WEBVTT - Week 9: Brown Out

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>advice Now League dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Paul Charchy. In my coast today

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>are Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison. Guys, Hello, Hello Governor.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh no god, it's hard to start at the preview.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>What's coming? Nothing's coming? Okay, copying at all? What is coming?

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Later in this show, take a chance on me. Nine

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>players not normally in your starting lineup, many of whom

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>are available on the waiver way. We will take who

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they are. You can play along with three tough questions

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'll pepper my co host with, and premature speculation

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>where we give you guys to pick up this week

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that everybody else is going to want to pick up

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>next week, but maybe on your team. Also, all of

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the matchups broken down fantasy style, and that's the core

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of the show. We do it every week, and we

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>begin with Chicago taking on Tennessee Brian Man. The entire

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Chicago roster is a disaster with injuries, COVID and I'm

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm very worried about points coming, even against a lukewarm

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee defense. Yeah, but this Titans team might be the

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>most ragged of them all. But we'll get to Tennessee

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>side in a minute. I'm like in a couple of

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Bears here, starting with David Montgomery. I'm going full Monty here.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Really don't do it. Monty and a tough matchup against

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the Saints last week. Ran for eighty nine yards. Not

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>super impressive, but eighty four of those yards are after contact.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>That's very impressive. He's working hard. He's gonna have to

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>work hard. Missing too linemen in this game. That's maybe

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>three yeah, yeah that missing all those linemen for the

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Bengals really didn't work out for them last week anyway.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Monty handling of the running back touches for Chicago and

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>unlike last year, the Titans are a cake matchup for

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>running backs, allowing one and thirty four combo yards in

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the one point for total touchdowns per game to the position.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And the Bengals who just played the Titans were missing

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>their entire offensive line and three running backs scored a

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that game. Three running back touchdown. So I'm

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>giving Montgomery and a as well as Allen. Robinson might

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>be the best all round wide receiver in the NFL,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but just has never had a quarterback in his entire career.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>He's on like the Andre Johnson Larry Fitzgerald trajector even

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>if Herman Moore going way back has not had a quarterback.

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But who was throwing to Herman Moore back in the

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>old days, Scotty Mitchell, Yeah, you're right, I think it

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>was Scottie Mitchell. I don't think probably Charlie Batch maybe

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit there Rodney Pete yet made its way

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to Detroit. Throw to him a little too late. But

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>back to a rob you can give him a second

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in targets among all players. Tennessee allows two hundred plus

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to wide receivers. That's the third most,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Titans have also yielded the six the most

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets to wide receivers. So I love a

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>rob with an A, and I like Darnell Mooney. Canna

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>give him a ce here, rookie uh Mooney played sixty

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>five of seventy offensive snaps against the Saints last Sunday.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>That the snap count. That's a higher percentage than Anthony

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Miller ever had as a rookie last year. He's definitely

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>usurped Miller on the depth chart. Mooney has caught two

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>or more passes in each of his first eight games

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, the only Bears rookie wide receiver to

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>ever accomplished that since the merger, and his usage has

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>been ramping up big time. And this is a great matchup.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So I like Darnell Mooney and we might talk about

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>him a little later in the show a little more

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh. Lastly, for the Bears, Jimmy Graham gets

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a c incredibly touchdown dependent only has four red zone

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>targets over his last five games, so that doesn't work

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown dependent player, and may not even play

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Might not play, but I think he

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>will suit up. The Titans have yielded the second most

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets at tight ends and have faced and

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>basically I faced, no one good the position. The two

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>guys you've heard of, Noah Fanton Darren Fells both topped

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty yards and scored a touchdown against Tennessee. So I'm

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna give Graham a see if he suits up, if

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he's out. Of course you're gonna bench him, and Nick

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Foles almost gave him a cee Am I allowed to

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>give him a D? Are we doing that? Never came together? Sorry?

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I might have a couple of DS to thrill. How

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>did it not come together? Nobody had decided it didn't

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>come together, I said. I said to our listeners, listen,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>if you really really want d's in the show, tell

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Paul CHURCHI in. I got like

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>three people said yes, like twenty that said no, and

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody else even bothered him answers. So that's that row?

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure you were using your your burner accounters nothing?

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>No response to the d's All right, let's talk about

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee's players. The Tennessee players, So I didn't work

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry Start with the king. He gets an A

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>has scored in five straight games. The Bears have given

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>up four point seven yards per carry to ap to

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>opposing lead backs in their four road games this year.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Even worse, they've allowed fourteen touchdowns running backs and then

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the last ten games on the road, going back back

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to last year. Of course you're going to start Derrick

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Henry ben slapping a on him A J. Brown. This

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is a bad matchup for A. J. Brown and company,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still getting a be because he's such a beast.

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>The Bears only allowing eleven and a half catches and

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty yards per game to wide receivers

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and just two total touchdowns on the season to the position.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>But Brown a tough guy to bench. Corey Davis also

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a tough guy to bench. One of my sleepers from

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the preseason, I believe of the last preseason show warm up,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that Hug. But he's on the bench this week. C

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Davis a bad matchup. I just can't go there, Hob.

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>But but hold onto him. He's healthy and he's looking good.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Blue chip prospect coming to fruition. John new Smith lastly, Yeah,

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll have blue chips a little strong. He was the

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>first wide receiver taken in the draft like three years ago.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>It's like a turquoise chip. You don't get much bluer

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>than that. He has. He has been You know who's

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been blue? Anybody's drafted Corey Davis before this year. True,

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>but let's not worry about the past. What about your guy, Johnny? Yeah,

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>John JOHNU what's up with John John? Just to see

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this week. Charge he's been blocking more than route running

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>as of late. But it's a good spot in a

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>good spot to bounce back. Opposing tight ends are averaging

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>more than five catches and fifty yards per game against

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. But really, when all the past catchers have

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>been healthy, he's just kind of reverted back to this

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>blocking role because he's so good at it. He's a

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>great football player all around, but kind of such a

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>good athlete he is, but it's it's a good match

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in the tight end waste land. He's more of a

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>high sea you can call him ecto cooler this week,

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and then Ryan Tannehill got him on the bench. Chicago

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>allows just two forty passing yards per game and the

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>fewest passing touchdowns all around, so I'm benching Tannehill. Wow,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's strong as good as Tannehill. I mean, he's like

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>fringe fourteen fifteen quarterback. Top quarterback this week, it's a

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee did Sorry. The Chicago defense is they're they're really

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's at super Bowl level. They could winnie super Bowl

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with the defense they've got. They can't with the offense

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got. Pittsburgh takes on Dallas, Matt and for Pittsburgh,

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they just they just had a successful fantasy game overall

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>against Baltimore. Here comes Dallas. Yeah, it's a start everyone's

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>scenario for Pittsburgh because Dallas has allowed thirty four or

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>more points to five of their last seven teams they faced.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger's getting a B grade um in their last

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>seven games. The only quarterback not to throw for multiple

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>scores against the Cowboys was Daniel Jones. The issue is

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>only one quarterback his top two hundred yards in the

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>last five games, and that kind of matches up with

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what Ben Roethlisberger is doing. He's not throwing for high

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>yardage totals, but he's thrown for a few scores a game.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's pretty easy to run on the Cowboys too,

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>which is why I like James Conner with an A grade.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys are allowing a hundred and thirty nine yards

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>per game, five point oh yards per carrying a rushing

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>score per game, and Connor is one of six backs

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the league with thirteen or more carries from inside

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the ten yard line, which is why he's averaging nearly

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a rushing score per game. Now, the wide receivers Deonte Johnson,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and I've got Deonte Johnson in so many leagues, and

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just the highs and lows of Dante. Johnson's gonna

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>give me a coronery. You know, we got we got Johnson,

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we got Chase Claypool, We've got Juju Smith Schuster. I'm

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>giving them all a B grade this week. Cop out. Yeah,

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm just kind of playing the odds here. I'm

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna get right, get it right on two of

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the three, and one of them is gonna see um.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Outside of the slot. Just about any wide receiver has

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>beaten the Cowboys this year. They have allowed fourteen touchdowns

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to the position in eight games, but weirdly, they're only

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:47.599
<v Speaker 1>allowing twelve receptions to the position per games because to

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>pass on them. Yeah, it's the problem. Um. So, Deonta

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>played seventy seven percent of the snaps last week and

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do well, But according to Establish the Run,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging over ten targets per game in the games

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>where he crosses the seventy snap count threshold, which he

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>might not have last weeks. He was he left last

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>week last week, so he absolutely has a good shot

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of doing that again this week in ten targets for

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Deonte means he's an easy B. Claypool leads the team

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in yards perception, are yards, and scores, and he's he's

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the high volatile guy, high risk, high reward, so he

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>gets the B and Juju leads the team and targets

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and receptions per game. Earlier this year, Tyler Lockett beat

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys for three scores from the slot, so I

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>can't count Juju out either. Eric Ebron is the last

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>guy I want to mention. He gets a C grade

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>scored last week, but I was surprised to learn that

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Ebron that big red zone threat. Remember he scored all

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>those red zone touchdowns for the Colt last year or

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the year before. He has one catch or one target

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, from inside the ten yard line. This one target,

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>he did score on it, and Dallas is only allowing

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>four catches and half a touchdown per game to the

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, so Abron's only a sea. Let's go to

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys side, where this is pretty easy. Ben Denucci,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's more like a bench Denucci. Then that's right, that's right.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Gilbert Great might be your starter. Well, his name is

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Gilbert or or Cooper Rush. They're still battling in

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>practice for the starting knot into the weekend. Um whatever

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback starts is on the bench. Well, Garrett Gilbert did

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>throw for three yards and two scores in his last

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>game for the Orlando Apollos, and that was against the

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Memphis Express in the A A F. The Steelers are

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tougher test than the Memphis Express. Uh.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They have not allowed a quarterback to hit the three

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>yard mark or three touchdown mark in a game yet

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. And with Garrett Gilbert probably leaning like he's

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the starter at all, the past catchers are on the bench,

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Gallop and uh ceedee lamb, it's come to this.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>We don't know who his favorite target is going to

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>be there on the fourth quarterback. You don't have to

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>explain to anybody who's seen a minute of Cowboys football

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>at since Dak went down why you can't start any

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of the receivers. The Steelers are only giving up twelve

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>receptions per game to the wide receiver position. Divide that

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>by three, maybe four catches per game. Ezekiel Elliott looks

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like he's coming down to a game time decision Jerry

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Jones says he's optimistic he'll play. He's optimistic. I have

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>him as just a C grade with that hamstring injury.

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a terrible matchup. The Steelers are only allowing seventy

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nine yards per carry. And there's another running back that

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I might talk about in the next segment who's starting

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to steal touches from Ezekiel Elliott. I don't know who

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that could be. I don't know either. Dedroy takes and

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>so do our listeners. They know too. Dedry takes on

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota in a game in which the Vikings will be

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>missing their number one, number three, number four, and number

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>five cornerbacks. So Matthew Stafford, who we believe is going

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to play in this game once he

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>clears the crovid protocol, is sitting on an A grade here.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Zimmer can only scotch tape this secondary together for

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so long. They were aided last week by thirty winds

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay. They will have no such no such

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>help this week inside US Bank Stadium. Over the past

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>month of games, Minnesota secondaries giving up almost three hundred

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>yards and three touchdowns per game, and even without Kenny Golladay,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Stafford is sitting on a probably a strong game here

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in vact. He was good last week, although in fairness

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I should mention Stafford struggled against similarly bad secondaries Jacksonville Atlanta,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>where we teat him up and thought he was gonna

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have a really good game. So it's not a sure thing.

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still giving Stafford the A grade here and

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>an A grade to the guy I think could be

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>his primary receiver, t J. Hockenson. He'll see more balls

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>with Kenny Golladay out. The Vikings law the fourth most

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>catches per game to opposing tight ends, although the yards

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are just sort of in the middle and they've only

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>given up two scores to the position. That said, every

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>competent tight end faced has put up decent numbers against

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Jonna Smith, Hayden Hurst, Robert Union have all

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>put up good numbers against Minnesota, So t J. Hockenson

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a grade, Marvin Jones is a B grade. Without Kenny Golladay,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones becomes a focal point of the passing game,

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a spot in which he's generally not done very well in,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>including the first couple of weeks of this year. Minnesota

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>has allowed one yards per game to opposing receivers, which

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is a lot fourth most, and they've allowed multiple touchdowns

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to receivers in four straight games. Two receivers are gonna

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>score here. Marvin Jones probably gets one of them. Could

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>another Marvin get the other one? And what are the

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>odds that two guys named Marvin would be the starting

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>receivers for a team And it's not nineteen fifty four?

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Hall will be the other starting receiver in place

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of Kenny Golladay and the Vikings, as I mentioned secondaries

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in tatters. Hall could be a dart throw here. I've

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>got a C grade on him. The only Vikings starting cornerback,

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeff glad you will be manning the slot. And we'll

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about Danny Amndolan in a future segment here in

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>just a few minutes. Uh, let's go to the running game.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift gets a C grade. A really disheartening box

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>score last week. Remember you had the big game two

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. We're like DeAndre Swift, He's finally here, it's

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>all coming together, and then last week he barely touched

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball. This week he gets a Vikings defense that

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>really has been quite good. He's since being obliterated by

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry in Week three, the Vikings have allowed only

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty three rushing yards per game and a single touch

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>now since Week three. Swift's a good receiver, and I

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>would like to say it's gonna catch a lot of passes,

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but Vikings are pretty good there too. No back has

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>managed even thirty receiving yards against Minnesota. So just the

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>C grade on DeAndre Swift and a bench grade on

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson only startable if you are Brian Johnson and

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you believe the Lions will fulfill a revenge narrative for

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson. Hey, I'm the one who said, played DeAndre

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Swift that blow up game, and now you're giving yeah,

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to take a chance on me Adrian Peterson

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in that game, and he scored. But among us, among

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>us thrives on the revenge narrative. I appreciate that I

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>gave you a little shout out. Now you did throw face.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the Vikings side. Dalvin Cookson obviously,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not gonna spend a lot of time and

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to accept to say he's coming off a thirty carry game.

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna get rested more in this game.

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't be surprised. We see a lot more Alexander Madison

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in this one and a lot more passing, but I

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>can't put a starting grade on Madison in this one.

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>A grade for Dalvin Cook. Let's go to the passing game.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with Kirk Cousins, who gets to see It's

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>almost always about volume for Kirk. With requisite passes, Kirk

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Cousins as a viable starter. If the team does in

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fact rest Cook some more, I think he will probably

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>get there. But the lines are bad run defense. They're

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing the fourth most rushes, so I can't guarantee the

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Cousins gets to an adequate level of volume when he

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't reach twenty six passes. Cousins average game one ninety

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and one touchdown. Um Every quarterback other than Gardner

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Minshew has thrown multiple to touchdowns or top three yards

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit, so you know there is some upside for

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Kirk this week, but I'm only going with the C grade.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling gets a B grade. His light usage is

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a concern, but he's got a very positive matchup that

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>will most often be against rookie Jeff Okuda, who Pro

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Football focuses ranks as their one hundred fifth rated cornerbacks.

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>He's uh, he does have history on his side, feeling does,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>having posted at least eighty yards or a touchdown in

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>his last five straight meetings with the Lions, and Detroit's

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>giving up the ninth most yards to receivers. Then there's

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson, the last guy I'll mention in this matchup.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Last week, Jefferson drew shadow coverage from Green Bay's best

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>corner That says a lot about Jefferson right that he's

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>drawing best coverage this week. If that were to happen here,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he will get Amani Horatio Amani Ruari. You totally made

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that name up. There's no chance that's a real person.

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>He is their best cornerback and he's averaging thirty five

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. Outside of Amnio Ruariuh. The Lion's secondary

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>has been brutal, and so if that guy is on theinland,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that would open up Jefferson that I'm kind of missing

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Horatio middle name. There was too many Domani's that name,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that. We'll be back more Fantasy Football

0:17:40.520 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Weekly coming up in moments Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a royalty free version of take a chance on me.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>This is where we give you nine players you would

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>not normally start, many of whom available off the waiver

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>wid Every time we do this show, I forget that

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this song is gonna come on, and I cringe a

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit every time, a little bit inside every single

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>time we begin at the quarterback position, Brian, you take

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance at the quarterback is Denver's Drew Lock at Atlanta. Now,

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons have only surrendered one passing touchdown across the

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>last two games to Teddy Bridgewater and Matt Stafford combined,

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but that was on also a combined forty pass attempts.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a bit of inadbiration. Before that, they were consistently

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>getting carved up through the air. And now this is

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the analysis you're not gonna get anywhere else. And Drew

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Lock this week, guys, he's most famous for just nailing

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>young jeezys put on on the sideline. Okay, yeah, okay,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>do you know what city was wrapping about Atlanta? Yep,

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And he's gonna put it on him, Drew Lock at

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons in a point orgy. We'll talk about this game,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>all right. Uh mine doesn't have anything to do with rap.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But Kyle Allen, in the last two games that he

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>started and finished, he's thrown exactly two touchdown passes in

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>each of those games. One of those games was against

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>these same New York Giants just three weeks ago, where

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>football team trusted him enough to have him throw the

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ball forty two times and he racked up two yards.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>And the Giants they're bad. They're allowing two d seventy

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>yards and almost two scores per game to the position.

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So Kyle Allen, fire him up. I've got this pains me,

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it does. Cam Newton. You guys know how

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel about Cam. Since his hot start in the

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>season's first two games, he has been straight up garbage,

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>averaging one forty seven passing yards per game and a

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a passing touchdown. You know how hard it

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is to do that in today's n FL All but impossible.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course he had the game losing fumble

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>last week. Uh now, no, I'll mention Newton's legs have

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>helped except when they don't, and then you done anyway,

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're never going to get a better opportunity than

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this week against the Jets. You have to be playing

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>him as a running back? Really, you really are you? Really?

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>That's all you're doing here. Although the Jets have allowed

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>three hundred passing yards and or multiple touchdowns to seven

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of eight opposing quarterbacks, that could mean upwards of like

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>two hundred passing yards that's right. And similarly, mobile quarterbacks

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray and Josh Allen twice both top sixty rushing

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>yards and or a rushing touchdown. There we go running

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>back getting two passing yards. That's right. If not, now

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>when for Cam Newton and then drop him? Brian, let's

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the running back position. Who has you take

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a chance on the runner? Per usual, Christmas season has

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>come way too early, but Patrick Laird season has held

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>me even earlier. What I'd rather hear nails on a

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 1>chocolate because it's not Christmas time. It's not even cool.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You're the one who brought it up. I know I

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was trying to make a joke and now it's failed.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to Patrick. Larry failed because of Bell.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why I failed throughout your comic timing. Sorry, I

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>just say I hate Slay Bills. In November, man, what

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>can I say anyway back to the aforementioned Patrick Laird,

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>one of two healthy running backs or available running backs

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.239
<v Speaker 1>for the Dolphins in this game. The only other one

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is Jordan Howard. Will talk about this matchup more later,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but Arizona very tough against the run. They've only allowed

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>three rushing touchdowns and running backs and no loan back

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as top seventy five yards. So I'm out on Howard entirely.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I like it. But there's a receiving angle here for sure,

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>especially with a rookie quarterback in two o'clock so outside

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Jets game, and we just don't count the

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Jets when it comes to opposing stats, right. The Cardinals

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>have surrendered running back catch totals of six, ten, and

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>seven in recent weeks, and again with a rookie quarterback

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>in his first road game, checked down to the running

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>back seam in order and very minimum for running backs.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Flared baby, your DFS angle, I like it, blared me

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>later on Sunday with is that a tipping situation? Yes?

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I do need to set up a tip jar. We

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do need to bring that back, right man? Oh yeah,

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>probably speaking of tippings, you take a chance of running

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>back I tipped off a little bit. Who that was?

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Tony Pollard. Zeke's dealing with a hamstring injury. The

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are absolutely brutal on the offensive side, especially in

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. Right now, with their fourth quarterback starting

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in six weeks, Pollard is quietly touching the ball more

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and more. Last week he got the rock nine times

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>times nine times. The week before he touched the ball

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>nine times, nine time, and the week before twelve times.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh Paul is especially good at catching balls out of

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. With an injured left tackle, right tackle, center,

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a hampert starting running back on a fourth string quarterback,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you'd imagine there'd be a few dump offs in this game.

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And are the Steelers a good matchup? No, absolutely not.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>This may be one of the worst calls and take

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me history. But pick him up and

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>throw him on the bench because he's going to see

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>an increase in touches throughout the rest of the year,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>especially if the Cowboys go we're out, We're gonna rest

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>our bazillion dollar running back and start giving Tony Pollard

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>some more touches. Feel free to just hold that thought

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>until later in this show. Might take a chance We're

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>running back is lavy On Bell, who has done nothing

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>since joining the Chiefs, but this game could should be

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the one in which he makes an impact in the

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>box score. Finally, the way that Bell is going to

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>help fantasy owners is receiving and goal line use. Which

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>team has allowed the most receptions to running backs Panthers.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Which teams allowed the most rushing touchdowns Panthers. This is

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>set up perfectly for levy On Bell, for Clyde Edwards, Hilayer.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Finally have is a good game. And you know what,

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not half bad start either. But Bell, who has

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>done nothing since joining the Chiefs, I think comes around

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game. All right, you take a chance of me.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Receiver Brian Nelson are at lack. That's the Los Angeles Chargers.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Of course. Over the last four games, the Chargers have

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>surrendered fourteen catches wondering savvy eight yards and more than

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown per game to opposing wide receivers. Four of

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the five wide receiver touchdowns surrendered during that span went

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to boundary receivers. Someone from the Raiders who plays wide

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>receivers going going to have a good game, And I'm

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>going with a yes, he had zero catches on two

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>targets last week, but that was in the monsoon in Cleveland.

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not reading too much into that. Prior to that game,

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>he was the only wide receiver getting consistent targets, the

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>only wide receiver getting targeted in the red zone for

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. So I'm going Nelson Aguilar and I hate it,

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going there. All these regretful rueful. The regretful

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ones are the ones that pay off the most. I'm

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>telling you, sounds like you're dating history this one. I

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's very regretful for me. That's Cole Beasley. Uh,

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>top the hundred yards or scored in three of his

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>last five. I used them as to take it on

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>every one of those weeks. Yeah, I think you have.

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>That includes eleven catches just two weeks ago. Uh, he's

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>only fifty owned in ESPN leagues, and you can fire

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>him up against Seattle, who's giving up twenty two catches

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and two seventy yards per game to the wide receivers

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and slot guys have had eight receptions or more against

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Seattle in three straight games. Hasn't every wide receiver at

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that many? Pretty much it's unbelievable. The kinds of numbers

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is allowing through the air are the kinds of

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers you hear like in week three, and then they

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of settle down and you know they you know,

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they come back to sort of some kind of normalcy.

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It's nuts that we're still talking about it at the

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>midway point. I should note they get Jamal Adams back

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this week, and they do have Carlos Dunlap coming into

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the fold as a defensive end, so that might help

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>their pass rush a little bit. So the pass rush

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>has been awful, pretty bad, alright, our final take a

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>chance on the player. Danny Amendola of the Lions up

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings. Vikings are gonna missing four of their

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>top five cornerbacks. The one starter who's left standing is

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Gladney. Now Jeff gladen he has played both outside

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's played the slot, but it doesn't even matter

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if he plays a slot because he's played the slot

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks and he's given up four touchdowns

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage in two games. He's giving up a

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>almost perfect passer rating of a hundred forty six in

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>his coverage. So Danny Amndola they take a chance of

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the option. For those interested in finding one, Let's work

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in one more matchup into this segment, and that is

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Denver taking on Atlanta. Brian, you already mentioned Drew Lock.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You want to reinforce that with some of some of

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the receiving targets you like. Sure, I'm gonna start with

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>no fans, though, Nona, I'm gonna start with wide receiver.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That's his best playmaker. Given phanton a the Falcons have

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most touchdowns to opposing tight ends and they've

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>given up the most catches to tight end. So this

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is pretty something as we call that. But yes, Albert,

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna butcher this ugg bum. You know, Scotty Fish

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>was really good at pronouncing that one. I just call

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>him Albert. Oh how that's what I was gonna go with.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Or Alack is a threat in the red zone. But

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm still giving fan today. Jerry Judy canna give him

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a b. Atlanta allows the fourth most PPR points per

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>game to wide receivers, and Judy will draw a slot corner.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Oliver, who usually finds himself in a twist, finds

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>himself in a twist. He owns on three six passerading

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>his coverage that it's sad deep Oliver twist joke right.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was gonna make it through that, and

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel I don't understand what you couldn't make it

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's so awful but so awfully good. Tim Patrick

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>his hamstring has felt pretty awful, but it appears it

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>will feel good enough to play on Sunday. I will

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>give him a see if he suit some up. If

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't, Dave Shawn Hamilton's and kJ Hamler r d s.

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Sorry they are start throws as you said Bylock might

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>take a chance, I mean quarterback quickly to the running

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>backs for the Broncos, Melvin Gordon getting give him the

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>b despite Philip Lindsay being the better football player, and

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not close. Lindsey looks awesome, he does, but Gordon

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>continues to out snap and out touch Lindsay. Uh and

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he saw twice as many targets as Lindsay last week,

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>which will played nicely against the Falcons, who have given

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>up the second most catches to running backs. A tough

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>matchup on the ground, though the Falcons have only allowed

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>three rushing touchdowns two running backs and no Loane runner

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>has hit the ninety yard mark rushing, so I will

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>give Gordon a B and just to see for lindsay

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>despite you're gonna say so. He is a better running back,

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>but he's not involved in the passing games. He's not

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>great for PPR usage, but his running is so good.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And keep an eye on him. I already had like

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>some jammed toes that he suffered last week, and he

0:28:55.880 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>might not play like toe Jam told Jam, I don't

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna hold him out number toe Jam and earl, Oh, yeah,

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you're kidding me, Early co ops, Let's talk about Todd

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Jam Todd Gurley. You can give him a be over

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to the land of side. His usage was a little

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>alarming last Thursday, but be very fresh for this matchup

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on ten days rest and over the last two weeks,

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Denver has allowed five point five yards per carry. They

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>are really missing nose tackle Mike Purcell, who they lost

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago and has lost for the season, so

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that run defense not as good as it was to

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>start the year. Julio Jones gets an A in three

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>games without Calvin Ridley. Last year, Julio totaled forty eight

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>targets and in two of those three games, he had

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>double digit catches and cleared one hundred and thirty yards. A.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>J Booyer will probably remain out for Denver. Yeah, Bryce

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Callahan him out? Has he been ruled out thanks charge?

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Callanan has been pretty good, but he's an unlikely

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>shadow candidate even if he did shadow Julio. Julio has

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>six inches and thirty pounds on Bryce Callahan, so it

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was all the Tommy Callahan covering him. There you go.

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Hey, Russell Gauge with Calvin Calvin Ridley out,

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I can give him a see. Jamison Crowder, Keenan Allen,

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, Tyree, killed Juju Smith, Schuster, Adam Humphries all

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>primarily run from the slot like Gauge. All had good,

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>good to great games against Denver. So a CEE for Gauge.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Hayden Hurst can give him a CEE. Not a great matchup.

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Safety Justin Simmons is Pro Football Focus is highest graded

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end defender, but Hurst as a safe floor with

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus yards into a touchdown in six of his

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>last seven games, and Matt Ryan lastly gets a sea

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>between Julio, Gauge and Hurst. He's got a pretty safe

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>floor in a plus matchup receiving wise for the running back,

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>so safety from Matt Ryan. Matt Ryan zero or one

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdown pass in five of his last six games. I

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>know it's been bad, but I'm not trying to look

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>shock you shocking by the way it is. Albert okuwai

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>bunam Albert okwa banab was not close. If you want

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to check out the freshest new way to play fantasy football,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it teen leagues dot com. Every week, the low scoring

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>team gets cut, their players go to the waiver wire,

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>where you and all the remaining teams get to feast

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.479
<v Speaker 1>on those players. The last team standing wins at all

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine Leagues dot com. More Fantasy Football Weekly coming up

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in moments. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchy

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison with you. Follow us

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. I am at Paul Charchy and you'll have

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how very good, very good at b

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>t x J and your mental name must start with

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the T or n X or maybe maybe it's like texts.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It's text text, yeah, Brian text Johnson used to girls

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>back in college. It's were totally extremely totally extreme problem.

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>That line might have worked back then and Matt Triple

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>X was out the Xbox. None of that the X games.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh you were a bad boy. Yeah, you know there's

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>an X and explosive output. There is that explosive output

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>for Matt Harrison. Speaking of Matt Harrison, you've got Seattle

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>taking on Buffalo. This has got sort of matchup of

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the week written on it. DK Metcalf enters as fantasy

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Football's probably second hottest wide receiver, but he draws tramp

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Davious White, he does. I'm still gonna give Metcalf the

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>A despite that that matchup. They're hard to bench a

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>guy who's just physically dominating any corner he faces. Plus,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf has five inches and thirty pounds on White, So

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he gets the A. And I'm giving Tyler Lockett something

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>better than an A. He's getting the fantasy art Vark

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. That's the fantasy Oh yeah. The Bills have

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>only allowed six touchdowns on the season to wide receiver.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Four of them have gone of the slot. Plus they've

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed to one yard games. You guessed it, both to

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>slot receivers on the year. So plus we usually see

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a lock it week than a Metcalf week. We're we're

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>do for the lock it week now, so he's back.

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>He gets an A A art Vark Russell Wilson. Fantasy

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Fonzie eats fantasy Artwarks for breakfast, though, right, I think

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we should have them fight they get out. Been here

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for years in this fantasy Fonzie versus Shark. We already

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>know who would win that because he jumped the shark.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Literally if fantasy Fanzi can't jump the art Vark though, no,

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we've never seen him. Dorian got mad when I gave

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy Fonzi out one time, and that's why the

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy art Vark existed. So you created this. This is

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your doing. Fair enough, they'll they'll do it out one

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of these. Can we find a fantasy Can we get

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Fonzi on our button? Bar Winkler, ah Um, Russell Wilson.

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>He gets an A Grade two. You don't bench a

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>guy who's averaging three point seven touched on passes per game.

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>DJ Dallas looks like he's going to get another almost

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>full bell cow role this week, with Carlos Hide and

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson now ruled out, so DJ Dallas he spun

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>his way and that's see what I did there, Brian. Yeah,

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen carries and forty one yards. That's last week.

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not good. He did add five catches, and he

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 1>did score once on the ground and once through the air,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>which saved his day. Now that the lead running back

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to face the Bills has topped on yards, scored or

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.399
<v Speaker 1>both in each of the last four games, so he's

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>got a chance there. Um, And that's it for the

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Seattle side. Let's go over to the Buffalo side, where

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll stay at the running back position. Let's talk about

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Zack Moss and Devin Singletary. Let's start with the matchup,

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 1>because Seattle doesn't get run on all that much, only

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty attempts per game for seventy four yards. Both are

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>amongst the league's lowest totals. They are susceptible to being

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>beaten by pass catching backs, though, So who wins that

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>battle between these two? That's kind of incomplete because Singletary

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>averages more targets per game than Moss, but it's four

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>versus two, and that's not significant enough for me to go, Oh,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 1>single Tarry is the pass catching back here, so let's

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 1>go inside the ten Singletarry has seen twenty one percent

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of the team's rushing attempts inside the ten. I bet

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>most of those were when when Zack Moss was out. Well,

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Zack Moss and half as many games as Singletary has

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty three percent of the team's rushing attempts. Now, Josh

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Allen's got all the rest of them, by the way,

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So the nod goes to Moss. I'm only going to

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>give him a C this week, though, while Singletary is

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Josh Allen gets an A grade. He's

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>playing Seattle. Stephan Diggs gets an A grade. Uh, he's

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>playing Seattle too. I have reason to believe Seattle plays

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>zone at the second highest clip amongst defenses and Digs

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely torches the zone. So he's going to have a

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>great day. Cole Beasley was might take a chance on

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>me wider Stever, I think John Brown is kind of

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>a desperation. No, I like he was almost might take

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance of the receiver. He played John Brown a lot.

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>He played one of the Bill snaps last week, and

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this is this is where he kind of comes back

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in this one. So I think John Brown is definitely

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>playable too. I'll give him a C grade available on

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>waiver wires and most leagues got dropped. And then uh yeah,

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember how good he was at the beginning of

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the year. I think John Brown goes back to being

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy viable in many weeks the rest of the way.

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>That's all I have to say about that. Okay, then

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that means it's time for me to talk about the

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Giants taking on Washington. We'll start on the Giant side,

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>where I don't have a lot of good things to say.

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Vanta Freeman is gonna miss another game with an ankle injury.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Vanta who Freeman free? Sorry, Vanta Seamen is not getting

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a C grade, He's getting a out to grade because

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>he's got an ankle injury. That means it's Wayne Gallman

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and Alfred Morris and Dion Lewis, the same rotation of

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>crappy runners we saw on Monday Night. They're bad, and

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad matchup against a team that's giving up

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just three point eight yards per carry on the season.

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>No back is top sixty one yards against Washington since

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Week three. They're all dead to us. Let's go to

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. A couple of lukewarm starts. Sterling Shepherd.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>In the past two games since returning from injury, he's

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>seen eighteen targets. He's turned him into two solid box scores.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's a tough matchup. Washington secondary has allowed the

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>third fewest yards and just three touchdowns to opposing receivers,

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>who most often face Ronald Darby, who brings little to

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the table other than speed. So a C grade for

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd, a C grade for Evan Ingram, who has

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>yet to score and now faces a Washington team that

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>hasn't allowed to tight end touchdown in three straight games

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>um including by the way to Evan Ingram three games ago. However,

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Washington is still a bottom ten defense against tight ends,

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>allowing five catches and sixty yards to the position. So

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you can start Ingram and a pinchon at tight end

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>who's not in a pinch. Golden Tate has possible disciplinary

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>actions because of him and his wife complaining about his

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>usage in the offense. You don't get that a lot.

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>But I like the wife sticking up. That's very nice.

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>There's one other who is the Dolphins to take wife?

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Why can't he was a great corner too. I can't

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:19.439
<v Speaker 1>think it is a good corner and and she made

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Google worthy cakes. Let's put it that way. What is

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that guy's name Google? Where the yes turned images on?

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm gonna say, And not in front of

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the kids anyway. Golden Date has scored him back to

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>back games, but he's had just to one and one

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>receptions the last three weeks he's on the bench. Darius

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Slayton has fallen under fifty six receiving yards and six

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 1>of the past seven games, scoring just once. Since his

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:47.919
<v Speaker 1>big Opening Day game. Slayton overwhelmingly runs from the left

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 1>side of the field, where he matches up with Kendall Fuller.

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you a little bit about Kendall Fuller,

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>who should be in the conversation for defensive player of

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the Year. Get this, He's allowing per game averages of

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 1>one catch, fourteen yards and zero touchdowns on the season.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>That's Kendall Fuller's coverage right there. And why Darius Slayton's

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. So if you google Dolphins cornerback cake

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>wife's birthday came, Oh my god, you know what. She's

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be on the Great British Baking Show. I

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that much. Most he might be. Let's

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>go to the Washington side. We've got a B grade

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>on Terry McLaurin in two full games. Terry, with two

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>full games with quarterback Kyle Allen, he's targeted Terry McLaurin

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a whopping twenty three times, which no, not yet Rich McLaren.

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame her for being h McLaren is parlayed

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>into an average of seven catches for eighty two yards

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>with one score, but he'll face shadow coverage from James

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Bradberry is having a very strong year. Just three weeks ago,

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it took twelve targets for McLaurin to get to seventy

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>four yards in the first meeting against Bradberry. Um Sticking

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with the passing game, Kyle Allen gets a C grade

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in his first two games, as I mentioned, to serviceable

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>fantasy games with multiple touchdowns in each, the first of

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.720
<v Speaker 1>which was against this opponent, New York, and he posted

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 1>two yards two scores. I already mentioned McLaurin. Tough matchup,

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 1>but startable, so we'll give the C grade to Kyle Allen.

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Also C grade to another of his targets, Logan Thomas,

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>You're in a pinch at tight end. Like everybody else,

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the Giants are decent against tight ends, allowing just two

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 1>scores on the season, but one of them went to

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas in Week six. The other tight end touchdown

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>went to Gronk last week. I was just last week.

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we can get Thomas to get this. Thomas

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is getting sixty percent six sorry, sixty seven percent of

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the team's targets from inside the ten yard line. I

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>wonder where you got that stat. I don't know. We'll

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>go with that. It was for me. Nicely done, Uh,

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas, you say, let's go to the running game.

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson C grade now before your member there by.

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Last week, before the bye, Gibson had a monster game

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of almost one hundred thirty yards in one touchdown in

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a rare lopsided win for Washington. We're gonna get a

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>healthy dose of him in this game too. But the

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Giants have turned into a pretty good run defense over

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks. They haven't allowed to single back

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to go to more than fifty two rushing yards. Gibson

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>might help through the air a little bit. Giants are

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>allowing the fourth most receiving yards per game to the position.

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>But that's really J. D. Mcsucket's calling cards. So I

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>think Gibson chips and just a little bit of work

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>through the air. I see a game that feels more

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like eighty total yards Frantonio Gibson and probably no scores,

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and then yes, you can start j D. Mcsuckett. You

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>gotta find your spots. But as I just mentioned, this

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>is a team that's struggling against running backs through the air,

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>allowing nearly six receptions and fifty yards per game, fourth

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>most to opposing running backs. So we'll we'll give him

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a C grade as well. Um, let's see, I think

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.439
<v Speaker 1>we had time for one more segment. Yeah, we're gonna

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>try to fit it in. You're gonna have to be

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.959
<v Speaker 1>quick about it. Las Vegas taking on the Chargers, Brian,

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 1>We got about two and a half minutes, all right.

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll give Josh Jacobs a be even though he's been

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>brutal outside of the opener and last week, he's kind

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of book ended his season with two good games with

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of bad ones in the middle. But the

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Raiders O line is coming to Fruition, probably the healthiest

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been all year, and the Chargers have also allowed

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the third most catches to running backs on the season,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and I've given up at least a hundred nineteen combo

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>yards or a touchdown to the last five backs they face.

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully Jacobs can keep it rolling. It seems like

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the Gauntlet part of his schedules in the past, so

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>stick with Josh Jacobs. Darren Waller gets an a Chargers

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>at bottom ten against tight ends. They've allowed five touchdowns

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to the position position, most of which have come in

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. Or Waller is top ten and targets

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>catches and target share in the whole league. So in

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a for Waller, Nelson Aghil are the only wide receiver

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting for the Raiders. He was might take a

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>chance on me, receiver Derek Carr. I was close to

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>give him to see. I love Waller here, kind of

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like Aglar, but I don't see a real ceiling for car.

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.399
<v Speaker 1>This has got to be a Josh Jacobs game where

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:05.839
<v Speaker 1>they keep air bear off the field. The air bear.

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to the air bear. The air bear is.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>He's not in the air. He's on the ground right now, alright,

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a bear. Of course, he's not the air well

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.280
<v Speaker 1>He's the air bear. How silly, aren't you? He's literally

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the air bear. So stupid to think that the air

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bear would be in the air where the ball goes. Anyway,

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was like like the air corriole. Whatever

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you blew that one, not me. Herbert gets in A

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 1>has tossed at least three touchdowns in four straight games,

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with at least two two hundred sixty passing yards in

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>each of those. Las Vegas ranks dead last and pass

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>coverage A dead last and pass rush by Pro Football Focus.

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen Easy a LaMarcus Joiner is a joke of

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a corner Mike Williams gets to be. Las Vegas has

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>surrendered four scorers to opposing receivers in their two games

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>prior to the Monsoon game last week, so they are

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>not a great secondary hunter. Henry A. B. The Raiders

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>are around league average against tight ends, but Kelsey and

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Gronk both shredded him. He is sort of in that

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>territory still. And lastly, Justin Jackson, with the Sea in

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Vegas last four games, no going back as top sixty

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>six rushing yard is not a great matchup and something

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>called Troy Mean Pope keep stealing touches from Jackson, but

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he is startable and Josh kellyanish out not even a

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:22.919
<v Speaker 1>factor at when we come back. Three touch Kelly eaten

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 1>by an air bear. Eaten by an air bear. Three

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>tough questions for a panel of experts play along and

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly resumed. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. This

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is a game we like to call three tough questions.

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I will Pepper, my co host, with the aforementioned three

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>tough questions you can play along to if you can

0:44:56.080 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>go three and oh, tough question number one. Christian McCaffrey

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>was universally selected as the first overall choice in our

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>preseason fantasy drafts. So now that he's healthy, will Christian

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey be the highest scoring runner from this point forward?

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So the main competition is obviously Dalvin Cook, Alvin Kamara,

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and King Henry moving forward from mcmccaffrey and at three.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna break this down from a reality football

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>perspective and not so much fantasy. The Panthers are three

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and five. They're on the outside looking in when it

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to the playoffs. If they can't fight their way

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>into playoff relevancy in the next six weeks. There's no

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 1>point in running McCaffrey into the ground after paying him

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money in a lost season. So the

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.399
<v Speaker 1>next six games where the Panthers start at Kansas City

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. That's already two losses right there, and also

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>bad matchups, and then Detroit, Minnesota, Denver, maybe they win one,

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and then at Green Bay a good fantasy matchup. But

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>after six games they're under five hundred. They're out of

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Mike Davis has proven an able runner, So

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>keep McCaffrey fresh. You paid him a ton of money.

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna see the touches to warrant being the

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>top fantasies or moving forward from the running back position,

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So I say no, all right, will Christian McCaffrey be

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the highest scoring runner from this point forward? And Brian

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:11.359
<v Speaker 1>took a lot of my talking points, but I will

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>note that this is the same injury that made se

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Barkley look like a mere mortal last year when

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he came back from this injury, so it's not particularly

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>perfect as far as him being a complete healthy guy

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year. So I think that he

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>probably finishes in the top ten. But like Brian said,

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we could be looking at some big time stud running

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>backs getting rested down the stretch this year, and what

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is a lost season In a season where there's no

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>fans in the stands, there might not be anything for

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for the owners and the general managers to go. Yeah,

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I want Christian McCaffrey to play in this last season.

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>So sa Kwon Barkley missed four games with his injury,

0:46:55.640 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>his high ankle sprain. Caroline arrested Christian McCaffrey seven weeks weeks,

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>which is the which is the perfect thing to do,

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't make sense to bring somebody back on

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this injury they're not effective that you have to be

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>back to basically one, which is where we believe. Christian

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey is practiced all week. At the ten game layoff

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>from the last one, we all we all feel like

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he's in very good shape, totally fresh legs right now

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's basically hasn't used this year. What holds him

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in the way from being the highest scoring running back

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>is the schedule. He's got a bye week left that

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the others don't have. He's got a tough schedule including

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>next week against the league's best run defense Tampa, and

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>then shortly after that a suddenly competent Vikings run defense

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and a good Denver run defense after that. So the

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>schedule doesn't work in his favor as well as it

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>does for Cook and Camara and Henry, so he's unlikely

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the highest scoring running back from this point forward.

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Tough question Number two is Travis Kelsey the most valuable

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>player in Fantasy football? Matt Um. To be the m

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>v P in fantasy you have to have the biggest

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 1>delta between you and the next player down in your

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 1>position group, and according to Fantasy Football Today, the biggest

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.359
<v Speaker 1>gap between the first and second place player at any

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:15.720
<v Speaker 1>position is that between the top wide receiver in football,

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Richie James and Davante Adams. Yeah, Richie James and his

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night blow up on is his only game he's

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>played this year. On a per game basis, he's the

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>best wide receiver in football, But second most is Travis Kelsey,

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>who leads the league UH leads the now out for

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the season George Kittle by two points per game and

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues and he's out, so if you go down

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>one more, he leads Darren Waller by four points per game.

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think Travis Kelsey, in a position that we

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:50.240
<v Speaker 1>thought was so deep, it's now insanely shallow. Travis Kelsey

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is the most important and valuable player in fantasy right now.

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>If I'm like doing a draft starting right now, which

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you can still do on guy team leagues dotcom, um um,

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking Kelsey first. I'm still taking one of

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the bigger running backs. Matt made very good points, but

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the four points between Kelsey and Waller is not enough

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for me than the twenty plus that you get from

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Kamara and Cook and Henry and soon to be Christian McCaffrey,

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>who are going to outscore every other running back by

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at least five points bringing on a per game basis.

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm still going with the running backs, maybe even

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams. But Kelsey is not the most valuable player

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football to me. But that's because I'm the

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>tight end whisper and I can stream anytime. If you

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>showed me, just showed me all the rosters in your

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>league and said pick the team that's gonna win, the

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>first thing I would do is I'd find Travis Kelsey

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on those rosters, and I would look at Kelsey and

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the team around Kelsey, because if you can tell me

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a qualified team around Kelsey, that's the team I'm picking.

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned the Delta, it's really all for most

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>valuable player. I did not say highest scoring players. Should

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>notice I said the most valuable player. Every word counts in.

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>He is very tricky assignment. These are They are tough questions.

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Um Every week, half to two thirds of your league

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is bracing for a zero at tight end. Ask anybody

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:15.879
<v Speaker 1>who plugged in Robert Tunyan on Thursday night, which many

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 1>people did. We have thousands of listeners right now who

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:22.320
<v Speaker 1>plugged in Robert Tounyan and got one catch for five yards.

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what most of your league is experiencing right now.

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>There are exactly four quasi reliable tight ends. That's it,

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Delta is gigantic. By ESPN scoring, Kelsey scored

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a third more Fantasy points than any other tight ends

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>still playing with Kettle out, and in a scoring system

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in which Kelsey has scored one points this year, the

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:47.839
<v Speaker 1>next closest tight end has sixty. Nobody else is close

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to that ratio except Davante Adams at the wide receiver position.

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I could find help there. Yes, Travis Kelsey is the

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>most valuable player in Fantasy. Question number three, Jase Edmonds

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is expected to start for the Cardinals. Well, he is

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>going to start? Will he finished the year as an

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 1>RB one, r B two flex or bench Brian, I

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just want to talk about e p A for a second,

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and not the Environmental Protection Agency. It's expected points added,

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a football metric. You don't have a whole

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to really dive in, but it weighs

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the value of a player what he brings to your

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>football team. And you take the e p A when

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you're on the field and when you're off the field,

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you find the delta and you just see

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 1>how good you are a football. Chase Edmonds is way

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 1>better than Kenyan Drake at football. Kenyan Drake's e p

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>A per play point negative point zero six. I'm pretty

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.959
<v Speaker 1>sure you don't want to be negative. He takes zero

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>six expected points added per play. Chase Edmonds is plus

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>point zero four. And now when you start piling on

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the plays, you're piling on the points. The schedule is

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>an ideal for Edmonds, But I don't see him what

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 1>letting this job go. Drake might factor in a little

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:03.320
<v Speaker 1>bit when he's healthy in a few weeks, and for

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>that reason, I'll just say RB two and not RB

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 1>one for Edmunds. But this is Chase Edmonds backfield moving forward.

0:52:09.000 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Quick question on this this e p a thing you

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about the delta for these players, and every player's

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:21.439
<v Speaker 1>got this delta. What would would Matt Burke have a delta? Burke? Sorry, wow,

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Sorry, my Mike wasn't on. I gave

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you an approving thank you. I appreciate that. Okay, So

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the answer you gave was r B two, r B two, Matt,

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is Chase Edmonds going to finish the years in RB one,

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>RB two flex or bench. He's super talented. He's got

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one huge problem for a running back. He does not

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 1>get the ball near the goal line. So far this season,

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with Drake being almost completely ineffective and injured off and on,

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Edmonds has only managed exactly one carry from inside the

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:59.799
<v Speaker 1>ten yard line. Kenyan Drake has thirteen and Kyler Murray

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 1>as seven. When your own quarterback is vulturing your touchdowns,

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:07.839
<v Speaker 1>you have to score from distance and that hurts him

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a ton. And while he's very talented. I think he's

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>only a flex the rest of the way. Don't you

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to take Kenyan Drake's goal line rushes?

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Not if Cliff Kingsbury just keeps handing Kenyan Drake the rock,

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:24.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's going to keep giving. If they're

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Kenyan Drake play the Matt p P, how

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are how are they going to put him on the field.

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>If Brian says he's he's bad on on like yards

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>per play, well, we're you're gonna keep him out between

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the twenties. You're gonna put him in at the goal

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.800
<v Speaker 1>line for somehow you think he's good. You thought he

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:46.279
<v Speaker 1>was thirteen to one over Chase Edmunds so far this year, Man,

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what you're talking about. Any thirteen

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to one carries inside the tent, carries inside the tent.

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that's past, that's in. That's in the past.

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>When Drake is no longer the starter, which is going

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen beginning this week and coaches totally changed their

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>mind going to go back running style. Edmunds has been

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>better than Drake at everything full two yards per carry,

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 1>better better receiver with quadruple the receptions and receiving yards.

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>His Pro Football Focus ranking is eleventh for Chase Edmunds,

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 1>forty five for Drake. Easy game against Miami this week,

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 1>which will boost Chase Edmunds his status, then a favorable

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>game after that against Buffaloes run defense. At that point,

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he solidifies this thing and he remains the first guy

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to and will be. Now, he's not an

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>elite runner, and this is why it's not an RB one.

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He's not Dalvin Cook, he is not Jase Edmonds, is

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:39.759
<v Speaker 1>not Alvin Kamara. He's not He's not King Henry. He

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is a good back, not a great back. Drake will

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>still factor in some He is going to be an

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>RB two, you know for somebody who got the question right?

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Why are you battling me so I got wrong? Got

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it wrong? Yeah, I got it right, always like Brian Better.

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>New England takes on the New York Jets Matt and

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for New England, we've already talked about out some a

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 1>handful of players here, including Cam Newton, who was might

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on the quarterback. Yeah, we did talk

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>about Cam Newton. Um I don't like him as much.

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>As you do. I will note that I'll give him

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here. Still it's the Jets. Yeah, he's

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:18.879
<v Speaker 1>got no wide receivers. He's tied for the fewest past

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>attempts inside the ten yard line among quarterbacks who have

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.800
<v Speaker 1>started at least six games, with only six attempts. That's gross.

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Jets are the team that you're

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:32.360
<v Speaker 1>going to run against. That's why Damian Harris is the

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 1>only Patriots starter on my on my match up here,

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm giving him a B grade. He's averaging five

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>point seven yards per carry, double digit rushing attempts, and

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>three of the four games he's played this year top

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:47.279
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yards, and two of those and scored last week.

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:50.239
<v Speaker 1>The Jets are allowing yards per game. I think this

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is a slow plotting, low scoring game, and they just

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:55.560
<v Speaker 1>give Damian Harris the ball over and over again. I

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like Harris a lot this week as well, although let's

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>note Sony Walkman back and active for this team, but

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 1>they can't give him. Damian Harris has been the only

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:08.440
<v Speaker 1>good thing the Patriots have had all year. I know,

0:56:09.320 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>particularly on offense, you would think, but Bill Belichick is

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 1>inscrutable with his running backs and nothing would surprise us.

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Did you know the starting wide receivers for the Patriots

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this week will be Jacoby Myers, who's owned in two

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>point four percent of ESPN leagues, and Demere Bird, who's

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:31.759
<v Speaker 1>owned in one and neither have scored a touchdown this year. Yeah,

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Jet side. Uh. Sam Donald had

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:36.880
<v Speaker 1>another m r I this week on his throwing shoulder

0:56:36.920 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's been limited all week. The Jets have a

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 1>bye next week, so they could conceivably rest him and

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 1>play Joe Flacco, or they could play injured Sam Donald,

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're gonna play Donald because they don't

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>want to win because they still have Adam Gaze as

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>their coach. It's a bench grade for either. The Patriots

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>have not allowed a passing touchdown in three weeks and

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>are only allowing two six yards per game in that span.

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Braxton Arios has more Sam Donald targets than Jamison Crowder,

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and with Crowder and Breshad Pereman looking both doubtful to play,

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:11.799
<v Speaker 1>he's probably the top pass receiver for him this week.

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It's also a revenge game for Braxted Burrios, who was

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>drafted by the Patriots. If you're going to start a

0:57:17.720 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Jets wide receiver, it's Burrios over Mims. But we need

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a grade lower than a seed to classify barriers. I'm

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 1>going to give him a J grade. Yep uh. Michael

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Perrine and Frank Gore are the running backs here. Parian

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>had more snaps last week, but they still had the

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>exact same number of touches with only ten. Parian looks

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more spry here, though. I'm going to give

0:57:39.440 --> 0:57:42.160
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade, as if the Jets will score

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, it will probably be him. The pat saw

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 1>split backfield last week with the Bills backs. They each

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 1>had four team carries and each of them went over

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:53.640
<v Speaker 1>eight yards, So Parrian could possibly manage like sixty yards

0:57:53.680 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in a score here. So that's why he gets the

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>C grade. And the best play of the game, by

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, Patriots defense. It is, by the way, available

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in many leagues. A lot of people have cut the Patriots.

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You remember at this time last year, the Patriots defense

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was like the I don't like. The tenth highest scoring

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy player was the Patriots defense. Yeah, what a difference

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of year makes. It's not quite like that anymore. If

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you've missed any of the player rankings you want more information,

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 1>All of my player ratings are available for free at

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot Com. Ratings explanations help you solve your

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>bench start conundrums at Guillotine leagues dot Com. More Fantasy

0:58:34.000 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly coming when we return. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchy and Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison. Matt tell

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people what's happening at Shock Fantasy. New Dynasty trade value

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 1>chart just hit yesterday and it's it's coming up on

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:23.880
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline and your dynasty leagues right now, so you

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 1>probably need to start looking at how your team is

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go. Are you are you a contender? Are

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you building for next year? The trade value chart will

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>help you all right, chock fantasy dot Com. Carolina takes

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>on Kansas City. Christian McCaffrey's back. Uh. They say they're

0:59:38.920 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 1>going to give him a full workload, and he's right

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 1>back to being the same obvious a that he was

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>back in Week one. Kansas City is a far worse

0:59:45.560 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 1>run defense than past defense, and Carolina will run for

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>as long as this game is close, and mostly they

0:59:50.680 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>do keep their games fairly close, so hopefully that will

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>be the case here in an A grade for Christian McCaffrey,

0:59:55.160 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't need more explanation than that. Teddy Bridgewater is

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. You gotta pick your spots with the

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimate game manager, and a difficult matchup against a very

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>good secondary is not one of them. The Chiefs ranked

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>seventh and passing yards allowed third in passing touchdowns allowed,

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewaters receivers have very tough individual matchups, uh and and

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that does include last week's hero Curtis Samuel, who was

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>also on the bench. He is going to frequently face

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>off against Tyron Mattheo and he's one of the best

1:00:23.080 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>tacklers in any second area across the league, and he's

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>giving up just thirty yards per game in his coverage.

1:00:28.280 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So no Curtis Samuel in this one for my taste.

1:00:31.440 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Robby Anderson is up at a B grade. He's drawn

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>at least eight targets and posted at least seventy four yards,

1:00:37.320 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and four of the past five games he has the

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>team's most favorable matchup against cornerback chart Various Ward, who

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is allowing a passer rating of one eight and he's

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>given up three touchdowns in his coverage. Bad news for

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore. He's got four or fewer catches in

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:53.919
<v Speaker 1>five of the last six games, so he's been lightly

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>used anyway, and volume could be an issue again this week.

1:00:57.360 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Chiefs are seeing the fifth fewest passes, just

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty two per game, which is weird that you would

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>think the Chiefs always ahead, so teams will be passing

1:01:03.840 --> 1:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on him all the time. But really, because the Chiefs

1:01:07.240 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are so dangerous, teams run the ball as long as

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they can, and they're not very good against run anyway.

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Moore's got a tough coverage against self described marijuana enthusiast,

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but Shot Brilon, who is allowing eleven scoreless yards per

1:01:21.720 --> 1:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>game and his coverage this year, that's it seems like

1:01:24.680 --> 1:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the green stuff's working for Apparently it is, uh, Mike

1:01:27.920 --> 1:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Davis dead to us now. He probably drops down to

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the tenent usage level and that's not enough. And I

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think other than just holding him as a handcuff, you

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>can drop Mike Davis. All right, let's go to the

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City side. Patrick Mahomes Entyreek Hill get a grades,

1:01:42.880 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but beware the faith. That's befallen. Several other good passing

1:01:48.080 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>receiving tandems against Carolina. They're so easy to run upon

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that quarterbacks get minimized. Opposing quarterbacks are averaging just two

1:01:59.000 --> 1:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>d yards and one point one touchdowns against the Panthers.

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>That's it now. All that said, Clyde Edwards A Laire

1:02:08.440 --> 1:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and Levian Bell have not been end zone magnets or

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>even usage magnets, so maybe it's not gonna go that way.

1:02:14.400 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And I still have a grades on Mahomes and Hill

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and just I'm just throwing it out. There is something

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of. There's been a lot of good

1:02:20.840 --> 1:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>matchups against Carolina in the past that have not panned

1:02:24.440 --> 1:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>out for the passers. Travis Kelsey is an obvious a

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to spend a lot of time

1:02:28.640 --> 1:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on him, and we've already broke him down earlier in

1:02:30.840 --> 1:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this show. Let's talk about the running backs, and it's fascinating.

1:02:34.480 --> 1:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell was might take a chance on me running

1:02:36.520 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>back earlier in the show. But let's talk about Clyde

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Edwards A Laire for a minute. Carolina has allowed ten

1:02:42.400 --> 1:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>running back scores in their seven games. They're giving up

1:02:45.560 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>almost five yards per carried to the position, and they're

1:02:48.160 --> 1:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>giving up the most receptions to running backs. The concern

1:02:51.880 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's volume Clyde Edwards a layer averaging just nine touches

1:02:55.000 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>per game since Levian Bell came to the team. All

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>O the weird part about these last two games with Bell,

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they've also been blowouts at half and neither back's gotten

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>any work. I think this one stays tighter, and we're

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna see more running in this game. Both guys have

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>been so lightly used, they have such fresh legs. I

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see enough of Clyde Edwards a layer

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and laby On Bell for them to both be C grades.

1:03:19.400 --> 1:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Mikole Hardman and DeMarcus Robinson are dart throws in most games,

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but this just doesn't seem like an ideal one here

1:03:25.600 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>for the reasons I mentioned earlier, with the de emphasized

1:03:28.280 --> 1:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>passing game and a possible emphasis on the running backs.

1:03:33.800 --> 1:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next matchup, which is Miami taking

1:03:36.080 --> 1:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on Arizona. Brian, you already told us Patrick Laird was

1:03:39.520 --> 1:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>your sneaky dolphin take a chance on me runner, which

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you validated it. I'm kind of buying into that vibe.

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>What about the passing game to looked, that's the end

1:03:53.960 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. So but yeah, Davante Parker, Preston Williams,

1:03:56.880 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sicky, all guys who would normally get a raid

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or at least some consideration most weeks. Yeah, absolutely none

1:04:03.640 --> 1:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this week to a Tongung gole Via making his first

1:04:09.840 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>road start of his career, only his second start. Of course,

1:04:12.640 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have to do much last week, and when

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he did, he didn't look sharp. So I'm not liking

1:04:18.120 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>him on the road. So do you guys stand I'm

1:04:20.400 --> 1:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>still rostering Stu Beard in a bunch of leagues because

1:04:22.640 --> 1:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I had him in a bunch of leagues, because you

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>guys know how I feel about it. I'm still holding

1:04:26.120 --> 1:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>him just in case. Well, he doesn't have a beard anymore.

1:04:28.800 --> 1:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I know he's got short short stubble. There's a there's

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a baseball player named Drew stubs stubs consider consider

1:04:43.600 --> 1:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that enshrined until he grows that thing back out. All right,

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds good? Uh? Some of you might be tempted to

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>play Jordan Howard, but in take home I mentioned this,

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. Arizona very tough on the ground against

1:04:54.600 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>running backs, have only allowed three rushing touchdowns to the

1:04:57.200 --> 1:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>position and no loan back as top seventy five rushing

1:04:59.640 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>yards and he the miracle goal line plunge plunge Jordan Howard,

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that is so Patrick Laird, You're only stortable Dolphin this week.

1:05:06.040 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Over the Arizona side, Jase Edmonds, who we just talked

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>about in great detail, gets an A and this one

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>only two opposing running backs have totaled six at least

1:05:14.840 --> 1:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen touches against Miami, which is kind of nuts. But

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>both of those backs scored twice and combined to average

1:05:20.480 --> 1:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifteen combo yards. Edmunds will get that

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>volume in this game. And but by the way, where

1:05:26.160 --> 1:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the hell is Eno Benjamin? My boy, he can't he

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>can't even see the field. I don't even see the

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>practice field at this point. Is he still on the team?

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But I almost prospect him. But I'm very disappointed in you,

1:05:36.680 --> 1:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. Anyway, to the passing game for the Cardinals,

1:05:39.120 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins gets an A. The Dolphins are allowing the

1:05:41.840 --> 1:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth most yards to wide receivers and shut down corner

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Byron Jones is not doing his job. Both both Stefon

1:05:49.320 --> 1:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Diggs and dk met Metcalf top the century mark against

1:05:52.720 --> 1:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Jones and h Hopkins is certainly on their level, if

1:05:55.960 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>not above it. Christian Kirk can give him a B

1:05:58.360 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>at least fifty five yards and touchdown in five straight games,

1:06:02.360 --> 1:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>so he's established a safe floor for himself and against

1:06:05.400 --> 1:06:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins secondary receivers like Robert Woods, Kendrick Born, David Moore,

1:06:09.920 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>John Brown, they all scored touchdowns and three of those

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>four also cleared eighty yards. Kendrick Borne was the one

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>who did not, so a safe B for Christian Kirk

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and a very safe A for Kyler Murray. What the

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins have done recently against quarterbacks is irrelevant because we're

1:06:25.760 --> 1:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about Joe Flacco, Jared Goff and whatever San Francisco

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>has thrown out there. We're not talking We're not talking

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>about actual quarterbacks. With those guys, Murray is more than

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>an actual quarterback. Has totaled at least two at least

1:06:37.600 --> 1:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns in every game. In fact, he's had more

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>than two total touchdowns in all but two games, at

1:06:43.880 --> 1:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>least three touchdowns and all but two games so far

1:06:45.800 --> 1:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this year rushing in passing, So in a for Murray,

1:06:49.720 --> 1:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Murray might be the best fantasy quarterback the rest of

1:06:52.240 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the way. Hey church before we move on to the

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Houston Jacksonville game. Yes, I think that this game might

1:06:58.080 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>have been the one that was going to be in

1:07:00.120 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>London originally scheduled. So I invited friend of the show,

1:07:05.920 --> 1:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Colin mccockney to let me go get him. He's out

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:10.919
<v Speaker 1>in the hallway, all right, thank you. So I hate

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this guy because I have to translate for him. Yeah,

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, we never know what he's saying. Na nab

1:07:18.960 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>some salty rumphs and Rupert's fingers. Make sure you have

1:07:23.440 --> 1:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>some posh legs, sleeves on, shut your sauce box, sluice

1:07:28.040 --> 1:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>your gobs with your favorite chuckaroo. It's high time for footy.

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little rusty. I think he said something about

1:07:35.120 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pretzels hot dogs, and I think i'm pants. I'm jamming

1:07:38.600 --> 1:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>something into something pantaloons. Maybe I don't know. Shaun Watson,

1:07:42.800 --> 1:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he's an egg Governor. Watson his top three yards and

1:07:46.840 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>frown for multiple scores and four straight free of the

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>bleeding last four pass throwers for the Nanny Goat Race

1:07:54.760 --> 1:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars of top three undred as well. Shaun Watson

1:07:58.000 --> 1:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>gets a Watsons and thrown for multiple scores in four straight.

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Three of the last four pass throwers to face the

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars have topped three yards as well. The master goat race,

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he's the master goat race. And do I need to

1:08:11.640 --> 1:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>be worried? Governor Brandon Cooks and Will Fuller a like

1:08:15.680 --> 1:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Battle of Griddington. Last time Cooks faced the Jaguars,

1:08:20.120 --> 1:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he had one sixty one and yield touchdown. Her Majesty

1:08:24.240 --> 1:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>sugar b on it. Fuller has topped a center and

1:08:28.520 --> 1:08:33.639
<v Speaker 1>dashed my wig in six or seven fire sticks blast.

1:08:33.720 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>The bloody Texans almost traded him last week, so they

1:08:37.320 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>want to give him some makeup targets. The bleeding Jaguars

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have allowed six different receivers to top seventy five yards

1:08:46.560 --> 1:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last four games. They let a dying duck

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in a thunderstorm on the foot road. Gransd how'd you

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>even get in the country back? I thought you. Brandon

1:08:57.800 --> 1:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Cooks and Will Fuller both getting a last time cookspace

1:09:00.720 --> 1:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars. He had a hundred sixty one yards in

1:09:02.600 --> 1:09:05.639
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. Fullers topped one yards were scored in six

1:09:05.720 --> 1:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of seven games this year. I guess those are fire

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sticks and sticks. Plus the Texans almost traded fuller last week,

1:09:13.479 --> 1:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>so they want to give him some makeup targets in

1:09:15.520 --> 1:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this one. Or maybe he's playing revenge game against his

1:09:17.680 --> 1:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>own team and the Jaguars have all that was my

1:09:19.920 --> 1:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>home on there. The Jaguars have also allowed six different

1:09:22.080 --> 1:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>receiversh topped seventy five yards in the last four games.

1:09:26.360 --> 1:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Still stuck on the master goat race. David Johnson, he'll

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>be the ninty knocking ear. He gets a BE because

1:09:34.920 --> 1:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>those Jags are a bunch of bacon faced blunderbusses. They

1:09:39.240 --> 1:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>low about five meters every time on the holidays. Even

1:09:44.840 --> 1:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson gets a B because the matchup is so good.

1:09:48.120 --> 1:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>The Jaguars have allowed five yards per carry over their

1:09:51.680 --> 1:09:56.599
<v Speaker 1>last four games. Jake Luton is a muff. He's named

1:09:56.640 --> 1:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>after the loup. He got bum fadder two. How's he

1:10:00.000 --> 1:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a couple of clicks in the cob. He's

1:10:03.280 --> 1:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a batty fang, That's what he is. Jake

1:10:06.920 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Luton is on the bench, especially because, according to Evan Silva,

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Luton was one of the worst college prospects to come

1:10:13.400 --> 1:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>out last year, calling him brutally unathletic. He had a

1:10:17.560 --> 1:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>spark score in the fourth percentile. You know, I'm really

1:10:26.640 --> 1:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>very surprised that edvon Silva's name translated is something about

1:10:30.280 --> 1:10:34.479
<v Speaker 1>putting bacon in your mouth. Batty fang, batty fang. DJ

1:10:34.760 --> 1:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Chalk is a hob merchant, but his dattles maybe an

1:10:37.840 --> 1:10:41.799
<v Speaker 1>e's gropus his ear. He's on the slab too. Everyone

1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>knows what this means, but it means Chark is a

1:10:43.439 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>good dancer, but he's not going to catch much in

1:10:45.400 --> 1:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this one, so he and the rest of the receivers

1:10:47.439 --> 1:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>are on the bench. Jimmy Robinson is tight as a

1:10:50.320 --> 1:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>boiled owl and ready to go off the chump. He

1:10:53.080 --> 1:10:56.759
<v Speaker 1>gets a bumble. Unless the Texas boys are rum gaggers.

1:10:57.000 --> 1:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>They ain't stopping Jimmy Houston allows a Lottie. Isn't toddies

1:11:00.800 --> 1:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to go for one one every day? Now, go fry

1:11:04.280 --> 1:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>your face and play with the gravy be He's the

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>only chance that Jaguars have to win with lutenant quarterback.

1:11:12.120 --> 1:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>The Texans are allowing one and fifty one yards per

1:11:15.120 --> 1:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing running backs. And then I think that

1:11:17.840 --> 1:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I just like Colin out what did I miss? I

1:11:20.240 --> 1:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>think a lot saying goodbye something about Bacon and the

1:11:24.479 --> 1:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Master goat race that I'm gonna go rough up Colin

1:11:32.520 --> 1:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and Colin mc I don't think he'll come back again

1:11:37.400 --> 1:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. We thought, we thought we're gonna make it

1:11:39.680 --> 1:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>through the season without Colin mccotney. But after apparently smuggling

1:11:43.920 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>himself back in and all the way into our studio,

1:11:46.240 --> 1:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>he told us it was a London game, so he's

1:11:48.120 --> 1:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna wake up at you know time and go

1:11:52.240 --> 1:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for it absolutely when we come back. Premature speculation. This

1:11:57.320 --> 1:11:59.479
<v Speaker 1>is where we give you three players you want to

1:11:59.520 --> 1:12:01.479
<v Speaker 1>pick up the this week that other people are gonna

1:12:01.520 --> 1:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>be trying to pick up next week, but they're already

1:12:04.600 --> 1:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on your roster. That's the beauty of the premature speculation

1:12:07.800 --> 1:12:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and our final set of matchups coming in the final segment.

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't already tried a Guillotine league, it is

1:12:13.320 --> 1:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>not too late to join one. Guillotine at leagues dot com,

1:12:16.080 --> 1:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the freshest new way to play fantasy sports Guillotine Leagues

1:12:19.240 --> 1:12:48.639
<v Speaker 1>dot com. It's the final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:12:48.720 --> 1:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening today. If you've are listening over

1:12:52.080 --> 1:12:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the air and you've missed any part of the almost

1:12:55.520 --> 1:12:57.519
<v Speaker 1>two hours of this show. We encourage you to go

1:12:57.680 --> 1:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>back and check out the podcast for fantasy football. Can here?

1:13:00.760 --> 1:13:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Can't be anybody listening anymore after Colin ruined the show.

1:13:04.680 --> 1:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not, but he mentioned Bacon, who's the guy on

1:13:07.360 --> 1:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter that does he does the rundown, tweets it out. Yeah,

1:13:10.360 --> 1:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you that don't remember hand. We'll get it at

1:13:13.720 --> 1:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>some point, is but we'll get it before that shows over.

1:13:15.640 --> 1:13:18.479
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a Twitter follower who's nice enough to tell

1:13:18.520 --> 1:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you where you can find at which minute mark you

1:13:20.320 --> 1:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>can find each and every one of our matchup. And

1:13:22.320 --> 1:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>he was a little sad he didn't have more followers

1:13:24.280 --> 1:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>as a result. So let's get him those followers so

1:13:26.520 --> 1:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he can share his rundown. We'll do a weekend Um,

1:13:29.200 --> 1:13:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I've retweeted stuff. I can't make people follow him. I'm

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>not saying to feel bad about it. This is how

1:13:32.840 --> 1:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>he feel. The premature speculation is a segment that we

1:13:36.040 --> 1:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>do every week, and which week his name is James,

1:13:38.320 --> 1:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, thank you James, Mr j C seventy seven,

1:13:42.439 --> 1:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>m r j C seven seventh on Twitter. Mr j

1:13:45.760 --> 1:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>C seventy seven, Thank you, James. We appreciate that. Every

1:13:48.240 --> 1:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>week Uh, the premature speculation is three players that you

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up this week that everybody else be

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick up next week, and they're gonna go, oh,

1:13:57.600 --> 1:13:59.519
<v Speaker 1>how did you know to go get him? It's because

1:13:59.680 --> 1:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>this is our time machine. Yes, we begin with Brian.

1:14:03.760 --> 1:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>You're premature speculation player. I've talked about him in the

1:14:06.600 --> 1:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>first segment and gave him a See. I'm gonna double

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>down on Darnell Mooney, rookie wide receiver for the Bears.

1:14:11.439 --> 1:14:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Out of two lane. Uh, Mooney has caught two or

1:14:14.600 --> 1:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>more passes in each of his first eight games in

1:14:16.960 --> 1:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, the only Bears rookie wide receiver to do that. Basically, Ever,

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:23.719
<v Speaker 1>his usage has been ramping up big time. Thirteen targets

1:14:23.760 --> 1:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks. Last week, he played the

1:14:26.960 --> 1:14:29.599
<v Speaker 1>snaps against the Saints a higher percentage. And Anthony Miller

1:14:29.680 --> 1:14:31.439
<v Speaker 1>ever played as a rookie last year and he just

1:14:31.800 --> 1:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he passes the eye test. If you've watched Darnell Mooney

1:14:34.160 --> 1:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>play and Allen Robinson commands double team's bracket coverage on

1:14:37.880 --> 1:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the regular, Mooney is going to have a nice finish

1:14:40.200 --> 1:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Uh, only it wears on I like

1:14:43.040 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that you said Mooney gets two catches like every game,

1:14:46.479 --> 1:14:49.519
<v Speaker 1>so it's like like a tuney look at it two

1:14:49.600 --> 1:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or more, all right, but it's been more lately. Moving on, Matt,

1:14:52.960 --> 1:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>your text is it's also a two dollar Canadian coin, right, Uh?

1:14:58.800 --> 1:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Ford. The Patriots just brought in Ford at the

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline to fill in for Julian Edelman for the

1:15:05.280 --> 1:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>remainder of the season. Now he might not play this week,

1:15:08.800 --> 1:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but Ford was quietly kind of good for the Dolphins.

1:15:12.080 --> 1:15:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Had around, you know, three catches per game for the Fins,

1:15:14.680 --> 1:15:17.599
<v Speaker 1>including a nine target game in a ten target game

1:15:17.640 --> 1:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. But what I really wanted to talk about

1:15:20.200 --> 1:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was last season in weeks seventeen, Ryan Fitzpatrick knocked the

1:15:25.320 --> 1:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Patriots out of a first round by and it was

1:15:28.160 --> 1:15:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Ford who was one of the big reasons why.

1:15:31.080 --> 1:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Nine targets, seven catches, fifty four yards plus a rush

1:15:35.320 --> 1:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for eleven yards. And you don't think Bill Belichick didn't

1:15:38.040 --> 1:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>write that down and went, Hey, that's a guy I'm

1:15:41.200 --> 1:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>going to steal from a divisional opponent. He's been stealing

1:15:45.360 --> 1:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>divisional slot receivers for years and years and this is

1:15:48.760 --> 1:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just the latest one. And I think Ford is worth

1:15:51.479 --> 1:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>picking up. I am going to start by reiterating the

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>guy Scott Fish mentioned last show, Alan Lazard, and I

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>know because they played Thursday. He's locked in a lot

1:16:01.960 --> 1:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of leagues, but get him primed up for the waiver

1:16:04.439 --> 1:16:07.599
<v Speaker 1>wire for next week. He's due to come back, and man,

1:16:07.760 --> 1:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>do they need a second target in that offense. He

1:16:10.120 --> 1:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of my sleeper picks from the preseason. Blew

1:16:14.080 --> 1:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>up in those first couple of games, then probably got hurt,

1:16:16.360 --> 1:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but he has his scheduled to come back for the

1:16:18.240 --> 1:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>next game, So go get Alan Lazard. Then my guy

1:16:22.320 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that was Scott's last week that I'm reiterating. My guy

1:16:25.320 --> 1:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is Tony Pollard, another player that I mentioned frequently in

1:16:28.960 --> 1:16:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the preseason when I told you I did not trust

1:16:31.680 --> 1:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott this year. Here all the reasons why, and

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>now here Zeke four straight games with diminishing yards per carry.

1:16:39.560 --> 1:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>He leads the NFL and fumbles. Leads the NFL among

1:16:42.400 --> 1:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>all running backs in dropped passes, two of which have

1:16:45.240 --> 1:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>turned into interceptions. His past protection is as bad as

1:16:50.040 --> 1:16:53.479
<v Speaker 1>anybody's in the NFL. It's all come apart for Ezekiel Elliott.

1:16:53.640 --> 1:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard getting an increasing time share. I'm not saying

1:16:57.000 --> 1:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul it is going to take the job from Zeke. No,

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but he's getting enough of the action now that he

1:17:02.280 --> 1:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>belongs to be on rosters. And just Zeke's got the

1:17:06.040 --> 1:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury right now. If at some point they decide

1:17:09.360 --> 1:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>if this thing gets worse or they shut down Zeke

1:17:12.240 --> 1:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, I think you're gonna want, Tony Pollard, I

1:17:14.320 --> 1:17:17.599
<v Speaker 1>think this thing is gonna get worse. Do you want

1:17:17.640 --> 1:17:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to just say something? I think you just say, Tony,

1:17:23.280 --> 1:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not to do that. You did say that last week,

1:17:25.840 --> 1:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>did I back? Well? I think I whispered it, so

1:17:30.400 --> 1:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't technically if you whisper it as much. Tony

1:17:33.520 --> 1:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Pollard our final premature speculation player. We've got a couple

1:17:36.920 --> 1:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of matchups to work in, including Baltimore taking on Indianapolis.

1:17:40.400 --> 1:17:44.519
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson Man. This Ravens passing game continues to be

1:17:44.560 --> 1:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>out of sake and it's awfully tough to get back

1:17:47.320 --> 1:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>on track in a game without your blindside blocker Ronnie Stanley,

1:17:51.280 --> 1:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're going up against the Colts defense that's very good,

1:17:54.200 --> 1:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>only allowing two d eight passing yards and one point

1:17:58.560 --> 1:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for passing touchdowns and Honestly, those numbers have even lower

1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>from weren't for a bunch of garbage time stats last

1:18:04.000 --> 1:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>week from Matthew Stafford. You know, the fortunate thing about

1:18:06.920 --> 1:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson is the rushing numbers usually give you a

1:18:10.120 --> 1:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>safe floor. But you know, if there's one game that

1:18:12.960 --> 1:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I were going to predict where he flops in both

1:18:16.040 --> 1:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>departments rushing and receiving, this might be it for Lamar Jackson.

1:18:19.920 --> 1:18:21.519
<v Speaker 1>I've got to be grade on him, but it's a

1:18:21.560 --> 1:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>cautious be grade at that. Let's go to his receivers.

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got a C grade on Marquise Brown. He is

1:18:26.720 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a low volume, touchdown dependent receiver. The cold secondary is

1:18:30.360 --> 1:18:33.839
<v Speaker 1>allowed to score or one yard performance to opposing receivers

1:18:33.880 --> 1:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>in six of their past seven games, and if one

1:18:35.479 --> 1:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>receiver is gonna do it, I think it's Marquise Brown.

1:18:37.880 --> 1:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Brown has reached paydirt and two of his last three games.

1:18:40.680 --> 1:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Last week's touchdown was his only catch of the game. Again,

1:18:43.439 --> 1:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent receiver, which you don't get a lot of

1:18:46.479 --> 1:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>um He's averaging just forty six yards per game in

1:18:49.400 --> 1:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>his last six. Brown runs from the right side of

1:18:52.600 --> 1:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the field over half of the time, so he's gonna

1:18:54.439 --> 1:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>face now rock solid cornerback rock Yasin the most. In

1:19:00.040 --> 1:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>five games so far that he's played this year, Yah

1:19:02.520 --> 1:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Sin has allowed a score, one score and surrounded forty

1:19:05.800 --> 1:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>seven or fewer yards in four of the five games.

1:19:08.000 --> 1:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, chart, I will note that I think

1:19:09.920 --> 1:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Colts defense might be just a little bit

1:19:12.240 --> 1:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of smoke and mirrors. By the way, the first five weeks,

1:19:15.240 --> 1:19:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks they faced the Gardner Minshew Kirk, Cousins, Sam Donald,

1:19:18.960 --> 1:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles, Baker Mayfield, and then the last two quarterbacks

1:19:21.920 --> 1:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have topped three hundred yards in Borrow and Stafford, and

1:19:24.520 --> 1:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it means you tore him up touchdowns but only seventy

1:19:29.280 --> 1:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>three yards. That's right. Let's talk about Mark Andrews has

1:19:32.200 --> 1:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>become really frustrating and disaster and guillotine leagues because he's

1:19:36.200 --> 1:19:39.559
<v Speaker 1>been boom er bust. He needs touchdowns to salvage good games,

1:19:39.600 --> 1:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're all low volume games and they thrown him

1:19:42.240 --> 1:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton. It just it doesn't seem to connect. Unfortunately.

1:19:45.360 --> 1:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to give you a better storyline. Here the

1:19:47.479 --> 1:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>culture the only team that has not allowed to score

1:19:49.439 --> 1:19:51.599
<v Speaker 1>to the tight end position, and here he is touchdown

1:19:51.640 --> 1:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>dependent but Andrews commands thirty two of the Ravens targets

1:19:55.920 --> 1:19:58.599
<v Speaker 1>inside the twenty, so there's some hope he can score here,

1:19:58.640 --> 1:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>but not a lot. Just to see grade and mark Andrews,

1:20:01.120 --> 1:20:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, if if the tight end position were healthier

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and stronger, I might not even give him a C grade.

1:20:06.680 --> 1:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Um the running backs around the bench mark Ingram is

1:20:08.720 --> 1:20:12.799
<v Speaker 1>not expected to play, although hasn't ruled. He's officially doubtful,

1:20:12.840 --> 1:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but we don't expect him to go. Dobbins and Edwards

1:20:15.479 --> 1:20:19.599
<v Speaker 1>are dart throws in a very difficult matchup. The Colts

1:20:19.600 --> 1:20:22.559
<v Speaker 1>have not allowed back to top seventy two rushing yards

1:20:22.640 --> 1:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>all year. They're giving up three point two yards per carry.

1:20:26.080 --> 1:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all. Only Derrick Henry get this stat. Only Derrick

1:20:30.040 --> 1:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Henry has topped eighty eight yards against the Colts in

1:20:33.920 --> 1:20:39.719
<v Speaker 1>their last thirty four games. We call that friend. Yeah.

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:41.599
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how many times the last couple of years

1:20:41.640 --> 1:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we've said only Derreck Henrry has Yeah, that's right, Derrick Henry.

1:20:45.840 --> 1:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It reminds Derek Astor Henry. We for years in this show,

1:20:49.520 --> 1:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the days of JaMarcus Russell, we have we

1:20:52.880 --> 1:20:57.479
<v Speaker 1>nicknamed JaMarcus Astric Russell because he broke all of the trends.

1:20:57.840 --> 1:21:00.559
<v Speaker 1>It would be you know, seven of the last quarterbacks

1:21:00.600 --> 1:21:04.559
<v Speaker 1>of top two h fifty yards and except JaMarcus Russell

1:21:06.640 --> 1:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>positive um. What's more, of the cultural are top ten

1:21:10.439 --> 1:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in running back receptions allowed, receiving allowed, and receiving touchdowns allowed.

1:21:15.120 --> 1:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's nowhere to go here. For Gus Edwards

1:21:17.960 --> 1:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and J K. Dobbins, I've got bench grades on them,

1:21:19.920 --> 1:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but I could see in a in a pinch, you

1:21:21.400 --> 1:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>may have to use them on the Indianapolis side. I

1:21:24.040 --> 1:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have no starting grades in this game for Philip Rivers,

1:21:27.400 --> 1:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>who has been better lately. This isn't a matchup with

1:21:30.160 --> 1:21:33.519
<v Speaker 1>much hope. This is an inconsistent passing game and Patrick

1:21:33.600 --> 1:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes aside, the Ravens are giving up just two hundred

1:21:36.400 --> 1:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty six passing yards and one passing touchdown per game.

1:21:39.920 --> 1:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>He will be without t Y Hilton in this game.

1:21:42.240 --> 1:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Not that Hilton has made a big difference, but it'll

1:21:44.160 --> 1:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be without t Y Hilton and all of the Colts

1:21:46.360 --> 1:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers around the bench. The Ravens allowed the fifth

1:21:49.320 --> 1:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>fewest fantasy points to wide receivers and have only allowed

1:21:52.360 --> 1:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>four wide receiver touchdowns this year, and two of the

1:21:55.360 --> 1:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>four were Chiefs. So there's your positive asterisk. Asterisk is

1:21:59.040 --> 1:22:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs big bounce back game for Rodrigo blanket Ship

1:22:03.280 --> 1:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>It could be if they bounce back game for the kicker. Um,

1:22:06.640 --> 1:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>let's keep going to guys that you're gonna bench the

1:22:08.960 --> 1:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Now, if mo Ali Cox doesn't go then

1:22:14.040 --> 1:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's he'll he's shaping up as a game time decision,

1:22:16.439 --> 1:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>then I could maybe see Trey Burton is startable here.

1:22:19.640 --> 1:22:22.519
<v Speaker 1>But if they do go, then those two plus Jack Doyle,

1:22:22.600 --> 1:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>they else cannibalize each other. They're splitting snaps, targets and

1:22:26.439 --> 1:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>receptions almost evenly at about each of them, about usage

1:22:31.560 --> 1:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>for the Colts. So overall, I think you should just

1:22:34.320 --> 1:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>avoid all the tight ends instead of the guessing game

1:22:36.439 --> 1:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as to which one might have a good game. Now,

1:22:39.040 --> 1:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the frustrating Colts running back situation. Frank

1:22:43.479 --> 1:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Reich's running backs are inscrutable, good luck trying to guess

1:22:47.280 --> 1:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen here, and likely to frustrate you if

1:22:49.680 --> 1:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you try to go with Jonathan Taylor, Jordan Wilkins, or

1:22:52.360 --> 1:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Niah Mines chasing the hot hand from the previous week.

1:22:57.400 --> 1:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Almost never works with the Colts. Remember Week one when

1:23:00.840 --> 1:23:03.519
<v Speaker 1>nikeim Hines had the big game, everybody blew a bunch

1:23:03.560 --> 1:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of fab to go get nai Hines and then he

1:23:06.080 --> 1:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>probably did nothing for like five weeks. Jordan Wilkins was

1:23:09.520 --> 1:23:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the hot hand last week. They effectively benched Jonathan Taylor

1:23:12.960 --> 1:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>in that game. But can anybody here tell me that

1:23:15.479 --> 1:23:18.519
<v Speaker 1>you think Jonathan you think Jordan Wilkins gonna come back

1:23:18.560 --> 1:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a totally gonna have ninety yards again. I mean,

1:23:22.600 --> 1:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>you just you can't know. Jonathan Taylor has top sixteen

1:23:26.960 --> 1:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>carries once in the last five games. You can't even

1:23:30.000 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>count on him. But if I do think there's a

1:23:32.200 --> 1:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>chance that Taylor comes back with a bigger game here

1:23:36.040 --> 1:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of workload, just to keep the rookies confidence up,

1:23:39.720 --> 1:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Frank Wright might be worried that he torpedoed

1:23:42.320 --> 1:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the confidence of his rookie and puts him back on

1:23:44.640 --> 1:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the field as the starter. Here's the problem. Baltimore's fifth

1:23:48.080 --> 1:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in yards allowed and their first and rushing touchdowns allowed

1:23:51.200 --> 1:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with just two on the year. So I don't see

1:23:54.240 --> 1:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>anywhere to go, and I've got bench grades on them all.

1:23:56.400 --> 1:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to play this game. I want off

1:24:01.200 --> 1:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>our final matchup. We have saved Antonio Brown and this

1:24:04.680 --> 1:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>discussion for the very end, New Orleans is at Tampa Bay. Brian, Well,

1:24:09.400 --> 1:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>let's start on the New Orleans side of this game.

1:24:12.000 --> 1:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>In a brutal matchup for Alvin Camara. Yeah, and this

1:24:14.880 --> 1:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is a divisional rematch. These teams played in week one

1:24:17.760 --> 1:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the opener, so will reference that game for sure.

1:24:20.520 --> 1:24:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Starting with Camara Uh actually on pace to break Christian

1:24:24.680 --> 1:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey's record for receptions by running back set just last year,

1:24:28.760 --> 1:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Like no one's ever gonna break this record hundred nineteen

1:24:32.280 --> 1:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>catches fro McAffrey last year. Camara on pace for one

1:24:35.600 --> 1:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>five receptions, but of course Michael Thomas making his eternal

1:24:39.479 --> 1:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about him in a minute. But in that opening game,

1:24:42.080 --> 1:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>UH Camara total just sixty seven combo yards, did have

1:24:45.960 --> 1:24:48.559
<v Speaker 1>five catches, but he scored twice, once on the ground

1:24:49.000 --> 1:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and once through the air. Just a brutal matchup though

1:24:52.000 --> 1:24:54.599
<v Speaker 1>for backs. Tampa Bay ranked third overall against the run

1:24:54.640 --> 1:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>by football outsiders. But I'm giving Alvin Kamara because he's

1:24:58.280 --> 1:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>an unworldly basically, UH with Tavis Murray actually had fifteen

1:25:02.400 --> 1:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>carries in that first game for forty eight yards. Gross,

1:25:05.920 --> 1:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>don't do that again in New Orleans. He's definitely on

1:25:07.840 --> 1:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the bench in this one. Now, did Michael Thomas, who

1:25:10.560 --> 1:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>should make his return? I feel like we've said that

1:25:13.000 --> 1:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a few times. He's expected to play. Uh. Five targets,

1:25:16.560 --> 1:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>three catches, seventeen scoreless yards. That was Week one for

1:25:20.680 --> 1:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas against the Bucks, but it's two games since

1:25:23.000 --> 1:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks last year. Eight catches undred fourteen yards and

1:25:26.000 --> 1:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, and then eleven catches one hundred and eighty

1:25:29.120 --> 1:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>two yards and two touchdowns. Hell of history for Thomas

1:25:32.360 --> 1:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Bucks outside a Week one of this year.

1:25:34.479 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But Tampa's secondary much improved this season, but they still

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:41.519
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the seventh most catches to wide receivers. So

1:25:41.600 --> 1:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>if Thomas is looking like a full go, and it

1:25:43.520 --> 1:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>looks like he is, you have to start him. But

1:25:45.439 --> 1:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just give him a very cautious see this week,

1:25:48.000 --> 1:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>see what we have with Michael Thomas. Manny Sanders also

1:25:51.360 --> 1:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>set to make his return. Emmanuel Sanders, but who cares?

1:25:53.840 --> 1:25:56.519
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench for me, Jared Cook. He gets

1:25:56.600 --> 1:25:58.559
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of pieces of the past game

1:25:58.640 --> 1:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>returning for the Saints, who have already mentioned which should

1:26:00.840 --> 1:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>sap Cook's targets a little bit. It's not like he

1:26:02.840 --> 1:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was getting that many anyways. He was touchdown dependent as well. Yeah,

1:26:06.400 --> 1:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>tight end isn't the yea Cook, like you said, pretty

1:26:08.840 --> 1:26:11.519
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent. The Bucks have only surrendered three scores to

1:26:11.600 --> 1:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, but who cares. Cook had five catches for

1:26:14.080 --> 1:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>eight yards. He's not touchdown dependent against the Bucks. That's

1:26:16.160 --> 1:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>when he had in Week one. So Cook gets a C.

1:26:18.200 --> 1:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But that seems like a ceiling here, but he's definitely

1:26:20.200 --> 1:26:24.559
<v Speaker 1>startable in the tight end waistline and then a gift

1:26:24.640 --> 1:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>see for Drew Brees. At this point, I will give

1:26:26.560 --> 1:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees a C in this matchup despite just a

1:26:29.320 --> 1:26:31.519
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty passing yards in the Week one matchup. He

1:26:31.560 --> 1:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>did have two passing touchdowns, but only one quarterback is

1:26:35.000 --> 1:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>hit three hundred yards against Tampa Bay this year, and

1:26:37.680 --> 1:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>their secondary is giving up a modest one point three

1:26:40.120 --> 1:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns per game. So see for Breeze. No ceiling

1:26:44.320 --> 1:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>here and not a very safe floor. But again I

1:26:47.240 --> 1:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>can't say enough just to see for Breeze or the

1:26:49.160 --> 1:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay side. Let's start with the running backs, which

1:26:52.680 --> 1:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>are also a nightmare which just when you think you

1:26:54.560 --> 1:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>have it figured out between Ronald Jones and Leonard four Nette,

1:26:57.320 --> 1:26:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the other one has the way bigger game at Leonard

1:26:59.760 --> 1:27:02.519
<v Speaker 1>fourn it did last week. A bad matchup for both.

1:27:02.600 --> 1:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>The Saints are allowing only one and six combo yards

1:27:05.960 --> 1:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and less than a touchdown per game to opposing running backs,

1:27:08.960 --> 1:27:11.519
<v Speaker 1>so I'll give them both a sea here for Net

1:27:11.640 --> 1:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>looks to be the guy now. That just means Ronald

1:27:14.479 --> 1:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Jones is actually the guy now from Varians is a

1:27:17.400 --> 1:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>diabolical schoster. But anyway to the passing game, this is

1:27:21.479 --> 1:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>where it gets complicated. Mike Evans Antonio Brown, Now, can

1:27:25.120 --> 1:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I give you? Can I just jump in with my

1:27:26.800 --> 1:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown? Take sure you can tell me if at

1:27:28.840 --> 1:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>least so several several data points in Brown. Bruce Arians

1:27:32.920 --> 1:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>says that he's looked great and he Bruce Arians also

1:27:36.160 --> 1:27:38.479
<v Speaker 1>says that he could play like like half of the plays,

1:27:39.040 --> 1:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but he is a would you call him a diabolical shyster? Yeah?

1:27:42.280 --> 1:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you can't. He's a ball face liar. You can't

1:27:44.720 --> 1:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>trust anything. Bruce Arian sets now Godwin's shaping up that

1:27:47.880 --> 1:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about Antonio Brown him too, probably Chris Godwin

1:27:53.000 --> 1:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>shaping up a game time decision. If he doesn't go,

1:27:55.080 --> 1:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that frees up seven targets per games. Some some of

1:27:57.040 --> 1:27:59.519
<v Speaker 1>that could go to Brown. Now, it's hard not to

1:27:59.600 --> 1:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be swim aid by Brown's one game last year with

1:28:03.160 --> 1:28:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady when he had eight targets and a touchdown.

1:28:06.320 --> 1:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm swede by that. I am also swede. And maybe

1:28:09.040 --> 1:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it's dumb by the fact that he was living in

1:28:11.040 --> 1:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>his house. And I think that tells me that he's

1:28:13.720 --> 1:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>got a little know that Tom Brady's committed to him.

1:28:16.479 --> 1:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Brady brought all of his dudes back to Tampa, alright,

1:28:19.360 --> 1:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>so Brady be basically got a dream team out there,

1:28:22.000 --> 1:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>including Rob Gronkowski, who gets an a UH for eleven

1:28:27.360 --> 1:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>yards in Week one. But the Saints are the bottom

1:28:29.200 --> 1:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>five fantasy defense against tight ends, as allowed nearly six

1:28:31.920 --> 1:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>catches and six yards per game to the position, including

1:28:34.400 --> 1:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>six total touchdowns. Gronk is on fire right now, with

1:28:36.920 --> 1:28:39.519
<v Speaker 1>at least four catches forty yards in a score in

1:28:39.600 --> 1:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>each of his last three games. Nicely done, and Evans,

1:28:44.040 --> 1:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we really get to Evans. Let's give him a b.

1:28:46.439 --> 1:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't play god when he see me at a pitch

1:28:47.880 --> 1:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>count B for Evans, C for Brown. Thanks for listening

1:28:51.080 --> 1:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. Everybody. We'll be back next week

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for more good luck. In week nine, we'll talk to

1:28:55.439 --> 1:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you a week time. Fantasy Football Weekly is a production

1:29:02.120 --> 1:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio,

1:29:05.000 --> 1:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:29:08.200 --> 1:29:09.639
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.