1
00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:03,200
Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Law. I'm June Grasso. The U. S.

2
00:00:03,279 --> 00:00:06,439
Speaker 1: Army Corps of Engineers will be preparing a full environmental

3
00:00:06,480 --> 00:00:10,680
Speaker 1: impact study of the Dakota Access Pipelines disputed crossing. The

4
00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:13,480
Speaker 1: last big chunk of construction for the three point eight

5
00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:16,240
Speaker 1: billion dollar pipeline is under a lake that is the

6
00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:20,360
Speaker 1: war water source for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. Yesterday

7
00:00:20,360 --> 00:00:23,320
Speaker 1: in North Dakota, federal judge rule the Corps could proceed

8
00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:26,920
Speaker 1: with the study despite a request by energy transfer partners

9
00:00:26,960 --> 00:00:30,480
Speaker 1: to stop the study. My guests are Pat Parento, professor

10
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:33,159
Speaker 1: at Vermont Law School, and Charles Warren, head of the

11
00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:37,560
Speaker 1: environmental practice at Kramer Levin, nef Talas and Frankel Chuck.

12
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,280
Speaker 1: There has been a lot of litigation in this case.

13
00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:45,560
Speaker 1: What is the legal question in this last motion? Well,

14
00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:50,520
Speaker 1: I think the legal question here is whether the Army

15
00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:55,840
Speaker 1: can basically now require an environmental impact statement, you know,

16
00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:58,240
Speaker 1: after it had already been reviewed by the Corps of

17
00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:02,560
Speaker 1: Engineers and they indicate there were not adverse environmental impacts,

18
00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:07,720
Speaker 1: and then it was reversed essentially at the Assistant Secretary

19
00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:11,240
Speaker 1: of the Army level for Civil Works, and and they

20
00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:13,840
Speaker 1: asked for this environmental study, and I think that's going

21
00:01:13,880 --> 00:01:15,959
Speaker 1: to be that's going to be one of the issues

22
00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:20,280
Speaker 1: that they raise here, whether or not, you know, it's

23
00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:24,440
Speaker 1: necessary to do that, and the delays that entailed. Chuck

24
00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:29,120
Speaker 1: the pipeline was rerouted from Bismarck because of concerns about

25
00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:33,679
Speaker 1: potential impacts to its water supply. So wouldn't there be

26
00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:38,560
Speaker 1: concerns about this water supply as well? Yes, I agree,

27
00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:40,800
Speaker 1: I think there are concerns about the water supply, and

28
00:01:40,959 --> 00:01:42,760
Speaker 1: and I think thats pat was saying that there's always

29
00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:45,360
Speaker 1: the potential for these pipelines to leak in being that

30
00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:48,520
Speaker 1: close to a water supply where it could be contaminated.

31
00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:51,120
Speaker 1: That I think that is a serious issue. And there

32
00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:54,960
Speaker 1: have been demonstrations going on for quite some time about this.

33
00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:59,480
Speaker 1: As far as the Native Americans, Yeah, this has been

34
00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:05,000
Speaker 1: one of the biggest demonstrations that Native Americans have you know,

35
00:02:05,040 --> 00:02:07,600
Speaker 1: put on in many years, and people came from all

36
00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:10,800
Speaker 1: over the country to support them, and I think it

37
00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:14,640
Speaker 1: was all of that that really caused the Army to

38
00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:20,200
Speaker 1: take another look at this. Um Trump, who's transition team,

39
00:02:20,240 --> 00:02:24,800
Speaker 1: has said in memos that he supports the pipeline's completion. Uh,

40
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:29,680
Speaker 1: could he seek to reverse the Army's decision last month

41
00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:35,280
Speaker 1: to continue to um to continue to do the study. Yes,

42
00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:38,600
Speaker 1: he could do that. It's I mean, it's it's not

43
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:41,720
Speaker 1: It's not that easy. One safe now said all right,

44
00:02:42,360 --> 00:02:47,000
Speaker 1: we think that it's warranted that we do this study.

45
00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:49,680
Speaker 1: And I think that would bring a lawsuit if they

46
00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:53,880
Speaker 1: didn suddenly say no, it isn't. And uh so, but

47
00:02:54,520 --> 00:02:57,760
Speaker 1: that conceivably could happen because I think that the new

48
00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:00,079
Speaker 1: administration is going to going to want to proceed with

49
00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:02,799
Speaker 1: this pipeline and this is just sort of the last

50
00:03:03,160 --> 00:03:07,960
Speaker 1: link of it, and the issue will be, uh, it

51
00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:10,440
Speaker 1: could be delayed for a long time from their standpoint

52
00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:14,680
Speaker 1: if you go through with this environmental impact from the

53
00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:19,000
Speaker 1: Trump administration side, would it just take the Trump administration

54
00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:22,120
Speaker 1: telling the Army Corps of Engineers stopped the study or

55
00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:24,720
Speaker 1: would they have to go to court to stop it. No,

56
00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:26,720
Speaker 1: they could tell the Army Corps of Engineers. I mean

57
00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:31,160
Speaker 1: the Army was it really wasn't. The core was actually

58
00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:33,840
Speaker 1: the Army was the assistant secretary because the Corps had

59
00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,720
Speaker 1: originally looked at this and said, we don't think there's

60
00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:40,680
Speaker 1: a serious environmental impact here and but it went up

61
00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:42,880
Speaker 1: to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, and it is

62
00:03:42,880 --> 00:03:46,480
Speaker 1: the decision that ultimately rest with the Secretary of the Army,

63
00:03:46,640 --> 00:03:50,800
Speaker 1: and they could then say we've changed our mind. We're

64
00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:54,880
Speaker 1: going along with the corps original recommendation. So they could

65
00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:58,440
Speaker 1: just do that at an administrative level, then we wouldn't

66
00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:02,160
Speaker 1: have to go for it. Ultimately, Will the pipeline be

67
00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:05,880
Speaker 1: completed in your opinion? I think it will be. Yes.

68
00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:08,320
Speaker 1: I mean it may they may have to move. They

69
00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:12,280
Speaker 1: may have to move this last segment, but I think, uh,

70
00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:14,520
Speaker 1: there's places that they can move it. But but it's

71
00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:16,760
Speaker 1: they've built so much of it. I think it'd be

72
00:04:16,880 --> 00:04:21,880
Speaker 1: unlikely that it's not completed. And if the Trump administration

73
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:26,279
Speaker 1: tries to move forward with it in this particular place, Um,

74
00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:29,920
Speaker 1: what who can sue? Is it the Indian tribes that

75
00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:33,040
Speaker 1: can sue? Are there other people that can sue? Yeah?

76
00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:35,320
Speaker 1: I think the Indian tribes, and then there are others

77
00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:39,520
Speaker 1: probably who have joined with them to the extent that

78
00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:42,440
Speaker 1: they have standing to sue. They probably could, but I

79
00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:44,320
Speaker 1: think there'll be a number of lawsuits to say, hey,

80
00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:48,320
Speaker 1: the judgment was made that we hadn't taken a complete

81
00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:50,480
Speaker 1: look at this and we need to do more. And

82
00:04:50,520 --> 00:04:53,960
Speaker 1: now you just can't turn around on a dime with

83
00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:58,480
Speaker 1: no basis, and you know, change your change your position.

84
00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:03,480
Speaker 1: North Dakota as U S. Senators Democrat Heidi height Camp

85
00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:06,360
Speaker 1: and Republican John Hoven said they think the federal government

86
00:05:06,400 --> 00:05:08,320
Speaker 1: is changing the rules in the middle of the process

87
00:05:08,320 --> 00:05:11,800
Speaker 1: and that the studies shouldn't be approved. So it seems like,

88
00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:16,839
Speaker 1: you know, both sides have representatives in in their in

89
00:05:16,920 --> 00:05:25,080
Speaker 1: their corner. And how long could this legal battle go on? Well,

90
00:05:25,760 --> 00:05:28,960
Speaker 1: I think he could go on for a while. And

91
00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:32,600
Speaker 1: I mean the court has basically said at one level

92
00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:37,120
Speaker 1: already that they think the the Army is justified in

93
00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:40,000
Speaker 1: doing this study. So you have one judge on the

94
00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:43,280
Speaker 1: record saying that that could be appealed certainly, and the

95
00:05:43,839 --> 00:05:46,880
Speaker 1: Palate Court could change its mind. But let's assume that

96
00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:50,200
Speaker 1: the Trump administration comes in and they decide to change

97
00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:52,640
Speaker 1: then I think that will be subject to suit, and

98
00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:56,160
Speaker 1: the issue will be whether a court will hold up

99
00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:00,800
Speaker 1: the completion of the pipeline while these suits are going forward.

100
00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:04,600
Speaker 1: That that will be the main the issue at that point, Chuck,

101
00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:08,680
Speaker 1: there are lots of suits around this pipeline, aren't there

102
00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:12,480
Speaker 1: from people who are claiming that they they weren't paid

103
00:06:12,560 --> 00:06:15,599
Speaker 1: the right amount for easements. And there's a lot of

104
00:06:15,640 --> 00:06:18,520
Speaker 1: court activity over this. Yeah, but that's the you know

105
00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:22,599
Speaker 1: that that's the general. Those kinds of condemnation lawsuits and

106
00:06:22,680 --> 00:06:26,159
Speaker 1: those can those don't really slow anything up. I mean

107
00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:30,760
Speaker 1: that happens all the time when government's UH sees UH

108
00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:35,479
Speaker 1: property and they have to pay fair compensation, and there's

109
00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:39,400
Speaker 1: always suits about what fair compensation. But that doesn't necessarily

110
00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:43,520
Speaker 1: hold up any projects. Is there um a lot of

111
00:06:43,560 --> 00:06:48,600
Speaker 1: a lot of political tension on this issue? Still? Yes, Yes,

112
00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:50,840
Speaker 1: I think you I think you have as you said,

113
00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:53,200
Speaker 1: I mean you have the United States senators from the state,

114
00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:58,560
Speaker 1: you have state officials, you have the company obviously, and

115
00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:03,600
Speaker 1: uh you know are at the last phase of this pipeline.

116
00:07:03,640 --> 00:07:06,080
Speaker 1: I mean, they've built many miles of this pipeline and

117
00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:08,599
Speaker 1: that's and that's the one side. And on the other

118
00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:11,040
Speaker 1: side there's the Indians and all the people that support

119
00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:13,720
Speaker 1: them and all the environmental groups and say, listen, you

120
00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:17,760
Speaker 1: can't put a water source in danger. By the possibilities

121
00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:20,360
Speaker 1: you could have a break here when there's easy alternatives,

122
00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:24,400
Speaker 1: what are the easy alternatives? Just another route. Yeah, just

123
00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:26,560
Speaker 1: for this leg, just to move this leg. I mean,

124
00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:31,600
Speaker 1: I don't think I'm actually surprised frankly that they haven't

125
00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:33,400
Speaker 1: come up with a solution like that. I would have

126
00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:35,920
Speaker 1: thought that the company, because it's not that hard to

127
00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:37,760
Speaker 1: move it. There are places not that close by that

128
00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:40,280
Speaker 1: don't impact the water source, and I think they could

129
00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:43,560
Speaker 1: have moved it, but they felt I think that they

130
00:07:43,560 --> 00:07:45,320
Speaker 1: were so far along they want to just push it

131
00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:50,600
Speaker 1: through and work. No, not much pushing it through. And

132
00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:53,960
Speaker 1: it's it's certainly you know, the visuals and um, the

133
00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:57,720
Speaker 1: audio from this is really something when you see all

134
00:07:57,760 --> 00:08:00,320
Speaker 1: the protests that have been happening and continue to happen.

135
00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:03,960
Speaker 1: Coming up, we're going to be talking about another environmental issue.

136
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:06,720
Speaker 1: States argue to a federal appeals court for more say

137
00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:10,280
Speaker 1: over the release of endangered species in their borders as

138
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:16,040
Speaker 1: Republicans target the landmark Endangered Species Act for rollbacks. We're

139
00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:18,640
Speaker 1: talking to Chuck Warren, who is the head of the

140
00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:23,240
Speaker 1: environmental practice at Kramer Levin. I'm June Grosso. This is

141
00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:23,840
Speaker 1: Bloomberg