WEBVTT - 2. Behind The Curtain

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Just a note before we get started. The stories we're

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sharing this season touch on different kinds of trauma. Please

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>take care of yourself while you listen. In this sprawling

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit that pitts foster families against Native families and tribes

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>against states, there is actually one point that everyone agrees

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on that the history of Native families being separated is tragic.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a history that people who are still alive today

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>survived people like Sandy Whitehawk.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 2>How me takya pi chante nape chiusip Lakota mia Chakata

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 2>na jiwa Suchango la Cota matah greeting's relatives. My name

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>is Sandy Whitehawk. My Lakota name is stands in the center.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Woman and I come from the Roast Bud Reservation in

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>South Dakota.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Growing up on the roset Reservation in the nineteen fifties,

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>kids knew to hide when strange cars came up the driveway.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I've heard people say, yeah, we had a drill in

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 2>our house that if a car drove up the driveway,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>we knew that it would be somebody from the government

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>or social worker or something.

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But one day Sandy wasn't fast enough.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember one of my uncles saying that he remembers

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the day that the social worker came and got me.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Drove into the driveway and I was toddling around, and

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 2>they were all sitting around the house. As far as

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>I know, that's how it was told to me. And

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>she just simply got out of the car, scooped me up,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and put me in the car.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Her relatives watched the whole thing.

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Could you imagine what that would have been like. Could

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you imagine that you knew not to move and not

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to do anything, and not to grab me and fight

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 2>for me, because they would have been put in jail

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and I would have still been taken.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>The first thing Sandy remembers about her white adoptive family

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was their.

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Truck, and I remember that it was a red truck,

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and I remember being lifted. I have this sensation of

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>being lifted and put between these two people, and everything

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>was so different. I just remember smell and what my

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>white adoptive mom's arm looked like, my dad's adoptive dad's

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 2>overhauls looked like the dashboard. I have this, like it's

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>incredibly clear picture. But right after that, I am in

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the back of the truck looking in the front of

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the truck watching this little brown girl. So at eighteen

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>months old, I disassociated to protect myself because I was

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I was terrified, you know, because these weren't anybody I knew.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>That red truck took Sandy away from her family and

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>her tribe to a small, rural white community. Being adopted

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>by a white family was supposed to give Sandy the

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>chance at a better life, but it didn't. Sandy's adoptive

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>mom was abusive.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>When I look back, she was suffering greatly. However, the

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 2>abuse that I went through then because of hers was

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, pretty, It was really hard. The sexual violation occurred,

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the beatings occurred, the berating, the spiritual abuse, telling me

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 2>from the time I could remember that I was going

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>to go to hell, and mostly because I was Indian.

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Sandy has this vivid memory from when she was about

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven or twelve. Her mom would have these rages.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I just remember I scurried up the stairs to get

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>away from her, and she was screaming and screaming, and

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>then there's this little landing. I could look down at

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>her and I seen her crying really hard and still

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>saying mean things, and she goes, I should have just

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>left you on the reservation. You're so ungrateful. Nothing I

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>do is good enough for you. You're just completely ungrateful.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>And I remember thinking, what's our reservation? I should have

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>left you on the reservation. What does that mean.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Around the same time that Sandy was growing up in

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>a white home, a national advocacy group got word of

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Tribal leaders reported their children were missing. The group,

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Association on American Indian Affairs, conducted a huge national survey.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>What they found was shocking. Twenty five to thirty five

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of all Native children were on removed from their

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>families and their tribes. Here's Bert Hirsch who led the.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Survey, and the idea was literally to separate these people,

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the parents and their children from their tribal communities permanently,

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately the hope was the tribes themselves would disappear.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Last episode, I told you about boarding schools. They were

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>followed by another federal program called the Indian Adoption Project.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>The government paid the Child Welfare League of America to

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>take Native children and put them up for adoption by

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>white families. Bert and his team found white families who

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>were using those kids for farm labor. The Indian Adoption

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Project fit into this era of federal policy when the

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>government was literally trying to get rid of tribes, and

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a tribe without children doesn't have a future. This type

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>of systemic racism is easy to spot because it comes

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with intent. But there was another reason so many Native

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>kids were missing bias in the system.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Rarely were their allegations of child abuse, but neglect was rampant,

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 4>and it was premised largely on white supremacist thoughts that

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Indian parents virtually by definition, were unfit to raise children,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 4>that Indian reservations, virtually by definition, were unfit environments for children.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 5>To be raised in.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It took another ten years of legal work organizing an advocacy,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but in nineteen seventy eight, Congress finally voted on legislation

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to address the problem. Bert was there in the Senate chambers.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 5>And it was way late at night, if I remember correctly,

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 5>I was in the Senate gallery. It was like midnight

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 5>or after midnight already at that point, because they were

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 5>trying to get all this other legislation passed first.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>He was worried it wouldn't get through.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>But sure enough, at the very end Bird called it

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 3>up and it passed on unanimous consent.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And on November eighth, nineteen seventy eight, President Jimmy Carter

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>signed the Indian Child Welfare Act into law. IKWA was

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>created the way we normally think about changing federal laws

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>through legislation. It took ten years of research, congressional testimony, organizing,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and finally a vote. And that vote in a democracy

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to reflect the will of the people. But

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there is this other way to change federal laws, one

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't congress. If you have money and resources, you

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>can take your issue to federal court, and that's what

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the people trying to get rid of IQUA are doing.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to This Land, a podcast about the present

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>day struggle for Native rights from Cricket Media. I'm your host,

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Nagel Goheen Daaladon d lac Ayete Gela, citizen of

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Cherokee Nation. This season, we're following how a string of

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>custody battles over Native children turned into a federal lawsuit,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>threatening everything from tribal sovereignty to civil rights. The Brakins

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and their lawyers say that stories like Sandy Whitehawk are tragic,

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but that tragedy is in the past, and Native children

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>don't need EQUA anymore. They say that while the law

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was well intended, today it actually harms Native kids, and

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>their evidence for that harm doesn't come from data, or

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tribes or even child welfare experts. It's a story, the

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>story of what happened when a white couple wanted to

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>adopt a Native toddler. But we dug into their story

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't add up. Matthew McGill looks at IQUA

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>through the lens of his clients, the Brakenes.

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 6>I suppose one could dismiss their situation as merely an anecdote,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 6>but that is how every case in the Supreme Court

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 6>is an anecdote of its own. I don't think that

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 6>Brakeenes ought to be dismissed because they are outnumbered by other,

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 6>more routine applications of IQUA.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>McGill is a partner at that big corporate law firm

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we told you about last episode. Gibson Done. He declined

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to speak with us. This is him speaking on a

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>panel hosted by the right wing organization the Cato Institute.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 6>They had been the foster parents to a child for

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 6>about two years, and they had petitioned to adopt that

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 6>child then, although it was unrebutted that it would do

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 6>great damage to this somewhat troubled two year old to

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 6>remove him from the only parents really he had ever

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 6>known that. Nevertheless, the family court in Texas held that

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 6>the adoption petition must be denied and that the child,

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 6>in due course, would be transferred to these strangers in

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 6>New Mexico.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And according to Matthew McGill, that decision to pick a

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Native family a Navajo family over his clients constituted racial discrimination,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>discrimination against white people, which he says is unconstitutional because

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 1>laws aren't supposed to treat people differently based on race.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 6>It obviously discriminates on the basis of race. When you

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 6>deny non Indian families such as the Brakeenes, the same

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 6>opportunity to adopt children as you would give to any

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 6>family of any of five hundred plus Indian tribes.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>McGill says the law also discriminates against Native children.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 6>I would say that it is a legitimate goal to

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 6>prevent the unjustified breakup of Indian families, But what does

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 6>that have to do who with the child the Brakeen

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 6>is trying to adopt. I mean, this was not a

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 6>child who was shunted off to some boarding school for

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 6>no reason at all.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>The Brakkeens and their lawyers say what happened in their

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>case was so wrong, all of Iqua should go away.

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Since so much as writing on the story of one

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>case as a reporter, I needed to know if that

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>story was true, and that's tricky because the details of

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Antonio's custody case are confidential. We dug through any documents

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we could find, talk to dozens of people, and after

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>months of prying and poking around, finally I got a

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>call from our managing producer, Amy Westervelt.

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 7>Hey, Amy's Hey, Rebecca, I have some good news.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>We cracked it open, and what we got was a

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>detailed timeline of Antonio's custody case. Knowing who filed what

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and when changed everything I thought I knew about that story.

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It turns out Antonio did have a Native family who

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>loved and cared for him the first year of his

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>life his grandparents, but because of his mom and dad's

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>substance abuse, CPS got involved and they decided he needed

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to go into foster care. After Antonio's parents' rites were terminated,

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Navajo Nation found a Navajo family Within a couple months

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>after that, things moved pretty fast. The Brakins hired a

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>local family lawyer and filed a bunch of paperwork to

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>try and keep Antonio in their home. In one motion,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they tried to kick Navajo Nation out of the case.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>In it, they spelled the word Navajo with an H,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not a J every time it was written. But that

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>motion and others all got thrown out. That's the family

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>court decision McGill was talking about. And that's when, according

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to Jennifer's blog, they started looking for help with an appeal,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>like how long does it take for them to get

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>connected to Gibson and done?

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 7>Okay, that's where this just like blew my mind because

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 7>it's August twenty second. They get denied by August twenty eighth.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 7>What Wrickets of Gibson done is filing motions?

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 4>What that's like? That's the day day.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 8>That's bonkers.

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>That is so bonkers, not even a week. Most law

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>firms couldn't write that kind of appeal in six days.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It left me wondering were the Brakeens looking for legal

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>help or was Gibson done looking for plaintiffs? And how

0:14:53.160 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>did they find each other? That quickly, and Gibson Dunn

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the only power player ready to jump in.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 8>Someone else shows up. Who the freaking Texas Attorney General.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 8>Why yes, that was just like really shocked me because

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 8>I in family court the office of the Texas Attorney

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 8>General and like some just like like some kid in

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 8>foster care, they're.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Intervening in that case to say that iqua should be

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>declared unconstitutional. Mm hmm, that's right. What the hell, that's

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a bizarre The office of the Attorney General, one of

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful politicians in the entire state, was there

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in family court. Imagine if you were filing for divorce

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>or in the middle of an ugly custody dispute and

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your state ag showed up. I ran this by a

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>few lawyers. They were all shocked.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 9>State AG's office would not participate in a case like

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 9>that at all unless it reached perhaps an appellate or

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 9>even a supreme court level within the state.

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's Matthew Fletcher. He's a citizen of Grand Travers Band

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians and a law professor at

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State University.

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 9>So it's extraordinary for high level persons in the attorneys

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 9>in the State AG's office to step down into the

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 9>trial level and participate.

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>The Texas AG's office didn't find out about Antonio's case

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>through their child welfare department. They found out through Gibson Dunn.

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Once we confirmed this, we weren't surprised because many of

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers who work at Gibson Dun's Texas offices used

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to work for the Attorney General and vice versa. It's

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>like a revolving door. The Texas ag came to Family

0:16:55.200 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Court with an agenda not about Antonio, but about he

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>asked that Terrant County judge to declare iqua unconstitutional. It

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 1>turned a custody dispute, a court case that determined the

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>life of a two year old, into a political battleground.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>We already knew from Jennifer's blog and federal court documents

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Brakins were able to adopt Antonio after both

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Navajo Nation and Cherokee Nation agreed to the adoption, but

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know when the tribes agreed, and that detail

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>stopped me in my tracks because it was the same

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>week the Brakens filed the federal lawsuit. I shared this

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>with law professor Matthew Fletcher. So they filed the federal

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit two days before there's court record that all of

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the barriers to the adoption have been lifted.

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's insane.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 9>They were going to win. I mean, that's baffling and

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 9>also disturbing that they were willing to go to those

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 9>lengths these It's apparent to me these children are irrelevant

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:16.719
<v Speaker 9>that they are part of the tool designed to destroy

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 9>the NHL Welfare Act. For reasons that I frankly do

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 9>not understand.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>The Brakeenes didn't file a federal lawsuit when they were

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>losing custody. They filed the lawsuit when they were winning.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Here is how Jennifer's blog, read by a voice actor,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>describes the time they spent waiting to adopt Antonio.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 10>We did our Christmas card photoshoot at Thanksgiving. We had

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 10>been told by CPS we would definitely have the adoption

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 10>by Christmas, so I planned the card accordingly, and as

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 10>the days and weeks passed, when I would have definitely

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 10>had my card in the mail by now, we still

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 10>didn't even have a date. So we mailed the card

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 10>on the way home from the adoption on January eighth,

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 10>and Chad cleverly closed the envelopes with some red tape

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 10>and wrote, sorry, this year our card got caught up

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 10>in some red tape.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So those months they spent waiting to adopt Antonio had

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Iqua. It was just Texas being

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>slow to finalize the paperwork. But here's how that same

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>time period was described in court documents McGill filed right

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>before Christmas. Quote for months, their adoption of Alm has

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>been delayed, caught in a terrifying whirlwind of court proceedings

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that occurred only because the federal government classifies Alm as

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>an Indian child. McGill alleged his clients were caught in

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a terrifying whirlwind created only by Iqua after the tribes

0:19:55.880 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>agreed to the adoption, after they all knew the Brakeens

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>would adopt Antonio. Normally, when building a big federal lawsuit,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to pick the plaintiffs with the strongest case,

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>which makes the Brakens an odd choice. It's almost like

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>a white student suing a university over affirmative action because

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>they were worried they wouldn't get accepted, but in the

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>end they did. It just doesn't make sense. But there's

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this other way, the Brakeens are the perfect plaintiffs. It's

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>less about how lawsuits work and more about how politics work,

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>specifically politics in the state of Texas. The federal lawsuit

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Rakkeen v. Holland is now waiting on the steps of

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. It got this far because the foster

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>parents have powerful company states more than one. Here's law

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Professor Matthew Fletcher again.

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 9>When the state says, hey, there's this federal law that

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 9>we think is wholly unconstitutional. Even if what the state

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 9>is saying is patently frivolous, it's still going to get

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 9>a hearing, in a serious one.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>When the Brakeens filed their federal lawsuit, Texas was right

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there with them. We wanted to know why, and we

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>had a way to find out. Public offices like an

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>attorney general have to respond to Freedom of Information Act

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>requests or foyas, so we filed FOYA requests to the

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>office of the Texas Attorney General. They stonewalled us, but

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in building their case, they gave us a workaround because

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they brought on other states. So we foyed those states

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and uncovered a web of communication. The same day Texas

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>filed the federal lawsuit, we sent out an email blast

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>inviting other states to join. The email was sent to

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly Republican attorneys general with the subject line new federalism

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>case opportunity. Of all the states Texas emailed, only three

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>got back Indiana, Louisiana, and Ohio. And here's what's strange

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>about those states.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 9>It's the states that have few Indian people, few Indian

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 9>tribes are the ones who are using this as a

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 9>vehicle to ascertain states rights.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>In the lawsuit, twenty six states came out against Texas

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and in support of IQUA. Those states represent ninety four

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of all tribes in the US. The four states

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>who say IQUA is a bad BA have less than

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>one percent of all tribes in the United States. Those

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>states also have very few EQUA cases. When we sent

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana a public information request, they told us they had

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty two open cases involving Native children. Their annual caseload

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is over ten thousand. In that email to other state ags,

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Texas laid out why IQUA is a states rights issue.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the Tenth Amendment.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 9>The Tenth Amendment says that states have all the powers

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 9>left to govern that are not explicitly delegated to the

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 9>United States, and that's a.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 11>Lot of power.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Most family law is governed by states, marriage, divorce, custody

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>over kids, how much child support you have to pay,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so. Texas says IQUA, by budding

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>into child welfare proceedings, is an example of federal overreach.

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas also says that IQUA is a burden on its

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>child wealth welfare agency.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 9>So, for example, IQUA requires states state agencies to send

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 9>notice to India tribes, and Texas says, we don't want

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 9>to notify tribes. You can't make us. It's kind of

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 9>akin to a neer neanor neanor argument. We don't want

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 9>to do it. You can't make us kind of thing.

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>To make sure we weren't missing anything, we reached out

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to tribes, social workers, and child welfare agencies in those

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>four states, and what we found made the lawsuit even

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>more perplexing because the state's own child welfare agencies don't

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>support it. Before joining the lawsuit, the Attorney General of

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana reached out to his state's child welfare agency. The

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>agency told him IQUA is a great law, not a burden,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>which is why the Secretary of Children and Family Services

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>was shocked to see him join the lawsuit. Two days later,

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we heard similar surprise in Texas.

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 12>The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services has a

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 12>great working relationship with all three federally recognized tribes here

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 12>in Texas.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Leah Lopez. She is a social worker who

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>handles most of the EQUA cases for the Isleta del

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>ser Pueblo, a tribe in al Paso, Texas.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 12>If there's an investigation and they have reason to believe

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 12>that they're one of our families, they will give us

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 12>a call. Our on call worker goes out with the

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 12>investigator and they work the case together. It was surprising

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 12>that this lawsuit came to be so.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>If these Attorneys general aren't following the advice of their

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:47.239
<v Speaker 1>own child welfare agencies, who are they listening to? And

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the biggest discovery in the pile of documents

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we uncovered. In all those thousands of pages of emails,

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>we saw exactly who the ags are listening to, who

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>they're stregizing with, who they go to for legal advice,

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>who they send drafts of documents to for approval. It's

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not child welfare experts. It's a handful of anti EQUA lawyers,

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and that communication between anti EQUA advocates and state ags

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about using IQUA to advance states' rights has been going

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>on for years, since way before the Brakkins case, since

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>before Antonio was born. The Brackens didn't just have states

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on their side. They got help from another unexpected place,

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a federal judge. That story after the break. The strategy

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in this case isn't new. Texas has used the courts

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to challenge federal laws and statutes for a long time.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 7>More than one hundred House Republicans on Thursday signed onto

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 7>an amicus brief in support of the Texas lawsuit aimed

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 7>at overturning the election result in four swing states.

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Now comes a new challenge brought by Texas and other

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 2>GOP dominated states that Obamacare must be struck down in

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 2>its entirety.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Texas is trying to invalidate the results of the presidential

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 3>election in key swings.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of those cases were filed in one judge's district.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 13>A federal judge in Texas has temporarily blocked the Obama

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 13>administration's public.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 8>School A federal judge in Fort Worth declared the Affordable

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 8>Care Act unconstitutional.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 14>US District Judge Read O'Connor in Fort Worth agreed with

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 14>a Republican led coalition of twenty states who brought the lawsuit.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>That was news coverage a federal judge read O'Connor striking

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>down the Affordable Care Act and Obama ERAIC guidelines on

0:27:55.000 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>transgender bathrooms and schools. He's also ruled against DHAKA and

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>family leave for LGBTQ parents. Here's Matthew Fletcher.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 7>So he has a.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 15>History of granting injunctions or striking down federal statutes that

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 15>conservatives tend to not like. So if you want a

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 15>federal statute to go away, at least for a little while,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 15>you can always count at rit O'Connor.

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>In twenty eighteen, the Associated Press called him conservatives go

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to judge. Even the Wall Street Journal has accused him

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of going too far. Judge ried O'Connor serves in the

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Northern District of Texas, and the way his district works

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is unique. If you want a federal lawsuit to go

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court, you have to start in district court.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like the ground level. District courts have a lot

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of judges, so when you file a lawsuit, you don't

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>know who will hear your case. But the Northern District

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of Texas is different. There, judges have worked out their

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>own system to divvy up cases, and so when you

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>file a civil lawsuit and a handful of counties, you

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have a good chance of winding up and judge read

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor's courtroom. Over half the lawsuits the Texas ag has

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>filed challenging federal laws have landed and read O'Connor's lap.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And here's where the Brackens start to make sense as plaintiffs.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not because of the details of their custody case.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's because of where they live in Terran County, Texas,

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in read O'Connor's district.

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 9>If you think you can find a judge or a

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 9>court that would be supportive a position that you're taking strategically,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 9>it always makes sense to go to that venue if

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 9>you possibly can. Lawyers and judges don't like to talk

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 9>about it, but that's a realistic thing.

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>They venue shopped. Remember earlier when I said there were

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>factual discrepancies between the details of the custody case and

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what the Brakeens claimed in federal court, Well I found

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>discrepancies like that all over the place, and they really matter.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>The whole lawsuit turns on the story the Brackens and

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>their lawyers tell. That story determines whether or not the

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Brakeens were harmed by EQUA, whether or not that harm

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>violated their constitutional rights, whether or not the Brackens have

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the legal standing to bring this lawsuit in the first place.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But early on, Judge ried O'Connor did the Brakens, McGill

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Texas ag a real favor. Federal courts have

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this process for collecting evidence in a civil lawsuit. It's

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>called discovery, but McGill argued that wasn't necessary, and Judge

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>rite O'Connor agreed. Now that the case is on appeal,

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it's too late. So what that means is that the

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>federal judges reviewing this case are taking everyone on their word.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't have all the documentation that I have. You,

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>as a listener to this podcast, have information that has

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>never been presented in federal court. And all of this,

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the story, the venue shopping, the strategy, it worked.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Shock Waves are going through the Native American community, and.

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>That's after a federal judge calls landmark legislation involving Native

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>American adoption illegal. In October of twenty eighteen, Judge Read

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor ruled that IQUA in its entirety is unconstitutional. There

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of legal ways I could talk about

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>his decision, but here's the simplest version. Judge O'Connor took

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the Indian Child Welfare Act, a forty year old statute

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and chucked it out the window. Now it's up to

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court whether or not that decision will stand today.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Sandy Whitehawk is a national advocate for Native families. Most

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of her work is helping other adoptees reconnect and heal,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>but she knows that IQUA is under attack, and I

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear what she thought about this case. So

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>people who oppose IQUA say that the law disadvantages Native

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>kids because it treats them differently than other kids, and

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's a bad law for Native children. What would

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you say to that bad?

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 11>Hell?

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 2>How does it treat them bad? You got an example?

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah? So I think like in these particular cases,

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>they say that it puts like the interest of the

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>tribe over the best entrance of the child.

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't know what you call it when you

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>take something and misconstrue it. That is so not true

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 2>because people do not understand the law, do not understand

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the structure of a tribe. They don't know anything about

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Indian families and our connection to each other.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So in this most recent lawsuit, the actual legal argument

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is that it's unfair to the white foster and adoptive

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>parents because it puts them last in line.

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Give me a fucking break. I'm sorry, that's my immediate

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>emotional response. You can edit all this out, Jesus, it

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 2>puts them last. Talk about privilege. We shouldn't be last

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>because we're white, just because we're white. Go ahead, I'm sorry.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was just gonna say, what would you say

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in response to that?

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess my response really would be, that's a true

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:08.919
<v Speaker 2>expression of white privilege. That they would assume that they

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 2>could have their needs over a child that's not even

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of their culture. That they feel that they have a

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 2>right is just beyond me. You know, I remember being told,

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, we took you from the reservation so you

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 2>would have a chance, you know, a chance at what

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 2>we're given. Nothing to deal with the major micro and

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 2>macro aggressions that happen on the daily. Most white families

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 2>to this day minimize racism like crazy, So you're emotionally

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 2>isolated to the point of you know, overload, which is

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 2>why for adoptees there's such a high rate of suicide

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and addiction.

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Native leaders aren't wondering why a couple who already won

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>custody brought this lawsuit, or why the states with the

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>tiniest of EQUA caseloads are the ones leading the charge.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>What is baffling about the underlying facts of this case

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>does not baffle Native leaders because the consensus in Indian

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>country is that this case was never about EQUA, just

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like boarding schools were never about helping Native children.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 9>It's not about kids. It was never about kids for

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 9>the organizations or even the states that are part of

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 9>this case.

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>So if this case isn't about the adoptions that are

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>supposedly at the center of it, then what is it about.

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's about the future of Indian law.

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I asked that question to a lot of people.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 11>It definitely is so much more than just the welfare

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 11>of children. I think there's a strategic, an aggressive and

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 11>intentional and a deliberate and a bold effort to undermine

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 11>every bit of tribal sovereignty.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 13>Really thinking about IQUA as being the first test case,

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 13>if you will, for really all a federal Indian law

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 13>being undermined by questioning the status of tribal citizens and

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 13>the sovereign authority of tribal governments.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 14>I think it's a pivotal moment for sovereignty in this country,

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 14>and the question will be whether this country continues to

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 14>understand that tribes are sovereign nations that we ought to

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 14>be able to exercise the right to protect our resources,

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 14>whether their natural resources are in this case something more

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 14>precious our children in our future.

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>That was the president of the National Congress of American Indians,

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the executive director of the National Indian Child Welfare Association,

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and the principal chief of Cherokee Nation. Native leaders who

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>are watching this case are not just worried about future

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 1>generations of Native children, They're worried about the future existence

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of tribes, even with states attached. McGill needed other plaintiffs,

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>plaintiffs to make his case stronger. Foster parents who, unlike

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Brakines, didn't have an easy time getting around Igua,

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and he found a case in Minnesota. Next time on

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this Land.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 16>When they terminate parnal rights, it says, if the whole

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 16>biological family is deceased, you don't even have a right

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 16>to see your brothers and sisters anymore.

0:37:58.120 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>They had no grandparents rights.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 16>I was calling every attorney in town and I got rejected,

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 16>turned down.

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't get no help anywhere. He y'all, Hey, Hey, y'all.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 11>Hey.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>This Land is reported, written and hosted by me Rebecca

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Nagle Goheen, citizen of Cherokee Nation. Additional reporting this season

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from Maddie Stone, Martha Troyan, citizen of o b Chika

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>kong Lack Suel First Nation, and Amy Westervelt from Cricket Media.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Our executive producers are John Favreau, Sarah geismer Lyra Smith,

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and Katie Long, thanks to Alison Falsetta from Critical Frequency.

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Our managing producer is Amy Westervelt, Our senior producer is

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Ventry, and our story editor is Raka Murphy. Additional

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>editing for Martha Troyan and Polly Dennette Claw who is Deney.

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Sound design by Lyra Smith, Mark Bush and Charlotte Landis.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Original score composed by Jared Tate, citizen of Chickasaw Nation.

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Our outro song is an honor song for adoptees, written

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>and sung by Jerry Dearly, who is Oglala Lakota. Our

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fact checker is wou dan Yan. Our First Amendment Attorney

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is James Wheaton, founder of The First Amendment Project. Podcast

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>art by Kelly Gonzalez, citizen of Cherokee Nation. Jennifer Brakeen's

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>blog was read by voice actor Alissa Sia. If you're

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoying the show, please rate, review, and subscribe. It helps

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>more people find us, and please share it with your friends.

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>If you have but a tip or information to share

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>related to our reporting, you can do that securely and

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>anonymously through our secure drop You can find a link

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes. To see a detailed timeline of

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Antonio's case, visit this landpodcast dot com. We'll link to

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it in the show notes as well. This season of

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>This Land touches on different forms of family, childhood, and

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>racial trauma. If you feel like you could use support,

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>please check our show notes or website this landpodcast dot

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>com to find resources for adoptees and survivors of childhood trauma,

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>abuse foster care and boarding schools,