WEBVTT - The Work-From-Home Boom Is Here to Stay

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. You can

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can also listen to our radio show at

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, and be sure to

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot going on, as we know, as there is.

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It feels like almost every day when it comes to

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, COVID nineteen UM and we are waiting maybe

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some emergency authorization when it comes to Maderna's vaccine, so

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we're following that. This is on a day when global

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>virus cases past seventy four point three million, deaths top

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>one point six million, and we're just seeing these numbers

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to go higher. I should say that the US

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hit a record three thousand eighty five deaths yesterday. Let's

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>check in with carry alt Off. She is Associate Professor

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University Boomberg School of Public Health.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>She's with us on the phone from Baltimore, the Bloomberg

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>School of Public Health, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. UM. Carrie, it's good

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to have you here with Tim and myself. UM. I

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>always feel like on every day, I'm not quite sure

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>where to start. What is you think first and foremost

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to COVID in the vaccine today that

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you think our listeners need to be aware of. I

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.639
<v Speaker 1>think everyone needs to know that these hearings are going well.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>The scientific rigor which the investigators and the expert that

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>have been brought in from lots of different places, the

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>rigor with which they're looking at this data is really important.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>They are asking questions which some of which there are

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>answers for right now, some of which there are not

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>yet answers for, and so there are ideas about how

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to continue these trials. It's really important to figure that

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>piece out because right now, thankfully, so many people want

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this vaccine and we need to keep pushing for that

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>because as these vaccines become available, of course, they only

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>work if people actually choose vaccination Kerry. We learned also

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in recent days about sort of the first here in

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the US response that that wasn't so great to a vaccine,

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the first allergic response, and this was a healthcare worker

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska who didn't have a history of allergic reactions,

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but this person was held overnight in the hospital and

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it got a lot of coverage. Is this something that

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>should how how should people who want this vaccine think

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about news like this? So I would say this, we

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have to remember that reactions to vaccines, even severe allergic reactions,

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>do happen to a number of vaccines. It is something

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that's expected, and that's why when you get a vaccine,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you're typically doing it in a healthcare setting where those

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>individuals who are administering the vaccine are also trained in

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>how to essentially give you an eppie shot if you

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>need it for anaphalactus or other types of allergic reaction. So,

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we know that allergic reaction is something

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that happens. Of course, when ever there's a new product,

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we we scrutinize every single one of these events. We

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>want to know when it happened, how it happened. We

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>want to know all of the information about it, but

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we also have to put it in the

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>context of we know that these types of reactions happen

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to vaccines and other medical products, and we also know

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of people in these trials

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>who have been receiving these vaccines. It's something we will

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely be keeping our eye out, but right now, there's

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>no reason to believe that the anflexus rate after a

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>vaccination is substantially higher with this vaccine than what would

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be accepted. And Carrie helped me out because this is

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>something we've asked a lot of UM. You know, your

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.119
<v Speaker 1>colleagues at Johns Hopkins and other members of the medical community.

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that my understanding is that if there is a

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>severe reaction to a vaccine, that you know it within

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the first month. But again, we're working with new technology,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>new science. UM Is that accurate though? So typically, you know,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to link the actual reactions back to the vaccine,

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a long process that goes on where you

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>really scrutinize everything. Of course, if it happens pretty quickly

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>after the vaccination, and some people say one month. UM.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>In some of the Maderna data that was presented Um,

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they were I'm sorry, it was a fiser data that

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 1>was presented that the reaction happened quite a few months later,

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and so, you know, actually tying these reactions to the

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccine itself. Sometimes people do put on a timeline like

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>one month, but really it comes down to the data

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that are uncovered when that reaction is investigated. Just from

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint of of of somebody with your background, an

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>epidemiologist who studies AIDS and it does AIDS research and

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>HIV research, what do you make of the development of

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines that we're seeing right now. How big of

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>a deal is this? It is absolutely scientifically historic. It

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is hours and hours and hours of scientists, you know,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>pouring your hearts and souls into trying to figure out

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>how to get this pandemic stopped with one of the

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>most important biomedical tools we've will have against coronavirus, which

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is vaccination. We cannot say that it is the prominent

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>tool yet in our toolbox. Of course, we only have

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one sectine that's eu AID hopefully will have to probably

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>by monday, and um, we're we're moving forward, but we

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 1>still have to wear masks, we still have to social distance,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we still have to take all of this very very seriously.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Even um this week there was an interesting analysis looking

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>at excess deaths in person forty four. I mean, these

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>are these are people that we've been saying, oh, you

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>know that they're not at the greatest risk of death.

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And although that might be true, losing someone in that

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>age group, someone who is a young mother or a father,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>someone who is someone's brother or sister, a person who

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>is a productive member of our society, losing them to

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>COVID is really a tragedy, as are all the death

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>due to COVID, but this excess death in this age

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>group is really it's shocking, it's compelling, and it just

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>reminds us that although these vaccines are absolutely scientific history,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it is also a time where we have to continue

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to rely on all the layers in all the tools

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in our toolbox to keep each other safe. So, Carrie,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you see kind of the next few months

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>playing out for our world here in the United States

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of virus numbers and also vaccine rollout. So

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note that right now, the best tools

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to reduce the number of new cases and

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the number of deaths are the tools that

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>we've had since the beginning, really, which is wearing your mask,

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>being home unless you absolutely have to, and um, making

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>sure that you're you're keeping space from each other when

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>when you're in public or in any enclosed environment in particular,

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but even outside. So essentially, what we're trying to do

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>is just prevent that virus from transmitting from one person

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to another, right, don't give it a host, so don't

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>get too close. It's really the name of the game.

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And we need to put these practices in place and

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>continue with these practices until we do have more widely

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>distributed vaccine. With the Maderna news today, you know, we

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>hopefully will have a number of vaccines rolling out over

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the course of the next couple of months, which not

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>only increases the numbers, but also interestingly it could perhaps

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>give people some options. Right, so if for example, of

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>vaccine works better in older adults versus younger adults. UM.

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>One thing I just wanted to correct from earlier was

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that the case that I referenced of an individual developing

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>inflexis more than two months after being vaccinated. This actually

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>was prompted. It came from m Jacqueline Miller, the vice

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>president for Infectious Diseases Development at Maderna during FDA hearings today.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It was prompted by a question from Mark Sawyer, who's

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the professor of clinical pediatrics at the University of California,

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>San Diego, and he said, you know, Maderna has done

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a number of Phase one into clinical trials of m

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>R and A vaccines for really eight other pathogens over

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last few years. And so he said, hey,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have you gone back into that data and looked to

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>see if those earlier trials if there were reports of

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a flaccus among patients. And that's when Jackline Miller said, well,

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there was this one report and a woman with a

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>sty allergy and she developed this more than two months

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>after being vaccinated. And so it does bring up this

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>question of Okay, maybe this this um triggering of anifyl

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>acxis it might be different across different vaccines, and we

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't just take what is happening in one and apply

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it to a different vaccine. And that's what Maderna's chief

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>medical officer also noted that, you know, we we have

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch each of these vaccines carefully and so we

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>know who should be using witch vaccines, So no blanket

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>assumptions really along the way. I would be really hesitant

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>right now to do a lot of one getting assumptions.

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>These these are big trials. We will be following these

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>um wonderful volunteers well into the future, and so we'll

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>let the data show us what it needs to show us.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But given that the supply of this is so constrained

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and there are so few vaccines available right now, when

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>will people actually have the option to take one vaccine

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>over another if they do have concerns about anaphylaxics. Well,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think for a lot of people that the choice

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and vaccines of course has to come after at least

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>more than one receiving e u A, which hopefully will

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>come very soon. But then it will be this rollout

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>process coupled with the tearing process. Right So who is

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the top priority right now? It's the healthcare workers and

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the individual to a learning living in long term care facilities.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And so once we get those populations vaccinated, um hopefully

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we will have higher production of at least two vaccines.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And so when this vaccine starts to roll out to

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the more generalized population, there may be some more options. Yeah,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Hey, just real quickly, just got about thirty seconds.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>What are your hopes, uh for the incoming Biden administration

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>come to Nuary. Um. I hope they stick to the

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>science and they let the science lead the way, and

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they are putting together people and teams that are true, um,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>followers of the science. Um. They are empathetic, compassionate people.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is the unstoppable combination to have

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>empathy and can move forward with the science so that

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>this virus gets stopped and we get back to living

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>our lives in a healthy way. Yeah. I think that's

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a really good message in terms of really sticking to

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the science because it says so much. UM, Carrie, thank

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Dr carry alt Off, Associate Professor of

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with US from Baltimore. The Bloomberg School of Public Health

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg LP and

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Philanthropies. But it is so interesting to him, like

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>every time, you know, everybody goes back to and it

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense masks, social distancing, Like there's just those basic

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>things that still work. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. Well, the cover of Bloomberg

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Business Week this week is the work from Home boom.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>It is here to stay and as a result, get

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ready for some changes, including everyone some pay cuts. It's

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>really all about the urban exodus and the implications because

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it has the potential to impact so much in our

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>world and economy. That story by Bloomberg News Finance reporter

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.239
<v Speaker 1>no Boo Hire, who joins us on the phone from Seattle,

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>along with Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Webber on the

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>access line in Brooklyn, and Joel kick it off for us.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do feel like this working from home

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thing has massive implications, and no one really lays it

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>out in the story. Yeah, that's right. I mean we've

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>been watching this trend um just evolved throughout the pandemic,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and and it started with people, you know, basically the

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>urban exodus, people leaving cities and going to the suburbs

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or or the country. And then instead of renting some

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of those places, people started buying and and then you know,

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the employers started to catch up with with it eventually,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's really kind of the new element. And I

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think the one that that really distinguishes Noah's story has been.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the shift was at first it was just

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the real estate implications, but now it's about the pay implications.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And Noah's reporting actually centers on a store, on a company,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>red Fin, the real estate company, and they actually almost

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>become the vehicle for the story. So Noah tells us

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>about this trend and what we've learned through red Fin. Yeah, well,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I think you really you really captured it. I mean,

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this is uh, this is a trend in HR policy

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>right now. We've we've we've had this massive experiment in

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.479
<v Speaker 1>working from home and I think a lot of companies

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>have found that it works for people. Um, it's not perfect.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>There are for sure some drawbacks. UM, but as as

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through the months, companies, I think, responding to

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what they're hearing from their workforces, have realized that they

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>can allow for a much greater UH amount of remote

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>work um when the pandemic is finally over. And that's

0:12:55.720 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>forced them to really reckon with UH policies and how

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you how you actually make this work in a way

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fairer and reasonable for your business. And um,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>really it's just opened up a giant can of worms

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>because uh, you know, the cost of labor and the

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>cost of living just vary so radically across the US that, um,

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you could create situations where, you know, if someone moved

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>from the Bay Area to Phoenix or Atlanta, they um,

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and they carried their salary with them. They just um,

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you create a situation where, um, you were paying way

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>above market essentially. Okay, So the Redfin thing that's so

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>interesting though, is that once people sort of moved out, uh,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and the company had to grapple with us, and they

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>were actually proactive I think and having a plan basically um.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And they basically realized that in order to implement this,

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>they needed to have some version of like a localized

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>pay policy. Right, So, so tell us about how they

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>actually went about implementing that. Yeah, so on some levels,

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>like companies have been doing this for years, right, it's

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just um uh like they they've thought about, well, if

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we open a new office in a new city, what

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>do we pay people that What's interesting is that that

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>red Fin and I think a lot of other companies

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, had to do this on a mass scale.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So what red Fin did is they got a bunch

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of data on cost of labor and cost of living.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>UM their their real estate company. They're in the home

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>brokerage business, so they're they're pretty attuned to this stuff.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And I have a lot of in house data, but

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they got external data as well UM to try and

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>craft the policy of what's fair and and and you know,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the data informed their decisions, but there were a lot

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of judgment calls at the end of the day, and

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're still tweaking and trying to make sure UM,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, their policy works for their people and that

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they can continue to recruit and retain the best people

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the day, that's that's really

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what this is about for companies is you know, there's

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>even with unemployment where it is today, there for certain

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of jobs, they're still an insatiable appetite UM in

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>demand for people and UM you know, as companies compete

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for talent, they want to make sure they're paying the

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>right amount in the markets where those people want to be. No,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there's there's something you explore in the piece, the economic

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>applications of this. The idea that people are leaving higher

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>cost areas moving to areas than aren't is expensive and

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and with that, of course, if they're leaving a city

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>or a state, with them goes tax base, with them,

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>goes spending in that local economy. What are the long

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>term implications of this migration. Well, I don't think we know, yeah,

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is the short and short non answer. But um, it's

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't seem like it's going to be helpful for

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>high cost places like New York and San Francisco as

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they you know, as the whole country tries to uh

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>dig itself out of of of the economic implications of

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. I mean, it's not helpful when you have

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>uh high earners leave your city. But at the same by,

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the same time, like, we just don't

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>know that at this point how extensive this is going

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to be. And and there are some real benefits to

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.479
<v Speaker 1>um living in being near where the action is, where

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there are other people in your industry, and um, you

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>know that could be a draw for people to come

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>back to some of these high cost places. Well that

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing we don't know right no yet,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this kind of urban boom, you know,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and away from that urban boom, whether or not that's

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going to stick. Because if you talk to a Jamie Diamond,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if you talk to the heads of a bunch of

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>financial companies, if you talk to the head of Netflix,

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>as you put in your story, they're not so on

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>board and think that this working from home thing is

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>going to stick. Yeah, I mean, I think what we're

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of companies do. I mean Google was

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a recent one. They're gonna They're gonna go towards a

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>more hybrid model where people would come back in like

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>three days a week. That doesn't necessarily free people up

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to leave the high cost city, but it may encourage

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>them to move to a suburb where they might not

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>have done that before if they were commuting in five

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>days a week. So there's there's both moves across the country,

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are moves within metros which have real implications

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for housing costs. I mean we've seen this all year

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that in Redfin has seen this in their business. I

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>mean suburban houses. I mean people want single family homes

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>with a yard because of the pandemic, but they're also

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to what life might be like when office

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is reopened. And maybe it's not so bad if you

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have to do that longer commute because you're only going

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>into three days a week. So no, you know, you've

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>got really good access at redfin And I'm I'm gonna

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>ask you to extrapolate here how willing were employees to

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>take this pay cut? I mean, it's obviously it's coming

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>from HR. You can keep the job, but you can

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>have a pay cut. I think that is to me,

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the biggest question here is like if employees are actually

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>willing to do this, But that willingness also depends on

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just probably how big the pay cut is. Right, So

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so talk to me about the willingness to participate. Yeah,

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the employees I spoke with who were

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>who were making these moves, I think ultimately felt like

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the numbers were fair. Um. And and that's because you know,

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>when you moved to some of these places where your

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>pay is going to be lower, your cost of living

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>goes down, usually by even more. And um. Glenn Colman,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Redman, argued to me, and I think

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty persuasive on this point. But I think

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's reasonable to expect that as more employers UH offer

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>remote work possibilities, we're going to see wages rise in

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>some of these places where the cost of labor is lower,

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>so you know, wages in Texas are going up, and

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you might also see housing costs in places like Austin

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>golf as well. But but to think that these things

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>is not right. It's a great story. We're gonna talk

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit more about the migration to textas a little

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bit later on No Boo Higher until Webber. Thank you

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>so much. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Cairol Masser

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio BIS Bloomberg Business Week on this Thursday,

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Carol Master along with Bloomberg Quicktake anchor Tim Stenovic and

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>top story at this hour. And I guess Tim, I

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be safe to say it's been a

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>tough story this weekend. It's going to end up being

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the top stories of this year. I think

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Right, we're talking bitcoin, right, We're talking bitcoin,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and we saw cryptocurrency exposed docs soaring today as well.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>We talked about that a little bit earlier, Bitcoin topping

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty three thousand dollars per token having only surpassed the

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty tho dollar bilestone for the first time. That was yesterday.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh so it is really just moving up as bitcoin

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>surges to record high. Scott minored our audience knows and well,

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.479
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer over at guggen Him Investments, believes there

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>was largest cryptocurrencies fair value still has a long way

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to go. He shared this with our colleagues over on

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg TV. We made the decision to start allocating towards

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin when bitcoin with a ten thousand UM it's it's

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more challenging with the current price closer to

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand. But having said that, our fundamental work shows

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin should be worth about four hundred thousand dollars,

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>four hundred thousand dollars, four hundred thousand dollars. My understanding

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of Scarlet Food over a Bloomberg TV when she heard

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that was like what she was. We played this on

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on Quick Take this morning because it's just the reaction

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is is really one of you know, whoa four hundred

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars? This is something that you know is that

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars now? And that's got a lot of people

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>scratching their heads exactly. So let's get into what we

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>need to know about the rise in bitcoin. Joining us

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>as Bloomberg intellige commodity strategist Mike McGlone. He's on the

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>phone from Connecticut, Mikes, so good to have you here

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with us. So, first of all, um, what's behind the rise?

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it just a basic supply and demand or what's

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>going on here? Hi, Hi Carrol. That's a lot of it.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Bottom line basic supplying demand is this year we cut

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>supply by a half, and the last time we did

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that was two thousand sixteen and two thousand seventeen. Bitcoin

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>increased from a thousand and twenty thousand, So I think

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we just broke above that twenty threshold. So what was

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>resistance is now probably going to be key support for

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>next year. And then you're opened. The man is really

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>picking up from institutions. It's become a bit of institutional fomo.

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And the factor is the macro. Look at debt to GDP,

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>q E, M M T all that it's very positive

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin. I think what we're seeing also is there's

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a migration from what a lot of assets that used

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to be more focused on gold going to the new

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>digital version. Why is why is it you said that

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going on is good for bitcoin? Is it just

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>seen as a now new safe haven or what? Yeah, Well,

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a new safe haven for a future that's

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>becoming more digitalized. Let's think of what's really happened this world.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>People don't want to really touch paper money, so everything

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is going digital. We don't really want to play with money.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And then it's also that store of value, so it's

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>got the macroeconomic factors. So I looked at like to

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>say it's it's not really a store of value yet

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>because it's too young, but it's getting there. So based

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>on my projections, the valtili of bitcoin, which is about

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>two and a half times that of gold on an

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>annualized basis, will probably match the same boutil the gold

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in about four years, so basically by the time we

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the next election and next time, that supply

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>will be cut in half. Wow. So apart from fomo,

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what our institutional investors seeing as the purpose for bitcoin

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and other cryptocurrencies when they're building portfolios. It's a store

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of value that has not really found its price ship

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's in that price discovery stage. So it's kind of

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a unique space and it's kind of scary to me.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's become almost tu bos. But I don't

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>see the bearer's case unless it's something I can't predict,

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like in the technology some kind of failure or some

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of hack, or maybe some kind of banning. But

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>other than that that this supplying demand and just looking

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>forward to this future going digital. It's a way to

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>transport them and really hold on to wealth. But on

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the thumb driver in your head or on your phone

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in the past, you know, gold is a little clunky,

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you have this world of what's the what

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>are the the competition of competitions of stock market and

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>all time high and negative or zero bond yields. So

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you're saying there's room for this to

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>go higher, not necessarily too much concern about it going lower,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at least long term, because I have friends, you know,

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>when when this happens, I always get friends texting me, Hey,

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>should I buy bitcoin? Is it too late to buy bitcoin?

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I'm not giving financial advice. You're not giving financial advice.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>But how would you answer that question? Well, I like

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to say, you have to put yourself in the future.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>If it fails, and everybody's gonna forget about it, doesn't

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>care if it succeeds. The question for Grandpa, why didn't

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you buy bitcoin when it was only so or Grandma.

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think what Scott Miner's point about four thousand

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is pretty I ThReD it's just a question of time

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>because that's about gets too where it's similar on the

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>same scale in a market cat basis versus gold. But

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for this year, I'm a little more conservative. I'm looking

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>at fifty thousand is the key next resistance because that

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.959
<v Speaker 1>would put the market tamp around um about a trillion

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>versus four hundred or so million. Now, but listen, Mike,

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>you remember back in seventeen when it hit, was it

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>around above eighteen thousand, and then it dropped down in

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>early twenty nineteen down to about thirty eight? Yeah, well yeah,

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that was another entry point, right. But I mean we

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have seen you know, tremendous, a tremendous run up and

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>another drop in this before. Is there something different about

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the momentum right now? That's the right question to ask, Caroline, sir.

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Is true, it did have a massive draw down, just

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>like Amazon drop in the early two thousand's, and the

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>big difference this time is that was more speculative excess

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>rally for really tech geeks. Now it's the mainstream getting

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in there's futures, there's m central banks potentially, but there's

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>corporate treasuries, billionaires and even insurance companies who are just

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>looking to buy dips below and the big differences. Now,

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at volatility on bitcoin, it's lowest ever

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>versus the stock market and versus gold. So it has

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>major fundamental tactical underpinions like I look at it like okay,

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>what can go wrong here? And I just try to

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. Right now, more of the same means

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>price it should go higher. What about the emergence of

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>other cryptocurrencies and we saw that a few years ago

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>when bitcoin got really popular. Doesn't that threaten Bitcoin's rise

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>him That's a key point, and it's really survivor bias.

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Last year there was about four thousand tradeable cryptocurrencies. Now

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there's about eight thousand based on coin market sap dot com.

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's the survivor bias that matters. So the Bloomberg

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Galaxy Crypto Index traps is tracks about ten of those.

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's the survivors. The winners will win and do well.

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is they don't have the adoption, the

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>oth and the robustness, and basically they're just not adopted

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin. They might be better, but they're not the

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>best store of value. The way I like to describe bitcoin,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a collectible. There's only gonna be twenty one

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>million over ever created. There's eighteen point five that I

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have already been created, and it's the one that's been

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>adopted the market, the world has already said, okay, this

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is the one versus like gold is the one, and

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, a bunch of other commodities, and there's

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other precious medals. So really quickly fifteen seconds.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Is it a collectible or is it a currency? I

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's more of a collectible. And left that is

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>really mild. Um. You were the perfect voice. Thank you

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so much. Um, really really appreciate it, because I think

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>we were all just we're kind of watching it and

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>understanding it, right, Tim, Yeah, we are. And I just

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sent my team a note saying we gotta get Mike

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>on quick take talking bit quick great Blueberg Intelligence commodity

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>strategist Mike mcclogne bro morow a journal now, but you

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>let me drive? Oh no, no, no no, no, oh please,

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the d I want to drive, just drive

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>baby the question try this is the drive to the globe.

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Radio, it is time for the drive to the

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>clothes and joining us this Thursday. Back with us as

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Alan Lance, he has research director at Lance Global dot

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>com and president of allenby Lance and Associates. He is

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>with us once again on the phone from Toledo, Ohio. Allen,

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you back with us with Tim and myself. Um,

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>how are you. What's Ohio like right now? I'm doing well.

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>We got an interest snow compared to your twelve or thirteen,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess, so, yeah, well we'll take that. But everything's

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>going well here in Hohow. All right, Um, what's the

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>virus with you guys right now? Well, we basically have

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>been more open than our neighboring state of Michigan, but

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we do have a ten pm curfew. Uh so businesses

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are closed and restaurants they are still open to uh

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from fifty percent capacity um and so far everything

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>stayed open as opposed to Michigan, which has locked down

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>another a few weeks. So yeah, well, we are certainly

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>not seeing these concerns play out in the stock market

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on pace to be a record day, as we heard

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>from from Charlie earlier. Um, Alan, I want to get

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on valuations right now, because our producers tell

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>us that, you know, one thing that you see right

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>now is that this is a different than two thousand seven,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that we see stocks at highs and

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we see real estate at highs right now. To what's

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>your take, Yeah, we get that question. About two thousand

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and seven, we had warned that we couldn't really find

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>anything in the international or domestic equity arena or real

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>estate arena that that was of in bargain territory. And

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>today I think it's different, Like I can see the

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>comparisons because we're hitting new all time highs again. But

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you you know, we've had energy that's been down tremendously.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>This year has actually been pretty predictable. We were we were,

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>even though it's been a strange year and and the

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>volatility has been excessive. We were taking property under January

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>early February, the market went up another three weeks and

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>then um, obviously we had the John Templeton you know

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>by when there's blood on the street type of march

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>where you know there are some incredible bargains and then

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the markets recovered h as almost like a

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>textbook in textbook fashion, where where uh you saw the

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>quality dividend companies moving up, you know, right after the

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>stay at home surged, and then uh now you know

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, we've seen the cyclical small caps and

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>internationals catching up, so the rallies broadening out, and and

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that's healthy. Uh Well, on two

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, what we had is everything moving up from

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, utilities in China to write you know, every

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>category in the US, and and and then we really

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't find any bargains that we're still finding bargains here,

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, don't judge me, don't hate me, But Alan,

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt like this was a year where you could

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>time the market because I thought about it early this

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>year too. It's like we just ran up so quickly

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>before kind of the COVID fallout, and I'm like, god,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I've kind of just dropped out in February,

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it would have been a pretty decent year. And then

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of course when the market fell off, you knew that

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>there was going to be History has taught us that

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the government's going to help us out. The Fed's going

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to help us out. You know, it was almost, as

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you say, kind of textbook predictable. And I do feel

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 1>like we're getting to a market environment where I know

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it goes against everything I've ever learned about timing the market.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But but we know that when the market drops off,

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the the you know, programmed trading kicks in and then

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the market goes up again, and then when it gets

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>too lofty, it sells off a little bit and then

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, I just feel like we're getting

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>into that kind of a rhythm. Yeah, And it's a

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand car. Also, you're totally spot on where

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>now you're seeing the I p o s. But again,

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>unlike these I p o s are still high quality,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so I think, you know, you're you're gonna get that

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>supply fill you know, filling up the demand, and then

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a situation where less and less quality

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I pos will come out in one and that's the

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:21.479
<v Speaker 1>time again where you know you hate to do it,

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know you've got a time a little bit

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and and take some money off the table. You know.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The The other thing that that we like is we're

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing takeovers. You know, we talk summer about Alexi. You know,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Alexey and pharmaceuticals, and and that's got a you know,

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a nice premium takeover and and I wouldn't even sell

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it here. I think you could have you know, another

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bid coming in or I don't mind owning the Astra Zeneca,

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, because that stock is underperformed, so uh, you

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>know we're in, you've got to takeover. Would you run

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>with it? Cash it out and and you don't wait

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for it to close now you can still you know,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>say that the stocks trading as historically multiples even being

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>taken over. And part of that is, you know, there

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>was a two product company, and with astra Zeneca, it's

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be you know, higher margins and and uh

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple expansion because it was discounted because you know, they

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the pipeline and they didn't have a broad

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>selection of pharmaceuticals. And and there are still other companies

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like that that I think offer opportunity to investors have

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>ignored most of the year. So so in that respect,

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it is has been uh, you know, unexpected year from

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the uh you know, volatility standpoint, but really textbook and

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in design all the way through Alan are you getting

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of questions from clients about bitcoin right now. It's

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a story we've been talking about all day hitting a

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>new record. It's below twenty right now at seven hundred.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But is that something that clients are showing interest in. Yeah, Bitcoin,

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we saw that attractive, you know,

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>into the sell off again because uh, you know, just

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>even Amazon went down, you know, in the early days

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of of March and into the pandemic. Now you know,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>those are one of the areas and and some of

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>these cult type stocks that you know, we would not

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we would not be chasing. So so when

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>when we get a lot of inquiries from subscribers and

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>members about you know, should we be buying Tesla, should

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we buy be buying Bitcoin, it's usually a little late

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in in in the game, and we don't really want

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to partist. Scott Minard says bitcoin's going to four hundred thousand,

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just gonna tell you Alan, it's way early

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in the game according to him and some other especially

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>when if you think about it, I I go back

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to you know, my economics, you know, um work is

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just like supply and demand, there's only going to be

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a limited number of bitcoins that by kind of its

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>own essence just creates you know, an entity that's going

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to go up. Yeah. The the problem is the same

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thing with blockchain is everybody has to participate, you know,

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with with the Internet and emails, you had that, Will

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you have that with bitcoin or will something else come out?

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So so bitcoin in itself, you know, if that ends

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>up to be the you know, digital cryptocurrency, than than

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>all that, uh, you know, hyperbole. You know, well we'll

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>come to fruition. But you know, are you willing to

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>take that risk that you know, something else, you know

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>won't superseded or thinking over so many times when you're

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>an industry leader, Uh, you know, you don't uh end

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>up you know, ten years from from that day be

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the one that that still is out on the forefront.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's where investors have to realize the risk that

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they're taking. Just wish I bought it when it was

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you and fraction of a sense you

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>could have thrown like twenty bucks at it. You know,

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you've been hundred dollars at it and it just would

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have been. But we'd still be here doing this because

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we love it. Carol, that is actually very very true. Um,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>good stuff, good stuff. Thanks so much for listening to

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, and be sure to check out

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>our daily radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio.

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And be sure to watch us too on YouTube by

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>searching Bloomberg Global News mmmmm