WEBVTT - Interview With Bill McBride: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholes on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra very

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>special guest. His name is Bill McBride. He is the

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>founder and runs the website Calculated Risk uh one of,

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if not the best economic blogs out there, according to

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everybody. So this was not my typical podcast

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in the regular interview when I'm supposed to be doing

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is asking questions and listening to what the guest responds,

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and asking follow up questions and going uh huh uh huh. Yes.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. I know Bill since the first

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>day he started blogging, we were exchanging emails. I was

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>linking to him. I could I think I could honestly

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>say I linked to Calculator Risks before anybody had an

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>idea who they were. And um, I have been using

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>his research and his charts for the better part of

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, ten eleven years, and we have always

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>had an email relationship. I think we had a couple

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of telephone conversations, but I had never met Bill before

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>until the night before we recorded this podcast. We went

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to dinner and I purposefully, with with eight people, I

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>purposely did not speak to Bill and told him, I'm

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to talk to you until the two of

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>us are in the studio, And so this is supposed

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to be an interview, but it's not. It's it's supposed

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a podcast Q and A. But it really

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is a genuine conversation between two people who know each

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>other for a decade and really have never sat down

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and had a conversation before. So if you're looking for

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the usual Q and A that that I try and

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>provide each week on the show, this isn't it. This

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is me and Bill just shooting the breeze. It's two

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>guys who know and respect each other for a long time,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and I found it illuminating and fascinating. Um, there's probably

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>too much of me and it relative to what should be,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>so I'll apologize for that in advance. But hey, if

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you've ever known someone for what seems like forever but

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>never met them, when you finally get to meet them,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of back and forth, and

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>truth be told, I thought the conversation was fascinating. I'm biased,

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So let me stop babbling because you'll hear enough of

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that throughout the rest of the interview with no further

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Ado my two hour bull session with Bill McBride of

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Calculated Risk. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. I have a very special guest here

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>is somebody I have known for quite a long time.

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you a quick background on Bill McBride,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>who is the proprietor of Calculated Risk. He launched the

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>website in two thousand and five. The idea behind it

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>let's put simple opinion free analysis and charts about economic

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>data out in public where everyone can easily access it

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and understand it. Uh. It has been called the best

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the economic blogs by such luminaries as Paul Krogman,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, Time. Pretty much everybody

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>puts the blog in its list of top twenty, or

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Top fifty, or top one hundred or top ten blogs.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Bill's background is uh. He has an NBA from University

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of California, Irvine, with a background in management, finance, and economics.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And he had been running a public company or involved

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in a public company in the he retired and was

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>looking for something to do. UM. Bill McBride, welcome to

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>bloom Bark. Thanks for having me, Barry. Let's start with

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>your background so you're you're running a public company. You're

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the co founders of a medical devices company,

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is that right? That's correct. Yeah, I was the head

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of R and D. So so tell us about this

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>what what was this company about? Ultimately it got sold

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to a larger company. Yeah. Where we started in the eighties,

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we were designing cardiac telemetry, which is it's it's like

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>a little box that you wear on you in the

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>hospital that connects the picks up your e c G

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and sends it to a central monitor in the hospital.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's for in hospital use. Did you have a background

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in in medicine? I had. I had worked previously in

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a telecommunications company, so it was more technology than medical. Yes,

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and my mindergraduate grease and chemistry, so you know, it's

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mix of things. And so what we

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>did is we um we kind of revolutionized that industry

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because in the eighties was when everybody was making the

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>transition to digital in a out of different areas, and

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we used some of the cell phone technology to make

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the first digital cardiac telemetry. So so when someone gets

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>an e KG in a hospital or the monitoring UM, well,

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're in particular awards in the hospital, um,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>postcardiac surgery. If they once they like to take you

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>off the bedside monitor and put you on a little

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>telemetry unit so you can get up and walk around

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and still be monitored. And so that's the use for it.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>There's other We also pick up other parameters in addition

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to E c G and then we sent it back

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to a central monitor with With that, then they can

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>have a nurses station, they can monitor the people walking

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>around the hospital. So what happened with this company in

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, So well, we we we grew very quickly.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We we designed telemetry for most of the major medical

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>device companies. They started using ours under their own name,

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and then uh we took it public in nine and

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>then sold it to ge Medical. And at that point

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you are gainfully unemployed, that's correct, as one of the founders.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So the site launches in oh five. What led you

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, I have an idea, let's analyze economic data. Well,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>economics is always a hobby for me, and uh I

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>specialized that and when I got my m b A,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>that was my focus. Um, you know I in the

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands, I had a few things that I

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>was doing in two thousand four. I remember thinking, what

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.119
<v Speaker 1>is a blog? And I think I stumbled across yours

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>said the big picture. Uh I if you remember Angry

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Bear when it was rich the three PhD economists, and

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>so that kind of inspired me. I said, well, you

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>know what to really understand that, I'll just do one.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'll start a blog, but I'm not going to

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>write it about politics like most of the blogs I saw,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And what I want to focus on is housing because

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of what I was seeing in southern California had just

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gone off the rail. Yeah. You know, I was at

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the gym one day and I was talking to this

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>attractive young lady who was a secretary for the Hurly

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>T shirt company. Oh sure, I know exact stuff. And

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh, one day she came in and she goes, Bill,

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I just bought a condo. Now this condo she bought,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>she bought for four hundred and some thousand dollars. And

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>she had already told me she was making. She had

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>moved up. This is No. Four, This is a No. Four,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and she was she was probably making. You know, she

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>had had gotten up to about forty a year and income,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>so forget the old rule of two times tend to

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>tend to one with no money down. And so after

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>she told me the story, I said, how can you

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>afford that? When she started telling me about the teaser

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>rate she had for the first year or two, and

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, what happens when that that comes do?

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And she goes, well, I'll just either you know, might

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>either I will have more income, or I'll sell the unit.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, well, she if this is happening all

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>over the place, there's gonna be no one to sell

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it to. So I went home that day and started calling,

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, some mortgage bankers I knew, and I said,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is this really possible? Oh yeah, you know, you don't

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have to have you know anything, you know in um

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the ninja loans, no income, no job, you know.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>She she was, yeah, no, acid she was. She was

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a great client, she had a job. Okay, So so

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you launched the blog and you decided to do something

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a little different than most blogs. Calculated Risk is fairly

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>opinion free every now and then, and it's much more

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>rare than the average blog. You'll come out and say

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this is my opinion about X y Z. I mean,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that's like an annual event. Most of the time, you're

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>just saying, here's the data, Here's what it means. Why

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>get why do you know? I do slip in a

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>sentence or two here and there about what I think

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is happening with that data. And then every once in

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a while, I will, like you're saying, right, a overview

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>piece of where I think we are in the economy

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and where we're going. You know, back in in two

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand five, one of the things I focused on was, uh,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I was actually calling up regulators and asking them why

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not doing anything? So I I, you know, I

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and I would write about how which either regulators are

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>not doing their job and here's why I'm Barry Ridolts.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>guests this week is Bill McBride. He is the founder

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and chief author of the highly regarded economics blog Calculated Risk.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump right back into this. You've developed an expertise

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in in mortgages and housing and real estate economics. Was

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that something that you had done in a previous life

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or is it just you gravitated it towards that because

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you were in southern California and real estate in the

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands had just gone insane in California. Well,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it really is a combination of things. My dad was

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in real estate, and he was and he was a builder.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>My mother was a real estate agent. So it was

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>always supper time conversation. Did you have that sort of

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I at least saw what he was doing and chatted

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with him about it. Uh, you know, after I started

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>my career, I was more science and technology oriented, but

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I always have been interested in real estate. And so

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean I and and you know, I

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>had that a little bit of a background of what

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>they went through. And I saw my dad go through

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the ups and downs. Where was he a builder? What

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the country in down to San Diego? Ah,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So that was really an interesting and fast growing But

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>your dad was in the Navy. There's a huge naval

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>base since in fact, I think that's how we ended

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>up there. That makes sense, Cornado Island in that whole area,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So we went from the Navy to San Diego to

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>San Diego and housing. So post war that had to

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be just a huge boom over there. Yeah, san Diego

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>was booming the whole time. I you know, when we

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>moved there when I was five, and so you know,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I was there until I went away to college. It

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was boom time back in the it was the sixties

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and seventies and and but even then there were big

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>waves cycles. Yes, you could you could see the ups

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and downs. There were times when my dad was clearly

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>struggling financially, you know, elctially, my mom was a elementary

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>school principle, so she had a good, steady income. Uh

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so they could offset each other. So so, how do

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you respond to the comment that was everywhere back in

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousand's, you know, we've never had a

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>downturn in the price of housing in the United States. Well, well,

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>first of all, that's not true. It's utterly false. There

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have been repeated examples all the way back to the

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Great Suppression. You know. One of the things is if

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, I'm sure you do, back in two

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five, is the data wasn't very good or

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>very available, especially on house prices. You know, we we

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>had the what's now the f h f A house

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pricing decks just based on the Fannie and Freddie mortgages.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But we didn't have Case Shiller publicly available, or core

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Logic public or several of the other you know, Zilo,

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that was just that wasn't even somebody's thought yet, you know.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And so now we have so much better data, and

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those guys case Shiller and core Logic have

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>published their data back to previous times, and you can't

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>see those ups and downs. And so the people that

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>were saying there were no ups and downs, there was

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>no real good data for them to make that argument.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And and obviously they had never lived in southern California,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>because I had seen the ups and downs in the

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>house prices absolutely and and like there was a there

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>was a real boom in the eighties. House prices peaked

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>around nineteen nine in my area, and they slid all

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the way to the same exact experience in New York

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>seven crash shakes Wall Street, a little bit alan Greenspan

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>cuts rates. You have a little bit of a surgeon

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in real estate throughout the eighties, and then it rolled over.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>If you bought a condo or co op in New

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>York in nine, you did not get back to break

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>even on that purchase price until plus or minus. And

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 1>you can see in the charts. But during the Great Depression,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we know real estate prices of course plummeted, and I

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think it was someone at Columbia, I'm not positive did

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a study on Manhattan real estate and they estimated that

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>real estate price has dropped sev during the Great Depression.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you just shrug that off in

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>your models? It's it's impossible. I never understood why people

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>say real estate prices I never go down. I never

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>understood it because there's there's plenty of evidence. Even though

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the data that we have today, there

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was still plenty of evidence. So so let's talk about

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I've I've been using the charts and the information you

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>put on cafe thank you for for how long? I mean,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be at least a decade. And I

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>got into a fight with the Wall Street Journal about

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it was I want to say, oh six or oh seven,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and they were doing the look real estate prices are improving,

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and the response was, well, no, it's June. They oh,

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it month over month. You have to

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>look at it year over year. So I grabbed and

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I brought a copy of it. I'll put it up

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on the site. I grabbed your existing home sales year

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>over year by month that shows the same seasonality it right,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know it it's at its nata in December and January,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it slowly rises throughout the spring, peeks later in the

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>fall and rolls off. You can't just look at June

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>versus February and say, oh, housing is fine. But that's

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of media was doing. Yeah, you know,

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that was one of the issues back in

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five was the media. I don't think

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they really knew how to report housing. There was some

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but to say that people missed it completely is wrong.

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>There were some excellent articles, for sure, and and there

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>were some award winning articles. And and give us David Strettfield,

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>who was at the l A Times at the time,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>now he's in New York Times. He won awards for

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>his housing articles. They were excellent. And uh, you know,

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean so so there were there were plenty of

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>good articles, but I think they got lost in the

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>bad articles. And and you know, and you know how

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the balance media works in classic false equivalent. If you

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>if you, if you talk to somebody who was very

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>concerned about housing, it could make a good argument on

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the making mortgages. They would always go talk to somebody

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>who was impressive background who would say they own house

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>prices never go down. Uh, there's nothing to worry about,

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. And and so I think for the average

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>person who was getting their information that way, it was

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult to see that there was a problem. Now. I

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>run into people all the time to say, you know,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was something really wrong. So most people

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the back of their minds, especially people in areas

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, southern California, Florida, you know, Nevada, they

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>were thinking, I think a lot of people are going

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong here. How much of that is hindsight

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>bias where but by the way, it could be. You

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>recall the number of people legitimately in prints in a

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>verifiable way warning about housing prices. There were a handful

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of people, a handful of us. You were one, well,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you me, you know, I, I know a few other

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>people they were doing it. But now every person I met, Oh,

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of course I knew the housing crisis was about to collapse. Well, well,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I just I just looked at certain data and said,

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this ratio which has been consistent home price to meeting income,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the cost of renting versus cost of owning. You covered

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a ton of this stuff how how frustrating was it

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>when you saw the train wreck coming, but you couldn't

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>really convince the average person that hey, something wicked this

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>way comes. Well, you know, I I was really focused

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>on trying to to to get the regulators to pay

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>attention to it, and and that was a very frustrating

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>process because they because they were paying attention to it,

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but they couldn't do anything. Their hands were tied. And uh,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the regular person. Uh, you know, I

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>started my blog, I was writing. I was writing for

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>friends and relatives, you know, so I was mostly just saying, hey,

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they asked me, I would tell them

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>don't buy please, don't buy anything. You know. Uh you

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know it's but you know, you put a blog out

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there in public, and so all of a sudden people

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>start reading it. I'm very hults you're listening to mass

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest this

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>week is Bill McBride. He is the founder of the

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Calculated Risk website, lauded by everyone from Business Week, Wall

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal, uh New York Times as the single best

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>economics blog there is. Um I put out a request

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Big Picture as well as on Twitter uh,

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if any of your readers had questions for you, and

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I got a long list of stuff, let's let's jump

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>into some of them. I think some of these are

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. First question, you're one of the few bloggers

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>who still maintains a comments section, and it's a mess. Sorry,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's honest. Why maintain comments? That's a

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>great question. And and uh, you know, comments early in

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the blog were unbelievably outstanding, amazing. As a matter of fact,

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought the comments, who are one of the key

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>elements to the blog. The comments turned more into just

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a at session about unrelated information, off topic, trolls, spam,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gone off the right. Yeah, well you know, NPR,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, just killed their common sense. You know.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>We we do have a comment section where people have

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to register so that you can't just get the drive

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>by commentors, so the trolling goes down, but the it's

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it's basically off topic most of the time. BuzzFeed does

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 1>this thing now where you can comment, but only if

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you register through Facebook, which is your real identity, so

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you lose a lot of the really off the change.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But the racist nonsense, yeah, you know, the they and

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>we don't have that for the most part. And you know,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>those people that are racists are bigoted in some way.

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>We've tried to band but the I keep it because

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the old timers are still there, but

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they chat more than they more than the economic content,

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're kind of friends so they so, you know,

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I just I leave it for them. If people don't

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like the comments, then don't don't participation, don't read the

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>comments exactly. That's my view. And I if there's you know,

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's ever you know, the anti semetic things I

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>banned so many people, well, it gets to be a

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>giant curation time sockets complicated. I had some people write

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>me when I killed comments on the Big Picture, which

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>is years ago. Um, well thanks for the site, but

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm done. If you don't have comments, you know, you

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>understand how many hours a week it is to maintain

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the comments, and you guys don't see the really horrific comments,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and it just got to be a total dreg But

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that was a lost era. I thought the comments were

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastic on you could read a really interesting article and

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>then spend a half hour reading some really smart, insightful

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>feedback on that audit there. Well, you know. I'm sure

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>some of your commenters are asked you any many of

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>mine were, Uh, one of the one of the I'm

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sure we're going to talk about my code blogger, Tanta.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>At some point I met Tanta through the comments. Yeah.

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>She she showed up and was commenting, and every time

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>she would either correct something I had said. If I

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>said something about the mortgage industry, and I would call

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it my mortgage banker friends, and they go, oh, yeah,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>she's right, all right, So I instantly corrected on my

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>blog and I'd credit Tanta and and uh, or she

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>would say, hey, yeah, that's you know. She she was

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>really sharp, she knew everything, and she was very quick witted.

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how I actually got to know my

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>code blogger. Through the comments. That's where I met her.

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk about that she starts writing for you,

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and well she this is what happened, and she commented

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot in two thousand five. In two thousand six,

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>she disappeared from the comments. About six months later, she

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>reappeared and she told me that she had been diagnosed

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with stage four ovarian cancer, had had left her job, uh,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and she had stopped commenting because she wasn't able to

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and she didn't even think she was going to live

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and so uh, I then asked her, well, why don't

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you come and write for the blog if you're not working,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because she's working in the mortgage industry, and uh, and

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it took me a little convincing, but she started in

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think her first post was in December two thousand six,

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and almost two years before she passed away. So she

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>was a regular on the side for a while, but

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately succumbed to the illness. Yes, but you know,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>she was stunning before she started writing for the blog.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I probably wrote longer pieces. And then when she showed up,

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>she undergraduate Greems in literature. Her pieces were brilliant. Uh,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they were they they One of her goals, she said,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>was to make blogs entries could be long and still

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>well read. And she accomplished. Uh. She would explain mortgage

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>uh issues in complete detail and all that stuff still

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>on the blog. Um. And you know, people from the

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve were crediting her and in papers they were

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>writing because they were learning from her too. And you know,

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>she was real mortgage banker. She knew the banking, the

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>mortgage banking industry inside and out. You know, she was

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely terrified and and and she was scared because they

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>were they were all the mortgage industry was pulling back

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on the risk management sign and his money to be made, yeah,

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and worry about risk later, oh yeah. And and and you know,

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and in the in the whole industry changed. They went

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>away from the three c's. You know, where you're you're

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at credit and collateral and capacity to pay. And

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we just went to FICO scores. I'm Barry Ridhults. You're

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My guest

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>today is Bill McBride. He is the founder and proprietor

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the highly rated Calculated Risk Economics blog, well regarded

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>by many people. You don't have a PhD in economics,

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a you have an m b A.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>How did you go from essentially a medical devices h

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>company founder to one of the leading lights in in

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>financial economics writing well, I don't I don't know if

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a leading light, but but it's very nice all

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>those things people have said about me. But you know,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I I I've had always had an interest in economics.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I've always had an interest in housing. I study hard.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I I dig hard to try to understand the data.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and I've a lot I've worked with a

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of economists since I started the blog, a lot

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of economic academic economists that that I call friends. Now

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>give us some names, Jim Hamilton's down fantastic, Mark Toma

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>up in North another one, Tim Dewey. Sure, so you're

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you're just named my starting lineup of that economists, right, Yeah? Yeah,

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean so so, uh, you know those guys I

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>chat with, I chat with several of them all the time,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and you know, it's it's so it helps

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>me focus on what on what's important in economics and

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>how to understand it. And and I think they liked

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that I really dig through the data and and so

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a mutual thing. So, so let's talk

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the state of the U. S. Economy.

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to throw some things out that I hear

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and see and read online that I question pretty um significantly.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And I want to just get your your feedback on

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>each of these. Um. You know, the recession never ended,

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy is still spiraling downward, and we're going into

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a depression. Well that's that's that's unrealistic obviously. UM. I

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>mean employment is up substantially since two thousand nine. Um,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the economy is growing slowly from a

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>GDP perspective. Uh. That's driven in my view by two

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>main things. One is, for some reason, productivities down, um,

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>something that I don't think anybody can really control, at

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.479
<v Speaker 1>least measure productivity, right. But also and a key thing

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's very rarely mentioned is demographics. We've we've the prime

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>working age population started decreasing, not not workforce but population

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in about two thousand and ten and decrease for five

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>or six years. And that's because of all the baby boomers.

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you were born in the fifties or sixties,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's say you're born in nineteen fifty, that would

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>make you sixty six today, you're you're thinking about retiring, right,

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're out of the prime working age. You know,

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>when as you get past sixty, which I can say

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is happens you you you have less energy, you know,

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So are you're speaking personally? You know? Yeah, you know

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm t talking about myself. So so you know, when

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>when you get a little older, you you know, I'm

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>still doing things, but uh, yeah, I don't think I'm

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>as excited about spending a lot of hours a day working,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but you do spend a decent amount of I spend

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount, nothing like what I was spending in

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine. But that's that's not age related, that's

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>just crisis crisis related. Yeah, you've got to be doing two, three,

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>four hours a day. Yes, oh yeah, at least you're

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>what my wife describes as gainfully unemployed. Right, It's like

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you would be doing this whether there was money in

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it or not. And h is there money in it?

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a question that people ask, well, what is there

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>money and blogging? Well, first of all, when I started

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the blog, I didn't take any advertising. For two or

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>three years, I didn't even think about it, so it

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.719
<v Speaker 1>really was just a hobby. People said, hey, take advertising,

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I eventually did. Uh. There's not a whole

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of money in it, but but you know, there's

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pays for some nice dinners out there you go. So

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>so it's still more or less a hobby that that

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>keeps you Uh yeah, active, Yes, you know. I I

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>guess I have this thing. I promise my readers that

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I would call our try to call the next recession,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I said, And you've been pretty consistent saying we're knowing

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>your recession anytime. Yeah, So I I'm gonna say I

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope to hang around long enough to do that,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see one in the near term at all,

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I'm gonna be around for a while.

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Let let's look at the indicators that you track in

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>order to identify a recession. And you track everything from

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>rail car waitings to two ships coming into the l

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.479
<v Speaker 1>A port. It's not just GDP employment. You look at

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it a ton of stuff. What what are some of

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>your favorite indicators to look at? Well? To me, the housing,

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>new home sales, housing starts. I always start there. You

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>know employment, of course, it's the big big dogs, right,

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So I mean employment went negative for several months in

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a row. I would really be Now. I heard from

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>some political candidate that all of the employment data is fake. Well,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I I think I don't think there's probably a better

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>organization than the b l S as far as telling

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>us being transparent on how they do their work. They

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>publicly announced all the changes. It's always you think pademically driven.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>You can go to their website, you can understand exactly

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>what they do, what they don't do, and and how

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>any changes which have been minor over the years in

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>how they gather data. Uh, so they're completely transparent and

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you call them up and ask them question. Yeah, and

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>they're and they're very they're very helpful. So the the

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the it's possible to disagree that, oh there there's a

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>different way to measure it, but to say that they're

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>doing it fake is outrageous. And there's outrageous. Yeah, this

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was what three thousand statisticians, PhD s, economists, etcetera. Could

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you really fake something and not have that leak out somewhere?

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not all from one party or the other. It

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like an impossible claim. It is. It is impossible,

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and and there are independent ways to measure some of

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that and and and it looks good too. You know,

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>whether you look at a dB employment, which is a

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>private measure, they're on it. Also, they're they're part of

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the part of the conspiracy. That's the always the answer,

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 1>you get it. Those those numbers are very very good

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and and uh, you know, do they describe everything? No,

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the model isn't perfect by any stretch. But but but

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the but the methodology is transparent. It so you can

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>go in and it's the same as like new home

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>sales or housing starts. You can go and see what

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they count, what they don't count, you know, how they

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>add them in. Uh. You know that was very important

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>during the crisis because you had to see you had

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to see, like a new home sales, how they canceled

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they handled canceled contract was a whole separate Yeah,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and they handle the completely different than the public companies.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So and so you could you could kind of say, well, gee,

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know they're going to catch up on this and

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they're following and uh, you know, the public companies basically

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>have to here's what here's what we got there reporting

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>net sales where the UH Census Bureaus tracking a house

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and then if it gets canceled later, then they take

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it out. So it's it's uh, but those sales that

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they originally reported is still there. It's kind of it's

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so it's's important to understand that methodology right now that

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that's irrelevant because everything's tracking. The you know, if you

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>follow the home builders and you follow the new home sales,

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty much tracking. So let's let's talk a little

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more about housing. My friend Jonathan Miller, who's a highly

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>regarded appraiser and data assembly on housing, has been talking

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for a good couple of years about the problem with

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>no equity and low equity homeowners and it sort of

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>gums up the chain of purchases. In other words, Hey,

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we're in a starter home. Up, we have a second

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>kid on the way. Let's sell this house, move up

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to a four bedroom, the people selling that house move

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>up to a larger house, and those people move up

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to the big mansions. But as long as the people

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom starter home are are kind of stuck

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>there because they don't have enough equity, the whole system

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is sort of compromised, and it means that there just

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't enough supply out there. How does how does that sound? Yeah? Yeah,

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>well you know that that is a problem. And and

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and housing historically always has been this kind of chain reaction.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>One guy sells and he can buy in another sell

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and buy and sell and buy, and so the situation

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're in today's is pretty unique. Um. One of the

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>things that's rarely mentioned is is that the reason there's

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>such low inventory, especially at the lower ends, is because

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of all those investors buying millions and millions of by

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the rent, by the fix and flip, by the Yeah, yeah,

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the fix and flip doesn't hurt the market, but the

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but the by the rent, by to rent, there's a

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>there's millions of homes that were bought to rent and

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>at a huge discount right the height of the crisis.

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And and so those guys and and and I talked

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to some of those guys in private equity or orstors combination.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know moms and pops that bought six

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>eight places. I know some larger investors that bought thousands

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and and uh and for the most part, none of

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>them are selling really Yeah, so they know why is that? Well, okay,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if they sell, they have to play capital gains and

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then and there's one short way to make sure you

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>never pay capital gains taxes. Don't have a capital gain. Yeah,

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's always to me, not a great reason not

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to sell. Yeah, but but where else they're gonna put

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>them up? But then they have to move it to

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else, right, and and you know, what are you

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? And and those guys rents have gone up substantially.

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>They were buying these things with cap rates of when

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they bought them, and the and the rents have gone

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>up dramatically, so on their original money, they're just they're

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just cranking it. If they sell it, even if they

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>can avoid paying capital gains. If they sell it, avoid

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>capital gains, where do they put their money and get

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that same return? You get one five one on the tenure. Yeah, yeah,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not negative yet, it's a positive. So those you know,

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I I know several people personally that own you know,

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe three or eight. They'd rather just get the income

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're never going to sell them. We've been speaking

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>with Bill McBride. He is the founder and chief blogger

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at Calculated Risk. Be sure and check out the site

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Calculated Risk for just an incredible slew of economic data,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>charts and analysis. If you enjoy this conversation be shown

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>check out our podcast extras, where we keep the digital

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>tape rolling and continue to discuss all things economic and digital.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Check out my daily column on Bloomberg View dot com

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>or follow me on Twitter at rid Halts. We love

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>your emails and comments. Please write to us at m

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I'm Barry rid Halts.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast. This is Barry ridhalts Bill. Thank you

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for doing this. You know, you and my pleasure.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>You and I have been ranting each other, no exaggeration.

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be ten twelve years. I think we

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>had dinner this week. I think that's the first time

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you met in person. Is that right? So I have

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>tons of of of stories and anecdotes. There's so many

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>questions to get through. And before I get to my

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>standard questions, there's there's just there's just so much stuff

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to do. Um. By the way, before we

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>get to those questions, how are you enjoying your your

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>week in New York. I'm having a great time. The

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>weather couldn't be nicer. Yeah, yeah, thank you so much.

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You you it was miserable, ninety and humid last week.

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>It's been it's been perfect today. I went for a

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>walk in the Central Park this morning. But it's been

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been delightful. So so you're now spending to three

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>four hours a day blogging in the midst of the crisis,

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 1>oh eight oh nine, how much time will you devot

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>into the sun? I was probably spending maybe eight hours

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a day full, a full day's work. But but I

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was up, you know at five in the morning, uh,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>and and doing work. And I was, you know, right

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>before I went to bed, I was doing work and

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>not it's not nine to five, it's it's all day.

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's digital sixteen seventeen hours a day. I did sleep

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a little, and every once in a while they have

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to set my alarm clock for the middle of the

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>night because I knew something crazy was coming when oh really,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so you would wake up to see, especially when stuff

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was coming from Europe. You know, I'd be going all great,

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I see my attitude as always, well it'll be there, Yes,

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it'll be there in the morning. That's my attitude. Now

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>when when did you realize that the site was really

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>catching on? Uh? You know it kind of it kind

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of just build. It's a boiled frog. Yeah, it happened

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>over time. You know. It was interesting because at first,

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I'd say the first month because you see the traffic data.

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was just sending it to friends and relatives.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>All those posts now have lots of his but that's

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 1>because people have gone back in time, you know, maybe

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in February two thousand five, Dr David, I'll tag of

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland FED or Atlanta FED. Now, I guess he stumbled

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on my blog somehow and he mentioned something that I

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>had written, and all of a sudden, my traffic was,

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred readers a day out of the

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>blue readers a day, and and uh, and I went wow,

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened there? And then something interesting happened is one

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of those readers was one of the three PhD economists

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>at Angry Bear, and he called me up and say, hey,

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>could you write a weekly column about housing? Because that's

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>because I was completely focused on housing at the time,

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I wrote a good reason. Yeah, I wrote that,

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and within several months I was up to two thousand

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>readers a day. And what was the peak traffic in

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:22.479
<v Speaker 1>oh eight oh nine? Yeah, probably averaged throughout oh eight

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and in oh nine probably add twenty thousand readers a day.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>What does that work out to be on a monthly basis? Uh?

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I was probably four million, three four millions. It went crazy.

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>It was crazy. It was crazy. And then I'm probably

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>less cut and half after that. Yeah, I'm probably now right,

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe forty readers a day. But these are

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>forty important influential readers. Yeah, well they're you know, they're

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>obviously people that are very interested in economicus. And we

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit during the broadcast portion about comments.

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>How frustrating is it that comments was once so crucial,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>so seminal, and now they're just a wreck. Well, you know,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in general, I don't I mean our our comments since

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to register. It's they're they're okay, but they're

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>they're more clicky, and and there their long term people

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>who just talk about off topic subjects with a queue,

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not not web click. Yes, yes, like like it's groups

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of people. Yeah, they they have their topics they want

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. It's unrelated. It's really it's completely different

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>when when in two thousand five, two thousand and six,

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>when I would post something, the topics were on topic.

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean the comments were on topic, uh and insightful. Yeah,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I met a lot of great people,

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>including my code blogger you know, to me, I was

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about this a little bit earlier. Is I remember

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>using Yahoo Finance when it first came out. That's you'd

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>comment on a company and the comments are great. It

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't take long since they were all public for that

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>just to go completely downhill and be completely useless. In

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, I very vividly so I began as a

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>trade in the in the mid nineties, and I very

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>vividly remember stumbling into Yahoo comments and a family member

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>had this huge position in I Omega had split two

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>one two for one. What started out as a ten

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar investment was like a three million dollar holding.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>And I remember following the Omega Yahoo message boards with

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>people driving I think the factory was in Utah or

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>some crazy thing, driving by the factory on a Sunday

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and all Wall Street is underestimating the revenue and profit numbers. Hey,

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the factory parking lot is filled with cars on a

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. These guys are working double and triple shifts,

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like it was that sort of serious investment was It

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. You get that, You get that kind of

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>local color. Somebody knew something about the company, not insider information,

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>driving by just a parking lot. That's public, man, It's

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing, so and and and you the only you

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>could get a little bit of that on tweeter. Now

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>somebody might take a picture of the parking lot. Of course,

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>then you got and you don't really know if it's

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>real or not that that's become and there's been a

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of scams and hacks and things. You really have

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to be careful with with what you see. You know,

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about this very very little. I wrote Bailout

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Nation with my commenters. I would post up three word

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of forenger word thing in the evening that I had

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>written during the day. What do you think about this?

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Tell me your thoughts, and people would say, have you

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>seen this article in the Christian Science Monitor off? You know,

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>because obviously the front page of the Wall Street Journal

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times everybody sees. So you have

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this huge research team and people making suggestions and comments.

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>The golden age of blog comments was unlike anything. You know.

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because one of my commenters wrote a fiction

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>book partially in the comments, called American Apocalypse. He's a lawyer.

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately has passed away now, but he It became a

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty good seller on Amazon, and he wrote it in

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the comments and people with It was a fiction thing about,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the financial crisis had really gotten dad,

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean total second great depression or worse. And but

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's just kind of like you and

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>bell on Nation, except for he started it in the

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>comments and it was fun. It was kind of fun.

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever gotten invites to speak or or take

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with anybody from Treasury, Department, Federal Reserve, House,

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Joint Economics Committee, anything like? Nothing? Well, the Treasury invited

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>me back once. Um, but that that was it. Uh.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>When you say he invited you back, they they. If

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I came, I got to to, you know, meet some

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>senior people. But but I was in California, so it

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't very union for me. I got the Tim Geithner invite,

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>which I think was the public relations Yes, did you

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>go to that? See, that's the one I was talking about.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>And did you go to that? No, I was in California.

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>It's too far. It was in New York. It was

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>too far because it just smelled like one of those things.

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Come on in, he'll come in, shake some hands to

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.479
<v Speaker 1>a photo op. And why did I travel three hours

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>each way for this? It was? I politely responded and said, hey,

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 1>let me know the next time Tim is in New York.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to meet with him, but I'm not interested

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in a photo op. And that's that was the sort

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of outreach trip. Oh, these bloggers are causing us trouble.

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's did you ever get a sense that you

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>were causing trouble too, elected officials? Not at all. I

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>never felt that at all. I um no, you know,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>there there was a time I think there was a

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of resentment from the media about blogging. Let's talk

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about that. I used to do this thing, and I

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>know Tanted did something similar called read it here. First

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning when so I launched the Big Picture

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and oh three, but before that it was a Yahoo

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Geo City site. And after No. Eleven I had written

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a piece that kind of had gone viral. So it's like, oh,

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this internet thing going to be big one day. And

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so I would notice the amazing coincidence. You'd write about

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>something and then a day or a week later it

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>would show up in Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Barons,

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Business everywhere, the whole media. And my initial well, no

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>one would just steal this. I must have picked something

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up and other people from wherever whatever motivated me to

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>write this, so they must have been motivated by the

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing. I don't want to say it was in

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the ether. But if I'm looking at an economic news release,

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bill is looking at an economic news release, and

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a reporter at x y Z paper is looking at that,

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we're all looking at the same thing. And I assumed

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a coincidence. And that changed. In two thousand

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and four, I wrote a long form piece called Radio's

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Wounded Business Model that basically trashed Clear Channel Communications and

0:42:55.480 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>trashed Infinity Broadcasting. It was really just rant and a

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was. Three weeks later Barons has a cover

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>story and I'm a music buff and I hate program radio.

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't motivated by anything out there. This was just

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>me going on a jag. And then Barons has a

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>cover story called Losing the Signal, and it was practically

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a point by point thing. And that was a moment

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 1>where it dawned on me that hey, it's not in

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the ether. These people are ripping you off. What Tanta

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>did something, well, tell us what what she did with

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a similar bit of a thievery well, you know. But

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>first I was working with a lot of reporters on

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 1>on their stories, and you were anonymous back then. Yeah,

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I would have people would call me up um and

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and and uh we would chat about a story, possible angles,

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to write it, and and every time they would go, I,

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>my editor will not let me mention that you're writing

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a blog calculator risk. Can can I mention that you

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>used to be the executive this company? Use your real name?

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, no, you know, if you can't, I'll help

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you the on stories all you want that's there and

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that good will over time paid off. But the you know,

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I said no, I I just want to stay anonymous.

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know why at the time, but it was

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just kind of fun for me. And and you were retired,

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you weren't looking to Yeah, I was. I wasn't. I

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>wasn't trying to make any money. I wasn't trying to

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>start a war. Uh Tanta. When when she came on,

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>she used to call me up. Yeah, she go, Bill,

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they ripped off your story or they ripped off my story.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.399
<v Speaker 1>And and so then she wrote a piece about how

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if if you want to use our

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>information point you really should mention that you where you

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>got it from. That's just kind of standard practice in journalism.

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh yeah, and and and several journalism professors have

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:57.720
<v Speaker 1>told me they use her piece two and they teach

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it in their classes, colleges, and and and it was

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>immediately after that that we started getting mentioned everywhere. And

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of the reporters I know wanted

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to mention us much sooner. So it was editorial and publishing,

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>not the actual right. Yes, the writer. Listen, writers, I

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:18.399
<v Speaker 1>write a daily column. It's drummed into your head from

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>day one. Always source, always link, always quote, always footnote,

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>don't just take. And my nightmare is reading something and

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of subconsciously ferreting it away and then it comes

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>out and it's like, oh, I I ripped someone off

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>by accident. That's my nightmare scenario. Yeah, you know you

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and and and I think that's always hard for a writer.

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I I I try to be very very careful and

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>linked to everything and and uh so what what I

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>started doing after the Baron's piece that to me was clearly, oh,

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>this isn't even nuance, this is just blatant. So I

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>started a series of reading here first columns, and I

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:01.280
<v Speaker 1>would do side by side the two column I'd highlight

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff I'd put on the blog, and especially with the

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the outlets that included the author and editors. I never

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>had that from Bloomberg, and I'm not just saying that

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm here, but I've had it from because their

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>sources they have a really crazy strict sourcing mechanism. But

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other places, I would take the two pieces,

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>say what a coincidence. I wrote this on Monday, you

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.320
<v Speaker 1>published this on Tuesday. I would send it to the reporter.

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I would send it to the editor, and I would

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of politely on the blogs say read it here first,

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>And eventually I think they became embarrassed. So like oh

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>four or five, oh six, once you got into oh

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>seven and oh eight, and I was you know, I

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>had an official job title where I was a media

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a market strategist and a media spokesperson, So it was

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>easy for me to say, hey, you don't have to

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>quote the blog, but at least credit the source. You

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to link to it, but you know

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you're stealing my work products. Well, you know, they would

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the media would mention people like professor Jim Hamilton and

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>San Diego or Mark Thomas um but they'd always mentioned that, oh,

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Mark Thomas a professor at University of Oregon. There was

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 1>an official tie. Yeah, not that he's writing a site

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>called the Economist View, which had the information you know

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and say, so you know that that's what they were

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>comfortable doing, but not the referencing the blogs. It took

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a different but they shifted and they sure, well what

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 1>first they rolled out their own blogs? Yeah, and and

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>then they realized that that it's all complimentary anyway. In fact, uh,

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we would drive traffic for them. We mentioned that, oh

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>hey wait they you know, this guy had a good

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>thing about this, and and people would go read that

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic And it got to the point where, uh, journalists

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>would send me their articles and say, hey, if you

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>like this, could you could you mention it or linked

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to it or or if yeah, and and and uh

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>it really helped them. They would they when did that

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>lip take? When did it go from O blobs we

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>could steal with impunity and no, it had to be

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seven. Two thousand seven, that's when you

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>first started noticing people asking yeah, and and and all

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden we were and it really boosted our

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>traffic to did did you ever get day loosed with

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>pr pitches? Hey would you like to meet the executive sales?

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Well you get that every day, you do, Yes, every

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>day I relentlessly, relentlessly black Matt Black um list those

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the people that just sends ridiculous. It's one thing that

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's unsolicited, but I don't really care about the sixteen

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>year old girls new pop song that's not relevant to

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're reading. Yeah, well, you know I I I

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think I saw the other day there's more PR people

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>now than there are journalists in America two to one,

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or something that explains. That explains, that explains a whole lot.

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that's awful. That that is a horrible,

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>horrible thought. Um On on the terminal, you have this

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>option on the bloomber terminal, you have this option. So

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>every now and then a reasonable PR pitch comes in

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or or read will say so. I had Jeff Maggian Calda,

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>who is the founder and former CEO of Financial Engines,

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>which they work with Nobel Laureate Bill Sharp, and they

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>were really one of the first entities out there to

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>do what people are calling robo advising today. But it

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was Bill Sharp and an entire four way to manage

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for one case through a series of intelligent algorithms, and

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they run like a hundred plus billion dollars. So someone

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>who worked for the company, sends an email, I love

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Are you familiar with Magine, Calda and Financial Engines? No?

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I never even heard of them. Their public company this

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and that. So I look them up. I'm like, how

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have I never heard about these guys? They are all

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>rock stars. So that sort of pitch from somebody, that's

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what It's a relevant pitch. Chin It's right and that

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't even a PR person. I think it was. Um,

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a quarry doctor at Boing Boing said, uh,

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:13.320
<v Speaker 1>he published a whole list of so all these PR

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>shops email you and your black blacklist the PR shop.

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So now you're getting these pitches from Gmail. So he

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>went out and published, I think was him. I hope

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. He's getting the wrong person. A list of

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody on this list is a PR wanker who is

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>using Gmail. They're multiplying so fast you can never So

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>here's a list. Add them to your black list and

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you won't ever see anything from that. And I just

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 1>read that Apple and Google are now doing something similar

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on the phone side. Um, it's amazing. How how this

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>problem so far, I've digressed so far. Let me jump

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>back to some of the questions that we just didn't

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>get a question, a chance to discuss. You mentioned your

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you're we're publishing anonymously. What made you decide to come

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:06.800
<v Speaker 1>out from behind the cloak of anonymity. Well, first, I

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>started that way just because I thought that's how you

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>did it. I mean, I just, oh, yeah, calculated risk.

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was fun. You know, people don't need

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to know who I am. The people who I originally

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>sent it to knew who I was. The when Tanta

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 1>came on board, Tanta was very concerned. She was very

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously very hopeful that she would recover, so she wanted

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.319
<v Speaker 1>to maintain and she she was very concerned if she

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 1>said certain things, she may never get another job. And actually,

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 1>people in the industry knew who she was immediately. Yeah,

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's only so many people that could be writing what

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:43.319
<v Speaker 1>she wrote, and uh and and then there are very

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>few of those were women, so so uh uh. But

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:48.719
<v Speaker 1>so you know, then as long as she wanted to

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 1>stay anonymous, I stayed anonymous too. I didn't want pressure

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 1>on her. And so, um, the first time my name

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>actually came out was in the obituary in the New

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>York Times. Really for Tanta no kidding. That was the

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>first time. I believe that was the first time my

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>name came out. Uh. And then after that, my name

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is in the open. So I went ahead and just

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>started saying yeah. And that was pretty much because they

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>quoted me in the New York Times talking about Tante

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and obviously they had her real name in that article too.

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So I posted on the blog, asked calculator risk anything,

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.839
<v Speaker 1>he's a little blast for the pet from the past. Yeah,

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I look at that. I pulled the old header from

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the blog spot days. Yeah, I like I like that picture.

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I like that picture. I always like that. The path

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>right down the middle between the trees. I took that

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 1>up in Canada. That that's really so you guys can

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:40.799
<v Speaker 1>see that on on the big picture. So the anonymity

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of ended. It ended when Tonta passed away.

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It just it wasn't a conscious decision. Soon as soon

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>as she passed away, my name was in public anyway.

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I I you know, I obviously linked to the New

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>York Times the Bituari, which was actually a lovely, lovely

0:52:56.160 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it was they wrote a beautiful piece and and and

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably the first time anyone got im

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>obituary for being a blogger. She was so famous. I

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>think that that might very well be the case. So

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about a related issue. What is the war

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on data? I wrote a piece I don't know last

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>month or whenever that was the Bookmarke did and saved

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it knowing this was coming up. By the way, for listeners,

0:53:26.080 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Bill lives on the other side, literally about as far

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>away in mainland, United States. You're in Newport Beach, and

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we knew you were coming in five months ago, four

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>months ago. So I started saying saving stuff. Oh, let

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>me ask him about this. That one has been with

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>me for a while, So let's let's jump into it.

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 1>What what is the war on data? Well, it's we

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>were talking about a little bit earlier. Um is there's

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a sense that the data is false by a certain

0:53:55.920 --> 0:54:00.800
<v Speaker 1>group of people, not just the employment not just flogyment data,

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>but but they they you know, I'd have to go

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 1>back through my piece, but I forget all the things

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I was pulling out. Some of it's political, some of

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's with people with positions, I mean market positions or

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 1>housing positions. Yeah, they're just there. There's there are a

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>group of people. It's just like people that reject climate change.

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>If you will, you know, uh, what do you say

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 1>in climate change is real? Now I gotta go, I

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta go rethink everything. Um. But you know, there's there

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>are people that are that are rejecting data and going

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:32.959
<v Speaker 1>with what they want it to be. The data wanted.

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:35.439
<v Speaker 1>They want the data to be this for whatever reason,

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's political or or cognitive dissonance. Yeah, I think

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think some percentage of these folks don't even realize

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. Some are just outright lyne but there's

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a healthy percentage that simply can't acknowledge well or or

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:54.479
<v Speaker 1>they see their own circumstances and and maybe believe that

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's more widespread. You know, maybe maybe for whatever reason,

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing more inflation than the inflation data shows and

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>because of where, how how they spend their money. Uh,

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, no question, rent's gone up faster than than inflation.

0:55:09.520 --> 0:55:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So if a rent, if a rents a big portion

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of somebody's monthly spending, they're going to think what those

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbers are are incorrect. So, you know, there's some

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. It's just that I think people are taking

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that people in positions of of of some power are

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 1>taking that and or or commentators and and just attacking

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 1>data right and left. And you know, if if like

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we were talking earlier, you you have to have a

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>good system of collecting data and you have to be

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>transparent on the data. And that's what we have at

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States probably has the best data in the world.

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But who's even close. There's no one even said well,

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Western Europe is far behind us, and um um. And

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:51.799
<v Speaker 1>at dinner last night a reporter who is hometown in

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:54.840
<v Speaker 1>London was saying, the UK has terrible data competed in

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Yeah, I mean and and and they're

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're actually very good. It's you know, in the world.

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 1>World in the United States is just excellent. And well

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we started post recession and post Great Depression in the

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thirties and forties. This really came about, um from from

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of people where it was pretty clear there

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:15.799
<v Speaker 1>was no data to measure progress or lack thereof. Well,

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that anytime you have something that you want

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand, you have, the first thing you have to

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>do is measure it. Uh and and because then if

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you say you make a policy change, well, how do

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know if it did anything? If if you're if

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:30.759
<v Speaker 1>you can't measure it, and it's like it's like, you know,

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:32.720
<v Speaker 1>losing weight or something. If you don't get on the scale,

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:34.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you know if you've really lost weight? I

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>guess you could check. Yeah, but that's another measurement system.

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is. Yeah. So um, yes, After the

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Great Depression, they started doing really collecting much better employment data.

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of hoping after the Great Recession that

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 1>there would be an emphasis on collecting better housing data.

0:56:52.280 --> 0:56:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I think they could improve the housing data in what way?

0:56:54.920 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So so we have so let's go over some of

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the housing stats. So you have the existing home sale,

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>which is reported by the National Association of Realtors. You

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>have a new home sales, which is UH Census Department

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Bureau UM, which is sort of kind of self reported

0:57:12.560 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>by the builders themselves well independently, independently. And I recall

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>writing something that you can want to take a three

0:57:19.880 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>month average anytime you have an outlier to the upside

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 1>or outside and invariably flip reverses the fire. That's right,

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we had a huge upside. Yeah, yeah, I would, I would.

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say, hey, it's great, it's a great, great number.

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say, yeah, yeah, that's that's And if you

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at the data, you can always

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 1>spot the outlier and the month the following, because what

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>ends up happening is people, well they'll revise that down

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and and the whatever follows it will be a terrible month,

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and that will eventually get get revised up. And that's

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons I do graphs anyway. It is

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because it kind of can show you where you're at. Yeah,

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this would be a little spike up and and but

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it's within the range of variability. We're getting there anyway.

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I you know, it's only six fifty, that's not even

0:58:04.160 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that big of a number. So that's right. So, so

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we have new home sales, we have existing home sales,

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we have contract signings, we have permits for for building

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 1>housing starts. Is a very important number. Why is that? Um, well,

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the biggest impacts on the economy is

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 1>how many from the housing industry as opposed to existing

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>home sales. Existing home sales is just there's a mortgageys. Yeah,

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the Yes, people do frequently buy a little more furniture.

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But but but it's it's more from the direct sale.

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 1>That's all it is is the broker's fee and a

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>few other fees mortgages. That adds to the economy. But

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>when you build a new home sales, the whole prices

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is new. It's that you've added to the existing wealth

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the company, the country. Uh so it's it's a

0:58:53.600 --> 0:58:56.360
<v Speaker 1>big deal. And what's the ratio of existing to new

0:58:56.440 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 1>home sales more or less? Uh, it's about eight to one,

0:59:02.920 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe tend to one, even he used to it used

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to be closer maybe six to one existing to the new.

0:59:09.640 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Um there's there's been ever since the crisis, a lot

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:17.919
<v Speaker 1>more existing home sales. New homes got slaughtered. Well, because

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you're you're competing against foreclosures, you're competing against dramatically. Although

0:59:22.960 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about foreclosures and and before

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I get to foreclosures, I almost forgot multi family homes.

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That's been a big uptick post crisis. Also, yes, And

0:59:33.800 --> 0:59:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is that just a reflection of rental demand or well? Yeah, Well,

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the nice things about for multi

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 1>family is there's the demographics have been incredibly positive for him.

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 1>At the same time you had all these people moving

0:59:47.680 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>out of foreclosed homes, and and and looking for a

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>place to rent. Now, a lot of those houses were

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>bought to to rent, and so that you would think, oh, well,

0:59:56.520 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>would you wouldn't have this multi family But but you

0:59:58.640 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>do have this huge surge in people in the twenties

1:00:01.760 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's the main rental a demographic. So there's a

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>big cohort there. They're not going to buy. There's well

1:00:08.560 --> 1:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to move into the buying years. So we

1:00:11.160 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>were moving out of parents basement. They're certainly renting. Are

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they forming households? That's another great data. Yeah, and they

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>will household formation and they will and and uh, you

1:00:20.840 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>know the problem with household formation data. See, there's an

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>area that we could really improve is everybody uses the

1:00:26.240 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>HVS Housing Vacancy Survey or whatever and and uh, and

1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that data is not consistent with with the annual census

1:00:36.240 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or the ten year census. So and the Census Bureau

1:00:40.280 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is aware of that and they're trying to figure out

1:00:42.360 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>why that data is so inconsistent. Um, but that's something

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>they can do a much better job of, I think

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is is uh household formations. So the next president gets

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>elected and they say, I want to see some better

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>data on the economics side, and they pick up the

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>phone and say, Bill, you mind coming to d C

1:01:01.080 --> 1:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for a year or two. We have some work for you.

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>What sort of stuff would you would you look to add, refine, improve,

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>or eliminate. Well, I think housing is is so important

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that I would definitely go through the methodology of each

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of those. Um. One of the interesting things I think

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is h for housing starts. If I'm remembering this correctly,

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it might be new home sales, they don't include certain condos, right,

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so if if if if they're side by side condos,

1:01:31.840 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they include them. But if their high right condo condos,

1:01:34.200 --> 1:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't. And it's really complicated, and and and there's there,

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're moving to where there's more of those being built,

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so we could have more units coming on the market

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>than anybody's really aware. That has to be fixed. Yeah,

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that that just needs to be resolved. What what aren't

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we measuring that we should? Well, you know, I I'm

1:01:55.480 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not completely confident in the private sources of of data.

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the National Association of Realtors and

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw them under the bus because I know you

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do that. We all so everybody who

1:02:10.080 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>blogged about realistic and economics used to make fun of

1:02:15.000 --> 1:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the chief economists for the n R because they were

1:02:19.240 --> 1:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>from the peak and oh six to the bottom in

1:02:23.040 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they were just relentlessly optimistic. And I figured that guy's

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:31.959
<v Speaker 1>named David David Young, that's the current guy. Um Laria. Yeah,

1:02:32.720 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>so he had the same book. So the fantastic thing

1:02:38.040 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>about that book is the same book came out two

1:02:41.120 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or three times, same picture, same everything. This is a

1:02:45.080 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>blog post somewhere about it. And they just changed the

1:02:48.160 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>name of it. So the first name was something like

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll google it and see if I can find it.

1:02:53.160 --> 1:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Why now is the time to buy housing? It was

1:02:55.280 --> 1:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>right at the peak, and then two years later they

1:02:58.400 --> 1:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>reissued it with a different house and take advantage of

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the decline in housing. And then the third the third

1:03:05.640 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>cover was We're all going to die run for the

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>hills sort of thing. And and by the way, that

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was at the bottom. It was it was quite quite amazing. Well,

1:03:14.360 --> 1:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know when we're talking about than are you know,

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a good relationship with a lot of the

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>industry people at nb A Mortgage Bankers Association, which I

1:03:24.800 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>find to be a much more realistic Those guys are.

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>They're straight shooters and and they and they do an

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>excellent job. National Associated Homebuilders same thing than are For

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>some reason, they're more cheerleader oriented because it's it's real

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>estate agents and uh and and uh here it is.

1:03:39.080 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually found it the O five, Um, David Laria,

1:03:43.280 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are you missing the real estate Boom? And then and

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>then um the second version of the cover in two

1:03:50.040 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six was why the real Estate Boom Will

1:03:52.800 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Not Bust? And then the two thousand and seven and

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, there's a house floating and a couple

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>with a kid looking at it. In the first two editions.

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The third edition, All real estate is local. The house

1:04:04.200 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is missing, it's just at and that is actually, this

1:04:08.480 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is not fabricated. This is true. It's the same book.

1:04:13.960 --> 1:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, could not have been more wrong with with

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>three different covers. It's quite it's quite uh quite astonishing.

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But their role is a cheerleader, right, I mean National

1:04:25.240 --> 1:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Associated Homebuilder their role they they they they're the homebuilders

1:04:29.480 --> 1:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>really want to know what's happening, and so when they

1:04:31.840 --> 1:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>gather data from them and distribute it, it's real. And

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>same with Mortgage Bankers Association. I'm not saying the NORDS

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>data isn't real. They just they they spin it. They

1:04:41.640 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>spent it very positively, and it's not really gathered in

1:04:44.960 --> 1:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a very scientific way. So, um, so isn't it based

1:04:49.280 --> 1:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on on on what McCall it on? Actual closings? Don't they? Yeah?

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know they they're they're sampling. It's mushy, Yeah,

1:04:57.640 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they were. They sample. What they do is they sample

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>certain large multiple listing services and that's they based it

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>off that. And then every what they were doing is

1:05:07.360 --> 1:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>every ten years they would go to the Census Bureau

1:05:10.640 --> 1:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and and look at how many houses have sold, and

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>then they would try to rejigger. Yeah, if you will,

1:05:16.480 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so and so I I to me, you know, we're

1:05:19.200 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>getting to the stage where why can't we count pretty

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>much every closing in America? I don't understand why not either? Yeah,

1:05:24.920 --> 1:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I so that I know that's been discussed.

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>When you're in DC. Can we get the BLS or

1:05:31.120 --> 1:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>i'd really Commerce Department? I like I'd like to see

1:05:34.600 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>them do that. And and you know the other thing

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is is when they're calculating GDP, they're just estimating the

1:05:41.120 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>percentage that the salesperson gets and which has been under pressure,

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually yeah, and and and I think that,

1:05:49.040 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's very possible that that's being overstated a

1:05:52.120 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So we really who knows, who knows? I

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>really don't know. Nobody knows. And and uh, I mean

1:05:56.640 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of estimating that goes on, but that

1:05:59.240 --> 1:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that whole industry is undergoing dramatic change right now. And

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know the online sites have just changed

1:06:05.840 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it dramatically, so you you, you know, they could measure

1:06:08.760 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot better. And and so we've talked about

1:06:11.880 --> 1:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>how they commit. They might be missing some high rise condos.

1:06:16.160 --> 1:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>The the existing home sales and commissions I think could

1:06:19.840 --> 1:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>be measured a lot better. Um house prices I think

1:06:23.360 --> 1:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting thing. The f h f A. It

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>does an excellent job, and they have an expanded series,

1:06:29.280 --> 1:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't get the publicity it deserves. Are they tracking

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the same house over time? Yes, exactly. So that's what's

1:06:35.800 --> 1:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating. Supposed to repeat sales. But you know, even

1:06:39.680 --> 1:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>even that, you know it's right away seven years apart

1:06:43.280 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on average something like that. Yeah, something like that. And

1:06:46.040 --> 1:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know, even that has obvious flaws. What if

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the people didn't maintain it what if they put in

1:06:51.360 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a new kitchen, you know, uh so just put it

1:06:53.840 --> 1:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the bathroom. Yeah, they and they try and and

1:06:56.320 --> 1:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they try to do some permitting. It was something permitted,

1:06:59.320 --> 1:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know a lot of people put in a

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>new bathroom without permitting it and nephews. So in my

1:07:05.720 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>town of Oyster Bay, unless you're changing the footprint of

1:07:10.080 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the house or running a natural gas line in like

1:07:13.920 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the midst of doing, you don't need a permit.

1:07:16.560 --> 1:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>A permit for the natural gas. You could redo a kitchen,

1:07:19.440 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you could redo a bathroom. You don't need a permit.

1:07:21.480 --> 1:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>If you if you extend the house, if you change

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the footprint, if you replace a make a deck bigger,

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and it impinges on the name, you you need a permit.

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it depends on what you do. Obviously.

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think in any area you can retile your bathroom

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>without a permit. I think if you move the electricity around, yep,

1:07:39.880 --> 1:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>change the plugs, whatever, I think most places would require

1:07:42.800 --> 1:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a permit. Makes sense. You have to have the electrical

1:07:45.760 --> 1:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>inspector to make sure it was done to so, you know,

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But but a lot of people do that without permits.

1:07:52.000 --> 1:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's because you don't want to pay an increased

1:07:54.160 --> 1:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>tax rate. You pay a fine at the end five

1:07:56.240 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>years later, so instead of paying a thousand dollars more

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a year, you pay two. They never they never even

1:08:00.880 --> 1:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>catch them. Sometimes you need a CEO, a certificate of

1:08:03.960 --> 1:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>ocupancy when you do the sale, so people run around

1:08:07.440 --> 1:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>before a closing in order to make all that um

1:08:10.880 --> 1:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>On the spin from the National Association of Realtors, I'm

1:08:14.160 --> 1:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>going way back two thousand and seven, there was a

1:08:17.439 --> 1:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>quote in the Palm Beach Post. Some realtors are grumbling

1:08:21.320 --> 1:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>about prices falling. Guess who they're not falling. Guess who

1:08:25.439 --> 1:08:28.599
<v Speaker 1>they're blaming. A growing number of realtors in Florida are

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>frustrated with the state and National Realtors Group efforts to

1:08:32.840 --> 1:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>spin the market as one that is strengthening and where

1:08:36.439 --> 1:08:40.799
<v Speaker 1>home prices are stabilizing. We people can take Customers continue

1:08:40.840 --> 1:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to list their homes at prices that are unrealistic, and

1:08:43.800 --> 1:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>as a result, sales volumes and thus commissions continue to

1:08:47.400 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be depressed. So the net impact of the n a

1:08:50.280 --> 1:08:53.639
<v Speaker 1>R spin in oh seven was that agents were saying

1:08:53.680 --> 1:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to people, these prices are unrealistic, and they're saying, well,

1:08:58.120 --> 1:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I read the paper. Things are getting better. Yeah, that's

1:09:00.840 --> 1:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem. That's what the home builders don't tolerate. But

1:09:03.800 --> 1:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the agents, but on a national level have have mess wet. Yeah,

1:09:07.520 --> 1:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, but there's there's more than the National Association

1:09:10.080 --> 1:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of Realtors there they're compliding about. And if you own yeah,

1:09:14.520 --> 1:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>well they are clearly. But if you if you own

1:09:16.720 --> 1:09:19.639
<v Speaker 1>a home and it's pretty much equivalent to your neighbor

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and he sold it for six hundred thousand, and the

1:09:22.520 --> 1:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>agents tell you when you're only gonna get five hundred thousand.

1:09:24.840 --> 1:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>For years, you think that agents crazy. And and yet

1:09:28.560 --> 1:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that might have been a very fair price or maybe

1:09:31.200 --> 1:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>even too high. How many times did you have that

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation with people and they said, when did the neighbors

1:09:37.240 --> 1:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>sell the house? Well they sold it to know five. Well,

1:09:39.920 --> 1:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it's oh eight and we have five million foreclosures exactly.

1:09:44.439 --> 1:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>If you want to sell at that price, getting a

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>time machine, go back to oh five, you get that price. Yeah,

1:09:49.280 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>but you have to. It does take extra effort. You

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do have to explain that to him and go through.

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I do know a family member, my mom, who wanted

1:09:58.120 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to sell in like two thousands heaven and uh and

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>moved to a retirement community and it worked out great

1:10:04.320 --> 1:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for her. But I I went down, we went and

1:10:06.200 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 1>looked at the local houses and they were the inventory

1:10:08.680 --> 1:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was really expanding, and I said, let's underprice everybody, and

1:10:12.360 --> 1:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh and we sold it right away and and

1:10:14.840 --> 1:10:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, that guy's got a nice house

1:10:16.520 --> 1:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's worth more than he paid for it. So

1:10:18.640 --> 1:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>ten years later and yeah, he's he's fine, and he

1:10:21.160 --> 1:10:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he loves the house. And but my

1:10:23.600 --> 1:10:26.519
<v Speaker 1>mom got that money out. It made her her retirement easy,

1:10:27.080 --> 1:10:29.639
<v Speaker 1>you know. But other people were sticking to their prices,

1:10:29.720 --> 1:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and or chasing them down, which is probably

1:10:31.920 --> 1:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing you can do. I did that with

1:10:34.280 --> 1:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a house we tried to buy, and thanks to technology,

1:10:37.960 --> 1:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you could look at every listing price and then you

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>find out so it's here, and then it's a hundred

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand lower, and then it's a hundred thousand lower, and

1:10:46.520 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 1>you're watching them, but they're a hundred thousand or more

1:10:50.120 --> 1:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>behind the market, so they're just following it down and

1:10:52.880 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>not selling it and just creating this paper trail. Or

1:10:55.400 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>chasing the market is one of the worst things you

1:10:57.000 --> 1:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>can do. You gotta skate to where the puck is

1:10:58.920 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be not to where it was five minutes ago.

1:11:01.560 --> 1:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And really, you know, selling a house is so emotional. Hey,

1:11:04.760 --> 1:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we lived here for twenty years, we raised our kids here.

1:11:07.439 --> 1:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>How could this only be worth x? It's worth three

1:11:10.120 --> 1:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>X well to you, but you've already bought it. You've

1:11:12.800 --> 1:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta it's coming to somebody who doesn't have the memories.

1:11:16.160 --> 1:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get realistic. So we mentioned foreclosures before. Let's

1:11:20.800 --> 1:11:25.519
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the foreclosure crisis way back when. Um,

1:11:26.479 --> 1:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what took place, uh during the from the O six

1:11:29.880 --> 1:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>peak to bottom more or less? Um? And what did

1:11:35.320 --> 1:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we do right as a country and what are we

1:11:37.200 --> 1:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>doing wrong with that? You know, I personally think it's

1:11:42.160 --> 1:11:45.519
<v Speaker 1>some areas of the country are still trying to recover.

1:11:45.800 --> 1:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So New Jersey, but that has that New Jersey has

1:11:50.880 --> 1:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>its own specific Yeah. But but you know, but if

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you go and look the states that have been slowest

1:11:57.479 --> 1:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to recover all have judicial foreclosures them. That's taken forever. Yeah,

1:12:02.000 --> 1:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and and you know by half the states are judicial.

1:12:04.120 --> 1:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You gotta go to court. The other states, it's it's

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a straightforward system. What about the rocket courts that Florida

1:12:10.120 --> 1:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>set up yeah, you know, I guess they've supposed to

1:12:13.000 --> 1:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>be horrible by the way, I'm sure because people have

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>complained that they haven't even gotten noticed they've come home

1:12:18.320 --> 1:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and well, you know that it really didn't help. It

1:12:21.520 --> 1:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>made things obviously much much worse for everybody that the

1:12:24.240 --> 1:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>mortgage industry was cheating on the foreclosures constantly. Yeah, and

1:12:27.439 --> 1:12:31.719
<v Speaker 1>so ham Bondi, a g of of Attorney General of Florida,

1:12:31.840 --> 1:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>got elected and stopped but with a lot of real

1:12:35.120 --> 1:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>estate developer and real estate owners backings, and stopped all

1:12:39.640 --> 1:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage foreclosure cheating investigations that her office her predecessor

1:12:45.160 --> 1:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Edward not my favorite age in America. Yeah, but that

1:12:48.439 --> 1:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me, that that was that made things

1:12:50.840 --> 1:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a much much worse. Is if if they had just

1:12:54.200 --> 1:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>followed the rules and and done things correctly, what do

1:12:57.680 --> 1:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you do when you can't find a note. We're missing

1:12:59.880 --> 1:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the note? Now, well you can always go recreated. I mean,

1:13:03.840 --> 1:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but they were paying there was actually I could cost

1:13:06.040 --> 1:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of money. That's one of the things

1:13:07.479 --> 1:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that Tanta was talking about. They they had cut the

1:13:10.479 --> 1:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>back rooms so much that they that whole they just

1:13:14.080 --> 1:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of assumed, well, we're never going to have foreclosures,

1:13:16.560 --> 1:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you know where when when Tanta was working in that industry,

1:13:20.200 --> 1:13:22.599
<v Speaker 1>that was very important to check every file, to make

1:13:22.640 --> 1:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>sure every file was completely correct. You know, you had

1:13:25.600 --> 1:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>all every single piece of document, which is what they

1:13:27.920 --> 1:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do again today. So so what about let's talk a

1:13:30.880 --> 1:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit about MERS the Mortgage Electronic Registry. I like

1:13:36.040 --> 1:13:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the idea. I think it's greatly see I think that

1:13:38.640 --> 1:13:42.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a scam and it exists to not pay recording

1:13:42.960 --> 1:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>tax or transfer tax county by county. They've been sued

1:13:46.720 --> 1:13:49.479
<v Speaker 1>by a number of people. Well I I yes, but

1:13:50.400 --> 1:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and it allows you to to put you could sell

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage so many times that supposedly you're tracking it

1:13:56.840 --> 1:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>through this electronic registry, but you weren't. There was some

1:14:00.000 --> 1:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>any times we didn't couldn't tell who won't the house. Well,

1:14:02.200 --> 1:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it was implemented poorly. Once it's implemented poorly,

1:14:05.960 --> 1:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad system. So you don't there's no argument

1:14:08.760 --> 1:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for me on that. The general idea. I kind of like,

1:14:11.920 --> 1:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>well if it was done with full congressional authority and

1:14:16.120 --> 1:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>local authority, but that didn't happen. I mean, I mean

1:14:19.280 --> 1:14:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the idea of that that you because because what they

1:14:22.520 --> 1:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do was put the mortgage the mortgages into

1:14:24.960 --> 1:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed security. Sure, and nothing wrong with that. No,

1:14:27.680 --> 1:14:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing wrong with that, But it's gotta you can't

1:14:29.880 --> 1:14:33.519
<v Speaker 1>have just some random companies saying wouldn't in my opinion,

1:14:33.600 --> 1:14:37.559
<v Speaker 1>we can't bypass the local authority because it's faster, easier, cheaper.

1:14:38.120 --> 1:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm convinced that mirrors is an underwritten story of the crisis.

1:14:42.560 --> 1:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But for mers, we may not have had as deep

1:14:45.040 --> 1:14:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and bed. You couldn't have cranked out as many houses

1:14:47.760 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and as No, yeah you need you needed to that. Yeah,

1:14:50.520 --> 1:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So so that was that was you know, it was

1:14:52.240 --> 1:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a grease enabler. But we want

1:14:54.320 --> 1:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>your cause, so sure. No, definitely not a cause, but

1:14:57.520 --> 1:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely an enabler. God, there's so many questions I haven't

1:15:01.439 --> 1:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten to and I want to make sure I leave

1:15:04.040 --> 1:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>leave some time to our standard questions. Um. So here's

1:15:09.000 --> 1:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question A reader had asked. Asked McBride what

1:15:12.439 --> 1:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>policy choices he would make to improve a lot of

1:15:16.240 --> 1:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the bottom even if it hurt corporate America. Well, uh

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>not not. You know, I think that one of the

1:15:27.200 --> 1:15:29.439
<v Speaker 1>key things is is you've got to have wages up.

1:15:29.600 --> 1:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to get wages up for the lower income workers.

1:15:32.360 --> 1:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So how do we do that? And so with the

1:15:35.720 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the to one thing you can do is you can

1:15:38.160 --> 1:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>mandate a higher a minimum wage. That will help. How

1:15:41.760 --> 1:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>many people earned minimum wage? It's not that many, but

1:15:44.360 --> 1:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it pushes up the people that are just above minimum

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess everybody. And then but but I think the

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>key is more bargaining power for workers of some sort.

1:15:55.520 --> 1:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So that means stronger unions. Yeah, well we've crushed the unions, yes,

1:15:58.920 --> 1:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>other than the public union um, which which have plenty

1:16:01.800 --> 1:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of problems still, you know, I mean because they have

1:16:04.080 --> 1:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>all these pensions that are crazy. So with the public unions,

1:16:07.840 --> 1:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of like, well, we should take a lot

1:16:09.800 --> 1:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of effort and and and work on those the pensions.

1:16:13.320 --> 1:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But but if when we're talking about improving a lot

1:16:15.880 --> 1:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of the lower fift I think getting some sort of

1:16:19.880 --> 1:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bargaining for workers, um and you know, whether they're unionized

1:16:25.520 --> 1:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>or some other way. I'm not a labor expert, but

1:16:27.720 --> 1:16:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I do think that that's where one of the keys.

1:16:29.960 --> 1:16:33.439
<v Speaker 1>The the full of the may be a coincidence, but

1:16:33.600 --> 1:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the full of the strength of unions and the full

1:16:37.520 --> 1:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and middle class income is seems to be quite the coincidence.

1:16:42.360 --> 1:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>One would imagine they're related. Oh, they're They're definitely related,

1:16:45.400 --> 1:16:48.479
<v Speaker 1>there's no question. And in raising the minimum wage is

1:16:48.520 --> 1:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>going to help some. So you know, there's a policy

1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that we can do. I don't think that there's a

1:16:54.400 --> 1:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>big negative impact for for I mean, for you know,

1:16:57.160 --> 1:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>in most areas, especially in the course if you look right,

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look in the Seattle and Portland and San

1:17:02.800 --> 1:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Francisco in l A, they could raise a minimum wage

1:17:05.640 --> 1:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen dollars and it's fine, may not work in

1:17:08.120 --> 1:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the heartland. Yeah, basically in l A you had to

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>pay that anyway. So um, well, you see Walmart McDonald's

1:17:14.240 --> 1:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>raising the minimum that's telling you they're having trouble getting workers.

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So so it's it's how you can either let the

1:17:20.479 --> 1:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>market do it or speed along and do it legislatively.

1:17:24.280 --> 1:17:26.559
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people have a mandate. Yeah,

1:17:26.640 --> 1:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, working for the minimum wage is pretty minimal.

1:17:29.600 --> 1:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And you're at even at at fifteen dollars, you're still

1:17:33.280 --> 1:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at a at a forty hour week, you're you're more

1:17:36.439 --> 1:17:38.519
<v Speaker 1>or less right at the poverty level, depending on how

1:17:38.560 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>many kids. I don't know, how you live in l

1:17:40.200 --> 1:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>A or New York can It's it's impossible. You've taken

1:17:42.720 --> 1:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a second job working off the books. It's it's rough. Uh.

1:17:46.479 --> 1:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Interesting question that came in from another reader. Um, we

1:17:50.360 --> 1:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>keep hearing about quote the next subprime. Where do you

1:17:54.320 --> 1:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>see excesses in the credit market that might be the

1:17:58.080 --> 1:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>next subprime? You know? Right now? It's I I think

1:18:02.720 --> 1:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we're okay in most areas. Um. I mean a lot

1:18:06.400 --> 1:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of people focus on the auto loans, but you know

1:18:08.439 --> 1:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>auto loans at car the cars are easy to repossess.

1:18:11.680 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>The technology that's built into it now is you buy

1:18:14.640 --> 1:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a car if you don't have a good credit rating.

1:18:17.320 --> 1:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a column about this a few months ago.

1:18:19.800 --> 1:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And they building a remote kill switch, so you miss

1:18:23.120 --> 1:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>a payment, they shut the car off. Yeah, people, you

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>want that car, you gotta water the money. And yeah

1:18:27.920 --> 1:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in in l A, you want your car bad for sure.

1:18:32.040 --> 1:18:33.799
<v Speaker 1>That's how you get to work or get to anything.

1:18:33.920 --> 1:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know, people pay. During the four closure crisis,

1:18:37.200 --> 1:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>people were paying their car loans, but they weren't paying

1:18:39.360 --> 1:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>their house loans. The story was you'd pay your visa,

1:18:42.080 --> 1:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd pay your car loan, you would skip the student loan.

1:18:45.240 --> 1:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>You would skip the mortgage because what are they gonna do.

1:18:47.479 --> 1:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna take three years. Yeah, you know, I'm not

1:18:49.960 --> 1:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that concerned about student loans either. I I

1:18:53.200 --> 1:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>think that there's things we can do, um, lower interest rates. Sure,

1:18:57.640 --> 1:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I I you know, when I went to school cool, Um,

1:19:01.320 --> 1:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it really dates me. But I paid. I

1:19:04.000 --> 1:19:07.719
<v Speaker 1>went to University of California, Irvine. Paid two hundred dollars

1:19:07.760 --> 1:19:10.519
<v Speaker 1>a quarter to go to school. I went to Sunny

1:19:10.520 --> 1:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Stony Brook. My first semester was semester, not even quarter.

1:19:13.479 --> 1:19:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Two semesters four fifty. Yeah, so you know, uh, I

1:19:17.600 --> 1:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>could go. I paid my way through school. I could

1:19:20.120 --> 1:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>work on the weekends, pay my rent, pay my my tuition.

1:19:24.080 --> 1:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's kind of Now it's twelve thousand

1:19:26.560 --> 1:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a semester. What do you do? Yeah, I mean, if

1:19:28.439 --> 1:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't work on the weekends to go to school,

1:19:30.720 --> 1:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>it makes life completely different. Sure, you know, not everybody

1:19:33.720 --> 1:19:35.559
<v Speaker 1>did that. Luckily, a lot of people when I was young,

1:19:35.680 --> 1:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>their parents paid it because it wasn't that much either,

1:19:37.840 --> 1:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. But so you know there's I do like

1:19:40.439 --> 1:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea of making some education less expensive makes sense. What, um,

1:19:46.240 --> 1:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>what asset classes do you see as expensive or is

1:19:49.760 --> 1:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that something you really don't pay close attention to. Um,

1:19:54.520 --> 1:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I I know it's not something I

1:19:57.640 --> 1:20:02.519
<v Speaker 1>don't write about. But you basically everything is at least

1:20:02.560 --> 1:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>fairly valued now I don't see you know, like in

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:08.559
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve, it was clear to me that if

1:20:08.720 --> 1:20:10.599
<v Speaker 1>you should be out buying as much real estate as

1:20:10.640 --> 1:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you could, um, the in two thousand nine, you should

1:20:16.439 --> 1:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be jumping in as hard as you can into the

1:20:18.120 --> 1:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>stock market. So what do you do in two thousand six, Um, Well,

1:20:25.240 --> 1:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year I did buy. I put some money

1:20:26.920 --> 1:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>into the stock market when we had that nice yeah,

1:20:30.240 --> 1:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and and so that was well, you know, luckily I'm

1:20:32.680 --> 1:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not sitting on any cash right now. I don't know

1:20:34.240 --> 1:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I would do today. You know, It's funny.

1:20:36.400 --> 1:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the things is I don't know what I'm

1:20:37.880 --> 1:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna do until I need to do it exactly. Uh.

1:20:41.920 --> 1:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I don't give advice on investing on

1:20:45.720 --> 1:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis. You know, back when, because we were

1:20:48.160 --> 1:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about the commenting and I participated in this site

1:20:52.120 --> 1:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>called Silicon Investor for a little while. And they, by

1:20:56.200 --> 1:20:58.559
<v Speaker 1>the way, they came to fame in the late nineties

1:20:58.640 --> 1:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>screaming bubble, and they were right eventually, but getting timing

1:21:02.720 --> 1:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on that is really you know, we would talk with

1:21:05.479 --> 1:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>some you know, as as happens on every commenting thing.

1:21:08.400 --> 1:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>At first it was really good, and uh we talk

1:21:11.160 --> 1:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about different stocks and and uh. One of the things

1:21:14.760 --> 1:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I discovered at the time is I could mention ten

1:21:16.920 --> 1:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>stocks that I thought were good, and nine of them

1:21:19.760 --> 1:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>would do great and one of them would really underperform.

1:21:22.920 --> 1:21:25.479
<v Speaker 1>And then people, every time I would say anything, people

1:21:25.520 --> 1:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>come back, weren't you the one who liked x y Z? Yes?

1:21:28.479 --> 1:21:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Out of the ten stocks I mentioned x Y And

1:21:30.600 --> 1:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>after a while you go, I'm tired of this, you know,

1:21:33.200 --> 1:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I let's let's chase let's chase away all the good

1:21:36.439 --> 1:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>commenters and just get it to the point where it's

1:21:39.040 --> 1:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just garbage. And that's what they do. The nice thing

1:21:41.360 --> 1:21:43.519
<v Speaker 1>about you have an NBA. The nice thing about law

1:21:43.600 --> 1:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>school is you learn the rules of rhetoric and debate,

1:21:47.120 --> 1:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you could very I can very quickly identify

1:21:50.840 --> 1:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a strong man argument, that's an ad hominum attack,

1:21:53.320 --> 1:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that's arguing from extreme that's all right, Like you start

1:21:56.320 --> 1:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to notice all than not and comments are us they're

1:22:00.840 --> 1:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>all that. It's just a place where logic and reasoning

1:22:05.800 --> 1:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>go to die. It's unfortunate. So last question before I

1:22:09.800 --> 1:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>get to my standard questions. I asked everybody so you

1:22:14.360 --> 1:22:19.519
<v Speaker 1>said you don't see a recession anytime um soon? And

1:22:19.640 --> 1:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I never asked people for what where, what's your favorite stock,

1:22:22.800 --> 1:22:24.519
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your with is the market could be what's

1:22:24.560 --> 1:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>your forecast? So I'm reluctant to ask this as a

1:22:28.280 --> 1:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>forecasting question. But how long? So I'm gonna phrase it

1:22:32.720 --> 1:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>slightly differently. How long do you see this economic expansion continuing?

1:22:39.240 --> 1:22:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Is this something that could go on for eight thirty

1:22:42.560 --> 1:22:45.519
<v Speaker 1>six months or a wee closer to the end of

1:22:45.560 --> 1:22:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the cycle than we are to the beginning. Oh, I

1:22:48.680 --> 1:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>would say we're probably closer to the end in the

1:22:50.520 --> 1:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning because we've been this seven years, seven years, it

1:22:54.120 --> 1:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>will go another seven years. It could actually because because

1:22:57.520 --> 1:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of the slow growth. I don't think it's gonna have Yeah,

1:23:03.280 --> 1:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's going to happen. But you know,

1:23:05.120 --> 1:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you look around, look at mortgage I could be withdrawal

1:23:08.720 --> 1:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is still basically zero. You know people are really yeah

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>people you we used to we used to look at

1:23:14.280 --> 1:23:17.479
<v Speaker 1>that data point. It was. It was enormously you know,

1:23:17.840 --> 1:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>people are pouring money out of their houses, you know,

1:23:20.920 --> 1:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and and yeah, we're I think we're I think we're

1:23:22.920 --> 1:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>right at that starting to turn positive again. But that

1:23:25.760 --> 1:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can go a long time positive. So you know, the

1:23:28.880 --> 1:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, so so I you know, as far

1:23:31.439 --> 1:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>as the cycle, I think we're mid cycle somewhere, maybe

1:23:36.439 --> 1:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>late in mid cycle. I'm of that camp that sixth inning,

1:23:40.640 --> 1:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that metaphor no but no, yeah, but I'm I'm of

1:23:42.880 --> 1:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the camp that they recovers, don't expansions, don't die of

1:23:46.000 --> 1:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>old age, they die for other reasons. And so we

1:23:49.080 --> 1:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>need to see some real excesses. Um. You know, some

1:23:52.280 --> 1:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>people it's easy to point out excesses, uh you or

1:23:56.439 --> 1:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>or imagined excesses. You could say, well, look at the

1:23:58.439 --> 1:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>bond market. The bond deals are so low. Clearly that's

1:24:00.800 --> 1:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>going to blow up someday. Yeah. But I mean I'm

1:24:04.320 --> 1:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not so I'm not in that camp. I

1:24:06.560 --> 1:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're not seeing the excess as yet.

1:24:10.479 --> 1:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not seeing the inflation that the Fed really would

1:24:13.120 --> 1:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>need to fight. I think that's going to be slow

1:24:15.360 --> 1:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to come. Um, the demographics is improving, in the US. Um,

1:24:20.400 --> 1:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, they forget about the baby boomers, they're moving on.

1:24:23.760 --> 1:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But we're getting that nice group in the in the

1:24:25.720 --> 1:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>twenties or gen X, gen y, Yeah, millennials and and

1:24:29.760 --> 1:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>don't and and you know there there could be a

1:24:32.040 --> 1:24:35.519
<v Speaker 1>little bit more inflation as they compete for products. But

1:24:35.760 --> 1:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I don't see it picking up dramatically

1:24:38.280 --> 1:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like we saw in the seventies at all. All right,

1:24:40.439 --> 1:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>so let's jump into my standard questions. Already told us

1:24:43.439 --> 1:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>about your background. Who are your early mentors, um as

1:24:49.560 --> 1:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>far as economics as anything. Uh, I was very fortunate

1:24:56.320 --> 1:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to have some very good CEOs that I worked with,

1:25:00.120 --> 1:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Don Judgen. Don Judson at vital Com, I was absolutely

1:25:04.120 --> 1:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>brilliant guy. Uh. I was kind of the number two

1:25:07.200 --> 1:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>guy there for for a number of years. Um, you know,

1:25:10.200 --> 1:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he just he just would see things and and uh

1:25:14.560 --> 1:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and so he was great. And uh Don Barry two Dons,

1:25:19.080 --> 1:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the two Dons was at the at the telecommunications company.

1:25:23.320 --> 1:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>He was the founder of that and just another brilliant,

1:25:26.520 --> 1:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>positive person you know who just was a hard worker.

1:25:30.160 --> 1:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Both those guys really promoted my career. Um. So yeah,

1:25:34.600 --> 1:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>those those two guys, I want a lot to the

1:25:37.000 --> 1:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>two dons. How about investors, any particular investor influence your

1:25:42.720 --> 1:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>approach to investing, be at real estate stocks whatever, um

1:25:50.360 --> 1:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>some Warren Buffett. I can't go wrong with that. Yeah,

1:25:53.360 --> 1:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so uh could do us. Yeah on real estate, you

1:25:57.280 --> 1:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>know a little bit. My dad Uh uh, you know

1:26:01.200 --> 1:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that's nice. My dad, My dad had. My dad's still around.

1:26:04.400 --> 1:26:06.719
<v Speaker 1>He's ninety four. So he got to see the blog

1:26:06.840 --> 1:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>blow up. He got to yeah, you're all of your

1:26:09.400 --> 1:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>post career success. He must have appreciated that. It's funny

1:26:12.680 --> 1:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's the only what's the only thing he ever

1:26:15.080 --> 1:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>really understood that I did. Really he come and see

1:26:18.000 --> 1:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he come and look at the heart monitors and go,

1:26:19.680 --> 1:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what the heck is this all a that that that

1:26:22.360 --> 1:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know when I started writing the blog. He understood that.

1:26:25.240 --> 1:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh but he you know, he had he had

1:26:27.320 --> 1:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>some funny sayings. One was, the deal of the century

1:26:30.479 --> 1:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>comes along every year, so you know you don't have

1:26:33.479 --> 1:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to like a year, flood comes along every five Yeah,

1:26:35.680 --> 1:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to. You don't have to jump on anything.

1:26:37.640 --> 1:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>There'll be another good opportunity six months from now or

1:26:40.800 --> 1:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a year from now. He goes on the deal. Deal

1:26:42.880 --> 1:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of the century comes along every years. Um, let's talk

1:26:46.680 --> 1:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>about books. What are some of your favorite books, be

1:26:49.280 --> 1:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they economic or otherwise, fiction or nonfictional. Well, I just

1:26:53.000 --> 1:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>finished reading, Um, well I can I'll mention a few

1:26:56.680 --> 1:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>economic books. Um. A book called Big Ship Ahead, Big

1:27:01.520 --> 1:27:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Shifts Ahead. Yeah. I don't have the whole title, but

1:27:04.640 --> 1:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the first person on the side. Yeah, it's a

1:27:06.960 --> 1:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't know if it's available yet. I read

1:27:09.720 --> 1:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a preview. It's by Chris Porter and John Burns, both

1:27:13.960 --> 1:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>real estate guys. And Chris Porter's a demographic guy. And uh,

1:27:18.720 --> 1:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is really driven by democrat like Harry Dent

1:27:21.360 --> 1:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>used to be Mr Demography. Yeah, well this book is

1:27:24.600 --> 1:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about the shifting demographics and what it means for businesses

1:27:29.439 --> 1:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and primarily for the real estate industry and housing. And

1:27:32.360 --> 1:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed it and and yeah, because it's it's something

1:27:34.880 --> 1:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's very very important to understand. And

1:27:38.360 --> 1:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>uh and you know what, how people are going to

1:27:40.800 --> 1:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>be building different projects. Um. And I think they did

1:27:44.320 --> 1:27:47.479
<v Speaker 1>a really good job. It was very interesting to me. Um.

1:27:48.080 --> 1:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>But else I really liked. Um. Uh, let me think,

1:27:53.720 --> 1:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the house of debt? House of debt? I could

1:27:59.000 --> 1:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>see and I could see it sitting on my bookshelf

1:28:03.479 --> 1:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>on the and yeah, and uh and dr she's in

1:28:08.520 --> 1:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>California somewhere right or or he he's I think he's

1:28:13.880 --> 1:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Midwest. I'm thinking of a different book then. Yeah,

1:28:16.960 --> 1:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's got like the torn sort of page of

1:28:20.920 --> 1:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of I'm trying to remember what the cover looks like.

1:28:23.280 --> 1:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But House of Debt, and you can look that one up.

1:28:25.040 --> 1:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>House of Debt, all right, okay? And that that what

1:28:27.880 --> 1:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they did with the two professors. What they did is

1:28:31.080 --> 1:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they looked at micro data in available in each city

1:28:36.200 --> 1:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to see how much um people, how much household debt

1:28:39.880 --> 1:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>people had, and how that related to the strength of

1:28:43.920 --> 1:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the recovery or the depth of the recession. And it

1:28:46.120 --> 1:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>was very very interesting and very insightful. So you know,

1:28:49.880 --> 1:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the more people could borrow, obviously, the more more trouble

1:28:52.439 --> 1:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they got into House of Debt. How they and you

1:28:54.960 --> 1:28:59.439
<v Speaker 1>caused the Great Recession? Can prevent it from happening again?

1:29:00.040 --> 1:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>A mir Sufi and a tief me on, yes, all right.

1:29:04.479 --> 1:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And the other one was called Big Shifts, Big Shifts

1:29:09.320 --> 1:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Ahead by Porter and Burns John Burns and Chris Border.

1:29:13.640 --> 1:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Big Shifts Ahead Demographic Clarity for business that's not coming

1:29:18.000 --> 1:29:20.479
<v Speaker 1>out until October. Give me one more. What else have

1:29:20.560 --> 1:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you read that you've really enjoyed? Uh? The kersh Act

1:29:24.840 --> 1:29:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Ben Bernink? Oh? Really? Yeah? I thought that was fun.

1:29:29.360 --> 1:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting because it's just from his perspective. Now,

1:29:31.920 --> 1:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I were writing about, you know, anything that

1:29:34.360 --> 1:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that's um about the crisis, the courage to act, a

1:29:39.080 --> 1:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>memoir of a crisis and its aftermat Yeah, anything about

1:29:42.120 --> 1:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the crisis. I always disagree with something, and I'm sure

1:29:44.439 --> 1:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you would too, but that's but I'd like to see

1:29:46.800 --> 1:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>other people's perspective. Did you really enjoy this? Because this

1:29:50.000 --> 1:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>book has been sitting on a shelf, untouched, unloved, not

1:29:54.040 --> 1:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>even I have. I didn't. I didn't read all of it,

1:29:56.800 --> 1:29:59.439
<v Speaker 1>but I read several chapters and not not even in

1:29:59.600 --> 1:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>my It's like, do I really Although I will say

1:30:02.880 --> 1:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I've I've really enjoyed his blog. Yeah, and I like

1:30:07.320 --> 1:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the post the I like the post crisis per Nanke

1:30:11.800 --> 1:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>better than the pre crisis. He was too blase and

1:30:14.080 --> 1:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>too willing to you know, rubber Stamwood Greenspan was doing

1:30:17.840 --> 1:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>pre crisis, but in the midst of the crisis and

1:30:20.920 --> 1:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>after couldn't have had a better guy there when he

1:30:24.120 --> 1:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>stepped up. We were very fortunately, yes, And I was

1:30:27.120 --> 1:30:31.439
<v Speaker 1>a big critic prior and in hindsight during the crisis.

1:30:32.080 --> 1:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Really you want a guy who's a student of the

1:30:33.720 --> 1:30:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Great Depression. He was slow to react to what was happening.

1:30:40.000 --> 1:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But then once I think one day he woke up

1:30:42.040 --> 1:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and said, holy count, you know, and and this everything

1:30:45.200 --> 1:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I've studied all my life, it's happening right now as

1:30:47.280 --> 1:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting here. You know. It's it's really quite amazing. Yeah.

1:30:50.479 --> 1:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we we remember when he first got

1:30:52.720 --> 1:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>appointed by George W. Bush and I thought, oh, three

1:30:56.280 --> 1:30:59.639
<v Speaker 1>something like that. He must have not not as chairman,

1:30:59.720 --> 1:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>but just on the board. He was ce a counseled

1:31:02.080 --> 1:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Economic Advice Yeah, and that, you know, and that him

1:31:05.040 --> 1:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>up to go on the FED. Yeah and that. And

1:31:07.960 --> 1:31:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I felt sorry for him when he was the c

1:31:09.680 --> 1:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>A because he was saying things that really didn't make

1:31:12.120 --> 1:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sense in my view, and I thought, oh man, he there,

1:31:15.200 --> 1:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got to be political a little bit, right, And

1:31:18.080 --> 1:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but when once he got but I'm still really happy

1:31:20.160 --> 1:31:22.599
<v Speaker 1>that he got appointed because you could have got anybody,

1:31:23.400 --> 1:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we could have got somebody really bad who

1:31:25.920 --> 1:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>felt like the FED shouldn't do anything right. And and

1:31:29.880 --> 1:31:32.519
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of people who think, just let it

1:31:32.680 --> 1:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>run its course. It'll be really painful, but then we'll

1:31:35.960 --> 1:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>come out the other end, cleansed and better. Well, you know,

1:31:39.000 --> 1:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, you kind of understand that except

1:31:42.280 --> 1:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for the realistic, it's not realistic, especially when you look

1:31:44.760 --> 1:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>at all the people that are seriously injured during the downturn.

1:31:48.920 --> 1:31:53.479
<v Speaker 1>And and um, I mean instead of instead of picking

1:31:53.560 --> 1:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at ten percent, the uneployment rate might have piked at

1:31:55.800 --> 1:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty or twenty five percent. And then and it's not

1:31:58.160 --> 1:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>only those twenty percent to get hurt, it's the next

1:32:00.880 --> 1:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ten or they are pulling way back. They're afraid they're

1:32:04.160 --> 1:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>going to lose their jobs to paradox of thrift. Yeah,

1:32:07.000 --> 1:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and and and then and then you get I mean

1:32:08.880 --> 1:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you get you get suicide's divorced. Yeah, I mean you can't.

1:32:13.160 --> 1:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You can't let that go on for five seven years

1:32:15.160 --> 1:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and hope it's going to resolve itself. And besides, I think,

1:32:17.640 --> 1:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Cain's kind of pointed out that you've got

1:32:20.439 --> 1:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a problem and it may never ever resolve with something

1:32:23.640 --> 1:32:25.639
<v Speaker 1>that but you know, if if the if the FED

1:32:25.760 --> 1:32:27.759
<v Speaker 1>can step up and you can get some physical policy.

1:32:28.040 --> 1:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Gee whiz, we turned it around from a financial crisis perspective.

1:32:31.439 --> 1:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>We turned this around better than just about anybody. Ever,

1:32:34.439 --> 1:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world certainly is still lagging behind

1:32:37.120 --> 1:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the US. All right, last two questions before they throw

1:32:40.000 --> 1:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>us out of the studio. We've been here for almost

1:32:42.320 --> 1:32:45.439
<v Speaker 1>two hours. So a millennial or a recent college grad

1:32:45.560 --> 1:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>comes up to you and says, I'm interested in blogging

1:32:50.400 --> 1:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate, um writing, What sort of advice would you

1:32:54.120 --> 1:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>give them? Go ahead, have fun? You know. Look, people

1:32:59.240 --> 1:33:01.479
<v Speaker 1>ask me how I built my traffic. I could ask

1:33:01.520 --> 1:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you how you built your traffic in relentlessly through ten

1:33:05.200 --> 1:33:08.439
<v Speaker 1>years of brutal work. I just becoming overnight sensation. Yes,

1:33:08.520 --> 1:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I just wrote and wrote and wrote and and people

1:33:10.439 --> 1:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>started picking up. People liked what I wrote, picked it up,

1:33:13.000 --> 1:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>spread it around, you know, post go viral and and uh,

1:33:17.080 --> 1:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, so I don't people ask me, well, how

1:33:19.720 --> 1:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>did you advertise? Not? I didn't how to spread the word.

1:33:22.320 --> 1:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't um ever send out emails to journalists that hey,

1:33:26.240 --> 1:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this is an interesting piece, you should look at it.

1:33:28.200 --> 1:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Never so I've never I've never advertised it at all.

1:33:30.840 --> 1:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I guess I'm advertising it now. But yeah,

1:33:34.040 --> 1:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but you're talking about after a decade of putting it out.

1:33:37.200 --> 1:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>This this is less advertising than a a victory lap

1:33:40.840 --> 1:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>slash retrospective. It's not like look at look at Bill

1:33:44.880 --> 1:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>out Um promoting look at him hyping calculated risk. I've

1:33:50.120 --> 1:33:54.519
<v Speaker 1>asked you full disclosure. How many times have I said, Hey,

1:33:54.640 --> 1:33:57.519
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get you, let's do something, let's talk about this.

1:33:58.320 --> 1:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I recall linking to you back in I don't know,

1:34:03.120 --> 1:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>oh five oh six I was doing. That's probably where

1:34:06.800 --> 1:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>my traffic came from. I was first I was doing

1:34:09.479 --> 1:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the link fest for the street dot com, and then

1:34:11.720 --> 1:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I was doing them on the Big Picture and I

1:34:14.280 --> 1:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>recall and you sent like a really lovely email. I

1:34:18.520 --> 1:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have it somewhere. Hey, thanks for the link, but you

1:34:21.240 --> 1:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you crashed our site. You took it offline.

1:34:24.040 --> 1:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't like I was getting that much traffic.

1:34:26.600 --> 1:34:29.679
<v Speaker 1>But in the scheme of bloggers, if you were getting

1:34:29.680 --> 1:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a thousand a day, that was a lot, you know,

1:34:32.280 --> 1:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>way back in the early days. But so your advice

1:34:35.080 --> 1:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to someone who wants to start today this late date

1:34:38.280 --> 1:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>covering housing or you would say, go for it. Yeah,

1:34:41.120 --> 1:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think anybody can I think anybody can

1:34:43.400 --> 1:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>do it if I mean, if there if they have

1:34:45.520 --> 1:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>something to add there. I mean, you just have to

1:34:48.680 --> 1:34:50.240
<v Speaker 1>work at it and be and put up with a

1:34:50.320 --> 1:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>low traffic to start. And you know, how how how

1:34:54.200 --> 1:34:56.639
<v Speaker 1>do you it's not I wouldn't consider a money maker.

1:34:56.720 --> 1:34:58.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean if it's if it's somebody's career, but if

1:34:58.520 --> 1:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's somebody's sidelight, uh, something they do because they're passionate

1:35:02.000 --> 1:35:04.559
<v Speaker 1>about their passion about it and they've got something another

1:35:04.680 --> 1:35:07.720
<v Speaker 1>real job, which is what really most bloggers do. What's

1:35:07.800 --> 1:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>up with you and zero heads? You've you've written some

1:35:09.800 --> 1:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>some critical things. He's not happy with me. Oh I

1:35:14.000 --> 1:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I have no relationship with him at all.

1:35:16.439 --> 1:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I just think the sits a joke. Really, yeah, because

1:35:20.240 --> 1:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>every now and then there's something of interest because he

1:35:23.720 --> 1:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>has an expertise and derivatives what have you. But how

1:35:26.760 --> 1:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>do you how do you know? How do you can't

1:35:28.000 --> 1:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>find it's you know, I only have so much time

1:35:31.960 --> 1:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>every day. I think this is a good lesson for

1:35:34.000 --> 1:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody is you have to you have to learn the

1:35:36.479 --> 1:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sites or the newspaper journalists that you want to read,

1:35:40.920 --> 1:35:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and and every once in a while you branch out

1:35:42.760 --> 1:35:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and pick up other people and and then decide whether

1:35:45.680 --> 1:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep reading them. You know, if I

1:35:47.120 --> 1:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>see John Hills and Wrath at the Nick Tamaris, I

1:35:51.439 --> 1:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>love both the work at the Walston Journal, I read

1:35:53.720 --> 1:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the article. It's just automatic, you know. I read everything

1:35:56.120 --> 1:35:59.439
<v Speaker 1>by Paul Krugman, and I read you know, um, I

1:35:59.640 --> 1:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>have my group of people that I always read, and

1:36:01.880 --> 1:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I branch out and read other people too, and then

1:36:04.600 --> 1:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they fall into that group, and and then

1:36:07.160 --> 1:36:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll start reading them if I see their name. Oh yeah,

1:36:09.680 --> 1:36:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I gotta. I think everybody has to have that filter.

1:36:12.040 --> 1:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't waste my time going through a hundred posts

1:36:14.080 --> 1:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to find the one little nute um and and you know, uh,

1:36:18.680 --> 1:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>way back when I don't. I don't think I've been

1:36:21.280 --> 1:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to zero hedge site in five years. Really, Yeah, that's fascinating.

1:36:24.760 --> 1:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I have friends who are always sending me stuff, and

1:36:27.479 --> 1:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>one out of five things are are kind of interesting them.

1:36:31.479 --> 1:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people read it. I don't

1:36:32.880 --> 1:36:35.320
<v Speaker 1>know why. And you know what, maybe they're better today,

1:36:35.439 --> 1:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe maybe I maybe I've been I've been

1:36:37.920 --> 1:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>blaming zero Hedge. I've been blaming that site for hedge

1:36:41.439 --> 1:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>fund under performance for the past five years. They've been

1:36:44.160 --> 1:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>relentlessly negative. They missed a giant move in equity, but

1:36:47.000 --> 1:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they were they were saying short uh in March of

1:36:49.680 --> 1:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine when the market would hit six six six,

1:36:52.360 --> 1:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>good time and uh. And they've never changed as far

1:36:54.880 --> 1:36:56.760
<v Speaker 1>as for you know, I was I used to go

1:36:56.920 --> 1:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>for entertainment purpose, well you know back when, back when

1:36:59.439 --> 1:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I first did and and I'm sure this is true

1:37:01.760 --> 1:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>for you too, is that. Um there was kind of

1:37:04.560 --> 1:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like camaraderie among the blogs. Absolutely. If I saw something

1:37:09.400 --> 1:37:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong or on on another side, or they saw something

1:37:11.880 --> 1:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong on mine, I we would exchange emails. Yeah, yeah, hey,

1:37:15.280 --> 1:37:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe you're looking at this. And it

1:37:16.880 --> 1:37:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was great because then I could correct my article. Um

1:37:19.800 --> 1:37:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I zero Hedge came along. You know, they didn't call

1:37:23.360 --> 1:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the recession at all, obviously, didn't call it recovery. They

1:37:25.960 --> 1:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't see the housing bubble then, none of that because

1:37:28.080 --> 1:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they yeah, they came out way after and it was

1:37:30.760 --> 1:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>all gloom and doom, yellow journalism. But like somebody sent

1:37:35.040 --> 1:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>me an article from it and I said, oh, a

1:37:36.640 --> 1:37:38.599
<v Speaker 1>new site, you know, and I read it and I said,

1:37:38.640 --> 1:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>well you I sent the guy an email and uh,

1:37:42.320 --> 1:37:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and I got the rudest reply and I went, I went,

1:37:45.560 --> 1:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what the hell I here? I am reaching out. I'm

1:37:47.960 --> 1:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not publishing it on my side. I'm not

1:37:49.800 --> 1:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing these guys. They just just just you can't you

1:37:54.840 --> 1:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>really can't look at the data this way. You need

1:37:56.760 --> 1:37:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to do this. And it's something I knew really well,

1:37:59.400 --> 1:38:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, screw you kind of response and

1:38:02.600 --> 1:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and okay, fine, you know, you know, I had a

1:38:05.439 --> 1:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>lunch with Chris Whalen set up a lunch with him

1:38:07.760 --> 1:38:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and me and a bunch of other people because I

1:38:09.880 --> 1:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was interested in the derivative stuff he was writing about

1:38:12.400 --> 1:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was excellent, and the high freagency trading stuff. He had

1:38:15.360 --> 1:38:20.240
<v Speaker 1>some really good insights. And then everything all kinda went

1:38:20.360 --> 1:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to just a degree of negativity and well being. Well

1:38:24.080 --> 1:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>being negative drives traffic for a lot of people. I

1:38:27.479 --> 1:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>guess you know, you if you if you're constantly bearish.

1:38:30.000 --> 1:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I always say that blogs having in centator to be

1:38:32.400 --> 1:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>bearish because it drives traffic. It's kind of like, you know,

1:38:34.840 --> 1:38:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Dalis having in centator to be bullish, you know,

1:38:38.160 --> 1:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and and it's the rare great economist on Wall Street

1:38:42.040 --> 1:38:45.479
<v Speaker 1>who can say we've got a problem. Um, and it's

1:38:45.720 --> 1:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, the very few bloggers are willing to

1:38:48.439 --> 1:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>go both ways. So let's let me ask you my

1:38:51.960 --> 1:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>very last question, my favorite question, and that is, what

1:38:56.120 --> 1:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is it that you know about real estate, about mortgages,

1:39:00.040 --> 1:39:03.519
<v Speaker 1>out writing and blogging that you wish you knew back

1:39:03.600 --> 1:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and five when you launched the site? Well,

1:39:06.240 --> 1:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had met Tanta two years earlier. As

1:39:08.880 --> 1:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>far as mortgages, Uh, everything I know I learned from her.

1:39:12.560 --> 1:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So uh as far as real estate, you know, I

1:39:17.000 --> 1:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>it was it was so much fun early on reading

1:39:19.840 --> 1:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>through all the technical documents and all of the sites

1:39:22.520 --> 1:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that would provide that as to how they gathered their data,

1:39:25.640 --> 1:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I really learned a lot. Um. If I'd

1:39:28.720 --> 1:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>known that a little earlier, maybe I could have put

1:39:30.400 --> 1:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>all the pieces together just a little bit earlier. Um,

1:39:34.240 --> 1:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I it was. It was a weird

1:39:37.120 --> 1:39:39.479
<v Speaker 1>thing in two thousand five. To me, I could clearly

1:39:39.560 --> 1:39:42.519
<v Speaker 1>see that the market was overvalued, that there was really

1:39:42.560 --> 1:39:46.479
<v Speaker 1>bad mortgages. But I kept asking myself, well, why why

1:39:46.600 --> 1:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>are they making these mortgages to people that are never

1:39:48.680 --> 1:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>going to pay them? I personally would never learn money

1:39:51.120 --> 1:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to people that aren't going to pay me, you know.

1:39:53.120 --> 1:39:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I it took me a two or three years to

1:39:54.840 --> 1:39:58.479
<v Speaker 1>finally really understand how they were rating based on two

1:39:58.880 --> 1:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>nine nineties methodology. The methodology had changed. How that how

1:40:03.600 --> 1:40:07.519
<v Speaker 1>you know that you had this real uh originate to

1:40:07.800 --> 1:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to distribute model that that was just pulling. You know,

1:40:10.880 --> 1:40:12.800
<v Speaker 1>people were investing in these things that they thought were

1:40:12.840 --> 1:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>triple A and they paid a higher yield than other

1:40:15.680 --> 1:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>triple as, which wish you can sell that you can

1:40:17.800 --> 1:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sell an infinite amount of that because people can can

1:40:20.240 --> 1:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage between the triple as. You know, I mean it's

1:40:23.000 --> 1:40:25.519
<v Speaker 1>crazy how that whole worked. Once you realize how that

1:40:25.560 --> 1:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>whole mechanism worked, and then it was obvious how it happened.

1:40:28.680 --> 1:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just couldn't understand originally why they make

1:40:31.280 --> 1:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>loans that were never gonna get paid. Well, if you

1:40:34.200 --> 1:40:36.679
<v Speaker 1>can my my favorite. I did a ton of research

1:40:36.760 --> 1:40:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for Bailout Nation. One of my favorite little research discoveries

1:40:41.240 --> 1:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were that the primarily located in California, private sector mortgage

1:40:47.240 --> 1:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>lenders who would then sell it to Wall Street would

1:40:49.960 --> 1:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>sell it to Wall Street with a nine day warranty.

1:40:53.320 --> 1:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>They would guarantee that this mortgage won't default, This thirty

1:40:57.080 --> 1:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>year mortgage won't default for three months. Now, stop and

1:41:00.960 --> 1:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think about how misaligned those incentives are. I have a

1:41:05.720 --> 1:41:07.800
<v Speaker 1>question for you that's not on my list. I have

1:41:07.960 --> 1:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to ask, because I've been thinking about it. Are we

1:41:10.200 --> 1:41:12.479
<v Speaker 1>ever going to see a calculated risk book from you?

1:41:13.760 --> 1:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, really, because I think that could

1:41:16.400 --> 1:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting. It looks like a lot of work

1:41:18.960 --> 1:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to me. Yet it's a lot of work. But when

1:41:21.200 --> 1:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you're done, I have a pH d. That's what it

1:41:24.000 --> 1:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>feels like. Okay, Well, I think people would buy the

1:41:26.920 --> 1:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Calculators book, and I think it could be. That's very

1:41:29.360 --> 1:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>nice to you to say, so you don't you know

1:41:32.040 --> 1:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>how much work goes into it. I know. Hey, listen,

1:41:34.280 --> 1:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been five years and I've been thinking about, well,

1:41:38.080 --> 1:41:40.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm just now five years later on my Alright, maybe

1:41:40.560 --> 1:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll start thinking about, well you could you could see

1:41:42.880 --> 1:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>five years. I'm sorry it's seven years later, but you know,

1:41:45.520 --> 1:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>your master's in business, You've You've had over a hundred

1:41:48.000 --> 1:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>interviews on my list. That's I've had two different publishers

1:41:51.400 --> 1:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>reach out. Three different publishers reached out to me. Hey,

1:41:53.880 --> 1:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>would you like to do this as a book? Sure?

1:41:56.360 --> 1:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be a great book. It could

1:41:57.920 --> 1:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>be fun. Bill. Thank you much for for doing this.

1:42:01.960 --> 1:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This has just been really fascinating for for those of

1:42:05.120 --> 1:42:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you who listened, I apologize for babbling. I know Bill

1:42:08.880 --> 1:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for so long, and literally it's the first time we've

1:42:12.000 --> 1:42:16.479
<v Speaker 1>actually sat down and chatted. I was very chatty, and

1:42:16.640 --> 1:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's because when you know someone virtually for twelve years

1:42:20.400 --> 1:42:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and you finally get to sit down and talk, you

1:42:22.520 --> 1:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>feel compelled to uh, to hold up your half of

1:42:25.200 --> 1:42:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. For those of you who have enjoyed this conversation,

1:42:29.840 --> 1:42:31.479
<v Speaker 1>be sure to look up an inch or down an

1:42:31.520 --> 1:42:33.519
<v Speaker 1>inch on Apple iTunes and you can see any of

1:42:33.560 --> 1:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the other hundred plus conversations we've had, which is in

1:42:37.439 --> 1:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>itself a mind blowing data point. I would be remiss

1:42:41.520 --> 1:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank my producer and Today's recording engineer,

1:42:46.560 --> 1:42:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Volmer, our booker Taylor Riggs, and Mike Batnick, who

1:42:50.640 --> 1:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is the head of research. We love your comments, feedbacks, criticisms,

1:42:55.160 --> 1:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and and other assorted responses. Be sure and right to

1:42:59.160 --> 1:43:04.439
<v Speaker 1>us at M I B Podcasts at Bloomberg dot net.

1:43:05.160 --> 1:43:08.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ritolts. You've been listening to Masters in Business

1:43:08.960 --> 1:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio