Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Mark Mos Show,
Speaker 1: where today we are talking about the signal we're seeing
Speaker 1: right now that signals the changing of the guard. Now
Speaker 1: something I've been talking about for quite a while, and
Speaker 1: it is summed up in what I've been calling the
Speaker 1: Fight of our lives. Now. I've done many talks talking
Speaker 1: about cycles and revolutionary cycles, decentralized revolution cycles. I talk
Speaker 1: about the battle for the fate of humanity. But I
Speaker 1: believe right now we are in the fight of our lives.
Speaker 1: This is we, the people versus the powers that be,
Speaker 1: the government, the state, if you want to call it that.
Speaker 1: The battle for the fight of our lives comes down
Speaker 1: to us having freedom, and ultimately it comes down to
Speaker 1: us being able to control our freedom and our rights
Speaker 1: and access to technologies. And either we get the fire,
Speaker 1: we get the technology that enables us to continue to
Speaker 1: flourish as a society, continue to think, communicate, expand become
Speaker 1: more efficient and all these things, or the state, the
Speaker 1: ever growing state, trying to hold on to power, takes
Speaker 1: control of this technology and is able to remain in
Speaker 1: power and limits our ability to have freedom. This is
Speaker 1: the fight of our lives. I talk about it on
Speaker 1: a regular basis. And the story that I'm going to
Speaker 1: break down for you today highlights this point better than anything.
Speaker 1: This is the signal that shows the changing of the guard.
Speaker 1: This story highlights, it emphasizes why all of these stories
Speaker 1: that I've been talking about, from freedom and privacy and censorship,
Speaker 1: why they're all coming to a head right now. This
Speaker 1: story puts a pin in this. And I say it
Speaker 1: all the time, right I say that technology is what
Speaker 1: changes the world. Technology is what changes the world because
Speaker 1: it changes the way that we organize, the way that
Speaker 1: we communicate, right, And this is exactly what we're talking about.
Speaker 1: We're I want to show you today how technology has
Speaker 1: done this. I want to show you how you can
Speaker 1: see how it's this technology that's rapidly changing society as
Speaker 1: we know it. There was a court case, all right,
Speaker 1: a court case that brought this right to the front
Speaker 1: of the public consciousness. If you know what you're looking at. Anyway,
Speaker 1: some people just look at it as a court case.
Speaker 1: But if you know what you're looking at, if you
Speaker 1: know where the dots are, you can start to connect this.
Speaker 1: And it's so important to understand is because it signals
Speaker 1: the shifting of the balance of power. The state has
Speaker 1: a monopoly on violence and force, but the balance of
Speaker 1: power is shifting back to us, we the people, with
Speaker 1: this technology, and we see this pendulum is swinging. It's
Speaker 1: swinging the world and its shifting back from this centrally
Speaker 1: planned the centralization of power that you and the IMF,
Speaker 1: the BIS, et cetera total control to this decentralized world,
Speaker 1: this decentralized revolution. It's in full effect. It's in full
Speaker 1: swing now. The event that I want to break down
Speaker 1: for you might not be obvious to you, but the
Speaker 1: event I'm talking about is Sam Bankman freed, SBF, the
Speaker 1: trial that just happened, the conviction that just happened. Of
Speaker 1: course SBF and the FTX crypt currency exchange. But this
Speaker 1: is not about crypto. It's not about cryptocurrencies, it's not
Speaker 1: about Ponzi schemes. It's not even about the fraud. That's
Speaker 1: the story you've already heard. What I want to show
Speaker 1: you is what this story means, what this signal is,
Speaker 1: and how this shift and how this story signals this
Speaker 1: shift in the trust that we have in institutions, the
Speaker 1: power of the crowd, how it harnesses technology and it
Speaker 1: shifts the balance of power back to us, and more importantly,
Speaker 1: it highlights the reality of the fight of our lifetimes.
Speaker 1: I know there's a lot in this story that most
Speaker 1: people just aren't understanding, so let's just go ahead and
Speaker 1: jump into it now. I do want to just shout
Speaker 1: out to Bology. Biology wrote a paper kind of breaking
Speaker 1: down a lot of these moments. I'm using his paper
Speaker 1: for some of my research. I'm going to link to
Speaker 1: it in the show notes. Shout out to Biology. Hopefully
Speaker 1: we'll be meeting up in Texas, I believe, next week
Speaker 1: at the Texas Blockchain Association. But I'm going to link
Speaker 1: to his stuff down below if you want to read
Speaker 1: his whole story. But you know, the story back to this,
Speaker 1: who has the fire? This power that we have now
Speaker 1: with this technology and right now I'm talking about the Internet,
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about like some cryptocurrencies as well,
Speaker 1: but mainly this Internet. And I've been talking about this
Speaker 1: a lot of you. If you pay attention to my show,
Speaker 1: you know this. I covered it in a book that
Speaker 1: was written called The Revolt of the Public. I had
Speaker 1: the author on Martin Gurry. Go back to the podcast
Speaker 1: search the Mark Mass Show, search the Archives for Revolt
Speaker 1: of the Public Martin Gurry highly worth it or read
Speaker 1: the book. But basically, it's that the power of the
Speaker 1: state has always been in controlling the narrative, controlling the
Speaker 1: information that we have, controlling then what we think, what
Speaker 1: we can say. But the Internet is a piece is
Speaker 1: a piece of technology that's given us back the power
Speaker 1: to communicate without the need of the state. We no
Speaker 1: longer need the states approved TV channels or radio channels.
Speaker 1: They have control over the SEC or the newspapers, and
Speaker 1: now independent people like me could just create a channel
Speaker 1: and start putting on information. And it's that ability for
Speaker 1: us to quickly spin up information, citizen journalism, the ability
Speaker 1: for us to discuss these ideas, that's changed this balance
Speaker 1: of power. And like I said, it's never been more evident.
Speaker 1: So we're talking about the SBF case and it's sort
Speaker 1: of like if you grew up on watching Scooby Doo
Speaker 1: like I did. At the end of the Scooby Doo,
Speaker 1: it was like the Mystery Machine. They would go do
Speaker 1: this research and they would find, you know, this haunted
Speaker 1: mansion or this haunted amusement park, and they'd find out
Speaker 1: it was just some old guy that used to run it,
Speaker 1: and they would tie them up and they'd bring the
Speaker 1: police in and the criminal would be tied up, the
Speaker 1: police would come in, the case would be sealed, and
Speaker 1: then they would pull the mask off and the criminal
Speaker 1: would say, I would have gotten away for it if
Speaker 1: it wasn't for you pesky kids. That's exactly what happened.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what happened with SBF. It was sort of
Speaker 1: like a Scooby Doo movie. And now the Internet, the
Speaker 1: Internet slews. They found SBF out. They delivered him hog
Speaker 1: tiede directly to the police with the case sealed. Now
Speaker 1: that he's been convicted, well, we were still waiting on
Speaker 1: the sentencing. We'll see where that's at. He's eligible to
Speaker 1: get up to I think one hundred and ten years.
Speaker 1: Some people are saying he'll probably get much less. And
Speaker 1: you'll understand why I forget through this story. But now
Speaker 1: that he's been convicted, we're starting to see sort of
Speaker 1: like a rewriting of history, which is saying, look, the
Speaker 1: system worked, right, Look we found him guilty. You guys
Speaker 1: thought we'd let him off because he was a democratic darling,
Speaker 1: but look it worked. He got convicted. But that's not
Speaker 1: the case. That's not the case at all. They're trying
Speaker 1: to rewrite history to tell you that. So let me
Speaker 1: give you the long version of this, and so you
Speaker 1: can understand. Like I said, this is a big story,
Speaker 1: the fight of our lives. This tells you why. So
Speaker 1: the system did not work. Don't let them tell you
Speaker 1: that it did. Right, if you get the last question
Speaker 1: right on a test after failing every other one, you
Speaker 1: still fail the test. And that's exactly what happened. The state,
Speaker 1: the legacy institutions, the politicians, the journalists, the regulators, the
Speaker 1: criminal justice system all failed and then eventually succeeded. Okay,
Speaker 1: but it was only after failing everywhere else, and it
Speaker 1: was only after the demand of the public, only after
Speaker 1: the internet crowd the public, armed with the power of
Speaker 1: the Internet, built the entire case out for them, and
Speaker 1: didn't just build the entire case out for them, but
Speaker 1: then demanded that day take action. All right, So what
Speaker 1: am I talking about? Well, we know that it was
Speaker 1: people on the Internet. I'm gonna break this down for
Speaker 1: you that really brought this to the forefront. Now, none
Speaker 1: of this would have ever happened, potentially if it wasn't
Speaker 1: for the power of us having this fire of the internet. SBF,
Speaker 1: we know that he stole people's funds. Now, we know
Speaker 1: billions of dollars, tens of billions of dollars. We know
Speaker 1: that he used that stolen money to help swing elections
Speaker 1: across the country. These are facts, These are non arguable facts.
Speaker 1: These actions that he did can never be unwound. Those
Speaker 1: political figures are there now. So this means that in essence,
Speaker 1: SBF kind of took one for the team and the
Speaker 1: bad guys got away with it. Again. Now, this isn't
Speaker 1: some great triumph for the US establishment, right because again
Speaker 1: we have the Internet. The power of the crowd is
Speaker 1: what really caught SBF and brought him to justice, not
Speaker 1: the centralized state. All right, So we're going to break
Speaker 1: this down into a couple of pieces. I want to
Speaker 1: talk about how the the legacy institutions failed, how the
Speaker 1: politicians failed. We're going to talk about how the journalists failed.
Speaker 1: We're going to talk about how the regulators failed. We're
Speaker 1: going to talk about how the criminal justice system failed.
Speaker 1: And then we're going to talk about how the Internet succeeded,
Speaker 1: how decentralized technologies and protocols help the Internet succeed, and
Speaker 1: then we're going to talk about the bigger reason as
Speaker 1: to why they don't want you to have technology and
Speaker 1: freedom of speech. Everything else that you're seeing is going
Speaker 1: to make sense after we go through the story. Now,
Speaker 1: if you're just tune and you're listening to the markmas Show,
Speaker 1: we're always talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about how
Speaker 1: technology is changing the world, and like I said, this
Speaker 1: story highlights it all. You do not want to miss this.
Speaker 1: We have a whole lot to cover, but I got
Speaker 1: to take a quick break. So I'm gonna do a
Speaker 1: quick break. We're gonna come back. We're gonna cover all
Speaker 1: those things. Don't miss it. I'm going to be right back,
Speaker 1: all right, welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're
Speaker 1: listening to the Mark Maas Show, we're running through the
Speaker 1: decentralized Revolution. We're running through the court case of SBF
Speaker 1: and FTX and how he just got convicted. But it's
Speaker 1: a different story than what you're hearing in the news.
Speaker 1: We're digging into the failure of legacy institutions and how
Speaker 1: the power of the crowd swung this over so again,
Speaker 1: the system didn't work. Let's talk about the legacy institutions
Speaker 1: that failed us. So first off, we're going to talk
Speaker 1: about the politicians. Now, if you remember, this is all
Speaker 1: over the news, SBF was the number two donor to
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party after George. So now I've been talking
Speaker 1: about George Soros for a long time. Lots of other
Speaker 1: people have as well. Lately, you've been hearing George Soros
Speaker 1: being talked about by Elon Musk. Elon Musk, I think
Speaker 1: was on Joe Rogan, so I got probably one hundred
Speaker 1: millions of views talking about how he was a threat
Speaker 1: to society and evil danger on all these things. So,
Speaker 1: George Soros is the largest donor to the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: SBF was the number two donor. Now it's been admitted
Speaker 1: that he was one of the people most responsible for
Speaker 1: putting Joe Biden in the White House. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, FTX, Sam Bateman Fried's cryptocurrency change FTX was
Speaker 1: created right when Biden announced that he was going to
Speaker 1: run for president. So it looks like that's pretty interesting.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, on my main YouTube channel,
Speaker 1: just search Mark Moss FTX SBF, I did a video
Speaker 1: highlighting all of these connections between the time that FTX
Speaker 1: was created in Joe Biden announcing his campaign, if you
Speaker 1: want to look into that anyway. We know that he
Speaker 1: was the most responsible for putting Joe Biden in the
Speaker 1: White House, and we know now that he's convicted that
Speaker 1: he did this was stolen money, all right. Now, we
Speaker 1: know other democratics like Maxine Waters praised FBF for being candid.
Speaker 1: She welcomed him to testify to Congress even after his
Speaker 1: fraud was public, Even after even after we knew that
Speaker 1: he took all these people's money, tens of billions of dollars,
Speaker 1: She's still invitedment. Maxine Waters isn't just some Democratic politician.
Speaker 1: She is the chair of the House Financial Services Committee,
Speaker 1: all right. She's not just some politician the House Financial
Speaker 1: Services Committee. She was quote surprised that SBF was arrested
Speaker 1: before he had the prestigious opportunity to make his case
Speaker 1: before Congress. Why why was she surprised? She knew him personally,
Speaker 1: She'd been working closely with him. She was working with
Speaker 1: him closely on doing what capturing the regulatory state. She
Speaker 1: was putting through a bill that he was helping her
Speaker 1: with that would have criminalized all the decentralized finance platforms
Speaker 1: and instead benefited his centralized FTX platform, So he was
Speaker 1: using the state. They were working together to push a
Speaker 1: bill to criminalize you for using technology and only be
Speaker 1: allowed to use his platform. So we know that the
Speaker 1: politicians failed. Their nominal job is passing laws that are
Speaker 1: in the best interests of the public. That's you and I.
Speaker 1: They're supposed to be public servants, watching out for us
Speaker 1: and putting in things that would help us flourish, like
Speaker 1: having access to technology, but instead she worked with a
Speaker 1: known frauds he Likestambankment freed to instead push a bill
Speaker 1: that would criminalize you and I for using software and
Speaker 1: instead push everybody into his pocketbook. Now how did he
Speaker 1: accomplish that, Well, he legally bribed them, of course, he
Speaker 1: legally bribed them by being the second largest donor to
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. Now, a few of you guys gonna say, yeah, Mark,
Speaker 1: he gave some money to the Republicans, doue. He did
Speaker 1: a couple. He did a couple, a couple, A couple
Speaker 1: couple coins went to some Republicans, But they were the
Speaker 1: Republicans that were on these committees that were pushing his agenda.
Speaker 1: Don't get caught up in the labels here. Now, SBF
Speaker 1: legally bribed them by donating these campaigns. He pushed this
Speaker 1: legislation that was in his favor, and it would have
Speaker 1: it would have it would have favored his centralized power
Speaker 1: over everybody else. Now, he would have succeeded in this,
Speaker 1: him and the state. Maxine Waters would have succeeded if
Speaker 1: it wasn't for those pesky kids like Scooby Doo on
Speaker 1: the Internet. Now, the other legacy institution that failed us
Speaker 1: was the journalist. Now, journalists were supposed to have freedom
Speaker 1: of the press, because the freedom of the press is
Speaker 1: supposed to keep the transparency of the state open. They're
Speaker 1: supposed to actually do research and they're supposed to actually
Speaker 1: do real journalism that keeps everybody honest that they know
Speaker 1: if if they do something shady, they're going to be
Speaker 1: found out and it's going to be exposed. That's why
Speaker 1: they're protected. But again, legacy journalism failed us as a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, not did they just fail us. SBF
Speaker 1: was the toast of the town in mainstream media, the
Speaker 1: New York Times, maybe a mouthpiece for the government when
Speaker 1: all was just fawning all over Sam Bankman free. They
Speaker 1: were his they were his favorite or he was their
Speaker 1: favorite character. And as a matter of fact, even after
Speaker 1: this all became public, after we found out that he
Speaker 1: stole billions of dollars from the public, after he took
Speaker 1: I don't even know, countless hundreds of thousands of people's savings,
Speaker 1: literally if people broke even after that came to public view,
Speaker 1: the New York Times brought him on to a stage
Speaker 1: to something called the Deal Book Summit. After they knew
Speaker 1: he had taken millions or billions. They gave him a
Speaker 1: loud round of applause to speak to everybody. And it
Speaker 1: wasn't it's just that they did this, but they tried
Speaker 1: to swing public opinion in his favor after already knowing
Speaker 1: that he ruined people's lives and he stole billions of dollars. Now,
Speaker 1: if we contrast this to the other coverage that they've
Speaker 1: had of cryptocurrency, for example, we can see that the
Speaker 1: media's message for bitcoin is that bitcoin's a fraud, Bitcoin
Speaker 1: uses too much energy, But not SBF. He's a friend
Speaker 1: because look how much money he's given to media outlets.
Speaker 1: Look how much money's given to NGOs. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, Legacy Media even went as far as to
Speaker 1: call him the JP Morgan of Crypto. He was the guy.
Speaker 1: So the journalists who were supposed to be researching this
Speaker 1: and bringing this, exposing this to us, they failed. We
Speaker 1: have trusted legacy media to expose these things. We have
Speaker 1: trusted legacy media to educate us on these things. But
Speaker 1: they completely failed in their nominal job of informing the
Speaker 1: public and instead taking money and then trying to push
Speaker 1: public opinion. Even after we knew that he took billions
Speaker 1: of dollars, they continued to put him up into the public.
Speaker 1: They continued to write nice things about him. And again
Speaker 1: they would have they would have succeeded in this if
Speaker 1: it wasn't for those nosy kids, those pesky kids on
Speaker 1: the internet. We're going to tell you how these pesky
Speaker 1: kids did that in a second. Now we also see
Speaker 1: that the regulators failed. The regulators are there to regulate
Speaker 1: people like this, so they don't do things like this.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, the main regulator is the
Speaker 1: SEC Securities Exchange Commission. Their role, their only role is
Speaker 1: to protect consumers like you and I. Did they do
Speaker 1: a good job well? Ten billion dollars of consumer funds
Speaker 1: were stolen right beneath their nose, So would that be
Speaker 1: a passing grade? Did they protect consumers? Could they lead
Speaker 1: that they were ignorant about it? Well, again, if you
Speaker 1: go back and watch the video I did when all
Speaker 1: this broke through again, go back to my main YouTube, Pianel,
Speaker 1: Mark Moss, search Mark Moss and FTX, you'll find it.
Speaker 1: Gary Ginsler is tied directly into the entire FTX fiasco.
Speaker 1: If you want to see the dots, go back and
Speaker 1: watch that. Gary Ginsler, who's the head of the SECU,
Speaker 1: whose job is to protect you and I the consumer,
Speaker 1: is tied directly into this. Gary Ginsler went and met
Speaker 1: with SBF privately. Now this is not something that he
Speaker 1: does normally, this is not something that's given to other projects,
Speaker 1: but he did meet with SBF. Now there's a whole
Speaker 1: lot more to cover. If you're just tuning in, you're
Speaker 1: listening to the Mark Moss Show, I'm breaking down an
Speaker 1: event that just happened, SBF getting I'm convicted, But it's
Speaker 1: not the story that I'm telling I'm telling you why
Speaker 1: the government wants to censor and control us, and how
Speaker 1: this cracked this wide open and it shifts the balance
Speaker 1: of power. I'm gonna have a whole lot more to cover,
Speaker 1: but I gotta take a very quick break. Don't go away,
Speaker 1: I won't be right back. All right, welcome back. If
Speaker 1: you just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Mas Show.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about how Sam Bankman freed SBF and the
Speaker 1: FTX fiasco and how he was just convicted. But that's
Speaker 1: not the story we're talking about. You know that story,
Speaker 1: it's all over the news. What I'm talking about is
Speaker 1: what happened here and how this signals the shift in
Speaker 1: the balance of power that's happening, and how everything else
Speaker 1: that you're seeing in regards to censorship and spine and
Speaker 1: regulations all makes sense if you understand this story. So
Speaker 1: we covered how legacy institutions have failed us. We talked
Speaker 1: about how the legacy the politicians failed us. We talked
Speaker 1: about how the journalists failed us. And now we're talking
Speaker 1: about the regulator. So Gary gins are the head of
Speaker 1: the SEC again. Their only job is to protect the consumers.
Speaker 1: Consumers lost over ten billion dollars, so they failed. Gary
Speaker 1: Ginsler should resign in disgrace. The SEC should be shut down, dismantled,
Speaker 1: just on that alone. Now let's take a look at
Speaker 1: what actually happened. So whether he was, whether he knew
Speaker 1: about it or not, doesn't change the fact that he
Speaker 1: failed in his job to protect the consumer. So whether
Speaker 1: he knew or didn't know, he still failed. But did
Speaker 1: he know? So again, if you can watch that video
Speaker 1: on my Manuguer channel, you'll see the ties that he
Speaker 1: had with SBF. But he met with SBF privately, and
Speaker 1: again most people don't get that. Now, not only did
Speaker 1: he meet with SBF privately, so he had inside information,
Speaker 1: he was privy to information about FTX that most people
Speaker 1: didn't have. Not only did he do that, did he
Speaker 1: see that and not do anything? He then went and
Speaker 1: attacked all these other projects publicly, cases that he's lost publicly.
Speaker 1: The meeting that he had with FTX mentioned quote conditional
Speaker 1: no action relief. What does that mean. That means in
Speaker 1: regulatory translation, that they will not pursue enforcement against FTX.
Speaker 1: So so he went and met with him. Apparently maybe
Speaker 1: Sam bankman free to open the books. We don't know.
Speaker 1: There was lots of information he received and we know
Speaker 1: now this was the biggest fraud scam in the entire industry.
Speaker 1: Ten billion dollars, and Gary Ginsler, right under his nose,
Speaker 1: right after a private meeting, just said Nope, we're not
Speaker 1: going to do any regulatory action against them. Oh, but
Speaker 1: we are going to go after a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: these other things that we don't learn anything about. And
Speaker 1: we ended up losing. So the regulators failed in their
Speaker 1: nominal job of one flagging a bad project, two passing
Speaker 1: good projects, and instead they spent their time meeting with
Speaker 1: SBF and attacked bitcoin ETFs when Gary Ginsler has said
Speaker 1: that he knows their commodities, when we know it's a
Speaker 1: decentralized cryptocurrency. Why why did Gary Ginzer do that? Could
Speaker 1: it be that it's because SBF was his ally? How
Speaker 1: was he his ally well donating money to their party,
Speaker 1: using people like Maxine Waters and the Financial Service Committee,
Speaker 1: using Garriganzer to push for more regulatory power. So if
Speaker 1: you have power, you and I most likely we don't
Speaker 1: want power. People in government they do, they want more.
Speaker 1: So if SBF is giving you money and helping you
Speaker 1: pass bills to give you more regulatory power and giving
Speaker 1: you more money, then you want that, which is why
Speaker 1: regulators gave him special favors like private meetings, which is
Speaker 1: why Congress steered cryptoregulation to his preference, to his business.
Speaker 1: And they would have all gotten away with it if
Speaker 1: it wasn't for those pesky kids on the Internet, like
Speaker 1: Scooby Doo. Now let's talk about what did work. The
Speaker 1: internet worked the power of the crowd, crowdsourced information. There's
Speaker 1: been all these tests done where you test the power
Speaker 1: of the crowd, and so like at a county fair,
Speaker 1: they'd have like a big steer, like a cow, up
Speaker 1: on stage and they'd say, go, guess the weight of
Speaker 1: that steer, And as long as you had people that
Speaker 1: were reasonably knowledgeable, like farmers, and they would go put
Speaker 1: a vote in, like how much the cow the steerway,
Speaker 1: and they didn't see the other guesses. What they found
Speaker 1: is that when they averaged those out, it was crazy close.
Speaker 1: They did that with like cows, they did it with
Speaker 1: how many eminem's were in a jar, things like that.
Speaker 1: The power of the crowd is extremely powerful, and that's
Speaker 1: what the Internet gives to us. The Internet allows us
Speaker 1: to have all this information. So when somebody like the
Speaker 1: state spreads misinformation, we can instantly disprove it. Instantly, we
Speaker 1: can do the research. We can find the information and
Speaker 1: we can show it, we can show pictures, videos, whatever
Speaker 1: it is. And that's exactly what happened. The power of
Speaker 1: the crowd blew out legacy institutions and how did they
Speaker 1: do it well. It started with crypto investor Nick Tomino
Speaker 1: and he tweeted that FTX was suspect in both its
Speaker 1: trading activity and its policy advocacy. Now it started on Twitter.
Speaker 1: If Twitter was still controlled by the state, would that
Speaker 1: have allowed to be happened? I mean, we don't know.
Speaker 1: That's why Elon Musk said he wanted by Twitter. That's
Speaker 1: why he believes Twitter is so important. We need to
Speaker 1: allow this information to get out. Now, if it's up
Speaker 1: to this, they would have wanted to suppress this information.
Speaker 1: He tweeted it, and he tweeted about FTX suspect and
Speaker 1: his train activity and its policy avoccy. Then another crypto ceo,
Speaker 1: Eric Vorhees, confronted SBF on a podcast and that kind
Speaker 1: of blew it open. And then it culminated in another
Speaker 1: Internet site called coindest published an article by Ian Allison
Speaker 1: talking about all these shenanigans that SBF was doing, and
Speaker 1: it blew this fraud case wide open. Now none of
Speaker 1: this was driven by legacy media, legacy politicians, legacy regulators,
Speaker 1: or police. None of it. Even Washington Post, another mouthpiece
Speaker 1: for the government, admitted that citizen journalists outshine traditional media,
Speaker 1: the power of the crowd, the power of the Internet.
Speaker 1: But if you need to hide your agenda, if you
Speaker 1: need to control a narrative, you could easily understand why
Speaker 1: you wouldn't want the public to have access to this information.
Speaker 1: You see, the elites want to push what they call
Speaker 1: a technocracy. That means a government, a state that's run
Speaker 1: by not technologists, by experts. That's what a technocracy is.
Speaker 1: It's run by experts. So they want to have all
Speaker 1: the information. They want to have the power of the information.
Speaker 1: They don't want us to have it. Never did they
Speaker 1: imagine the balance of power would be shifted where the
Speaker 1: public would have access to the same information that they
Speaker 1: would and they would no longer be able to hide
Speaker 1: in this murkiness opacity, because now we the people, would
Speaker 1: have access to information, will be able to expose him,
Speaker 1: just like what happened. Now, after this happened, After Coindesk
Speaker 1: broke this article, things started moving really, really quickly, Binance
Speaker 1: CEO CZ said he was going to sell his stakes.
Speaker 1: SBF from FDx said, oh it's fine, it's fine, no
Speaker 1: big deal. But very quickly the community tested his claims.
Speaker 1: All this happened on the Internet, so everybody saw this,
Speaker 1: and very quickly the Internet, the power of the crowd,
Speaker 1: the decentralized community was able to fact check him because
Speaker 1: of Bitcoin. So bitcoin has an open, transparent ledger, so
Speaker 1: you can say, hey, we have the bitcoin, but the
Speaker 1: open transparent ledger shows the truth. And so because of
Speaker 1: the Bitcoin blockchain being open, Sam Bankman Frid couldn't continue
Speaker 1: the fraud. They couldn't cover it. Now, we can't emphasize
Speaker 1: this enough. It wasn't legacy journalists, wasn't politician, wasn't regulators,
Speaker 1: it wasn't the police. It was the Internet, the power
Speaker 1: of the crowd, and the decentralized power of the Bitcoin
Speaker 1: blockchain that was able to bring him to, you know,
Speaker 1: showing that he was a fraud. SBF was saying that oh,
Speaker 1: everything's fine, assets are fine, but they weren't. And because
Speaker 1: we could fact check it, he failed. So the network succeeded.
Speaker 1: The decentralized network succeeded, where the centralized power of the
Speaker 1: state failed. It was crypto Twitter that asked the hard
Speaker 1: questions that the crowd to the actual citizen journalism. They
Speaker 1: found the smoking gun. They published the proof on the Internet.
Speaker 1: And after that, only after that happened, Only after the
Speaker 1: power of the crowd, the Internet, the Scooby Doo mystery
Speaker 1: Magine went and found the crime, found all the evidence
Speaker 1: exposed it, tied it up and gave it to a
Speaker 1: gave it bow tide to the state. Did something happen?
Speaker 1: The Internet had cryptographic proof that SBF was a criminal
Speaker 1: on historic scale. By a November eleventh of twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: when ftx paused withdraws, they said that customers thought there
Speaker 1: was twenty thousand bitcoin in ftx, and we quickly found
Speaker 1: out they only had one, not twenty thousand bitcoin. One
Speaker 1: bitcoin that was found out and that was delivered. Now,
Speaker 1: SBF and his cronies they lied to the public. They
Speaker 1: said that, you know, they came up with all kinds
Speaker 1: of reasons. We have plenty of funds, but you know
Speaker 1: we can't we can't give them out right now for
Speaker 1: whatever reason. But they couldn't lie. Because of the bitcoin blockchain,
Speaker 1: millions of witnesses could independently confirm that their money was
Speaker 1: stolen by monitoring the network. Now, if you're just tuning in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Maas Show. I'm breaking down
Speaker 1: what happened with SBF and FTX, but not the story
Speaker 1: that you're hearing in the news. I'm telling you why
Speaker 1: this is bringing to front the battle for the fate
Speaker 1: of humanity, the battle of our lives. Right now, I'm
Speaker 1: trying to take aquick break. I'll be right back. Don't
Speaker 1: go away, all right, welcome back. If you just tune in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Maas Show, I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the SBF, the FTX fiasco. SBF just got convicted, it's
Speaker 1: facing one hundred and ten years. But that's not the
Speaker 1: story I'm telling. What I'm telling is a story that
Speaker 1: signals this massive shift in the balance of power. And
Speaker 1: if you understand this, you'll understand exactly why the state
Speaker 1: wants to censor and control technology all right now, So basically,
Speaker 1: the power of the crowd the Internet. They found all
Speaker 1: the information, they they bow tied SBF up, they gave
Speaker 1: him to the DOJ Department of Justice to go after
Speaker 1: But yet they wouldn't do anything. For weeks, nothing happened,
Speaker 1: Sam bankmin Freed was free going around. He's going around
Speaker 1: on TV shows. He's going to Good Morning America again.
Speaker 1: As I said earlier, the New York Times hosted them
Speaker 1: at an event and gave him a round of applause.
Speaker 1: He was still welcome to testify before Congress by the
Speaker 1: Chair of the House Financial Services after we already knew
Speaker 1: that he did this, but more importantly, while he was
Speaker 1: doing this. This is the point we have to drill
Speaker 1: into because one of the core lies being circuledl online
Speaker 1: right now is that the state succeeded in this. But
Speaker 1: that's not what happened. During this time. As he was
Speaker 1: allowed to remain free, as he was allowed to go
Speaker 1: on the speaking tour, as he was allowed to come
Speaker 1: in and testify in Congress, the legacy media and politicians
Speaker 1: were basically making his case to the court of public opinion.
Speaker 1: A lot of times these high profile cases, there's like
Speaker 1: gag orders and things like this because they don't want
Speaker 1: them to affect what the public perception is or what
Speaker 1: the jury might see. But during this time, they were
Speaker 1: changing the public perception of what was going on. That's
Speaker 1: part of the reason why this took so long. Now,
Speaker 1: this didn't happen in a vacuum. People see this, but
Speaker 1: most people don't understand this. Now, why did it happen
Speaker 1: so long? Why did it break down like this? Well, again,
Speaker 1: we broke down the legacy institutions, one of which was
Speaker 1: the justice system. Now we know. Back to George Soros,
Speaker 1: the bigger downer in front of SBF, being the number two.
Speaker 1: Soros has basically said, ah, you know what, let's not
Speaker 1: focus so much on the big presidential election, which of
Speaker 1: course he's there. Let's go more after the district attorneys,
Speaker 1: the dast Let's not try to change America through like
Speaker 1: changing the constitution or voting. Let's just change the justice
Speaker 1: system if we can change the way they prosecute crime.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what's happening. We can see now crime
Speaker 1: is de facto legal in most American cities. We see
Speaker 1: that all over the place. We see all through the
Speaker 1: major cities, the stores, even in Beverly Hills, the stores
Speaker 1: are having to leave because they can't afford to be
Speaker 1: there anymore. We're seeing prosecution of actual crimes winding down,
Speaker 1: put the prosecution of political crimes ramping up. Sure, go
Speaker 1: ahead and firebomb pregnancy Advocate center, go ahead and spray paint, graffiti,
Speaker 1: hate messages and threats. But if you're silently peacefully preying
Speaker 1: on a sidewalk, you're facing a decade in prison. These
Speaker 1: are political crimes, That's what's happening. We're seeing it all over.
Speaker 1: We're in the era of show trials, where Russiagate charges
Speaker 1: are slowly admitted to be false, while the Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: allegations are gradually acknowledged to be true. For years, we
Speaker 1: were fed this Russiagate phony case, which a lot of
Speaker 1: people saw through, and eventually they admitted that it was
Speaker 1: all fake, but they quietly did it, slowly did it
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. Everyone knew it was already true. They said
Speaker 1: it wasn't and then eventually they said it was true.
Speaker 1: Why because the power of the crowd was able to
Speaker 1: figure this out. But all this was only after the
Speaker 1: elections had already happened. We found out about russia Gate
Speaker 1: after it already changed the course of the election. We
Speaker 1: found about the Hunter Biden laptop after the election was
Speaker 1: already decided. No, the Biden administration pushed a letter with
Speaker 1: like fifty intelligence analysts saying that the Hunter Biden thing
Speaker 1: was false, even when the laptop had been known to
Speaker 1: be true since twenty nineteen by the FBI. None of
Speaker 1: this is justice. So this is why we don't trust
Speaker 1: the justice systems, why we don't trust the police. The
Speaker 1: fact that criminal justice system eventually grudgingly was forced to
Speaker 1: do something because the public put so much pressure on
Speaker 1: them they couldn't go any longer without it. And this
Speaker 1: is the point that we're talking about the government didn't
Speaker 1: want to do anything about it because they wanted SBF
Speaker 1: there to continue to donate, be the second largest donor
Speaker 1: to the party. They wanted them to continue to push
Speaker 1: these regulations. They wanted him to be able to continue
Speaker 1: to fund them, and they didn't want to have to
Speaker 1: give the money back. Now, justice delayed could be the
Speaker 1: same as justice tonight. So this is the second point.
Speaker 1: Why did it take so long for SBF to get
Speaker 1: picked up? Now? The powers that be want to tell you, oh,
Speaker 1: because that's the justice system. And people in America are
Speaker 1: innocent until proven guilty, which they are I would agree
Speaker 1: with that, So everyone should be innocent til proven guilty.
Speaker 1: But then why do you see people like Alex Pertsev
Speaker 1: jailed within days. Who is he created a piece of
Speaker 1: code for a tornado cash All he did was write
Speaker 1: the code, and the OFAC created some new law. They
Speaker 1: interpreted an existing law, and then they went and grabbed
Speaker 1: him and held him without charges for writing a piece
Speaker 1: of code. In twenty twenty, the FBI went to go
Speaker 1: investigate that fake new story at the NASCAR within twenty
Speaker 1: four hours. We see them move fast all the time
Speaker 1: when they want to, and part of this was that
Speaker 1: they wanted to allow this court of opinion to be changed.
Speaker 1: They want to believe that their hands were tied they
Speaker 1: were giving him due process, but we see all the
Speaker 1: time the state doesn't do that when it fits their agenda.
Speaker 1: The state put millions of innocent people under indefinite house arrest,
Speaker 1: but they couldn't get SBF under legal arrest. It took
Speaker 1: an entire month after we knew that he had stole
Speaker 1: billions of dollars of funds from customers before they finally
Speaker 1: went in. And part of it is because there's an
Speaker 1: entire embarrassment to the party. We've seen that there is
Speaker 1: now no trust in the police, there's no trust in
Speaker 1: the DOJ, and they wouldn't have done anything unless it
Speaker 1: was pushed by the power of the internet. Again, we
Speaker 1: can see this all the time, but the rest of
Speaker 1: the world sees it as well. Unfortunately, it seems like
Speaker 1: a lot of people in America have been gas lit
Speaker 1: into this, but the rest of the world sees this.
Speaker 1: Everyone who lost money into that sees it. Democratic Party
Speaker 1: even admitted it. They said that they were quote watching
Speaker 1: the case closely, and part of the reason why they
Speaker 1: are watching the case closely is because again it was
Speaker 1: their second largest donor and they didn't want to have
Speaker 1: to give the money back. But this is a good
Speaker 1: question to bring up. If these politicians were in fact
Speaker 1: covering for some of the crimes, if in fact we
Speaker 1: see that even some legacy media like New York Times
Speaker 1: might have been helping to cover up the crime. If
Speaker 1: we see that, well, now that he's been convicted, we
Speaker 1: know that he swung elections with stolen funds that can't
Speaker 1: ever be unwound. But do those investors get their money back?
Speaker 1: What happens to the politicians that took the money from FTX?
Speaker 1: Will they be able to keep their seats should they
Speaker 1: be removed? And we should bring in the challenger. What
Speaker 1: about the money that they received. Now, there's lots of
Speaker 1: court precedents that shows how there's clawbacks. We know that.
Speaker 1: Denish Desuza, who's a conservative filmmaker. He makes documentaries. He
Speaker 1: made a movie. Oh, he's made a bunch of movies,
Speaker 1: one of which was The two Thousand Mules, and he
Speaker 1: kind of talked about the twenty twenty election. He made
Speaker 1: one back in twenty sixteen. It was about Obama, and
Speaker 1: Obama didn't like that very much, and Obama went to
Speaker 1: the Obama administration and the DOJ went and found him
Speaker 1: guilty of campaign finance finance violations. I want to say
Speaker 1: it was about twenty five thousand dollars orth less, and
Speaker 1: I think he was convicted for like eighteen months a year,
Speaker 1: eighteen months something like that. Don't fact me. I'll go
Speaker 1: ahead and in fact check me on that, somewhere in
Speaker 1: that range. But yet here we have hundreds of millions
Speaker 1: of dollars of stolen funds. Now, Denis Desuza weren't stolen funds,
Speaker 1: he just didn't declare them properly. Here we have one
Speaker 1: hundreds of millions dollars of stolen funds of customers who
Speaker 1: want their money back given to politicians to swing a vote.
Speaker 1: The damage is forever done and the people are out
Speaker 1: their money. This is not about this is not so
Speaker 1: much about politics. This is framing up why this is
Speaker 1: the battle for the fate of man. This is why
Speaker 1: they don't want us to have the power. So when
Speaker 1: you see digital IDs and central bank digital currencies, and
Speaker 1: privacy and misinformation and malinformation and controls on AI, now
Speaker 1: you know why they don't want you to have the
Speaker 1: power of the technology in your hands so they can
Speaker 1: continue to manipulate this. And this is the battle for
Speaker 1: the fight of our lives. Now. One of the ways
Speaker 1: that we've been able to always protect our life is
Speaker 1: by having our money, access to our money, because money
Speaker 1: buys us options. Now inside money like CBDCs will be
Speaker 1: controlled by them and controlled through censorship. One of the
Speaker 1: best ways is to get money outside the system, and
Speaker 1: for five thousand years, the best way to do that
Speaker 1: has been with gold. That's why I buy gold, and
Speaker 1: that's why gold, I think, is going. It's rallying. It's
Speaker 1: up big. It's up nineteen percent in October. Silver's up
Speaker 1: twenty two percent in October, and it's because people see this.
Speaker 1: They want to get their money out of the bank
Speaker 1: into assets like gold, and I get my gold from
Speaker 1: a company called Universal Coin and Buoyan. I've met with
Speaker 1: doctor Mike Fulgens and his company. They're trustworthy and they
Speaker 1: have great prices, and they have a special price on
Speaker 1: a silver one ounce American silver ego coin with no
Speaker 1: dealer markup, just twenty seven dollars each, but a limit
Speaker 1: of three. They'll even ship it to you for free.
Speaker 1: If you mentioned my name, give them a call called
Speaker 1: Universal Coin and Buoyan to get either a twenty seven
Speaker 1: dollars Solver ego coin deal or they have a forty
Speaker 1: seven dollars Donald Trump Tribute label silver ego coin deal.
Speaker 1: Get either one with free shipping. If you mentioned my name,
Speaker 1: call one eight hundred uc B Gold again one eight
Speaker 1: hundred U see b Gold, or go online to universalcoin
Speaker 1: dot com. Slash Mark Moss. If you're just tuning in
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Markmas Show, We've been breaking down
Speaker 1: this SBF court case, but more importantly, so you can
Speaker 1: understand what is really at stake here. Hopefully enjoyed it,
Speaker 1: let me know hit me up on the comments on
Speaker 1: social media. At one Mark Moss until next time.