WEBVTT - NFTs and Why They're So Hot

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>The frenzy over n f T s or non fungible

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>tokens is a little hard to wrap your head around.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>From digital art to sports memorabilia to tweets, everyone seems

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to be getting into the craze, and the sales prices

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are staggering, from nearly six hundred thousand dollars for the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>n f T of Nion Cat, a cat with a

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>pop tart body that leaves a trail of rainbows, to

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>two point nine million dollars for an n f T

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter founder Jack Dorsey's first tweet, to a record

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine million dollars for the n f T of

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a digital art collage by the artist People sold at

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Christie's auction house in March. Even the artist, whose real

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>name is Mike Winkleman, seemed overwhelmed by the final price

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>as he and his family watched the auction from his

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>living room. We're watching that closing of the auction, which

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>closes in an hour and eight minutes. It's already at

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like an absolutely ridiculous amount to say congratulations, Yet I

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>think it probably means digital art is here. To stay.

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Disney World. So what is an n

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>f T and why are they so hot? Joining me

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is Robert him a partner at Tartar, Crinsky and Drogan

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>who recently wrote an article on n f T s

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and securities law and turned it into an n f T. So,

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Bob tell us what an n f T is. An

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>n f T is a non fungible token, and it's

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a new development that's been occurring in the markets. And

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>unlike say a cryptocurrency like bitcoin, which is fungible in

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the way dollar bills are in the sense that you

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>don't care what sort of dollar bill you get. They're

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>all pretty much the same and they do the same thing.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And n f T is a unique token, so people

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>do care about the specific token that they're getting because

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>each one is on the blockchain and each one individually

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>carries a certain amount of right with it, whether it's

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to digital art or to music or two other things.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's really a way that's starting to revolutionize a

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of the creative industries. N f T seemed to

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>be really popular for artistic endeavors. N f t s

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have been the most popular with respect to artistic endeavors.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>In March, there was an auction at Christie's where an

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>artist named People had sold a digital art collection for

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine million dollars and that's really raised a lot

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of interest. And the n f T market for art

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>had been growing before that, but with that blockbuster sale

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it really came into the mainstream. There's other companies, especially

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, they've been at the forefront in terms of

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>creating n f T s for essentially collectibles and almost

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>like the digital version of sports collectible cards. And as

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we look to the future, there's a lot of exciting

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>possibilities in the in the physical world, like an ownership

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of real property that can be documented on the blockchain.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of new opportunities that are out there.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But currently it seems like the creative industries are really

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>um in the throws of the new n FT craze

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and benefiting a lot from it. So just to get

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>really down to basics, if you buy an n f T,

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you get a digital file? Do you get

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a thumb drive? What do you get in your hand

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>or on your computer? Well, that's a great question, June,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>because h n f T has its own set of

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>rights with it, and really right now, it's a buyer

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>beware market, so buyers really have to dig deep and

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>understand what they're getting. But at the heart of it,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a person gets essentially a piece of code, and they're

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>mostly being done on the Ethereum blockchain, but there's some

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>other blockchains that are doing it as well. But you

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>don't get any sort of physical device like a USB drive.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to have a digital wallet which accepts Ethereum

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever cryptocurrency you you get, and it appears essentially

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in your wallet, on your browser, on your cell phone,

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's an n f T that's unique. It's on

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain, and it's a way of authenticating the person

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that purchase a n f T is really the true

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>owner of that piece of digital artwork or work that

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was created. The n f T that was sold at

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>Christie's for the digital art. So you own the n

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>f T. Do you own the digital art? Can you

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>say if someone tries to show that digital art on

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a computer somewhere, can you say that's mine? You can't

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>use that. It really comes down to the rights that

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the creator the artist gives to the token purchaser um

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and and each token can carry different rights. Um, A

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of the digital art tokens that are being created

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>come with licenses for the person to be able to

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially use it for personal use. Other n f t

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>s come with rights to commercialize the digital artwork and

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to to generate royalties. And that's really one of the

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>nice thing about n f f p s is that they

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.119
<v Speaker 1>really allow for a lot of customization. Uh, some artists

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are even including residual clauses in their tokens, so that

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>if they sell the first one, say for a thousand dollars,

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>and in that person resells it for ten thousand, the

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>artists might get ten percent as a residual royalty from

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the subsequent sales of the token, and they the rights

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can really be tailored to however the artist wants to

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>give to the to the purchaser. So is it governed

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>by the securities laws? Whether the securities laws apply is

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a developing question. I recently wrote an

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>article that ties into whether n f t s are

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>covered by securities laws, and I actually turned that article

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>into an n f T and I sold it on

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a digital platform. So somebody out there purchased my n

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>f T of the first legal articles as far as

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, but a lot of the securities law questions

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be tied into how the token is marketed.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>If it's marketed it as an investment as a way

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for people to make money, as something where they're going

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to be relying on the efforts of other people in

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>order to earn a profit, then it's very likely that

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>an n f T could come under the regulations of securities.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>But if it's being marketed it is more of a

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>digital collectible as a way to authenticate the ownership, as

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a way to authenticate that it's a legitimate, authorized piece

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of digital art, then in that situation, it's a lot

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>less likely to become a security So it's really going

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a new developing areas we apply these principles

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that have been around for over a hundred years with

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the securities laws to these new emerging technologies in the

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>digital space. So let's say that three people get together

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to create an n f T for profit based on art.

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that an investment contract that might be subject to

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>securities laws? It certainly can be if the people create

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>an n f T that's focused on digital art, But

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when they go out to sell that n f T

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and they promote it in such a way the person

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>can get rich or they could make a significant profit

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>by buying this n f T, And it's really a

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>decision that's being driven by an investment desire and a

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>profit making desire. Under an old Supreme Court test called

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the Howie test, that contract that n f T could

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be considered an investment contract and therefore security. These days,

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>most people are trying to stay away from that. So

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a lot of marketing being done by

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>artists that are really emphasizing the art and the collectibility

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of the art and the significance of the art, versus

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a way of trying to entice people to invest based

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on a desire to turn a quick profit. Now a

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are purchasing these n f T s

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>with the desire to perhaps make money, but that in

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it itself will not be enough to make it a security.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>It's really going to depend on the whole picture about

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>how the tokens are being marketed to people. Do you

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>know of any n f T s that have been

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>registered as a security I'm not aware of any n

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>f T s that have yet to be registered it

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as a security. UM I do know that recently there

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is an investment fund that is in the process of

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>being started that it looks like it's going to be

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>listed on the London UH Stock Exchange UM. So definitely

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>there's some more established players that are coming into the

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>n f T market to UM to invest in it,

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>but as of yet, I don't believe in any n

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>f t s have been registered as securities. And the

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>nice thing about n f T s, as we kind

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of compare it to the boom and initial coin offerings

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>UH several years ago, is that while initial coin offerings

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of the traditional indications that they would

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>be securities. In other words, people were using UM initial

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>coin offerings to raise money for new businesses and they

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>were going to be deploying the capital to develop concept.

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Those things were almost, you know, very similar to typical

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.599
<v Speaker 1>startups issuing stock. Here with n f T s, I

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>think there's much more of a real world application in

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of people UM, you know, purchasing these items, not

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so much to invest in the business because these these

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>digital artworks are already created, So people aren't funding new ideas,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're purchasing digital art They're purchasing certificates of authenticity.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think the whole impetus in a lot of

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ways for n f t s has a much more

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>real world focus and much much not more natural affinity

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for collectibles and for art than they would for for

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>securities laws and investment purposes. Let's say it was determined

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that one of these n f t s was an

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>investment contract. What kinds of procedures do you have to

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>go through if if it's considered a security. Well, if

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a security, there's a couple of problems that are

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>going to come up. You know, one of the creator

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>sells an n f T and it's subsequently determined to

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>be a security, that person is going to be subject

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to sanctions in terms of having to potentially disgorge any

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>money that they received, having to pay civil penalties to

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the sec having an injunction entered against the person um

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to be quite quite problematic. But if

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>a person was to um create an n f T

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 1>that that was designed to be a security and to

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>come under the securities laws, then the traditional ways of

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>marketing and security would come into effect. If the person

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to sell it to the general public, they'll have

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>to register that n f T with the Securities and

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Exchange Commission on a registration statement with the perspectives that

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>outlines the business purpose of the n FT outlines the

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>risk factors. But probably if people are going to create

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>n f t s that their first um their first

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>approaches are more likely to be private placement, which are

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>also regulated by the SEC under something called Regulation D.

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.479
<v Speaker 1>And these are investment opportunities that are open to accredited

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>investors and they generally can't be marketed to the general

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>public UM with certain exceptions. So it's a it's a

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a much more established market and in in a

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>regulatory that people will become familiar with. So if you

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>create an n f T and decide to sell it,

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you have to think about legally? Well, right

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>now it's it's an open question. But if you're just

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a regular person that's participating in some of these online marketplaces,

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there's there's quite a few that have gotten to be

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very popular. There's different marketplaces called Mintable and Wearable and

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>top Shop as the NBA shop. UM as a as

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a person just buying an n f T for their

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>own use or maybe looking to resell it down the road.

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You really don't have much in the way to to

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>worry about with regards to securities regulations. It really only

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes an issue if, um if you're go out and

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you're promoting it and you're issuing perhaps press releases or

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>another area that's been a great concern to the SEC

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or social media influencers. There's been a number of celebrities

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that have been charged by the SEC for accepting undisclosed

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>payments for cryptocur in seas and touting those cryptocurrencies on

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>their social media accounts. Floyd Mayweather, the famous boxer, was

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the people that settled with

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the SEC about that. Um. So, but as long as

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not accepting payments for that aren't being disclosed, and

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you're just kind of personally purchasing and selling n f

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>T s, there's really not a lot of risk to

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>that process. So, but can you walk us through how

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you made an n f T of your article? Yeah,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>what I did is I used one of the popular

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>sites called Mintable, So I took the b d F

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the article that I wrote, I used the Mintable

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>site to create an n f T from it, and

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>then I listed it for sale on the mintable site,

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and to my surprise, about five hours after I created it,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a crypto investor an entrepreneur that had purchased

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the n f T. But it was really a pretty

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>straightforward process. I had a basic understanding of ethereum and

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>had a wallet already. Once you have the basic covered,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not a very difficult process. And a lot of

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>people that are every day artists that aren't necessarily tech

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>people are finding it manageable to create their own n

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>f t s. And so how much did you get?

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I did it more just as a learning experience, So

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I saw this for the grand price of five dollars um.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in the future, as I think about it,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll create another n f T or something else

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the legal space. But it was really a great

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>learning experience and some a securities lawyer that's worked a

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>lot in the crypto space. Part of the reason I

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>did it was to better understand my clients who who

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are also starting to operate with n f t s

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and creating them. Thanks Bob, that's Robert him of tartar

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Kinsky and Drogan. The Netflix documentary series on the college

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>admission scandal entitled Operation Varsity Blues the College Admission Scandal,

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>became available for streaming on Mark seventeen. The movie, starring

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>actor Matthew Modine as Rick Singer, the admitted mastermind of

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the college admission scheme, presents re enactments of conversations drawn

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>from FBI tapes in addition to the usual interviews of

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>documentary fair We helped the wealthiest families in the US

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>get their kids into school. So I've done seven sixty

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>one what I would call side doors. The front door

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>means getting in on your own. So I've created this

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of side door. And because my families, I want

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to guarantee A private equity and real estate executive accused

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of paying bribes to get his children into Harvard, Stanford

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and USC as recruited athletes is suing Netflix for defamation.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>John B. Wilson has pleaded not guilty and is awaiting

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>trial on charges including money laundering, conspiracy, federal programs, bribery,

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and filing a false tax return. Joining me is Bloomberg

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Legal reporter Patricia Hurtado tell us a little bit about

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the series and the complaint. Well, their Netflix did a

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>series based on the investigation in the case called Operate

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and Varsity Blurs, and it's based on the events of

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the case and allegations including you know that Lori Laughlin

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and her husband Um allegations that they got their daughters

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to pose on a rowing machine and pretend that they

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>were real athletes so they could get into like usd UM.

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>This dad is a private equity UM executive and he

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lives in Lynnfield and he is finding the charges the

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>next six series. It's a documentary that is a re

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>enactment of the investigation. So what they've done is they've

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>hired actors and actresses to read the transcripts of the

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>wire taps and the conversations of the government quotes and

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the criminal complaints and indictments against the parents, and then

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they have actors and actresses re enact SBI agents listening

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to the call. So it's a documentary, but not in

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the typical ken Burns type of documentary that you're thinking

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of with real people. UM. This is of a recent

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>case that's still pending. So there are at least a

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>half dozen parents that are still fighting the charges of

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the more than thirty parents that were charged in the case.

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And so the parents that are still fighting. The charges

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>include this dab John Wilson from Lynnfield, Massachusetts. He has

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>three kids, and he was accused of conspiring to get

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with the with singer to pay bribes to get his

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>children into USC, Stanford and Harvard. So Wilson says he's innocent,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but the film groups him in with the parents who

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>pleaded guilty, and he claims they contacted the producers before

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the series aired. What happened is, according to uh the

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>lawyer for John Wilson, is that they met with the

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Netflix producers before the series was completed. The documentary was completed,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and they lawyer gave them evidence. The producer's evidence of

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>what he said is will clear him of wrongdoing, evidence

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of his actual innocence, including that the dad, John Wilson,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>took a a lie detector test and passed with flying colors,

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>according to lawyer Howard Cooper. He also says that they

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>have evidence of the kids F A T and a

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>C T score test scores um the grade of the

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>three kids that they narrited applying to these schools, and

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the key examples is that there is um

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the allegation that his son may have had this picture

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>doctor to a fake athlete as a water polo athlete.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>When John Wilson's lawyer says, they actually have proof that

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>his son, Johnny was a star high school water polo

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>player who is now at USC on the USC water

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>polo team and he's never been taken off so that

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he narrated it. There also is um. The father's says

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there's proof that all three of his kids tested in

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the ninetieth percentile as their college exams, including one daughter

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>who got a perfect score on her a c T test.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So they presented all this evidence to the Netflix producers,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>according to Howard Cooper, who's John Wilson's lawyer, and Netflix

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>went ahead and put him in the same hopper with

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the parents who pled guilty, and they talked about doctored

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>photos and photoshop pictures of kids that are fake athletes.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>So now John Wilson says he's technically gonna stand trial

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in September. You have all these people sitting at home

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>watching Netflix because they're the global pandemic. They can't go

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to the movie, so they're live streaming their hearts out

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>at home on their sofas. And John Wilson says, the

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>whole potential jury pool who could hear his case in

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>September has now been painted. That evidence sounds pretty strong.

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>But before trial, they would have tried to approach the

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>prosecution right and present that evidence. But the prosecution is

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>still going forward. So what does that tell us? Well,

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it tells us I mean there is a fine line

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it. You know, everyone has presumed

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>innocent until convicted, right until either plead you plead guilty

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>or convicted a trial. So it sounds to me almost

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>like the producers and Netflix didn't make that distinction in

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>their depictions of the parents and um. John Wilson's lawyer

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>told me that he the family friends of his client

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>have called him up and said, hey, I didn't know

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you did this. I thought you did what you know

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>x or y, and and it completely blurs the line

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>between those who have admitted their guilt versus those who didn't.

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, technically, you know, we as we journalists,

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>we would write and say the person has denied wrongdeering

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's fighting the charges, and here's what they're defense

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>lawyers say. But that's kind of omitted from these re enactments,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>according to the lawyer complaining about the documentary. So they

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sued them for defamation, and the producers saying they're basically

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>put in the same bucket with all the parents who

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>pled guilty, you know, the likes of A. Lori Laughlin

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and her husband or in Felicity Huffman. They've admitted their guilt.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>They said they did these crimes. They plead guilty, and

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that's the truth as far as the courts are concerned.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But somebody who has pled not guilty has a right

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, wait a minute. The court of public opinion

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>may say something, but you know, technically you're fighting the charges,

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to be accurate, you know, you

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>might need to remember that even in a in a

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>documentary depiction. So Wilson says he's not guilty, but did

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>he have any contact at all with Singer, who masterminded

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the admission scandal. He argues that he did have contact

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>with Singer, but nothing was improper. He said he was

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>introduced to Singer after a major financial advisory firm referred

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>him to him, so that he was called a highly

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>reputable college admissions counselor so, and that they were legitimate

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>donations that were made, not bribes paid with the way

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the government argues this. Have the producers or Netflix responded

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>to why they put Wilson in with the people who

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pleaded guilty. Uh, now, they would not give us any comments,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>so I guess we'll remain to see what their responses

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are in court. Um, they filed a lawsuit, and I

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>understand from my colleague in Boston the lawyer for John Wilson,

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>his name is Howard Cooper, and he's been successful as

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the top defamation lawyers in the Boston area.

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So this child will be pending in state court in Boston.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've seen all the movie stars, the famous

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>people going to prison, coming out of prison. It's surprising

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to me that the case is still going on. Oh,

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the government charged a whole slew of people.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the universe of people. I think

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we're up into the fifties now. Um, many of them

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>have pled guilty. And there's certainly, you know, a whole

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>cast of characters and parents, coaches, school consultants, testing consultants

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as um, you know, the parents that have

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>been implicated in this case, and many of them have

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>pled guilty. I think the scorecard is I think we

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>have over thirty parents that have pled guilty. Um, and

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly some coaches. There was a Stanford sailing coach, a

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Georgetown tennis coach. They all they played guilty. So the

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>universe of people that the documentary filmmakers could have used,

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's plenty, it's plenty of material. I guess

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>this dad is saying, I'm not in that universe of people,

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>so you should have made more of a distinction. And

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially he's got a well known libel and

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>defamation lawyer who's met in advance of the documentary being

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>broadcast and completed, and he said that, you know, he

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>put a dossier of information and they went ahead and

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he says, defamed him. And what about the parents who

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>pleaded guilty and went to prison. Um, some of the

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>parents have gone in and they went into One of

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the interesting things about this is they went in right

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the pandemic, and some of them

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>got out because of humanitarian reasons that you know, the

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>risk of COVID, because of their health issues and they were,

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, with co morbidity, so they were able to

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>get out. But some of the parents who went in

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>later after pleading guilty, they ended up finding themselves in

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a jam because they asked to get released from prison,

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and basically the judge said, you should have thought about

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this before you agree to go into prison. So I

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can't let you out now because there's just as much

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID out of prison as in prison. So some of

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the parents that have played guilty and some of the

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>other participants in the case that have played guilty, they

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have now postponed their sentencing until things calmed down at

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>COVID before they go in. Thanks for being on the show,

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>pat That's Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg Legal reporter. And that's it

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. I'm June Grasso.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for listening. Please tune into The Bloomberg

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Law Show every night at TAMPM Eastern right here on

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.