WEBVTT - NFL Week 13 Waiver Wire, Adds and Drops, and Playoff Help!

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best Friends

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Forever M To Do To Do, To Do, Do Do

0:00:54.240 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Don too Yeah is as the

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports Rare

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Network alongside Frankie stampell I am Greg Sauceman rights on

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Money Not Much Money, Night Football in the Books, Week

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>twelves in the Books onto week thirteen for most the

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>final week of the regular season where this could decide

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you make the Fantasy playoffs or not.

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I know that we're in that position as well, myself,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you and my Ga Florio on Team BFF that we

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>share together. So it's crunch time. It's crunch time for

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire and setting those lineups. Crazy. It certainly is, Frankie.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>We have everything on the line this week, and if

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you stilly help all the waiver wire, well we're here

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to help you do just that. Will go over the

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire as we do each and every Tuesday. And listen,

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>there's those cool guys out there that are gonna help you.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, let go to the bank, because

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean it for? At this point, we'll

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about some strategy, we'll talk about who you wanna

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>go after, and I want to start there before we

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>get into that, with a question. What's your question? Right?

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Does Lamar Miller suck? How do the field to know

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that you and Corey together have become the poster child

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>for whenever Lamar Miller does anything good, anything, you two

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are the first ones to get hit up. How does

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it feel? Tweets? How many tweets did you get last night?

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot? Literally? There's Greg More, Greg Martinez fourteen hours ago?

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Does Lamar's Miller still suck? There's Carl Anderson. Lamar Miller

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>is something to say. I mean, you deserve it. Sam

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>when you see you know, maybe you should talk to

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>U Joe testa tour and find out whether or not

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller sucks. Estes not think Lamar Miller snacks. Yeah,

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if if I don't know if Christie bones around or

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>if that play call is still up, if you want

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to play that Lamar Miller call. Because I missed, I

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't watching the game live at first. I missed the

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>first quarter. I was out playing basketball Greg It's you know,

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the only cardio I get nowadays. Good. So I

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>missed the first quarter. I missed a touchdown run and

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching it back on my phone and the person

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm with it was like, is that wrestling? They legit

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>thought it was like Jim Ross from back in the day.

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how crazy Joe Testator goes. And I know that's

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like a common topic for Gabe. I mean, it's it's

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty out there that calls pretty out there? Are you

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on the side of you support Testator in his I

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>like t his exuberance most bear Sean McDonald, who is

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>boring as hell. Um. If the thing is like you

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of need that happy medium now like a little

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>over the top, you can't. I like Testatory because I

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like Gus Johnson. I like all those types of announces

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>more so than a Jim Nance. I guess, um so

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Tests, I do. But but Nance to me

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of like the happy medium, isn't he. That's

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>why I brought it up because I like him more

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because McDonald was like too boring. Yeah, that's why I mean,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe Bucks are happy me him. Also, like Joe Buck

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>used to be super boring, and that's a good job.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of hate it for it. And it's

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>also you're at the point where, like you hear Joe

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Buck here Jim nancey know, it's a big game, like

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not there with Joe Testatory yet. I'm Michael obviously

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>um speakings Testory out of the hole. He put Carl's

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>chasing sucks. Seven yards of glory. That's my favorite That

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is it. That's my favorite part. When you're nineties seven

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>yards of glory in a regular season game between the

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Texts and the Titans. To me, none of that call

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was was like super outrageous as you built it up

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and as venture built it up until the end, nineties

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>seven yards of glory glory, he broke that team in half.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get JR from it, man, I didn't get it.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I like Tess I watched zero minute watch zero minutes

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of this game last night. I was nine. Do you

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think Jason Witten is getting better? Yeah, I mean people

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are really hard on him. They're really hard on the

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>first year on the job. Like, yeah, I know. Look,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people's um attack on Jason Witten is

0:04:58.560 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of people that can do

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the job better than him, that there's people that are

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>more quality. Yeah, all right, you're not wrong about that.

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's his first year, young job. Give you know

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he was improving, he's improving everyone's romo right away. No,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>they're not. They're absolutely not. Now announcing update I can do.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I can do a entire shot and probably would probably

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>start like your own like announcing podcast. Probably you work

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for all announcing realistic. I didn't apply for a job

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>that once. I never heard back. But nonetheless, you want

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>me to, uh put a good word. The game is

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>front of the Ken Fang, So do you want me

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to find out what's going on over there? Seven and

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy three rushing yards and three touchdowns this year? So

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on the great stat line? What any means? So it

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>really does suck? He really does? Where does he Where

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>does he rank? Amongst like running backs. This here because

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously I don't own him anywhere, like I took your advice, right,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>he sucks, so I didn't draft him. I'm looking at

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>half point brs. That's okay with you, yep, in the

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>half we're looking at points per game. I was just

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at Accumulo now because ever, and he has amount

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller the top twenties. He's twenty one, I believe overall.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>If I haven't met, I'm sorry, twenty two. Overall, he

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't suck. You know what's funny? The running backs that

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are just just passed him Isaihral, Austin Ekela and yeah, Lewis,

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>why do you say Austin neck? Look like that's what

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I do. It's like Lamar Miller's what I do. It's

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>just little you really showing you stripes there, Greggy Austla.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't you have on last night to marry is Tom?

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to watch the games? I have nothing. Well,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>did you you at least look at the box score? Yeah?

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I was following along on my phone. Why didn't you

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>watch any of it? Why that one in net raw

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was much better than so I didn't watch true story

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.559
<v Speaker 1>about raw so I had did it pretty lately. Judy

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>got home from work late. Um, so we didn't like

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>start cooking dinner. We made like like a chicken or

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>zo kale thing. It's delicious, but it was very intensive.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>It's very intensive. There was like an hour. I can't chicken.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>It was like chicken. The chicken part is great. It's

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like it's like it's like it's like Costa. I know,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like rice Posta. There's butter, right, so anyway, the

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>only where you like in there is cal But anyway,

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>let's take a while to make. So we didn't like

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>finish until like like a quarter to TenneT to recall

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on Lettuce, Greg Remain it's my dream come true, So

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 1>recall all Lettuce. So then it's about like ten o'clock almost,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and then we wanted to watch HBC from last night.

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It was intense episode. I've ever seen Hollidy Baking Championship.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that there was a acrony acronym for

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Baking Championship, Holiday Holiday Holiday Baking Championship, So it's very

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a very intense episode. I've never seen Jones

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Abisa Ruthless. It was awesome. Um, so then we're at

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the point where it's not like ten thirty was all right,

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>d to hear the options. You could either go to

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>bed and I watched Monday Night Raw, or you can

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>watch the Kardashians and I'll go watch the Net on

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the other room. Or we can watch this show we

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to watch our showtime called Escape at Denamora, which

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>about a prison escape. Football was never an option. It

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was Titans Texans. I had no that both of us

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>had no fantasy implications on the line. Yeah, but like

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis played well, that was fun to watch. Both

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of us are no fantasy complications on the line whatsoever. Yeah,

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but like so we Shawn Watson's fun to watch. So

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we chose to watch Escape a Downama, which was very

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>She was creeped out by it. She didn't creeped up

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>by anything, so that was really good. Um, and then

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>just watched The Haunting House on Haunting Hill. Yeah, you

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>told me about that. I don't like scarey things. So

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>then it's like eleven third Now it's like eleven thirty

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>ish were like a living forty. She goes to bed

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and I start watching watching when the Net raw at

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven fifty. I finished the three hour show at twelve ten.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>That's impressive. Yeah, yeah, I do. I stayed up two

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>late last night. How do you go to bed? Was

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing? Is? I go to bed, but then I like,

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and this is really bad, like you shouldn't do it,

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and I know you shouldn't do it, but I just

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like read articles for like an hour in bed right

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>before I sleep to be. But I mean, so I

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually go to sleep till like one is late.

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to go to bed me eleven o'clock hour.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>When I hit the twelve, I got annoyed. M Grandpa Greggy.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>The point the point being, point being, it all circles

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>back to the month night righte some monther night or

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't be worse than this game. So I read

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>two reviews and when then I read one review that

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty entertained, and Buddy texted me another review when

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that night, well, I said it was the worst episode

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they've ever seen their lives. It was horrible, all right,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so you should you know, you should have watched

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>me lose. Remember remember yesterday when I brought up watch

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a little basketball, I was, I was, I was up thirty.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I had Corey Davis against Watson, DeAndre Hopkins and the

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Texans defense. I didn't realize he had the Texans defense.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I lost by four points. Greg I lost by four points.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis gives me that touchdown, and I'm freaking out

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>because I go up by like ten points on my art.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I got this locked up. It's like a quarter laugh.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>But like the Texans have it in the bag. I'm

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like the Shawn Watson goes and like running for fifty yards.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>He has a career high rushing performance seventy one yards

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>rushing in this game, and then throws a meaningless touchdown,

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>like the Texans didn't need any of that, that whole

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty yard run and that touchdown, and then I end

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>up losing by four points because like Derrick Henry fumbles

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the game. It's funny, it's like

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take the good in the bad with fantasy man.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But like that one just sucked because it was just

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>such a roller coaster that like it went back and

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>forth between like a thirty minute span where I was

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>up with the Corey Davis touchdown. I felt so great.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I was up ten points and de Shaun Watson just

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>puts into my eye. It's funny because Junior was following

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>along different matchup in her league where the second place

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>team was playing the third place team, and she really

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to move up to third place. I told it

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter here in third or fourth, like what's difference,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know she's still learning. She wants to move

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the third place, so she's following with this matchup. You

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>should want to finish as high as you possibly could.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>It does, it definitely can matter. It'll determine who right.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I understand that. But ultimately you want to

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>match up with I'm in a fourth place, I don't

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>really care. I wanted a third because I think the

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>sixth tees is just weaker than the fifth. You don't

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>play in the league with Judy yet against her? Will

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you ever do that? Maybe one? But the point being

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>she was watching this team and this team was without

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Girly this week, and they had last night Deshaun Watson

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and Key Qut and because that monster run at the end,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they want by like point five points and like you've

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>never seen that before, like literally eight point three, and

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>she's like, oh my god, Yeah, it's awesome. How many

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>people went into last night up like twenty points against

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller and they're like, I got this in the back.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>How many people went up? You think how many people

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>winning the game down twenty points with with DeAndre Hopkins

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and I tell you they put up thirty four points.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>He'd be like, I got that in the bag. Didn't

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>happen and he had his he had his touchdown and

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>streak snapped in this one. Marius Thomas, the invisible man

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>from weeks past. Two touchdowns for Damarius and yeah, and

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>he reinjured his hamstring too, which is it's an entrustrating

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Jnald Smith though, John Smith, I mean, we're gonna talk

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>about tight ends today. Tight End is a crapshoot. We

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>know that all season long. It's like if you don't

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>own Art's Kelsey Grant looked good this week, or like

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Eric Ebron because obviously now Jack Doyle has landed on

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the i R, It's like, who are you starting at

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end? I have Trey Burton in the league, and

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>up until about three four weeks ago, like he was serviceable,

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but he's been terrible. Trey Burton has been terrible, man.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's like I'm trying to find tight ends now too.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know john Hu Smith Now, um, I know

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have the touchdown last week, he had the

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>PPR performance where I believe he had six for forty

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so that's you know, ten ten points in a PPR

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>from your tight end and then had a touchdown in

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>three of his last four games, had a long touchdown yesterday.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I know the targets aren't there, it's kind of flukey,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's scoring. So you're looking for a tight end

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that's scoring. John Smith is scoring and they face the

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Jets this week. So I think Jona Smith is kind

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of one of these tight end streamers. I agree he's one.

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>He's one of these guys where he's not really doing

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>anything else but scoring. But that's all you need. We

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>said every week we get week got jon Nay Smith

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly an option for you at tight end, as is

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>going back to the Chris Herndon Royal. Chris Herndon well

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>as well. He had a queer height targets and receptions

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this past Sunday. Yeah, the problem with Chris Herndon is

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that the Titans have actually been really really strong against

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>tight ends this year. I mentioned the matchup a few

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago where they haven't allowed a single touchdown to

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a tight end all season long, and they were going

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>up against the Colts, who have the most touchdown scored

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>by tight ends this season, and the Colts didn't score

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown with the tight end in that game, So

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>advantage Titans. They just keep getting it done against tight end.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>So Chris Herndon, while he's getting the targets, seems to

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be a mainstay in the offense now, whether it's josh

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>mccounter donald, I believe they've already said that Joshua Count's

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna start again this week. But I would actually I

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>would rank John nuts Smith and even use Ama ahead

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>of Chris Herndon. I know that Jeff Drischool is the

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>quarterback there, but that doesn't really mean anything to me. Like,

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're a backup quarterback, you might even

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>lean a little bit more on the tight end cd

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Usama just had thirteen targets, So give me the targets

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and what's likely the better matchup because against the Titans

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for Chris Herndon, and that's honestly the worst matchup you

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>could have as the tight end. Yeah, yeah, fair enough.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So Chris Herndon, not the option you want this week?

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>C j Uzama, What are they facing? Who do we got?

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>What do we got for the Bengals this week? I

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't have Cincinnati on my list anywhere

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this week, alright, But you can talk about something else

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. Yeah, the other tight end I have on

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>my list because I can't, I can't quit it. It's Denver,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>where Jeff Hiraman is out for the year, So we

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>go with former New York Giant Matt Lacas. Yeah. When

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw this name on here, where's that? Where's that

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>lacass shirt? Yeah? I don't, I mean down. It's hard

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to replace the can you take Me High? You're man?

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's probably the last time you're gonna hear that

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on the show this season because he's landed on the

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I R. So that opens up the opportunity for the cost.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not really I'm not really digging that great cost.

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals are facing the Denver Broncos is so yeah,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Vin's McDonald should have scored a touchdown last week for

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers against the Bunch. Yeah, I like uh, I

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like Usama. I would will we rank it Usama Johnny Smith.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Funny because the thirteen targets, you know, thirteen targets tight

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>end is crazy. Yeah, it's a lot of a lot

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of targets. Jeff Jusicale using that tight end. Of course,

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>he's a new starting quarterback for the Cincinnati Bengals. Any

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>interest in picking up Jeff driscoll. So I have a

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>few quarterbacks listed here, just as like super flex guys

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>where obviously in a one quarterback league, you know, you

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>have absolutely no interest in these guys. But like things

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are happening. Andy Dalton lands on the i R like

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Portals was bench yesterday. So we have we have quarterbacks

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming available. And again you're not gonna use these guys

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in a one quarterback league, but in super flex or

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>two QB leagues. You know, Josh Allen, we should mention him,

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean rush for ninety nine yards again, he's gonna

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>be inconsistent. Colte McCoy. Uh, you know I mentioned when

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Colte McCoy became a starter because of the injury to

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith, that he's gonna take more chances. And we've

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly seen that Alex Smith, one of the most conservative

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in the league. Colpe McCoy does throw for three interceptions,

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but also throw us for two touchdowns. He's more likely

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to throw into tighter windows, which helps the weapons and

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get into that a little bit later on.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But Jeff driscoll and Cody Kessler both come in here

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>as all right, not the most sexy names in the

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>world by any means, but if you're if you're stuck

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in a super flex league, if you had Blake Bortles

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>or you had any dalton Um, you know, I would

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>look at Josh Allen Coulte McCoy first, but Jeff driscoll

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and Cody Kesler just because their quarterbacks were starting job,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna look at those guys in super flex or

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two QB leagues. Nothing more than that. Okay, so nothing

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>more than that, Uh for a guy like Jef d school,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you come back some of the other quarterbacks.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Frank we just mentioning we'll got to Lamar Jackson again

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and talking about his performance Jameis Winston. Some names are

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>on the top of the lest last week, are back

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on the top of the list this week. And then

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into the fun stelf the running backs, the

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, how much you're spending, how important it is

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to get certain guys, and Freak and I have a

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>bit of a disagreement or the bag. Let's talk about it.

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>We come back that and more. Fantasy best Friends Forever

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Fannis Sports. Our Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from the

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Roado dot Com optimized in minutes,

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>building optimized line up for cash games and turneys learned

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rhodo dot com.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Back with your Fantasy best friends Forever Fantasy Sports. Ready

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to network. Frank Stanville, Gregg Suspen with you. Let's quickly

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>right with the quarterbacks, right? You need everyone's back, right,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody's back, and if you fighting for the playoffs, you

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>can't be starting any of these guys, right, Like, that's

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>probably not a thing. Why do you? Why not if

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you were stacked everywhere else, but you were just kind

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of streaming quarterbacks all year and now you get to

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this point that you know if you were the guys

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>streaming Winston and if it's Magic or you know, if

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you had any Dalton in your line up for whatever reason,

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, you might have guys like Lamar Jackson or

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield in your line up. I could see that

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>as a possibility. Okay, So which who would you want

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to start this week? Baker Mayfield, James Winston, Lamar Jackson.

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Which of those guys are you starting? Well? I still

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>do trust Jamis Winston the moment, just based on the

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>volume matchup too. He faced the Carolina Panthers and we

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>just saw what Russell Wilson and the Seahawks did. You

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>asked me yesterday, you know what's going on with the Panthers?

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Why why do they keep losing games? It's you know,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the defense hasn't helped them out much. Especially you know,

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>we just saw Russell Wilson throw for multiple touchdowns. I

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>know Stafford in the lines. They didn't put up a

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>ton of points in that game. But then the week

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>before that, it was the Pittsburgh Steelers, where you know,

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they dropped a fifty burger on the Carolina Panthers. So

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>their defense has not been great. The volume is always

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be there for Jameis Winston. The game is

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa Bay, but I still do expect them to

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>be trailing in this game. I haven't I haven't looked

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>at the spreads yet. I'll pull those up to see

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what Vegas expects for this game. But just based on

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the volume and the opportunity and the fact that the

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Panthers defense is not playing that well, I'll always always

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>lean Jamis over these guys. Uh. But it's close when

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about like Lamar Jackson VERSU Baker Mayfield. Okay, yeah,

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it is tough. But what's interesting about Lamar Jackson,

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>as I understand, he had seventy one rushing yards in

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this one, but it seemed like he was more apt

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>to pass or take chances with his arm. That the

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>game plan was very, very different than we saw two

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, especially in the first half. And I was

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>sweeting about it was it was very Uh, it was

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>very odd to me that, um, I believe you know,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>he had like something like when he passing attempts in

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the first half, but they only had ten total rushing attempts.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Mind you, only two of those were Lamar Jackson in

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the first half. And I believe eight of them were

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for Gus Edwards. So it seems like they were making

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a concerted effort to not get Lamar Jackson killed, which

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what we spoke about a week ago. So

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>they tried to short those things up a little bit.

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>But for a guy like Lamar Jackson, he has to

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>be able to make plays with his legs, but you

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have to be smart about how he makes those plays

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>with those legs have him run out of bounds. You know.

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The only problem that we had with Lamar Jackson running

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>as much as he did, you know, the twenty seven

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts two weeks ago, was the fact that he

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was getting killed every time he was touching the ball.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, yeah, you could give him ten fifteen

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts, and you could have some of these designed runs,

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>but you just have to be smart about how you

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>do it. So I thought that they tried to make

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a concerted effort for him to stay in the pocket

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and try and get things done with his arm. But ultimately,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>when the Ravens were able to take off in that

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>game was when they started to mix up the offense

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and let him run a little bit and let Gus

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Edwards run a little bit, so, um, I appalled them

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for trying to see what he could do with his arm,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but he also threw I threw a few more interceptions here, So, um,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson is still very raw as a passer, and

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that's exactly what we expected. Um, I would expect.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I would expect him to be in that category for

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want him more for his rushing potential

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>than than you want him for his arm. Obviously, absolutely,

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and this week it should be be Lamar Jackson game.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>It should be make Lamar Jackson game. But I'll say this,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfields also been really good as late and really

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>consistent as a late as well. They're running the ball,

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>but they're also trusting their their their quarterback. I think

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's awesome between those guys. If I had to choose,

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give me the matchup, give me the matchup with

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. And I know it's close. Baker Mayfield. You

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>know he's throwing multiple touchdowns in I believe five straight

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>games now, and uh, I know PFF had an awesome

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>tweet about this, a graphic involving pretty much every single

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>week over the past four weeks, he's improved, like his

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>his fantasy production and his passing touchdown totals, so he's

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>getting better. He through for four touchdowns last week. We

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have to remember that was against the Bengals. We just

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>saw the Texans defense of what they did to uh

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee last night, and the Titans. I know that

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Titans offense is not a juggernaut by any means,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but when I'm not putting the Browns in the in

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the conversation of jargonnaut either, certainly not so. I think

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a tougher matchup for for

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Baker here, but I do think he's safe. I think

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he's proven now that he's safe for at least multiple touchdowns,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So again, I like him. Just give me the matchup

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for Lamar Jackson. I think we might see a little

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more back and forth here between the Falcons and

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. They might have to put up some more

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>points and just that rushing floor that he gives you

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>every single week. It's close, but I'll take Lamar Jackson

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>over Baker. Okay, fair enough. Now, any other quarterbacks you

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>want to get into, you want to just jump into

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the running backs to wide receivers, did have anyone else

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>here listed? Dak Prescott just against New l And Saints.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Dad has been great since since Mark Cooper has come

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>over for fan Jack has been absolutely fantastic. In fact,

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he's rushburk touchdown in four of his last five games,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>including the last three, So even though he's not running

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge volume inside that red zone and in particularly

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>inside that ten, he's using his legs. Dak has been

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>awesome since the Mark Cooper got there. Yeah, he has.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But I know, saying, you know, credits of the Saints defense,

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they've been a lot better as well. This isn't this

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the same defense that matter? And you might you might

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have that vision that, oh, you start all your wide receivers,

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you start every quarterback against the against the New Roland Saints.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how did that work out for Matt Ryan

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>last week? Matt Ryan was not great. I know, he

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>fumbled a few times inside the red zone. But the

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Saints defense over the last month or so are in

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points allowed two quarterbacks, so they're actually closer to

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>being one of the better teams in the league over

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the past month against quarterbacks than not. But Dak Prescott,

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying in especially with a Mariy Cooper playing as

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>well as he has had a monster game against Washington

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on Thanksgiving, so I just thought I would throw Dak

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Prescott out there as well. I know he's owned in

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a large number of leagues. Now he's over Like, yeah,

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that people are buying at the deck man.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of cowboy fans out there, Greg, You're right,

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I do not realize that when I then want to

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>look up the total between the Ravens and the Falcons

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>forty nine points. Interesting, this game is basically a pick

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>him right now, Greg, between the Falcons and the Ravens.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's with the oddsmakers knowing that it's likely Lamar

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Jackson this week in Atlanta inside the Dome on the

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>fast track total there, and then you get the Brownies.

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't have a total right now, but the Texans

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are favorite at six and a half at home, which

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that spread makes sense the way the Texans

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are playing. I know, I know the Browns are playing

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>well too, but Texans are an eight game winning streak

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and they play play great at home. So there's no

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>total there yet though. I just total of the week.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>What do we have? Fifties six for the Panthers and Bucks,

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half for the Lions and Rams,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and then fifty five for the Raiders and Chiefs. Obviously,

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know whoever the Chiefs or the Rams play is

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>always gonna be high total there. But yeah, those look

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>like the three highest ones as of right now. The

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Panthers and Bucks highest total of the week points looks

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>three and a half point home dogs against the Panthers, Greg, Yeah,

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks suck. Look pretty good against forty niners last week.

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Forty niners is what we do with the Giants? Man,

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand, but hey, the Pants doing on a

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>three games losing street looks suck. Let's take points here,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>gregs do that all right? I want to get into

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the running backs and wide receivers though, for real, Frank

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and you had to pull a little while ago before

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the program asking you who the number one waiver claim

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of the week was. Can you name those four players please?

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It is Nahem Haines, the Indianapolis Colt, Justin Jackson with

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, Adam Humphries with Tampa Bay, and Josh Dockston

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of Washington. Would you like to know the results. Eight

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>seven votes in Adam Humphries number one, number two, ahem,

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>HEINZ thirty but it's pretty close and in Justin Jackson.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So then you know there's no one that's running away

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with it right now? Do you have anything you'd like

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to add about the poll? Grad I knew and I

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>said this to you when you walked in here, I go,

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>why didn't you add Carlos Hide to the poll? Because

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense to me that you didn't. LETTERD

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 1>four Nette suspended for one week. Now he could appeal

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and play this week and we'll see. Maybe if that

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>appeal process it will help you in the playoffs potentially

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hide starts. It's a one week thing. Justin Jackson.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a backup for some reason, he's included on this poll.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't really get that one. He's back up to the backup.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm surprised Carlos Hide and t J Yels and well,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hide has a ne role. It's a negative game

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>script against the Indianapolis. Every game's in the negative game script. Yeah,

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the Colts are favored by four points in Jacksonville, but

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's offense I believe is going to be based around

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the run, which is what we've seen with Letter

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of four Net in the past. I think they'll try

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to do the same thing with Carlos Hide. Yeah, but

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing is it's only for one game still. I

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think the same one will change With Justin Jackson.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's gonna get at least I think he's

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna get at least ten touches per week. And if

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>something were to happen to Austin Ekeler, then you're looking

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at Joustin Jackson as an RB two and anything could happen.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So just given the injury to Melvin Gordon, he's out

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>what we suspect to be at least two weeks, it

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>could I think we'll be closer to four weeks. I think. Yeah,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I just I want a piece of that that that

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>charges offen. It's very potent. Even this year when Melvin

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Gordon was doing in this thing. Austin Ekeler has been

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the flex discussion all season long. Gregg. If I'm

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>looking more, you know, I think Justin Jackson can help

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you out for longer term rather than Carlos Hyde, who

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it is just a one week fix. But

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that one week he can he can help you, you know,

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get to the playoff is what we're talking about. And

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think more he should have been this

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It's more relative to context, because if you need to

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>win this week, then Carlos Hide is probably your guy.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>If he needs to win this week, I'm going all

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in on Carlos out. And if he got left, you

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>need to win this week to get in the playoffs.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Every dime you have should go on Carlos Hide. Yeah,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair to say. I mean, can't you

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>say something similar about nihem Heins because Marlin Marlon mc

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>deealing with the concussion, and Nahim Hines look pretty good

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.239
<v Speaker 1>now now he looks he looked, He's looked pretty good

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>all season long. Actually, concussions are or tough right for

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>all we know more than Mac made clear concussion protocol tomorrow. Now.

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't usually happen like that. Guys usually miss a

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>week or so. Um the last talk to me about

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>it on Thursday. But as much as I love the

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Naim Hides, but I know he's starting this week, I

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know for sure right now, I do know, I

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>guess as you can say the same thing is letter

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for that appeal. I mean, look, why would why would

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the league rescind this suspension? They won't. I mean, you

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>could play through the appeal process, but I'm pretty sure

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the appeal is get I don't already read somewhere that

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna happen this week, Like the appeal is gonna

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>happen the process, Okay, so it'll be this week. So

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>then the other thing is with Jacksonville out of it, right,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville obviously eliminated. They're they're not going anywhere. They're really

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a culture, right. Is it possible that they don't want to?

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Letter Fran has been banged up all year.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They want to make sure he's healthy going into the

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>off season. See what they have in Carlos Hide. Let's

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>see what they have. But I don't want to injure

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>their franchise corner stone. Is that possible? Camera? White camera, please,

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>white camera, Greg, here's what you're doing, white camera. See

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing right here. I'm reaching for you, Greg,

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm reaching. I'm reaching it hard. Yeah, you just can't

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>get it done. I think you're reaching a big I

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>think you're reaching a little bit here. I thought about

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that too, Like the thought across my mind, like maybe

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know Leonard Fournett the discipline, Tom Coughlin being the

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>disciplinarian he is in the front office whatever, but like

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>tells the team, like, you know, let's discipline in Leonard

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Fournete ourselves and not use him as much on the stretch.

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you invest, when you invest as high of

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a draft pick in for net as you do, and

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he's finally healthy, I think outside of suspension games, if

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy, he's he's gonna play. He's gonna be the

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>work horse. Okay, so there you go. So not Frankie,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that's all that interesting in Carlo's hide going forward is

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing. He's one. He's gonna be in the flex discussion.

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But I this game is undoubtedly going to be a

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>negative game. Script. It's just a matter of how far

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>into the game, Like is it like four teenship in

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, because then if that's the case, then

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we probably get a lot of yelling. But if it's

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, if it's like fourteen seven at the half

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're like kind of hanging around, then they probably

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>want to establish the run and keep Andrew Luck off

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the field, and the guy to do that will be

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Carlos High. So it's gonna be very game flow dependent

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>within the game, and you're not gonna know that going in.

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Unless you just think that the uh are gonna cream them,

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>then then you probably lean in uh Yelden's camp. Okay,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so all in on A nine Hines, then all in

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on I definitely if you're the Marlon mac owner, like, yeah,

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean you should have and we we've been banging

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the table telling you to get your handcuffs for however

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>long now. But forty owned is niheim Hines. T J

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>yelled in, so likely not available in your league, But

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>then Carlos had thirty eight percent, so hi didn't Hines

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>are in the same camp. If I'm a Marlin NAC owner,

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be the most aggressive on niheim Hines. If

0:30:58.240 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just in a vacuum and I need to win

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this sweet, I'll go with Carlos Hide. I think he's

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>one A. I think niheim Hines is one b um.

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And then if you're just thinking about like the long term,

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or if you're like an Eckler and a Melvin Gordon owner,

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>then I'm looking at Justin Jackson. There's like there's a

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of context going into like which running back you

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>want to try and get this week, but ultimately if

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you just need to win, I think Carlos Hide is

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>one A and then Niheim Hines is one B. Okay,

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but going forward, you'll that's different. That's separated. Yeah, Like

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if I have already locked up the playoffs and maybe

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking like the final couple of weeks of

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the season, three or four weeks, probably leing with Justin Jackson.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You're leading with Justin Jackson. Now, Frank, he's a bit

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>higher on Justin Jackson. I am to me, I believe

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Austin Ekeler and all all Austin Ekeler.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's that's silly because we haven't seen it be

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>all Austin Ekeler before. They want to use a bigger

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>back at some point that's Justin Jackson is well. Look,

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning that in that game where the London

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>game where Melvin Gordon missed against the Tennessee Naton's Austin

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler did play of the snaps. But I'd have to

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>into it. I don't know if Justin Jackson was like

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a healthy scratch. Was he even on the team? Um,

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, did he get any snaps in that game?

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't Also earlier earlier this season, he's not as

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>worn down. I don't know that Ekeler is like the

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>guy that's like built to touch the ball twenty times

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a game. He's kind of like a smaller, like he's

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>like a stocky dude. But I don't know. I think

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he's more of like the Alright, we'll give him fifteen

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen touches. He'll get his you know, ten to twelve

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>carries and his whatever five six targets, whatever it might be.

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>He'll be in you know, he'll be in the mid

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to high teams for touches. But then I do think

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>just because when Melvin Gordon was doing everything that he

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was doing, Austin Ekeler was still getting touches as well

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>throughout the season. So Austin Neckler kind of steps up

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to that Melvin Gordon role and Justin Jackson steps since

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that Austin nel role, and Ekeler has been in the

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>flex discussion all year. So that's kind of how I'm

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at Justin jacks Okay, Justin Jackson you prefer him

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>long term to any of these guys, because he may

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have even if it's a complimentary role, a role going forward.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson guy that Frank really likes this week? Would

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you rather have not this week and forward? Would you

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>rather have Justin Jackson or Rex burkehead? That was That

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>was a question that I asked earlier this morning to

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you where Rex Burke had officially activated off of injured

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>reserve yesterday. He could be active on the game roster

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as soon as this Sunday, but if he does anything,

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he becomes much more expensive obviously in the weeks ahead.

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you think Rex burkeheads roll will be going

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>forward if he has one? Greg, we're right back to

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bellatris right, like we we could try. I always

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hate when people say Bellatris never does. I mean it's

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool. I enjoy it. I hated it. Yeah,

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>well you kind of hate everything. No, not true. I

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>like fun stuff, like like a named Kendrick Borne. Is

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that that fun? Though? Like I just kind of proved

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to myself this past week, it's not that funny. But

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the bellat tricks. You know, you know what we're bad?

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You know? He says that Jake Seeley says that not cool.

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say you did when it comes to Rex Burkehead.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But we try our best to make a prediction here,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but really like nobody knows. I don't even think Bill

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Belichick knows right now. Um, I'll take Justin Jackson just

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>because he's one of two, whereas Rex Burkett is one

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of three. You can argue that the Patriots is like

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>more potent offense and the Chargers, but like at this point,

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is it like the Charger's offense is really good as well?

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take Justin Jackson just because he's one of two,

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and we know that Melvin Gordon's gonna miss anywhere from

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>two to four weeks. Um Burkehead, I would say Burkett

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>has a higher upside of the two because he can

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>he can take on that Dion Lewis roll where we

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>saw it down the stretch last year when Dean Lewis

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:36.439
<v Speaker 1>was on the field. But we can't constantly say about

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Dean Lewis when he was with the Patriots was when

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he's on the field, you don't know whether the Patriots

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to run or pass, and they love that

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>deceptive nous. So when somebody sells on the field, you

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of have a good feeling that they're gonna run.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>When James White is on the field, you kind of

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have a good feeling that they're gonna pass. Rex Burke

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>ittt he's the closest running back that they've had to

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like that Dion Lewis Roll where when he's on the field,

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't know whether they're going to run or pass,

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of like that's with army knife. He

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>can carry the ball, he can catch the ball out

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of the back field. He's good and pass protection. It's

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that, you know, prototypical, just another like

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>White player that kind of like fits into like the

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>new England Patriots offensive scheme of things. So with all

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that being said, Um, if I had to choose one,

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I would take Justin Jackson just because he's one of two.

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But Birkhead I do think is worth mentioning. He's on

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this list as well. He's one of four running backs. Um,

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking down the stretch, you don't need a

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>guy just for this week. I think he's kind of

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in that Justin Jackson Roll. I like Birkhead. I like

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson a little bit more. Where do we come back?

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll list any other running backs do you need to

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>know about, and then we'll get into the wide receivers,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>which they're not very fun either, So stick around. There's

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot more coming your way. Fantasy best friends forever,

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports right here, never one. If you're someone that

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 1>needs fantasy sports advice every day, the Fantasy Sports Radio

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Network has you covered. When you download the n T

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>S Y Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the top

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy advice every single day, right through the weekend. Be

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>sure to listen to our weekend warriors like College Football Today.

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to College Football Tonight Weekend Fantasy Update. The fantasy

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Jesus in this league is never short of exciting at

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I T L and so much more. Download the Fantasy

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes and Google Play

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Store now and keep the best fantasy experts right in

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>your pocket all day long and all week long. I

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just want to remind you the entire Lamar Miller sucks

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>bit him from me last year, loving Lamar Miller and

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Corey get trying to tell me he sucks, and eventually

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I bought it. Vot it bought in at the wrong time.

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg didn't buy back in running back many than he's

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>better than me, much better than us. Frank, who's better

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>than us? Reli who's better than us? Oh? Nobody, exactly not,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>probably definitely alright, any other running backs Frank on the

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>way over wide this week? You picking up? No, I

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna hit on it. I know some people

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in the chat are talking about Chris Thompson. We're really

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna do the Chris Thompson thing again, guy, guys like

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the guy has been in and out of the lineup

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>all year. Washington's offensive line is completely banged up. Like,

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>what are like, what are you hoping for with Chris

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Thompson that he could become like Jalen Richard at this point?

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>The guy can't stay healthy. He's an extremely talented, explosive

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>player when he is healthy, but that hasn't been the

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>case all season long. Adrian Peterson Capri bibs. Also, they're

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like I mentioned Chris Thompson's name, Like, look, if you're

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>playing a fourteen team PPR with like deep benches, like okay,

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues all right, but in your standard twelve team,

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like I'll take everybody that we've mentioned today over Chris Thompson,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a bow on the running backs. I

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>totally agree that agree with that considered the running backs

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 1>completed wide receivers. Frank, there's other really new out here.

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing that all of a sudden, we're just like,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go out and get this guy. Don't think

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>he exists. I know one name that's been on my list,

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh Doxson when I picked him up a couple of

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago when I was desperate for a starting spot.

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And Dowson has been good last week now against with

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Colt McCoy at quarterback, UH season high in yards, receptions, targets,

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>all across the board. He did it and it was

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>like McCoy is willing to go down the field a

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. And if that's the case, better for

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Reid. Better Josh Dockson. So I do like Josh Dockson,

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but like am I saying, you have to go out

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and get Josh Dawsons and must go out and get

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh Doxon. I'm pretty excited about joshun really specifically for

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this matchup against the Eagles. Man, the Eagles secondary is

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>completely you know, ravaged by injury, and I know, you know,

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham didn't have the monster game that we were

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>all hoping that he would have. But it's a good matchup.

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles have given up fantasy points to wide receivers

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>all season long. Uh, they're extremely injured. And her our

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>friend of the program, Greg Ray Summerlin with Rural World. UM,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to the Rural World podcast on the

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>way in today. Of Colt McCoy's fifty past attempts this season,

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>fifteen of them have gone towards Josh Jockson. That's the

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent targets here. Greg, That's a massive number. So

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty excited about Josh Jackson back to back games

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>with at least seven targets. He had ten targets on

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving against the Cowboys. Great matchup against the against the

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles. I play in a standard league, Greg, where

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to start three wide receivers and two flex

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and two running back. So it's a little bit of

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a deeper starting wind up, and I'm trying to pick

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>up Josh Jackson in that league and play me against

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. Alright, So Josh Dawson, very excited for him.

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Is here number one wide receiver target this week, he

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't just because the ownership percentage is not high enough

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>for Josh Reynolds. He's sixty O. I think the barometer

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>normally is like sixty five. Like if you're below that,

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>people might have dropped him just because the Rams were

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>on top. So go out and make sure that Josh

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds isn't available. He's not gonna be Cooper Cup. He's

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be a top twenty wide receiver, but maybe

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a top thirty six wide receiver consistently. We just saw

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>him score in that game against the Chiefs. I mean,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody scored in that game against the Chiefs. But you

0:39:57.960 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>want a part of the Rams offense, this is an

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>easy way to get exposure there. And I would also

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>rank Adam Humphries greg I would rank Adam Humphries ahead

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 1>of Josh Dockson right now with with what he's doing.

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of been in and out of the lineup

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in in my home league all year long. I've had

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>him some weeks. I've started. I started this past week.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But Sean Jackson is dealing with a thumb injury. We

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know what his status is as of right now.

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That would obviously help Chris Godwin as well. But Adam

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Humphreys is a guy who you know all year long.

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of find out, like, all right, well, which

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>which WOS wide receiver besides Mike Evans is gonna be

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 1>this week. Adam Humphries has been pretty consistent at least

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty receiving yards in five straight games. He's done it

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in six of his last seven. He scored four touchdowns

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in his last four games. He's scored in back to

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>back games. So Adam Humphrey is not your typical guy

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that you look at to score touchdowns. He's like a

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>smaller slot receiver, but you're the slot greggy. And we're

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Carolina Panthers, who have bled to

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to wide receivers recently. So I'm in on

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphreys. I would say Reynolds, Adam Humphreys, Josh Dockson.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I actually like that wide receiver group this week in

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the waiver wire. Yeah, I'm I'm with you.

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree those are the guys that you want. Humphreys, Dockson,

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Reynolds. But they're all names that we've spoken

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about before. They're not just really low man, Adam Humphreys owned.

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe those are the leagues where like people are

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>still paying attention and like they're still in it, you know,

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>much helper to look at ownership persentage time. It seems

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too low to be. Yeah, I get that,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dockson, What do I mean his is low to

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a few of the wide receivers here

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>that we can mention in deeper lease. Curtis Samuel, who

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you dropped, right, I dropped. I dropped for Kendrick Bourne

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Board Identity whatever, great favorite name in the world.

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But Curtis Samuel getting a little bit more involved in

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the offense. Target share still isn't necessarily there. The offense

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>runs directly through Christian McCaffrey and even d J. Moore now,

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know what the status of of Divin

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Funchiuses at this point. But Curtis Samuel, guy who's coming

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:57.919
<v Speaker 1>around a little bit. They're getting him out in space,

0:41:57.960 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they're using him in the rush game a little bit,

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to find ways to manufacture touches for Curtis Samuels.

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So od it was worth mentioning him, and then Bruce Ellington,

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>who you know has been targeted quite heavily over his

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>last two games since Marvin Jones has gone down and

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones has landed on i R. He's done for

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the season. That came out yesterday, so this isn't like

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>an upside play, but he's had at least seven targets.

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 1>He's had at least six receptions in every game since

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones has gone down. So in PPR league specifically,

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe deeper leagues, it's worth mentioning Bruce Ellington. I agree.

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that brucelling the lines face the Rams this

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>week too. They'll be throwing, throwing all game. I actually

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>picked up Bruce Ellington for this exact reason, knowing that

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>they have the Rams coming to the knowing that Marvin

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Jones is banged up. Listen, I'm gonna say this, if

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to make the playoffs, you're starting a guy

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>like Bruce Ellington this week, things aren't going well for you.

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's probably why you're fighting to get into

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, right, It's because you know you got a

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>guy like Bruce Ellingson, But maybe you were Marvin Jones owner, right,

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're just scrambling trying to find a wide receivestrip.

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>We like the three wide receivers we mentioned earlier, Reynolds, Docks,

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and Humphreys. But if those guys are gone, you're playing

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a deeper league. Bruce Ellington and Curtis Samuel are the

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>next two up, the last couple of pieces here of

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>players we want you to consider picking up. You know,

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Trey Quinn uh slot and also he did the uh

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Microlcott dance. Tray Quinn is a guy that comes

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>up to my mind, and he didn't actually write him

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on here. Um. Ryan Switzer for Pittsburgh, also playing the slot.

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>He played nine of the slot reps fort Pittsburgh. Juicu

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>only played ten, which is a season low for Judice

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Sues start. It's first time because he's been

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>getting regular playing time that he did not finish number

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 1>one inning the slot for Pittsburgh. So but I've been

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit changing the guard in the slot. Vance

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>McDonald a little banged up this week, maybe even more.

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Switzer, just as deep lead named a quan I

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>app for I think that's a good call. Gray. I

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't know those numbers about the slot. So that's that's

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>really interesting considering the fact that you do had his

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>best game of his career right yesterday, I mean, not necessary,

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but Sunday. Yeah, so this past week and he did

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it on the outside. So that's that's worth noting for Juju.

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. Streaming defense is this week the Bills.

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about them for a while now Buffalo faces

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Miami this week. Miami looks a little bit better with

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's Hanna a little bit, but it might be a

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit being off the Bills a little bit not

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought they were gonna do better than

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 1>they did against the Jaguars this week. Maybe, you know,

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe my expectations were just too high, so a little

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Yeah, I'll mentioned I'll mentioned the Rams. Greg.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think a keep to lead is. I

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>know he was expected to return in a week. Third

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>team will obviously find out later in the week whether

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen, but I mean he'll be a

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>big boost to this offense and they're already the second

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:42.280
<v Speaker 1>highest scoring UH Fantasy defense in terms of thin points

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>per game. Obviously, a lot of that came in the

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs game, where you know, they just went crazy. But

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean they have, you know, a few of the biggest,

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the best defensive players in the league in terms of

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>playmakers and Aaron Donald and Domikins to Marcus Peters. He

0:44:57.360 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot of chances, but sometimes those chances pay

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>off and then you get it keeps lead back too.

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's worth mentioning the Rams going up

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions, who their offensive line is not played

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that great. Um. You know, Stafford has been taking a

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of sacks. So I like the Rams against the

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions if anyone dropped them because of their bye week. Okay,

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>so there you go. The Rams, Uh a possibility against

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Detroit and the City a possibility against Oakland, two teams

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that were on to buy uh Danny Olakers or or

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>doing Danny auto Kansas City because they're facing Oklan. I

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>was like, Danny's so proud of you that you're playing matchups. Yeah.

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I liked them a lot too. They're here as a

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>streaming defense. Uh. They also had a defensive touchdown against

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the Rams in that game, and their defensives. You know,

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it's come along, you know, like the Chiefs were brutal

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to start the season. I real. They signed a few

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>guys and signed a few veterans in there, and they've

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>played better in The Oakland Raiders offense is just tread

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I know. You know, they surprisingly scored uh some points

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.359
<v Speaker 1>against the Baltimore Ravens, but ultimately on the season, they're

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>amongst you know, I think one of the top one

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of the bottom five teams in terms of offensive scoring

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. Here, So the Chiefs against the Raiders, I

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's worth mentioning. And then I think this

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>team is probably owned. But the Titans against the Jets,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like just stream anyone against the Jets right now. Total,

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten to that point with the Jets totally and Green.

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm also I have no choice. I was thinking on

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the Brownies this week. You can look at the Brownies

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>against the Texans am Houston. I don't love it. Craig, Well,

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>should I see the houses out there? Frank yeah, sure,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>because I have I had the Lions for next week

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm ready to go for my playoffs. Where do

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the Lions have again next week? Is it's like Buffalo

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>or something? Arizona? I think Arizona, Yes, that's pretty good.

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>They play Arizona and Buffalo the next two weeks. I think,

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>right is what it is? What I told you, Well,

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>after they face the Rams, accidentally put the they placed

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Buffalo fourteen. Who's on who's on your free agency

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that you can look at? Let's find out because I

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't I'm really thinking. But let's play the waiver wire

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with Greg Sussman. Uh. This week on the waiver wire, Oh,

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we have the Browncos Broncos based Inincinnati. It's a good one.

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I like that one. That's a good one. And the

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks face San Francisco, so that's a good one too.

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good. Yeah, is that game in Seattle? It is solid,

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>very nice. I have the Bills against Miami. Greg, in

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 1>my home leagues, do you like one of those other

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>defenses more? The Titans are available in the Jets. Probably

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Titans more than you like the Bills. Right,

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:20.320
<v Speaker 1>also have the Dolphins on the other side of that

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>game playing s the Bill is probably not a bad

0:47:22.160 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>call there either. The Broncos. I like the Seahawks call too.

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Against San Francisco. It is pretty good Broncos in Seattle.

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of streaming defenses this week. Good week

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>for streaming defenses. It's funny because I don't know, I

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 1>have no idea how much money. And this is more

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>of a strategy question. I want to ask you, like,

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much money to leave myself for

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs? Have no idea. Well, I know your league

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>rules are weird. Are you actually allowed to make pickups

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>throughout the playoffs? How much money do you have left? Uh?

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I played three dollars on the defense, that's fair. Is

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there anyone else that you're gonna be aggresive on? These

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's of the world or Justin Jackson and Carlos? Those

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>only two guys are out there that you need Carlos

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 1>hide this week. I'm I'm in the playoffs, okay, So yeah,

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'd throw a few bucks on Justin Jackson,

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>six bucks something like that. How much would you leave

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for the playoffs? So if you have twenty one and

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you drop like eight, leave like, yeah, I think that's fine,

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a good idea. I only have three dollars left

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>my home league, so I'm just kind of like spending

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>what do I do? I've probably spent like a dollar

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on the defense this week, and then, as you know,

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Greg I'm making the playoffs despite like not really wanting

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs. It's the weirdest fantasy season I've

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:37.800
<v Speaker 1>ever played my home leak keeper league. There's teams that

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:41.240
<v Speaker 1>have made playoffs and like there's like the Dynamo super teams,

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and I have the second fewest points scored in this

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>league and I'm like the five seed right now. Just

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>really weird. Do I want to make the playoffs? It's

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>weird season. Greg's interesting. I'm sorry reading Jake's playoff flex

0:48:56.760 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>emount Okay, stop reading any Actually six teams make the playoffs, alright,

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>so I think I'm third and year fourth, Thanks mam.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's go holding down boom. I feel like Adam Cole

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 1>baby boom. Is this something he does now? He's been

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>doing that for a while. I'm watching a long time

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Jesus man um. All right, uh, last few things of

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the program. Let you know, let sign off YouTube now

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to sign off YouTube. Was tay goodbye to

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody watching. Come up next Fantasy Ball Frenzy, Corey Parson,

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day and the Closer Chris Fincher WIBB be covered

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to get out their game balls as they do each

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 1>never tuesdays to make sure you are stay tuned for that.

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:39.839
<v Speaker 1>We of course go live each every day Monday through

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Friday at noon Eastern. Subscribe to our podcast. You don't

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>listen live, rate us like us and give us five

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>stars and leave a comment, and you're listening live all

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. We go for another four

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half minutes. All right, Frankie La portals benched

0:49:56.280 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for Cody Takla. What are we doing? Nathaniel Hackett fired

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a fun someone's gotta be the scapegoat, right, as we mentioned,

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily Nathaniel Hackett's fault probably you know that guy

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>who got bench, probably a little bit of his fault too.

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 1>In Blake Bortles, probably a little bit of Duck Marown's

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>faults as well. We'll go with Cody Kessler here, which

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they're ever going to there. They're

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:23.799
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be an offense that passes all that much.

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of for their weapons, I think Cody

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Kessler being there probably helps. But honestly, you're not starting

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Dante Moncrief anyway, You're not starting g D. Westbrook, and

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see how the offense can be a

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>lot worse with Cody Custer than with Blake Portles. So

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens, but probably a lot of h probably just

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of running the football more than the same

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>from the Jacksonville Jaguars. Okay, so that's Maron. You also

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>had Tom Conflin to actually come out today and say, well,

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't regret anything we did in the

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>off season because we were one bad call away resigning

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Blake ports We are one bad call away from the

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>plant from the super Bowl, so we have to go

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for it. But you know, obviously they have to reevaluate things. Clearly.

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeff driscoll and new story quarterback Sincinnati with any Dalton

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.879
<v Speaker 1>don't over the year. I cannot believe Jeff driscoll Um

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the starting quarterback in the NFL. I remember him at Florida.

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He had a good freshman year, then wound like going

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 1>transferrings like Louisiana State. Louis had a tech or something

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. It was very strange, and here he is

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Joco now starting. You know who their backup quarterback is though?

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it Bruce Gregkowski? No? Two more guesses. Uh, it's

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a Tom Savage. Tom Savage. Once again the backup

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback leave San Francisco and heads over to sinc Nati

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>oh Man. Tom Savage is the same quarterback that started

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>over to Shawn Watson. Never forget it, Never forget, never

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>forget Bill O'Brien, the great offensive mind that he is.

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Driscoll, we were a touchdown to Tyler Boyd last week. Look,

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Driscol, you're not expecting much here. Just get the

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 1>ball to your best players, Jeff, the ball to Tyler Boyd,

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to AJ Green and to cj us Alma because obviously

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we need tight ends. And you know what, greg I

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>looked into target share this Sunday with Joe Mixon. You

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>got seven of seven targets is here, but only has

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>like thirtent of the targets share in the season. In

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:17.720
<v Speaker 1>my mind, Joe Mixon should be one of these Todd Gurley,

0:52:17.840 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon, the way that like they're used in the

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:22.399
<v Speaker 1>past game, that's how Joe Mixon should be used. That's

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:24.919
<v Speaker 1>a part of the reason, the reason why, like Marvin Lewis,

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:27.279
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go like clean house. We need like all

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:30.439
<v Speaker 1>new minds in here so to get the most out

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of your weapons in Cincinnati, because Joe Mixon should be

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 1>utilized more in the past game in my opinion. Now

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I do wanna. I do want to mention that um

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle out for the season. He was placed on

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I R yesterday, which is good for Eric Even he'll

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:48.359
<v Speaker 1>get back in the saddle. He's been, as we kept saying,

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a red zone threat and that is it. Now he'll

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:54.400
<v Speaker 1>be on the field for more than plays he was

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>back ups about eighty or so, which is good for him.

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>They'll see a lot of mo Alei Cox as well. Uh,

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>eric On. This is only great news for er run

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>per Evan Silva, I saw his tweet yesterday regarding this.

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>In games that Jack Doyle did not play this year,

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.479
<v Speaker 1>might on average ten targets per game, So that would

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>just be phenomenal. You know, he's he's entrenched as the

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>top five tight end rest of season regardless, just because

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of how he's gonna be used. Greg, I'll raise the

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>question to you, yep, does this open up an opportunity

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for Moli Cox because we know the Colts used two

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. If you're desperate, I think there's a lot

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of ten ends out there, Like I'd rather take an opportunity,

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the Rams tight ends. He could be

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>coming back. I think I around think of shot in

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Ever or Tyler Habe at that point. Um then

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Moriley Cox. Yeah, I see what you're saying. More potent offense,

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but targets share in terms of like how often Andrew

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Luck throws to the tight end? Do I get that?

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:52.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna do it for us tomorrow, a brand

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:54.360
<v Speaker 1>new initiation of the program. Your calls, We're gonna do

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays. I have no idea, we'll figure it out.

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>It love a team meeting. It's gonna be interesting. Now

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>up next, Fast Well Frenzy with Corey, Jim and Chris

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Frank Staffle. My name is Greg Sausen. Thank you so

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>much for watching, Listening and the Fantasy Best Friends Forever.

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it all again tomorrow, we hope,