WEBVTT - Burned from the Mind’s Eye, Part 1

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, you, welcome to

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's October. So we're continuing

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>with our Halloween spooky, ghostly kind of theme, and today

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to explore a somewhat ghostly topic that ties

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>into neuroscience to stuff we've talked about recently on the

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Invention podcast with the history of photography. But before we

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>get into that, I wanted to start with a question

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of orient us here, and that question is,

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>what is it that makes somebody skilled at an art

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like realistic drawing or realistic sculpture. I should say, by

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the way, I am not skilled at this at all.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I cannot draw realistically for the life of me. In fact,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>when I tried to draw pictures of people, it's the

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a source of great amusement to Rachel. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the same way. I can. I can draw

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a pretty mean goblin, but um, I can't really draw

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a human. My my son, who seven, is already a

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>better that better artist when it comes to depicting actual

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>human beings than I. But but obviously so, a huge

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>part of what's going on here is is practice, right,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you gotta learn techniques. But another part of this I

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>think could just be thought of as some kind of

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>motor power of translation. Like how do you take an

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>image represented in your brain and it's in your brain

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>either way, whether you're currently looking at it or calling

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up out of a memory or an imagination. Either way,

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the image is coming from your brain, and then it's

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>being translated somehow through a series of hand motions into

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a physical object in the world, whether that's a sculpture, painting,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>or drawing. Like, there's some kind of skill there that

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I think remains ineffable to us. It's mysterious. Sometimes it's

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>even kind of spooky because we don't understand what's happening

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>with that translate process. But what if there were no

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>translation process? What if there were no way for clumsy

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>arms and hands and failures of technique to impede the

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>physical manifestation of what you've got in your mind's I

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>what if we could just project the objects of the

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye directly onto the physical world. Would such a

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>thing be possible, and if so, would such a power

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>be in a way terrifying, sort of godlike in the

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>worst and most ancient sense. Ah, and here you're getting

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>into the uh, the Halloween aspects of this topic. This

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>is the reason that we have decided to approach this

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>during the month of October, exactly because this power does

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>show up in horror fiction. One place that you might

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>have encountered it is in the books or the movies. Uh.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>There have been several different series at this point, but

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>The Ring, the story of The Ring, the the scary

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>ghost girl who can print media with her brain. You

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>can psychically print images onto photographs or onto the wall

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of a barn, or onto a videotape. She can just

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>make a videotape without filming it, just straight out of

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>her mind's eye. Of course, this is played up for

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>horror in the film, and I I sort of stand

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>by taking it in that direction. I think if anybody

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>actually had this power, it would be horrifying, and it

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>would be it would be a little irritating to everyone

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>who's has put a lot of time and effort into

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>honing their craft. Right. Um, so it's possible. You're you're

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>familiar with The Ring via Gore Rabinski's two thousand and

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>two remake The Ring. This is where I saw it

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>for the first time too, but you also may have

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>seen it by watching the original Japanese horror film directed

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by Hideo Nakata. This came out, and I severely hope

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that if you, if you did see the original Japanese

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>version back in the late nineties, you watched it on

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a crumb a dubbed VH tape because that would be

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>most appropriate, right, because either way, if you haven't seen

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the movies or read see The original Japanese movie was

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>also based on a book by by Koji Suzuki, but

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in any case, the story is about a cursed videotape

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that is made by this ghost girl. She uses the

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>psychic power of projecting her thoughts directly onto media to

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>make a videotape that kills the people who watch it. Yeah,

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a curse video tape containing disturbing It is basically a disturbing,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>surrealistic art video kills you in seven days. So there's

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of a uh what do you call it in

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>medicinal terms? Uh? Delayed react effects effects. Uh. It takes

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that along to work through your system, you know, time

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to release. Sometimes artists like that it's time released. You go,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to see it at the museum, and you're like,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what what I how I feel

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>about this or or you know, how I think about

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this piece and how it relates to me, and then

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>seven days later it kicks in and you die with

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a weird look kind of fist. But yeah, this is

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>basically an update of a very old notion, right of

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a haunted object, or of haunted media. Only instead of

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>a dark and magical book, instead of something like you know,

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the Necronomicon or you know the Book of sand or

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>any of these other treatments, we have a dark and

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>magical video recording and it unleashes a world of terror

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and death. It's an inherently compelling idea. In horror, I

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>think actually some piece of media, whether it's a book

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or now a movie, I think there there's some There

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>are Stephen King's story with like a painting that kills

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you or something. There's the representage horror, and it's one

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of one of King's best short stories. I highly recommend.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Maybe that is what I was thinking of.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That is a fantastic story. Um, but yeah, I mean,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously the idea of like a a work of art

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>or something that cannot be experienced without cursing or killing you. Yeah,

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that's scary. It's also fertile ground for any kind of

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>metaphor that the artist wants to sew about, you know,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>about art itself. And and art does have an effect

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>on us. I mean there's an old episode of Stuff

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind where Julie and I discussed Stendahl

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>syndrome and some of its related uh alleged syndromes. You know,

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it deals with the reality that, yes, sometimes great works

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of art, uh, you know, with great works of art

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>with appropriate priming, uh can overwhelm us, can have a

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>physical reaction on us. So uh, you know, it's it's

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>not unrealistic. Um. Yeah, you know. I want to say

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>about the gor Verbinsky remake of The Ring, Well, I

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>don't inherently love the idea of just like American remakes

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.119
<v Speaker 1>of foreign films just to sort of americanize it because

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it had only been like a few years since the

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>original film had been made at that point, right, and

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they americanized the heck out of exactly. But at the

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>same time, one thing I will defend about it is

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a very um visually imaginative film, Like it's

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>got great creepy abstract imagery in it. Oh yeah, great,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>great visuals, great performances, uh in, wonderful special effects. Uh

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>That remake I remember really had an effect on me.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Was the last time a horror film like made me

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>sleep with the lights on? Uh? So I look back

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>fondly on it for that reason. However, I have to

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>say certain aspects of the film stuck with me and

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>others I kind of forgot about. Like some of you

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>might be like, oh, yeah, I guess that girl did

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>write video tapes with her mind like that I kind

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of forgot about. I also kind of forgot that it

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>had this that it's essentially adoption sploitation horror not the

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>only country, yeah, basically, yeah, basically because the whole idea

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is that this this couple that adopts this child, and

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the child is troubled, and I forgot that she was adopted. Yeah.

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I have a very uh queasy attitude

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>towards that kind of horror at this point in my life.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>For sure, totally. But but still, those are the things

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I tend to forget about it. I remember, you know,

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>those scenes with Samara um iimbing out of the television

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>with the creepy walk where they think they filmed her

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>backwards and then made it go forwards. I remember, I

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>think Hans Zimmer did the music, and it's very effective

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>horror music. Um. And then on and then on to

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the On top of that, you have some great performances. Uh.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever see the sequel? I didn't spoil it all.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw it in the theater even um and I

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>don't recommend it, but but no, it's a it is

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a film that is still both films are considered classics

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in their own way, and I think they earned that

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that reputation just if nothing else, by just scaring us

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>so terribly and really connecting with our relationship with media.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And at that time it was it was dealing with

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the VHS and uh and and and how we were

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>connecting with with this kind of you know, physical media.

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And I should say also you know, getting into that

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>idea of finding weird things, finding weird footage. And at

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that point it was most of us through like tape

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>trading or I guess to a certain extent, downloads, but

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I definitely remember, uh, you know, ordering up like weird

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>dubs of the Japanese laser disc of say um El

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Topo or Holy Mountain, and there was this weird you know,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like you do. You have not really sure exactly how

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this got to you. You know, what are the hands

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>that dubbed it from this format to this format and

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>then re dubbed it here and then finally it's in

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>my hands. I think that is actually one of my

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite types of story forms for horror is the the

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>creepy found piece of media. I can remember one of

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>my favorite horror short stories I've read in a long

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>time was won by Laird Baron. I think it's called

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Mysterium Tremendum, where the narrator of the story you just

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>finds this travel guide and I think some weird use

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>bookstore or something, but it turns out to be a

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>nefarious sort of magic travel guide that leads to very

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>dark places. So yeah, I love that nowadays though, and

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they do this so I think maybe they

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>did this in one of the recent Ring movies. It's like,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially it's gotta be on YouTube, which takes the punch

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>out of it because it's like you have the dark media,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but then the dark media is on an even more

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>um deplorable social media you know, bummer format. But it

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>also takes away the ironic distance that makes the horror

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>fun because YouTube just will melt your brain and kill you.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't, it doesn't need any like horror upgrades. The real,

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>actual YouTube is just waiting to destroy you at the moment. Yeah,

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>though it is, it is kind of comforting to think

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that that all the commentators at the bottom of the

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Ring video, then YouTube died seven days later. So, like

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy says, w TF is disreal? Yes, is real.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>As long as we're just talking about the Ring, though,

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the American remake, we should point out again that that

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>cast is tremendous. Um talking about Samara. Her mom is

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>played by Shannon cochrane who plays who played Pam's mother

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Office, and then her father is played by

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Brian Cox, the legendary Brian Cox. Brian Cox of my

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite actors of all time. He he kind of makes

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the movie and in the the the the young actor

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>playing Samara herself. I don't know if we said Samara

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is the ghost Girl, the ghost Girl, she's Samara and

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the American version, and she's Sadako in the Japanese version,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so that the name changes. But anyway, in the in

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the in the remake Devey case Chase, I hope I'm

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>saying her name right. Uh. This actor played Samara, and

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>she also voiced Lilo in Lilo and Stitching, the Disney

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>film about the you know, the the alien visiting Hawaii.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Going to her IMDb page is hilarious because I found

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>out she also is the girl in the Sparkle Dance

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Troupe in Donnie Dark. And she's the voice of the

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>main character in the in the English dub of Spirited Away. Ah. Yeah,

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the Minazaki film great. Okay, So, first of all, the

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>idea that Samara can create a surrealistic film that she

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>can pour like all the the nihilistic, misanthropic visions in

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>her head into a videotape and make it so potent

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that it can kill people, either just through the sheer

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>power of the art or you know, probably through some

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of supernatural um you know whatever. Uh. That's a

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>really cool trick and one that I would think could

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have been put to much more profitable use. Um, Like,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>why isn't there a sequel where like the U. S

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Military ends up acquiring Samara, Like that would be great

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because since she ends up killing all the like the

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>evil mk Ultra gate dudes, it basically rights itself. But

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of a crossover with The Ring and Stranger Things

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>would have been yea. Now to to go a little deeper, though,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think in a way this concept really really works though,

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you can think of any creative endeavor, especially filmmaking,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>as an attempt to bring that ideal image, that mental

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>image in your head into the world, and of course,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for a number of reasons, we generally don't succeed in

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>pulling that off. And part of the reason, of course,

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>is that is that the idea in our mind is

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>rarely as fully formed as we think it is. I

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>think that's exactly right. I mean an experience so I

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely have when writing. And I think you've said you

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>have this before, is I don't necessarily know what I'm

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>going to write until I start writing, Like if I'm

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>writing a scene in fiction, you know, like that it's

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the process of writing that helps bring out the content. Yeah, exactly. Uh,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know in other issues coming to play as well,

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>in the final version perhaps feels a bit lacking, So

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can forgive a lot of us if

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>we we we wonder, you know, imagine how perfect it

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>would it would have been if you've been able to

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>simply beam your vision directly onto a video tape. You

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about casting it where you're gonna

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>film all your weird art, film your artifacts. How are

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you going to get that that chair to go upside down? No,

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you can just beam it directly onto the onto the

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>tape um. And so maybe the power then of your

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>vision would be so pure and uncut that it would

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>just literally slay people. Well, I like that, But on

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, I mean, I think it's sort of

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to imagine. This highlights the unreality of what it

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>is you're trying to imagine. I mean, I feel like

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>our image of the thing we want to create is

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>never really fully formed, even when it seems like it is.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if even people who have extremely vivid mental

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>imagery can actually see a full completed painting that they

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't finished painting yet, uh, and and not just sort

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of like see glimpses of little bits of color and

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>shape that that ultimately add up to something concrete and

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>finalized once you've you know, translated it through your hand

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>movements into that painting. I kind of doubt that people

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>can actually see a full painting that they haven't painted yet, right,

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And maybe we may be part of his linguistic you know,

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like we we might tend to say a sculptor might say,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I see the horse trapped in this block, and I

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>wish to free it. I'm just going to remove all

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the pieces around the finished piece that I envisioned within it,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>within reality. It's more like I see the inspiration for

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I am going to create. Yeah, a

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of fuzzy, low resolution suggestion of the thing that

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you will create. Yeah. And then comes the hard work.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Then comes the talent, uh, and the skill. One more

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>one more thing about the ring, and then I'll I'll

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>mostly let it go. But ultimately, what is the message

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of this film. It's It's seen because basically the whole

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>plot is, oh, this these tapes are killing people. Why

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is it killing people? Oh, it's because of this little

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>girl that died. And then they go on this question like, oh,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>well we can set her spirit free, she'll be happy

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and everyone will be saved. And then you realize, oh, no,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't work, because she can't be saved. She's just

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>evil to the core, and everybody's gonna keep on dying, right, Well,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but they do figure out a way to get around

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the curse, which is just keep passing it, keeps spreading it.

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So right, if you spread the curse to more people,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>she won't kill you. Yeah, when basically the plot of

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of it follows as well, right, But but ultimately in

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Ring, well you only get temporarily spirit and it follows, right,

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But then I think in the Ring they acknowledge what

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>happens when like you know, that did it might come

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>back to them as well. But maybe that's in the sequels. No, No,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that was it was kind of at least

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>hinted at in the first book. Yeah, I don't really

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>don't trying to think about the sequels. But but ultimately,

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>like the messages, don't try to help people, don't try

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and fix the world like everybody's gonna do. That's so

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>just so bleak and nihilistic. Maybe it's just too bleak

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and nihilistic for me now. It's the kind of thing

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I would have loved when I was younger. But but yeah,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that's such a harsh way to land it. Isn't it. Yeah, Um,

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not an inspiring story on close examination. But but

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I do still stand by a lot of the visual

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>imagery in the film, which I think holds up really well.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And Brian Cox is just an absolute treat absolutely. All Right,

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break when we come back.

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>We're going to move on from just discussing the ring

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in general, and we're going to discuss this this thing

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that she is supposed to do, this idea that a

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>mind could somehow imprint an image on something or in

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>something or in like on tape or on film. Uh.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's gonna be one of these top that I

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>think you know, draws in from a number of past

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>episodes of both stuff to blow your mind and invention.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank alright, we're back. So we're exploring the topic of

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>psychic photography, or just generally being able to print the

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye into some manifestation in the physical world without

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>going through any kind of normal motor translation process like

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>drawing with your hand or explaining a mental image with

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>your mouth, just printing the mind's eye directly onto film

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or onto a piece of paper. Yes, and this is

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a topic that if you're if you're already thinking, well,

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that just sounds silly. Um, we'll hang with us, because

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, ultimately, I mean, I think it's pretty safe

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to say this is not actually occurring, This is not

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>a power that human beings actually have. But but by

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at it and considering, like how we get to

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this point of thinking that it's possible in some cases,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, what it reveals as about our relationship

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>with our own mind and considerations of our own mind

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and mental states, as well as our understanding of photography itself. Yeah,

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this episode made me keep thinking back to the series

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on photography that we did on our other podcast, Invention,

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which if you're not subscribed yet, go subscribe to Invention.

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's a journey through human techno history. And

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, we did a whole series on photography, also

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff before photography, like the camera obscura, and then also

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on motion picture technology afterwards. And really, you know, we can't,

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, overstate the degree to which photography change

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. It changed the way we thought about the world,

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>how we thought about ourselves. It gave us new metaphors

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>for uh, you know, thinking about our own minds and

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>how we're perceiving the world and uh also arguably made

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the modern celebrity possible. Uh So we can lay that

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>crime at its feet as well, but it also lent

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>itself well to a number of pseudo scientific ideas and

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately downright occult notions about what photography was and what

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it might capture. Well. Sure, because if you are, say,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is adamant that there is a type of

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>reality that we can't normally see, a very commonplace to

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>go to try to find bits of evidence of that

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>reality that we can't normally see is some kind of

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>objective recorded media. I mean, I think about the people

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>who do e VP ghost recordings electronic voice phenomena. Again,

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that I think is real evidence

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of ghosts, but a lot of people think, Okay, you know,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I take my tape recorder to a haunted graveyard and

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I just leave it going, and then I play it

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>back and in through the static and the rustling in

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the wind, I hear voices saying things. If I can

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be psychological for a minute, I think what's mostly going

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>on is that drawing from objective recording media like that

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>allows people to generate the noise into which they can

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>read a signal, yes, And of course photogra raphe when

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it was new, provided a whole new way of doing

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>something like this, right, And then other technologies that were

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>coming out around, you know, in the same era, we

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>also had the X ray, which we also have an

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>episode of Invention about which deals with invisible um, you

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>know processes, you know, invisible rays, an invisible world and

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and also was a big game changer and how we

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>we thought about reality. Sure, so I was reading a

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>little more about this, and I ran across a two

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand five book titled The Perfect Medium by Shiro at

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>All and it it gets into the intersections between the

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>occult and photography, which are numerous, numerous, but the author's

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>point out that they generally they generally fall into three categories.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>First of all, photographs of spirits, in which a spirit

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>entity shows up in the photograph. I think we awph

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>movie with the examples of this, uh uh. And then

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>another is photographs of mediums in which the spirit medium,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a you know, human like as someone who's

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>leading a seance or something, is doing something supernatural. Okay,

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so it might be like a photograph that shows that

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>during a seance, this medium was levitating, or that this

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>medium during some kind of session, was generating ectoplasm, right,

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's the next one, photographs of fluids And and

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this one is interesting because the obvious subject matter here

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is exoplasm, some weird substance emerging from the individual, and

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in reality it's generally wet sheep's cloth or something like that. Uh.

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's easy to just think of this as ghost

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>slime and a ghostbuster's fashion. Maybe we should explain ectoplasm

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more so. It was this phenomenon

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>where a medium would claim that they can generate some

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of physical manifestation of the spirit world that shows

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.239
<v Speaker 1>up when you take a picture of them in the dark. Maybe, uh,

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and it would yeah, so it would look like some

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird cloth or slime beside their head or

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on their body, like like a big like mucus something

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like don't even generally it just looks like some it

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a weird mucacy cloth they got slimed. Yeah, slimber exactly.

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's where that comes from. But it's also

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit more more complex in the society. You know

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that the fluids in these photographs as sharrow and I'll

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>point out, you know, it's dealing with this the idea

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're capturing a sense of the vital force, the soul,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the thoughts, feelings, dreams, etcetera. All of this directly captured

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on a photographic plate without the use of a camera

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>in some cases. So it has a strong connection to

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>what was going on at the time and observation of

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>X rays and radioactivity. They point out that in France,

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>so Luis darg and others quote, sought to photograph their

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>own vital energy or thoughts simply by placing their fingers

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or foreheads on the censusized plate, despite numerous refutations by

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>scientists who demonstrated that the traces thus obtained were no

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>more than photographic artifacts arising out of the experimental conditions themselves.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Attempts to record human fluids continued throughout the twentieth century,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and so this these fluids would not just be like

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>blood or something. That would be these the spiritual fluids. Yeah,

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it gets beyond just like mere fluids and into

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>also things like horrors. Um. So in other words, and

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the people still do photographing as absolutely, that's like big business. Yeah,

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, in other words, in the midst of

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>all this what was essentially future shock, you know, uh

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 1>at this emerging technology and the hidden worlds exposed through

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>X rays. This idea of capturing thoughts through photography carried

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of weight, no matter what the science

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>said and is still saying about it. So the author's

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>point to to uh to a couple of examples, one

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of which is the work of Simion Kurlean in the

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forties. Uh. Kurlean, of course, is where we get

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Kurlean photography. He lived nineteen seventy eight, and it's the

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>process in which an image is obtained by the application

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of a high frequency electric field to an object so

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that it radiates a characteristic pattern of luminescence that is

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>recorded on photographic film. And it ultimately has to do

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with moisture and other factors. But but claims were made

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that it captured some aspect of an individual's health, their essence,

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>or their vital bodily energy. So there's some kind of

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>like invisible quality they have this showing up when you

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>run this electric current and take a picture, right, And

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still factors into some sort of to

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>some like alternative like new age of systems, and I'm

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>not saying there's anything wrong with that. I mean, it's

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you're you're dealing with something that is perhaps a

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>a what you know, a supernatural interpretation of some visual

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>data that you've created, which you know, as long as

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not not you know, claiming that it's scientific, I

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>guess you know, go for it. Um. It just falls

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>under the domain of of of of spiritualism and religion.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>They also point to a man by the name of

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>ted Sirius, who we will come back to in a bit. Yes,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>because we before we get to Sirius, we have to

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>explore the origins of this very act that Samara in

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ring is Uh is engaging in. UH, this idea

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that human beings are capable not only of photography, which

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>photography in and of itself is an amazing accomplishment. This

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this this much seemed magic when it was new. Oh, absolutely,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>because at least we discussed an invention. You know. It's

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's this perfect convergence of of optical expertise and chemical

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>expertise and artistic expertise, all of it coming together in

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this new way of of of of dealing with the

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>visual world. Um. But then we have this added idea

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that people can also engage in thought ptography, right thoughtography. Uh,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes by several names, now psychic photography maybe thoughtography,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's modern origins are I think you could you

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>could argue that they are in Japan. So I want

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a researcher named Fukuai Tomokuchi, who is

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese psychologist who lived from eighteen sixty nine to

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty two. He was educated at Tokyo Imperial University

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen nineties. He studied in their philosophy department.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Because this would have been when psychology was brand new.

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>There weren't like psychology departments you know at there would

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have been many if there were any at the time,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and he received his PhD after doing a dissertation on hypnotism.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And according to the History of Japanese Psychology by Brian J. McVeigh,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>which is my source on most of this about Fukarai,

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Fukarai played an important role in introducing the work of

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the pioneering American psychologist William James to Japanese scholars. Of course,

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>William James would have been a contemporary of fukurais James

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Is The Principles of Psychology came out in eighteen ninety

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and his lectures which became the Varieties of Religious Experience,

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>which we've talked about a number of times on the show.

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.479
<v Speaker 1>That those happened around nineteen o one and nineteen o two,

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, But so this would have been around the

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>same time that Fukarai was working and UH and doing

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>his dissertation and doing his early research. And now, according

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to McVeigh, Fukarai also published work on the subject of education,

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and he became a lecturer and an associate professor in

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the field of abnormal psychology, which today we would just

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>call the study of mental illnesses. And he so he

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was a lecturer at Tokyo Imperial University on these subjects.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But from here his interests apparently took a turn for

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the paranormal. So, beginning sometime around nineteen ten, Fukarai became

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>extremely interested in spiritualism, especially in the subject of clairvoyance. Now,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of course, we should note that he would not have

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>been alone in this at the time. Interest in spiritualism, mediums,

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>and the paranormal enjoyed extreme popularity and elite circles all

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world at this time now Today, clairvoyance is

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>usually understood to be a special kind of psychic power.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Common definition of it is quote the supposed faculty of

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>perceiving things or events in the future or beyond normal

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>sensory contact. Now, like a lot of psychic concepts, I

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>see clairvoyance invoked to refer to sort of a broad

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 1>range of things. So I think it can include all

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>manner of cases of remote viewing. So like seeing things

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that are behind physical barriers. You know, you shouldn't be

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>able to see through the closed door into the next room,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>but you can seeing things that are far away, you know,

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe seeing things that are happening in another country, seeing

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>things that are separated in time, in the future or

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the past. Uh. And sometimes, but less often, seeing things

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that can't normally be seen at all, such as spiritual

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>essences or the contents of other people's thoughts, or otherwise

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>having knowledge that you just couldn't acquire by normal means. Now,

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's worth noting that all of these things

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>as psychic phenomenon, they are basically exaggerations of things that

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the human mind does through um, you know, through a

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>mental time travel, for instance, imagining what the future will

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>be like a or remembering what the past was. The

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of not being able to see through a wall

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>into the next room and see what's going on there,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>but perform, but you know, conceiving a mental picture of

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what it might be like. Like for instance, there's another

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>recording studio here in the office. I cannot see in

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>there with my mind, but with my mind, I can

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine that the guys from stuff they don't want you

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to know are in there right now recording something. But

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you cannot imagine what they are doing. But I can

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>form a pretty basic idea that you're setting around a

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>table talking. It will not fit in your brain, and

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it's it's it looks just like what we're doing.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>The subject matter is slightly different. But but at any rate,

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is I can form a pretty good idea,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but I know that that is just my brain creating

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a simulation of my environment, right. But I mean, I

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of this clairvoyant stuff hinges on the

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>concept of generating accurate knowledge. It's like all the stuff

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we can do with our imagination, except they can do

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it to see reality. Um, And the kind of clairvoyants

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that Fukurai was most interested in I think would be

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>covered by the first two categories of things I said,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so mostly like seeing things that are far away and

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing across physical barriers. According to McVeigh, he was focused

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on something called toshi, which meant something like seeing through,

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>as in seeing through barriers, and on syndrigan, which meant

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the far seeing I And in this para psychology phase

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of his life, Fukurai was aided by another Japanese researcher

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>named Imamura Shinkichi. Now Fukuai studied a reputed Japanese clairvoyant

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>named Mifuna Chizuko and another named Nagao Ikuko, and McVeigh

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>writes that in nineteen ten, Fukurai performed a series of

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>experiments in front of a panel of scholars and experts

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that he believed would demonstrate Mifuna Chizuko's power to read

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>out written messages even after they'd been sealed inside envelopes

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and then placed inside lead containers, and apparently an attempt

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to rep locate these experiments the following year in nineteen eleven,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>was not as successful as Fukurai and Mifune had hoped,

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people considered that Fukarai's research was

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly misguided after some failed demonstrations, and he and his

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>supposed clairvoyance subjects like Nagau and Mfune were criticized in

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the press. And at least I think it's implied that

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>partially as a result of these failures and subsequent criticism,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh writes that both Mfuni and Nagaikuko committed suicide in

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the year nineteen eleven, but before I've also seen another

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>cause of death attributed to Nagaikuko, so I'm not sure

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. But McVeigh says that that she also died

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>by suicide. But before she died in nineteen eleven, Nagaikuko

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>appeared to demonstrate a novel form of psychic power that

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>fascinated Fukurai, and this was apart from traditional clairvoyance. This

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>was the power that Fukurai called ninsha, which would have

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>roughly translated as thoughtography. That the Japanese term ninha comes

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from the combination of nin meaning like sense or feeling,

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and shah meaning picture, and in concrete terms, this just

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>means that Fukura I believe that Negau had the power

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to use her mind's eye to expose a dry plate

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of photographic film, essentially burning her thoughts directly onto the

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>physical substrate, the same way that light prints and image

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>onto a piece of film. After Mifune and Nagau died,

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Fukurai continued his research, and he published a book about

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>clairvoyance and photography in nineteen thirteen, which was widely criticized

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>as credulous and unscientific, and Fugura I eventually lost his

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>university position moved on to other things that he apparently

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>continued to be interested in paranormal research well into his

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>retirement in the nineteen forties and nineteen fifties. UM one

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>weird thing is before he was publicly ridiculed and ousted

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>from his position, it took you a university. Fugara was

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>considered an elite scholar at the head of Japanese psychology.

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>He was not you know, just some crank right pamphlets

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.479
<v Speaker 1>in his basement. He was uh. He was a top scholar,

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and his his academic exile had consequences. I was reading

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology, Global

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Perspectives by David B. Baker that, in reaction to the

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Fukarai Affair, a new head of the psychology department at

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Tokyo Imperial University, decided that the department could rehabilitate its

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>reputation by only focusing on quote normal psychology, ignoring both

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of Fukara's areas of study, meaning parapsychology like the study

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of psychics and quote abnormal psychology, which again would amount

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to the study of mental illness. Uh. Now, of course,

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>saying we're not going to study mental illnesses is a

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>huge limitation on academic psychology, which the authors right in

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>this book a quote stunted the rise of clinical psychology

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.959
<v Speaker 1>and pre war Japan. Yeah, absolutely though, because he had

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>studying an mental illness is a way not only of

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>understanding how to trade mental illness, but also to understand

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like what, uh you know, how the mind is functioning

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in individuals who are are not experiencing mental illness, right,

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean it. It provides a frame of reference. Yeah,

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the For example, a lot of the

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest breakthroughs in the history of psychology have come from

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>studying patients who have brain injuries or legions or some

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind that like they show you how the brain changes

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>when certain or how the mind changes and how behavior

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>changes when certain physical changes are made to the brain.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And of course, I I've seen it alleged by a

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>number of writers that the stories of people like me,

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Funa Chizuko, and Nagai Kuko inspired the fictional ghost in

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the original Ring by Suzuki Koji. I don't know if

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that's uh correct, but it's at least been alleged that

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there's some threat of inspiration there um. And you know,

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a little bit sympathetic to Fukurai

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and consider the historical context, Like in the year nineteen ten,

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it was only fifteen years previous that X rays and

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>X ray photog graphy had been discovered. We sort of

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>alluded to this earlier, right. The German physicist Wilhelm Runkin.

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>He discovered X rays by accident in the year eight

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>when he was performing experiments with the type of early

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>cathode ray tube, which was an electrical device that shoots

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a beam of electrons across space inside and evacuated tube

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>from one electrode to another. And Runkin noticed when he

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was running these experiments, he'd put current through the cathode

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ray tube in the darkened room it would make this

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>particular screen in the room. It was a screen of

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>barium platinum cyanide, which is like a type of photographic plate.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It would make that glow. And this puzzled him, of course,

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>so he tried to run some more experiments, and he

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>discovered that he could use the cathode ray tube to

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>expose photographic plates inside a completely dark room, except the

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>photos were nothing like anybody on Earth had ever seen.

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>A human hand placed in front of the tube, between

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the tube and the plate would create an exposed you're

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>almost completely ignoring the fleshy parts of the hand, but

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>showing the bones hidden underneath the flesh. And when Runkan

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>created an X ray exposure of his wife's hand, she

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>reportedly looked at the images of her bones and said,

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I have seen my death. Uh yeah. And if you

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>want more about this, we talked about this in our

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>x ray episode of Invention. But the X ray photo

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was a radically completely new way of imaging the hidden

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>reality inside the body. It had been discovered almost completely

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>by accident, and it had been only like fifteen years

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>before this. Of course, photography itself was maybe like eighty

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to ninety years old at the time. And so you

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>add to that the fact that people were proposing all

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of other hypothetical classes of rays at the time.

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>You remember we talked about n rays. Those didn't exist,

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but people were just thinking that there were all kinds

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of rays we didn't detect or understand yet invisible forces

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>beaming out from one object to another. Um Fukurai was wrong.

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think he was misguided, But I don't

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>think it was crazy the time, or certainly not as

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy as it seems now to think that the hidden

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>anatomy that governed the mind's eye and the brain might

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>leave some kind of print on a piece of film

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>via raise projected out of the head. I don't know.

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Does does that make sense to you? Yeah? Yeah, I

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>mean we have to put ourselves in the framework of

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, and uh and and and really again in

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that the sense of future shock that would have would

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have still been resonating, and to a certain extent still resonates,

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>because I think one of the one of the things

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to keep seeing in these episodes is

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that and I think this was revealed again in our

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>our photography series on Invention, is that photography is a

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>complicated process that brings in uh, you know, at least

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>two different fields the third if you count the artistic

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>world as well, but certainly optics and chemistry, and not

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone really has a firm grasp on that like it too.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>For a lot of us, it's still kind of feels

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like magic. A polaroid camera, uh, you know, we're you know,

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>instantly gives you the the images sort of magic. Uh.

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And when we when we don't understand something completely, it

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it allows us to engage in uh, unrealistic modes of

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>thought about what is going on with the camera, what

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>is going on with photography. All right, we're gonna keep

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about all this, but we're gonna take one quick

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>break first. Alright, we're back. So I want to talk

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit about this idea of remote viewing,

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>which which Fukurai was definitely involved in. This idea that

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could just you could see what's going

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on in another place, either in another room, another part

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the world, sealed envelope, sealed envelope, or another planet.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, another example of an accomplished individual in

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>their field who is also a prominent, uh proponent of

0:38:56.239 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>remote viewing is Atlanta's own Courtney Brown, an associate professor

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Political Science Department at Emory University. It also

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>works in nonlinear mathematics. So we see in fukarai and

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>interest in hypnosis uh and then Brown is versed in meditation. UH.

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Meditation induced light experiences can occur and have been linked

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to similar experiences in sensory deprivation UH and and I've

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>seen things like that in yoga meditation as well, where

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you will be you know, you're you're you're seeing lights

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or shapes or or some sort of imagery that feels

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as if it is it is arising, and it is

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not called forth you know what I'm saying, Like, it

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like it's something that you are consciously imagining.

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't feel like something that is dictated by the

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>default mode network, you know, it doesn't feel like the

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of images um or thoughts that are normally bombarding

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>our brain. Well, I think about how often in psychedelic

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>experiences people talk about believing they have encountered an other

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>where if you just you know, it's impossible to know

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but it seems like probably what's going on

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is they're having an internal experience with their own brain.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are some types of experiences that we've just

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, feel our exogenous. It feels like it's

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>coming from outside you, right. And so with with the

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>right amount of of priming, expectation, and ultimately consolidation, like

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>any one of these experiences, be it something that is

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>due to the use of psychedelics or something that is

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.919
<v Speaker 1>acquired through meditation, hypnosis, etcetera um. Because as we've discussed before,

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like even normal our normal sensory view of the world

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is inherently hallucinatory, you know, it is in its in

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.359
<v Speaker 1>its own way and illusion. It's not the way things are.

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a useful sort of movie that we

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>can interact with the world through. Right. So if you're

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>having an experience like that and it feels real, right,

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you can see how even like like certainly

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>very intelligent people uh can can can come to believe

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that that they are actually perceiving the reality of a

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>distant location and become very convinced of it. And then

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>certainly if you have a name for this as well,

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it becomes kind of established in parapsychology. Than

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>than that also helps that gives you even more like

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>priming and conditioning, uh too, in which to frame this experience.

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>And and also I mean just to go back to

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics too, and certainly our episode on psychedelics, like we

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>see that trend uh in the twentieth century, right this,

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this counterculture emerged, this idea taking shape that secular individuals

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>can have a essentially a mystical experience that is not

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>due to the imachinations of gods or angels, you know,

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>um and and so you know, it's it's not surprising

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that we see all, you know, cases like this arising. Well,

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I also say on top of that, there's just I

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's a very respectable humilitium el that says, like, Okay,

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we should always accept that there may be

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>forces at work in our day to day surroundings that

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't fully understand. You know, we don't have a

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>scientific theory that accounts for them yet. And I think

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing to to start from. But I

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of like parapsychology and paranormal type people

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>jump from there too, because we we should acknowledge that

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of things about the world we don't

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>understand yet. Therefore, remote viewing is real you know, or

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like therefore, you know, you can't discount thoughtography and finding

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the right balance there I think is part of the

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>difficulty of living the skeptical life. You know, you don't

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>want to live a life of denialism where you're just like,

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>anytime something is strange or unexplained, you just say like, oh,

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that's nonsense. But at the same time, you want to

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 1>maintain a high standard of evidence, and that's that's the

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tightrope walk I guess you've got to do if you

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be a scientific investigator, if you want to

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>try to have the most accurate view you can of

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, and they're always going to be these edge

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>cases where some he's presenting, you know, evidence that maybe

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe seems compelling for some kind of phenomenon that doesn't

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>really seem like it like it fits with well tested

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 1>theories that otherwise predict the physical world. And I think

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the case that some of these investigators have run

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>into with psychic photography, especially in the cases we'll talk

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about with Ted serious. Absolutely, I should also point out

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that we always have to remember that the c i

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>A sunk something like twenty million dollars into the stargate

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>project in the nineteen nineties and an attempt to ascertain

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the effectiveness and military potential of remote viewing. And this

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 1>project was ultimately terminated in remote viewing was found unfruitful

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to their needs. But maybe it was a conspiracy. No, No,

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I I tend to think like if

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there I mean, first of all, I've got major objections

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to remote viewing, just on like a plausibility basis, Like

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, you can't rule things out just because

0:43:57.520 --> 0:43:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't know the mechanism. But if you've got a

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty good picture of how physics works and it just

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, their power is proposed that don't seem to

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 1>fit in any way with any you know, any physical

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 1>forces that you could identify. That's that should definitely be

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>a red flag to start with. And then on top

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of that, I think there are additional plausibility problems with

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>remote viewing, which is like if it is, if it

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>does exist, why isn't it being taken better advantage of Yeah? Uh,

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and that thing said, I do come back to like

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what I said earlier, like even though it's not scientifically

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>feasible as far as we understand it, um, you know,

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that you know, people shouldn't be interested

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in it and uh or even you know, practice it.

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But it needs to be more of I feel like

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it is more definitely in the line of like a

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>spiritual or religious practice, you know. Um. But that's my

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>just my two cents on it. And I think that's

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems that and we're going to see

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that with a lot of these these people that that

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are they're claiming these abilities, is they are not presenting

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>them as something that is uh, you know, ultimately like

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the domain of the spiritual, something that can't really be

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>proven or disproven. But they're but they're agreeing to tests,

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they're agreeing to uh to uh performances of their ability

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and inviting in some cases experts to to see what

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they're doing and to to to try and find the

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>problems in it. Uh So, uh, it's something to keep

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in mind as we've moved forward. All Right, So let's

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>come back to a figure that we've We've mentioned the

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 1>name already, uh Ted Sirius. That's s c r I O.

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>S Is it serious or Sirius Sirius with Sirius, well

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you say that, I'll say Sirius just to be confusing

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like serious black. Um. So Sirius lived through two thousand six,

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and he claimed to be able to create thoutographs on

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>polaroid film. So, um, this is an interesting figure, um

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. So Um, I was reading a

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit about this in that in that book The

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Perfect Medium, paras psychologist Stephen E. Broad writes about him.

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Who Broad is also a philosophy professor, uh and he

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 1>contends that sirius Is photography is perhaps the best documented

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps the most impressive. Does he seem a little

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 1>uh sympathetic to maybe he he did have some psychic powers? Um.

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I encourage everyone to read uh Broad's work

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>for themselves because he Um. He certainly is more inclined

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to to criticize some of the the individuals who have

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 1>been attributed as being like solid debunkers. At the very least,

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be saying, look, whatever Ciris was doing,

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not nearly as debunked as you think it is. Um.

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm and he is a paras psychologist. He is

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a paras psychologist. So so I gonna stress all of that,

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's still an interesting read. He does seem to

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be more climbed to um entertain the possibility though. So.

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Sirius was a Chicago bellhop who had experimented with with

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>hypnosis and uh. He claims that during this time he

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>found that he could use his mind to project images

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>onto camera film and later instant polaroid film. And he

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>apparently demonstrated this to various folks and was quite convincing.

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And this caught the attention of Denver psychiatrist and researcher

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Jewel Eisenbud, who took a strong interest in his work

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and conducted numerous trials, resulting in hundreds of images. Yeah,

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've read that Eisenbudd is one of the main

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>reasons that people really know about Ted. Seriously, he sort

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of took up the cause like uh, or at least

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 1>from what I read. Eisenbudd claimed he was initially skeptical

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of Ted serious his abilities, but then after spending time

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with him and seeing his photographs, he he came more

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and more to believe that these powers were real and

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that Serious really could project his mind's eye onto a

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 1>piece of holm. Yeah. Eisenbud at one point believed that

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Sirius was seeing the essentially remote viewing the surface of

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jovian moon Ghannamed and then using photography to implant

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that image on onto film. And it gets more complex

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>than that, actually, because I was reading that so Sirius

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>apparently made these images that Eisenbudd later said, oh, this

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is the surface of Ganymede, because he said that serious

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was very interested in space exploration and had been thinking

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about the voyager to probe, and that must have been

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what triggered his generation of this image of the surface

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of of Ghanymede. But at the time he generated the image,

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the photographs from the voyager probe had not been taken yet.

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think Eisenbudd is suggesting that if these photos

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>are real, serious actually not only projected his thoughts directly

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>on the film, but also pre cognitively remote viewed the

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>surface of of Wait precognitiant. Well, I guess it wouldn't

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have mattered whether the voyager probe got there yet. He

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was seeing the surface of the moon before the probe

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>got there, right, And I've seen this in other, uh

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, accounts of remote viewing, where they have they

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have essentially seen other worlds or have encountered historic figures

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing, Right, Now, another thing worth noting

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>about Cirios here is that is that even eisenbud like

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>points out that that that ted it was definitely an

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>alcoholic and that's sort of part of the thing, but

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:35.760
<v Speaker 1>also displayed like a lot of you know, at times

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like irrational behavior and seemed to have you know,

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 1>definite uh you know, psychological issues. So but but anyway,

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this was basically Sirius his process. So he generally he

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>needed to be drunk, generally very drunk to perform this art,

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, I guess that's fair enough, right, I mean,

0:49:57.480 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really even podcasting, I don't know when when

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>when we first started podcasting, um, Jerry told us, like,

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have a little to drink before you go into the

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast booth, it'll help. Jerry ever told me that, oh

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>well maybe maybe I just look like I needed to

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>drink at the time. I don't know. But wait, are

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you serious? I'm serious? Yeah, I mean I think she's joking.

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, like the idea that you would

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>need a social lubricant too, essentially to perform something um

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>either you know, a legitimate psychic ability or to perform

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a trick, some sort of a um

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>an illusion or even a confidence trick, right, um, so

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that's one part of it. Also, he preferred to hold

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a quota he called a gizmo in his hand to

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>help him focus his powers. And it was a short,

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:49.879
<v Speaker 1>open cylinder about an inch in diameter. And of course

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this is highly suspicious. You don't have to be Sherlock

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Holmes to suspect that the gizmo is either the heart

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the trick that he is going to perform, or

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a d e cooy to distract onlookers from the

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>actual trick. Because he'd often placed this in front of

0:51:06.239 --> 0:51:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the camera lens, like he'd get up into the into

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the camera lens with the gizmo and then also like

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, mugging for the camera, placing his forehead in

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the way and somehow using the gizmo allegedly to focus

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts into the camera. Yeah, he said he needed

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to connect his body to the camera. Uh. Though there

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:28.279
<v Speaker 1>are allegations also that he was able to produce the

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:32.239
<v Speaker 1>autographs and uh and and actually make images on a

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>camera while being far away from the camera that at

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>least as alleged, But he most of the time, it

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has said, would like put his forehead right on this

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 1>thing and stick it in the camera camera lens. So, yeah,

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>raises some red flags, right, But but then the idea

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is that he's essentially taking a snapshot of the mental

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>image that he is forming in his mind, be a

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the be it a mental image that is formed via

0:51:56.000 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>memory or just sort of general mental imaging, or it's

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>something that is that he has acquired through um uh,

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, sending his consciousness to a to the moons

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of Jupiter. Yeah. Now, I read some conflicting reports that

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:14.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it seems like the images he produced, he claimed

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 1>were like not what he was thinking about consciously, but

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just would be these unconscious kind of associative images. That's

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>what's suggested by eisenbudd Uh the Galilean moon, right, is

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that he just had the Voyager two probe on his

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.400
<v Speaker 1>mind and happened to generate an image of the surface

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of Ganymede. And so if we're approaching it from the

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the pro psychic side, we can say, well,

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. The mind is difficult to control. Mental

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>images may form in the mind that you you're not

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:43.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to summon. Certainly we can all attest to that.

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, from a purely skeptical point of view,

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to be drawn in and put to

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the test by asking, you know, being asked to think

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of a particular thing, how convenient would it be if

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, I tried to think of that

0:52:57.600 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that that bird feeder that you wanted me to imagine,

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just so obsessed with space travel right now,

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I gave you Ganymede instead, right. I mean that makes

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that suggests that maybe you've already got an image of

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>something that looks like a moon's surface on hand with

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 1>you or something, right, And I guess that gets to

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>what the actual trick would be, if there is a

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>trick here, which I assume there probably is right now now.

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 1>In that article in The Perfect Medium, a Broad certainly

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>focuses on the aspects of Ted's art that kind of

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 1>continue to mystify, as he mentions, for instance, that Eisenbudd

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:31.400
<v Speaker 1>offered a cash reward for anyone able to replicate Ted's

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>results quote under conditions similar to those prevailing during the

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 1>during the experiments. Now I've read that there was serious

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 1>dispute about like them negotiating with skeptics about what would

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 1>be acceptable for those uh conditions, Like I think I

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 1>read that James Randy wanted to try to replicate it,

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but that Eisenbudd said, well, you have to be really drunk,

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>because Ted is always really drunk when he does it. Yeah. Yeah,

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the famous debunker James Randy, who we had the privilege

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to meet. Um. But last um, it definitely plays into

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 1>some of this, and it's kind of if you if

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you read some of the more pro serios material, Randy's

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of portrayed as a villain. Oh all, Randy is

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:16.320
<v Speaker 1>always the villain of something written by pro psychic powers people.

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, uh so, Yeah, some of these account like

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 1>brought accountants to highlight the things that were not you know,

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 1>they're still a little mysterious or or or certainly accounts

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of replications that don't meet the same degree of replication,

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you weren't able to do exactly what Sirius is doing,

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>therefore you didn't fully debunk him. No, I've I've read

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>some of his defenders say, Okay, people have used tricks

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to replicate what Serious was doing, but they couldn't do

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it without those tricks being evident to people who were watching. Right. Um,

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean The other way to think about it is,

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:58.240
<v Speaker 1>can I can I paint the Mona Lisa? No? I cannot.

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Can I demonstrate some of the techniques personally that that

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that the artists used to create the Mona Lisa? Uh? Certainly, Uh,

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we have to take it into account. That's sirius assuming

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>again that he's not a psychic, that he's not a

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not capable of photography, that he's just a performer, an illusionist. Uh,

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, a trickster. Uh. There is still an art

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to what he is doing. Uh, there is still a

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 1>performance aspect, of charismatic aspect to it. And there are

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>aspects of that that are going to depend in part

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on like innate charisma, but also in in practice, in

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in like sheer devotion to to the trick. And I

0:55:39.520 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think you can't discount that. And on likewise, you can't

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 1>expect a debunker to rise to that level of performance. Well,

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can expect them to try. But I

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that's one thing that you know, as long as

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:56.319
<v Speaker 1>we're probing the depths of the unexplained, you could say, well,

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's some kind of mystical power that this

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>person has that we just don't have the power to

0:56:00.760 --> 0:56:03.640
<v Speaker 1>explain it. Or you could say that there's an extreme

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:07.240
<v Speaker 1>talent this person has for performing a trick that hasn't

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 1>been explained yet. Yeah, because certainly one of the things

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that would come into play is slight of hand, right,

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 1>because the main charge is that is that Sirius had it.

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Kind of varies. Sometimes they talk of just using the

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>microfilm um or using microfilm affixed to a marble or

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a film affixed to the end of a

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>tiny tube to be like inside the quote gizmo that

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he put up against the camera. Because that's the obvious, right,

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is that the gizmo contains something, and if it contains something,

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>some film would be ideal because then you have that

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 1>pre existing photograph that can be the thing that he

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:47.839
<v Speaker 1>imprints UM. Skeptic Terence Hines also charged that Ted used

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a secondary tube about one inch long with a tiny

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 1>magnifying lens that could hold a small slide, and then

0:56:54.200 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>he would conceal this within the gizmo, but also he

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>could use it when the gizmo was taken away. Again

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:02.280
<v Speaker 1>getting an of that idea that the gizmos not merely

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:07.360
<v Speaker 1>useful as something to um to hide the trick but

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>also can be used as a distraction, can be the

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that, oh, when it's taken away, look I can

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>still do it. I don't even have the gizmo on me, right,

0:57:14.360 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And it was alleged that sometimes he could, I mean

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>usually he used the gizmo, but it's alleged that sometimes

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he did it without the gizmo. Now, there were a

0:57:22.440 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>number of expose a s at the time that claimed

0:57:25.000 --> 0:57:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to show that Ted Sirius was a fraud. The entry

0:57:28.240 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Skeptics Dictionary by Robert Todd Carroll suggests that

0:57:30.920 --> 0:57:34.840
<v Speaker 1>two amateur magicians and photographers named Charlie Reynolds and David

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Eisendraft exposed Serious as a fraud. Basically, they wouldn't spend

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a weekend with him and jewel Iz and Bud, and

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they saw his stuff and they they came to the

0:57:45.200 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that he was a fraud and wrote this up

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in the article. And Reynolds and Eisendraft claimed to have

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>spotted Serious quote slipping something inside his little gizmo before demonstrations,

0:57:56.600 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and they think it was a picture of something that

0:57:58.760 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Sirius wanted to show up in the camera exposure. They

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>also published an article explaining their findings in in October

0:58:05.880 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty seven issue of Popular Photography of Photography magazine. Now,

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:14.480
<v Speaker 1>according to the skeptic investigator Joe Nichols account of Serious

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is confrontation with magicians and sleight of hand experts. Quote,

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at one point during the session, after an exposure was made,

0:58:21.600 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a magician asked to examine the paper tube to see

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if there was anything inside. This would be the gizmo, right,

0:58:27.160 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the gizmo. Uh. Serious backed away, putting his hand in

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 1>his pocket. Now that's suspicious behavior. But then, weirdly, during

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this session, Sirius was unable to produce the autographs. So

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>apparently he had been using the gizmo. They said, let

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>me see the gizmo, he wouldn't show it to them,

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and then none of the pictures came out. Anyway, there

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:48.680
<v Speaker 1>were no autographs. Uh. And he and Eisenbudd blamed the

0:58:48.760 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>quote hostile atmosphere for interfering with Serious his powers. This

0:58:52.680 --> 0:58:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is always a red flag also, I think. But there's

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:58.160
<v Speaker 1>still plenty of people, I think, who hold out for

0:58:58.240 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>psychic photography, claiming that Head Serious his powers were real

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and could not be explained. And he's got defenders who

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:09.040
<v Speaker 1>say that some of his feats are just impossible to explain.

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>For example, I was reading claims in an article in

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chronicle of Higher Education which was about a gallery

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 1>exhibit of Serious as thotographs, which I would like to

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>see that. Oh yeah, I mean they're interesting images, certainly

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>when you know the background for them, especially if you

0:59:23.560 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>just think about him as works of art, not as

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:28.439
<v Speaker 1>like displays of real psychic powers. Um. But to quote

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 1>from this article quote, on occasion, volunteers were asked to

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 1>attend the experiment with a photograph sealed and a cardboard

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 1>back to manila envelope. Serious then managed to reproduce the

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 1>image with no prior knowledge of it. So again, that's

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like double psychic powers. That's not just the thoughtography, which

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>would be a feat even if he was looking directly

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>at what the photo should be. UM. But also, I

0:59:49.920 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 1>guess seeing into this envelope if I'm reading that right,

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That might also be suggesting that they

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just arrived with its sealed and then showed it to

0:59:57.040 --> 1:00:00.120
<v Speaker 1>him and he reproduced it. Either way, I mean, you

1:00:00.160 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>saw that. I wouldn't say that would prove it was real,

1:00:02.480 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but that would be impressive, you know, you'd be like, wow,

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's either real or some impressive trickery. I'd leaned

1:00:08.160 --> 1:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>towards the ladder um. But in other cases he apparently

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>managed to produce what appeared to be images of landmarks

1:00:14.160 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>from up above, like aerial views that his supporters claimed

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>could not be explained through trickery. But it seems like

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he stopped doing his thing after the late nineteen sixties,

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which seems a little weird. Yeah, especially consider he lived

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:29.439
<v Speaker 1>until two thousand and six. You know, I mean, that's

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of time to not at least not

1:00:32.000 --> 1:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>be publicly doing this displaying this uh this ability. Uh.

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But then again, um, you know, we do have to

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>come back to you the fact that Eisenbud himself wrote

1:00:43.080 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that serious was you know, psychologically disturbed alcoholic. So you know,

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you can come up with various, you know, reasons that

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody with that kind of with with with those kind

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of demons would not engage in their art. Now, he

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the only one in the later twentie tree to

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>get in on the psychic photography thing. Over the years,

1:01:02.640 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of figures, including Uri Geller, got into psychic photography.

1:01:06.880 --> 1:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>One one of Geller's many demonstrations was that he would

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>leave the lens cap on a camera, placed the camera

1:01:13.000 --> 1:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to his forehead, and then take a picture, supposedly saying,

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know the same kind of thing. I'm using my

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye to imprint upon the film, and then the

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>photo would reveal whatever he had been imagining. Again, James

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Randy shows up, as he often does whenever Uri Geller

1:01:26.920 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>claims something. James Randy criticized this and other psychic photography

1:01:31.120 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is having two main explanations, either using a handheld device

1:01:35.160 --> 1:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to project the image into the camera lens as the

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>photos taken, or loading the camera with pre exposed film

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>already bearing the desired image, and the latter seems to

1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be the case with a later twentieth century alleged psychic

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>named Matsuaki Kyota, who claimed to be able to produce

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>photographs on film again, and skeptical critics such as Joe

1:01:56.560 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Nicol have pointed out that when Matsuaki Kyota was asked

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to reform his thoughtography under controlled conditions for a TV

1:02:04.520 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>crew in London, he couldn't produce the images, and Nickel

1:02:07.720 --> 1:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>claims that it was only times when he was able

1:02:10.960 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>uh to get the film and have it alone with him,

1:02:15.120 --> 1:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>like basically to get hold of the film and have

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it in a private place before the test that he

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>could demonstrate his powers, which again makes you think he

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was doing something to the film before it was loaded

1:02:25.560 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in the camera. Alright, Well, on that note, we are

1:02:28.320 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have to call it for episode one of

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this exploration, but we are going to return in a

1:02:34.640 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>second episode where we're going to continue to explore this idea,

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like how would it work if this were possible? Like

1:02:41.720 --> 1:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>what what what can we grasp onto in the labyrinth

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of the human mind and the complexity of our our

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>our sensory perception, but also what can this question reveal

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>about the reality of mental imagery and how that happens

1:02:56.400 --> 1:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the brain, which is fascinating, mysterious, and even spooky

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>topic on its own, even though we don't necessarily credit

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the reality of psychic photography, there's a lot of spooky

1:03:06.360 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on when you picture something right. And we'll

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>probably talk about The Ring a little bit more, and

1:03:11.760 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably bring up a few other films such as Scanners,

1:03:16.360 --> 1:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So hey, be sure to tune in for that episode,

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and tune in for all of our episodes in October,

1:03:20.720 --> 1:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>which are going to be Halloween flavored uh and we

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>encourage you again to check out Invention if you haven't already,

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can find it wherever you get your podcast. You can

1:03:28.720 --> 1:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>find out the website at invention pod dot com. If

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to support our show, the best thing you

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>can do is rate and review it wherever you have

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the power to do so, and make sure you have subscribed.

1:03:37.600 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Huge thanks as always to our awesome audio producer Seth

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

1:03:43.320 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

1:03:45.520 --> 1:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, just to say hello,

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at stuff to blow

1:03:51.280 --> 1:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radios. How stuff Works. For more

1:04:03.400 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.