is

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 3>them to start who are.

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You looking at?

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And then I'll give a more exciting answer.

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm so done with the Padres. Like there's a reason, right,

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 2>there's plenty of players on the Padres that we could

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 2>have chosen to build a franchise around. Juan Soto is

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 2>one of them. He's gonna get seven hundred trillion dollars,

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 2>most likely Fernando Tatis Junior. It's having a great year

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of. He's got an no Ps under eight hundred,

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 2>which not a lot of people are talking about, but

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 2>he's still been incredible in right field. Twenty home runs,

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty stone bases. We know a good is Manny Machado.

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 2>They can't play together like there's something there, right, They're

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 2>too damn good. They have the second place finished sure

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 2>in the National League. Saying, as we sit here today

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 2>in Blake Snell, Joe Musgrove, you Darvish, Michael Waka has

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 2>been awesome, but they don't win any games, Like you

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 2>can't just point to the middle of the bullpen being

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the reason why they've lost games. They go down in games,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 2>they don't fight back, they go up in games. The

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 2>bullpen blows it. They are not a winning team. No,

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not the same as the Blue Jays. But there's

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 2>something there that is not indicative to winning, and I

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know what it is. It could be a clubhouse thing,

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 2>could be a managerial thing, could be a culture thing.

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but we've seen it too many times

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 2>now to put our eggs in that basket. Similar with

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 2>the Angels, I can't do it anymore. I don't care

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 2>if Atani's on the team. I don't care if they

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 2>get another O Tani.

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 3>They're not winnings or just no, it's not happening.

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 2>So of the teams that are not in contention, like

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 2>the Reds would be my answer, but they are in contention, right,

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 2>So I want to go with kind of a last

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:50.760
<v Speaker 2>place team and a team that's showing so much art,

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's hard to make an actual argument for them.

0:46:56.360 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 2>But man, they show fight. The Washington Nationals. Dude, Hey,

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 2>like we love c j Abrams Ling, Thomas's has stud

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:10.400
<v Speaker 2>at the play, Joey Manessa's Stone. Garrett is just raking balls.

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't believe that he was just let go in

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the minor league free agency. Basically that was crazy to me.

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 2>McKenzie Gore has been good in spots, but you can

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.720
<v Speaker 2>see what he could possibly be. Of course, Josiah Gray

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and then the bullpen is horrible, but like sometimes they

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:30.399
<v Speaker 2>get out and like they just win games. Sometimes they're

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 2>not like them. I like watching them.

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 3>I actually don't hate that answer at all. You're also

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 3>not investing in the bullpen when your team sucks, like

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I bet they invest a little bit more into the

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 3>bullpen this coming year. And look, Dylan Cruz just skipped

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 3>h A. You know he's going straight to double I

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 3>guarantee the plan is for Dylan Cruz to be up

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 3>next year. Will he succeed? I think at least moderately.

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 3>He's Dylan fucking Cruise. So you have Dylan Cruz coming

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 3>into the fold yere you hope that you get k

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Cavali back. I think that this team could be sneaky

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 3>good next year. I also think they're gonna spend a

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit of money. The Nationals are, you know, not

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 3>not to break the bank team, but they're definitely not

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:12.359
<v Speaker 3>this like perpetually cheap team. You know, I know they

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to pay you know, Juan Soto all of

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the money that he wanted, or renown all the money

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:17.760
<v Speaker 3>that he wanted.

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Or whatever it may be.

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:20.479
<v Speaker 3>But I do think that they're gonna spend some money

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 3>this coming off season and go pick up some guys.

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 3>They've got catching locked up and keep it release. They've

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 3>got shorts up, as you mentioned, locked up with CJ. Abrams,

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 3>They've got a couple spots in the rotation set with

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 3>Josiah Gray and Mackenzie Gore. I think they can find

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 3>a way to kind of piece this team together and

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 3>make it not bad at all. Another boring answer would

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 3>be the Cardinals, because I do like the youth that's

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 3>coming up, and you know that they're kind of fun. No, no, no, no.

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yes, obviously Cardinals fans obviously, but yeah, no,

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 2>I I want to buy into a team that actually stinks.

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you know what I'm saying.

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:58.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Cardinals, like the Cardinals, the Padres, Like there's

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 2>teams that you know that this year they be our answer.

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But like, let's let me, let's let's let's let's you know,

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 2>find the diamond in the rough here. Let's fuck Tigers

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 2>for a second.

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well okay, here it's Tigers versus Pirates for me

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 3>right here, and you know, I look at the Pirates,

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 3>you know I'm gonna go with the fucking Tigers. I'm

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 3>gonna go with the fucking Tigers.

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the Tigers because I saw a couple of

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>questions that we got kind of like. I actually kind

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of like them too.

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 3>And God, if they just didn't have Javier Bayas, I'd

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 3>feel so much better. But Riley Green is coming into

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:36.759
<v Speaker 3>his own, no doubt about it. I have talked about

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Carry Carpenter on this podcast for like two years now,

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 3>and we're finally seeing Kerry Carpenter really really blossom into

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the guy who just flat out Rakes Torkosin. I hope

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 3>this keeps rolling books sex Spencer Torkleson has found it

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 3>like this offense is coming together. They're gonna clear some

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 3>money now with Miguel Cabrera coming off the books, right

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I Javier Baias, he's opting in, no doubt about that.

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the pitching is coming together a little bit.

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:06.759
<v Speaker 2>I wants to stay a Tiger, clearly, he wants to

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 2>be a career Tiger, good for Clearly he.

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't want to go anywhere.

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 3>But they got Trek Scuogl back Matt Manning actually looks

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 3>like a big league arm Like they've got guys kind

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 3>of coming together here. I think this team is not

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 3>bad at all as is, and I think it's gonna

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 3>get stronger and stronger. I do think that they're going

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to spend a little bit of money too and and

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.720
<v Speaker 3>put this together. And they also have a pretty decent

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 3>farm system. So consider me in on on the Tigers

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 3>long term. I'll make that my my team here that

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I kind of believe in. And again, they've got other

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 3>guys that are coming up through the pipeline that I

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 3>think can help them.

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Here's my one issue with the Tigers and people who've

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 2>been following my picks all year, you know, they are

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 2>my one band team, and it's because I believe in

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 2>them more than they believe in themselves. I keep betting

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 2>on Alex Viyodo and he keeps giving up home runs.

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I keep betting on Resoulson and he keeps sucking. But

0:50:55.600 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I see something there like the expected year right, like

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 2>they're all way lower because these guys have strikeout stuff.

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 2>They don't really walk anyone in The hard hit rate

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 2>isn't enormous. But then I bet on them and the

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 2>wind is blowing in at co America and they still

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 2>give up a four hundred and twenty five foot home run,

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:14.399
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, what like that would have been four

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 2>eighty everywhere else, Like what is going on here? And

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:19.879
<v Speaker 2>I think that's more of just I'm betting on them

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:22.399
<v Speaker 2>in the wrong spots or something. But you talked about

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 2>those first guys, like one of those pictures I fully

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 2>believe is going to work. Well, both of them work.

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Yeah, I agree, maybe both of them won't,

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 2>but I believe that one of them is here to stay.

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 2>But jeg Els, Fido and Rees Holson, I agree.

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 3>And then you've got Scooball and then you've got the

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 3>guys you mentioned. You've got time Adden coming up, You've

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 3>got job not too too far away, and then Cole

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Keith is one of my favorite bats in the minor leagues.

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 3>He I think he's a September call up. He's a

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit limited defensively. He is either gonna play first

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 3>or third. Probably end up playing third since Torque is,

0:51:52.120 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, anchoring that that first base spot.

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:56.879
<v Speaker 1>But again that's a mash or two.

0:51:57.080 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I think the Tigers could be one of the more

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:01.720
<v Speaker 3>underrated young lineups and baseball the next next season.

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 2>It's been agree with you more. Let's move on to

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 2>our next question, but before we do, let's hear from

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 2>our friends at ALT.

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, by the way, that is a card that I

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 3>am buying Colt Keith. I've bought plenty of and the

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 3>place that you can do that is at all dot xyz.

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 3>The baseball card market is heating up during the second

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 3>half of the season here and as we get into

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs, and the only place to search for cards

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 3>is all dot xyz. It's the only platform that allows

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 3>you to search all the major marketplaces and eBay at once.

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Just download the free All app in our episode description

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:39.839
<v Speaker 3>type of player card into the search bar, and All

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 3>will return every graded card available for sale. Even better,

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 3>you can save the search and be notified every time

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 3>that a card is available. So for me, when I'm

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 3>looking for Cold Keith, don't see anything on the market

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 3>at that moment, I put a little you know, save

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 3>search mark there and I'll be notified anytime somebody lists

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:00.839
<v Speaker 3>a Cold Keith card, and then like Psycho, I will

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 3>go and scoop that up immediately. You'll never want to

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 3>use another app for researching and buying baseball cards. Ever again,

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 3>it's also a great way to get a price guide

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:13.160
<v Speaker 3>on maybe a card that you pulled, a card that

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 3>you bought a while ago. They have a really really

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:19.280
<v Speaker 3>advanced pricing system to get an idea of what recent

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 3>sales were and what your card is worth. So go

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 3>check out that link in our episode description so they

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 3>know that we sent you, and I think you will

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 3>never use any other app to track your baseball cards

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 3>sports cards in general, and buy or sell on there

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Our next question, out of all the teams in contention,

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:43.319
<v Speaker 2>who do you have the least faith in when it

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 2>actually comes down to winning a playoff series? Asked by

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Alex Cornell twenty six on Instagram. I think we should

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:53.600
<v Speaker 2>give an answer for both the American League and the

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 2>National League. And my National League team is very easy.

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 2>My American League team is very hard. So I'll just

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 2>start with the National League. If the Giants make it

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 2>in the postseason, I don't see them winning against anyone.

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I like them. I think they can win games in

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the regular season in low scoring battles when they're using

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 2>the bullpen. But at the end of the day, you

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 2>spelled it out with their rotation. If Logan Webb loses

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Game one, which is possible, of course it is, it's

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. They're done. It's right like they won't be

0:54:26.239 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 2>able to hit enough. They don't have the power, they

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 2>don't their depth in the lineup is not good. Like

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 2>at sometimes they look like a last place team when

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 2>they play, and then sometimes they beat the Braves four

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 2>to three with Jacob Junas versus Max Free Like, sometimes

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that happens and it looks awesome and I'm in, But

0:54:45.520 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 2>more often than not you get into the playoffs. I

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:52.760
<v Speaker 2>cannot see the Giants winning a playoff series against anyone

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:56.040
<v Speaker 2>in that's in contention right now. I really don't, cause

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:58.399
<v Speaker 2>I think other teams have upside. Right, we talk about

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the Diamondbacks like Gallen Kelly, you can win those games.

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Right If we're looking at other teams on the fringe,

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 2>like the Marlins. I think the Marlins beat the Giants

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:09.319
<v Speaker 2>in a playoff series. The Phillies do, right, I think

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the Cubs could beat them. I think the Reds could

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 2>beat them. I think the Giants of all the remaining contenders,

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 2>have the least amount of upside. Decently high floor, but

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 2>it's not even that high of a floor.

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now, I'm with you. It's it's the Giants. I mean,

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing a team that's again only I think their

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 3>roster moves kind of scream panic mode.

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's fight or flight a little bit. With this team.

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 3>They didn't even need to add Weay Mechwork to the

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 3>forty for another year or two now, or for several

0:55:40.640 --> 0:55:42.920
<v Speaker 3>more years, I believe, And now they're going to have to,

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, have a little bit more of a forty

0:55:44.960 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 3>man crunch because they panicked and brought Mechler up and

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:50.080
<v Speaker 3>thought that he could be a better option than you know,

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Elliott Ramos or Luis Manto. So we're also kind of

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:55.880
<v Speaker 3>panic options, and you know, and how they pick up

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:59.399
<v Speaker 3>Paul de Young and like they're just trying everything right now.

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think a team that's throwing shit at the

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.799
<v Speaker 3>wall and hoping it sticks it kind of tips their

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 3>hand already as probably one of the more vulnerable teams

0:56:08.719 --> 0:56:11.400
<v Speaker 3>in the Hunts. You know, I would I would highlight

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 3>the Marlins, but when you have, I mean, you saw

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:17.400
<v Speaker 3>what Uri Perez did to the Dodgers. I mean that

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 3>was unbelieva. I was one of the best rookie pitching

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 3>performances I've seen basically since Spencer Strider. But besides that,

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 3>like I can't remember a much better rookie pitching performance recently.

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Then you have, you know, you hope Lizardo turns it around.

0:56:30.800 --> 0:56:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Like they just have so many arms and the bats

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 3>have come alive a little bit. I feel better about

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 3>that team being a little bit more complete than the Giants.

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I'd highlight the Reds, but they're gonna get Lodolo back

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 3>very soon.

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 1>They have greenback.

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 3>I know his first start was a disaster, but you know,

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 3>he's still better than Luke Weaver. And they've been hanging

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 3>around and Ellie's playing better. I'm with you. I think

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the Giants are the obvious answer here.

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Who's your team in the American League? Because this one

0:56:57.760 --> 0:57:01.400
<v Speaker 2>is is interesting because it's not the Ashos, it's not

0:57:01.440 --> 0:57:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the Rangers, it's not the Mariners. It's probably not the Twins,

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 2>because I think that the Twins can get you if

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 2>their bats are hot, their pitching is so good, and

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 2>their bullpen, when Rocco Baldelli puts in the right arms

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:18.440
<v Speaker 2>in the right situations, they can be good. It's not

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the Orioles. I still think that if the Rays have

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Efflin Civalian Glass, now it's tough to beat. So I'm

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 2>trying to decide between the Blue Jays and the Red Sox,

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and you might say, yeah, it's definitely the Red Sox.

0:57:35.440 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 2>They they keep winning, like the Blue Jays are so

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 2>disappointing on them. They can't hit Vlattie. I mean, I

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 2>could just go for days about how disappointed I am

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 2>in him. But when the Blue Jays and the Red

0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Sox play each other, the Red Sox win. When the

0:57:56.400 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays play the Organs, the Orioles wine. The Blue

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Jays an't winning it against the eliast but they can't

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:04.720
<v Speaker 2>really hit at home. Why he is an ops under

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred at home?

0:58:07.560 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what's with the Canada effect on some of

0:58:10.840 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys.

0:58:11.280 --> 0:58:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Both in Jordan Romano pitches in the United States that

0:58:13.720 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 2>he's like a decent reliever that he pitches in Canada.

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:21.400
<v Speaker 3>He's bar yeah, Rivera. It's it's bizarre. And to your point, though,

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 3>the Red Sox against teams over five hundred, thirty three

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 3>and thirty three, you look at the Blue Jays against

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:31.120
<v Speaker 3>teams over five hundred, the thirty seven and forty. That

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 3>might not sound like the biggest difference, but when you're

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 3>a team that's three games behind them, you shouldn't have,

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, a better record against teams better than five hundred. Again, Boston,

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 3>now they struggle with them. They kind of play down

0:58:44.600 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 3>to their competition. We saw them lose the series to

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the Nationals. We saw them struggle with the Royals. They're

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty one in I gotta find below five hundred. I

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:55.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's been very good for them. And you know,

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 3>you look at what the Blue Jays have done. They

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 3>just torch teams that are below five. So you know,

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 3>for me, it's one of those interesting spots where I,

0:59:05.160 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 3>on paper, I don't trust the Red Sox pitching, but

0:59:08.560 --> 0:59:12.080
<v Speaker 3>like shit, man, then fucking Cutter Crawford goes out there

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:14.560
<v Speaker 3>and gives you a gem, you know, and then you know,

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Chris Martin to Kenley Jansen right now.

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Is lights out. It's lights out with those two. So

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Twins.

0:59:22.360 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I know you you eliminated them, and I love the Twins,

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 3>like I've tried to talk myself into this Twins team,

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 3>but this offense, man, I just see them stalling out

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the same way we saw the Mariners stall out last

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 3>year against the Astros, where you're just like, holy shit,

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 3>they're not gonna score a run, like, oh my god,

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and even when the pitching holds up there under the bargain,

0:59:43.600 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 3>you're sitting there and you're like, they're not gonna get

0:59:45.480 --> 0:59:48.040
<v Speaker 3>the one run that they need to get. Everyone's punching out,

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 3>like Edward Julian like has this like come down to

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Earth moment in the playoffs, or hey, Polonco gets banged

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 3>up again, Correa keeps being a shell of himself, kepler

0:59:58.000 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 3>like faces a lefty. I don't know, I just see it, like, oh,

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Royce Lewis like runs into the first baseman, and then

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 3>it's like Matt Woner, Ryan Jefferson, Joey Gallows striking out

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 3>and then Michael A. Taylor rounding things like I already

1:00:09.760 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 3>see it, bro, Like I just I already see it.

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 3>And it kills me because I fucking love this team.

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 3>They're so there's so much fun. They're like my MLB

1:00:18.160 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the Show team. But fuck, I can't watch them anymore.

1:00:20.880 --> 1:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't.

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm so sick of it, and I think they're very

1:00:23.680 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>flawed and I follow some Twins folks.

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>They can't stand their own team.

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 3>I just saw a headline the other day that was

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Twins considering Byron Buxton in the outfield.

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>The fuck you mean?

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Like I understand why that they haven't had him out there,

1:00:36.720 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 3>but like, that's a headline that they're considering Byron Buxton

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:44.760
<v Speaker 3>in the outfield. Like, I can't do it with this

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>fucking team, man, I I'm most concerned about them.

1:00:47.840 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Like, that's it.

1:00:50.040 --> 1:00:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Max Kepler faces the left team. That was beautiful. I'm

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>switching my answer to the Twins. You're right, like the

1:01:00.160 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Jays versus Twins, who's winning that series? The Blue Jays

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>are really How.

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Was Kaiko gets the ball in Game five? Spinning it

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>like eighty five mile an hour sinker? Like I can't

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>do it, man, You and Jack are obsessed with the Twins.

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I've always known them. They're just not

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>they're frauds. They're frauds.

1:01:18.320 --> 1:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I've just I you know, it's funny because I've seen

1:01:22.800 --> 1:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees so many times in the playoffs when I

1:01:25.200 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't think the Yankees were good enough, and then they

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:30.400
<v Speaker 2>fuck up the Twins, and I'm like, Okay, but we

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>have a shot. Then we get Steve rold By the

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Ashos or somebody else. I'm like, well, there you go.

1:01:34.960 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Like it was like the Yankees against the Guardians last year,

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>where they at least like the Guardians took them to five. Yeah,

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>they've taken the Yankees to five. Like there's not a team.

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>There may be a gentleman's.

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>They're not a team that battles to me and and

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 3>grinds it out and steals one.

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like that, and well.

1:01:49.840 --> 1:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Deli puts, oh yeah, Martin in a tie game because

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 2>it's a lefty when the lefty is reverse splits like,

1:01:56.560 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>come on, we gotta be better. And then I hear

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:00.920
<v Speaker 2>from Twins Twitter, It's like, what do you mean, Gravonni

1:02:01.000 --> 1:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>moranz is our lefty? Get a better lefty because it

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>ain't working.

1:02:05.280 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you, I'm with you, God you it.

1:02:07.720 --> 1:02:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I just fucking read the Twins. I'm sorry Twins fans,

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 2>but come on, we see what you see what we're seeing.

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's keep going. This is a good one,

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>arm and this one, this one's for you. But I

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>have my answer, but I'm sure you have multiple answers.

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Which trade has the highest chance of flaming out at

1:02:24.880 --> 1:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>this deadline. From last season, it was probably the Tyler

1:02:27.920 --> 1:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Malley deal. So what is it this season? If we

1:02:30.840 --> 1:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>remember Tyler Mallley was traded in exchange for Spencer Steer

1:02:35.360 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>and Christian and Carnacion Strand, who are both contributors this

1:02:39.760 --> 1:02:42.800
<v Speaker 2>year for the Reds, and Tyler Mallley has not really

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>pitched for the Minnesota Twins. That was asked by Naoki

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Baseball nerd on Instagram. I'm just gonna give you my

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>answer first, and then you can agree or disagree, because

1:02:52.400 --> 1:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I know you're gonna have multiple answers. Yeah, Kyle Manzardo

1:02:56.680 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>was traded for Aaron Savali. Now, Aaron Savali is a

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>good pitcher, but Kyle Manzardo is one of those guys

1:03:05.120 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>that I think you're gonna put in a lineup for

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a long time and he's gonna hit fifth for a decade.

1:03:09.480 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:03:09.800 --> 1:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Like you look at his stats, right, you even look

1:03:12.000 --> 1:03:14.440
<v Speaker 2>at his swing. It's a sweet swing, but there's no

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>real swing and miss. There are tons of walks, there's doubles,

1:03:18.360 --> 1:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>there's home runs. Like that was a big piece to

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 2>give up. Now I understand it from the race perspective,

1:03:25.840 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 2>they had a crunch. They have so many first base

1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:31.000
<v Speaker 2>third base prospects. So I'm not saying the Rays were

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 2>completely wrong to trade him. It wasn't like they needed

1:03:34.120 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>him anyway. But just looking back on that trade, I

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>think Manzardo is gonna be one of the better hitters

1:03:39.000 --> 1:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>for the Guardians for a long time. Well, Aaron Savali

1:03:41.720 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 2>is probably gonna be pretty good for the race for

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>a season or two.

1:03:44.800 --> 1:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, that's the thing is like it's tough

1:03:47.360 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>because it's like there's the lens of yes.

1:03:51.200 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Savali is probably one of the only reasons why they have.

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 3>A pulse at this point. Well, okay, great, you have

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>a pulse, you get balanced in the wild card round,

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:02.160
<v Speaker 3>and and now you don't have a first baseman for

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>seven years, like you traded away a guaranteed starting first

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:08.520
<v Speaker 3>basement with you know, six seven years of control. For

1:04:09.240 --> 1:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>what I mean, there's a reason why the Guardians moved

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Josh Bell won financially two. It was that they believe

1:04:17.920 --> 1:04:19.960
<v Speaker 3>in Menzarto to the degree that I think he can,

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:22.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, be that first basement for them, nailor can

1:04:22.560 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 3>dh and play a little outfield whatever. They'll they'll move

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it around they'll figure it out, but I think Menzarto

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:29.360
<v Speaker 3>was a big part of that, and I think he's

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 3>one of these. I have him in my right up

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:33.720
<v Speaker 3>on top of on our top one hundred list as

1:04:34.160 --> 1:04:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the one of the safest offensive profiles in the minor league.

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I thought that that easily could be

1:04:40.920 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 3>one that they regret. I weirdly a small deal that

1:04:46.320 --> 1:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'll get to a more exciting one, but I

1:04:47.800 --> 1:04:50.080
<v Speaker 3>just want to mention before I forgot. I think it's

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 3>weird that the Brewers just decided to move off Luis

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Arias so quickly for what like Bradley Blaylocks. And you know,

1:04:56.120 --> 1:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, a random right handed pitcher like Arius has

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:00.720
<v Speaker 3>already swung it pretty well. We've seen him in the

1:05:00.760 --> 1:05:03.160
<v Speaker 3>past swing it really well. I thought that was a weird,

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>random kind of like dump off there. But I think

1:05:06.080 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 3>the number one, number one, number one, number one thing,

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:13.280
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be the Lucas Giolito trade. I I just

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I wanted the Angels to stand pat. I wanted him

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>to maybe even soft buy like we saw the Padres

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 3>do right and go get a rich Hill might end

1:05:22.120 --> 1:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>up giving similar production to what they got from Lucas Giolito.

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:28.760
<v Speaker 2>That's that's so beat to Giliito. Rich Hill has been horrible,

1:05:30.080 --> 1:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>has been bad too.

1:05:31.280 --> 1:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>How bad is rich Oban? Can you pull the numbers up?

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 2>It's three innings, like I know what it is. Okay, Okay,

1:05:37.760 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe three innings, seven hits, five earned every single outing.

1:05:40.800 --> 1:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, at least thank you for holding me accountable.

1:05:43.400 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I won't I won't be too hyperbolic, but because that is,

1:05:47.360 --> 1:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>he has been horrible. Okay, has been bad. Okay, last start,

1:05:51.760 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>last last start from rich Hill, five innings, two hits,

1:05:54.800 --> 1:05:56.720
<v Speaker 3>three runs, three.

1:05:56.560 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 2>K's okay, Okay, you don't want to take it back.

1:06:01.320 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 3>But no, my point being now, like Gilito was never

1:06:04.840 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna move the needle for you, like he's a mid

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:10.960
<v Speaker 3>four ZR guy. You knew that when you got him

1:06:11.200 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and Raynaldo Lopez like if he had control, I'd get it.

1:06:15.600 --> 1:06:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Rental reliever, rental starter. That's crazy. I was pounding the

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:21.040
<v Speaker 3>table for the Angels to keep Otani and I stand

1:06:21.080 --> 1:06:23.320
<v Speaker 3>by that, and I would have liked them to add

1:06:23.800 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>that's fine too, but they they added I think an

1:06:29.920 --> 1:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>asset that doesn't help them that much, that is a

1:06:32.840 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>rental and they also traded somebody for that like in

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:40.080
<v Speaker 3>that deal that I think is there was probably their

1:06:40.240 --> 1:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>best prospect and probably one of their better options. And

1:06:43.760 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>since the trade, by the way, Edgar Caro, switch hitting

1:06:46.840 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>catcher who's twenty years old in double A three twenty eight,

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 3>three eighty nine four fifty nine slash line as a

1:06:54.160 --> 1:06:56.880
<v Speaker 3>switch hitting catcher with a ten percent walk rate and

1:06:56.960 --> 1:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>fifteen percent k rate in double A, Caro is going

1:06:59.680 --> 1:07:02.280
<v Speaker 3>to be their starting catcher at some point next year,

1:07:02.640 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>and Lucas Gilito will be pitching in LA or something

1:07:06.120 --> 1:07:08.200
<v Speaker 3>like that, and not not for the Angels, for like

1:07:08.240 --> 1:07:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers or something like that. That one blows my

1:07:11.600 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>mind because Carol, I think they sold him at the

1:07:14.840 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>lowest possible value and for two rentals that that was.

1:07:19.080 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>That's one that I think they'll regret for a really

1:07:21.400 --> 1:07:21.959
<v Speaker 1>long time.

1:07:22.800 --> 1:07:25.000
<v Speaker 2>The thing is they do have logan Ohapi though kind

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>of similar to the race they could trade from you know,

1:07:28.000 --> 1:07:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a surplus.

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 3>No doubt, and I would have used that to go

1:07:30.720 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 3>get Lorenzen or you know, somebody else, just anything else.

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>The Phillies got Lorenzen for their an infield prospect that

1:07:39.800 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm how you don't care about.

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>How you lee who is like a similar offensive profile,

1:07:47.240 --> 1:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>slightly diminished and set like stuck at second base, so

1:07:51.480 --> 1:07:53.360
<v Speaker 3>like you have a catcher.

1:07:53.440 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Like football Tigers, Like what are we doing there? Right?

1:07:56.640 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, I thought they could have.

1:07:57.720 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Done the prospects. They're gonna regret the prospects, like Tigers,

1:08:01.080 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>can we be better?

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Well, you just you just saw what Edgar Carrow

1:08:04.560 --> 1:08:06.720
<v Speaker 3>got you. If you attached Folly or something, you could

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 3>have got a haul. And that's kind of what I'm

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>talking about here, is like if you dangled Caro elsewhere,

1:08:12.680 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 3>to me, it was just like a panic move. A

1:08:14.520 --> 1:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of teams I think would have given up more

1:08:16.439 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>for Edgar Caro. And you know that's I don't mind

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 3>trading Carrow. I floated him as one of the best

1:08:22.320 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>trade chips going into the season and going into the

1:08:25.200 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 3>trade deadline, like that's what you cash it in for

1:08:28.200 --> 1:08:30.800
<v Speaker 3>a rental Giolito and a rental Reinaldo Lopez when you

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:33.240
<v Speaker 3>know it's unlikely that you make the playoffs Like that

1:08:33.280 --> 1:08:35.880
<v Speaker 3>one I think is really going to uh sting for

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:37.760
<v Speaker 3>them for a while, because I do think he's gonna

1:08:37.760 --> 1:08:40.679
<v Speaker 3>be a big league piece for for a good time.

1:08:40.880 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 3>And then I don't think that the I don't think

1:08:43.479 --> 1:08:48.040
<v Speaker 3>that the Blue Jays are gonna miss Matt Swanson very much. Uh,

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:51.000
<v Speaker 3>because I won't pretend to know anything about Matt Savonson.

1:08:51.560 --> 1:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>But he acquired Paul de Young and then just defade

1:08:54.880 --> 1:08:57.960
<v Speaker 3>him three weeks later, So you basically just gave away

1:08:58.000 --> 1:09:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Matt savonsin that one's got to be in the conversation too.

1:09:02.479 --> 1:09:05.879
<v Speaker 2>I saw this question from our guy Kyle Taylor Portraits,

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>who again shout out, made all of these behind me

1:09:08.280 --> 1:09:10.640
<v Speaker 2>go check them out on Instagram, just to wrap up,

1:09:10.640 --> 1:09:13.479
<v Speaker 2>because that was our last question. But he said, and

1:09:13.520 --> 1:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure exactly what he said, but I know

1:09:15.439 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 2>it was about the Cardinals, because I think he's a

1:09:17.479 --> 1:09:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals fan. He was like, does it say anything about

1:09:19.479 --> 1:09:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals front office that they kept Paul the Young

1:09:21.800 --> 1:09:24.040
<v Speaker 2>this entire time, kind of traded him for nothing, and

1:09:24.040 --> 1:09:26.320
<v Speaker 2>that a team gets Paul the Young and DFAs him

1:09:26.560 --> 1:09:29.240
<v Speaker 2>three weeks later? Does it say anything about the Cardinals?

1:09:29.320 --> 1:09:32.320
<v Speaker 2>It made me laugh, I'm not sure exactly made laugh.

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 3>It kind of does like the Cardinals are sit on

1:09:35.120 --> 1:09:37.840
<v Speaker 3>their hands like none others are you? How excited are

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>you to talk about the Cardinals this offseason.

1:09:40.080 --> 1:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not at all, because they said the team is different,

1:09:44.439 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 2>same thing, Cardinals fans. I'm going to scream into this mic. Yeah,

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:52.519
<v Speaker 2>they said arting pitching. They said the team's going to

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>look different, and I think by that they're just going

1:09:54.680 --> 1:09:57.479
<v Speaker 2>to like change the jersey color or something like that's

1:09:57.520 --> 1:10:00.720
<v Speaker 2>your fire. Yeah, they're actually there, gonna come up with

1:10:00.880 --> 1:10:04.240
<v Speaker 2>some sick jerseys Cardinals wherever they are, whether it's the

1:10:04.280 --> 1:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>baby blue weather, it's just the whites of the reds

1:10:06.800 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>fire jerseys. The problem is they don't really win baseball

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:13.600
<v Speaker 2>games and are them I'm not patting myself on the

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>back because I didn't even end up betting it, but

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna keep bringing it up. And that's the reason, folks,

1:10:19.320 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 2>because I always sometimes get dms like why do you

1:10:21.520 --> 1:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>guys bring up odds so much? Because sometimes the odds

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>makers know more than we do at the beginning of

1:10:27.800 --> 1:10:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the season and not sometimes kind of all of them

1:10:30.600 --> 1:10:32.880
<v Speaker 2>all the time. But there's sometimes where you can go

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:35.519
<v Speaker 2>into the market and win bets, obviously, But like there's

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:37.799
<v Speaker 2>a reason Vegas is so shiny with all the water.

1:10:37.840 --> 1:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Say, there's a reason why there's castles in the Desert Man.

1:10:40.360 --> 1:10:43.640
<v Speaker 2>On bet MGM, the Cardinals were minus one ten to

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>win the Central and I stared at that line on

1:10:46.800 --> 1:10:50.200
<v Speaker 2>this podcast and I was like, I'm not saying the

1:10:50.280 --> 1:10:52.599
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals are not gonna win the division, but there's no

1:10:52.920 --> 1:10:55.479
<v Speaker 2>fucking way I'm betting on the Cardinals to win this division.

1:10:55.680 --> 1:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Look at that stinky ass line. But we did hit

1:11:00.920 --> 1:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the market Arizona, and i'mbacks over seventy four and a

1:11:03.680 --> 1:11:07.599
<v Speaker 2>half wins. Our biggest bet on this podcast bombs. They're

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:10.040
<v Speaker 2>eleven wins away. Baby, it is in the middle of August.

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Give us the give us a castle in the desert.

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>They botched that one.

1:11:14.880 --> 1:11:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you bet MGM for the free money, and

1:11:17.920 --> 1:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>thank you all for listening to this episode. This was

1:11:21.520 --> 1:11:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the mail bag. We had a bunch of other questions,

1:11:23.960 --> 1:11:26.679
<v Speaker 2>but of course arm and I get talking, and we'll

1:11:26.680 --> 1:11:30.080
<v Speaker 2>have plenty of mail bags downline, and plenty of one

1:11:30.400 --> 1:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>in the off season two. Not a lot of team specific,

1:11:33.000 --> 1:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like we did touch I feel like

1:11:35.080 --> 1:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>on every single team, and if we didn't touch on

1:11:37.800 --> 1:11:39.960
<v Speaker 2>your team, let us know when. The comment section will

1:11:40.000 --> 1:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>be sure to answer your questions moving forward. But the

1:11:43.680 --> 1:11:45.960
<v Speaker 2>best way to support the just Baseball Show is to

1:11:45.960 --> 1:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>get yourself some Just Baseball merch. You can find that

1:11:48.000 --> 1:11:50.880
<v Speaker 2>end of the episode description. Arms, Rock in the fire

1:11:50.960 --> 1:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Polo you can find those in the episode description. Check

1:11:55.080 --> 1:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>out our sponsors right card collectors, go get all it's free.

1:11:59.160 --> 1:12:01.599
<v Speaker 2>It's in the episode. It's going to save you money

1:12:01.640 --> 1:12:04.400
<v Speaker 2>on cards for all my gamblers out there. Bonus bets

1:12:04.439 --> 1:12:07.599
<v Speaker 2>every Wednesday, every Saturday on bet MGM and then when

1:12:07.600 --> 1:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>you use KOJ Just Baseball up to one thousand dollars

1:12:11.120 --> 1:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>in bonus bets when you sign up. But if you

1:12:14.920 --> 1:12:17.599
<v Speaker 2>don't like cards, you don't like gambling, you don't want

1:12:17.640 --> 1:12:19.160
<v Speaker 2>to leave a comment, you don't want to do anything,

1:12:19.520 --> 1:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to spend a time, we get it.

1:12:21.520 --> 1:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean it'd be nice if you did, but I

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 2>get it. If you could at least rate and review

1:12:25.720 --> 1:12:28.560
<v Speaker 2>this podcast five stars, whether it be on Spotify or

1:12:28.640 --> 1:12:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts. And if you're feeling generous, we'd love a

1:12:31.320 --> 1:12:34.360
<v Speaker 2>written review. Sometimes when I'm having a bad day, I

1:12:34.400 --> 1:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>go check out those written reviews. They're phenomenal. We love you, guys.

1:12:38.280 --> 1:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back tomorrow. That's arm I'm Peter, And with that,

1:12:42.120 --> 1:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>thank you everybody,