WEBVTT - Gemini/Genesis Battle; Your Questions Answered

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heard podcast,

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. It's Friday, January. There's a common saying among

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>folks who work in crypto, and by that I mean

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a common saying on my team that a week

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>often feels like a year in this asset class, and

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>as we wrap up the second week of three, sometimes

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>we really feel like it might actually be the week

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>and feel like a decade. So what are some of

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that happened this week. Well, we saw more

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>evidence of the distress facing crypto. There is an emerging

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>fight and a pretty ugly emerging fight between Gemini, which

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is a crypto exchange that's owned by the Winklevoss twins,

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and a company called Jen Assists, which was one of

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest crypto lenders in the world. We also had

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>some updates as it relates to ft X, including confusingly

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>or not why Tom Brady, Giselle Bunch, and Bob Kraft

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>their names are popping up in bankruptcy filing statements coming

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>out from f t X, And of course this week

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>we will be tackling some of the biggest questions that

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you had for us. So thank you to everybody who's

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>sent in questions for our three survey. Joining me to

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>help answer those questions today will be Dave Lita, Senior

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg. Everybody talks about it, whether you're covering

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the bond market or the stock market, there's always some

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about what the influence of crypto is on any

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>given time. Dave, Welcome back to the podcast. Another week

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in Crypto. Some stuff has been happening as usual. I

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have to admit I was not expecting to start the

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>week with Tom Brady so much. Why are we talking

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>about Tom Brady in this context? What happened this week, Well,

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>besides the football playoffs, it's also f t X reckoning

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>time for those who decided to jump on board and

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in this case through Tom Brady as advertising and spokespersons.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's an interesting We got an insight into what

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they actually received, what was equity in ft X, and

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>how the various stakes were handed out, whether it was him,

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>his former wife or his former boss Bob Craft who

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>stole into the New England Patriots. So this is the

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of difference between folks who had like money on

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the ft X platform, and then folks like the Celebtis

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned Giselle, Tom Brady, Bob Kraft who were

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>investors in ft X. Is that correct? Sure, you can

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>almost use an analogy like since there are celebrities of

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>movie actors when they get a stake in the movie, Um,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the smart ones instead of getting straight houry will take

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of the movie and if it does well,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do very well. Right. But there are other

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 1>exchanges that are I mean, I think the word troubled

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is fair fair to apply. And one of them has

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say, like reasonably well known and cool founders

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, the Winklevoss Twins. Sure, it's been a fascinating story.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>They've been caught up in the broader implosion of the

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>market going back to the springtime, and basically they used

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>their exchange to let customers put the money in a

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>product that's called Urn that was really more of a

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pass through device on their platform that went into Genesis,

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>which was one of the biggest lenders, if not the

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest lender in the crypto market before it imploded, and

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>now their customers are about a billion dollars um out

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of luck over you know, the holiday period. At the

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>end of two, we asked folks to send in what

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>some of their burning questions were about crypto. But I

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start with someone who acknowledged I'll use the

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>quote that for somebody who came into crypto with a

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of enthusiasm and maybe a bit of a starry

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>eyed approach, it was pretty heartbreaking for them in two

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the direction of prices right where it was.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>At the end of one, you had these all time

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>high is going too you still had a lot of enthusiasm.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>The end of two, you're like, not so good. What

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>would you tell this person about you know, what to

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>expect next in the depths of this crypto winter that

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we're in. Sure, but they have to kind of figure

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>out why they're there first. If you believe the argument

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that this is the cutting edge of money, you can

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>write it out, or you're there to make money quickly,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And it really comes down to that. And if people

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the industry will take the former and say we're here

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to build you here, that a lot becomes a catch

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>time to build, Yes, but it's been building with other

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>people's money for the most part, and and honestly, speculation

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 1>has been the number one use case. It's the beginning.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Our colleagues on Bloomberg Intelligence, which is sort of our

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in house research service, you know, did um some analysis

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>where they found that the use of bitcoin, specifically bitcoin

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as a means of exchange like for transactions hit almost

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>record lose in two So to your point, so much

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of the utility that people were getting was mostly speculation,

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>frankly true, and it questions the original argument for bitcoin

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and other cryptocurrencies. If you're going to be a currency,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>you have to be a means of exchange, and it

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't been. It's been a means of speculation. And

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this is something that the industry still struggled with one

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that a dozen years later. But there are absolutely still

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kind of the original die hards who

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have a much more philosophical take on the utility of

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>bit points specifically and for some of them crypto more broadly.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>What is that like and how are those folks reacting

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to the current crisis? Sure, well, the the core group

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the post financial crisis of two thousand

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and he had a libertarian undercurrent where government

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>basically does no good staut of our way and we

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>can go independent. We can do this better. That had

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>been a major selling point for crypto and still is

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning, and since the various crashes and this

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one that what they call the maxis the maximal lists

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>are now pointing this is what it should be. Honest,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't be about this. We told you back then,

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.239
<v Speaker 1>stay away because they basically blame a lot of it

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on government spending, changed the FED, that type of thing.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back to answer the questions sent in

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>by you, our listeners, and you'll hear more from Bloomberg

0:06:51.760 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Senior editor Dave Litka. Another thing we fully expect and

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we're all frankly already seeing, is even more regulatory scrutiny

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>than was the case last year. And I think one

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's been interesting so far if some

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of it has been aimed at non crypto native financial

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>institutions who have been playing in crypto or who want

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to play in crypto. This is especially timely when you

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>look at circumstances like what happened to Silver Gates exactly.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Silver Gates great example. It's a regulated bank that basically

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>had a bank run and they were able to tap

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>into the traditional federal government system this time that the

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>home loan bank system and borrow money from then and

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this time as the tune of over four billion dollars.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>That is a lot of money on it, and the

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of banks that have been involved in crypto are

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>very limited kind of on your hand, at least yours banks.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the other trends that we may or may

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not see this is one of those too soon to

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tell questions, is what it means for kind of global coordination.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>The holy grail for a lot of folks when they

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>think about crypto regulation is you could set up in

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 1>any country and you would have the same things apply

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to you if you're a crypto exchange or you're a

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto customer. Our colleagues on regulation tell us that that

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be in the cards. Have you, in

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>your sort of history of covering financial markets, ever seen

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>coordinates a global financial regulation for like anything? Really? Oh sure?

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could point back to the post global

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis example, and you still see it. I mean,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you could see central banks move lockstep and interest rates

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. But in terms of regulatory oversight,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on markets like this, I would expect more to be

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in unison, just because of the nature of this market

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>being so fluid, all the regulatory arbitrage that has gone

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on over the years on it basically firms bouncing from

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one island to another wherever they get the most advantageous help.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And some of the you can actually look in the

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the examples of the relationship right now between the US

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Bahamas and dealing with m f t X.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Bahamas were very pro crypto from a very economic development perspective.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like a good thing on it, and some

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of those moves appeared to maybe coming back to bite

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>them a little bit. And there's been a lot of

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>tension between regulations in the US and uh in the Bahamas.

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And it was actually a big deal a couple of

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago when the Bohemian regulators came to an agreement

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>with you know, the US based Liquid Data's on winding

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>ft X over here, and they were like, okay, fine,

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Like we agree that what we're trying to do is

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>make the creditors to ft X as whole as possible,

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to get caught up in the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictional fight but you know, to your point, the financial

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>crisis was a huge event. It had absolutely global consequences

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>and reverberations, and there were very real fairs that potentially

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of people around the world could be

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>seriously negatively affected. One of the challenges facing the momentum

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for regulation of cryptota global scale is we cover it

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>all day long, but the as you say, like the

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>number of people and entities involved is like relatively small

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>compared to people who are say, exposed to the stock

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>market exactly, but it's become so prominent in ourselves, the media,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>and just the general markets in general. I mean, everybody

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>talks about it, whether you're covering the bond market or

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. There's always some talk about what the

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>influence of crypto is on any given time. And just

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>as a kind of a final closing point to that

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>note on influence, certainly one of the things that we

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>started seeing in twenty one but especially was kind of

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the crossover with crypto and other industries. Right, so, like

0:10:56.040 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>non fungible tokens and art or crypto mining, bitcoin mining

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and environmental considerations or energy considerations. Are there any like

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>emerging trends or themes that we're seeing where it's like, oh,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>tech companies are really paying attention over here, or financial

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>services firms are trying to figure out if they should

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>do crypto mortgages. Like those sorts of intersections in anything

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you've seen so far, this interesting. Yeah, they've been percolating

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for a while, but I still think it's gonna be

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>The biggest area to watch, in my opinion, is going

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>to be what the mainstream banks do. The Wall Street firms,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they're very good at compartmentalizing businesses on and and we

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>live in a world really where money is electronic, and

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if some of the guiding principles of kind of removing

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the friction and speeding up the guardrails, they

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>see it as a benefit on us. I think they're

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the ones that aren't gonna walk away. You may see

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the trading outfits pulled back, whether they're associated proprietarry shops

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>or things like that, but um, I think they're still

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get the guys in the back room working

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on this. Money will be made somewhere in other Thank you, Dave,

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>pleasure having you in the show. Happy that was Bloomberg

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Senior editor Dave Litka, You can find more of Dave's

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.239
<v Speaker 1>work on the Bloomberg terminal or on Bloomberg dot com.

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And once again, thanks to everyone who submitted questions and

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>participated in our survey. We always welcome your input and

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>feel free to email us anytime at Crypto at Bloomberg

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>dot net. This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more shows from I

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions,

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>or suggestions for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot net.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Vergelina. Our

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed Faruke

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and Sharon Berriro. Our associate producers are Ty Butler and

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Moses on Them. Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>me Sick by Leo Sidrin. I'm Stacy, Marie Ishmael. Have

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend.