WEBVTT - Musk Backlash and APEC Wraps Up

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Loudlove.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heide a Bloomberg's WORLDEA quarters in New York,

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>The fallout continues for Elon Musk after the billionaire endorse

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 3>an anti semitic post on his social media platform. Will

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 3>discuss what it means for his businesses, and.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 5>We'll return to APEX as Chinese President Jijingping finishes his

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 5>first visits in the US in six years on a

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 5>high note, what does it mean for US?

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Kurds on technology to China?

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 6>And then there has.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Been some Tesla investors criticizing the Elon Musk post, of course,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>one that seemingly is endorsing anti Semitic views. More advertisers, though,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 3>are also fleeing his social media platform X. The European

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Commission joined IBM in announcing it will stop advertising on

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 3>X after Musk agreed with a post that said the

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Jewish people hold a dialectical hatred.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 6>Of white people.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Musk responded by saying, you have said the actual truth.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:18.839
<v Speaker 4>That was Thursday.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, this Friday morning, the White House is addressing Elon

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 5>musk comments saying, quote, we condemn this abhorrent promotion of

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 5>antisemitic and racist hate in the strongest terms, which runs

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 5>against our core values as Americans. Joining us now from

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 5>DC Bloomberg's a Kayla Gardener, Kayla give us the rest

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 5>of the detail on that White House response to Elon

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Musk and Elon Musk's post.

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the White House has been pretty adamant about condemning

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 7>antisemitism pretty much ever since the President took office. They

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 7>have a national strategy to counter antisemitism, and this has

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 7>been a major focus of the Second Gentleman, who was

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 7>of course the first Jewish spouse of a Vice president.

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 7>And as you mentioned, this comes on top of yukes

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 7>from the European Commission from IBM, which both announced they

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 7>would be pulling advertising from the platform. But I think

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 7>the best way to think about this is a broader

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 7>and much more complicated relationship between the President and Elon Musk.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk has been very critical of Biden. He says

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 7>he will not support him. In twenty twenty four, he

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 7>was also unhappy when Tesla was not invited to an

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 7>event for EB companies earlier this year, and so that's

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 7>definitely something to think about here. And at the same time,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 7>the government also has contracts with SpaceX. It also applauded

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk's decision to open up their charging infrastructure to

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 7>other companies. But I do think it was the timing

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 7>of these comments, of course, amid the Israel Hamas War

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 7>that ultimately caused the White House to put out these

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 7>statements because there has been such an increase in incidents,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 7>particularly against the Jewish community, they felt as though this

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 7>was the time to make such a condemnation.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 3>Okayla God, we thank you so much for that really

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 3>important context coming from Washington. That's bringing more context coming

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>from an investivase now. Kristin Hall is founder and CEO

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>of NIA Capital. It's a social impact fund and it

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>is about two hundred and eight to two thousand dollars

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla stock as of mid year. It's waged pressure

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 3>campaigns against the company for years, including via shareholder resolutions.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>You put out a response to Mask's comments saying that

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>you're appalled by Elomusk's recent post on x Kristin, talk

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 3>us through what you think. Ultimately, the investor viewpoint is

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>at the.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 8>Moment, oh, this is so complicated. Thank you for having

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 8>me today. This is the most complicated CEO for investors

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 8>to deal with, and yet it really doesn't need to be.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 8>We all are completely appalled by his statement, and we're

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 8>really calling on the board to take some action. If

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 8>you think about what Tesla's assets are, it's that brand

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 8>and it's also its people. So we really count on

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 8>Tesla to be innovative, and we really need them to

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 8>be able to attract, recruit, hire, and retain top talent.

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 8>And of course a statement like this is going to

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 8>inhibit all of those.

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 5>Kristin Ela Musk has said in the past and consistently

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 5>he is absolutely pro free speech, and he's also said

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 5>on more than one occasion he's against anti semitism of

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 5>any kind.

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 4>That's right, you hold a small volume of shares.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 5>My understanding is that that is basically just a function

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 5>of being a social impact investor. There will be parts

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 5>of our audience that say, why is Kristin on She

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 5>holds hardly any stock.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, so we.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 8>Actually held Tesla for many years in our core portfolios.

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 8>We really were behind that battery play and of course

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 8>the infrastructure across many of the products and services that

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 8>Tesla is bringing for a just and innovative transition to

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 8>a sustainable economy. So that thesis was really important to us,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 8>and we did hold Tesla in our core portfolios. And

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 8>yet when it became really apparent that there was racial

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 8>discrimination within the plants and across the firm, we became

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 8>really cautious and there was lots of risk for us

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 8>as an investor, and we pulled out. We did retain

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 8>some shares on a small amount of shares, as you

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 8>point out, so that we could keep our responsibility as

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 8>investors to engage with this firm and to call them

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 8>on what in their own code of ethics says to

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 8>do the right thing. So Elon Musk is actually in

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 8>violation of his own code of ethics right now, and

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 8>that's why we're calling on the board.

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Christ and thank you for that explanation.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 5>I just think the audience wanted to understand the mechanics

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 5>of how your firm is operating. The emphasis is on

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 5>the absolute truth statement or posts that he made. He

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 5>made a follow up post which I are going to

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 5>bring up on the screen for our audience, where he

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 5>says the adl unjustly attacks the majority of the West,

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 5>despite the majority of the West supporting the Jewish people

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 5>and Israel. This is because they cannot buy their own

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 5>tenets criticize the minority groups who are their primary threat.

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 5>It is not right and needs to stop. What do

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 5>you think Elon Musk was trying to say in that post?

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 8>Now, Elon Musk has been erratic, He's been volatile with

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 8>this speech. We never actually know what he's trying to do.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 8>And while he is saying he's promoting free speech, hateful

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 8>speech and hates speech has no place on X and

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 8>it certainly doesn't have any place coming from a major

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 8>CEO in our nation.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that certain key founders leaders, one who actually

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>co founded now Meta, has called on perhaps roles within

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>other companies that Elon Musk holls. Of course, he's not

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 3>just the leader of Tesla, but he also is the

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 3>owner and CTO of X, the platform with which he's

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 3>currently putting out these views. And indeed, one particular key

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 3>founder saying, Linda Yacarino, your turn to actually potentially even

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 3>firer own CTO. Linda herself has been trying to point

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>out that X's view has always been very clear that

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>discrimination by everyone should.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 6>Stop across the board.

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>What would you want to see for Elon, whether he

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>be CTO chair of X, whether it be CEO of Tesla,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 3>whether it be his roles and the many other companies

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 3>that he has. Are you calling for him to step down?

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 8>So that isn't my place to call for that. I

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 8>do want to see the board stepping in and taking action.

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 8>And whether that means, you know, taking his cell phone away,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 8>that's one possibility. But what we really need to see

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 8>is leadership, and we want to see him not only

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 8>protecting his brand but growing it in a sustainable and

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 8>inclusive way.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 8>Again, we want to see employees, both current and future

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 8>feel not only really comfortable but excited to join this

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 8>and bring their top talent and expert and skills. And

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 8>then also on the consumer side, there are so many

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 8>consumers right now saying they're getting rid of their Tesla

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 8>and they're certainly not considering purchasing anything new, and so

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 8>with a prime business model at Tesla at any rate,

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 8>we need to see as an investor that that CEO

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 8>is really looking out for the business model, and that

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 8>brand has so much to do, so there's I personally

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 8>would like to see him step down. Whether that's possible,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 8>that's really up to the board.

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 6>Christin.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>It's been interesting because this hasn't happened in a vacuum.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 6>In fact, we have seen him put out.

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Very controversial posts before, some which he has indeed retracted,

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 3>and he's gone to say he's full pro free speech

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>but against anti antisemitism in.

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 6>All its forms. But he's almost been a bit like Teflon.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Nothing has stuck, and Tesla nevertheless is up ninety percent

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>year to date in terms of a share price, and

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 3>people thus far perhaps haven't been pulling back on their

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Tesla purchases. It's been deemed more of a consumer weakness

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 3>story than it has actually a pushback against Lil Musk.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Can you really sort of drive that narrative together?

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Do you think this is the moment that we see

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 6>a tipping point?

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's going to be interesting to see what

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 8>we see as a tipping point, because with a regular company,

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 8>an ordinary company with one of the richest billionaire CEOs,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 8>we would have seen other consequences much earlier. Elon Musk

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 8>is in icon in the US and across the world,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 8>and he seems to be treated differently both by his

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 8>board and by his van base, and that's problematic, I believe,

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.359
<v Speaker 8>for the kind of companies and the kind of corporations

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 8>that we want to see grow in the US.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 5>We reiterate that Tesla has rebounded to positive territory, having

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 5>been down as much as three percent in the session

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 5>over a two day basis.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Of course it's lower, but on the week.

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 5>I think on track for a pretty sizable gain. There

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 5>are many that took to X in support of Elon

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Musk who are both Tesla shareholders and vehicle owners. But

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 5>there's one name that seems aligned with you, and that

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 5>is Ross Gerber, a Tesla investor who says his clients

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 5>his an asset manager.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 4>His clients are.

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 5>Asking him to unwind their positions. They will no longer

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 5>buy Tesla cars. My understanding is that you are doing

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 5>a new initiative where you're right to the board of

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Tesla in the coming week. Have you spoken to Ross

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 5>and who are you trying to bring in on the

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 5>initiative that you're taking.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 8>Actually, that's really interesting, So we haven't spoken to Ross yet.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 4>I welcome that.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 8>I maybe he's available for a phone call this afternoon,

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 8>that would be great. We are part of a coalition

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 8>with Whistlestock Capital and many others who have written to

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 8>the board, and we did that actually earlier this year.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 8>We put out a statement and a letter speaking about

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 8>lots of different issues that we want to see the

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 8>board take up, and sadly we have not had a response.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 8>And so we've been meeting as a group monthly to

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 8>figure out how we can be engaged to really support

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 8>this company to be its best. And we will resend

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 8>that letter with a new cover letter with the additional

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 8>grievances that have occurred since we sent the original letter,

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 8>and that should go out in the next couple of weeks.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Kristin, howe, let us know what the response, if any, is,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and we thank you so much for articulating your point

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 3>of view for Nia Impact Capital today.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 6>We thank you for your time. Meanwhile, coming up.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 3>That we're going to turn to the markets, because, as

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 3>we've been saying, Tesla stock is up over the last

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>five days, and indeed over the last month, tech stocks

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 3>have really outperformed, and we're up two trillion dollars worth

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 3>in terms of a risk rally in November, but could

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>it be at a slowing point?

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 6>And what are you looking at?

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at shares of Applied Materials, the biggest US

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 5>maker of chip making equipment. To see they're the stock

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 5>down five point five percent, five point four percent. Reuter's

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>reporting that a probe's been opened by the US into

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 5>it breaching those US technology export curbs to China.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 4>We'll get the details next. This has Boombog.

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 5>Technology technology stocks wavering today amid November's two trillion dollar rally.

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 5>What can we expect going forward? There's a bit of

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 5>a learning still to come and joining us now. Jonathan Curtis,

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Franklin Equity Group, Senior VP and Director of Portfolio Management.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 5>You're an investor who holds a number of the magnificent

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 5>seven key semiconductor names and software names. It's in the

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 5>chip space. I want to start Applied Materials. The report

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 5>of that probe looking at whether they breached the US

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 5>technology export curbs to China. You hold Applied Materials across

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 5>different Franklin funds.

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Just to what did you make of that report? First? Jonathan?

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, in fact, Applied Materials had actually disclosed back

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 2>in October of twenty twenty two.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 4>I believe that they were under investigation.

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 2>The incremental news that we got yesterday out of Reuter's

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>was that the investigation had turned perhaps potentially criminal. I

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think comment the company is commentating on the specifics

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 2>of that report. But importantly, Applied Materials is one of

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the world's leading semiconduction capital equipment companies. They're involved in

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 2>really every part of the market with the exceptional lethography,

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>They're a leading player in the space.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 4>They're very very.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Essential for Western babs, FABS in Korea, FABS in Taiwan,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 2>and fabs in China. And while if they have made

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>a mistake, or if somebody deeper down in the company

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>made a mistake and allowed equipment to make its way

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>over to a smith in China, then certainly that should

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 2>be dealt with. But when I don't think that any

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>sanctions that would be imposed would negatively impact the company's

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>earnings power or they're certainly their mote, their critical supplier

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 2>in the ecosystem and very very essential to keep operating.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Johnath, thank you strapolate out the China risk to the

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 5>industry more broadly. Right, if you think about how Nvidia

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 5>is traded over the last seven days. Some of it's

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 5>on reports of new gen China specific chips right trying

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 5>to get product that complies with these curbs. Clearly there

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 5>is a danger of being in breach of them. How

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 5>as an investor do you navigate that?

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, so, certainly in China wants to be able

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 2>to be a player on some of these leading edge chips.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 4>They want to be able to manufacture them. Certainly they

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 4>want to have.

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Them for their own efforts in cloud computing, in military

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and artificial intelligence, and the US is trying to curb that.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 4>China is a very big market. Even if China is

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 4>not able.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>To acquire the chips they want, they will certainly find

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>other ways around being able to get get the most

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 2>leading edge chips by manufacturing their own less powerful chips,

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 2>but spending then more money on the equipment to build

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 2>those less powerful chips and more money on the infrastructure

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to run those chips so they can match the compute

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 2>capacity in the West. So, in an odd way, we

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>actually think it is positive for the industry because it

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 2>ultimately means that there's an overspend if you will happening

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in China to support matching the compute capacity requirements of China,

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>but certainly we are paying close attention to it, you know,

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 2>guard up applied Materials. At the beginning of our conversation,

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I think forty four percent of their revenue in the

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>most recent quarter was from in fact China, So certainly

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 2>China is a big consumer. The US is really trying

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 2>to limit China's access to equipment and processes and chips

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 2>at the leading edge. But China can make good progress

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and build a very successful industry on lagging edge nodes

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>if they want it, and they'll just end up having

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to overspend to match the compute capacity available in the

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 2>West for more advanced chips.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan is interesting and mentions in video of course, and

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the way in which they're trying to build different types

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 3>of chips to meet the current standards, and video course

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 3>got its earnings coming up fast, and I'm interested in

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 3>your perspective on ultimately how far these Magnificent seven have

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 3>room yet to run. Is an idea I think is

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 3>put out by Goldman Sachs that twenty twenty four you stay,

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>you hold, you remain invested, and actually these might have

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 3>sent seven is still going to be some of the

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 3>companies that deliver into the next year as well.

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 6>Do you abide by that with evaluations?

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, we're certainly quite positive on really the entire

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>technology sector and artificial intelligence particular. The Magnificent Seven have

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 2>done well because they are truly magnificent businesses, strong balance sheets,

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>high levels of profitability, structural growers. But almost all of them,

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>with the exception of one or two, have very strong

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 2>AI talk tracks and opportunities. They have massive amounts of data,

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>They can get more data, they can wrangle the compute

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>to build these models, They have the talent to build

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>these models, and then they have the pathways into which

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to deliver value from these models into their customers and

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>charge for them. Some of these companies have the potential

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to double their overall businesses on the delivery of AI

0:16:55.920 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>features into just a small number of their businesses. Is

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>great potential that lies ahead for many of the Magnificent Seven.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Now we own many of them, we happen to be

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 2>underweight them. We see greater value down the market cap

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>range companies that have some of those same characteristics as

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the Magnificent Seven, but that are trading it more compelling

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>valuation levels.

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Can you just very quickly tell us some of the

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 3>names therefore that are less obvious.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Sure a company like a service now for instance, they

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 2>have they can tick all those boxes that the Magnificent

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 2>seven can in terms of being able to be a

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>player in AI.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 4>But I think they're just a less well understood business.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 2>They have significant opportunities to raise prices and to deliver

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 2>new value to their customers, to make their customers more efficient,

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>all with generative AI.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Curtis, we thank you a Franklin Equity Group.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 6>Great to have you time now for talking tech.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 3>First up, Apple maybe falling behind in fact on his

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 3>efforts to make a modem chip for the iPhone.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 6>Apple will likely misrolling.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Out its own emonem for twenty twenty five due to

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 3>the complex designs of Qualcom's chip.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 6>Mean While open AI, s Altmann.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Believes we have yet to see the biggest risks in

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 3>AI posers to US politics and policy. While he is

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 3>hopeful that oftificial intelligence can help humanity in the longer term,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 3>Amann has called for government oversight of the technology in

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the near term. Plus, Amazon cunning hundreds of jobs in

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 3>its voice activated Alexa division. Now, the company says it's

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 3>shifting efforts to better focus on building capabilities powered by

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 3>you guess it generator.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 6>AI ed.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 5>Back here in SF and the pitch, I says he

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 5>expects China to be at the forefront of AI. The

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 5>Alphabet CEO called China's work on the technology astounding to

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 5>see during a conversation over at APEX.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Have a listen. It's not going to be easy.

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 9>But I would start from this premise that AI will proliferate.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 9>So this is not the inherent nature of software. AI

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 9>advances will get out to in all countries, and so

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 9>it is naturally the kind of technology. I don't think

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 9>there's any unilateral safety to be had. We all have

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 9>a shared incentive to solve for safety. You know, you

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 9>could have AI go wrong in one country that will

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 9>impact every other country. So in some ways, it's like

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 9>climate change in the planet. We all share a planet.

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 9>I think that's true for AI. So now that you

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 9>know that will be true, I think you have to

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 9>start building the frameworks globally to make progress. I've seen

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 9>encouraging progress when the G seven happened in Hiroshima. I

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 9>think it was a good start. You've seen more progress

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 9>the Uki summit last week, the administration here. The White

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 9>House has been leading the way as well, and I

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 9>saw good encouraging announcements even yesterday for us in China

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 9>to start having a dialogue on AI alf Let's CEO.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 5>So welcome back to Bloomberg Technology, Ed Ludlow here in

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 5>San Francisco.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 6>In Caroline Hide in New York.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 3>There has of course been some weakness in Tesla's trading

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 3>yesterday after of course, one has been seemingly an endorsement

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 3>for some anti semitic posts post on x by the

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 3>owner of x Any, the CEO of Tesla, which is

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk.

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 6>But a lot to still be dissecting across the board.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 5>D Yeah, that was the big story of the last

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 5>twenty four hours. The other is Apex, which is wrapping

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 5>up in San Francisco. It's a who's who of global

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 5>power players in politics and technology. One of them, I'm

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 5>delighted to say, joins me right now on set Bloomberg's

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 5>Amory Horden. You make it to that party last night

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 5>down the road.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 6>I did that.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 5>Now I'm in all seriousness. Everyone that matters in the

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 5>world has been here. When you last joined us on

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 5>the show, it was all about Biden. G what happened

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 5>after that, particularly in the world of technology as well.

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think Biden and she really was the starting

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 10>gun to this entire APEC summit. But then for Shijingping,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 10>as much as the Biden meeting was very important. Actually,

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 10>the New York Times had a story about one of

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 10>the organizers was talking about how the Chinese had prepared

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 10>three speeches for him to give those executives, and he

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 10>ended up going with the friendliest one after the Biden meeting,

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 10>that room where he.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 6>Got all those applauses.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 10>It costs a lot of money.

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 4>To say about Tim Cook being in the room as well, people.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 10>Like that, Larry Fang, Steve Schwartzman. But then we also

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 10>had a letter from Shijingping going out to executives saying

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 10>he wants a heartwarming welcome really of the business community.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 10>He's clearly trying to woo investors. And it comes as

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 10>there's been a tumble really a feign direct investment into China.

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 10>So this was Shijingping's opening in his moment. The problem

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 10>is these are just words at this moment. They sound

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 10>very fuzzy and warm from the Chinese president, But will

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 10>there be actions? I will note about a few hours

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 10>before Shijing Ping's letter became public and his remarks to

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 10>these executives, the Chinese Commerce Ministry did say that they

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 10>are going to try to go after a campaign for

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 10>potential discriminative measures that are happening to foreign investors.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 4>So aka technology export curbs.

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Technology expert curbs.

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 10>I'm talking more about foreign direct investment into China, but yes,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 10>technology companies have been having a number of issues in China.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 10>But if we're talking about technology export curbs from the

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 10>United States into China, that is something that I'm sure

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 10>Shijinping brought up with President Biden. But the US is

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 10>not going to budge on any of these sanctions, any

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 10>of these penalties that potentially can hinder their national security.

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 3>Amory Horden, it's been great to have you on the

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 3>show throughout the week. We really appreciate it, and we

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>want to well pick up where Amrie leaves off. Ultimately,

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 3>has these discussions in any way changed the ultimate relationship,

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 3>the trade relationship between US and China thus far, I've

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 3>got the perfect guest e Liza Tobin, Senior director of

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Research analysis for the Economy Special Competitive Studies Project, And

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>indeed you previously served on the National Security Council Staff

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>as China Director, where you help lead development of multiple

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 3>US strategies and policies related to China. And to that

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 3>end point, will policy change? Will doing business get any

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 3>easier between these two nations?

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 8>No.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the previous speaker is right. I think the

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>talk out of Xi Jinping is trying to signal that

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>China is open to business. But I think words are cheap,

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think what we're seeing is a tactical shift,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but no strategic shift on either side. I think the

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>US is going to keep up the pressure on the

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>technology and economic controls, and for China's side, I don't

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>think Sheijinping's strategy has change at all over the long term.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is trying to kind of reduce some

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of the pressure given how weak China's economy is looking lately.

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so paint us forward five ten years time. What

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 3>does this relationship look like. What does this self ability

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 3>to provide for chips, for manufacturing, for technological innovation within

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 3>China look like? Can they be self determination in that respect?

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>The administration going into this was really signaling that they

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>see the United States as in a long term strategic

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>rivalry and competition with the peoples from public of China,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and so this meeting was intended to kind of set

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a floor and stabilize relations, and they kind of signaled

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>very low expectations that they hope to at the very

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>least restore some kind of military to military communications. So

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>going forward, based on the updates last month that you

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>saw to the export controls on the high end AI chips,

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>these were really a doubling down by the US administration

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on those controls and the signaling that they realized that

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they're in a cat and mouse game and that China

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>will adjust to the US controls and continue to seek loopholes,

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but the administration in response, will continue to update them

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to try to meet the object of preventing

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>China from using US high end chips to accelerate their

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>military development.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 5>Eliza, you said a moment ago, words are cheap. I

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 5>think that's what you said. That we're talking largely in

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 5>the context of the diplomatic relationship between the US and China.

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 5>You look at who is in the room Wednesday night.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Tim kok hoc Tan of Broadcom, it seems as if

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 5>the private sector the biggest technology companies in the world

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 5>have a very different attitude to China.

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 4>They just want to do business there. Beijing is smart.

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It has a strategy of trying to exploit the gaps

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and the splits in American society, you know, federal government

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>versus local and state level government, public and private. They

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>realize that we're democracy and they try to exploit these gaps. However,

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think given how increasingly opaque and hostile to foreign

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>businesses the Chinese market is, I don't think you're going

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to see any kind of strategic reprochement between the companies.

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>China has moved on beyond the era of reform and opening.

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 4>That era is over.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>They still say these words, but I think the reality

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>on the ground is becoming increasingly hostile.

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Liza, it's Friday. It's been a long week.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 5>What is the most positive outcome from APEG. What is

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 5>a good thing that's come out of it?

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Looks I had mentioned that the administration kind of set

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a low bar for itself, and I think they stepped

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>over those low expectations easily, and there are a few

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of concrete deliverables. One that they're quite I think

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>gratified by is an agreement to work with the Chinese

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on counter narcotics, and of course there's a lot of

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>precursor chemicals for fentanyl flowing into the United States, much

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>of it coming through Mexico, and they're signaling that the

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are starting to take some actions to crack down

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>on firms that are doing this. So I think the

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>hope is very modest that at least in the short term,

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>we can save some American lives by limiting the flow

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of this. So we should expect the cooperation on the

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Chinese side to turn on and off depending on how

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>happy they are with other aspects of the relationship. But

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, if we can save American lives,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good thing. It's also good for

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>our militaries to be talking to each other. That's a

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty low bar, but we need to be communicating to

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>avoid some kind of misunderstanding. And then they've also announced

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that we will start some type of initial discussions with

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese about AI risk and safety, and of course

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this is something the US is talking to a lot

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>of different partners and allies around the world of art about,

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and they'll start doing the same with China.

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 5>All right, Eliza Tobin at the special Competitive Studies product.

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for joining us here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 5>Now coming up on the show, we'll be joined by

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Michelle Gonzalez, head of Microsoft Spenter, to discuss her outlook

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 5>for bench capital and interesting strategy there private markets and

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 5>a big tech name. Thus nets this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Time for the VC roundup and in the news. Canadian

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 5>startup Deep Sky raised fifty five million dollars from VC

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 5>firms and governments to begin a carbon capture plant in Quebec.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Uses early stage technology aiming to suck millions of tons

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 5>of emissions out of the atmosphere and also out of

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 5>the oceans and over in Japan, Japan's state backed foundry

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 5>startup Rapidness says it will work to develop semiconductor technology

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 5>with Canada's ten storrants. The companies will exchange no how

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 5>on two nanometer logic chips to help devices access AI.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 5>According to Rapidest, plus billionaires Zeba, Neil Rolledolf Sad and

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 5>Eric Schmidt announced a new nonprofit AI research lab in Paris.

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 5>The lab will have three hundred million euros in total

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 5>funding and produce open source research.

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Caroline we've got to stick with the world of AI

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 3>labs and investment.

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 6>Is today's VC spotlight. Let's bringing Michelle Gonzalez.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 3>She is corporate vice president, Global head of Microsoft's bench

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Fund twelve. And what's so fascinating is you are aligning

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 3>with your own thesis driven view on investing, but also

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 3>basically what works alongside Microsoft's own business focus and in

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.719
<v Speaker 3>many ways helps turbocharge some of the companies that you

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 3>have in your portfolio. Where is anything being done outside

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 3>of AI? I mean, is everything about artificial intelligence fee

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, thank you Carolyn for having me here. Yes, we

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 11>view AI as a revolution on the order of mobile,

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 11>the smartphone technology, cloud computing, and the internet itself. We've

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 11>even had a few of our experts in house think

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 11>of it as the impact on society similar to electricity.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 11>And so we are all in on AI as M

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 11>twelve's investment investment ARM. We are Microsoft's Venture Fund, a

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 11>CBC thesis driven So the other areas that we do

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 11>cover our cybersecurity. We have the GitHub Fund, which is

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 11>focused on developer tools and oh look there's our portfolio

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 11>companies we have. We invest in infrastructure, deep tech as

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 11>well as enterprise applications.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's quite an expensive place to be investing right

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 3>now for AI, amazingly considering the macroeconomy. And it's also

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty competitive. What is your edge? I mean in lots

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of ways. We started to see big corporates come in

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>because they can offer basically the compute power. Is that

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 3>something that really has set you apart?

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this is actually a golden age for corporate venture capital,

0:30:56.280 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 11>particularly with JENNYI. Founders are looking for access to customers.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 11>So in the enterprise right now, there's a lot of excitement.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 11>So we're seeing about sixty percent of enterprises say they

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 11>want to adopt AI technology and then needing to have

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 11>sort of the right partners. So that's one aspect for US.

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 11>We also, as you mentioned, have access to technology. So

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 11>we just announced AAI supercomputer dedicated GPUs for M twelve

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 11>portfolio companies, and you see this as well with Nvidia

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 11>and salesforces investments as well. So for US, we look

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 11>to connections customer access, helping these companies get go to

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 11>market ready selling to the enterprise, as well as the compute.

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 4>I want to dig in on that supercomputer. It's interesting.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Access to compute is something we talk about in the

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 5>show all the time. It's great having the supercomputer be

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 5>built in the first place. Who pays for it on

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 5>an ongoing basis so that your portfolio companies and founders

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 5>can have access to that compute.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, what I can tell you now, right now, we're

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 11>offering this as a way for our companies to start

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 11>experimenting with their training, and it is free for a

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 11>certain time, but we are a business, so eventually they'll

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 11>be a paying for that as well.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 5>Michelle, real quick, give us an example of something that

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>you've invested in that down the road has ended up

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 5>becoming a part of Microsoft or the technology that Microsoft uses.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So one actually recent example here is in World.

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 11>We invested two years ago. I knew the founders from

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 11>Google and this is a company that's focused on non

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:44.719
<v Speaker 11>player characters, so AI characters in the gaming space. And

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 11>we just announced a multi year co development partnership with Microsoft.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:50.719
<v Speaker 11>This is about a year in the making and our

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 11>team worked very hard to ensure that this partnership came together.

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 11>This will now allow game developers on Xbox to have

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 11>access to almost an aigan co pilot, which will help

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 11>them with prompting for different scripts. And help building their

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 11>game development. So that's one example, but we have several

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 11>others well.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Corporate vice president and global head of end to Michelle Gonzalez.

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 5>When one of those examples goes big, come back on

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 5>the show tell us about it.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Definitely for your time, thank you for joining us.

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 3>The fallout from an Elon Musk post seemingly endorsing anti

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 3>semitic views, it continues to spread, whether it's Tesler investors

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>criticizing the billionaire or more advertisers continuing to flee his

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 3>social media platform X, including for example IBM as bringing

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 3>in Blumber Businesswee columnist Max Chafkin, who has been following

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 3>the rise the volatility around in a Musk for years now. Ultimately,

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 3>this has sort of been hiding in plain sight for

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 3>a long time.

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 6>Does this time it stick?

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 12>You know, Elon Musque, as you said, has kind of

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 12>had an edgy social media presence for years.

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 6>Has anyone who followed the.

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 12>You know, funding secured ruhaha five years ago knows? You know,

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 12>He's always sort of done things that are a little

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 12>bit outside of the norm.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 4>This is something further.

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 12>This was an explicit endorsement of a anti Semitic conspiracy

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 12>theory and in fact, an anti Semitic conspiracy theory that

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 12>has been cited in you know, a prominent mass shooting.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 12>It's the same philosophy that was used by the mass

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 12>shooter in the Tree of Life Synagogue who killed eleven people.

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 4>So certainly very serious.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 12>We've seen responses from investors, We've seen a handful of advertisers,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 12>you know, a lot of sort of backlash to this,

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 12>and Elon Musk, I think crucially, has not really responded.

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 12>I mean he's sort of attempted to do a little

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 12>damage control the night of, but mostly he's been tweeting

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.720
<v Speaker 12>through it and more or less standing by what he said.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 5>Well more than that, we've written to everyone and chased

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 5>every avenue we have to try and get an answer

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 5>or response from me or Musk. For what it's worth,

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 5>there's two things happening in parallel. So Media Matters post

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 5>this report on Thursday right and it shows that names

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 5>like Apple, Oracle, IBM, their ads are showing up in

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 5>timelines alongside sensitive content, for example posts that are pro

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 5>Nazi as an example, and X wrote to me this morning, Max,

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 5>we're showing their response right now, but they're basically saying

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 5>this is a function of the media matters, researchers, their

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 5>user base. In other words, this is how ad targeting works,

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 5>and therein lies a bigger technology problem about the health

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 5>of that platform.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we should also say that, you know, Linda Yakarino

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 12>posted essentially sort of like halfway towards a sub tweet

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 12>of Elon Musk saying that the company doesn't tolerate anti

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 12>semitism of any kind.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:47.439
<v Speaker 4>I do think.

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 12>It's a lot harder to make the argument that you're

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:54.720
<v Speaker 12>taking hateespe seriously when the de facto leader of the company,

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.720
<v Speaker 12>you know, Linda Yacarino's CEO, but Musk is the owner

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 12>and seems to be making all the big decisions is

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 12>going out there and actually actively tweeting hate speech himself. Right,

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 12>it's harder to say you're taking this seriously, and that's

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 12>going to create a huge challenge with advertisers.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Dustin Muskowitz, for example, he was one of the co

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.479
<v Speaker 3>founders of Facebook. He sort of put it out there

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.959
<v Speaker 3>in a social media post saying, look, Linda Acchni needs

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 3>to fire Elo Musk as CTO as chair. Whether or

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 3>not that's in any way feasibly possible. But at what

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 3>point do you think, if ever, this might have ramifications

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 3>on his holding of senior executive titles across his incredibly

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 3>successful businesses.

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think each of his companies are going to

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 12>be a little bit different.

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 12>Tesla, of course, is a publicly traded company with a

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 12>huge customer base. Now that customer base has traditionally been

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 12>left of center, right, these are environmentalists, and you got

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 12>to think that this is going to have an impact

0:36:55.600 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 12>on Tesla's already significant challenges generating Jaman and for its cars.

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 12>SpaceX is a government contractor, so you ask, like, is

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 12>the Biden administration are they Are they gonna They've already

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 12>they've put out a statement. You know, I suppose it

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 12>possible to go further. I do think at some point

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 12>we will see a response from us, because the volume

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 12>is getting up there, but it's telling. I'd say that

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 12>it hasn't happened yet.

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 4>All right, Bloombers match Traffckin.

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 5>That has been the top story of the last twenty

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 5>four hours. It is not the only story in the

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 5>world of Elon. SpaceX has a significant launch planned for Saturday.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Starship will do a full attempt.

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 5>Number two joining us Bloomberg's Lauren Grush and Lauren, what

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 5>is significant about this attempt and what are we expecting

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 5>to happen?

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 13>Sure, So, as you mentioned, it's the second time ever

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 13>that SpaceX will be launching a fully stacked starship system.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 13>So that's the starship space Trap on top of its

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 13>massive super heavy booster. And you know, I can't tell

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 13>you what we effect last time when it launched. Elon

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 13>mentioned you know, excitement would be guaranteed. Preferably, we're looking

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 13>to see them do quite a bit better than last time.

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 6>If you watch the last the first.

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 13>Launch attempt, they did, you know, have a few engine

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 13>failures and then the rocket started spinning out of control

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 13>and SpaceX was forced to intentionally destroy it. So the goal,

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 13>hopefully is to get a little farther than last time.

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Lauren just outlined the rocket science from from countdown ten nine, eight,

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 5>five forty to one zero lift off, what happens thereafter?

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 13>Sure, So, at liftoff, presumably all thirty three Raptor engines

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 13>at the base of super Heavy will ignite, lifting off

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 13>the entire rocket. Roughly two and a half minutes into flight.

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 13>We're going to be looking at this thing called stage separation,

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 13>so that's super heavy and Starship separating, and something that

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 13>SpaceX will be testing on this flight is known as

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 13>hot staging, So the engines on the Starship spacecraft will

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 13>ignite briefly while that super heavy booster is still attached,

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 13>giving it a bit of a kick and pushing it away.

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 13>That's something that SpaceX changed from the first launch and

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 13>it's the only thing. They can only test it during flight,

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 13>so that's going to be something exciting to watch. And

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 13>then if all goes well, hopefully Starship we'll continue on

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 13>reaching near orbit and doing almost a full lap around

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 13>the Earth before it comes down off the coast of Hawaii.

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 6>Right, all right, gosh, we thank you so much.

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 3>That does it for the decision this edition of BlueBag

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Technology yet

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, recap the podcast, right, we get yours