WEBVTT - How Supreme Court Nominations Work

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff you should know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry over there, and

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>this is who I object to what I don't know.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you object them from the Supreme Court.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they strike you down with lightning if you

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>talk out of turn. Yeah did they even uh geez,

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see one of those hearings. Yeah, they

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>even call them hearings. Uh, magic our right, I don't know.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they do call them hearings. I'm almost positive

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.639
<v Speaker 1>it's like shrouded in secrecy though, right, you never know.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't show that stuff on TV, do they like? No,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but they do have like like if you listen to

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Nina Totenberg, she's a great Supreme Court reporter, and um,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all. It's not televised and I guess it is

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>just traditional reporting reporters that are allowed in there. But

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not closed to the press or and he's not

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like a Pasi court or it's not it's not the

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Star Chamber. No, no, uh, it's interesting though, it's it

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is sort of it does seem sort of secretive though,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>because they like write these rulings. Sometimes they don't even

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>read them. I saw that Clarence Thomas went seven years

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>without speaking in court. What Yeah, that's what it said.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Where did you see that? In an article about Clarence Thomas.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It said he he's one of the quietest justices. That

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>said he went at one point seven years without speaking

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in court. But apparently writes a lot in his uh

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>um rulings and you know, his briefs, his briefs, he

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>writes in his briefs. Yeah, I can see that because

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess when you're in court, you're arguing in front

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Supreme Court, I think basically, and we'll do

0:01:53.840 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like a whole separate Supreme Court episode. Yeah right, agreed, Sure, okay, um,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody mark that town. But you are, you're being peppered

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>with questions from them and then like you're you're trying

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to answer the questions to to show why your side

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is right right and arguing the case right now here

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and intimidates you. Um. But yeah, part of it is

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>going back thinking about it and then writing your opinion

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on It's very weird job. It is. It's a pretty

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>neat job. Too. One of the big things about it

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is it's in here in the United States. If you

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are on the Supreme Court's the highest court in the land,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you're there for life. It's a it's a life appointment.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the only as far as I know, besides you know,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>um working at the d M v AM. I right,

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the only for life appointment in the United States government. Yeah,

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.839
<v Speaker 1>which seems like kind of crazy, but it also sort

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense because you want you want a stable

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. Yeah, you want them focusing on cases, not

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's going on, whether they need to elected

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>again or campaign. That makes it makes sense once you

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of put your head to it. Plus, it also

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of dovetails with the way that they're viewed here

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in this country and I'm sure abroad to um that

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they are this panel of highly learned legal scholars just

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>basically like um uh, I don't know. I'm sure there's

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>something in Star Wars that resembles this. You know, the

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Jedi Council. Oh man, I'm always afraid to say, hang

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>about Star Wars. You know, the Jedi Council that John

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>jar Binks was on. Okay, Yeah, we won't hear anything

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>about that. How could we write? Uh so this was

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>written by our old buddy Ed Grabbynowski. Yes, should we

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>tell everybody? Should we reveal the big reveal? Do we

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>have an announcement? I think so? All right, go ahead.

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh you're letting me do it so everybody. You may

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not know that because we tried to stretch out Grabstar

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>articles as much as we could, but they were starting

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to get thin. Ye, Crabster wasn't really writing for the

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>site any longer. While we said enough of this, we

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>need them, you need them bad. So we did a

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>little wheeling tad bitter dealing and Grabster is going to

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>be writing again, specifically topics that we are requesting. Yeah,

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty great. Like you and I were both so excited, stoked,

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is the word. Yeah. So anyway, we love

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Ed and uh big shout out to him and to

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo New York and their wings and their football team.

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure why not? So anyway Ed wrote this, Um, and

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a great article. So, like you said,

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we kind of duve into it really quickly.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But um, if you're not in the United States, you

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>might be saying, what's the Supreme Court? Although I think

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you probably know. Um, like you said, they are the

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>highest court and um, they're the third branch of our government. Uh.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And they are specifically specifically air to kind of keep

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>everyone in check and to say, like, you know, you

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:08.119
<v Speaker 1>may be the president, but you're not a dictator because

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you still have to answer to the Supreme Court at

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. You can't run a monk.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna we're gonna make sure that we and

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this is ideally, we're going to make sure that we

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>review everything in a in a legal way, and we're

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to ideology. You can't escape that, of course,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, Supreme Court justices are supposed to rule

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on law and specifically these days at least how it

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>relates to the Constitution. Yeah, and that's a It wasn't

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>their initial They weren't created to say, like, go defend

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution. Uh. And the the Supreme Court said, well,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>can we sow some patches or bedazzle our robes? And

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the framers said sure, we don't care, so they went

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>out and defended the constitution. It actually is very vague.

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The judicial branch or the Supreme Court is created in

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, but all it says is that they are

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there to UM. They that it's power should shall quote

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>extend to all cases in law and equity arising under

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this constitution. That's it. It's the only thing it mentions

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Supreme Court and its power. So Ever since

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution was written and ratified, the Supreme Court has

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of been this evolving thing, or it was evolving

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Now it's pretty well set into into

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>its role and what it's meant to do. What evolves

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>and changes are, like you said, the ideology and the

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>personality of the of the people sitting on the court. Yeah,

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and their word is the final word. Um. There there

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is no court that can overturn or review even their decisions.

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>And they review. They have about five thousand cases submitted

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>every year and can only review about a hundred to

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty, which I thought was kind of

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Actually, yeah, I was not expecting that. UM.

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.239
<v Speaker 1>And they specifically try now, like we said, and focus

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>on the constitution or UM usually cases that have been

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>appealed from lower federal courts. You know, they worked their

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>way up to food chain um or and I think

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they probably love these uh treason cases involving treason or

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>disputes with other countries or ambassadors kind of like you know,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the high stakes stuff. Imagine being an ambassador and getting

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>dragged in front of the Supreme Court for something you

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>did being or your kid did. Yeah, probably a little

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>snot nosed brats ambassador kids. So like, like I was saying,

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the the Constitution is pretty vague about what the Supreme

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Court is meant to do. And it wasn't even out

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of the gate that they realized that they were supposed

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to really kind of examine laws in respect to the Constitution.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That started in an eighteen oh three case Marbury versus Madison,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was yeah, it was a landmark watershed case

0:07:55.400 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>both both kinds um and ironically, the court found owned

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that it didn't have the power to satisfy the petitions

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the petitioners. I think James Madison or no, Stephan

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Marberry was suing James Madison because James Madison had said, um,

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you these commissions and then he was taken

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>out of office or he phased out of office and

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the commissions were forfeited, and the Supreme Court said, you know,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we thought we had the power to do this, but

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it turns out we don't constitutionally, so sorry. And it

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was the first time that the Supreme Court had ever

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>examined something through the lens of the Constitution, and that

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>set the precedent from then on. Yeah. And they serve, well,

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>they serve kind of however long they want to or

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>if they die obviously, but the average about fourteen years

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>UM or if they retire, they average retirement age seventy

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>one UM. But they can serve super long. And I

0:08:55.600 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>know that one justice served for thirty five years UM.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you if you nominate a young judge,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of more of the trend these days

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're thinking politically, like you know, we want someone

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in there for our team, so pick a young one, right, Uh.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Then they can have tremendous sway And how things going

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy year after year after year after year. Yeah. Yeah,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>because the reason why they have so much sway is

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like the stuff that they're they're ruling on is constitutional

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in nature, and here in the United States, if it's

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's constitutional, if it's guaranteed by the Constitution, protected

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>by the constitution, outlawed by the Constitution, whatever. However, the

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court measures the law against the constitution, Like you said,

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the law of the land. From that point on. Um,

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>any law similar to uh, what the Supreme Court just

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ruled on, it's immediately null and void, like it's done.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Um ed used is a really good an example. And

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this he said, like if if main bands anti war

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>signs from people's front yards and Supreme Court rules that

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that law is unconstitutional, well, if Rhode Island has a

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>similar law, California is a similar law, those those laws

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>are immediately illegal. I guess, um. And it's not like

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Rhode Island's gonna bring their case and then California is

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>going to try their case. Once they rule, it's done.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's been ruled on. That's right by the sc Yeah,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there are nine justices, Um right now there

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are eight, which we're going to get into. And uh,

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously having an odd number means you can break a tie.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's um with eight you can have a tie.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And when you do have a tie, they've actually thought

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>about this, believe it or not, they arm wrestle. I'm kidding,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, they don't arm wrestle. But um, what happens

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is the lower court decision is what's called passively upheld,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>which means that for that case only, it's upheld. But

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the Supreme Court didn't rule on it,

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't create that that nationwide legal precedent forever

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and ever passive aggressive and someone could you know, once

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I get that ninth person, they could bring up a

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>similar case, not the same one, but a similar one

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if they want to like have that precedent said in

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Courek will be like, let's try it again. Yeah,

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, if you for a case to be decided definitively,

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>all you need is a simple majority five to four.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of cases these days in the United

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>States are have I have like five to four decisions, um,

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Which is the fact that that's a pattern and then

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's routine really kind of shows you how just close

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to the center that that ideologically the bench is. And

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>um that all it would take was you know, one

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>or two votes that you can really rely on one

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>way or the other. It's going to be super liberal

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or it'll be super conservative. Yeah, and these days it's um,

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean sometimes you'll get surprises on ideology, like oh,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we thought this person would vote this way, that way,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But generally you got kind of the four on the

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>left the four on the right, or you know you

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>did before Scalia died. And um, I think Kennedy is

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of the swing vote, right, yeah, generally speaking for

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>us right, it used to be Sandra Day O'Connor. Right.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But when when they say, oh, we were surprised, we

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>thought they were going to vote this way, that's putting

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it about as mildly as you can. But surprise, yeah, outrage.

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't expected that fiddle d d yeah, And I

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>looked up some of the I mean, we'll get to

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this later, but some of the appointees, um, throughout history

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>have been made by like conservative points of conservative and

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>then they might grow a little more liberal over time

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>or the other way around. And they're always like they're

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so upset, like, you know, I thought this is what

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we were getting. But to me, that's how it should be,

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like that means probably that that judges deciding

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>cases based on merit and not like I'm just dug

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>in and entrenched in one ideology. Yes, which is exactly

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>what you want from a Supreme Court justice. Should we

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>take a break, Yeah, let's take a break. All right,

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about appointments, so we'll get to that right

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>after this. All right, how's this work appointing? Yeah, so

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>remember the constitutions when their Supreme Court do it. I'm done.

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm out right and going to take a nap um.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So appoint appointments, it's it's all just made up. There's

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>no qualifications. Uh, there's no requirements. You you or I

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>could be nominated to be on the Supreme Court. The

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>President was like, I want to figure out the fastest

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>way to ruin my political career. I've got it. That's

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that'd be a good way to do it. Because again,

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>here in this country, people treat Supreme Court nominations like

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a religion. It's a big, big deal. Not even to

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like get someone through the process. Just to nominate somebody

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can bring so much blowback from your party, from the voters,

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>from the opposing party, from everybody that you really want

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to think it through. It's not a haphazard thing. But

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as as far as the starting the whole thing off,

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a list of qualified candidates. I think every

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>single Supreme Court justice in history has been a lawyer

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at least, but lately almost all of them The only

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>person on the Supreme Court now who isn't a judge

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is Elena Kagan Um. But the trend is is most

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of them are federal judges who are called up to

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the bigs. Yeah. And a lot of them have even

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>served as clerks on the Supreme Court. Um. So what

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for with all that is experience. Yeah. And

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and for the last hundred and fifty years, not only

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have they been attorneys, but they've they didn't go to

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the strip mall although was it O'Connor, Well,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>she didn't go to a strip mall law school, but

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>she was a strip mall lawyer. I think yeah at first.

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But they have all graduated from like an accredited legit university,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like not like Dr Nick graduated from the Upstairs Medical Clinic.

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it was called. I think it was

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Tijuana Upstairs Medical Credit. Uh. A lot of these UM

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>justices before their Supreme Court appointment have been involved in politics. Um.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Some of them have been governors, some of them have

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>been in Congress. There was even one former president, one

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Howard Taft. Howard is actually a great story. He hated

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>being president, hated it, loved being a Supreme Court Justice.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see that, he said. On the bench, it groaned, anyway,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm home, this is great, the bench groaned. I know

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that for a little while there were people there were

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there were rumblings that Obama might be in line for

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a Supreme Court appointment had the election gone a Diffroy,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>which would have been I could see that. I could too,

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, obviously that's not gonna happen. No,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see Trump, I pointing Obama. All right, So,

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>once this nomination goes through UM and you know, the president,

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it used to be like a very I don't know

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>about solitary probably there a little close circle. But now,

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like you said, they get a list and that that's

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>culled from a group of very smart people that are

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>UM trying to firmly entrench their own ideologies basically, so

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna choose from that list the candidate UM and

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>nominate them officially in the Senate. Then we'll hold hearings.

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And just recently, you know, we've seen this going on.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is happening right now with Gorse. Yeah,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing would have started with Gorsets getting

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a phone call from the press saying, hey, I want

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you to want me on the Supreme Court, and Gorstch

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, I don't, I don't know what you're saying.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like, you're gonna be on the Supreme Court and

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>hung up right. That was it, And then uh yeah,

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the name gets released to the press and the Senate says,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's get busy, let's get to work, and um,

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this whole high bee hive of activity just starts kicking

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>up around this one. Poor sap who accepted the nomination

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and now has everyone from the Justice Department to Congressional

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>aids putting on latex gloves and going right up there

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>rectum to try to see what they can find in

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>this person since passed. Yeah, and not only what they

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>can find in their past, but really grilling them, um

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on maybe where he or she might lie ideologically, like

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>how how would you rule in this case that it

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>has happened? How did you feel about this case? And

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I was watching um A news network the other day

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about how Gorsets did such a masterful job of

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like dodging, yeah about like not going on record with

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with how they lean, um and that's tradition. Well, yeah,

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>apparently they they like the one thing that you're supposed

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to do up there is not give anything away. No,

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's just a big dance. And if they say yeah,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden back and I think the eighties called it

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a kabuki dance. Um, and Elena Kagan called it a

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>vapid and hollow charade because the senators are trying to

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>pin you down one way or another on your views

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on gun control, abortion, all of these hot button issues

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Supreme Court has either ruled on, may rule

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>on in the future, may overturn at some point. Um.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>That that really split the country ideologically. And the point

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of these Senate hearings is basically for the nominee to

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.479
<v Speaker 1>sit there and not give up anything, because if they

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>did do that, then they would have to recuse themselves

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>from that case for having gone on the public record

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>stating their position. Well yeah, And it's the opposition's party's

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>job to sit there and sigh and rub their temples

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, it just seems like you don't want

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to go on record for anything, right, And they never

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>get to respond. Duh. It's a Senate hearing for Supreme

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Court justice is what always happened. It's really funny that

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>they play that up, that like the senators act like

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they just can't believe what's going on even though this

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>has been happening for decades now. Yeah, it's just a

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>big I don't know about a charade, but I think

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>part of it is they part of it is to

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:57.719
<v Speaker 1>see how well they can hold up to the grilling too.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's part of it as well. But the

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>group that probably plays the biggest role in in in

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of rooting out what the nominees politics are are

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the aids in the Justice Department and whatever they leak

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to the media, because, um, you're not gonna you wouldn't

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.959
<v Speaker 1>find anything out about say, like Gorsets from those two

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>days of hearings. No one found anything out about him.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>If that's all you know about that guy was those

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>two days of hearings, you didn't read anything else about it,

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You have no idea what his positions where. You'd just

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>be like, that guy's got one of the better haircuts

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen in my life. That's all you would

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>get from it. But the media tends to report on

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it and they kind of fulfill the role that um

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that that the Senate fails at every single time and

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it'll be things like, um, Harriet Myers was was, um

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>was nominated by George W. Bush, and Um, he just

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>got immediate blowback for it is a terrible nomination. But

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things somebody found was that she had

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>cant if you did some money back in like a

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>good fifteen something years before to Al Gore's presidential campaign.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Like they find like little stuff like that, and they

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>try to put it all together to create a picture

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>so that the Senators can ask them about stuff or whatever,

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>or the media can can paint a picture one way

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or another, and everyone can try to divine how they're

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going to rule. Now, did Harriet Myers actually go through

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the Senate hearings? Well, that that's what will happen a

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of times if there is a skeleton in their closet.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they want to accept the nomination, not even for

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that reason. Sometimes they want to accept the nomination because

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.719
<v Speaker 1>they're like, no, man, I know it, I don't want

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to go through all that. I'm fine just being on

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>my federal circuit here. Um. But sometimes they'll withdraw if

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they know that they won't make it through that and

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't want that drug out in public. And sometimes

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the the President will withdraw that nomination to avoid that

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of embarrassment too, right, Um, Like Clarence Thomas, I

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how they missed that, or if they did,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, he would famously was uh allegedly sexually harassed

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Anita Hill. And I don't know if they that didn't

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>come to light until the hearings or if that's what

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>my guess was. I think they started the hearings and

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they were still doing investigations and they got into Anita Hill.

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Yet he would come I don't think in today's climate, no,

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that was that was nuts, um. But the what's ironic

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about it is that he wouldn't make it in today's

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>climate with our awareness and understanding of sexual harassment. But

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>those hearings, his his Supreme Court Um confirmation hearings were

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what exposed the world to sexual harassment and concept of

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it that we understand today is rooted in that moment

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in those three days where Anita Hill stood up and

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is messed up and I'm gonna share it. Um.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>And and Clarence Thomas famously called the whole thing a

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>high tech lynching. And then after all this, so he

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>was about to be voted on. There was debate in

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, which we'll get to this process in a second.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>They sent after this came to light, they sent it

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>back to the committee hearings. So he took a huge

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>step backward in the confirmation process, had to go through

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>three days of Anita Hills testimony, and then after that

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the Senate still said, all right, cool, well we'll confirm you. Yeah,

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and he was so upset he said, you know, I'm

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna talk for seven years, right, I'll show you so. UM.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>By and large, though the vast majority of appointee UM

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>submissions what would you call him nominations are appointed, right. Oh,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something like there have been a hundred

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and sixty one nominations and a hundred and twenty four

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have been confirmed. I think there's only been thirty six rejections,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and so the rest are withdraws, withdrawals UM or. There's

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>one very recent one that I think is the first

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:09.479
<v Speaker 1>in history, um Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland. They just

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't even get hurt. Yeah, um, which is very much

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>an unusual, uh step that was taken in the process. Yeah,

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this just happened. Everyone saw it happen. Um.

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Obama was in his last year of his presidency, and

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>so uh, Republican senators basically said, not only are we

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna vote on it, we're not gonna hold hearings.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of them refused to even talk to the guy.

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>They just basically took their ball and went home. Right,

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 1>so we're not gonna do anything, which received a lot

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:44.479
<v Speaker 1>of blowback from people already frustrated with the um the

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>notion that maybe these people work for them and they

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>should do their jobs, and that is one of their

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs is to at least have hearings and take a vote,

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and um they everyone dug in and um he went

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>without earrings, went without a vote, And uh, I don't

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>know what he's doing now. I guess he just kept

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>his regular job. Oh yeah, I'm sure. I don't think

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you like lose your job and no, no, like quit

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and move and everything go on the trail. Um no

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>he uh yeah, I I but I think the more

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to the point, like you're it's gotta affect your reputation,

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying, Like even if it had

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it was no fault of his own, it's still like

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a black mark on his history at least. Well, it

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal because this was Um, it's kind

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of tough to pin down someone's political ideology as a judge.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They have a few ways of doing it. There's something

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>called the Martin Quinn score for Supreme Court justices, and

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they compare how they vote relative to one another. Uh.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>And then there's something else called the Judicial common Space score,

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>which measures their ideology based on the ideology of their

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>appointing presidents and home state senators. And then I think

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this from Washington Posts, I read an article that they're

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>basically trying to sus out how liberal is Garland right here?

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Who was super centrist, wasn't he? Well, they said in

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the end that they looked at all those scores, and

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>then they did one more where they basically looked at

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the law clerks that they hired, because generally you're gonna

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>hire clerks that agree with you, and clerks to work

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for judges who they who they agree with, um, And

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they looked at what they're the clerks political donations where

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they were So what's this? They said that he was

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>center left in the end, would have definitely swung the

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>court more to the left. But at the time you know,

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of a showdown. It was like for

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are like, do we do we let Garland

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>go through because he's sort of center left? Where do

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>we take a chance that Hillary wins this election and

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>goes whole hog left to someone that's way more liberal.

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And in the end they dug in and uh, well

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows what happened. Uh yeah, And I read both

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>sides of this, likebviously the liberals and the Democrats were

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just going crazy over it there like this with the

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>audacity of not doing this right, um that that because

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans were saying, well, it's an election year, so

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to put a Supreme Court nominee on

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court for life during an election year, right,

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And the Democrats said, you're crazy. There's been like eight

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>or nine Supreme Court justices who were confirmed on an

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>election year. That's a terrible argument. But apparently that was

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>when the um the I think the government wasn't split, right,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't like the executive and Congress were in the

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>same party. The same party was in power for like

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight of those confirmations to have gone through,

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So both sides actually had legitimate arguments, but it definitely

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed like a dereliction of duty from the outside looking in. Well,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>what it did, too, was it set up, um the

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>gorste situation now, which is Democrats are delaying the vote,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think by the time this comes out, they

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>will have voted. I would guess so, because usually I

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>think McConnell said by April two he'd be confirmed, was

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>his estimate. Yeah, well they delayed it one more week

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago, but um, regardless, it's it's

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, imminent if it hasn't just happened. And so

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they set up the situation now where Democrats are dug

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in and they're like, don't expect any votes from us

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to confirm. And then the Republicans are saying, well, if

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you do that, though, we don't need a simple we

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just need a simple majority. We can use what's called

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear option, which we talked about in the Filibusters episode.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, so they're the Democrats would filibuster, then

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they would use a nuclear option, which means they can

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of rewrite the rules and confirm with a simple majority.

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a fear that if that happens, that

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>will just be the norm going forward. Yeah, that they'll

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>use that for everything. And and on the one hand,

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it will definitely be the Democrats fault because they used

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear option first. But they used it for a

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Obama appointees back and I think two thousand

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>thirteen or fifteen, and um, they said specifically this does

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>not apply to Supreme Court nominees. Now the pendulum is

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.239
<v Speaker 1>swing the other way. The Republicans are in control. If

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they use the nuclear option for the Supreme Court nominees,

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that'll that'll just be like there will be nothing off

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>limits any longer. And yeah, they'll there will be no

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>filibuster power in the Senate any longer. Yeah. It really

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>underscores just how ugly things have gotten, you know. Yeah,

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty ugly these days in Washington. Uh And and

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we should say, well, we'll take a break in a second, choke,

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>but we keep talking about the Senate. The House has

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with this, actually, yeah a little bit. Um,

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's strictly the president appoints, and the Senate holds committee

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>hearings and then debate and then votes, and then the

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>person is either confirmed or rejected, almost exclusively confirmed. And

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>if they are rejected. Um, they can't be submitted again.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But it usually doesn't make sense too unless something big

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>has happened that makes the president think that they can

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>get confirmed. Which happened I think with Andrew Jackson. Is

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that right? Yeah? In the eighteen six Yeah, he had

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Roger Taney who had never heard of before. Um,

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>who he submitted. Guy got rejected, and then there were

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>elections that changed the complexion of the Senate. Yeah, that

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was much friendlier to Jackson. So he did it again.

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I got he brought him in with a like a

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>baseball head on. Yeah, I said, how about this guy

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>big mustache? Um? And George W. Bush did the same

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thing too, but he his guy John Roberts didn't get rejected,

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but he nominated Roberts twice in the same month for

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>two different seats. The second time he got confirmed. So well, well, um,

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of politicking that goes on behind this,

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of thought goes into it, not surprisingly, and

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about all that stuff right after this. So chuck, um,

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this is not again, This isn't taken lightly. Um. It

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is a hollow and vapid sharade and a kabuki dance

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's ridiculous in a lot of ways, but it's

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the end result is really really important, and that is

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that you have a Supreme Court justice who's one of

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>nine voices that are that create the law of the

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>land here in the United States, and that they're on

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>there for life. So everyone again takes it extremely seriously,

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of things to be considered when

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a president is even picking a nominee from that list

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that they have. Yeah, that you know, even though we

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>said there are no rules for qualifications, there is a

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>long history that's kind of become accepted as qualifications, which

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about an attorney generally a federal court judge. Um,

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so once that is kind of sussed out. We talked

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>about ideology a lot, and um, you're not gonna find

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>his head points out the perfect fit where someone agrees

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with everything that you agree with as president, But what

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you want is someone who by and large will side

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with your side. What Yeah, you know, he's like us,

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.959
<v Speaker 1>But again it's not going to be a perfect fit. Yeah. Like,

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but you also want someone who probably has a good

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>chance of getting uh confirmed. That's a big that's a

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>big point, right, So like that. There's a lot of

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>factors that go into that selection. Right. So obviously, if

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you are a conservative president, especially like a deeply socially

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>conservative president, you're gonna try to find somebody who's a

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty socially conservative ideologue, right, and that will be your

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>your pick. But you may want to stop yourself and

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think about this first. Let's let's let's think about this.

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Who's in control of the Senate. That's a big one.

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>If it's the opposition party, well, then you may want

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to consider somebody who's um maybe a little closer to

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the center, because your person might get rejected. And if

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you're just an outside observer saying, well, who cares, it's

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll get rejected. Pick somebody else. You you said

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a list, go to the next person, right.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of political ramifications for this, right. So

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if if you are a president and you're picking a

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty radical nominee, um, it can make you look bad,

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're not that popular of a president. Yeah,

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.919
<v Speaker 1>And it can also have a lot of bearing on

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mid term elections and how the public views the direction

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the country is going as a whole. Yeah, Because if

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Senate goes along with your radical person and the

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>public is not down with that person. That's going to

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>be a a negation on on on the ballot, like

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you're you're You're not going to look good at all

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>because of this Supreme Court nominee pick. Yeah, the the

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>whoever um just left whatever, whether it was a retiree

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>or in the case of Scalia, someone who just died.

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Um suddenly, Um, the outgoing justice is gonna play a

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>large part in and again depending on what parties in office,

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>what party holds the Senate, because gets the replacement, can

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you can you get somebody pushed through? And if you can't,

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna look very good on you as the president. Yeah.

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And basically with gorsech Um, I looked him up as

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>far as where he might sit or is predicted to sit.

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>He's pretty right. Yeah, obviously he's pretty right. But they

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>said that he was right now at least you know

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this is from all the studying done from those different

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>methodologies that I talked about earlier. They said he would

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>sit second to the right, next to Thomas, the silent

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Clarence Thomas apparently is the furthest right at this point. Um.

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, it goes all the way through

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>down to uh Sonia Soda Mayor, who's uh the furthest

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to the left, and then uh Mr Kennedy in the

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>middle man. What a powerful dude he is. He gets

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>gift baskets all the time. Yeah, yeah, he has muffins

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>every morning. And you know, depending on and people forecast

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this like a way in advance. I'm like, it's not

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just Supreme Court justices, it's appointing appointing judges all throughout

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the system in the United States. Um, Republicans have had

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a tactic for years now that's really paid off for

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 1>them where they have really worked hard to appoint as

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>many judges conservative leaning judges throughout the system and staunchly

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>tried to oppose any liberal appointments. And um, you get

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>those lower courts. I mean, people don't pay a lot

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of attention a lot of times to these lower court appointments,

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's made a big difference, you know, Oh yeah

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>over time. Sure, if you've got that many more bullets

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in the chamber just in as far as like conservative rulings, yeah,

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just all over the country. You know, if you have

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>more of your people in place, and lower courts they're

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be more clerks that work for them that

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are conservative, and then eventually they rise up and you're

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna have a better chance of getting a Supreme

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Court nominee appointed who was conservative. It's an incubator. Yeah,

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a good way to look at it. A farm system. Sure,

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they probably love that terminology. But you were saying, so

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>do Myers farthest to the left and Thomas is farthest

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to the right, right, Now, that's what they say. Yeah,

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're saying earlier to that. You know,

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on who's being replaced, and that makes a decision

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on who's picked as well. True, right, because if you're

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>replacing a far right seat with a far left nominee,

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get some serious um push back from the

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>right or vice versa. Yeah, And that's why this election,

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, that we just went through, was so important

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>because there are some aging members of the Supreme Court,

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, if you get to a point

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>like Nixon got to a point, four Supreme Court justices, Yeah,

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and they turned on him like a pack of jackals,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>three of them did. I'm sure that's that's what Nixon thought. Um, yeah,

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's and this is kind of a pretty good

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>demonstration of how Supreme Court nominees. They're appointed or they're

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 1>nominated by presidents, but they are in no way meant

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to be beholden to presidents. They should not be. It's

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's they're not doing their job if they're ruling in

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>in line with what they think the president wants to hear. Yeah,

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>and I guess that goes back to why they're in

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>there for life. Like they probably do feel I mean,

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they still have their ideologies, but they probably do feel like,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm in here. They can't take me out. Um,

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>there's probably some mechanism to take them out. There is

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>something really bad. It's a it's impeachment. It's the exact

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>same process that you would get rid of a president

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with where the House impeaches the person and then the

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Senate votes to convict or not and then they're removed.

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>It's only been threatened twice. One of them was a

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Nixon appointing, and thing. Uh, but I was looking, like

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, at Garland and the kind of gut started

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>digging into history and um in the modern era, and uh,

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Anton and Scalia is rated as the number one most

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>conservative justice in the modern era. Is that right? That's

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what it said. See because I have anonymous further right

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>than him, and that gorstch would be even further right

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>than Scalia. I didn't create that. That's a well, I

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't create this either. So well, this was Stanford University,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in the University of Chicago, Northwestern and Harvard. Yeah, but

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>it was based on um. It just depends on what

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>they use. Let's just say they're both super conservative. But

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the things they looked at and

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>they like to look at his campaign contributions, either by

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>like I said, clerks or by them, and they said,

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>based on Gorstages Gorstages campaign contry utians, they said that

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>he would be more conservative than seven percent of all

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>other federal judges. That's pretty conservative. When Requests was supposedly

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>number two and they don't have Thomas where they have

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>they have Thomas at number seven on my list. I

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know by that. They have him on the furthest

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.879
<v Speaker 1>right right now, at least in the sitting justices. Well,

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and then there's people, like I said, over time that

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>might change a bit. John Paul Stevens was the guy

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that was in there for thirty five years and apparently

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>he became more liberal over time. Um, and then Burton

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>was very conservative, but he ruled against segregation. It's like

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you kind of never know. Uh. David Souder became he

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was a Bush appointee, and I think he was one

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>of those that like conservatives were really mad at. They

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>were like, you're not nearly as conservative as we thought, Souder.

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>They would have never picked you. Yeah, And I mean

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you just can never tell. You can't tell. And the

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>whole point is that makes a good just this, that's

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what you want. You don't want to be able to

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>look at them and be like, oh, this is how

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to vote and be right every time. You

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be surprised, because if you can just point

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to a Supreme Court justice and say this is how

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna vote, they're doing a terrible job. They're voting ideologically,

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:18.879
<v Speaker 1>not on the merits of the case. Yeah, it sounds

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>funny to say that you want a Supreme Court justice

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.399
<v Speaker 1>like you never know what they're gonna do. And I'm

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>predictable like Clarence Thomas, he didn't speak for seven years.

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Who knew. I did not see that coming A Penny

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>farthing to work every day. He didn't know that Judge

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Rehnquist had a huge heroin problem. Oh you got anything else? Uh? Yeah.

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that Harriet Myers was criticized for

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the Harriet Myers nomination by George W. Bush was that

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody had dug up that she had called George W.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Bush cool at one point, and that was used against here. Huh. Well,

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they were worried that she was she would be beholden

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to him because he was so cool cool. Interesting. Um,

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Actually we didn't cover this. I think it's pretty interesting. Um.

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Goldberg appointment of John F. Kennedy. He was Jewish,

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and he took his oath on the Hebrew Bible and

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on the traditional Official Court Bible, which is a Christian Bible,

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and he signed that because everyone has signed it. And

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, I just want to I'm not

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna make a big deal out of this, even though

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jewish. I'll sign the Christian Bible just to kind

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of maintain that continuity. But when he was um, he

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 1>said it was really neat. When he was sitting at

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 1>his bench for the first time, he uh, he opened

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>up the drawer and there was a copy of the Constitution,

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 1>because he said it was a dog gear to copy

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution that actually belonged and it was signed

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>by who Oliver Wendell Holmes. Pretty neat was just in

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that drawer. He calls him that old yankee from a limp.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.439
<v Speaker 1>This no idea what that means, but it meant something

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to Goldberg. I'll tell you that. He said he's looking

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 1>for like a notepad. Yeah, and there was. He thought

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty awesome. Well, it is pretty awesome. And

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>if you think Supreme Court nominations are awesome, you should

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>go look them up. There's plenty of stuff out there.

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:21.919
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty fun to watch. Uh, if you go back

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>through old articles, every nomination cycle or whatever pattern it

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>follows um has people griping about how you can't tell

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>anything about this nominee and they never say, well, it's

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>like that for all nominees. Anyway, take a trip down

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>memory lane. You'll amuse yourself. You can also type in

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the words Freme Court in the search bar. How stuff works.

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And since I said Supreme Court, it's time for listening.

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm gonna call this Georgia connection to Trail of Tears. Hey, guys.

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed the episodes on Trail of Tears, which I

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>literally just finished. Even Calhoun, Georgia, which is home to

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the new ektoa She says yeah, she says, oh, even

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's He's serious, sir, And I think that's right historic site.

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 1>It is home to the print shop where the first

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>English language Cherokee newspaper was printed, the home of Samuel

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>wools Stuff, among other things. It's a beautiful and fascinating place.

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think all uh North Georgia kids have gone on

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a field trip there at least once. There are also

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:29.320
<v Speaker 1>road signs that drive past every time I drive to

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and from my mother's house, indicating that I am actually

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>driving where the Cherokee marched from their homes, very sobering.

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>The home of Chief Van is also nearby. I didn't

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm gonna have to go see that stuff. Yeah,

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's not too far. I enjoy your history episodes

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>because the way you explain history in layman's terms and

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>make it interesting to someone like me who couldn't quite

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>stay awake in history class in school. I believe learning

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>about history is important to help prevent society from repeating big,

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>shameful Calcy Mistakes. Thanks for the work you do and

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff we should know. Have a blessed day.

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>That is from Tiffany Waits and Tiffany if you don't

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to stuff you miss in history class from our

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 1>colleagues Tracy and Holly, you should check that out, dude,

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for sure, it's great. It sounds like you'd be right

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>up our alley. Who was it, Tiffany Waits? Thanks a lot, Tiffany,

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you writing in and if you want to

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be like her and get in touch with us to

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>tell us some cool stuff, you can tweet to us

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at s y s K podcast or josh um Clark.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:25.919
<v Speaker 1>You can hang out with us on Facebook, dot Com,

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant, or Stuff you Should Know.

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email the Stuff podcast at

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works dot com and has always joined us

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>at her home on the web, Stuff you Should Know

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com For more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it how Stuff Works dot com