WEBVTT - Beating the Book: The 87th Masters Betting Preview

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Check it in Man Now Down Man, Tuesday morning, April fourth,

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. It is the Beating the Book podcast,

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the eighty seventh Masters, Golf's first major tradition unlike any

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>other first major of the year that is not of

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>all time. It's Gil Alexander, thanks for joining us today

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show to preview the Masters from a betting perspective.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Two of the three members of the long Shots podcast, which,

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're not familiar, is Veson's golf dedicated podcast, which

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is co hosted by Matt Brown, Wes Reynolds, and Kelly Bidlin.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt too much of a diva to show up for

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this one, because you guys have a live Masters long

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Shots performance coming up at about an hour after this show.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But Kelly and Wests are here. Thank you, gentlemen for

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>being here. I appreciate it. Thank you for having Mattelie

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>shows up for the big stuff. Gil. Okay, come apparently,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>so back your expectations. Good bye. So now, so when

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>people by the time people listen to this, and we'll

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>probably have already happened. But on the off chance that

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>people listen just before it happens, you guys are doing

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a live long Shots at eleven am Pacific two pm

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Eastern today. Yes, but it will also be in the

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>normal long Shots podcast feed. So everybody listens to us weekly,

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>go go find podcasts wherever podcasts can be found, head

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Visa dot com. You'll find a whole right up. We've

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>got the Master's Guide out that we all took a

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>part in as well as Matt Humans, so definitely go

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>check that all out and this will be yes in

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>our normal long Shots podcast feed. We've gotten a few

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>questions about that on Twitter and for people who are

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to this, be like, wait a minute, but if

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening to this, why do I have to go

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to long Shots pod. Well, you'll get to hear

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>all of Matt's picks as well, and you guys probably

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>are holding something back for that show as well. Yeah,

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say that, And uh, West, I don't know

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>about you, but I kind of expect these shows to

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>be led differently from what with Gill versus Matt Browns.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be okay, Gills will be slightly more jewish er.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So what he means, I think it's we don't. We

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.559
<v Speaker 1>don't really like your Cohn coming down to Augusta Guil.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I know you want to join us for the Masters, Okay,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's begin with And we've talked about this already

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a myriad of times on a numbers game. I'm sure

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you've talked about it West on different shows as well.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's just start with the weather, because that's an

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>issue here. First of all, the Master's pool of players

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>is always like a ninety player pool kind of thing,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a lot of like sort of dead

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>money players of one masters, you know, in the during

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Eisenhower administration, Larry Mises of the world, Jose Mariela Thaboles. Yes,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's what makes this tournament so awesome because it's

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a small pool of players, smallish compared to others, and

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the most predictive of all golf courses, Augusta is

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from year to year. So you start with that as

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a baseline. But we are throwing in the weather here.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's eighty percent as we look at the weather forecast,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>and you know weather forecasts go and West will start

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>with you. So it's eighty percent chance on Friday, one

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent chance on Saturday, sixty cent chance on Sunday.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>We're doing this Tuesday morning. Do you let that affect

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>your handicapping? Yes and no. I think I think, look,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to with the draw bias. You know, you

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>could try to handicap that as much as you can,

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes you're just at the mercy of the weather

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>guides here. But just when I'm looking at Okay, how

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is the weather going to affect play? I think where

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.399
<v Speaker 1>it affects play is the fact that, look, you have

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>elevated tea boxes on most of these holes, so that's

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>going to add to the impact of the wind. I'm

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>worried more about the wind than I am about the

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>rain necessarily here over the past ten days, I believe

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the event, as we record on Tuesday,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>about a little over two inches of rainfall is what

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen on this course, and we're probably going to

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>get that over the weekend at some point or one

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or the other. So what I think it's going to

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>do is how is it's going to affect the course.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's going to affect the course. It's going to soften

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 1>up the fairways, so that makes the course actually play

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>even longer because this is seventy five five, so this

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is not a short course. By any stretching, it actually

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>plays a little bit longer because it's more hilly. That's

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>why you know when Tiger came backing right, Yes, a

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>part of that, and plus the fact Tiger coming from

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the injury, that's why it was so such a struggle

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for him to see him get around because this is

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a big course. This is not like a flat course

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like in the desert where even if it's seventy five

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy six hundred yards, where it's easy to walk

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and easy to manage. Plus getting the cooler temperatures here

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on the weekend, the ball's not going to travel as far.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is why, at least from what I did,

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>you want a little bit more bombing off the tea

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and whether you're using those for outright bets or maybe

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>top ten, top twenty placement market bets. I think distance

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>is really going to matter this year with this weather forecast. Yeah,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>completely agree. They're often tee always important at the Masters.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe a little bit more this week. We

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>heard a couple of the guests mentioned that on the

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers game as well. I do think the one thing

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind with the Masters is I have

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that I just looked up the subair system where they

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have this like a filled air filtration system to get

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the water out of the out of the greens and

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>even the fairways. They're one of the few places in

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the world lest I think that actually has that running

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in the fairways and not just the greens. So you've

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>heard some different reports over the past couple of days

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of the rain being bad, but they expect them to

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>dry out pretty well here over the next couple of days,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have to see. I think my advice always

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with weather betting is okay if you're betting first round

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>leaders like I do, basically every tournament is absolutely something

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that you need to keep in the front of your mind,

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and you should be putting those first round leader bets

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in basically up until the last minute that you can

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and when you really have the best feel for what

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the weather is going to be, like well your guy

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is playing beyond that, I think you can. Often golf

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>betters often get themselves in trouble by trying to predict stuff.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was trying to get because we've seen

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it before, Gill. Sometimes sometimes the weather changes, sometimes a

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of times it changes. You've noticed that right, especially

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>get to the open right, that's where you get like

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the pronounced draw bias at the Open Championship, and sometimes

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you're just at the mercy of it. You're just on

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the bad side of the draw and none of your

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>gays contend. The biggest thing, though, is I think if

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the weather is people don't think about this one enough.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>If it gets really bad, and you brought this up earlier,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I think one hundred percent right what we're looking on

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Saturday. If it gets really bad, sometimes you just

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get reined out for the rest of the day and

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>they pick up their balls and start again the next day.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you have this whole strategy in mind of

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>which you know which wave I'm gonna play and how

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna work out, then all might be shot

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to pieces by the time they blow that horn and

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>then they're done for the rounds. True. So when Drew Dinsick,

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Dan Weston and I do our tennis slam pods, and

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>we also do any in welles, we're always trying to

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>time it right after the draw. Sometimes we even get

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>lucky at it's happening while we're on You guys were

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see where the tea Times were we're Tuesday,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>We're forty eight hours before this thing starts, and you

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>guys were like, where are the tea times and West

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they just came out just now. They did just come out. So,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you always get like different types of players

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you mentioned that you have former champions here,

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a few amateurs here from all over the world,

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and you have guys that you know, now with the

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>live thing, you have live players mixed in with different

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>type of players. So it's always interested to look at

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>those storylines who's paired with who? But just looking at this,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of on the once over, nothing really

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like strikes me. You know, like I didn't really see

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>any you know, two guys that hate each other or

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Like I didn't see Rory wasn't paired

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>with Phil Mickelson. They didn't play or anything like that. Yeah,

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't put Patrick Red with Rory or one of

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>like the PGA Tour loyalists here. So yeah, so yeah,

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you're getting these these tea times. You know, early on,

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously the three honorary starters player Nicholas and Watson hit

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the first shot and then I believe eight Eastern is

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the first tea time goes all the way to two Eastern,

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>which the last group I believe is Jordan Spief, Tommy Fleetwood,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Tony Fee now for the Thursday group and then inverted

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously on Friday. All right, let's so yeah, go ahead. Well,

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I was very I was looking for these as quickly

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>as humanly possible for a very very specific strategy of Hell,

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing this tournament. Um, now, I could save that

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for when we go over bets or if you want

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>me to launch until it right, let's hear that now

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, Gil, it's a guy that you're on in

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this tournament and you love him. Scotty cheff Yes, everything

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that I all of my research and West we're gonna

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be hitting on this a bunch, but running the models

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and everything. Scheffler is so by far my number one

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>rated guy in this field and not even really that close.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Um defending champion and usually that doesn't happen back to

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>usually does not happen. But we saw what he did

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. I think he's in the best form of

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>those big three right now. Between Rory and Ram. I

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see one thing. Is he going to be

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier is he going to be late, because if he's

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>an early tea time, I might have to fire before

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this tournament begins, and I don't really want to fire

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>at seven No. One, but if I can wait now,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna approach this from a live standpoint, because as

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>West told me, he is what one of the later ones,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>he is the third D last group, third D last groups.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So what you can do now? And we even have

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a book that offers us in Vegas or two books,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>but if you're outside of Vegas, you're Colorado, Jersey, whatever, DraftKings,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>MGM fan to all these all these books will keep

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>up outright markets throughout the round. So all I'm looking

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>forward to someone to go out early and post a

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>low number. Go low, and Scheffler's odds should get longer

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>before he even teas off. So that is what I'm

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>hoping to do is actually grab a piece of Scott

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and Scheffler before he teas off. The same applies, by

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, to Rory McElroy. You mentioned Cherry up third

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to last group, Scheffler, Holmes the amateur, Sam Bennett, the

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>US Amateur champion, second to last group, Tom Kim, Rory

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>McElroy and Sam Burns, so two of the top three

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>along with John rom that you're seeing anywhere seven to one,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>eight to one, nine to one. Like Kelly said, you

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>can wait and then you get that double digits because

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like I'm more partial Rory McElroy, I don't want to

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>bet him necessarily at seven to one. I want to

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>wait a little bit that I like that strategy. Who

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>are the two books? I'm gonna guess one of them Caesar's.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Who is the other book in Vegas that leaves them up? Boyd? Okay,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>boy boyd? And in Caesar's that was the only one.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of unsure because I've seen them do it.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah most of the time. I think they're doing it

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time now. But well, because I could do

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there's there's like pillars of offshore, right, bookmaker, let's just

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>say who it is. Bookmaker will not they do it

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a little more for the majors, but like on a Thursday,

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not leaving those things up during the round. I

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>don't believe it's interesting draft Kings will leave them up

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire course they will. Yeah, that's it's It's not

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like we'd be allowed to bet there anyway, right, exactly,

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but that for everybody listening right that might be outside

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the vata. These are those things though that it's

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>how do you I don't want to say manipulate the markets, right,

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>but it's looking for different way. How do you manipulate

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that number where you don't West doesn't want to bet

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>seven to one or a or you have to think

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>about these ways if you want to attract more value

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>out of those golfers. All right, let's let's start with

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your outrights and then all sort of cherry pick golfers

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is gonna want to ask you about specifically. But West,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>let's start with your with your outrights that you have

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in pocket currently. Yeah, and look with the masters. I

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>usually because these are up so much longer, Gil, because

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>these are up you know come the winter time, right,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna probably have more outrights than you would usually

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have on like an average tournament or like US Open

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or PGA, and you're gonna have them a different number.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's gonna be a segment of the audience that's

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, yeah, so I'll get like my antipost

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what they call it overseas out of the way a

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>couple I bet we'll tell us if you'd still bet

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>them at current numbers as well. Camera and Young. Yes,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in the thirty range where I'm seeing him. I got

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>him at forty five to one. I bet him during

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the dull match play and look he went to the

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>final loss to Sam Burns. Obviously, Cameron Young, I would

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>still bet Jason Day, which I have at forty I

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>probably would not bet I'm I got very lukewarm. This

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was before Jason Day had that little bout with vertigo

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>or had the dizzy spell that he oftentimes has, and

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I had bet him before that, and he was three

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>up against Scottie Scheffler in the match play, and then

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that's when it happened. I was like, oh, no, here

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we go again. Because Jason Day, the poor guy. I'm

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of his, but he's made a glass,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.599
<v Speaker 1>he's always injured, he's always sick. So no, I'm not

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>going to bet him in the twentiesh range this week.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, okay, but Cam Young is one of yours

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>that Cameron Young, I would still be willing to sponsor

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in the low to mid thirties. Okay, those are all

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that you have. That's what I had free A couple

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, but the ones I added this week.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I did go with Jordan Spief, which I found a

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>little over twenty in the market here in town. He's

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>had a couple chances to win already this year. He

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was fourth at bay Hill. You know that that very

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>condensed leaderboard where they're about eight guys in. Kurt Kiddiama

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was the first guy to make a pot on seventeen

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and one. Jordan Spief could have easily won that. He

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>probably should have won in Tampa before he hit a

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>ball in the water on sixteen. You could argue he

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>should have three green jackets here instead of just the

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one in twenty fifteen. He definitely should have that second one. Yeah, sure,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But with Danny Willett, Yeah absolutely, Danny Willet was able

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to steal it from him in the end, but possession

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>nine tenths of the law of course, second in strokes

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>getting around the green over the last thirty six rounds.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>What's that it is, Danny Willett. Danny Willet's not saying no,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>don't invite me Champions dinner, so I'll hold it at

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>my house. Yes, twenty one to one. For speed, he's

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>second and strokes getting around the green, which I think

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be important this week, considering only about

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a sixty percent rate in terms of greens of regulation.

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>These are hard greens to hit. And the guy who's

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>been the best in strokes getting around the green, Justin

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Thomas and Kelly and I have had this conversation a lot, Gil,

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>especially with the top ten to fifteen players in the world,

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you can have target numbers on these guys when they

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>drift to a certain number. Justin Thomas's number for me

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is anything north of twenty five to one. It's like

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>an autopl man point ye, yeah, absolutely, And look he

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, has never really been right in the hunt here.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>He's got a couple of really good finishes. The approach

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>plays dipped a little bit, but he's been great around

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the green this year. He also has Bones McKay, Jim

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Bones McKay on the bag who won this thing three

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>times of course with Bill Mickelson. So Justin Thomas, once

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he got up to above twenty five, he was an

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>AutoPlay for me. Tony Fee now who I have just

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less than thirty to one, Top five,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>all four majors, top ten in actually ten, top tens

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty six that he's played. The difference with

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Fee now now and Matt Brown, Kelly and I talk

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>about this on long shots all the time is win equity.

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Who wins? You know, who gets you some wins? And

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I know Kelly has played a lot of Sam Burns

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of Max Homa because they have win equity.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Will so does Tony Fee. Now he's won three times

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>since the Open Championship last summer. This is a new thing.

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>We can say, yeah, because remember he didn't win for

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like five years after he won that Puerto Rico opened.

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So Tony Fee now twenty nine. Colin Marikawa, who I

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>got at thirty four to one at Cercin. He's still

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>drifting upwards so apparently not drawing a lot of interest.

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>He has friendless in the market as our friend Dan Weston. Yes,

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>yes he is, but I'll be his pal. He has

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not won in eighteen months anywhere. He won in Dubai

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for the DP World Tour Championship at the end of

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. But one of the world's best iron players.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Second on approach, fourth on ball striking, fourth tee to

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>green last thirty six rounds. So Colin Maracawa for me,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Sun jay N that was one that I had just

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bet on a drift. I got him at forty four

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to one. Hasn't really done anything wrong this season, but

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't contended except at Tory Pines, where he was

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth earlier this year ye but second on debut here

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, was eighth last year. So, like you say,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>predictive course, go with guys that play well here every year,

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and soon Jam pretty much does. Another guy that does

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a Sideki Matsiyama, who I wasn't gonna bet, but I

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>saw him at fifty to one. I'm like, man, this

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>could feel like a Matza Yama week, who is probably

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>putting the best he's putted his entire career, and seven

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of his eight PGA Tour wins are on ben grass,

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so I think he's gonna like these greens and won

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this tournament with one of the more iconic moments ever

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>with a nod from the caddy. Oh yes, one of

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorite moments of sports in sports. Yeah, look, and

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I know he's been battling a little bit of a

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>neck injury, but it looks like he's good to go.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But Mazzi Yama is almost It's almost like Tom Brady

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with Bill Belichick. Like Tom Brady was always listed on

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the injury report, but you knew he was gonna play.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the deal with Matsiyama. I didn't go

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if many bombs because the average price of the winner

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten years is like twenty seven to one,

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so you can't go that deep, even though I played

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>one deeper. Guy Men Woolee ninety five to one. Men

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>woo Lee, he finished T fourteen last year, actually shot

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty on the front nine and then forty on the back,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so he missed out getting a return invite by one shot,

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>but he gets back in being in the top fifty

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So Men Wu ninety five to one

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>at Circus Sports. If you're here in Vain, let me

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>just before we get to Kelly's, and then I'll ask

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you about specific golfers. A couple of the names you mentioned.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Tony Fenew point out Joe pet who has been on

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this Master's Preview many years but was not really diving

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>into golf these days. He did write the The Real

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bible on Analytics at Augusta, which is not which

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is not public domain information. It's proprietary. He had to

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do the digging on this and Tony Fenew in that

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen Tour guide was the guy who came out

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>with the best metrics on this course. So that's a

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>nod for your Tony Feedelle pick. And the other one

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is Kelly and I talked about that this morning on

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a Numbers game. Dave Tindall who's been on this Master's

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Preview before at Dave tindal Golf on Twitter, who writes

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>for Betfair. He does his like we do our college

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>basketball formula West he does his Master's formula where he

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>goes through the age of the golfer the world, ranking

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>their appearances and their placements at Augusta before how what

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>their recent form is, their lowest Augusta around. You know,

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Strokes gained around the Green on and on with his

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>different categories. And Jordan Spieth was the guy that came

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>up as the main guy just nipping Rory. So shout

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>out to your Jordan Spieth call as well, Kelly, what

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>do you got? Yeah, I'll start, I'll start right right

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>where WestEd with Justin Thomas. This was a it's not

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a smaller, it's not a bigger bet for me this week,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is a little bit of a smaller for

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>an outright, but West, I can't say much more perfectly

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>than West. Twenty five to one is about my breaking

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>point where I was. I was kind of tracking them

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all week. Do I have him way to blow a

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>few other guys? Yeah, but he drifted to twenty six

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to one here at Circle in Town. I finally pulled

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the trigger last night. It's a bet I had to make.

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he summed it up all pretty well. West,

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>not not exactly so many times he could have. It

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>felt like he could have finished better here at the Masters.

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>But he's still if you just look at it long term,

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>still one of the best, most consistent players at this

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>course when we talk course history for all these guys,

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>he was top thirteen all the models I ran. Not really,

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, West, not really nice spiking anywhere

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>consistently with some of the stats that we often look at.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But we've seen JT do this before. He gets hot

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this week with those irons or with the putter, because

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>even his iron plays been a little bit down, he

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>gets hot with one of those. I think he's right

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>up there. In contentions of twenty six to one is

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.239
<v Speaker 1>where I guess I started from the short end. I'm

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>going short along here. Maxhoma, thirty six to one. Maxhoma,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you and I were texting yesterday West if he wins

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>or Gail will You and I were texting yesterday about it.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>If he wins, you might be gone for a while.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I might be gone for a while. Sean McColl might

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be doing a numbers game for a couple of weeks.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>And this mainly just because his number keeps drifting. I

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>understand that this is a guy who has not had

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton of success at Augusta National three years. He's

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>had two missed cuts. It was a t forty eight,

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe is what he finished yet forty eight last year.

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing you have to keep in mind

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about Maxhoma is that he's thirty two thirty three years old,

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>has been playing on the tour for a while now.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>But he is not the same golfer that he was

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. This guy's game has completely changed. He

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is elevated into an upper class of players on tour,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and it as much as course in tournament history mean here,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not throwing it out the window. I'm not saying that,

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying this kind of number in a condensed

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>field on what I consider one of the better golfers

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Is it's my favorite outright bet that's

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>out there that's available. I think even we got thirty

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>six to one here in Town of the Circa, I've

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>seen thirties though East Coast. I think anything in the thirties,

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's silly on a guy with this level

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of talent. Uh here he was, Um, you know he's one.

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about win equity, the same thing between the

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Tony Fenel, the bast year and a half. The guy's

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>won four times on tour. He's way he has more

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>wins than he does second and third place finishes combined.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>And if you've followed my golf betting at all, you

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>know how many second place finishes I have. So throw

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>those out the window. Let me get a winner. Actually,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's the guy looking at He was third in

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>my last twelve bottle third, third in the field and

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>approach first first and h strokes game par fours can

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>be very important this week. Um. So that is the

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>two guys that I have bet where numbers are basically

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>similar to what I grabbed Okay then as West and

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>home Maxihoma and justin Tim just As West will lay

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it out. This is Matt Masters betting. I think it's

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>very important if you're a golf better like we are,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to scoop up numbers along the way, as you see him.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So I do have other bets at longer numbers you're

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to get now, Corey Connor's eighty five,

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I have. I have the two guys that won last

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>week West, I have Brooks Keptka and Corey Connors. Somehow

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Corey Connors eighty five to one and Brooks Kepka ninety

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>nine to one made them forever. Yeah, Like, if you're

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>betting Brooks right now at thirty three or thirty five

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to one, you're not. You're late to the part. Can't

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>do that. You're You're late right now. So if you

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>scooped it early, good on you. Brooks Kepta now the

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>first man to win two live events. Obviously a short

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>sample size, but yeah, I think you're too late. Don't

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>don't be late to the party in early for the funeral,

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>as our buddy Will Hill likes to say, and I

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>would say the same thing about Connors and then I

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and then the other one that I have is I mean,

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I love that I have this one is Jason Day

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and eighty five to one because I really grab that

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>as he was kind of moving upward. But I'm with you,

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I would not bet him were his numbers at right now,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>with what we saw with the vertigo stuff him in

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>those low twenties. It concerns me he could he could

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>easily go out and win this thing, or he could

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>be a w D after six holes of golf. I

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what Jason Day is gonna look like

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>out here this week, So I'm just riding with that

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>one out right with the only two that I have

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Scottie Chefler, I did take a pre flop number, not

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the best number, plus eight forty five, But I said

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a year ago on a numbers game, I feel like

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>he's the one guy you should have every golf tournament

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in some form, and maybe your strategy of getting him

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in tournament is better, but I won't remember. So I

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have him here, and then the other one is home

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at thirty five fifty but plus thirty five and a

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>half to one. So because I think, just like you

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>when you look around golf Golf's landscape. If it's not Scottie,

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Scheffler or John ram As the guys you can always

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>count on Rory as well. Max Holme was on that shortlist.

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Right He's been unbelievable. He's in that next He's in

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that next crowded and we had a couple of guests

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>on numbers game dropping today on Tuesday. Drop drop another

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>name that I kind of cringed when I hear when

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I heard it, because he just missed out on my

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>outray card and I was kind of trying to decide

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>between adding him or trying to do something with Scheffler,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which I'm now going to go down the Scheffler road

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>because I do think when you're betting guys at seven

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>to one, you can only bet so many outrights, so

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Patrick can't lay. I have rated very high this week,

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>but he falls in the same kind of arguments as

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of Max Homa. He's not a guy that's necessarily come

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>to Augusta and performed amazing year after year. Yes, he

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>has some good finishes here here, but he's also had

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>some bad finishes as far his recent form. Right now,

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>he's he is right right blow Scottie Scheffler. He is

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>one of my highest rated guys in this field, so

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I didn't bet an outright on him. And I know

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to other bets, but I have a

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>massive top twenty betal Okay, but I'm glad you said

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that about like you can't bet everybody for those who

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>are new to golf betting. And Matt Brown even says,

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>this is the host of your of your podcast long Shots,

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>he went through a spell back in the day betting

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>golf where he lost a lot of them, like he

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>did the inventory on his golf bets. He's like, oh,

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting murdered because I have too many outrights. So

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you're right, like, you can't bet everybody. You gotta pick

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and choose on this, so you can't like if you

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>have HOMA and can't lay on everybody else, you're probably

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you probably got to edit that. On the other hand, right,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>like you eyes already talking about because this is my

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite question to ask of golf shows. There's a guy

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'll ask it of you right now as you

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are talking about Justin Thomas. In my head, all

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking is, man, these two are right. If Justin

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Thomas wins this, I'm going to hate myself because he's

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the one guy that I consider betting in addition to

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the two that I already have, and I haven't pulled

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the trigger on it yet, so less I want to

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>ask you the question which I love asking, which is

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the guy that, if he wins this tournament

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>will create the most self loathing in you, Like you

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.479
<v Speaker 1>just don't have bets. You're not going, as far as

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you can tell right now, you're not going to have

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>bets on him. Maybe Zander Shole exactly what the answer

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 1>we got this morning from Sia, who I have bet

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, many many times, and I'm a big fan

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>of his, and he's got he's got a lot of

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like backdoor top ten's. He's been at least in the

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>mix a couple times to win a major, and that's

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one thing like Patrick Cantley, who is eventually going to

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>win multiple majors, hasn't done. Max Homer, I think could

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>be fair to point out with him, he's never really

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been right there. The win equity thing, Yes, it's that,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's also the fact of just having experience at

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>major's having a little bit of pain because I think

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's very rare that a guy like wins,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, your first time out in a major, like

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Marikawa did at Harding Park a couple

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of years ago for the PGA. He's just destroyed. Everybody

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was waiting for him to collapse, and he never did. Usually,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got to have a little bit of pain,

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you got to come close and then fail before you

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>can end up winning. So Xanderschofle won for me because

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>it's been like, I bet this guy so many times

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and majors and he's got top fives and top tens

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>out the wazoo, but he's never won. So I think

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the one that scares him. That's a pretty common

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 1>answer that question, I would imagine I'll ask you Kelly too,

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>But the Morikawa thing sticks out too, because why is

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it like one of my biggest memories of that is

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just what you're talking about. After the tournament, he's like,

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I've played Harding Park a million times and it's just

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>like any random parking lot. Right in He's out there

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>with his girlfriend sitting on the back of his car

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>after he just won a Harding Park like it was

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>anothering Like how did you not get nervous about any

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of this. Ye, who's your guy for that question? Yeah,

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm loving that everybody's bringing up Xander because, Okay, well,

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that if everything that

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I just said about Patrick can't lay and if I

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>end up going down the Scottie Scheffler route and not

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>betting him, yes, it might answer then has to be

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>can't lay if he wins and I don't have an

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>outright bet on him. Now again, I have bet him

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in other ways, but missing out on that outright would suck.

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm right there with the rest of these guys

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>that the other answer would be Xander. Softly, because you

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>have sat here week after week is I've gone through

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>my golf bets and Xander has made my card almost

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>every week for the past few months. I finally, finally,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, he got away from him the past week

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 1>or two when his plays kind of been on the downside.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm pretty I stick to my model as

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount. His last twelve last twelve round model

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I ran, he is fiftieth in it five zero eight.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>He is usually like top ten in everything that I run.

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So it just speaks to a little bit of so

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was nineteenth of players, thirty ninth at

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the API, thirty third at the Genesis US losing strokes off.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>The team has past two events. That concerns me at

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Master's where that's a place you need to be gaining.

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>He's not the longest driver of the ball. That always

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>helps here, but still he's got his game is so good, Yeah,

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that it would not surprise me if he went out

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in one. And I'm not going to have a bet

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on him, and in nothing that anybody says will change

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>my mind on him. And I'm glad you mentioned that

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>too because of modeling, and I think we'll get into

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this more on long shots with Matt Brown. This was

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a tough event to model, yep, simply because you have

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteen live players. Yeah, and you don't have a ton

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of data. I know our friend Rick Gaiman at Rick

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>run Good has some live data, but it's more of

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an estimate. It's not something that live actually puts out.

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So that was the big other MAC question we asked

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on a Numbers game this week, which is what do

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you do about the live golfers without that kind of data,

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you just mentioned, brooks Chepicast just won an event

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's his second live win, but he just wanted he's

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>had great obviously great success here. That's an understatement here

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at Augusta. Do you read into that or do you

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like, I got my number, that's great.

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But anybody who's taken into this number now like it's

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>too dicey for you to do that. There's not enough

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to go on. I approach the live guys basically. I

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think I have an outright on any of them,

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but I approach or I am going to approach them

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>more in like the placement markets, and I've did a

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of prop markets too, because you get a lot

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of props this week of course nationality prop low Amateur,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>low left hand or low debutante. And I did play

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>one live player this week. I played Meto Pereira for

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>low debutante and low South American, which means he basically

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>has to beat his bellow Chile and Joauque Nieman because

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the third guy is an amateur. So that's what I played.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Because I looked at Mito Perera, I was like, hey,

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this guy's guy, you know, a six and a fifth

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and his two of his last three live events. So

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at least he's up there. Because that's the thing about

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>live what we've seen so far, you don't get that

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>consistency with a lot of guys. Every once in a while,

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>DJ is going to show up and be right there,

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and every once in a a while he's going to be

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the pack. So you can never

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>really know, I think, because you just don't get that

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>consistency that you get on the PGA Tour if you're

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>playing week after week, or the DP World Tour for

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that matter, where it's like top ten, top fifteen, top ten,

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>top five. You know where you're putting all those strings.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That's I think why both of us ended up Bett

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Day at various points because he was like

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in the money on the first page of leaderboard, like

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>every every week. Yeah, but you don't get that with

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these live guys because the schedule is

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so erratic. All right, let's let's do some of the

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>other Oh I was just for live for me, I'm

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll say a couple of things just real quick. Yeah.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>West has Look, I'm sure there are more others that

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have watched more out there. West has probably watched twenty

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>times more live golf than I have. And that's if

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he spent twenty minutes watching it. He's right because that's

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>about what I spend this week getting to be honest

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with you. But let me do the math. Kelly has

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>watched one minute, I got got it. So what's fascinating

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to me is I think mostly everybody I've talked to

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that that I respect in the golf betting community has

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty much had similar answers of the look, hey, unless

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>unless numbers really drift on guys I'm staying away from

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's just not enough. There's not enough data. There's

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not enough that's data. Even if we had data supplied

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>by by liv Right, we don't even get that statistical data,

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but they just don't. We haven't even seen these guys

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>play that much. So it's even if you're trying to

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>do the eyeball test, I think it's tough to do.

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But Gilt's the number one question I have gotten tweets

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about over the past two weeks. What you know different

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>props are listed for live golfers and the masters, all

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>these things. It's the number one subject I've been tweeted about,

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>asking questions about how I'm approached because nobody knows the answers.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>One more thing to add on this too, because I

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>asked Jeff Davis, who's the head golf odds make or

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at Circus Sports here in Las Vegas, and he said,

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a good question about these live guys.

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But DJ is getting support. Yeah, Like DJ's getting the

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt, of course, because he won a

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 1>green jacket here in the COVID the November Masters of

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. But yet with Cam Smith, he says, we

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>can't write a bet on him, which we're not getting

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>any which is pretty fast. So I heard, I don't

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>know how much have you watched some of the Masters

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>press conferences yesterday? Tip of the cap to Cameron Smith

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for being the only live golfer that would speak to

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the mass the mass media press conference. Okay, but he admitted, like,

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's I think some of these guys are

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>being more open and honest about hey, what this money

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>does to you and changes your life. And he talked

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>about taking a very long time off of golf here

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>recently and enjoying time with friends and family before they

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of started up the new live season. That concerns

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>me for a guy, you know, when some of these

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>guys on the PGA Tour have been playing week in

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and week out for the past three months. A guy

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like that taking that much time off concerns me. Matt

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown fired back on me a couple of weeks ago

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>when I brought up, well, I'd probably looking at some

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of the younger guys who've got a long career ahead

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of them, like a Medo, Pereira, Walking Nieman and Abraham answer.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, his retort to that was, well, or

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys are just collected fat cash and they're young

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>mid twenties living the life now, Like, what's the motivation

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for them to be out on the driving range every day?

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a fair point, absolutely, Tiger Tiger brought

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that up. What's the incentive to practice? Yeah, yeah, what's

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the incentive to really get in the dirt when you're

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>getting that kind of money? But simply based off of

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>historical perspective from the masters, like West said, if I

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>had to bet one, it would be DJ. What do

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you This is a complete speculation because there's no static

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>answer to this, and it probably depends on who the

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>golfer is. But what would it take like for each

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of these guys talking about like in tournament bets. Now, Like,

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>if DJ is lurking, let's use a broad term like that,

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>lurking after the second round, are you jumping in right

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>there on him? Or do you tend to wait till

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the final day? Obviously they say Saturday's moving day AUGUSTA,

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's nothing like but a tournament is one on

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the back nine on Sunday, right, So like, is there

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>is such a tough question to answer, But is there

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment that you think is optimal to jump in

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>on some of these guys or is there no way

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to answer that? Oh, you're just talking live outright. So

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that, I mean, I think for any golfer,

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I actually traded pretty similar to my NBA live betting.

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that kind of second quarter, third quarter times,

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the second round, third round time more in golf is

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>a little later, I would say, after the cut is made,

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>after the second round, start looking at it then. So

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>after the second round or in the third round is

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a great time to look at guys live. But that's

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>just a blanket statement on everybody. I don't think the

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>live guys will make me think any more or less

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>amount that. Yeah, then this won't be a Kiddi Yama

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>situation where you're like, I can get him at plus

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>three fifty, there's only two more holes of there won't

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>be that available, probably correct. Yeah, And also if like

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 1>golf outright, golf golf outright, like live betting, you do

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>want to bet with the momentum oftentimes, and like your

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>other sticking ball sports like basketball, like football, you want

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to play against the run. Sometimes I see people all

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the time, including people we know, it's like, okay, there

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>was a big rush of points right away, over over over,

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, oftentimes you want to play against that.

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, you want to play against runs because all

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden you're getting that right number. Whereas in golf,

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to play on a guy that's maybe a

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit off the pace or a few holes ahead,

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you want to jump in on a guy.

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's gonna be tougher to do that

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this weekend because we're probably gonna get a lot of

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>stops and starts. We're probably gonna get a lot of

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>intermittent to play, and you know where this could go

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>into Monday, So it's gonna be a lot harder because

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>different guys deal with the weather differently. Like we were

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about Patrick Cantley. I just saw a tweet from

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>our friend Jeff Feinberg, and he goes, I love Patrick Cantley,

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but my concern isn't the major's right, it's the fact

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>that he often looks miserable when he's playing out there,

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and how is he gonna be when it's cold and wet?

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Patrick kiss some of these guys are gonna be like, Man,

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>have we ever had a Masters go to Monday? A

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>few years ago? I believe we did. I don't remember

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>when the last one was. I'm trying. I don't remember

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it offhand at all. Yeah, because there did the COVID

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>year go to Monday? Oh you know what, I would

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>never if it didn't. Well, twenty twenty. I thought he

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ran away with it, didn't he, Dustin Johnson? He did,

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>But we have a delay. Maybe you're right, Yeah, because

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I was trying because I felt like we've had one

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>in recent years. So, uh, yeah, we don't. We don't

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get it necessarily. All that off, All right, Kelly, give

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever derivative bets you want to give here and then

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>save some for long shots. Yeah, I'll roll through. Uh, look,

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>can't lay top twenty. I already brought off. I'll just

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll just give I mean, I'll give him all out here.

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care. I think we're gonna have some

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>different audiences. Um, can't lay Top twenty big, Tony Top

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty Big. I didn't play the outright, but I absolutely

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 1>agree with what everybody's saying about fen Now. I actually

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>think somehow he's like flying under the radar heading into

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this event too. Like he look back. He's still playing well.

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, I might not be winning events every week,

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's still been playing well. So I did play him.

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Top twenty Maxima, Victor Hovlin, Top twenties, Big on Homa

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and big on Hovel. I love Hovlin this week. I

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's another guy like Tony Feenow who's had good

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>finishes here at Augusta. His game fits pretty well for

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it as long as he doesn't get too much in

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>trouble around the green. Um. I think he's a good

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>top twenty bet this week. I am staying away from

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>betting out rates on him until I see him win

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>an event, but I think he's a good top twenty

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>play this week and then I did Keith. Mitchell's a

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>guy I approached a little a little interestingly. He was

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 1>very high up there in by Bottles, which he's been

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>playing great, especially off the tea here this season, and

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I've bet him a few different times. He's only played

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Masters once, so he doesn't really have that history here,

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so I'm trying to tread lightly and I'm kind of

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just going bigger going home with him. So I played

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a top ten on him at seven to one, and

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I played him in a couple of matchups. I played

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>him over Kirk Kiddy Yama never played here before. I

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>played him over Medo Pereira as well. So those two

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I played Keith top ten and then those two matchups

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned other tournament matchups, I played Victor Hovland

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 1>over Matt Fitzpatrick. Matt Fitzpatrick another guy. I don't want

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to say I'm necessarily fading this week buying betting on him,

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and I do think there are some matchup opportunities to

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>bet against him. I don't think this is a perfect

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>fit for his game. We've seen him struggling a little

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more here recently. I think that's a good matchup

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>bet MAXI hooma, I took over Cameron Yell. I think

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Young's it's just another number playing on maxihlma though.

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>I think Cameron Young's a good golfer. But I'm getting

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty five on a tournament matchup on Homo

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>over him. I gotta go with that bet. And then

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>one you're gonna laugh at Yell, Gary Woodland minus one

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>h two over Jatz posting I really didn't play it

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on having and then Tom Debutante, I don't know how

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.439
<v Speaker 1>he rated out for you Wes Taylor Moore, I bet

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I bet it over seven to one he. I was

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>shocked actually, and how how Hiley he was rated in

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>by models. They they've been getting support down at Circa

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 1>for Taylor more because I asked about the rookies here

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, and they've been getting support by the

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>way to clean one thing up. Nineteen eighty three was

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the last Monday finish that was Sevey seven four shot

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>win over Tom or Tom Kit and bryand Crenshaw. So

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that surprises me that long ago for a Monday finish. Yeah, um,

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I have I'm gonna cherry pick golfers West. What derivatives

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have you been debutante. Why do we never have a

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>debutant market in any other tournament but this one? I know,

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, because it's such a smaller feeling too. There's

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>there's eighty eight because they don't have debutants necessarily in

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the US Open, because you're oftentimes getting random qualified. You

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have to qualify. That's yeah, yeah, so that's tough to do.

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.839
<v Speaker 1>But I played two in the debutante. One was Meto

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Pereira at six to one. Look in the last three

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>live events fifteen, six and fifth, he's been top seven

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and driving distance in all of those events, fourth, second

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and first for greens and regulation in those last three events.

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And then I did play one longer one Adrian moronk

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>at twelve to one, just because if you look, driving

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>distance is gonna matter, and both Meto be Adrian Moron

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can absolutely bomb it off the tea. So I think

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that he takes better to see in this course the

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>first time than the favorite, who is Tom Kim in

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the market. But Tom Kim looked a lot of things

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>he does well, but he's not a real long hitter, right,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>so I think he might struggle the first time here.

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>A couple other prop markets I played. I played a

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>low amateur and I got it at plus one sixty five.

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>The nineteen year old NCAA champion, Gordon's sergeant, who I

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>made bet as a top forty two to make the cut.

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we actually have a chance with an amateur

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 1>to make the cut here. Number one world amateur in

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the world plays at Vanderbilt right now. So Gordon's sergeant

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I played also played Brian Harman plus one ninety five

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for top lefty and it's a four player mark left. Yes, Yes, Harmond,

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Phil Carmen, Phil, Bubba Watson and Mike Weir are the

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>four left Anders in the field. Harmon, by the way,

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>two years ago a second after thirty six holes and

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>then ended up finishing twelve. You know, I wouldn't consider Bubba,

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't consider Weird. The only one I would consider

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>against Harmon maybe is Phil. But then you look at

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Phil last week at the live of it, and he

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was like forty five? Is at a forty eight players?

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Is Mike Weir? And I apologize Canada for this, but

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is Mike were the most random of all Masters winners?

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>He is? Look, he was a pretty solid player in

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>those early two thousands. But this is a guy that

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought would have won more on the

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Champion PGA Tour Champions. Yeah, and he hasn't. Yeah, and

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why I went ahead and ignored him in that

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lefty market this week. But all I've done our props

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and outrights right now, the players round leaders, no, not yet,

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the placement markets and the matchups. By the way, depending

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on when you listen to this, yeah, I'll have out

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>wednesday morning. Oh yeah, and that's I'll bring it up

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>everywhere I bet first round leaders almost weekly. Feel free

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>if you want to tweet at me and get and

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get those out, no problem, send them to you. I

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>usually wait, though, until later on Wednesday, when I really

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have that weather kind of figured out. So at Kelly Bidlin,

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>hit me up, I'll get those to him. Okay, last questions,

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it rapid fire on these. I'm just gonna

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>cherry pick golfers and you're gonna give your quick thoughts

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 1>on them. One of the live golfers who has won

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 1>this tournament, which we may have given I'm not even

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>sure if it was here that we gave him a mention,

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it was on a numbers game. Patrick read nothing.

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You don't like any Patrick read here in a placement market,

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>perhaps because he has at least shown, unlike some of

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the live golfers some form. Remember he was second at

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dubai Desert Classic and Rory made that put fifteen

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>feet birdie. Because we were all catty, those of us

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that were insomniacs and up in the middle of the

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>night watching this thing on Golf Channel. We were hoping

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we were going to get that Rory and Patrick Reid playoff,

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>just for the tension, because of course that Rory was

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>served lawsuit by Patrick Reed didn't really appreciate that. So

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yeah, you know, I'd love to see that tension,

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but Rory won. So Patrick Reid in a placement market,

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I think absolutely like top twenty, top thirty, but nothing

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:22.439
<v Speaker 1>for an out right I mean, he's a guy who's

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>won here before twenty eight. I'm not going to be

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>shocked if he did. He plays well when everybody is

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>against him. Yes, well, yeah, you know, he tends to

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. I don't know if you coughed a note

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I guess he played a practice round by

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>himself this morning. So I think Patrick Reid's approaching this

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just live against the world, it's me against

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the world, right, So he is very ligitious. So that's

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>probably why a lot of people don't like him. That

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sends to do it. You know, I'm just Columbia me

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with all the rest of the live guys. I haven't

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>done anything with him, but I would not be shocked

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to see him in the mix real quick, just a

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>few more Bryson Deshambo, who famously a couple years ago

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>said I'm playing this like a par sixty seven. Obviously

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>he is not in form. Nothing with Bryson, No, no,

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 1>not at all, even though he did finish in the

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>top half of the field last week in Orlando. But

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>the last thing he's really been in the mix to

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>win was the Long Drive Championship well, and he seems

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to be more interested in that than you know, being

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a great golfer. Is he still regularly doing that? I

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 1>remember when he started, I didn't know if he was

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>still doing he was in I think of his last

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>fall he was second in the World Long Drive Championship. Yeah,

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy gil I haven't I didn't even consider um,

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think the sports books are pricing him absolutely correct,

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Like there's one twenty five to one. Yeah, even spots

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>where I would try to look to play against him

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in matchups, but it's like he's he's playing another fellow

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>bum I'm bringing I'm bringing him up only because of

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the long distance in the weather and just because he

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to be mentioned a couple more. John Rum we

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have not mentioned once. I know he kind of seems

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to be of the three favorites, the one that's coldest

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>on the board between Like you could totally argue for

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Scottie Scheffler, you could really really make the argument for Rory,

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think he still can for Rom. But about Ram,

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he has good finishes here, but he's never really been

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>quite there in the mix. It's always been kind of

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like a battle of attrition where he's out a few

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>groups ahead, or he contends early and then all of

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you know, he shoots like a sixty seven

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday and it looks like he's right there where

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>he was right in the mix to win, and he

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>has dipped a little bit from his form. Because we

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about this in January February. It's like this guy's

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna win like ten events. Yeah, but he has just

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>dipped a little bit, and I just think that that

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is right now. So I'm not going

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to discount as chances at all. He's got a huge

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>chance highest finish here fourth the year that Patrick Reid

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>won in twenty eighteen. Yeah, I still think he is.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:50.479
<v Speaker 1>I still think he's the best golfer in the world,

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with the best, most well rounded game going. Right now,

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm just a little I'm a little hesitant,

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and look, those three guys long at the top where

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they're at. He still is a part of those big three.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>But when you're really picking, you know, we talked about

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>already betting on one of them and then including other outrights,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you can pick two put two of

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 1>those guys, right, So he is. If I had a

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>rate those three this week, he is probably third. Yeah,

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's like West, Maybe he'll disagree with me,

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>but I think there he's another guy that's I don't

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think he's flying under the radar, because I don't think

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>John rob Ever flies under the radar. Like I said

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>about Tony Feenou. I think he's being a little bit

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>disrespected in the marketplace because Okay, what's he really done?

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>He finished thirty ninth of the API, and then he

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>had the w D from the players. Right, that's one

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>reason I think why, But it was it was a

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>stomach bucker something. Right. Well, so it's not like it's

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 1>an injury. It's okay, he hit the can too many times.

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to play golf anymore. The can they can. Yeah,

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 1>three wins and nine starts, by the way this year,

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and it does kind of feel like we're, you know,

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like pushing himself side a little. So he

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 1>withdraws from the players and then okay, he doesn't make

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it out of his grouping match play, but match plays

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a it's funky and it's it's not an easy environment.

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 1>So I thought long and hard about that last night,

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Gil where I I just think the market isn't respecting

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>him as much as they should right now. But I'm

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking at Scheffler when we're talking about

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 1>those short shots, all right. And then lastly, last person,

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:24.879
<v Speaker 1>because I'm contractually obligated and he appears on the screen

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in front of us. You brought him up early, Eldrick,

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Woods, any anything ever. It is the Masters after all, right,

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and look, you know, I was asked about this. I

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was doing an interview with that Nashville radio station yesterday

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and they asked about Tiger. I said, I'm not going

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to bet it, but if you're asking me if he's

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna make the cut, yeah, he's gonna make the cut.

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 1>He's made twenty three to twenty four. However, he's forty

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:53.399
<v Speaker 1>seven years old, and that just I don't know why

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that should have been obvious to me because we've been

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 1>following him for over two decades, but it just kind

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of hits you. He's forty six seven like like that.

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing to me. And you know, just looking, I

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was looking to say, Okay, who is his who are

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>his matchups? He's matched up? I think in a lot

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of the markets with Sergio Garcian it's basically like a

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>coin flip on the price. I think. Actually they had

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>him against Bryson Deshambo down at CERCA as well. So

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably not gonna have hardly any Tiger this week.

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I may have him in a matchup maybe like a

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>top forty. I'm not gonna bet him to make the

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>cut because he's almost two dollars yeah, yep, And that's

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and this weather can get funky and he

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>could start hurting. And he's played one event this year.

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Granted he looked very good at Riviera. But I'm probably

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna avoid him all together. I will. I will say, no,

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to, of course you have to. And this

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is look I like these kind of terms where I'm

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna have much action on him. So if

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>he's in the mix at the end and I don't

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have anybody there, I'll be rooting hard for Tiger. Makes

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a sport better, there's no doubt about that. I agree

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with what West just said. I mean, we would have

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>never thought he was gonna do what he did in

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, and he went went out and won the

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>whole damp. His fifth Green jacket is fifteen. Itch is amazing,

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's dealing with all this injury stuff. We were

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>all impressed with what he did at Riviera. Um, I

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>can't bet the make miss price. I think that's price

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty accurately here. If anything, I would lean to him

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>making the cut or that was a big deal last year. Yes, Um,

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I would lean towards him making the cut, but I'm

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>not laying I think it's one sixty five. I'm looking

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings. Yeah, one sixty five, that's even too high

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for me. Lower. Yeah, I'm not laying that. What I

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>will do though, if he makes the cut, it's gonna

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>probably be targeted against him in round three, round four

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and matchups, because that's when I'm gonna be concerned about,

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the injuries and surgeries he's had, Is

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that body gonna hold up for four straight days of

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>all these all the time on the range, all the

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>time on the course, and as West pointed out, this

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is another course where it's it's it's a little deceiving,

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the elevation changes, and this is a lot of a

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of walking for him over a long, tough course.

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I think round three, round four is gonna be the

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>time to bet against him in matchups. Yeah, if he's

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>lurking after a couple of rounds, though, I would I

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>would love to like put a microphone in all he

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:21.400
<v Speaker 1>really and I gonna bet against Yeah? Yeah, well Tiger,

0:50:21.440 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>would you have to ask about him? West did this

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>whole podcast while wearing a green jacket. It should be

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, would you like to say jokingly that it

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was what year that you won the Masters nineteen eighty seven,

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 1>because that's the year after Jack and no one remembers

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 1>who Larry Miys, right, I, I you know, I think

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it was actually Larry mikes who, by the way, he

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to be playing his last Masters this year,

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Larry Miys, I believe he and Sandy lysle are retiring. Yeah,

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it was Larry Miys who broke Greg Norman's heart, which

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>never breaks my heart, which never when Greg Norman gets

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>his heart. Yeah, man, he wanted a playoff against uh

0:50:56.480 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Sevy and Norman. Jeez. Oh, I was one of the

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>iconic Masters finishes ever man. Yes from the bunker, right, yes, yeah,

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>from the bunker Larry Mice All right, thank you guys.

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Let's get you ready for your show

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>which is coming up in less than an hour Long Shots,

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>which Kelly and West Kelly Bidlin, West Reynolds they are

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>doing Live with Matt Brown live on Vison at eleven

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>am Pacific two pm Eastern here on a Tuesday, but

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that will be put on their podcast feed at long

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Shots available where all podcasts are distributed. Thank you, boys,

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, appreciate you. Enjoy good luck with all your

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Master's bets. Thanks for listening,