WEBVTT - NFL Fantasy Football Podcast: Week 10 Matchup Preview

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Wow, Hey everybody, It's Wednesday, November eighth, twenty twenty three.

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the NFL Fantasy Football Show. It's me your man, MG,

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Grant, joined by Michael f. Florio. Coming up, we

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>are previewing TNF and the early Sunday games for Week ten. Well,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>here we are. We've made it all the way to

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>week ten. We are more than week into November. This

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>thing's flying by.

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Season is flying by, and this week, in my opinion,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>is going to be the worst week. With buys and

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 2>everything to set your line up. Three of the best

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 2>offenses in football, you just can't use them this week. So, yeah,

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>we got to survive this week.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we need to have a talk with somebody in

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the league office who thought it was a good idea

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to have the chiefs of Eagles and Dolphins all have

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the week off in the same week. Not to mention,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are off, so we miss Cooper Cup and

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Pooka Nakua. It's going to be rough to set lineups,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>especially at the quarterback position, but we're here to help.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's get started, as we always do, with some fantasy

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>headlines and a big one coming out of Minnesota justin

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson returned at Vikings practice on Wednesday. The team has

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a twenty one day a window to elevate him from

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>injured reserve to the fifty three man roster. Look, there's

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it, right, Like, when he is back

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and available, he is back in your starting lineups. Chances

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>are he was the number one pick, but we can

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>feel confident in him. Right with Josh Dowbs. We didn't

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>know this a couple of weeks ago. We didn't know

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna be the quarterback. But at least with Josh Dowbs,

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we can feel confident about Jefferson, right, Yeah, I think so.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's better than how we should be feeling.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Like a week ago when Kirk Cousins went down and

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 2>we thought it would be Jaron Hally, the fifth round rookie,

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>and even he looked good. So if something happens to Dobbs,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>like they have a rookie that they can maybe trust

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. Yeah, I mean, you're starting justin Jefferson

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the minute he returns, no matter what. But now at

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 2>least you get some peace of mind. That's exactly what

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>we want. It's peace of mind with Jefferson back in

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>our lineup. Meanwhile, down in Tennessee, they are trying to

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>get some peace of mind at the quarterback position. Head

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>coach Mike Vrabel says that Will Levis, the rookie, will

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>be starting for the rest of the twenty twenty three season.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a couple of good starts out of Levis

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>so far this year. So earlier in the week, we

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 2>played a game of who'd you rather for the rest

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 2>of the season from different positions. I want to play

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 2>another round with just Will Levis. We compare him against

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 2>some other quarterbacks who are, in theory sort of on

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 2>his level. So wo'da rather Will Levis or Taylor Heineke.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 2>I would rather Will Levis. I know Taylor Heinike he's

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>throwing the ball more downfield than Desmond Ritard did. But

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 2>and the weapons are nice in Atlanta, but his head

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>coach is still Arthur Smith, which means they're just going

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to be doing weird things. Will Levis. I know the

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 2>floor might not be great, but the ceiling, I believe

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 2>is really high because even last week in a down performance,

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of downfield throws.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, your point about the inconsistency of the play calling

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta is what has me worried about Taylor Heineke.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. I'm gonna go Will Levis there,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis or mac Jones. Will Levis, I mean, what

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>upside does Mac Jones bring us, even in a good matchup.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>A couple of weeks ago, it was like, alright, he

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was all right, but that's it. And neither one of

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>them have very deep wide receiver corps. But Will Levis

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>has DeAndre Hopkins and Mac Jones does not. All right,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>here's another one, Will Levis or Geno Smith.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm still gonna stick with Gino here, even though

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I keep saying, if Gino disappoints you this week, you

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>could drop him. But he gets the Commanders, then the Rams,

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and he still has later in the year. He gets

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles, the Titans, the Steelers, still some favorable matchups,

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 2>especially in the Fantasy playoffs, that I'll still give Gino

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>another chance.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I said that Will Levis has DeAndre Hopkins. Well,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Gino Smith has dk Metcalf and Tyler Lockett. So those

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>two I think Trump just having nuke a loan. So

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with Gino Smith wins for me there, And last one

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis or Jordan Love. This one feels kind of

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>easy Will Levis because Jordan Love. Outside of the first

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, it's been rough. It has been rough for

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love for a while. Now, real quick though, Now

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>now that you know Levis is the starter, and we've

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>seen that that Levis has no hesitation about going to

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins. Where are we ranking? You could he a

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen guy the rest of the season, I.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Think like borderline. If not top fifteen, certainly top twenty

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>because in the two games he's given us ten and

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 2>a half and thirty five, and that's a good floor

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and obviously a huge ceiling, and I'm expecting at least

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 2>a couple of times a game that Will Levis is

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>just gonna chuck it downfield to d hop which means

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>that he'll always bring a high ceiling.

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the last two weeks he's actually the wide receiver three,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>but that feels very much inflated by the thirty plus

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>point game he had a couple of weeks ago. I

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>think you're looking more around on average, probably ten to

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen points per game. I think that's good enough to

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get him certainly in the top twenty and maybe knock

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>on the door of the top fifteen. All right, let's

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>get our attention to Thursday night football. It is the

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers heading to Chicago to take on the Bears.

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>You can see that game at eight fifteen pm Eastern

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on Prime Video on the Carolina. They got their first

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>win a couple of weeks ago, had a tough loss

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts last week. But Adam Thielen has been

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>balling pretty much all season long. So let's to the

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>number at eight. Do a little more or less eight

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>receptions for Adam Thielen more or less more Since Week two.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Adam Thielen leads the NFL in receptions per game. And

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a game where I think it'll be close throughout,

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>so the Panthers will have to, you know, continue to

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball. And it's not like they're gonna have

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>game script where they could just run all second half

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So I'm expecting a big game

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>out of Adam Thielen. I'm expecting another good game out

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of Adam Thielen. And really he has been it in

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, at least at the wide receiver position.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>He's got six hundred and ten receiving yards this year

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that is more than all other Panthers wide receivers combined.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It's been him or nothing. And so in a game

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>where as you mentioned, I think the Panthers will have

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball, especially because they can't run it.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see more than eight catches

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for Adam Thielen in this one. Deontae Foreman has been

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>play really, really well. The Bears are expecting that Khalil

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Herbert will be back this week. The Panther run defense

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is atrocious, so more or less half of a rushing

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown for Deontay Formers. So basically, ken Deontay Forman getting

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the end zone this week.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 2>He definitely can, but I'm gonna go less because I'm

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 2>wish casting that that touchdown goes to Khalil Herbert, who

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I need to start in a league or two because

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>of all the buys this week, and the Panthers have

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 2>allowed more touchdowns to running backs than anyone, So someone

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 2>in that backfield is gonna score. But if I if

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I had to take a pick on which one it will,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Khalil Herbert has the highest odds.

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say more. I'm gonna say Foreman scores

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. I am interested to see what kind of

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>workload they give Herbert after so much time off, and

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>especially if we don't know for sure if Justin fields

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>plays he is I think listed is doubtful for this game,

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>so maybe another Tyson Bagent operation. I still think that

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see Herbert kind of eased back into his work,

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think Foreman gets some work at the goal line.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>This might be the last big week for Deontay Foreman,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think against Carolina he finds the end zone there.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So check that game out of course. Uh Thursday night,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>eight fifteen Eastern on Prime Video. Turning to the rest

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of Week ten, we talked about it at the top

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of the show. Four teams are on a buy, the Chiefs,

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, the Dolphins, and the Eagles. So it means

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>no Patrick Mahomes, no Matthew Stafford, no to a tongue

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of Ioloa, no Jalen Hurts. A slew of wide receivers

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>are unavailable to you. Some good running backs not available

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to you as well. So we got to navigate this

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. It's not going to be pretty. We will

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>start with the Colts and the Patriots at game being

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>played in Frankfurt, Germany. Second week in a row, the

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL goes to Frankfurt nine thirty am Eastern. You can

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>see that game on NFL Network and stream it live

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on NFL Plus. Ramadre Stevenson's been okay the last couple

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Any Patriots beyond that you would be willing

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to start.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Nope, Look Ramandre getting more passing use, pass game usage.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>He had the big long run last week. The Colts

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 2>struggled against the run. All of that keeps him in play.

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Besides that, we've seen teams go overseas and not live

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 2>up to their usual offensive output, like the Chiefs and

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins last week. The Patriots normal offensive output is terrible,

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>so I can only imagine what even worse than that

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 2>will look like. If you squit.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Real hard, you can probably find a space for the

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Mario Douglas just because he's been the lead receiver there

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>three straight games with at least six targets. But the

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>passing game is brutal for New England. You know, we

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>sat here and both just said moments ago we'd start

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis over Mac Jones. That's how bad it is.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Even in good matchups, Mac Jones is still giving you,

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 1>like barely two hundred passing yards, So hard to make

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a case for anybody. But if I could find anybody,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>it might be the Maru. I should like this. I

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>think Hunter Henry has sleeper potential this week. Then the

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Colts are kind of me against tight ends, so I

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>think Hunter Henry has a chance to maybe score a

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdown this week. Brown at the Ravens really good matchup,

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at least on paper in the AFC North two teams

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>very good defensively. Are you pulling anyone from your lineup

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and what could be maybe a low scoring game.

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to pull a whole bunch of people

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 2>out of my starting lineup from this game. Like Zay

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Flowers is someone I think you start most weeks. I

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.359
<v Speaker 2>would get hit him out. He really struggles against man coverage,

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>actually the worst passer rating when targeted against it this year,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and the Browns are on the fourth most man. I'm

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to sit Gus Edwards. I'm trying to sit David Njoku,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>not Amari Cooper. You're starting Amari Cooper Deshaun Watson, though

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I would try to sit so a lot of people

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>that I think that most weeks you could comfortably start,

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>just because I'm expecting this to be a very defensive battle.

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be a very defensive battle.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Though admittedly when these teams played earlier in the season,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens ran off to a twenty eight to three

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>win in that one. I think if I've been starting

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>them before, even though the matchup looks bad, I'm still

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>giving them a shot because Gus Edwards is getting those

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>goal line opportunities, which helps Zey Flowers last time around

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>had three catches for fifty six yards. Not great, not awful,

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>especially in the week where you're going to be missing

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, and I think that's sort of

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing for me. Yeah, so many guys are going

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to be missing that you're gonna be strong armed into

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>into starting a lot of people. Any Browns pass catchers,

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>though not named Amari Cooper can go to the bench,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's not just for this week. That might just

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>be for the rest of the season because they cannot

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>consistently connect with anybody besides a Mariy Cooper in the

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>passing game. There So I think you kind of hold

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>your nose and you kind of start some guys and

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that the floor is a lot lower this week

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>than it is probably more weeks. The Texans at the Bengals, CJ.

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Stroud coming off a historic game with four hundred and

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy passing yards and five touchdowns. What are you expecting

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>from them in an encore against a good Bengals defense?

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Eighty and six?

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh sweet?

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Every week until he gets to five hundred and ten. No,

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 2>I obviously he's not going to give you what he

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 2>did last week, but I think he's gonna be good

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 2>enough where you want to comfortably start him. And the

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>floor we've seen is about like fourteen to fifteen fantasy points,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>which isn't as high as we would like, but the

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>ceiling is certainly worth starting. And that floor could only

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 2>be elevating because he every week that I watched him play,

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh, he looks even more comfortable and just

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>better than he did earlier in the season. So that

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>floor and ceiling could just keep getting raised. And this

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>is a game where Joe Burrow and co. Are gonna

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 2>put up points, So CJ. Stroud is gonna have to throw.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>He's going to have to throw the football, and so

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes him worthy of starting. But yeah,

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it goes without saying you're not gonna get

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>almost five hundred yards and five touchdowns out of CJ.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Stroud this week. But I do think he belongs in

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a lineup any particular pass catcher. Is this a Nico

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Collins week? Is this another Tank Dell week? Is this

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a Noah Brown week? Again?

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I think you start Hank Dell and Nico Collins, especially

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 2>given the week and how many teams are on buy

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and such. I have two teams I believe where I

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 2>need to plug in Noah Brown because I am hit

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>hard at injuries and buys a wide receiver this week.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, it's not ideal taking out Tyreek Hill and

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>putting in Noah Brown, but we gotta do what we

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 2>gotta do this week.

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it's just what it is. I think

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Noah Brown's maybe the one guy that'd be a little

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more concerned about. But you know, in a pinch,

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.599
<v Speaker 1>if you gotta start him, you gotta start him and

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hope that maybe he gives you something decent this week

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for your fantasy lineup. We're just getting started here on

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the show. We got plenty more games to get to

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Week ten slate, including the first pick in

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>the draft versus the last pick in the draft a

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>face off this week in Jacksonville. We'll talk about that

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and more here on the NFL Fantasy Football Show. Forty

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers at the Jaguars. The Niners coming off of

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the bye, they have lost three in a row, trying

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to get it back together. The Jaguars on a five

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>game winning streak and trying to atop the division in

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the AFC South. Also an interesting matchup. You got the

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>first pick in the twenty twenty one draft in Trevor

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence going against the last pick in the twenty twenty

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>two draft in Brock Purty. So who scores more Fantasy points?

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be Trevor Lawrence or is going

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to be Brock Purty With the caveat that Brock Party

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>may have Deebo Samuel back this week.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 2>This gives me game of throne vibes, right, Like Trevor

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence is the prince that was promised and then Brock

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Party just arrives and like they.

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Call, can work out well for the prince who was

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Probably no.

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying to navigate around that. I think it's

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Brock party. I think he's gonna score more points one

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Deebo Samuel's back, and his numbers with Deebo compared to

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 2>without are way better. I also just I trust their

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 2>playmakers there a little bit more. And the Jaguars have

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>been a very favorable matchup as well this year. They're

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>in the top ten and fantasy points per game and

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 2>yards allowed to quarterbacks. But the Niners have struggled as

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of late against the pass as well. So I think

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 2>you could get both. Actually, given the state of quarterback,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I think both are starting options. I think they're both

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>starting options this week. I'm gonna go with Trevor Lawrence.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I will admit that some of this may be me

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>as a pessimistic forty nine Ers fan who's watched this

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 1>defense struggle over the last few weeks. But they are

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>giving up a lot of yards, they are struggling to tackle.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll see whether or not they're able to fix some

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>things in the bye week. Of course, they do add

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Chase Young to add to that pass rushing front. But

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence spreading the ball around to a lot of

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>his playmakers, I think you're going to see big games

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from Christian Kirk and from Evan Ingram as well. So

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>give me Trevor Lawrence over Brock Purty in terms of

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>scoring more Fantasy points Saints at the Vikings. Josh Dobbs

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>was the story of the week last week. I mean

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know his own teammates' names, but went out

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there and came from behind to beat the Atlanta Falcons.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about it at the top of the show.

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We feel okay about Justin Jefferson when he gets back

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on the field. Does the Josh Dobbs magic continue enough

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that you feel okay? Would say, Jordan Addison and TJ. Hawkinson.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I think so, And I think we could kind of

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>look a little bit to what Dobbs did in Arizona

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and get a little hint there. The two things that

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>were good in Arizona were Marquise Brown, who he would

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 2>air the ball out to downfield and stuff like that.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 2>That is Jordan Addison in this as of now with

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 2>no Justin Jefferson, and then he was peppering their tight

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 2>ends with targets. With Dobbs there, they had a thirty

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 2>two percent target share for the Cardinals tight ends. So TJ.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Hockinson is going to be very much so in play

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I also think Dobbs is just a streaming option this

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 2>week because you saw what he did last week. Now

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>he's actually gonna know the playbook a little bit. It's

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 2>going to know people's names a little bit more so.

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>If anyone could get it done. It is a literal

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 2>rocket science.

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, right. See the tweet that NASA put out.

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, Josh Dobbs actually in a nationnaut suit

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and they nicknamed the Pastronaut, which I kind of dig it.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think Dobbs is a nice streaming option this week,

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>though against New Orleans, I'm just very comfortable with starting

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Addison and Hawkinson, even to some extent Alexander Madison, even

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>though they're struggling to run the football effectively. I do

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to get some targets now that Cam

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Akers is out for the remainder of the season. That

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>means a lot more volume for Alexander Madison. So it's

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not great, it's not exciting, but I do think he's

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially startable this week if you're in a pinch and

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>need some running back help. The Packers at the Steelers,

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a matchup of two legacy franchises in the NFL that,

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, haven't really been fun to watch offensively lately.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw a stat in our research packet

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that the Steelers have had fewer than four hundred total

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>yards of offense in fifty six straight games. Wow, and

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they continue to post the winning They're five and three

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, Like I can't figure it out. Like it

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>does not get enough credit. He's a wizard. He's a wizard,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and half the folks in Pittsburgh want him out. Like,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>be careful what you wish for. And that's all I'm

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>saying about that. But anyway, look at the Steelers offense.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you trust they? Can you trust George Pickens? Rather

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>now that Deontay Johnson is back, and do you trust

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>any of the running backs in this game?

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 2>George Pickens. It's it's probably a situation where in most cases,

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>because of the buys and all of that, you probably

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 2>need to just play him because the upside is still high.

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna say that it's not, but it's he

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.239
<v Speaker 2>is so boom or buss when Deontay Johnson is out there,

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 2>because Johnson is going to get those short consistent targets

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.239
<v Speaker 2>and then Pickens is you talk about it all the time,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>They're just gonna basically tell him rundownfield and Kenny Pickett

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 2>cannot win downfield. So it's so boom or bust for

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>George Pickens. As for the running backs, Aaron Jones is

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 2>very much so in play. I think aj Dillon is

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>in play if you're in need of a bye week

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>replacement or something like that. And that's why I think

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 2>both Normally, you know, I'm not a fan of this

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Steelers backfield, but given the circumstances and the week and everything,

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 2>like I have to play Jalen Warren in a league,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure many people out there need to play

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Naji Harrison Jaalen Wore.

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna be forced into it. But in

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of the the running backs, Aaron Jones is the

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>one guy that I feel okay about. They seem to

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>have taken the leash off of him a little bit,

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>gave him twenty carries last week against the Rams, and

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>he looked better, He looked more effective, and so hopefully

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>he's back to the Aaron Jones we thought we were

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>getting when we drafted back at the end of the summer,

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so I feel good about him. The whole George Pickens

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Deontae Johnson thing, it's sort of a mystery to me

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>because when Johnson wasn't there, you had Pickens running a

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>wide variety of routes and they were finding ways to

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>get the football. Then all of a sudden, Deontay Johnson

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>comes back, and instead of maybe having two guys running

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a wide variety of routes, as you said, they just say,

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>George Pickens, go run long and then maybe once in

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a while we'll throw it to you, and maybe once

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in a while that'll be in bounds. Although George, it's

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of on you when you don't drag your toe

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the quarter end zone.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>That one's on you.

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>That was actually a good throw from Kinny Pickett and

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you just didn't complete the catch. But it is worrisome.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>But the ceiling is really high and that might be

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>enough reason to put him in the one up against

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>green Bay. Also, don't let green Bay's offensive struggles to

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>distract you from the fact that the Packers defense has

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>been kind of bad this year. So there's that, all right, Titans.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>At the Buccaneers, we talked about Will Levis and all

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the guys we may or may not start over him,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but what about Baker? Does Baker keep it rolling? And

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>can we count on Rashad White again this week?

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I think Baker keeps it rolling this week. He gave

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 2>you over nineteen fantasy points in two straight games. This year,

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 2>he's four over eighteen and just two under sixteen. So

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, as far as streamers go, that is

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a safe floor, high ceiling. And then their run game

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>hasn't really been working, so they've been throwing the ball more.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>It's led to good things for both Baker Mayfield and

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Rashad White because we talk about it, a lot of

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 2>target is worth like three carries on average, and Rashad

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 2>White's doing nothing with those carries, but he has at

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 2>least four catches and forty five receiving yards in three

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 2>straight games. That's why he's had his best stretch as

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>a fantasy player in those last three weeks. So, and

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the Titans don't scare me. They struggle against pass catching

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 2>running backs. They've given up a whole bunch of rushing

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 2>yards the last five or six weeks to running back.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think this is a week to get

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 2>both of those Bucks into your lineup and.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You look Rashad White. His value has bumped up because

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he's getting those short targets, right. I mean, we didn't

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>love him when he was just getting straight carries. Now

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he's getting targets. It's Look, however you feel about PPR,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the world we live in, and so you

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>might as well just take advantage of that loophole and

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>use Rashad White. And I keep saying it. A couple

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, somebody asked me what I take, James

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Cook or Rashad White. My knee jerk reaction was like, oh, yeah,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of course it's James Cook. Until I dug in and

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>looked at it was realizing, oh, it's way closer than

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought. And I think at this point Rashad White

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>may have surpassed James Cook in terms of his production

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and what the offense is asking of him. I want

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to ask you real quick though, about Chris Godwin because

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he only has one touchdown this year, only has one

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yard game this year. I mean, like the

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>last three games haven't really been great. Like a couple

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, he gave you sixteen yards fifty four yards,

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it'd have that touchdown sixty six yards. He's got more

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>games under sixty yards than he does over sixty yards.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Can we feel.

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Confident about having him in lineups right now? We're never

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna get the Chris at least right now. We're never

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna get the Chris Godwin production that we got accustomed

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>to with Tom Brady the last couple of years. But

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 2>he's still looking at his game. Bloc has two games

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 2>under ten fantasy points. Look, the ceiling is very low.

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 2>He twice, I believe his topped fourteen, So he's really

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 2>sitting in that ten to fourteen fantasy point range, which

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 2>is someone that I think you want as you on

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>your bench most weeks, and you could plug in just

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 2>in case, but like a week like this one, I

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 2>think you can get Chris Godwin into just because lack

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of options, Yeah, lack of options and the Titans generally

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 2>have been pretty friendly to wide receiver, so I think

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that sort of gives Godwin a little bit of an

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to go out there and produce.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>But this has not been what we thought. Although you

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>know it's funny, I think it's the opposite of what

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was going to be, where I thought

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be a lot of Chris Godwin

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and not so much Mike Evans, but instead it's been

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the Mike Evans show, and Chris Godwin has been the

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>second fiddle in the in the passing game. Yeah, what

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is a.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Stretch where everyone was like, oh, Godwin is the better

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>of the No, Godwin is very good, but Mike Evans

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>is a Hall of Fame.

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>He really is. Plus, I think it does have something

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to do with the quarterback. And people have pointed this

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>out that Tom Brady's a guy. He was going to

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>go through the progressions. If you were open, he would

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>throw it to you. Baker Mayfield is like, effet man,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike's gonna make a play. I want to get these

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>yards some be Mike's gonna make a play. I'm gonna

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just throw it in that direction and hope he comes

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>down with it. And so that has helped Evans over

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Godwin so far this season. That'll do it for this

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>edition of the NFL Fantasy Football Show. Stay happy, safe

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and healthy, do good, and live well. We're back tomorrow

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to preview the right rest of the weeked in matchups.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>H