Speaker 1: Democrats right now, they're in a really awkward spot. They're
Speaker 1: trying to figure out exactly how to deal with the
Speaker 1: Democratic Socialists. Van Holland went on Meet the Depressed and
Speaker 1: was asked about what do you do is the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party completely dead? As a Democratic Socialist running the show?
Speaker 1: How do you handle with the extremism of the Democratic Party?
Speaker 1: And here's what Van Holland, one of the Democratic leaders
Speaker 1: had to say.
Speaker 2: Delve a little deeper into this debate that you referenced
Speaker 2: inside the Democratic Party. Florida Congressman Jared Moskowitz fended off
Speaker 2: a DSA backed challenger in his district, and he's taking
Speaker 2: a very different view of Democratic Socialists of America. Here's
Speaker 2: what he said about DSA members likely to join Congress
Speaker 2: next year. He writes, quote, they're anti American at their core.
Speaker 2: People who have said anti American things and have said
Speaker 2: things that are pro Russia and pro China. Should they
Speaker 2: really get a security clear And he asked, do you
Speaker 2: think the Democratic Socialists have a place in the Democratic Party?
Speaker 3: Senator, Yes, they do.
Speaker 4: As part of the debate and in this upcoming election,
Speaker 4: candidates can be very clear about where they strongly disagree
Speaker 4: with the DSA, which is probably on most issues, but
Speaker 4: they can also talk about.
Speaker 5: Their own plans.
Speaker 4: So you know, I'm not afraid of debate. I think
Speaker 4: that those in the Democratic Party who are afraid of
Speaker 4: a healthy debate are missing the point because voters, including
Speaker 4: Democratic voters, they don't want to simply return to the
Speaker 4: pre Trump status quo. They want Democrats who are going
Speaker 4: to stand for something. And I can strongly disagree with
Speaker 4: one set of Democrats, but I think that debate is healthy.
Speaker 2: Well, okay, talking about the debate, let's talk about the
Speaker 2: DSA platform. It calls for, in part, replacing the president
Speaker 2: and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by
Speaker 2: and subordinate.
Speaker 1: I'm just going to stop there. We've gone through the
Speaker 1: Democratic platform. Democrats, there's this platform. You notice what Van
Speaker 1: Holland tried to do there. Them voters don't want to
Speaker 1: simply return to pre Trump's s tas quote.
Speaker 6: We're just trying to figure this out.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be fine, Everything's okay, kumbaiaism, right, all right,
Speaker 1: So then let's see what happens when he's pressed on
Speaker 1: this in a different way. And notice how again they
Speaker 1: are terrified.
Speaker 2: It's a platform it calls for, in part, replacing the
Speaker 2: President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen
Speaker 2: by and subordinate to Congress, and quote, to abolish the
Speaker 2: Senate the chamber of course in which you serve. Do
Speaker 2: those ideas go too far for you?
Speaker 4: Yes? Of course they do for me. And I think
Speaker 4: a lot of the folks who are running, regardless of
Speaker 4: where they are on the Democratic spectrum, have rejected those ideas.
Speaker 4: And so I think when you look at the Democratic
Speaker 4: Party right now, you're looking at a party that again
Speaker 4: is incredibly united when it comes to making sure we're
Speaker 4: out there standing up for working people. We need to
Speaker 4: end this war in Iran, which is driving up prices.
Speaker 4: And the reason that Senator Scott didn't want to talk
Speaker 4: about this election and the issues and didn't want to
Speaker 4: talk about Trump's record is because you have a rubber
Speaker 4: stamp Republican Senate and rubber stamp Republican candidates who simply
Speaker 4: want to do Donald Trump's.
Speaker 2: Bidding and very quickly. Would you accept an endorsement by
Speaker 2: the DSA.
Speaker 6: I would not.
Speaker 4: I'm not going to sort of look into old.
Speaker 6: I love there. Would you endorse? Would you accept an endorsement.
Speaker 1: They say, the Democrats of America believe that Democrat Van
Speaker 1: Hollin and the Senate should not have his job. They
Speaker 1: want to abolish the Senate. Like, I don't know what
Speaker 1: part of that he doesn't understand. But you also notice
Speaker 1: there when he's asked about what they believe in, he
Speaker 1: tries to say, well, the reason why they're active right
Speaker 1: now is because the Republicans are just so bad, and
Speaker 1: because the Republicans are just so bad, you know, we
Speaker 1: just know that that's just what it is. That's why
Speaker 1: this is happening. And you're like, what are you talking about? Like, seriously,
Speaker 1: what are you even talking about? This is the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: They I go back to what I said about Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: Barack Obama spoon fed the Democratic Party. Barack Obama bottle
Speaker 1: fed the Democratic socials of America. They helped create them,
Speaker 1: they have backed them, and the Democratic Party. I will
Speaker 1: say it over and over again, the Democratic Party is
Speaker 1: one thousand percent supporting these Democratic socialist candidates with their money.
Speaker 1: Anyone that says they're not, they're lying to you. They
Speaker 1: are spending their cash. They are spending their cash in
Speaker 1: a way that is massive. They are spending their cash
Speaker 1: in a way that is I mean, it's truly incredible
Speaker 1: how much money they're giving to these socialist candidates. And
Speaker 1: so anyone that sits there and the Democratic Party is like,
Speaker 1: oh no, like, this isn't really us, this is not
Speaker 1: what we really believe in.
Speaker 6: Like, they're lying to you, folks. They're lying to you
Speaker 6: on a level that is diabolical.
Speaker 1: They're lying to you at a level that you sit
Speaker 1: there and you should be laughing in their face, like
Speaker 1: do you actually expect me to believe what you're even saying?
Speaker 6: Right now?
Speaker 1: The Democratic Party is controlled by these individuals. Now, I
Speaker 1: want to take a quick moment and I want to
Speaker 1: talk to you about right now what you can do
Speaker 1: to help pray for the people of Israel. Anti Semitism
Speaker 1: is continuing to rise around the world every day and
Speaker 1: Jewish people continuing to pay the price from growing threats
Speaker 1: against Jewish communities to acts of violence, harassment, intimidation. Many
Speaker 1: Jewish families are living with fear simply because they're Jewish synagogue,
Speaker 1: schools and community centers. They continue strengthening security as hatred
Speaker 1: spreads far beyond the headlines, and that's why the international
Speaker 1: Fellowship of Christians and Jews is working every day in
Speaker 1: Israel and around the world, and they're providing security, emergency assistance,
Speaker 1: food and critical care for vulnerable Jewish communities. Now for
Speaker 1: more than thirty years, the Fellowship is stood alongside the
Speaker 1: Jewish people, delivering practical support when it is needed the most.
Speaker 1: Hatred continues to spread, but compassion and action can make
Speaker 1: a huge difference. So I want you to join the
Speaker 1: International Fellowship of Christians and Jews and me in praying
Speaker 1: simply for the safety of the Jewish community, praying for
Speaker 1: peace in Israel, and for an end to anti Semitism.
Speaker 1: Together we can remind God's people that they are not alone.
Speaker 1: So if you want to know what the prayer requests
Speaker 1: are now that are needed the most, go and visit
Speaker 1: PRAYIFCJ dot org. That's prey I FCJ dot org. Pray
Speaker 1: I f CJ dot org.
Speaker 6: Look at Rokana.
Speaker 1: Rokana claims Democrats stitching Hassan Piker would show weakness, so
Speaker 1: therefore it is absurd that they get rid of one
Speaker 1: of the most radicals that is actually out there. I
Speaker 1: want you to hear another Democrat try to defend what
Speaker 1: I would refer to as the indefensible. Okay, Like, there's
Speaker 1: no way that you can defend what is being said
Speaker 1: now what Hassan Piker has said, and I want you
Speaker 1: to hear Rokana, try to do that.
Speaker 6: Take a listen.
Speaker 7: Is the right platform for the nation to overcome some
Speaker 7: of the divides and anger and exclusion.
Speaker 5: You stuck your neck out for progressives like a Bill say,
Speaker 5: you also supported Platner before the allegations came out. You've
Speaker 5: also stuck your nckout for Hassan Piker. And you've seen
Speaker 5: that Hassan Piker is now being attacked twenty four to
Speaker 5: seven on Fox. Here's Hailey Stevens going on Fox and saying, well,
Speaker 5: the first thing you know how el say it could
Speaker 5: moderate to voters is to get rid of the Piker affiliation.
Speaker 5: You've seen near attendant retweet Laura Lumer's attack on Hassan Piker.
Speaker 5: Your comment on Hassan Piker. What should the Democrats do
Speaker 5: with them? Should they abandon him? Do you renounce your
Speaker 5: support of him? You tell me, rog give it to
Speaker 5: me straight.
Speaker 6: It's absurd.
Speaker 7: I mean, these are the same people who were at
Speaker 7: one point criticizing Democrats for going on Joe Rogan. I mean,
Speaker 7: remember when Bertie went on Joe Rogan. The same the
Speaker 7: people who said, oh, you can't go on Joe Rogan.
Speaker 7: These are the same folks who criticized me when I
Speaker 7: got went on Ben Shapiro. Should I not go on
Speaker 7: Ben Shapiro's podcast because I disagree with him? We had
Speaker 7: in a horrle argument on the minimum wage. Just because
Speaker 7: someone is engaging with Hassan Piker, who has a strong
Speaker 7: viewpoints on these issues, doesn't mean that you're endorsing every
Speaker 7: single one of Hassan Piker's positions. And if you're going
Speaker 7: to argue that we should exclude a left wing commentators,
Speaker 7: and frankly, some of these people were arguing that we
Speaker 7: should be canceling and excluding right wing commentators, you're left
Speaker 7: with a party that is basically a status quo party.
Speaker 7: That's why we lost to elections. My view has been engagement,
Speaker 7: engagement with people on the right, people on the left,
Speaker 7: people I disagree with. I say the same things. Look,
Speaker 7: I've gone to Hassan Piker and gotten criticized because let
Speaker 7: me just.
Speaker 1: Pause here, let me give you the top thing that
Speaker 1: Hassan Piker said that Rokhana is falling all over himself
Speaker 1: to defend Hassan Piker said that America deserved.
Speaker 6: A nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: Dude, he was in a debate and he said America
Speaker 1: deserves nine eleven. He wouldn't even further, saying America had
Speaker 1: essentially brought the attack upon ourselves. America deserved nine eleven.
Speaker 1: And this is who ro Hanna is out there falling
Speaker 1: all over going, well, I like him? I mean why
Speaker 1: would I Why would I say that I don't like him?
Speaker 1: Why would I say anything negative?
Speaker 6: Like I like him? Why would I not like him?
Speaker 1: This is who they are, This is how extreme they become.
Speaker 1: I go back to what I mentioned a moment ago
Speaker 1: about how it's Sam Piker. Not only did this dude
Speaker 1: say that America deserved one eleven, but years later, while
Speaker 1: discussing Saudi Arabia nuclear power, Hassan Piker joked, nine to
Speaker 1: eleven two is going to be so sick, quote unquote,
Speaker 1: and then he joked about giving Saudi Arabia a nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons so they could carry out nine to eleven two
Speaker 1: point zero. Then there's what he said about Israel and Hamas.
Speaker 1: Piker wrote that Hamas is a thousand times better than Israel.
Speaker 1: So I guess he's for the extermination of all the Jews, right,
Speaker 1: because that would match up with what democratic Socialism America believe.
Speaker 1: He was confronted about that statement on Pods of American
Speaker 1: twenty twenty six and what he say. He didn't retweet.
Speaker 1: He said, quote, I stand by that. He then explained
Speaker 1: his position by saying he views the choice as one
Speaker 1: between two evils. So, now Israel is evil, just as
Speaker 1: evil he's as a terrorist organization that kills innocent people
Speaker 1: and rapes little children and takes people hostage and then
Speaker 1: tortures them and then makes them dig their own graves
Speaker 1: and then rapes them and then kills them. Right, So
Speaker 1: he's saying Israel is the same as as they are,
Speaker 1: which is anti Semitism on steroids. He said, I got
Speaker 1: to pick between the two evils and would choose him
Speaker 1: Moss over the Israeli government quote unquote. Now think about
Speaker 1: what we're talking about here. This isn't some anonymous account
Speaker 1: with fourteen followers, okay, sitting his basement. This is one
Speaker 1: of the most influential political voices in the left, certainly
Speaker 1: on the Internet, and Democrats are dying to campaign with him.
Speaker 1: And then there's his comments surrounding the sexual violence of
Speaker 1: October seventh. Piker said, quote, it doesn't matter if rape
Speaker 1: app in October the seventh, It doesn't change the dynamic
Speaker 1: for me. That is how evil Hassan Piker is.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: Piker says the clips have been badly quote misrepresented. How
Speaker 1: do you misrepresent the quote? It doesn't matter if rape
Speaker 1: happened on October the seventh, It doesn't change the dynamic
Speaker 1: for me.
Speaker 6: I just want to know. Now.
Speaker 1: His explanation is that he was actually arguing with someone
Speaker 1: questioning whether sexual violence occurred, and his point was that
Speaker 1: Hamas atroctites could not justify what he regards as Israel's
Speaker 1: subsequent actions in Gaza. So doesn't matter how bad the
Speaker 1: terrorists are, even if they're sexually assaulting people, it doesn't
Speaker 1: change the dynamic for him. Now his rhetoric again, it
Speaker 1: doesn't stop there. When discussing Hesbela, Piker said, I don't
Speaker 1: have an issue with them, So this is another terrorist organization, Like, yeah,
Speaker 1: totally fine when them works for me.
Speaker 6: He described hes.
Speaker 1: Blah as quote a resistance group, not a terrorist group,
Speaker 1: and he argued that if hes Blah qualifies the terrorist
Speaker 1: organization in America is the world's leading terrorist organization. Okay,
Speaker 1: so now America is a terrorist organization.
Speaker 6: That is what a som biker says.
Speaker 1: And again this is ro Kona saying, no, no, I
Speaker 1: a problem with the guy, like, you know, it's fine,
Speaker 1: we'll campaign together whatever. Let me go back to another
Speaker 1: Democrat and I want to play for you, Senator Van Holland.
Speaker 6: He's a Democrat. He was on Meet the Press.
Speaker 1: On dsays abolish the Senate, right, so he's being asked
Speaker 1: by them, Hey, like you know the DSA wants to
Speaker 1: abolish the Senate, that would be you. And listen to
Speaker 1: how he will not stand up to the DSA because
Speaker 1: he's so afraid of them that he has to justify
Speaker 1: what they're saying while saying, well, of course, I don't
Speaker 1: want to lose my job. I mean this is this
Speaker 1: man has no spine bait.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about the DSA platform. It calls for, in part,
Speaker 2: replacing the President and Supreme Court with an executive and
Speaker 2: judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress, and quote to
Speaker 2: abolish the Senate the chamber of course in which you serve.
Speaker 2: Do those ideas go too far for you, Yes, of.
Speaker 6: Course they do for me.
Speaker 4: And I think a lot of the folks who are running,
Speaker 4: regardless of where they are on the Democratic spectrum, have
Speaker 4: rejected those ideas. And so I think when you look
Speaker 4: at the Democratic Party right now, you're looking at a
Speaker 4: party that, again is incredibly united when it comes to
Speaker 4: making sure we're out there standing up for working people.
Speaker 4: We need to end this war in Iran, which is
Speaker 4: driving up prices.
Speaker 6: And the reason that Center.
Speaker 4: Scott didn't want to talk about this election and the
Speaker 4: issues and didn't want to talk about Trump's record is
Speaker 4: because you have a rubber stamp Republican Senate and rubber
Speaker 4: stamp Republican candidates who simply want to do Donald Trump's.
Speaker 2: Bidding and very quickly, would you accept an endorsement by
Speaker 2: the DSA.
Speaker 4: I would not. I'm not going to sort of look
Speaker 4: into old.
Speaker 6: This is how weak the Democrats are.
Speaker 1: They cannot stand up even to a guy who is
Speaker 1: out there saying America deserves nine to eleven. Hassan Piker
Speaker 1: is joking about nine to eleven two point zero. A
Speaker 1: guy who says to Hamas a thousand times better than Israel.
Speaker 1: A guy that says I don't have a issue with Hesblaw,
Speaker 1: a guy who even mocked an American veteran who lost
Speaker 1: his eye fighting overseas. So the important political question isn't
Speaker 1: whether hasan Piker and the Democratic Party have a right
Speaker 1: to say these things they do. That's why I love
Speaker 1: free speech. The question is why is a man that's
Speaker 1: this politically influential in the Democratic Party, who has a
Speaker 1: record that's extreme as his is, becomes so important to
Speaker 1: major Democratic politicians and candidates that they're willing to associate
Speaker 1: themselves with this extremist on stage and then defend and
Speaker 1: protect him as a political leader.
Speaker 6: I'm going to answer that question. It's because the.
Speaker 1: Democratic Party is dead. Democratic Socialists are running it, the
Speaker 1: Marxists are running it. You have to answer the question
Speaker 1: based on what they're doing, not what they're saying, even
Speaker 1: when they try to act like, oh, we're not the same,
Speaker 1: Oh we're a little bit different. Oh well, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, it's just the DSA, and I understand the DSA,
Speaker 1: but you know, well, I mean, you know, we're just
Speaker 1: trying to stop Donald Trump, right, Like that's what they say,
Speaker 1: We're just trying to stop Donald Trump. They hate this country.
Speaker 1: They want to destroy this country. Van Holland was asked
Speaker 1: another question on Democratic Socialists. He said, dem voters don't
Speaker 1: want to simply return to the pre Trump says quo.
Speaker 1: That is how he's defending this Marxism, socialism, and communism
Speaker 1: that has exploded within his party.
Speaker 2: Delve a little deeper into this debate that you referenced
Speaker 2: inside the Democratic Party. Florida Congressman Jared Moskowitz fended off
Speaker 2: a DSA backed challenger in his district, and he's taking
Speaker 2: a very different view of Democratic Socialists of America. Here's
Speaker 2: what he's said about DSA members likely to join Congress
Speaker 2: next year. He writes, quote, they're anti American at their core,
Speaker 2: people who have said anti American things and have said
Speaker 2: things that are pro Russia and pro China. Should they
Speaker 2: really get a security clearance?
Speaker 6: He asked?
Speaker 2: Do you think the Democratic Socialists have a place in
Speaker 2: the Democratic Party, Senator.
Speaker 3: Yes, they do.
Speaker 4: As part of the debate and in this upcoming election,
Speaker 4: candidates can be very clear about where they strongly disagree
Speaker 4: with the DSA, which is probably on most issues, but
Speaker 4: they can also talk about their own plans. So you know,
Speaker 4: I'm not afraid of debate. I think that those in
Speaker 4: the Democratic Party who are afraid of a healthy debate
Speaker 4: are missing the point because voters, including Democratic voters, they
Speaker 4: don't want to simply return to the pre Trump status quo.
Speaker 4: They want Democrats who are going to stand for something.
Speaker 4: And I can strongly disagree with one set of Democrats,
Speaker 4: but I think that debate is healthy.
Speaker 1: Look, I think that debate is healthy. Translation. We will
Speaker 1: sell out our values. We will stand with terrorist sympathizers,
Speaker 1: we will stand with people that say that we deserve
Speaker 1: nine to eleven and another one, and we will not
Speaker 1: back down from this as long as we think it
Speaker 1: means that we can probably win moving forward. That's what
Speaker 1: you just heard. We will do whatever we have to
Speaker 1: do to win. And if that means that we destroy America,
Speaker 1: find because we're all in this together, right, like we
Speaker 1: all want to destroy America.
Speaker 6: That that's the other part of this.
Speaker 1: Like, if you love America, there's no way you could
Speaker 1: stand by this and you would fight back because the
Speaker 1: stated goal of Hassan Piker and others is yes, to
Speaker 1: dismantle and destroy America. The Democratic socials of America have
Speaker 1: also made it very clear that their objective they've said
Speaker 1: it is to destroy this kund They want no Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: they want no Senate, they want no checks and balances.
Speaker 1: They don't want anything that holds back them from implementing
Speaker 1: full blown communism in the United States of America. So
Speaker 1: when they tell you this is what they believe, you
Speaker 1: really should believe them. When they tell you they hate
Speaker 1: this country, you shouldn't say no, they really don't hate
Speaker 1: this country. Yes, in fact, they actually do. They hate
Speaker 1: this country. When they tell you that they believe America
Speaker 1: is evil, you need to also understand that they actually
Speaker 1: mean it, that they are going to advocate for that,
Speaker 1: that they are going to do everything they can to
Speaker 1: destroy this country, because that is what they have stated they.
Speaker 6: Want to do.
Speaker 1: The United States of America is under attack from within.
Speaker 1: This isn't coming from overseas. This is from our elected
Speaker 1: officials and the leaders of the Democratic Party, and the
Speaker 1: Democrats going to try to fake you out going to
Speaker 1: the midterms. They're going to try to make you believe
Speaker 1: that what you're hearing is somehow Oh, they don't really
Speaker 1: believe it. But when their challenge aren't, they will not
Speaker 1: go after their own. That is what this election is
Speaker 1: actually all about. There is another example that I want
Speaker 1: to tell you about right now about just how extreme
Speaker 1: and how radical the DSA actually is. Now you have
Speaker 1: to look no further this time into and and to
Speaker 1: just deal with a basic headline, and it is one
Speaker 1: that if you are a conservative, this should terrify you
Speaker 1: that we are now at this point where this is
Speaker 1: where the Democratic Party has gone. You look in a
Speaker 1: guy by the name of Abdul l said, he is
Speaker 1: now out there attacking jd Vance's marriage. Why on earth
Speaker 1: would a senate Democratic candidate attack jd Vance's marriage his wife? Well, well,
Speaker 1: it is all because of something that jd Vance said.
Speaker 1: Now I'm going to play for you what jd Vance
Speaker 1: said so that you understand exactly what he said before
Speaker 1: I tell you what Lsaide's response was, and it was violent,
Speaker 1: grotesque and also extremely racist.
Speaker 6: Here is jd.
Speaker 1: Vance in his own words, and then you'll understand how
Speaker 1: egregious this is.
Speaker 3: It's sometimes actually hard to understand, like what do these
Speaker 3: modern Democrats actually stand for? But look what they say.
Speaker 3: Pay close attention and they'll leave these little hints of
Speaker 3: what they actually care about. Now he l Sai ed,
Speaker 3: this guy running for Senate in Michigan. He once argued
Speaker 3: not too long ago that criticisms of sharia law were
Speaker 3: rooted in white supremacist I'd love to go back in
Speaker 3: time and tell my papal that there's a man who
Speaker 3: claims to stand for working people, who says, not only
Speaker 3: should we have sharia law, but if you criticize it,
Speaker 3: you're a white supremacist. That's not my Patpal's democraty my friends.
Speaker 1: All right, so let's talk about why that story is important.
Speaker 1: What Jeddie Vance is doing is he's reminding people that
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party has become so extreme that Democrats of
Speaker 1: yesterday would not even recognize their party today. I believe
Speaker 1: JFK would be a Republican today. I think there's a
Speaker 1: chance Bill Clinton of the nineteen nineties would be a
Speaker 1: Republican today. That is how extreme the left has gone.
Speaker 1: And El said has lost his mind over those comments.
Speaker 1: In a social media post over the weekend, el Said wrote,
Speaker 1: so do we think JD is taking Usha? That's his wife,
Speaker 1: all right, the second lady with him back in time
Speaker 1: to meet Papa or no, with a link to that video. Now,
Speaker 1: Vance's wife, Usha and her family are Hindu. So this
Speaker 1: is not only a racist statement, but is an incredibly
Speaker 1: nasty statement coming from Alsaid. And by the way, they're
Speaker 1: Hindu and they would not impose real law on Americans.
Speaker 1: That is another part of this conversation because al Said
Speaker 1: has refused not only to apologize for his racist remarks
Speaker 1: about Vance's wife and family, but it's also important to
Speaker 1: note that Elsaide's campaign has confirmed that he actually complies
Speaker 1: with Shriel law in his personal life. Now, this all
Speaker 1: comes from a comment from nine when he described it
Speaker 1: as being himself as being quote in his religion as
Speaker 1: a lifelong obligation. Said later respond to Vance's comments during
Speaker 1: an interview, setting quote, He's painting this picture of going
Speaker 1: back in time to talk to his Papa about me.
Speaker 6: Now, why is he pointing to me? Why is don
Speaker 6: Trump pointing to me?
Speaker 1: They're pointing to me to try and say somehow I'm
Speaker 1: less of an American than they are. What does that
Speaker 1: have to do with this? I don't know the color
Speaker 1: of my skin, how I pray, question Mark. But the
Speaker 1: confusing thing about it is that he thinks there are
Speaker 1: some people who are more American than others because they
Speaker 1: can point to their papa who was here earlier. Now,
Speaker 1: obviously that's not even close to what Vance was talking about.
Speaker 1: What he was saying was the Democratic Party has become
Speaker 1: so radical that his papa, who is a Democrat, would
Speaker 1: not recognize it. He then goes on i'lside to ask
Speaker 1: this question quote and my question to him, referring to Vance,
Speaker 1: is simply, why is it how do you look your
Speaker 1: parents in laws in the eye and say that somehow
Speaker 1: they're less American than you are? Because that's what he's
Speaker 1: implying here. That's, by the way, not what JD. Vance
Speaker 1: implied at all. That goes back to the racist statement
Speaker 1: that has been put out there by Lsaid. Now, this
Speaker 1: is a very very very very very tight race. You
Speaker 1: look at the most recent pulling, Michigan's Republican Senate candidate
Speaker 1: Mike Rodgers and Lsaid divertually tied in the general election race.
Speaker 1: Lsaid now is doing everything he can to try to
Speaker 1: undermine JD. Vans, undermine the present, and undermine Mike Rodgers.
Speaker 1: And so what he's saying is, Hey, I'm going to
Speaker 1: go after the wife of JD. Vance and her religion
Speaker 1: and the color of her skin and then say Oh, well,
Speaker 1: I guess somehow Republicans are racist, Like that's pretty funny. Well,
Speaker 1: let me also remind you of l said when when
Speaker 1: he said this in an interview as well.
Speaker 8: Well, you know, Jesus' piece and Blessings be upon him
Speaker 8: was considered radical in his time too, and there is
Speaker 8: a radical nature to being willing to stand forthright in
Speaker 8: a time of corruption.
Speaker 1: Southside says that Jesus was radical, so therefore it's you
Speaker 1: should support me because I'm a radical. He's admitting that
Speaker 1: he is a radical is Almus By the way, that's
Speaker 1: very different than what Jesus believed in let's just point
Speaker 1: that out as well. I hope you'll take all the
Speaker 1: audio that I just played for you. Please share our
Speaker 1: podcasts wherever neever you are on social media to help
Speaker 1: us grow, and I will see you back here tomorrow