WEBVTT - Ep. 49: Deep Fried Reading Rainbow Trout

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You've gotta be a lot smarter than that if you're

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna Rick roll, Joe Surmelli, I was like, not today,

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Rick Astley, not today. I don't need big screen TVs

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and and sports when I can watch people making asses

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of themselves trying to dock in front of a rowdy crowd.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>And we'll be back next week to give us a

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>hack on how to properly put those on and remove

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>them with Google from all the ship that leads. Day later,

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask you about Australian Santa. Feel good

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>about that? Great wow, Good morning, degenerate anglers. Welcome to

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Ben the fishing podcast that struggles to get your ride

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>at home from its favorite bar because it only has

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a three star rating on Uber. I'm Joe Surmelli, I'm

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Miles Nulty, and and I'm I'm a little confused by

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that set up. Are you an Uber driver? Now? Are

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you like noon lighting as an Uber driver? No? No, no, no,

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>no no no no. Drivers can rate passengers too, that yeah,

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like if I get yes, right, Like if I get

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Homeboys car And for the record, this is this

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is totally hypothetical, But if I get in dude's car,

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>wearing like soaking wet waiters and leave behind a trail

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of mud and like sand or bunk or slime or something,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and then tip him in in ski ball tickets, which

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been known to do because I always have a

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of very good skiball player um that he can

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>give me a bad rating so that future drivers don't

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>make the mistake of picking me up. Real real thing. Yes,

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>so I can get black balled as a Uber passenger,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like I can. I can get like cut out, like

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>don't pick this dude up totally. And you can also

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>get blackballed as an Airbnb guest. That what I know

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about that. I was Yeah, okay, see I I was recently.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I was recently. I'm proud I was just rated as

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a five star gas, which means I didn't have a

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>foam party or steal the linens or anything. Yeah, but real,

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>grown up, it pays to be nice to Uber drivers, um,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and if you if you must leave a mess in

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the car, like at least compensate with a hefty tip,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>right like real American money, because that's the beauty of capitalism.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You can buy your way out of the consequences of

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>almost any any bad behavior. Any mistake a lesson I

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>hope you're teaching to your children. But you know, setting

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>aside ugly cultural side effects of Western industrialization, we do

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>live in a society, as you're pointing out, where crowdsourced

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>ratings are growing increasingly important. Right. For example, the fact

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that we are the lowest rated of all the Mediator

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>brand podcasts on Apple, a lowly four and a half

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>stars out of five, likely means that we're missing out

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>on perspective listeners simply because a few people out there

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>either don't understand or can't appreciate the value of satire.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud of that. Like, sometimes you have to, like

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have a perfect rate, and that means

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>you've you've you've ruffled some feathers. And I'm about that.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But all those people who I do have a modest

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>proposal for all of them. Um But but group think

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>ranking of goods and services has become a huge part

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of how we choose what to consume, you know what

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean? Like, we now have so many choices about

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>what we eat, watch, listen to and buy that we're

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>just desperately searching for help to figure out what we

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>should consume and I mean, we're all guilty of it.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I do it not, especially like if I'm traveling hotel

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and motel reviews that's everything to me. The doctored photos

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the room won't tell you about the blood on

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the carpet, and like the half eaten egg salad left

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in the mini fridge um and see, it depends on

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>how you look at it, and that's that's the point.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like that one guy's bad review. You might be like,

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy if there was this is the right exactly.

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And I can also spend our wars literally hours reading

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>reviews on Amazon, and I'll go into a tailspin of

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>indecision because even though like that one toaster of and

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been eyeing it has four thousand good reviews. You know,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Alan and Iowa wrote a really compelling, angry missive about

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>how his his kitchen counter was set on fire, and

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the one like all of them can be good,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>but you can read that one you're like, oh no, yes,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what if it sets my counter on fire too? I

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be like Alan. Yeah, I don't want

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to be I know, I know, And and the fact

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>is you really shouldn't care what Alan in Iowa says,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but you do, right, You shouldn't care, but you do.

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>You know what you should care about, though, you should

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>care that we give thirteen Fishings Whipper Snapper jerk Bait

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a five out of five star review because we do. Yeah,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we do, and you should because uh, well, for one thing,

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>they sponsor this show, they do, but that I actually

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna set up part aside and said fish been

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>fishing it recently, and I like that short bait so

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>by it's it's just a badass, well tune little bait

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that that it plays plays big on small water right

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's it's skinny, it darts, it slashes, it

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>slashes and darts. Um. And it's become a favorite of mine,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>like for wet waiting summer Smalley's and it's gonna hurt

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>some trout this winter. I can't wait for that. I

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>know it. Um, that's a kind of review. I could

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>just cut and paste that right into the Amazon review

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and then Alan might buy one. Exactly. Yeah, we can

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>only hope, and I hope you do that, but we

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The point being, Amazon reviews are a dark, dark, deep pit.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I both love and hate them because it feels like

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we're in the situation where everyone in the world has

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>turned into the characters from High Fidelity. You guys, it's

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.679
<v Speaker 1>not We're not not seriously, you're totally elitist. You feel

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>like the unappreciated scholars. So your shipped on the people

0:05:55.600 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>who know lesson which is everybody. Yeah, it's just sad that.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>A couple of weeks ago, we had Brad Leone on

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the show and Joe asked him which fish is the

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>most overrated? Yes, right, And to my disappointment, he responded

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>none of them, which was just a slightly lesser cop

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>out than his refusal to choose between kvs He and Popeyes.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, give Brad a break. I like Brad,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>He's like a lot. But but to be fair to

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your point, right, that's that's how you survive public scrutiny

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and remain popular, like you enough sometimes right, Um? But

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>even though so, maybe Brad is not welling a risk

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>his reputation over like a knee jerk opinion. We are

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because we're not famous or popular, so I'll say anything

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to anybody. I don't give a ship, right, um, and Miles,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>we've actually compiled for you, like our Desert Island Top

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>three lists of the most underrated fish to eat and

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the most overrated fish to eat. Yes, we will step

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>out on this limb, put ourselves out there. So I'll

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>start with with underrated. For me, my first one, and

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this isn't any order, just the first one. I'm going

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>with escalar. We've talked about escalar in the past, but

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is an underappreciated fish because, like

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they make it up, they have it's white tuna. White

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>tuna doesn't exist. There's no need to dress it up

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>under a fake name. It's so good on its own.

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The colloquial term you see sometimes uses butterfish, which I

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think is right because it's just rich and fatty and

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>delicious pearl white meat and so good. Part of the

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>reason I think that this fish gets hated on is

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look it up online, they're all they're they're

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people. They're all these posts and things

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about how, oh, if you eat too much you'll get

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>gastro intestinal issues. People call it x lax fish. I

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man. I've eaten a lot of escalar, also

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>known as Waldo Waldo and Hawaii, and I've never ever

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>had any problems, well, like if you eat too much

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>taco bell, it will be the same problem. You know

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. But I did, I've eaten, I've eaten

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>how I've eaten pounds of the ship in one sitting,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I got a one time. I saw it in

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a local seafood place and bought like a whole steak

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and just whacked it up and ate it. I've never

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>had any gastro intentional issues from from eating it. So

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that's why this fits on this list. I think. Don't

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>believe the hype. Yeah yeah, so number two for me

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 1>the second one. Anyway, blue gill and people at least

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Midwest right now are screaming about this and

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like blue gill aren't underappreciated. We love them all the time. Yes,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>some of you do, but a lot don't. A lot

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of people, if they're pan fishing, prefer to hold out

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for the croppy or the perch. I say, give me

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the gills right because they're easy to catch, their super available.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You can you can limit out quickly. They're easy to scale,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>which I think is nice. And when you go out

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and catch up at the little ones, you just you

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>scale them. You gut Hm, you fry them whole and

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it's damn good man. I think blue giller underappreciated as

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a food fish. Yeah, but see we have a different

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>perspective on that because of that whole ease of catching things.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So I've eaten blue gill right, and it is very good,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. I think there's definitely a cultural thing here,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and by and large, I think people in the Northeast

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>don't eat bluegills, and to be honest, I have I

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have very little interest in it. And because I think

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>part of what makes this is for me speaking for myself,

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>makes a meal of fresh fish more enjoyable is the pursuit,

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you put in a long, hard day

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for those fluke or tuna or snakeheads or even big

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>cropp ease. And do you ever have somebody joke like, well,

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could go to the store and buy

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>tuna for a lot cheaper than you just spent, but

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, run off short. But if you're an angler,

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that's all part of it. It's all like part of

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the pursuit. But bluegills are everywhere. In my opinion, it's

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's too easy, Like I can literally drive down

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the street with two slices of wonderbread and catch enough

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>blue gills for a fish fry in twe I mean

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's every single day from April to November exactly. Now.

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>To me, if the only reason you fish is if

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to put food on the table, that's appealing, but it

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't for me, Like I'd rather use those blue gills

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to catch a flathead and then cook the flathead because

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>now those easy bluegills are becoming part of that bigger pursuit.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I see, I see what you're saying. But that's why

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're underrated, because people take them for granted.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's that's why there's no right or wrong.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not wrong, it's just two different perspectives on it. Today.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like that's so easy. They're swimming right there, like

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that's take like ten minutes exactly. Know which My third

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>one is scorpion fish and this is my sleep this

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is the one. I'll admit this one with which I

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have the least experience, and and scorpion fish are they're

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>really ugly if you've ever seen like, they're kind of

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>scary looking it and they have these again bad reputation.

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>They have venom in their dorsal fins, and if you

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>step on one, it can give you nasty sting. And

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I have avoided them up until recently. But not too

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>long ago, I was I was back in Hawaii and

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>my cousins brought a big, like a whole big scorpion

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>fish back to the house. And I will never shy

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>away from those fish again. It was so good. It

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>was so good. And they're they're scorpion fish all over

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. You can find them in all the different

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>oceans all over the place. Their meat it's like firm

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's white, and it's just delicious they have. It's

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not one of those bland white meat fish. It's got

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting texture and flavor. And they also have these massive heads.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of like they look like giants sculping. Yeah,

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and you can take those heads. And this is for real.

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I just did it. They make the best fish stock

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I've ever eaten, so good. I've never eaten scorpion fish.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I I love to try it, I just have not

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>had um the chance. So I'll switch into my list here,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>my number one most underrated take a guess, I think,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, I think I know where you're going. Right.

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It is really the only fresh water fish I genuinely

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>get excited to eat because it's just so different from

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>your standard walleye or catfish. UM. And I've never fed

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it to anyone an he's skeptic that wasn't blown away

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>by everything about it after they tried it. I have

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>no personal experience, but I've I've heard your gospel, and

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to crushing some fried snakes on your

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>back porch with a double tall cocktail. I hope we

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>do it someday soon, because I want we will do that.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>We need to do that. Um. Next up for me, right,

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>would be the Atlantic bonito, which is not to be

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>confused with the bonita, the A and the O. Okay,

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>very important because bonita with the A and that's just

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the common Southern name for false albacore. Right, Bonito with

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the O or lumped in with the mackerels and tunas,

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and they don't freeze, well, they freeze like ship. But

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Benito is outstanding. It makes terrific Yeah, yeah, it makes

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>terrific sashimi poku sevich. It's outstanding on the grill and

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very flavorful without any of the like the really

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>strong oily taste of a lot of the mackerels. I

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of liken it to it's like Spanish mackerel meats

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>yellow fin kind of. And they're also just a blast

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to catch on light tackle, just speed demons. I only

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>got to do this once, but I can confirm when

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>when eating fresh bonito or damn good, I'm waiting there. Yeah,

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and last and last, i'd say northern Pike. And I

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>fully understand that's that's not the case on parts of

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the midwest of Canada UM where I live, though, and

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>even I think kind of out west where you are, UM,

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>people just still want the wall eyes and the perch

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and the pike kind of get overlooked. And I remember

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time I ever had it was in Saskatchewan,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't get over how good it was. I

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>actually like it better, dare I say, than Wally, And

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I've had it a bunch since. I'd actually eat it

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>more often locally, But anyone who watched season one of

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>b Side Fishing knows my local pike water is full

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of PCBs and heavy metals, so I refrain from doing

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that but when I get a chance from cleaner water.

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so. You know, so I underrated overrated Europe. I know,

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I know what. I know what one of your overrated

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you do everybody knows before I get there. I'm with

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you on the pike, which which actually that totally teased

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>me up for my first overrated fish. We don't really

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>need to talk about this. We've already done it. It's Walleye,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>end of story. We can move on. We get it.

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Number two for me though, Marlin, Okay, marlin are amazing

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>sport fish. But the only marlin I've ever eaten that

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought was really good, like I look forward to,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>was smoked, and we've it Wasn't the fish right? If

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the preparation, So steak Marlon, you can. I'd

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>rather that fish be swimming around. It's just not to me.

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just not worth it. My number three and and

0:14:55.640 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the most overrated food fish on the planet.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It if you ask me, salmon. I do not understand

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>why people like salmon so much. I don't get it.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, but I can't. I cannot, for the life

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of me to understand why salmon is the most ubiquitous

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>food fish on the planet. It's it's just not that good.

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's often mushy, and it's either fishy or

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just totally bland. Sorry, I don't get the salmon thing.

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just I don't get it. I did. I'm I'm

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>right there with you on all accounts here, right, Like

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't get the wall Like Craze, I I'd never

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>personally kill a marlin, period, right. And while I like

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>salmon sushi, I could frankly just give a shit about

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a cook piece of salmon now, like fresh caught in Alaska. Sure,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like that's like a treat, right, Otherwise like farmed or

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>shipped out. I just I'm just not interested. And similarly,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I also find just trout extremely overrated. And I'm sorry,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry if I piss anyone off of that, but

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I just think trout are bland end and completely uninteresting.

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm talking about wild ones too, not just stockers, right,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the wild ones too. It's edible and

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like you feel all cool cooking one, you know, on

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a campfire. It's yeah, I was about to say, it's

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>good if you're like out in the back country. Yeah,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>because then it's like it's like part of the little experience,

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know. But but will I ever be excited

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to eat a trout? No, I will not. Um. And

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>finally I find I find fluke and flounder very overrated,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and so many of my Jersey people are cursing me

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>out right now. It's good, it's very good, but it's

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so mild to me. It's one of those fish that

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just tastes like whatever you put on it. Um. And

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as Northeast inshore fish go, I will take

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a dog or a black sea bass over a fluke

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>any day of the week. So all right, there you

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have it. Waly and salmon universally overrated. We might be

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the only people who pick scorpion fish and snaked over salmon.

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Although something tells me that our first guest, who we've

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>had on this show before and is not afraid to

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>express controversial opinions, Abby Schuster, might actually agree with us.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So must week on Trivia, Miles is going to ask

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Abby about a kind of salmon that actually might be underrated,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>at least as a food fish. You gotta be highly

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>skilled for these shows. You understand that if I don't

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>under are you well versed there? You very smart man.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, joining us for our trivia game today, we

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>have guide captain and owner of Kisman Outfitters on Martha's Vineyard,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Abbey Schuster. Abby. Thanks for making some time for us,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me absolutely all right. So we brought

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you here to play a little trivia, And uh, I

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>guess I feel sort of honor bound to inform you

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that in our version of trivia, you you can't actually

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>win anything, but you do risk losing some dignity. So

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, but bar trivia, you win something you wouldn't

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have a beer around of drinks or something. Nothing, No

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>free drinks here, you get nothing. Uh So the first

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>time you and I crossed paths, I was working on

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>an Atlantic salmon film project, and you were you were

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like one of our go to people to help tell

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the story of the younger generation of East Coast anglers

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who grew up without the chance to fish for Atlantics,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and and I just that was like my first introduction

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to who you were and which you were all about.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And and also the first time I really dug into

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that sad story, which is kind of a shame. It's

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>not hopeful one. And that's something you know, we've touched

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>on a little bit here in the past, and hopefully

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll be able to touch on the future with with

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>some more positivity. And so just from from that experience,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I know that you have a decent knowledge base when

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Atlantic salmon, and and regular listeners to

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>this show will know that I probably spend a maybe

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>too much time talking about Pacific salmon. So instead of

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>all that, I am going to ask you about Australian salmon.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel good about that? This sounds like it's

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a fun question, because the intro was kind

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of downer. I gotta say I had to turn it around.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I had to turn Let me just say that you're

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>going to win the legs and you're dying. But here's

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the good part. Ozzie's love to have a good time

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and Australian salmon are are not in trouble at all.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's play. These are all multiple choice, Okay, all right?

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Which of the following is not a colloquial name for

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Australian salmon A Hawaii b cocky salmon see new fish,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>d budgee salmon, or e colonial salmon. Which one of

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>those is not a name for Australian salmon. You're going

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>with colonial salmon. Yeah, I'm sorry, that is incorrect. No, no, no,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be d the Budgee salmon, because I totally

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>made that up. Because that's a reference to the budget smuggler,

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a very different slang term in or either

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys familiar with that one? Nope, but you have

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to you have to tell now, don't make me Urban dictionary.

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>You should. Uh, you don't even have to do that.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So the budget smuggler, if you if you refer to

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that in Australia, you would be talking about a very

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>small speed. Oh that's that's what Okay, that makes sense.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And the term is actually so common that it was

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>entered into the Oxford English Dictionary in just moving on,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you got you got a chance for redemption here? Can

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I just ask a question? One quick question? You can, okay,

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>just because I have to know when we say Australian salmon,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not like they don't call salmon something. More questions

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this will all be revealed, right, I'm sorry,

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Sorry, all right, Always always get

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of things, Joe, I'm a thinking man. I'm a

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking man. Question number two, which species are Australian salmon

0:20:54.800 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>most closely related to Pacific salmon, Atlantic salmon or three

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>finn salmon? Oh, Pacific salmon. Yeah, I'm sorry, you're you're

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of on street here. Nobody knows these. Don't feel bad.

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what he's talking about. To be fair,

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I knew that one, but but I'm weird. So let

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>me clear this up. Neither Australian salmon or thread finn

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>salmon are actually salmon, nor are the two of them

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>even that closely related. They're just closer to each other

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>than they are the actual seal monits. There are no

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>actual native seal monits in Australia. This is uh, this

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is one of those cases where like the settlers who

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>came from elsewhere went to Australia and and and the colonists,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to name fish, and they just named them

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>after fish. They already recognized and reused old names, even

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>though the two weren't related at all. Kind of like,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>that's why that's why they have ten million cod? Yeah cod? Right,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they call everything a cop But we're going we're going

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>long because I really like this category. So for once,

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have three questions. You still have a chance

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to bring it back. I believe in you here, I

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 1>believe in you. I'm nervous. You got this all right.

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Last question. Australian salmon are of particular interest to fisheries

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>biologists because they seem to be successfully adapting their diet

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as as water temperatures warm around Australia from climate change

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and the food sources shift. So now they feed almost

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>exclusively on pelagic baitfish like pilchard, scat and anchovies. Right

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're just they're eating those. But before climate change,

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they used to have a very different diet. What did

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they previously eat? A octopuses, b eels, see vegemite or

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>d squid. Uh, I would go with eels. Yeah, it

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is just not your day. I'm very sorry. I knew,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I knew it all. I knew you'd bring along. It

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>was like the coming hot you turned it around. You

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>really you really redeemed yourself on that one. And uh,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and we appreciate you debasing yourself enough to that was

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a tough one. That was a tough one. That was

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>that was a tough friend. It was I know, we

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe me. I asked all those questions because I

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>already know you're an expert on like salmon, so I

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>knew I couldn't put anything over on that. I had

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>to go a different direction. Abby, Thanks so much. We

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate you taking time. Thank you. Have you ever

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>eaten Australian salmon? No, I've never. I've never caught one.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never held one. I've never seen one. I've read

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>about him, and I know people who catch them. It

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're kind of they're like the blue fish

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of Australia. People think that's toily and they're only smoked right,

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have any personal experience to draw from,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>right and saying you can't pass judgment on any fish

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>without the pe, because we call it in media personal experience,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know pe, like I said I did. I didn't

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think pike would be good until somebody fed it to me,

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and that experience allowed me to get excited about having

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>fried pike. When I was out in Wisconsin last summer,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I knew what I was in for and um our

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>next guest cooked it for me, Tim Land where who

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>runs Tight Lines fly fishing company. Um Tim showed me

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>some incredible smallmouth fishing on the Manominee River. And uh,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this week he's got a tackle hack that might help

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you out when it comes to finesse fishing on the

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>surface in the heat of summer. I'm getting hats coming

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>from inside the city. Hike up, flood. Welcome to tackle Hacks,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>where we call up somebody who knows a lot more

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>about fishing than we do to pass along some some knowledge,

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>some tip, information, something that will make you a better angler.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And today we've got my buddy Tim Land. We're on

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Tight Lines Fly Fishing Company up in

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. What's going on, man? Not much? How you doing, Joe,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great. I'm gonna be better when this is

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>done because I'm gonna know something I didn't know before

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and there there thereby be able to fish better. So

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>excited for learning for us. So I mean, you're you

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>specialize in all kinds of things which you do a

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of small mouth predominantly fly. Um make us, make

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>us better long rot anglers, people who call it long rotting.

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You just dropped pearls of wisdom right now, pearls wisdom

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on your fellows. Well, one of the things that we

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>see right now, once we've rolled into our July and

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>August time on the river, the river drops out, we

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>lose all the water flow and we have to get

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more technical, a little bit more finesse,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>especially with our top water stuff. And what we see

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot of times when we go to darker

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>colored patterns blacks olives, they blend perfectly into the river

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>so you can't see them, and the bites can be

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>very very small. So what I always do my hat

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>tackle hack is I buy the cheapest fluorescent orange fingernail

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>polish that I can find, and what I'll do is

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll just keep that in my boat bag, you know'll

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>paint the top of a popper or the top of

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a wiggly pattern with just that. Or if you guys

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>remember the old pulsa strike indicators with the adhesive the

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>adhive back. Yeah, yeah, crazy, Yeah, they're they're awesome. We

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we still sell them in the shop. They're they're they're great.

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I cut those in half and that adhesive is good

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>enough on those, as you know, because you can't get

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the ship off your leader after you put them on there.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But you put that on the back of a popping

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>bug or a wiggly and now your clients can see

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it and you can see it. So those two little

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>combination things in my boat bag are there all the

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>time for low water season. That's a great tip. Man.

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do I feel like I'm the only one that

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like the pulse and you guys are like, oh

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>love those And I was they used to twist my

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>line like crazy there. I must to put them on

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>wrong or something. I think that was a you problem, Joe, Yeah,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>probably it's I think it's you'll be back next week

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to give us a half on how to properly put

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>those on and remove them with Google from all the

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>ship that leaves on your leader. Yeah, that was presented

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>as a fly specific hack, but I can see that

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>working with conventional two right. Contrary to popular opinion, midsummer

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>fish will still eat on top, sometimes not as much,

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but but sometimes you have to get more subtle and

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>smaller with your presentations. You can't just throw out the

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>big stuff and like have a big weight coming back.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>You gotta go slow and you gotta go small. And

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's where his his hack really helps out in

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 1>my experience, that's true, at least for all river fish

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>from trout to bass, even muskie. Right, if you go

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>super slow and downsize your baits, you might get blown

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>up on top Tim, Tim knows what he's talking about.

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh I can. I can attest the Tim's prowess man.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>His guide service and shop have five well deserved stars

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on Google reviews. Good for him, must be good. Dude

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously knows his stuff. Um, but we're about to find

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>out which one of us knows his stuff. In this

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>week's battle Fulfill's Best Review, it's time for fish news.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Fish news that escalated quickly before we hit news. We

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have a little housekeeping. A couple of weeks ago, I

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>covered a news story about people painting turtles, and a

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>shocking number of you wrote in to tell me all

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why a person might feel compelled to paint

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a turtle shell. And so I feel like I have

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to I have to give voice to some of these

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>because I was dumb. I have to. Ryan Knapp wrote,

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Snapping turtles get run over by cars all the time.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>They migrate to find places to lay their eggs in

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>sandy banks, then make their way back to water. Their

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>dark shells are hard to see against pavement. Hence traffic

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>cone Orange not supporting it, but it's pretty obvious how

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>someone could think they were being altruistic. So I missed

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the obvious one there. Oh yeah, So then we got

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>one from listener Cody Cantrell, who apparently comes from a

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>long line of turtle painters, because he wrote a heartwarming

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>tale about how he and his grandma used to enjoy

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>watching three toad box turtles on their walks together, and

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>how they would mark the shells with now polished so

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>they could distinguish and better get to know their local turtles. Um.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>His town also has a spring festival that involves a

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>wild turtle race for kids, and he has painted the

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>shells of his kids racing turtles in various themes. So

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we can meet that one too. And I felt I

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>felt a little like a jerk when I read that,

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>because it was it was so heartwarming. Uh, I was.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong on at least some level. I still

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with turtle painting, but I have been educated.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>You all have educated me on how it might happen

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with good intention. Yeah yeah, and like and like. The

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>maya culpa was all fine and good, but several other

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>listeners were disappointed in that story for a completely different reason. Okay,

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So Evan thread wrote, both Miles and Joe spent several

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>minutes discussing the subject without making one single teenage mutant

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Ninja turtles reference. They are turtles who are named after

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>famous painters. Semi colon. The jokes wrote themselves. I feel

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that this was a blatant oversight and a mistake that

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you both should have avoided. I am severely disappointed, and

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>my day is ruined. I do believe this is something

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I can look past moving forward, though it may take

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>some time. Man, that one hurt that would hurt Evan,

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and and it struck a nerve because as soon as

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I read it, I went yell, lew it And so

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we do apologize, uh and and for that and whatever

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>else and to make up for it. I think this

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>might help Evan. Here's Here's a final email from Aaron Littera,

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>who has the whole thing figured out, and he wrote,

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>here's my theory on the turtle that was painted from

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>last week's Fish News. The turtle was painted orange to

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>look like the legendary teenage mutant ninja turtle Michael Angelo.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>The perpetrator of this was none other than vanilla Ice.

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>In a moment of nostalgic passion, he tagged the turtle

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and sang a little song as he worked. Go Ninja,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Go Ninja, Go Go go Ninja. This is how the

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Secret of the Ooze comes full circle. Game set match.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>There you have it. There it is uh man, But

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>who who knew myles stupid turtle painting story would elicit

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>such rancor um? Slow? It was a slow newsweek people, okay,

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but better news. Uh, this is not a slow news week,

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so prepare yourselves. And as a reminder, this is a

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>competition and normally Miles and I do not know which

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>news stories the other guy is bringing to the table,

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but full disclosure, because we're about transparency here this week,

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we do know at least most of them, okay, because

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Myles has been cooking up a monster story. Um, and

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>he knows I've been cooking up a monster story in

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the makeshift shed I built in the backyard, and I

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>had just enough robotusts and left to have it ready

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for today. So even though there's uh not not much

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>element of surprise between us, our illustrious audio engineer Phil

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>will still be judging us, perhaps commenting on who delivered

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>their news with more pep flair and zing now and

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>since Joe's robo tripping and has been for days, I'll

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>give the edge there, but we'll see. So you you

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are up first this week? Yes I am. I am,

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>so I am normally up first. This would be my

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>week to go up first, but I am seeding off

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>position to you because I, as you mentioned, I've been

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>working on a big story, so I only have one

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>because it took a lot of time. Okay, So I

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think I think you should go first, and then I'll

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>give my story and then you can close it up. Fair, fair,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and and a lot of you already know where we're

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going here. And I gotta tell you, I thought that

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the outcry from listeners for for Miles and I to

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>use our journalistic talents to uncover the truth about subway

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tuna was massive. No, nothing, subway tuna ain't got shipped

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on trout addicted to math Um the meth trout man

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in what is creeping in? On one year of bent,

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we have never had a link sent to us. As

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>much as this link was sent, it's still being sent.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee I have five new d M s right

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>now with links to the story and it dropped over

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a week ago. I've got I've got friends from high

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>school who I haven't talked to in years sending me

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this story, like my great aunt Like, I'm like, what

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>where's this going? I don't even get a birthday card?

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But I got the trout meth um, you know, and

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and look. And I'll be honest, I did not click

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on the link for the first two days of getting

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it because I read the headline trout could become meth addicts.

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And I said, yeah, nice, try, Like, you gotta be

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot smarter than that if you're gonna Rick roll

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Joe Shmelli is like, not today, Rick Astley, not today.

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But a few days and four thousand plus links later,

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I bit. So this is a real story. It has

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>popped up on every news source in the world, I think,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>from Al Jazeera to your kids like weekly Little League

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>news email um, and all the stories are pretty much

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>saying the same thing. So for this, I'm going with

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the National Geographic version and their headline was trout can

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>become addicted to meth. Here's why that's so scary. So

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>here's the gist. You do your meth on your own time. Privately, right,

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you pee and poop and there's still traces

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>of meth in your excrement and that goes to the

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>wastewater treatment facility. And while these facilities are pretty good

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>at removing contaminants from the wastewater before it returns to

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the river, they don't apparently do a great job with

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>controlled substances, which means tiny amounts of that meth are

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>ending up in the water flowing downstream from the treatment facility. Now,

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note that this doesn't just happen with meth, right,

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Like if you take birth control pills, do heroin, antidepressants, cocaine.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Trace elements of all those substances can end up in

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the water this way. And you might be saying, yeah,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>but can enough really get in the water to make

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a difference. So, according to Pavel Horky, a behavioral ecologist

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>from the Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, they might.

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 1>And the article points out that while Matthews has it's

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously always been a huge problem um in Eastern Europe.

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>In the US, it's gotten worse since the pandemic. Okay,

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>so Hokey proposed that these trace elements in the water

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>could essentially make trout meth addicts, which could make them lethargic,

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>give them withdrawal symptoms, and make it more difficult for

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>them to find food and reproduce. So Quirky and his

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.919
<v Speaker 1>team conducted a lab study, and here's what they did.

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>They dosed sixty captive bread brown trout with meth amphetamine

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>laced water for two months while keeping another group of

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty control trout in a drug re tank, and the

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>researchers ensured that the drug levels matched the meth levels.

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Other researchers have documented just downstream of wastewater treatment plants

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 1>in Czechia and Slovakia, and in the first few days

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>after being removed from the meth last tank, the fish

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 1>moved around less, which the team interpreted as stress from

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>drug withdrawal. Analysis of their brain tissue showed that the

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>fish that moved less had the most meth amphetamine in

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>their brains. The researchers also gave the trout from both

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 1>groups a choice to enter one of two streams of water,

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>one with meth amphetamine one without. The meth exposed trout

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>preferred to swim in the meth lace water, particularly in

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the four days after their drugs supply stopped. Over time

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the studies trout preference for meth and phetamine declined to

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>match those of the control fish, a clear sign of

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>addiction withdrawal. Now, the article mentions a few other similar studies,

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>one that found traces of cocaine in certain European rivers.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>They suggested that might interfere with the reproduction of endangered eels.

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>In Canada, there was they did a study where they

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>exposed young male fat head minnows to synthetic estrogen from

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>contraceptive pills and found that when they did that, they

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't grow test these but produced eggs instead. But I

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think the most important thing to understand with all these studies,

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>including the meth trout, is that all these things are

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>are documented in controlled lab settings, right, but nobody has

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>hard evidence about any of these substances having adverse effects

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in the wild, at least not yet. Because if you

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think about it, right, that's that's a pretty hard study

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>because at minimum, right off the bat, you have to

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>factor involution, you know what I mean, Like a sample

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>taken at the outflow of the water treatment plant is

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna read different than one taking five miles downstream. You

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>have to factor in rain, high water flows, low water flows.

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So they've they've proved that this could be a problem

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and the fish can be effective, which is real and fascinating.

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think so many people sent this because which

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is what a great headline does, right. It leads you

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to believe just a river of of meth addicted trout

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>has been discovered, and it has not. But if it,

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would because that would be something else,

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like I I assume that

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 1>fish would have too few teeth to take a shot

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at a stream or crayfish, you know what I mean,

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>opting only for squaremy wormies or they just they'd be

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>so indecisive and confused. They just have no idea what

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to eat. Yeah, the sty only with Jesus

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>dike allly, you know right they as I don't think

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they'd be very hungry or that or they I don't know.

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I know enough about tweakers to know that food is

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>not not high on the needs. Well, if it was

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>marijuana getting into the water to be a completely different story, different,

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. But look, it is a

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>fascinating study and the hope um is that these findings

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 1>will push lawmakers to insist that wastewater treatment facilities alter

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>their filtering and cleaning processes to catch these substances, which

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the story suggests is possible. Like that that can be done.

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just that they're not really factoring that. They're not

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>really doing that, and it would mean investing in some

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>new technology um and revamped water testing methods, but they're

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not really there yet, so appreciate it. Four thousand. I

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>wish I could send all four thousand of you stickers

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for that one. You deserve it. But here's my question. Yeah,

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of those four thousands, how many read more than the headline?

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm just gonna say to those of you

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>out there who did send it to us, which we

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>do appreciate, but I'm wondering, did you just see meth

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and trout and go, like, you know who I send this?

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Of course they did, come Miles. This is the world

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we live in digital media. Everything is a photo and

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a headline. That's what matters. It was a question, but

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>my point was that, like, I hope that read the articles, Yeah,

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>to take five minutes read the articles, because I did

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>find this one to be fascinating. I read several of them,

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think your takeaway was exactly spot on the

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing I would hit on, which is that we've

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>known for a long time. There're a ton of studies

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that show we are getting traces of all kinds of

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>different pharmaceuticals over the counter and illicit that are going

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.720
<v Speaker 1>into the water making through wastewater treatment. This is not news.

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>We've known about this for a long time. And wastewater

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>treatment plants are starting to half. They're they're getting pressure

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to have to look at those contaminants as they need

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of just like they do eat cold

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I and others. Right, So that's great. I hope that

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>pressure increases, and I hope we start making those changes.

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But the only difference in this studies that it was

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 1>about meth. Yeah, Like no one cares about the title

0:40:56.719 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>because the methods of methods pop culture. Man, I hate

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to say that, but likes so much more pop culture

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>than um synthetic estrogen. Like that's not a T shirt,

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. There's there's there's no exactly,

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 1>there's no breaking bad for tile and all. So um

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and listen, we're not coming We're not coming down. But

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a good point. I thought the same thing.

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you guys are reading the headlines seeing brown

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>trout meth and sending but if you read it, it's

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very different. So if you didn't read it, we

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>now just kind of read it for you, so you

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>got you got the whole picture anyway. That's maybe that's

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>why they sent us like we don't want to Can

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you tell us where this is all about? Because I'm

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>just gonna assume there's a bunch of cracked out trout,

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, likely in Delaware. I don't know who

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the yeah, yeah, so Trout aren't actually methodics.

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the takeaway for those of you who sent that.

0:41:54.960 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. The one I'm gonna hit I this

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>isn't the newest in new for news, right it's the

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>story is a couple of weeks old. But Joe and

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I talked about it when it first broke, and I

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>intentionally held off because I wanted to give this one

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a little breathing room, Like are We were hoping that

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that the flames of internet fury might subside a little

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and calm down, and that and and and more importantly,

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we were hoping that more information would come out. But

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>neither of those things has really happened. Yeah we're still going. Yeah,

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>we're still going for it. So I rather than than

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>waiting on an outcome that's probably not gonna occur, I'm

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>just gonna try to present the situation as clearly and

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>accurately as I can given what I know, and then

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.720
<v Speaker 1>followed that up with my own personal take and reasoning

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>behind my opinions. You can draw your own conclusions on

0:42:56.000 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this one. Plenty of people already have all right. On June,

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>a guy by the name of Josh Jorgensen uploaded a

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>video to his YouTube channel titled Biggest Tarpin Ever Caught, and,

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>as is the case with most YouTube titles, this one

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't skimp on all caps lettering or multiple exclamation points. Uh.

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Jorgenson runs a fishing YouTube channel called black Tip h

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>which you've probably heard of since it has nearly three

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half million subscribers, making it among the most

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:33.240
<v Speaker 1>watched phishing channels on the Internet anywhere in the world.

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Jorgenson is based in Florida, and his content focuses on

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>large inshore saltwater species, primarily goliath grouper and sharks, often

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>being fought on rod and reel by extremely muscle bound

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>men and also sometimes women. I feel like I have

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to begin this by admitting my own personal biases. This

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the kind of fishing that I personally want

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to watch. I find I find his content gimmicky, one dimensional,

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and lacking in substance. Okay, that's my personal opinion. Get

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that out of the way. That's said. He has a

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 1>much bigger audience than we do, so what he does

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously resonates with a lot of people, which is part

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why this video has struck such a

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>chord with with opposing factions within the fishing community. The

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>video recounts Jorgenson's recent trip to Bahia Solano on the

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 1>remote Pacific coast of Colombia. It starts with a short

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>travel narrative where Jorgenson explains some shock at a local

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>restaurant that is serving cow tongue. And I'm sorry, but

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I say this dude needs to dig a little deeper

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>into his local Floridian cuisine because there's plenty of good

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>langu with tacos in Florida. If you if you go

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to a taco shop and they don't have tongue, where

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I even dare say tripe sometime I'm like, play st legit.

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you watched that video, but he

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:56.280
<v Speaker 1>has this whole beat and being like, I can't believe

0:44:56.320 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they serve tongue. Do you eat tongue? Like, dude, it's anyway,

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>go to any New York deli, bro, you know, it's

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>across many cultures, Jewish, Mexican. That would again, we know

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>my biases, but that that particularly bugged me a little. Anyway.

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So the video does the standard travel narrative montage and

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they get to a remote lodge, but they pretty quickly

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:22.240
<v Speaker 1>jump into the fishing part where Jorgensen hooks and lands

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>his first ever rooster fish. Normally, a feet like that

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>would be celebrated in YouTube fishing videos like it would

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>there be build up, there'd be excitement, but they moved

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>through his first rooster fish pretty quick. A few minutes later,

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>his bait gets blown up by a mystery fish. He

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>reels down on the circle hook and a massive tarpean

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>erupts out of the water, and of course after that,

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>all hell breaks loose. Most of the video consists of

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Jorgensen and two others holding onto a stout spinning rod

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>flexed over the rail of the boat and a real

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>dumping line. Jorgensen decided to hand the rod off to

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a friend mid battle, be as a recent UTV accident

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>left him with a back injury and fighting this massive

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>tarpain clearly caused him pain. They start off estimating the

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.359
<v Speaker 1>fish around a hundred and fifty pounds, but as they

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>fight it and see more of it, their estimates of

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>its size continue to grow. After an hour fight, they

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>get the fish boat side. Jorgensen puts one arm up

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.720
<v Speaker 1>through the fish's gilt plate, reached his other arm into

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the fish's mouth, locked hands, and began to lift the

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>tarpaun over the gunnale. Mates and friends gathered to help,

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and they eventually hoisted the giant fish into the boat,

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>took some measurements, posed for photos, and then threw the

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fish over the side back into the ocean. After releasing

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the fish, they estimated that weigh fifty pounds. Back at

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>the lodge, they punched the measurements into a tarp and

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>weight calculator available on the Bone Fish and Tarpin Trust website,

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>which spit out an estimated weight of three hundred and

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve pounds. The current I g F a world record

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>tarpin weighed two d and eighty six pounds nine ounces,

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>so if that's correct, this fish would have well surpassed it.

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's video then then goes into interviews, one with an

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>experienced trophy tarpin captain, the other with a saltwater fish

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:20.359
<v Speaker 1>taxidermist who has created over a thousand tarp amounts. Both

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>individuals verified that they believe this fish to have been

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>over three pounds after looking at flows in video. Jorgensen

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 1>closes his YouTube video with a monologue that stops short

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of admitting that he would have kept the fish had

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>he known it was a record. He kind of hints

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>at it, but he doesn't come out and say it.

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>He then says, quote, but I'm glad we let that

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>fish go. It's still out there, still swimming around. It

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 1>always feels really good. And now we can cue the controversy,

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, And this one has some layers. The main

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>reason for the outrage has to do with the handling

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the fish. One aspect of the story that is

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not opinion are the well researched effects of handling and

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>release on adult tarpan. Adult tarpan, particularly the really big

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>ones like this one often suffer significant injury when removed

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>from the water. That's why Florida prohibits anglers from lifting

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 1>fish overt out of the water at all. Additionally, all

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 1>tarpin release best practices recommend reviving a fish boat side

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>before it got it, especially after a long fight, which

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>did not happen in this particular case. So bottom line,

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Jorgensen's decisions to remove that fish from the water and

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 1>then dump it back overboard without reviving it, they do

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>go against the prevailing science based recommendations for tarpin handling.

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to put a caveat on that everything he

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>did is completely legal in Columbia, where he was fishing.

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>He broke no laws at all. Okay, that's another point

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can't argue, that's a fact. The truth is,

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:06.919
<v Speaker 1>though no one knows for certain what happened to that fish.

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You got all these very vocal folks in the angling

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>community that are making definitive claims that fish died, that's

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>dead fish. And then you got Jorgensen and his supporters

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly countering the fish is fine. That I guarantee that

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>fish is fine. It never it never goes belly up

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in the video, it disappeared, and I'm sorry, but the

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fact is that we don't know. All we have our

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>belief and conjecture. That's it. Anybody's saying they know the

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>fate of that fish is just being hyperbolic, all right.

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>They're just pretending to know something they can't know, all right.

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 1>But having settled that, let's break down a couple more

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>elements of this story. First, the record, So everybody understands

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the minute that Jorgensen chose to hand his rod off

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to another angler, he lost any chance the records gone.

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I g f A rules prohibit multiple anglers from even

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:03.839
<v Speaker 1>touching the rod or the real all right, So even

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>even if he had kept the fish and gotten certified weight,

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it would not have officially broken the record period. Second,

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>another theme that keeps popping up on the social media

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>sniping around this fish is the status of tarpan in

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the Pacific Ocean. Tarban are native to the Atlantic, not

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the Pacific, but in the last decade or so, more

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and more tarpan are being caught on the Pacific side

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of Central America and northern South America. The prevailing hypothesis

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:35.920
<v Speaker 1>claims that tarpan has started migrating through the Panama Canal

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and are now establishing new populations in the Pacific. In

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the video, Jorgensen and his local guide refer to the

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>fish as an invasive species. As you might imagine, the

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 1>lack of clarity on how this fish got to these

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>waters and if it's quote unquote natural, has fueled so

0:50:56.160 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>many keyboard artillery barrages. Those in support of Jordan's and

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>claim it doesn't matter how it ended the fish because

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it's invasive species. It was opposed to him counter that

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>if a fish migrated to a new habitat on its own,

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's non invasive. I've even seen people claiming that tarpin

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:16.799
<v Speaker 1>are actually native to the Pacific. We just didn't know it.

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But I actually looked. I couldn't find any credible evidence

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.319
<v Speaker 1>supported that claim, So that is questionable. I mean that

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's all irrelevant, Like getting into that side of the

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>argument in the case of this is stupid. But because

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>so much of it is going on, I understand that.

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But like all all of those kind of arguments to me,

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are are deflecting from the biggest problem, which will close

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on which just like the improper handling of this could

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have been this could have been done respected could have

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>been totally avoided. Here's the thing, man, we don't know

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>where that population of fish came from exactly. People haven't

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 1>figured that out yet. They're just starting to look into it.

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I find this to be a highly interesting topic, right,

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And I hope we get to cover this in an

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>another segment that has nothing to do with a record

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 1>or a controversy or a YouTube video, because i'd really

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 1>like to know. Right. But exactly as you're saying, Joe,

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's pertinent in this case, it's not.

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And now I'll just I'll just add that I remember,

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this has got to be going back ten years.

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Somebody I knew who fished down there was like telling me, like, man,

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>there's some tarp and showing up down there, and like

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember being fascinated by it then. But you're right

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in this case, it's it's very interesting. The how or

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.799
<v Speaker 1>why they're there is irrelevant in this The only way

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that would have like the way I could see it

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mattering is if and this didn't happen, but if Jorgensen

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>had kept the fish, I then I could see the

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>invasive claim coming into play, and I could see how

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that would fit here. But he didn't he released it.

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>He just did it without proper handling, right, So I

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like, just like you said, it doesn't matter. Finally,

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, and I have to point this out. We

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 1>wander into the whole you know, one side says you're

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:01.799
<v Speaker 1>just a bunch of one jill his haters, against the

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>other side saying you're just a bunch of ignorant fish

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>killing googins. And there's feces being flung around in the

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>form of comments and stickers. God, and I find it

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just all completely counterproductive, right, And this is more personal opinion,

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think comments sections should just be eliminated from

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the Internet because that is where the worst elements of

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 1>human nature get mainlined with steroids. Personal opinion. All right,

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:32.399
<v Speaker 1>here's what I think about this whole thing, and then Joe,

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me where you agree to disagree. But

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>here's why I think went down. This is me projecting.

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Jorgensen didn't know he had a record tarpet on his hands.

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>If he had, he might have made some different choices.

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He probably wouldn't have passed the route off though, Like

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 1>like we said, he had a serious injury, so he

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 1>might have been ultimately forced to do that anyway. I

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:56.319
<v Speaker 1>think had he known how big it really was, I

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 1>think you would have just kept the fish and considering

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 1>these circumstances. Had he done that, the result would be

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot less controversy. Had he decided to say, like, hey,

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a potential record fish. I want to keep

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it and mounted even if it's not an official record,

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think most people would have understood that. I can't

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>know his mind, right, I wasn't there, But if he knew,

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't planning to keep that fish, I wish he

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 1>would have handled it according to best practices to reduce

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>fish mortality. Right they were. They were fishing out of

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:33.400
<v Speaker 1>an offshore boat. I think that's an important point to mention.

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's got really high gunnals, so it would have

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>made it difficult to do those best practices, but not impossible.

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Someone could have gotten in the water with the fish

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to take measurements and and help pose it for photos

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and video. You could have done that. The problematic aspects

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of the fish handling are meaningful, at least for me,

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>because of Jordan's huge platform. We're not just talking about

0:54:57.200 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 1>one individual fish that may or may not be in

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:03.000
<v Speaker 1>vase right. I get that that doesn't really matter. But

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:05.839
<v Speaker 1>millions of people follow and look up to this guy,

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and like it or not, what he does gets mirrored

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 1>by other anglers, And to me, that's why it matters. Okay,

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we all make mistakes, and we all have a tendency

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to lose our heads when big fish are involved. I

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 1>cannot imagine that I would have had anything near complete

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>clarity of mind with a three hundred pound tarpet on

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the line, like freaking out both side. I would lose

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:37.240
<v Speaker 1>my ship. So I can understand and forgive the mistakes.

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I really can. My My biggest complaint with how Jordan's

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:44.239
<v Speaker 1>handled this situation is that he hasn't been willing to

0:55:44.280 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>admit that he made any mistakes. If he were now

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to simply come out and say, hey, I didn't know

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we had and I had so much excitement and adrenaline

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>when we landed the fish, I wasn't thinking through all

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the pintential implications. If I could do it again, I

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:01.280
<v Speaker 1>would do it differently in the ways for these reasons.

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:04.600
<v Speaker 1>If he would come out and make a statement to

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that effect, I think we could squash this whole thing.

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be over. But regardless of what

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he says or does. I think that the damage being

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:18.240
<v Speaker 1>done to the fishing community through this backbiting and sniping

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and this drawing of lines and the sowing of hate

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>around this incident is so much more destructive than one

0:56:24.120 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 1>dead fish. And and that's the real tragedy that I

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>see in all this situation is the way that's playing out. See,

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I see another level of tragedy, and it's like a

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 1>cynical one. But I can't I can't get my head

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.160
<v Speaker 1>around it. Like, this is my interpretation. Here's what I

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:39.960
<v Speaker 1>think happened. Obviously, they weren't tarp and fishing. That was

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a surprise fish. You know that they were doing something different, right,

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But I also think this this sort of speaks to

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>just fishing content in general. Now my guess is as

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:56.720
<v Speaker 1>as a guy who's made a few videos in his day, right, this,

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:59.759
<v Speaker 1>this would be my guest. This goes down, they hook

0:56:59.840 --> 0:57:03.719
<v Speaker 1>this fish, they're filming this because that's what he does. Right.

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Things are not handled properly. In the heat of the moment,

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not thinking straight. You have this huge fish. You

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:13.759
<v Speaker 1>just it's very easy to get that mentality of get

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it on camera, get it get it, get it, get it,

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:18.600
<v Speaker 1>get it, and we'll figure it out later. Right, it

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was not handled well. Things were done wrong. But then now,

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 1>because the world you live in is based around your views,

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that is your world, that is what you do. You're

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting on this piece of footage and you have two choices.

0:57:32.520 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You could not post that because probably deep down inside

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know you didn't handle that well, and that's not

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, setting a good example for your fans or

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like I'm not going to miss out on millions

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of views for this, And I think that's the route

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people take and why we end up

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing so many similar examples of poor fish handling and

0:57:56.400 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not best practices because so many people. You don't even

0:57:59.840 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have to be black Tip h with three plus million followers.

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think we see that all the time, like

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the the clicks and the likes and the views matter

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:14.160
<v Speaker 1>more than anything to too many people. Yeah, I mean

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that goes without saying right, you know, I agree

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 1>with you there. First of all, if you or I

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have been in this situation, I would like to think

0:58:20.520 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we would have had a clear enough head to to

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 1>not handle it this way, right, Like I've dude, I've

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 1>dealt with you under pound tarpin um in Costa Rica,

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:31.439
<v Speaker 1>in fact, on the eastern side, and you you fight

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:34.320
<v Speaker 1>him to death, and those guys like we held that.

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't hold it anymore because I was dead. But

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like that guy cradled that fish and idled and mean

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we stayed with it for forty five minutes until it kicked,

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and then he still followed it on the surface for

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a while to make sure it didn't turn or anything,

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and went back. So I would like to think that,

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you made a genuine mistake, like you knew

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 1>like this, I didn't do that right. It was a mistake.

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't necessarily malicious, it was just a mistake. It's

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>like you have an obligation. You're setting an example as

0:59:04.120 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a media person, as somebody in the spotlight that has

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fans and you know is an advocate of this sport.

0:59:10.920 --> 0:59:13.400
<v Speaker 1>You make that call, but that doesn't get you the views.

0:59:13.880 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a lot of that wrapped up

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in this too. Sad. I think you're right. I would

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 1>like to think, well, I'd like to think we would

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>handle it differently, but I could see. Listen, I've never

0:59:22.960 --> 0:59:25.120
<v Speaker 1>faced a three pound dark, and I could see myself

0:59:25.160 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>losing my ship, the one I didn't expect one right,

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I could see my I don't know that I would

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have done what he did, but let's just for the

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>sake of argument. It happened to you or me, or

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we're filming together, that happens. I don't know that I

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>would recommend my I don't think my position would be

0:59:39.480 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we should not show this. I think my position would

0:59:42.200 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be we should show this and talk about all the

0:59:45.600 --> 0:59:48.640
<v Speaker 1>things we did wrong here. And that's another way to

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:51.680
<v Speaker 1>take it. Yeah, that would be I think a more

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 1>productive way to go about dealing with this stuff to

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be like, hey, we we we got this crazy video.

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>We want the engagement, we want this, but we also

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we screwed up and here's how and here's why. I

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>also think in terms of him not admitting wrong, I'm

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:10.439
<v Speaker 1>sure you've seen this before. To wherefore some people it's

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you you want something so bad, you want the glory

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of something so bad that you can literally talk yourself

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>out of wrong doing so much that it just becomes

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the truth to you, you know what I mean, Like

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you just you just say it so much to yourself

1:00:23.080 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that then it just you become convinced of it, but

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't see how anybody could have posted

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this and not where how many videos have we had

1:00:31.720 --> 1:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>with the same thing. It's like, how can somebody post

1:00:33.640 --> 1:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that not think people were gonna flip ship? Like you know,

1:00:37.520 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he knew, he knew. Um, so yeah, I'm sure a

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of you guys have seen that. There's our our

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>little take on that. That was that was heavy. We've had,

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We've had meth and now that I feel I feel

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a little dumb, but I also feel like it's not

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea to light in the mood before we

1:00:53.160 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>close out here. That's your only story today. But that

1:00:55.200 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of research. That was a lot of research.

1:00:57.480 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'll wrap things up quickly this week. Um, let's all,

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll simmer down, we'll stop, we'll stop fighting and and

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>doing meth, and we'll take all take a dive into

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>my favorite file, which is fishing, gizmos, gadgetry and gimmickry,

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, and we'll just we'll talk about the hook

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and roll. And this is exciting because it plays into

1:01:15.400 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>something we recently discussed on the show that being lower retrievers.

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Remember this, It wasn't that long ago, and we both

1:01:22.320 --> 1:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty much agreed that they suck, like all those weights

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>with the paper clip and the do Dad and do

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Hickey slide down your line. Uh, pretty much suck or

1:01:30.680 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum, don't work every time, or you know,

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't incapable of becoming snagged themselves. We'll guess what, forget

1:01:37.440 --> 1:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the past, because the Hook and Roll is the last

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>lower Retriever you're ever gonna buy. And uh, for many

1:01:43.720 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of you would probably be the first Lord triever you

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>ever bought. And after hearing this, none of you were

1:01:47.280 --> 1:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy it, whether you had one or not already. Uh.

1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So this popped up in my news feed from the

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>website Geeky Gadgets dot com. Uh. And of course, like

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>many of these things, all the info is pulled from

1:01:58.480 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Hook and Rolls Kickstarter camp Pain, which, let me tell

1:02:01.240 --> 1:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you so far, is not kick started very well at all. Uh.

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>At the time of this recording, they were thirty five backers,

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so they've they've got a little way to go. And um,

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you've seen this video, right, so you know you know

1:02:12.960 --> 1:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into air. What we have here, in my opinion,

1:02:16.080 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is a case of creating perceived value and performance simply

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>by making something much more expensive, you know what I mean.

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's a tactic that works no doubt. Like

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're holding them like a three dollar broom and

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a thirty dollar broom at the store, and most people

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>are gonna assume thirty dollar broom is better, let me

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you it isn't. My garage floor is no cleaner.

1:02:35.120 --> 1:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh But anyway, big reveal here. The hook and roll

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>does pretty much exactly the same thing as all the

1:02:39.720 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>other lower retrievers that slide down your line and knock

1:02:42.680 --> 1:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the lower free of a snag, except instead of being

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>lead like the peasants use, the knocker device is made

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of high grade aluminum and stainless steel. It's rectangular in shape,

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it clamps around your line, and it's loaded with bearings

1:02:57.840 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so that it zips down your line very fair, creating

1:03:00.480 --> 1:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>zero friction, thus thwarting line chafing. Now, if the hook

1:03:04.800 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and roll doesn't knock the lowre free, don't worry, because

1:03:07.600 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's tethered to a heavy duty braided line and that

1:03:11.160 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>runs from the knocker device up to the hook and

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>rolls own reel, which looks like a little tiny aluminum

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>fly reel. But what that allows you to do is

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is also wrench on the line to pull the lower

1:03:25.000 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>free or I guess you know, bend the hooks out

1:03:27.600 --> 1:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>without using your rod and fishing line to do this,

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>like we all do. And the entire contraption is of

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>course made to be worn on the outside of your

1:03:35.080 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fishing vest with your leader, straightener or not tool or

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever else you got dangling there. And here's the thing

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to hear your your your opinion. I'm not

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>saying this won't work, but even this, it's not going

1:03:47.040 --> 1:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to get every lower back all the time. And could

1:03:49.800 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this this can get snagged to anything with a weight

1:03:53.040 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and a rope that you send into the rip rap

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like it might not come back to I do like

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the dual purpose knocker puller, but this product, they're asking

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy five dollars and that's steep And if this were

1:04:07.360 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks, I might bite, But I'd still either forget

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring the product fishing or just lose it in

1:04:13.480 --> 1:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the garage with all the other retrievers. So I'm still out.

1:04:16.760 --> 1:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But the best part of all this is the Kickstarter video,

1:04:20.440 --> 1:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and what I gather is that this is made by

1:04:22.280 --> 1:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a European company because they talk about meters and stuff

1:04:26.160 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of feat But they're trying to make the video

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>uber American. They have this scruffy they have this scruffy

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>dud there that they've named Mike very American Mike um

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's supposed to be this sad bass fisherman that

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>keeps losing lords, but the narration misses the mark. He's

1:04:44.400 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>also he's also driving a Toyota high Lux, So that's

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dead giveaway, but I don't Yeah, it's

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the long skinny ones, also dead giveaway. But

1:04:56.320 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to this intro clip, Meet Mike, the saddest guy

1:05:02.280 --> 1:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on the water. Mike just sacrificed his favorite lure to

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the river lake gods. He had no say in the matter, Like,

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>who are the river lake gods? Did you catch that

1:05:16.120 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in there? Okay? They also they also flashed to a

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>shot of Mike with a big, large mouth that's clearly

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>his European head photoshopped on Denny Brower's so photo shopped,

1:05:25.640 --> 1:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but but he's still a badass. Listen to this. He

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>drove here with a glad heart, an open road, and

1:05:32.280 --> 1:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the music as loud as he damned well pleased glad

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>hearted who uses the term with That's some had some

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Hansel and Gretel ship right there. Um anyway, that's what

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I got the gizmo, gadgets and gimmick file this week. Um,

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, seventy five bucks buys a lot

1:05:48.240 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of Sanko's, so no thank you. But what do you

1:05:50.480 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Dude? It's I don't know. You

1:05:52.680 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't scroll down far enough. Only gets the basic model

1:05:58.400 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>if you if you want that sweet real contraption that

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>comes with it, you're talking a hundred and nine dollars.

1:06:06.960 --> 1:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Whoa wait a minute, I screwed up. So seventy five

1:06:09.960 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>bones only gets you what? Then it gets you the retriever,

1:06:14.000 --> 1:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a pack of lure clips, of really snazzy carrying case

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>with velcro strips, an Alan wrench that they call a

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>maintenance tool, full instructions, and a carabineer for your vest.

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But how do you slide it down the line if

1:06:29.080 --> 1:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no line connected to it? You didn't read this

1:06:32.800 --> 1:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at all? Did you? You have a bunch of gear

1:06:36.320 --> 1:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for fishing, including the reels from your old rods? Cool?

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Then just grab this small but mighty retriever and use

1:06:42.960 --> 1:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>your old reels to complete the set. You were more

1:06:45.720 --> 1:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>thorough than I was, because another thing that crossed my mind.

1:06:47.840 --> 1:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>If you watch the video of the Lord being retrieved,

1:06:50.600 --> 1:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like, how do you do this by yourself? Because

1:06:53.120 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they've got one dude pulling the rod tight that you'd

1:06:57.240 --> 1:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>sending it, which means you better also have a friend.

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So for like fifty extra bucks, they might be able

1:07:02.200 --> 1:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to get you a friend as well. I gotta admit, man,

1:07:05.560 --> 1:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought that this was pretty well done. And when

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I got down to the end of their marketing Spudle,

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I'm gonna sign up. They toltally got me,

1:07:14.440 --> 1:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and then I dug deeper and like two bucks, and

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>then I kept going deeper and like the next one

1:07:20.840 --> 1:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>offered is like, well, you might lose the retriever, so

1:07:23.480 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>here's what it would cost for a set with a

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>second retriever. And I'm like, wait, I thought the whole

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>point of this was that you never lose it all right, now,

1:07:29.720 --> 1:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm out. I was almost there. This is like what

1:07:33.360 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>goes around comes around. It's like a lot of these

1:07:35.920 --> 1:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>gimmicks are just revamped versions of ship that didn't work

1:07:39.080 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the first two times they came around, and I'm like,

1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we've come back around the lure retrievers, Like that's one

1:07:44.560 --> 1:07:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't been reinvantaged. I want them to work. I

1:07:48.520 --> 1:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>want someone to reinvent the lure retriever in a in

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a way that that's functional and actually works. So I

1:07:54.320 --> 1:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe this is the one I wanted to

1:07:56.400 --> 1:07:58.919
<v Speaker 1>be and if it really did work, if it really

1:07:58.960 --> 1:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>did work, I would, and two it I would, But

1:08:02.440 --> 1:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced it will work. Yeah, if I knew,

1:08:04.880 --> 1:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I could get all my line and lures back off

1:08:06.960 --> 1:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the Lake River and not have to

1:08:09.120 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>worry about it. Yes, and the river lake gods anymore.

1:08:14.240 --> 1:08:17.559
<v Speaker 1>If it was seventy get it for Christmas. But not that.

1:08:17.640 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But maybe you will get one and we'll we'll get

1:08:20.160 --> 1:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that more later, perhaps over a drink.

1:08:23.280 --> 1:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're gonna go get as soon as we

1:08:24.960 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>hear from Phil this week to see who won. Um

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>here from Phil, then go pony up to that's my bar,

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Miles Nulty. Your story went deep, but unfortunately I am

1:08:39.400 --> 1:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>a shallow person. So the winner this week is Joe Surmeli. Okay, guys,

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta complean about something. One of the reasons I

1:08:48.000 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>actually named Joe the winner this week was because I

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>have put something together. It's something I've actually been working

1:08:56.479 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>on for the last couple of weeks. I have not

1:08:58.400 --> 1:09:02.639
<v Speaker 1>told you about it. Um, you've probably heard of this service,

1:09:03.080 --> 1:09:06.519
<v Speaker 1>this app, this website called Cameo, where you know, you

1:09:06.560 --> 1:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>can pay c list celebrities to record a little personalized

1:09:10.720 --> 1:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>video for you thirty seconds long. Maybe they were a

1:09:13.880 --> 1:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>list celebrities back in the day, but have you know,

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:20.599
<v Speaker 1>just dropped a few letter grades over the years. It happens, Joe.

1:09:22.200 --> 1:09:25.599
<v Speaker 1>I know you are a big Jaws fan. I think

1:09:25.600 --> 1:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows this. I put something together. Friend from high

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>school actually works for Cameo. I don't know how he

1:09:33.360 --> 1:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>got that job, but he got it. I've been working

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>with him to kind of find a little loophole to

1:09:39.120 --> 1:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>put this together. You could say that I had to

1:09:42.640 --> 1:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>jump through some hoops to make this happen. Catching on yet, Joe,

1:09:50.080 --> 1:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>someone has a little message for you, sucker. No, I

1:10:03.439 --> 1:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>did not get Richard Dreyfuss to record a cameo for you, Joe. Um,

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Richard Dreyfuss is on Cameo. This is true. You can

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>look it up. He has one of the steepest prices

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>out of anyone I've ever seen on cameo. So for

1:10:15.600 --> 1:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, lolo price of one thousand dollars, that's true,

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get a personalized video from Richard Dreyfuss. If

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to fork out that kind of money,

1:10:26.720 --> 1:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get the kenting your kid that was eaten

1:10:29.120 --> 1:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>by the shark for thirty five dollars. So something to

1:10:32.240 --> 1:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>think about. Best god damn bar tender from Tim buck

1:10:38.360 --> 1:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to to Portland's Maine Portland argument for that matter. Lately,

1:10:44.200 --> 1:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say all of you out there, you the listeners,

1:10:47.680 --> 1:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you you are getting back on point with the barn nominal. Yes, yes, applause.

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>For sure, we are greedy and so we always want more,

1:10:57.280 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but I will say I will give credit recredits do

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We've been getting some really good ones, and and what

1:11:03.920 --> 1:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I love about this is that I can see how

1:11:07.400 --> 1:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this is. It's it's slowly but surely achieving the goal

1:11:10.960 --> 1:11:13.599
<v Speaker 1>that we had at the beginning of establishing the best

1:11:13.840 --> 1:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>fish bars across the world. Yep. So, so this week

1:11:18.360 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>we're headed to Maryland, and I'm pretty sure we have

1:11:21.600 --> 1:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not hit that state yet, so we can we can

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>put another pin in the that's my bar map. Yeah

1:11:27.840 --> 1:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we can, we can. And this nomination comes from listener

1:11:30.200 --> 1:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Marks, who wondered if I was familiar with this place,

1:11:33.880 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>which I am not. However, I've been to plenty like

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it and and victimized at similar spots. But I'll get

1:11:41.840 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to that later. I'll leave you hanging to get right

1:11:44.040 --> 1:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>into it. Kirk writes, this bar is much more than

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>just your typical fishing bar. If you're in the rock

1:11:49.800 --> 1:11:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Fish chatter stripers for you Jersey folk, okay, uh, local

1:11:54.760 --> 1:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>beers watching newlyweds to face their wedding gowns and boat

1:11:58.400 --> 1:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>handling that could only be suitable for the qualified captain

1:12:01.160 --> 1:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>feed look no further than the Jetty Restaurant and dock

1:12:04.280 --> 1:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>bar in Kent Narrows, Maryland. So, in case you missed it,

1:12:08.200 --> 1:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>rock fish, that's what they call him in Maryland. It

1:12:10.160 --> 1:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is incorrect, but that's still what they call them. He

1:12:13.400 --> 1:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>goes on, as any Chesspeake angler would tell you, the

1:12:15.760 --> 1:12:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Jetty has a reputation. Accessible by boat or a car,

1:12:18.800 --> 1:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the Jetty is a waterfront bar that offers pretty decent

1:12:21.439 --> 1:12:24.599
<v Speaker 1>seafood and pub fair, but having some friends that used

1:12:24.640 --> 1:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to work there, I gotta say I wouldn't recommend the oysters.

1:12:28.360 --> 1:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate that, Kirk. As a ravenous consumer of

1:12:32.880 --> 1:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>raw bar edibles and and having learned that the hard way. Um,

1:12:37.240 --> 1:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you gotta take it easy when there's a

1:12:38.680 --> 1:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>raw bar at the Chinese Buffet, found that out. It

1:12:41.439 --> 1:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>was difficult delicious going down, you know what I mean,

1:12:44.920 --> 1:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to hear there that. Moving away from that,

1:12:47.680 --> 1:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say thanks as well, Kirk, because that that

1:12:50.160 --> 1:12:52.479
<v Speaker 1>truly is a hot tip. God knows. When I see

1:12:52.479 --> 1:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>oysters on a beach side bar menu, I order them

1:12:56.680 --> 1:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what I do, So I'm the guy that's like, keep

1:12:58.439 --> 1:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>them coming until I say stopped, all right, Kirk continues.

1:13:05.360 --> 1:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Although I'm not certain of the name's origin, I assume

1:13:09.760 --> 1:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it has something to do with the large concrete jetty

1:13:14.160 --> 1:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and fifty yards away that mysteriously pops

1:13:17.120 --> 1:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>up right in front of drunken boaters every summer. I

1:13:21.560 --> 1:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>waited tables at the neighboring fine dining restaurant for several

1:13:25.120 --> 1:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>years throughout my time in college. After a long shift,

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>already half buzzed, from dehydration. The White Staff would make

1:13:31.880 --> 1:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>our weekly pilgrimage to the Jetty. Man, have I seen

1:13:36.360 --> 1:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>some ship there, Several good bar fights, some stellar live music,

1:13:41.080 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a handful of boating accidents, and I've even had the

1:13:44.320 --> 1:13:48.639
<v Speaker 1>pleasure of watching a classy wedding party whom I served

1:13:48.680 --> 1:13:51.519
<v Speaker 1>a few hours earlier get ship faced in a way

1:13:51.800 --> 1:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>only the Jetty can deliver. I I will say that

1:13:56.040 --> 1:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I do wish Kirk had expanded on that story, but

1:14:00.479 --> 1:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's okay. I have it a vivid imagination. I can

1:14:03.439 --> 1:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty well see where that went. Yeah, we'll choose our

1:14:05.840 --> 1:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>own adventure there. Uh. Fun fact though, I usually get

1:14:08.479 --> 1:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>drunk enough at the actual wedding reception that I'd never

1:14:10.800 --> 1:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>make it to the afterpart. That's just something about me. Um. Anyway,

1:14:14.280 --> 1:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the nomination continues. I have a feeling most folks come

1:14:18.000 --> 1:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>for the location and the entertainment alone. Hell, one time,

1:14:21.320 --> 1:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>as a young kid, I was fishing a spook from

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the dock and accidentally called a seagull. I remember receiving

1:14:25.880 --> 1:14:28.559
<v Speaker 1>evil glares as if catching that bird was my intention

1:14:28.560 --> 1:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>all along. Point being, there's never a dull moment at

1:14:31.880 --> 1:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the Jetty. And this is the part I personally sympathized

1:14:34.240 --> 1:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>with because there was a tiki bar right around the

1:14:36.760 --> 1:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>corner from where I slipped my my old boat, and

1:14:39.240 --> 1:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the fun was just sitting there watching people, you know,

1:14:41.400 --> 1:14:43.799
<v Speaker 1>try to pull into the dock for dock and dine.

1:14:44.360 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And I only ever did it once. One time, I

1:14:47.400 --> 1:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>just went straight there instead of going to my slip first,

1:14:50.400 --> 1:14:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up like pinballing off a couple of

1:14:52.600 --> 1:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>pilings and that the whole bar like clapped, and who

1:14:55.760 --> 1:14:57.679
<v Speaker 1>did And I was like, that's it. From now on,

1:14:58.080 --> 1:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I will just dock in my slip and getting truck

1:15:00.320 --> 1:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and drive over, so lesson learn there. I think that

1:15:03.360 --> 1:15:07.479
<v Speaker 1>all seaside bars should have dock parking for exactly this reason.

1:15:07.880 --> 1:15:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't need big screen TVs and and and sports.

1:15:11.720 --> 1:15:15.759
<v Speaker 1>When I can watch people making asses of themselves trying

1:15:15.800 --> 1:15:18.479
<v Speaker 1>to dock in front of a rowdy crowd. That's that,

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>my friend, is real entertainment. We appreciate this with very much, Kirk.

1:15:22.840 --> 1:15:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm always down for some solid people watching, and this

1:15:25.520 --> 1:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the perfect place to do it. If you know,

1:15:28.680 --> 1:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a fishy bar where you can see my tie while

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:34.559
<v Speaker 1>watching people like Joe crashed into the dock. Let us

1:15:34.600 --> 1:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>know where it's at by sending an email to Bent

1:15:37.880 --> 1:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Mediator dot com. You know, I looked it

1:15:42.720 --> 1:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>up and the Jetty actually has excellent online reviews, does it?

1:15:46.640 --> 1:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It does, over two thousand of them in fact. But

1:15:49.120 --> 1:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think um the fact that they served you know,

1:15:51.960 --> 1:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>stiff drinks waterside and makes people a little more lenient.

1:15:55.560 --> 1:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's a four star review I found that Jess said,

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>get some crushes, talk to the ducks, sit on the beach. Kitchen.

1:16:04.040 --> 1:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Service was slow and orders came out wrong. Hey, on

1:16:07.439 --> 1:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful day with a few drinks. It's not a problem.

1:16:10.439 --> 1:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not not what I expect. It's perfect review. But

1:16:17.280 --> 1:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>if that dude, if he had that experience at the

1:16:19.160 --> 1:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Olive Garden Inland, would be a whole different room. You'd be,

1:16:21.680 --> 1:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it'd be it'd be one stars. That I'm pissed. It's

1:16:23.840 --> 1:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's that old adage location location, location service might suck, food,

1:16:28.040 --> 1:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>might be all wrong, but you still get four stars

1:16:30.400 --> 1:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because exactly stiff and I see the water. I like it.

1:16:34.680 --> 1:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That's smart. We're gonna close out the show with an

1:16:37.120 --> 1:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the line about a traditional lure for targetus

1:16:40.280 --> 1:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>species that used to be underrated but I'd say has

1:16:45.040 --> 1:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>caught on with the foodie crowd in the past decade

1:16:48.000 --> 1:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>or so, and it's it's no longer underrated. We're talking

1:16:50.800 --> 1:17:03.679
<v Speaker 1>about delicious, delicious octopus. Well, that's not loud enough. When

1:17:03.680 --> 1:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I was in middle school, our Hawaiian studies teacher assigned

1:17:07.000 --> 1:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what I thought was going to be the greatest project

1:17:09.600 --> 1:17:12.479
<v Speaker 1>of all time. We were each going to make a

1:17:12.560 --> 1:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>traditional octopus lure. I was ecstatic. Finally homework that centered

1:17:18.960 --> 1:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on fishing. I imagined myself not just building the lure,

1:17:23.280 --> 1:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but catching an octopus on it, maybe even bringing some

1:17:26.439 --> 1:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>in to share with the class. Then I got the

1:17:29.479 --> 1:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>materials list and realized we were going to make it

1:17:32.280 --> 1:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>out of toothpicks, chopsticks, and glue. Actual hooks were deemed

1:17:37.400 --> 1:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>too dangerous for a classroom use. I suppose the whole

1:17:41.120 --> 1:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>exercise felt representative of my frustrations with school in general.

1:17:45.120 --> 1:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I had no opposition to learning. In fact, I relished

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>new knowledge and skills, but we often received a pasteurized

1:17:51.840 --> 1:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>version of information. Everything was classroom convenient and safe, but

1:17:57.240 --> 1:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it lacked direct application. Sure, I was going to make

1:18:01.240 --> 1:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>something that looked kind of like a traditional octopus lure,

1:18:05.640 --> 1:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but I couldn't actually use it to catch octopus. So

1:18:10.360 --> 1:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I failed to see the point. And I'm pretty sure

1:18:13.320 --> 1:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I also failed that assignment. I always hated arts and crafts.

1:18:18.360 --> 1:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Hawaiian octopus or lures haven't actually changed all that much

1:18:22.680 --> 1:18:26.479
<v Speaker 1>since ancient times. They were first documented by Westerners in

1:18:26.520 --> 1:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the mid eighteen hundreds, and the ones for sale today

1:18:29.439 --> 1:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at local tackle shops and hardware stores across the islands

1:18:32.120 --> 1:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>remain surprisingly similar. A cowichell attached to a weight above

1:18:38.560 --> 1:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>one or more hooks. Native Hawaiians used rope fashion from

1:18:43.320 --> 1:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>plant fibers to lash, an elliptical stone sinker, a cowichell,

1:18:47.880 --> 1:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and a bone hook to a six inch wooden stick

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to create They would troll or jig the lures over

1:18:55.200 --> 1:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>pockets in the reef. Cowry are a favorite food of octopus,

1:18:59.200 --> 1:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and the lures would often tempt hungry cephalopods out of

1:19:02.960 --> 1:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>their holes. Hawaiian historian Samuel Camacao described it this way.

1:19:08.920 --> 1:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>The handsome stone was husband to the cowari, and the

1:19:11.960 --> 1:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>colary was married to the stone. When the two matched

1:19:16.120 --> 1:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in beauty and they swayed in dance in the ocean,

1:19:19.560 --> 1:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the came to watch the joyful dance. Those of them

1:19:23.240 --> 1:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who wished to kiss the calorie leaped to embrace and

1:19:27.200 --> 1:19:30.599
<v Speaker 1>kiss her because they were aroused by the dance. When

1:19:30.720 --> 1:19:33.559
<v Speaker 1>he took hold of the cowali, the fisherman pulled up

1:19:33.560 --> 1:19:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the cord swiftly with his right hand, grabbed it with

1:19:36.560 --> 1:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>his left, and pulled hard against the side of the canoe,

1:19:39.080 --> 1:19:43.519
<v Speaker 1>which forced the hook into the hay. Modern Hawaiian octopus

1:19:43.600 --> 1:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>lures have swapped out the wood and bone for metal

1:19:46.000 --> 1:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and the stone for lead. Some still used calari shells,

1:19:48.920 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but others feel that's unnecessarily specific, claiming that a painted

1:19:54.040 --> 1:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>golf ball works just as well and is far more durable.

1:19:57.840 --> 1:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Octopuses are pretty damn good at crushing shell after all. Basically,

1:20:02.520 --> 1:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>though the technology and technique remain the same, most of

1:20:07.000 --> 1:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the lures I've seen for sale commercially also have six

1:20:10.520 --> 1:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to ten inch metal times on the bottom, which allow

1:20:13.439 --> 1:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>anglers to drag them over rocks without getting hung up

1:20:16.360 --> 1:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>as often. When I was a kid, we occasionally spear

1:20:20.000 --> 1:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>fished for octopus, generally with very little success, but I've

1:20:24.200 --> 1:20:27.559
<v Speaker 1>always been enthralled by the idea of catching one with

1:20:27.600 --> 1:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a lure, which usually involves one of two techniques. The

1:20:31.800 --> 1:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>first is sometimes called drag shell essentially just slow trolling

1:20:36.120 --> 1:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>and octopus lure over promising bottom and waiting for one

1:20:39.520 --> 1:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to grab it. The second is more sight fishing than trolling.

1:20:44.320 --> 1:20:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Anglers take canoes, kayaks, or even surfboards out to good

1:20:47.560 --> 1:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>spots and then snorkel at the surface, carefully studying the bottom.

1:20:52.400 --> 1:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>When they see an octopus or what looks like a

1:20:54.920 --> 1:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>promising hole, they'll jigg a lure and try to entice

1:20:58.720 --> 1:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the creature into grabbing it. One thing I do know

1:21:03.439 --> 1:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>from limited experience is that hooking or spirity and octopus

1:21:07.160 --> 1:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is just the beginning. The real trick is killing them

1:21:10.320 --> 1:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly and safely. As most people know, octopuses have eight

1:21:15.120 --> 1:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>arms covered in powerful suction cups, and they will grab, crawl,

1:21:20.240 --> 1:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and yank hard at you to survive. They also have

1:21:23.360 --> 1:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a nasty, sharp beak where all those arms meet that

1:21:26.920 --> 1:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>can take serious divots out of your flesh and possibly

1:21:30.400 --> 1:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>sever a finger. Once you get hand to hand with one,

1:21:34.720 --> 1:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to kill it quickly. The hardcores, and traditionalists

1:21:39.200 --> 1:21:42.559
<v Speaker 1>bite them between the eyes, crushing the brain almost instantly.

1:21:43.560 --> 1:21:46.519
<v Speaker 1>I was never that much of a badass, instead using

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the howly method of stabbing them in the same spot

1:21:49.479 --> 1:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with a dive knife. Not nearly as cool, but definitely effective.

1:21:53.920 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I know some people turn the heads inside out, but

1:21:57.680 --> 1:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I personally recommend killing them first. Trying to turn a

1:22:01.280 --> 1:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>squirming and surprisingly powerful octopus inside out is not as

1:22:05.439 --> 1:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>easy as it looks on YouTube. I once read an

1:22:09.240 --> 1:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>essay called how to Kill an Octopus by Alison Wilkins,

1:22:13.240 --> 1:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and one passage in particular has always stuck with me.

1:22:18.040 --> 1:22:21.519
<v Speaker 1>An octopus can see light, They have great eyesight and

1:22:21.640 --> 1:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>sense of touch. Their suction cups have chemo receptors that

1:22:25.720 --> 1:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>allow an octopus to taste what it is touching. Imagine

1:22:30.160 --> 1:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for a moment that the octopus is wrapped around your

1:22:33.040 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>arm trying not to die. What do you taste like

1:22:37.439 --> 1:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>as you bob in the water with this creature and

1:22:40.520 --> 1:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>your weapon? What do you taste like as you kill it?

1:22:50.240 --> 1:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the end of our show this week. But

1:22:52.360 --> 1:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're planning to write us a review on whichever

1:22:54.360 --> 1:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>streaming service you prefer and need a reference guide for

1:22:57.400 --> 1:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>all the fantastic dishes we served up, scorpion fish are

1:23:00.360 --> 1:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>better than salmon. Australian salmon aren't salmon and should never

1:23:03.400 --> 1:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>be smuggled like budgies. Now polish does belong in your

1:23:07.840 --> 1:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>tackle bag after all, and octopus speaks can crush cowie shells,

1:23:11.360 --> 1:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>golf balls and your finger equally true story, Please keep

1:23:15.720 --> 1:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>those bar nominations, sale bind items, awkward photos, fish news stories,

1:23:19.120 --> 1:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and Dear John letters coming to Bent at the Meat

1:23:22.120 --> 1:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Eater dot com. Yeah, I don't forget to drop our

1:23:24.760 --> 1:23:28.479
<v Speaker 1>favorite hashtags degenerate angler and Bent podcast on the Graham

1:23:28.800 --> 1:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for the chance to win sticker prizes, and uh, you know,

1:23:32.240 --> 1:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and give us some good ratings on your

1:23:34.760 --> 1:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast service. Right now, we're tied with the Jetty.

1:23:38.840 --> 1:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we can do better. MS lost by