WEBVTT - Irish Border Issue Is Increasingly Difficult to Solve: Harkin

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. The

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Brexit negotiations are ongoing and painful. The latest and uh,

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the most difficult stumbling blocks is the

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>issue of the Irish border. And here to talk about

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this with us ahead of St. Patrick's day tomorrow in

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the US Marian Harkin, European Union parliament member representing Ireland. Uh.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But she is here with us here in our eleven

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>three studios in New York. Thank you so much for

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Marion, I want to just talk about this.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>According to several diplomats in a Bloomberg News story, UH,

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been a lot of progress made on this

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Irish border issue. Can you just describe the issue from

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>your perspective and what needs to happen for a deal

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to be reached. Well, good morning to you, sent to

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>all your listeners. Unfortunately, today, just before I arrived here,

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I had a very quick look at a report which

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>has just come out from the House of Commons Northern

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Ireland Committee, and they say that they have failed to

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>find a technical solution for this frictionless soft border that

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to have. And not only do they say that,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they say there is no evidence that such a type

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of order can be found anywhere in the work. So

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>what is the soft border. It's basically a way for

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Ireland to maintain access direct access to the Union. Correct, Well,

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a soft border would be between the Republic and Northern

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Ireland as of now free floor goods, people's services, animals, etcetera.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But after breakfit, we will have a different regulatory regime,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we will have different rules, etcetera. And we have to

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>find a solution because we do not want a border

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on the island of Ireland. Now, I understand that there

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a European Commission in Irish government

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and UK government meeting that will take place March that

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>will last until April the eighteen and the idea is

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to resolve these issues about policing the Irish border when

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the UK leaves the European Union. If this Committee does

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>not reach some kind of consensus. What's your worst case

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>scenario for what the border looks like after the United

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom leaves the European Union. Well, I hate even say

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what the worst kiss scenario. It's because nobody, absolutely nobody

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>north or south of the border wants to see that.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>We do not want to go back to the bad

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>old dates when there were customs points, police soldiers, et

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>cetera on the border. And the issue is him that.

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Just before Christmas, the British Government signed an agreement which

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>gave three options. Number one, the trade deal, the comprehensive

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>trade deal it would do with the EU would solve

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the issue of the border. Number two, if that didn't work,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they would set up some kind of a specific arrangement

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Republic and Northern Ireland. And number three the

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>backstop option, which was that there would be full regulatory

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>alignment between the Republic and then Earth. And if either

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>one or two are not possible, then three still remains.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is that that would mean a border

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Irish Sea and the d up which the

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Union this Party in Northern Ireland have said that's

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>not acceptable. So the main obstacle at this point is who. Well,

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the main obstacle is that the British government have signed

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>an agreement to say they will either do one, two

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>or three, and they are not coming up with technical

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>feasible solutions to deliver any of those three. I suppose

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>number one the trade deal. That's for further down that. Okay,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that the British leadership hasn't come up

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>with technical solutions, how much does that reflect a broader

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>issue that you see of this entire Brexit negotiation, of

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a lack of details and a lack of cohesion. Look,

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>my personal opinion, and I know it's shared by many,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is nobody thought this would happen, and when it did,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody was taken by surprise. And I mean we had

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Boris Johnson just recently saying that the

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>border between the Republican the North was the very same

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>as the border between two boroughs in London. I mean,

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>such an incredible level of ignorance in the sense of

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>not knowing about an international order is just unbelievable. So

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>that is part of the if you like, the background

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to all of this, that nobody was prepared for this,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>nobody thought true. What the main outcomes of a Brexit

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>would be on the island of Ireland, so you know

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>the British government are as as Jean clad Yunker said,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I listened to him in the Parliament. I was sitting

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>there listening to him this week and he said it's

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>time to turn at fine words into treaties. In other words,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we need the detail, we need to sort this and

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not getting it from the British is the European

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Union and leaders in the European Union. Are they trying

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to push or have they pushed UK Prime Minister Theresa

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>May into a corner from which it is more difficult

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for her to extricate herself. And this is in the

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>context that, as you mentioned, the d u P has

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>ten members of Parliament which are part of her governing

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>coalition in Westminster, and she has not only two assuage

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>their demands, but also she needs to be I guess

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>remained firm in this in gaining taking the support of

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>her UH fellow Conservative members of Parliament. Well, again, my

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>perspective on this since pim that Brexit day one was

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>about a split and the Conservatives and the question is

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>what's changed, what's new. Look at what's happening. So to

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>some extent, you're right, she is in a corner. But

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the question is who put her there? How much of

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this is her own making or Cameron's a making? And

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, what can the EU do to try to

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ensure that we can reach some kind of agreement. This

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>whole phrase of cake and eat it is still there,

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It's still part of the negotiations. As I said, I

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody actually ever thought this would happen, and

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.679
<v Speaker 1>therefore no plans in place to deal with it. Marian

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>real quickly. Do you think that the mersiness is discourage

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>discouraging some of the populism that we had seen previously

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in the UK? Yes, well, I think I saw a

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>program the other night where a very well known British

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>chef for cook Poulte, she'd be seen as sort of

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a very sensible sort of woman, and she actually just said,

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>look it time just to get on with us, and

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there was everybody in the audience capped, even though there

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>were people in that audience who are remain and people

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>who are breakfast. So that the I think the feeling

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>may be coming to the point that we just have

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this. What it is a days and

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's all over. So I think maybe that's the way

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>British people are beginning to think, not maybe they can

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>influence the negotiators. Marian Harkin, thank you very much, European

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Union parliament member representing Ireland. Shares of Walmart dropped yesterday

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>after a Bloomberg News exclusive story that talked about a

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower suit against the company charging that they encouraged manipulation

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of some of their on line sales numbers. Here to

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about that and other issues that Walmart is currently

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>facing is Jennifer Batasha's senior US food retail mass merchant

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>wholesale restaurants analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, and Alan berga agricultural

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. Jennifer, I want to start with

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you to talk about this whistleblowers suit. What was your

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>reaction to it? Does it seem feasible? Does it pass

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the smell test? Um? You know, when when you look

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>at how the market reacted, there was an initial initial

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>reaction and this the stock really regained a lot of

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>what it lost fairly quickly following the news. Um when

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>you when you look at it, it's hard to believe

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that Walmart would really open itself up to this sort

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of risk, especially when you think of all the measures

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that put into place following the bribery probe that that

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it was involved with UM that started back in two

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve when Walmart was accused of being engaged

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>in a multi year bribery campaign in Mexico. So that

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the company is very sensitive about its ethics and compliance

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point. So it's hard to believe that, um,

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>that something of this scale UM would be taking place. Well,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer just tells who is actually the whistle blower, give

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>us a little background. UM. Well, so the whistleblowers is

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>an ex employee, UM, you know, someone who has been

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>involved in the e commerce side of the business ummerly

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon, formerly at Amazon. UM. And and really you know,

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the calms center around the idea that that UM, there's

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some artificial manipulation in the numbers that were actually published UM,

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's by under reporting returns or not processing returns

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or things of that nature. UM. And so you know,

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's difficult with a retail business the size

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of Walmart to to you know, assume that everything happens

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly when it's supposed to. Um. But the fact that

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know the employee, UM, you know it just it

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>seems that it seems that if something happened, it maybe

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>more of an isolated incident than the pattern of abuse.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>That is, you know that it's alleged in this although

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the stocks responded at all highlights this

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>increasing challenge that Walmart faces to keep up with Amazon

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and to lower costs going forward. Alan, I want you

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to come on in here. There was a story that

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>caught our attention about how Walmart might consider using drones

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to help reduce agricultural costs, in other words, planting and

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>weeding and doing other things like that. Can you explain

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>what is this? Well, this sounds like nothing that has

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with a whistleblower suit, but there actually

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>is a connection here. UM. Walmart gets more than half

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of its revenues from groceries at this point, and of

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>course Amazon is becoming a big entrant into the grocery market,

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and Walmart is looking at ways to make itself ever

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>more efficient, um, and part of that is looking at

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>agricultural drones. Walmart is known for very tight control of

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>its supply chains, and ultimately one of the things it

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>could do is fine technology that allows it to even

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>have more control by requiring farmers, for example, to use

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>these specific drones to cut down on pesticide applications, be

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>as of the efficiency of using something mechanized rather than

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>human beings who tend to be more wasteful. Alan, you know,

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to confess that you and I share a

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>love of videos looking at the variety of planters, automatic

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>planters that a variety of agriculture companies have come up

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>with in order to sow the seeds literally of farms. Well,

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I think you here the out one

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>out here, Lisa, Yeah. Well, and the reason I bring

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>this up is because I wonder if you could just

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>discust that pack and describe for people that you know,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they may not understand exactly the mechanization and the automation

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that is taking place on the farm. Sure, I mean,

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the story of agriculture is the story of mechanization. I mean,

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>people stop being hunter gatherers because they learned to domesticate crops.

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, the tractor was a big innovation of the

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and things like the reaper, and

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>now we have precision agriculture that you know, gives you

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to put your seeds exactly where they're most fertile

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in the soil. A lot of people are seeing the

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of drone technology as the next frontier Right now.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Drones are very much used to sort of map fields,

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fly around, serves oil soil tops, see how the harvest

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 1>is going. But this would be where you could be

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>using big data and a drone basically to come up

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>with a most efficient application of inputs to your field possible.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the patents for that Walmart has it's gotten

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention, actually deals with bees, the idea

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that you can start mechanically pollinating things rather than using insects. So,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer coming in here, I love your take on whether

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Walmart is doing enough or spending too much on sort

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of nascent technologies that could eventually reduce costs. Yeah, so

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know, to me, this story um is less

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about bees, um, but more about the the idea that

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Walmart is taking a broad approach to technology UM. And

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>then it's really a reflection of all of the investments

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that they have been making since two thousand and eleven. UM.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that right now in a world where technology

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is progressing at such an unprecedented rate. Um, Walmart can't

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>afford to not be participating in all of these iterations

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of potential technologies. Um. Whether you know, it seems that

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they've done fairly well in terms of bell thing the

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the the cost of participating in the technology evolution versus

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>running their day to day business. Um. You know. However,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>investors are expecting that there is a payoff with regards

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to seeing actual growth in sales, and not only in

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>their stores, but on the in line, on the in

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the online e commerce world as well. Alan, just a

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thought for you, is this not just limited to the

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>planting and cultivation of crops, This is also about harvesting

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yes, I mean you're looking for patents off.

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Walmart has filed forty six patents dealing with everything from

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the planting to the logistics of it. And I would

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>respectfully disagree with my co guests. I actually think this

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is all about bees in the sense that bees are

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a variable cost. Pollination becomes more and less expensive, and

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what Walmart's trying to do as they get their costs down,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>as they try to make things more reliable down the road,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>find the technology that allows them to compete with Amazon

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and beat them at their own low price game. So,

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, metaphorically, some of the stuff seems very very

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, space age and in several years away, and

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just gaining some intellectual property so you can

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sue Amazon down the road. We don't know. But the

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>point is, you know, as we've been saying, Walmart is

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the technology that gets them ahead so

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that they can win not in just today's marketplace, but

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's as well. I want to thank you both very much.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Alan burga joining US our agriculture reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jennifer A. Bartash, senior US food and retail analyst

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Him you're going to have to share

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>some of those scintillating videos with me. You just haven't

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>shared the I just got an email all about the bees.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the bees and these and these videos.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Well check it out. It's an amazing story, the automation

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of the U S farm, and none better than Alan

0:15:48.480 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>burg gonna tell us about it. A ruling from the

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Federal Energy Regulatory Commission touched off a sell off in

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Master Limited Partnerships yesterday, at one point the Larian MLP

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>index was off by about ten percent. It ended up

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>closing lower by about four and a half percent. The

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>issue has to do with master limited partnerships operating interstate

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>pipelines and they charge customers a price under a cost

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of service model. Now they also have to collect a

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>portion to cover corporate tax charges, but because they're massed

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>limited partnerships, they don't actually pay these taxes. Here to

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>help us understand this more is Chuck Lieberman. He is

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg profit and also chief investment officer and managing

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>partner for Advisors Capital Management. Chuck, maybe you could just

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>expand on my attempt to explain what is going on here. Well,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you did a pretty good job him. So there are

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>count acts for pipelines that are done as cost plus,

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and the question then is what is included in costs?

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's an allowance for corporate tax rates, although, as

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>you point out, the pipelines structured as partnerships do not

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in fact pay taxes. And that's why, uh, it was disallowed. Now,

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a long term issue. It's been debated for twenty years.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>The courts weighed in and that finally pushed for to

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>kick that stuff out. Now, keep in mind that most

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>contracts are not cost plus, they're negotiated between the pipeline

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and the shipper. UM. And now, of course, one way

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to get around this ruling is to renegotiate those contracts,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the cost plus kite contracts on a negotiated basis directly

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>with the shipper and restructure them. Uh. There's also another

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it, which is it only affects companies that

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>are structured as partnerships. A lot of these pipeline companies

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>are structured as C corporation standard corporations. They do pay tax.

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Those companies can, in fact, uh in a cost plus

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>contract add in the cost of the tax. Uh. And

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>it is likely that uh, this ruling will accelerate the

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>consolidation of partnerships with their C corporation parents. Uh. That's

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>another trend that's been going on in the industry, and

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>probably more companies will do it sooner than expected because

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of this ruling. Yeah, you know, just broadening out so

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>so clearly there are people on both sides here who

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>think that this is going to her MLPs and other

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>people who think that the move has been overdone. I

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>thought It was interesting though, because the biggest exchange traded

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>fund that tracks America's energy pipelines, hillaryon e t F,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>saw one hundred and eighteen million dollar outflow yesterday, which

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest one day with all since July of

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. What this indicates to me is that the

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>retail investors are sort of the peripheral investors will be

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>quick to leave should there be any threat to the

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tax benefit that these funds enjoy. How much of a

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>concern is that to you just the perception of these funds. Uh,

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a youth concern, and that's actually the primary driver

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in the entire sector. So if you go back to

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen, oil prices fell that actually boosted demand

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for products like gaslene. So some pipeline saw an immediate

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>boost to shipments. Some of the downstream pipeline businesses saw

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>an increase in business and an increase in profitability. Don't

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>confuse me with facts. They sold off too because there's

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a general lack of understanding on the part of retail investors.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So they have been getting out of the space. They've

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lost money in the space. Therefore they've been getting out

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of the space, and all of this has driven all

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of these stocks literally across the board, including companies that

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>really have not been affected by the decline in oil prices,

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that have seen an increase in business volumes anyway, they

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have still decline in value. And most of these things

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are trading at low low levels, meaning very very attractive valuations.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And now this is just one more kick in the

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>rear end at a time when the stocks are already down.

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure there are a lot of unsophisticated investors

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>who were saying, I've been I've lost too much money.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't seem to be turning around. I don't understand

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. I want out. So I'm sure that

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a negative, okay, But as a sophisticated investor, and

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>of course that's one of the reasons we speak to you,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Chuck this and what maybe presents an opportunity because number one, uh,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>it may have been an exaggerated response to this ruling.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>But also if these master limited partnerships decide, you know what,

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we can't spend all this time, money and effort educating

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>people about what we really are. We're just going to

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>turn ourselves into a regular CE corps that's going to

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>make it more attractive for institutional investors to buy them. Right,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right, and I expect all of that to happen.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think that a lot of these unsophisticated investors

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>are going to methodically continue to pull out because they

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the institutional investors will want to get in,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, some of them have been getting in.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think what will really turn it around is

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if more of the companies turn themselves into C corporations

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and then become part of indexes, because then they can

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>be all of that will bring in new buyers and

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll take advantage of the fact that pricing is very,

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>very attractive. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Charles Lieberman, Chuck Lieberman, Bloomberg Profit and chief investment Officer

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and managing partner at Advisors Capital Management talking about the

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>MLP ker fluffle yesterday, and you know, it's funny, PIM.

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>In the past few years, there have been record amounts

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of MLPs that have I p oed, So it's very

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see the turmoil now and wonder whether retail

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>investors are going to exit until the opportunity is lost.

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Cyber attacks are literally happening hundreds of thousands of times

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a day. This according to Energy Secretary Rick Perry in

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a speech to lawmakers during a hearing yesterday. Here to

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>speak about these attacks which are ongoing UH and are

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>targeting the US electric grid is Dr Eric Cole, chief

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of Secure Anchor Consulting in Ashbourne, Virginia. He

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from Los Angeles today. Dr Cole, thanks

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for being here. I just would love to

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get your perspective on where these attacks are mostly coming

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from and infrastructure they are targeting. They're coming from the

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>usual players Russia, China, North Korea, but what we've seen

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last six months is that cyber attacks level

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the playing field. There are some small countries that can't

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>play in the nuclear weapons space. It's either too expensive

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>or they're regulated. But when it comes to cyber weapons,

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>anybody can build them. So we're even seeing some of

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>these smaller countries, Pakistan and others starting to target the

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>US infrastructure. And what they're really trying to do is

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have command to control capability, so they're targeting water, electrical, nuclear,

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control. And most people think if they break

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in that they're gonna want to go in and take

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>it down to destroy, but it's really more of a threat.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>If they have control of our nuclear power plans, they

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>now can influence the United States in a lot of

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>different areas. Dr Cole, And what if you could just

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>step back, and perhaps this is not your purview, but

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to give you an opportunity. Do we have

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a clear definition of who, quote, the enemy of the

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>United States is or who are our enemies? The way

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I always say in the real world we have allies.

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>In cyberspace there is no allies, So in cyberspace I

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>would say every other country other than the US is

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>our enemy. And even surprisingly a lot of cyber attacks

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>against the US are coming from Canada. Okay. The reason

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I asked this is because Article three, Section three of

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the U. S Constitution seems pretty clear. If a subversive

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>act has any tendency to weaken the power of the

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>comfort has been given, that's a definition of treason. Why

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is this so difficult for both the prosecutors, it seems,

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of these acts and those that are defending this as

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a freedom of speech notion? Why are they so Why

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Constitution not able to be used in order

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute this. The biggest problem in cyberspace is attribution,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>knowing who's actually doing the attack. So, for example, we

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>know that attacks are coming from Russia, but finding the

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>exact location, the physical location is very hard. Also, we

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have seen cases where we had attacks that we thought

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>were coming from China and it was actually the Russians

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>breaking into Chinese systems and then attacking us from there,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>so it looked like the Chinese, but it was actually

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the Russians. So the attribution is our big challenge, and

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that's why this takes a lot of work and a

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of time and energy to figure out who's really

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>behind the attacks. All right, So Eric, one thing that's

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>notable is there is this report by the US government

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about how Russian in particular has launched many attacks

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>on a variety of different infrastructure systems, whether it was

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the electric grid, water processing plans, air transportation facilities, etcetera.

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Why haven't we heard more about this? Why haven't they

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>been successful? The reason why they've been successful is we

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't making it easier for them. Typically in the past,

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>when you designed and built nuclear reactors in the computers

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that supported them, known as c D as critical digital assets.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>They were always disconnected from the Internet. They never had

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>any connectivity, so there was no way for somebody to

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:49.479
<v Speaker 1>attack remotely. In the last year, we are starting to

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>interconnect these systems to make it easier to monitor and

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>more functionality. And that's really the big problem. We're taking

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>systems that were never designed to be accessible on the

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet and making them accessible. And the reason why it's

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>taking so long, and this is a scary part, we're

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>not detecting these attacks. It's taking us fifteen to twenty

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>months to catch and find the fact that they've broke

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>into our systems. Well, but Eric, I mean, just to

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>play devil's advocate, Okay, perhaps they've broken in, but we

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard about incredible disruptions in the power grid or

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the water system. Are they being hidden? Are they are

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>they affecting uh, people's access to clean water? Or is

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this uh? Is this just sort of more subtle type

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of attack. It's more subtle, and right now it's more

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the fear of the threat and the analogies. It's like

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons. The Russians have a ton of nuclear weapons,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't used them. But just the fact that

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they have them put them in the power SORR a

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>position of power, and it's similar here. They've breaking into

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>our systems, they've taken can troll. They haven't done any

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>massive attacks, but that gives them a position of power

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to negotiate differently with the United States.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Dr Cole, if you were to advise the chief executives

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of corporations that control these essential utilities, what would you

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be advising them today March six to do? The first

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thing I would recommend is to any critical systems, any

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>critical infrastructure, disconnect from the Internet. I work in a

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of these areas. I travel around the world with

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>critical infrastructure. It's not worth the benefit. Second, do a

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>discovery exercise to know where your critical data is. In

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so many cases organizations don't even know where the data

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is located. And then third, assume you're compromised. And now

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>go in and say, okay, if we are compromised, how

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>do we find and get them out of our networks?

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>As opposed to just accepting it and not dealing with

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Is it also something as prosaic as preventing

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>people from using their own personal communication devices within the

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>actual physical plants of these institutions. That's absolutely a component

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of it is not allowing people to bring personal devices.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>We have seen many cases where people bring cell phones

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that inadvertently are infected with malware. They plug it in

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to a control system to charge the USB and it

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.239
<v Speaker 1>affects the system. So you really want to have what

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we call air gap where there's no connectivity with any

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>other device from the outside world. And just finally, a

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>doctor called do we know? I mean, you mentioned that

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't know a lot about what's going on as

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>far as the attacks. Do you believe that these organizations,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>these companies in the United States, that they know their

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>own vulnerabilities. I believe they know some, but they don't

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>know all. And we have a lot of situations like

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Equifax and others, where there's one or two

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>systems that they didn't know about that led to the compromise.

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the problem. Security means two percent exposure and

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.479
<v Speaker 1>it's always the part you don't know about that causes

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the problems. Our thanks to Dr Eric Cole. He is

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of Secure Anchor Consulting. They are based

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in Ashburn, Virginia. You can follow him on Twitter at

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>d r. Eric Cole. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>p m L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio