WEBVTT - Meta to Deploy “Millions” of Nvidia Processors

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast, with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Meta agrees to deploy millions of Nvidia processors over the

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 3>next few years, reinforcing its ties with the AI chip giant.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Plus Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg is set to take the

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>stand later today in a landmark social media addiction trial

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>in Los Angeles. And we discussed some news in software

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and energy tech with the CEOs of Autodesk and heron

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 3>later this hour.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Tech.

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>The story right now in public markets when it comes

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 3>to tech is we are rebounding a little bit then

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 3>as that one hundred up more than a percentage point.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Largely that's on strong or positive economic data. But I

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 3>put the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index in there or socks because

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>actually movements in chips and the mag seven is the

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 3>news driver, the catalyst in some of what's happening at

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 3>the index level. That manifests in a deal between Meta

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>and Nvidia for millions of invidious processors over a number

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>of years. But this is clearly a driver of markets,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 3>at least in Vidia's case up almost three percent. Meta

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 3>had been lower is now modestly higher. Let's get the

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 3>details of bloombogs Ian King, who leads our coverage of semiconductors.

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 3>So the reality is Meta is already the number two

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>customer for Nvidia. But this is an agreement over time,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 3>millions of chips, and we're not just talking Blackwell GPU,

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>We're talking later generation Rubin and then the CPUs in

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 3>each case. What are the kind of facts that we

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>need to know?

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and networking as well. I mean, the frustrating part

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 4>about it it is we don't have a definitive time period.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 4>But if we sort of back it out a million chips,

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 4>their average selling price for in video of one GPU

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 4>for the data center is about fifteen sixteen thousand dollars,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 4>probably as much as twice as that for a leading

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 4>edge one. So you're already talking as much as Meta

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>spends on in video gear in a year in just

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 4>the GPUs. Add on top of that the networking, add

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 4>on top of that the CPUs, and obviously it feels

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 4>like an extension, It feels like a bigger commitment to

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 4>in video but they wouldn't say for sure.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 3>You had a discussion with one of in Video's leaders

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 3>in the data center and Infrastructure group, and part of

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the discussion was, this is the first big example of

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>in Vidia selling the Grace CPU to market as a

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of standalone product.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Simple questions like.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>What would you use a Grace CPU for other than

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, what's happening in AI. And that is why

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the number is probably tens of billions over that that

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>time period.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, I mean, it's definitely a step forward for them.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 4>It's definitely a market expansion for them. You remember Jensen

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 4>told us this a while ago. He dropped a strong

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 4>hint that this was coming. And here it is the key.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>The key thing to look at is all this is

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Intel's territory, this is Amb's territory, the general purpose processor

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 4>for a data center that there's a lot of the

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 4>general computing task. What in Video is saying, Hey, we've

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 4>got this CPU that was buried in the middle of

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 4>all of this gear, but you can just use it

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 4>on its own as well. That's a market extension for

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 4>them if we see widespread adoption. Obviously, MATA is a

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 4>good adoption case.

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>One of the other movers in the market this morning

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 3>is AMD, which was to the downside.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>I guess not surprising. The biggest story is in Vidia.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Kind of keeps rolling on and dominating the spend of

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the hyperscaler's plus Meta, which is not a hyperscaler, but

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that has the data center footprint of one. I was

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>interested to go into the terminal and see, like Meta

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>about nine percent of revenues from video, but Microsoft's number one,

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, double that. But the big picture is there

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>right in video it seems dominant.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, you know, the background here is Microsoft, Meta, Amazon.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 4>They're all making their own CPUs. They're all trying to

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 4>make their own accelerators. Any commitment to either in video

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 4>or indeed AMD for exactly those parts is obviously something

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 4>that investors want to see and is a strong sign

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 4>for the chip makers themselves.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Ian King on a story that again news driven

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 3>catalyst for markets this morning. Investors are looking also to

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 3>scoop up beaten down names after a stretch of choppy

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 3>AI driven volatility. Morgan Stanley says the recent sell off,

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>especially in software and services, was largely indiscriminate, with some

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 3>companies hit harder despite strong fundamentals. Here's breakdown the AI

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 3>impact across all sectors is Morgan Stanley Gooble Research director

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Katie Huberty. I mean, it's such a detailed report that

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>looks across stocks with a very wide lens. But in

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the here and now I want to go to that

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>word indiscriminate and just that parag off of the report

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>where you summarize the last few weeks, what do you

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 3>think was happening right right?

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 5>So I think it's important on the back of the

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 5>announcement that you just discussed to understand that we're in

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 5>the very early innings of what is likely to be

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 5>a ten trillion dollar CAPEX investment cycle. That investment cycle

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 5>is underwritten by a productivity story.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 6>As the technology diffuses into.

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 5>The market, there is real productivity acceleration, which is important

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 5>because the last two decades we've been running at labor

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 5>productivity that is half of normal levels. Because we knew

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 5>this adoption story was going to be critical and it

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 5>was going to touch all sectors of the market. We

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 5>have now five times over map the thirty six hundred

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 5>stocks that we cover to understand rate of change, exposure, materiality, pricing, power,

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 5>and it's on the back of that data that yes,

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 5>we've been able to identify where there are companies that

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 5>have been sold indiscriminately and there's a real opportunity. We

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 5>see that in software and services. In research, we're a

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 5>heavy adopter of AI technology, and the conversations we're having

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 5>right now with large language models is how do we

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 5>connect those models to the applications and data that we

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 5>use every day to unlock the real potential. And so

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 5>you can see that the list that we published last week,

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.119
<v Speaker 5>the thread across the software and services companies are where

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 5>there is a data mode, whether that's credit or it's

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 5>market data or its systems of record in financials or

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 5>customer data.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 3>This is the fifth time you've kind of done this

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 3>exercise mapping global AI stocks, right, and you list margin

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 3>expansion as the leading piece of evidence and so of

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 3>ROI I'm thinking back to earlier in earning season when

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>we had names like Salesforce Service Now and that part

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>of the research report I flagged at the beginning fundamentals.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, they didn't really get the benefit of the

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 3>doubt from the market. They showed actually quite a lot

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 3>of real well deployment of that technology, but something you

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 3>know isn't quite believed by the street.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>What is that?

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 5>So what's really important in this data set is tracking

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 5>rate of change.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 6>So if you go back two.

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Years ago, the big rate of change in exposure materiality

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 5>was energy and utilities. That sector outperformed the most in

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty four. Last year it was financials. At the

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 5>beginning of twenty twenty five we highlighted as the biggest

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 5>rate of change. Financials by many accounts, even outperformed parts

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 5>of the technology sector last year. Right now, of the

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 5>rate of change is actually greatest in non tech categories,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 5>particularly in consumer and apparel, endurable goods, in autos and

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 5>so Yes, we see areas of software that have been

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 5>sold indiscriminately where there is a data mode and there's

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 5>an opportunity, but it's broader than just technology. What we

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 5>see in the data is that the AI adopters are

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 5>experiencing margin expansion that's double the market indices, double the

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 5>MSCI World Index, double the S and P five hundred,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 5>and so we believe that there's a regime shift happening

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 5>in the market away from a purely tech and specifically

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 5>AI enabler leadership to now broadening of AI adoption and

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 5>leadership not just in technology, but across all sectors.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Katie tied to this.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 3>One of the big moments of last year was Morgan

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Stanley launching its private companies coverage, going much deeper on

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 3>private companies who are so active in this world. Right,

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>have you shifted existing analysts from public to private companies?

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 3>Are you onboarding specific private analysts on specific domains?

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 2>We just have thirty seconds.

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Right, So we believe that that the domain experts that

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 5>cover the public companies are typically and best positioned to

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 5>also cover private sectors. But there are areas of thematics,

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 5>think humanoids and AI where we have shifted analysts from

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 5>stock coverage to covering those thematics where there will be

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of private company innovation, But most of the

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 5>time that coverage comes from our existing public company domain experts.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 3>Katie Ubertim Morgan Stanley, it's great to have you on

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Now, coming up on the show,

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>we're going to.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Speak with Andrew and Egnost, Autodesk president and CEO. That

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>conversation's next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Autodesk is leaning into

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the AI powered physical world. The company announced a two

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollars strategic investment in AI research firm World Labs,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 3>its largest startup investment to date. Here to discuss Autodesk

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 3>President and CEO Andrew and Egnouse.

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 2>Very interesting, Good morning to you. We've been looking at it.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 3>We've been looking into this idea a lot, you know,

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 3>through the beginning of twenty six, particularly in the context

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of industrial manufacturing, the future role of humanoid robots, how

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 3>they come to learn the environment that they're in. People

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>sometimes say digital twins, you have chosen what you believe

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 3>to be the best player right for the sort of

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 3>AI and software underpinning.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Of that thought. Why World Labs.

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, there's a couple of really important reasons. You know, First,

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 7>we kind of share a common ethos. We believe that

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 7>AI can enhance and expand human ingenuity, not replace it,

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 7>and that's something that both World Labs and auditors share

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 7>in common. But more importantly, you know, FAI, fe Lee,

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 7>Autodesk others believe that the next frontier are world models.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 7>This is the ability to simulate, predict, and react to

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 7>real world constraints and virtual changes in world world constraints,

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 7>virtual changes of design constraints within a virtual environment.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 6>That means you really have to partner with.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 7>Someone that's got deep expertise and spatial reasoning for AI.

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 6>That's why we're working.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 7>With world Labs, and they picked us because we have

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 7>deep expertise and deep data knowledge of what happens in

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 7>a design and make process.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 3>The technical challenge is to apply the physics of the

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 3>real world into the virtual world, particularly when you're trying

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>to simulate. I'm assuming that beyond the investment, there is

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>a commercial arrangement here right where you're able to do

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 3>something with World Labs technology. How does that manifest?

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so we're going to be working together with using

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 7>world Labs technology with our tools. They're also going to

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 7>get access to some of the proprietary models that we've

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 7>built so that we can help them expand and create

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 7>their ability to do deep spatial reasoning. So you'll see

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 7>us initially lean into the media and entertainment space, but

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 7>you know, as you said, this is much more expansive

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 7>than that and Autodesk. We're really interested in the mid

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 7>market manufacturing space and mid market factories, small and mid

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 7>sized factories in particular. This is going to be a

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 7>high growth area, and these factories are going to need

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 7>to be able to operate like the biggest factories in

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 7>the world, but at a much smaller scale, and they

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 7>need technology from US and technology from World Labs to

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 7>do that.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>You put out the announcement about the two hundred million

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>dollar part of the strategic investment. Actually, later in the morning,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>world Labs confirmed they did a one billion dollar fundraise overall,

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 3>so you're a big portion of it. What was the

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>valuation that World Labs was assigned.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 6>In that You'd have to talk to World Labs about that.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 7>I'm not going to discuss what their valuations were, but

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 7>you can reach out to that team.

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>The question is when does this become a real commercial

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 3>opportunity for you then, Andrew, you know, when is it

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that you're going to be able to say in an

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 3>earnings report this is something that resulted from that strategic investment.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 7>You know, it's important ed for us to recognize that

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 7>in our space, AI is already returning value. I know

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 7>there's a lot of hype out there, especially with the

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure build up and what's happened with large language models,

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 7>but a lot of software companies, particularly Autodesk, have been

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 7>investing in AI incrementally for a decade, so we're already

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 7>delivering value today around the ability to simulate certain things

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 7>like flooding, lighting lighting studies, the ability to simulate air

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 7>and wind and noise studies using AI, the ability to

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 7>build preliminary models with AI that take into account structural

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 7>constraints or the need to remove structural costraints, and helping

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 7>people make better decisions the construction cycle. So AI is

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 7>delivering value in our space today and regardless of what

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 7>happens out there in the world, We're going to continue

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 7>to invest over the next two, three, four, five years,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 7>so you'll see us continue to roll out incremental real value.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 6>So it's happening now.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 7>This is only going to allow us to accelerate deeper

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 7>value into additional areas and into deeper parts of the

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 7>design and make life cycle.

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 3>That's where I want to end it. You know, a

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of people ask what's the net result of all

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>of this. We focused a lot on digital twins, virtual worlds.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 3>We discussed that is the result that you know, big facilities,

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing sites, plants get built quicker, the people inside them

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 3>get trained more quickly. Humanoid robots are deployed in the

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 3>real world more quickly.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 7>Here's the big story in our space, Eddie. There is

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 7>a massive capacity problem. There is not enough money, people

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 7>and materials to build and rebuild everything in the world

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 7>right now. Right now, people are building lots of data centers,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot of infrastructure that serves day to day people

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 7>in their lives, road rail, all sorts of things.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't get built while that's getting built.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 7>We need to execute more projects with the same amount

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 7>of people in the same capacity we have today, and

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 7>we need to do it at an accelerated rate. That's

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 7>something that's very unique about the design and build world,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 7>this fundamental capacity problem.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 6>AI is going to be enabled to unlock that.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Anagnus autodes CEO, really appreciate your time on bloo

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Bow Tech.

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 3>In other earnings news, Palo Alto Network shares plunging having

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a difficult day after the cybersecurity company released a forecast

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 3>for adjusted earnings that was weaker than anticipated, though it

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 3>also boosted It's for your forecast for other key metrics,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 3>including revenue and remaining performance obligations. CEO nikesha Ora told

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 3>us why he thinks the market is wrong about its

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 3>reaction to the earnings.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>This is this.

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 8>I think the market is not paying attention to our

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 8>numbers carefully. We just complete We did our largest acquisition

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 8>in cyber Arc.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>We had a great quarter.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 8>Our numbers are across every known consensus metric. The market

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 8>is not understanding that our guidance for the next two

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 8>quarters includes cyber Arc. If you take the consensus of

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 8>cyber Arc and ours, who are actually getting above the

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 8>collective consensus. But the market hasn't understood the dilution of shares,

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 8>so I think they have it wrong.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Apple Fast Tracks AI wearable devices, we have

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg recording.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Bezos Space Dot Up Blue Origin has shifted resources

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 3>from space tourism to lunar projects. CEO Dave Limpz like

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 3>with Bloomberg's and Marie Harden about the move while at

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the Defense Tech Summit.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 9>Where it's such a pivotal moment around where space is

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 9>and there's never been more demand, you know, the We

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 9>have years worth of demand for our launch business, as

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 9>does everybody that's launching. We're very constrained as a country

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 9>in terms of the number of launch vehicles that we

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 9>have right now, and our adversaries around the world are

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 9>not standing still. They're putting hundreds of billions of dollars

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 9>into launch and into space, and especially as it relates

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 9>to the Moon, which we haven't been on the Moon

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 9>for fifty years. We think it's really important for Blue,

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 9>for the country, and it just made prudent sense from

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 9>our standpoint to take the brilliant people that we're working

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 9>on New Shepherd, pause that for a while we're planning

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 9>for at least two years, and then repurpose them to

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 9>even further accelerate our efforts in lunar and launch.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 10>There was all this excitement I think about New Shepherd,

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 10>especially because Katie Perry went to space and for civilians

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 10>who maybe want to have that moment like.

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Mark Bezos had. So do you think you'll go back

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 2>to that at some point? Is it really just a pause?

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 9>I think we will. I think there's still you know,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 9>we had multiple years of backlog and that it was

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 9>the easiest ticket to sell, was that, And so I

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 9>think we'll likely go back into that business. But again,

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 9>at the moment in time right now, it just makes

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 9>more sense to focus on the Moon.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>So it really is a space race, right now I

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 2>don't you know.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 9>I'm very much pro America and a capitalist, but I

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 9>don't think we want another Spotnik moment. And we were

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 9>the first to put boots on the moon, and I

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 9>really feel like we want to put you know, we

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 9>want to put boots on the moon. And this time

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 9>the name of our group inside of Blue is Lunar Permanence,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 9>So we're not only racing to the moon to get

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 9>there back again for the first time, but we want

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 9>to keep people on the moon.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Blue Origin CEO Dave Limb speaking with Bloomberg's a Marie

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Horder and in other news, it's time for talking tech

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 3>and first start or On Buffett's Berkshire Halfaway cut its

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Amazon steak by seventy five percent in the fourth quarter,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 3>reducing it to about two point three million shares, according

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 3>to a regulatory filing. At the same time, it built

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 3>a new position in The New York Times with five

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 3>point one million shares and continued trimming. According to the

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 3>thirteen and a half document, its other holdings in Bank

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 3>of America and Apple plus Uber and plans to invest

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 3>more than one hundred million dollars to expand fast charging

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure for autonomous.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Evs in the US.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 3>The company will build high capacity charging hubs in San Francisco,

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Los Angeles, and Dallas, the same market where it's preparing

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 3>to roll out a public ROBOTAXI service. And Apple is

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 3>breaking away from its tech pits. Bloomberg data show the

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 3>iPhone maker's forty day correlation with the NASDAQ one hundred

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 3>has dropped to its lowest level since two thousand and

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 3>six as it largely sits out the AI arms rates,

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 3>with rivals pouring money into AI related capex. Some investors

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>are starting to see Apple as an healing alternative. Let's

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 3>power on and stay with Apple. The company's fast tracking

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 3>work on three new wearables as it races to compete

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 3>with AI powered hardware. Sources say the tech giant is

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>developing smart glasses, a pendant, and AirPods with expanded AI capabilities.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Consumer Tech and Apple managing editor Mark gum And

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 3>break the story and it's with us. Okay, three distinct products,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 3>three distinct categories.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's go through what you've learned from sources.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, you know, Apple, they are sitting out the AI

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 11>race in a way, but they're going to enter in

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 11>an Apple way, and that means hardware blended with AI,

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 11>blended with software, blended with services. And they're going to

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 11>get there if they're able to pull off this new series,

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 11>which I believe they will before the end of the year.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 11>And so three hardware products. One is smart glasses. These

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 11>are going to be quite significant. They're going to compete

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 11>with the metal product. They're likely going to be a

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 11>bit pricier. They're going to have dedicated cameras, one for

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 11>media capture, one for computer vision. In terms of functionality,

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 11>you'll get things like if you're taking a walk and

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 11>you have turned by turn directions on.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 12>Instead of it telling you make a right in four

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 12>hundred and fifty.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 11>Feet, it might say make a right at the gray building,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 11>becacause it sees your surroundings, or make a right past

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 11>the white car. AirPods with cameras very similar AI functionality

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 11>without the media capture functionality built into the earbuds that

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 11>you know people already know and love. And then the

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 11>pendant that's really an alternative product that is an accessory

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 11>for the phone, your eyes and ears for the phone.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 12>For AI in a sense similar functionality to the glasses.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 11>And the AirPods, but not everyone wants to wear smart glasses,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 11>and so if Apple wants to provide that eyes and

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 11>ears to the world, it's going to need some o

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 11>their product, and that's what the pendant's for.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 12>People aren't going to have AirPods in their ears at

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 12>all times.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 11>People aren't going to want to put glasses on their

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 11>face in all cases, especially if they don't have vision

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 11>correction needs.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 12>So you need some sort of hand or necklace. So

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 12>that's what they're developing as well.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Just fifteen seconds, Mark literally, but do these come this year?

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 3>When do they get released?

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 11>I would expect the glasses and the pendant to be

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 11>released next year in the air pods as early as

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 11>this year.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>The most Mark German, who leads all our consumer tech coverage,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much. This is some interesting stuff going

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 3>on in private markets, and actually the team at Bloomberg

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 3>News do a really good job at going into those markets,

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 3>looking at the documents and finding out stuff that actually

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 3>all markets want to know. Sally Bakewell leads our finance team,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 3>and in this case, the reporting is about what we

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 3>know from sources from some of those private names in

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 3>software who are coming to us a little bit earlier

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 3>than normal and saying here's what's under the hood, here's

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 3>what we're learning.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Just explain the reporting to us.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, that's exactly right. So these are private firms. They

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 13>are owned by private equity firms which obviously borrowed in

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 13>order to buy them. So these are company software firms

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 13>that have bonds and loans outstanding. Now, a lot of

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 13>debt tied to software has sold off in recent weeks,

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 13>particularly software as a service, because investors are very worried

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 13>about the threat of AI disruption potentially supplanting some of

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 13>those tasks. So we have seen billions of dollars of

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 13>loans tied to US software and US tech slipping into

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 13>distressed territory. Now, amid all of this concern we have

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 13>had a couple of private software firms actually opening their

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 13>earnings books a little bit early to investors in a

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 13>bid to calm nerves to say that our earnings and

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 13>our revenue are trucking along just fine. So we had

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 13>the likes of McAfee, which showed that it's fourth quarter

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 13>revenue held steady at about six d and twenty six

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 13>million compared to the year earlier. We had Rocket Software,

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 13>which actually saw a five percent increase in twenty twenty

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 13>five revenue, and we had Perforce Software which actually saw

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 13>a slight decline, but it was just a slight decline.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 13>So the aim here is to say with software firms,

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 13>but we are actually benefiting or we are handling, or

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 13>we're dealing with.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 9>At the AI threat.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.479
<v Speaker 3>Just for we start the conversation, the team in New

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 3>York indulge me really going to the treasury market. This

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 3>is quite an interesting opportunity to go to corporate credit

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 3>and some of the unsecure bonds tied to those case

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 3>studies because there's some reaction, right, like the companies tell

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 3>them something we don't normally do this.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 2>But how the bomb market react right?

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 13>Well, I mean a lot of this debt is actually

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 13>senior secured, which means it is it is backed by collateral,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 13>it is high in the repayment line. They would have

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 13>to see really significant impairment to experience any losses, so

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 13>or significant losses. So this is one of the arguments

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 13>that the private credit industry is coming out with at

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 13>the moment in defense of software saying, you know, our

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 13>software loan books look good. In fact, Blue Out Capital

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 13>said it wasn't seeing let alone red flags. It wasn't

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 13>even seeing yellow flags in its software loan portfolio. And

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 13>we've had the same sort of sentiment from a number

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 13>of them. And what's the saying that it's a bit

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 13>too early to see any degradation in software right now?

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Sally Bakewell, thank you very much. We've spent a

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of time on the impact of AI on specific stocks.

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 2>What about the macro picture.

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco FED president Mary Daily says, monetary policy makers

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 3>need to be open to signs pointing to how the

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 3>new technology could be changing the US economy.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 14>Listen to this in productivity numbers, especially when they're happening

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 14>in what I would think of as real time. It's

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 14>very challenging to assess or draw it back to exactly

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 14>what the factors are that have shaped it.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 15>You know.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 14>In fact, people still don't agree on what happened in

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 14>the nineties all the time if you look at research.

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 14>So it's just something to keep in mind. So then

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 14>what you do would any good economist or person, any

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 14>industry person would do is they'd say, well, what am

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 14>I seeing? What am I seeing? And so right now,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 14>while we can't find it in the macro studies that

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 14>would do very sophisticated empirical econometrics and ask the questions

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 14>how much this is AI. We still can see that

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 14>there's something going on there. The question is it happening?

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 14>The question is how long will it persist? And so

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 14>clearly something's happening in the economy. But if you make

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 14>a series to go back to your question about productivity,

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 14>if you make a series of one time adjustments, so

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 14>say you automate a production line or you use AI

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 14>to help in loan application process, you save money once.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 14>You don't save money forever. I mean, you keep saving

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 14>that money, but you don't get growth out of that.

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 14>You don't get productivity growth. You get one time adjustments

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 14>to the level of productivity of your employees or your process.

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 14>So what we're looking for is a technology to give

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 14>us consistently good changes in productivity so that all industries

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 14>at scale get better, industries figure out new ways to

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 14>generate revenue, new ways to do product design, new ideas

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 14>to come and shape the economy. That's the thing that

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 14>has a sustained productivity growth parts. So it's undeniable. Productivity

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 14>growth has gone up. What's not as clear is how

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 14>long will that last that.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Was San Francisco FED president Mary daily. Aber W's MGX

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>is pouring billions into its AI bets with no plans

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 3>of slowing down. Since it's launched in twenty twenty four,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 3>the fund has already invested in AI startups, chip makers,

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 3>and data centers, with plans to raise an additional thirty

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars for infrastructure. Although fears of potential AI bubble rise,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the fund and its investment chief remain unfazed. Here with

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>the details, Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Mike Shephard, We've been

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 3>taking a very close look at the golf generally, but

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 3>but MGX is an example, and in part our reporting

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 3>is based on a conversation with that investment chief.

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know? Well, let's rate.

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 15>Our colleagues, Mark Bergen and Dineshire sat down and this

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 15>was really the first of its kind interview with their

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 15>AI investment chief Ali Yasma and their chief strategy officer

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 15>David Scott, and they got a look at the inner

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 15>workings of this firm, MGX, whose name is really showing up.

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 2>More and more.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 15>Ed with all these AI related deals that we've been

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 15>talking about, Let's go to anthropic MGX was a co

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 15>lead investor in the latest fundraise. The company has also

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 15>invested and taken stakes in xai and open Ai, really

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 15>giving it, in a way, the triple Crown of AI investing.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 15>And there's more. They've also put money into the big

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 15>Stargate AI data center venture here in the US, and

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 15>also taken a stake in the new TikTok that we've

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 15>spent so much time talking about. So MGX is really

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 15>a player in so many of these different areas. And

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 15>one thing that struck me ed during the interview and

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 15>reading the big take on this was that David Scott

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 15>likened their approach not to a private equity firm or

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 15>a venture capital fund, but really to Invidio, which you

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 15>and I have seen from the the conference here in

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 15>Washington in October, just how much Nvidia has tried to

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 15>take stakes in cloud computing and software companies that tried

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 15>to feed the ecosystem of artificial intelligence. And this is

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 15>just a sign of how Abu Dhabi, whose sovereign wealth

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 15>fund bax MGX, is really trying to diversify its economy

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 15>away from just energy and try to seize on the

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 15>AI wave.

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Now that's Abu Dhabi.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 3>The other news headline of the morning was Saudi Arabia's

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Humane disclosing that it had participated in XAIS Series E round,

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 3>which predated the merger of SpaceX.

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 15>What do we need to know there, Well, this is

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 15>another key tie up between Humane which got had start

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 15>just last year the Saudi's unveiled Humane, which is backed

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 15>by the Public Investment Fund. Again we have state backed

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 15>golf money going into this new Ai venture. It was

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 15>announced just as President Donald Trump arrived in the Middle

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 15>East for a high profile visit, high stakes visit with

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 15>golf leaders, and they are now deepening this partnership. Already

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 15>in November, Human announced with Xai that would develop a

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 15>five hundred megawatt data center in Saudi Arabia, and this

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 15>just furthers that partnership and as a result, as a

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 15>result of this investment, of course, they end up now

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 15>with a stake in the much larger combined SpaceX, which

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 15>now counts XAI as a subsidiary. And Human is also

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 15>looking to deploy more of Xai's technology, including the Grock chatbot,

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 15>across Saudi Arabia, giving Elon Musk access to a key

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 15>market that it could see develop going forward and of course,

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 15>possibly more access to funding as his larger combined venture

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 15>moves forward.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 2>DEMX Mike Sheppard, thank you very much.

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, Drew Bagino, CEO of herom Power, joins

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>us talk about the energy startup's latest funding round. He

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 3>may be a familiar face and a familiar name, of course,

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 3>long time Tesla executive now in a new domain.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is bloom Bug Tech.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Heron Power, the energy startup founded by former Tesla executive

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Drew Baglino, has raised a one hundred and forty million

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 3>dollar Series B. The company makes advanced electrical equipment for

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 3>delivering power faster and more efficiently to projects like AI

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 3>data centers. Drew us with us now here in San Francisco.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 3>We have been tracking Heroin since its earlier days. This is,

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, a quick Series B, maybe in succession to

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>the fundraising you did already, but importantly you bring Andreson

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 3>in through the American Dynamism Fund, a new investor.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with that. Why go there?

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 10>First of all, thanks Ed for having me again on

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 10>the program. I'm super proud to represent her and Arnor's

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 10>major milestone today.

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 10>Well we're focused on building new technology and manufacturing in

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.479
<v Speaker 10>the United States, and that's really aligned with A sixteen

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 10>Z's thesis through their American Dynamism Fund, and we just

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 10>found alignment on our future vision of how we can

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 10>revolutionize the electricity sector in the US.

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Together.

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 3>In the time that I've known you, but particularly since

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you've been working on Heroin, you know you've been pretty transparent.

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, what you're trying to do is rethink a

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>technology essentially and where it fits into modernizing grades, data center,

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the big energy capacity.

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Build out, which we'll get to.

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Is there something more than just the capital that the

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 3>A sixteen Ze can help you with there.

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 10>They're an amazing firm. They've got resources across recruiting, in finance,

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 10>in policy. They're great thought partners for us along with

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 10>our existing investor team as we set off on this

0:32:58.360 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 10>ambitious adventure.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 3>So you kind of still an R and D phase

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 3>right now. Maybe just explain what Heroin is and what

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Heroin does and then we can go from that.

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 10>Sure, what Hearn's trying to do is take really four

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 10>decades of innovation and power semiconductors that have happened in

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 10>parallel to like the More's law, improvement in transistors that

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 10>are in compute and bring them to the core of

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 10>the grid. Right now, the grid is using largely mechanical

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 10>devices that were invented like a century ago, and that

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 10>is still what's underpinning everything in the power distribution sector.

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 10>But at the same time, we've leveraged amazing improvements in

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 10>power transistors truly like orders of magnitude, capability and cost

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 10>reductions that have enabled all the innovation at the grid's edge. Compute,

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 10>you know, consumer electronics, it communications. We're bringing that to

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 10>a sector that hasn't seen much change, which is the

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 10>electricity sector itself.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 3>You have made some commercial progress basically, you know, even

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 3>if you're in R and D phase. One of the

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 3>case we talked about previously is with Crusoe, which right

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 3>is in the AI date center context. Yeah, but just

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>in Layman's terms, where would Heron fit in in the

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 3>buildouts of a new data center?

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, So, what Heron is doing is really three things

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 10>for a data center developer. First, we're offering them like

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 10>an alternative supply, like right now they're waiting for equipment

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 10>that's largely produced overseas potentially two or three years. And yeah,

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 10>we're building it at home, and we're building it with

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 10>completely different supply chain that's way more scalable, no more

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 10>steel and oil, replacing it with silicon and software. Second,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 10>we're simplifying what they need to build out. You know,

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 10>we're moving seventy percent of the gear on the way

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 10>from the grid to the chip. That means less labor

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 10>to find in the field, less time in the construction schedule.

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 10>And the third thing we're doing is reducing the losses

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 10>from grid to chip by a factor of four, which

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 10>means for the same power interconnection, which as we know

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 10>it could be difficult, you can produce that many more

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 10>tokens very quickly.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>What is the go live date? You know, when is

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 2>this going to be foid commercially?

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 10>Do you think, Yeah, we're going to deploy ourselves this

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 10>year with early customers with revenue units in early twenty seven,

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 10>and then mass production in late twenty seven.

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Data center gets a lot of the focus.

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 3>The other big story, which I think you'll appreciate, is

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 3>what is happening with energy generation energy storage right Elon

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Musk has this one hundred gigawatts solar goal. Yeah, you

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 3>ran that business on the energy side at Tesla for

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 3>a long time. You understand the reality of that number.

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Please also feel like, you know, to jump in where

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 3>heron would fit in with that. But what do you

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 3>make of that goal?

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I think it's fantastic.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean, globally we saw over half a terrot lote

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 10>five hundred gigwats of solar installed last year and that

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 10>number isn't going to go down anytime soon. Really, the

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 10>electricity sector is at a pivotal moment. You know, electricity

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 10>has meant prosperity and growth for people all over the

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 10>world for the past decades. But now it's at this

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 10>juncture right. We've got AI that needs way more power

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 10>and electricity abundant renewable electricity can be a path to

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 10>an all sustainable, all electric energy economy. And to do

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 10>that we need more renewable energy and we need more electricity.

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Is one hundred giga? What's in the United States like achievable?

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 10>I mean, of course, you know, if you put your

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 10>mind to something, no matter how difficult it is, you

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 10>can accomplish it. I can say that from two decades

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 10>of experience scaling new technologies from nothing to you know,

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 10>millions of units.

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like I think it's possible, and that would be

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 2>an addressable market for Heroin one hundred percent.

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we're going after solar, We're going after batteries, data centers,

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 10>really anywhere where you need to go from DC to

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 10>medium voltage AC. That's what hearn Link is for.

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Three bagging, you know, CEO of heron formerly of course

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 3>it tests like great to have you back here on

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is set to take

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 3>the stand later today in a trial alleging his company's

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>products and Google's YouTube We're designed to addict young people

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 3>claims that both companies deny. Social media platforms, including Meta,

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 3>are actually facing thousands of similar cases. That's in addition

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 3>to claims brought by various state attorneys general alleging that

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 3>these products cause harm in some way to users.

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's discuss with Sasha Howe.

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 3>She's the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project and

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 3>advocacy group that urges reducing the power of big tech.

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 3>And like from me off, you're very much on the

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 3>side of the alleged victims in this case, right. I

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 3>think that's important to set out early and there has

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 3>been this criticism of big tech, but particularly the social

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 3>media platforms for.

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>A long time.

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 3>In the context of this trial today where mister Zuckerberg

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 3>will testify later in the day, what's different this time.

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 16>Well, this is, as you alluded to earlier, big Tech's

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 16>big tobacco moment. It's the moment that tech accountability organizations

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 16>like mine as well as countless parents who have been

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 16>touched in some way by the harms that social media

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 16>addiction have caused. Where we are going to see Mark

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 16>Zuckerberg raised his right hand, take an oath before a

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 16>judge and a jury of his peers, and for the

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 16>first time explain to a court of law why his

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 16>company knowingly developed products that targeted children to get them

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 16>hooked and then continue to feed them algorithmic content that

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 16>did irretrievable harm. And what's different because he's also told

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.399
<v Speaker 16>that to Congress. But he's going to have to explain why,

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 16>despite telling us the public as well as members of

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 16>Congress that their products were safe for kids, why he

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 16>systematically buried internal research and data showing there is a

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 16>connection and showing they did know that their products were addictive,

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 16>and showing they did know that their products were harmful.

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 16>So for many parents. This is the first step to

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 16>hold big tech executives like Mark Zuckerberg accountable.

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 2>And what you just said, Sasha.

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Meta's response to this particular lawsuit is we strongly disagree

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 3>with these allegations that are confident the evidence will show

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 3>our long standing commitment to supporting young people. Mark Zuckerberg

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to testify later today. Why is his testimony

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 3>specifically significant and what is it that the Tech Oversight

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Project would hope he's asked about during that process.

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 16>Well, the evidence has already shown that there have been

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 16>many internal surveys, again conducted by Meta and in some

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 16>cases partnering with external companies survey firms such as Nielsen,

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 16>to uncover whether there was a connection between social media overuse,

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 16>social media addiction, or as the Instagram executives uphemistically referred

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 16>to as problematic use and you know, harmful behavior, and

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 16>there was After about a week of not using social media,

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.919
<v Speaker 16>users reported that they feel better about themselves, they didn't

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 16>have this compulsive need to pick up their phone, their

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 16>mental health improved. Instead of alerting the public to this

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 16>potential health threat, they buried the research and never let

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 16>it see the light of day, which is why Mark

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 16>Zuckerberg can testify before Congress claiming that the research is inconclusive.

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 16>Another study that Adam Masi, the CEO of Instagram, had

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.439
<v Speaker 16>to explain the other day when he testified was something

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 16>called Project myst which surveyed over one thousand teens and parents,

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 16>again showing that the parental controls which big tech executives

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 16>point to as one of the reasons why their products

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 16>are safe for kids to use, essentially useless.

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate summary of the events of the trials, so

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I far. My question is why significant that Mark Zuckerberg

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 3>testifies later today and what is it that you hope

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 3>he has asked in that process.

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 16>Well, it's significant because this evidence has never before been

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 16>seen and he is not going to be able to say, hmm, Senator,

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 16>I don't recall. Let let my office get back to

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 16>your office about that, and then walk away and never

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 16>have to think about it again.

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 2>This is a judge and jury.

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:24.439
<v Speaker 12>This is a court of law.

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 16>The law comes for everyone. And if you have created

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 16>a product that is unsafe for kids, that actually has

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 16>been shown to kill kids, and you've lied about it

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 16>to the public and buried research when you could have

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 16>been warning us to the dangers, You're going to be

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 16>held accountable. So that's why it's significant he's never before

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 16>had to answer to that. As far as the outcomes,

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 16>I really hope that we see lasting policy change because

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 16>of this.

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 2>These are individual.

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 16>Harms cases and so the individual outcomes might differ, but

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 16>I hope that the US Congress is compelled to act

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 16>after these trials conclude.

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Executive director of the Tech Overside Project, Thank you very much.

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech, And

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 3>what an addition it's been. There is a bit more

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 3>calm in the market right now. There is a lot

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 3>driving the markets in terms of newsflow, and we got

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 3>through a lot of that in the program. So recap

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 3>it on the podcast. You know where to find it.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 3>It's on the Bloomberg terminal as well as online on iHeart, Spotify,

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 3>and on Apple. This is Bloomberg Tech.