WEBVTT - A New York (Mag) State of Mind

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm off my game today. No, you're not. People are

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start making better content. I think

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about this for a long time.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>When you program for everyone, you program for no one.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that we're purpose driven platform, like we're

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to substance. How was that? Are you

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>happy with that? This is marketing therapy right now? It

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really is? What's up? Laura And I'm Alexa Kristin. Welcome

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 1>back to Atlantia. Laura's in New Jersey today calling in

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so close but so far away. I miss you. I

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>miss you in the studio. So today we have Pam

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Wasserstein coming in UM from New York Media. They own

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>brands like New York Magazine, Vulture, The Cut, the Strategists, Intelligence,

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are lots of other brands. Kind of an amazing story

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>because what I don't think a lot of people know

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is that they're privately owned company, one of the few

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>uh still around. You know. Pam has been on board

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for a few years now as CEO, and they have

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>really pushed and she's really pushed the company to think

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about and get into very quickly, UH digital publishing. They

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't have what I think a lot of companies have,

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>which is creating brands more organically and in the digital space. Yeah,

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it stands for a perspective, and there's certainly a sort

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of level of premium associated with that. I think that's

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>reflective in the fact that they just created a paywall

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in front of their content. Um, they're moving into merchandise

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>with some of their brands. They're thinking about, you know,

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>how to take the business offline and really tap into

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the community and create a closer one to one engagement.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And so even though the brands, the individual brands which

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned earlier are leading UM with their unique

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of perspective and what they're covering, sort of the

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>quality when you step back of what you expect from

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>New York Media backed properties, I think is consistent and

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it'll be fun to hear um that perspective from Pam.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So with that, Pam from New York Media, we'll be

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>right back. We are back in the studio with Pam Wasserstein,

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>CEO of New York Media, Vulture, The Cut, New York Magazine.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>What other brands intelligence are the Strategist You guys have

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>so many amazing brands. Welcome Pam, Thank you so much

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>happy to be here. Guys, We're so happy to have you.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Laura's calling in from Jersey. Hi. Everyone. So Pam, before

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we get into the business, we want to talk about

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>how you came to be CEO of the business. Uh. Well,

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I definitely did not start my career in media at all.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I was a corporate lawyer for several years, and then

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I worked in private equity on the investment side, totally

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>different world, very very different. And then well, so for me,

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do something more entrepreneurial, something more creative.

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I ended up working at Tribeca Film which was you know,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Tribeca Film Festival, and UM a bunch of other things,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up leading corporate development there. Stayed for

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>about five years, and then I came over to New

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>York Media, originally as a head of strategy and then

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>UM moving into the CEO position. So what was the

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of for you, the thought process or the kind

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of passion that drove you into like, yep, this this

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>feels right, this is right. I always loved media. I

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>was passionate about media, but I was neither a journalist

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>nor an advertising salesperson, and back in the day that

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was sort of where the opportunities were in the industry,

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those paths typically, right, So I think what

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>changed for me was that the industry changed and then

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the business changed, and so suddenly there were a much

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>bigger set and frankly for me, a more interesting set

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of problems and opportunities to start to dig into. So

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you suddenly are thinking about and a lot

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of them tie to the future broadly, like what what

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is the future um of marketing, what is the future

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of content consumption and business models? Yeah, for sure, New

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>York was such an incredible brand that was still fresh

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and vibrant and had a lot of I think opportunity

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in the digital world and a really loyal, you know,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of core audience that we could build on. It's

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a mainstay. I mean, so I would say, like in

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>New York the Post, in New York Magazine, and you

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>can walk into a New Yorker's home and you'll see

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>both of those publications. It's a mainstay and part of

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity for our business, right was moving from that

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>kind and traditional in print. We're sort of four hundred

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand circulation and New York d m a right, Um,

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so it does tend to be more regional, and then

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>digitally we're like million monthly uniques on our own and

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>operated sites, and you know, quite national and even international.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>What we're able to do when the Internet arrived just

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of take that voice and authority which was always

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>through the fifty year history of New York Magazine sort

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of ambitious and not really tied or limited to the geography.

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It was always sort of trying to lead a cultural conversation.

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But now there's so many new opportunities to achieve that.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that you all are obviously known

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>for very well is covering things that are central to

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>New York, right but understandably to scale and you know,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>reach forty five million people with information that obviously goes

0:05:55.680 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond what's happening within New York City. What was sort

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the reason to move into things like the strategists

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>or intelligence or like, what were the insights that said, hey,

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>we need to expand beyond covering or talking about things

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>just happening specific to New York. So that kind of

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>strategic push toward truly national coverage has been a long

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>time coming. I would spend probably twelve years now since

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we first started UM one of what we call our

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>our verticals, our our digital brands, which was for scrub Street,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>which covers restaurants and food, and Vulture came pretty quickly

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 1>after that, which covers culture and entertainment. Several legacy print publishers,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we're more hesitant to publish digitally because you know,

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>concerned about cannibalization of the print model and so forth.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>We didn't really have that. Yeah. Yeah, for us, it

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, we you know, our audience loves our

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>cultural coverage. We can do so much more of it,

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this arment and like serve our audience

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:06.239
<v Speaker 1>better and more with our sensibility, take that lens and

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of mix it with Internet voice and optimized for

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, digital audiences. So it was relatively early, certainly,

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think for legacy print publishers that that we were

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>very gung ho about that, and I think on the

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one the end, there was opportunity to serve our audience

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>even more. And then on the other hand, the business

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>model encouraged national coverage, so um digitally in an advertising

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>based model, typically local is a tough, tough business, a

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>tough business, right, So, and even when we started grab Street,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which was more local and its coverage because it was

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>more service and news around New York restaurant scene. And

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>then Vulture. What we quickly found was that you know,

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>for sort of the same resources, that you could talk

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>about something with more local interest, you could talk about

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time, gossip Girl or Madman something like that

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and reach an enormous, really engaged audience and find new audiences.

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So that was a pretty exciting discovery for us, and

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we just kept kind of growing, growing and building on that. Yeah,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>has that impacted the voice of New York magazine? The

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>need to go national? Do you find yourselves appealing to

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>an audience beyond New York? Do you find that that's

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>changed the way you cover news or politics or style

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or do you still feel that you have a specific

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>lens at what you're covering things. It's a great question.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think our voice is everything, Like differentiation in the

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>digital world, I think is everything, and so we we

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>try really hard to stay specific and true to that voice. Yes,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know that that's how we build real loyalty

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and connection with our audience. I think just going scale

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of scale is not ultimately a winning game.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You really need um you do need to achieve scale,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but you also need a loyal, engaged audience, and to

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>do that, your brand has to mean something and continue

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to mean something over time. There does need to be

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think of voice and a sensibility, and at least

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in our case, we're very, very focused on that and

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of think of that as our core asset from

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>which the business follows. People that are in the kind

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of cultural no like Saturday Night Live bring you guys

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>up in their skits, and it's this hilarious thing to me,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that culture when he's on Saturday Left. But and it's

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I think happened a couple of times where they like,

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't read it in Vulture, then you don't know,

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>like if it's not in Vulture, then it doesn't exist,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. You know, something to that effect.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's funny because at the end of

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the day, as a New Yorker, as New Yorkers, we

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>know the SNL is like kind of this, it is

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the New York Lens, but everyone in the world is watching.

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's very very SIMI learned to that, right. Yeah, that's

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a great analogy actually, And it's funny because I also

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's this halo of that brand, but then there's

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a core that voice in that perspective that no matter

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>where you are, it's not about geography, it's about mindset

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and mentality our audience. We try to understand our audience

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>really well and they it's sort of a psychographic right

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it is. And the voice is also is not New

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>York the place. It's New York the idea of sort

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of sophisticated, smart, witty, empathetic and and that's what we're

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>going for and there are a lot of people who

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>are really hungry for that right now in particular, but

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 1>over years as well. Yeah, So with a further push

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>into digital, you know, obviously you've launched podcast now you

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are kind of two days. You've also implemented a paywall

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in front of your content, So there's a lot of

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>change and use of technology to obviously both build community

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but now also recognize the premium nature I'm assuming, which

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is why you have the paywall of the content that

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you're producing. Can you talk about some of those changes

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're making as we move into twenty nineteen that

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace needs to be aware of and sort of

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>new platforms and why the paywall. So our digital subscription

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>which we launched actually this week, which is exciting and

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you. And on the tech side, we largely built

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it ourselves. We have a custom content management system that

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we developed ourselves that we actually license and partner with

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>other publishers on as well, and then so we've built

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>our subscription capabilities into that and it's an exciting next

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>step for our business. Been a year now that we've

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>been seriously working on implementing the paywall, not not even

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from the tech perspective, but the messaging and marketing is

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>really goes hand in hand, especially because the subscription goes

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>across all our brands, which is a great value. And

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the theory is that because there is really

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a tight DNA around all our brands, and the subject

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>matter and focus is different, you know, that's between Vulture,

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cut, Intelligencer, etcetera, but the sensibility is quite tightly similar.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And so if you are a Vulture reader a Vulture user,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you're likely reading about politics somewhere, or you're likely reading

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about a technology and new ideas somewhere, and you're probably

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>going to love Intelligencer, and if you're not, then kind

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of tightening to our consumers. The connection among all our

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>brands I think helps bring value to them and introduce

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>them to more opportunities to engage with us and engage

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>with these brands that they will likely really enjoy. New

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>York Media is a pretty unknown brand. You say New

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>York Meg and people are like, oh, yeah, okay, right

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, right are you thinking about New York Media

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of that brand coming out more or is it

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>stay in the background. Is it just a kind of

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>more of a business brand and you let the kind

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of individual publications shine through. So that is our corporate name.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It was frankly somewhat of an accidental corporate name which

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't really matter for a while. It doesn't really It

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>almost still it almost still doesn't matter unless it needs to.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think from a like a business perspective, and it

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>depends on where you're taking it, and it depends on

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>how you're thinking about it. Well, we did have some

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation around our digital subscription. What do you call the

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>thing if Vulture, which now has a pretty loyal and

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>independent of New York mag audience, to introduce them to

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this subscription, what do you call it? And what we

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>decided is to call it the New York subscription. I

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>love that, but I think it's right. I think it's

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>simple and it has again it's that lens, right. So

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I think for now New York Media will stay a

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of corporate and not really consumer facing brand. But

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>New York Work is very much a consumer facing brand.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's the way we treat it. Have you acquired

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>any brands, they've really been you've built, it's been organic. Yeah.

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We did acquire Splitsider, which is a comedy focused site

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and really had a passionate fan base in the comedy community,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and we incorporated that into Vulture and kind of made

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it the heart of the comedy vertical within Vulture. So

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>many of these individual brands have followings, right, They have

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>these communities. And one of the things that I've enjoyed

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>watching the brand do, particularly New York Mag and The Cut,

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is the ability to reach the community offline around things

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like Fashion Week and some of the events that you curry.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's this expectation that sort of you get

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this insider perspective when you're hanging out with New York

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Mag and The Cut. Can you talk about that sort

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of online offline aspect of your business. Look, we are

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to engage our audience and sort of be that trusted,

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>authoritative um friend for our audiences as much as we

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>can be and deep in connections. One way to deepen

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>connection and have a tangible relationship with a publishing brand

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is through print. It's not the only way, but you know,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in an ephemeral world, to have like a thing that

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you kind of snuggle up with and enjoy is actually

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty powerful. But another form of tangible connection is around events.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We just did a Vulture Festival in l A a

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, which you know, something like over

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand people come to and the programming of Vulture

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Festival is designed towards the Vulture voice, and it's a

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit like witty and quirky and interesting, and we

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>got stars of the Vulture universe to come and interact

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with the audience in bringing The Cut to We have

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a co production with let Media now for the Cuts

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>podcasts The Cut on Tuesdays, which there too, It's like, okay,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>how can we deepen our relationship with our audience and

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be more of a habit for you and be your

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>partner for your life for a lot of aspects of

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>your life, um, help you be informed and help you

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>understand the world, be entertained all of that. Who are

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>some people that you're following in things that you're thinking

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>about to expand not just the brands, but expand their footprint,

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>expand the kind of offline online relationship where you guys

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>show up our brand. The Strategist is a little bit

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>different from the restaurant brands in the sense it's a

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>product recommendation site. The tagline is shop Smartly, or we

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>have another tagline that's an obsessively curated internet emporium and

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's doing really well and has all these like passionate

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>fans who basically come the Strategists to help navigate internet shopping.

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>So there too, we took authority that we had historically

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in the case of shopping. New York Magazine from day

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>one in nineteen sixty was publishing something like best Bets

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and telling you cool new things to buy, what's a deal,

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>what's what's beautiful, what's different? I'm always looking for the

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what's different, and that's kind of the strategist sweet spot.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>UM is there's a sense of discovery and it should

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be something typically that you wouldn't necessarily find on your own.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>One of the trends that Alex and I have been

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>monitoring for quite some time has been the idea of

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>personality as platform and the idea that communities galvanized around

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people's perspectives and opinions. How are you thinking about elevating

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>journalists as talent? I think yes absolutely that. You know,

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the individual brand in journalism and elsewhere is very much

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a trend and a trend that's continuing. Ideally there mutually

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>reinforcing kind of synergistic relationship between the editorial brand and

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>then the individuals where everyone is made better and offers

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a better product at the end of the day to

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>your audience. Intelligence Or which recently Uh kind of launched

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in a more ambitious way, has this really cool homepage

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>experience you like slack integration with the editors, right, and

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can actually talk to them and find out

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what they're thinking about certain things that are happening. I'm

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>personally just such a fan of that because in my

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>own life, lurking in our editorial slack channels is like,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just the phenomenal. Yeah, it's so phenomenal, And we

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to kind of bring a piece of that experience

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to our audience, and people seem to really love it.

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Also in a time where there's some distrust of media,

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>right a thing showing your work a little bit, and

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think helping our audiences understand what goes into what

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>we do, proving out kind of why we do have

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the authority that we have with our audiences is powerful.

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the partnerships that you've executed or

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are working towards executing that demonstrate where the business is headed. Well, So,

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>one partner that we work with in a lot of

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>front ways is Amazon right this Strategist, which is a

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>truly editorial product, but you know, it's largely an affiliate

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>revenue business, which is of fascinating because we're we're suddenly

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in the commerce business. We've done a lot of you know,

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>internal technology work to produce really interesting and useful insights

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>around purchase behavior people are saying, and then actually we're

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>able to take those insights to our grand clients and

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>help you know them build better eCOM experiences or content

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>experiences a around their objectives. What are your thoughts on

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the status of print as a media channel. How does

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that affect the decisions that you're making on the business side,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and what would your advice be two buyers in the market,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>who are you know, deciding whether or not that's a

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>channel they want to think about in their media plans.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>In I do think it should continue to be an

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>important piece of a media plan. It's a great brand play,

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think sometimes in the marketing mix, some advertisers

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>have moved too far, too far down the funnel, and

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to see the impact of that right away, right.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you're if you're really like being strategic about

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>your marketing mix, you need the lower funnel and you

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>also need the upper funnel. We agree with that. To agree, Um,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's not digital all the time. It's

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>definitely not print all the time. But it's where those

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>things and how you use those things and the content

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>right obviously matters. And people, you know, print subscribers, they

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>really love those publications, right, and they are an engaged audience.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure, it's a treat to I haven't to

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>cuddle up with your favorite magazine. There are a ton

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of digital brands that you know not to mention away

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>suitcases like DTC brands who are coming out with their

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>own publication. Yes, I think there's a reason why so

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>many of businesses still go to the New York Times,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>still go to New York mag to create an impact, right,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a statement, and to really create sort of

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a clear, concise communication that's going to get attention in

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a way that digital I just don't think has the

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>ability to do. So. I am all in on print.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is. It's a high impact medium. Yeah, I

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>totally agree, Pam. What would you kill? What would you buy?

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And then what would you do yourself? What would you

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what would you kill some of the self reporting fake stuff?

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>What would you buy for both buy and build. I've

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>been thinking a lot about products these days, bringing new

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>exciting experiences to our audiences. How can we developed products

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like physical physical products? Yeah, The Cut has done these

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>T shirts and collaboration with Amazon. There's a new T

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>shirt every week. We've thought about it as content you

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>can live in. Basically an Amazon had originally encouraged us

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to offer a lot of variety and a lot of

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>different skews and you know, different options, colors, etcetera. Like

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that's typically how the playbook for doing well on Amazon.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And we're really just offering this one thing, and it's

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>gone really well to the point where apparently they've been

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>using it as kind of a case study internally, and like,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's brand right, that's a brand. That's

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>brand pulling through the funnel right, by the way. Yeah, great,

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a great example. Okay, what would you what would

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you do yourself? TV? We're interested in TV. Where. Um,

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's great explaining I p for TV, Pam. If people

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get ahold of you, how do they find you?

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you can email me. Wow, everybody, get out

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>your pen the pen you bought from the article on

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the strategies exactly. First go buy a pen from the

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>strategist and then use that pen to write down my

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>email address. It's Pam dot Wasserstein at and my meg

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Pam. This is awesome. Thank you so much

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>for coming by. Big thanks to Pam. Thank you so

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>much for coming by. I think we've been talking about

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>having you on the show at least for a year,

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>so it's been long time coming. Thank you big. Thanks

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to Dana, our producer. Everyone at Panoply Atlantia will be

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>talking to you in a couple of weeks. Full disclosure

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Our opinions are our own.