WEBVTT - Despite All the Noise, PPE Is Only 1% of 3M's Bottom Line

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg penl podcast. I'm Paul swing you,

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penil podcast on Apple

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Let's talk industrial earnings. We had

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>three M, we had Caterpillar out today, Lots of uncertainty

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in a second quarter, lots of uncertainty to the point

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of withdrawing guidance, as we've seen from a lot of

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>other companies, from some of these industrial companies as well.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>When we want to talk industrial companies, we talked to

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>town double Heart. She's covered this space for decades. She's

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg Intelligence. Karen, thanks so much for joining us.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So three M and Caterpillar take whatever you want. The

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>highlights you think we need to know. Um, I'd say

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>number one, the breath of of the decline. So everybody

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>knew things are gonna be down and down double digits,

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but cat every region, every segment. UM three M did

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a little better because of the diversity UM. So it's

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.279
<v Speaker 1>really the swiftness of the drop that UM is the issue.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Second thing is costs are doing pretty well. The decrimental

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>margins were not that at Caterpillar, given two cent sales declines.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>They really didn't do that badly on costs because a

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they haven't taking out structural costs for years and B

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they did move fa UM on three m You know,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 1>they have a diversity that actually helps them. And I

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>am a fan of the UM multies if they're well run,

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>although they're out of favor at the moment. And U

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they also saw declines and they're gonna expect double digit

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>declines in April, but not as significant as, of course,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the deep cyclicals UM. I'd say. The other point is

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody was talking about three ms ppe impact, you know,

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>all the respirators. It's less than one percent of sales.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly helped, but it wasn't a big deal. And yes,

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they're all eliminating guidance, you know, go ahead, go ahead.

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Well, no, no, I'm wondering. I was reading

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a story the other day about how executives never like

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to waste a good crisis, and that basically it's a

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>fantastic opportunity to to accelerate moves that they would already

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>be doing or find it prudent to do under the

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>cover of it's a crisis. And there's no place that

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that actually is more relevant than in the industrial space,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>where there's been an incredible transformation, whether it's downsizing and

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>shrinking and becoming more focused or other moves. What do

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you glean from the earning so far in terms of

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ways that they are reshaping in the wake of this

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that they may have done anyway. Yeah, I mean in

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the case of the two we're talking about today, CAT

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and three M, they both have long term structural programs

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>going on, and they have I mean CAT use the example.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh there there s g n A and their R

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>and D in sort of their non manufacturing custs were

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>flat um from nineteen while revenues were so I mean,

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they have already been taken big chumps of um costs

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and people, etcetera out of their business. But certainly they're

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>going to accelerate that. They're gonna call it more structuring,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure they're going to try to hold on

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to as much of the cost production as they can.

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean. The other big change is going to happen,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, is supply chain is going to change a

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>lot because why did we learn how long supply chain

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>from abroad are not good? And um, so you're gonna

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more. I mean three M does a

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of local for locals still as Cato killer, but

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>around the margin, there's going to be changes in that

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um And you know, so I think it's

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be a continuation um. And they're going to

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>try to hold on as much as as much of

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the cyclical structuring that they're doing as they can. So

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that's I would agree with you there. So, Karen, I

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of these companies, industrial companies have been

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>pulling their guidance like a lot of other sectors as well.

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But did the management give you a sense of kind

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of what their playbook is. Are they thinking that this

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>economic contraction that we're is occurring in the second quarter

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to be lower for longer or do they

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>expect this economy wants it's to we start to but

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>up to to re accelerate in the second half of

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the year. I think the general seems so far is

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lower for longer, Like you know, second quota is going

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to be terrible. Third quota is not going to be

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>great either. And you know a lot of these guys

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>still have significant US exposure where it's going to roll

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>down and of the shutdowns and it's probably gonna be

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a roll back up. Um. Both Caterpillar M three M

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>did mention the snap back in China, but that's the

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>managed economy, so they shut it down quickly and they're

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>spending money, um, you know, on on stimulation and of

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy and getting people back to work quickly as well.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So I would not and in fact that question came

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>up in the three M call. Could we use that

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>as a playbook? China is different, Um, Europe is snapping

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit. US is going to roll out slowly.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Is the general sense is going to definitely be a

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>tough year. I will say one thing on China three

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.119
<v Speaker 1>M is the economy with the diversity of their product

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>line they set across the boards map back. It isn't

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>just you know, one or two segments, So that economy

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is starting to roll back up. That's that's interesting. And

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>just real quick here, Karen, do we have a sense

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of whether the pace of the snap back is I

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hate saying this. I actually am feeling a visceral response

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>v shaped or is it a slower it douns back

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>or a w or you um, the China feels like

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a the you know, um us probably pretty slow roller.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>And and I don't think you're gonna see good numbers still,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you know there are you know, we're

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we're fighting over house fess we're gonna come back, you know.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>And uh so I and really the companies are really saying,

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.119
<v Speaker 1>we're going month by month, we don't know. And April,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we know is going to be down in the in

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>like the multi in the cyclicals, you know, but we

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>don't really know. And and three M, which who never

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>gives monthly orders, are giving monthly orders right now until

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we know what the heck is going on. Emerson is

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>also doing it, so they don't know, but they're going

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to give us as much as they can

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>along the way. They don't know. Seems to be the

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>theme of this earning season. Karen yu Bilhard, thank you

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with US senior industrials analyst for

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. And you know, honestly, John Farrows raised this point.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>A number of times. How can any company actually give

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>guidance at this point given the fact that people have

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a real lack of clarity around what's going to happen.

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they're giving monthly order numbers just

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, we'll give you the data as quickly

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>as we get it. Yeah, exactly, And the questions, well,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>what will this do to forward guidance going forward? Will

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>companies give less of it? Maybe it's time to check

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in with Bloomberg Opinion. We're pleased to be joined by

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>opinion communist Dr Ellen Wall. She's a president of Transversal Consulting,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>also a Bloomberg Opinion contributor. Uh. Dr Wall, thank you

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Boy, you know this, what

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in the oil market is just extraordinary. We

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>had negative prices just a week ago. We had tremendous

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>volatility so far, uh this week a little bit of

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it today. What if you could just set the stage,

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Force Ellen, and just give us a sense of where

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you think the supply and demand dynamics are today for

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>global crude. Yeah, the supply and dynamic dynamics for um

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for crude are not good. Looking at what's happening and

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we've still gone I think, by the way, not good

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>carry on good. So that way too much oil oil

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>production coming on the market on the market right now,

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and not nearly enough demand, and that's resulted in a

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>massive build in storage. And we're not just talking about

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>storage of crude. We're talking about gasoline stocks are way up,

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>diesel fuel, jet fuel. Massive amounts of this stuff is

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>piling up. And even though refineries are cutting their runs now,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that's leading to even more build up of crude oil.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that's really the main issue here as I

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think this in balance and supply and demand, which was

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>not helped, by the way by Saudi Arabia, which increased

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>its oil production to its maximum level of twelve million

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>barrels per day in April, and at the beginning of April,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seemed like that that might be okay,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but but really, uh runs economies around the world, we're

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly shutting down. We maintain that production when clearly there

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough demand. So that kind of just piled on

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to all of the other issues. So this complete imbalance

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>has been manifested, most significantly in the negative pricing in

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the May w t I contract that just rolled. We're

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing an exodus from the June contract as the biggest

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>oil et F in the United States amends it's it's contracts,

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's provisions, yet again in terms of what

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>it is willing to buy. My question is how long

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>will this complete imbalance last? A lot of people putting

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>faith that by to lie, things will start to ease

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and people will start to use cars and fly around more.

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that optimism is misplaced? Well, I

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a that's a it's not a bad assessment. Um,

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say that's it's it's optimistic, But I don't

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's too optimistic. I do think a lot

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>will depend on, uh, the psychological effects of this lockdown

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in these quarantines, because even as states in the United

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>States we're seeing them start to lift quarantine restrictions and

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lockdown restrictions. The question really is are people going to

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable going out of their houses, going back to work,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sending kids to school or camp? And that I think

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>will really set the tone for whether we're going to

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>seek demand roaring back or kind of slowly trickling back.

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And that could really, you know, that could spill over

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>past the summer and then over into into the fall

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and winter. Even win demand is traditionally lower, so were

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>we could even compound the problem if we don't have

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>strong summer demand by by heading into winter with lower demands.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, okay, we could see a massive

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>search in gasoline demand in the United States, for example,

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 1>as if things get back to normal and people are

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>psychologically ready to get back out there, but air travels

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not back, we could see a huge surge in gasoline

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>demand as people drive a lot more. So. It really,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I think depends a lot on how comfortable people feel,

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and also how comfortable they're made to feel by the

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>authorities and medical professionals. So, Ellen, how bad is it

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>going to get for our friends in the U S.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Shail patch? It's already bad h and I think it's

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>only going to get worse. It's it's very bad. Companies

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are shutting down. And the question I think now is

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not just is it going to be bad for those

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in the upstream, but is it going to spill over

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>into the midstream, into the pipeline, into the people who

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>are who are doing the midstream business? Uh? And are

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we going to see it spilling into into that area

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>because um we're we're seeing we can expect more layoffs.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we've already seen a lot bankruptcies. But then

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the question is does is still into midstream and do

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>we see long term damage to our midstream infrastructure and

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>our ability to um you get that oil to where

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it needs to go, because that has for many years

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>been kind of the limiting factor and we were just

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>starting to get over that issue right when this hits

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just real quick here, Allen, I'm wondering what this means

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the swining oil prices for Saudi Arabia

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and any potential political threat. Given how much of the

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>nation's budget relies on crude. I think that's that's an

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>issue that cannot be ignored, particularly at this point because

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>crude oil, I mean we have we have Brent barely

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>above twenty barrel, and at that level, Saudi Arabia is

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>making just a few dollars in royalties off of every

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>barrel of oil it and that's not good for the

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Saudy budget. And so far, what we've seen is basically

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a complete dismissal of these issues. The Socauty government is

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>choosing to rely on um borrowing money and that's not

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea, said, maybe it definitely has more room

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to borrow, but they're not. I think we're seeing them

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not really look at the long term nifications here. Dubai

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just announced that they're cutting cutting their expenses, and so

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really unclear as to whether they're going to see

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a need to cut expenses. Uh, the country could could

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be seeing some serious financial problems, which, as we know,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>can lead to political unrest. Ellen Wall, thank you so

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Ellen Wild, President of Transversal

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Consulting and a Bloomberg opinion contributor. In some ways, the

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>US equity market is going to be put to the

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>test this week as the big tech companies report earnings.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>The question is how much further can US talks rally

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>if they don't necessarily have the leadership of the tech

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>giants joining us. Now Jim Pulse in chief investment strategist

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>at the Loophole Group joining us. I'm wondering, Jim, do

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you feel like the market cannot continue rallying without the support.

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to say big tech. We're really

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>talking Amazon, Microsoft and Netflix here. I think I could.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that it. It would be hard

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if they are going to collapse, Lisa, you know, over

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a sustained period, have a big collapse. I think that

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>would be hard for the market to avoid going down

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>again in a big way. But if they just underperformed,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's maybe even to be expected somewhat in

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the sense that UM, you know, look look where we

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are here, where there's now greater expectations of restarting the

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>economy after shutting it off the position UM and with

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that comes I think new leadership, and you're seeing that

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and things like the performance of the high Beata SMP,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Hiberta Index, small caps, cyclical stocks, you know, over defensive stocks, UM,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>even international markets doing better. I think it's real likely,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>which often happens at the start of a new recovery.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>If you off the markets starting to look in discount path,

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is that's the type of leadership you get. UM, So

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it might well be the new era of growth if

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you will, does have a period of under performance as

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the economy re emerges from the code UH from the

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus crisis, and I don't I think that could happen

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>within the context of the general rising market. Even though

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>under performance by some of these most popular areas. So, James,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the you're hearing more and more from scientists and medical

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>professionals that it's possible, probably likely that the virus or

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>return in some form and the fall in winter. Do

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you think the market's discounting that risk properly as we

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about reopening and and maybe a V or

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a U shaped recovery at the end of the year.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Who knows for sure, Paul. I mean, there's very little

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about this whole crisis that everyone knows, um including myself.

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I do think one of the things

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that's likely to happen that there hasn't been a lot

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of discussion about, is sure, it's gonna take a while

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>before this virus is gone. It's going to take a

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>while before we get all parts of the economy back

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>functioning again, even in general, let alone at full capacity. However,

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that does not mean that there might come sort of

0:15:53.520 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>an appreciation among investors in general, companies, police officials that

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>both this virus and the economy can coexist, and you know,

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>both can be there and be a functioning capacity. I

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's one or the other necessary, which is

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what we had here of late. I think in part

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>because the primary issue has been the hospital crisis, and

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we've come a long ways in increasing our capacity and

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>abilities there, and we're probably even if we have a

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>re emergency, viruses not like to be as severe as

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the first time, And that combination means that we might

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly have re emergent virus problems down the road, but

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily mean we're going to have to close

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>everything back up again. I think we're already learning how

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to operate within the context of a live virus so um.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the realizations that even the market

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>might be coming to is that both can coexist. Collection

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and your calm assessment of markets is a very nice

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>contrast with sometimes my my gut fear when I read

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the headlines that cross and you know, Moody's

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>sending me a report fair enough, but you know, at

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>least you know you know there there is there is

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of sanity and preservation. Right now. We should note

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that we are seeing the NASDAC turned down negative seven

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tenths of a percent right now, in the SP is

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>just up a tenth of a percent to do up

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>about a quarter of a percent, And I think to

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>your point, you could have both the sort of reality

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the unfolding crisis and also look to the other

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>side of this. I guess, then, are you buying into

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this rally? Are you just sort of sitting tight and

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>not expecting armageddon? Um? I definitely. And my approach, I

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>guess is what we're doing star gapl Boil is kind

0:17:55.359 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of sitting with an overweight new era UM a mile overweight.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, well, not just not just tech but

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of new era growth. It's a little broader than

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just tech, but certainly teching colms, part of healthcare, part

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of consumer discretionary. UM. You know, I I think I'm

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>okay with with sitting in an overweight in that area.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm doing is taking advantage of any weak

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>periods here, which will probably have some more and I

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>would start to add more in the broader participation is

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in this market that haven't done that well even in

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the last bowl. I look, as I said to High

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Beta SMP high Baya, that I'd looked to cyclical sectors

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>would look too small caps. I've looked at international and

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>add some of those compoets here because I think they

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are likely to have leadership over the next year as

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we as we sort of re emerge from this this thing.

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mentioned the fear, and to me, that's

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a that's a good thing. I think historically whenever we've

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>had really high levels of fear, and we've got all

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>three fears in this one. If you're losing your money

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market, if you're losing your job, and

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the fear of losing your life, if you're on steroids,

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if you will. Typically that's led to good returns and

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>risk assets. Look, I know, but look where we are

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in this crisis too. You know. We we start when

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it first hit in China, we thought, well that that's

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not really a problem. And then well, it's just gonna

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be a temporary problem. And then it was this is

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>full blown crisis. And now it's evolved too. Oh, it's

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>never gonna go away. It's gonna last wherever, it's gonna

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally change capitalism. It's never gonna go away. I think

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the stages of a crisis that we're in the

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>last stage at least committing Hey, James, thanks so much

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We appreciate it, appreciate your calm perception

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in the Marcus James Paulson, chief

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>investment Strategies for the Luthold Group, on the phone from Minneapolis.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate his thoughts in the markets here, and

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>at least you were just mentioning you kind of did

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a quick market check here. The market's really kind of

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>rolled over after a strong opening here as I guess,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we're digesting earnings and thinking about what the Fed may

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>or may not say tomorrow. Yeah, good luck, good luck

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a narrative for this market. That's all

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to say. I mean, for minutes a minute,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you could change the narrative, and it's easy to do

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it one way or another. Right now, let's take a

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>look at the pharmaceutical industry after we did get some

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>results from Merk and Fiser, and before we dig into those,

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be joined by Max Niece and biotech,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>pharma and healthcare columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. And I never

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>want to miss up a chance to ask Max about

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>vaccine development, where we are in terms of that, and

0:20:54.560 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>how well international pharmaceutical companies as well as scientists are

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>cooperating to move as quickly as possible to make this happen.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>So it does seem like there there is a broad

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>movement towards cooperation UM companies, sharing science, beginning to focus

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>on the issue of manufacturing its scale, which is the

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>thing you have to worry about once you actually have

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>an effective vaccine UM. There there was a report this

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>week from from an organization called SEPPI that's working to

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>do some that coordination in advanced candidates that they hope

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there may be a vaccine available for sort of limited

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>emergency use by by the end of this year. But

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>again that would be in very small quantities and only

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>if everything goes very very right. So I still looking

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>probably at at some time next year or later for

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>first sort of the broadly available vaccine that it would

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>take to to really get get life back to normal.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So Mark did report earnings today and they waited in

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>on the potential for a vaccine. What do they have

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to say? So Mark is a company that that has

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit later to to sort of join

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the fray UM. They they are actually the one company

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of the major pharmaceutical groups that's actually successfully developed a

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in a response to pandemic. So anything that they

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>end up doing is worth responding or at least worth

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>watching very closely, though they will be at least to

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some extent behind some of the other efforts that started sooner,

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, hopeful that that that past experience will lead

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>them to a faster and more effective result at some point.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So Max, So that's the the updil on the vaccine.

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>How about testing, that's the more immediate issue here, Testing equipment,

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>testing laboratories. Where are we on that? So there has

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>been some some genuine improvement and in the last week

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>or so in terms of the testing rate, and and

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>we just got a plan from the Trump administration um

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that that should hopefully bring a little bit more of

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>federal attention, funding and coordination to the issue. Their their

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>goal of the Trump Ministry School is somewhat short of

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>what some experts have called for, which is a really

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>dramatic increase in testing such that you know, people could

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>could be tested multiple times of months, those on the

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>front line things like that. Um, you know, it'll take

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes to get to the point where we have really

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>robust diagnostic testing, let alone that sort of broader surveillance

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and antibody testing. But definite progress and uh, it's covered

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>by the Trump administration should help some extent. I remember

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago, about I don't know, three months ago,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and other diseases and other medicines were in the forefront

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of people's minds, in particular with cancer and the development there.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, you know, fives are in particular has

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>been particularly on the front lines with new drugs to

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>combat cancer. We got their earnings. Let's talk about some

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the other things we're learning aside from the coronavirus,

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>because life does go on another way, is too sure.

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So the two main things at point to from from

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Fiser Murk a nive artists also reported today the impact

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that you see in terms of their business cuts in

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of two waves. The first is that they are

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing some reduced sales for for drugs like cancer drugs

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>they're administered in a hospital settings as people have a

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>harder time doing that safely, does certain things you can't avoid,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and so they're they're doing all right. But Murk, for example,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.959
<v Speaker 1>did cut it's expected to sales because it has a

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>high proportion of those kind of drugs. In terms of

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the long run, there there may be a slowdown in

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in various drugs development efforts because it's, as you might imagine,

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>it really hard to run a cancer drug trial right now. UM,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about getting a lot of immuno compromise people

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to one place, and often to traditional clinical trial sites

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which are at hospitals and husion suits that are being

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>used for other things right now. So it's it's both

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a short term financial impact and a long

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>term disruption of research. Um, it will be some time

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>before we find the real extent of both of those.

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Companies are still being pretty cautious about making really forward

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>looking projections given the sort of early stage of the

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>epidemic and the recovery from it. Max, you cover all

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>things healthcare, how come there's not a Manhattan Project equivalent

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for UM treatments and vaccines for this virus. So to

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent, there is that there is a lot

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of public funding being directed through organizations like set B,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>through through Barada UM towards supporting organizations that that are

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>working on these treatments. I think more, very much, so

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>more has to be done in terms of you know,

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>doing surge funding, coordinating efforts, making sure that the best

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>candidates get as much funding as they could possibly need,

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and then the most expensive problem, the one that really

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>needs that Manhattan Project effort. Something that I know Bill

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Gates is devoting some attention and resources to, is when

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you have viable vaccine, how do you rapidly deploy it

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>produce it at a global scale. That's something that that

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't been done before and is going to require

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>an enormous amount of spending and wasteful spending in that

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>if you wait for, um, you know, concrete proof that

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the best possible vaccine, the one that works,

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to even start building manufacturing, they won't even be ready

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>nearly in times. You're gonna have to build some manufacturing

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that you'll never knew, never end up using. Considering that

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these vaccines use different and novel technology.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's the thing where I think you can you

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>should have a dramatic increase in funding and attention because

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that is a difficult, huge and thorny problem that will

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>need to be solved in the next year or two.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking with Max Nis and biotech, pharma and healthcare

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. And Max, since we have you,

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and since we have some time, I want to take

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this conversation a step further, not just as far as

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>where we put money to develop the vaccine and to

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>do it quickly, but the entire ecosystem of creating vaccines

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and these crucial medicines. And I'm struck by Joseph stigletz

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>uh column in Project Syndicate, Nobel Prize winner economist at

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Columbia University, where he was saying that the entire structure

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of drug creation is flawed and really goes against creating

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these crucial medicines. Can you speak a little

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>bit to that and how maybe there'll be a rethink

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of the incentives around creating new medicines that could potentially

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>be beneficial going forward. Oh. Absolutely, this is a real

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hobby horse of mind. And the medicines that we incentivize

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 1>are are the ones that are the most profitable, and

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>often specifically the ones that are most profitable in the

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>United States. Now, what that often means is a lot

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of money goes towards rare disease drugs, towards cancer drugs

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>that are really expensive and don't get a lot of

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>reimbursement pressure because there aren't that many people that that

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>get any given cancer disease. What that leaves behind our

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>our vaccines, and especially vaccines for infectious diseases, which you

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>know by their very nature, they they often arise and

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in less developed countries, they arise at moments of great

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>public health need where there's not a lot of tolerance

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for for high pricing. UM. And then when you point

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to another potential source of future pandemics UM antibiotic resistant bacteria.

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>The incentive if you actually develop a good UM, a

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>good medicine for those is to use it as little

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as possible. So UM, you know, the pricing, the things

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that we we tend to value and pay money for

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are not the ones that we want to most incentivize.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I very much hope that we can begin to build

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>different incentives so there's not just uh an incentive to

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to kind of jump in when there's a crisis, but

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to develop the sort of long term pipelines and technology

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that that will help when when the next crisis runs

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>around us to be more prepared at a global level.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So Max, just I know you talked to lots of

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>different people within the health spare, healthcare space, scientists and

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and doctors and so on. You know, I guess one

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>thing to me is a lay person here. This is

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a virus. It's similar to other coronaviruses, maybe even the

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>common cold, maybe the flu. It doesn't appear from that

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>perspective that we have to literally start from ground zero

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and have these biotech companies, these farmers companies saying they

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just you know, it's going to take a lot of

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>time like any other new drug. Again, am I reading

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that wrong? Is this so different that most of these

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>scientists really are starting from ground zero? So you know,

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this is actually kind of getting back to incentives. You know,

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the closest cousin that we know about to this coronavirus

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is Stars, and there were Nasson efforts developed a vaccine,

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but since that outbreak peter out, there was no financial

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>motivation to keep developing in and because we don't have

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>well developed incentive structures or or long term financing structures

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for developing vaccines that don't have a profitable economic future, uh,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>those vaccines stopped getting developed. So we didn't make a

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of the discoveries about coronaviruses that might help this

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>time around. Um, you know, there there are some vaccines

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for animal coronaviruses, but none of them are are especially effective.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It just all comes down to the fact that making

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccines is incredibly difficult, and making a vaccine for a

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>comparatively new and poorly understood virus, even though it's related

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to ones we know, it still does take a lot

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of work from scratch to develop a long lasting and

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in robust immune response. That's just a fundamentally difficult scientific

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>problem and one that well, there have been you know,

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>real recent advances, there's still a lot that we're learning

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on the fly. The most advanced candidate, or one of

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is what's called an m R and a vaccine. The

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>good nice part about it is that it's very adaptable.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It's something that can be produced quickly in response to

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a new pathogen. We we don't know and we're going

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to kind of have to find out on the fly

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is whether it's safe, reliable, and effective and beyond that

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>able to be produced on a mass scale. So it

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>really is unfortunately a lot of work that does have

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to be done from scratch, both drough to you know,

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bad incentives, under investment and sometimes the wrong priorities and

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>any where we spend money. In the meantime, there's another

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of immunity, heart immunity that could be created by

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 1>people getting the virus potentially we don't know, and not

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>being able to get it. Maybe again, we aren't sure.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>W h O has put something out saying that there's

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>no evidence showing that you do get immunity to the

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>virus once you already have it and developed the anybodies.

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But there is a question of how much of the

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>population and the hardest hit area in in the United States,

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>how much of the population has been exposed and there

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have been studies. Is this right that there about of

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the population has already been exposed max. So that that's

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>one study and fundamentally that's an extra lation from a

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>limited sample size based on a test of unknown specificity test. Yeah,

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know so, I I wouldn't be surprised if the

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>final answer, once we have more data from a series

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of reliable tests, isn't too far off from there. But um,

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it may be that that it is substantially less than

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that once we get a sample size that better represents

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the broader population and a more reliable test. And then

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on the question of of herd immunity. Um, that that's

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>one where we don't just need to you know, this

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>one round of testing. We need to do that test

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and then follow people for months in order to get

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a sense of whether reinfection is possible and who might

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be vulnerable. UM. You know that those common coronavirus is

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>those seasonal ones we mentioned before. People lose immunity inside

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a year. That's why they come back seasonally. UM, if

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the case for for this virus, then if we

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>reopen and cautiously, if we we aren't Julian, and we

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>may see you know, really robust seasonal reoccurrence. And that's

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>something that we really need to understand and that should

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>inform the sort of ongoing response for not just you know,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the next few months, but for years of it. Max Neeson,

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for taking all this time with us.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Max Neison, biotech, pharma and healthcare calumnist with Bloomberg Opinion,

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from New York. Thanks for

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg PANL podcast. You can subscribe and

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa abram Boy. It's I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>abram Woit's one before the podcast. You can always catch

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.