1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:02,560 Speaker 1: This is Tom Rowland's Reese and you're listening to Switched 2 00:00:02,560 --> 00:00:05,160 Speaker 1: on the podcast brought to you by B and EF. 3 00:00:05,559 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: Following controversies surrounding voluntary carbon credits markets, a lack of 4 00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:12,799 Speaker 1: regulation and standardization has continued to prove a challenge when 5 00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: it comes to the use of credits as a means 6 00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:17,800 Speaker 1: of decarbonization For aviation, one of the hardest to abate 7 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: sectors and the only transport sector with growing oil demand. 8 00:00:20,880 --> 00:00:24,079 Speaker 1: The United Nations has recently introduced the Carbon Offsetting and 9 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:28,320 Speaker 1: Reduction Scheme for International Aviation, more commonly known as CORSEA, 10 00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 1: in a bid to offer legitimacy for carbon credits to 11 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:33,760 Speaker 1: help tackle emissions at scale. With one hundred and twenty 12 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:36,600 Speaker 1: six markets currently signed up and that number set to 13 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:39,520 Speaker 1: rise to one hundred and thirty five from twenty twenty seven, 14 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:43,120 Speaker 1: CORSA boasts a truly global footprint, but with the Trump 15 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:46,520 Speaker 1: administration looking set to pull the US's involvement, the EU 16 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:50,200 Speaker 1: questioning its effectiveness and its non legally binding structure, meaning 17 00:00:50,240 --> 00:00:53,519 Speaker 1: individual markets have to police themselves. Just how impactful can 18 00:00:53,560 --> 00:00:56,120 Speaker 1: CORCIA really be? Today I'm joined by a member of 19 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 1: our Environmental Markets team, Associate Leila Camphire and we discussed 20 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:03,840 Speaker 1: findings from her note aviation credits market outlook. CORSA gets 21 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,760 Speaker 1: its wings, which BNAF clients can find at BNF go 22 00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg terminal or on BNF dot com. All right, 23 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:22,560 Speaker 1: let's get to talking about CORSEA with Leila. So, Leila, 24 00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:23,560 Speaker 1: welcome to the show. 25 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:24,720 Speaker 2: Thank you for having me. 26 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 1: So I'm going to confess I've always found CORSEA to 27 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:31,080 Speaker 1: be a little bit of an intimidating topic. In all 28 00:01:31,080 --> 00:01:34,160 Speaker 1: the different parts of my career where I have been 29 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 1: adjacent to or involved in carbon markets, CORSIA has been 30 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:40,679 Speaker 1: this sort of shadow lurking in the background. And the 31 00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:43,840 Speaker 1: reason I'm so intimidated by it was that everything had 32 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:47,480 Speaker 1: it seemed kind of complicated, involves lots of different nations, 33 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:51,320 Speaker 1: flights going to and from one place, so which jurisdiction 34 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:53,640 Speaker 1: does it fall into? You know, is it voluntary? Is 35 00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:56,240 Speaker 1: it mandatory? But it all seemed a little bit scary 36 00:01:56,320 --> 00:01:59,040 Speaker 1: to me. So I hope that today we can demystify 37 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:01,960 Speaker 1: some of this and to start with, tell us what 38 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:04,520 Speaker 1: is CORSA and how does it work well. 39 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:08,440 Speaker 2: CORSIA stands for the carbon offsetting and Reduction scheme for 40 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:10,079 Speaker 2: international aviation. 41 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:10,400 Speaker 1: Got it? 42 00:02:12,040 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 2: And that's all you need to know. No, just kidding. 43 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 2: So this is a un governed scheme, so it is 44 00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 2: international by nature, but it's not legally binding. You've got 45 00:02:21,400 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 2: member states to the International Civil Aviation Organization which the 46 00:02:26,240 --> 00:02:30,360 Speaker 2: scheme falls under, and this is the jurisdiction or the 47 00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:33,840 Speaker 2: mandate of Corsia's the member states of KAO. The scheme 48 00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:39,240 Speaker 2: aims at decarbonizing international aviation for both passenger and cargo flights. 49 00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:43,040 Speaker 2: And it works in different phases and it has different 50 00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:47,240 Speaker 2: ways that airlines especially can decarbonize their emissions. And it 51 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,440 Speaker 2: runs from twenty twenty one until twenty thirty five. 52 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:54,519 Speaker 1: And what happens after twenty thirty five, then there'll be reconvene, 53 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:57,240 Speaker 1: there'll be a new scheme of some of. 54 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:00,959 Speaker 2: Some it's still unclear. They could extend that, they could 55 00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:03,920 Speaker 2: have a new scheme, they could redesign the scheme. It 56 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:07,040 Speaker 2: is still unclear. Coursia as it stands now is also 57 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:10,239 Speaker 2: not really set in stone. So at every three years, 58 00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 2: which is whenever a new compliance cycle starts, they'll sit 59 00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 2: together and maybe do some changes to the scheme. So 60 00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:19,079 Speaker 2: who knows what will happen in twenty thirty five. 61 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:22,000 Speaker 1: And so just understand that the history of the scheme 62 00:03:22,120 --> 00:03:26,519 Speaker 1: Cossia has been in existence as a concept before. Now 63 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 1: has it just been all talk up until now or 64 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 1: is this just a new phase of something that has 65 00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:32,400 Speaker 1: been ongoing. 66 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:35,840 Speaker 2: No, it's not all talk. So as I mentioned earlier, 67 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,720 Speaker 2: it runs in three main phases, pilot phase, first phase, 68 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:43,760 Speaker 2: and second phase. The pilot and first phase are both voluntary, 69 00:03:43,840 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 2: and the pilot phase started in twenty twenty one and 70 00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,560 Speaker 2: it ran until twenty twenty three, so it was still running. 71 00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:53,200 Speaker 2: There were still some talk around it, but it was 72 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 2: more of a trial period, and then when we entered 73 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,320 Speaker 2: the first phase in twenty twenty four is when most 74 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:02,440 Speaker 2: market players, especially airline start paying attention. I think what 75 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 2: makes Corsia a bit of a shadow that lurks like 76 00:04:05,360 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 2: you described it is that airlines compliance deadlines actually are 77 00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:16,520 Speaker 2: like thirteen months after each compliance cycle ends, So it 78 00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:20,400 Speaker 2: gives us a lot of time to contemplate and pick 79 00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:22,680 Speaker 2: and choose and decide what we want to do until 80 00:04:22,720 --> 00:04:26,040 Speaker 2: we have to submit our upsetting obligations under Corsia. 81 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 1: I mean, I'd love to have been in the meeting 82 00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:31,560 Speaker 1: where they decided specifically it had to be thirteen months, 83 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:35,359 Speaker 1: so odd yeah, that really logical time period. So just 84 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:37,960 Speaker 1: to really clarify, we're now going from the pilot phase 85 00:04:38,040 --> 00:04:40,040 Speaker 1: of COURSIA, which in twenty twenty three. We're in the 86 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:43,080 Speaker 1: first phase of CORSIA, and then the mandatory phase would 87 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 1: be when. 88 00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:46,960 Speaker 2: So the second phase is mandatory for all ico member 89 00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:50,440 Speaker 2: states unless they are except and that starts in twenty 90 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:53,320 Speaker 2: twenty seven. So up until now, when we say voluntary, 91 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:56,680 Speaker 2: it means that certain states have said we'll participate and 92 00:04:56,720 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 2: we'll see how that goes. But once they do, airlines 93 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 2: have to comply. 94 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 1: And so i COW, I'm sorry if you already spelled out, 95 00:05:03,839 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 1: could you just define out ICAO and I'll be curious 96 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 1: to know how many states are part of it? 97 00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:13,280 Speaker 2: Okay, So ICOW stands for the International Civil Aviation Organization. 98 00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:16,760 Speaker 2: It's the part of the yue that runs CORSEA, and 99 00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:21,280 Speaker 2: member states to ICW I believe are north of one 100 00:05:21,360 --> 00:05:25,159 Speaker 2: hundred and fifty. But the ones that for sure are 101 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:30,039 Speaker 2: participating in the second phase or the mandatory phase of CORSEA, 102 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:33,560 Speaker 2: are one hundred and thirty five. Because ICOW does give 103 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 2: out exemptions to small states or island states, et cetera. 104 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 1: Got it, So countries that have less alternative options to 105 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:43,719 Speaker 1: relying on aviation, I. 106 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:46,600 Speaker 2: Would say so. Also, to clarify, one hundred and twenty 107 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 2: six markets volunteer to participate in CORSEA in twenty twenty four, 108 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:52,480 Speaker 2: that's the beginning of the first phase, and then three 109 00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 2: additional markets joined in twenty twenty five, So now we're 110 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:58,039 Speaker 2: up to one hundred and twenty nine for phase one, 111 00:05:58,240 --> 00:06:01,119 Speaker 2: and then in phase two, which in twenty twenty seven, 112 00:06:01,279 --> 00:06:04,680 Speaker 2: around one hundred and thirty five markets are expected to join. 113 00:06:04,920 --> 00:06:07,599 Speaker 1: So when we get into the mandatory part of phase one, 114 00:06:07,800 --> 00:06:10,719 Speaker 1: it's actually not going to be that big a difference 115 00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:14,000 Speaker 1: in terms of the number of countries participating. The majority 116 00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:17,640 Speaker 1: of countries that are part of AIKAO have already opted in. 117 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:23,480 Speaker 2: That is true. However, the ones that are joining in 118 00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:27,560 Speaker 2: phase two are Russia and China and India and Brazil, 119 00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 2: and those are big markets that would impact the emissions 120 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:35,400 Speaker 2: covered under CRISTIAS, So those emissions would actually go up 121 00:06:35,400 --> 00:06:38,479 Speaker 2: by around fifty percent in twenty twenty seven relative to 122 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:39,359 Speaker 2: twenty twenty six. 123 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 1: Okay, wo wow, that's a pretty big difference. Okay, cool, 124 00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:46,160 Speaker 1: So I think I've I've got a good understanding certainly 125 00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:49,840 Speaker 1: compared to where I was five minutes ago on you 126 00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: know what COURSEA is and the sort of the scope 127 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 1: and and the sort of trajectory of it. So then 128 00:06:57,400 --> 00:07:00,479 Speaker 1: the next big question is is what options do the 129 00:07:00,520 --> 00:07:05,880 Speaker 1: airlines actually have to reduce their emissions under this scheme. 130 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:10,880 Speaker 2: So airlines have two options. They can either use carbon credits, 131 00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:13,080 Speaker 2: which is why I'm on the podcast to begin with, 132 00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:17,560 Speaker 2: and those are CORSIA eligible carbon credits, or they can 133 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:21,960 Speaker 2: use CORSIA eligible fuels and those include saff or sustainable 134 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:25,520 Speaker 2: aviation fuels or lower carbon aviation fuels, and they to 135 00:07:25,560 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 2: meet Corsia's criteria, a fuels life cycle emissions must be 136 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:32,840 Speaker 2: at least ten percent lower than those of conventional jet fuel. 137 00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:36,960 Speaker 2: As for the CORSIA eligible credits, they need to also 138 00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:41,320 Speaker 2: be approved by ICO, they need to meet certain eligibility criteria. 139 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:44,800 Speaker 2: But there's an additional layer of complication, which is that 140 00:07:44,880 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 2: these credits need to be approved by their host countries 141 00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 2: such that these governments apply corresponding adjustments so they don't 142 00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 2: double count the emission reductions when they're accounting for their NDCs. 143 00:07:56,840 --> 00:08:01,680 Speaker 1: For example, Got it, so the emissions reductions take place 144 00:08:01,760 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 1: under ICO, you're saying is that can't count towards the 145 00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:10,560 Speaker 1: country's DC emissions target. Correct, And so these when we're 146 00:08:10,560 --> 00:08:14,200 Speaker 1: talking about eligible offsets and eligible fuels, is that all 147 00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 1: determined by ICO? 148 00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 2: Then yes, more or less. So for fuels, ICOW does 149 00:08:19,960 --> 00:08:22,840 Speaker 2: provide airlines with a set of fuels that are eligible 150 00:08:23,080 --> 00:08:26,080 Speaker 2: and then there's a bunch of documentation airlines need to 151 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 2: submit to ICO for it to count. And the same 152 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:33,000 Speaker 2: goes for credits. But the thing with course eligible credits 153 00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:36,640 Speaker 2: is that you don't have new credits that come from 154 00:08:36,720 --> 00:08:40,520 Speaker 2: a special ICO registry that's reserved for the use of airlines. 155 00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:44,640 Speaker 2: They're actually borrowed from the existing voluntary carbon market, which 156 00:08:44,720 --> 00:08:47,040 Speaker 2: we know and we've discussed before, even on this podcast 157 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 2: last year. It's a very troubled market and it's bruised. 158 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:54,880 Speaker 2: So that adds a layer of complexity to what CORSEA 159 00:08:55,040 --> 00:08:57,320 Speaker 2: or ICO in general has to do to make sure 160 00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:01,160 Speaker 2: that those credits are legitimate and have high environmental impact. 161 00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:05,080 Speaker 1: Right. So that's part of the issue then, is that 162 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 1: the voluntary markets at the moment have too many low 163 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:11,480 Speaker 1: quality credits, and that is why EIKAW has kind of 164 00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:16,640 Speaker 1: created its own specifications, but those same high quality credits 165 00:09:16,679 --> 00:09:20,640 Speaker 1: are still available to other sectors, which airlines will have 166 00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 1: to compete with those other sectors as well. 167 00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:24,760 Speaker 2: Exactly, Yeah, exactly. 168 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:30,440 Speaker 1: So whenever we're looking at an emissions reduction scheme, particularly 169 00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:34,040 Speaker 1: one which is as maybe complex isn't the word, but 170 00:09:34,400 --> 00:09:38,839 Speaker 1: it's sort of so multilateral, let's say, between nations, the 171 00:09:38,960 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: question always comes is is doesn't really have teeth? Obviously, 172 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,600 Speaker 1: the first phase is voluntary, although let's assume that all 173 00:09:45,600 --> 00:09:48,920 Speaker 1: of the countries involved have good enough intentions that they 174 00:09:49,760 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 1: have volunteered seriously, and then it's mandatory after twenty twenty seven. 175 00:09:53,360 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 1: But what happens when these targets aren't met? I mean 176 00:09:58,679 --> 00:10:01,479 Speaker 1: who's on the hook? Firstly? Is it the airlines specifically, 177 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:03,480 Speaker 1: or is it the countries or is it sort of 178 00:10:03,760 --> 00:10:05,640 Speaker 1: the airlines are on the hook to the countries and 179 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:07,640 Speaker 1: the countries are on the hook to the scheme? Yeah, 180 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:11,240 Speaker 1: what is the What are the mechanisms that really ensure 181 00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:13,920 Speaker 1: that this doesn't turn into sort of you know, I 182 00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:16,400 Speaker 1: mentioned earlier all talk. How do we ensure that this 183 00:10:16,440 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 1: isn't all talk? 184 00:10:17,679 --> 00:10:21,920 Speaker 2: It's honestly down to the participating member states and governments 185 00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:25,600 Speaker 2: to determine this. So this scheme, or at least the 186 00:10:25,720 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 2: responsibility to decarbonize falls on airlines. But airlines are on 187 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:36,080 Speaker 2: the hook to the countries, like you explained, So some 188 00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:39,440 Speaker 2: countries or some governments like Canada and the UK, did 189 00:10:39,679 --> 00:10:43,199 Speaker 2: incorporate CORSIA into their national laws, so they have monetary 190 00:10:43,240 --> 00:10:47,240 Speaker 2: penalties for airlines that fail to comply. The UK has 191 00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 2: a pretty significant one. So if I'm an airline and 192 00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:53,319 Speaker 2: I'm operating my flight between the UK and another member 193 00:10:53,400 --> 00:10:56,480 Speaker 2: state and I don't comply with CORSIA, then I will 194 00:10:56,480 --> 00:10:58,760 Speaker 2: have to pay around two thousand pounds a day, so 195 00:10:58,800 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 2: that will force me to go and those credits rather 196 00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:05,200 Speaker 2: than pay that fine. But for other governments that don't 197 00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 2: have any penalties in place, they don't really enforce CORSIA 198 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:12,880 Speaker 2: international law. There is nothing really binding those airlines to 199 00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:15,920 Speaker 2: comply unless out of the good of their hearts they 200 00:11:15,960 --> 00:11:18,360 Speaker 2: want to, or if they want to avoid also reputational 201 00:11:18,440 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 2: risk that comes with not decarbonizing, which they're already sort 202 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:22,480 Speaker 2: of under. 203 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 1: And just one more question, and this this is not 204 00:11:25,520 --> 00:11:28,800 Speaker 1: so much about enforcement. You know, whenever I, as an 205 00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:31,240 Speaker 1: individual go and book a flight, I do always have 206 00:11:31,280 --> 00:11:34,680 Speaker 1: the option as a consumer to buy offset credits to 207 00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:40,560 Speaker 1: offset my flight. So can airlines also claim those as 208 00:11:40,880 --> 00:11:44,920 Speaker 1: reduced emissions or is that sort of is the emissions 209 00:11:44,920 --> 00:11:46,960 Speaker 1: that they reductions they have to make in addition to 210 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:49,040 Speaker 1: whatever offsets consumers taking. 211 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:52,840 Speaker 2: Those flights a buying, So it's a bit more complicated. 212 00:11:53,160 --> 00:11:55,200 Speaker 2: So when you go as a consumer and you go 213 00:11:55,280 --> 00:11:57,360 Speaker 2: buy a ticket and some offsets on top of it 214 00:11:57,440 --> 00:12:00,720 Speaker 2: to offset your emissions, airlines used out more or less 215 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:03,920 Speaker 2: like a marketing strategy, and you often end up buying 216 00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:08,440 Speaker 2: very cheap credits that do have questionable environmental impacts, and 217 00:12:08,480 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 2: if they are questionable, then they are likely not eligible 218 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:16,120 Speaker 2: to be used towards CORSIA regardless. The way this works, 219 00:12:16,559 --> 00:12:20,280 Speaker 2: or at least the way airlines submit their emissions or 220 00:12:20,280 --> 00:12:23,400 Speaker 2: account for their emissions for CORSIA, is that they count 221 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:25,480 Speaker 2: how many emissions they have at the end of every year, 222 00:12:25,720 --> 00:12:30,080 Speaker 2: and then they compare that with a preset baseline for 223 00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:34,680 Speaker 2: that year, and for CORSIA, it's the twenty nineteen emission levels, 224 00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:37,680 Speaker 2: and then my total emissions is an airline for that 225 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:41,120 Speaker 2: year needs to be below that twenty nineteen baseline, and 226 00:12:41,160 --> 00:12:44,480 Speaker 2: the difference is what you need to reduce using credits 227 00:12:44,600 --> 00:12:45,960 Speaker 2: or eligible. 228 00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: Fuels, so those consumer offset credits are irrelevant both to 229 00:12:50,559 --> 00:12:56,760 Speaker 1: CORSA and ultimately to how many emissions are made overall. 230 00:12:56,920 --> 00:13:00,880 Speaker 1: In effect, if there's such poor quality, let's move on 231 00:13:00,960 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 1: to talking about the sort of the geopolitics of this. 232 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:07,959 Speaker 1: You know, you've talked a little bit about the challenges 233 00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:11,600 Speaker 1: of you know, maybe different degrees of commitment to enforcing this. 234 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:14,000 Speaker 1: The UK and Canada have turned it into law, maybe 235 00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:16,040 Speaker 1: some other countries will, I mean, is that something that 236 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:18,800 Speaker 1: we see happening? Yeah, how does this all play into 237 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:22,520 Speaker 1: the relationships between all the different countries involved? 238 00:13:22,640 --> 00:13:26,160 Speaker 2: More or less, the relationships between countries don't seem to 239 00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:30,040 Speaker 2: be affected as much if they're all operating under an 240 00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:33,080 Speaker 2: international scheme that they've signed to do, signed up to do. 241 00:13:33,400 --> 00:13:36,320 Speaker 2: When we talk about geopolitics and Christia, I think the 242 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:39,920 Speaker 2: main question that arises is will the US actually participate 243 00:13:40,200 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 2: in Courstia given the Trump administration and their view on 244 00:13:45,080 --> 00:13:49,280 Speaker 2: climate policies in general. But the relationships between countries themselves, 245 00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:53,720 Speaker 2: having them governed by as scheme like Cristia actually protects 246 00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:56,960 Speaker 2: them from any tension, which is a solution that we 247 00:13:57,000 --> 00:14:00,839 Speaker 2: see to other compliance carbon schemes trying to expand to 248 00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:03,880 Speaker 2: international aviation but could not because of these issues and 249 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:04,840 Speaker 2: these complexities. 250 00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:09,360 Speaker 1: So Leila, we've kind of established a little bit about 251 00:14:09,400 --> 00:14:13,760 Speaker 1: the qualitatively how CORSEA works. But you are a BNF 252 00:14:13,800 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: analyst and a very fine one, indeed, which means that 253 00:14:16,840 --> 00:14:20,680 Speaker 1: you presumably have somewhere a spreadsheet where you've crunched the 254 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:22,840 Speaker 1: numbers and figured out what all of this means, and 255 00:14:22,840 --> 00:14:25,560 Speaker 1: you've put it into a report which BNF clients can 256 00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:28,480 Speaker 1: access at BNF dot com or on the terminal via 257 00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 1: BNF Go. But you will have created a forecast, I presume, 258 00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:35,200 Speaker 1: of what all of this means. So talk us through 259 00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:38,120 Speaker 1: the numbers. How much demand is there going to be 260 00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:42,160 Speaker 1: for either emissions reductions or offsets because of the phase 261 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:43,640 Speaker 1: of CORSEA that we're currently in. 262 00:14:43,880 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what she did. Give me a lot of headaches, 263 00:14:46,960 --> 00:14:49,480 Speaker 2: but it's done and it's out now and it looks beautiful. 264 00:14:49,720 --> 00:14:52,920 Speaker 2: So for the report that we're talking about, there are 265 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:57,360 Speaker 2: several scenarios that we run. The base case scenario just 266 00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 2: assumes business as usual in we have a total of 267 00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:05,240 Speaker 2: one hundred and twenty nine participating markets in Phase two 268 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:07,440 Speaker 2: we have one hundred and thirty five. I will just 269 00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:12,160 Speaker 2: preface this and point out that Corsia credits are available 270 00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:16,320 Speaker 2: to everyone and not just airlines. But our forecast and 271 00:15:16,400 --> 00:15:20,040 Speaker 2: our scenarios are based completely on what airlines will have 272 00:15:20,160 --> 00:15:23,880 Speaker 2: to offset or reduce emissions, and that is what drives demand, 273 00:15:23,920 --> 00:15:27,239 Speaker 2: or at least the main driver of demand for Corsia credits. 274 00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:31,960 Speaker 2: So in Phase one we estimate that the airlines offsetting 275 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 2: requirements will total one hundred and fifty million tons by 276 00:15:36,400 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 2: twenty twenty six, and then they will climb to a 277 00:15:39,040 --> 00:15:42,920 Speaker 2: total of one point two three billion tons by end 278 00:15:42,960 --> 00:15:46,440 Speaker 2: of phase two. Now, Phase two is three times as 279 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:49,360 Speaker 2: long as Phase one, but also, as we mentioned, it 280 00:15:49,480 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 2: does include the major or big markets that operate a 281 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:56,640 Speaker 2: lot of the flight routes, like Brazil and Russia and 282 00:15:56,760 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 2: China and India. 283 00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:01,960 Speaker 1: So just to clarify these numbers, you're saying these accumulative, 284 00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:04,840 Speaker 1: you know it is not per year, it's for the 285 00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:06,760 Speaker 1: entire phase, Yes, got it. 286 00:16:07,280 --> 00:16:11,240 Speaker 2: The annual demand for CHRISTI eligible credits would peak in 287 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:14,080 Speaker 2: twenty thirty five at around one hundred and sixty one 288 00:16:14,240 --> 00:16:15,960 Speaker 2: million tons of CO two. 289 00:16:16,280 --> 00:16:18,680 Speaker 1: And when you say it peaks, that's that's the last 290 00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:23,600 Speaker 1: year of Phase two, so presumably something is coming after. 291 00:16:23,640 --> 00:16:25,200 Speaker 1: So it's not like it's going to peak and go 292 00:16:25,320 --> 00:16:29,360 Speaker 1: down necessarily, it's just that's the end of the runway. 293 00:16:29,560 --> 00:16:31,640 Speaker 2: So it will reach one hundred and sixty one million 294 00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:34,600 Speaker 2: tons of CO two in twenty thirty five. One last 295 00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:38,600 Speaker 2: thing I'd like to note is that apart from passenger flights, 296 00:16:38,640 --> 00:16:42,320 Speaker 2: we also account for cargo flights. Now in phase one, 297 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:45,800 Speaker 2: which is now they are very little, they account for 298 00:16:45,880 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 2: an additional two percent of emissions that say, but once 299 00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:53,440 Speaker 2: we have China and Russia in Phase two, cargo flights 300 00:16:53,520 --> 00:16:58,720 Speaker 2: will account for around nine percent of total emissions, so 301 00:16:58,760 --> 00:17:01,520 Speaker 2: they will also contribute with that additional demand or jump 302 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 2: in demand that we see in phase two. 303 00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:07,520 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm going to ask a really really stupid question. 304 00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:09,040 Speaker 2: No stupid questions. 305 00:17:09,240 --> 00:17:12,720 Speaker 1: Well, you haven't had my question yet. Is this a lot? 306 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 2: This is actually a great question. If you compare Christia 307 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:20,360 Speaker 2: with the wider ol global carbon credits market, where it's 308 00:17:20,680 --> 00:17:23,679 Speaker 2: very massy, it's oversupplied, everyone and anyone can buy a 309 00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:26,720 Speaker 2: credit that's actually very little. And even if you compare 310 00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:31,000 Speaker 2: that with the demand for credits from corporates that we 311 00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:34,160 Speaker 2: go over. In our long term carbon credits demand outlook 312 00:17:34,480 --> 00:17:38,280 Speaker 2: that my colleague Kyle published a couple months back, it's 313 00:17:38,320 --> 00:17:41,720 Speaker 2: twenty two point five times higher than airlines demand for 314 00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:44,680 Speaker 2: Christia in twenty thirty five. But if you look at 315 00:17:44,720 --> 00:17:48,320 Speaker 2: airlines on their own, it is a lot for airlines. 316 00:17:48,440 --> 00:17:52,199 Speaker 2: So since twenty fifteen, we tracked the buying activity of 317 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:55,600 Speaker 2: credits for airlines and that amounted to around thirty six 318 00:17:55,720 --> 00:17:59,600 Speaker 2: million tons, and that's only twenty four percent of airlines 319 00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:02,040 Speaker 2: offset requirements in Phase one alone. 320 00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:04,600 Speaker 1: So this is I mean, you know, to my question, 321 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:07,440 Speaker 1: is this a lot? It's a big deal for airlines, 322 00:18:08,119 --> 00:18:11,400 Speaker 1: it's not as much a big deal for carbon markets. 323 00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:12,760 Speaker 1: Is that a fair framing? 324 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,040 Speaker 2: Not really, because it's a little more nuanced than that. 325 00:18:18,080 --> 00:18:20,399 Speaker 2: It's a big deal for airlines, definitely, because it's going 326 00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:23,320 Speaker 2: to be because they need to buy them, they're obliged to, 327 00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:24,520 Speaker 2: and they're expensive. 328 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:26,400 Speaker 1: So I was half right, half right. 329 00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:29,879 Speaker 2: But if you want to talk about whider carbon credits 330 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:34,320 Speaker 2: and markets, COURSA is the closest thing carbon credits or 331 00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:38,760 Speaker 2: vulntary carbon markets have gotten to standardization or legitimacy. And 332 00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:41,479 Speaker 2: because you have that, you and stamp of approval on 333 00:18:41,480 --> 00:18:44,840 Speaker 2: that carbon credit. Everyone is attracted to it and wants 334 00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:48,200 Speaker 2: to buy it because that helps them hedge against reputational risk. 335 00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:51,200 Speaker 2: But the quantity of it, it's another issue, and that's 336 00:18:51,240 --> 00:18:54,080 Speaker 2: something we go over in our supply outlook in the report. 337 00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:59,000 Speaker 1: So this is a big deal for airlines. We agreed 338 00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:02,639 Speaker 1: on that, and then it might not be quite as 339 00:19:02,680 --> 00:19:06,240 Speaker 1: big a deal for sort of maybe the poor quality 340 00:19:06,920 --> 00:19:10,600 Speaker 1: carbon offset markets, but it is a big deal for 341 00:19:11,119 --> 00:19:14,240 Speaker 1: this idea of like higher quality offsets. It's something like 342 00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:17,280 Speaker 1: to what you're describing is almost like it might crystallize 343 00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:23,200 Speaker 1: the creation of a a sort of a higher tier 344 00:19:23,240 --> 00:19:25,240 Speaker 1: of offset and solve some of these problems that the 345 00:19:25,240 --> 00:19:28,440 Speaker 1: broader market has suffered from. Is that what you're saying? Yes, well, 346 00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:31,359 Speaker 1: that's quite exciting because this is this quality issue has 347 00:19:31,400 --> 00:19:33,160 Speaker 1: been some people I've been talking about for a long time, 348 00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:37,320 Speaker 1: so I'm really happy to hear about this. So anyway, 349 00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:39,679 Speaker 1: you were just about to talk about the supply of 350 00:19:39,840 --> 00:19:43,879 Speaker 1: these high quality credits and of course direct emissions reductions, 351 00:19:43,920 --> 00:19:46,440 Speaker 1: so I'm sure in your spreadsheet you calculated that as well. 352 00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:48,400 Speaker 1: So what did the spreadsheet tell us? 353 00:19:48,800 --> 00:19:52,360 Speaker 2: So the question of supply in Christia is even trickier 354 00:19:52,800 --> 00:19:56,119 Speaker 2: than demand. So i COOW decides whether a credit is 355 00:19:56,160 --> 00:20:01,040 Speaker 2: eligible or not, and they publish this document at the 356 00:20:01,080 --> 00:20:03,359 Speaker 2: beginning of every phase telling us what we can buy 357 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:05,760 Speaker 2: and what we cannot buy for it to count towards CORSIA. 358 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:08,679 Speaker 2: But then they also add another layer and they say 359 00:20:08,880 --> 00:20:12,360 Speaker 2: that credit needs to be approved by your host country 360 00:20:12,520 --> 00:20:15,680 Speaker 2: and corresponding adjustments must be applied so that we don't 361 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:19,679 Speaker 2: double count, and that does enforce or reinforce the environmental 362 00:20:19,720 --> 00:20:22,679 Speaker 2: impact of coursia. But then we know governments, and we 363 00:20:22,760 --> 00:20:25,440 Speaker 2: know the Yuan, and we know that they're slow and bureaucratic, 364 00:20:25,640 --> 00:20:28,600 Speaker 2: and because of that, right now we only have fifteen 365 00:20:28,640 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 2: million credits that are available for airlines to use towards 366 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:36,000 Speaker 2: their offsetting obligations, and frankly, that's nothing. These fifteen million 367 00:20:36,040 --> 00:20:38,760 Speaker 2: tons come from a forestry project in Guyana that the 368 00:20:38,800 --> 00:20:43,119 Speaker 2: government has approved, but all the other projects and credits 369 00:20:43,200 --> 00:20:46,400 Speaker 2: that are eligible for cristia are still waiting approval from 370 00:20:46,400 --> 00:20:49,199 Speaker 2: their host countries, and their host countries still need to 371 00:20:49,240 --> 00:20:51,920 Speaker 2: go through a bit of a process to submit their 372 00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:55,040 Speaker 2: corresponding adjustments and the requirements and so on, so it 373 00:20:55,119 --> 00:20:58,560 Speaker 2: might take some time, and that makes apply very very uncertain. 374 00:20:58,880 --> 00:21:03,120 Speaker 2: In our outlook, we estimate that supply could reach three 375 00:21:03,240 --> 00:21:06,320 Speaker 2: hundred and six million in phase one and one point 376 00:21:06,359 --> 00:21:09,560 Speaker 2: five to three billion in phase two. That's also cumulative, 377 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:12,840 Speaker 2: and it surpasses offsetting requirements in each phase. But that 378 00:21:13,040 --> 00:21:17,560 Speaker 2: happening is contingent on governments getting those approvals in place. 379 00:21:18,200 --> 00:21:19,880 Speaker 1: I mean, this is I mean it kind of comes 380 00:21:19,880 --> 00:21:22,160 Speaker 1: back to the previous point, doesn't it that this whole 381 00:21:22,200 --> 00:21:26,920 Speaker 1: thing is a forcing mechanism for governments that are interested 382 00:21:27,280 --> 00:21:31,040 Speaker 1: in offset markets to kind of get their act together 383 00:21:31,359 --> 00:21:35,359 Speaker 1: in actually defining what good is, enforcing what good is 384 00:21:35,400 --> 00:21:37,720 Speaker 1: in order to enable that to happen. Yeah. 385 00:21:37,880 --> 00:21:41,040 Speaker 2: Correct, And that is a double edged toward, I would say, 386 00:21:41,080 --> 00:21:45,199 Speaker 2: because on one hand, yes, you have some enforcement and 387 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:48,520 Speaker 2: some policy mechanism, but then if you leave it completely 388 00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:53,600 Speaker 2: up to governments without any overarching standards between them, it 389 00:21:53,640 --> 00:21:55,359 Speaker 2: could create some inconsistencies. 390 00:21:55,640 --> 00:21:59,480 Speaker 1: And so final question about your spreadsheet, You've looked at demand, 391 00:21:59,600 --> 00:22:02,760 Speaker 1: you've looked supply. So the inevitable question that follows is 392 00:22:03,080 --> 00:22:05,600 Speaker 1: what did your spreadsheet tell us about the price. 393 00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:09,240 Speaker 2: So in my spreadsheet, when I put those demand in 394 00:22:09,280 --> 00:22:12,679 Speaker 2: supply balances against each other, we estimated the average price 395 00:22:12,760 --> 00:22:15,680 Speaker 2: for Corsia credits in phase one to be sixteen point 396 00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:19,919 Speaker 2: seven dollars briton and an average of forty nine point 397 00:22:19,960 --> 00:22:23,879 Speaker 2: four dollars priton in phase two. Right now, the auctioned 398 00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:27,200 Speaker 2: price of Corsia credits is around twenty one point seven 399 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:31,760 Speaker 2: dollars priton, and that actually decreases in twenty twenty six 400 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:35,440 Speaker 2: to twelve point four dollars priton because in Phase one 401 00:22:35,840 --> 00:22:40,160 Speaker 2: demand is so little, it's comfortably below available supply if 402 00:22:40,240 --> 00:22:44,040 Speaker 2: like we said, governments approve those credits. But then as 403 00:22:44,040 --> 00:22:46,280 Speaker 2: soon as we enter phase two, which is in twenty 404 00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:49,960 Speaker 2: twenty seven, I mentioned that offsetting requirements jump by around 405 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:53,120 Speaker 2: fifty percent, and suddenly you have that spike in demand 406 00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:57,080 Speaker 2: and you're sort of scrambling to get enough credits to 407 00:22:57,160 --> 00:23:00,600 Speaker 2: cover that, and more expensive credits come in and they 408 00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:03,720 Speaker 2: set the price at ninety six point five dollars per 409 00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:06,399 Speaker 2: toon in twenty twenty seven, and that's the peak price. 410 00:23:06,640 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 2: The year after the market is still slightly oversupplied and 411 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:13,399 Speaker 2: prices fault around forty dollars peron. 412 00:23:13,800 --> 00:23:18,000 Speaker 1: Okay, so these are you know, maybe these prices in 413 00:23:18,040 --> 00:23:21,280 Speaker 1: the early phases of the scheme are you know, in 414 00:23:21,400 --> 00:23:24,879 Speaker 1: terms of the big picture of carbon markets, that's quite cheap, 415 00:23:24,920 --> 00:23:27,040 Speaker 1: but it gets to being pretty meaningful by the end 416 00:23:27,080 --> 00:23:27,680 Speaker 1: of the scheme. 417 00:23:28,320 --> 00:23:31,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, they do so, even frankly, even at the beginning 418 00:23:31,960 --> 00:23:35,840 Speaker 2: of the scheme. I know that twelve and sixteen dollars 419 00:23:35,880 --> 00:23:38,840 Speaker 2: perton might sound cheap, but if you compare that to 420 00:23:38,920 --> 00:23:42,679 Speaker 2: the wider voluntary carbon market prices, these are pretty decent 421 00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:46,280 Speaker 2: because low integrity credits or low quality credits that are 422 00:23:46,320 --> 00:23:49,560 Speaker 2: flooding the market right now trade at below three dollars perton. 423 00:23:50,200 --> 00:23:55,280 Speaker 1: So the current voluntary phase you mentioned, there's four major 424 00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:58,160 Speaker 1: markets that run involved India, China, Brazil, Russia, and they're 425 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:00,879 Speaker 1: going to be joining in the next phase. But given 426 00:24:00,920 --> 00:24:05,040 Speaker 1: the current state of global politics, and in particularly US politics, 427 00:24:05,080 --> 00:24:08,240 Speaker 1: it's not to me outside the realms of possibilities that 428 00:24:08,320 --> 00:24:12,920 Speaker 1: the US might not be willing to participate, just given 429 00:24:12,920 --> 00:24:16,000 Speaker 1: the political narratives we've seen recently. Is this something that 430 00:24:16,160 --> 00:24:18,720 Speaker 1: people are talking about as a realistic possibility. 431 00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:22,640 Speaker 2: Yes, definitely. The US leaving seems more and more of 432 00:24:22,760 --> 00:24:25,840 Speaker 2: like a reality to Christia. Now, like we mentioned before, 433 00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:28,399 Speaker 2: Cristia is actually not legally binding and there are no 434 00:24:28,520 --> 00:24:31,840 Speaker 2: consequences for any government to leave, and the US has 435 00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:34,560 Speaker 2: the option to do so, and we did model that. 436 00:24:34,760 --> 00:24:38,560 Speaker 2: So if the US drops out of the aviation decarbonization scheme, 437 00:24:38,720 --> 00:24:42,080 Speaker 2: it could reduce demand for Christia credits by three million 438 00:24:42,119 --> 00:24:45,040 Speaker 2: tons in phase one that's two percent of the base 439 00:24:45,119 --> 00:24:48,360 Speaker 2: case demand, and one hundred and eighty four million tons 440 00:24:48,359 --> 00:24:50,960 Speaker 2: in phase two or fifteen percent of the base case. 441 00:24:51,240 --> 00:24:54,919 Speaker 2: And in that scenario, because you have less demand and 442 00:24:55,040 --> 00:25:00,719 Speaker 2: the market is still oversupplied, credit prices don't there are 443 00:25:00,760 --> 00:25:03,760 Speaker 2: no dramatic peaks and price it reaches an all time 444 00:25:03,840 --> 00:25:06,320 Speaker 2: law of twelve dollars per ton in twenty twenty six, 445 00:25:06,600 --> 00:25:09,679 Speaker 2: and then they will gradually rise and peak at forty 446 00:25:09,720 --> 00:25:13,000 Speaker 2: four point four dollars perton in twenty thirty. 447 00:25:13,320 --> 00:25:18,400 Speaker 1: And so if the US pulls out, would international flights 448 00:25:18,600 --> 00:25:21,159 Speaker 1: coming in and out of the US two countries that 449 00:25:21,200 --> 00:25:24,760 Speaker 1: are participating in CORSEA, they would still be subject to 450 00:25:24,880 --> 00:25:27,200 Speaker 1: CORSEA right No, So. 451 00:25:27,119 --> 00:25:31,040 Speaker 2: For a route to be covered under CORSA, both of 452 00:25:31,080 --> 00:25:36,320 Speaker 2: its departing and arrival markets need to be member states 453 00:25:36,640 --> 00:25:39,080 Speaker 2: or at least ones that are participating in CORSEA. So 454 00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:43,320 Speaker 2: if the US drops out, all international flights coming out 455 00:25:43,400 --> 00:25:47,080 Speaker 2: or into the US won't count, and that actually alleviates 456 00:25:47,119 --> 00:25:50,479 Speaker 2: a lot of the responsibility from US based airlines, seeing 457 00:25:50,520 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 2: that ninety nine percent of their emissions come from flights 458 00:25:53,600 --> 00:25:55,760 Speaker 2: that operate either in or out of the US. 459 00:25:56,000 --> 00:25:59,240 Speaker 1: Wow. Okay, so that would be a major impact, although 460 00:25:59,520 --> 00:26:02,159 Speaker 1: in the prices of the scheme you still see some 461 00:26:02,200 --> 00:26:05,040 Speaker 1: pretty robust pricing, but just in terms of the total 462 00:26:05,080 --> 00:26:09,440 Speaker 1: emissions coverage, that would be a pretty major And I suppose, 463 00:26:09,640 --> 00:26:13,320 Speaker 1: as with all carbon schemes, if the US pulls out, 464 00:26:13,440 --> 00:26:16,040 Speaker 1: they'll it'll leave a lot of other countries asking themselves, well, 465 00:26:16,080 --> 00:26:19,160 Speaker 1: why should we stay in if the US is pulling out? 466 00:26:19,280 --> 00:26:22,200 Speaker 1: Which kind of leads me on to something else which 467 00:26:22,359 --> 00:26:26,240 Speaker 1: is touched on in your note, is the EU potentially 468 00:26:26,440 --> 00:26:29,159 Speaker 1: dropping out? Is that tell us a little bit more 469 00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:29,640 Speaker 1: about that. 470 00:26:29,920 --> 00:26:32,439 Speaker 2: It's pretty ironic, isn't it That the US and the 471 00:26:32,560 --> 00:26:35,800 Speaker 2: U might pull out, but for completely different reasons. So 472 00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:39,600 Speaker 2: the US could drop out because they don't like decarbonization, 473 00:26:39,920 --> 00:26:43,040 Speaker 2: but the EU might drop out because it loves decarbonization 474 00:26:43,200 --> 00:26:47,640 Speaker 2: and CRISIA might not be as effective. So the EU 475 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:51,840 Speaker 2: will decide on whether CORSA is effective or not. In 476 00:26:51,920 --> 00:26:55,000 Speaker 2: twenty twenty six, If it is not, then the EU 477 00:26:55,119 --> 00:26:58,560 Speaker 2: ETS or the Compliance Carbon Scheme for the U would 478 00:26:58,600 --> 00:27:02,640 Speaker 2: expand its Monday took cover international aviation emissions. But as 479 00:27:02,640 --> 00:27:06,920 Speaker 2: it stands now, CORSA actually could be ineffective, seeing that 480 00:27:07,080 --> 00:27:12,760 Speaker 2: even if airlines comply, their emissions for intra EU flights 481 00:27:12,840 --> 00:27:16,320 Speaker 2: would still surpass the cap that is set by the 482 00:27:16,359 --> 00:27:20,040 Speaker 2: EUTS or aviation. The EU is known to be more 483 00:27:20,080 --> 00:27:23,680 Speaker 2: stringent when it comes to de carbonization policies, and Corsia 484 00:27:23,880 --> 00:27:27,640 Speaker 2: can be deemed ineffective by the EU. They will decide 485 00:27:27,640 --> 00:27:31,760 Speaker 2: on that in twenty twenty six. If Corsia's design remains unchanged, 486 00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:35,200 Speaker 2: the EU is likely to deem the scheme ineffective because 487 00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:40,000 Speaker 2: emissions from EU departing flights would still surpass the annual 488 00:27:40,080 --> 00:27:43,399 Speaker 2: emissions cap set by the EU ETS, which is the 489 00:27:43,760 --> 00:27:46,720 Speaker 2: compliance carbon scheme in the EU for aviation. 490 00:27:47,160 --> 00:27:49,920 Speaker 1: Got it, so for their own rules they need something 491 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:52,600 Speaker 1: more stringent than CORSEA, and that's the sort of the 492 00:27:52,640 --> 00:27:55,360 Speaker 1: problem that they face at the moment. There's so much 493 00:27:55,400 --> 00:27:58,000 Speaker 1: interesting stuff we've discussed today, but one of the really 494 00:27:58,040 --> 00:28:01,959 Speaker 1: interesting things about this was this idea that CORSA beyond 495 00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:05,399 Speaker 1: aviation can have this impact of being a force for 496 00:28:06,280 --> 00:28:09,720 Speaker 1: bringing integrity to voluntary carbon markets, which has always been 497 00:28:09,880 --> 00:28:12,720 Speaker 1: the challenge there. The last sort of two questions we 498 00:28:12,760 --> 00:28:14,199 Speaker 1: discussed is, you know, what could be the impact of 499 00:28:14,200 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 1: the US dropping out? What could be the impact of 500 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:18,720 Speaker 1: the EU dropping out, albeit for very different reasons. If 501 00:28:18,760 --> 00:28:22,359 Speaker 1: that happens, Would that diminish the power of CORSEA to 502 00:28:22,400 --> 00:28:23,640 Speaker 1: have that broad impact? 503 00:28:24,240 --> 00:28:28,239 Speaker 2: Yes, because the effectiveness of Coursia relies entirely on the 504 00:28:28,240 --> 00:28:31,119 Speaker 2: fact that airlines and governments will comply by the scheme, 505 00:28:31,440 --> 00:28:34,480 Speaker 2: and it would have like that would have a ripple 506 00:28:34,520 --> 00:28:38,360 Speaker 2: effect on other crabin markets. So when we look at 507 00:28:38,440 --> 00:28:41,560 Speaker 2: CORSA and whether it is necessary or not, there are 508 00:28:41,760 --> 00:28:46,480 Speaker 2: two lenses. One is decribinizing the aviation sector, which is 509 00:28:46,520 --> 00:28:49,840 Speaker 2: hard to abate, and this is something compliance schemes have 510 00:28:49,920 --> 00:28:54,360 Speaker 2: failed to do because it's a big and international problem 511 00:28:54,440 --> 00:28:57,600 Speaker 2: and you can step on other jurisdiction's feet when you're 512 00:28:57,640 --> 00:29:00,800 Speaker 2: trying to decribinize aviation. And the other one that you've 513 00:29:00,800 --> 00:29:04,440 Speaker 2: talked about is legitimizing the voluntary carbon market. Now that 514 00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:10,280 Speaker 2: markets has been on a journey of hardship and media scrutiny, 515 00:29:10,480 --> 00:29:14,040 Speaker 2: and COURSIA does provide a way out where it finally 516 00:29:14,120 --> 00:29:18,160 Speaker 2: legitimizes the use of carbon credits. It tells everyone that actually, 517 00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:21,320 Speaker 2: carbon credits are a real way for you to decarbonize 518 00:29:21,360 --> 00:29:25,480 Speaker 2: your emissions and meet your targets. So if the scheme fails, 519 00:29:25,600 --> 00:29:29,600 Speaker 2: that's just another pain point, another obstacle that the VCM 520 00:29:29,680 --> 00:29:30,840 Speaker 2: has to overcome. 521 00:29:31,680 --> 00:29:34,160 Speaker 1: Wow, I can hear the pain in your voice when 522 00:29:34,240 --> 00:29:37,720 Speaker 1: you say that, Leila, Thank you so much for joining 523 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:38,360 Speaker 1: us today. 524 00:29:38,480 --> 00:29:39,560 Speaker 2: Thank you for having me. 525 00:29:48,400 --> 00:29:51,520 Speaker 1: Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray 526 00:29:51,720 --> 00:29:55,400 Speaker 1: with production assistance from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg NEF is a 527 00:29:55,440 --> 00:29:58,560 Speaker 1: service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This 528 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 1: recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed as 529 00:30:01,400 --> 00:30:05,320 Speaker 1: investment advice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an 530 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:06,680 Speaker 1: investment or other strategy. 531 00:30:06,680 --> 00:30:10,120 Speaker 2: Bloomberg ANIAF should not be considered as information sufficient upon 532 00:30:10,160 --> 00:30:13,280 Speaker 2: which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP 533 00:30:13,520 --> 00:30:16,720 Speaker 2: nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty 534 00:30:16,840 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 2: as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained 535 00:30:19,880 --> 00:30:22,440 Speaker 2: in this recording, and any liability as a result of 536 00:30:22,480 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 2: this recording is expressly disclaimed,