WEBVTT - Geopolitics, the US Election, and Investing Amid Fed Easing

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:23.159
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always I'm Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app. If you

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>are a certain persuasion, you remember where you were when

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you close the book on the Winds of War by

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Herman wilt Bout, and you said, when's he gonna write

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 2>the next one war?

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>And remember and you waited two years.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Young James Stravita's had this feeling as I did, like

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>you waited. Except admiralstra Vetus, of course, lived the American military,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 2>the United States Navy of Pug Henry as well. The

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 2>book is The Restless Wave. It is a novel, a

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.279
<v Speaker 2>novel idea, a novel from.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 4>Jem four Desk and I'm ready to go to chapter five, and.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just wonderful about a young lad before nineteen forty one,

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 2>across the arc of World War Two. What's the why, Admiralstravitas,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Why did you need to write The Restless Wave?

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Tom? I'll give you three reasons, I'll do them fast.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 6>One is Winston Churchill said, the further you want to

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 6>look into the future, the more you have to look

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 6>into the past, meaning the lessons of World War Two

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 6>are still with us, great power of war in the Pacific,

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 6>the rise of technologies. And then third and five, and

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 6>most importantly you mentioned it, Tom, character we think of

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 6>Captain pug Henry from the Winds of War. Here we

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 6>have a young naval officer. He's flawed, he makes mistakes,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 6>he's in a love triangle, there's betrayal, the early days

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 6>of the Greatest Generation. So any reasons write a sweeping

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 6>novel about the Second World War.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to give this away Pulse four chapters into

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the book. Page three ten, the exo took a breath.

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Admiral Wright failed us, Sir. He was slow and hesitant.

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't understand the new technology. His battle plan looked

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 2>like Dewey at Manila in the Spanish American War, admiralstavinus,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 2>are we living that today with new drone technology and

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>all is A navy have to adapt and adjust.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 5>One hundred percent.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Tom, And look at Ukraine where the Russian Black Sea

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 6>Fleet has been sunk by the Ukrainians.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 5>Except the Ukrainians don't even have a navy.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 6>They're using drones, cruise missiles, exquisite intelligence, surface forces operating

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 6>using artificial intelligence. Our navy better learn those lessons and

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 6>get ready. And that's something that we experienced at the

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 6>start of World War two as well.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Admiral Tom and I have a million questions on many

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 4>different hotspots around the world. Let's start with the Middle

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 4>East here. Can you give us your latest thinking on

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>how things are developing there and how you kind of

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 4>foresee I guess the next several weeks and months.

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Clearly the next big muscle movement is going to be

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 6>an attack bite Israel in retaliation appropriately for two hundred

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 6>ballistic missiles that came raining down on Israel five six

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 6>days ago. So what will that attack look like? I

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 6>think that's the key question for investors. I think it's

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 6>going to be big, but not shock and awe level

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:03.279
<v Speaker 6>kind of strikes. I'll probably go against the military industrial

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 6>complex in Iran, probably not against the nuclear power complex,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 6>and probably not against energy. So that should be something

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:20.679
<v Speaker 6>that investors and tolerate as we look at rising risk

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 6>in the region. Bottom line, I think there's about a

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 6>one in four chance of a broader war in the

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.559
<v Speaker 6>Middle East that drags the US in. That's uncomfortably high,

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 6>But I've still bet against a big, sweeping war in

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 6>the Middle East.

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 5>Let's hope not admiral to.

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 4>What extent is the US policy being represented by the

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Israelis here? It seems like the relationship between Biden and

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Netanya who is not maybe as strong as we would

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 4>have hoped here. And we have US assets, men and

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 4>women in the region there So where are we in

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 4>terms of dealing with the Israelis?

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 6>You are correct, we have fifty thousand troops in and

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 6>around the Middle East, many of them at sea on

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 6>navy worships, by the way, but many asure as well.

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 6>So it's critical that we maintain the strongest relationship with Israel,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 6>which is our best partner in the region. Unfortunately, at

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 6>a personal level, it's pretty clear that Prime Minister net

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 6>Yahoo and President Biden have not good relations.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 5>And here's our hope.

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 6>The next tier down, that's General Lloyd Austin working with

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 6>his counterpart Israeli Minister of Defense Yuav Gallant. That's a

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 6>pretty good relationship. But a storm cloud to watch, no

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 6>pun intended, terrible hurricane coming, But a storm cloud to

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 6>watch is that Yuav Gallant, Minister of Defense, just canceled

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 6>the meeting in the Pentagon.

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 5>So relations are not good at the moment.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Is James Tvetus late in your book?

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Arley Burke shows up, No, folks, it's not the name

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of a boat, it's an actual person. And Arley Burke

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 2>shows up to drive the story forward. And he says

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 2>at one point, with some heat in his voice, the

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 2>difference in an officer good or bad is about ten seconds.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>There's an officer from the streets of Boston named John Kelly,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 2>who is the longest chief of staff the Marines served

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump. And he's come out. He's made real clear

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 2>he's not a fan of the operations of the former president.

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 2>If we have elected President Trump, I mean in twenty sixteen,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>this was all new, will he be able as commander

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>in chief to form a military apparatus after what we

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.679
<v Speaker 2>hear from the likes of John Kelly.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 6>First of all, John Kelly is one of my closest friends,

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 6>and I encourage everybody to listen, to read, to follow

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 6>what John Kelly has said about attempting to take President

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 6>Trump to a cemetery in the north of France, and

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 6>according to John Kelly, President Trump described those buried there

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 6>as suckers and losers. I think that is a disqualification

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 6>to be a commander in chief in terms of can

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 6>he put together coherent national security for the nation. It

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 6>depends on who he selects to bring in office alongside him.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 6>The quality people. General Jim Mattis, General John Kelly, General

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 6>h R. McMaster. They're not coming back. You don't have

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 6>to get kicked by a mule a second time to

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 6>understand whether that's a good thing to do or not.

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 6>So if there is a second Trump presidency, we'll have

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 6>to see who's willing to come in and who does

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 6>come in.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Paul and I went to the Lawrenceville in Fairport War

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>College where we figured out that Germans had two fronts,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the Eastern Front and the Western Front. Israel has two

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>three four fronts. Right now extending over to the persia

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 2>of your book. The leader's bookshelf isntnaho extended or because

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>of his small geography, can he handle those many fronts?

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 6>I think Israel is over extended. I'd say five fronts.

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 6>It's Hamas in the south, has Beala on the north. Obviously,

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 6>it is the Hoo theis to the far South. It's

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 6>also the militias in Syria. And it's Iran itself. I

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 6>can count that on the five fingers of my hand.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 6>That's too many. Israel is only a nation of ten million,

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 6>seven million Jews. That's too few to ultimately fight wars

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 6>with countries like Iran newsflash, which has a population of

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 6>ninety million. That's Iran alone. So Israel needs friends. And

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 6>let's go back to paragraph one. How important that relationship

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 6>is for Israel, end for the United States, between the

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.359
<v Speaker 6>US and Israel, DROI.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to lose a sight of Ukraine. Can

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 4>you give us your latest thinking on what's happening in

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Ukraine and how it might play out?

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 6>I can, and thank you for raising it, because they

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 6>are losing oxygen to all that is happening in the

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 6>Middle East. The situation there remains relatively static. The battle

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 6>lines are in place. Russians are moving forward very slowly

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 6>in the east. The Ukrainians have carved a small chunk

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 6>out of Russia in the north. Ultimately, I think after

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 6>the election we are probably headed for a negotiation because

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 6>the burn rate, think private equity, the burn rate on

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 6>both sides of that battle line is terrible. Pressure will

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 6>be for a negotiation regardless of who is elected in Washington.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>One final question.

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>In your book The Restless Wave, Kai is trouble? Did

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you know what Kai in Hawaii? Admiral asking for a

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 2>few Kai is nothing but trouble In your book, Admiral, did.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 3>You know someone like Kai.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 6>KaiA is a beautiful Hawaiian woman who ends up in

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 6>a love triangle? Thomas correct, between between a Navy officer

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 6>and a Marine Corps officer. So in The Restless Wave, yes,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 6>Kai is trouble, and yes I have met a few

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 6>beautiful women in Hawaii over the years.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Bottle that James Tavinis, thank you so much, greatly appreciate it.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>The Restless Wave, folks, I can't It's not going to

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 2>be my book of the year because Kai's in it.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I can't help Kai and my book of.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 2>The year Admiral James Travine is The Wrestless Wave. If

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 2>you love the winds of war, find it. It's hugely

0:10:47.200 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>free book. Joining us now in for Global Wall Street,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>It's time to lean forward. He's with pine Bridge Investments,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, managing money and that huge heritage

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>with aig. Stephen O joins this globalhead of fixed income

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>except he writes, like PhD cell Side, his notes are

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 2>absolutely exquisite And the key thing Stephen Oh in your

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 2>note is it's not time to be defensive?

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 3>How do you be offensive in fixed income?

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Well by writing that it was really looking forward to

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>the fact that despite the type valuations, the economic environment

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as defed as a global central bank easing cycle,

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>will be continued to be supportive of risk assets. So

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>what does that imply for not being defensive? It means

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that the natural bias in that environment would be defensive.

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But at a minimum, you take your exposure up to

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a beta type risk exposure and take potshots at targeted opportunities.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>What you don't want to do is go hyper defensive

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in this type of environment where yield is likely to

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>care today.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 2>So is that simply Paul Sweny buys a thirty year

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey hospital bond.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Is that what it demolves down to?

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess it depends on That's a lot of

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>security selection risk there, so I can't opine on that.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think broadly speaking terms of where is the

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>risk component fixed income, right, it's going to be in

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the credit segments, and that's where you don't want to

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be hyper defensive.

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Something we don't talk about, but I think it kind

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 4>of goes to where you're going, which is talk just

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 4>about the leverage loan market. What is that and how

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 4>do investors get exposure to that?

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, leverage loan in its simplest form is corporate debt

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that's syndicated and secured by assets of the business. In

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the simplest history, it was really loans that were issued

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>by banks. But of course banks are not really in

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the origination of debt anymore. They're in the intermediary business,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>and the loans that they used to originate, which primarily

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>back leverage buyouts, have now moved to an institutional market

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>where trays very freely. Of course, whur it's the adjacent

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>market that's talked about ad nauseum for the last you know,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>five six years is the private credit market as well.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 4>And are there opportunities there? Do you see? I mean,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 4>is that something that if you want to take up

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 4>maybe even a little more risk than above and beyond

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 4>high yield, that's the market you look at.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, well, first, I wouldn't say that it's higher risk

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>than high yield. It's really adjacency risk because those are

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>both blow investment. Great corporate credit. But what you are

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>getting right now is the credit spread over base rates

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is elevated and it's one of the few places where

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you are getting excess yield long spreads right now. For

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the index is over four hundred basis points, which is,

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, over one hundred basis points over the high

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>yield index. But you do have to adjust that for

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a like for like risk, because the way to look

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at it is oftentimes there's a tendency to look at

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>acid class to asset class, and you have to look

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>at ratings to ratings or like risk to like risk,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're still getting a premium for that component.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Talk to somebody not as sophisticated. They're in a money

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>market fund. Go on, this is good to be true.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Our money market fund yields now too good to be true.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, money markets funds by nature are very short term,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's been a great place to be, although one

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>could make the case of perhaps there was opportunity cost

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of not being in equities where you look at the

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>yield today and given the shape of the curve at

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the short end where FED funds and so far is,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>money market optically provides you a very high yield, but

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to look forward that yield is going to

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>come down. And so I think it's just a matter

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of do you utilize money market as primarily a return

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>seeking area or do you use it as a liquidity

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>while you hide out in what is acceptable returns at

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this point in time?

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Could you use it as a liquidity? All right?

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Steven John Tucker and I we've been trying to get

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Tom out of his triple leverage all cash fun I've

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 4>got the FED that's cutting rates and I'm not in

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 4>a recession.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Shouldn't Tom be taking.

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Some risk here?

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think anybody's risk appetite is a function of where

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>there are. You know, for all I know, Tom may

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be so wealthy that he should be taking a lot

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more risks.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>You want to chime in, Oh yeah, what's that tuition bill?

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 7>Now?

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you exactly continue mister oh uh.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of where do you want to be

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of risk right now, I think a balanced

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>approach is the best approach because in certain market environments,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the time you want to take risk, and I think

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know Warren Buffett said at best is when there's

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trauma out there, when there's fear in

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. There is not much fear in the marketplace

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>out there right now, so I don't think this is

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>an environment where you want to start adding more risk

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to your portfolio. Is simply a type of market environment

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>where you want to be balanced in your approach because

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing looks particularly cheap, but it's hard to see anything

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going to cause a meaningful sell off in the

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>near term.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 4>September was I think a record month for investment grade issuance.

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 4>So when Morgan, Stanley, Goldman, Sachs, all those folks were calling,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 4>bringing you guys, will you picking up the buying this

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 4>new stuff?

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, we constantly look at not only what is the

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>value coming to the marketplace, but what is the value

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in relation to what's trading in the secondary markets. Overall,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and typically there are some new issue concessions, although at

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>times that has been very anemic, and so we have

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been targeted in our approach to buying some of those

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>new issues. There have been some.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>You don't buy everything that comes across the transom.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>We're not a ten trillion dollar asset manager that has

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to be beta. We pick and choose, and we manage

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a very targeted alpha approach portfolio.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Steve Think Stephen O with Pinebridge brilliant. Note again we

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>protect the copyright of all of our guests. Look to

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>pine Bridge Investments for Steven Oh's brilliant professors showing now

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>from Brown University doing so much for the Taalban Center

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 2>for their international relations. I guess it's a close selection, Wendy,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and I guess there's a lot of tension. And I

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>remember sitting there in shock after Bush Gore going.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 3>How close is close?

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Almost like I think it was Kennedy Humphrey in nineteen

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 2>sixty I really can't remember.

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 3>With Mayor Daily Clyde Haberman the New.

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>York Times twenty four years ago, on this day, high

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 2>falutin but hardly proud of it. He was talking about

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 2>fancy Yale people that went to Brown or Yale or

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 2>whatever fancy ivy league people dominant down to get elected.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Is that what we're seeing right now is everybody going basic,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, for a couple four weeks here because they

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>have to.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'm Tom I first I want to address this

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 7>is exactly what I've been talking about Bush Gore, Bush Gore.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 8>You know, statistical polling within the margin of era.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 7>As you remember, they were absolutely statistically tied going into

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 7>that election. You know, one day one be forty eight,

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 7>Yether'll be forty five. So exactly what you're pointing out

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 7>is that, oh, this is historic. We've never seen anything

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 7>like it. Yes we have, if you're old enough. We

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 7>saw it in two thousand and that aftermath of that

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 7>election was a bit messy, we can say.

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 8>So I think we have to brace ourselves for that.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 8>So I think I don't actually think that they're dumbing down.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 7>I think that the Trump campaign, I mean he can

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 7>go off the ranch sometimes, has been disciplined in its

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 7>messaging on border security and inflation. That's I mean basically

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 7>pocketbook issues and security issues.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 8>And Kamala Harris tried to.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 7>Raise the conversation about her economic plan. It didn't take,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 7>so now she's simplifying it. I'm simply gonna make your

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 7>life economically better. That's what she's doing and leaving off

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 7>some of that.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Paul wants to jump in here.

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 2>Is that policy professor Schielder to say, I want you

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 2>to feel good or whatever, whichever candidate you know. I

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 2>don't want to pick sides, but is that what our

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 2>policies devolved down to? His feel good statements?

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, the problem is, as we've discussed before,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 7>is that the federal government is so large now, and

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 7>it is so enmeshed in every American's life, multiple dimensions

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 7>that most people don't even grasp how involved it is.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 7>So discussing a simple policy change is not simple because

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 7>any policy change will whipple through a total a set

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 7>of federal programs and affect.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 8>Lots of different people in different ways. So it's not as.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 7>Easy as it used to be to say I'm going

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 7>to do a and you're going to feel it in

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 7>six months.

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 8>It just doesn't happen in America anymore.

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.239
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Wendy, let's fast forward to maybe the evening of

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 4>November fifth, maybe the early morning hours November six, maybe

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 4>bleeding into the day of November six, Are we going

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 4>to know anything? How is this going to plag out?

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Do you think?

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 7>I think we face the situation in twenty twenty as well.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 7>I think there are going to be some states you

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 7>can expect Georgia, you can expect Arizona in particular those states,

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 7>and Pennsylvania, by the way, doesn't, to my knowledge, does

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 7>not open mail in ballots till after they count the

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 7>in person ballots.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 8>And if there are legal challenges for hand counting, not

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 8>just in Georgia and Arizona, but other places, it will

0:19:58.720 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 8>slow down considerably.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 7>Wisconsin also, So unless which we don't expect one candidate

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 7>is just going to run the table, We're probably not

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 7>going to know very much until the weekend, you know,

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 7>at the soonest, and it will be up to Secretaries

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 7>of state, attorney generals, governors to certify election results and

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 7>make sure that county level election officials certify those results

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 7>in a timely fashion.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 8>That's going to get messy pretty quickly.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Turnout. What do we expect for turnout, Wendy? Do we

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 4>expect this to be a high turnout election a low

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 4>turnout election? And does it favor one or the other?

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to crip for one of my colleagues here

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 7>at Brown who said that she expects that it will

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 7>be lower than even twenty twenty because of mail and

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 7>valliding being so predominant in twenty twenty, but that the

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 7>general level of enthusiasm is still.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 8>High on Trump core, and you know, is pretty high.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 7>Among Democrats, if you can call it enthusiasm or fear

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 7>one or the other. But it's not quite the same

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 7>as it was in twenty eighteen twenty twenty when we

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 7>saw historic mid two and presidential election turnouts. There's still

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of ambivalents and voters don't like to

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 7>regret their choice.

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 8>They don't want to regret their vote.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 7>So if they're still on certain election day, they made

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 7>our role to stay home.

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to show.

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know, with the electoral quality of Rhode Island,

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the Vice President Harris should have been sipping in there

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 2>against Lager Beer the other night, but instead she went

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 2>with the champagne of Wisconsin Beer's Miller High Life.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what is the symbolism of sipping a beer on TV?

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 3>What does that get you politically?

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, Bill Clinton, Win's McDonald's you know, Barack Obama had

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 7>to find some food that was bad for him. They

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 7>was willing to eat on camera because we knew he

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 7>didn't do it otherwise. You know, this is part of

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 7>I can identify with you.

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 8>I'll drink a beer too. I think it's a stretch.

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 7>I don't think that's the image necessarily that's going to

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 7>be a Kamala Harris elected. But I think each candidate

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 7>and each campaign right now is really like, what do

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 7>we do to get this momentum?

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, addressing your advice in the time we've got left,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you get thirty seconds. Trump, what's the Shiller to do

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 2>for Trump? What's the Shiller to do for Harris?

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 8>Trump? I'll make the United States safer. I'll make you safer.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 8>I'll make the world safer.

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 7>Calmin Harris, I'm gonna make your economic life better and

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 7>to protect your working rights, your minimum wage, your health care,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 7>the fundamental things you need to live a good life.

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 7>The Democrats always protect, the Republicans always try to destroy.

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Can you imagine in her class, I'm pulling a C

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 2>minus and she's looking at me with eight in her eyes.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Professor Schiller thinking so much from Brown University. There that's

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 3>what I love. Just short speaking, it is a pedigree

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>of extinction.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 2>He was at Oxford and Nuncia, and I did some

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>amazing work at Morgan Stanley. I'll get to in a

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 2>moment readable essays on the chaos of continental banking, and

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 2>then went on to work with the British government and

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 2>of course service to the Bank of England as well

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 2>with Oliver Wyman in her studios. This morning, their vice

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 2>chair Hugh von Steinis joins us. Hugh Paul's going to

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 2>get to the private credit essay.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Where we are.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 2>We had Jim Zelter in from a Polo Global Management

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>to other day. I got to go back to your

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 2>wheelhouse where it was like we'd read these fifteen page

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>reports and god damn, I got to read this whole thing.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Is it finally with Unit Credit in her Maadi and

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>Commerce Bank that were finally well you were writing about

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty years ago.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 9>Well thanks for having me on. Look my goodness. I

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 9>wish Andrea the best of luck on this because I

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 9>think it. I think we need cris culture.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Still, but culture still matters.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 9>Culture still matters. But let's be clear. Luftians took over

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 9>the Italian Airline, Why can't it happen in reverse. And

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 9>also UniCredit owns a German bank already, so actually it's

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 9>it really is an in market German deal. There's two

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 9>German banks going to merge, we potentially merged with each other,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 9>so I think it. Look I was an investor conference

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 9>two weeks ago. I'd say my read is the the

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 9>market thinks there's like a seventy to ninety percent chance

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 9>it will happen, but they might need to get one

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 9>or two.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 3>What's the government thing?

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>David Harrow of Chicago went down in flames, and this

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 2>finally they're going to get their act together and the

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 2>continental Europe is going to act more like American and

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Anglo Saxon.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Banking and Bologne. Do you see a change in the

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>German government or in the Italian government?

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 9>It's it's slow. Look so look we are seeing so actually,

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 9>but below the radar, we are actually seeing some bank

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 9>m and a. There's actually three live bank deals in

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 9>the UK at the moment, so you know they're small,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 9>but they're happening. Spain's got one on the boil to

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 9>as well, so there's bits and pieces happening. But let's

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 9>be honest, it's not us style, and we haven't like

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 9>as Jim's Elton would say, we don't have the capital

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 9>markets either with the breadth and depth that we need.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 4>But you certainly, but you certainly can have that. I mean,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean right before the Great Financial Crisis time, the

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 4>argument was is London more important than New York? And

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 4>that was a valid argument to behave totally, and then

0:24:58.720 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 4>Bruxit happen.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 3>You get strewed. But is the horse.

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Out of the barn for European banking. They will never

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 4>catch up the Bank of America at the JP Morgan.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 9>So it's interesting at the moment if you look at

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 9>the top twenty market caps of banks globally, there's only

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 9>two Europeans. Yeah, on HSBC, HSBC which is effectively Asian,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 9>so it's not even European. So it's only one and

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 9>that's UBS and that's number twenty and so absolutely, and

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 9>so I think UBS, I think, with my old boss

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 9>column and Sergio, actually do have a chance to be

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 9>in the Global super League. Everyone else is in a

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 9>kind of a European League or even a division below.

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 9>And I think that's the challenge.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think the European Union and the UK, don't

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 4>they recognize that as a structural flaw that's going to

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 4>hinder that part of the world for generations.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, absolutely so. You know someone you know, well, Mario

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 9>Dragy just put out a report. Now it was probably

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 9>a little bit to more than fifteen pages, Tom, I

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 9>mean he had one hundred and fifty rex. I mean

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 9>even one too, but you rolled it for no, no, no,

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 9>not this time. But actually his finance piece rade a

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 9>lot of sense, which is, we need securitization markets to open,

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 9>we need deeper capital markets, and we need some of

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 9>the larger banks to merge because scale matters in banking.

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 9>You see that here you're talking about JP Morgan on

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 9>Friday with Jeremy's earnings. You know, scale really matters, and

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 9>we have too few banks with that scale.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 4>All right, Your latest work is a topic that Tom

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 4>and I talk about a lot, is we're fascinated by

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 4>the growth of this private credit. Early in my career

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 4>I was the Chasement Hannen Bank. We were making leverage

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 4>loans like crazy, making money hand over fist. I would

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 4>never give up that business to private credit. But that's

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 4>what happened, hasn't it.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 9>No, Look, it's really fascinating how much banking has changed,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 9>and I think it's because you know, the rules, whether

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 9>they're federals or basil rules are encouraging banks to limit

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 9>the amount of risky loans they can take. Either they're

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 9>hard capped or soft capped, or it's just the amount

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 9>of capital. So the way I think we talked about

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 9>this last time, the way I think about it is

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 9>that banking is being retranched. The riskiest pieces are being

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 9>laid off to private credit or to others, and the

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 9>banks are left with slightly the lower risk pieces. Now,

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 9>from point of view of banking stability, that's not the

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 9>end of the world. It means they're less profitable. They

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 9>need more scale. And actually, one interesting thing which I

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 9>don't think has come out clear is you know there

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 9>are banks who play to win and the banks who

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 9>play not to lose. The largest five or six banks say, actually,

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 9>if I've got private credit, I can write even more

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 9>loans and lay more off. But that's not how most

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 9>people think.

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 4>So we are seeing deals with banks and private credit

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 4>top what is going on there.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 9>Explain that how those yes look Just to let's be clear,

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 9>this is a real thing, and we see the City

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 9>Group was the most of the biggest city. But we've

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 9>seen fourteen tie ups in the last twelve months versus

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 9>only two in the year before, so it is a

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 9>real thing. Barclays a Blackstone is another big one. Now

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 9>what's happening is, you know, the big private credit firms

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 9>need to originate assets because they know what They're hungry

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 9>for more assets and they can't originate them all themselves,

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 9>so they're working with the banks any more deals. There's

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 9>there's plenty more in the book in the works.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but the simplistic thing from me mortals listening and

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 2>good morning worldwide, particularly in you'ven't seen as United Kingdom.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 2>The heart of the matter is good people like Jim Zeltner,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Mark Rowan and others are trotting out this is painless

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 2>even though we have ill liquidity.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 3>There's no big deal. You know the drill.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you buy it or do you have a skepticism

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 2>that we see out there from others.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 9>So look, I know, I think for the leading firms

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 9>who so let's be clearing credit and Paul knows not this.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 9>You can make a good deal or a bad deal, and

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 9>you can lose all your money or take a big

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 9>haircut so you need to be very thoughtful when you're

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 9>letting out your sheet. There are smart people and Tom,

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 9>as we both know, there's some less smart people. So

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 9>within the private credit, of course there'll be some deals

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 9>which go bad. But in this kind of thing, insurance companies,

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 9>which are about half the assets funding private credit, need yield.

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 9>And so I think the really interesting sub theme here

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 9>is that as private credit gets more insurance assets, they

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 9>lower their cost of capital and they become more relevant

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 9>for investment grade assets in the in the marketplace. And

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 9>I think that's the trend, which you know Paulo does brilliantly.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 9>Blackstone's doing very well, and I think that is a thing.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 9>And obviously if it's an investment grade, well that is

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 9>less risky, isn't it, Tom. So you know, don't get

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 9>me wrong, I'm sure there'll be there'll be a fringe

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 9>of bad practices, but I think on the whole, actually

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 9>this is more investment grade than not.

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever worked with pure pot Later and into

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the TV show industry, I.

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Mean here sounds right out of industry. Now are you

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 3>watching industry? How real is it?

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 9>I'm not I should I'm a failure on that. I haven't.

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 9>You're not watching billions I love, but I haven't watch

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 9>the industry.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 2>The industry is like I'm looking at it with missus Kin, going,

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>my god, that guy talks just like you. Actually pretty good,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:47.479
<v Speaker 3>Too rare to see him.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 2>He's in studio today, of course, from the United Kingdom,

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 2>working with Dantean Obamad Oliver Wyman. His own important comments there,

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm private credible.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 3>This is a.

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and international relations. You can also watch the show live

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube.

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Visit the Bloomberg.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 2>from seven to ten am Eastern from our global headquarters

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app.