WEBVTT - The Misinformation Export Industry

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. We just talked about some

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of the day's COVID and vaccine headlines. Dr Anthony Fauci,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>who's the director of the National Institute of Allergy and

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Infectious Diseases, he spoke to Bloomberg's David Western earlier today

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>at the Bloomberg Business Week Live event, and they talked

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility of another COVID wave. We don't want

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to declare victory prematurely, but if we can get thee

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of adults vaccinated with at least one doze by the

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>fourth of July, the way the president to set the goal.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the chances of there being a surge or

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a rebound is extremely low. That's the reason why we

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>want to continue to get people vaccinated, all right, And that,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.199
<v Speaker 1>of course, was Dr Anthony Fauci, director with the National

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Institute of Aology and Infectious Diseases, catching up with our

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>David Weston at the Bloomberg Business Week Live event. Let's

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about the latest on COVID and the vaccine. Suberklin

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is Professor of Molecular microbiology and Immunology at the Johns

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, Founder,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Her research on covering the

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms mediating how males and females differ in their immune

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>responses to viral infection and vaccination. She's also co director

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Center for Women's Health, Sex and Gender Research.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>She's with us on the phone in Baltimore. Sober nice

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to have you here with Tim and me. So Dr

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Fauci I think surprised us by some of the

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>things he had to say about maybe we won't need

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a booster, talking about the passa ability of another COVID wave.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the reality, What are the discussions you all have

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it Johns Hopkins about maybe what's next from here? The

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>good and the bad? I think I think the good

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the good news is that the vaccines are proving to

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be excellent and they're proving to be protective against some

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of these variants UM, including the variants that was initially

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>identified in the United Kingdom UM, which has is quite

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>prevalent now here in the United States. So I think

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that is very good news, and I think that likely

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>contributed to the CDC's UM recommendation that that those of

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>us who are vaccinated are allowed to be unmaked um

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>outdoors and in some situations indoors UM. I think the

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the what we see in other countries cause us to

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>pause and probably cause Dr Fauci to remind into all

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of us that that just because we are our numbers

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of cases are down here in the United States UM,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're getting so many people vaccinated, that we're still

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not completely out of the weeds. So, you know, I

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>think they're trying to, you know, emphasize that for anybody

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>who is hesitant at this moment about receiving the vaccine

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>but want to go and be in public settings without

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a mask. They've got to get vaccinated. And we have

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so many millions of people who have been vaccinated that

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>our understanding about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's tremendous. They are safe and they are efflications. Yeah,

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to that point, Dr Klein, it does seem like and look,

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been a week since we got that news from

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the CDC about being able to take masks off if

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in certain situations, if we are vaccinated, it does really

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like and and look, this is my impression, but

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>correct and correct me if I'm wrong. But if you

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>have been vaccinated with with one of the vaccines available

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for emergencies authorization in the US, it's it's like, seems

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's back to life. Is as normal it is,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it has, it has that flavor and that potential. And

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I think this is this is

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so important, and I think from a public health perspective,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this is so important because if if those of us

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>who work with these vaccines study these vaccines, know these

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccines to be both safe and efficacious, if we believe

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in how well they're working, if we believe the data,

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>which I do, that have come out about the effectiveness

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of these vaccines against the variant, then we should be

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>able to take our masks off and trust that we

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>will be protected, in particular against severe disease. UM. No

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is going to be a hundred percent, so as

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>your listeners may have, you know, those those one off

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>stories that somebody who got vaccinated but who's still got infected.

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm even thinking about our story about about the Yankee UM.

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>You know it is going to happen. But I think

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what needs to be appreciated is this is precisely what

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>can happen during a typical flu season. Is as we

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>prepare for the flu season in the coming fall, we

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>know that vaccines they reduced the probability of severe illness

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and death, they may not completely prevent you from ever

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>getting infected. And I think that's what we're seeing in

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in some circumstances with the current um current stars Kobe

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>two vaccines. And the other thing is Tim and I

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>were talking about before we got going about how scientists

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>are racing to figure out the so called correlates of

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.119
<v Speaker 1>correlates of protection against COVID, in other words, which test

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>results a shore immunity. I mean, we don't exactly know

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>when the protection from these vaccines is expected to wane.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It's tricky and we don't necessarily the tests yet right

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to tell us exactly that You phrase all of that beautifully,

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That is all completely correct. And you know, I think

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as these companies were, were, you know, very acutely aware

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>of how important it was to get these vaccines and

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>determine their safety and define their efficacy based on the

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>ability of the vaccine at present preventing excuse me, severe

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>disease and illness they weren't going, and then doing the

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>more detailed assessments that researchers like my myself typically do.

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So now you've got to let the rest of us

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>catch up. Do our very detailed analyzes, study this durability,

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>study the types of immune responses, and see which of

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>those immune responses best predicts Okay, so when we say

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>a correlative protection, we're looking for what is that measure

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of your immunity that sessed predicts protection. I want to

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>get right into it when it when it comes to

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the questions that so many people have about pregnant women

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and vaccines, what do we know right now? What we

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>know right now is we have through them the PBC

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Reporting system. UM, there have been thousands of pregnant women

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>who perceived the available COVID nineteen vaccines. They have been

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>proven to be safe UM in pregnant women. There is

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>no evidence that these vaccines are causing UM adverse reactions

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>either serious or non serious, at at a higher rate

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in pregnant women. So and and I think now knowing

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and having considerably more data over the course of this pandemic,

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that infection can uh results in you know, serious effects

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on preg that se outcomes including things like pre term

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>birth UM. I think pregnant women UM. And the recommendation

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>by the CDC is that pregnant women in their second

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>or third trimester should definitely be getting getting vaccinated. Excuse me,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what do though, pregnant women need to understand about kind

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of how this vaccine works to kind of feel more

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:25.559
<v Speaker 1>self assured or are confident about getting it. Absolutely so,

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the nature of these platforms and

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the terminology that's used for these platforms m r N

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>A virus vector vaccines these confound quite intimidating, as though

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they could do something off target, either to the pregnant

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>women or their baby. And there is absolutely nothing to

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about. These are not causing infections in US.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>These are vaccines that, through their delivery mechanisms, are stimulating

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>our cells um to to make in this case, the

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>spike antigen um, which is what our immune system um

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 1>recognizes in the stars Covey two virus. It's just proteins,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>so it can't replicate, it can't in fact, it can't

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do anything to harm either the pregnant woman or her fetus.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, Professor Klein, I just want to jump

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in because, well, how would you answer the question if

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody came to you and said, but wait a second,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't yet know if the vaccine has an effect

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>on a baby in two three years. Absolutely, I would

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>say that there's no evidence from any vaccine ever that

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there are those types of long term effects. But what

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>there is ample evidence of is in utero infection during

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>pregnan can have long term implications on the baby one

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to five ten years later, even in cases where the

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>virus itself is not transmitted to the baby. So I

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think I think pregnant women need to be considerably more

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>concerned that the probability of getting inspected in and getting sick,

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>very sick, and having to potentially be hospitalized is greater

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're not vaccinated. It's greater for pregnant than non

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>pregnant women. And the one way to mitigate this is

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>by getting vaccinated. All right, some good advice, And I

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>want to just mention one thing because I heard somebody

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>talking about this to the CDC recommendation that women who

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>need mammograms try to get them before vaccination or six

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks after a vaccination because of swollen lymph nodes under

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>their arm. Like, we are finding out more information so

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that you have an understanding about when to do these things. Again,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this is I don't want to say it's a Senex experiment,

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're watching the research play out in real time

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, and each day we do learn more and more,

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>but still so many questions, especially when it comes to

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>that question that you ask, Carol, to what extent does

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>do these vaccines last past six, eight, ten months? Right? Exactly?

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>We don't know yet, right because we've done it a

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit differently. Dr saber Kline. She's Professor of Molecular

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Microbiology Nammunology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>co director of the Center for Women's Health, Sex and

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Gender Research. Great to have her back with us on

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Baltimore. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Bloomberg Sarah Fryar. She has been following how

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>social networks circulate information for years, and our latest reporting

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>in the magazine covers how social networks are exporting disinformation

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>about the COVID vaccine, and Tim exporting is the keyword. Yeah,

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it certainly is. Content that's blocked or flagged in the

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>US often continues to circulate in other languages. The Joel.

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>The question that I have whenever I read a story

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about content moderation and Facebook is these companies are most

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>powerful technology companies with the brightest minds. Why can't they

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>get this under control? Well, they can, um, and they've

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>been cracking down on it. But in the case of

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the story that Um Sarah did, the problem becomes um

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that things get lost in translation, or that more more accurately,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>translations are still getting out there with the mins information. So, so, Sarah,

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>can you help us get to the bottom this Why

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>does it keep happening. Well, in this case, the global pandemic,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a different situation than we've seen in the past.

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>We've had this debate about Facebook and YouTube for years,

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they really just don't have people who

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>understand and can moderate content in all the languages that

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they offer their services in. Their machine learning for finding

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccine misinformation and harmful misinformation is only proficient and about

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>a dozen languages, and Facebook has offered in more than

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred languages. So just just keep that in mind. Um.

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But the difference with this pandemic is it's it's a

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that is global, and the information that is coming

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and circulating globally it has a similar potency to US

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>pop culture. Researchers told me, I mean, this is just

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's what's what we're talking about here. We've had access

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to the vaccines sooner here than they have in other countries,

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and that culture of the debates, the rumors of things

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that have already gone viral and gotten banned or gotten

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>labeled in the US on YouTube and Facebook have then

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>been translated into other languages and and are having a

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>whole other cycle elsewhere and outside of the realm of

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>these tools that can can really bring it under control.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And just for our audience, you recognize her voice. Bloomberg

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>News technology reporter and author of No Filter, The Inside

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Story of Instagram, Sarah Friar. She's with us from San Francisco,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course Bloomberg Business we get out or Joe

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Webber right here to a friend that I forgot to

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>tell everyone. Sarah, you know, we do have the technology

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>available to us, and I believe Skype does it like

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>real time translations in many different languages, and it's just

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so hard for me to to understand why if this

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>type of machine learning is available, it is still so

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>challenging for these companies to get this under control. Well,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>every time something new occurs, you have to train a

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>model to find the images that UM that correspond with

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that problem and and understand the local context. Maybe people

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>don't call it UM the same. There is a lot

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of colloquialisms around how you describe immunizations. There are a

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of UM, a lot of content that that may

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>go viral in the US and and may not pop

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>up for months elsewhere. And so I think that the

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>UM the issue really is one of investment, is the

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that these companies have only just started to crack

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>down strongly in English, and even then, I don't know

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>about you, but I see so many rumors still circulating

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in English. People who are talking about, you know, the

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>false notion that that the fiber maderna vaccine can shed

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to others, or cobb in fertility, all of those, all

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>those things, those harmful things are still spreading. So the

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>English version of this is not proficient. You just need

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that if you are witnessing this media environment

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in English, that is definitely worth in any other language.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was particularly interesting. There's a paragraph in

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the story about Arabic subtitles in particular. Can you tell

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>us about that one? And what a review by the

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Institute of Strategic Dialogue found. So, the Institute of the

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Strategic Dialogue found that there were these US originated videos

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of women shaking and convulsing purportedly after getting the shot. Um,

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but they were obviously, you know, lacking in context, and

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't verified. And then um they were labeled as

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>meeting to be fact checked in the US on Facebook.

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But those same videos exactly the same content, just with

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Arabic subtitles. We're not caught by the same machine learning

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>algorithms in in Arab language countries. So so I think

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that this is what we've seen happen over and over,

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is that the US drama occurs and gets evaluated and

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and we saw it also with the even before the

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>era of vaccines, we saw with the planned Demic video.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you guys remember that was the highly conspiratorial

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>video documentary that you know, went and had millions of

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>views on Facebook and YouTube before it was taken down

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>finally by the platforms for its harmful impact. And that

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>video was circulating in other countries for days, becoming a

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>problem before it was addressed in other languages. So what

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>do the social media companies, say, Sarah, when it comes

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to basically policing platforms outside the US, It is really

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not that transparent. Facebook skills is not disclosed, how many

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>moderators it has in a certain language. Um, you know,

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 1>any comparative data on how it's work in the US

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>compares or in Europe compared to work elsewhere. Um, we

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>get bulk statistics from from companies like like Alphabets, Google

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube, but we do not have any transparency into

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the actual effectiveness we are relying on this anecdotal research

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.479
<v Speaker 1>from people who who spend their whole career looking at

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this problem, and they're telling us that this is the

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>trend that they're seeing. But Um, but I really think

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that in order to get to the bottom of this,

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need a lot more information from these companies

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that have now had had so much control over our

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>global information diet Sarah, I know you've spent months reporting

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>on misinformation when it comes to vaccines on these platforms,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in years reporting on these platforms, and in the research

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for your book. UM, give us the motivation for people

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>who do spread this disinformation in just the lass thirty

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>seconds that we have with you. It is about being

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a personality on the internet, about getting that engagement, and

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in some cases about making money. I mean, the people

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>who are telling you that vaccines are are scary and

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>possibly harmful, they're also trying to sell you alternatives. They're saying,

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>by my supplements instead, or you know, come to my

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>mindfulness retreat instead, UM, listen to my podcast. And so

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a commercial aspect, there is an

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>ego aspect to this, and there are some people who

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>really have fallen down the rabbit hole and believe it

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and are trying to to keep each other's safe. And

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>those are the people that we need to make sure

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>get the right information. Well, great continuing coverage, Sarah, Thank

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Bloomberg News technology reporter, author of No Filter,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the inside story of Instagram. Sarah Fire on the phone

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Are thanks to Bloomberg Business we get

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>out to Jill Weber in our Interactive broker's studio. You're

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. This is I'm

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>just checking. It's our most red story in the Bloomberg

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in the past eight hours. It's about Morgan Stanley, now

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the latest big US bank to shake up its leadership.

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So here with this scoop is Bloomberg News Finance reporter

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Street n Uragan. He's in our Interactive Brokers studio. So

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know where I want to go. I'm looking at

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the visual. I know everybody's saying it. So four white

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>guys and Goodwind on radio and good thing. We're on radio,

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but on YouTube. I don't know if everybody can see this. Wait,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna low. It's all over Twitter here it is, Yeah,

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it's all over Twitter. Um, did James Gorman not get

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the memo? Look, I think, to be completely fair, Morgan

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Stanley would probably tell you that this is a moment

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.719
<v Speaker 1>in Times snapshot, even before diversity was a buzzword on

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. This is a firm that had Ruth poor

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>At as it's CFO six years ago. She left and

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>went to Google and rose higher there, and then there

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>was Zoe Cruise before the financial crisis around around that

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>time two thousand seven two, when she was the co

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>president of the firm. So Morgan Stanley has had women

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in senior leadership roles because it's a separate question why

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they have not been able to climb to the highest rank.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>But it would not be totally fair to say that

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley stands out different from every other bank. But

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>at a time that we are in right now where

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing succession planning everywhere, and you know, when the

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>senior leaders are thinking about and the heels of JP

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Morgan what the future looks like, it does it does

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>strike a bit of a discordant note. But if you're

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO S sixty two and the next generation is in

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the mid fifties. You still have a Wall Street that

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is populated with you know, old white men in that

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>racket who have that experience, who have rose through the ranks,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>who have got that divisional experience across the board. The

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>real pipeline, and it is coming up elsewhere, perhaps not

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as fast as it should be, but the real pipeline

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.719
<v Speaker 1>is probably in the late thirties, in the early forties,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mid forties generation, and that crew is still a while

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>away from getting the top perch at any major institution. Yeah,

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the new co presidents are are ted. Pick is fifty

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>two Andy sapristein who are these people and who is

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this quartet? Well, that Pick is, of course, uh, you know,

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>seen as the turnaround artists at Morgan Stanley. He started

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>his career out as a e c M banker equity

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>capital markets. He out with the ip of Google, he

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>helped with the IP of Blackstone. But then of course

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>his real climb at Morgan Stanley is considered with what

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>he did post crisis, and the crisis was a really

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult time for Morgan Standay like most other banks, but

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>for Morgan Stanley in particular. But post crisis he helped

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rebuild the trading division, the equities group. He took it

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to the dominant player, to the number one standing on

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. Then he was tasked with repairing their fixed

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>income division, which really was, you know, to be completely blunt,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a train wreck, and he took some hard steps there,

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and hard steps in Wall Street means a big number

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of job cuts. But since then it does seem to

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>have rebounded. The trading group has done really well. And

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>then he was given oversight of its traders and dealmaker's

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>head of the Corporate Investment Bank. So it made sense

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for him to be rising to the position of a

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>president because the c IB is about fifty of the

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>firm's revenue. The other half of the majority of the

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>other half comes from wealth management, and the Sapperstein has

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>helped Bill Morgan Stanley into this wealth management powerhouse, and

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that has been carried out really in the course of

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years. You think about the Smith Barney

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>acquisition in two thousand ten, from there all the way

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>through to the e Trade purchase last here, which was

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a Jumboard deal. The biggest bank deal in over a

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>decade or probably even since the Smith Barney deal again

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>was carried out by Morgan Stanley, and that has shifted

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the center of gravity at the film. It really has

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>his balance of you know, they have the standing among

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the elites of investment banking as well as such a

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>big operation intending to customers his money. Concidal living anytime

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing that it doesn't sound like he's keen on leaving

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. Our understanding he's already told the board, the

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>scenior management that he wants to stick around for at

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>least three more years. And who can blame him? This

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is the best performing major US banks talk in the

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>last five years. And the wind going is this good?

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Would you really want to walk off into the sunset?

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So what happens now is these these four individuals and

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as as you write, the shuffle thrust the quartet into

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a public bake off to succeed Gorman. What happens now,

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>well I did speak with Gorman and he said it

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>gives them time to spread their wings. So it really

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to play off as a bike off. You

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>have these four people right now and these would be

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>seen as the leading contenders. But that's now, that's six

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>months from today, that's nine months from today. Three years

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is a long time on Wall Street, her stock at

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>record high, your businesses that are firing on all cylinders,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>something might go wrong. Other contenders might come about the

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bye side is of Washington liquidity. Some of these people

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>might get pushed away too much. Higher paying jobs are

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a very different jobs. So just because these four other

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>leading contenders right now doesn't necessarily mean this is how

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it will look three or four or five years from today.

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, do they do anything there to increase

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the amount of women in terms of leadership,

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know the pipeline here and just got about twenty

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>seconds here. I think they will tell you that they

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>are doing everything that they can and to boost that bipline.

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>They will tell you they have a number of senior women.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Susie Huang, who's the cohead of their investment bank, is

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the most senior Asian women across Wall Street,

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and they are trying to promote other women as well.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But when we see the big headlines like this, when

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we see the contenders, it does send out a message

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they would should have thought of the creative

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>solution when it comes to thinking about successes, just a

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>little diversity, little diversity check out that story at Bloomberg

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com if you want to see the picture to

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gain an idea of what we're talking about. Trinadaraj And

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>broke this story. He got the scoop financial Bloomberg News

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in our Interactor Broker studio, Marc a journal. Yeah, but

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you let me drive, No, no, no, night, please out

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of the riding vel. I want to drive. Just drives

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the questions. Your job. This is the drive to the globe.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks well, try us on Bloomberg Radio. All right, just

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>about ten minutes left in today's trading session, so let's

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>get to it in his time for the drive to

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the close. Back with us is margat Bittel. She is

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>senior portfolio manager at Wells Fargo Asset Management, billion dollars

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management. Market back with us on the

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>phone from Boston. So market, It's been an interesting week,

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>an interesting couple of weeks. Whether it was inflation news

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes made investors a little bit nervous, certainly in

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets, and then sometimes not. You know, we're

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>watching the crypto markets, which fell out of bed yesterday,

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>bounced back and they're bouncing back some more today. How

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>do you make sense of what really matters fundamentally to

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the equity trade. Well, I think what the market is

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at most of all is the sense policy on

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Uh, that's what's really I think relief that

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>from the FED minutes that the FED is nowhere near

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about raising rates because of inflation helped to draw

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector which was over sold anyway. And I

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think the market is really looking for large themes and

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>narratives at this point. But that that's the most important

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>thing is is their inflation is a feed very tighten

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think a review of their minutes and that

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't the case. So the market is having a little

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a relief rarely here. But I guess the

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>question is is what changes the Fed's mind? What what?

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>What are the inflation numbers that makes people and the

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>FED start to think differently about their targets for raising rates. Well,

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the problem is because the Fed has

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.959
<v Speaker 1>not made that clear. Whether that's deliberate or they'll strew

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 1>up deciding among themselves what the signals would be. Uh,

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>But basically they haven't made clear what exactly be a

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>trigger point to change and begin to draw liquidity out.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And also the Feed is talks about inflation, but the

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>definition of inflation and the numbers that they look at

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is inflation is not necessarily with the markets looking at

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>with consumers, with businesses looking at for their price increases.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a little bit of confusion of well,

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly what is the inflation rate that people should look

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at to try to figure out what the FED would

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would be sensitive to moving And so there's a lot

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty, and so I think people are just really

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a grip on what will make the

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>FED react market will look. I'm a little confused that

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 1>because those Fed minutes came out Him and I were

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on air, and you did see equities take a little

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a of a dive on the FED minutes,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>especially because the FED was talking a little bit about

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>acid prices and some concerns um and seeming to that

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>there are members of FED starting to consider maybe talking

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>about kind of what was the next move for the FED,

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and we did see rates go up. So how do

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you see today being a relief rally off of that?

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Did you think there was a rethink a little bit

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>after that initial reaction to the FED minutes yesterday? Yes,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think people are trying to parce out what

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>will be the FEDS reaction to what specifically, and that

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't very clear. Uh. It's just we need to take

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS pulse to figure out what they're looking at

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and how close they are. And that's what the market

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was doing yesterday. Today the market feels a little relieved. Um.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that I personally think it will

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>be a long time before we see the FED do

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>anything in the way of titan need to try to

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>race rate. What do you mean that long time? Uh,

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly for the rest of this year, well intil next year,

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this year, well into next year. So

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is that something that with you when you see these,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when you know the text off a few weeks ago.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that something that you think is a widely held belief? Uh? No,

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think people are really trying to figure out what

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they can match onto because we've never had a recession

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>like this COVID recession. It hasn't been driven by economic conditions. Uh.

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>The FED has a monetary policy that we've never seen before.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And also the set is saying, UM, watch for our reaction,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to saying these are the data that we're

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for that will be our trigger. So the market

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is sort of flailing around saying, well, what inflation numbers

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have been looking at? Uh, certainly in the real world

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that, but the fit isn't reacting to it.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So and then I think that keys into the biggest sector,

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a tech sector that's been the most overvalued

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>performance wise, and so it's the most sensitive at any

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>time we see any any wobbly in what the ten

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>years doing that makes weakness in tech. They ten years

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>rallied text up, especially text have been I think gotten

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.479
<v Speaker 1>pretty oversold here over the short term. Worrying about interest rates, Well,

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you think investor should think about tech specifically?

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Should you even be thinking short term or do we

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>no longer term? Especially some of those big momentum players

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be around for a while. That's

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>where we're still going to go see some growth. That's

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna still see some momentum. And it makes

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.959
<v Speaker 1>sense fundamentally. Yes, I think that those companies, the high quality,

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>proven growers, are going to continue to be above average

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>performers over the next few years um. But still we

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of short term trading nervous money that's

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>come out of check and when they come out of

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>chech they come out of the small, risky names and

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the big names too. So I think you're just seeing

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of market volatility. So we're trying to

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>look through that and not really time to trade the

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>tech sector based on the short term moves, but just

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a long term we think we'll still see higher growth

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>out of that sector than most other market sectors, so

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we still like the sector a lot. What are your

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on cryptocurrency? Yesterday we saw quite the decline, with

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin more than before making up much of that, and

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin at last check trading higher on the day today. Um,

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what are clients asking you about bit quinn and how

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are you feeling about it? Uh, we're not seeing many

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>questions on that. It's because our clients are really broken advised,

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>so when they get nervous about that sort of thing,

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they talked to their advisor. He calms them down and

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>then they feel feel better about the world. We think

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a speculative development and it doesn't give you

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the information say that if you look at the price

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of gold might give you about market sentiment and risk

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. That's any more questions about it that

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. I mean, I don't know, how do you

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think about you you know, have seen a lot of

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>different cycles, a lot of funky new wave investments, whether

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it was high yield junk bonds way back when that

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>have now become kind of a norm normal part of

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>an investors portfolio. How do you think about digital currencies? Well,

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's mostly um market, that participants are short

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>term traders, opportunistic investors, short term and maybe new people

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to trading. So it seems very exciting and new and fresh,

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's how we always learned and until the market.

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a good lesson about fundamentals. So I think

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just really reflecting liquidity, a surge of new investors,

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>something that seems on the surface very exciting and new

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and techie, and but not much to do with fundamentals

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>or relative value of currencies for example, or anything about inflation.

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just too volal. I should say, Bitcoin pair gains

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>as the Treasury seeks a tough and tax compliance, but

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>now is back above so up another eighteen hundred dollars today. Yeah,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen we've seen really, really dramatic moves. One quick

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>last point twenty seconds here, Margie, Um, what do you

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>want to avoid in this environment? We think that some

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the smaller tech names are still a little vulnerable

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>here because we still seek some money coming out of

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>those sectors. And we think some of the economically sensitive

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sectors who have gotten way ahead of themselves with market

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm on the rebaild, we think they're going to be

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of dead money for the next six months. All right,

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Good to know, Good to check in with you. Market Patel,

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Senior portfolio manager at Wells Fargo Asset Management, five billion

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets under management, joining us on the phone

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>from Boston. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News