WEBVTT - This Is What The Coronavirus Means For The Chinese Supply Chain

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Odd Lots listeners. Of course, normally we released new

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes on Monday, but today we're bringing you a special

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>midweek episode. That's because it's very timely one. Obviously a

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest in the coronavirus and the effect that

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's having on supply chains around the world, so we

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to wait. We didn't want to slot it

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in future in the schedule. We wanted to get it

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>out now, and hopefully you've h Hello and welcome to

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tray all Away, Tracy. You know, it's really struck

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>me in the markets over the last several weeks. I

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>go on, Well, obviously the crisis over the coronavirus continues

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to be this massive story for the global economy, for China, Asia,

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of different companies, and yet investors, in a

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>weird way, outside of some specific names or specific currencies,

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>still seem surprisingly or maybe not surprisingly, but generally not

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that worried. Right now. Yeah, um, I find this pretty amazing.

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So at the time that we're recording, I think the

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>SMP five is still pretty close to its all time high,

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and what amazes me about that is we spent two

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>years collectively worrying about how trade tensions between the U

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>S and China we're going to affect global supply chains

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and economic growth and consumption, and we sort of followed

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>every tiny in and out when it came to the

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>trade negotiations. And now when you have something the ownavirus

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and the containment efforts underway in China, you have something

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that is guaranteed to impact production and consumption in the

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>world's second biggest economy as well as disrupt a bunch

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of supply chains, and no one seems to care. Yeah,

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really odd, it's really surprising, it's counterintuitive. It's

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not what I would have guessed. Even this week, the

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 1>week that we're recording it, we got um a warning

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>from one of the sort of emblems of US China

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>trade globalization, Apple, which is heavily exposed to China on

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain front and heavily exposed to China on

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the revenue front, saying, look, this quarter is going to

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>be worse than we previously expected. Factories aren't opening up

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>for our suppliers as fast as we had anticipated. A

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, we're not totally sure when things

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>will be back to normal. Uh, not to mention the

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that people are outlets opping and uh, you know,

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the stock fell about two in the immediate wake of that,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe because people figured this was the case already, And

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>then the next day the stock immediately basically erased all

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of those losses. So even a company coming out and saying, um, no,

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a serious issue for us, even it's not

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>having that much effect on them right now, I guess

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>people are so confident that the effects will just be

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>transitory and everyone will okay, but be back to be

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>back to work eventually. Yeah, and our colleagues over at

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence actually counted up the number of companies that

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>are talking about the coronavirus at the moment, and I

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think they counted something like nine trillion dollars worth or

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>companies accounting for nine trillion dollars worth of market cap

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have mentioned the coronavirus. But so far we only really

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have a handful of them who are issuing, you know,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the kind of warnings that we saw from Apple. Most

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of them are just talking about how it's too really

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to say that, you know, they'll get a direct hit

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but again, frankly, watching all of this uh go down

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in China and in Asia, I find it really difficult

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to see how global supply chains would not be impacted

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Right. So obviously, look, we don't know

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>what the markets are going to do, and nobody does,

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and we'll just see what happens. But I do think,

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and I did think, in light of that Apple warning,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we really need to dive deeper into the question of

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>supply chaine because so much of the world, so much

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so many companies that manufacture anything are exposed to China

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or East Asia in some way, and getting some sort

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of handle on what the risks are is key, and

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>what the risks of course to the China economy are

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be that's also key. Uh So that's what

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss today. Great, I think that's a good, good,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>good idea given the circumstances, let's do it all right.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>We have a really great guest. We've had him on

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast I think a couple of times before, at least once,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pretty sure twice. He's Dan Wang. He's an

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>analyst at gav coll dragon Omics. He's talking to us

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>from Beijing. He's a tech analyst really knows a lot

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about Chinese manufacturing, Chinese supply chains, the interaction with global tech,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he'll walk us through the risks posed by

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this virus, what we're seeing right now, as well as

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>other risks that maybe people aren't even thinking about right

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>now beyond the virus. So Dan, thank you very much

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thanks very much for having me on

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a gun. We've all seen the images of various cities

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>across China, either quarantined or de facto quarantine, empty streets

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. We know that there are numerous factories

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that have yet to reopen, and the schedule for that

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is remains unclear. We got the warning this week from

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple that this is going to be a hit to

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>their performance in the current quarter, So that's known. What

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to you, based on your work that you're doing looking

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at the industry, what you've seen, what really jumps out

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>at you in terms of the coronavirus hit to China's

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>industrial economy. So I think you've all lad by saying

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>within a really good way, by saying that basically the

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>market seems to be parting all of this off. I

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>think there could be an economics way of thinking about

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that in just uh, you know, if you assume that

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the virus is going to be mostly contained in this

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>current quarter, and there's some evidence that that could be

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the case, um, and that's the Chinese economy while basically

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bounced back into the normal previous trend growth, that will

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>be all expecting there will be some pent up demands

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that would be released later on, and you know that

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it will be a quite that quarter, but everything gets

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>back to trend. I think that case could be made

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>for the general macro economy, and that's why most people

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are not reacting very much. But in terms of electronics,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that story would not be so simple, and

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that's because electronics manufacturing is uh some involves most some

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most complex supply chain ever. Um. You need

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>basically a lot of different components in place in order

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to begin production. You need a thousand and one or

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>movie even a dollient and one components all at the

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>right place and all at the right time. And so

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have this delay, which hasn't really resolved itself yet,

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that can ripple on and cascade on throughout

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain all the way throughout the rest of

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the year. When it comes to basically the peak selling season,

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the Christmas season in the US. I think

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that will ripple on throughout the rest of the year.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>How much flexibility is there when it comes to altering

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>global supply chains for electronics companies, because you know, during

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the trade tensions, we saw a lot of people talking about, well,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll just move production from China to Vietnam or to

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>wherever there was that option. But in the current situation,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, first of all, you have to do

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it much much more quickly um And secondly, no one's

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>really sure how the virus is going to play out,

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>so you don't necessarily have the motivation to move production

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're thinking that it's going to end very very quickly.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So how easy is it to to shift supply chains

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for electronics companies? It is all pretty difficult. And we

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have not seen a great deal of production move overseas

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>um as a result of the US terristan Chinese production.

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>We have that certainly seen. Some have seen a few

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:47.599
<v Speaker 1>marginal products something like servers and something like wearables move overseas,

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>especially to Vietnam that's the most cited place, But in general,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been a wholesale movement of supply chains, and

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, you know, that's a pretty difficult thing

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for our companies to deal with on a short term.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>A manufacturer made a statement a while ago to say that,

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the terrorists are something that we can deal with.

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a cost increase, and that's something you have to

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we're into, but that is a predictable and something that

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we are able to resolve. Where he as Um, if

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 1>we do not have a lot of parts, as that

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus has threatened. Um, if we do not have workers

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in our factories because they just are not coming back,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>or we cannot pass these sanetary checks or quarantine checks

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>uh imposed by the local government, then we don't even

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>have the parts in place to engage in production. So

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this is like a much bigger deal. Talk to us

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about modern electronics supply chains, and

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, uh, there are an absolute marvel because

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>all these different companies come together and the logistics are

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>such that companies can hold very little inventory, and and

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the key part arrives just in time for the other

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>company or the other manufacturer to assemble it into something

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and then that goes into something else. And it's this

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of beautiful orchestra. Maybe when it's working, uh, when

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>it's working, ideally, talk to us about what you said

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>when you pointed out, look, it's not as simple as

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>just restarting this because it's so complex. It's not just

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a matter of Okay, the switch goes off for a

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>few weeks and then maybe you just turn it back on.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>What is that cast scading effect you're talking about? And

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>why is it not so simple to get it going

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>again once? Once? Uh, the you're ready to restart, Yeah,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. So basically, to really get production going

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>at the major manufacturer like fox Con, you need a

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of different components in place. So you need to

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have let's play something like the house and components in place.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>You need all of the labor in place. Also, to

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>begin stacking, you need to make sure that all of

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the components are um aliving on a daily basis that um,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of flow. You need to make

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sure that the components are of pretty good quality and

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>used to make sure that the labor is of good quality.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And right now, basically none of those conditions are holding.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So fox Con, it's not said, uh, very publicly very

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>much about how many workers have been able to return UM.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Our estimate is that something like half of China's UH

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>migrant labor force has UH allied back into other factories.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It's going to take up quite a while, probably in

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>March or early April, for everyone to get back into

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>their place. And so you know, I think that the

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>larger manufacturers are probably able to deal with a lot

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of these problems. So fox Con, in spite of a

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of bad press that has received over the last decade,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is still the best pain of the large manufacturers that

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>has the best working conditions. UM it is just really large.

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>It employees about a million people in China every year,

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the five other big contract manufacturers in Taiwan

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>UM employee about collectively UH five thousand, so about one

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>point five million people total working on UM, which is

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just directly on all types of electronics, but especially the smartphone.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And so basically Apple needs a lot of people in

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>place UM and it should be able to hire all

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of the people that it needs. But if fox Con

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is able to hire for everyone, because it is working

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for its largest customer, Apple, which has a lot of

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>cash to throw at these problems, UM, it might suck

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>away the labor from a lot of the sub assemblers,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>so the component makers that are supplying goods for Fox

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>con to put onto lines of people to actually produce.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, again, I want to emphasize that it

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>only takes a few missing parts for an entire supply

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>chain not to be functional, and so there will be

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these gaps out there, even for Apple.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple every year launches a new iPhone by Q four

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that is highly predictable. But even for Apple it is

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty hot affair. The supply chains are pretty tight

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and every week counts towards Q four, and not very

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>many firms have a few weeks of production to lose.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So my thought here is that even though large manufacturers

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>working for large consumer electronics companies like Apple are able

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to get through this, many smaller companies are going to

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more problems. Q one is typically the

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>time of the year where many consumer electronics companies um

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>engage in prototyping and developments with the UH with the manufacturers,

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and if the manufacturers just are have persistent labor shortages

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and supply shortages, are going to be dedicating all of

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>their people to their large customers like Apple, and I

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>think the the the case would be here that this

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>year that consumer electronics will be pretty that a lot

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of smaller companies won't even be able to launch the

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>products they had hope to launch by the Christmas season.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's if that's already probably the case, and it's going

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a stretch even for Apple. Could you talk

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit more about the labor shortage

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>idea and how the containment efforts that we've seen rolled

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>out across China at this point, how those actually impact

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the way the labor market functions. So China today has

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of restrictions in place in who can go where.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>When I leave my apartment in Beijing, I have to

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have flash this little card at these doormen who have

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>are newly set up to exit and enter the building. Um.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Every uh three blocks I go, there is someone um

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>taking my temperature to make sure that I'm all right.

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I'm struck by now is that the

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of state capacity that China has brought to bear

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on this problem is impressive and also frightening. That China

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>has been able to quarantine about sixteen million people around

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the population of Italy and the span of around twelve hours.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>My thought here is that China can mobilize it, that

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't more quickly than many countries can mobilize their armies,

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and so it is imposing many sorts of restrictions on labor.

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Even today, many UH migrants are not able to enter

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the large cities to actually begin a production. So a

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the public transportation in terms of trains are shut,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of roads are a lot of cars are

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not able to go on the road, and this is

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>creating a lot of problems for factories that really needed labor.

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think the biggest issue here is that there's

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>considerable and certainty about when this virus could be declared

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>eradicated and for everybody to feel faced to go back

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to other jobs. So these travel restrictions could evaporate, um

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say next week. Um there are tap could take

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>something longer, um let's say a month, But it will

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>take probably even longer for all of the flights to

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>resume and for all of the people to feel that

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they can safely travel about in China, and that will

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>create a lot of uncertainties. There is just a lot

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of human contacts feel required for to engage in production. Yeah.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we've seen anecdotally as

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>well is this notion of a sort of patchwork of

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>local and national rules. So, for instance, in order to

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>open up a factory, you know, local officials will require

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the factory owner to give face masks to all of

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>its workers. But of course there's a giant face masks shortage,

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and so there are an able to do that. And

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of chaos, let's say, in confusion

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to what the rules are and what

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they are not when it comes to work environments, right

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can trying to deal with that right around the holiday

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, the huge moves extraordinary, Dan. Is

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>there a compounding effect of the delays such that okay,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, I know that at one point the

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>goal was okay, reopened by February tenth. That didn't happen

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in many cases. But is there a sort of nonlinearity

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>where a week of delays does not just mean a

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>week of problems and each week the situation uh sort

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of snowballs and grows, uh you know, compounds or grows exponentially. Yes,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>there is that risk that there is a lot nonlinear

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this. UM. If you were expecting basically a

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of components to rise and a few don't, then UM,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of manufacturers could be quite stuck. And for

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturer like Fox cons who are at the end

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of a supply chain basically waiting for everybody to send

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>everything through, UM, they don't necessarily have great visibility into

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>which little part they require. That just doesn't necessarily make

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.959
<v Speaker 1>it so UM. Every time there's an earthquake in Japan,

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>UM reminds us. The reminds the world about how dependent

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the entire world is on perhaps a particular factory making

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a particular widget, and so UM, these things can be

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit unpredictable. But I think the the I

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>think the large companies like Apple realize that at this point,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think everybody is going to be in a

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>scramble in the coming weeks to really understand how deep

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the supply chains are. Another issue for Apple right now

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is that Apple sends a lot of engineers from its

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>headquarters in Cupertino to come over to China and then

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>actually monitor a station. These engineers and monitor the progress

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of these component makers. Have quality assurance and product development purposes.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of those flights are canceled, and I expect

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is only able to send a trickle of

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>staff over to China to actually monitor all of that production.

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of these worsts out there.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan talk to us a little bit about I guess

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the big picture, long term impact when it comes to

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>China's technology ambition. So I think the first time we

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>had you on this podcast was to talk about the

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>MAIDE in China initiative, where China is really trying to

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>bulk up its own technology expertise. Would you expect something

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like the coronavirus outbreak to have a long term impact

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>on those efforts? Certainly, I think it will push greater

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>geographic diversity. I think that um, the the the events

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of the last two years have shown that companies are

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>highly dependent on China for our produc ships. I think

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>many companies are thinking more deeply about what geographic diversity

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>actually means. So previously we we thought that geographic diversity,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>um you know, it's important in case there's a flood

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>or an earthquake, which are fairly localized events, and so

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to basically have a more robust supply chain,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you should locate a lot of your factories just geographically

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>quite far away from each other. And I think the

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>events at least of the last year have shown that

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>when President Trump has imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, but

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a political element, So even if you produced

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in northern China and then southeastern China, you may necessarily

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you might still be hit by a lot of these

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>name risks. Now whether and how it impacts China's technology development,

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it is going to make it a little

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more difficult for China to do everything that I

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>would like. Um, at the very least, it is turning

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on some foreigners and ex pats out off the idea

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of living for most of the time in places like Baching,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>China Hi, and I think that will be at least

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a loss of potential talents that Chinese firms are able

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to hire. Dan I think, uh, that's a great opportunity

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of segue into another another risk factor facing

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Chinese manufacturing, Chinese supply chain, because it was just a

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>few months ago that there was this thought that Okay,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the big risk was just on the trade front. That

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to have cleared up. They got the Phase one deal.

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Now suddenly there's this which is uh, you know, as

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>your point, could potentially change everything, or at least change

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>really changed the way companies around the world think about

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>their exposure to China. But as you point out, and

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>as you've been writing, the coronavirus is really not the

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>only major threat to UH Chinese supply, Chaine Chinese manufacturing,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and that there's an another thing lurking out there that

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>people need to pay attention to. So what is that?

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So that is the um the current US policy on

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>how to restrict technology flows to China, and so they're

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>as part of the trade war. There has also been

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a tech war hovering in the background

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of US policy action. I think the first

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>major shot of that was last year or or or

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>almost a year and a half ago now when President

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration designated ETE to something called the Denied Person's List,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>which more or less cut off vts entire ability to

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>procure from American technology, especially semiconductors, And so that has

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>brought the firm to its kneed, almost the virtual bankruptcy

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>until Presidency and Trump reached a political solution to save

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the company. There has been this element covering the background

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of the US exercising investment restriction on the ability of

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>foreigners to invest in US firms, especially technology firms. There

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a process initiated by the Department of Justice

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to scrutinize Chinese actions much more closely in terms of

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>treats ecretments, appropriation, but also Chinese activities, and say university

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is working with certain professors, and then it US also

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>manifested in specifically this issue of AWE becoming a large

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>player in the tech world. And then the administration is

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking much more carefully now about how to deny products

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>American products to a firm that it considers a national

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>security threat. What would be the impact on China's tech

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>industry if the US does actually go through UM with

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things that it's threatening, and what

0:23:55.119 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>options does China have to offset the impact of those curves.

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the issue right now for China is to

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to be Americanized supply chain. So UM again,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of a supply chain story in which

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the lack of a few components can really defeat system.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you take a look at your smartphone and

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>has something like fifteen hundred different components in it, and

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>if you lack even through your four different components, the

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>whole system might be defeated. So your phone needs, for example,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a battery, it needs a process or needs memory chips,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and it needs a screen. And if you don't have these,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>then you don't really have a phone. And given that

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the US has figured out that it is almost a

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>monopolis on very important technologies, especially the semiconductor and by

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>denying U S semiconductors to particular firms of previously EPs

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>figured out, it can really cripple China technology advancement. Now

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I take the view that over the long term, China,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>now that has realized it is very dependent on US technologies,

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it should be able to figure out a lot of

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>long technologies. UM. In turn, so UM, it's difficult to

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>name in history a country that has monopolized the key

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>technology over the long term. So in the eighteenth century,

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>when the UK was the leading industrial power at the time,

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and when they tried to export control certain textile mills

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and enginery to the US rising power, certain people just

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>memorize a bunch of mill design gone into a ship

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and then went to the US. So one of these

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>people is Samuel Slater, who's known in the UK as

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>later the Treator and states side as the father of

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the US Industrial Revolution. A lot of knowledge just consists

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in people's heads, uh, and transfers. I used to working

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. The same that we had there was that

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>knowledge travels that has bit of beer beer copy bit

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>for poison. And so long as you can just talk

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>through these sort of ing um and a lot of

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>technology is able to travel. The Chinese don't have to

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>invent anything to novo um. They only have to replicate

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>existing processes. But that is still a pretty big chal um.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>The US is basically a monopolist and very many key

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>semic cocceptor of technologies, including the capital equipment to actually

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>advocate the sety conductors and also in things like aviation

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>engines in which China is also kind of catch up.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And so this is why there has been a pretty

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>active debate in the White House on how to actually

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>restrict a lot more technologies to China while also being

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>able to protect the ability of US firms to sell

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>goods to their largest markets and then also generate the

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>revenue for greater R and D. It's so interesting, uh,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>just sort of thinking about the symmetry or the asymmetry

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or I guess it's the symmetry of the needs and

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>priorities of China when it comes to trade, and the

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>needs and priorities of the U S when it comes

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to trade. Obviously, we know President Trump feels that they

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he would like to bring back jobs from China, and

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>though maybe you know, it's debatable whether anything that's been

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>done so far I would really accomplish that. Obviously that

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was a key driving aspect of his campaign and his

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>message and so forth. And then you have the Chinese

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>economy and the Chinese priorities that you've talked to us

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast before, and it's not about jobs per se.

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>It's about the over alliance and uh, you know, winning

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>back the tech tech war against uh, the US. So

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's really sort of the same thing in a sense

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of both just wanting to not need the other. Yeah,

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So both countries are clients to reach the

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>purpose serves the technology, which is right now mostly an

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>American affair, and the Chinese also wanting many of the

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>same things. So I guess then the question is, you know,

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I've see on the first half of the conversation you

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Okay, US companies are going to think

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>about geographic diversity for manufacturing. And of course during the

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>trade war, we heard a lot about Vietnam. But there's

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>really no country immediately that can just suddenly absorb a

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>huge influx of new demand for manufacturing. I mean, there's

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just all kinds of things that need to go into that.

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you just build a fox Con in

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam overnight, or a fox Con in Brazil overnight or

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Who into the race, Like, how long,

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>UH say, will it take for China to accomplish what

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it needs on sort of, you know, being able to

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>design some of its own semiconductors so that it can

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>wean itself off of US tech. That's a great question

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it in terms of a race, and I

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to think that the US has the advantage here.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It is a lot more straightforward for uh Apple to

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>move most of its supply chain out of China uh

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and into let's say, a mix of places that include India, Brazil,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in Vietnam. Then it is for China to figure out semiconductors,

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>which are the most complex technologies in the world. When

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think of something like a semi conductor manufacturing equipment

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>from a firm like an smel. Basically, these pieces of

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>machinery are about as large as buses. Each machine costs

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred million US dollars UM and you're really

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>playing with light and physics and math at that point.

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like a pure science affair, and the Chinese

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just have not had enough experience really doing a lot

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of these things. Now they're the The question that becomes

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>when the US exercises these ex core control actions on China,

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>does it accelerate Chinese technology development or does it are

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>really crippled? Right? I think odd all over the long

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>term it should still the accelerating China technology development. So

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>UM right now, the you know, the Chinese have always

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>had a program to replace its own internal uh, the

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>technologies that it uses with Chinese made equipment. Part of

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that has that has always been a program and has

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhat accelerated UM in after the sting revelations of UM

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>different spying, and I think the Chinese now are m

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the difference in the last two years is

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is no longer a whimsical government effort which

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>has never really been terribly successful in the past. Now

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this has led much more by private companies, by firms

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like um Ali Baba or ten Signs or High Division

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or sell Me that are asking themselves, can I depend

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on American supply such that I'm willing to build off

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>my build my technology off in American stack for the

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>next ten years and UM, they are becoming a little

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more hesitant to do something like that. UM, and

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so they are taking the lead and trying to develop

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's there more homeground, more politically dependable components. Uh. So, Dan,

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just to sum it all up, I'm kind of curious

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to get some of your personal observations about the situation

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. What has surprised you about how the

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus or the containment efforts around the coronavirus have impacted

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>either the tech industry or the electronics industry. What was

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>most surprising. I think the speed and scale of the

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>payment effort. I think after Woohim was quarantined, um first

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of all, they quarantined Wolhi really quickly, and basically there

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>has been a really enormous demonstration of state uh power

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>here and state compa sit here, and I think are

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>now trying to figure out given that there are some

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>encouraging signs that the virus is abating. Um. The number

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of infections x Hube has been in the double digits

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think for the last three days, meaning that the

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>epidemic seems to be mostly contained in in Hube and Wolheim.

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And as a question now is really how to restart

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy. So they have been really good at making

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>sure that people are in their place and that these

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>states has the ability to quarantine very many people. UM.

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Now I think the interesting a lot points to watch

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is how quickly they can reverse a lot of these

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>restrictions to uh, well everyone's fears and then really restart

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy because a lot of things are just halted. Now. Well, Dan,

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate you joining us. Always love chatting with you,

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and we should probably you know, do one again, maybe

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in three months or six month and just sort of

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>reassess where things are on the supply chain and the

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>degree to which the industrial economy has been able to

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>come back. But Dan, thank you, and hope everything returns

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to some semblance of normalcy fairly soon. Thanks very much,

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. Dan, that's really good. So Joe, I

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>found that conversation really really interesting. It's nice to dig

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>deep into the supply chain issue. And I do think

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be a sense out there that they

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>can be very flexible and they can be reoriented as needed.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>But as Dan pointed out, they they're actually quite complex

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and it takes time to move these things. Now. There

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are so many things that he pointed out that I

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hadn't seen anyone discuss before thinking about. So, for example, okay,

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Christmas shopping or holiday electronics sales, that seems like a

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>long time from now. But if the basic prototyping of

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of any products is Q one and

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>QN is looking like for sure a total disaster, then okay,

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>even if there is a big economic rebound in Q two,

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>which we don't know for sure yet, but even if

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>there is, there will be inevitably this cascading effect that

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>last at least through the year, and that to some

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>extent there's no getting back this lost time. Yeah, And

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I've been thinking about is we you know,

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we were just speaking about the production side of things,

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>but you would think that the coronavirus outbreak is going

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to end up having a very very large impact on

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>consumption as well. So China is basically in for both

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a supply and demand shock to its economy, And I

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>also wonder when it comes to the consumption decline, how

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 1>long is that going to last and is it going

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to be similar like supply chains and that it takes

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>a while to get back to normal. You know, the

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government has spent so long, uh telling people that

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they really need to make efforts to contain the virus,

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to stay at home. Is it going to

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>be easy for them to lift those and suddenly tell everyone, Oh,

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>everything is back to normal, you don't need to worry anymore.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>To Dan's point in the last question, yeah, totally. Because

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's obviously there's no cure. There's no vaccine

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that we have or anything like that yet. So to

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>declare victory over the virus or to declare that it's

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>been eradicated seems like an extremely difficult thing. And even

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>after you know, people start coming back to work, it

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>seems plausible that fear of a new outbreak, or fear

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>just one person having it and spreading into a new

0:35:55.040 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>super spreader situation could really change how people behave at

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>least for quite some time after, you know, after whatever

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of any sort of imminent resume, resumption

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>of normal life, it kind of seems implausible. There's so

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>much going on. It's such an interesting story and really

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of unprecedented in many ways. So what a fascinating

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>topic to talk about. Hearing Dan talk about how there's

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>someone who checks um checks his temperature literally every three

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>blocks and as he pointed out, the state capacity required

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>simply to set that up. I mean, it's just extraordinary

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to think about what they what has been done already. Yeah,

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it in Hong Kong as well, though not

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>quite on that scale, but certainly to get into the

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>major office buildings at the moment, you have to get

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>your temperature taken, so it's a big change. This has

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracey Alloway.

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Chase the Alloway,

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>at the Stalwart. And you should follow our producer on Twitter,

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson, as well as

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levie at Francesca Today

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of the Bloomberg Podcasts, under the

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>handle at podcast, Thanks for listening.