WEBVTT - Buck’s First Thoughts - 12/11/20

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. I know it

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is nothing new that the media lies to you. We've

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>said it on this show so many times that it's

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>almost like an unofficial mantra. But the media does a

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>lot to you constantly, the lot of all Americans. They

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lie to themselves. But you've seen a shift, and this

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>is clear with the Hunter Biden story as we now

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have it, because it's a condensed enough period on an

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>important enough issue that it's clear as day what's going

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>on here. Let me tell you the old model, or

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the old thinking about this was that the mainstream mediaize

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to you largely out of a subconscious bias. They don't

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>even know how liberal they are. They don't even know

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>how much they're Democrat activists pretending to do journalism. So

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what they do is to them completely fair minded. Now

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that's insane and it's obviously wrong and delusional, but they

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>at least can consider themselves. They at least think they

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>have that going for them. They believe that at whatever level.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But now when you see what's happened with this Hunter

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden storyline, which I also I'm still not sure that

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that alone would have had a dramatic effect on the election,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But we can't know. That's the problem. That's the point.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's too late. We can't run the experiment again.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But the Hunter Biden story was suppressed in such a

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>way that anyone can see. It is very clear, It

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is very obvious that they did this intentionally, and they

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>did this without any remorse, without any sense that they

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>were betraying their profession, that they have scruples or ethics.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not about that anymore. This is the change. It's

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>not that they think they're being fair minded. Now they

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just weaponize whatever they've got. Now it's out, it's all

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>out in the open. They are on team Destroyed, Team

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>destroyed Trump, Team help Biden. That's what they're doing. That

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is the plan. That's what's going on here. So the

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>media is a disgrace, and social media has now amplified it.

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And I do believe I believe that there is right

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>now a greater degree of aggressiveness and brazenness from the

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media than there's been a long time, because They've

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>got social media now running cover for them, so they

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>figure now is the time. Now is their moment. Crush

0:02:56.400 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the opposition, lie to everyone's faces, get away with it,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>rub our noses in it. That's what they're doing. What

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>examples could I point to on this? Oh, they're they're

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a countless ones right now. But let's just start before

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I get into how disgraceful and dishonest they were on

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this story and how it's clear now and this is

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the real takeaway. This was not an accident. They didn't

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>really think that the Hunter Biden laptop was stolen or hacked.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>That was all a lie, and they knew it was

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a lie. They didn't really believe any of this was

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Russian disinformation. They knew that was a lie. The point

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>now is that with social media running cover for them,

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>backing them up, magnifying their lies, they feel comfortable doing

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever they've got to do to achieve power. They don't care.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't care that you and I know, I think

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that's important. We used to believe that if we held

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a light up to them, if we were able to

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>express our outrage age and how they violated their principles,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're not really being journalists, that there was some

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>cause and effect there, that there would be some responsiveness

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from their side. I mean, I think that was always overstated.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But they don't care what you think. They don't care

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.559
<v Speaker 1>what anybody who's not a Biden supporting Trump hating leftist thinks.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>They simply do not care. Does not matter to them.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>We are now in a post journalism world in this

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>country where all we have are these warring propaganda machines,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and now propaganda can be for the good. Right. The

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Allies engaged in propaganda during World War Two against the Nazis.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It was good propaganda. Right, So let's understand that that

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>word can usually have a negative connotation. But what else

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we can call it polemics, we could call it fierce debate,

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to say. We have to defeat their arguments,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have to actually defeat their power grabs, or

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>else they'll just continue to do this and continue to

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>get away with it. So here we have perfect example.

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, then there's so many examples that we could

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>choose from, but here's a perfect example of this politico

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>which considers itself to be an insidery politics first publication

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in DC. I mean, it's it's a bunch of libs.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>They could the politicals for people who couldn't get jobs

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at the New York Times. But you know, we're almost there,

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty close. And they put out this before the election.

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at this stuff and it's it's

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>just amazing. Hunter Biden's story, this is before the election,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this is in October. Is Russian disinfo. Dozens of former

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>intel officials say more than fifty former intelligence officials signed

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a letter casting doubt on the providence of a New

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>York Post story on the former president's son. What does

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that even mean? Who cares what fifty former intelligence officials

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think about the New York Post reported? What do they

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>know about it that the New York Post doesn't. The

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>answer was nothing. But this was a smokescreen. This was

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a classic smokescreen operation. Just put something up there to

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:20.119
<v Speaker 1>obscure what's really going on. That's what they did. Now

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you go to the story from this week, Justice Apartment's

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>interest in Hunter Biden covered more than taxes actually covered.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Federal prosecutors also investigated foreign ties, including possible money laundering

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and money launders. A serious crime. It's a federal felony.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You can go to prison for quite a few years

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>for that one. So this is the same publication a

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>few weeks apart. And I think that our belief that

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>what we will usually fall back on an our side.

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>As see look at how dumb they look. Ha ha.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>The journals. The journals are being silly journals again, and

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm here to tell you that's not how they view it.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times, CNN, the Washington Post, MSNBC, all

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of major news publications, platforms, channels across the country that

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are not explicitly right of center, all of them, all

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of them now have trended toward this. But the big

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>players in the space, CNN, the Times, the Post, they

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>don't do these things and then feel embarrassed when they

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>get caught. They're doing them now and they're saying, what

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do about it? And the answer, and

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you this, and not a lot of

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>other people will the answer on the right is we

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>got to figure that out. Because we don't have a

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>good answer yet. People ask me what can we do?

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And I share all of their frustration. I mean, I'm

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>seething over stuff like this when I dig into it,

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing this research, I I just want to just

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>shout profanity when I see this stuff happening. But they

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>do it now, and they look you in the eyes

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and they say that's right, and it worked. This is

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the Harry Reid school, and the Democrats do this all

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the time and there and the media now is just

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>open about it. Remember what Harry Reid said about the

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>completely baseless smear. I'm no Mitt Romney fan, as you know.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>But Mitt Romney has always paid his taxes. Okay, Mit

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Romney is not a is not a guy who hasn't failed,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hasn't filed tax returns in ten years, No way at boy, scout,

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. Okay, that guy pays his taxes. Is he rich?

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Is he a plutocrat? Is he a sell out? Sure?

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But way not that there's nothing wrong being rich. We

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>should all be so lucky. But here we are now

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at the true manifestation of the philosophy that Harry

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Reid very clearly outlined for us when he was asked, sir,

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you think now about the

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that you lied about Mitt Romney's tax returns. He

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly did his responsible will. He didn't win, did he.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what the entire mainstream media. They're all laughing at

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>us now behind closed doors. We sit here and we say, see,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys, don't do what you say you're gonna do.

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And they giggle in our faces and say, oh, yeah, sorry,

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess we made that mistake. I guess we had

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a slip up on the Hunter

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden stuff. Oh we'll do better in the next election. Sure.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, enjoy being shut down. Enjoy having your

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>conservative websites and commentators people like me shut down on

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Facebook and YouTube. And who knows what Google's doing?

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Google's the most powerful company in the world right now,

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Google's the most powerful company in the world. All in

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know what they're doing. Who do you

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>think's gonna stop them? Oh? You think a bunch of

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who are getting a lot of money from big tech.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Mike Lee is gonna all of a

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>sudden be the great savior of the Republic against the

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>big tech oligarchs who are handing our country over to

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the radical left. I don't think so. Not that guy

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>here we are seeing it couldn't be any more clear,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be any more obvious. They do this now, and

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't apologize. They do it because it is the mission.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not something that just occurs, This isn't an

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>unwanted byproduct of their political aspirations. This is how they

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>do what they do. And now we get to what

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>can we all do about it? The answer is stop

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>trusting them on anything. Don't read them, don't support them,

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>don't click on them, don't accept it when they put

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>someone forward who's, oh, well, we've got some conservative voices

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at CNN. No they don't. They do not not that

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>are worth a damn. So don't do it. You all

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to vote with your dollars. You all

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to be a part of this movement

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>based on who you support, who you listen to, who

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you help. And I tell you openly, please make me

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one of them. If you're listening to this show, get

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>as many people as you can in your orbit to

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>listen this because you think they're being told this message elsewhere.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that any friend of yours, and you know,

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>good patriotic Americans who probably aren't that into the news cycle,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't as into politics as you are. If you're listening

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to this, you know they're they're they're listening to you know, NPR,

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're listening to PBS and there you know, they

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get information too, and they're just being

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>constantly propagandized too. They're being brainwashed. It's not their fault.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Brainwashing is very effective if you if you study and

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look at cults. There's actually some stories on

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this recently. A lot of very smart people fall for cults,

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>usually because they think they're too smart to fall for

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>a cult. Same thing as true a brainwash. You've got

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to be very aware, you've got to be self effacing.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And the dominant media, unfortunately, the liberal media, the mainstream,

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they're achieving a position again where they can just fully

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>stifle the other side. They don't have to pretend anymore

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that there should be balanced in media and you know,

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>equal time and fairness doctrine and all this stuff. No,

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, they want the same way they want

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>absolute political dominance. They're going for absolute media dominance. And

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they're in a better position now than they've been in

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. And we all need to be

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>aware of that. Fox News alone and a handful of

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, radio personalities, and a couple of publications. Not enough,

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>not enough. If it were enough, Joe Biden wouldn't have gotten. However,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>many years, seventy or eighty eighty million votes. I think

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it is what they're saying now, right, eighty four million

0:12:58.000 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or eighty eighty million. I mean, Joe Biden, you got

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>million more than Obomber, right, so let's call it eighty million.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden wouldn't have been able to get that. But

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the propaganda machines are very powerful, and I know there's

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>more will dig into this Hunter Biden stuff. I've also

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>seen people now calling did anyone call for a special

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>counsel into Hunter Biden before I did? I'm just curious

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>because I put that out on Twitter and it started

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to catch fire, and now I'm hearing a lot of

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>people say, oh, we should have a special counsel for

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden. Yeah, we should. In fact, this is a

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of what we should have a special counsel

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for a criminal investigation involving the son of a possibly

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>incoming president. That's when you appoint it, and you appoint

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it now. You don't wait until there's another president who

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>happens to be the one whose son would be under

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigation. We need to reorient our thinking a bit

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on this. We've caught them in the fraud about it's

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>no one really could have believed it was Russian disinformation,

0:13:55.200 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But that was the disinformation. The claim was the deceit.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>That was the whole point, and at some level it

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>was successful. At some level it worked. And all that

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>means is they're going to do it again. There's no

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>good faith, there's no common ground, there's no reaching across

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of the media and saying can't

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we all agree on the following can't we have fair

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rules of the road. No, we are now in all

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>out political media war. That's where we are. We need

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand that. And everybody has a role to play.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can choose who they watch, who they listen to,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who they tell their friends, who they support, and the

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas that come with all of that. So you absolutely

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>every day are making choices that play a role in

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>this fight. Don't forget that. Thanks for listening to The

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest news and information

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>from Buck by heading to Bucksexton dot com. Now let's

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>get into some of the best exchanges to identify the smug,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>intentional dishonesty and overall idiocy of so many in the

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media. And we're talking about some of the most

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>established names in journalism, people who have a fancy accent

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and work on a specific kind of presentation on television,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and then everyone's supposed to think they're so smart just

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>because they have this very pompous accent, and it's all

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>really just like they're an actor. But we think they're

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>smart anyway for no reason. Christian I'm um Pool. You'll

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>remember perhaps she had this exchange when the Hunter Biden

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>laptop was exposed, when we got into all this, she

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>had this exchange on CNN and you gotta hear at

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>play one. Okay, you know what. Also, the United States

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>government says, the FBI says this laptop is not Russian disinformation.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So what are you talking about here? This laptop is real.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not just the laptop. There's other emails, there's text messages.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>They are real. So according to there's this government I

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>verifying everybody to look at that. But that's not what

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing from. This is one of the most power

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because families in watching this, the Biden family and you're okay,

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you're okay, with our interest being sailed out to profit

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden and his family, when when we're suffering during

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic from communist China, keeps doing deals with communist Okay,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as you know perfectly well, I'm a journalist and a

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>reporter and I follow the facts and there has never

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>been any issues in terms of corruption. Now let me

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>ask you this. Yesterday the FBI. The FBI had that

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about reporting and any evidence. I'm talking to

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you now, Okay, I would talking if you guys would

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>beyond aren't doing that verifing? Oh, we're not going to

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>do your work for you. I want to ask you

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a question. The FBI journalist Hustry is verified. How much

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>insane crap can Christian Mumpool say in one interview? I

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>just want to know this is this is on on

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>CNN in some ways there their longest running and best

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>known host. I mean, now I'm on poor goes back

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Larry King days, and uh, she's saying I'm

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a journalist. She also says that's not what we're hearing

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>from the FBI. It was the most obvious news story ever.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>They had the guy's laptop, they had all of his

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>personal information. It was clearly his laptop. But the problem

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is that I'm on poor after all this, you think

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>she looks like a moron, so she'd be upset. No,

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>she probably got a pat on the head, maybe even

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>a bonus from Jeff Zucker for this disinformation. You're in

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>from more buck Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to the podcast. I wish you would interview

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden like you interview me. It would be so good.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what, you like this? I thought, I thought.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But when I watch him walk out of a store

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's walking with a ice cream and the question

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the media asked him, what kind of ice cream? What

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>flavor ice cream do you have? And he's in the

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>midst of a scandal, he's not and he's taking of

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>course he is, Leslie, Come on, of course he is.

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the biggest, second biggest scandal. So the biggest scandal

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was when they spied on my campaign. They spied on

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>my campaign. There's no real evidence of that, of course

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>there is. It's all over the plays, Leslie, they spied

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on my campaign, and they get Can I say something

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is sixty minutes, and we can't put

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on things. We can't pay it on because it's bad

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for Biden. We can't things we can't very leslie. They

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>spide on my campaign, We can't totally verified it's been

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Just go down and get the papers. They spied on

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>my campaign. They got caught. No, and then they went

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>much further than that, and they got caught. And you

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>will see that, Leslie, and you know that, but you

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to know. As a matter of fact,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. No, as a matter of fact,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't apparently read any of the various lengthy reports

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>from the DOJ on this, or what the Congress and

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the various oversight committees have proven. And no, this is

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes. We don't do facts that make Democrats sad

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on the inside. That's what she's telling you. Again, looks

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like an idiot to anybody who knows anything about Russia collusion.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>The Attorney General of the United States said and used

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the word spying on the campaign, and was and backed

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it up. Afterwards. They said, oh, you didn't really mean spying.

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>They said, no, no, No, I meant spying on the campaign.

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the sitting Attorney general. But sixty minutes knows better.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>This is sixty minutes. Unbelievable, unbelievable. It's all a fraud. Friends,

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>They're they're you know how Satan is the father of

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>lies the mainstream media because the grandfather applies. Okay, they're

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they're coming up with this stuff all the time, all

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the time, and they don't care you catch them. It

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>does not matter because they're doing it for a reason.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>The reason is not to inform people. It is to

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>please their democrat audience, to make them feel happy on

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the inside, and to crush conservatives. That is why they exist.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>They do not exist for the truth. They do not

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>exist to tell you things as they are, and they

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>don't care when you catch them anymore. That's that's the

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>big difference. Now there's no pretense. They just think. Here's

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a perfect example of the transition that I'm talking about.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Go back, look, just do it. You can do it.

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, a time constrained Google search, you know, put

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in in the tools and you go to the dates,

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>go back and do his search five years ago on

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>social media bias against conservatives, and all these websites would say, oh,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we don't do it at all, and

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the social media platforms, oh, that's not that was a mistake. Oh,

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>we didn't mean to do that. Oh no, no no.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And now it's gone to the point where they're just going, yeah,

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna do about it? That's right. We

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>are attacking. We are coming after you. We are shutting

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you down and cutting you off. And get ready for

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the possibility here of Joe Biden getting a televised Shiatsu

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>massage for the next four years. I mean, it's gonna

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be embarrassing. Joe is gonna be every interview. It's gonna

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be the equivalent of Joe Biden saying, oh, yeah, no joke,

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>my shoulders really, you know, man, it's tight up there.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, let's right, get into those knots. Yeah, a

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>little more oil. Yeah, that's right. That's what the media

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be doing to Joe Biden for four years,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>if he is present, and if he lasts four years

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>in office. Because let's be honest, friends, we're already seeing

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>some very interesting indicators, aren't we. No, no, no, And

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know this. I'm thinking this one through as

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I talk to you, but sure, the media is now

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>coming clean on the Hunter Biden stuff. And I shouldn't

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>say coming clean, they're just they have to now drop

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the facade. But why now? Why are they dropping the

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>facade now? They probably could have extended this out a

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer, waited until after the inauguration. Why do

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it now? And they don't seem upset about this at all?

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And remember that they are a bunch of conniving, backstabbing,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes manipulators. That's what the mainstream media is

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>full of. So why would they all of a sudden

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be so calm about clearly very negative revelations about Joe

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Biden that aren't really revelations as you know. I mean,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's even tough to talk about this because the words

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that we end up using. And this is not a

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>news story. This is just the media saying, whoopsie, why

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>do you sorry? But not sorry? That's really the media's

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>new entrip. Sorry, not sorry. They don't care, that's all

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this is. Why is this happening now? Why is this

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>occurring in this moment? I have told you all along

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it is my belief that Kamala Harris was very likely

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>to take over for Joe Biden early in a Biden administration.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And that this would work out for all those involved.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>As far as the Democrats are concerned, Joe Biden gets

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a hero, the savior of our democracy from

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the clutches of Trump and Trumpism and hand it over

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to the first black female president after being vice president

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>for eight years, to the first black president. Right, Joe

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden gets to be a hero for the ages. In fact,

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the legacy of Biden versus say,

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the legacy of the Clintons, Biden, if he pulls this off,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>will be a more revered name. And who would have

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that could have been the case. But here we are.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about among Democrats, great hero to the party.

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we all need to see that.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That's given Biden's age, Right, if Biden were like a

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>strapping guy of you know, if he was in his

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>early sixties and you know, look like I mean, I

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>think when Bush came into office, remember someone telling me

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>who was in that White House that you know, he

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>could run multiple, multiple miles under seven minutes. And I

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mean he was like a you know, a young, vital guy.

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And then of course after eight years of being president,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he looked like he had aged about thirty years. But

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Biden were in his even in his

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>early early sixties, I would say, or just his sixties,

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, yeah, he's gonna make it. He's gonna go

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>all eight years. He's gonna be eighties soon. And those

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of you who have people in your in your lives

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>who I mean, the difference for a lot of people,

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>not for all people. And so I don't need to

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>get the emails from our wonderful team buck audience whore

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in their eighties who could still kick my butt. I appreciate,

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're out there. But for a lot

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of people, the difference between seventy and eighty is really substantial,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and just in terms of their energy, and they're that's okay,

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's true for all of us. This is not this

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is no way is this anything other than an observation.

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I'm seventy, it's gonna be different than

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>when I'm eighty. I mean, gosh, I'm gonna be forty soon,

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and it feels very different from when I was thirty.

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you. So we all have this, we

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>all have this understanding. Joe Biden is going to deteriorate

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>more in office with all the pressure and stress under

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>him in terms of his aging and everything else, and

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it's so easy for him to step aside, but I

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think the media wants him to. This could be and

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this is really where I'm going to this analysis analysis.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>This could be the greatest Baden switch. This could be

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the biggest maneuver in politics in our lifetime. They essentially

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>get this guy who doesn't seem that radical, at least

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're saying, and they push this guy and

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, and then they just replace him with

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's completely willing to do whatever the corporate left wants,

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on corporate. Kamala Harris is a liberal, but she

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>likes you know, she likes the dollar dollar bills. I mean,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>she's somebody who wants the Googles and the facebooks and

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the Soros Foundation, and she wants all

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that to be on her own planned parent at all,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be on her side. And then they're

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the radical left as we know anyway.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But I can't help but notice that there's a a

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>sense here of oh, Okay, turns out maybe Joe Biden

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>does have some problems. And the left is fighting this enough.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>They're not even trying to run cover on it right now,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they're just saying, yeah, sorry, I mean they don't care.

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>As I've said to you, they don't care. But they

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>could have held it a little bit longer. Look, maybe

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm maybe I'm reading further into this than I should.

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That's always possible. But I don't think Joe Biden makes

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it to the mid terms. I really don't. And you

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have this time, meaning that he voluntarily steps aside for

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>health reasons, which would be not there would never be

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a way to prove that that was planned versus that

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the reality. There's a very decent chance Joe

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Biden could have a real health reason to step aside

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>in the next four years, right That wouldn't be a surprise.

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So the door is wide open for it, I think.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not talking so much about this Biden thing

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.479
<v Speaker 1>because I've given up, So you don't need to tell

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>me that I haven't given up yet. I had Sean

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Parnell on yesterday. We're taking this thing to the Supreme Court,

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and we all all it takes is one big break

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in the damn That's what it takes. And it could

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be this Pennsylvania case. It'd be amazing if my buddy

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Sean was part of the legal effort that change history.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he knows it's a long shot. He's

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>told you that, but it's still a shot. But with Biden,

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just sensing now this is at least the media's

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking and the Democrat Party's thinking, which is why this

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Time magazine thing is just so interesting. Who do you

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>think the Time Magazine Person of the Year is Person

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Year Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Not the

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>people that have put together a vaccine that might give

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>us back our lives in the next six months, because

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that's really what it's going to be. Not the people

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that have done that. Not are frontline healthcare workers. You know,

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they've done this sort of group thing before. They'll say

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that the person of the year and they'll name a

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>group of people. No, No, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris person

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year Time Magazine. This is the only thing

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that ever talks about with Time Magazine, just because it's

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's had this ability to put this stamp of person

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>on the year for going back. I don't even know

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>now how many decades, fifty sixty seventy years whatever, maybe

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>more than that. I have no idea, so we still

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>say this, but it just shows you where the mentality

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is right now. Yeah, they they couldn't just put Joe

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Biden on that cover. Had to put Kamala. They had

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to put the vice president Joe Biden they think won

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this election. That's what we're all being told as has happened.

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, no fraud, no fraud at all. Of course

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>there was fraud, but Joe Biden won this election. And

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>here we are now seeing the Kamala Harris shares the

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>cover with him Time Magazine. These are little indicators. These

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 1>are things that in the media world, you always pay

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>attention to what the photo placement is. In the media world,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>who's in the center, who's on the sides, who who

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>has a good photo picked to them, who is kind

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of a crappy photo picked of them? Because there's decisions

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going into all this all the time, which by people

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in the media are usually so crazy and and finicky

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about stuff like this. But they put kamalaw on that

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>cover for a reason. Friends, that much I know you're

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Get more from buck by following him on social media

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Make sure

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.479
<v Speaker 1>you go check out buck Sexton dot com. We got

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>judge Emmett Sullivan is the new face of Trump derangement syndrome.

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a story up there. And we've also got dems

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>were effective and distracting from their own skeletons to the

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>closet Bucksexton dot Com breaking down all that for you.

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of what you hear on the show, we're

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be writing up and putting on that site and

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you gotta check it out bucksex and dot com. Make

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it a homepage, check in throughout the day. You can

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to the podcast there too, so you can always

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just share that site with somebody and say, hey, this

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is where you can listen to this guys radio show.

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, now, what is what is the reality of

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia election that's coming up. We've got to be

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>focused in on this thing. I think we you know,

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I worry about the psychology of the right at this

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>point in time because Trump supporters are look, I get it,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>people are upset, they're dejective. We've got people talking about

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the road to secession here right this is this is upsetting.

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It's an emotionally challenging period. I'll put it that way.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of other words I'd like to use, but

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a family show. It's emotionally challenging period. It is

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>messed up. You could say that's family friendly. But if

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't get our heads right and get into this

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fight in Georgia and make sure that these senate runoffs

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>go our way, then we really got problems. No matter what.

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We can focus as much as we need to and

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>push at support and people are sending donations and they're

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>keeping the story alive, and they're spreading, spreading word about

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the fraud, and I think we also don't have enough time,

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>which has always been my concern here. They keep saying, well,

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>where's the fraud? Show us the proof, and I say, well,

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>how long is you got to go and say they're

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about tens of millions, over one hundred million votes.

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>You're not looking at them everywhere, obviously only in certain

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>states and certain precincts. But it's a big operation, and

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you got to go and do hand recounts and check

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>things us. This takes time, and we don't have a

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of time. But that said this Georgia election, the

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are hoping that we don't show up those of

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>us who live in and are registered in the state

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of Georgia. Of course, because we don't commit we don't

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>commit fraud. That's what Democrats do. Mike Pence is telling everybody.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I know Trump and Pence are out there pushing for

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Leffler and for Perdue. And here's Pence making the very

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>straightforward case, we got to show up for this thing.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Play five. I know we all got downs about this

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>last election. I know I do, but I actually here's

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>some people saying here in the Peach State, just don't vote.

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>From my fellow Americas, if you don't vote, they win.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>If you don't vote, there could be nothing to stop

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer and Nancy Felosi from cutting our military, raising taxes,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and passing their agenda the radical left. So I want

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to say to you from my heart, for all we've done,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>for all we have yet to do, for our president,

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>for our future, for Georgia, and for America, cast another

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>vote for all President Trump has accomplished. Cast a vote

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to send David Perdue and Kelly Leffler back to the

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>United States Senate's absolutely right. In fact, my only criticism

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>would be that if they took the Senate majority, it

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>would be a lot scarier than just raising taxes and

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>cutting the military back a bit. It would get much

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>worse than that. They will go for long term strategic

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.439
<v Speaker 1>structural changes to the American political landscape so that then

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>they can win on any issue. Then it's just a

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 1>question of what their base wants, what the Democrats decide

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to do. They don't have to worry about, Oh, we're

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna get we're gonna get thumped in the mid terms,

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>because we'll make a difference. That's what eliminating the filibusters,

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>statehood for DC and Puerto Rico, and amnesty and packing

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the courts would accomplish. He's lay it out right there.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>We're not winning another election for thirty or forty years.

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>If they get those things done, and they know it,

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast from more buck Head to Bucksexton dot com

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and remember to subscribe to the podcast. Harsani Time, Everybody,

0:34:54.320 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>our friend David Harsany the Sage of Harsanyidom. He joins

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>us now. He's a senior writer at National Review, checkout

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>nashreview dot com for his latest. He's got a lot

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of thoughts up there, and he wrote a piece this

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>week in fact on the Hunter Biden story killing. Let's

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>get to that, David. Great to have you, always a

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>pleasure of thank you. Fuck so, David, I have a

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>thesis and you can. I'm sure you have either either

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>another view on this that's a little diversion, or maybe

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to add to it, or you know, you'll

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 1>do what you do. But here's here's what I want

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to put out there for you. I think we're at

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a point now that the media that and when we say,

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I know, we don't have great terms here, right, the

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.879
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media, the lib media, whatever Democrat aligned media, which

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>controls ninety percent of journalism as we know, ninety five percent. Really,

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at a point now where they get

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>caught doing things that violate the core ethics of their profession,

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like the suppression of the New York Post piece turning

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>against them the New York Times writing some palace intrigue

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>piece about how in the newsroom at the Post. I

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>mean we had you on to talk about this. I

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>remember you're saying that there were Yeah, there are people

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that have disagreements in a newsroom all the time. But

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the point is is the story true and shouldn't have

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>been run. I think the media and David is at

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a point now where they just don't care if they're

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>caught as long as it was for the right cause,

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that is Democrats. No, of course they don't care. That's

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>their mission is to help elect democrats. You know. It's

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 1>not as if they're suffering. You see the New York

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Times or even CNN. It's not like there is some

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, everyone knows what they do, so

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no blowback to anything like this. This is the

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.399
<v Speaker 1>They're playing to their crowd, their left wing organizations, their

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>partisan organizations, you know, and that's what they do. They

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>don't care about stories like the hunter by the story

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>because it hurt their candidate. They knew very well that

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Post story had been conducted, the reporters had conducted

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves with the same ethical standards and the same journalistic

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>standards that you know, a vast majority of other stories

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>used and scoops used. They just wanted to suppress it

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and they did, and none of them care. None of

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>them are today are like, wow, maybe we should have

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>conducted ourselves differently. At least I haven't seen anyone too that. No,

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why I have not I've not seen a single

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>person who apologized for lying about the I mean to

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>call it Russian disinformation. Ben Rhodes, the former Obama White

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>House a foreign policy propagandist who is really one of

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the more odious figures of the Obama administration, you know,

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in its totality, He called it Russian disinformation at the time,

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>many many other people were, I mean, that was the

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>talking point. You could go all these different cable news shows,

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>MSNBCCNN and all the rest. They're all saying that it

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>was Russian disinformation, which it clearly was not. And there's

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>no Mayakalpa at all. In fact, the only Mayakulpa that

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I've seen came from I think it was a guy

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>at Politico during the suppression effort who was sorry publicly

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for sharing the New York Post story. Yeah, you're right

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about that. Remember that it's funny because Political ran one

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the most dishonest stories. Political is a complete joke,

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>but they ran the most dishonest piece where they had

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Brennan and a bunch of other former figures within other

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:29.439
<v Speaker 1>administrations say that this might be Russian disinformation, but even

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't come out and say for sure it was

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>or anything of that nature. But yet the whole thing

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was couched in a way to make it seem like, well,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know it could be Noah, well anything could be

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Russian disinformation, right, I mean, so we can literally cover nothing.

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>The Post had its hands on the laptop. All they

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 1>have to do is go and ask for confirmation from

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Biden himself, which they have now done, because how long

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can you ignore a story that's under You know, if

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a federal investigation into someone, you can pretend that

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist forever. But now, of course it's been blunted

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and all that. So yeah, I mean, I laid out

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of examples of how people were misleading on

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the story, suppressing the story, how they were There were

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>more stories process stories about the Post newsroom than there

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was about the front running candidate of the United States

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly being involved in what is essentially either criminally corrupt

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>but at the very least shady business dealings with authoritarian states.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they don't care. So I think that

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the main thing here. I'll keep complaining my whole life.

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The main thing is we're going to have to people

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>who care about the truth, even when it's about Democrats

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>need to come up with a better plan than relying

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on these organizations and institutions which don't do their job anymore.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Or they do their job, but their charge is very

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>different from the one they pretend it is. I'm just wondering.

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>On his show earlier this week, Tucker referred to The

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Daily Beast as he said something like, probably the worst

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>left wing website that does news on you know that

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>people know that does news. Is there one offender that

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you think is the worst at all of this? Because

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Daily Beast is a good choice. I actually think in

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways, really, CNN dot com is actually

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the single worst site on the internet. But is there

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 1>one that bothers you more than the others? See? I

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think the Daily Beast is a joke, though I do

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>there is one reporter I sort of like over there,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But in general, I mean, I think the editor is

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a complete joke of a of a you know, a journalist.

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're journalists over there at all. But

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem with that is that everyone knows that and

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>deals with them in a certain way where CNN positions

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>itself as an unbiased source and actually prides itself with

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>its stupid banana apple commercials with one of the anchors

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>was wearing like facts first sweater the other day, you know,

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>things like that. It's just annoying. But so to me,

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>CNN is has the most egregious because of people like

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Jake Tapper and others who are complete activists pretending to

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be journalists. So for me, I think CNN is the worst. Yeah, Mike,

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I will totally totally agree, obviously, And I think that

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>it's something that people need to just we need to

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>come at all this now, not as oh, sometimes these

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>places lie to us in terms of their motivations. Now

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's no one lies about the facts all the time

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's counterproductive, right even and people and I have

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>some familiarity with propaganda from studying it as an intelligence

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>officer to see how other countries do it, and also

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Soviet Union, you know, you want to use

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>some factual basis for things, and then you want to

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>either spin it in a certain way or leave certain

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.919
<v Speaker 1>things out. So it's not about that. It's not like

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to be using a different number for

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>COVID cases, for example. It's about things like this, What

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>do they suppress, what do they actually tell you? How

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>do they know? What information do they want you to

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>be aware of? What are the headlines that they're using.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But David, I guess, and we're speaking of David Harsani

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>of National Review here nash Review dot com. What do

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>we do about this? I get asked this question, and

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question when blast me, but I'm not

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>always sure that I have a great answer. It just

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly what you're said about there being a kernel of

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>truth and all kinds of misleading propaganda. You know, as

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>far as you know the history of the world goes,

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that's always the case. There's always some you know, every

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory for instances, somehow has one leg in the

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>truth or it wouldn't seem plausible for people. So that's

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of course the case. And the worst defenders who deal

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>with that kind of thing are fact checkers, who are

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the low it's the lowest form of journalism there is,

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion at this point, anyway, move forward. I

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>enjoy bashing these people, but what can we do about it? Well,

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>there's not much right now in the sense that I

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 1>think that you have to keep pointing it out and

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>in essence fact checking them in their genuine use of

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the term as they go along. But the problem is,

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and I've said this on your show before, is that

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it costs a lot of money, and it

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot of work, and there has it takes

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time to actually really report on big stories.

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you have to put reporters on it for months,

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>year more even And the problem with doing that for

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>smaller places National Review, Federalist, whoever, or even Washington Examiner

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and places they're trying to do more old school journalism

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is that it's super expensive and they just don't have

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the institutions to do it. Whereas you know, the New

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>York Times has I don't know how many reporters in

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the news or might imagine a thousand, I think I

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think I think they've got a thousand people that work

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times. Right when I worked at

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Post and the idea of newspapers there are

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>four hundred people. I think they're So you're talking about

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 1>there used to be a lot of reporters doing a

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of work and having very specific beats and so on,

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>where it's very difficult to do. But I just don't

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>see any other way to combat this because I think

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 1>journalism has been corrupted by journalism, from journalism professors all

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the way up the line to the top editors. They've

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>turned on free speech, they've turned on it's not even

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not biased anymore. That is completely something you can

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>deal with. It's much worse than that. So I don't know,

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have answers to what we meaning anyone

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 1>who is upset by that can do. Um. I think

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:05.360
<v Speaker 1>right wingers need to start their own journalistic outfits and

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>do the work. But I wish there were very much

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>places that the ap or routers pretend to be, you know,

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>just the people who just give us the you know,

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just the bare bones facts about what's going on out there.

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that, by the way, I think there is

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a you know, there could be a market for that.

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I for example, you know, if there was a place,

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>if there was a place that did what CNN laughably

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>pretends to do, I would be I mean, I would

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>be reading it, I'd be checking in. I mean, I'd

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to see what I could, what I

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>could gather from that for my own purposes. If I

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>knew that I could trust the information was accurate, right,

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and then I wasn't getting all this nonsense. I mean,

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>if you if you're a I mean, I know I'm

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>picking on CNN and there are many others. I'm CNN,

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think is the worst defender in this regard,

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's gotten much worse even in the last four years.

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that having had personal experience of working at

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>CNN and knowing it's gotten even even crazier. But but

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me, Brian uh, David, Sorry, it seems

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to me, d just kill me. It's face flashed on

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a screen for a second, and I got you know,

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the problem with having screens in your in

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 1>your radio room. M David. It seems to me that

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the way that we can fight against this is also

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>severely limited by the fact that the social media companies

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>now and I feel like the old like the Fox

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>News watching generation, for example, people like me talk about

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and you know and Twitter, and it's like, ah,

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this is no, this is the new mainstream media, like

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they're more powerful than CNN. I'm trying to get everyone

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>understand that even if people who are of a certain age,

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>a certain demo don't use these things. Well, I think

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you're right in that. Um. You know, people often point

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:49.320
<v Speaker 1>out a very very small percentage of Americans actually use Twitter,

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 1>but you know, and of that percentage of very few

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 1>use it all the time. But I do think that

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that things that happen on Twitter tend to filter up

0:45:57.640 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>into the news and elsewhere, so I think it's more

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>important and then the credit that's given to it. But

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's been an amazing way for conservatives

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to combat things. Now I get that Twitter, like I

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>think that Twitter is both terrible and excellent at the

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>same time. It's both makes us terrible human beings. It

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>allows fake news to filter, it makes us you know,

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there's all kind of terrible things going on. But honestly,

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>how many big stories have there been debunked on Twitter

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>by Twitter users in the last four, you know, eight years?

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I think many? Right, first it was blogs that we're

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>doing it, and now you have people on Twitter doing it.

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So it is an important tool. And that's why I

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>worry about stripping liability protections from these folks, because I

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to kill social media in a way,

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and then that gives gatekeepers even more control because you're

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have less ways for democratized, you know, way for

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 1>people to talk to each other. So again, I don't

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>have any good answers for this, but I think that

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that talking to yourself on parlor, which is a fine

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 1>site whatever, is not helping you in the sense that

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>being out there being able to debunk what CNN is

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>saying in real time on Twitter, if you have a

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>big following and you do, is much more effective. So

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>giving up that fight and going to another platform, I

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that's really the answer to I would

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>say this too, and I just that we have learned

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so much about what is true about these journalists and

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>how they think because of Twitter. Finally, it took I

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>took a while people to realize this, but the guy

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>who's tweeting orange Man bad, he's basically Hitler at ten am,

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is not doing a fair recitation of the White House

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Press conference at four pm. And I think that that

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>has been an enormous benefit of Twitter. Yeah, and if

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I may add, it's not just journalists though. You now

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you see what they're really about the things they tweet,

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the exclamation points on stories, you know, all that kind

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. They're just completely unprofessional. And this goes for

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of them. But you also see it

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>with college professors. You know, my kids are going to

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>go to college soon, and I'm like, I used to

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>have a list. I'm like, I cannot send them to

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this college. Does this idiot or this unintellectual crackpot teaches there?

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:09.959
<v Speaker 1>But now there are too many schools that I've seen

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>professors from everywhere that I don't even know where. It's everywhere.

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't give a dollar to my college, and I

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have zero regrets about that. I can tell you that.

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>David Harsani, everybody check him out National Review dot com.

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you're not following him on Twitter and you're

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, you should be David Harsan. Ye kind of

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.919
<v Speaker 1>spell it out phonetically. You'll get there. David, thanks so much.

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you,