WEBVTT - Intel's Amazon Deal and Musk's Super PAC

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York and San Francisco.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up. Intel gets to work

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>striking a chip making deal with Amazon after postponing expansion

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>plans in Germany.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Plussy Loon Musk expanding his support for Republicans, don eighteen

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 4>millions to back the GOP in congressional races.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 3>And Microsoft rewards its shareholders boosting is diffenend and unveiling

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 3>a sixteen billion dollar buyback plan that as we hear

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 3>from co founder Bill Gates as he tackles a different

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>three trillion dollar problem. But first, let's check in on

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>these markets. Because they s people one hundred hits new

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Interdai highs. We are still well off the hires and

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>annows that one hundred about five percent off of them,

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 3>but we managed to push.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:05.919
<v Speaker 2>On higher on the day. We're at five to percent.

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing a Goldilocks reading once again.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to economic data.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>There's retail sales surprising to the upside for August, but

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>still the market waits for tomorrow the FED and whether

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 3>we get a fifty basis point cut.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 4>But ed, you're watching the micro Yeah, three big technology

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 4>names moving higher.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Amazon CEO Andy Jasse.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 4>Has told staff they have to go back to the

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 4>office five days a week starting in January except for

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 4>extenuating circumstances.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's talking about that.

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft boosting its dividend ten percent, a new sixty billion

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 4>dollar share buyback plan that is pushing the stock higher.

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 4>And then Intel a long list of news and announcements

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 4>that shows Pat Gelsinger's turnaround plan is making. They will

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>manufacture a chip for Amazon Aws, they will separate out

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the foundry business to serve customers. They will pull back

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 4>in plants in Europe.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 5>That's a long list.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Carrot it is, and we get into it blom Meg's

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Ian King. There is the positive, the deal to fabricate

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>for Amazon.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>How important is this the in I.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 6>Mean, they needed a win, They needed a big name

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 6>customer to come out and say, hey, yeah we can

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 6>use that stuff. How material this particular type of chip is.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 5>How big a.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 6>Deal this individually is is another question. And really I

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 6>spoke to Pat ahead of the announcement and he said, look,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 6>I don't need one big customer. I need lots of customers.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 6>So really that's the perspective for that particular announcement.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 4>But this is an important start. We'll show what Pat

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 4>told you on that phone call on screen in a second.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 4>It's a fabric chip.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 5>What is a fabric chip and why is it significant

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 5>that Intel has been chosen to make it?

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean this is an integral part of a data center.

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 6>It links other chips together. It's not the kind of

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 6>thing that you have millions and millions of, but it's

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 6>very important and you want it to be made on

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 6>the best possible technology. The fact that Amazon, which is

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 6>one of the, if not the leading data center operator

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 6>in the world, has decided to use Intel, that's an

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 6>affirmation that Intel has something that it can use and

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, helps.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It helps.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned that he needs lots and lots of customers,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>but they're not going to be Europe based for the

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 3>time being. How upsetting is this ultimately for Germany and

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Poland today?

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, it might have customers in Europe, but they won't

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 6>be being building chips in Germany. Remember, they have a

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 6>plant in Ireland which they said is going to be

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 6>the center of their operations for now in Europe in

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 6>terms of what this means for the actual you know,

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 6>the European investment in semiconductors.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 8>It's clearly a setback.

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 6>Everybody has been hoping that Intel would kind of ride

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 6>to the rescue, obviously here in the United States, but

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 6>also Europe is pushing this as a public policy. Anything

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 6>that delays that, anything that raises the possibility that it

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 6>won't happen, is obviously not good.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Let me show you this chart on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 4>It shows us that going back to twenty twenty, Intel's

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 4>only had three quarters where sales have grown. What did

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 4>you learn on your phone call with back Pat Gelsinger

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 4>that suggests this list of actions will change that chart

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 4>and that at the top line they will start to

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 4>see some growth.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 6>What I said to him was like, Pat, do you

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 6>have enough money to keep this thing going?

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, everybody approves of the plan, everybody approves of

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 6>what you've set out to do, but they are worried

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 6>that you don't have enough money to do that. And

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 6>his answer was, well, this has kind of saved me

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 6>some more money to help me to keep things going.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 6>I feel like I've got the worst of the investment

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 6>period behind me, and now we're in a position with

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 6>our technology and what we can offer to begin to

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 6>start to bring in those orders that turn things around.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>In King always bringing us the important conversations.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Now let's bring in Jordan Klein to continue that conversation,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 3>tech media and telecom analyst over at Bazooho Americas.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 2>You'll take on all of this, Jordan.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>You write your note this morning really actually highlighting the

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>pa reality for Intel is that in one week alone,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>a company such as Broadcom will add twice the market

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>capitalization of an Intel. How are you thinking about the

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>news coming from what was the key chip manufacturer of

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>ten years ago.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well thanks for having me. I mean, I would

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 9>agree with the insummation that this is an important bit

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 9>of positive news. Intel needed something to kind of help

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 9>the stock and sentiment.

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>So I think on one.

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 9>Side, it's at least a affirmation that yes, they have

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 9>this foundry business. They've won an important cloud customer in Amazon,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 9>But basically it's not we don't really know enough on

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 9>the volume and the timing of when it would actually

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 9>drive you know, revenues for them, and I think now

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 9>the stage is set for them to hopefully go out

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 9>and start adding more customers to the mix.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's you.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 9>Know, the biggest and the best would be in Nvidia,

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 9>but they could get others as well, and that's going

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 9>to be a very zephill to climb, but they got

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 9>to start somewhere, and that's what today.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 2>Was biggest of the best in Vidia.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Our investors still feeling that that's where they should be

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 3>allocating that chip's more broadly, chip making is where they

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>should be putting money in this time in the market.

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a really good question.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 9>I think people are a bit mixed on how much

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 9>more exposure to semiconductors they want and need at this time.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 9>The group semiconductors that is is extremely sentiment driven, so

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 9>when it's performing well, it's got the momentum, people are

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 9>generally very happy to ride the wave. And that's what

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 9>you saw all first half of twenty twenty four. It

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 9>was like a fear of missing out led by Nvidia.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 9>As soon as we hit the highs in the first

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 9>part of July and the group sold off, I think

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 9>investor sentiment shifted. People will worried this group is ahead

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 9>of fundamentals. Evaluations were stretched, and it was time to

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 9>look outside of SEMIS to areas like software or large

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 9>cap Internet, and that's kind of where we are now.

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I would say.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 9>A last thing is that the investor feedback in SEMIS

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 9>is quite mixed. Even though the group is still up

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot this year and the stocks act relatively well,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 9>not a lot of them are making new highs and

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 9>the fundamentals, meaning what these companies are saying, particularly outside

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 9>of Nvidia and GPUs for Ai, is actually not improving

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 9>in some instances, it's deteriorating a bit, like the auto

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 9>and memory sector.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Away from the idiosyncratic Jordan, what did the Intel story

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 4>tell you about this investment cycle and through pats lens

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 4>those potential customers and where they might be going.

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, it tells me a couple things. It tells me

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 9>that one these large cloud hyperskill customers like Amazon, Meta, Google, Facebook. Sorry,

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, these large cloud customers are very interested in

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 9>building and designing their own custom chips. As you pointed

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 9>out early in the show, this is more of a

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 9>fabric new working chip. But keep in mind Amazon is

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 9>very big at building and designing their own chips for

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 9>training and inferencing as opposed to relying too much on Nvidia,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 9>so I think that's going to continue.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 5>All these big.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 9>Cloud companies with large CAPEX spending budgets will seek to

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 9>do as much as they can internally with the help

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 9>of other leading design companies like Broadcom, Marvel, maybe Intel

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 9>and others. It also shows that there's really no end

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 9>in sight here. I think that they're going to look

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 9>to diversify if they can beyond just building all these

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 9>chips with Taiwan Semi, who's the world's leading foundry. But

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 9>they don't want to be too reliant upon them or

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 9>give TSM so much leverage that they can keep raising prices,

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 9>so they kind of want to keep the industry balanced

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 9>and honest, so to speak, and that would be at

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 9>Intel's advantage if they can show and prove they can

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 9>execute at these very advanced, leading edge nodes.

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Jordan, I don't know what you're doing on Wednesday afternoon.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Here we'll be focusing on the next FOMC decision. You're

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 4>somebody whose desk is just every day flowing with technology

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 4>news essentially, So how do you and all the people

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 4>that phone you at five am think about the FED tomorrow?

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think half of them, like myself just wanted

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 9>to be behind us so we can move on and

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 9>focus more on fundamentals as opposed to the FED and

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 9>the macro. I tend to think this one is one

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 9>of the more important FED decisions and announcements that we've

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 9>had in some time, But it also feels like a

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 9>little bit overhyped in terms of are we really is

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 9>the market really going to change dramatically whether it's twenty

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 9>five or fifty basis points. Are institutional investors and big

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 9>mutual fund managers going to dramatically change the makeup of

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 9>their portfolio based on twenty five versus fifty? I don't

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 9>think so. I think they're already of the view that

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 9>whether it's twenty five or fifty, the FED is going

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 9>to continue to probably air on the side of wanting

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 9>to ease as opposed to keep rates high. And with

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 9>that backdrop, as long as we can believe in a

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 9>soft landing, which I think most investors do, they're going

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 9>to probably stay long equities, and they're probably going to

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 9>continue to look for growth, and that's going to favor

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 9>key parts of tech. So bottom line, I think when

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 9>the dust settles in a week, the fundamentals and the

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 9>backdrop for tech still remain pretty favorable.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Does it still favor the most valuable companies? I think

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 3>of Microsoft today once again having money back in terms

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 3>of buybacks, promised dividends given, but it's so valuable already.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Do the sentiment stick with it?

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 9>Oh yeah, I definitely think that there's no deterioration or

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 9>weakening and positive sentiment for these mag seven you know,

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 9>particularly these names like Microsoft and Video, Amazon and Meta.

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 9>That the companies that are perceived to be the leaders

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 9>in both class out an.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 5>AI, even Apple.

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean it's down a bit the last few days,

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 9>but to be to be honest, like if AI on

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 9>the smartphone is going to work, they're going to be

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 9>leading the charge. And I just don't think you can

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 9>get that exposure, that potential growth in other areas of tech,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 9>and actually probably not in other areas of the market.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 9>The debate is going to be what you pay for it,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 9>and that's that's you know, hard to determine. It's it's

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 9>more of an art form than a than a science.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 9>But as long as rates are coming down and the economies,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, not grinding to a halt, I tend to

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 9>think people will pay up for growth and that favors

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 9>these large megacaps as opposed to the smaller companies that

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 9>are going to have to see if the economy.

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 5>Holds up or not.

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 4>MISSOI America's analyst Jordan Klein, thank you very much. Coming

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 4>up on the show, we have all the details on

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Uber's latest driver safety perch that's next.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 8>This has been that technology.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Starting tomorrow, Uber will begin automatically verifying passengers, checking their

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>account information against third party identity databases, all in an

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 3>effort to make drivers feel safer.

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomegs. Dana Wrman joins us for more.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 3>A big step one that's been called for.

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 10>Yes, And I don't think we talk enough about driver's safety,

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 10>which is odd because when you think about it, these

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 10>are drivers who are picking up strangers, mostly in their

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 10>own cars, and I can imagine that being somewhat scary,

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 10>maybe vulnerable feeling. And these are measures being taken really

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 10>to make drivers feel a little safer as they pick

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 10>up drivers in the day.

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 5>To day Dana, How's this going to work?

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 4>In some cases, like if you pay with a gift

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 4>card on Uber rather than attach a credit card, there

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 4>is some verification as a passenger or rider you already

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 4>have to go through what will be required of us

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 4>going forward.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I don't excuse me.

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 10>Writers who use anonymous payment methods, and I don't know

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 10>how many of them there are, will need to go

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 10>through a manual process, but most of us, For most

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 10>of us, the process will be automatic, and it might

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 10>even be that it's already been done. I actually checked

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 10>my Uber account before joining you all here on TV

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 10>and I had check marks next to both my cell

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 10>phone number and my email address in my account. So

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 10>for many customers, that automatic process may have already taken place.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 10>And it's worth noting that you cannot, as a writer,

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 10>opt out of the automatic process. So if you have

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 10>a phone number attached the email address, ubers going to

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 10>match you against a third party database to verify your identity,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.479
<v Speaker 10>and it may already have been done.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>This is one of a couple of steps that doing

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>dosh cooms as well. All of this costs, but the

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 3>reward must be more sustainable.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Drivers on that platform.

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 10>Yes, drivers have said in the past they're worried about

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 10>their safety, both physically and reputationally. They're worried about things

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 10>like carjack, but aside from violent incidents, they're worried about.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Malicious reports, just reports.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 10>From maybe spiteful riders that could really tank their rating

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.479
<v Speaker 10>and therefore their standing with the platform and by extension,

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 10>their income. So one of the measures today, in addition

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 10>to the automatic identity.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Verification, is the ability.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 10>To no longer match within the future someone who you've

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 10>rated as a.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Driver a two or three.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 10>As it is, you wouldn't be matched against again with

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 10>someone who you rated just one out of five. But

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 10>this is sort of an extension of that, saying, Okay,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 10>this passenger was a bit of a jerk, I rated

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 10>them a two or three.

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to see them again.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Dana Wolman, thank you very much. Now.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft raised its quarterly dividend ten percent and unveiled a

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 4>new sixty billion dollar stock buyback program, matching the size

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 4>of the repurchase plan three years ago. The company said

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 4>shareholders as of November twenty first will receive a quarterly

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>dividend of eighty three cents a share, compared with the

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 4>current seventy five cents. The buyback agreement represents less than

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 4>two percent of Microsoft's market value.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 5>Carac Let's just.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Discuss in one of Microsoft's co founders Bill Gates, as

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>his foundation just released its Goalkeepers Report for twenty twenty four,

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 3>highlighting a sudden halt in the global health boom with

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>a worsening child nutrition crisis causing a potential three trillion

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 3>dollars in economic losses.

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.119
<v Speaker 2>I sat down with Microsoft co founder.

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Bill Gates to discuss just this, how technology and AI

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>can help, and why resources are needed.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 7>Take a listen, We do need to raise money to

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 7>get resources for this so that the poor countries, you know,

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 7>get out of the poverty trap and then are our

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 7>self sufficient. The innovation is going to accelerate tools like

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 7>AI or helping us understand that god the immune system,

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, how to design vaccines in a very deep way.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 5>And you know, the.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 7>Key thing that the Foundation has my innovation is making

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 7>sure it's not just helping the rich countries, but it's

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 7>helping the poorest.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 5>And so, you know, can.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 7>They get medical advice in their native language on their

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 7>cell phone. Can they have their diseases that are so ignored,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 7>like malaria, Can we use AI to develop ways to

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 7>not only reduce that but eventually eradicate it. And so

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 7>you know, that's where the Foundation is looking at the

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 7>innovation and making sure that it's benefiting those most in need.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 3>The foundation talking with global leaders often, I'm sure global

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 3>leaders of wealthy, developed nations who are preoccupied right now

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 3>with their own political instabilities, their own worries about the

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 3>cost of living. Will you get the help you need

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 3>from developed nations?

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a very good question.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 7>The dream is that even in the face of huge

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 7>budgetary challenges that all countries have, that they would be

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 7>willing to have one to two percent that go to

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 7>help the poorest, to help these countries move forward. And

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 7>these are things where you're saving a life for less

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 7>than a thousand dollars per life saved, so, you know,

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 7>very catalytic, very well measured. You know, I wouldn't be

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 7>putting my money in unless I knew that it was

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 7>extremely well spent. And so we're trying to keep this

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 7>on the agenda to continue that miracle that took place

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 7>where we made so much progress getting rid of childhood death.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 3>Bill gates there and often ed to solve what is

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 3>a three trillion dollar economic issue.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Is not rocket science.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 3>It's about getting vitamins out to people. It's about more

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:53.479
<v Speaker 3>productive cows.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and consistent with the foundation. What Gates is looking

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 4>for is a technology that is upfront, affordable and scale

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 4>and that's consistent always done. But they're putting a big

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 4>check in particularly a nutrition microby and things like that.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Time now for talking tech and first up Hong Kong

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>while it's preparing to issue a policy statement on the

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 3>use of AI in finance, escording to sources, with the

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 3>document broadly intended to signal Hong Kong's.

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Support for artificial intelligence, and.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 3>The move could catalyze the use of the technology in

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 3>areas from training to investment, banking and cryptocurrencies. Plus, Lenovo

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 3>started building AI servers in south of India, moving beyond

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 3>products such as laptops and smartphones, and the Chinese company

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 3>will also build out its facilities in Bangalore region, including

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 3>a research lab with a focus on.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>AI and Amazon.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 3>CEO Andy Jase he's moving to streamline the company. In

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 3>a memo to employees yesterday, the CEO announced cutting management

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 3>layers and ordered employees to return to the office five

0:18:58.840 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 3>days a week.

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 5>In January, more.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 4>Tech news as Salesforce is kicking off its Dreamforce event today.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 4>It's also unveiling a pivot in its AI strategy now

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 4>saying that it's AI tools can handle tasks without human supervision,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 4>and changing the way it charges for software. Let's bring

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 4>in Bloomberg intelligence analyst and a rag Rana and on

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 4>the charging they're going to start doing two dollars per

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 4>conversation handled by an AI agent as opposed to a

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 4>subscription on a per head basis.

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 5>What's the BI reaction to that.

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So when you look at the way some of

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 11>these core pilots are being priced, you know, companies like

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft are saying they're going to charge thirty dollars per

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 11>user per month. So that's one pricing mechanism. Another pricing

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 11>mechanism is consumption based, which is what you just mentioned.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 11>Adobe has a similar one for their Firefly appligation where

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 11>you're going to get some credits initially and then you're

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 11>going to have to pay for it. And the third

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 11>one would be just part of the full enterprise packet.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 11>So there are several ways you're going to modernize this

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 11>is monetize this, but needless to say, over the next

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.479
<v Speaker 11>few years, we think these costs are going to reduce

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 11>dramatically because currently the reason why it's a little bit

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 11>more expensive is because it really required a lot of

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 11>resources to train these large language models. And over time

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 11>that consumption, that processing is going to improve.

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 3>So as it becomes cheaper, will that be reflected in

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 3>the price point that you and I charged for any conversation?

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think that's going to be beyond for everything,

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 11>not just this, but probably you know, you could say chat,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 11>GPT pricing or subscriptions. Over time, you could expect some

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 11>compression in those charges and you know, better profit for.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 5>These AI vendors.

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 11>But for Salesforce, I think they're going to play it

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 11>a few ways. They have a product called data Cloud.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 11>I think that's doing very well. That's an area of

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 11>strength for them. Now, remember but that's too small of

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 11>a thing that is cannot offset the bigger compression on ender.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 11>Is it budgets that's compressing their seat growth right now?

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Anna Rag, I'm surprised that you're not here with me

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco for dream Force. You know, Salesforce were

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 4>well the research, the podcast. Why aren't you attempted to

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 4>come out? Is it not a sort of substantive event?

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 11>No, it is an important event, but frankly speaking, almost

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 11>every week there is an event like this whether it's

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 11>Oracle World or Workday, I wondn't get any work done

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 11>if I.

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 8>Was doing that.

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>He's going to be in the office like most of

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the Amazon employers will have to be as well soon.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.239
<v Speaker 3>Just very briefly, what is factored in to CRM at

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the moment in salesforce? Are we seeing well the enthusiasm

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 3>ram the name reflecting the evaluation.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think you know, for CRM, they really need

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.719
<v Speaker 11>to get back to double digit growth rate. I mean,

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 11>I think this is really a big issue for them

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 11>because right now, when we looked at bookings data for

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 11>the last quarter, we're hovering around at eight and a

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 11>half nine percent mark, which means next to your sales

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 11>growth is going to be nine percent. You can check

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 11>out on the Bloomberg te or in our view that

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 11>needs to come to that ten to twelve percent number

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 11>before you know, you would see investors by link the

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 11>way the margin story is done and done with, but

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 11>now it's a matter of revenue acceleration for them.

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Anna rag Rana, thank you, Welcome back

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>to Bluemag Technology.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline hid in New York.

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Medald Loo in San Francisco, let's just talk.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Politics, because Elon Musk is openly as wallet wider in

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 3>support of Republican candidates in battlegwn districts across the country. Now,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the Tesla CEU Super Political Action Committee is following two

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 3>point one million dollars in its first foray into congressional races.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Megs Mike Shephard joins us. Now, this is a new foray.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Which kind of races are they targeting?

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, what they're looking for is some of the most

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 12>closely contested districts in the country. These are the kinds

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 12>of competitions that could side control of the House of

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 12>Representatives come November. These are areas where Joe Biden won

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 12>in twenty twenty but Democrats in twenty twenty two during

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 12>the midterm elections lost those seats. Now that Democratic Party

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 12>is trying to make some efforts to regain control of

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 12>those districts so that maybe they could flip the House

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 12>back into their hands come November. Now, this will not

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 12>be an easy task, but it is something that's a

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 12>little bit more within reach than might appear, even as

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 12>we look at a very closely contested presidential race. So

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 12>Elon Musk putting some money through his superpack into these races.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 12>One is Mike Lawler and Westchester. Another is Marcus Molnaro's

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 12>district further upstate New York. These are the kinds of

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 12>places where Republicans are looking to hold onto their gains

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 12>from twenty twenty two.

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 4>To some two point one million dollars might not seem

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 4>like a lot to others, it will seem like a lot.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 4>But the point that Bloomberg's Down the Hole makes well

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 4>in her story is that Elon Musk is the world's

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 4>richest man but also has other platforms in which his

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 4>voice gets out to voters. Explain why that's important, Mike.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 12>Well, and you're getting at something really important here in

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 12>this particular campaign, and that is a dynamic of in

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 12>kind support that Elon Musk is able to provide to

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 12>his allies on the right. He for the first time

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 12>really came out and endorsed a candidate when he did

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 12>so in July, coming out in favor of former President

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump. And he has signaled his interest in pushing

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 12>more of these right leaning causes and conservative candidates.

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 5>So he is doing so using.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 12>His ex platform by amplifying some of their posts and

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 12>their views and also putting information out there and putting

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 12>posts out there that make Kamala Harrison Democrats look not so.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Great, Mike, what does it mean for his businesses though,

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 3>like Tesla, what does it mean to have well finance

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 3>some political candidates.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 12>Well, it's a really good question, Carolyn, because Elon Musk

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 12>has so much business tied up with the federal government,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 12>either directly for example with SpaceX providing so many services

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 12>to the US government, but also Tesla does have a

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 12>stake in the fate of how President Joe Biden's Inflation

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 12>Reduction Act, in all of its green incentives to get

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 12>more people to buy electric vehicles, how that goes. So

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 12>he has a very strong tied to the US government

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 12>and how things look for his companies. Now, in this sense,

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 12>he is trying to ensure that not only does he

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 12>get a candidate like Donald Trump who is in his

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 12>court and in his favor, into the White House, he

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 12>also wants to make sure he has allies in Congress

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 12>who will act on his interests.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Bombangs Mike shepphad out of DC. Thank you very much.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to another story.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 4>Instagram is rolling out new privacy settings for teens. It

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 4>will make teen accounts private by defeat limiting the use

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 4>of private messages and sensitive posts. These restrictive settings will

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 4>be turned on automatically for all Instagram users under the

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 4>age of eighteen. Bloom Best Kurt Wagner covers social media

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 4>and joins us now. And you spoke to Adam Asseerri,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 4>the chief over at Instagram, not just about how that

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 4>will look if you're a team user of Instagram, but

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 4>the rationale for doing it.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 5>What did he tell you?

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 13>Well, he said that this has been in the works

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 13>for over a year, and you can see why, right,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 13>this is one of the biggest complaints that Instagram gets

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 13>from parents. It's one of the biggest complaints they certainly

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 13>get from lawmakers. We've seen Mark Zuckerberg have to show

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 13>up in DC to answer questions about their role on

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 13>protecting children on several instances over the last couple of years.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 13>So this is something that is not a new problem

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 13>or something that is not a new idea to them.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 13>It's been in the works a long time. I think,

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 13>you know, the bigger question might be what took them

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 13>so long? But I think they've gotten to a point

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 13>here where this is a very robust set of changes,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 13>and they feel like they're finally sort of addressing a

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 13>lot of those concerns that they are getting from parents

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 13>and lawmakers.

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 3>And Kurt, it does intertwine artificial intelligence to help them

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 3>ensure that you are the age you say you are.

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's sort of unique.

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 13>So if you are a teen under eighteen and you're

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 13>lying about your birthday, they're going to use AI to

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 13>try and detect those lies. Right, They're going to look

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 13>at what a normal teen account might look like, what

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 13>normal teen behavior might look like, and using AI, they

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 13>will sort of bucket people into whether or not they

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 13>think they are an under eighteen account, and then will

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 13>automatically put them into those settings right now. It may

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 13>make mistakes at times, but you can imagine a lot

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 13>of teenagers who are suddenly going to wake up here

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 13>this news and try and change their birthday to get

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 13>around this. And Meta says that they're trying to proactively

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 13>prevent that.

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 4>For many social media platforms, Kurt, the demographic of the

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 4>user base is important. So we have a sense of

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 4>on Instagram how much of the user base is teen

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 4>age and how much of it is parent overseeing teenage

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 4>user account.

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, no, we don't. I mean, we know it's in

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 13>the millions. We know there are millions of teens around

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 13>the world and millions of teens just here in the

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 13>US that are using Instagram. We don't know a more

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 13>striking percentage than that. This will be a small portion

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 13>of the overall user base, right, So, even though it's

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 13>all teens that are eighteen, it's really just teens under

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 13>sixteen who need parental.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Permission to change these things.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 13>If you are a sixteen or seventeen year old, you'll

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 13>be kicked into these new settings, but you can change

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 13>them on your own. So you know, this is a

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 13>small cohort of users based on Instagram's total audience. But

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 13>of course it is the most vulnerable and it's also

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 13>the group that people are most concerned about, right because

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 13>they're interacting at times with people that they've never met

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 13>or don't know in real life.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 3>And as a global concern, how is this a global outreach?

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so this will be implemented for teenagers across the world.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 13>They're starting with some English speaking countries, the US, the UK,

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 13>out in Australia. They're going to bring it to the

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 13>rest of the European Union. I believe by the end

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 13>of this year, and then early in twenty twenty five

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 13>they'll start expanding this to teens in other countries. So

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 13>this isn't just a you know, a US thing.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 5>This is a global thing.

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 13>And I asked Adamissari, hey, is this the kind of

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 13>thing that's going to come to Facebook too, right, because

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 13>this isn't just an issue on Instagram. He said, they

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 13>want to start small with Instagram and if all goes

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 13>well with the rollout, it seemed I got the sense

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 13>that it was very likely these types of protections could

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 13>move to some of Meta's other apps in the future

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 13>as well.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Wagner, thank you keeping us up to speed and

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 3>more on Meta now because it's banning Russian media outlet

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 3>RT and its parent entity Rasia Say Good yea, the

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>media group, and other related entities, according to reports Now,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 3>a spokesperson at Meta said in a statement that the

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 3>outlets have been banned from metas apps globally for foreign

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 3>interference activity.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Ed that's quick take quick look at Market's carry because

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't who really have done as much so far

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 4>as maybe we should. The S and P five hundred,

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 4>by the way, is very near a fresh record but

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at the text focused indexes. We know what

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 4>the points boosts are, right, you see one on the

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 4>screen there Microsoft after the shared buyback in dividend that

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 4>is helping push the NASDAK one hundred higher, along with

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Amazon Chips having a better day outperforming up almost percentage

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 4>point on the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index. Y. You know the

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 4>story Intel, and Intel's seen its gains accelerate. We have

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 4>so much more to come here on bloom Technology.

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. This is bloomot Technology.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Time now for our VC roundup in video back sakhana

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Ai now valued at one point five billion.

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Dollars according to sources. The startup, founded.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 3>By former Google researchers in twenty twenty three, was boosted

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 3>by investments from Summer Japan's biggest banks.

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 2>And companies, using two hundred and thirteen million dollars in

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>a series a funning round.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Emhil, Germany's rapid delivery startup Flink, has raised one hundred

0:30:58.440 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>and fifty million dollars in a new round of fun

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>We's thing it's valuation to.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Lily a billion.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Still, that's down from three billion dollars that it was

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 3>valued at during the height of COVID when it emerged

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 3>as a pandemic darling during Lockdown's VC firm Patron raised

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>three and well one hundred million dollars for a new

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 3>fund with a focus on young consumer facing companies.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Particularly in the gaming field. It's second fund from Patron.

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Ed We've got more.

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and Patron general partner and co founder Jason Yea

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 4>joins us now for today's VC Spotlight here in San Francisco.

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Cover gaming a lot in this program. There are lots

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 4>of headlines we should get to, but I think it's

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 4>a good place to start. When you have one hundred

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 4>million dollars to invest, where do you find disruption in

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 4>the gaming industry? It won't be all of your focus,

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 4>but it'll be a big part.

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 14>Well, good morning, ED, thanks again for having me here

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 14>and alongside my partner's Brandjo and memory Atherdon, we're excited

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 14>to be announcing our one hundred million dollars second fund today.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 14>So to the point about where we focus, I think

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 14>a lot of a lot of our insight comes from

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 14>the time that we spent helping to build Right and Discord,

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 14>and there's this entire generation of young people that are

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 14>growing up on these gaming platforms spending thousands of hours

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 14>with their friends, and I think we really want to

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 14>follow the audience and take a look at what are

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 14>the ways that they're going to evolve, how they use

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 14>how they use the Internet.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 4>When I think about the studios in particular, I mean

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 4>you still focus on studios in.

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 5>Part that's an area where there are some.

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Uncertain futures and a lot of them are pulling back

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 4>reducing staff. Does that impact your ability to invest anywhere?

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 14>I think something we think a lot when looking at

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 14>gaming studios is this idea of market expansion and market creation.

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 14>It's incredibly tough to go directly compete against the Riot, Epic,

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 14>a Valve, and so I think in that particular area

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 14>we really look for, like what is the unique insight

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 14>how can you actually grow what previously seemed like a

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 14>market that might have been too niche I think League

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 14>certainly was that way with Dota initially, and then really

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 14>go from there.

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Jason, how much is AI changing the game things?

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 14>I think, as with a lot of technology emergent technologies, previously,

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 14>gaming has served as the forefront for new technology adoption.

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 5>And on our side, we really believe.

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 14>That AI is going to change how people use the

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 14>Internet overall, and I think a lot of the earliest

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 14>efforts are tied to content and game creation. I think

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 14>the thing that we're more interested in is like, how

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 14>can AI actually help to make your experience as a

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 14>consumer better? How can it make the games you play

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 14>more fun? How can it make the learning apps more effective?

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 14>How can you make shopping more easy? So those are

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 14>the areas that we're looking at.

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's been a story you've told to institutional investors

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 3>who got in on this fund, some big names who

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 3>manage their own vcs. You've got Mark Andriesen, You've got

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Fred Wilson of Union Square Adventures.

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Why are they seeking you out in particular?

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 3>And how easy was it to get that commitment in

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 3>this environment?

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 14>So well, I think fundraising overall, as we've all seen,

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 14>has been pretty challenging over the last year and a half.

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 14>I think one thing which resonated with a lot of

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 14>our earliest investors, including a handful of the General Partner

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 14>as you mentioned, and some of our largest institutions, is

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 14>this idea that we are We're very focused on what

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 14>we know best, and we spent better part of the

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 14>last decade helping to build companies like Ride and Discord,

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 14>and it is becoming increasingly clear that the consumers that

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 14>grow up on products like Roadblocks and Discord and League,

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 14>they're the ones that are going to drive kind of

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 14>future innovation adoption of technology. And so that focus has

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 14>allowed us to really differentiate from a lot of our peers.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Discord's present is very different to its origin story. I

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>wonder how much in that context you'll focus on being

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 4>an operator, not just an investor. A lot of people

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 4>have great ideas that they're morph into something completely different.

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 14>Certainly, I think for our firm specifically, so Amber really

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 14>helped Discord expand into non gaming verticals. My job at

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 14>Riot was to help us launch the game, launch sports,

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 14>launch entertainment into new markets. And so having this real

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 14>recent experience helping to launch products build communities has really

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 14>resonated with the founders that we're working with.

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Jason, I go back to a different hype cycle when

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 3>we sort of gaming, we thought of Discord, and we

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 3>thought of web three.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 5>How much is that.

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Still an underlying driver for you, even if it's less

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>sexy to talk about.

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 14>I think we're always going to look at how new

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 14>technologies influence how people connect with each other and play online,

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 14>and so whether it was web through initially, whether it's

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 14>generative AI now, I don't think that changes.

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 7>Again.

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 14>I think as a firm, we're much more focused on

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 14>the audience and the behavior of that audience. And I

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 14>do think it is good to be looking in areas

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 14>where not everyone else is looking, and so we are

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 14>always going to be hyper focused on this audience as

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 14>they kind of grow up and adopt new technologies.

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Jason Yay, I've patron, thank you so much for joining

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 3>us on the new fund.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 5>I want to get a.

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Quick check in on crypto market's not already talked about

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 4>it as much. Just before ten am Eastern, a lot

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 4>of risk assets took a big leg to the upside,

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 4>and that included Bitcoin that's now back trading around sixty

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 4>one thousand US dollars per token. It had sort of

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 4>had a shaky start to the week, which is a

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 4>fed week, and that was a big part of the narrative.

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 4>There are some other individual movers as well, largely tied

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 4>to news. Crypto adjacent stocks micro Strategy, Riot and coinbase

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 4>all pushing higher as well. So news overnight, Donald Trump

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 4>headlined an event billed as the unveiling of a crypto

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 4>platform promoted by the Republican nominee and his sons, called

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 4>World Liberty Financial. It's all part of his push to

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 4>attract digital asset proponents. Here's what Trump had to say

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 4>about why he thinks the US should embrace crypto.

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 8>If we don't do, a chinel is going to do.

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 5>A channel is doing it anyway.

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 13>But if we aren't doing, we're not going to be

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 13>the biggest, and we have to be the biggest of

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 13>the first.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 4>We're join now by Insight Consulting principle Amanda Wick. She

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 4>used to work at the just CIS department specializing in

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 4>money laundering and crypto, and I think all those that

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 4>tuned into the spaces would agree it was kind of

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.879
<v Speaker 4>thin on detail and specifics, a focus on DeFi there'll

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 4>be the issuance of a token, but it will be

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 4>for credited investors only here in the United States at least.

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 5>What did you learn? What's the main takeaway here, Amanda Well.

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I think the sad thing is is that everything he

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>just said is right.

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 15>I think what people in the industry are terrified is

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 15>that he's the emissary saying it because there's no doubt

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 15>that WLFI is going to be, if not a pump

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 15>and dump, a rug pull. Everybody's watching in horror. Even

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 15>Trump supporters are begging him not to do this because

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 15>of the negative impact it could have on the industry

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 15>long term.

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Amanda, can you.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Give us real data or hard evidence as someone who

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 3>formerly worked for the government in this as to why

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 3>you think it's definitely going to be a rug pull

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 3>or a pump and dump, because many working on the project,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 3>I would think would dispute that.

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, and I really try to be objective. But if

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 15>you're looking at project where the incentives are flipped, usually

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 15>these projects the organizers hold twenty percent maybe less of

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 15>the tokens. I think Ethereum kept maybe sixteen percent, Cardona

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 15>is twenty percent. The Trump organizers are keeping seventy percent,

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 15>and even in the thirty percent that will be released

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 15>to the public, they're going to make.

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Some profit off of that.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 15>That is a terrible sign in terms of how it's

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 15>being structured. The other thing you have to look at

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 15>is the motive of the people organizing it. Trump's steering

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 15>down the barrel of a four hundred million dollar collection

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 15>in New York, and this would be personal funds that

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 15>he could use to satisfy that. So the motives that

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 15>they have here to make a bunch of money very

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 15>quickly is unfortunately the worst aspect of crypto and it's

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 15>the part of the.

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 5>Industry that people do not want to continue.

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Amanda Bloomberg's states quite clearly in its report that the

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 4>issuance of WLFI is in sort of having a role

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 4>in the governance of the business itself. I want to

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 4>park that The other narrative is that Trump thinks the

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 4>United States of America needs to do this bigger approach

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 4>because China's already doing it and he wants America to

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 4>be a leader in the field.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 5>How do you respond to that rationale.

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>He's absolutely right. I wish that the Heroes campaign was

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 1>saying that.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 15>I think they're a little tied in terms of what

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 15>they can say because a sitting vice president can't really

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 15>talk about the sitting administration negatively. But everybody in the

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.320
<v Speaker 15>industry wants a pivot from the Dems, wants America to

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 15>lead first.

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 5>The sad thing is is Trump is right.

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 15>I think the sadder thing is this project might end

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 15>up destroying the very thing that he said that was accurate.

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 3>When we think of China, though we don't see China

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 3>embracing all of crypto and projects. You think perhaps more

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 3>of them entertaining the idea of stable coins or indeed

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 3>some sort of form of using it within a central

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 3>bank coin. What of DEFY more broadly, Amanda and this

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 3>project about sort of getting in the way of the intermediaries,

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 3>and it's all about loaning lending asset.

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, Look, there are great aspects of DeFi, and I

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 15>think that part of his project is the good part

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 15>that the industry.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Wants to talk about.

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 15>Again, it's just that the emissary if this ends up

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 15>being a rug pull or a pump and dumb, it's

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 15>the worst part of DeFi. But there are amazing DeFi

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 15>projects out there that the industry wants to highlight and showcase.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 5>This will not be one of them.

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 15>And I don't know that China is necessarily the market

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 15>that's leading on DeFi. There are other countries that I

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 15>think are more pro investing and are pro regulating in

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 15>those areas, areas like you hate Singapore. Sometimes he doesn't

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 15>get it quite right, which is unfortunate. But the fact

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 15>that America needs to lead and DeFi is correct. It

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 15>is horrifying that this project may take us back ten

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 15>years instead of advancing us the way that the industry

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 15>would hope.

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 3>Zeke Fox Are reported in an amazing long deep dive

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 3>story on the people behind this project and Dough a

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 3>project before that have been hacked, and people who've come.

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Across from that.

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 3>They had responded saying basically an email address that you

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:02.919
<v Speaker 3>posted to saying we all see the picture you're trying

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 3>to paint here and consider it best grossly inaccurate, and

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 3>they're saying they're confident of our results will speak for themselves.

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 3>You talk of regulation, Amanda, what regulation could be put

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 3>in place to ensure that projects being built like this

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 3>don't have this question of whether it'll be a rug pull?

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 15>Well, look, I mean there are regulations that we could

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 15>use In trad FI, I prosecuted countless people who stole

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 15>money as asset.

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Managers in trad file.

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 15>So it's not a perfect system now, and a lot

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 15>of times you're just relying on doing your own due

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 15>diligence or as we see in CRYPTODYOLR, do your own research.

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 5>Are there?

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 15>I think there are particular regulations in DeFi because it's

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 15>making certain financial acts decentralized.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 5>That's a lot.

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 15>It's a longer complicated question, Amanda Wick, the.

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Insight consulting principle.

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 3>We'll get you on for the longer, more complicated answers soon.

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 3>We hope that does it for this edition of Blue

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Meg Technology Ed.

0:41:58.160 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Check out the pod.

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 4>You know where to find find it on the online,

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 4>on the Bloomberg platforms from New York and SF.

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology. M hmmm