WEBVTT - 3 Million Vaccine Doses Ready To Go Out Next Week: JHU's Sauer

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. It's a weekly visit with

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Lauren's sour Time and it's always something we look forward to.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Lauren's assistant professor of Emergency Medicine at Johns Hopkins University,

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>which of course is assisted by the philanthropic efforts of

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the owner of this radio station. But Lauren, thanks for joining.

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Very thrilled today because Reuters is rewarding that the first

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>doses of vaccine could be dished out to seniors and

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>nursing facilities and nursing homes December twenty one. What's your reaction?

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think we all needed a bit of

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>good news, and we all were watching with um a

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of anticipation to see how the meeting went yesterday

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with the SBA, and so it's just great to see

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone collectively working towards this emergency use off rezation the

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>outcome looks promising. I think we're waiting to see the

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>final details of what will be within the Emergency Use authorization,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we're hoping to see you know, almost three

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>million doses go out sometime early this next week. So, Lauren,

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>there's an interesting fascinating story on the Bloomberg terminal today

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>saying how the US ranks thirty second in vaccine buys

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on a per capita basis. UM, where are you? Where

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>do you think the US is in terms of having

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a proper supply, sufficient supply of vaccines to vaccinate its

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 1>population as I guess, you know, quickly as possible. Yeah,

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>I think we would like to see, Um, we would

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we would have liked to see more doses secured, but

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the the challenge will be an administration. So the one

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>benefit of this UM somewhat slower rollout will be that

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we really are very careful with these initial doses. UM.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw that about two point and nine millions,

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So the of the initial available six point form million

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>fiser doses will go out UM in this you know,

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hopefully early this week, and that will give us time

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to really UM perspect the supply chain and the distribution. UH,

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>as everyone knows us and find now the Fiser vaccine

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>has some challenging cold chain storage, some challenging distribution issues,

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and so UM using this time to start a little

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>bit slow, not super slow. I mean, we have a

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in the year which is absolutely incredible UM to

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to really make sure that we're not going to waste

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>any doses, that we have a plan for how we're

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>accessing these harder to reach populations, UM, that we're getting

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it to the people who need it most right now

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is critical. I do think that there's going to be

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a need for massive scale up UM that we're not

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>really quite ready for UM and and I haven't seen

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that story yet, but it does make sense to me

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that we will need to improve UM that capacity. I

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>think as more vaccines come online, particularly ones with more

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>improved cold chain storage issues, UM, we'll see that number

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>tick up. Is there any reason to suspect that it

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>will be difficult to scale that up? And given the

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>difficulties we had, you know, bringing in PPE for example,

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>or other sorts of things that we needed very badly

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year, Yeah, it's I mean, that's a

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>great question. I think it's something that we're all a

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit worried about. You know, we have not seen

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>significant changes to how our national supply chain has improved.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>We have a little bit of improved PPE situations, but

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we're still having tons of challenges with not with national

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>level testing, with a you know, a national level strategy

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for testing, a national level strategy for resource allocation. Um,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is no different where relying on

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the States to truly figure this out. And um, we're

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>getting support, but but the scale up is going to

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be critical, and I think we'd like to see more

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>activity maybe around the Defense Production Act, around um, some

0:03:56.120 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to production scale up. And then um, you know

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>many of us are seeing backups in our ability to

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>obtain freezers and dry ice and so these all have

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to be worked out in these next few weeks or else. Um,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter how much vaccine we produced, we won't

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to distribute it basically and effectively. So Lauren,

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess initially here the market's going to look like,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the demand for these vaccines is going to

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>exceed the supply. But at some point presumably next year,

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>mid next year, you know that that dynamical kind of

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>change and we'll have plenty supply, and the question will be, UM,

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>will enough people want to take the vaccine? Do you

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>expect at some point some type of public relations campaign

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>may be needed to to get people to convince them

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to in fact take the vaccine so that we as

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a siety can achieve her community. Yeah, I mean, I

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely think that. I think rebuilding the trust in science

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>across our country is going to be incredibly important in

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>these early weeks of vaccine distribution. I think people trust

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>their primary care providers, people us UM individuals they know

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we're getting the vaccines UM to be spokespeople. But that's

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a heavy burden on the people who are getting these

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>first rounds of vaccine UM. So we can't put all

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of that reliance on them. We have to build UM

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>an education campaign and a trust building campaign and roll

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it out as soon as possible. We can't wait until

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>we already have the vaccine ready to go UM. And

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that there we're going to see a

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of this in this these first two phases.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think there will be health care workers who

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>are hesitant, and I think there will be elderly and

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable populations who are hesitant to receive vaccine, and I

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>think we need to we we many people have already

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>started working in this space, but we need to have

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this as a primary focus, not a secondary focus to production. Yeah,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>because we do have a couple of days head start

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>on the UK, but there are some reports out of

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the UK that might make people a little more hesitant

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>allergic reactions and so on. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. I mean

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone is watching the UK with sort of

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>fat breath to see what happens, and we have to

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be prepared to learn, you know, in real time from

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>what's happening there and um and apply very rapidly lessons learned.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that will happen even within the process

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of writing out the eu A building distribution strategies, you know,

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>all of those things will be impacted by what's happening

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>right now in the in the UK. Hey, Lauren, thank

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much once again for joining us. Always appreciate

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>your perspective. Laurence so our associate Professor of Eburgency Medicine

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, joining us for

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the weekly discussion of COVID and the vaccine. It's time

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Barry Rittle's expert opinion provider, and he

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>is a great column ount today. Of course, Barry, just

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to remind everybody, is a Bloomberg Opinion contributor, also founder

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of Rittle's Wealth Management and the host of Masters in

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg Radio. So, Barry, I presume that you've

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 1>been watching this week's activities with absolute combinations of disgust, horror,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all the amusement, just like the rest of us. You

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>have a great column today saying that Airbnb in door

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>dash Show caused the best and worst of Uber. Explain

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>what you mean. Sure, we'll start with the basic model

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that Uber created. You know, we all got consumed by

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the frat house and the Travis getting thrown out as

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as CEO. But really they created a fascinating model where

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they identified a massive inefficiency in a high margin business.

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>They created an app that made it really easy for

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>consumers to consume those services. And you know we've all

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>used the Uber app. Uh, the ability to say I

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>want a small car, I want a big truck, I

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>want a luxury car, and track when it's going to

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>arrive and and not have to mess around with cash

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or anything. That they just made that sort of transportation

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>service so much better than it was. And both door

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>dash and Airbnb have followed that same basic process. Um.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>With Airbnb, it's a massive addressable margin with an average

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>transaction price of a hundred and sixty dollars and a

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>an enormous profit margin. Uh. The problem with door dash

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is that we can't say the same thing. So it's

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting here Yet investors feel, what what do you make

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess of the market this week and and the

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the markets willingness to bid these stocks up so dramatically,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>What did you take away from it? I you know,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>someone saying that the bankers really blew it here. Um.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, how often do the bankers get it right

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and and be aware there's a ton of hindsight bias

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>involved when oh, you should have priced it higher. Well, yeah,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you say that after the fact, so to be fair

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to the bankers. Yeah, it's it's easy to tell what

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the demand is after the fact, but very often the

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>companies want to really high um number. The bankers want

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that there's enough appeal um in the shares,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that there's demand not only for the I p O shares,

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>but the quote unquote shoe that comes out afterwards the

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>subsequent shares that the bank seals, and and they want

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to create a little excitement and buzz around the name,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, you could argue they could have

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>priced this ten twenty higher. Um. Ultimately, the founders, the shareholders,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they all benefit the insiders. So the company ends up

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>with the four or five billion dollars in cash instead

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of six or seven billion dollars in cash. In the

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things, when the price runs up, if they

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do a secondary uh in six months and

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>put some more stock out, it's certainly an option. The

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>clue sitial. I suppose really that we'll have to wait

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>some time to see the answer to is can these companies,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a quarter off a quarter of revenue

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>growth and profit berry well, for Airbnb with the much

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>higher transaction price, I mean, you could go look at

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>homes for rent for two three four thousand dollars a

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>night on Airbnb. What's the most expensive pizza you're gonna

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>get delivered from from door dash. That's the big difference

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>between the two business models. They both are sort of

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>positioning themselves as pandemic plays. Hey, get out of the city,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>get out of your apartment, come rent a place out

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the burbs, or where you can drive. You don't

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have to go through t s A or on a plane,

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>drive to an airbnb and and you know, wait out.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic seemed to be a pretty good line that

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that investors UM brought into door Dash and some of

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>their compared it is like Uber eats and and grubhub

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and all the others. There's been a series of mergers there.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know who's who anymore, but UM they

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>also try to make that same sort of pandemic. Hey,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to go out to eat. You know,

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll do a touch free delivery, you pay for it

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on the credit card, will leave it on your doorstep.

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know that they certainly have been growing very

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. The differences the people I know who are

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>who are currently using airbnb. UM. Almost to a person,

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone says, of course, we're going to continue using it

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>after the pandemic. The food delivery services are a short

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>term substitute for going to a restaurant, and I suspect

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that post pandemic, the various food delivery aps and and

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that certainly includes do our Dash and all the rest

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to presume there's going to be some sort

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of fall off in usage. The question is is it modest?

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it big? Is it giant? I don't think it's modest.

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be more substantial than that. Yeah, Barry,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I actually I agree with your analysis of door Dash there,

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and again I was, I guess surprised at how well

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>embraced UH that I PA was in evaluation. It's garnering.

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So that brings me to my my question, Barry, are

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you drawing any conclusions as it relates to the state

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the overall equity markets about how these two deals

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>were received and how they are being valid as it

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>suggests you maybe a certain level of frothiness in the market,

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>akin to maybe what we've seen in some past bubbles. Um. So,

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>frothy is a great word because it doesn't commit you

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to saying that this can't continue any further. So I'm

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with you on that. And and remember Alan Greenspan's infamous

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>irrational zuberan speech in the middle of the dot com

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>boom that eventually blew up. That was if you were

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a seller on that speech, you missed an ungodly amount

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of gains over the next four years. Remember a market

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't peak until March two thousand, so frothiness. And we

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly have seen this in in some back issuance UM

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and some bit Clean Person and other crypto related UM items. Yeah,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely some speculation going out there. And I'm not

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in the camp that wants to blame Robin Hood on everything.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>That's an aspect of it. Boredom, people lacking the ability

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to go out and play, to go to casinos to

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>watch you know, sports. We we keep watching one football game,

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.599
<v Speaker 1>whether it's college or or professional, after another get canceled.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you have a lot of people who

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are homeboard that might count for some of this um

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, it's been such a long time

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>since we've had a sexy, exciting run of I p

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>O S. Companies have been staying private yea for longer.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Airbnb is a perfect example. That's a fairly

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>mature company that has um both strong revenue and and

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>profit growth. And you know, they had a few missteps

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning of the pandemic, and they writed the

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>filter pretty quickly. They did pivot pretty quickly. Barry Riddh Holtz,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. For joining us here. Barry ridh Holts,

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion calumnists and host of Masters in Business on

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio also found their chairman and chief investment officer

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of rid Holts Wealth Management, giving us his thoughts on

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Well, I'm sending a trend here in the

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>world of business. First it was Stevie Nicks selling part

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of her catalog to some investors for about a hundred

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, and then just recently Bob Dylan selling his

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>catalog to Universal Music Group for what is expected to

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be at least two hundred million dollars. What is going

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on here when we know we have somebody who has

0:14:55.920 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the answers. Lucas Shaw, Bloomberg Entertainment reporter joins us here. So, Lucas,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be a trend here is maybe some

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of these aging artists really cashing out here. Yeah, you know,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they are seizing on something that that has really been

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>happening in the music business now for three to five years,

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that the value of these copyrights has soared

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>because of streaming services which have more broadly listed industry

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>revenues and so and they've also made them a little

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more stable, and so that's mein that's meant that

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other investors have looked at music as

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a really appealing asset after years of dismissing it frankly,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>as an industry that was that was dying um and

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>then the pandemic only added fuel to that fire. Because

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of artists who might ordinarily be

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>going out on tour and making money. Instead they're stuck

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at home. So they're doing a mix of, Hey, I

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>want some extra cash to pay for more X, Y

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and Z, and maybe I'll start planning for whatever my

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>future is. In the case of Stevie Nicks and Bob Dylan,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>who are both older in age, lucas, are they going

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to get secured tied to these these securities or how

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>does it work? Because I could imagine that in the future,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be listening to, you know, Bob

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Dylan's top you know, boots of Spanish Leather for the

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>next you know, centuries, but something like Dark Eyes might

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>get played once in a million years. Yeah, I mean

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing so what Bob Dylan, and what Bob Dylan

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>told was his songwriting catalog, which can make money in

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different ways. You know, songwriters get paid

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>if the music if a song gets listened to on

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a streaming service, or if an album gets purchased, but

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they also get paid if song gets played in the radio.

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>They also get paid if you do what use uh

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>perform a sync. You know, you licensed that song for

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>an advertisement, for a movie, for a TV show. So

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people can get pretty creative with someone like Dylan as

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, people are listening to his music.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Although he's not a huge act on streaming, I'm sure

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of his money also comes from licensing

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it for for advertisements. Um. You know, you will have

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>people who will just a math enough assets that they

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>think it will be a kind of a consistent generator

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of revenue. And we've seen that play out time and

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>time again in the music business. I mean there are

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>um you know, there are investment firms that investment in

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>publishing catalogs as well as more traditional music investors. It's

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>something that has long been seen as a relatively stable

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>asset and something that people go to often kind of

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in times of uncertainty in the market, because even as

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>people are losing their jobs, they're still listening to the radio,

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>still listening to music Lucas you know, it's it's interesting.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I followed David Crosby on Twitter and he admitted that

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>basically he's going to pursue a similar type of deal

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for his music because because of the pandemic, he's not

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>touring and that's a big source of revenue for a

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of UM music acts and streaming doesn't pay really

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>anything at all too publishers and artists, do you think

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see more of this maybe from some

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>against some aging acts who may own their catalogs. It's

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a financial access that. Yeah. I think

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those acts that have relied on touring

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to continue to pay the bills will go this route.

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>As he's noted, you know, streaming has generating additional returns

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for the broader industry. On an artist by artist basis,

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are pretty small unless you're a Drake or

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a Taylor Swift, or a Post Malone or an Ariana Grande,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're an aging act. If you're if you're

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a David Crosby, chances are that a lot of your

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>fans are those that may still not have converted to streaming.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>They're buying physical physical sales have gone off a cliff

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>uh during the pandemic, or you're able to get them

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to go and see you perform, and you can't do

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that either. So really your only source of money would

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>be selling your catalog or if you can get somebody to,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, put an old Crosby Spills Nash and Young

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>song on the radio. Excuse me? In the TV show

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>well speak you of Taylor Swift. What happens when she

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>gets old and wants to get rid of her is

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>does she have to? Does she sort of have a

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>bidding war between her and the private equity firms that

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>bought her already recorded songs? Well, so that that's again

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind what the people who just bought

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>her first six albums, those are the recordings and she

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>will own her She owns the recordings for all the

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>new music she's putting out. Universal distributes it, but she

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately owns the master's Does right pervert to her publishing?

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>She actually changed her publishers in the last year. She

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>used to be at Sony ATV she is now at Universal.

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the particulars of that deal, but I

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>would imagine she worked out sort of more of what's

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>called an administration or distribution deal, where in the long run,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift can own her music. When you're as powerful

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>as Taylor Swift or in the case of Bob Dylan,

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you get to demand ownership because everybody wants to work

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. So the re recording, Lucas what what what

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>does that change for you know, the stream of money

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>with the recording her old albums. Yeah, So, because she

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>does not control the recording rights or the actual recordings

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>from her first album, what she would do is she

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can control her publishing right the songs that she wrote.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>She would then make new recordings based off of those

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>lyrics and re release it and try to make it

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>so that those are the songs that people play. But

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>what we don't know is, let's say Taylor Swift does

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>end up rereleasing her her first six albums in some form,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which she has talked about doing. If you're Spotify and

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.479
<v Speaker 1>you're put putting together that this is Taylor Swift playlist,

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>which is like their equivalent of the best the greatest hits,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and you want to put one of those early Taylor

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Swift songs, do you pick the one from the initial

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>album which is the version that everybody knows, or do

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you put the re record on there if you are

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>putting together some curated playlists for a user who really likes,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, who wants to listen to kind of country

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pop and that some of those early Taylor Sist songs Again,

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>which version and that's gonna you know, I'll be very

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>curious like to see what the streaming services decided to do,

0:20:55.400 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>because they obviously want to maintain good relations with Taylor Swift,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest acts in the world. But there's

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>no telling, there's not really a precedent for fans gravitating

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>towards the rerecord over the original. Um So it's it's

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a tricky situation and one that you know, we'll learn

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit more about when we actually see what Taylor

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Swift is doing with the rerecorded music. In the meantime,

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>she just put out her second album of the year

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and album I was listening some of this morning, evermore

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>let's give her add while we're at all, right, Lucas

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not note we all sort of drifted off there into

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of daydreaming as we think of Taylor

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Swift on the British Moor's recording music with American pop

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>stars and uh, you know, getting groups in like Jack

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Aunt and Off and so on to make sure that

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>she has another hit record. And uh, Lucas, thank you

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>for giving us up to date. Lucas also out with

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the story today about the top streamers and Ariana Grande

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>being the top act in the world right now, which

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating read. So, Lucas, thanks for joining us, and Paul,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you for for indulging me in that last reverie there.

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing story. The economics there, this is Bloomberg. All right.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's get something just a little less optimistic now, and

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that is the one billion empty hotel rooms for the year.

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We've been obviously looking at various numbers throughout this year.

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>It's been a year of numbers, and this is not

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>one that we enjoy talking about. But Patrick Clark is

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>our real estate reporter and he will talk about it

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to us. Patrick, how on earth did we get here?

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>A billion rooms have gone unsold or practically at least

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>nine sixty two million through last week. Yeah, well, when

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was the last time you stayed in a hotel? Good point?

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's the conference business, which is about

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a third, hotel demand is completely on ice. Um the

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's very little business travel happening. And while

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>there are are you know, some hotels that are in

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the right end of beach locations where you can drive

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to them, uh from you know, from big city that

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing okay, you know, across the board. Uh, this

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is this is really been the worst year and probably

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the history of the modern lodging industry. And uh when

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you stack up all the empty rooms, pretty soon we

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>will cross, um the one billion unsold rooms. Mark Hey, pat,

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>when when you talk to these hotel companies, what is

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>there thinking as to how uh their business may recover

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>As we start getting vaccines into the market place, there's

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a you know, expectation of a big ramp up in

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the year. How are they thinking

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>about the timing and and you know, the back half

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of this year and so on. I have to say

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they're less optimistic than I am. I'm thinking about my

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>next vacation as soon as I get vaccinated. My family

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to the beach. But but um, the I

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>think the I think there, I think hotels tend to

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>be more focused right now on the tough months that

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they have ahead of them. Yeah, I mean the question

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I have is we know that, you know, we didn't

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>pay to spend nights in hotels, but how many of

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>these rooms remained empty? How many of these hotels got

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>involved in schemes to rehouse homeless people for example. I

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's been fairly marginal. I mean, I do think

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>there there there certainly has been a you know, a

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>downward drift in the types of business hotels have been

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 1>willing to take. Right. So like, if you're you know,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a business traveler who is booking the room on their

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate credit card and not thinking a ton about the

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>price they pay is a good type of business. Um,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the I was just sort of more,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the richer of the expense account, the better

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of the business that is for the hotel um the

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I but I have The last time I

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was in a hotel was about a month ago, and

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a nicer hotel than I normally would have

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>stayed at because because it was offering a good rate.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And I got there and there was an airline crew

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>checking in. And you know, I think if you talked

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to big hotel owners or managers, they'll tell you yeah, well,

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we we are starting to take um, you know, types

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of business where we have to negotiate a lower rate

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>than we would have otherwise. So you know, your flight

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>crews probably are staying at better hotels. UM. You know,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly are medical workers. There's probably some government travel. Um.

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, even even people who normally would have sort

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of recovered from uh you know, maybe like a minor

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>surgery or something in a U in a hospital or

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>instead possibly checking into a hotel thinking that, you know,

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>better to be outside of a hospital environment. So there's

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there, there are bits of business available, but you know,

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>none of it makes up for what the hotels have lost. Well, Patrick,

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you as soon as I get the shot

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>hopping on a plane and going somewhere, that's for sure.

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Clark, real estate reporter for Bloomberg News. He joins

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from New York City, talking about

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>again that same very difficult situation. We're here for the

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>leisure and hospitality businesses, and now the question becomes for

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them as vaccines get into the marketplace,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what is the patient scope of the recovery that you

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>can expect from an airline from a theme park from

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a hotel um and I guess a lot of it

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is just we'll have to wait and see, but expectations

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are starting to build positively. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Bonny Quinn, and I'm

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio