Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge Ken Joe Biden remember
Speaker 1: what's her name again? COVID relief, stuck at the post office.
Speaker 1: Trump gets a historic foreign policy deal done, and white
Speaker 1: privilege training for nuclear scientists. Bucks Sexton coding the news
Speaker 1: and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American Great,
Speaker 1: You're a great American again. This is the Bucks Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Homeless CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without
Speaker 1: a phone call. Try doing that sometime. No, welcome everybody
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show. Honor to be here with you.
Speaker 1: It's gonna feel a bit more like a Friday in
Speaker 1: the way that we do the show today because I'm
Speaker 1: out tomorrow flying down North Carolina, gonna go see some friends,
Speaker 1: do some stuff, give a little talk, come up to
Speaker 1: the coast, and a few laughs the East coast, of course,
Speaker 1: North Carolina. But it should be a really good, really
Speaker 1: good time down there. I'm looking forward to coming back
Speaker 1: with tales of traveling during the pandemic. Oh my gosh, Buck,
Speaker 1: you are on a plane. How are you still alive?
Speaker 1: I think it's all gonna be okay, folks. You know
Speaker 1: you just one foot before the other. You know, you
Speaker 1: lace up your shoes, you put on some pants. Hopefully
Speaker 1: a lot of days lately I feel like I haven't
Speaker 1: really been putting pants on, just boxers walking around the apartment.
Speaker 1: But you gotta just keep going forward, keep moving. All right.
Speaker 1: We got a lot to get to today, and we've
Speaker 1: got some fantastic gas planned as well. But the thing
Speaker 1: that's really catching my eye at this point is the
Speaker 1: incredible and the furious, feverish rewriting of history from all
Speaker 1: the people in the media, all the people in the
Speaker 1: media and the Democrat Party who are rewriting the history
Speaker 1: of Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, all of it. Right, It's
Speaker 1: like we haven't seen anything we have. There's nothing about
Speaker 1: this that we already know, There's nothing that doesn't add up.
Speaker 1: It's just simply bizarre. I mean, a year ago, even
Speaker 1: Democrats could see that Biden was in cognitive decline and
Speaker 1: the only people who wanted Kamala to be president were journals.
Speaker 1: Now they pretend none of that actually happened. It's almost
Speaker 1: impressive to watch the Libs fake tears of joy for
Speaker 1: this ticket of political mediocrits. This is the ultimate version
Speaker 1: in politics of running the also rans running the people
Speaker 1: that never really get it done out at the national level.
Speaker 1: I know you'd say, oh back, but Biden's won his
Speaker 1: Senate race so many times. Look, Delaware is a lovely place,
Speaker 1: great beaches, very nice people. But politically winning in Delaware
Speaker 1: is a little bit like being the governor of Rhode Island.
Speaker 1: You know, it's not no one's going to clear the
Speaker 1: streets out and make way for the governor of Rhode Island.
Speaker 1: You know, it's anyway, you see what I'm saying. Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris one in California one or Senate seat, but that's
Speaker 1: just being a machine, that's just being a cog in
Speaker 1: the Democrat machine. Really, you know, it's only Democrats win there,
Speaker 1: so there's they get to just pick and that's really
Speaker 1: what happened. So she had a relatively tight primary. I
Speaker 1: actually know her history a bit with this, but not impressive.
Speaker 1: I'm not impressed when you have been in public office
Speaker 1: in California and just sort of stay the course at
Speaker 1: eventually make your way up to being senator as a Democrat.
Speaker 1: I think that's a lot of people do it who
Speaker 1: are not impressive at all. So we look at the
Speaker 1: big the big shot the big race for the presidency
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden. As you know, I mean, you go
Speaker 1: back a little bit in history, and you very quickly
Speaker 1: find out that Joe Biden has a stunningly unimpressive record
Speaker 1: of trying to be president in the past. Right, they
Speaker 1: have Biden whose mental state has now become a point
Speaker 1: of fierce partisan discussion. It wasn't always so. As I
Speaker 1: told you about a year ago, it was clear to
Speaker 1: a lot of journalists, including Libs who wanted other Democrat
Speaker 1: candidates to win, that Biden wasn't up for this. So
Speaker 1: they were willing to point it out then that that
Speaker 1: Biden was past his prime. And for a man who's
Speaker 1: lived his entire life in the public eye, it's impossible
Speaker 1: to miss Biden's habit of saying things that are barely
Speaker 1: coherent and often absurd. Yeah, you know, I was there
Speaker 1: and Cornpop came along and he was like hey, man,
Speaker 1: and I was like hey, And I was like, I
Speaker 1: got this chain and it's rusty, and I'm I'm gonna
Speaker 1: wrap this chain around that poem. Oh, you know, I'm tough.
Speaker 1: And Cornpop was like, whoa, look at how blonde your
Speaker 1: leg hairs are? Man, from the sun bleaching him. That's crazy.
Speaker 1: Maybe some kids can touch your leg hairs because that's weird.
Speaker 1: Remember all that we should break you know what, producer Mark,
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to start pulling the old Biden clips out.
Speaker 1: We gotta have him ready, almost like drops in radio,
Speaker 1: you know when someone will play another one like that's
Speaker 1: a That would be a drop that we could do that.
Speaker 1: There should be drops from Biden's past. We can call
Speaker 1: it Biden dropping the ball or something. I mean, he's
Speaker 1: just not not somebody yet anybody would think should be
Speaker 1: in a role of greater responsibility and greater authority at
Speaker 1: this point. But Democrats are saying, oh no, he is.
Speaker 1: In fact, there's a forced jubilation at this Harris Biden ticket,
Speaker 1: and people are trying so hard to be like, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, but this is amazing. These are the these
Speaker 1: are the ones we've been waiting for. Oh no, no,
Speaker 1: they don't really think so. While Biden was Obama's vice president,
Speaker 1: the weaknesses that he had were apparent, but it was
Speaker 1: far easier for the national media to cover them up
Speaker 1: or ignore them. The president is a heartbeat away from
Speaker 1: the presidency. But as long as that heart keeps beating.
Speaker 1: The VP's mostly a walking, talking life insurance policy for
Speaker 1: the chief of the executive branch. Right. Depending on the administration,
Speaker 1: we know, the VP can be a real player and
Speaker 1: policy or be celebrated or sorry, relegated to the ceremonial
Speaker 1: not celebrated to the ceremonial. In the mundane. Nobody really
Speaker 1: remembers much in the way of accomplishments for Biden during
Speaker 1: his eight years as Vice president because there really weren't any.
Speaker 1: The most important part of his portfolio. Oh, Trump just
Speaker 1: got a big foreign policy victory today. Nidia is not
Speaker 1: going to celebrate it though, But Biden was supposed to
Speaker 1: be a foreign policy guy. That was an unmitigated disaster
Speaker 1: for both of Obama's terms. The Obama team, you know,
Speaker 1: they picked Biden as VP because of his decades in
Speaker 1: the Senate handling foreign affairs and all that that record shows.
Speaker 1: If you look at it, if you look at Biden's record,
Speaker 1: you see he was reliably, consistently, egregiously wrong on every
Speaker 1: major foreign policy question all the last thirty years, thirty
Speaker 1: six years in the Senate. I think it didn't make
Speaker 1: a difference. They didn't care. They're like, yeah, let's make
Speaker 1: him VP, because I mean Obama had zero foreign policy experience.
Speaker 1: Let's not forget. Biden was also a long time third
Speaker 1: fourth tier finisher in presidential politics. His first attempt was
Speaker 1: back in nineteen eighty eight, right the Soviet Union clung
Speaker 1: to its last gasp of global power. Then the coolest
Speaker 1: gadget you could get was a walkman. And if you
Speaker 1: were really cool like me, you had a walkman that
Speaker 1: had a little thing on it you pressed that was
Speaker 1: no skip. Oh now I can walk. Now I can
Speaker 1: actually walk with my walkman pretty fast and it won't skip.
Speaker 1: Biden's nineteen eighth out of the presidency was ignominious. It
Speaker 1: collapsed in accusations of resume inflation, speech plagiarism. He actually
Speaker 1: claimed to have marched in the Civil Rights movement, only
Speaker 1: to later admit no, he hadn't actually marched in it.
Speaker 1: Fans of Biden politely called this tendency to make stuff
Speaker 1: up embellishments. My friends, lies would be more accurate another one.
Speaker 1: Biden ran for president again in two thousand and seven.
Speaker 1: He was unable to get past fifth place in the
Speaker 1: Democrat primary. He dropped out. He was never able to
Speaker 1: get more than one percent, one percent of the primary vote. Folks,
Speaker 1: ninety nine percent of Democrat primary voters back in two
Speaker 1: thousand and seven were like, not that guy, He's a loser. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is reality. I'm not making up these numbers. These
Speaker 1: are all true. This is all real. I mean, his
Speaker 1: name in the polling them was right alongside bizarre curiosities
Speaker 1: in the Democrat field, like Dennis Kucinich, a man who's
Speaker 1: biggest contribution. What is it? Tack like this real high
Speaker 1: you know, Yeah, we're gonna create a United States Department
Speaker 1: of Peace to work against the Pentagon. Yeah, remember Kousinich.
Speaker 1: Biden was right alongside him. I went to a small
Speaker 1: event that was really easy to get into and DC
Speaker 1: just as a sheer curiosity. I was working at the
Speaker 1: CIA at the time, and I just got invited to
Speaker 1: some event where it was like a cocktail hour with
Speaker 1: presidential candidates, but it was the guys that weren't going
Speaker 1: to win, and nobody cared. And it was Biden, Kusinich
Speaker 1: and one or two other people that I can't even remember.
Speaker 1: Biden has always been a third tier politician with a
Speaker 1: fourth tier mind. But then the Obama team knew that
Speaker 1: they needed to add a little bit of foreign policy experience,
Speaker 1: a little bit of gravy toss to that ticket. So
Speaker 1: now Joe Biden wants the top job again, and he
Speaker 1: actually might get it, which is quite a commentary on
Speaker 1: American politics. Despite the surge of socialists like Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: and Elizabeth Warren back in the twenty nineteen primary, we
Speaker 1: all know the Democrat faithful, We're told to go for
Speaker 1: Biden at the last minute, right it was clear we
Speaker 1: had candidates drop out. It was all orchestrated. The machinery
Speaker 1: of the DNC decided to get everybody in line. You
Speaker 1: need politicians who will do what the left wants while
Speaker 1: keeping Wall Street, Hollywood detect oligarchs oligarchs, as Bernie calls
Speaker 1: it happy. We all still know that Biden is the
Speaker 1: quintessential middling senator from Delaware, his clear limitations somehow failing
Speaker 1: this time around to limit his rise. And as we've seen,
Speaker 1: his campaign is going to be this very tightly scripted,
Speaker 1: stage managed presentation. Biden from the basement in Delaware, always
Speaker 1: wearing a mask. Oh, I see all these journos standing alone.
Speaker 1: They've got the microphone in their hands out in an
Speaker 1: empty street got to wear a mask while they're doing there?
Speaker 1: Why would you do that? That's right. This is about
Speaker 1: signaling virtue and political signaling. It's solidarity with the lockdowners.
Speaker 1: Oh but it's not political. No, now they're saying openly
Speaker 1: it is political. But back to who's supposed to be
Speaker 1: the most powerful figure in our politics. If Biden wins
Speaker 1: the presidency, my friends, he's gonna be taking office at
Speaker 1: what seventy eight years of age? The guy's going to
Speaker 1: be eighty around the time of the midterms. In his
Speaker 1: first term, he's gonna be almost eighty years old. Would
Speaker 1: nineties start to be an age at which people would
Speaker 1: question whether he's really up for this. For most of
Speaker 1: the opponents of Donald Trump, none of this matters, of course,
Speaker 1: because Biden is not Trump, and that's good enough. That's
Speaker 1: all it really takes. And they think he can win
Speaker 1: because they think they can fool voters in swing states
Speaker 1: in the Midwest, the industrial heartland and you know, Florida
Speaker 1: a couple other places. Convince enough of those voters. You know,
Speaker 1: come on, it's just Joe Biden. I see's a moderate. Oh,
Speaker 1: or in the case of Kamala Harris, a pragmatic moderate
Speaker 1: that's the new Oh, just a pragmatic moderate really, senator
Speaker 1: from California. California is trying to make the communist Manifesto
Speaker 1: come to life with every policy it passes every day
Speaker 1: now and has been doing this for years. We're going
Speaker 1: to act like a senator from a Democrats. Senator from
Speaker 1: California in twenty twenty is anything other than, at best
Speaker 1: a trojan horse for a far left socialist agenda, much
Speaker 1: more likely just an all out assault alongside the socialist agenda.
Speaker 1: None of this matters. Signs of Biden's cognitive decline, the
Speaker 1: lack of a meaningful political platform, the hyper controlled campaign
Speaker 1: that is a price the Libs are willing to pay
Speaker 1: to get Trump out of office. See there's also a
Speaker 1: widespread belief in political circles when the Democrats won't say
Speaker 1: aloud for for fear of scaring off into and instant
Speaker 1: swing voters in key states. Biden is a trojan horse
Speaker 1: candidate for the far left agenda. He is for the
Speaker 1: agenda of AOC and the Democrat hardliners. His pick as
Speaker 1: for VP of Kamala Harris is obviously meant to placate
Speaker 1: the left wing of his base and the identity politics
Speaker 1: that now rule the Democrat Party, the most powerful force
Speaker 1: within Democrat politics. Oh no, the first is abortion, the
Speaker 1: second is identity politics. Those are the only things that
Speaker 1: are truly sacred. It's all about It's all about control, abortion,
Speaker 1: identity politics, and the redistribution of wealth along social justice lines.
Speaker 1: Few will remember the predictions about the election in November
Speaker 1: that we make today, but observations can have a longer
Speaker 1: shelf life, right and one that is difficult to avoid
Speaker 1: right now, no matter what your politics, it's the most
Speaker 1: straightful word observation of all. Joe Biden is not up
Speaker 1: for this. Even Democrats don't want Kamala Harris to be
Speaker 1: up for this, but the Democrat Party simply does not care.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: And just in case you're wondering how close Kamala and
Speaker 1: Biden are. Now the guy it's gonna be tough for
Speaker 1: him to even remember her name to get it right. Oh, Kamala,
Speaker 1: here you go. Play clip one. That's what I asked.
Speaker 1: Kamela asked Comma to be the last voice in the room.
Speaker 1: It's his vice president Dan. He doesn't know now her
Speaker 1: name is unusual. Let's because I thought this was so funny.
Speaker 1: CNN at Brad Stelter was really upset. Upset up Brad
Speaker 1: stout there, I look like Zuckers. I have a TV show,
Speaker 1: Brian Stelter and and the rest of the CNN moron squad.
Speaker 1: I actually think another one of their anchors, one of
Speaker 1: their interchangeable anchors, was going after Trucker on this too,
Speaker 1: and one of their people who's just paid to trash
Speaker 1: conservatives as though that's journalism. It's it's a pathetic life,
Speaker 1: but some people choose to lead it anyway. They were
Speaker 1: all pouncing, and actually I think that's the proper there.
Speaker 1: They were pouncing. Okay, they were oh my gosh, because
Speaker 1: Tucker called their Camela. I've heard plenty of people say
Speaker 1: it that way, and there's no you know, some people
Speaker 1: think of it more like potato potato, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. You say things different tomato, tomato, you say
Speaker 1: things different ways. It is Kamala. And they went after
Speaker 1: Tucker and said it was disrespectful. You see, every attack
Speaker 1: on Kamala, no matter how either true or not, really
Speaker 1: an attack it is they're going to say, is disrespectful.
Speaker 1: Comma because of sexism and racism. It doesn't matter what
Speaker 1: it is. You know, Kamala Harris was a dishonest person
Speaker 1: about her time as district attorney in San Francisco, as
Speaker 1: a state attorney general in California or whatever. It's a racist,
Speaker 1: sexist and like clockwork, conservatives actually say in the last
Speaker 1: twenty four hours they've they've been saying, just wait, everything
Speaker 1: is going to be racist and sexist, and the Libs
Speaker 1: are like, oh, yes, that's right, everything is racist and sexist.
Speaker 1: They didn't even try to hide it. And the claim
Speaker 1: that Tucker mispronounced Kamala's name on purpose, you know, when
Speaker 1: Trump calls it msd NC, you know, or or MSLSD
Speaker 1: or whatever the different. You know, this is like very
Speaker 1: grade school stuff that we can all sit around and
Speaker 1: come up with. You know, oh, the communist news Networks CNN. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know it's fun. I do it too sometimes, but
Speaker 1: you know it's not exactly that clever. But that's clearly
Speaker 1: making fun of when you say Kamala and it's Kamala,
Speaker 1: Like this is just a normal you know, north It's
Speaker 1: like spelling someone's name named John without an h. You know, people,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, it's a busy world out there. I don't
Speaker 1: know that I'm always supposed to know whether you're John
Speaker 1: with an H or without an H. Pick one, everyone,
Speaker 1: can we just pick one? Don't even get me started
Speaker 1: on Kristen and Kirsten. Okay, don't even get me starting.
Speaker 1: But this was an honest mistake, one that is so
Speaker 1: honest that even Joe Biden, who has far less grounds
Speaker 1: to make this kind of mistake, made it the next day. Ye,
Speaker 1: the next day. I just think it's so funny. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh. The one thing I can promise you is
Speaker 1: that there's going to be some real entertainment value from
Speaker 1: watching people who take themselves so seriously and have been
Speaker 1: lecturing the country, or at least whatever audience they have
Speaker 1: in lecturing one thousandth of one percent of the country,
Speaker 1: you see, and but you know, lecturing the country constantly
Speaker 1: about how we need more, you know, we need adults
Speaker 1: in the room for our leaders, and we need and
Speaker 1: then Joe Biden is basically going to walk onto the
Speaker 1: debate stage, you know, in his boxers with mismatched socks
Speaker 1: and you know, a pair of overalls wrapped around his
Speaker 1: head because he can't figure out how to get them on,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna be like the greatest statesman of our generation,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Everybody, Emperor Biden has no clothes, folks, except
Speaker 1: for the boxers and the mismatch socks. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Morris comes from the middle of the road,
Speaker 1: moderate wing of the Democratic Party, not the first choice
Speaker 1: of progressives, but Joe Biden thanking that this historic move
Speaker 1: as the first woman of earn a national ticket will
Speaker 1: overcome that middle of the road Little Stephanopolis, I hope,
Speaker 1: I hope his paymaster's over at ABC or you know,
Speaker 1: patting him on the head writing him big checks to
Speaker 1: do what the DNC tells him to do. You know, oh,
Speaker 1: mid middle of the road, Little Stefan says, yeah, sure
Speaker 1: she is. Uh find me one middle of the road
Speaker 1: policy other than locking people up for a while in
Speaker 1: high crime cities was a popular position Biden's taken in
Speaker 1: the past. Kamala is taken into the past. You see,
Speaker 1: here's what you need to understand about about Democrats in
Speaker 1: general on law and order, and on public safety. They're
Speaker 1: not unwilling to use the state's force to take away
Speaker 1: people's freedom. As we see, they're willing to do it
Speaker 1: even for I don't know, opening up a gym, more
Speaker 1: perhaps not wearing your mask enough. Right, They're all about
Speaker 1: using the force of the state to get what they want.
Speaker 1: Whether they actually will enforce the laws use that force
Speaker 1: to make sure that public safety and criminal justice are
Speaker 1: our priorities, right, is all dependent upon whether or not
Speaker 1: it's popular among their Democrat constituents at that time. So
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that they're they're completely unwilling to ever
Speaker 1: have law and order. But right now the winds, the
Speaker 1: political winds within the Democrat Party are let people loot
Speaker 1: and ride a bit, don't come down too hard on them.
Speaker 1: You know, we got to have a lot of handwringing
Speaker 1: over white privilege, and everyone has to be constantly, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry about being white, and it's terrible and
Speaker 1: we're just depressing everybody. You know, That's that's what the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party wants for the whole country, and that influences
Speaker 1: the way people think about criminal justice and law enforcement issues.
Speaker 1: You know, can cops really do their jobs? Which is
Speaker 1: going to involve cops putting hands on people and arresting
Speaker 1: and putting cuffs on and taking away freedom from people
Speaker 1: these temporarily who break laws. Do the cops have public
Speaker 1: support for that? Democrats right now are a lot of them,
Speaker 1: the ones making decisions, I should add, not the ones
Speaker 1: who actually live in these neighborhoods. That that's this is
Speaker 1: a key distinction. The Democrat apparatus is all in this
Speaker 1: white guilt mindset of Oh, law enforcement is somehow because
Speaker 1: of the disproportionate impact, disproportionate number of arrests within the
Speaker 1: minority community, law enforcement is, Oh, let's blame the cops
Speaker 1: and let's pull back on law enforcement. When you actually
Speaker 1: go out and do some polling and talk to people,
Speaker 1: including our fellow Americans in poor parts of major cities,
Speaker 1: including black Americans, who want to just go about their
Speaker 1: lives in security and safety and decency and respect like
Speaker 1: all the rest of us, a solid majority of them
Speaker 1: eighty one percent eighty one sent according to the most
Speaker 1: recent Gallipoling. We're saying, we want as many cops in
Speaker 1: the neighborhood, maybe more, either more or what we got
Speaker 1: we don't want less. And the other twenty percent. I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you, I think I've just been so influenced
Speaker 1: by by Democrat propaganda that they actually believe that cops
Speaker 1: are targeting them, and which is a shame. It's not true,
Speaker 1: but that's the mindset. So I blame the Democrat apparatus
Speaker 1: for spreading these lies. You know, I blame the peloss
Speaker 1: and the Schumers and the you know, the Coopers and
Speaker 1: the Tappers and the Mattow's and the New York Times,
Speaker 1: the Washington Post. They're the ones that are creating this
Speaker 1: perception that cops are the problem. But back to the
Speaker 1: way this is going to play out in this election,
Speaker 1: it's fastening. You have Harris and Biden, who at different
Speaker 1: times in their careers or the Democrat equivalent of law
Speaker 1: and order candidates, which doesn't mean what what it should,
Speaker 1: but they were the Democrat equivalent of that, and now
Speaker 1: they're running at a time when their party doesn't believe
Speaker 1: that the law should be enforced as it is without
Speaker 1: a constant eye toward the balancing needs of social justice
Speaker 1: or whatever. But Democrats have in the past wanted more
Speaker 1: safety and security. Even the left realizes at some point,
Speaker 1: at some point they're not there yet. But at some
Speaker 1: point the left realizes that when all the stories are
Speaker 1: being burned to the ground, and when people don't feel safe,
Speaker 1: and when people walk outside and there is a perception,
Speaker 1: you know, is these are the intangibles. This is what
Speaker 1: I try to bring you. One of the things I
Speaker 1: like to talk to you about from my perspective here
Speaker 1: in New York because I'm in the middle of the
Speaker 1: largest city in the country. Some of you listening to
Speaker 1: this are also here, but a lot of you are
Speaker 1: vast majority of you are all over the country, all
Speaker 1: over We got people listening in all fifty states and
Speaker 1: countries all over the world. Not every country be cool.
Speaker 1: I mean, Tim Buck Turkmenistan in the house, but I
Speaker 1: don't know if we have anybody in Turkmenistan. But we
Speaker 1: got people listening in the UK and Canada and Ireland
Speaker 1: and South Korea and Afghanistan and Iraq. Thank you military Syria.
Speaker 1: Still one of my proudest moments on the show when
Speaker 1: a member one of the SF teams came up to
Speaker 1: me and said they used to listen to this show
Speaker 1: as they were liberating Rocca. That's that I'm not somebody
Speaker 1: who who tears up over things that are happy or
Speaker 1: that are proud. That made me proud that that was
Speaker 1: the closest I've been in a very long time. Anyway
Speaker 1: back to where was I. Oh, Yes, What I'm trying
Speaker 1: to tell you about the intangibles of being in a
Speaker 1: city is that you can tell when the criminal element,
Speaker 1: and there's a criminal element in every society, there are
Speaker 1: people who are damage who either choose evil or are
Speaker 1: so so damaged themselves that their ability to discern good
Speaker 1: from evil is mixed at best. And when they feel
Speaker 1: like they have free reign on the street or something
Speaker 1: closer to it, when they think that there's a you know,
Speaker 1: what you want is a society where people commit crimes
Speaker 1: and believe believe that they will be likely caught and punished.
Speaker 1: That's you. That's what you want to have. And there
Speaker 1: are countries where that is absolutely the case and they
Speaker 1: have very low crime rates and everybody realizes, and even
Speaker 1: some authoritarian regimes if you talk to people about what
Speaker 1: it was like. I remember when I was in Terrear
Speaker 1: Square when there was all that tumult with a member
Speaker 1: of the Muslim brotherhood took over took over Egypt, and
Speaker 1: we had all kinds of problems going on. I was
Speaker 1: in Arrear Square and there were homeless encampments around it,
Speaker 1: and there was a real sense of menace on the streets.
Speaker 1: And I spoke to some of my Egyptian contacts there,
Speaker 1: some of my friends who were Cairo natives, and they
Speaker 1: were taking me around and showing what was going on,
Speaker 1: and they just said, look, the old regime was they
Speaker 1: were authoritarian thugs. But if you, you know, punched an
Speaker 1: American in the face, stole their wallet or their handbag
Speaker 1: and ran off with it, and you were a street criminal,
Speaker 1: you thought it was likely that you were going to
Speaker 1: get caught and it was gonna they were gonna be
Speaker 1: rough with you when they caught you, and you did
Speaker 1: not want that. So that changed the perception. Once the
Speaker 1: Mubarak regime was gone and the Muslin brother had taken over,
Speaker 1: they said, oh no, now it's like it feels more
Speaker 1: like a free for all in the streets. The criminals,
Speaker 1: the same criminals that were there before, have the belief
Speaker 1: that they'll likely get away with it, and that just
Speaker 1: creates a cascading effect. That was true in Kiro's true
Speaker 1: in New York as well. It's really it's a corollarity
Speaker 1: of the broken windows theory. When people believe they can
Speaker 1: get away with little crimes, then they start to do
Speaker 1: enough of them that they feel a sense of the
Speaker 1: criminal element, feels a sense of being empowered, and they're
Speaker 1: more likely to commit more serious crimes. You've already you've
Speaker 1: already broken in and done a burglary. Maybe next you
Speaker 1: want to rob a bank. Right, you've already been legally
Speaker 1: selling I don't know, you've already been illegally selling marijuana
Speaker 1: now is not really even a crime in New York.
Speaker 1: So I'm trying to think of what would be a
Speaker 1: you know, you're selling on tac cigarettes. Maybe you decide
Speaker 1: to make your way up to selling a little bit
Speaker 1: of fentonel on the side, you know, or prescription drugs
Speaker 1: off off label, off prescription whatever, you know, illegally, and
Speaker 1: that that just you filter that out through across the
Speaker 1: society and you can see how everything starts to collapse.
Speaker 1: And I'm telling you, I walk around New York now
Speaker 1: and everyone sees it, and there's new stories, better all
Speaker 1: the time. And when you're aware of people who are
Speaker 1: are and you can only see when you're on the street,
Speaker 1: you can tell all, right, you know these things, you
Speaker 1: know in your neighborhood, people always have a sense. All
Speaker 1: beat cops that I've ever talked to in the past,
Speaker 1: and I have a beat cop in my family. I
Speaker 1: spent decades walking the streets of major cities, and they'll
Speaker 1: tell you that once he spent off time in a place,
Speaker 1: you just kind of get to know something's not right here,
Speaker 1: something's off, something is And when you see individuals that
Speaker 1: you really can tell there's a sense of this is
Speaker 1: not you know they have ill intent. It's one thing
Speaker 1: when they're trying to hide it. It's another thing if
Speaker 1: they're more brazen and open about it. And again, a
Speaker 1: cascading effect. And that's what you're seeing in these cities.
Speaker 1: And it's because stopping those smaller things, preventing those broken
Speaker 1: windows requires the interaction between law enforcement and whoever is
Speaker 1: doing that your respective of social justice or a history
Speaker 1: of discrimination or anything else out there, it's just you
Speaker 1: break the law. You do these things you're not supposed
Speaker 1: to do, there will be punishment for it. When that
Speaker 1: starts to fade, then all the other crimes start to
Speaker 1: become more pervasive. There's an increase in them and all
Speaker 1: the literature will tell you this. This is just the
Speaker 1: reality around it, and this is what we're seeing right now.
Speaker 1: And Democrats, even like they call her Cop Kamala sometimes
Speaker 1: because she was such a law and order person in
Speaker 1: some instances for some things, also willing to abuse the
Speaker 1: powers of her office on behalf of planned parent and
Speaker 1: choose essentially like a paid hatchet woman for planned parenthood.
Speaker 1: Oh hatchett planned parenthood. I know, Sorry, but that's what
Speaker 1: was going on there. But now the Democrats, because of
Speaker 1: the mood of the apparatus of their party, put aside
Speaker 1: that they don't care really what's happening in these communities
Speaker 1: and what the people in the communities want. Because of
Speaker 1: the mood of the Democrat party, they won't actually do
Speaker 1: what is necessary to enforce these laws and restore a
Speaker 1: greater order, to shut down the riots, to shut down
Speaker 1: the looting, and then just the day to day criminality,
Speaker 1: the day to day abuses and lawlessness on the streets
Speaker 1: that make everyone walk a little bit faster than they
Speaker 1: would want, to feel a little less safe than they should.
Speaker 1: Lacrosse can't walk away from that. Now, they won't. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedoms. This is The Buck Sexton Show Podcast. Kamala,
Speaker 1: You've been an honorary Biden for quite some time. You know,
Speaker 1: I came first to know who Kamala was through our son,
Speaker 1: Bow Biden. They were friends, They served as attorneys general
Speaker 1: at the same time. They took the same big They
Speaker 1: took on the same big fights together, Kamala in California,
Speaker 1: Bo here in Delaware, big fights that helped change the
Speaker 1: entire country. I know how much Bow respected Kamala and
Speaker 1: our work, and that mattered a lot to me, to
Speaker 1: be honest with you, as I made this decision. So
Speaker 1: now we need to get to work pulling this nation
Speaker 1: out of these crises we find ourselves in, getting our
Speaker 1: economy backgroun track. You're nineteen this nation and yes, winning
Speaker 1: the battle for the soul of America, my fellow Americans.
Speaker 1: Now let me introduce to you for the first time,
Speaker 1: your next vice treasure in the United States, Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: There's a lot that I would like the journos to
Speaker 1: check into about all of this. For one, the idea
Speaker 1: that that Kamala Harris, these stories we've heard about the
Speaker 1: the truly overt racism that she was subjected to, things
Speaker 1: like other other children in her community, weren't allowed to
Speaker 1: play with her when she was a child. This was
Speaker 1: in This was in Berkeley, California. In what was it
Speaker 1: I guess it would have been the seventies. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying she's lying. I'm just saying the Press Corps should
Speaker 1: look into some of this, we should, we should verify
Speaker 1: more of it. Oh, but we know they're not going to.
Speaker 1: And on Joe Biden. I think it's worth knowing here
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden has and there are things that are
Speaker 1: beyond politics and the human the human tragedies that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden has suffered through the personal tragedies where he's you know,
Speaker 1: he's lost he lost family members in a car accident,
Speaker 1: he lost Boe Biden to brain cancer. Um, those are
Speaker 1: truly sad, and we pray for for the departed. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's that's not a political thing. That's said. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: also has a particular habit of I'm sorry, I've seen it.
Speaker 1: I've heard it, talking about and and even leveraging the
Speaker 1: personal tragedy for political purposes in a way that's really
Speaker 1: you know, sleazy, used lawnmower salesman stuff. It is he's
Speaker 1: pretty shameless about it sometimes. Uh, he still would would
Speaker 1: cling for a long time to the to the uh
Speaker 1: the story that you know, his family members, his wife
Speaker 1: and I believe his wife and and child were killed
Speaker 1: in a car accident because the other driver was drunk.
Speaker 1: It's not true. That's not true. And I can tell
Speaker 1: you that if and I believe the other driver wasn't
Speaker 1: even responsible for the accident. Yeah, So if you weren't
Speaker 1: responsible for an accident and somebody says that you were
Speaker 1: drunk and that you killed his family members, I think
Speaker 1: you'd be pretty horrified, and you'd be right to be.
Speaker 1: But it's a more powerful story. You see, if if
Speaker 1: Biden changed around that narrative, do you remember who these
Speaker 1: people really are? Remember who Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: really are. Kamala Harris was willing to in front of
Speaker 1: fifteen or twenty million people watching, but also in front
Speaker 1: of a man's family, in front of i'm a Kavanaughs
Speaker 1: wife and children, try to rip him apart and accuse
Speaker 1: him of being a gang rapist, accuse him of being
Speaker 1: a gang rapist based on zero evidence and based on
Speaker 1: an allegation that only and I mean this, I mean
Speaker 1: this from you know, the center of the truth wheelhouse.
Speaker 1: Only a moron could have believed that. So Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: is either a moron, which I don't believe, or she
Speaker 1: is a shameless, a shameless, immoral person who is ruthless
Speaker 1: and will do whatever she has to do in order
Speaker 1: to help Kamala Harris's pursuit of power. That I do believe.
Speaker 1: That I think completely lines up. And on this point
Speaker 1: even about Bobiden. Bobiden, who of his sons, is the
Speaker 1: one who you know, is served in the military and
Speaker 1: people thought of as the heir to the Biden political legacy,
Speaker 1: and it's very sad he'd he died of brain cancer
Speaker 1: and it's terrible, I think served in Iraq. But to
Speaker 1: bring up Bo Biden as a as a connection to
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris again, I don't know if that's an embellishment,
Speaker 1: which is what they say about the Biden record. But
Speaker 1: we're really to believe that the state Attorney General in
Speaker 1: Delaware was working on a lot of the same challenges
Speaker 1: and really tight with the state Attorney General in California.
Speaker 1: I mean, they might have met it like the Attorney's
Speaker 1: General Conference once or twice or something. But notice that
Speaker 1: there's this fabrication or at least I think fabrication of
Speaker 1: narrative here that isn't necessarily route in the facts. And
Speaker 1: here's one of the problems we have to confront. The
Speaker 1: lies will come at you so fast and furious. There
Speaker 1: will be so much dishonesty around the Biden Harris ticket
Speaker 1: that it would be difficult even for the most observant
Speaker 1: political analyst to be able to pick out the falsehoods.
Speaker 1: It's just going to be an avalanche of bs until
Speaker 1: election day, and the media not only will they not
Speaker 1: be fact checking it, they'll be with the shovels and
Speaker 1: the bs. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Why Kamala, let's just deal
Speaker 1: with that one now, shall we. Why Why Kamala? Because
Speaker 1: you know we are here in a week ago Susan Rice,
Speaker 1: and you've also heard of what Keisha Lance bottoms and
Speaker 1: there were some other names I think Karen Bass right,
Speaker 1: there are other other names in the mix. And yeah,
Speaker 1: we go with Kamala, which is interesting because she's already
Speaker 1: she was already found insufficient by the Democrat bass By
Speaker 1: in the primary, couldn't even make it to the first
Speaker 1: round of primary vote. They didn't want her, they didn't
Speaker 1: want her to be president, and now she's going to
Speaker 1: kind of be president through the back door of being
Speaker 1: a vice president for a guy who everyone knows can
Speaker 1: actually be president for eight years, can't really be president
Speaker 1: for four years. I don't think he I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you this right now. I don't make outlanders predictions. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I thought Hillary was gonna want to win in twenty sixteenth.
Speaker 1: Thank god I was wrong. I don't I don't make
Speaker 1: out landish predictions. That was such a happy day, but
Speaker 1: it was a happy day of shock. It was kind
Speaker 1: of like when when when Trump won the election. For me,
Speaker 1: it felt like if somebody, you know, wins the lottery
Speaker 1: and instead of like dancing and crying with joy, they
Speaker 1: actually just pass out. It was such a what It
Speaker 1: was such a shock and a lot of you are
Speaker 1: like I told you, Buck, I told you for six
Speaker 1: months before I know. There were the I really should
Speaker 1: go through one day, all the emails, all the messages
Speaker 1: like God from the team Buck faithful who were like
Speaker 1: Trump's gonna do it. Man, Trump's gonna do it. A
Speaker 1: lot of you saw it, and I to this day
Speaker 1: I give you all credit for it. I don't make
Speaker 1: outlandish predictions what I'm trying to say, and I meant
Speaker 1: when I'm right, I'd meant when I'm wrong. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't think Biden make if he becomes president. I don't
Speaker 1: think he makes it through the mid terms without up
Speaker 1: down for personal health reasons. And why would that be? Who?
Speaker 1: How is that a bad look? How is that a
Speaker 1: bad situation? Because wouldn't you rather have incumbent Kamala? Right?
Speaker 1: She becomes the incumbent, then she steps up, takes the
Speaker 1: job running for her first term with two years, with
Speaker 1: all the money around her, all this stuff put together? Right,
Speaker 1: isn't that better? Doesn't it make sense? You get to
Speaker 1: be Joe Biden. You get to go down into history
Speaker 1: if you're Joe Biden, and you do that as the
Speaker 1: guy who was the vice to the first black president
Speaker 1: for eight years and then the bridge for the first
Speaker 1: minority female president for eight years, for well four years,
Speaker 1: eight years whatever wherever, will end up being right, if
Speaker 1: you're Joe Biden, what could be a more that legacy alone.
Speaker 1: I mean, the Biden's airs are going to be swimming
Speaker 1: in vaults of gold coins like Scrooge McDuck. They're gonna
Speaker 1: be so rich the Democrat apparatus though, all you know,
Speaker 1: Ji doctor Joe Biden. Okay, you guys, can you're allowed
Speaker 1: to disagree with me on this. I'm sorry. A PhD
Speaker 1: in education does not mean I'm going to call you
Speaker 1: doctor right it is Jill Biden. I'm happy that she
Speaker 1: spent a lot of years getting a PhD in education.
Speaker 1: It's not even like a PhD in mathematics or something.
Speaker 1: A PhD in education. Right now, I've got a bunch
Speaker 1: of I've got a bunch of masters at PhD students
Speaker 1: in education, going click, gonna turn on Alex Jones. Alex
Speaker 1: Jones respects a PhD in education, respects it. Unlock Buck
Speaker 1: sex Bucks actual smug seeing that face before smug face. Look,
Speaker 1: he's he's a he's a he's a lunatic, but he
Speaker 1: is he is quite a he's quite a show, that's
Speaker 1: for sure. Oh man arm wrestling. Oh yeah, we'll see
Speaker 1: who wins. We'll see who wins you versus me. Let's go, um,
Speaker 1: where was I I went off into into crazy land
Speaker 1: there for a second. Oh, yes, Kamala, Kamala and how
Speaker 1: she should become. So I think that Biden really does
Speaker 1: step down telling this right now, steps down in the
Speaker 1: mid terms. And I did get the Kamala prediction right,
Speaker 1: stretching back for a long time. But that's not a
Speaker 1: top And that was almost a coin flip. It was
Speaker 1: gonna be Kamala or well, no, it was like four
Speaker 1: or five candidates, but I knew it was going to
Speaker 1: be Kama because the media apparatus loves her so much,
Speaker 1: and there's such a there's so much Obama nostalgia, so
Speaker 1: much Obama nostalgia. And I also think it's interesting the
Speaker 1: way that we're going to be describing because you know,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party, you know, you had the you have
Speaker 1: with Obama the first the first black president, right, that's
Speaker 1: he has that historic title with And this, I'm not
Speaker 1: this is not a criticism. I'm actually curious about this.
Speaker 1: We're going to refer to Kamala Harris as the first
Speaker 1: black female president. Should shouldn't she also be referred to
Speaker 1: as the first Indian female president? What? You know? And
Speaker 1: I mean this, I just wonder how how in an
Speaker 1: identity politics world, how is that? So is the media
Speaker 1: just going to pick one that they think is more
Speaker 1: is more powerful for the narrative because she's as Indian
Speaker 1: as she is black, Right, So what's the how does
Speaker 1: that work? You know that? I'm I wonder if they're
Speaker 1: actually gonna go with some kind of a you know,
Speaker 1: an identity a new term. I don't know. But to
Speaker 1: call her just the first black president and not to
Speaker 1: make mention the fact that she would, I think that's
Speaker 1: an interest again not this is not a criticism, It's
Speaker 1: just I think through this, and it is noteworthy to
Speaker 1: me that they're so comfortable. I've never heard her called
Speaker 1: the first I've heard plenty of people say she'd be
Speaker 1: the first black female president. I've heard nobody say, except
Speaker 1: for Mindy Kalink, to be fair in an interview, that
Speaker 1: she would be or she didn't call her first Indian
Speaker 1: American female president. She said she's you know, South Asian
Speaker 1: as a politician, and I think I forget the context
Speaker 1: of the interview, but no one ever says the first
Speaker 1: Indian American female president. And I think that's it's why
Speaker 1: shouldn't that also be in the discussion. You know, Indian
Speaker 1: Americans are a wonderful a wonderful part of our of
Speaker 1: our American family. Um, I don't know. I just think
Speaker 1: it's I think it's interesting that that's we're always here
Speaker 1: in the one and we don't hear the other. But again,
Speaker 1: not a criticism, just a note of interest to me.
Speaker 1: But why Kamala Harris? Going back into that, why Kamala Harris? Uh, well,
Speaker 1: have you listen to Netzy Pelosi. She's like the best,
Speaker 1: He's the best, the best play eleven. Kamala Harris is
Speaker 1: not only the choice as a woman of color, a
Speaker 1: woman of color, she is the best person that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden could name. There are many people who would do
Speaker 1: no harm, there are many people who could be president.
Speaker 1: To have those two combined with the person he had
Speaker 1: the comfort level with to serve, it's about governance. As
Speaker 1: your commentator said, it's about governance. So let's recognize her
Speaker 1: not only as the first woman of color to be
Speaker 1: vice president, but the best possible person he could have
Speaker 1: chosen to proceed into this election and of course to
Speaker 1: win and serve the American people. A lot of focus
Speaker 1: on the identity politics stuff there. Why why is she
Speaker 1: the best choice? What isn't. Let's look at this really,
Speaker 1: you know, we can actually have a real conversation. What
Speaker 1: makes Kamala Harris the best choice? It's really that people
Speaker 1: like Pelosi like her. They stylistically culturally like her. Right
Speaker 1: Wall Street likes herum, the tech oligarchs like her. She's
Speaker 1: the liberal elites are are very pro and journals, of course,
Speaker 1: because journals are the are the poorly paid, generally speaking,
Speaker 1: the poorly paid cousins of the liberal elites. Right, journals
Speaker 1: are you know, they're the kind of hangers on too,
Speaker 1: the liberal elite, because they're all, you know, unless they've
Speaker 1: got trust funds or something, they're they're generally not making
Speaker 1: the kind of money that Wall Street bankers and tech
Speaker 1: oligarchs are. So but but there's not a focus on
Speaker 1: what is it the Kamala Harris springs, what vision, what policy?
Speaker 1: We don't even know. I don't even know what Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris springs for any of this. And I think it's
Speaker 1: worth noting that in the last election cycle it was
Speaker 1: very clear that here's an experiment. Before I say anything,
Speaker 1: I really just and be honest with yourself, because I
Speaker 1: can't this is like a test where I'm not going
Speaker 1: to grade the horror, And it's like homework where I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna grade it, but I'm gonna collect it. Remember
Speaker 1: when they used to do that to you in math class?
Speaker 1: I hated that, I'm not going to give you great,
Speaker 1: but we're going to check it. And then I've got
Speaker 1: all this red ink all over my math homework. I
Speaker 1: still I still have nightmares about math class. The only
Speaker 1: thing in school that ever. It was not my thing anyway,
Speaker 1: But think about this. Who was ready for it? Who
Speaker 1: was Hillary Clinton's vice president? Oh? I know you probably
Speaker 1: got it right, you you remember, but I come on now,
Speaker 1: I would bet no one ever be able to check this.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, I'll ask you. When I asked, I'm sure
Speaker 1: you know who it was. But how long did it?
Speaker 1: Did it? Did it take you about three seconds to
Speaker 1: think that went through? And remember, honestly, I had no
Speaker 1: clue until this morning when I was doing show prep.
Speaker 1: See one thing I will say, Producer Mark is rock solid,
Speaker 1: honest always, which I love. Okay, so thank you. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm sure if I would have thought about it, but
Speaker 1: I would have remembered eventure No, no, of course, But
Speaker 1: see my point in this is not it is that
Speaker 1: even for me, I work in Pole, this is all
Speaker 1: I do all the time, Mark right, and I I
Speaker 1: would have to think for about three or four like
Speaker 1: I'd have to go, but wait, who is your vice right?
Speaker 1: You don't remember? Right? And that's that was part of it, right,
Speaker 1: that was part of Kelly head Conway points this out
Speaker 1: play play seventeen. Senator Harris cannot cure the flaws and
Speaker 1: the inadequacies at the top of the ticket. She can't
Speaker 1: do that. And I'd imagine that she is going to
Speaker 1: receive advice on how to go out there and run
Speaker 1: through the tape and campaign hard, but don't overshadow vice
Speaker 1: president by him, which is so easy to do. He's
Speaker 1: overshadowed basically by almost every when he comes in contact with.
Speaker 1: I gave him credit for doing something Hillary Clinton didn't do.
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton picked one of the five people in the
Speaker 1: country you could not overshadow her. There weren't that many,
Speaker 1: And she picked Tim Kane and people are struggling even
Speaker 1: this week to remember who she had chosen as her
Speaker 1: running mate. I think that's absolutely true. I think it's
Speaker 1: absolutely the Tim I if I buzzed in on who
Speaker 1: was in jeopardy who was Hillary Clinton's running mate in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. I did know the answer, but I'm not
Speaker 1: sure I would be able to get I'm not sure
Speaker 1: that i'd get it out before then. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure i'd be able to do it. Sonya, Mark,
Speaker 1: don't don't feel at all, you know, put off by it. Man,
Speaker 1: I had to I had to go. Oh, that's right,
Speaker 1: it was Tim Kane. Go back and you think this
Speaker 1: stuff through. Here's another phone. Who who was you gotta
Speaker 1: be honest, who was running as vice president for John Kerry? Right?
Speaker 1: Think about this. Vice presidents are not people who you
Speaker 1: generally think, all right, and you know it was John Edwards.
Speaker 1: John Edwards. I actually, I'm gonna tell you this. I
Speaker 1: actually I had to check to make sure I hadn't
Speaker 1: forgotten that one in real time. Um. It's it's stunning.
Speaker 1: It's absolutely stunning when you think back to how challenging
Speaker 1: it is to remember who some of these candidates are.
Speaker 1: But there's a reason I'm going through this. Yeah, that's right,
Speaker 1: John Edwards, the guy who was like paying off the
Speaker 1: lady who sells wind chimes or whatever because she had
Speaker 1: his baby during the campaign, and he said he didn't
Speaker 1: on his wife, who had was dying of cancer unless
Speaker 1: she until she was in remission. I mean it, folks,
Speaker 1: that guy you want to talk about slimy John Edwards? Wow? Right,
Speaker 1: he has wow level of slimy. And who broke Don't
Speaker 1: ever forget this. Who broke the story of John Edwards,
Speaker 1: the philandering slimeball? The National Enquirer, the rest of the
Speaker 1: entire journalistic establishment no idea, and they fought against it.
Speaker 1: They pretended it wasn't true. The National Enquirer broke that story.
Speaker 1: Pretty amazing, all true, all true. Kamala clearly does overshadow
Speaker 1: Joe Biden in the minds of the liberal elites. But
Speaker 1: here's the issue. They in my opinion, I guess everything's
Speaker 1: in my opinions. It's my show. But as you look
Speaker 1: at this ticket, Kamala Harris is supposed to overshadow Biden. Right,
Speaker 1: They're supposed to have someone to get everyone excited because
Speaker 1: they're not excited about Buiden. So with Hillary, it was
Speaker 1: they didn't want overshadowing, they didn't want somebody, and so
Speaker 1: they picked Tim Kane, who you know who really even
Speaker 1: remembers that with Kamala as the pick. It's supposed to be,
Speaker 1: this is who your real president's going to be. And
Speaker 1: Democrats are desperate to believe that people will be excited
Speaker 1: about that. Here's the problem that I think they face.
Speaker 1: Nobody's excited about that except for the liberal elites, and
Speaker 1: they are so out of touch. Remember they also were
Speaker 1: sure that Donald Trump is going to get crushed. So
Speaker 1: I actually feel pretty good for our team, for our
Speaker 1: side with Kamala as the candidate, because Democrats never learned
Speaker 1: from their mistakes. Friends, you're in the Freedom Mind. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. These people are crazy, okay,
Speaker 1: and this is what we're getting. And it's amazing the
Speaker 1: way Sleepy Joe buys into it. He buys into it
Speaker 1: like oh great, you know, doesn't know what he's doing.
Speaker 1: And now you have a sort of a madwoman. I
Speaker 1: call her because she was so angry and such hatred
Speaker 1: with Justice Kavanaugh. I mean, I've never seen anything like it.
Speaker 1: She was the angriest of the group, and they were
Speaker 1: all angry. They were all radical left to angry people
Speaker 1: and they're angry because I beat them. They still ever forgotten.
Speaker 1: You know, these are seriously ill people. But if you
Speaker 1: look at if you look at you know her record
Speaker 1: is a terrible record, terrible record, radical left, angry people.
Speaker 1: I think that we are going to have quite a
Speaker 1: quite a contest on our hands, your friends. Even though
Speaker 1: the country is going through it is going through a catastrophe.
Speaker 1: A large part of the catastrophe is just the reality
Speaker 1: of dealing with COVID. But there's also a serious component
Speaker 1: of this catastrophe. That's the response. And I would argue
Speaker 1: and will continue to argue the inept and over zealous.
Speaker 1: Both inept and over zealous two descriptors for a government
Speaker 1: that you have to always remember. They're going to tell
Speaker 1: you what to do, you know, with with a ferocity
Speaker 1: and make you do it. And they're idiots. That's pretty
Speaker 1: much a definition for why we want to limit government
Speaker 1: and why we want to make sure that there are
Speaker 1: safeguards in place from the abuses of power that are
Speaker 1: inherent really and any government system. It's a question of degree,
Speaker 1: it's a question of severity. But Trump is right, He's
Speaker 1: right that they're they're leftists, and that this is part
Speaker 1: of the Biden, the Biden Kamala storyline. You're going to
Speaker 1: be told is that they're pragmatic moderates. Yeah, how does
Speaker 1: any sane person think the Green New Deal is a
Speaker 1: pragmatic moderate position? Does any sane person think that it's
Speaker 1: a middle of the road position to have not just
Speaker 1: abortion all nine months of a pregnancy, but that there
Speaker 1: should be taxpayer funding for it, and that we should
Speaker 1: continue to give hundreds of millions of dollars a year
Speaker 1: to plan parentder That that's the middle of the road position. No,
Speaker 1: these are just Democrat positions now. But the Democrats have
Speaker 1: gone that They're going to have quite a challenge here.
Speaker 1: They have gone far left, and they're going to try
Speaker 1: to convince America Americans that being far left is actually
Speaker 1: being centrist, that they've moved the overtson window over politics
Speaker 1: so much that they are somehow magically now not on
Speaker 1: team crazy. And I've got to tell you they are
Speaker 1: on team crazy. I disagree. They are on team crazy.
Speaker 1: So that's where the president is going to have I
Speaker 1: think a lot of ability to score points with the
Speaker 1: voters who matter. Remember, there's so much of this people
Speaker 1: talking about what is perception, what are the American people well?
Speaker 1: And what do they want to vote for? It really
Speaker 1: ends up being about what do a couple hundred thousand
Speaker 1: people in a half a dozen different states think, do
Speaker 1: they show up? And if they show up, who do
Speaker 1: they vote for? That is that's the difference maker. That's
Speaker 1: going to be the difference maker in the selection. We're
Speaker 1: not going to have some big blowout. The blue states
Speaker 1: are gonna stay blue. It's gonna be just the contested
Speaker 1: states that once again are up. I mean, I mean
Speaker 1: when I of course always the contested states or what matters.
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is there's not gonna I don't think
Speaker 1: you're going to see a major surprise where a state
Speaker 1: that we think of as anything other than belong to
Speaker 1: one party of the other goes the other way. I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't think you're going to see that. As much
Speaker 1: as Democrats all want to believe Texas is going to
Speaker 1: go blue, No way, no way. Oh what else is
Speaker 1: Joe Biden gonna do? Play fourteen? Everyone knows that if
Speaker 1: Biden gets in this market's going to chrish. He's going
Speaker 1: to build regulations and his taxes. He's gonna tax people
Speaker 1: for trillion dollars trillion that will destroy this economy the
Speaker 1: likes of which nobody's ever seen before. Four trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in taxes. That is going to hurt things, isn't it
Speaker 1: the flight from cities that are already over taxed that
Speaker 1: the Democrats think they're going to fix by taxing more.
Speaker 1: That's just a harbinger of things to come. If Democrats
Speaker 1: can do the federal level, they will Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Speaking of major cities, how do Democrats think they're gonna
Speaker 1: fix them? What are they going to do? I just
Speaker 1: told you that they are planning on doing big tax increases,
Speaker 1: So that's you know, shut down the economy largely for
Speaker 1: political reasons. Now I mean that the continued shutdowns or
Speaker 1: this is madness. This should not continue. This should not
Speaker 1: be allowed to continue. But they figure where the federal
Speaker 1: government will bail us out. What a federal government doesn't
Speaker 1: you know what they're planning to do. They're going to
Speaker 1: start raising taxes, taking more of your money at a
Speaker 1: time when the American people are already strapped. So we
Speaker 1: have the government pumping money into the system and then
Speaker 1: people who are all ready not able to make ends meet,
Speaker 1: You're gonna be told, well, you also have to pay
Speaker 1: higher taxes. This is not good. This is not healthy
Speaker 1: for an economy. This is not going to make us
Speaker 1: wealthier or better off. But how are you going to
Speaker 1: fix the deterioration in the cities. How are you going
Speaker 1: to fix Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco. Well,
Speaker 1: the mayor of Chicago has an idea of play clip five.
Speaker 1: Those are the words of somebody who doesn't understand the
Speaker 1: first thing about local policing, doesn't understand the first thing
Speaker 1: about building authentic relationships with members of the community. Case
Speaker 1: and point is, look at the disastrous efforts of the
Speaker 1: federal government under this administration in Portland. It didn't help,
Speaker 1: it hurts, it exacerbated problems. I'm not letting that happen
Speaker 1: in my city. Yes, of course we have our challenges.
Speaker 1: But the thing that the federal government is uniquely qualified
Speaker 1: to do is things like past common sense gun reform,
Speaker 1: make sure that everybody has background checks, stop the availability
Speaker 1: of assault weapons. People that are on a no file
Speaker 1: lists shouldn't be able to get weapons. The list goes
Speaker 1: on and on. The things that could really help cities
Speaker 1: to stop putting guns in the hands of criminals. This
Speaker 1: president has shown an absolute abject unwillingness to even discuss,
Speaker 1: let alone move on. So I need a leader in Washington,
Speaker 1: DC who was willing to take on the gun lobby
Speaker 1: and do what's right for our children in our cities.
Speaker 1: That is not President Trump. We need Joe Biden. Yeah,
Speaker 1: sure you do. Let's unpack this, shall we Why the
Speaker 1: focus for a mayor whose city is a cautionary tale
Speaker 1: of lawlessness, violence, murder, gang banger shooting it out all
Speaker 1: the time? More bodies piling up in Chicago than a
Speaker 1: whole other large industrialized nations, and piling up in one
Speaker 1: weekend then other countries, entire countries will have in a weekend,
Speaker 1: large countries. Why is that? Why does that happening? Oh?
Speaker 1: Because we need an assault rifle band. You know, I
Speaker 1: watched a few episodes I couldn't get through anymore. I
Speaker 1: watch a few episodes of The West Wing because it's
Speaker 1: now available on Netflix, and it's just funny because it
Speaker 1: is a window, or really a time machine back to
Speaker 1: the lifestyle liberalism of the nineties, where it was really
Speaker 1: just about gun control and feminism and worshiping unions. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is what this is what the nineties are all
Speaker 1: about for liberals, but gun control in particular. And we've
Speaker 1: done this, We've run the experiments they wanted us to.
Speaker 1: We've been They say things like band assault rifles. Does
Speaker 1: anyone want to just take a guess, I mean, how
Speaker 1: much of the violence in the city of Chicago involves
Speaker 1: assault rifles. I mean I would place a monetary bet
Speaker 1: with somebody that it's less than one percent. But ban
Speaker 1: assault rifles. That's no. That's a talking point that Democrats
Speaker 1: say to make it seem like they're serious about stopping crime,
Speaker 1: make it seem like they actually have ideas about this.
Speaker 1: More gun control, Yes, because gangbangers who will shoot up
Speaker 1: a funeral and hit over a dozen people, murder people
Speaker 1: in broad daylight at a funeral, when they find out
Speaker 1: that it's illegal to buy a gun without a background check,
Speaker 1: they're gonna say, whoa, whoa, I'm just in this for
Speaker 1: the drive buys. I don't want any of that heat
Speaker 1: from missing the background check. When you think through what
Speaker 1: they say, when you think through what the Democrats what
Speaker 1: Lori Lightfoot says, it's stupid. It's not going to make
Speaker 1: anyone safer. It's not going to make anything better. This
Speaker 1: is a problem for them. If they had a media
Speaker 1: it wasn't completely I don't know, I say, in their pocket.
Speaker 1: But they're just the media is the Democrat Party. The
Speaker 1: Democrat Party is the mean, it's the same thing. Really,
Speaker 1: there's there's almost no separation whatsoever. I mean, they're just
Speaker 1: you know, DNC had on CNN, had on DNC had
Speaker 1: on CNN. It's the same thing. But if they actually
Speaker 1: had people that were there to bring facts and ask
Speaker 1: real questions, they'd say, the Mayor of Chicago, you've already
Speaker 1: created a gun free zone practically in Chicago, the strictest
Speaker 1: gun laws anywhere in the nation except for New York City.
Speaker 1: And you got guns flooding and you're saying, well, they're
Speaker 1: coming from other states. We'll guess what, there's over three
Speaker 1: hundred million guns already in circulation. So you really think
Speaker 1: that that gangbangers aren't going to be able to buy
Speaker 1: guns illegally without a background check. Even if you say
Speaker 1: that there's gonna be mandatory background checks, what who are
Speaker 1: the only people that are stopped by the lory lightfoots
Speaker 1: of the world. The deblasios of the world, these Democrat mayors.
Speaker 1: The only people that are stopped from getting firearms are
Speaker 1: people like me. If it were were reasonable to get
Speaker 1: a firearm, and I'm still thinking about going through the
Speaker 1: process although if it were, but it's been really shut
Speaker 1: down for a while now because of COVID, all the
Speaker 1: delays and everything. But they stopped me from getting a gun,
Speaker 1: so I can't defend my home. And there has been
Speaker 1: looting and rioting on my block, and I'm not allowed
Speaker 1: to defend my home. No, no, no, I'm subject to
Speaker 1: calling the police, who are subject to being told whoa, whoa.
Speaker 1: You can't actually arrest that career criminal and throw him
Speaker 1: on the ground if he resists arrest, and you know,
Speaker 1: use force. You can't do that. That looks that looks bad.
Speaker 1: Don't you know about systemic oppression? You can't do that, say, well,
Speaker 1: hold on, what does systemic oppression have to do with
Speaker 1: any of this. Whether a person is white, black, Hispanic,
Speaker 1: any race, they break the law, they should be they
Speaker 1: should be held responsible, and the police should have the
Speaker 1: backing of political authorities to use force as necessary. Oh no, buck,
Speaker 1: we have to start balancing these things out differently. Now
Speaker 1: in our public discourse, it's just all blather, it's all nonsense.
Speaker 1: You want Chicago to be safer, federal resources going after gangs,
Speaker 1: which are already used at some level. But we just
Speaker 1: talked the Attorney General about this yesterday. The operation Legend
Speaker 1: federal resources to go after the criminality is clearly helpful,
Speaker 1: and the mayor of Chicago should be thankful for this.
Speaker 1: She should be saying, oh, thank you so much, thank
Speaker 1: you so much to President Trump. Instead she slaps him
Speaker 1: down and acts like he's the problem. You know that
Speaker 1: Trump is the issue, or if you're Kamala Harris, you'll
Speaker 1: just say that he does He doesn't care about anybody place.
Speaker 1: Sixteen America is crying out for leadership. Yeah, we have
Speaker 1: a president who cares more about himself than the people
Speaker 1: who elected him, a president who was making every challenge
Speaker 1: we face even more more difficult to solve. But here's
Speaker 1: the good news. We don't have to accept the failed
Speaker 1: government of Donald Trump and Mike Pence. In just eighty
Speaker 1: three days. We have a chance to choose a better future.
Speaker 1: Sure we do. You're in the freedom mind. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show Podcast. Big day for the Trump team.
Speaker 1: On foreign policy figure that we should spend a couple
Speaker 1: of moments on this when here he is announcing a
Speaker 1: historic peace deal between Israel and the UAE that was
Speaker 1: brokered and assisted along by the Trump administration. Well, thank
Speaker 1: you very much. This is very important. This is a
Speaker 1: big event, and I want to just congratulate all of
Speaker 1: the people standing behind me because they have done an
Speaker 1: incredible job. This is something that hasn't been done in
Speaker 1: more than twenty five years. Just a few moments ago,
Speaker 1: I hosted a very special call with two friends, Prime
Speaker 1: Minister Benjamin net Yahoo of Israel and Crown Prince Mohammed
Speaker 1: bin Zaid of the United Arab Emirates, where they agreed
Speaker 1: to finalize a historical peace agreement. Everybody who said this
Speaker 1: would be impossible, and as you know, Mohammed is one
Speaker 1: of the great leaders of the Middle East. After forty
Speaker 1: nine years, Israel and the United Arab Emirates will fully
Speaker 1: normalize their diplomatic relations. They will exchange embassies and ambassadors
Speaker 1: and begin cooperation across the board and on a broad
Speaker 1: range of areas, including tourism, education, healthcare, trade and security.
Speaker 1: This is a truly historic moment, not since the Israel
Speaker 1: Jordan peace treaty was signed more than twenty five years ago.
Speaker 1: Has so much progress been made towards peace in the
Speaker 1: Middle East by uniting two of America's closest and most
Speaker 1: capable partners in the region, something which said could not
Speaker 1: be done. This deal is a significant step towards building
Speaker 1: a more peaceful, secure, and prosperous Middle East. There you
Speaker 1: have it. Now, this has been trending in this direction
Speaker 1: a little bit for a while. Let's just let's look
Speaker 1: at this for a moment as just a general foreign
Speaker 1: policy issue, and then we'll talk about the Trump camp,
Speaker 1: at the Trump team and what this means for them.
Speaker 1: The Obama administration was doing everything that could to play
Speaker 1: kate Iran and clear in Iran in eventual Iranian path
Speaker 1: to nuclear power status. I know the Libs always argue
Speaker 1: with this, but that's the truth, Okay. Iran was getting richer,
Speaker 1: more and matched, more entrench the international financial community, allowing
Speaker 1: to build up all of its conventional military capabilities, allowed
Speaker 1: to continue using its proxies and spreading terror all throughout
Speaker 1: the Middle East. And at the end of it, they're
Speaker 1: still going to have all the all they know how
Speaker 1: and facilities necessary to just be unstoppable in their quest
Speaker 1: to get nuclear weapons. So that meant that even some
Speaker 1: of the remember Iran is the Shia, the biggest Shia
Speaker 1: Muslim state in the world. Gosh, we used to talk
Speaker 1: about Islam on this show and Islamic issues and terrorism
Speaker 1: and jihad and all this stuff all the time. Remember
Speaker 1: that I first got into the radio business and got
Speaker 1: into media, and you had the rise of well, you
Speaker 1: had the Syrian Civil War and the rise of ISIS,
Speaker 1: and the US operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and you know,
Speaker 1: Isis's export of terror all over the world. You had
Speaker 1: ISIS franchises popping up in Somalia and Nigeria and Egypt
Speaker 1: and all over the place. You know, it was Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: I mean, there were ISIS franchises all and we used
Speaker 1: to spend so much time that was the primary national
Speaker 1: security challenge. And it just faded to a point where
Speaker 1: now I can't remember the last time I had to
Speaker 1: say rat Islam or jihadism on air of any kind.
Speaker 1: I know, this is a bit of an aside. This
Speaker 1: is a little soliloquy I'm doing. Oh, I guess it's
Speaker 1: on radio. So but this is a soliloquy. No, you
Speaker 1: can do soliloquy on radio on stage on radio, that
Speaker 1: makes sense. But yeah, this was something that we talked
Speaker 1: about all the time. I remember going into pretty in
Speaker 1: depth discussions on the original Saturday Show OSS about the
Speaker 1: difference between Shia and Sunni and the history of different
Speaker 1: great Islamic battles and all that. This is such a
Speaker 1: more of a part of it. And now in the
Speaker 1: Middle East we're like, ah, you know, we don't need
Speaker 1: the oil and as long as there's not anybody trying
Speaker 1: to blow up a plane, and we're gonna be like,
Speaker 1: you guys, do your thing. I mean, we've had a
Speaker 1: big shift away from the Middle East. I think that's
Speaker 1: a good thing. I'll also say there's some pretty prominent
Speaker 1: conservatives out there gave me a little bit, a little
Speaker 1: bit of a hard time, a little bit of hard time.
Speaker 1: They tried to, at least when I was saying, we
Speaker 1: don't want a further military intervention in area. The Kurds
Speaker 1: are not all gonna die. Everyone needs to calm down.
Speaker 1: And I was right. That was a couple of years ago.
Speaker 1: I remember I debated on the main stage at Cepack
Speaker 1: with was the guy kind of a big, big guy
Speaker 1: over at the Washington Post. I don't remember. I don't
Speaker 1: remember his name. Um, But anyway, we debated on the
Speaker 1: main stage and nice guy. I don't I don't. I'm
Speaker 1: not forgetting his name on. Oh, Mark Deeson, Mark Deeson, UM.
Speaker 1: But you know, we debated this issue and he was
Speaker 1: a send the troops wherever there's bad guys. That was
Speaker 1: anywhere in the world where there's bad guys, we got
Speaker 1: to send troops. And I was like, we've been doing
Speaker 1: a lot of that. Let's not do that. Let's pull
Speaker 1: troops out of Syria as much as we can, at
Speaker 1: least as soon as we can. And I think that
Speaker 1: was certainly the correct point of view. UM. I also
Speaker 1: think the Trump administration has been unfortunately stopped from pulling
Speaker 1: pulling the plug on US US military involvement in Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: or at least the active duty deployment of thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of troops there. And that's a shame because we need,
Speaker 1: you know, we need to stop and let let let
Speaker 1: the rest of the world do what it does as
Speaker 1: much as we can where it doesn't affect US interests.
Speaker 1: We have learned lessons about trying to remold them at
Speaker 1: the least everything else, And the best thing is to say, Okay,
Speaker 1: who are allies, who are enemies, work with our allies, marginalize, undermine,
Speaker 1: and when necessary, use force against our enemies, but only
Speaker 1: when absolutely necessary as a last result, and try to
Speaker 1: get the regional players to play more in their region,
Speaker 1: you know, have a bigger role. I'm not somebody spends
Speaker 1: a lot of time talking about the foreign policy interests
Speaker 1: of Israel, because I prefer to spend time talking about
Speaker 1: the domestic interests of the United States. But this is
Speaker 1: this is good for the region, and this is for
Speaker 1: me more importantly, well I shouldn't say more importantly, but
Speaker 1: more on the radar for what we're all looking at
Speaker 1: here in this country. It just goes to show you
Speaker 1: that the Trump team for all to talk about how,
Speaker 1: oh Trump is gonna destroy NATO. Oh my god, No
Speaker 1: he's not. Okay, that didn't happen. Trump is going to
Speaker 1: start a war with North Korea. Trump is going to
Speaker 1: start a war with a run. All this stuff that
Speaker 1: we always hear, Nah, didn't happen. Didn't happen. Now, the
Speaker 1: North Korean diplomacy did not bear fruit. Really, I know
Speaker 1: some of yours say buck, but the missiles stopped. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but we were hoping for more than that. And it's
Speaker 1: been a few years here and it really hasn't. And look,
Speaker 1: it was a long it was it was a long bomb. Whoops,
Speaker 1: probably not the right term, but it was a long
Speaker 1: bomb in the end zone, you know. And they didn't
Speaker 1: they didn't pick it off and run it back for
Speaker 1: a touchdown. But we didn't. We didn't get what we
Speaker 1: were looking for on that one. But remember the way
Speaker 1: that the Trump team has approached this is not to
Speaker 1: make blunders and to take to do outreach or to
Speaker 1: take action in areas where the blowback possibility or the
Speaker 1: risk of losses on our side are very very mine
Speaker 1: are very small. They're not non existent, but very small.
Speaker 1: You see that Trump has been able to marginalize Iran
Speaker 1: from the international community, pull this out of the disastrous
Speaker 1: JCPOA right, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Trump Trump
Speaker 1: managed to do all of these things, and he was
Speaker 1: supposed to be the weakest of all the stuff that
Speaker 1: he brought to table as Commander in chief. The area
Speaker 1: of the Democrats were so certain he was going to
Speaker 1: be the least competent. I mean, and there were a
Speaker 1: lot of places, but the main place was on foreign policy.
Speaker 1: They really thought that that's where they were going to
Speaker 1: be able to just hammer him. And you compare the
Speaker 1: first four years of Trump foreign policy the first four
Speaker 1: years of Obama foreign policy. No question, Trump has been better,
Speaker 1: and not better because I like it more, not better
Speaker 1: because oh I want to root Trump. No, Trump has
Speaker 1: been better because US interests have been more supported. Americans
Speaker 1: are not dying for policies, for strategies that no one
Speaker 1: can even really articulate, at least certainly not in the
Speaker 1: numbers they were. And we're not extending ourselves in places
Speaker 1: where we shouldn't be, and also trusting entities that are
Speaker 1: really enemies of the United States. Remember, the Obama foreign
Speaker 1: policy in the Middle East was to get a foreign
Speaker 1: policy legacy for Obama. They were willing to do anything,
Speaker 1: anything else to appease Iran. So Syria policy collapsed and
Speaker 1: the whole region caught flint, caught up in flames, and
Speaker 1: Iraq was a complete mess in the Islamic state made
Speaker 1: it what forty fifty miles from Baghdad at one point,
Speaker 1: a total disaster. And you're not gonna hear anyone talking
Speaker 1: about this Trump form policies. Pretty good. It's we got
Speaker 1: our own stuff to deal with. We'll be nice to
Speaker 1: our friends, we're gonna slop down our enemies, and we're
Speaker 1: not going to involve ourselves and stuff. Then isn't really
Speaker 1: all about us? And if we can bring to you
Speaker 1: responsible parties together like the UAE and Israel and to
Speaker 1: do good things, great, And they did put a win
Speaker 1: up on the board. But now let's get back to
Speaker 1: winning the election. Thanks for listening to the past. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. It's been a while since
Speaker 1: we've had this esteem gentleman on the show. We're glad
Speaker 1: to have him back. Lieutenant Colonel Allen West is with
Speaker 1: us now. He's an author, commentator, former congressman, and of
Speaker 1: course veteran, also the author of the book Hold Texas,
Speaker 1: Hold the Nation, Tenne Curl West. Great to have you, sir,
Speaker 1: Good to be with you, Buck, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: It's been too long. How are we doing right now
Speaker 1: in this fight against the left and the Democrats to
Speaker 1: get President Trump and the Republican Party hopefully along with
Speaker 1: him reelected. How are we doing in this election cycle
Speaker 1: so far in your opinion, Well, I will tell you.
Speaker 1: I'd like to use the phrase from Admiral Yamamoto after
Speaker 1: they bombed Pearl Harbor, when he said that I fear
Speaker 1: that I have awakened the sleeping giant. And I think
Speaker 1: that's exactly what has happened here in the United States
Speaker 1: of America. We have a very clear choice. Either we
Speaker 1: stand for the rule of the law or we allow
Speaker 1: the rule of the mob. And when you look at
Speaker 1: all the video that's coming out of Portland, Seattle, Chicago,
Speaker 1: New York City, I was talking to some friends up
Speaker 1: in New York City and they say that it's basically
Speaker 1: like being in a gulag up there. The American people
Speaker 1: don't want that as their future. They don't want socialism, Marxism, communism.
Speaker 1: They don't want to have people that are going out
Speaker 1: into their streets and threatening them and corusion, violence, intimidation tactics.
Speaker 1: And even here in the Great State of Texas, we've
Speaker 1: seen Antifa and Black Lives Matter try to stir up
Speaker 1: that type of chaos and confusion. So I believe that
Speaker 1: you're going to see an incredible turnout, and I believe
Speaker 1: that you're going to see a resounding defeat quoted Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: Do you think that you know BLM based on the
Speaker 1: polls that we saw a couple of months ago. Was
Speaker 1: people were saying, and the media was of course touting
Speaker 1: this poll I was overwhelmingly popular as a movement with
Speaker 1: the American people. It went away back under the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: We all remember it started with Michael Brown and Ferguson
Speaker 1: and it faded out and probably because there were a
Speaker 1: few law enforce and officers, most notably in Texas in
Speaker 1: Dallas almost I believe it was six officers who were
Speaker 1: murdered by BLM supporter and then all of a sudden
Speaker 1: five thank you sir, five who were murdered by BLM
Speaker 1: supporter and it went away. Do you think that we're
Speaker 1: at a point now where BLM has become, at least
Speaker 1: for mainstream Democrats running for office, a liability going into
Speaker 1: this fall, Well, it is a liability. And you know,
Speaker 1: when you look at the fact that you have so
Speaker 1: many of the Democrats out there that are somewhat trying
Speaker 1: to said, they're definitely not speaking out about it. The
Speaker 1: head of the New York City BLM movement said that
Speaker 1: if our demands aren't met, we're going to burn the
Speaker 1: system down. You see in Chicago with the head of
Speaker 1: the BLM said that if our demands aren't met, we're
Speaker 1: not going to We're going to continue to loot, and
Speaker 1: they're advocating for people to go out and loot stores
Speaker 1: because that's part of reparations. You look at the website,
Speaker 1: you look and understand what they stand for. BLM. Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter is not dealing with anything that is affecting
Speaker 1: the black community. As a matter of fact, one of
Speaker 1: the biggest issues in the black community is fatherlessness. You
Speaker 1: only have twenty four percent of young Black children and
Speaker 1: have a mother and father in the home. But yet
Speaker 1: when you go to their website, Black Lives Matter is
Speaker 1: against the traditional nuclear to parent household. They're not talking
Speaker 1: about school choice, they're not talking about better education or
Speaker 1: economic opportunities in our inner cities. They're definitely not talking
Speaker 1: about criminal justice reform. These are all the things that
Speaker 1: the Republican Party and conservatives are talking about. And I
Speaker 1: think that you're going to see a good deal of
Speaker 1: the Black community that's going to reject this far left approach,
Speaker 1: even though Joe Biden did select Kamala Harris to be
Speaker 1: his running mate. Speaking to Lieutenant Colonel Allen West, author commentator,
Speaker 1: former member of Congress, author, author of Whole Texas Hold
Speaker 1: the Nation? Lieutenant Colonel? Are we we're gonna hold Texas?
Speaker 1: How are we looking elsewhere? I mean, you're also a
Speaker 1: man of knows Florida quite well. How do you think
Speaker 1: we're gonna do there? Well? You know, I don't know
Speaker 1: it as good as I did. I've been out here
Speaker 1: in Texas now enjoying myself for the past six years,
Speaker 1: and you know, I'm the chairman of the Republican Party
Speaker 1: here now going into my first month in that position.
Speaker 1: But I still think as well, when you look at
Speaker 1: the fact that the left is really embracing this far
Speaker 1: you know, socialist Marxist approach. You've got a lot in
Speaker 1: the Hispanic community there, especially venez Whelans down to South
Speaker 1: Florida and also Cubans. They don't want to see that
Speaker 1: they fled from Venezuela and Cuba to take root in
Speaker 1: the United States of America. So I think that Florida
Speaker 1: is going to be successful as well. But you have
Speaker 1: to be concerned, of course, without a doubt, with the
Speaker 1: exodus of so many people from California, Illinois, New York,
Speaker 1: New Jersey, many of them moving into Tennessee, Florida, even
Speaker 1: here into Texas, that they cannot bring those failed ideologies
Speaker 1: with them from whence they were fleeing. And I want
Speaker 1: to ask your opinion of the ticket now that we
Speaker 1: know what it is, Biden, Kamala Harris, what do you
Speaker 1: make of Kamala Harris as a political opponent? Obviously you're
Speaker 1: not a Harris supporter, neither of mine, right, so we
Speaker 1: can we know that. But what do you think of her?
Speaker 1: How you know you're somebody who understands war gaming very well,
Speaker 1: Lieutenant colonel, how do you war game her as an
Speaker 1: opponent here in politics going into this November decision point
Speaker 1: well as the chairman of the Republican Party of Texas,
Speaker 1: she just made my job incredibly easy. I mean, here's
Speaker 1: a person that embraces the Green New Deal. The last
Speaker 1: thing that anyone in Texas wants to here is that
Speaker 1: you wanted to get rid of the oil and gas
Speaker 1: industry in the next ten to twelve years. She doesn't
Speaker 1: believe that people should have a private health insurance. That's
Speaker 1: something that she said. And we are a border state
Speaker 1: and she believes that the borders should be open and
Speaker 1: that illegal immigrants should get free healthcare. Texas is the
Speaker 1: number one state in the United States of America for
Speaker 1: human and sex trafficking. And we have a ticket with
Speaker 1: former Vice President Biden and Kamala Harris to believe in
Speaker 1: open borders, decriminalizing crossing our border illegally. What does that
Speaker 1: tell you their concerns about the young men and young
Speaker 1: women to be in traffic right here in the great
Speaker 1: state of Texas. So she's going to be a gift
Speaker 1: that go. We'll keep on giving and we'll draw that
Speaker 1: clear delineation. Lieutenant Colonel Allen West, author commentator, former Congressman.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, before I let you go, sir, I wanted
Speaker 1: to also just see how are you doing in Texas
Speaker 1: right now with COVID. I had a lot of listeners
Speaker 1: because we have a great audience of Texas and particularly
Speaker 1: in the Austin area. Okay, LBJ Austin. We had a
Speaker 1: lot of listeners right again saying that they were very
Speaker 1: disappointed that Texas seem to be locking down hard, and
Speaker 1: you know, they were starting to believe some of the
Speaker 1: more extreme mandates were necessary to fight against COVID. How
Speaker 1: are you doing and how do you see the way
Speaker 1: forward for your state? Well, without a doubt, I think
Speaker 1: the most important thing is that we have to focus
Speaker 1: on the most severely affected demographics. When you look the
Speaker 1: median age for COVID nineteen deaths of seventy eight, which
Speaker 1: is really about the life expectancy age for the United
Speaker 1: States of America. So we have to protect our senior citizens.
Speaker 1: But we also need to make sure that we are
Speaker 1: doing the things that enable us to continue to be
Speaker 1: the tenth largest economy in the world, make sure that
Speaker 1: our oil and gas industry stays viable. So when you
Speaker 1: look at the numbers, Buck, I mean twenty nine million
Speaker 1: people here in Texas, really about point zero four percent
Speaker 1: had lost their lives due to COVID nineteen. So I
Speaker 1: think that we need to be sensible and not allow
Speaker 1: this to become a political issue treated as a medical issue. Senna,
Speaker 1: Colonel Allen West. Always great to have you, sir, comeback soon.
Speaker 1: Let's talk you before this election actually happens. Thanks so much, Buck,
Speaker 1: Take care you're in the freedom hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck sex and show podcast. My buddy is back, everyone,
Speaker 1: Sager and Jetty in the house. He is a co
Speaker 1: host of a show called um Well, It's on HILLTV
Speaker 1: and I actually rising, so I was about to call
Speaker 1: it real now. Ever, look this was I used to
Speaker 1: be a host of the show, so I didn't forget
Speaker 1: him on purpose, That's right. I swear to god. I
Speaker 1: was about to call it real news, which is what
Speaker 1: I did at the Blaze. I'm so sorry. Sager Rising
Speaker 1: a great show on YouTube and on the Hill dot
Speaker 1: com called Rising. I was a coast there. Sager sits
Speaker 1: now in the conservative chair holding it down with our
Speaker 1: mutual buddy Crystal Ball, representing the left wing point of you.
Speaker 1: Check it out on YouTube. Follow Sager on Twitter. Mister Sager,
Speaker 1: good to have you back, buddy. Good to see a buck.
Speaker 1: How are you, man? I mean, I'm a New York
Speaker 1: you're in DC. I feel like we're both living in
Speaker 1: these very expensive prisons run by idiots. Yeah no, I
Speaker 1: mean that's exactly right, Buck. I mean, you know, life
Speaker 1: here has basically been terrible for the last five months,
Speaker 1: and the only time it's been good is whenever I left.
Speaker 1: So there you go. There we go, so I want
Speaker 1: to ask you about so. So, here's my take on
Speaker 1: the on the Kamala Biden ticket is that in a way,
Speaker 1: this is just seeing once again if the Democrat elites
Speaker 1: can convince enough normal Americans that the far left is
Speaker 1: not like either of these candidates. We know that, right,
Speaker 1: these are not the Democrat socialist to prove it's not
Speaker 1: Warren or Bernie or anything. So it's not the real
Speaker 1: hardcore base of the party. And they're gonna try to
Speaker 1: get the sort of middle of America voters to think
Speaker 1: that Biden's not scary and crazy. But talk to me
Speaker 1: about why the elites like, particularly Kamala Harris in Tech
Speaker 1: on Wall Street. Yeah, Buck, The reason they love her
Speaker 1: is because there's she's somebody who appears to be moderate, right,
Speaker 1: And this is the thing, our political language is broken.
Speaker 1: Everybody's like, oh, Kamala Harris is so moderate, but it's like, well,
Speaker 1: we don't have the language currently to describe somebody who's
Speaker 1: like pro reparations, anti ice, you know, basically pro open borders,
Speaker 1: but also pro Wall Street. Right. So what they love
Speaker 1: about her is that they can say she's the most progressive, right,
Speaker 1: That's what you're what you're alluding to. They're trying to
Speaker 1: con younger, normal Americans and say, no, no no, no, she's
Speaker 1: one of you. She's a progressive person, while at the
Speaker 1: same time she's a stooge of them. This is the
Speaker 1: best part, right, Like, do you know how Biden tested
Speaker 1: his vice presidency given his mental capacity, You would think, like,
Speaker 1: you know, they want somebody with the affairs of the world,
Speaker 1: you want somebody to experienced. No, here's what he did.
Speaker 1: He basically gave every prospect the ability to headline a
Speaker 1: Wall Street fundraiser. Whoever brought in the most cash, that
Speaker 1: person got the Vice President. You guessed it. Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: She's the one the Wall Street in Silicon Valley. I
Speaker 1: mean she literally represents Silicon Valley. They loved her whenever
Speaker 1: she was a candidate, even though no actual citizens like her.
Speaker 1: And then whenever she was a VP prospect, she headlined
Speaker 1: these events for Biden, raised a boatload of cash. That's
Speaker 1: what this is all about, Buck, It's about they want
Speaker 1: to be able to go Scott free in a Biden
Speaker 1: administration and then let them push all this race identitarian
Speaker 1: immigration nonsense. And the rest of us are the ones
Speaker 1: who get screwed. Why do you what do you think
Speaker 1: is the reason or what are the reasons that the
Speaker 1: Democrat elites really I mean they want to remember it's
Speaker 1: not like, oh, Kamala is acceptable to them. They were
Speaker 1: all you know, and I'm jurnalist Savacy. I consider them
Speaker 1: the poorly paid democrat elites. Right, journals are the ones
Speaker 1: they're like clinging onto their rich cousins in the in
Speaker 1: the tech and Hollywood, you know, oligarchy. But in Wall Street,
Speaker 1: which people wait, can we just do a little side here? Um,
Speaker 1: And I was about to call you, Tucker Jesus because
Speaker 1: you're on Tucker Show all the time. Sager. When are
Speaker 1: people going to realize that Wall Street is Democrat? Now?
Speaker 1: How do we get this to change? Wall Street? The
Speaker 1: big hedge funds, Goldman Sacks, they are Democrat tacks. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they have been for a long time. Buck, I mean
Speaker 1: that's the truth. And look like you can go, I
Speaker 1: don't need you don't need to believe Buck, you don't
Speaker 1: need to believe me. You don't need to believe Tucker.
Speaker 1: Go look at the money. There's a graphic in Bloomberg
Speaker 1: that shows you there's only one guy on Wall Street
Speaker 1: who's really giving Trump any money right now, Steve Schwartzman
Speaker 1: from Blackstone, everybody else is going for Biden. A lot
Speaker 1: of the people there from twenty twenty sixteen and supported
Speaker 1: Trump gone. They're all in favor of Biden and of
Speaker 1: Kamal and Harris. So look, when the richest people in
Speaker 1: the country are all backing somebody, they did not get
Speaker 1: rich out of the goodness of their hearts. Okay, there's
Speaker 1: something going on now. Biden promised these people behind closed
Speaker 1: doors in an openly reported Pool report. You can go
Speaker 1: see it as a quote he told Wall Street quote
Speaker 1: nothing will fundamentally change. Well, we're living through what the
Speaker 1: most transformative economic moment like in probably one hundred years.
Speaker 1: That's a great message if you were living on Wall Street.
Speaker 1: And look these people. What I love about them is
Speaker 1: how naked they are. Front page of the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal today says Wall Street size relief because of Kamala Harris. Right.
Speaker 1: First article, first CNBC article that's in reaction to Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris says Wall Street approves of Kamala Harris. Now again,
Speaker 1: these people don't approve because they're you know, they're like
Speaker 1: social justice warriors. Although they do support social justice causes
Speaker 1: for the rest of us while they continue to make
Speaker 1: billions and billions of dollars. They do it because they
Speaker 1: know they're going to get away. And I think the
Speaker 1: Tucker said it back, which is that private equity barons
Speaker 1: are the ones who are happiest to keep Americans divided
Speaker 1: amongst race lines while their taxes get cut in half.
Speaker 1: I think that's exactly what's going to happen under their administration. Yes,
Speaker 1: I always think of the checks that flow from Hollywood
Speaker 1: ultra millionaires and really that you're talking about producers and
Speaker 1: you know, studio execs, although not as much anymore as
Speaker 1: you are. This the very well known, you know, famous
Speaker 1: actors who are always writing checks for climate change. It's
Speaker 1: like indulgences in the medieval church. You know, they're they're
Speaker 1: they're sending these checks to social justice causes so that
Speaker 1: they can continue to find tax shelters and fly private. Right.
Speaker 1: We all know how the lifestyle liberalism, how the life
Speaker 1: cell liberalism game works, you know. So we're speaking of
Speaker 1: Soger and Jetty. He is co host of Rising on
Speaker 1: Hill TV. You you guys should be following on Twitter.
Speaker 1: He's also a regular guest on Tucker Carlson Show, which
Speaker 1: I think, well, I'll say, I think is the best
Speaker 1: show on Fox News. I won't speak for Sogerum at Tucker.
Speaker 1: I didn't. It just happened. I'm sorry. I don't know
Speaker 1: why it's stuck in my head. Sager, not Tucker, Sager.
Speaker 1: You often are out there making the case about big Tech.
Speaker 1: We had these hearings recently. We covered it here on
Speaker 1: the show. Are we going to see any change with
Speaker 1: any of this? Because now, more than ever, it seems
Speaker 1: apparent to me two things. One, big Tech is so
Speaker 1: much more powerful. This isn't like one company on Wall
Speaker 1: Street that's having a really good year. They are I mean,
Speaker 1: they're monopolies, right, So they're so powerful, and they're so
Speaker 1: politically aligned with the Democrat Party in ways that people
Speaker 1: I think are just really beginning to grasp. But is
Speaker 1: anything going to change? We had these hearings, some good speeches.
Speaker 1: Josh Holly's smart on this issue. There's some people that
Speaker 1: make a lot of sense. But I feel like we're
Speaker 1: all still going to be buying all of our stuff
Speaker 1: from Amazon. No, there you go. That's it, Buck, which
Speaker 1: is that big Tech has bought both liberals and conservatives,
Speaker 1: and now even though they might be liberals, conservatives are
Speaker 1: allowing themselves to really get caned by this issue. And
Speaker 1: you're right, which is, yeah, the hearings buy and large.
Speaker 1: I mean, some of it was okay, But the Republican
Speaker 1: Party needs to step up. They need to start actually
Speaker 1: fighting on behalf of their voters. Because ask yourself this,
Speaker 1: If AT and T the Bell company and you're vital,
Speaker 1: you're like, say you're Verizon Internet Service were liberal and
Speaker 1: let's say even then, okay, they're liberal, but they don't
Speaker 1: mess with who you talk to on the phone, how
Speaker 1: you conduct yourself on your Internet or other things. That's
Speaker 1: essentially the version of big tech in terms of how
Speaker 1: you and I communicate with each other on different social platforms.
Speaker 1: On you and I buy things online like say Amazon.
Speaker 1: One of the things that's an amazing statistic is that
Speaker 1: eighty two percent of American households have Amazon Prime. Okay,
Speaker 1: there are not eighty two percent of American households that
Speaker 1: do anything else that they have in common. Maybe eating, sleeping,
Speaker 1: and breathing. That's about it, right. There are less Americans
Speaker 1: who buy Christmas trees then who have Amazon Prime memberships.
Speaker 1: So at this point, Amazon Prime is like American is
Speaker 1: Apple Pie. Shouldn't Congress be interested in, like I don't know,
Speaker 1: at least knowing how they conduct businesses, knowing whether they're
Speaker 1: discriminating against you or I. Since it's almost up there
Speaker 1: in terms of public utility, there are public utilities that
Speaker 1: less people use than Amazon Prime, just to give you
Speaker 1: an example. So at this point there is something where
Speaker 1: conservative lawmakers need to update the way that they think
Speaker 1: about this stuff and say, hey, you know what, this
Speaker 1: falls within my purview, but a lot of them are
Speaker 1: just not there yet. Buck change it? How Sager? How
Speaker 1: could how could we make the changes needed in big tech? Well, see,
Speaker 1: this is such a hard question because what the reason
Speaker 1: I was really against the way that those hearings were
Speaker 1: conducted is Amazon is e commerce. Apple is a hardware company.
Speaker 1: Facebook is a social media platform, and who was the
Speaker 1: fourth one who was up? There? Was it? So we
Speaker 1: had Facebook? Oh, Google? And Google is a search engine. Right,
Speaker 1: those are four distinct monopolies. Those are four distinct industry
Speaker 1: So the same fix doesn't apply to all of those.
Speaker 1: But what does apply is what I talked about was
Speaker 1: the change in thinking ideology to admit that, Hey, it's
Speaker 1: okay as a Republican you can be for free markets,
Speaker 1: and you can be for competition and for free speech
Speaker 1: and many of the other things that we all dear
Speaker 1: in our society, our constitution, our way of life, and
Speaker 1: be okay with telling this business, which has so much
Speaker 1: power over the way that you and I conduct our lives,
Speaker 1: to say, hey, you know what, if you're going to
Speaker 1: you know, count out to the Chinese government, that's not okay.
Speaker 1: You're not allowed to do business here then, Or if
Speaker 1: you are going to discriminate against your conservative customers, then
Speaker 1: it's actually on us to say, no, We're going to
Speaker 1: protect your rights as an American citizen to be able
Speaker 1: to maintain your ability to speak in a free public
Speaker 1: square as we have always guaranteed you since seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 1: That's the way that we have to change it. We
Speaker 1: have to change the way that we start to think.
Speaker 1: So before that then we can get to policy change.
Speaker 1: Where should folks go to get more of Sagara and
Speaker 1: Jetty's wisdom? Oh well the Hill on YouTube and Twitter
Speaker 1: dot com. Slasher es a gr there it is, o man, Soger,
Speaker 1: have a great one, buddy, We'll talk to you soon. Thanks, Bo,
Speaker 1: appreciate you. Thanks for listening to The bus Esson Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. What does diversity training have
Speaker 1: to do with a nuclear lab or, as President Bush,
Speaker 1: you should say, a nuclear lab What does that have
Speaker 1: to do with it? Well, this coming courtesy of the
Speaker 1: Washington Free Beacon. There's a federally funded nuclear weapons laboratory
Speaker 1: that made their white man employees participate in racial re
Speaker 1: education training. Oh my, this piece by Alex Nestor quote
Speaker 1: Sandia National Laboratory. To government contract, the nuclear weapons laboratory
Speaker 1: required its white male employees to participate in a racial
Speaker 1: re education seminar. Leaked documents reveal at the three day
Speaker 1: training session called White Men's Caucus on Eliminating Racism, Sexism,
Speaker 1: and Homophobia in Organizations, participants were encouraged to examine their
Speaker 1: privilege as white heterosexual men. Christopher Rufo, a visiting fell
Speaker 1: at the Heritage Foundation. He's a guy who also got
Speaker 1: those documents from the Seattle diversity training that I've read.
Speaker 1: I've read to you here on the show. He has
Speaker 1: leaked documents from the seminar. So this wasn't even a
Speaker 1: foyer request. He got leaked documents and oh, here we go.
Speaker 1: This is a nu nuclear research facility, folks, federally funded. Okay,
Speaker 1: the federal governments running a research facility for nukes, and
Speaker 1: we need people to be like, check your privilege quotes.
Speaker 1: Trainers asked participants to think of words associated with white
Speaker 1: male culture and created a list which included k KK,
Speaker 1: privileged and maga hat. Maga hat is a privilege, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: did you know that? I was unaware that it's considered
Speaker 1: a privilege, But to buy a Team Buck hat on
Speaker 1: the website would be considered just a smart thing to
Speaker 1: do as soon as we actually have that, which we
Speaker 1: don't yet. I'm talking to our digital team. It's man, producer, Mark.
Speaker 1: Are we just teasing people now? What? You're just teasing
Speaker 1: people now? No? But I keep getting told this week,
Speaker 1: this week, and it hasn't I know. And there's also
Speaker 1: there's another thing, a podcast about a small island in
Speaker 1: the central Mediterranean where there was a pivotal battle in
Speaker 1: fifteen sixty five. I don't know it's gonna happen. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so except expect Team Buck merchandise by what twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four or so, it's gonna happen. It's gonna happen. Mark
Speaker 1: is the alms budsman for all of you who remind
Speaker 1: me of things that I've said are going to happen
Speaker 1: that haven't happened yet. So don't worry. It's gonna happen anyway.
Speaker 1: Trainers ask participants to think of words associated with white
Speaker 1: male culture and created a list in which which included KKK,
Speaker 1: privilege and maga hat. An example of systemic privilege, according
Speaker 1: to one document, is having role models in the public
Speaker 1: eye that outweigh the Ted Kazinskis of white maleness. I
Speaker 1: don't even know what that means of role models that
Speaker 1: outweigh that Ted Kazinskis of white maleness. Quote. I routinely
Speaker 1: witness and benefit from the many positive white male role
Speaker 1: models displayed in the media, politics, and entertainment that far
Speaker 1: outweigh the Ti MC phase and Ted Kazinskis of white maleness,
Speaker 1: the document reads. One document said rugged individualism, a can
Speaker 1: do attitude, and operating from principles and conscience are vestigial
Speaker 1: attitudes that once helped white men survive. Another listed statements
Speaker 1: of privilege, which included assertions like white privilege is being
Speaker 1: the first in line, first to be served, first to
Speaker 1: be noticed, first to be listened to, and that men
Speaker 1: can ogle women and get a pass from their colleagues.
Speaker 1: Participants wrote apology messages to women, people of color, and
Speaker 1: other groups as a reflection at the end of the seminar.
Speaker 1: This is a religious belief. Now, friends, this is religious
Speaker 1: indoctrination because liberalism. Liberalism killed God. Right, They've eliminated God.
Speaker 1: We all know that. And now that they've eliminated God,
Speaker 1: they've replaced God with this state. But they've also increased
Speaker 1: They've also included in that in order to control us,
Speaker 1: this indoctrination of the separate separateness of us all by
Speaker 1: immutable characteristics, and to turn us on each other based
Speaker 1: upon that. This is This is also intersectionality. You don't
Speaker 1: hear that term as much anymore, but that was the
Speaker 1: in vogue term in academian liberal circles. For what this is.
Speaker 1: Intersectionality is just you are in constant with everyone in
Speaker 1: society around you who is different from you in different ways,
Speaker 1: and the most the most guilty of creating such conflicts,
Speaker 1: and the ones and the ones who are the only
Speaker 1: ones who will be held responsible for creating all such conflicts,
Speaker 1: or white males. White males are in a tough category
Speaker 1: with regard to that interesting that this is what we're
Speaker 1: all supposed to accept. We're being trained, we're being taught
Speaker 1: now that this is and being taught using federal dollars,
Speaker 1: that white males need to just constantly be sorry. And
Speaker 1: I can tell you this much. I have yet to
Speaker 1: meet a white male who has gone to any of
Speaker 1: these trainings and said, yeah, you know, I'm really glad
Speaker 1: I learned to confront my systemic racism. But I worked
Speaker 1: in the federal government and I worked for local government
Speaker 1: in New York, and I know that we do a
Speaker 1: lot of these similar, similar trainings. And the one thing
Speaker 1: I always thought, here, here's just an example. One thing
Speaker 1: goes that's kind of funny was that whenever we were
Speaker 1: doing terror training when I was working, and this was
Speaker 1: outside contract, this wasn't classified stuff. This was more of
Speaker 1: the procedures and all that that you'd have when I
Speaker 1: would do terrorism training stuff, it was always a guy
Speaker 1: named Phil who was some white area nation guy wanted
Speaker 1: to blow up a building or something. That was always
Speaker 1: the It was never anybody that would be associated with oh,
Speaker 1: I don't know, ISIS or jihadism. For all the training modules,
Speaker 1: it was always a guy named Phil who lives next
Speaker 1: door to you in the suburbs, and you know, it's
Speaker 1: just a little too patriotic, so he wants to blow
Speaker 1: things up. That was the the examples that they make,
Speaker 1: believe examples they would always use. But this political correctness
Speaker 1: has infected the entire federal government. It's affected our entire culture,
Speaker 1: and it is It is absurd, but it is also damaging.
Speaker 1: It is destructive, and I think a part of this
Speaker 1: as well is not only is it wasteful, but it's counterproductive.
Speaker 1: So it's dumb, and if anything, I think it works
Speaker 1: against the intended purpose, because the commentary, for example, in
Speaker 1: those terrorism tradings when we walk out of them among
Speaker 1: everybody who was really doing that work day in and
Speaker 1: day out, was oh, okay, I'm glad we need to
Speaker 1: be on the lookout for our neighbor named Phil who
Speaker 1: wants to blow up a federal building. When we're handling
Speaker 1: ninety seven percent of the cases we're seeing right now
Speaker 1: that our federal terrorism cases are geehutis I'm related. But
Speaker 1: I'm glad we're worried about our neighbor Phil. You know
Speaker 1: that's the reaction that people actually have to these things.
Speaker 1: But libs don't care. You're in the freedom hud. This
Speaker 1: is the buck Sexton Show podcast, rock and roll. Fellow patriots,
Speaker 1: we made ours go up to eleven. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call. Roll call everybody. If you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the roll call action, Facebook dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck Sexton, send a message on the Instagram The
Speaker 1: Graham as the kids call it. I think if you say,
Speaker 1: as the kids call it, you're not cool though. Um
Speaker 1: that's what That's what I've been told by the kids
Speaker 1: as it were on the Graham buck Sexton. And then, uh,
Speaker 1: if you want to send an email kick at old
Speaker 1: school teen Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com and producer Mark. What's
Speaker 1: your facts number? I don't have effacts, just checking, just
Speaker 1: making sure you're not napping on us, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. I don't think I've had a facts in
Speaker 1: my home in twenty years. Just making sure you know,
Speaker 1: keeping you on your keeping you on your toes. You
Speaker 1: have seen office space right, yes, right where they where
Speaker 1: they destroy the copy machine. That's how I've always felt
Speaker 1: about facts machines. You want to just destroy them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're e evil, evil devices that are always meant to fail,
Speaker 1: all right, kind of like Democrat policies and cities. Oh,
Speaker 1: let's get to it. Adam Buck. For the producer mark
Speaker 1: T shirt, I think it should say where is my
Speaker 1: multi podcast shields high? Oh, producer Mark, Apparently you have
Speaker 1: cousins who are writing in this week. I did not
Speaker 1: write that one, but that is hilarious. We have like
Speaker 1: a little island of multi that we put on it
Speaker 1: just with a question mark and then have producer mark
Speaker 1: written on the back of the T shirt. That would work,
Speaker 1: actually be kind of fun. I don't know how hard
Speaker 1: would it be for us if I if we wanted
Speaker 1: to bring back the character Commy Bear, which I don't
Speaker 1: think you're familiar with, to do like a little bear
Speaker 1: cartoon that we could put up on Instagram and stuff.
Speaker 1: We would that be doable? What do you think now?
Speaker 1: I'm an animator, I don't do enough. I mean I'm
Speaker 1: just wondering. You know, isn't there probably some computer program
Speaker 1: we could make like a little stupid bear and you
Speaker 1: know probably Yeah, I'm sure we'll do that very soon.
Speaker 1: Listen to the list. Yeah, na hill list, We'll get
Speaker 1: to it. What did I when did I say the
Speaker 1: T shirts would be ready two years after? Okay, you
Speaker 1: did tell me don't bring up the T shirts till
Speaker 1: we have them, And technically you were correct. That is
Speaker 1: fair because I was all excited. I should have said
Speaker 1: that about the multipodcast too. Yeah, I hope people are like,
Speaker 1: what Look, as soon as I have multipodcast dropped, I
Speaker 1: better see people passing the buck like wildfire, because this
Speaker 1: is just a labor of love, doing a free history
Speaker 1: podcast because I love this team so much. All Right,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get to it. I'm gonna get to it.
Speaker 1: Michael Buck. Yesterday you failed to report who who? Sorry
Speaker 1: you failed to report the most important news that was
Speaker 1: reported yesterday that Trump supported with major contributions Kamela Harris's campaigns.
Speaker 1: Actually he supported many major Democrats at a Schumer and Pelosi.
Speaker 1: But it explains to all this paraphrase, of course I did.
Speaker 1: I'm a businessman and had to grease the skids to
Speaker 1: get projects working. He also noted from time to time
Speaker 1: he had to work with organized criminals, but they had
Speaker 1: more respect for them because they kept the promises they made.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's major news man. I mean, look
Speaker 1: a lot of Michael, thanks for writing in. But a
Speaker 1: lot of people, especially that are businessmen in major cities,
Speaker 1: they'll just give money to all the political can they're
Speaker 1: it's just hedging their bets. They just give money to
Speaker 1: whoever they can give money to. That's what they do,
Speaker 1: you know, that's that's the way it is. People do
Speaker 1: that also with prosecutors. I gotta tell you, if someone's
Speaker 1: running for district attorney, you have the money, give them
Speaker 1: a little money to every district attorney that's gonna run.
Speaker 1: If you can afford it. It's not a bad move.
Speaker 1: If you're a rich person, little's only I think you
Speaker 1: can only give whatever them. I don't even know what
Speaker 1: the max. It was the twenty five hundred dollars or something.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the max is for these I
Speaker 1: that's the funny thing. We have all these rules about elections.
Speaker 1: None even knows them. Don't even really understands any of
Speaker 1: this stuff. Oh, but you know it's gonna keep us
Speaker 1: all safe from corroding our democracy. Yeah, democracy is pretty corroded.
Speaker 1: I hate to say it. Mike writes, Hey, Buck, you
Speaker 1: and Mark are killing it on the show. Keep up
Speaker 1: the great work, Mike, you have excellent taste. Just want
Speaker 1: to ask if you could explain the term gas lighting.
Speaker 1: I loosely understand it, but wanted your own explanation. For
Speaker 1: whatever reason, my Joe Biden brain makes me think of
Speaker 1: an old gas lantern anytime someone uses it. PS. I'm
Speaker 1: in Auckland, New Zealand. Oh wow, Team Buck, New Zealand,
Speaker 1: and it looks like armanic socialist leader is forcing us
Speaker 1: into lockdown version two scary times. Yep, you're gonna have
Speaker 1: I'm sorry to hear that about New Zealand. Man, I've
Speaker 1: been seeing this. New Zealand has a super strict lockdown
Speaker 1: in place. Keep doing it, Gonna keep going through until
Speaker 1: there's a vaccine. Keep going through it. Okay, people think
Speaker 1: that's the move. Notice how even even in a small
Speaker 1: island nation with the most extreme precautions, they still have
Speaker 1: outbreaks of the virus. Because the virus is gonna virus.
Speaker 1: We'll see. Oh as for gaslighting, I don't know where
Speaker 1: the term comes from. I can just tell you what
Speaker 1: it means. Gaslighting is when someone intentionally tells and intentionally
Speaker 1: takes a position or says something that they know to
Speaker 1: be untrue as a means of undermining your own grip
Speaker 1: on reality, and also as being kind of passive aggressive. Right, So, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's gaslighting, saying something obviously untrue and taking that position
Speaker 1: as a form of rhetorical attack. Here, let me actually,
Speaker 1: I'm curious if I were to read, if I were
Speaker 1: to take a definition of gaslighting off the internet, let
Speaker 1: me see what it says. Gaslighting a form of Yeah,
Speaker 1: a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or
Speaker 1: group covertly so seeds of doubt, making them question their
Speaker 1: own memory, often evoking them cognitive dissonance and other changes,
Speaker 1: including low self esteem using denial, misdirection, contradiction, and misinformation.
Speaker 1: The term originated, Oh this is fascinating. I'm learning something here.
Speaker 1: The term originated This is all from Wikipedia, by the way,
Speaker 1: which journals I know are not supposed to ever use.
Speaker 1: But I'm not a journal, so screw it. The term
Speaker 1: originated from the British play gas Slight nineteen thirty eight,
Speaker 1: but originally performed as Angel Street in the United States,
Speaker 1: and it's nineteen forty and forty four film adaptations The
Speaker 1: term has now been used in clinical psychological literature, as
Speaker 1: well as in political commentary and philosophy. Interesting Interesting. In
Speaker 1: interpersonal relationships, the victimizer needs to be right in order
Speaker 1: to preserve their own sense of self and their sense
Speaker 1: of having power in the world, and the victim allows
Speaker 1: the victimizer to define their sense of reality inasmuch as
Speaker 1: the victim idealizes them and seeks their approval. The psychological
Speaker 1: manipulation may include making the victim question their own memory, perception, insanity, Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 1: I didn't you know. It'd be like if you hit somebody,
Speaker 1: I didn't hit you. What are you talking about. I
Speaker 1: didn't hit you. That's like classic gaslighting if you hit
Speaker 1: somebody and then five minutes later you're like, I didn't
Speaker 1: hit you. Gaslighting. How easy must it be to do
Speaker 1: that to Joe Biden? What if? Who did? What? How
Speaker 1: easy must it be? Oh? Yeah, hit me, hit me,
Speaker 1: Brucia Mark, I want you to check out my leg hairs. Man,
Speaker 1: they're blonde from the sun. It's amazing long blonde leg
Speaker 1: hairs on Joe Biden? You want to check them out?
Speaker 1: I do not know. John is saying, Hey, Buck shields high,
Speaker 1: I listen to your comments about the five year old
Speaker 1: in Wilson who was executed. You are correct. This story
Speaker 1: has even been touched by the local media. Had the
Speaker 1: situation been reversed, the city of Raleigh would probably be
Speaker 1: in flames right now. Raleigh's pathetic Mayor, Maryann Baldwin did
Speaker 1: not allow Raleigh police to protect people in businesses. Back
Speaker 1: when the riots were occurring, downtown Raleigh had made a
Speaker 1: big comeback from twenty years ago. It was thriving and alive.
Speaker 1: Baldwin set the city back twenty years. Businesses are now
Speaker 1: boarded up downtown as a ghost town. Baldwin was far
Speaker 1: more concerned about making sure people did not go out
Speaker 1: to bars on South Glenwood and Raleigh than she was
Speaker 1: about preventing looting and destruction. By the way, I think
Speaker 1: that through a lot of libs, a lot of libs
Speaker 1: much more concerned that you wear a mask that your
Speaker 1: business doesn't burn down. Robert, my family are big fans
Speaker 1: of your show. Your speech at the start of the
Speaker 1: second hour of Wednesday show on the theft and others
Speaker 1: moralities is at the center of our conservatives foundation. The
Speaker 1: one thing to hold fast to is the law abiding
Speaker 1: side of America. I have heard several compatriots say the
Speaker 1: sooner we as Republicans figure out that the Dams play dirty,
Speaker 1: we should too. My response is always the same. If
Speaker 1: you feel that way, you should join the Dams. Cheating
Speaker 1: to win is cowardly, and that is exactly what playing
Speaker 1: dirty is. Cheating or Robert Team Buck's a big fan
Speaker 1: of your family for being fans, being a part of
Speaker 1: what we do here. Thank you so much. Oh one
Speaker 1: more thing, he says, a coward dies a thousand deaths,
Speaker 1: but a hero only dies once. Thank you, Bucking producer
Speaker 1: Mark for being a part of that foundation and Sean
Speaker 1: Rens Buck love the show. I'm a hooked on the
Speaker 1: truth you tell about the state of this country. I
Speaker 1: recently read an article about NYC neighboring counties forbidding their
Speaker 1: officers from pursuing or resting criminals, one that crossed an
Speaker 1: ny See proper, this being due to Comrade at Blasio's
Speaker 1: bill that limits forced to apprehend a suspect. So your
Speaker 1: city will soon turn into a haven for the criminal element.
Speaker 1: Before you our need of a rescue see Kurt Russell
Speaker 1: and escape from New York and get out of there.
Speaker 1: Shield's High. Well, Sean, thanks for the update. My man
Speaker 1: and I have not yet seen Escape from New York,
Speaker 1: but it's on my list. I'm gonna be out tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Mike Slater is gonna be in for me. It gonna
Speaker 1: be a great show. Please do give Mike your attention, team,
Speaker 1: and I'll be back on Monday. I'm gonna be in
Speaker 1: Craven County, North Carolina tomorrow. Get a little GOP address.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be fun. If you're in the neighborhood to
Speaker 1: come check it out. Until next time, my friends, you
Speaker 1: have your orders. Shield's High.