WEBVTT - OPEC, Trump, UBS, and WWE

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We're gonna get right

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>into that energy story in a big way. We're gonna

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>roundtable this thing with a couple of smart folks. Fernando Valley,

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the senior an also Bloomberg Intelligence. He's been covering

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the oil industry for decades. He's our global view guy.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcglowe's senior macro strategists with Bloomberg Intelligence. Our commodities

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>guru joins us viafone. Fernando's here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Brokers studio. So since he's here, he's getting the gold star.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>You get to go first, Fernando. Opec. They surprised me.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I woke up this morning. I wasn't expecting a production cut.

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>What's what's going on with our friends at Opec? Plus

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>same here? It moved up the timeline. We were expecting

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that they would do it around the June meeting, which

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is the presential meeting, the larger one, and they moved

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it up to Wednesday. The rumor mill says that muhammadan Salman,

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the Crown Princess of Saudi Arabia, was upset that the

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration did not do strategic petroleumers of purchases to

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>help stabilize the prices, and so they decided to act quicker.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't and then that's a little outside here, why

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't we built back the spr when there are a

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons. First, they had tried to time the

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>market to perfection and they didn't. And then even when

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>prices dropped below the oil price set, they did not

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>make those acquisitions because it was a pre sale of

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the expected sales over the next ten years. They just

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>moved it up so they don't technically have to refill.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But it does seem like they missed a golden chance

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of time the market and create some support

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for the local industry as opposed to foreign industries. Get it, Yeah, No,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty shocking that they weren't able to do that,

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>especially since the price fell at one point below the

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>level that they had set right to buy barrels. And

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at the same time President Biden warned there would be

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>consequences for a cut that the Kingdom put into place

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>last October, right a two million barrel a day cut,

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and those consequences never, as far as we know, came about. Yeah,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they haven't materialized to tishing. And I think one of

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the problem is if they did make those acquisitions, they

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>would have moved the price up a little bit above it.

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>The WTI came to sixty six dollars versus a sixty

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>eight price, so if they were to purchase that kind

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of level, you would have pushed it back up way

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>above seventy dollars. So it was a limited window. But

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there was no real commitment, and apparently the

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Department of Energy doesn't have a strategy to make those

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>purchases as are. This is what I'm gonna do. I'm

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna send Mike McLoone to the pits and just say

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>start buying hand over fill. He's been right on his

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>his oil podcasts. How does this OPEC movement here change

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>your call, which has been these prices going down. I

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>think what Fernando said really is scary. The fact that

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to try to raise prices as we

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tilt towards global recession, as you just saw the ism, manufacturing, employment,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>new orders all came out weaker than expected and below

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty as a federal reserves tighten, as o're entering a

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>bankering crisis, just just adds to my fear that we're

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>entering to the greatest global macroeconomic reset of our lifetime.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's look at w TR right now. It's eighty

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel. It's still down nineteen percent on a

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one year basis, goals up two percent. But the key

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thing is bouncing the upper end of the range. But

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>before this happened today, net positions had all been stopped

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>out because they're all bullish above a hundred. They got

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>stopped on the sixty four. The low this year was

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty four. And I think the rational thing for people

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to do now is Okay, this is a bear market.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We're bouncing and to start selling again to questions how

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that high pick kicks in, because it's there's the macro's

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming and the key thing, remember Ellen, was this at opec.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>OPEC is always when you have surprise cuts. It's always

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>almost always consistent with bear markets. I want to hear

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>more about your big concern there because our lifetime where

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were you old? So you're saying this is going to

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be the greatest, the greatest when you say global macroeconomic

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>research resets of our lifetime. So I've been writing about

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it for about a year. I've been tightening and printing

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it more on headlines lately, but I had to get

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>into a gradually. It's just the classic examples of biggest

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>booms in history and the back of liquidity, and then

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the bus come as you take that liquidity away. Now

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you just look at money supply, you look at bank deposits.

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Things are negative things never before just plunging in. The

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>FED is still tightening based on backward looking measures of

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation that were spiked by them in the first place.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Because they didn't they waited too long and they cut

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>too much. And I'm not blaming them, but it's just

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a classic pendulum singing swing heading the other way. In

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>crude olt natural gas was one of the best indicators.

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the number one measure of heat, electricity and fertilizing

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this country. It's down eighty percent at two dollars, the

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>equivalent price in WTI is closer to forty forty five

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the cost of production in the US. I think that's

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>where it's going. And just in the numbers, we saw

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Printon just a few minutes ago. Manufacturing in this country

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and a global basis is negative and central banks are

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>still tightening. That's a classic recessionary trajectory. And if you

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>see what Anna wants is are chief economists. She said

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>her calls for a recession in Q three and now

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>she's pushing it closer. Basis point One of the reasons

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that you would be bullish oils because a limited spare

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>capacity at OPEC and when you cut what have you

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just made spare capacity, So you're really trying to put

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in a floor to the price as opposed to make

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.799
<v Speaker 1>its spike. And so this is a tug of wars,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike was saying, between interest rates and the FED trying

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to contain the overheating of the economy, and then other

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>sides like OPEC trying to steer more inflation in higher prices,

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and so far demand seems to be winning, or like

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>lower demand. I should say, yeah. But by the way, Mike,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want to sell that book, I'm going to

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>say change global macroeconomic reset. You got to say something

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that people understand, because I still don't know exactly what

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that is. If you say, you know, the greatest financial

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>crisis of our lifetime, that book I'm buying good well.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I expect to be you know, I expect to be

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>writing the history Sunday and leaving it right now. You

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>never really realize when you're middle of it. When you

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>point out these facts, and if you study the history

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of booms and busts and supplying and contraction and coming

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on with liquidity, it's we're in one of the most

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>severe cases of liquidity contraction ever. Now. The key point

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is we have a banking crisis, that's clear, and what

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>cause that banking crisis is still Actually it's accelerating. The

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>FED raised rates just what a week ago the ECB

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>did the Bank of England. That's what's making it worse.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the key thing that's the trigger is

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the stock market probably needs to go down. And good

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>indications for that is what's happening with copper, and they

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>trade tick for tick and if the stock market can

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>stay up, everything's fine. But I think the biggest risk

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's more like to do what take the hint

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of the what people say the smarter bond market, I

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>mean the two year note yield that and Fed funds

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at five percent? Is not that that's a recession indication, Fernando.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a huge risk to the upside, do we?

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Because what if Chinese people get in their cars in droves,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in hundreds of millions and drive around. What if Europe

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a recession and they continue to drive everywhere

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and fill up their tanks. The OPAT plus companies are

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to come to market with, you know,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>cheat these production cuts as they have historically, right, they

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can to a certain extent if everyone goes through the

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>door at the same time, and then we're probably short

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't invested in the industry. And that's the

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>case we see in the long term why oil should

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be higher. But we agree with Mike. In the short term,

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the pressures on themand are just too strong that especially

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Chinese consumer being over levered, the European consumer

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>being way too exposed to high energy prices, the US

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer between high leverage and higher energy prices also struggling.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>We see those pressures being too much in the short term,

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually that leads even more underinvestment in oil

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and gas, and that's when we see a supercycle for

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>commodities really taking off. Wow, good stuff. We got these

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>two guys on. Those are some superlidis. I know I'm

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>going big time here. I told you. Fernando Valley, senior

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>annalso Bloomberg Intelligence covering the energy space for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And Mike mcloan is Scot's down in South Miami Beach,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>senior macro strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's our commodities go

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to person. So we'll have to get those two folks

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on together. We have big moves in oil like we

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do today given the OPEC plus did even talk about

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>good going over twenty eight thousand? I know we don't

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>even get to that, but interesting stuff waking up this

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>morning in the global energy space. We'll have more coming up.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to the Team Cancer Live program,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten AMI staring on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the I Heard Radio app and the Bloomberg Business appe.

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>We're listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. Tomorrow

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll be a when history will be made, when former

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump will be indicted in Lower Manhattan. We

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get the latest on that. We go right

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to ground zero, if you will. Bloomberg's Curtty Gupta joins

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>us from downtown Manhattan to discuss the latest on the

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>ground there and also joined by Nick Ackerman. He is

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 1>self employed the law office of Nick Ackerman. He was

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>former assistant Special Watergate prosecutor. He joins us on the phone, Cretty,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. You're down in Manhattan. Just tell

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>us where you are and what you're observing down there

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as we wait President Trump's indictment schedule for tomorrow. Yeah,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of anticipation in the air. It's interesting. So

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we're standing rights here outside of the New York District

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's office. So within the next forty eight hours, this

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is the spot where President Trump or former President Trump

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is expected to be arraigned at about two pm tomorrow afternoon.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>But look, it's going to be a really quick visit.

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.599
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna fly out from his Marlago esteate, or is

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>at least expected to today. I want to say, in

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hours stay at Trump's how we're a

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>few blocks north from here, which I hear is packed

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, only to get arranged, like I said, right

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>out here outside the District Attorney's office in downtown Manhattan

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>at two pm tomorrow, only to return again to his

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>moral lago state at eight fifteenth pm tomorrow. So right

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>now you're really seeing a lot of media presents, a

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of police presidents, actually a couple of protesters as well.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You can really see the anticipation here isn't just for

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing President Trump go through this historic move, but also

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what the fallout might be, protests, rallies. The police are

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>prepared for it. Allow, So he's going to go straight back.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess he assumes he'll be released on his own recognizance, right,

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because usually if you're indicted, don't you don't they have

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>to hold you? Or I don't know, Hey, Nick, let's

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>let's bring you in Nick. How does this typically works?

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>What's the legal process tomorrow for former President Trump? Well,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the process of the arrangement is he will go in

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>before the judge. The judge will ask him if he

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to read the charges, and he can either wave

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the reading or not. And at that point, the judge

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>will ask whether how he pleads guilty or not guilty.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Most all defendants plead not guilty at an arraignment, and

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>then the judge sets bail. In this case, it's it's

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>almost a certainty that he's going to be released on

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>his own recognisance. Sometimes, if there's a situation that justifies

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bail because the person doesn't have roots to the community

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and as a flight risk, they would put up a

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>certain amount for bail. But I don't think in this case.

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's pretty much a dead certainty that

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be released on his own recognissance. Nick,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about based upon what we know,

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>which which is limited at this point, but based upon

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>your experience as an assistant US attorney for the Southern

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>District of New York from nineteen seventy six to nineteen

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty three, as I mentioned, a former assistant special Watergate

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor from seventy three to seventy five. Based upon your

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>experience and based upon what we know, what do you

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>think of this case here that the district attorneys of

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the screen, well, we don't know what the case is,

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what the charges are. The only thing

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we really know is that they have been looking, you know, publicly.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 1>That we know is that one of the things they

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly have been looking at is this Pecker, David Pecker,

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>who is the head of the National Inquirer, and Donald

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump agreed that the National Inquirer would keep their eyes

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>out for any kind of stories that might hurt Trump's

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>chances for election in twoy sixteen, and as a result,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they wound up paying off Karen McDougall, who is a

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>former Playboy playmate, and they paid off Stormy Daniels. But

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>part of what's going on here fits into the overall

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 1>theme of falsification of records of the Trump organization, for

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>which the Trump Organization has already been convicted of a

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>criminal violation in Manhattan State Court. And so the real

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>question is will there be other violations of falsification of records,

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of insurance fraud, bank fraud, falsification of annual statements for

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the Trump organization. Will that play a role in this indictment.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know at this point, and it's a

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>pure guesswork as to what this indictment is going to

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>look like. It could also involve actions that Donald Trump

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>has taken in the last week by putting up that

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>picture of him with a baseball bat and the district

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>attorney that could wind up involving other charges. There could

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>also be witness tampering relating to Michael Cohen. All of

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this is speculation at this point, right, Well, we're going

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to find out tomorrow. It does remind me that Trump

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially threatened death and destruction if he were indicted. Cratty,

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You're standing there at the DA's office, and you mentioned

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of people around trump O.

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Are there security concerns? Are we worried that there will

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be you know, busloads of angry protesters coming in from

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>out of state. Well, it definitely is the worry, And

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can say that pretty confidently with the

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of police presidence here. It's not just about protection

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for President Trump as well. But you can see the barricade.

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You're even seeing media not necessarily about to be parked

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>close side to where their cameras are parked, for example.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is definitely the preparation for that worst ye scenario.

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think we also have to keep in mind

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that even President Trump's defense team over the weekend had

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>come out on another network and said, look, we are

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid showmanship or trying to avoid the theater.

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And Nick can perhaps comment on this, but I thought

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting the way that they're talking about

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>approaching this case. They're not looking to dismiss it. They're

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not looking to remove the presiding judge, who, by the way,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>has a history of presiding against the former president President Trump,

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>even going as far to saying, one merchant, who of

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>course is the judge presiding, he hates me. And those

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are some comments, a very wrong comments made on social media.

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yet the defense team isn't actually looking to remove them

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>from the case. And that's all to show that this

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is being done cooperatively, collaboratively and through the due process

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of law. Hey, Nick, just want to get a sense

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>from you given up, there's a lot we don't know.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But and assuming the former president, you know, does not

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>plead some point at this case, what's the timing of

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a case like this, how would it progress and when

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>would we actually get to a trial if there was

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a trial, Well, I hate to say it, but after tomorrow,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's probably going to be thoroughly boring. Um, what what's

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>going to happen is just like at all other criminal cases.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>The defense is going to file motions. Um, they're probably

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the emotions are dismissed. It could be emotion for change

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of venue. There could be emotion for more details on

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the complaint in the indictment. But my senses, this is

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very detailed indictment, unlike most indictments.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But there'll be the pre trial motion practice. The district

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>attorney will have the opportunity to respond. This doesn't take

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>place in a matter of days. It's going to be

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a matter of months as this goes back and forth.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>The judge then has to decide the motions. They'll be

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>discovery where the DA's office has to provide the defense

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with documents that are in its possession that relate to

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the case. So this is this could very well take

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up to a year before it finally gets to trial.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>This is not going to happen overnight, all right, Really

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting your insight there. Nick Ackerman, he's a former

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>assistant special Watergate prosecutor and then he went on to

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>be the Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>New York from nineteen seventy six to eighty three. And

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he now has his own law office of Nick Ackerman,

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>getting his thoughts there, and of course could Gupta on

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the ground downtown Manhattan for Bloomberg News on site at

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the DA's office in Lower Manhattan. If you're listening to

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the tape, Kens are a line program Bloomberg Markets weekdays

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the Tuna app,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. I

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>want to get to the banks here. It is grim

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>news coming out of Switzerland. UBS buying credit Swiss. I

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>guess that's the good news kind of. But there's a

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of redundancies there. They're going to cut a lot

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>of people, and that's why we go to Alison Williams,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Senior Global Banks Analysts. So, Alison, you saw some of

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the numbers here, tens of thousands of people likely to

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>be let go. Here is this kind of part and

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>parcel when you put two investment banks together, well, it is.

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>It is generally with investment banks, especially areas where there

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>might be direct overlaps such as such as research as

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it does seem like, you know, some

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>of the reports I've seen that a lot of the

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>cuts could be centered in Switzerland would also seem to

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>make sense just because, um, there's probably a lot of

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>overlap in terms of systems and management administration. And again

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's tough to tell, and we've said since

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this deal, it's tough to tell sort

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of what the what the revenue attrition is going to

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>be from. You know, people that use both banks right

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and that now um maybe move some of their exposure

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to someone else that also will reverberate with employees. So um,

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of synergies, so to speak,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if they're as bad as as we anticipate.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the market has been there for Credit Suite

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and ubs. There was enough share for both players before.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And while I get that, you know in terms of

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>back office or you know, wealthy clients that used both

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to hedge their bets in a sense, um, that's an overlap,

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like there still is enough room for

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this big business, isn't there? Yeah, I mean it does.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean to me, it does seem a really big number.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I scratched my head a little bit about where

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>some of those will come, right, because a lot of

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the like asset management UM, you know, there's very complimentary products.

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, so there's some overlap in the

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>investment bank, but that investment bank has already been so

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>dramatically downsized. I'm not sure you know what's left to

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>cut except for a couple of small areas that I mentioned.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of the uh, you know, one

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the compelling things that UBS ces is the ability

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to add the US presence and the technology presence that

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have a credit suitee UM, and same thing

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>in asset management, there's some complimentary things. And then in

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of the wealth management business you know, both globally

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and the Swiss in particular to the extent that you

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have a number of advisors with a number of client UM. Yes,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as I said, there might be some overlap and some

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>reduction of exposures, but the headline number is really significant.

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Little bit it is a little bit interesting to think,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 1>like where those cuts are going to write. I mean,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>this is this is this is all according to the

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Zontag Situngue, which is a Swiss newspaper citing an unidentified

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>senior manager at ubs. They're saying thirty six thousand jobs

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.719
<v Speaker 1>will roll, so eleven thousand inside Switzerland, twenty five thousand

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>outside Switzerland. And this is not at all a beloved

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>deal domestically, So you can imagine that a local newspaper. Um,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it bleeds, it leads, they might want

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to play it up a little bit just for sales.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, yeah, and who knows how they're coming

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because the cuts, the cost cutting that they've talked about, um,

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's something like fifteen to twenty percent of

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the cost base. You know. Also could it be outsourcing again,

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's very hard to get to these really sizeable numbers.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>One one could imagine someone saying, oh, well, if it's

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>this much percent of clasts, what does that mean for

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a headcount? But I think you know, again, it's it's

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a very different um, you know, business and some others. Right,

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.719
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like a typical we're going to have

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we know, two branches now we're only going to have one. Um,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, how many headcounts? How many heads you really cut?

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 1>If those branches are focused on serving Mualti clients and

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you're bringing those people together. They're we've sort of identified

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>for you where we see the areas we're cuts, but

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still hard to get to that. So Elson's big numbers.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of a reason. I mean, if I'm

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>an UBS shareholder here, I have to be really patient,

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>don't I'm because i don't know really what I've bought.

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure what I'm going to end up with.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you really have to believe in UBS management

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to stick around for what it could be a multi

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>year in integration, you do. And perhaps that's one of

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why they felt they needed to bring Ermadi back,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the fits and starts, um. You know,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>obviously Hammers was not there for that long, but some

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he had done, you know, in

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of buying the Digital Wealth Manager in the US,

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a deal that was later canceled, um, like we did

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>evaluation or other reasons. Archigos actually happened under Hammer's watch,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>although you could certainly connect the dots to say that

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the risk culture was there before he got there. But

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>URMANDI what he brings is, you know, he came in

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>after if you can remember the rogue trader scandal or

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>unauthorized incident as they like to call it, which we

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>know means they lost money because generally a rogue trader

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>make money. We don't hear about that. But you know

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he came in after that, he put in a plan.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>His plan was successful. He said he was going to

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>shrink the investment bank and he did, and he did it,

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, at a time when it was not

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that popular, Like they were the first bank to say,

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we don't have to be this big

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fix income. We don't have to be everything to everybody.

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>We're going to focus where we want. We're going to

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>focus on profitability and then manage through like a ten

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>year period of like regulation, litigation, the things coming. So

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, to your point, it's a long period,

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but maybe that he gives some confidence. All right, Alison,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us yet again. Alison Williams,

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Senior banks analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, breaking down what is

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of a long merger process ubs acquiring credit Swiss.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Take Kids Are a live program

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty. Yeah, woke this warning to a big

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>production cut command out. Plus looking at in the markets here,

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>WTI crude oil up about five point eight percent, about

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just about eighty dollars per bower. What does that mean

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for global investors? Will Robert Teeter joins us here in

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Director Broker studio. He's head of investment policy

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and strategy for Silver Crests Asset Management. Robert, thanks for

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming to the studio here. Again, what

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this move from OPEC in the

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in the impact on global energy? Yeah, it's a really

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting development in terms of a couple of different impacts.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the first thing that I would say is

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that it does certainly send us a pretty important signal

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps demand in the global economy hasn't been quite

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>as strong as we've all been expecting. I think that's

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that OPEC's been responding to here

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>is trying to get prices up through restricting the supply

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>side rather than relying on demand. And I think that's

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>a pretty important signal in terms of demand outlook for

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>global economics. I mean, you have, i've key drivers that

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you think we should be watching, bank stress, inflation, the economy, earnings,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and the fixed income market. This I think goes to

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation and to the economy in a sense. It seems

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>like it could drive inflation higher and slow the economy down.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that Am I reading it the right way? I'm

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>reading it that way as well. Certainly, mechanically speaking, higher

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>oil prices will be inflationary. They will represent that classic

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>tax on the consumer and take spending away from other

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the economy. I do think perhaps it

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>plays into the rate hike cycle as well, though in

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of reading that signal that perhaps demand is a

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>bit slower than we've been anticipating. So on the bank

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>stress issue, is that something that's in our rearview mirror now.

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was kind of acute there three or

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>four weeks ago. Haven't heard too much since, but some

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of the drivers probably are still there. I think they are.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of depositors, it's in the rearview mirror. Certainly,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the comments from FED officials have been very focused on

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>protecting deposits. I think they've been very er that that

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>issue is over and done with. When you think about

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 1>earnings in the economy, I think the earnings drag on

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>banks might be real, and I think when you think

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>about the drag on economic activity from a slowdown in lending,

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be real as well. Although the fact

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that the crisis was sort of mostly over and done

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>with relatively quickly bodes well for the outlook. But nonetheless,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be follow through drag on the

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>economy from a slowdown in lending, whether that's regulatory mandated

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>or just more caution on balance sheets. So what does

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>that mean? What are your expectations for earnings? Are we

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>entering a recession and does that mean earnings come down? What?

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>In percentage terms? I don't see a recession yet, So

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>my view has been that we're running around two percent

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>on the economy right now. I'd expect somewhere like another

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>one percent drag from some of these issues in banking.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>So I'm in the camp of slightly positive economic growth

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm in the camp that consensus earnings are about

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>right for flat, although I do think there will be

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>some reshuffling of the deck beneath that, and we'll get

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more color on that as we get into

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>earning season and see where some of those misses and

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>beats are coming from. It all that backdrop, what do

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you expect our federal Reserve to do? There's you know,

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks out there to saying, hey, another

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five bases point hike, maybe two, But there's also

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable crowd out there saying this economy is slowing

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>down everywhere you look. We had the ism data again today,

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this should be it. Maybe you can cut. I mean,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>what camp do you fall into. I'm in the camp

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. They'll either be a pause or twenty five

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and that will be the end of it. And I

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think if it is twenty five, it's unlikely to be

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more following. The one thing that I think will perhaps

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>change over coming weeks will be that the rate cuts

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that have been priced in for later in the year,

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I think those will be going away. I read the

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>signals from the FED as the bank crisis is not

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a major issue. They don't need to cut in response

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to that. Economy is okay. They don't need to cut

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in response to that, and that they'll be resolute in

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>keeping rates where they are our twenty five bases points

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>higher until inflation gets down to target. So let me

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>get to the fifth driver. Then we've covered the banking stresses.

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We've covered inflation in the economy as well as earnings.

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The fixed income market has been aptly nut. So I

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>mean I grafted the VIX, which is supposed to measure

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in some sense at least equity market volatility, against the

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>move index, which measures bond market volatility, and the move

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>index is just off the charts. I mean, looking at that,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you would expect equities to be doing absolutely nothing, which

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is fair, a fair assessment, but the bond market just

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to be, I mean, going crazy. How does this affect

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>your investment strategies? Yeah, so it's interesting. I read the

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>volatility in a similar way, and I think I take

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>it as to an indication that we're right around this

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>inflection point. So we're near the end of the FED

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>rate hike cycle. We're sort of on the edge of

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a recession, but not quite there, and so each incremental

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>data point is going to trigger a pretty massive response

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fixed income markets. But I think if I

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>zoom out from that a little bit and look away

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from day to day trading and think about this upcoming

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks and months, to me, we're likely to be range

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>bound on treasuries. The range of you know, plus or

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>minus thirty basis points are still from here, which is

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>still some volatility. But I think dependent upon what signal

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as we get in terms of inflation, what signals we

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>get on the FED. You see some of the data

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>today in ism pointing to a slightly weaker economy. So

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think all of these things balance out and keep

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>us range bounding treasuries, even though there's been a lot

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of volatility lately. Robert, when you talk to folks in

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace, do you get a sense a lot of

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>people missed that first quarter move? I mean, we'd s

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and p up just about seven percent in the first

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>quarter and coming off with just a brutal twenty twenty

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>two when you lost money is inequities, you lost money

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.959
<v Speaker 1>in bonds. Do you get a sense that people missed it.

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I think some people have missed it. I think it's

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>been very easy to be barished at any point in

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>time over the last couple of years, there's certainly lots

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of things going on that we can point to as negative.

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that I've been impressed by,

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and you see it when you listen to company earnings calls,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is just the dynamic response of companies and ways to

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>find to manage around whatever the problems of the day

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>might be, whether that's a OPEC oil cut or surprise

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation or the issues we had with COVID, and so

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>companies are finding ways to make money, and so I

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to sort of stick with that story

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>through the long haul, even though there there are lots

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of reasons to be barished today as there were a

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>year ago. Where which companies? Where where are you looking

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to find those? Yeah? So I think we've seen some

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>durability and earnings in the consumer discretionary space. I think

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we're still looking to see some positive earnings out of

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the industrial side, and we've and we've seen tech companies

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>respond in a pretty interesting way to the situations that

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they're involved in. So whether that means earnings, beats or missus,

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're doing a lot of things to restructure

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>their businesses and create earnings. So those three sectors are

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>ones that I think have the potential for durable gains

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and earnings going forward. We had our commodities analyst on

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier and what was the term he used, Matt like,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got like Mike McLoone said, this will

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be the greatest global macroeconomic reset in history. Oh no,

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in our life, in our lifetime, but that's close enough

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to history because we're pretty old. Yeah, exactly so, I mean,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was just kind of looking at it

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 1>from interest rates and commodity prices and you know this

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and not and you know, weaning off of the stimulus

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 1>from the pandemic. He thinks we're set up for how

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>long the duration is, but certainly a violent move downward

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in this economy that's the hardest of hard landing. I

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>guess it was kind of a Thomas Wood statement. I

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think it was, you know, the kind of thing we

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>were hearing a lot after the Great Financial Crisis but

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't really come to pass. At some point, though, the

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>chickens have to come home to roost, right. I think

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right, And I actually think the financial crisis is

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a good analogy in a way. We've had a massive

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>cycle over the past few years related to the pandemic

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're sort of back to where we started, although

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think there will be some drags and some lags.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And so if we look at, you know, long term

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers on economic growth coming into the pandemic era, we

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>were around two percent. We're maybe there now, but a

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>bit lower going forward because of all those drags. But

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's a reset. It's sort of a

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>back to where we were before. Not a lot of

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic activity on the economy, just slow growth. That doesn't

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>seem like a bad thing. I mean, it doesn't seem

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as bad as McLoone put it, right, But they're not

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>going to sell any books Robert, Yeah, Boks, Mike needs

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to write a book, and Robert needs to just make

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>money for his clients, right, exactly, Easy peasy, all right.

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So Robert Energy is having its day in the sun today.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, had a after I had had two or

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>three great years, and then Nis you're given it a

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>back smarting because he thinks he missed I think I

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.239
<v Speaker 1>missed that trade a little bit. So, but what do

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we do with energy from here? I mean, I know

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>today's having a good day, but it hasn't been having

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a good twenty twenty three. In my view, I would

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>say the outlook is okay. And the reason I say

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>okay is I think the backdrop on economic growth is

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>relatively slow. So that same signal that I think we

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>got from OPEC today of not seeing a lot of

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>demand side activity as far as energy, I think that

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>backdrop is with us going forward. So while the price

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>action might be favorable today and going forward, I think

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that's probably just an okay outlook rather than a great

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>outlook for energy. So the the idea that OPEC is

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>going to cut this surprise announcement that we got yesterday

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't rock your boat too much. Not a lot. I mean,

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the follow through on pricing will again be

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>inflationary and a drag on the consumer. But I think

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's more important to look at the demand side signal

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that it seems to be sending. That's a poor demand

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>side signal. I know. Just thirty seconds Robert Tech it's

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>having a good year after big really really lagging last big,

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>big profitable Tech has done well. Yeah, yeah it has.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of the rotation we've seen

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>recently has been on the back of balance sheet strength.

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.479
<v Speaker 1>In my view, with inflation continuing to improve, you'll get

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>rate stabilizing and some valuation boost on that front as well.

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think the outlook for technology is reasonably favorable

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>here as long as they're cutting costs. That seems to

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be a theme for a lot of industries, a lot

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of companies. Robert Teeter, head of investment policy in a

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>strategy group for Silver Crest Asset Management. We appreciate getting

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>his time. Appreciate him coming into the Bloomberg and Actor

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. You're listening to the Team Cancer Line program

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Irhart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business App. We're

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. I'm gonna guess, actually,

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet that our next guest is not the WWE fan.

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? I don't think he is either.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's him in here. Jerry Smith. He's a

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>reporter Bloomberg News. I think he knows more about ww

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>than both of us combined. Yes, particularly in the last

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four hours. Because he's a reporter. This is

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>his beat, all that media entertainment stuff, and he joins

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>us live in a Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, which is

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a strong performance from somebody who's a Wake Forest Demon deacon.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So we appreciate him coming into the studio. So, Jerry,

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what's it he's ripping on you? Dude? What's a talent

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>agency doing buying? You know, mister McMahon's WWE. So Endeavor

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is a lot more than a talent agency. They own UFC,

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>so they are already into They're into with this okay,

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>combat sports, and I think that's why a lot of

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>people saw them as the front runner when WWE said

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that they were exploring a potential sale. As you can

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just see the obvious synergies, the crossover a fan bases

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>between people who are fans of combat sports like UFC

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and WWE. So, first off, just some semantics here. I

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>see the red sticky headline that crossed the Bloomberg terminal

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>says Endeavor and WWE to combine in a deal valued

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it more than twenty one billion dollars? Is endeavor? Has

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it been reduced to just UFC? Are they really combining

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>as a merger of equals? Or is Endeavor buying WWE?

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So Endeavor is gonna have fifty one percent of the

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>new company, and WWE is gonna have forty nine percent

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of this new company. Um, and that it's going to

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>trade under the stock ticker t KO, which is a

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>fun a fun stock tick, technical knockout for those unfamiliar. Correct.

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So so it's a purchase essentially, it's not a combination.

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>That's PR likes to spin it that way all the time. Um,

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I just need to sort it out because what do

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you call a flak? He hates that term, hate that,

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's for a good reason. Um. I just when

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I saw the headline, I thought, oh, maybe Endeavor has

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>just uh you know, focused most of its business on UFC,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't know that it dwindled down to that.

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.879
<v Speaker 1>But Endeavor does a lot more than just bat sports. Right.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>This is William Morris Endeavor, right right, I mean this

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is a massive talent agency. A lot of the biggest

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>celebrities in Hollywood are represented by um talent agents. I

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>mean obviously, um Ari Emmanuel runs Endeavor and kind of

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>made famous by that show Gold was said to be

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>based on on Ari Emmanuel. So they do that, you know,

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they broker major sports rights, A lot of sports leagues

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>will UM, you know, higher endeavor to help them with

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>their sports rights deals. So they do a lot more

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>than just UFC. But as far as buying WWE, I

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>think that's where a lot of people saw the synergies

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in this. So Vince McMahon, who was the control shareholder

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of WWE via his control stock, had ten votes per share.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Did he have to body slam his daughter out of

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>there to get control? Right? I mean, this is a

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>remarkable turn of events for Vince McMahon. I mean considering

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>just months ago he um, you know, he's been under

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 1>investigation for um, you know, hush um alleged high money

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>payments with UM, you know, involving his leadership of the company.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And now he turns around and UM has this massive

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>deal with Endeavor, so um, you know it's you never

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>count out UM. Vince McMahon scorn stars though, right, But

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna so now his super voting stock is

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>can be converted into just common stock, right, So he's

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have any outsized control here. He's in fact

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be a minority shaholder. Right. Yeah, he is

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody who and if you can actually see this in

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>WWE's sec filings where they see him so important to

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>WWE that if he was out of the picture, Um,

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the creativity of the company would suffer and

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be material impact the company because he is

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for years. I mean, he is the guy who has

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>um really orchestrated, um all of this behind the scenes.

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>So he's very involved. So do we know what his

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>role will be in his new couh he's still gonna

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>be leading WWE. Um Nick con is gonna be uh

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>technically leading WWE, but he's still there and it's um yeah,

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's going to be really interesting. He was

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on CNBC earlier. I thought it was a perfect fit.

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 1>He said that, um, WW had many suitors for the company.

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that true? Where there are a lot of people

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>after WWE? That's what That's what he said. Um, you

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>know it's I think one thing to think about is

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>this is live sports is extremely valuable right now if

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you think about what's happening in the industry with cord cutting.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Anybody who can draw even just a few million viewers

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>because WrestleMania was this weekend, right yeah, WrestleMania. I mean

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the viewership for that is huge. They're very big on

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>social media as well. They're very savvy about WWE's social

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>media presence. They've been trying to expand internationally. So yeah,

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is um, you know, whether they had

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple suitors or not, I'm is a good question, but

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly valuable. And I think they paired this where

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they were also renewing these deals with USA and Fox,

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>which are they're two big broadcasters, so you know, we'll

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>see what happens with those deals. So what do we

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what is Endeavor saying today about how they want to

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>create value here? We're you know, because they're paying a

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty big number here, and but the w w E

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>stock is down, so maybe they're getting you know, a

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>good deal a relative to expectations. But where do they

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>see the upside here? Yeah? I mean Ari Manuel said,

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're looking at doing some sort of streaming product, um,

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's also just cough save means and

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>synergies involved, So you know, I think it's going to

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>be um. You know, you're talking about two big properties

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of live sports, combat sports, and I think

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not saying too much about the strategy just yet,

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>but I think that that's you can see opportunities there

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of combining these companies and putting that together. One of

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the interesting things we've seen, besides Vince McMahon's mustache is

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the value for the curling up. I've got a little

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got a little thing going on here, only on radio, okay,

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>not on TV. UM is that the WWE thinks maybe

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>betting would be a good idea. How can you organize

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>betting on what's essentially a fixed match? I assume these

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>things are all fixed, right, They're scripted? Is the term, right? Jerry? Well?

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they, um, you know, there's been reporting out

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there that they had explored potential betting on WWE UM

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and they could see the opportunity there. Um, you know,

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>similar to you can bet on UM award shows and

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it's you know which the outcome of those are already

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>known to a small number of people. So I think, yeah,

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you can bet on the Oscars for example, Yeah, okay,

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>or the Grammy's right fee. Only two award shows I

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can think of, but I'm sure there are others. Golden Globes.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>All you can bet on the Golden Globes. Okay, good

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to know. So, Jerry, is this is an all stock deal?

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we know or is they some cashion near Do

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>we know? Um that I have the check on that.

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just wondering, like, who's going to really really

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>control this thing? But I'm guessing Ari and the Endeavor

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>folks will be doing it, and so this is a

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Do we know when this closes? I think

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they've said, um, later this year. Okay, all right, good stuff.

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>That was fun. All right, wrestling. I'm just I know

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it's huge and people are into it. So the third

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>time we've talked about it in the last two hours,

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, so we I feel like we've talked more

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.879
<v Speaker 1>about the WWE today than we have about oil well

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and the former president being indicted right now. Yeah, well

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that's tomorrow's news. So all right, Jerry Smith, thanks much

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Jerry Smith is a media entertainment reporter

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News and that includes wrestling and ultimate fighting stuff.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And Jerry, are you a fan? I've dabbled, Yeah, you've dabbled.

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have lost that bet. All right, Jerry Smith

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 1>breaking it down for us here, Endeavor buying WWE snapped

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>into a slim gym. There you go, this is Bloomberg.

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the take to our live program Bloomberg

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, jes Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>The bank rate thirty year fixed mortgage six point eight

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>one percent down from the peak, just a couple of

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>USCO still sharply higher than what a lot of people got,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>just as recently as a year ago. I count myself lucky. Yes,

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes I'm so angry about the high taxes

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I pay living up in Westchester. But then I think,

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>at least I got three percent of the mortgage, because

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that kind of makes up for it. That does, That does.

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk to somebody who follows this real estate stuff

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis. Jeff Langbaum. He is the senior

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 1>reets analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey, Jeff, I mean, there's

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of ways we want to go here. People

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>are concerned that the banks are going to run into

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>some problems because interest rates are going up and a

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of these offices, these office complex out there, a

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of real estate owners. I got a refinance here

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna be a lot more expensive. How do

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at that? How do you quantify that risk? Well? So, um,

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>basically we're likely, like you mentioned, Paul Offices are in

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a perfect storm here. The you know, it's it's been

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a story for a while that um that you know,

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 1>cash flow into building level is falling as there's a

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>risk of you know, tenants pulling back on space and

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>higher rates mean lower asset values. And at the same

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>time all that's going on now, all of a sudden

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you kind of wonder when who's going to be willing

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to lend on these properties? When new death new when

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>debt maturities come due over the next couple, next couple

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>of years, um, and the landlords are you know, going

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to have to fight to find access to capital. So um,

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a real concern in the sector. And I

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>noticed today we saw a story on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:43:56.080 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that Blackstones be Read, the famous Blackstone Read saw four

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollars of withdrawal requests in March.

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:06.479
<v Speaker 1>This is a third month in a row that they've

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:10.240
<v Speaker 1>been in that you know, four to five billion dollar area.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they have shut down the gates. There's a

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a limit to what investors can take out

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in any given quarter five percent, so they haven't been

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>able to withdraw that. But what does this mean for

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Well, I think what going on with the

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone Read is there's a disconnect right now between what

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.720
<v Speaker 1>public READ prices are showing to be the perceived value

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of commercial real estate versus where nonlisted shares like b

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>READ and private real estate values are trading. And investors

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>in b READ are looking at that and saying, well,

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if public reach shares are way down, this is going

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>down too, let me try and get my money out.

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>And so there's there's just a disconnect there, and I

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that it's going to have

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen is private real estate values are going to

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have to come down some and then we'll have to

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether public reap shares came down too much

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:08.439
<v Speaker 1>or whether private values are going to have to chase

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>them lower. All right, So how bad is it out there, Jeff?

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>In the office world? I mean, you know, vacancies here

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in New York City still remain extraordinarily high, and no,

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say vacancies, but people coming back to work.

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>It just seems like this is a huge problem that

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure when it gets people realizing Yeah, when

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>when when will this be realized? When will the office

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>owners really feel the pain when they come around they

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>say their tenants don't want, don't need as much space.

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>They're feeling it now. I mean, vacancy is high, not

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>just you know, the amount of people in the buildings,

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>but the amount of UM least space in the buildings.

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>It's it's high. It's above historical levels UM, and it's

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going and it's probably going to get worse. But I

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>think what's interesting and what needs to be UM thought

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about is that there really is going to have to

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of bifurcation between the better quality assets

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>UM and the better and the better located assets and

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>those that are you know, probably bound for obsolescence UM.

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And what you'll probably see is those better, better quality assets.

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, even if the existing tenants move out or

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>pair back of their space, they'll have an easier time

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 1>filling that space because their own assets. Where tenants are

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>going to want to be UM, the older, more commodity

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:23.959
<v Speaker 1>like stuff. You know, that's going to be a real

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:26.720
<v Speaker 1>tough slog and it's going to impact the overall supplied

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.399
<v Speaker 1>demand dynamics, no doubt. Um. But you know, the better

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>quality assets probably hold up better. It's a lot. It's

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot like what happened in the mall space over

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the last decade or so, where you know, the lower

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>tier malls just kind of disappeared and the better, better

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>quality malls. You know, did Okay? I love a good mall. Sure,

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I gotta Sammy, you're coming to New Jersey. I just

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was hanging out the Ridge Hill Mall in Yonkers. We

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>do malls in Jersey. I want to check out the

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what is the American Dream Mall? Yeah? I know we

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>can get over there, uh, Jeff. In terms of the movements,

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the flow us that you've seen, um, was there a

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>marked difference pre and post SVB because the collapse of

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank obviously tied to holding they're holding a

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>chut charity portfolio and the move in rates. But everybody

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>then started saying commercial real estate was the next shoot

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to drop. Has that freaked out big institutional holders, It

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>freaked out the anybody invested in office reachs that's for sure.

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And you can look at the stock price performance on

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on you know, the Bloomberg Office Read index for example,

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know it was it was down. They underperformed

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>last year just because of all the things that we've

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>been talking about. But then all of a sudden in

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:42.760
<v Speaker 1>March when it became you know what, when refinancing became

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the new risk, the new headwind. Uh, they shot down

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>um pretty rapidly, um completely disconnected from the rest of

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the reach sectors. They found a little bounced lately. I

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>think probably a little short squeeze, a little you know,

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>risk on type type move. But you know, there's been

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a real move away from those names because of the

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>concern that if you can't refinance, your mortgage is coming due. Um,

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's the equity worth. So I think about

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just the New York marketings. I think that's one of

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the harder hit markets in the country, along with maybe

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco and New York. I'm looking at your research

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>New York focused s L Green and Vornado. I mean,

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>what do those reads do, what are they what are

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they telling me about the future of their business? I'm

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just look around in New York and

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tough to see a real rebound in office occupancies. Well,

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they do tend to own the better quality acids, like

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I was referring to before, So you know, they they

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:43.919
<v Speaker 1>probably m end up being okay, but not without pain

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the in the near term. What they need to

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>do is actually show UM that they have the ability

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to raise capital, that they have the ability to refinance

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that is coming due UM and you know, UM

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one way that they can do that is if they

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>can sell some assets or or partial ownership interest in

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:09.879
<v Speaker 1>assets and prove that there is still demand to own

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.479
<v Speaker 1>this space and demand to lend on this space. And

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's something that's really going to take a

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>little while to shake out. It's going to probably be

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the story of twenty twenty three, you know, proof that

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>there is both debt and equity interest in office buildings.

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And it really remains to be seen. But you know,

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think that, you know, if if my argument

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about the bifurcation between quality holds true, that those guys

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>end up being okay. How about Hudson Yards. I mean,

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that is an amazing redevelopment of Midtown West just west

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of Penn station and amazing office buildings and space over there.

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But that seemed to open almost like just right before

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. How is it doing it? It's actually doing okay. UM.

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know one of the reasons it's doing okay

0:49:57.120 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is because they got those leases signed and you know,

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got long term leases and so we haven't really

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>had as much opportunity for that to roll off yet. UM.

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, with the benefit of a long

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 1>term lease is that even if people aren't coming back

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to work, the tenant is on the hook and so um.

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You know it will it will be an interesting shakeout

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 1>over the next you know, couple of years to see

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what works and what doesn't. Um. But again, high quality

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>new stuff really should be them, you know, the type

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of buildings that uh that that tend to um outperform

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>versus the overall average. They have cool stuff to do

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>over there, studios there, They've got this little Spain area

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 1>which is I saw that eat there. Do do office

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:49.799
<v Speaker 1>big successful office properties have to offer experiences or do

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.319
<v Speaker 1>they have to have a daycare on site? Does there

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>need to be a gym? Do you see that, Jeff,

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>highly amenetized space will win out. I mean, you know, basically,

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 1>what landlords are trying to do and what tenants are

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is figure out ways that they can

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>make the office buildings somewhere where their tenants and their

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>employees want to go. And you know, they're they're trying

0:51:12.640 --> 0:51:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what works and it will evolve over time.

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, you know that that goes that

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>goes hand in hand with you know, highly amenitizes, you know,

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>landlords that can put capital into their buildings to make them,

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, up to the most modern required standards. And

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what's going to win out. Why can't a boss

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just say come back to work. I don't know how

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that does work, all right, Jeff, thanks so much for

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>joining our Yeah, exactly waiting for your session. Jeff Langbaum,

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a senior read analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence breaking it

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>down and lots of headwinds for the real real estate space,

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:48.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the commercial side. Do you think about the

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and people not coming into the office and now

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got you know, kind of refinancing risk here in

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a much higher interest rate environment, which is one thing

0:51:57.080 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>after another impacting these companies. So it's good to have

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody like Jeff Langbaumo covers all of the reats able

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to get us a little bit smarter here. Thanks for

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:13.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller nineteen seventy three. And I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:25.280
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio