WEBVTT - CZM Rewind: The Case Against Generative AI (Part 2)

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media, Hello im ed Zetron, and this, of course

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is better offline what Welcome to the second part of

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>our four part series, where I give you my most comprehensive,

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>most up to day explanation of why we're in a

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>bubble and what that even means. The reason why I'm

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>taking my time to be descriptive and comprehensive is because

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I want this to make sense to those who listen

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to it. Having written hundreds of thousands of words this

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>year about the AI bubble, so many of the arguments

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I've made and the secrets I've exposed are contained in

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>their own discreet little episodes or newsletters. This is my

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.319
<v Speaker 1>series to consolidate all of the information I've put out

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there in one place, and I want to make it

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to anyone who listens to him. I want anyone,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>even who someone who doesn't even know that much about AI,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to listen to the audience I've been making for the

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>past three years, to understand why things are dire and

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to feel the same alarm I'm feeling, or at least

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>understand why I'm alarmed. Because I don't like to tell

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you how you feel. Old school bit of FEEDBACKERD got

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>from a listener once, and I appreciate that to this day.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Now today I'll make the case the generative AI's fundamental

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>growth story is flawed and explain why we're in the

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>midst of an egregious bubble. This industry is sold by

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>keeping things vague and knowing that most people don't dig

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>much deeper than a headliner problem I simply do not have.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>This industry is effectively in service of two companies, open

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Ai and Nvidia, who pump headlines out through endless contracts

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>between them or subsidiaries or investments to give the illusion

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of activity. Open Ai has now promised over four hundred

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in the next four years, though honestly they

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>might owe about a trillion dollars with all the data

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>centers they're signed up for. All of these are egregious

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>sums for a company that have already forecasted billions in

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>losses with no clear explanation as to how it will

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>afford any of this beyond we need more money and

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they're vague hope that there's another soft bank or Microsoft

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>waiting in the wings to swoop in and save the day. Now,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to walk you through where I see this

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>industry today and why I see no future for it

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>beyond a horrible, fiery car rack. While everybody reasonably harps

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on about hallucinations, which to remind you, is when a

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>model authoritativety states something that isn't true, the truth of

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>why that's bad is far more complex and actually far

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.119
<v Speaker 1>worse than it seems. You cannot rely on a large

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>language model to do what you want, even though its

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>highly tuned models on the most expensive and intricate platforms

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>can't actually be relied upon to do exactly what you want.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know some people might say, well, yes, they

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>do every time, one hundred percent of the time. A

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>hallucination isn't just when these models say something that isn't true.

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It's when they decide to do something wrong because it

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>seems the most likely thing to do, or when a

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>coding model decides to go on a wild goose chase,

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>failing the user and burning a ton of money in

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the process. The advent of reasoning models those engineered to

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>think through problems in the way reminiscent of a human.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's not thinking. They don't think. They have no consciousness.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>They literally you ask them something and they break down

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what the prompt might mean and then choose it's not thinking,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and the expansion of what people are trying to use

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>llms for demands that the definition of an AI hallucination

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>be widened, not merely referring to factual errors, but fundamental

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>errors in understanding the user's request or intent or what

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>constitutes a task, in part because these models, as I said,

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot think and do not know anything. However successful a

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>model might be in generating something good once, it will

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>also often generate something bad, or it will generate the

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>right thing, but in an inefficient and over verbos fashion,

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you do not know what you're going to get each time,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and hallucinations multiply with the complexity of the thing you're

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>asking for or whether a task contains multiple steps, which

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is a fatal blow to the idea of agents. You

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>can add as many levels of intrigue and reasoning as

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you want, but large language models cannot be trusted to

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>do something correctly or even consistently, let alone every time.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Model companies have successfully convinced everybody that the issue is

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that users are prompting the models wrong and that the

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>people need to be trained to use AI. But what

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is training people to explain away the inconsistencies

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of large language models and to assume individual responsibility for

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what is an innate floor in how these fucking things work.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Large language models are also uniquely expensive. Many mistakenly try

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and claim that this is like the dot com boom

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or uber, but the basic unique economics of generative AI

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>are insane. Providers must purchase tens or hundreds of thousands

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of GPUs, each costing fifty thousand to seventy thousand apiece,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars of

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure that goes around them are so expensive and hard

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>to install, and that's without mentioning things like staffing or construction,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>or power or water or even permitting. Then you turn

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>them on and immediately they start losing new money. Despite

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of GPUs sold, nobody seems to actually

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>make any of it, other than Video of course, the

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>company that makes them, and resellers like Dell and Supermicro

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>who buy the GPUs put them in servers and sell

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>them to other people. Now, if you're an eager listener,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear from you on one question,

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>then this is just something that's been bouncing around my head.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Super Micro is in Video a customer of super Micro.

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>They're a custom in super Micro is a huge customer

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of Video. I've read something like seventy percent of the

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>cost of goods sold is buying GPUs. But I read

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that in Video as a customer of them. But I

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>can't find anything else. Reach out easy at better Offline

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>dot com if you've got any thoughts there anyway, But

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>back to those resourers. This arrangement works out great for

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Jensen Wang, the CEO of in Video, and terribly for

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. Today, I'm gonna explain the insanity of the

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>situation we'll find ourselves in and why I continue to

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>do this work underterred. The bubble has entered its most pornographic,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>aggressive and destructive stage, where the more obvious it becomes

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're all cooked here in AI land, the more

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous the GENERATIVAI industry will act a dark juxtaposition against

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>every new study that says generative AI does not work,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>or new story about chat gpd's uncannyability to activate mental

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>illness in people. And we're going to start looking at

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one company in Video which now dominates the stock market

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and has taken extraordinary and dangerous measures to sustain growth.

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>That is, to any sane person, completely unsustainable and unrealistic

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>on every level. But let's start simple. Nvidia is a

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>hardware company that sells GPUs, including consumer GPUs that you'd

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>see in a modern gaming PC. But when you read

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>someone say GPU within the context of AI, they mean

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>enterprise focused GPUs like the A one hundred, h one hundred,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>H two hundred, and more modern GPUs like the Blackwell

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Series B two hundred and GB two hundred, which combines

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>two GPUs with an Nvidia CPU. This is all complex sounding,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>but I want you to have the groundwork. These GPUs

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>cost anywhere from fifty to seventy thousand dollars and require

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of dollars more of infrastructure networking to

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>cluster these server acts of GPUs together to provide compute

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and massive cooling systems to deal with the massive amounts

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of heat they produce, as well as servers themselves that

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they run on, which typically use top of the line

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>data center CPUs and contain vast quantities of high speed

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>memory and storage. GPUs itself is likely the most expensive

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>single it and within an AI server the other costs.

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not even factoring in the actual physical building

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that the server lives in, or the water or electricity

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that uses. Well, all this crap adds up. I've mentioned

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in Video because it has a virtual monopoly in this space,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Genera IVAI effectively requires in video GPUs, in part because

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the only company really making the kinds of high

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>powered cards that GENERAIVAI demands, and because in Video created

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>something called Kuda. Cuda a collection of software tools that

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>lets programmers write software that runs on GPUs, which were

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>traditionally used primarily for rendering graphics in games. While there

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>are some open source alternatives as well as alternatives from

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Intel with its Arc GPUs and AMD, in Vidia's main

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>rival in the consumer space, these aren't nearly as mature

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>or feature Richkuda's been around for ten fifteen years now,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they really knew what they were doing. They also have

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bought a company called Melanox, which did the high speed

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>networking back in twenty nineteen, I think, for six billion dollars. Anyway,

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>due to the complexities of AI models, one cannot just

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>stand up a few of these GPUs either you need

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>clusters of thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of them for it to be worthwhile making any investment

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in GPUs and the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>especially considering they require completely different data center architecture to

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>make them run. You've probably read a bunch of stuff

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about cryptominers turning into AI data center providers. These crypto

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>data centers have to be knocked down and replaced. They

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't just put the same GPUs in isn't going

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to work, and with the new Blackwell ones, the brand

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>new ones, and then the Rubens following them, same deal.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>A common request like asking a generative AI model to

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>pass through thousands of lines of code and make a

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>change or in addition, may use multiples of these fifty

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars GPUs at the same time. And so if

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you aspire to serve thousands or millions of concurrent users,

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to spend big, really really really big. It's

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>these factors, the vendor lock in the ecosystem and the

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that generative AI really only works when you're buying

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>GPUs at scale that underpin the rise of Nvidia. But

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Beyond the economic and technical factors, there are human ones too.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>To understand the AI bubble is to understand why CEOs

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>do the things they do. Because the executive job is

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so vague, they can telegraph the value of their labour

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>by spending money on initiatives and partnerships and stratagem. AI

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>gave hyperscalers the excuse to spend hundreds of billions of

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars on data centers and buy a bunch of GPUs

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to go in them, because that, to the markets, looks

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like they're doing something. By virtue of spending a lot

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of money in a frighteningly short amount of time, Satchnadella

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>received multiple glossy profiles, all without having to prove that

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>AI can really do anything, be it a job or

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>make Microsoft money. Nevertheless, AI allowed CEOs to look busy,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and once the markets and journalists had agreed on the

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>consensus opinion that AI would be big, all that these

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>executives had to do was buy GPUs and do AI

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>or plug AI within their own software profitts. But really

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it was just jump on the big stupid asshole train.

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>We are in the midst of one of the darkest

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>forms of software in history, described by many as unwanted guest,

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>invading their products, their social media feeds, their bosses, empty minds,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and resting in the hands of monsters. Every story of

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>AI's success feels bereft of any real triumph, with every

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>literal description of its abilities involving multiple caveats about the

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>mistakes it makes or the incredible costs of running in

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>generator of AI really exists for two reasons, to cost

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>money and to make executives look busy. It was meant

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to be the new enterprise software and the new I

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>phone and the new Netflix all at once, a panacea

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>where the software guys pay one hardware guy for GPUs

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to unlock the incredible value creation of the future. In

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>many ways, Jenera iv AI was always set up to

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>fail because it was meant to be Everything. Was talked

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about like it was everything. It's still sold like it's everything.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Yet for all the fucking hype, it comes down to

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>two companies, Open Ai and Nvidia, and in Video was

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>for a while living high on the hog. All CEO

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Jensen Huang had to do every three months would say,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>check out these numbers and the markets and business journalist

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>would squeer with glee, even as he said stuff like

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the more you buy, the more you save, in part

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>tipping his head to the very real and sensible idea

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of accelerated computing, but frame within the context of the

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>cash inferna that's generated AI, and it all seems kind

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of fucking ludicrous. Huang showmanship worked really well for Invidia

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for a while because for a while the growth was easy.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Everybody was buying GPUs, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and to

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a lesser extent, Apple and Tesla made up forty two

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of Invidia's revenue, creating at least for the first

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>four a degree of shared mania where everybody justified buying

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>tens of billions of dollars of GPUs by saying the

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>other guy's doing it. This is one of the major

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons the AI bubble is happening, because people conflated in

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Vidia's incredible sales with interest in AI rather than everybody

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>buying GPUs at once. Don't worry, I'll explain the revenue

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>side a little bit later. We're here for the long haul.

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>Sit down, get comfort. You're gonna need to be anyway,

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Invidia is now facing a big problem that the only

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>thing that grows forever is cancer. On September ninth, twenty

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, The Wall Street Journal said that in Vidio's

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>wow factor was fading, going from beating analyst estimates by

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>nearly twenty one percent in its fiscal year Q two

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four earnings to scraping by with a pathetic

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>measly one point five to two percent beat in its

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>most recent earnings, something that for any other company would

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be a good thing because they made so much money,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But framed against the delusional expectations that generative AI has inspired, well,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the figure looks nothing short of ominous. I quote the

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal. Already, in Vidia's fifty six percent annual

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth rate in its latest quarter was its slowest

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in more than two years. If analyst projections hold, growth

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>will slow further in the current quarter. In any other scenario,

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty six percent year of a year growth would lead

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>to an abundance of dom perignon and one signing hundreds

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of boobs. But this is in video, and that's just

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 1>not good enough. Back in February twenty twenty four, in

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Video was booking two hundred and sixty five percent year

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of a year growth but in its February twenty twenty

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>five earnings in Video only grew by a measly per

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>thetic disgusting seventy eight percent year of a year. I'm

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>being sarcastic, of course. It isn't so much that in

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Vidia isn't growing, but to grow year over year at

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the rates that people expect is insane. Life was a

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>lot easier when in Video went from six point oh

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars in revenue in Q four fiscal year

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five to twenty two billion dollars in revenue

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in Q four fiscal year twenty twenty four. But for

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it to grow even fifty five percent year of a

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>year from Q two FY twenty twenty six, I'm just

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>going to truncate that now, which is forty six point

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>seven billion dollars to Q two twenty twenty seven. That

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>would require them to make seventy two point three eight

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars in revenue in the space of three months,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly from selling GPUs, which make up about eighty eight

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of its revenue. Just want to be clear that

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in a year they would have to make seventy two

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars just selling pretty much GPUs and the associated

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hardware in the space of three months. It's it's insane.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>This is this is really that it's too much. It's

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>too much to expect. And this, by the way, we

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>would put in video in the ballpark of Microsoft, who

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>made seventy six billion dollars in their last quarterly earnings,

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and within the neighborhood of Apple, who made ninety four

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in their last quarter of earnings. And they

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>would do this predominantly making money in an industry that

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half ago barely made the company

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars in a quarter. And the market needs

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in Vidia to perform. They must, they must, as the

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>company makes up seven to eight percent of the value

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of the S and P five hundred. It's not enough

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>for Invidia to be wildly profitable, or to having a

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>monopsony on selling GPUs, or for it to have effectively

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>ten x their stock in a few years. No, no, no, more, more, more,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>always more. Number must go up. It must continue to

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>grow at the fastest rate of anything ever, making more

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and more money, selling more and more of these GPUs

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to a small group of companies that immediately start losing money.

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>The moment they plugged them in. It's not brilliant, is it.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>While a few members of the Magnificent Seven could be

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>depended on to funnel tens of billions of dollars into

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a furnace each quarter, there were limits even for companies

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft, which had brought over four hundred and eighty

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>five thousand g us in twenty twenty four alone. To

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>take a step back about how people actually make money

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>from buying these GPUs, companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>make their money by either selling access to large language

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>models that people incorporate into their products, or by renting

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>out servers full of those GPUs to run influence the thing,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to generate the output, or train AI models for companies

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that develop and market their models themselves, namely Anthropic and

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Open AI, with some smaller competitors that don't really matter

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that latter revenue stream. Renting out GPUs is where Jensen

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Wong found a solution to that horrible eternal growth problem

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the neo cloud, namely companies like core Weave, Lambda, and Nebius. Now,

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>these businesses are fairly straightforward. They own or lease data

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>centers that they then feel full of servers that are

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>full of Nvidio GPUs, which they then rent out on

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>an hourly basis to customers either on a per GPU basis,

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are in large badges for large customers who guarantee they'll

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>use a certain amount of compute and sign up for

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a long term agreement for moderan an era a time

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>couple years perhaps these larger commitments. A neocloud is a

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>specialist cloud compute company that exists only to provide access

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to GPUs for AI, Unlike Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and Google Cloud, all of which to have healthy businesses

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>selling other kinds of compute with AI, as I'll get

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>into later, failing to provide much of a return on

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>investment at all. It's not just the fact that these

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>companies are more specialized than say AWS or Azure, as

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you've gathered from the name. These are new, young, and

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in almost all cases incredibly precarious businesses, each with financial

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>circumstances that will make a Greek finance minister blush. That's

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>because setting up a neocloud is expensive, even if the

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>company in question already has data centers as core We've

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>did with its cryptocurrency mining operation, AI requires, as I said,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>completely new data center infrastructure to run and call the GPUs,

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and those GPUs also need paying for. And then there's

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the other stuff I mentioned earlier like power, water and

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the other bits of the computer. CPU are the bah

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah blah. As a result, these neoclouds

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are forced to raise billions of dollars in debt, which

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they can lateralized using the GPUs they already have, along

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>with contracts from customers, which they then use to buy

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>more GPUs. That's right, they buy GPUs from Nvidia. They

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>raised dead on those GPUs and then they used that

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>debt to my more GPUs from Nvidia. It's enough to

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>drive a man insane. Corwave, for example, has twenty five

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in debt on an estimated five point three

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars of revenue in twenty twenty five, losing

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars per quarter. Now you know

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who also invests in these neoclouds. You'll never guess. It's

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in video. Invidia is also one of Corweed's largest customers,

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>accounting for fifteen percent of its revenue in twenty twenty four,

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and just signed a deal to buy six point three

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of any capacity that core Weave can't otherwise

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>sell to someone else through twenty thirty two, an extension

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of a one point three billion dollar twenty twenty three

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>deal reported by the Information. It was also the anchor

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>investment in Corewey's IPO about two hundred and fifty million dollars.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>In Vidia is currently doing the same thing with Lambda,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>another neocloud that Invidia invested in, which also plans to

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>go public next year. In Vidia is also one of

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Landa's largest customers, signing a deal with it this summer

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to rent ten thousand GPUs for one point three billion

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars over four years in the UK. And Video has

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>also just invested seven hundred million dollars in n Scale,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>a former cryptomner that has never built an AI data

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>center that that has despite having no experience, committed one

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars and or one hundred thousand GPUs to an

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>open AI data center in Norway. On Thursday, September twenty fifth,

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Nscale announced that it closed another funding round within Video

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>listed as the main backer. Although it's unclear how much

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>money it put in, it would be a safe to

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>assume it's probably at least one hundred million dollars. In

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Vidia also invested in Nebius, an outgrowth of Russian conglomerate Yandex,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and Nebbeus provides, through their partnership with Nvidia, tens of

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars of compute credits to companies in Videa's

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Inception startup program. Look, in Vidia's plan is simple, fund

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>these neoclouds. Let these neoclouds load themselves up with debt,

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>with which point they buy bunches of GPUs from Video,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>which can be used as collateral for loans along with

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>contracts and customers, allowing the neoclouds to buy even more

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>GPUs from Nvidia. It is just that simple. It's infinite money, right,

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just money, me money. Now, you fund the company, the

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>company buys from you, you fund them again. They've used

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing they bought to buy from more from you,

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>unlimited money. Except that is for ones more problem. These

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>companies don't They don't really appear to have that many customers,

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and they don't appear to be making much money. As

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I went into a recent premium newsletter, and Video funds

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and sustains neoclouds as a way of funneling revenue to itself,

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as partners like super Micro and Dell resellers

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that take in video GPUs like I mentioned and put

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>them in service to sell pre built to customers. These

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>two companies made up thirty nine percent of in video

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>revenues last quarter. Yet when you remove hyperscalar revenue Microsoft, Amazon, Google,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai, and n Video from the revenues of these neoclouds,

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>there's barely one billion dollars in revenue can bind across

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>core Weave, Nebius and Lambda. Corwev's five point three five

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in revenue is predominantly made up with its

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>contracts with Nvidia, Microsoft, who are offering that compute to

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, Google who have hired Corewave to offer compute

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to open Ai. And I'm not kidding, and of course

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>open Ai itself, which has now promised core Weave twenty

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>two point four billion dollars in business over the next

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.959
<v Speaker 1>five years. This is all a lot of stuff, So

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll make it really simple. There's no real money in

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>offering AI compute, but that isn't Jensen Huong's problem, So

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>we simply will force in Nvidia to hand money to

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>these companies that they have contracts to point at so

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they can raise debt to buy more of those GPUs,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 1>so that in Vidia can give them more contracts they

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>can use that to raise more money. It's it's really bad,

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, It's really bad. When I read this stuff

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>out loud, I feel a little crazy because it's so

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously unsustainable. Neil clouds are effectively giant private equity vehicles

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that exist to raise money to buy GPUs from Nvidia

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>or for hyperscalers to move money around so they don't

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>have to increase their capital expenditures and can, as Microsoft

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>did earlier in the year, simply walk away from deals

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't like, with the masses of data center at

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>least as they walk from. Nebius recently signed a seventeen

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>point four billion dollar deal with Microsoft, which even included

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the clause in its six K filing and official filing

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>with the government the Microsoft can terminate the deal in

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the event that the capacity isn't built by the delivery dates.

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, ah Nebius already used the contract

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft gave them to raise three billion dollars to

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not shitting you here, build the data center to

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>actually to actually provide the compute for the for the contract.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't have it. Yeah, now they don't have them.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the fucking compute. They they haven't fucking

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>built up. No one built up. They haven't got the compute. Mate,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>These fucking companies are right anyway. Anyway, sorry, sorry, I'll

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>stop spiraling. Let me just break down these numbers. Let's

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>look at cort we First, Microsoft, they're sixty percent of

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>their revenue twenty twenty four and they're providing compute mostly

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>for open Ai. Fifteen percent of their revenue last year

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was in VideA, and then the rest was Meta and

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>then open Ai and then Google. Lambda half of their

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>revenue comes from Amazon and Microsoft, and now one point

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars of their revenue comes from in VideA,

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>which are their current revenue by the way, and that

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>one point five billion dollars over four years. So the

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>current revenue, it's two hundred and fifty billion dollars. Well,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that would make in video the largest customer. I realize

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying numbers here, but for real, with that contract,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>because Lambda only made two hundred and fifty million dollars

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of this year, and in Video

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is spreading one point five billion dollars across four years.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>In Video is the largest customer now Now Nebutus has

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>got similar revenue to Lambda, but their largest customer is

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>now is It's it's fucking Microsoft. It's just they don't

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have real customers. They just have hyperscalers or in VideA themselves.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And from my analysis, it appears that Core we've despited

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>expectations to make that five point three five billion dollars

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, has only around five hundred million dollars of

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>non Magnificent seven or open AI revenue in twenty twenty five,

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with Lambda estimated to have maybe a round of one

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in AI revenue. Otherwise, Nebius only around

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty million dollars, and that's being generous.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>In much simpler terms, the Magnificent seven is the AI bubble,

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and the AI bubble exists to buy more GPUs because,

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as I'll talk about, there's no real money or growth

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of this other than the amount that private

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>credit is investing. And this really is quite worrying. By

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, I had a quote here for analyst that

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>says is about fifty billion dollars a quarter for the

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>low end for the past three quarters. So why is

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this bad?

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Let's start simple. Fifty billion dollars a

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>quarter of data center funding is going into an industry

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that has less revenue than three to play mobile game

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>gensin impact. That feels pretty bad. Who's going to use

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>these data centers? How are they even going to make

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>money on them? Firms don't typically hold on to assets.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>They sell them or they take them public. That doesn't

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>seem great to me anyway. If AI was truly the

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>next big growth vehicle, neoclouds would be swimming in diverse

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>global revenue streams. Instead, they're heavily centralized around the same

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>few names, one of which in Vidia, directly benefits from

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>their existence not as a company doing business, but as

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>an entity that can accrue debt and spend money on GPUs.

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>These neoclouds are entirely dependent on a continual flow of

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>private credit from firms like Gold and Sachs, Who's becked,

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Nebbia's Corweave and Lambda, JP Morgan, Lambda Crusoe Building Applene,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas As Open AI Data Center, and of course Corwave

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and Blackstone Lambda and corwav, who have in a very

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>real sense created an entirely debt based infrastructure to feed

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars directly to Nvidia, all in the name

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of an AI revolution that's yet to arrive. The fact

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that the rest of the neoclo revenue stream is effectively

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>either a hyperscaler or open ai is also concerning. Hyperscalers

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>are at this point the majority of data center capital

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>expenditures and have yet to prove an any kind of

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>success from building out this capacity, outside of course, Microsoft's

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>investment in open Ai, which has succeeded in generating revenue

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>while burning billions of dollars of revenue on well, I mean,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it's not really any profit, is they have just burning money.

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It's also insane when you say this stuff. I've got

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>two more goddamn episodes of this and when I read

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>these scripts, I'm just like, how is nobody else more

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>freaked out? Oh well, hyperscaler revenue is also capricious. But

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>even if it isn't, why are there no other major customers?

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Why across all of these companies does there not seem

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to be one major customer who isn't open Ai Well,

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the answers are quite obvious. Nobody that wants it can

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>afford it, and those that can afford it don't need it.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>It's also unclear what exactly hyperscalers are doing with this compute,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because it sure isn't making money. While Microsoft makes ten

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in revenue from renting compute to open Ai

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>via their Microsoft as Your Cloud, it does so at cost,

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and was charging open Ai one dollars and thirty cents

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>per hour for each a one hundred AIGPU at a

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>loss of two point two dollars an hour per GPU,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>meaning that it is likely losing money on this compute,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>especially as semi analysis as the total cost per hour

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>per GPU around one dollars and forty six cents with

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the cost of capital and debt associated for a hyperscaler,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>though it's unclear that whether that's for an H one

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred or an A one hundred GPU. In any case,

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>how do these neoclouds pay for their debt if the

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>hyperscalers give up or in video doesn't send them money,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>or more likely private credit begins to notice that there's

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>no real revenue growth outside of circular compute deals with

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>neocloud's largest suppliers, investors and customers. Don't know why I

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>said plural there, because it's just one in video, And

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the answer is they don't. In fact, I have serious

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>concerns that they can't even build the capacity necessary to

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>fulfill these deals, but nobody seems to worry or think

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about them. But really, though it appears to be taking

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Oracle and Cruso around two point five years per gigawatt

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of compute capacity, how exactly are any of these neoclouds,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>or indeed Oracle itself able to expand to capture this revenue.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, but I assume somebody is going to say

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. Here's an insane statistic for you. By the way,

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>open ai will account for in both its revenue projected

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>thirteen billion dollars and in its own compute cost ten dollars,

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the region of forty to fifty percent of

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>all AI revenues in twenty twenty five. As a reminder,

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>open ai is leaked that it will burn one hundred

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen billion dollars in the next four years, and

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>based on my estimates, it actually needs to raise I

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>mean upwards are four hundred billion dollars in the next

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>four years based on its three hundred billion dollar deal

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with Oracle and some recently announced one hundred billion dollar

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>compute purchases for backup. And that alone is a very

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>bad sign, very very bad indeed. Especially it's with three

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>years and five hundred billion dollars or more into this

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hype cycle, with few signs of life outside of well

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>open AI promising people money, and that's not healthy or

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>sane or normal, and it's certainly not stable, and it's

0:27:53.560 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get bad real fast. Gatget tomorrow. Thank you

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Better Offline theme song is Matasowski. You can check

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>out more of his music and audio projects at Matasowski

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, M A T T O S O W

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>s ki dot com. You can email me at easy

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at Better offline dot com or visit Better Offline dot

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>com to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter.

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I also really recommend you go to chat dot where's

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>youreaed dot at to visit the discord, and go to

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>our slash Better Offline to check out our reddit. Thank

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for listening better.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For more

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zonemedia dot com,

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you get your podcasts. FI