WEBVTT - Zohran Mamdani’s Win Is A Political Earthquake + How Will America Regulate Artificial Intelligence?

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Happy Thursday, and welcome to another episode of the Chuck Todcast.

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I got to a pretty packed episode for you. We're

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>going to do a rundown of what's going on around

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the country and the states, some state politics, of what's

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>happening with AI, and in fact it ties into something

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>else I'm going to get to in a minute, the

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>big beautiful Bill and whether what it's going to look

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like and whether it has any chance of ever becoming popular.

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But look, I'm going to start with what is still

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>a seismic earthquake inside the Democratic Party, and that is

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the victory by Zoron Mom Donnie in the Democratic primary,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>apparent victory. I mean, we got to remind folks we

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>still haven't had the retabulation in the New York City

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>mayor's race. You know, let me throw a bizarre what

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>if out there. There's an assumption, and I think it's

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a correct assumption based on the polling we've seen and

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly the campaign strategies the candidates had of trying to

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>convince their supporters not to even rank Cuomo in some

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>places and things like that. But let me just throw

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>out a here. If Cuomo closes the gap to just

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of points and ends up losing the primary

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>after rank choice voting more like that fifty one to

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine or fifty two forty eight. Is that what

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>they're waiting for to see whether Cuomo will decide to

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>run in a general election. But look, let's it. Certainly

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody is behaving today as if that's not going to

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>happen in that Mandani is going to be the Democratic nominee.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The question is what kind of general election is it

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be. But before we get to that, on

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the New York City side of things, it's been interesting

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>how Democrats have reacted, right it's around the country. You've

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>had some in New York, including the two leading Democratic

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>figures in New York who happen to hold the two

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>most important positions in Congress for the Democrats, Senate Democratic

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Akim Jeffries. They

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>both congratulated Mandani, but they did not endorse Mamdani. Maybe

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>they will eventely, but they have not made that decision yet.

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders came out gloated and said, Hey, the Democratic

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>establishment has some explaining to do, and I really think

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they do. In fact, I want to quote a column

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was just outstanding, and it sort of,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>I think, summed up how the Democrats have really blew

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this when it came to when it came to how

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten involved over the last couple of cycles. It

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was a column written by Julie Roginsky, and it was

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it was expressing her frustration. And I'm going to read

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it in part here word for word, because these are

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>her words, not my words. What were voters in New

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>York to do? This is what she wrote. When I

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>filled out my ballot yesterday, I did not rank either

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Cuomo or a Mom Dannie because I, again her words,

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I won't vote for a sexual predator, and because I

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>won't vote for a deeply inexperienced candidate who refuses to

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that quote globalized the Intifada is an offensive term

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to his Jewish constituents. She adds, I knew that my

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>vote was wasted, that the five people I ranked had

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>no shot of winning, and for this I blame the

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Democratic establishment. And she goes on when Cuomo popped up

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>his head to run, all the establishment figures who flocked

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to him could have said no, They could have looked

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at other competent leaders who did not have Cuomo's baggage.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Raginsky suggests Police Commissioner Jessica Tish was somebody that came

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to mind. I've heard that name quite a bit today. Instead,

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they did what they do best, tried to impose a

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>deeply flawed candidate with a disconnected message on their own voters.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me repeat that last phrase, because this, to me

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is the key to how the Democratic Party has lost

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>its way. They tried to impose a deeply flawed candidate

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>with a disconnected message on their own voters. Hmmm, where

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have they done that before? Oh? Maybe restraight presidential elections.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Remember this is a Democratic party and a Democratic establishment

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that has chosen candidates on behalf of the voters and

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>not let the voter's way in in a good decade, right,

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>trust me. If the Democratic establishment had its way, Hillary

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Clinton would have been the nominee in two thousand and eight.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But they let that go. There wasn't. In fact, some

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of the establishment were divided enough that hey, Obama and

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Clinton both had affair shot at it, and the voters

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>chose Obama in twenty sixteen. The voters weren't given that

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of choice. Barack Obama put his arm around Hillary Clinton.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It convinced a whole slew of other potential candidates not

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to run, and only this unknown senator from Vermont decided

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to throw his hat in the ring. Bernie Sanders. People

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>forget Bernie Sanders did not have any sort of name

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>ID back then. The question has always been did his

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>message truly resonate or was the fact that he wasn't

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton why he resonated or was it a combination

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of the two. But things sort of went her way,

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and there was a feeling that the Democratic primary voters

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>really didn't get a fair shot to decide who they

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>really wanted as their nominee because the establishment essentially shoved

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a whole generation of Democrats aside. All right, an entire generation.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's move to twenty twenty Joe Biden. This time, there

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>were a whole slew and then COVID hit and the

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>establishment came in, and there was a fear that what

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a progressive named Bernie Sanders was going to win this

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nomination if a whole bunch of people didn't quickly get

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>out and consolidate around Joe Biden. A m clobashar got

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>out and consolidated around Joe Biden, Beto O'Rourke did, Pete

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Budaget did, and there was this consolidation. Again, the establishment spoke.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Jim Clyburn did his famous endorsement, and they spoke, and

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>then they did it again in twenty four. Right first,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the establishment said, anybody that dare question Joe Biden's capability

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of doing a second term is only doing the bidding

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump. Just look at how that Dean Phillips,

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the former member of Congress who did decide to challenge Biden,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>who openly said he didn't want to be the candidate

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>running but believed but it would if nobody else would

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>step in, and he tried to recruit plenty of governors

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to do just that. Nobody would get in the Establishment

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>labeled him some sort of secret Trump surrogate. Okay, they

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>were able to protect Biden, and of course we now

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>know what happened, and the voters never got to choose

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris was essentially chosen for them as

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the nominee. And this is essentially what Julie Roginsky is

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>saying happened in New York City. For the life of me,

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and I've written about this. You can go back a

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of substack colms and go, why the heck did

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Cuomo just sort of get o laid into this field?

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think it really does mean that the establishment,

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's guys like Chuck Schumer, King Jeffrey's other major Democrats,

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>just didn't fully appreciate how unpopular Andrew Cuomo was. Thought, well,

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>his name, I d the amount of money he'll raise,

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he's got. You know, older voters, they'll vote for the

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.679
<v Speaker 1>familiar name. It'll be too hard to push him out.

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to have that fight with him. That's

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>only going to be ugly too. So they just sort

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of acquiesced when it was obvious he had major character

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>flaws and the fact that he never apologized for what

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>happened or explained himself in an honest and straightforward way,

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and instead said he regretted resigning. You know, I wrote this.

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I regret that he resigned too, because he he didn't

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>get due process, and the voters never got due process.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is why I think if you resign in

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>order to avoid an investigation, whether it's a House ethics

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>committee or it's an impeachment inquiry, in your state legislature,

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be barred from running for any office for a decade

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>because you're breaking your compact with voters. You were elected

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to do a job for four years and you're walking

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>away in less than four years. There should be some penalty,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but there was none. Guess what, there's a penalty. Now

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>his political career is over. Now does he contemplate running

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>as independent? He might, But do you really want to

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>take two losses? Look, I will say this with Mam Dannie.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you're sort of seeing two reactions

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>right now. You have a whole bunch of Democrats try

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not to say anything. You have an entire Republican messaging

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>machine that is trying to weaponize Mamdanni and turn him

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>into you know, the grandson of Vladimir Lenin and trying

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to make the hammer and sickle, you know, call him

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a communist and all of these things. And look, and

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I've warned and I've showed you this. If you don't

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>think this is an effective strategy, if Democrats don't know

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>how to figure out how both to embrace embrace his

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>victory and at the same time say hey, we disagree

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on this issue, this issue, in this issue or some

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>form of that. They're going to tie themselves into knots

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to essentially allow the weaponization to take hold.

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>All you have to do, and this is what I

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>pointed out yesterday is look at what happened to the

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in the state of Florida when they nominated somebody

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>friendly with democratic socialism. The S word just totally destroyed

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic brand in Florida, and now Florida is a

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>red state. The fact is that the Mayor of New

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>York City is I would argue, the second or third

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>most famous elected official in the country. I promise you

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>if you did it, you know over time, after the

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>president and vice president. I think that most people have

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a better shot at naming the Mayor of New York

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>City than the Speaker of the House. So it is

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the more symbolically, certainly one of the bigger names.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why this is symbolically such a huge victory.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But it is, it absolutely is. I think the it's

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the first shot in the big fight between sort of

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream wing of the Democratic Party. If you want

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to call it again, they need a better descriptor. Right.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Establishment is a terrible thing. Nobody wants to be the establishment.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like they're the incumbent. You know, if you say mainstream,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you're saying there. You know, it's so.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And as far as the voters were concerned, Mom, Donnie's

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream, or he wouldn't have won the nomination. So

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I will admit there needs to be

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, center left, maybe we call it that

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the center left Democrats, the non progressive Democrats. They've they

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, they've got to sort of stop supporting ancient names,

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, family dynasties. And I think part of it

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is you sort of have an actre feed class of

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats who I think are being advised by the same

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, five or six consultants, They get their funding

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>from the same five or six sources, and it becomes

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of I think they've become their own bubble and

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>they fully don't see it. And yes, the positions that

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Mamdani holds are not popular overall with swing voters. The

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>ideas are, but sort of the paying for them are right,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Like okay, free groceries, Yeah, how does that going to work?

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And who pays for it? I do think that he

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>is going to Mamdani. If he does become mayor, is

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>going to somebody's going to educate him that the tax

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>base of New York City is actually, you know, seventy

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to eighty percent of it comes from a very small

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>group of people, and be careful taxing them to the

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>point where they decide to leave. Now, I think some

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff's overblown, right, like all the people that

0:11:57.880 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to flee to Canada if Donald Trump got

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to like that, I don't think. I think ninety five

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>percent of the people that claim they're leaving New York

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>City if Mom Donnie becomes mayor, are not going to leave.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>But the story is not you know, it's not a

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>good narrative. It's certainly not a good you know, a

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>good look, and you're going to have a lot of

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>squeaky Wall Street people. But if your mom Donnie politically,

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>if Wall Street's upset, then you're winning, right as far

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>as your voters are concerned. So you got how he

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>had to actually be careful if you're in the if

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you're in the wealthy wing of the Democratic Party or

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy wing of New York City, how you go

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>about criticizing I speak to you Bill Ackman, who I

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think has a full self awareness gene in him

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>at all times. And so I, you know, I do

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that that some of the complaints come across as, oh,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it must be tough for you, for you folks that

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have to fly private in and out of New York City,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know it is. Look, it is a party

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>that's very nervous about more about the fact that they

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>have no confidence in their own party at figuring out

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>how to embrace mom Donnie without owning all of his positions.

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>The fact of the matter is a Republican Party struggled

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with this with Donald Trump from twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen,

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty seventeen until guess what, Donald Trump just eviscerated

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the establishment. Look at the people that were still around, right,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>You had this sort of uncomfortable alliance between sort of

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the Paul Ryan wing that was still alive in twenty

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and twenty eighteen and the Donald Trump wing of

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the party. Well, five years later, all of those folks

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>are gone. It's Donald Trump's party. Are there still some

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>few remaining members of that old establishment? Rich McConnell's on

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>his way out. John Thune is trying hard not to

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>look like he's part of the old guard, and we'll

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>see John Cornyn is struggling. As you can see, he's

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>about perhaps going to see the end his political career.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>He's somebody that's been around. So it may be that

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what Republicans dealt with in twenty fourteen to twenty sixteen

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe what's going to be happening here and maybe this

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is the beginning of a revolt of sort of a

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>secondary revolution of sorts. I do want to point out

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>another piece of commentary that I retweeted earlier today, but

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to read. It comes from somebody who's going

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to be on the podcast pretty soon, Kristen Sultis Anderson.

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>She's a Republican polster, really good, and she highlighted this

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:42.479
<v Speaker 1>quote from Politico's Playbook. It was from an anonymous centrist Democrat.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a hot take, and it was this quote.

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It is extremely alarming that the only candidates who genuinely

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>excite our voters are the ones making absolutely insane promises

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on politically toxic positions, one strategist tells Playbook, leaving us

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in the spot of trying to execute on bad policy

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and losing terribly or failing to keep our promises and

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>reinforcing the idea that all politics is bullshit. Well, Kristen

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Sultius Anderson put this little note above that quote, and

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>she said, change the party label from DEM to GOP.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And this reminds me of a quote you'd read in

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the summer of twenty fourteen. Well, the summer of twenty fourteen, right,

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>was the sort of the second big tea party election, right,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that last midterm of Obama. And it really those that

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>came in there. Josh Holly was a twenty fourteen elected Republican,

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>for instance. The beginnings of what is now sort of

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream MAGA coalition that is very supportive of the

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump agenda started to come in in twenty a little

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bit in twenty ten, more so in twenty fourteen, and

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it was the same concerns you had. Mainstream Republicans. Establishment

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Republicans just panicked, and some of these candidates were so

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bad it did cost them Senate races.

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Why why are Democrats as close to having the Senate

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>majority and in fact just had it for two cycles

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that arguably they shouldn't have had it for It's because

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of how poorly many of these candidates did the first

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>time they ran. But as you saw, over time, eventually

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>those candidates were able to become seen as mainstream Republicans

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as Donald Trump changed the Republican Party electorate itself, right,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what you know, those Republicans that rejected some of those

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Tea Party candidates in twenty fourteen, for many of them,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the last time they voted Republican. Right, They

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up becoming the new suburban Democratic voters. And this

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is the challenge that I think the Democratic Party has.

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>They have been growing support in the wealthier suburbs around

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every major metropolitan arean America. But these folks

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>are not keen on the policies of democratic socialists, you know.

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is going to be the uncomfortable alliance that

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the two of them are going

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to coexist. Perhaps there's a way that happens. Maybe it's

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a temporary alliance. You know, for a long time, this

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff was papered over by just being angry at Donald Trump.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think now after sort of eight years of

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>conducting campaigns that paper over this divide between essentially a

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>business wing of the Democratic Party and a progressive populist

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>wing of the Democratic Party that really I think culturally

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they see things eye to eye and some social issues,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but not on economic policy, and this is where there's

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>this sharp divide and a little bit unfeigned policy. But

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think sometimes we over highlight the Israel

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>issue as a primary voting issue. There's not a lot

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of evidence that voters themselves vote on this issue. That

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>instead they're voting on pocketbook issues. So you know, perhaps

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>now now that Trump I mean, look, Cuomo tried to

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>use the Trump card in order to gain traction with

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Democratic primary voters, and it's pretty clear Democratic primary voters

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are tired of that messaging. They want to hear something

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that's for them. They want to hear something that feels

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>like fighting. They want to have something that feels like

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing back in one form or another. And I think

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that's what Mam Doni I think gave voters in a

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>way that Cuomo never did. But this is where I

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>think we all have to sort of take a breath.

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we can sit here and say for

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>sure that Mam Donnie's nomination is. It means the Democratic

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Party wants to go in a very progressive direction on

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>economic policy. I think this right now one is not

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a trend. Let's see if this happens in multiple races,

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and then we can have another conversation. But I think

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this had more to do with in Cuomo becoming the

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>quasi incumbent to voters right he was seeing the establishment

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and incumbency feels like one and the same these days.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>He ran a terrible race. He wasn't talking about economic issues,

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and he also ran an old race. What do I

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>mean by that? Well, they just ran an old campaign,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of TV ads, a lot of sort of slickness,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the sort of traditional events, getting the proper

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>endorsements and proper endorsements like you know, Jim Clyburn worrying

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>too much about those endorsements, versus a mom Donnie who

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>by necessity had to come up with different ways to

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>run because he didn't have that amount of money. Ran

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a more modern twenty twenty esque the twenty twenties. What

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of media is today? Hey, I'm you know, independent media, streaming,

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to refer to it. He was all

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of the above. He was showing up everywhere. He would

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly do plenty of legacy cable television, but he also

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>would do plenty of new media as well. Cuomo wasn't

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>doing any of that. I mean, I think I said

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it earlier. I believe he did two podcasts and one

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of them was his brothers. Right. He wasn't exactly looking

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk to new vote and sort of let loose,

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think part of that, frankly, the reason they

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>hit him, right, the reason we never saw Joe Biden

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is that they were afraid he really couldn't reassure people

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that he was all all on the up and up,

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>which is why we rarely saw him in interviews, and

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>he was very protected. I think with Cuomo, they just

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>wanted to duck questions about the circumstances with which he

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>decided to resign his governorship. And that was a mistake, right,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>not confronting these things. You know, he could have taken

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a page from Trump's book and gone right at it

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and sort of owned it or not owned it, but

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>dealt with it. Whatever you think of Trump, he tries

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to deal with all of it. Sometimes obviously, sometimes he

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>lies about it, makes up, but he's constantly trying to

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with it, and it sends a message to voters

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that he's at least acknowledging the elephant's plural in the room.

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Cuomo never did any of that, So I think I

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>would caution, assuming this is some sort of leftboard lurch

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party, what were the alternatives. He ran

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a better race, He talked about the issues that voters

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>cared about. Cuomo was the front runner. He behaved like

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>an incumbent, and he lost. He was sort of and

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it felt like he was out of touch. He didn't

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>even live in the city. He didn't even know how

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to His bagel order was an English muffin. I mean

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that alone, to some people, was grounds for never being

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>elected mayor of New York City. So it is. You know,

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very possible that Mom Donnie won for very mundane

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>reasons that have nothing to do with ideology and nothing

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with any big shift that bread and butter issues.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>One guy was talking about bread and butter and the

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>other one wasn't pure and simple. But here's what I

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>would say. I do think that I think Senate Democrats,

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Democratic Party is a real problem with Chuck Schumer.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Right now I say this, it's going to sound like

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking on him, But you know there was a

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>new candidate jumped into the US Senate race in Texas,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and the first thing he did to say, you know

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>he's running is a This is the astronaut, former astronaut

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>who decided to run first time he's run for office,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>running as a Democrat, and he and he took a

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and he named Check Schumer as the Democrats who aren't

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>doing enough, who aren't fighting, who don't know what they're doing,

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Rocanna who wants himself a congressman out in Silicon Valley.

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Longtime listeners of the Chuck podcast know that I've had

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>him on and we've we've we've we've, we've had conversations

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a few times on this broadcast. He regularly named checks

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Schumer in a negative way these days as part of

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem on the he's becoming the punching bag for

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to show that they they are getting the message.

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's really I think he's becoming the now symbol.

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>It's not Jeffries, it's not the DNC chair that probably

0:22:57.920 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>most people can't remember the name of right now, it's

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Martin in case you're asking yourself right now, it is

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of Chuck Schumer. Some of this maybe some of

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the criticism is unfair, but basically he is the remaining

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>member of the sort of the group of Democrats that

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels like they've been running the party since Obama left. Right,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, Clinton is no longer there, Biden is no

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>longer there, but Chuck Schumer. You know, Nancy Pelosi is

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>no longer there, but Chuck Schumer is still there. Right,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Harry Reid is no longer there, but Chuck Schumer is

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>still there. Stanny Hoyer is no longer there, but Chuck

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Schumer is still there. So he is I think going

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to become an even bigger magnet. The question. Now, the

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Senate Democrats are very you know senators in general, they're

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>not They don't they don't act rashly. You know, they

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>usually are very They want to they want to take

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>their time on dealing with things. So I don't know

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>that he's in trouble and that there would be some

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>move against him. In fact, it would be very unsenate

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like to see something like this. But I'll tell you

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that conversation I had with the Democratic senator very recently

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>who was really upset that Michael Bennett decided to run

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>for governor, and I think I shared this with you

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that a form of this, but it was this senator

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was saying, look, we've got to replace Schumer. We all

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>know it, but there's no obvious person. I thought Michael

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Bennett was the obvious replacement, and and and the senator

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, said, look, you know, he decided he wanted

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to be governor. He's frustrated working in the Senate. He

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>gets it, but you know, you know, it's sort of

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like if you're going to shoot the king, who you're

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>going to replace him with? Right? You know? Is it?

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you're thinking about running for president in the

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>US Senate, the last thing you want to be is

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in leadership. Right, maybe it's better off of Brian Shatz,

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>who is a Senator from Hawaii who seems to be

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the few that has figured out how to

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>how to talk to both the progressive wing of the

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>party in a in a way that's authentic and the

0:24:57.800 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and the and the sort of center left wing of

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the party party where I think he's decidedly a bit

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>more progressive. But it's very respectful. You know, when you

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>replace Daniel inn Away in the Senate, you're sort of

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>respectful of how of the different wings of the party itself.

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It might behove the party to essentially listen to the

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>base of the party and say, you know, and here's

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Schumer's one of the most self aware politicians

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I've ever met. He has made ruthless decisions in the past,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>nominees to let loose in Senate races where you're just

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to save the Senate in another state and you

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>can't fulfill a promise. He knows how to make tough decisions.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>He's done it before. He's pulled the plug on candidacies

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know, made a lot of people mad. But

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>somebody has to make those decisions. There might be a

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>moment where the best thing for him to be is

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to sort of say, you know what, I shouldn't. You know,

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>nobody saying he should leave the Senate, but that he

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>steps aside as party leader and sort of sends the

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>message that the Democrats do want to sort of turn

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the page, do want a new set of leaders. I

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>think Jeffreys is still considered new to the post, right,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and Nancy Pelosi is still there right, still

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of walks the halls and some I've talked to

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>some House Democrats who think that she's she needs to

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>lay lower than she has been, and she's actually laid

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty low here. It is interesting who did decide to endorse,

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>who did decide to endorse Mom Donnie today and who

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>did not. The first member of the New York City

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Congressional delegation to endorse Mom Donnie Jerry Nadler, and he's

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>he is Jewish. It's a big endorsement. He called it

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a seismic election. He compared Mom Donnie's victory to Obama's victory.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And here's what he said when it came. He said

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on and whether he had any concerns about some previous

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 1>statements that Mam Donna he had made as a Jewish American,

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and he said, quote, I've spoken to him today about

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 1>his commitment to fighting anti Semitism, and we'll work with

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>all New Yorkers to fight against all bigotry and hate.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I'm going to be curious to see.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I think Mom Donnie, we're going to find out. You know,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>sometimes insurgent candidacies don't know how to then not be

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:25.959
<v Speaker 1>an insurgent like Bernie Sanders. I would argue, he's now

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an establishment leader of the party. But he never wants

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to be seen as an establishment member of the party,

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>which is why he continues to back out of his promises.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>He is multiple times promised he was going to register

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as a Democrat and never did because I don't think

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he ever wants to be seen as quote unquote part

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of the establishment. But you could argue, because he's been

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the progressive movement arguably now for a decade,

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that he is certainly the establishment member of that. But look,

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there's he's never been able to

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to be bigger than just his movement.

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a challenge from mom Donnie. Right.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Governing that city is incredibly difficult. It has been referred

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to as the second hardest job in politics. And he

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>actually has an opportunity here over the next three or

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>four months where the bar's kind of low, right, you're

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>going to have a lot of skeptical moderates, skeptical business

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>leaders about him. How does he he's had an opportunity

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>to sort of make a new first impression with some

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of these folks. What's he like behind the scenes, right,

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's sort of like sometimes insurgent politicians don't

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>know how to be sort of diplomats. When you have

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a diplomat, you need to sometimes do diplomacy

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>even in domestic politics. Right, it's a challenge that's taking

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>place in Syria with the new president there. Right, he

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was a rebel and then suddenly you're now in charge

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and you have to govern everybody, including people that may

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>not have wanted you in that position. Can you meet

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment, can you handle the moment, and can you

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>say no to a supporter if it's for the greater good? Right,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So it'll be interesting to see that challenge, see how

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he handles that challenge going forward. But look, there's no

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it. This is an earthquake. And one final

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>point I'll make on this, I did a little quick

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>research here. There are fifteen members of Congress that are

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy years old or older. I do think Mom Donnie's

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>victory is going to inspire primary challenges to many of

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>these folks. And if you've been in Congress, you're over

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the age of seventy and you've been in Congress more

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>than two decades, you really ought to look in the

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>mirror and ask yourself whether you really do you want

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to end this way because I think there's going to

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be real vulnerability. It's clear there is a hunger for new.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think the key to Mom Donnie as he

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was new Cuomo, was old, pure and simple. And those

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen members of Congress who have allved so far have

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>said they're going to run for reelection, whether it's a

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Maxine Waters in Los Angeles, Stenny Hoyer in Maryland, a

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Bill Pascrell in New Jersey, and Al Green in Texas,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>A Jerry Nadler in New York City, which may explain

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>why he quickly jumped on the Mom Donnie bandwagon. He's

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven and has had to deal with his sheriff

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>primary pro Progressive primary challengers before. So that's the door

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that I expected. You know, this is what David Hogg

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>had promised he wanted to do. And it is interesting

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>when I look at the fifteen House members, none of

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>them are in swing seats except for one that I

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>can see here, Marcy Captor. Beyond that, everybody else is

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in fairly safe democratic seats. This could be This could

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be the sea change. A sea change is coming. And

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you one other one that might want to

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be careful here, and that is there is one senator

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>who is up for reelection in twenty twenty six who

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.479
<v Speaker 1>is running that's over the age of seventy five, and

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that's Ed Markey. Now, he survived a primary challenge when

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>he was an appointed senator from from young Joe Kennedy,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the third but Kennedy kind of ran to his right,

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>ran a primary challenge from his right, which, as we

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>all know, in a Democratic primary, that usually doesn't work.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's another one. The point is is that I think,

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think if you're an incumbent Democrat and you've

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>been in office for more than a decade, watch out.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That's probably the number one message. Watch out quick update

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>on the big beautiful bill that the president's trying to

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get through, and you have all these folks trying to

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of jam, if you will, The Senate's trying to

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>jam the House. They still want to rush this vote.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing how unpopular this bill continues to be. And

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>there's been a couple of just sloppy comments that that

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling are going to come back to

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>haunt congressional Republicans. And that is one, of course, was

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the one Joni Ernst made Everybody's going to die. And

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>another is a comment that Mitch McConnell was quoted as

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>saying on Medicaid cuts when he said, when he was

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>quoted Tom Tillis, who is up for reelection, is concerned

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>about the severity of some of these Medicaid cuts. Mitch McConnell,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>apparently in the same meeting said, yes, he's been hearing

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the same in Kentucky. But they'll get over it. I

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>just that phrase. They'll get over it. And we all

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>know how whether one thing, it's one thing for Joni Earnst,

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody who outside of Iowa, most people don't know who

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>she is. Mitch McConnell, that's somebody a lot of people

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have heard of. I just have a feeling that quote's

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>going to become famous. The biggest problem Trump has, and

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he's promised to do a tour of the

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>country to try to top this bill, is this bill

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>starts out enormously unpopular. It has been so defined as

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a cutting Medicaid bill. It is not on other stuff

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>at all. It is it is. I don't know know

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how they turn this thing around as a political asset,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know what this is what happened to Biden

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Democrats. They eventually got their bill passed, but

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it was such an ugly, painful process, so many ugly

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>negotiations and various Democrats trashing different proposals, allowing quotes to

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be used in the elections to sort of make it

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>make Democrats uncomfortable trying to sell it. They had a

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was not a political asset in twenty

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, It just wasn't to the voters. I think

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the situation that Republicans face with this bill in

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. Look, not passing the bill would still

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>be worse politics than passing this bill. But there's I

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they get to sell out of this

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that's positive. I really don't. It's becoming harder and harder.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of which, and this May, it's an important

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>poll number that I wanted to share with you that

0:33:55.480 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I just saw recently, and it's a CNN poll and

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it was just out. There's a there's a certain question

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've tracked, we tracked at NBC for years. It's

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>an important question. CNN had it on their poll on

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>their on their most recent May twenty twenty five poll,

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and the question is simply this. It's a question we've

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>tracked for generations and it's fascinating. The pattern here government

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.439
<v Speaker 1>is it doing too much? Or should government do more?

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And the pattern is this, whenever Democrats and are in

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the White House, they're a majority of voters believe government

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is doing too much, And whenever Republicans are in the

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>White House, the number starts to increase the government that

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the government needs to do more. Well, we are at

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a near high fifty in CNN's polling, fifty eight percent

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that the government needs to do more. At the

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of twenty twenty three, it was a

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty one forty nine. Now government does more versus government

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>does too much is fifty eight forty one. And what's

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting here is nearly forty percent of Republicans believe that

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>government should actually do more, not less. Why am I

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>singling that number out because in every previous pull that

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>number has never been over thirty before, and it's over

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>forty percent. This gets to the Josh Holly point, right,

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a Republican senator in Missouri who's worried about these Medicaid

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>cuts because he knows the elect Donald Trump changed the

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>electorate right. The single most important political decision he made

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to become president of the United States was

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>taking the idea of cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>off the table. Now we're having a big argument, now

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>what's a cut what isn't? And I think the country

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>believes Medicaid is getting cut. And it certainly looks, you know,

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, they are making cuts to Medicaid.

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are going to try to claim it is just

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>simply cleaning up Medicaid, that there aren't cuts to actual beneficiaries.

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't matter. Voters think government, no matter what

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>government's doing, they should do more. So perhaps if your mom, Donnie,

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're offering to have government do even more, maybe

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a reminder that there's a fairly large constituency

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>out there of people who think government should do more

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and not less. All right, I hope you enjoyed the

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>NBA Draft last night. This is my favorite stat for

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>how crazy the NBA draft is. Of the final eighteen picks.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>If you paid attention to the first round last night, only

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the final eighteen first round picks belonged to

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>its original owner. That's how often and how many of

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>these picks have been traded back and forth. The Boston

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Celtics at number twenty eight the only team, the only

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.399
<v Speaker 1>team after the top I think it was like seven

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>or eight picks. Top ten would be top twelve picks,

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the only team to be an original owner of that pick.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That all seventeen of the final eighteen picks in the

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>first round had been traded. I can't say the NBA

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't interesting. I think that's part of the NBA's problem.

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>There are times where the off season or the stuff

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter is sometimes as exciting, if not more exciting,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>than sometimes they play itself. All right with that, I

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoyed my conversation with my friend Read Wilson.

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>We've worked together for years. He's an ex hotliner, but

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, he runs one of the smartest, most important

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>news organizations you might not have heard of yet. It's

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>called Pluribus, tracks what's going on on the state level.

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>More and more your life is being impacted by what

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>state legislatures decide to do or not do. And in fact,

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the big parts of the conversation we have

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is about AI regulation, which of course Congress. Congressional Republicans

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>are trying to protect big tech from any regulation in

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the States for ten years. It is a part of

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the big beautiful bill that is extraordinarily controversial, and this

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 1>could be the section two thirty piece of legislation. And

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans do end up doing this that gets hung around

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>their neck in a few years. If AI goes sideways

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>on HI with that, let me sneaking a break and

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>we'll bring on Read Wilson we joining me now is

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time friend of mine, colleague, an ex hotliner

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and all of you know how I feel about X

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>hotliners on this there is yes, I will always over

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>index on X hotliners on the Chuck podcast. Read Wilson,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a former editor in chief himself, got started there when

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I was there. He is now runs what I think

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of the must reads every morning for me.

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>It's called Pluribus and what it is is it covers

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in state legislatures, in state law, and as

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we all know, there is with so much inaction in

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>the federal level of the government, with one of the

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>weakest legislative branches in the history of the United States,

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of the self weakening that Congress has done.

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It is actually strengthened legislative chambers and legislative action all

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>over the country because of the polarization and inability and

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to have it. And so in many ways,

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the laboratories of democracy is what we've always referred to

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>as the states. Well, those labs are very busy these days.

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And whether it's on voting rights, whether it's on cooperation

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with the federal government, whether it's about medicaid funding, AI regulation.

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Reid Wilson knows all of these things these days. Plus

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you know he's a long suffering Seattle SuperSonics fan. We're

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going to you like that I went SuperSonics on you.

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.919
<v Speaker 1>It's I had Leibovich on recently read and he came

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on the program wearing not a Seattle Sonics T shirt,

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>SuperSonics T shirt. It was old school. It was green.

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It was that faded green yellow was kind of you

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>could see the space needle and you know in the

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 1>background you saw Shay, Oh, never mind, sorry, I look,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>we're I'll be honest, we're taping before game seven. This

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>will air after Game seven. Do you care about the

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>thunder and all?

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Are you?

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Like? Are you negative about them, or do you not

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hold it against Oklahoma City fans for how Howard Schultz

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>destroyed the Seattle super.

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 3>It's not Oklahoma City's fault. It's Howard Schultz's fault. It

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 3>always will be. Let me tell you a funny story though.

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 2>So I was I was back home over the Fourth

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 2>of July, and I took my kid to a Fourth

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 2>of July parade and the gubernatorial candidates came through, and

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Bob Ferguson, then the attorney general, now the governor stops

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 2>right in front of me, in front of a guy

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.720
<v Speaker 2>with a Sonic shirt, and he says, hey, we're not governor,

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get the Sonics back. I thought to myself,

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 2>that feels pretty much done. And you had nothing to

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 2>do with it. It was just it was the most blatant

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:54.959
<v Speaker 2>pandering i'd.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Ever hey man called pandering. You're at a parade? What that?

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>What parades are full? You really feel that confident? It's

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just a done deal. It's just about whenever they decide

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to get Vegas the basketball team, they have to do too,

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>so ergo it'll be Seattle or bust.

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 3>And we got the facilities for it. We don't need

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 3>to build a new stadium.

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm generally negative on using public funds to build stadiums,

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>which by the way, is a pretty big trend in

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the States right now that we can talk about.

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 3>If you want. But we've got the facilities already, we

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 3>just need the team.

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's interesting on that front. So I was,

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>actually i've been I've been sort of going back to

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>my sports business routes a little bit as I'm trying

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to build a you know, I have this thesis that

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>local sports and youth sports could be what can become

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the revenue stream to build local to sort of build

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>back local news. And I'm pretty the more I look

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>into it, the more the more bullish I am on this.

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's allowed me to sort of I've gotten I've

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of reacquainted myself with the industry, gotten to know

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these key players. And is that a

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>an off the record conversation And I don't want to

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>say where because I don't want to give away that

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>part of it, but generally it was interesting. The essentially

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>what the goal now is in these public funds debates

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:18.399
<v Speaker 1>about stadiums is don't go to the voters now right now?

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>The voters are always it's easier to vote them down

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>than vote for them. What's funny about these things is,

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like take Washington, DC is a great example. There was

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of controversy about whether Nationals Park should be

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>done the way it was done. Twenty years later, everybody

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>looks at what's been done to the waterfront to that

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>area and says, oh my god, this has been transformational

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and so which is why it was they're going to

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>get the Commanders deal done because they see what it

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 1>has meant it really, you know, because sometimes you make

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>these projects and they do not deliver on the extra

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>jobs and the extra this. But it does seem as

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if if you do it in a city, you know,

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you try to do it in a suburbs and you're

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>not going to get the return on investment those promises, don't.

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is rare. Maybe the Braves thing is

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>an exception to the rule, but usually suburban developments don't

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>work as well as actual city developments doing these things.

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But what are you seeing as a trend and do

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you see more of these local governments going all right,

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll do this, but we cannot essentially make it a

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:24.720
<v Speaker 1>referendum with the voters.

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, nobody wants to go to the voters. Take a

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 2>look at what happened in Kansas City. The voters there

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 2>voted down in incremental sales tax. I think it was

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 2>five to eighths of a cent of a sales tax

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:37.399
<v Speaker 2>to keep the chiefs and the royals in town. Now,

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 2>the legislature just passed something last week to get that

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 2>project done. Same things happening in Ohio with the Cleveland

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Brown Stadium. And I think the big trend that you're

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 2>seeing here is not that legislatures are doing are giving

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 2>money to rich owners to build new stadiums. That's happened

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 2>over time. They're building more than just stadiums though. They're

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 2>building these entertainment districts own the stadium. To talk about

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 2>DC en sure that that sort of Navy yard area

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 2>has all built up.

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Around the stadium.

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 2>You're going to see the same thing like the like

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.479
<v Speaker 2>the power and Light district in Kansas City. Uh, those

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of entertainment districts building up around a stadium so

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 2>that it's more than just someplace that people go for

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, eight football games a year.

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 3>It's a place where you go to have dinner and

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 3>walk around a city.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's interesting is that the sports franchises themselves realize

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they have to create a destination they that you know,

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you're competing. And I always say this with football man,

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it takes a lot to get me to go to

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a game, because I is there a better view than

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 1>your big screen television in your own house right, the

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to see the replay, the ability to do all

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>those things right. And you know, when you go to

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:51.919
<v Speaker 1>a game, especially college football, and the extraordinarily lengthy TV

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:55.240
<v Speaker 1>timeouts that can sit you know, it isn't a great

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So you really have to do a lot of other

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>You've got to make the experience big than just the

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.760
<v Speaker 1>two to three hours in the in the action itself.

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think in many ways the franchises are incentivized

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to think bigger and then actually that does create payoff

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for the for the for the local government, because when

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 1>you think bigger, then you do get hotel taxes, you

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.760
<v Speaker 1>do get the tourist stuff, you do get just basic

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sales tax and property tax return, where if it's just

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the stadium, you don't see any kind of return. Ask

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Maryland what kind of return they got from from ral John? Right, Yeah,

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is no longer roll John whatever that,

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. But but you know, in Landover with that stadium,

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.439
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get the return they expected because Landover wasn't

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a destination, pure and simple.

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And you know, by the way, a big thing that

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of states are dealing with right now is housing.

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 3>And you build an.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Entertainment district like that, and hey, that's you know, a

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 2>couple of thousand new housing units something that all these pass.

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:56.919
<v Speaker 1>You and I both see Mayor Bouser keeps bringing that up. Hey,

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we're building this many new units in to this this stadium,

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and that is what I think has made these things

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>go down a little bit easier. And again, voters don't

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like it. You know. Look, I'm a cranky voter. I

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>almost always vote against these these tax asks referendums in

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>my county, you know, if it's you know, unless it's

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 1>for schools or parks, like that's the up school in Barts. Yes,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm one of those voters. But I'm always

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a little skeptical. Why are you always going to borrow?

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Why do you always want to borrow? Can you can

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you do this another way? You know? Type of mindset.

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably not alone in that, which is why all

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 1>of these things are always what fifty one forty nine

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and usually in the negative, right, And.

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean think about it, that people getting the money

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 2>are billionaires, right, the billionaire sports owners.

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:43.800
<v Speaker 3>It's the it's the.

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Easy, easy ad campaign, privatization of gain and the socialization

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of cost.

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, no, there's no doubt about it. Look,

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that motivated me to get you

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on sooner rather than later recently one is just because

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I know we can talk a lot of politics outside

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>of Washington, which I'm constantly interested in. But it's fascinating

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to me how members of Congress are now realizing they

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>read the fine print of the big, beautiful bill, which

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I went on and ran on this. I'm

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 1>not asking every member of Congress read every bill, but

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>can you read the one big one every year that

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you got to vote on, Right, Like when you were

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in college, you knew which books you didn't have to read,

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but there was always one you had to read, right, Yeah, at.

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Least running through chat GPT right, get the summary.

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Get it summary. Although I think the submaries didn't know

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that this bill was going to take AI regulation power

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>away from the states. Which I remember when I was like, Wow,

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that is boy AI thinks they can get These AI

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 1>companies think they're going to get anything they want, And

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it was amazing how they did get it into part

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:51.240
<v Speaker 1>one of that legislation. Now I think it's definitely going away,

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>don't you.

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I would imagine so, especially because we've seen such outcry

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 2>from the States.

0:47:56.840 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 3>There was a bipartisan letter.

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:00.720
<v Speaker 2>A couple of weeks ago from a couple of hundred

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 2>state legislators, even numbers of Democrats and Republicans and even

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of independents out there who.

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Said they wanted the power.

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 2>And the interesting thing about this is the states have

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 2>really taken a lead on it, and it's it's a

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan cause there's this there's this caucus of legislators led

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 2>by a guy named state senator in Connecticut named James

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Maroney the state of Rapid Texas named Giovanni's Capriglione uh

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and and they're they're taking very different approaches, but they're

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 2>sitting there and they're talking about it and learning about

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 2>AI and uses in state government guard rails around safety

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and discrimination. UH. It's it's been a huge conversation in

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the states and they want to keep that power.

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I.

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Think it's you know, there's a there's At the same time, though,

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing the growth of a new set of very

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 2>moneyed interests playing in politics these days. You know, in

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the old days, it was it was you know, pharma

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 2>and big tobacco and you know, the boogeyman. Today it's

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 2>crypto and it's AI, and they're starting to play federal races.

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 2>We saw that in you know, the Ohio Senate race,

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 2>the Pennsylvania Senate race, where the crypto community came in

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 2>hard for the Republicans.

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.399
<v Speaker 3>And now we're seeing it in state legislators too, where

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, open.

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Ai and Meta and Google are are they're spending a

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of money lobbying mostly against these bills through a

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:20.760
<v Speaker 2>number of interesting cutouts.

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's like the liberal tech interest group will go.

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Play in California and the conservative tech interest group will

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 2>go play in Texas.

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And the money comes from the same pot, doesn't it.

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Money comes from the same pot.

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 2>And they don't really you know, there's no real difference

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 2>other than they call themselves liberals or conservatives.

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:37.320
<v Speaker 3>But they all they all.

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Sort of carve it up and then and then the

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:41.760
<v Speaker 2>moderate the libertarian guys come in and sew when something

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 2>actually passes.

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the sad new realities in Washington

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>lobbying is that there's it's rarely now big corporations versus citizens.

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It is usually one industry versus another industry, and they

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hide behind the people, right, they try to use voters,

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's you know, we're seeing it with

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the with with pharma, right, it's like one you know,

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it's really too moneyed interest going after each other. I

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the citizens have any role in this whatsoever.

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Who's the you know, is there any entity pushing back

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>against big tech on their aggressive AI? Is there another

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>industry stepping into sort of to try to slow down

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>AI's ability to basically get governments to do whatever the

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 1>hell they want now?

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't see an industry group.

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I do see a lot of the AI companies sort

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:37.360
<v Speaker 2>of feuding with each other, although mainly on sort of

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 2>other issues around tech, social media, digital privacy, things like that.

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 2>A big example is the push for age verification rules.

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, your kid downloads an app, whose responsibility is

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 2>it to verify that used age?

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Is it? You know, is it the app people themselves, Facebook.

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Snapchat, something like that, or is it an app store

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Apple and Google Apple? And right now a lot of those,

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 2>a lot of states are fighting over so.

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:06.760
<v Speaker 1>In that sense, you get those two big moneyed fights,

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>right It's usually there's a lot of Apple versus meta stuff.

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I am curious since Apple is sort of the lagger

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sort of AI at this point,

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>are they at all funding the other side of this

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or no, you know, not.

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:23.720
<v Speaker 3>That I've seen.

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the other side is mostly privacy groups, good

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 2>government groups, common cause people like that.

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Who you know, truly the citizen groups, the original citizen

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 1>lobbyist type.

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, as opposed to as opposed to the big companies

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:40.400
<v Speaker 2>fighting over AI itself.

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting when you just pointed out about

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>how it's a bipartisan pushback right from the states on

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the against the Feds. And this is one of the

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>things while you know, we talk a lot on a

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>macro level when we look at state legislatures about oh, look,

0:51:54.600 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 1>this is a one party control here, one party control there. Yeah,

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And from sixty thousand feet that's what looks like. And

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>then when you look closer you see a place like

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Texas right where the Texas House is actually split into

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>three right, it's a three party apparatus these days, and

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of coalitions working themselves out and you see

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 1>these Is there more bipartisanship on the state level than

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on the federal level or am I just being pollyanniship? No?

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 3>There is, but it's it varies by state.

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.839
<v Speaker 2>So in Texas it is tradition that the Texas House

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:31.320
<v Speaker 2>alexis speaker unanimously. You know, the Dems will vote for

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 2>whatever Republican gets the nomination, assuming it's sort of the

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 2>moderate Republican and not the ultra conservative.

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 3>And in other.

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 2>States, you know that Illinois was in Illinois, no, somebody

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.840
<v Speaker 2>else just passed a budget with on a pretty bipartisan vote.

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:49.399
<v Speaker 3>Arizona is going to do a bipartisan budget too.

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 2>They need to because they've got Republicans have narrow control

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and there's a democratic governor. In other states, the vitriol

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 2>is at the same level that it is at the

0:52:58.680 --> 0:52:59.400
<v Speaker 2>federal government.

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Wisconsin, the RS and the D's barely talk to each other.

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin is sort of ground zero. I always say Wisconsin's

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>polarization started before America. Yeah, I think they were they

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 1>were the shot heard around the world on this But anyway,

0:53:11.680 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>go ahead.

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 2>But but you know, by partisanship does exist, and let

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 2>me tell you it exists across state lines too. You know,

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:19.800
<v Speaker 2>if I go to the National Conference of State Legislatures,

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll sit next to a a very liberal Democrat from

0:53:22.480 --> 0:53:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Maryland and a very conservative Republican from Utah, and they

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:28.760
<v Speaker 2>have a perfectly pleasant conversation about education policy or whatever

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 2>it happens to be.

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 3>And I mean, I think largely that's because they're not

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 3>competing with each other.

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 2>There's no chance those two will ever run against each

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:38.800
<v Speaker 2>other or seek control by trying to beat the other person.

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 3>So there is that level of comedy in most states,

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 3>but certainly not everywhere.

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And would you say, you know, one of the other

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting trends, and you were you were early on spotting

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this is that you know, the better members of Congress

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that were in state legislatures and the

0:53:57.239 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>basically the crop members, the performers, usually the ones that

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 1>weren't in state legislatures. That's still the case. Are we

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>starting to are we starting to see the performance influencer

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>mindset infecting state legislatures now too?

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's it's it is still the case,

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 2>largely because you know, I think the people who are

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:21.719
<v Speaker 2>most effective are the ones who understand the rules. That's

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of my guiding prints of politics. The people who

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 2>get the rules are the ones who actually get stuff done.

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 3>And I think, hey, that was.

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 1>True with Mitch McConnell, right, that dude knew how to

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 1>knew how to manipulate the rules. Sometimes did it with

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the Nancy Pelosi. I mean, you're right if you understand

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the rules, particularly of your chamber, better than the person sponsoring,

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:43.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, a BILLI you don't like, now you got

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 1>some leverage.

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean I always go back to the

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:49.400
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and eight Democratic primary, right when the Clinton

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 2>campaign understood and didn't understand the delegate rules as well

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 2>as the Obama campaign did. And so you know, Obama

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.319
<v Speaker 2>was going around picking off delegates here and there and

0:54:57.440 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 2>ended up ended up winning the race.

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course. So going back on AI on what are

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:10.319
<v Speaker 1>what is the most what has been the easiest regulation

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to get passed on the state level on the AI front.

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the thing that most people are are doing now

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and that that is the bipartisan trend between the you know,

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:21.719
<v Speaker 2>the Connecticut version of Bill and the Colorado version of

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Texas version has been to limit algorithmic discrimination. So if

0:55:26.640 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you're you know, seeking housing or or a medical care

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 2>or something like that, a lot of states are passing

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 2>rules that say that AI cannot deny you.

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Without the oversight of a human.

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 2>So a human has to go in and make sure

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that your application isn't isn't denied for unfair reasons.

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, these algorithms they learn.

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Things and and they learn from us, and you know,

0:55:49.480 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 2>society has its problems with racism and sexism and things

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 2>like that. So it's it's going to deny people based

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.399
<v Speaker 2>on things that it shouldn't deny. So that's I think

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:01.720
<v Speaker 2>that's been the real common thread. That's the low hanging fruit.

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Who regulates that though, I mean, I look, I want

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it too, but I have not found the federal government

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like I look, I think all algorithms should go away.

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any upside to it, or certainly

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 1>algorithms should be only allowed only allowed to work based

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>on users giving permission versus the other way around. Right

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, the other way around is you know, they

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>see you know, it's like we have to uh, agree

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to the parameters that they set in order to use

0:56:31.920 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a product versus the other way around. Right, We've just

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this is unfortunately the mindset. So, I mean enforcement seems

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to me the part of this that I don't that

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't obvious to.

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Me, right, And the enforcement usually takes place within within

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:49.720
<v Speaker 2>an agency itself or with the with the attorney generals.

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>What state has this kind of uh what state has

0:56:54.880 --> 0:56:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this kind of brain power to do this? No offense?

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But I mean we all know on a government salary,

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get the people that understand that

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>understand code as well as the people writing.

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but I think in this case it's it's more

0:57:08.080 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 2>a sort of a policy examiner. So if it has

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:13.240
<v Speaker 2>to do with housing, you're going to have the housing

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:16.440
<v Speaker 2>agency overseeing, uh that kind of decision. If if it

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 2>has to do with medical care, you know you're going

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to have the state Department of Health and Human Services

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 2>overseeing something like that.

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 3>You don't I don't think you need the AI coder.

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh to go in and make sure that you know,

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 2>John Doe's medical procedure was denied for a you know,

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:31.520
<v Speaker 2>incorrect reason.

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 3>You need an insurance examiner a medical examiner or something

0:57:34.120 --> 0:57:34.400
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:38.560
<v Speaker 2>So this is but to your broader point, this is

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 2>a huge deal that every state is dealing with. They

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 2>know that the you know, the wave of the future.

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 2>What's the old line, like, your job isn't going to

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 2>be taken by AI, but your job is going to

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 2>be taken by somebody who understands AI. And a lot

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 2>of states are looking for that workforce. Who in the

0:57:55.360 --> 0:57:57.960
<v Speaker 2>workforce that's going to understand the AI of the future,

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:00.439
<v Speaker 2>because there are a lot of things that that AI

0:58:00.560 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 2>could streamline, a driver's license renewals, or just the basic

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 2>government functions of the sort of lower level of intro

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 2>employee new employee that could be made more efficient, so

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:18.480
<v Speaker 2>long as you have the workforce there that understands how

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:21.520
<v Speaker 2>to create those efficiencies. And I think that's where that's

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 2>where we're seeing a bit of a problem in state workforces.

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a huge wave of baby boomers who are retiring

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:30.919
<v Speaker 2>and there are not a ton of people who are

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 2>coming in to take those jobs.

0:58:32.880 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So AI is almost there's almost an urgency to get

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it going in order to fill gaps that they see

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 1>right now due to retired government.

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just to streamline government, make it more efficient.

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 2>That's something that I could could do in a positive way,

0:58:48.440 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 2>so long as you have those algorithmic discrimination protections over.

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 3>The top of it.

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>A derivative of the AI issue is access to power.

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And you may be loosening regular relations for small nuclear

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 1>power plants, right and things like this. What what is

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the trend? And is our legislatures basically rolling over for

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for the for these industries to to hand them any

0:59:15.000 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>anything they want in order to experiment with power or

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or is it is there is there some pushback?

0:59:23.640 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so a couple of different things are happening here

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 2>that the AI AI uses compute. Compute requires power, you know,

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 2>electricity run These massive data centers are blowing up absolutely everywhere.

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 2>There are some states that are that are moving to

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 2>create as much power capacity as possible.

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Some and the and the projections.

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Are are those states that are doing that.

0:59:45.200 --> 0:59:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Utah, Michigan, and Virginia are moving forward on the small

0:59:49.240 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 2>module reactors, although those reactors they're going to take a while.

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Pennsylvania Meta, I think it was Meta signed a big

0:59:56.200 --> 1:00:00.200
<v Speaker 2>deal with with three Mile Island to restart the good

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 2>luck with that. Yeah, it's amazing that what.

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 3>It's requiring there.

1:00:06.640 --> 1:00:09.960
<v Speaker 2>There are some states that are moving and Mississippi is

1:00:10.000 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>a good example here where they have they have approved

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:15.520
<v Speaker 2>so many data centers sort of as a backdoor way

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>to create new power, to create the demand for new

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>power that will then create the demand for coal and

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and sort of traditional power plants, if you will. The

1:00:26.120 --> 1:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>really sort of the third degree impact here though, is

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>that these data centers are starting to cost states a

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of money.

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:35.919
<v Speaker 3>And not just like.

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>You in Virginia where you live in Virginia, I don't

1:00:37.640 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>know if you know this, Chuck, there is a there

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>is a greater concentration of data centers in northern Virginia

1:00:43.520 --> 1:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>than there is anywhere else in so.

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh reed, Look, let me tell you a little something

1:00:47.240 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>about our alma mater. Yeah, and w owns a bunch

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of land out there, loud m It is the last

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>piece of land that is zoned for a data center.

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It is worth a bunch of extra money now because

1:01:02.000 --> 1:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>there's suddenly nobody wants to give more permission for this,

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>right there is suddenly what you just described. So it's interesting.

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a look, you know, universities are looking for new

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>pockets of money asap, right, so they It may be

1:01:16.000 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>good news for GW, but it is interesting. It's funny

1:01:19.480 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you brought this up because I've learned this that you know,

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Louden was very open to this until they weren't. Right

1:01:25.040 --> 1:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, now Louden residents are fighting this

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and there are others that don't want Suddenly there's a

1:01:31.280 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>pushback against these data centers.

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Correct, and yes there is.

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, it's being led in the Virginia

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 2>legislature by another former Hotliner stay centered, Danica Rome.

1:01:41.080 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Danica, you're right, thelight boy. We cast so much trouble, don't.

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>We because she keeps bringing all these anti data center

1:01:48.200 --> 1:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>bills and haven't haven't passed yet.

1:01:49.960 --> 1:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But she reps Louden, I believe, right, a big chunkle

1:01:53.200 --> 1:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>loud Yeah, yep.

1:01:55.840 --> 1:01:57.479
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you a funny story when when she worked

1:01:57.480 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>at the hotline, uh, you know, we had to be

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>in the off is at six am. Right. Of course,

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>she was late frequently and I you know, got mad

1:02:05.200 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>and yelled at her once. Well you know Route twenty eight,

1:02:07.640 --> 1:02:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Route twenty well, you know, to her credit, she ran

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 2>her entire first campaign promising to fix the Route twenty

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 2>eight right.

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So it turns out she wasn't b s U right,

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Like it wasn't just like my dog ate my homework.

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let me let me make one more point on

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:24.240
<v Speaker 2>these data centers, which which I think is interesting. They

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>are they are starting to cost states a lot more

1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>money in the incentives. Like we talked about with the stadiums,

1:02:30.200 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the amount of money that states are paying to locate

1:02:33.840 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>these data centers in their areas is through the roof.

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's not a lot of jobs associated with

1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not right, and it was a automated crap.

1:02:41.960 --> 1:02:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and we're talking, you know, close to half

1:02:43.960 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollars this year in subsidies alone. So these

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>states passed a lot of incentives four or five years

1:02:50.640 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>ago that now these data centers are realizing, hey we

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>can we can claw back a whole bunch of tax

1:02:55.120 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>revenue and things like that, and so they're building it.

1:02:57.840 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>And now that now the.

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>State budgets are exploding because of these data centers. So

1:03:01.760 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I think in the next couple of years you're going

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to see legislators trying to sunset a lot of these

1:03:05.120 --> 1:03:05.920
<v Speaker 2>incentive backs.

1:03:06.560 --> 1:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Two more hot button issues that I know are royaling

1:03:09.480 --> 1:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple state legislatures. One is housing and zoning. And you know, look,

1:03:17.520 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever neighborhood if you live, you know, suburban

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>neighborhoods have these fights. This is county level stuff. But

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>then states are trying to deal with it. We we

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>know California is you know, how do you? San Jose

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>has these where you can take your backyard garage and

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>turn it into an apartment, standalonepartment. I think they are

1:03:34.920 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>actually going to sell these things, of these little micro properties.

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they call them ad us.

1:03:40.640 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Well huge right legislatures.

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And so is that is how is that a polarizing issue? Uh?

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And is it? I assume it's pitting geographic areas against

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>each other rather necessarily than partisan ship. Correct, Yeah, it is.

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>And we're seeing we're seeing something very clever is happening

1:04:01.920 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>right now. A lot of states have taken up big

1:04:03.760 --> 1:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>housing packages in recent years. Colorado, Oregon, New Mexico, Uh,

1:04:08.320 --> 1:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>your home state of Florida, my home state of Washington

1:04:10.360 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>both changed single family zoning laws recently, uh in certain

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>cities to allow more you know, multi multi family housing.

1:04:19.760 --> 1:04:22.840
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, this becomes a huge nimbi issue, right Uh,

1:04:23.080 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>where the locals don't want new housing coming in because

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>it I don't know, devalues their housing, their housing market

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>or whatever.

1:04:31.520 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they think it does it. You know, well I

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>know this. Over time, all it does is increase you know,

1:04:38.520 --> 1:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>increase value. It also does it always.

1:04:41.400 --> 1:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>The clever thing that's happening in a lot of these

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:47.320
<v Speaker 2>states is that the city councils in some of these

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:50.600
<v Speaker 2>areas where the nimbi's are strong, will go to the

1:04:50.720 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 2>legislator I talked to. I talked to a legislator in

1:04:52.760 --> 1:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Colorado about this. She told me she was getting a

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:56.800
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of phone calls from the city councils in

1:04:56.840 --> 1:04:59.840
<v Speaker 2>all the mountain towns saying, you guys have to preempt

1:04:59.920 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 2>up now.

1:05:00.680 --> 1:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Ordinarily you know this. Cities hate being funny by the state.

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Because they said they knew it's a popular like, look,

1:05:06.480 --> 1:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna be able to deal with this. Don't

1:05:08.000 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>make us do it. If it's right.

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>The state is the one setting the rules.

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>The local guys get to say, look at the big

1:05:13.480 --> 1:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>bad guys up there at the state capitol.

1:05:14.920 --> 1:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>It's not us they get. You know, the locals get reelected.

1:05:17.920 --> 1:05:20.120
<v Speaker 2>The state legislators mostly get re elected because they're in

1:05:20.240 --> 1:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Denver or Boulder.

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Or wherever, and you get more housing in these mountaintowns.

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 2>So those those conversations happen behind closed doors, and more

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and more housing comes to these areas. So we're seeing

1:05:32.240 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're seeing a lot of big housing packages

1:05:34.120 --> 1:05:37.200
<v Speaker 2>that focus on zoning, that focus on those alternatives.

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Dwelling units, things like that.

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, there's no question there's a massive housing

1:05:42.280 --> 1:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>crisis across the country. I mean, in Rhode Island, there's

1:05:46.560 --> 1:05:49.680
<v Speaker 2>a story in the Providence Journal today that the median

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:51.880
<v Speaker 2>housing cost in Rhode Island for a single family home

1:05:51.960 --> 1:05:53.360
<v Speaker 2>is now north of half a million dollars.

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, in California it's north of a million dollars.

1:05:55.880 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's every state knows they've got to build

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:00.720
<v Speaker 2>this housing as as possible.

1:06:00.920 --> 1:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>The problem is to take so long.

1:06:10.040 --> 1:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>You know. Rita was funny. Every member of Congress I

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>talked with last year, and I would say, hey, what's

1:06:15.560 --> 1:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>an issue you never talk you never bring up, but

1:06:18.600 --> 1:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>your voters always bring up to you. And they all

1:06:20.920 --> 1:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>set housing. You know, it was one of those they say,

1:06:23.760 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about enough. You guys don't ask meaning

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>us in the national media. We don't ask enough about it,

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and partially because we all know it's a local issue, right,

1:06:31.040 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's not really much the FEDS can do

1:06:33.280 --> 1:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about it. But that doesn't mean people don't go to

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>their congressmen and complain about local things. Right, You're like,

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>come on, like, we've got a problem here. You know,

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's necessarily something the FEDS can

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>deal with, as much as this really is a state

1:06:46.280 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>local issue. The other one is the privatization of the

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>public school system, which seems to be certainly that is

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>probably a partisan that obviously is falling along partisan lines.

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the destruction of the public school system

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in Miami has just been just heartbreaking for me and

1:07:03.920 --> 1:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. And it's all over Florida's got

1:07:06.120 --> 1:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>huge gaps here. Texas is about to go on this

1:07:11.000 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and they've already had a very antiquated public school where

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>basically you and I could say, hey, we're starting a

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>school district, not just the school, you know, not just homeschool.

1:07:19.920 --> 1:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>You can start your own school district in Texas and

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly collect public tax dollars and that you may

1:07:26.160 --> 1:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>or may not have to account for. So obviously I

1:07:30.800 --> 1:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>have strong feelings about this because I just think we

1:07:33.040 --> 1:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have problems in our public school system. This is not

1:07:35.320 --> 1:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the way to address it. That's my frustration with this.

1:07:38.160 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But is a is in these conservative legislatures? Is this

1:07:43.640 --> 1:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>just a I mean, it's just an avalanche that's coming

1:07:47.840 --> 1:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and the privatization of our public education system is only increasing.

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So this is why Player of US News exists.

1:07:54.400 --> 1:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Like we our goal here is not to cover, you know,

1:07:57.840 --> 1:08:00.760
<v Speaker 2>everything that happens in one state's legislature, to spot the

1:08:00.800 --> 1:08:03.400
<v Speaker 2>trends that happened across the country. And the very first

1:08:03.440 --> 1:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>trend that we started following three years ago when we

1:08:07.040 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>kicked off, was this push to expand school vouchers. And

1:08:11.320 --> 1:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Iowa was the first state. And by the way, this

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>is why it's important to pay attention to more than

1:08:15.240 --> 1:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>just California and Texas.

1:08:16.320 --> 1:08:16.800
<v Speaker 3>And New York.

1:08:17.000 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, Iowa is a real leader these days in

1:08:19.439 --> 1:08:22.240
<v Speaker 2>conservative policy. They were the first ones to kick off

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:25.519
<v Speaker 2>this voucher push. Governor Reynolds signed the bill like two

1:08:25.560 --> 1:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>weeks into session.

1:08:26.680 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Jeb Bush started this and Flay I did,

1:08:29.520 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody is this is derivative of the Florida Plan.

1:08:32.560 --> 1:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>This is the latest This is the latest push, and

1:08:34.880 --> 1:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>after Iowa did it, about two dozen states followed suits,

1:08:38.720 --> 1:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>most recently in Texas.

1:08:40.439 --> 1:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Iowa has a Democratic governor in eighteen months. It'll be

1:08:44.960 --> 1:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>because of this issue, I.

1:08:46.040 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Believe very well. Maybe. But the interesting thing that we're

1:08:50.040 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 2>seeing now, so this happens in steps. First of all,

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:55.880
<v Speaker 2>you establish a program usually for people who are three

1:08:55.920 --> 1:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred to four hundred percent of the medium by the

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>poverty level, poverty level which is what eighty to one

1:09:01.960 --> 1:09:05.759
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand dollars total. Then the pool begins to expand,

1:09:05.840 --> 1:09:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and you expand it to people who make up to

1:09:07.680 --> 1:09:09.560
<v Speaker 2>two hundred thousand, are up to five hundred thousand, and

1:09:09.560 --> 1:09:12.479
<v Speaker 2>then everybody who you know had disabled students or special

1:09:12.520 --> 1:09:15.679
<v Speaker 2>needs students are included too. And then we go universe.

1:09:15.840 --> 1:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>And that's the that's the latest thing that we've seen

1:09:18.040 --> 1:09:21.439
<v Speaker 2>here is a number of states expanding that eligibility pool

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:26.320
<v Speaker 2>to all kids in their state, places like New Hampshire, Iowa,

1:09:26.520 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Arkansas just did it.

1:09:28.800 --> 1:09:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Texas is taking that first step.

1:09:30.840 --> 1:09:33.200
<v Speaker 2>After you talked about the three parties in Texas well,

1:09:33.200 --> 1:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the Texas House, the Republican held Texas House, was where

1:09:36.120 --> 1:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>voucher bills went to die Unbitt spent a whole bunch

1:09:39.280 --> 1:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of money primary ing all the anti voucher members.

1:09:42.240 --> 1:09:43.719
<v Speaker 3>And he finally got it through this year.

1:09:44.000 --> 1:09:47.240
<v Speaker 2>So the just like we talked about with the data

1:09:47.240 --> 1:09:50.720
<v Speaker 2>centers here, when you go to that universal eligibility like

1:09:50.800 --> 1:09:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Iowa did, the amount of money that that costs the

1:09:54.120 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>public school systems explodes. We're talking, I mean, you know,

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>fifty sixty seventy million dollars over what states had budgeted

1:10:02.640 --> 1:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>in small states like Iowa and Arkansas, so legislators are

1:10:06.120 --> 1:10:08.960
<v Speaker 2>having to go back to the well, spend more money

1:10:08.960 --> 1:10:09.840
<v Speaker 2>on these on these.

1:10:09.680 --> 1:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Programs, and it's costing a whole bunch of money.

1:10:12.320 --> 1:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>The other funny thing that happens is that the schools

1:10:15.160 --> 1:10:18.559
<v Speaker 2>themselves respond. So in Iowa, there was a you know,

1:10:18.600 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>there's a maximum amount that students can receive for these vouchers.

1:10:23.240 --> 1:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's nine thousand dollars a year somewhere around there.

1:10:26.040 --> 1:10:28.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, funny enough, all the Catholic schools in Iowa change

1:10:28.600 --> 1:10:31.439
<v Speaker 2>their tuition rates to about that nine thousand dollars a year.

1:10:31.479 --> 1:10:35.400
<v Speaker 2>So schools themselves are raising tuition to capture as much

1:10:35.400 --> 1:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>as that of that money as possible, which again no it's.

1:10:38.200 --> 1:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Just a wealth transfer. It's not actually doing it's not

1:10:40.640 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>doing what the original do gooders thought what they were

1:10:46.040 --> 1:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to do, right, which is, you know, how do

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you you know, how do you allow parents who are

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>trapped in a bad school district to get out of

1:10:56.680 --> 1:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that school district? Right? That's the original problem. And nobody

1:11:00.200 --> 1:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ever thought, let's fix the school. Everybody is always like,

1:11:02.760 --> 1:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>let's abandon the school. And I'm trying to figure out

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:07.839
<v Speaker 1>how this is. You know, when you keep abandoning these schools,

1:11:08.400 --> 1:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>where in rural America? Are we building more schools in

1:11:10.880 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>rural America to create school choice?

1:11:13.320 --> 1:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>You?

1:11:13.720 --> 1:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is this is the reality that I

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think Texans are going to run into and why I

1:11:20.160 --> 1:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>actually think this is going to turn into and why

1:11:22.880 --> 1:11:25.479
<v Speaker 1>for instance, in Iowa this is more polarizing than you

1:11:25.560 --> 1:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>think it would be because you know, in theory, many

1:11:29.760 --> 1:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of these conservative voters agree with the premise, and then

1:11:32.240 --> 1:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the reality sets in, well, oh so I have to

1:11:35.560 --> 1:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>go thirty miles away or then or somebody says I'm

1:11:39.640 --> 1:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>going to start a school, right, and that's what you're getting.

1:11:42.880 --> 1:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You're getting and some of them are good, and some

1:11:45.920 --> 1:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of them are are crooked. And what I've not What

1:11:50.920 --> 1:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I've also noticed is that there doesn't seem to be

1:11:54.000 --> 1:11:57.759
<v Speaker 1>any good regulatory model to find out are these startup

1:11:57.840 --> 1:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>schools stealing tech expayer money or actually putting it to

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>good use.

1:12:03.680 --> 1:12:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a there's a just just as we talked

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:08.000
<v Speaker 2>about in AI and these big tech companies. I mean,

1:12:08.000 --> 1:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a booming business behind this. It's not just the

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:14.799
<v Speaker 2>charter schools. It's the firms that administer the education savings

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>accounts or vouchers, whichever they are. You know, that's that's

1:12:18.520 --> 1:12:20.240
<v Speaker 2>like the biggest sexy thing in the world. You're never

1:12:20.240 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 2>going to see that on TV, but that's that's a

1:12:22.240 --> 1:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of money right there.

1:12:23.360 --> 1:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And that well, that's the thing. Like you know, look,

1:12:25.240 --> 1:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a friend of mine who's an education lobbyist

1:12:27.080 --> 1:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in Florida who was telling me that, you know, they

1:12:31.280 --> 1:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>keep they keep sort of starving the public school and

1:12:34.080 --> 1:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they do this and then there's no there's no agency

1:12:37.280 --> 1:12:41.599
<v Speaker 1>that holds the private charter accountable and there's no auditing

1:12:41.640 --> 1:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of that money. The public school system gets audited all

1:12:44.760 --> 1:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the time, right you know, there's a school board that

1:12:47.479 --> 1:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>oversees it. There's multiple layers of of watchdogs on that money.

1:12:53.760 --> 1:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as these voucher systems have been expanded,

1:12:57.520 --> 1:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there's been very little expansion of oversight welso on how

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this money is being spent.

1:13:03.160 --> 1:13:05.599
<v Speaker 2>And this brings up another thing that legislators are doing

1:13:05.640 --> 1:13:09.599
<v Speaker 2>these days. Chuck, define for me an educational expense because

1:13:09.640 --> 1:13:11.559
<v Speaker 2>in Utah right now, you can pay for a ski

1:13:11.640 --> 1:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>pass with your education savings account and you can you know,

1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>there are whole forums on Reddit and things like that

1:13:17.920 --> 1:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>where you can use.

1:13:18.760 --> 1:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So signing my kids up for any sport then becomes

1:13:21.280 --> 1:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an educational expense because guess what, if they're good at

1:13:24.040 --> 1:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the sport, they actually might get money for it.

1:13:26.400 --> 1:13:28.799
<v Speaker 2>Hey. I mean, you know, Chuck, if you're using YouTube

1:13:28.840 --> 1:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>for an educational purpose, why not. I think you need

1:13:31.000 --> 1:13:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a big screen TV, don't you. I mean that's like

1:13:33.560 --> 1:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>people are gaming the system to buy things like big

1:13:37.200 --> 1:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>screen TVs and toys and video games and things like that.

1:13:40.800 --> 1:13:44.080
<v Speaker 2>So now legislators are going back and further defining what

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:45.640
<v Speaker 2>you can actually spend that money on.

1:13:46.200 --> 1:13:48.719
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I'll take I'll take a ski pass

1:13:48.720 --> 1:13:50.559
<v Speaker 3>and a big screen TV if you know, for my kid.

1:13:50.760 --> 1:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me tackle this school issue in other way.

1:13:53.320 --> 1:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there anybody actually saying, hey, let's rethink the public's

1:13:57.920 --> 1:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the public education sytemm, but in a public

1:14:02.720 --> 1:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>funded way, like you know, look, I do believe we

1:14:05.240 --> 1:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't changed the I understand the frustration, right. We haven't

1:14:08.920 --> 1:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>really changed the premise of our public education system since

1:14:12.360 --> 1:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we created it over one hundred years ago. It's basically

1:14:16.400 --> 1:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the same premise property taxes, funded district stuff like that.

1:14:21.439 --> 1:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So I have no doubt. And and you know, we're

1:14:23.880 --> 1:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we do everything by age. And I think now all

1:14:27.240 --> 1:14:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the all the research indicates that learning, you know, that

1:14:31.600 --> 1:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that is a you know, that is not always the

1:14:33.920 --> 1:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>best way to go, and that you need to have

1:14:36.760 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>some of that flexibility.

1:14:37.840 --> 1:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>No doubt.

1:14:38.280 --> 1:14:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Smaller class sizes help with that all those things, right,

1:14:40.880 --> 1:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly those with means can go to a private

1:14:43.120 --> 1:14:47.439
<v Speaker 1>school and get a form of that. But I guess

1:14:47.520 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the is there is there any legislature, Is there

1:14:50.120 --> 1:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>any leader in this space thinking about how to create

1:14:54.000 --> 1:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this flexibility in the publics, in the public sector rather

1:14:57.960 --> 1:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>than just farming out tax to the private sector.

1:15:01.479 --> 1:15:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Uh, not that I can think of.

1:15:03.320 --> 1:15:05.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this strikes me as one of those issues

1:15:05.760 --> 1:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>that sort of sort of like housing that it is

1:15:09.479 --> 1:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>so it is so big structurally that you would need

1:15:13.240 --> 1:15:15.320
<v Speaker 2>a I mean, this is why we're never going to

1:15:15.360 --> 1:15:18.799
<v Speaker 2>get a real tax reform package passed through Congress.

1:15:18.880 --> 1:15:21.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's so big that anything you do is

1:15:21.200 --> 1:15:22.320
<v Speaker 3>going to create an enemy.

1:15:23.160 --> 1:15:25.760
<v Speaker 2>This it sort of reminds me of what they did

1:15:25.800 --> 1:15:28.599
<v Speaker 2>in Colorado a couple of years ago with their housing package.

1:15:28.640 --> 1:15:31.679
<v Speaker 2>They put all the bills together in one, one big

1:15:31.720 --> 1:15:35.120
<v Speaker 2>omnibus bill, and it gave everybody just enough to hate

1:15:35.439 --> 1:15:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that they voted it down. Well, the next year they

1:15:37.280 --> 1:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>came back and they introduced a lot of the same

1:15:38.880 --> 1:15:41.479
<v Speaker 2>bills as piecemeal bills, and if you hated this one,

1:15:41.479 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>you could vote against it, but you could vote for

1:15:43.160 --> 1:15:43.759
<v Speaker 2>this one.

1:15:44.200 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Suddenly everything passed.

1:15:46.200 --> 1:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>This is you know, it's really hard to get a

1:15:50.280 --> 1:15:54.560
<v Speaker 2>massive structural change through a legislature because you're giving everybody

1:15:54.920 --> 1:15:57.080
<v Speaker 2>just enough to hate that they can vote against it

1:15:57.160 --> 1:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to little piece meal stuff. And education is

1:15:59.640 --> 1:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>so huge, huge, I mean, you're not going to change

1:16:01.840 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the system with piecemeal stuff.

1:16:03.160 --> 1:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting read. I actually think this is

1:16:06.040 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>an underrated issue for a presidential candidate to tackle. Like

1:16:09.320 --> 1:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you this, I know, Bill Clinton, if

1:16:11.960 --> 1:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this were nineteen ninety one, he'd be talking about this

1:16:15.560 --> 1:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>no one. You know, he knows that this is this

1:16:18.000 --> 1:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that cuts across parties, party line. So it's

1:16:22.080 --> 1:16:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a way that you could actually have a conversation with

1:16:24.560 --> 1:16:28.599
<v Speaker 1>voters from different ideological stripes if you come at it

1:16:28.840 --> 1:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>from a hey, we know it's a problem. We need

1:16:31.840 --> 1:16:33.559
<v Speaker 1>to we need to figure out a better way. I

1:16:33.560 --> 1:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>don't have the answer yet, but I know we got

1:16:35.520 --> 1:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to tackle it. I actually think simply leaning in on

1:16:39.040 --> 1:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit it's probably good politics right now.

1:16:44.000 --> 1:16:46.479
<v Speaker 2>It strikes me as something like Simpson's bowl. Simpson bowls

1:16:46.479 --> 1:16:48.680
<v Speaker 2>where you know, and when Simpson bowls it, I get

1:16:48.720 --> 1:16:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you on that.

1:16:49.200 --> 1:16:50.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, It's just it's.

1:16:50.400 --> 1:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>So big that everybody's going to find a reason to

1:16:52.160 --> 1:16:54.400
<v Speaker 2>hate it.

1:16:54.400 --> 1:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It's possible, I hear you on that, and it can

1:16:57.040 --> 1:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>get weaponized quite easily. All let's talk a little bit

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>of politics in the States. You know, I can't stand

1:17:05.600 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>so much of the political analysis these days nationally, particularly

1:17:10.560 --> 1:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sort of projecting the politics of

1:17:13.080 --> 1:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a state, where there's always this assumption that what it

1:17:15.920 --> 1:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is today is what it'll be in four years. You know,

1:17:18.280 --> 1:17:20.479
<v Speaker 1>there's all this doom and gloom on the left about

1:17:20.479 --> 1:17:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are never going to control the Senate again

1:17:23.320 --> 1:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>because of the trend lines in different states. And I'm

1:17:25.720 --> 1:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>just sitting there going, God, does anybody think about history right?

1:17:29.439 --> 1:17:29.519
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1:17:29.640 --> 1:17:34.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, what seems absolutely certain today can change within

1:17:34.680 --> 1:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a cycle. So with that said, which states that are

1:17:39.920 --> 1:17:43.799
<v Speaker 1>perceived to be you know, fairly reliably red or fairly

1:17:43.840 --> 1:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>reliably blue that there's some tumult underneath that we ought

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to these midterms.

1:17:49.680 --> 1:17:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd pay attention to a state like Wisconsin, which

1:17:52.439 --> 1:17:54.000
<v Speaker 2>just went through a rediscerpt.

1:17:54.120 --> 1:17:55.759
<v Speaker 3>I know, I'm just going to list all the swing states.

1:17:55.760 --> 1:17:58.599
<v Speaker 1>You don't get to. Don't give me a presidential swing state.

1:17:58.800 --> 1:18:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I said, reliably read reliably blue. You don't get to

1:18:01.479 --> 1:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>come back maybe with Wisconsin. Man. And you know what,

1:18:03.760 --> 1:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>because I know you, I can say that, See this

1:18:05.680 --> 1:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is why you got to bring people on your pie.

1:18:07.200 --> 1:18:09.599
<v Speaker 1>And you know, God, damn it read anyway, Sorry, kiddy,

1:18:09.600 --> 1:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Jack, appreciate it.

1:18:11.120 --> 1:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>You bring up Iowa. Iowa was a good one. Rob

1:18:13.360 --> 1:18:15.519
<v Speaker 2>sand is the state audit there. He's runner for governor,

1:18:16.200 --> 1:18:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the only Democrat left in state wide office. He's young dynamic.

1:18:20.000 --> 1:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>He looked forgive me rob if you listen to this,

1:18:22.600 --> 1:18:23.679
<v Speaker 2>but he looks like a teenager.

1:18:24.400 --> 1:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But he's you know those blue eyes. Man, he's like,

1:18:26.680 --> 1:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>oh blue eyes. You know you're waiting for him to

1:18:29.040 --> 1:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sing Sinatra at you. But man, he's also he's also

1:18:33.560 --> 1:18:37.519
<v Speaker 1>like a like he's an uncomfortable Democrat and he says it,

1:18:37.640 --> 1:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>which might be the right, might be the right persona

1:18:40.120 --> 1:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to have this scle.

1:18:41.400 --> 1:18:45.160
<v Speaker 2>The thing that's always interested in me about states is

1:18:45.479 --> 1:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>about the state politics.

1:18:47.080 --> 1:18:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it?

1:18:47.280 --> 1:18:49.559
<v Speaker 2>People vote for governor differently than they do for US

1:18:49.600 --> 1:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Senate seed to US House seats.

1:18:51.160 --> 1:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Just go to Kansas, right, you'll find that.

1:18:53.080 --> 1:18:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Look, yeah, Larry Hogan can win a governorship in Maryland,

1:18:55.400 --> 1:18:57.519
<v Speaker 2>but he couldn't win a Senate seat. You know, same

1:18:57.560 --> 1:19:01.160
<v Speaker 2>thing with Phil Bredeson and Tennessee or or I don't know.

1:19:02.800 --> 1:19:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Dave. Did Dave run for governor percentate? I can't remember.

1:19:06.120 --> 1:19:08.719
<v Speaker 1>But Freudenthal did and he didn't win. No, I mean absolutely,

1:19:08.720 --> 1:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they did try to get him and he

1:19:10.160 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't and it didn't work.

1:19:11.240 --> 1:19:13.719
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean there are always going to be interesting

1:19:13.760 --> 1:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>opportunities for ds and rs to pick up seats that

1:19:16.439 --> 1:19:19.559
<v Speaker 2>that they they otherwise. I mean Phil Scott has been

1:19:19.640 --> 1:19:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the governor of Vermont for four two year terms. Now,

1:19:22.640 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>last time he won with seventy something percent of the vote.

1:19:25.040 --> 1:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>He didn't run a television ad. He a Republican winning

1:19:28.280 --> 1:19:30.120
<v Speaker 2>in Vermont without running a TV ad.

1:19:30.800 --> 1:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Every two years. Yeah, you know that's a pretty pretty

1:19:34.720 --> 1:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>well would I would say highly uh highly news literate state?

1:19:40.760 --> 1:19:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, Well, so you know a state like Oregon

1:19:44.640 --> 1:19:46.960
<v Speaker 2>is going to be interesting because there are you know,

1:19:47.120 --> 1:19:50.719
<v Speaker 2>there there's a lot of unhappiness with with Democrats in Portland,

1:19:51.760 --> 1:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and and you know Governor kotech Is is going to

1:19:54.080 --> 1:19:54.759
<v Speaker 2>run for reelection.

1:19:55.200 --> 1:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>What are we up to? Are they the second longest

1:19:56.880 --> 1:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>streak after your home state of white party governorship?

1:19:59.760 --> 1:19:59.800
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, third, third longest.

1:20:01.320 --> 1:20:05.280
<v Speaker 2>South Dakota is the longest Republican streaky a Democrat in

1:20:05.320 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 2>the seventies. Washington last elected a Republican in nineteen eighty

1:20:08.560 --> 1:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Oregon in nineteen eighty two.

1:20:10.120 --> 1:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they're both longest. Idaho Is Idaho not in

1:20:12.960 --> 1:20:13.559
<v Speaker 1>that top four?

1:20:14.479 --> 1:20:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Who did Idaho have? Idaho? I had a republic a

1:20:16.960 --> 1:20:20.479
<v Speaker 3>Democratic governor in the in the ninet nineties. I'm going

1:20:20.520 --> 1:20:21.479
<v Speaker 3>to blank on who was.

1:20:21.800 --> 1:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>There was a guy named Larry Echohawk that always would

1:20:23.920 --> 1:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>come really close, but never never, never quite get there.

1:20:27.080 --> 1:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, those Mountain West states are becoming increasingly difficult for Democrats.

1:20:31.720 --> 1:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, when look this cycle, it's New Jersey, right,

1:20:35.200 --> 1:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the quote reliably blue state that feels like

1:20:37.320 --> 1:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a real swing state.

1:20:38.800 --> 1:20:39.880
<v Speaker 3>This, I'll make you bet, Chuck.

1:20:40.040 --> 1:20:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I was talking to a Republican stratge out in Vermont

1:20:42.240 --> 1:20:45.600
<v Speaker 2>in Virginia yesterday, and then he was talking, he was

1:20:45.840 --> 1:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>talking up his Well I can say this because he

1:20:48.360 --> 1:20:48.720
<v Speaker 2>posted it.

1:20:48.760 --> 1:20:50.719
<v Speaker 3>It's your your doppelganger, Brent Todd.

1:20:52.280 --> 1:20:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Is working on He posted something on his blog about

1:20:55.439 --> 1:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Republican chances in Virginia is here.

1:20:57.320 --> 1:20:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I will bet you New Jersey will be closer than Virginia.

1:21:00.200 --> 1:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I I, you know, sorry, but said that. I think

1:21:03.320 --> 1:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I've already said that on my my pot a few times. Oh.

1:21:06.000 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Virginia is going to be double digits on

1:21:08.200 --> 1:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the top part of the ticket probably. You know, when

1:21:11.640 --> 1:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I say double digit, somewhere between that right around that

1:21:14.280 --> 1:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Ralph Northam, you know, somewhere between eight and eleven. I

1:21:16.680 --> 1:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>mean just the federal worker stuff alone. The question is,

1:21:20.600 --> 1:21:23.519
<v Speaker 1>is you know the and I assume Brad Todd has

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>one race he cares about in Virginia. I think he's

1:21:26.080 --> 1:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>got the AG right, who's the only incumbent on the ballot,

1:21:30.200 --> 1:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and that'll be the test, right, how strong are Spamberger's coattails?

1:21:34.360 --> 1:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Does does the AG winner loose?

1:21:36.240 --> 1:21:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:21:36.479 --> 1:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a it's you know, I don't

1:21:40.360 --> 1:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not the strongest down ballid ticket Democrats could have nominated.

1:21:43.320 --> 1:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>But guess what, it's not exactly a strong top of

1:21:46.680 --> 1:21:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the ticket on the Republican side. So it's an interesting

1:21:49.800 --> 1:21:52.599
<v Speaker 1>I do think Virginia AG will be in Virginia LG

1:21:52.760 --> 1:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>will both be weirdly closer, will be really perhaps fairly

1:21:57.240 --> 1:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>competitive on that front. But New Jersey there's no to me.

1:22:00.800 --> 1:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and we were seeing this, I mean New

1:22:02.840 --> 1:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Jersey has that you know, there was a you know,

1:22:06.479 --> 1:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it has it has that blue collar Democratic labor voter

1:22:12.920 --> 1:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's culturally a bit more conservative than the average Democratic

1:22:16.760 --> 1:22:17.599
<v Speaker 1>candidate these days.

1:22:17.680 --> 1:22:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Republicans have had have sort of harbored the

1:22:20.720 --> 1:22:22.160
<v Speaker 2>hopes of winning there for a long time.

1:22:23.360 --> 1:22:25.479
<v Speaker 3>You'll remember this better than I did. Dick Cheney make

1:22:25.479 --> 1:22:28.479
<v Speaker 3>it last minute stop in Jersey in two thousand or four.

1:22:28.720 --> 1:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, New Jersey's always one of those states it polls,

1:22:31.080 --> 1:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, remember you and I used to talk about

1:22:32.439 --> 1:22:35.479
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. It always polls close because there's

1:22:35.479 --> 1:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>always a high undecided, right, it's a weird. There's no

1:22:38.080 --> 1:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>media market. It's all bleeding in. I always say I

1:22:40.760 --> 1:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>feel sorry for New Jersey's reputation because the only reason

1:22:43.880 --> 1:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they have the reputation is sort of a scandal plague

1:22:46.160 --> 1:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>state is because the Philadelphia media market and the New

1:22:48.800 --> 1:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>York media market only covers New Jersey politics when there's

1:22:51.400 --> 1:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>something bad that happens. They never cover the day to

1:22:54.000 --> 1:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>day stuff. They cover the day to day of their

1:22:55.840 --> 1:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>own states, but they never cover So the outsized coverage

1:22:59.640 --> 1:23:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of the negative of New Jersey creates this negative vibe

1:23:03.240 --> 1:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for for I think New Jersey politicians, which you know,

1:23:07.880 --> 1:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a fairly competent state government, you know, whether

1:23:11.840 --> 1:23:14.519
<v Speaker 1>it was Christian charge, Murphy in charge, et cetera. But

1:23:14.640 --> 1:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it does have this this reputation. Some of it is,

1:23:18.160 --> 1:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, an old reputation. Some of it is basically right, yeah,

1:23:22.200 --> 1:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the party boss stuff that got rid of that, which

1:23:25.200 --> 1:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is a you know, Andy Kim is never a US

1:23:28.080 --> 1:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>senator without it, you know, on that front. But there's

1:23:31.760 --> 1:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely Jersey. Let me ask a few other states that

1:23:36.240 --> 1:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if their legislatures have sort of pushed the

1:23:39.720 --> 1:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>envelope too much to give the other party a chance here.

1:23:43.920 --> 1:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So do we see any green shoots for the Republicans

1:23:48.040 --> 1:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in Massachusetts this cycle? They're going to go to maga

1:23:51.080 --> 1:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on there there are.

1:23:52.280 --> 1:23:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there are, there are such.

1:23:56.520 --> 1:24:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Small you know, Republican Republican caucus in Massachusetts is so

1:24:01.720 --> 1:24:04.840
<v Speaker 2>small that even even if they do well, you know,

1:24:04.920 --> 1:24:06.759
<v Speaker 2>they get two or three more seats.

1:24:06.800 --> 1:24:09.679
<v Speaker 3>And that's I mean, it's such a such a little.

1:24:10.320 --> 1:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>And as a Charlie Baker's not walking through that door.

1:24:13.880 --> 1:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>No, No, Charlie Banker and Republicans had a remarkable streak.

1:24:17.040 --> 1:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>But they've had They've had six of.

1:24:19.360 --> 1:24:21.479
<v Speaker 1>The I think they've had more Republican governors in the

1:24:21.560 --> 1:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>last thirty years than Democratic governments.

1:24:23.800 --> 1:24:26.200
<v Speaker 3>They certainly have, But that takes a Charlie Baker, a

1:24:26.240 --> 1:24:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Mitt Romney something like that.

1:24:28.200 --> 1:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I am. I think Tommy, let's talk about

1:24:32.920 --> 1:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the three US Senators running for governor. Tommy Tapperville, Alabama,

1:24:36.280 --> 1:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bennett Colorado, Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee? Am I leaving somebody out?

1:24:39.640 --> 1:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Those are the no But I don't think Blackburn has

1:24:41.479 --> 1:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>technically gotten in yet. But we all know, right, but

1:24:43.160 --> 1:24:45.479
<v Speaker 1>she's already run ads like I'm sorry, Like I'm not.

1:24:45.760 --> 1:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, she's already run ads for it. So please,

1:24:49.320 --> 1:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is there a fourth that I'm missing? Right on took

1:24:52.720 --> 1:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>himself out of New Mexico. I know there was some

1:24:54.760 --> 1:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>chatter there where else was there chatter?

1:24:57.640 --> 1:24:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about it too. But he's not going

1:24:59.160 --> 1:25:03.479
<v Speaker 3>to run No. I think that's all.

1:25:03.439 --> 1:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Right, So let's look at those three. Bennett looks like,

1:25:06.520 --> 1:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what's what am I missing? This looks like he's going

1:25:09.720 --> 1:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to a walk in the park. What would prevent that?

1:25:13.280 --> 1:25:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Republicans haven't been I mean in Colorado is one

1:25:16.840 --> 1:25:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of those states that gets to your point about about

1:25:19.520 --> 1:25:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, sort of the evolution, right.

1:25:21.120 --> 1:25:24.360
<v Speaker 3>It was a conservative state. Now it is a liberal state.

1:25:25.240 --> 1:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And but that's too liberal. It's always what you can't

1:25:28.080 --> 1:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>go too far. I mean, like polis knew what he

1:25:30.080 --> 1:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>could and couldn't do during COVID, for instance, Right, I

1:25:32.479 --> 1:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think I think he was the I think no governor

1:25:34.439 --> 1:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>handled COVID politically better than Jared Polis. Polis is given

1:25:38.760 --> 1:25:41.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit, but DeSantis didn't help his national reputation.

1:25:41.960 --> 1:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Polis helped both his local and national reputations.

1:25:44.640 --> 1:25:46.479
<v Speaker 3>I think, I think what we're going to see, what

1:25:46.920 --> 1:25:49.280
<v Speaker 3>if if Polish runs for president, he's going to be.

1:25:51.080 --> 1:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>The centrist.

1:25:52.120 --> 1:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm a most conservative person, democratic feed, pro business. Polis

1:25:56.160 --> 1:25:58.599
<v Speaker 2>was never a liberal. He was He's never been a liberal.

1:25:58.680 --> 1:25:58.880
<v Speaker 2>He was.

1:25:59.000 --> 1:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>No. He was the boulder Boulder thing, being a bolder congressman,

1:26:02.320 --> 1:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which used to be the kiss of death for state

1:26:04.280 --> 1:26:07.479
<v Speaker 1>wide office in Colorado. I always wonder to that about him.

1:26:07.520 --> 1:26:11.599
<v Speaker 1>But his background was you know, he was a tech guy, right,

1:26:11.720 --> 1:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and he made a bunch of money. I always say,

1:26:13.560 --> 1:26:15.519
<v Speaker 1>do you remember in the early days of the internet

1:26:15.560 --> 1:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the musical greeting cards? Right? That was him. You know.

1:26:20.520 --> 1:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Alabama is the one that I think Tommy Tupperville is

1:26:23.560 --> 1:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>just not a good political athlete. He may be a

1:26:27.960 --> 1:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>good football ex football coach, but he doesn't He steps

1:26:33.200 --> 1:26:35.519
<v Speaker 1>in it quite a bit. And as you point out,

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>voters take governor's racist more seriously by the person than

1:26:40.080 --> 1:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>by the party. If Doug Jones runs for governor, why

1:26:44.400 --> 1:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do I think that's a competitive.

1:26:45.920 --> 1:26:49.479
<v Speaker 2>Race, it'll be competitive. I don't think it'll be I

1:26:49.520 --> 1:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>think Tupperville probably still wins. But by the way, he's

1:26:53.000 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 2>a football coach. I haven't heard him mention that fifty

1:26:55.560 --> 1:26:56.679
<v Speaker 2>times in the last hour.

1:26:57.479 --> 1:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Fairly, I think one of the most. You know, I

1:27:00.680 --> 1:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>don't make any look, he was a he was a

1:27:02.040 --> 1:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>really good assistant coach at the University of Miami. You know,

1:27:05.240 --> 1:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, you know, there's I will just say,

1:27:09.920 --> 1:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of family that's big Auburn fans.

1:27:12.880 --> 1:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Nobody shed a tear when that dude left. Nobody shed

1:27:16.240 --> 1:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a teer when that.

1:27:16.760 --> 1:27:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Dud There are always politicians who lean so heavy into

1:27:20.760 --> 1:27:25.360
<v Speaker 3>their into their backstory that it I mean, it's I

1:27:25.360 --> 1:27:27.840
<v Speaker 3>don't want to mock people, but it's it's pretty easy though.

1:27:27.920 --> 1:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>That's my point with him, Like he does it. Look, dude,

1:27:30.360 --> 1:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you weren't that successful. You weren't the worst coach. They

1:27:33.200 --> 1:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>were the worst, but you weren't the best. Yeah, the

1:27:36.000 --> 1:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>riker to ever tell you you caught the Green River killer?

1:27:37.880 --> 1:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, howay, but that you know what, at least

1:27:40.439 --> 1:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>that has something to do with your job. Okay, at

1:27:43.600 --> 1:27:46.559
<v Speaker 1>least that was a public service. Okay, I don't think

1:27:46.560 --> 1:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>football coach applies to that. And you know, look, Tennessee

1:27:52.520 --> 1:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is one of the more remarkable states if I you know,

1:27:55.360 --> 1:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>when I was first coming up professionally in politics, Tennessee,

1:27:58.880 --> 1:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, Georgia, when you said new South, it was Virginia, Tennessee,

1:28:02.760 --> 1:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, Georgia. Well, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia definitely sort

1:28:07.760 --> 1:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of is in one direction, but Tennessee didn't go in

1:28:11.800 --> 1:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that direction now, and it's you know, it's it is.

1:28:16.200 --> 1:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, part of it was the strength of the

1:28:17.760 --> 1:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Tennessee Republicans to sort of prevent too much democratic

1:28:21.640 --> 1:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>encroachment early on. But that's my only question. There is

1:28:26.439 --> 1:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there a point where Nashville grows so much that Blackburn

1:28:29.160 --> 1:28:32.479
<v Speaker 1>is seen is slightly too far to the right. I don't.

1:28:32.560 --> 1:28:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, but I'm just curious what you're seeing.

1:28:35.160 --> 1:28:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, I think the difference between the first three

1:28:38.280 --> 1:28:41.280
<v Speaker 2>states to outline there, Virginia, North Carolina and Georgia and

1:28:41.600 --> 1:28:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee is that those first three states are becoming a

1:28:45.600 --> 1:28:48.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of a second Silicon Valley. They're becoming homes to

1:28:49.200 --> 1:28:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the big growing industries of today. You know, the demographics

1:28:54.200 --> 1:28:57.479
<v Speaker 2>that that changed Virginia. Weren't the federal workers. They were

1:28:57.560 --> 1:29:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the they were the data center workers, right, folks around

1:29:00.800 --> 1:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the Richmond suburbs exactly. And I'm up in Charlottesville and

1:29:05.280 --> 1:29:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Northern and the and the Ampton Roads, and the same

1:29:08.120 --> 1:29:10.799
<v Speaker 2>thing is happening in you know, around the fintech sector

1:29:11.080 --> 1:29:15.719
<v Speaker 2>in Charlotte and Raleigh, uh and the tech sectors establishing

1:29:15.760 --> 1:29:16.839
<v Speaker 2>a base in Atlanta.

1:29:17.240 --> 1:29:18.759
<v Speaker 3>You're not seeing the same thing in Tennessee.

1:29:18.800 --> 1:29:20.599
<v Speaker 2>And so I think I think that sort of broader

1:29:20.800 --> 1:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>changing economy uh is is what's brought in the younger workers,

1:29:25.080 --> 1:29:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and those younger workers that tend to be more liberal.

1:29:27.720 --> 1:29:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Of course, the natural flow of this is, you know,

1:29:30.320 --> 1:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>this brings up what about Texas? What about Austin, San Antonio?

1:29:34.479 --> 1:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, the fastest growing states in America, But take

1:29:37.920 --> 1:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>a look at the Census Bureau puts out a list

1:29:40.000 --> 1:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>every year of the fast growing cities in America, and

1:29:42.160 --> 1:29:44.479
<v Speaker 2>they're all to the sun Belt sun Belt areas. You

1:29:44.560 --> 1:29:47.479
<v Speaker 2>know that they're in Texas, They're in the Phoenix suburbs

1:29:47.560 --> 1:29:49.960
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. And hey, look, you know Arizona

1:29:50.000 --> 1:29:53.840
<v Speaker 2>has two Democratic senators. Now, North Carolina is always going

1:29:53.920 --> 1:29:57.280
<v Speaker 2>to be competitive. Georgia has two Democratic senators for the moment,

1:29:58.240 --> 1:30:01.439
<v Speaker 2>so you know, Texas, Texas should be on that list.

1:30:01.520 --> 1:30:04.639
<v Speaker 2>But it's I feel like it's it's the Democratic version

1:30:04.680 --> 1:30:07.559
<v Speaker 2>of Republicans New Jersey where it's always loosey in the football.

1:30:07.800 --> 1:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is, and it's and it's so and the

1:30:10.880 --> 1:30:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and look, Republicans probably could if they spent more time

1:30:14.479 --> 1:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey, probably could keep it competitive. But it's

1:30:16.920 --> 1:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>such an expensive proposition. And that's what happens to Democrats

1:30:20.520 --> 1:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>with both Florida and Texas, Like it's a lot of

1:30:23.200 --> 1:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>work to keep it up right, and they just and

1:30:26.800 --> 1:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of course then you throw in bad state party leadership,

1:30:29.200 --> 1:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>right and there's just nobody. There's nobody, there's you know,

1:30:33.320 --> 1:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>there is no None of these mayors in Texas and

1:30:36.880 --> 1:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>none of the mayors in Florida have become party leaders,

1:30:42.280 --> 1:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. It becomes sort of that

1:30:43.920 --> 1:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>North Star, the way Bob Graham was able to and

1:30:47.920 --> 1:30:50.519
<v Speaker 1>even Bill Nelson to a lesser extent, keep the state

1:30:50.560 --> 1:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>party competitive in a float, or the way you know, frankly,

1:30:54.080 --> 1:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>not since Lloyd Benson was there a Democrat that could

1:30:56.960 --> 1:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be a magnet for money in the state party to

1:31:00.200 --> 1:31:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to have the to have the resources do that. And

1:31:02.520 --> 1:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the same problem in New Jersey, right, there was

1:31:04.240 --> 1:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>no one Republican to invest in to get that part

1:31:07.960 --> 1:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>because it was just no other officeholders that they had there.

1:31:11.800 --> 1:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Interesting take on Tennessee. I also think that Memphis is

1:31:15.000 --> 1:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>just such a an ignored area by the state to

1:31:19.960 --> 1:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>try to redevelop, right And and ironically it's almost like

1:31:25.920 --> 1:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a part of me that thinks the Republicans in

1:31:28.360 --> 1:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Nashville are afraid that they don't want to create a

1:31:30.240 --> 1:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>second Nashville. Yeah, yeah, right, and Memphis.

1:31:35.080 --> 1:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Talk about talking about preemption. By the way, Tennessee is

1:31:38.479 --> 1:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>working on a bill. I don't know if it's past yet,

1:31:40.760 --> 1:31:45.120
<v Speaker 2>but it would effectively preempt Nashville from naming its own airport. Uh.

1:31:45.400 --> 1:31:46.800
<v Speaker 3>And hey, you want to take a gas or they

1:31:46.800 --> 1:31:47.960
<v Speaker 3>want to name the airport after.

1:31:48.240 --> 1:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Well why, I mean, look, you do it after If

1:31:52.800 --> 1:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it isn't Peyton Manning's airport, then I don't want to

1:31:55.040 --> 1:31:55.519
<v Speaker 1>hear about it.

1:31:56.800 --> 1:31:57.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not.

1:31:57.720 --> 1:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm shocked, really, I'm shocked. I'm sure, Well, somebody's

1:32:01.400 --> 1:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get you know, it's going to get the

1:32:02.960 --> 1:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump Airport. When is Obama getting an airport, right, and

1:32:06.080 --> 1:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we went down that. Yeah, I mean I couldn't actually

1:32:09.200 --> 1:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you who O'Hare was exactly at this point? Do

1:32:12.320 --> 1:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you turn it all? Right? Harry Reid took over Vegas? Right,

1:32:15.240 --> 1:32:18.519
<v Speaker 1>George Bush? I remember my cousin one time left the

1:32:18.600 --> 1:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>country for six months and he goes, I flew out

1:32:21.800 --> 1:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of National change planes in Houston, and then I came

1:32:26.439 --> 1:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>back and I flew from Bush to Reagan. It was

1:32:28.840 --> 1:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>like both happened like within six months of each other.

1:32:32.560 --> 1:32:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Now here's some contrivia for you. What president's name is on?

1:32:37.400 --> 1:32:39.919
<v Speaker 2>Now let me say what airport named for a president

1:32:40.120 --> 1:32:43.040
<v Speaker 2>is the smallest in America based on passenger traffic.

1:32:43.320 --> 1:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm going to say Grand Rapids.

1:32:46.880 --> 1:32:48.879
<v Speaker 3>Abraham Lincoln Airport in Springfield, Illinois.

1:32:48.920 --> 1:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh a B Lincoln. Ab Lincoln has the naming rights. Huh.

1:32:52.800 --> 1:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting for airports to auction off their naming rights

1:32:55.120 --> 1:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like football stadium right, you know you're changing played at

1:32:57.920 --> 1:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Hartsfield Why Hartsfield Jackson? No, No, no, come on, Amazon, Hey,

1:33:02.200 --> 1:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm now changing planes in the Amazon Airport. I'm not

1:33:05.240 --> 1:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you think I'm kidding. I you know, at some point, right,

1:33:09.360 --> 1:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what do you think toll roads were at

1:33:11.439 --> 1:33:13.559
<v Speaker 1>one point? What do you think rest stops are about.

1:33:13.880 --> 1:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's about state governments getting you know, Hey, you want

1:33:18.000 --> 1:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to be at our rest stop, you got to pay us.

1:33:20.240 --> 1:33:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:33:20.640 --> 1:33:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I think this is coming to airports. We're probably twenty

1:33:24.800 --> 1:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>years away, but I bet it's coming. Well.

1:33:27.000 --> 1:33:29.519
<v Speaker 3>UPS will take over Louisville. That's their big distribution hub.

1:33:29.640 --> 1:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, maybe you sell the naming rights of terminals first, Right,

1:33:32.439 --> 1:33:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you don't quite do the whole airport, but you do that, Okay,

1:33:35.160 --> 1:33:38.759
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon terminal, the Apple terminal, the UPS terminal.

1:33:39.560 --> 1:33:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Amazon does a ton of business at BWI. Although I

1:33:41.680 --> 1:33:42.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the THIRDD.

1:33:42.400 --> 1:33:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Marshall name, I.

1:33:43.280 --> 1:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Hope I do too. I mean, I look, the reason

1:33:46.280 --> 1:33:49.599
<v Speaker 1>I like to see stuff named after politicians is sort

1:33:49.640 --> 1:33:52.559
<v Speaker 1>of a force history on people. Sometimes. I always say, look,

1:33:52.600 --> 1:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to accidentally teach people about history. If they're

1:33:54.920 --> 1:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>not that interested in it, that's fine. Not everybody should be.

1:33:57.640 --> 1:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But then if you name stuff after people that were elevant,

1:34:00.880 --> 1:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, then it's a way to have a conversation.

1:34:03.000 --> 1:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a way to spark a conversation. And oh why

1:34:06.439 --> 1:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do they call it this? And you might go read

1:34:08.080 --> 1:34:10.639
<v Speaker 1>a plaque and oh, you might have educated yourself by accident.

1:34:10.840 --> 1:34:13.599
<v Speaker 1>And we can remain very, very in favor of these things.

1:34:13.680 --> 1:34:15.960
<v Speaker 2>We can rename things that are named after terrible people

1:34:16.080 --> 1:34:18.559
<v Speaker 2>like you know, Pat McCarran was a kind of a jerk,

1:34:18.720 --> 1:34:20.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know, Harry Reid.

1:34:21.560 --> 1:34:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Is now there you go, well so, but sometimes Harry

1:34:25.680 --> 1:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Reid thought I was a jerk. So I don't know,

1:34:27.400 --> 1:34:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was. I was going to say, you know,

1:34:30.520 --> 1:34:33.720
<v Speaker 1>having worked for you, you know, all right, all right,

1:34:35.040 --> 1:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>are the Mariners ever going to make the playoffs?

1:34:37.000 --> 1:34:37.040
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:34:37.680 --> 1:34:40.479
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, are you guys with the longest route? Right?

1:34:41.040 --> 1:34:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, so we made it the other year in the

1:34:43.720 --> 1:34:45.320
<v Speaker 3>last two years to get in.

1:34:45.600 --> 1:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay that for that one game playoff business, whatever it was, it.

1:34:49.120 --> 1:34:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't count for me. Now where Look, I've haken. I've

1:34:52.280 --> 1:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>got an eight year old.

1:34:53.320 --> 1:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about cal Raley? I mean, is

1:34:54.880 --> 1:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this like the greatest thing ever?

1:34:56.240 --> 1:34:56.519
<v Speaker 3>I love?

1:34:56.880 --> 1:34:59.080
<v Speaker 2>He's fantastic, But I've got an eight year old. I've

1:34:59.080 --> 1:35:02.080
<v Speaker 2>taken him to ten Seattle games and nine Mariner games.

1:35:02.120 --> 1:35:05.320
<v Speaker 2>In a Seahawks game, they lost the first nine, They

1:35:05.400 --> 1:35:07.800
<v Speaker 2>lost the first nine. He finally saw the Mariners beat

1:35:07.800 --> 1:35:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the Nationals last year and I was like, look, can

1:35:10.520 --> 1:35:12.920
<v Speaker 2>this this is teaching you to be a good loser,

1:35:13.040 --> 1:35:14.479
<v Speaker 2>which is just as import as it is to be

1:35:14.520 --> 1:35:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a good.

1:35:14.920 --> 1:35:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. I always said this. You know, you

1:35:17.320 --> 1:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>know people think I'm a bandwagon Packer fan. It's like, no, man,

1:35:20.320 --> 1:35:22.599
<v Speaker 1>when I was a Packer fan, they sucked, man, we were,

1:35:22.880 --> 1:35:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we were. In fact, there was a sports writer for

1:35:24.840 --> 1:35:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Newsweek that used to call the annual Packers Buccaneers game

1:35:27.840 --> 1:35:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the Bay of Pigs. It was because neither team made

1:35:31.520 --> 1:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs for like ten years. It was just you know,

1:35:34.600 --> 1:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>below five hundred football, and you're right when you when

1:35:38.160 --> 1:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you lose and then you win, it's some as it

1:35:43.080 --> 1:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is you fork and and so uh it's uh. The

1:35:49.240 --> 1:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Mariners are a frustrating you guys. Have I love the

1:35:52.960 --> 1:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>players that go in and out of that franchise and

1:35:55.040 --> 1:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you're like, what, why can't it all be put together?

1:35:58.439 --> 1:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Jay Rod drives me crazy. He's he's always won for four.

1:36:01.880 --> 1:36:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I have enough fantasy team. He's always won for four.

1:36:04.800 --> 1:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You has ever three for four? You know, he's not

1:36:07.439 --> 1:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>an over for guy. But it's like I keep waiting

1:36:10.240 --> 1:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for him to be a Kuna and he's not a Kuna.

1:36:12.280 --> 1:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>But he's all the Kunah talent.

1:36:14.120 --> 1:36:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you've been You've been hot on him longer than

1:36:15.800 --> 1:36:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I have been.

1:36:16.439 --> 1:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, have you given up on him? He's just

1:36:19.080 --> 1:36:21.439
<v Speaker 1>he is who he is a very good player. But

1:36:21.560 --> 1:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>not Ken Griffy.

1:36:22.600 --> 1:36:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, oh yeah, nobody, nobody will ever be Griffy. Yeah.

1:36:26.080 --> 1:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So well, the cal Raley, I mean, if we have

1:36:28.920 --> 1:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a home run you know, he gets to be in

1:36:30.960 --> 1:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the home run derby, that'll be exciting for your for

1:36:32.960 --> 1:36:34.439
<v Speaker 1>your son. I mean, that'll be fun to route for

1:36:34.479 --> 1:36:35.240
<v Speaker 1>hopefully James.

1:36:35.040 --> 1:36:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Wood's right, Yeah, no, he would like that. That's coming

1:36:37.080 --> 1:36:37.760
<v Speaker 3>up in a couple of weeks.

1:36:37.840 --> 1:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh, the home run. Look, every the MLB All

1:36:41.439 --> 1:36:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Star it's like the NBA All Start, every other every

1:36:44.280 --> 1:36:48.240
<v Speaker 1>event is fun except the game itself, you know, right,

1:36:48.479 --> 1:36:51.519
<v Speaker 1>everything else is awesome. The home run contest, I like that,

1:36:51.600 --> 1:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>even the celebrity game, right, it's kind of fun, right,

1:36:55.200 --> 1:36:57.599
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting the player show. The game itself sucks.

1:36:57.880 --> 1:36:59.080
<v Speaker 3>I got to go to the game.

1:36:59.160 --> 1:37:00.679
<v Speaker 2>I got to go to the game in two thousand

1:37:00.720 --> 1:37:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and one when it was in Seattle and cal Rip

1:37:02.080 --> 1:37:05.920
<v Speaker 2>can hit that groove fastball's Yeah.

1:37:05.880 --> 1:37:07.960
<v Speaker 3>That's thank you, thank you, deeo Nomo.

1:37:08.320 --> 1:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Good for him? Good for him anyway, read Wilson Pluribus

1:37:13.520 --> 1:37:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Business good I assume, right. The more action in the States,

1:37:16.760 --> 1:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>my gosh.

1:37:17.840 --> 1:37:19.320
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's it's been great.

1:37:19.320 --> 1:37:22.200
<v Speaker 2>We're actually now a part of the State Affairs Network,

1:37:22.280 --> 1:37:24.240
<v Speaker 2>so you can check that out at state affairs dot com.

1:37:24.360 --> 1:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>People find it, yeah, yeah dot com. Sign up for

1:37:27.680 --> 1:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>your other socials? Are you all over the place? Where

1:37:29.840 --> 1:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>should people find at.

1:37:31.120 --> 1:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Pluribus news everywhere you can. You can think of on

1:37:33.360 --> 1:37:36.800
<v Speaker 2>blue Sky, on Twitter x whatever it is, Facebook, all

1:37:36.840 --> 1:37:40.120
<v Speaker 2>that stuff. Yeah, we send out a morning newsletter that is.

1:37:40.560 --> 1:37:42.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you if you used to read the Hotline,

1:37:42.600 --> 1:37:45.599
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see very strong notes of hotlinification in there.

1:37:46.520 --> 1:37:47.400
<v Speaker 3>But every morning you.

1:37:47.800 --> 1:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Talking like a wine guy, you'll see notes of behind

1:37:51.840 --> 1:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>in there, with a dab of roll call and a

1:37:54.520 --> 1:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>tiny splash of the hill right.

1:37:56.280 --> 1:38:01.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, and look our I would credit a good friend

1:38:01.720 --> 1:38:05.200
<v Speaker 2>of both yours and mine, Danielle Jones, with infusing a

1:38:05.240 --> 1:38:07.519
<v Speaker 2>lot of the flavor of RBUS news. I try to

1:38:07.560 --> 1:38:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I try to emulate sort of her amazing sense of

1:38:09.920 --> 1:38:11.640
<v Speaker 2>humor and all that in our daily news.

1:38:11.720 --> 1:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Let you do you know, it's funny. I could tell

1:38:13.800 --> 1:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>your try your You're like, I have a feeling your

1:38:16.680 --> 1:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>audience doesn't have a sense of humor yet. So you're

1:38:19.200 --> 1:38:23.439
<v Speaker 1>just you're it's baby steps. Your quotes are great, You're

1:38:23.640 --> 1:38:25.599
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to get them there. You're like, come on, guys,

1:38:25.920 --> 1:38:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have a laugh, and hey we.

1:38:28.400 --> 1:38:30.479
<v Speaker 2>Get we get great feedback to the state legislators who

1:38:30.520 --> 1:38:32.679
<v Speaker 2>read us. We'll tell me, you know, keep that funny

1:38:32.720 --> 1:38:34.479
<v Speaker 2>news in there, keep the funny quotes things like that.

1:38:34.760 --> 1:38:35.559
<v Speaker 3>People love that stuff.

1:38:35.600 --> 1:38:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1:38:35.800 --> 1:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I love the quirky stuff. Man, it's you know, I

1:38:39.120 --> 1:38:42.439
<v Speaker 1>borrow it all the time. There's about seven thousand other

1:38:42.520 --> 1:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>issues we didn't even talk about. Abortion. Is abortion even

1:38:45.920 --> 1:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on the radar this legislative season.

1:38:48.560 --> 1:38:51.799
<v Speaker 2>It is? It is, but it's it's largely Blue states

1:38:52.040 --> 1:38:55.040
<v Speaker 2>passing protection lections from providers.

1:38:56.080 --> 1:38:57.679
<v Speaker 1>May not see anything in red states.

1:38:58.680 --> 1:39:01.479
<v Speaker 2>You are, those red states have done as much as

1:39:01.479 --> 1:39:03.080
<v Speaker 2>they can. There are some red states.

1:39:03.160 --> 1:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Missouri is trying to undo the voter ballot voter reference

1:39:07.600 --> 1:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>some other Well that's the other trend that I've noticed

1:39:09.840 --> 1:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is that red states are trying to have referendum, are

1:39:12.439 --> 1:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to everybody either either you do what Florida did

1:39:16.160 --> 1:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and try to raise the threshold beyond you know, viability,

1:39:19.960 --> 1:39:23.919
<v Speaker 1>or they're trying to make it hard. This petition signature

1:39:24.000 --> 1:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>crap in Oklahoma, where you know, we're not going to

1:39:27.040 --> 1:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>base it on population, We're going to base it on

1:39:29.000 --> 1:39:32.559
<v Speaker 1>something else. I mean, the fact that Tulsa or Oklahoma

1:39:32.600 --> 1:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>City will get punished. I mean, to me, those laws

1:39:36.960 --> 1:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are unconstitutional because there's any I think it violates equal protection.

1:39:40.560 --> 1:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting how fearful these red states are

1:39:45.240 --> 1:39:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of their urban centers creating referendum that they don't like.

1:39:49.120 --> 1:39:52.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's a longer trend than just recently.

1:39:52.439 --> 1:39:55.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the progressive era was marked by ballot measures

1:39:55.720 --> 1:39:57.400
<v Speaker 2>in the West that you know, took power away from

1:39:57.520 --> 1:39:59.640
<v Speaker 2>corrupt legislatures that were owned by the timber barons and

1:39:59.680 --> 1:40:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the robber barons and gave power to the people. And

1:40:01.840 --> 1:40:04.559
<v Speaker 2>of course those legislatures tried to undo everything. I feel

1:40:04.680 --> 1:40:07.880
<v Speaker 2>extremely strongly about ballot measures the first political campaign.

1:40:07.920 --> 1:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh you're a West guy, Look I have my own.

1:40:10.479 --> 1:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they're all unconstitutional. We're republic, we're not a

1:40:13.920 --> 1:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>direct we're not a direct democracy. So and I get

1:40:17.080 --> 1:40:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the tenth Amendment, but I think, but that said, if

1:40:21.520 --> 1:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the law, then it should be you know, hey,

1:40:24.880 --> 1:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that's the consequence in your state constitution.

1:40:28.240 --> 1:40:31.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big fan of ballot measures, and someday I'll

1:40:31.479 --> 1:40:33.840
<v Speaker 2>write a history of ballot measures that fifteen people will read.

1:40:35.160 --> 1:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, maybe you can create a TikTok that

1:40:37.280 --> 1:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>goes viral.

1:40:37.840 --> 1:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Good.

1:40:38.080 --> 1:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that'll that'll definitely help it, you know, so

1:40:41.840 --> 1:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll get more than fifteen people.

1:40:43.760 --> 1:40:44.800
<v Speaker 3>That's true, that's true.

1:40:45.479 --> 1:40:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Read Wilson. Always a pleasure, my friend.

1:40:47.439 --> 1:40:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Thanks seat, good to see man.

1:40:56.479 --> 1:40:58.559
<v Speaker 1>All right, I hope you enjoyed that conversation with read

1:40:58.680 --> 1:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>check out pluribus. I mean, you know, I just think

1:41:01.960 --> 1:41:05.599
<v Speaker 1>if you want to truly understand how your life's being impacted,

1:41:05.600 --> 1:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you got to pay more attention what's happening in the

1:41:07.360 --> 1:41:10.559
<v Speaker 1>States because Congress is dropping the ball left and right.

1:41:11.479 --> 1:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do a little ass Chuck, ask Chuck.

1:41:16.800 --> 1:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>First question Josh from Baton rugelel go tagas. I love that.

1:41:21.720 --> 1:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Give me a little go tigers with the eaux. Is

1:41:25.400 --> 1:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>there a real path for a Democrat to win the

1:41:26.960 --> 1:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>US Senate seed in Louisiana in twenty twenty six with

1:41:29.280 --> 1:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple Republicans lining up to primary Bill Cassidy, who's still

1:41:31.960 --> 1:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>unpopular with many in the GOP for voting to impeach Trump.

1:41:34.760 --> 1:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Could a bruising primary create an opening if John Bell

1:41:37.120 --> 1:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Edwards runs and goes unchallenged in the Democratic primary, could

1:41:40.080 --> 1:41:43.320
<v Speaker 1>enough Trump voter sit out or even back edwards tipping

1:41:43.479 --> 1:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the race? Should Republicans be nervous? Thank you? So? In

1:41:46.960 --> 1:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the old rules of how the elections worked in Louisiana,

1:41:50.320 --> 1:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't that long ago, right, you know where there

1:41:54.000 --> 1:41:56.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a runoff if no candidate got fifty regardless

1:41:56.920 --> 1:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of party, in the top two would meet in a

1:41:59.080 --> 1:42:03.559
<v Speaker 1>December runoff. One of the first I remember the first

1:42:04.479 --> 1:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty oh two mary Landrew ended up in a

1:42:07.479 --> 1:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>runoff and pulled out the runoff sort of. It was

1:42:11.080 --> 1:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a surprise in twenty oh two, and it was a

1:42:12.960 --> 1:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>December race down there. It happened again. I believe in God.

1:42:18.040 --> 1:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, you know, a they since you

1:42:21.120 --> 1:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>know part of the change in how they do they

1:42:23.120 --> 1:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody used to be on the same ballot, even for

1:42:25.240 --> 1:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>federal elections. They I guess separated out federal elections. John

1:42:29.000 --> 1:42:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Bell Edwards became governor because of the ability of having

1:42:31.320 --> 1:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>all those Republicans on the ballot. Then he finished in

1:42:33.640 --> 1:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the top two, and it was somebody who was too

1:42:36.400 --> 1:42:38.479
<v Speaker 1>far out of the mainstream on the right, and John

1:42:38.520 --> 1:42:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Bell Edwards was able to win not one but two

1:42:41.640 --> 1:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>terms that way. Look, if a Democrat is going to

1:42:46.240 --> 1:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>win in Louisiana again, it's going to be John Bell Edwards.

1:42:49.840 --> 1:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>He'd probably be the only one. I would I would

1:42:52.280 --> 1:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>think it would have a chance, and it would have

1:42:54.760 --> 1:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to be under a circumstance where it was somebody that

1:42:58.280 --> 1:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>was closer to that was probably further to the right

1:43:02.320 --> 1:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>than even the governor is further to the right than Scalise.

1:43:07.520 --> 1:43:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd have to have a sort of a

1:43:09.520 --> 1:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>very sort of what I'd call it an undisciplined maga

1:43:14.240 --> 1:43:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Republican because one of the things in Senate races, you know,

1:43:20.920 --> 1:43:24.519
<v Speaker 1>is people really do vote their jersey color. That the

1:43:25.320 --> 1:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>more voters know now that these these are proxy votes

1:43:28.760 --> 1:43:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Supreme Court, right, that who you support here,

1:43:31.960 --> 1:43:33.639
<v Speaker 1>that you know what their vote for a Supreme Court

1:43:33.800 --> 1:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>justice is going to be, and you're just starting to

1:43:36.920 --> 1:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>see it, right, Larry Hogan couldn't win it. He was

1:43:39.680 --> 1:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>very popular in Maryland, a popular governor as a Republican,

1:43:42.920 --> 1:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't going to win a Senate seat, and

1:43:44.680 --> 1:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't even that close. It was competitive ISHU for

1:43:48.960 --> 1:43:54.639
<v Speaker 1>because he was a respected office a former office holder,

1:43:54.960 --> 1:43:57.519
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't going to win. And I kind of

1:43:57.600 --> 1:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>feel the same way about John Bell Edwards. In fact,

1:43:59.920 --> 1:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I actually think he'd have an even

1:44:02.200 --> 1:44:05.479
<v Speaker 1>money odds if he ran for governor. Again, I still

1:44:05.520 --> 1:44:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's an uphill battle, not out of the question,

1:44:08.760 --> 1:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and certainly I think Chuck Schumer and some other Democrats

1:44:11.400 --> 1:44:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are trying to see if they can convince John Bell

1:44:13.960 --> 1:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Edwards to go on the ballot. I know what I

1:44:17.880 --> 1:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would do if I were him, if I really wanted

1:44:19.360 --> 1:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to be a Senator, I wouldn't run as a Democrat.

1:44:21.760 --> 1:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd run as an independent. And I just sort of say, look,

1:44:25.439 --> 1:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I probably you know type of thing. I probably

1:44:28.120 --> 1:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>will caucus with them, but I you know, I don't

1:44:29.920 --> 1:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm you know, I'm going to be more

1:44:32.200 --> 1:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>independent on a lot of these issues. You know, Look,

1:44:35.120 --> 1:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't get elected if he wasn't going to be

1:44:37.080 --> 1:44:39.759
<v Speaker 1>in favor of the oil and gas industry. Right, Probably

1:44:39.880 --> 1:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to be a member of the Democratic Caucus if

1:44:42.640 --> 1:44:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do that. Look, how uncomfortable Joe Manchin

1:44:44.880 --> 1:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>was being somebody that was arguing four cole in a

1:44:47.600 --> 1:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Democratic party that was shifting away on that issue in particular.

1:44:51.280 --> 1:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm more skeptical about a Democrat being able to

1:44:55.880 --> 1:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>win in a deep red state like that. I mean,

1:45:02.120 --> 1:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Alabama.

1:45:03.240 --> 1:45:03.800
<v Speaker 2>It it.

1:45:05.640 --> 1:45:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Was a close race when Doug Jones won, and he

1:45:08.600 --> 1:45:12.280
<v Speaker 1>was running against somebody who was an accused pedophile. Convicted,

1:45:12.320 --> 1:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>but he was accused, so and it was still quite close.

1:45:16.280 --> 1:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think Jersey color is such a powerful force,

1:45:19.520 --> 1:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>such a powerful force in voting in senate races, not

1:45:23.040 --> 1:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so much in governor's races. All right, next question, it

1:45:26.240 --> 1:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>comes from Alex Reck with two k's. I checked. Your

1:45:29.320 --> 1:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Jose Antonio Vargus got me thinking again about

1:45:32.120 --> 1:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>media literacy. Most people don't really understand what journalism is,

1:45:35.320 --> 1:45:37.479
<v Speaker 1>how sourcing works, what off the record means, or the

1:45:37.520 --> 1:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ethics behind reporting, and that makes it easy for them

1:45:39.960 --> 1:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss things as quote fake news. You said, journalists

1:45:42.720 --> 1:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are also educators, so why don't more of them explain

1:45:45.000 --> 1:45:47.479
<v Speaker 1>how how their work actually gets done. If trusted media

1:45:47.520 --> 1:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to be rebuilt, shouldn't part of the back pulling

1:45:49.840 --> 1:45:52.679
<v Speaker 1>back the curtain. Yes, I think. I hope you've noticed

1:45:52.760 --> 1:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>quite a few people on substack do this. In fact,

1:45:55.439 --> 1:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>even I've noticed the Washington Post does a better job

1:45:58.080 --> 1:46:01.439
<v Speaker 1>than most news organizations explaining I a source decided to

1:46:01.479 --> 1:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>be anonymous. The Wall Street Journal is starting to do that,

1:46:05.240 --> 1:46:08.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, explaining why they allowed anonymity with that source

1:46:10.000 --> 1:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to speak freely or fear of retribution. I

1:46:12.920 --> 1:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>think that that's important, right if you see somebody decided

1:46:15.960 --> 1:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to be anonymous due to fear of retribution. There's an

1:46:19.160 --> 1:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting idea that the Washington Post announced today that they're

1:46:22.240 --> 1:46:26.519
<v Speaker 1>going to let if on the record sources quotes. You know,

1:46:26.560 --> 1:46:29.280
<v Speaker 1>if you've been quoted in a story and you think

1:46:29.400 --> 1:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think if you you know, if you don't think

1:46:31.120 --> 1:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it was in context, they're giving you an opportunity to

1:46:34.600 --> 1:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>issue a correction it appears, or some form of that.

1:46:36.840 --> 1:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a you know, anything you can

1:46:39.040 --> 1:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do to you know. Look, I always thought it was

1:46:43.080 --> 1:46:48.720
<v Speaker 1>important to always correct a mistake because I think you

1:46:48.880 --> 1:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>gain more credibility if people know. Hey, when you make

1:46:51.680 --> 1:46:53.519
<v Speaker 1>a mistake, you let people know you've made a mistake.

1:46:54.880 --> 1:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>On that front versus trying to minimize. I mean, I

1:46:58.800 --> 1:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>used to get into real fight.

1:47:00.360 --> 1:47:00.479
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:47:00.640 --> 1:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>No, let's just call it a correction. No, it's a clarification,

1:47:03.720 --> 1:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>or somebody said, don't admit it was a mistake, and

1:47:06.000 --> 1:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be lawyers would try to get involved. It's

1:47:08.400 --> 1:47:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like they were afraid of and it would be to

1:47:09.920 --> 1:47:14.720
<v Speaker 1>come on, let's just speak English. It's okay, you know.

1:47:15.479 --> 1:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But I understood the concern because you do have Donald

1:47:18.880 --> 1:47:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump is just filing, you know, absurd lawsuits, and copycat

1:47:22.960 --> 1:47:26.800
<v Speaker 1>people file these absurd lawsuits. So you don't want to,

1:47:26.920 --> 1:47:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's this feeling of don't give them anything,

1:47:29.479 --> 1:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>type of don't give him. You know, if you admit

1:47:31.560 --> 1:47:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you made a mistake, my god, We're all human beings.

1:47:34.600 --> 1:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna make mistakes, you know.

1:47:38.160 --> 1:47:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:47:38.439 --> 1:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I've always been a believer that, you know. I was

1:47:41.720 --> 1:47:43.760
<v Speaker 1>never a fan where newspapers used to put all their

1:47:44.000 --> 1:47:47.280
<v Speaker 1>corrections on like the page A two. And if you

1:47:47.360 --> 1:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>remember in the old days of a newspaper, literally you'd

1:47:50.120 --> 1:47:52.320
<v Speaker 1>go from there to the Nobody ever read A two

1:47:52.360 --> 1:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>because it was mostly the contents page. What else was

1:47:55.000 --> 1:47:56.720
<v Speaker 1>going on? Maybe there would be a weather map and

1:47:56.840 --> 1:47:59.519
<v Speaker 1>some newspapers there and like the corrections, we'd be down

1:47:59.520 --> 1:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on the right hand corner. I am somebody who believes

1:48:02.160 --> 1:48:07.240
<v Speaker 1>if you should correct them, correct the era error sort

1:48:07.280 --> 1:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of with the same general audience size that saw the error. Right, So,

1:48:13.479 --> 1:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if you make the mistake in your lead story on

1:48:15.240 --> 1:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the NBA on a broadcast, make the correction on the

1:48:19.479 --> 1:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>lead story of the broadcast, maybe it's the next day

1:48:22.000 --> 1:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is, don't bury it at the end

1:48:25.520 --> 1:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. So, look, I totally agree with the premise.

1:48:30.439 --> 1:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually think a lot of journalists are trying to

1:48:32.240 --> 1:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>find more ways to be explanatory in how they do

1:48:36.160 --> 1:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>their reporting, and I think the more we do that,

1:48:38.200 --> 1:48:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the better. Last question before I let you go, I

1:48:41.360 --> 1:48:43.720
<v Speaker 1>know you know, I don't want to simmons it. I

1:48:43.760 --> 1:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do a Bill Simmons and give you

1:48:45.120 --> 1:48:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a two hour plus podcast. But if you want to

1:48:47.360 --> 1:48:51.599
<v Speaker 1>our podcast, let me know after mom, Donnie was when

1:48:51.760 --> 1:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York City could an outsider like Governor Andy Basheer,

1:48:54.120 --> 1:48:56.840
<v Speaker 1>with his relentless focus on economic populism, be a model

1:48:56.840 --> 1:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for candidates to bridge the divide between the establishment and progressives.

1:48:59.720 --> 1:49:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Josh B. Well, look, I am very right now.

1:49:03.520 --> 1:49:06.599
<v Speaker 1>If I were to buy stock in any potential twenty

1:49:06.640 --> 1:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight er. He's somebody stock i'd be buying right now.

1:49:10.280 --> 1:49:17.240
<v Speaker 1>In Basher, You're I'm going. I have now spoken recently

1:49:17.360 --> 1:49:20.599
<v Speaker 1>with two people running for governor in swing states. One

1:49:20.800 --> 1:49:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was Michigan, the other was Florida. These are Democrats, and

1:49:23.760 --> 1:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I asked them, you know who's a governor you want

1:49:26.040 --> 1:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to you know you're going to lean on for advice.

1:49:29.240 --> 1:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The first name both of them, now remember where they're running.

1:49:31.960 --> 1:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>One out of Florida, one out of Michigan. First name

1:49:34.240 --> 1:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>out of their mouth, Andy Basheer. I think many, many

1:49:38.880 --> 1:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of these sort of presidential hopefuls, you know, these governor

1:49:42.120 --> 1:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>candis who are trying to win in swing states or

1:49:43.880 --> 1:49:46.439
<v Speaker 1>even in red leaning states or reddish states like Florida,

1:49:47.280 --> 1:49:50.719
<v Speaker 1>look at and want to associate themselves more with Andy Basheer.

1:49:51.600 --> 1:49:53.519
<v Speaker 1>The other governor you hear mentioned a lot would be

1:49:53.560 --> 1:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a Joshapiro. What you're not hearing is Gavin Newsom. What

1:49:57.120 --> 1:50:00.439
<v Speaker 1>you're not hearing is JB. Pritzker. You're not hearing you

1:50:00.520 --> 1:50:03.360
<v Speaker 1>know that occasionally you'll hear a Wes Moore every now

1:50:03.400 --> 1:50:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and then. But the red state governor that may run

1:50:07.560 --> 1:50:12.519
<v Speaker 1>for president Bashir has a lot of early buzz from

1:50:12.560 --> 1:50:15.519
<v Speaker 1>some of these, particularly from candidates who are trying to

1:50:15.640 --> 1:50:18.720
<v Speaker 1>send the message to independent voters that they're not a

1:50:18.880 --> 1:50:24.840
<v Speaker 1>base Democrat. So, but you're right, he is an economic populist, right,

1:50:25.280 --> 1:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can he somehow be the the sort of a neutralized

1:50:29.439 --> 1:50:32.320
<v Speaker 1>cultural issues right, Perhaps it's on guns, and you know,

1:50:32.640 --> 1:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>before when Roe v. Wade was Law of the land,

1:50:35.720 --> 1:50:37.760
<v Speaker 1>any butser never could have gotten elected president because he

1:50:37.840 --> 1:50:41.479
<v Speaker 1>was a self described pro life Democrat. Now when the

1:50:42.760 --> 1:50:45.479
<v Speaker 1>story is not about whether abortion is legal, it's about

1:50:45.520 --> 1:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>simply getting access. Well, he's on the pro access side,

1:50:48.200 --> 1:50:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and as long as you're on the pro access side,

1:50:50.400 --> 1:50:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be considered a Democrat in good standing.

1:50:52.400 --> 1:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's I think he's got a unique

1:50:55.160 --> 1:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>way to potentially diffuse some cultural issues, very similar to

1:50:59.800 --> 1:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>a governor from a state that's quite close to Kentucky.

1:51:04.200 --> 1:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the last time a Democrat carried the

1:51:06.360 --> 1:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>state of Kentucky there was a it was a gentleman

1:51:10.280 --> 1:51:12.280
<v Speaker 1>named Bill Clinton was at the top of the ticket,

1:51:12.360 --> 1:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and he, of course was at the time the sitting

1:51:14.200 --> 1:51:20.479
<v Speaker 1>governor of Arkansas. So I'm you know, I think Bash's

1:51:20.520 --> 1:51:22.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody out of buy stocking. I'd also buy stock in

1:51:22.880 --> 1:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Wes Moore right now, I'd also buy stock in Alexandria

1:51:27.200 --> 1:51:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Cossio Cortez. So I'm not sitting here saying which wing

1:51:30.640 --> 1:51:33.240
<v Speaker 1>or which part of the party will end up ascendant,

1:51:33.280 --> 1:51:35.759
<v Speaker 1>but I think all three of them right now feel

1:51:35.840 --> 1:51:40.639
<v Speaker 1>like safer plays of people that put it this way,

1:51:41.960 --> 1:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I definitely think there'll be top three type

1:51:44.800 --> 1:51:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of candidates going forward. All Right, I'm gonna I'm gonna

1:51:49.880 --> 1:51:55.439
<v Speaker 1>pause the conversation there. I will got a couple of

1:51:55.520 --> 1:51:57.720
<v Speaker 1>great episodes coming for you. I think I previewed one

1:51:58.600 --> 1:52:00.040
<v Speaker 1>coming up in the state of Florida. I think you

1:52:00.120 --> 1:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>will enjoy that conversation. But with that, appreciate it, like subscribe,

1:52:04.600 --> 1:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>give me some good comments, leave some any questions you have,

1:52:07.560 --> 1:52:11.800
<v Speaker 1>ask Chuck at dchucktodcast dot com, and until we upload again,