WEBVTT - The Pulitzer Prize: A major award!

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Chuck and Jerry's well, no, Jerry's not here. Man talk

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 2>about habit. Ben's here. It's the reign of Ben still

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 2>and that makes this these days stuff you should know.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 3>That's right. The episode in which we talk about a

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>major reward.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's not a leg lamp, but the Pulitzer Prize.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 4>It is a you know, it's an award with much

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 4>prestige attached. They will be giving out the next round

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 4>on May eighth, probably not too long after this episode

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 4>comes out, in twenty three different categories. At a ceremony

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 4>at Columbia University in.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>New York City, did you say Pulitzer? Pulitzer? What do

0:00:58.120 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>you say?

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what I say now. I said Pulitzer for the

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 2>vast majority of my life.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Though, Do you know which is right?

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 2>I think Pulitzer. Okay, yeah, we've been corrected enough times.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it is Pulitzer. You got it right?

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Good they are and we'll go over all the categories.

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 4>But what you should know about the Pulitzer Prize is

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 4>they are distinguished works of American works, Yeah, in a

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 4>variety of categories. And I don't think even until yesterday

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 4>I fully realized that it was such a strictly American award.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 2>I didn't either, which is ironic because it was the brainchild.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>It was founded by Joseph Pulitzer, who was a Hungarian immigrant. Yeah,

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 2>but loved America. Loved America so much he moved to

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Missouri and didn't leave for a while.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 4>He was born into a wealthy family April tenth, eighteen

0:01:54.400 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 4>forty seven and was a real like ambitious dude. He

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 4>came over to fought to fight in the American Civil War.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>For the Union. Yeah that's something, and did, in fact

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>enlists for a year in the Lincoln Cavalry.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 4>But he became a newspaper publisher at the age of

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, and by the time he was thirty one,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 4>he was the owner of this Saint Louis Dispatch, like

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 4>a major paper.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yet no, the Dispatch is still around. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 2>that's amazing. I didn't see how he ended up in

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>New York, but eventually he made his way to New

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>York and with his experience running a paper, took over

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the world. The New York World, which was just a

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>New York paper in eighteen eighty three when he started,

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>but under his tenure it became the first national newspaper

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>like the USA today of its time.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he was, like I said, he was a

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 3>tireless worker.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 4>But he also suffered from poor health for most of

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 4>his life. I'm not sure exactly what it was, because

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 4>I saw that noises were a big deal. So he

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 4>would like have like rooms that were just like vaults

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 4>basically so he could sit in silence. But this poor health,

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 4>and I think he had failing vision two. He eventually,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 4>at the young age of forty three, technically retired as

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 4>editor in chief of the World, but still really maintained

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 4>a pretty tight control over that paper.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Right. So today we think of Joseph Pulleitzer, we associate

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 2>his name with distinguished works of journalism, like the Cream

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Crop of journalism every year, and that it

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>turns out as largely by design, because Joseph Pulleitzer, at

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the time he was alive and running the New York World,

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 2>was well known for being the essentially the guy who

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>helped create yellow journalism, using hyperbole, using sensationalism, like writing

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>front page stories about people's divorces, like just scandal tabloid

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>stuff like this guy helped establish tabloid journalism in the

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>United States, And it might not have been quite so

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 2>pronounced his brand of yellow journalism had he not had

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>a like a rival who actually, in like perfect star

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Wars in fashion, was actually his protege protege turned rival,

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 2>a guy named William Randolph.

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Hurst, that's right, And they had the New York American Journal.

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 4>American was the big paper for Hurst at the time,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 4>and they were in a real sort of neck and

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>neck battle to sell newspapers there in New York and

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 4>really kind of went at it yellow journalism style.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so yellow journalism, it turns out, has to do.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 2>We must have talked about it in our comics episode

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 2>or whatever there was. The Yellow Kid was a character

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 2>on the comic called Hogan's Alley and the World and

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 2>the Journal American both had versions of this cartoon, essentially

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>one ripped off the other. So this was known as

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the competition between the Yellow Kids, which came to be

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 2>known as yellow journalism. Right, and they would just pull

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 2>out all the stops, And apparently this race to the

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>bottom is largely blamed for starting the Spanish American War

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 2>essentially or at least getting America behind the whole thing,

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 2>so there was like real repercussions to it. People's lives

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>would be ruined. And so the idea that Joseph Pulitzer's

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 2>name is associated with, like the greatness of journalism is

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>really one of the better cases of I guess whitewashing

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>your image over time.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, he did believe in great journalism. He

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>said at one point, my idea is to recognize that

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 4>journalism is or ought to be one of the great

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 4>and intellectual professions. And there's more to the quote, but

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 4>like he was, he had this idea that he revered

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>this journalism, maybe because he wasn't doing it. And in

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 4>eighteen ninety two he approached Columbia University president and said, hey,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>how about we get a graduate school of journalism going

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 4>there isn't one in the whole world. They said, eh, no, thanks,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 4>So Missouri, the Missouri University of Missouri School of Journalism

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 4>became the first one in nineteen oh eight. The Nobel

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Prizes were launched in nineteen oh one, and right after that,

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Joseph Pulleitzer said, well, why don't we have our own

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>awards for journalism. This is nineteen oh two. Two years later,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen oh four, in his will he said, hey, Columbia,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 4>here's two hundred and fifty grand, which is about nine

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 4>million bucks today. Established these prizes, and Columbia had a

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 4>new president at the time, and they said this guy

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 4>named Nicholas Butler.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>He was like, yeah, that sounds great.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I'll take that money, and I'll also take the two

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 4>million dollars that you're going to give us for that

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 4>graduate school that we now think is a good idea,

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 4>which is about seventy one million bucks today.

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right, So very wisely, Joseph Pullitzer, he helped establish

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>his legacy. He steered what his name would be remembered

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 2>for by creating the foremost prize for journalists. Right.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>He didn't live to see it though, right.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Uh No, I believe I don't know what year he died,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>but it was before nineteen seventy nineteen seventeen.

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he died in nineteen eleven, Okay, so he didn't

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>even I think the graduate school opened a year after that,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 4>and then the Pulletzers didn't start until six years later.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So he probably died with his fingers crossed, and

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>it actually paid off because not only did he he

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>did two really smart things. Chuck. One, he created a

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>panel a board to oversee the Pulitzer Prizes, and he

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>very wisely said, you it's up to you guys to

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>let these prizes evolve with the times. Don't let them

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>just be stuck in like nineteen oh four type stuff, like,

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>we want them to just kind of grow and evolve,

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and they have over time. That was very smart. And

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 2>then secondly, he tied them not just a journalist, but

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to drama, to music, to fiction, poetry. And at the time,

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the American arts were considered foreig inferior to Europe, but

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>they were still considered vastly superior to American journalism. So

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>by hitching the wagon of journalism to this more revered

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and legitimate form of expression, he raised journalism as well

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 2>the profile of journalism, and it worked. I mean, it

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 2>was really sharp how we set all this up, because

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>it paid off in aces.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think music came after him because his initial

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>eight awards were four for journalism and then four book

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 4>and drama awards. Compared to the twenty three categories we

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 4>have today fifteen in journalism, five in books, one in drama,

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 4>one in music, and one for graduate fellowships in journalism.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 4>And I say we take an early break, yeah, and

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 4>go over these categories.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's do it.

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Lately I've been learning some stuff about insomnia or alumnia.

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>How about the one on borderl disorder that are under order.

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You've heard that one be more, but it was so

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>nice I learned this.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Why except everybody listen up, stop stop lead stop stop stop.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna go over all twenty three categories. Dave

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 4>helped us with this, So we'll just tell you a

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 4>little bit about him because there's so many and maybe

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 4>mentioned like some notable winners or maybe this past year's winner.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>This is going to be a four parter.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. One thing you will notice is that.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 4>He was a populist guy, Joseph Pulitzer was very sort

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 4>of progressive populist. Even though he was a wealthy dude

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 4>from a wealthy family. He really wanted to identify with

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 4>a common person. And the winners, as you'll see, still

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 4>have a very sort of populous progressive bit to them.

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, very much so to this day. And it's you know,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 3>through Columbia university.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Still, so it's not You're not gonna see Alex Jones

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 4>winning a Pulitzer Prize, you.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Know, for one of many reasons such a shock.

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>So the first one, the big Daddy, as they call

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>it at Columbia, is the Public Service Award. This is

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the only Pulitzer award that comes with an actual engraved medal. Right, yeah,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>that's what they expect you to do when they hand

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>you the medals. Dave who helped us with us he

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>put it, it's like the MVP of Pulitzers. Yeah, this

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 2>is so if you win this one, usually it's for

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>an entire organization. Sometimes they'll they'll mention like the lead writer,

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 2>if it was basically the work of one person. But

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 2>usually it's like the New York Times newsroom, or the

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Washington Post newsroom, or yea once in a while, the

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal's newsroom. Usually one of the big news

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>services organizations are the ones who win the Public Service Award.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 4>That's right, that's the big Daddy. So there's also the

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Breaking News Reporting Award. Obviously, it's about breaking news and

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 4>it is for a story that quote as quickly as possible,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 4>captures events accurately, as they occur and as time passes, eliminates,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 4>provides contexts, and expands upon the initial coverage. One notable

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 4>winner was the Denver Post the year the Columbine massacre happened,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 4>or the New Orleans Times pick a UNI for their

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 4>coverage of Katrina in two thousands, that kind of thing.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, journalism, what journalism is supposed to be. They have

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 2>a special award for that.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, newsy journalism.

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>There's also investigative reporting, which you don't really need to

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 2>spell out because sure you know it is what it is.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>But for this year, the Wall Street Journal one, they

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>had a series of articles, and that's a recurring theme.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 2>Very frequently the winners have had a series of articles

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>rather than just one big whopper of an article. Yeah,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 2>and that's actually by design, as we'll see. But there

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>was a series of articles about the conflicts of interest

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>between people at fifty different federal agencies and the stocks

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 2>of the companies that they regulated, and how they used

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 2>that information to basically trade publicly. Like you remember our

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>COVID episode where we started shouting about how some of

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 2>the senators who were debriefed on COVID and then went

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>and sold stock should be locked up. Yeah, it was

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 2>about that basically.

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 4>What is for explanatory reporting if it's like a really

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 4>complex topic that someone can break down in a in

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 4>a great way.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>One for local reporting. So yeah, that speaks for itself.

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is where it's much easier for a

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>smaller organization to shop. Yeah, sure, that's good. Else there's

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 2>also national reporting, again usually goes to the larger, the

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 2>larger organizations just because they cover more of the nation.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 2>International reporting, same thing. And then feature writing, where you're

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 2>you're also kind of credited for bringing in style, like

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 2>making a like taking a topic and actually like making

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 2>it more readable in some ways. There's just some a

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>certain flare to it. It's like the TGI Fridays of Pulitzers.

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I thought.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd get a bigger reaction out, even you jerk.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Commentary. That is for columnists, but it is not editorial columns.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 3>That's another one.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Criticism, like if you're a you know, drama critic or

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 4>a restaurant critic or someone like that. Like Roger Ebert

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 4>won one in nineteen seventy five.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 2>So did our old friend Michiko Kakutani, who, as Dave

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>helpfully pointed out as a she for me because I

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>got it so so wrong before, so so.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Wrong, which will we already corrected, Dave. Yeah, what else?

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 4>We do have one for editorial writing. This is for

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, either editorial boards or op ed writers. Right,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 4>illustrated reporting. This is a fun one because that's for

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 4>editorial cartoonists.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what they used to call it, and then

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>they changed it to illustrated reporting and commentary. And for

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>this year, Mona Chellabi won for The New York Times.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>She had a series illustrating Jeff Bezos's wealth and they

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>were all pretty clever and interesting, so were the finalists

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the runners up too, but she had one that showed

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>so it compared the avera Ridge Amazon employees wages to

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Bezos's wealth, and so that the average Amazon employee

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>made thirty seven, nine and thirty dollars in twenty twenty

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and at that rate, to reach Jeff Bezos's wealth of

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and seventy two billion, they would have had

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 2>to have started working in the Pliocene epoch four point

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>five million years ago. They really drove it home to me.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, those are always fun, Yeah you can.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was going to say like, oh, was it

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 4>just a sack of money in the shape of the

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 4>United States or something.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 2>No, it was much more telling that.

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah that's how you went a Pulitzer exactly.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>But I mean the runners up too, were just just

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>just good stuff. Like go look up illustrated reporting and

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 2>commentary Pulitzer stuff and you'll you'll be like, wow, this

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>is amazing that people do this.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 3>We should we should do one on political what are

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 3>they called cartoons?

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, editorial cartoons.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, we should do one on that whole thing.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 3>That'd be a fun one, I think.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yumy's uncle is an editorial cartoonist, a well known

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>one in Japan.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 3>No way, way, wow, all right, well, we're definitely gonna

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 3>do it. Then, okay, that's the old deal.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Cool.

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 4>I have seen that there's breaking news photography, you know,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 4>that's obviously some usually some tragedy is unfolding and someone

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 4>will snap a iconic photo. Different from the feature photography award.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 4>This is like a photo series usually yeah that has

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 4>a tells a story.

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 3>That's feature photography.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It's more flip bookie than the breaking news photography.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 4>And then finally, everybody introduced just a few years ago

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 4>audio reporting, Like there is a they don't call it

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 4>the Podcast Award, but that's kind of what it is.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, it includes podcasts, but it can also include like

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 2>local yeah, public radio, like features and stories and all that.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a huge expansion because before it was all print,

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 2>it was all writing, as we'll see. So that's a big,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 2>a big new one. And there's another new one coming

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 2>down the pike that allows broadcast outlets like say, your

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>local NBC affiliate it's a really great reporter that writes

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 2>on their website that reporter will now be eligible for

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Pulitzer stuff.

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 3>That's cool.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Then there's also the whole book section, which is interesting.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the Prize for Fiction used to be called the

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 4>Prize for novels, but now it's fiction. Usually it's about

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 4>American life, says you know, preferably, but it's American author

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 4>generally with a story about Americans American ing.

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So every year they picked that year's Great American

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 2>novel basically.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that's remember I said I was reading a book,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 4>a novel for the first time in a while recently. Yeah,

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 4>I picked this book because that's sometimes when I'm after

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 4>a novel and it's been in a while, I will

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 4>go to the Pulitzer list, and that's exactly what I did.

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 4>And I'm reading Less by Andrew Sean Greer, which one

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 4>in twenty eighteen, and it is so funny and great awesome.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.479
<v Speaker 2>From in Living Color to Pulitzer Price.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh, David Allen Greer com.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh that's right. There's also one on history, a

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>one on biography also other way outs biography.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 3>Your man, Charles Mann has not won the Pulitzer. I

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 3>looked it up. I was like, surely Josh's guy won

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 3>this award for history.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, that's more. He's more focused on meso American.

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>This is America, like United States American.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that counts.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I agree, But apparently the Pulitzer committee is not interested

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>in that kind of thing.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 3>He won which was yours fourteen ninety one.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then the follow up was fourteen ninety three.

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he won a big award for that, but not

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the Pulitzer.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, no, he definitely deserved it for sure.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So you mentioned biography.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's also now memoir or autobiography, sure.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Which was branded this past year.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're just really busting out the new awards.

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, they got a Poetry Award for American Poets

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 3>general nonfiction.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>That would be what our book won a Politzer.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 4>For, right, so nonfiction but not a memoir or autobiography

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 4>or biography.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And I'm not sure if we said this, and

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if it was spelled out, but the

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 2>it had to have been released in that year. Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 2>so the good point. Okay, that's that's very important. So

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 2>like our book will never win a Pulitzer because it

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 2>had a shot at winning the year it came out,

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 2>and then after that it's out of the running.

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Same uh, same with drama. There's a drama one that

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 2>we said, like usually it is a great American play.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>David Mammott won for Glengarry Glenn Ross.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what's the name one, oh David.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Well Miranda, Yes, that guy, Yeah yeah.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 4>August Wilson won for Fences, another great play. So yeah,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 4>great great plays.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And then music, and this one's typically kind of controversial

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>because it really reveals just how stuffy the Pulitzer board is.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 2>In any given year. It almost always goes to a

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 2>like a recording of classical music that somebody released that year,

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and classical music is not exactly America's contribution. These are

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 2>American awards. Don't forget about America by Americans. Typically well,

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 2>America contributed jazz, rock for the most part, and hip

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>hop very clearly as far as music goes, and only

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>one hip hop artist. I'm surprised that there's even one.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Kendrick Lamar won a Pulletzer in twenty seventeen. A couple

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>of jazz cats have, but for the most part, it's

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>usually classical music. So look for that to continue to

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>change in the future because from what I can tell,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the Pulletzer people are hyper aware of how they are

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>perceived in the in the intelligentsia version of pop culture

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and respond to it subtly over time.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what I want to know is how many of

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 4>our friends in Britain their heads about to pop off.

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 2>That's why I said kind of I qualified the invented

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>rock and roll. We had a lot to do with it.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, of course we did.

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Chuck Berry was in British.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 3>No, I know, we trust me.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm with you, okay, And some can even say that

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 4>the you know, the American Blues is the true birth

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 4>of what would become rock and roll because all those

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 4>British bands were influenced by the American blues exactly.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah to stick it.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, take that our British friends.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 4>You know what's interesting though, is the biggest sort of

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 4>rock bands of the classic rock era, most of those

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 4>were not American. I mean that we had our share,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 4>but like when you think about you know, the biggest

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.719
<v Speaker 4>bands in the world, they were led Zeppelin and the Who,

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 4>and the Rolling Stones and the Beatles and mostly British.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So super super duper classic version, not like White Lion

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 2>or Dockin No, no, no, because they were Americans through

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and through.

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 4>My friend Yeah, yeah, I mean we had Boston and

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 4>the Eagles and Aerosmiths and stuff like that.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but they have flatbirds.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Boys, See, you're taking a rite down the White Lion lane.

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>All right? Should we keep going or should we take

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 2>a break here?

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Uh, let's keep going since we already took it early one.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay. If you guys thought it was a slog before

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>buckle up.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 4>That's right, because we're going to talk about how they

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 4>choose these and the first step. And I think the

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 4>main reason we didn't win a Pulitzer Prize is that

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 4>we didn't submit our book.

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 3>You gotta submit.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 4>They just don't say, all right, every book that's written

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 4>this year will look at you.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 3>You got to. You gotta pay your seventy five bucks

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 3>and submit it.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we didn't have seventy five bucks.

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 3>We did.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>We thought about it. We couldn't couldn't get the company

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 2>to back us or.

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Pay us to stand off. You and I had to

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 4>standoff of it was like, well, I know you got it.

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 4>You're not gonna pay it.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm it.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I noticed Jerry didn't step forward.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's Jerry needs to bust out the wallet one.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>There are a couple of like our book would have

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 2>qualified and every other way it had to have been

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 2>published in a hard copy definitely was That separates a

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 2>lot of the self published ebooks, which apparently are not

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 2>up for Pulitzer consideration. Unless you self publish a book

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>in hard copy. As long as this in hard copy somewhere,

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 2>it's eligible to be considered for a Pulitzer, and you,

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the author, like you said, can suggest it, can nominate

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 2>it yourself.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 4>If you're entering in journalism, it has to be in

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 4>a news outlet that publishes regularly, so it can't be

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 4>the zine you put out, you know when you feel

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 4>like it. Right, that can be online only versions. It

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have to be in pay per form, but it

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 4>has to be like a legit, you know, qualifying website.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, for sure. And then now, like I was saying,

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 2>broadcast media outlets, their writers can can be eligible for

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>stuff posted on their websites, But there's nothing for documentaries.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing for video only journalism. I predict this changing

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>in the next within this decade.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they'll be just one for like content creator, their influencer.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Dave makes a point here to watch out for when

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 4>something claims to be bullets are nominated, because if you

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 4>have submitted, then you're technically nominated. It doesn't mean that

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 4>you're special because anyone can can nominate. If if you've

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 4>got seventy five bucks, you can and you qualify, you

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 4>can put yourself in there. I say that they should

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 4>require people just say bullets are submitted.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, we can't even claim that.

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but if you don't win. The only other sort

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 4>of distinctive honor is if you're one of the three

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 4>finalists and you can claim to be a finalist.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, that's yeah. If you're a policer finalist, Like,

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 2>you can still toot that horn for sure and people

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 2>will listen.

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're like three out of I think they are

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 4>eleven hundred journalism entries per year on average.

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Wow, and about fourteen hundred books.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so yeah, now we reach step two. Like your

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 2>work has been nominated, it gets shuffled together with a

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of other stuff and about one hundred different jurors,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 2>sometimes repeat jurors from the year before. You don't have

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to just do it once. And it's not the same

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 2>people every year for sure. But they're all volunteer jurors.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>They get assigned to twenty two different categories. And yes

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 2>we said there's twenty three. But the photographers who are

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 2>the jurors judge both breaking news and feature photography, and

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 2>they are people who are some time former Pulitzer winners.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>There are people who are like really well known in

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 2>their field. I think like Roxane Gay was one of

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the jurors on this past year's poetry Poetry Committee. I

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 2>think so, Like you're you're probably pretty good at your

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 2>job if you're on a Pulitzer jury.

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Josh, I have one question, though, what are any of

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 3>those jurors.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Jurors for the local reporting ones.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, okay, Giral jurors, Yep, that's great.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 4>You usually serve a few years and then they'll rotate

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 4>you out.

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>You don't get paid for it's a volunteer thing, but

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 4>you got If you're on the book side, you were

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 4>reading a lot of books.

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, apparently for the fiction category, there might be three

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred books that you have to read through within several months.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 4>I tried and tried to find out if that was

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 4>because what I saw was there are six book juries

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 4>with five jurors per jury, so thirty different judges, and

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 4>they send them in thirty book packages. But I didn't know,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 4>are they really it's impossible to read three hundred books

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 4>over the course of months, not if.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 2>You're Pulitzer jury material, My friend.

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that the deal?

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Because I was trying to verify that, I thought maybe

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 4>they read thirty each and just it was all like

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 4>packaged together or something.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see anywhere that contradicted that. And yes, three

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred books is a lot to read. As a matter

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 2>of fact, now that that we're talking about it, that

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 2>is a preposterous number for one person to read within

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>several months.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how many books is that a week? Two weeks?

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>One hundred? I think if my math is correct.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 3>That's almost six books a week. Is that possible?

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not, because these people also have like regular

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 2>jobs that their whole holding down too.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 4>So I really looked and looked and looked, and I

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 4>could not find. What I'm guessing is is that they

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 4>get thirty books per judge.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Which is still quite a bit. But yes, that's much

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>more manageable than three hundred.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 4>I hope somebody knows, because I really want to get

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 4>to the bottom of this. There's no way there they're

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 4>reading three hundred books.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I wonder.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if each judge so this would make a

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 2>lot of sense. And again, like we've never advertised ourselves

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 2>as experts, and I think we're showing it big time now.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>But if I were guessing, chuck each if each one

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>reads thirty books, they pick like their favorites and present

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 2>them to the committee and say, these are some of

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>my favorites. And everybody does that, and it immediately whittles

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>it down to a manageable size. That would make a

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of sense. And then maybe the other ones have

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to read the books that the other people brought forth.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, rat, I mean that makes sense. I was just

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 4>destraughed at how hard it was to find this out.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 4>I looked and looked and looked, and I couldn't find

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 4>out for sure if they each read each book.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's an ongoing thing too. From what I've seen

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>that the deliberation process is very secretive. The Pulitzer Committee

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and board and anyone associated with it has no obligation

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 2>whatsoever to be transparent about the judging process at all.

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that is a criticism. But ultimately what happens is

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 4>they will meet in person in February at Columbia, sometimes

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 4>in March, and they reduce it to the three finalists,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 4>and then the board picks the ultimate winner from each

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 4>of the picks of three. Well that's not true. They

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 4>are generally picked from that group of three, but they

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 4>are not required to pick from that group of three.

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:52.719
<v Speaker 4>And there have been many cases leap twelve times in

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 4>fiction at least, where they did not award a winner

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 4>at all.

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Anytime the board decides not to pick somebody, it's

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a huge it's considered a huge slap in the face.

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 2>As recently as twenty twenty one. So twenty twelve for fiction,

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, for the Editorial Cartoon prize, the board

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>opted not to choose from the three finalists Lalo Alcaraz,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Marty two Boles Senior, and Ruben Bowling from Tom the

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Dancing Bug. They were the three finalists and none of

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 2>them won.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 3>And so with he did someone win? No, they look

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 3>like there was no award to gotcha.

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>No award? And I saw Ruben Bowling was basically like, so, yeah,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 2>they're saying no one made Pulitzer worthy material this year,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and that's that's like, that's crazy. And but I liked

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Marty two Ball's interpretation. He said that to him, they

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 2>had so much trouble picking a winner that nobody won.

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>They all spoiled when another's chance, because there has to

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>be there can be a hung jury. You have to

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 2>get some percentage of the votes to make it as

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the as the winner and not just a finalist.

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Well that's what happened in twenty twelve for sure, because

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 4>they actually came out and said for fiction.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 3>That it was a three way tie.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>That's rare. With the editorial cartoon in twenty twenty one,

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 2>they just stayed, Mom, They just said, no awards going

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>to be awarded.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but like, how do you have a tie, Like

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 4>you could either have an odd number on the board

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 4>or let that president because the president of Columbia is

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 4>always on the board. Still they should be the tie

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 4>breaker or something.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>That is a huge criticism that that's even possible that

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't do that not have a winner because they deadlock.

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, thumbs down Bulleitzer for that decision for me

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 4>to get with the times.

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>So you hit on something earlier. You thought I was saying,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the board can select somebody that wasn't even nominated by

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the jury.

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, yeah, if it's not someone outside that final three.

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they apparently just need a three quarters vote to

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>either select somebody that wasn't nominated, that was in that

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>category or was in another category, and they moved them

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>to a category they think they are likeli or to win.

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 2>That happened with the biography of George Floyd this past year.

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>It was nominated in biography. Apparently this biography and Jaeger

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Hoover with such gangbusters that it was no way even

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 2>George Floyd's biography was going to win. They moved it

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>to the general nonfiction category, and George Floyd's biography won

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>in that one. So it's like you said, the Pulitzer

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>committee is very conscious of the messages they're sending out

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 2>by their awards, for sure, and sometimes they maneuver to

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 2>speak loud and clear.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 4>All right, I say we take our second break, and

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 4>we'll finish up with talking about some of the controversies

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 4>and some of the surprises over the years.

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Lately I've been learning some stuff about insomnia or aluminia.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>How about the one on border like disorder, better under order?

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Heard that one before, but it was so nice I

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 2>learned it.

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Wise, everybody, listen up, stop shut off, stop stop stop.

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 2>So uh. One of the things that the Pulitzers are

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 2>definitely criticized for is the frequency, Yeah, the frequency of

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 2>ords that go to the same news organizations over and

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 2>over and over again, because the Pulitzers were award extensive

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 2>in depth reporting that you really kind of have to

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 2>have a pretty decent budget to carry out. And so

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times has won one hundred and thirty

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 2>two Pulitzers over the years. The Washington Post has seventy plus,

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 2>The Associated Press has fifty eight so like the big

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>news organizations are the ones who usually take home the most,

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 2>but they have it set up in a way that,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 2>like the local news reporting is much likelier to go

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to a smaller organization than the bigger guys. But that

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 2>big one, the big daddy, as we said, the Public

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Service Award almost always goes to or very often goes to,

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the large news organizations. But that's not always

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the case, Chuck, it's not always the case.

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:51.439
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 4>In twenty seventeen for editorial writing the Storm Lake Times one,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 4>this is a speaking a rural juror. They probably went

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 4>wild over this because this is a paper that runs

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 4>twice a week with a staff of nine people, with

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 4>a circulation of about three thousand in rural Iowa. And

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.399
<v Speaker 4>it beat the big daddies, that beat the New York

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 4>Times in the Wall Street Journal, among others.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. In nineteen ninety, a few years earlier, the Washington

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Daily News out of Washington, North Carolina. They won because

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 2>they had a series of articles that exposed that the

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>city council was well aware that the drinking water was

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>tainted with carcinogens and that they were covering it up.

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 2>And they won a pulletzer. They had a circulation of

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 2>eighty six hundred and forty four. So, in addition to

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 2>these really good reporting that it would require for a

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 2>small organization to win the public service pullets or the

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 2>big one, it's worth pointing out these people are under

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the most pressure to not publish stories like that. Yeah,

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 2>their friends, neighbors and grocery store shoppers, with the mayor,

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 2>with the city manager, with the Chamber of Commerce head

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 2>like the people who are who can pressure them and

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 2>say like, you're you're ruining the image of our town.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't don't write about this or change the tone of it.

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.919
<v Speaker 2>So in that sense, those people deserve a pulletzer even

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>more than say, you know, a huge organization that can

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 2>that can just kind of deflect that kind of stuff

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>is under tremendous pressure. There's a difference getting a call

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 2>from the president saying I don't want you to run

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>this and getting a call from the mayor saying you

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 2>don't want to run this, But it's still it seems different.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the pressure is even greater for smaller

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 2>news organizations.

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 4>So as far as controversies go, there are a few

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 4>kind of famous incidents that not incidences. By the way,

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 4>I've been saying that wrong, have you. An incidents doesn't

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 4>mean something that happened, it's an incident.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah yeah.

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Somebody pointing that out to me.

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Okay, believe it or not.

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 4>Someone wrote in and point out out something that we

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 4>said that was bothered them.

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a first.

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, we should talk about these incidents.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 3>The first one was from nineteen eighty one.

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 4>A woman named Janet Cook at the time was writing

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 4>for the Washington Post and was the first black woman

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 4>to get a Politzer Prize and feature writing well I

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 4>think journalism period. And this was a story about called

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:29.479
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy's World, about an eight year old heroin addict named

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy and Washington, d C.

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 2>It had such an effect that at the time Marion

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Barry was mayor. Marion Barry was mayor of DC forever.

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 2>He ordered his administration to find this kid and get

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 2>him away from his parents. It was a huge It

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 2>just dropped a bomb on not just Washington, d C.

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 2>But the whole country. And Janet Cook made the whole

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 2>thing up.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 4>So it was submitted by who at the time was

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 4>the assistant managing editor of the post, a guy named

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 4>Bob Woodward, none other than and he submitted this thing.

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 4>She had previously, for three years worked for the Toledo Blade,

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 4>which was her hometown newspaper and Josh's sometown newspaper. And

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 4>they were like, wait a minute, she worked here, and

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 4>we're looking at her bio from the Pulitzer Committee, and like,

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 4>this doesn't match up with the bio that she gave us.

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 4>It says she speaks all these languages. She doesn't speak

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 4>all these languages. She didn't graduate magna cum laude from Vassar,

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 4>she didn't have a master's degree from University of Toledo.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 4>And so they start kind of like her old employer

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 4>started grilling her publicly about this, and she initially said, like,

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 4>all right, I fudged my resume some and literally within

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 4>hours it all fell apart. She eventually copped to making

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 4>up this whole story. This is as Marion Barry and

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 4>the DC cops are coming up empty looking for this

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 4>non existent kid, and Marion Barry's casting public doubt. But

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 4>was in a you know, kind of a pickle of

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 4>a situation. Yeah, like it seems like there's no Jimmy,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 4>but like we're not sure what's going on. I think

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the sad thing is that apparently it's sort of like

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 4>the A Million Little Pieces book. Yeah, that guy wrote

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 4>like I read that book and it was great with

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 4>a capital G. And in my mind I was always like, dude,

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 4>why did you just should have called it a novel

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 4>and you would have been fine. And apparently the writing

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 4>in Jimmy's world was so great, like really famous authors

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 4>came out and we're like, I just wish she hadn't

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 4>have done this all. You know, she should have won

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 4>the Nobel Prize for Literature.

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 3>That was so good.

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 4>But she put herself out there for a pulletzer and

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 4>that was that was the fatal flaw.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So it took days before she finally fested up

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and and and retracted the story and said that she

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 2>was returning her pulletzer, which from what I could tell,

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 2>she didn't have to do. She could have been like,

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 2>thanks for the pulletzer jumps, I don't I guess they

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 2>could rescind it, but she didn't have to give it back.

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 2>So she did and moved to France and just stayed

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 2>in communicado for a decade or two and then Teresa Carpenter,

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 2>who wrote the story Death of a Playmate about the

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 2>murder of Dorothy Stratton in The Village Voice, ended up

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 2>winning the nineteen eighty one Pulletzer for feature writing. She was,

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I guess the runner up, and after Janet Cook gave

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 2>it back, Teresa Carpenter got it and that was a

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 2>really good story. It was definitely pullets are worthy.

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Alex Haley was another one in nineteen seventy seven for

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 4>his book Roots, which I never knew it had a colon,

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 4>but I didn't either. The full title of Roots was

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Roots Colon the Saga of an American Family. I think

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I've seen it before on the cover, but it they

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:52.879
<v Speaker 4>didn't call it mini series that so.

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Plus the colon was implied.

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 4>It was a novel, but Haley claimed that it was

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 4>based on his family from his own African heritage that

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 4>he had researched, and it turned out that that probably

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 4>wasn't true. It was unverified, and he admitted to plagiarizing

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 4>parts of Roots from other novels. At the time, they

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 4>did not rescind his Bulletser though it was a special citation.

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't the Book Prize, So I think they just

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:20.760
<v Speaker 4>let it slide.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a real campaign to get that special citation,

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 2>even rescinded by some people. But yeah, I had no

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 2>idea that Roots was fabricated in some ways or plagiarized

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:36.959
<v Speaker 2>to And then there's a guy named Walter Duranty who

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 2>inspired so much. I guess dislike is a nice way

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to put it among journalists that he was awarded the

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Poltzer back in nineteen thirty two. People still today are

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 2>calling for that to be rescinded. And then the war

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.359
<v Speaker 2>in Ukraine kind of flared it back up again after

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:58.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of dying off a little. He was the Moscow

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 2>bureau chief for the New York Times, a Pulitzer, like

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I said in thirty two, for his reporting on Joseph

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:09.439
<v Speaker 2>Stalin and Stalin's dictatorship, and essentially he was the guy

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 2>who was presenting Stalin in a really great light to America.

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>He was a huge apologist for Stalin. And it's gross

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 2>because in his Pulitzer award it says that he was

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 2>awarded for his dispassionate reporting. It was not just passionate

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 2>at all. It was in favor of Stalin and Stalin's

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 2>policies that killed millions of people.

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and one of his direct quotes was to pretty brutally,

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 4>you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs. But when

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 4>talking about the death of Ukrainians.

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, so he still has his Pulitzer. People are still

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 2>mad about it.

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we did mention the you know, the sort of

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 4>secrecy of how it goes out is always controversial. And

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.439
<v Speaker 4>it's like any award, any subjective award, whereas he whether

0:42:56.480 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 4>it's Academy Awards or Emmy's or whatever, they're all subjective.

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 4>So there's always going to be people complaining that it's

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 4>not rigged. But just like you got to be a

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:12.319
<v Speaker 4>certain kind of thing to win this award. Just like

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 4>an Oscar bait movie that they throw out at the

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 4>end of the year, there are Pulitzer I don't know

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 4>about bait, but you know, when these publications are putting

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 4>together these series, they're like, hey, you do a good

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 4>job here, and you know what might be at the

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 4>end of that road.

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, there's a really great you can characterize it as

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 2>a takedown very easily by Jack Schaeffer in Politico called

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the Pulitzer Prize scam from a few years back, and

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Jack Schaeffer basically is like, how could you possibly compare

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 2>some of this stuff and find any distinguishable difference enough

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 2>that says this one's better than this one? And an

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 2>example I came up with is the editorial writing Pulitzer

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 2>for twenty twenty three. It went to a writer for

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 2>a series on the broken promises of the city of

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 2>Miami to citizens. Right, the runners up were one that

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:08.839
<v Speaker 2>explained the U'voldi tragedy and the botched police response, and

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>then the other runner up was about how domestic white

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 2>supremacist terrorism affects the United States. How could you compare

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 2>those three things and be like, Yep, this one's better.

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because the writing in and of itself is

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 2>going to just be top notch to begin with. So

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 2>then what you're using the material to judge it? Bi, well,

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 2>how do you compare that material to other material? It

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 2>is fully subjective, and that drives some people nuts.

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think with any award like that,

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 4>the voter, whether it's a board member of the Pulitzer

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 4>or an Academy member, is voting on something that speaks

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 4>to them the most, I guess.

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, And like you said, I mean it is if

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 2>you look at some of the material, a lot of

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:55.959
<v Speaker 2>the material, it is very liberal in it's bent, and

0:44:56.280 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 2>it shines a light on the kind of the kind

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 2>of issues that liberals would be interested and upset about.

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>And that seems to be generally what the Pulitzer committees

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 2>tend to the juries tend to percolate towards the top.

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it's clubbe university, it's academia. They have

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 4>that bent anyway, generally that I mean that joke I

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 4>made about Alex Jones earlier.

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:23.959
<v Speaker 3>I want to be clear.

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 4>They're not giving him and they're not denying him the

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 4>award because he's a conservative. You know, they're denying him

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 4>the award because he's a lying liar, right, you know

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 4>there's a difference for sure.

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even sure he qualifies as conservative at this point.

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, who knows?

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 2>You got anything else on Pulitzer prizes? No?

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, should we put in for podcast or not?

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I don't. I don't know, man.

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:53.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean I feel like in order for us to

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 4>put in, we would have to do a special, like

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 4>four part series on something. It couldn't just be for well,

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 4>it certainly couldn't be for all excellence.

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.879
<v Speaker 2>No, definitely, for a lot of reason. Definitely not. But yeah,

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 2>we could do We'll do a four part series on

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 2>jelly beans.

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, or maybe we should just submit to the episode

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 3>for the word like.

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great idea. Okay, Okay, we're gonna do that.

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, if you want to know more about

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 2>the politzerprise, go Rey Jack Shaffer's takedown. It's a good

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>place to start because he also gives a lot of

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 2>background too. And since I said background, it's time for

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 2>listener mail.

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 4>This one is from a teacher. We love these, Hey guys,

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm a chemistry professor at the College of Worcester in Ohio.

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 4>And he says Wester not Wooster.

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 3>But that's another story.

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 4>One of the joys in my work is chatting with

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 4>college students in the lab while we wait for experiments

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 4>to complete, talking about life, current events, random facts. There

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 4>have been some uncanny similarities between our conversations and your

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 4>recent are you guys listening in Luckily most of my

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 4>recent experience. In my most recent experience, you realized the

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 4>podcast before the conversation. I was never taught much African history,

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 4>and thanks to you walked away from your Highly Selassie

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 4>podcast feeling well in formed. I shared what I learned

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 4>with one of my students from Ethiopia, and during the

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.839
<v Speaker 4>conversation they shared an interesting fact of their own. Apparently

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 4>there is a bump engineered on purpose in the road

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 4>at the spot where highly Selassie's former residence is. So

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 4>when motorists pass by, they hit the bump and their

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 4>head bobs, and it is so every head will bow

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 4>when they.

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 3>Drive by his house.

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Pretty amazing.

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 4>And I try to find this out and verified it.

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 4>I didn't spend a whole lot of time looking because

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, fact checking listener mail is something I want

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 4>to put a lot of time into. But hey, if

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 4>this is true, that's pretty pretty awesome.

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and even if it's not true, I'm going to

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 2>go do the same thing in front of my house.

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Bags of cementas Yeah, I expense them too.

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Awesome. That is from Paul Bonbalay.

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot, Paul, that's a great email. Thank you

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>very much, and yes, we are watching you in your class.

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Keep up the good work. If you want to be

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.919
<v Speaker 2>like Paul and get in touch with us, we love

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 2>hearing additional facts that may be so amazing that they

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 2>possibly aren't true, but are still a good idea. If

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 2>you want to do that, you can send it in

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:36.439
<v Speaker 2>an email to stuff podcast at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.