WEBVTT - Malcolm Goes to Debate School

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.716
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to the month debates.

0:00:27.396 --> 0:00:30.436
<v Speaker 2>Not long ago, a few thousand people gathered up Roy

0:00:30.476 --> 0:00:34.316
<v Speaker 2>Thompson Hall in Toronto, the fanciest performance space in the city,

0:00:34.916 --> 0:00:41.796
<v Speaker 2>to hear a debate parliamentary style, opening statements, rebuttals, closing arguments.

0:00:42.596 --> 0:00:45.236
<v Speaker 1>So I want all of us to think tonight carefully

0:00:45.636 --> 0:00:51.796
<v Speaker 1>on our debate motion. Be it resolved. Do not trust

0:00:52.156 --> 0:00:53.716
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media.

0:00:54.716 --> 0:00:58.316
<v Speaker 2>Speaking for the resolution, We're two prominent journalists.

0:00:58.996 --> 0:01:01.076
<v Speaker 3>My name is Matt Tayibi, had been a reporter for

0:01:01.116 --> 0:01:04.556
<v Speaker 3>thirty years, and I argue for the resolution you should

0:01:04.596 --> 0:01:05.996
<v Speaker 3>not trust mainstream media.

0:01:06.876 --> 0:01:09.596
<v Speaker 2>Tayibe was one of the people Elon Musk turned to

0:01:09.876 --> 0:01:12.556
<v Speaker 2>when he took over Twitter to publish on Twitter the

0:01:12.636 --> 0:01:15.596
<v Speaker 2>so called Twitter Files, with the intent of showing that

0:01:15.716 --> 0:01:19.916
<v Speaker 2>liberals were meddling with free speech. Matt Tayib has a

0:01:19.956 --> 0:01:21.356
<v Speaker 2>massive online following.

0:01:22.196 --> 0:01:24.556
<v Speaker 3>I grew up in the press. My father was a reporter,

0:01:24.876 --> 0:01:29.276
<v Speaker 3>my stepmother was a reporter, my godparents are reporters. Basically

0:01:29.316 --> 0:01:31.836
<v Speaker 3>every adult I knew growing up was a reporter. So

0:01:32.076 --> 0:01:36.596
<v Speaker 3>I actually loved the news business, but I mourned for it.

0:01:36.596 --> 0:01:40.156
<v Speaker 3>It's destroyed itself by getting away from its basic function,

0:01:40.796 --> 0:01:42.396
<v Speaker 3>which is just to tell us what's happening.

0:01:45.676 --> 0:01:51.836
<v Speaker 2>Taybe's partner was the prominent English journalist Douglas Murray, Oxford educated,

0:01:52.196 --> 0:01:56.156
<v Speaker 2>beautiful suit, a certain international man of mystery.

0:01:56.356 --> 0:01:59.476
<v Speaker 4>Thanks not fair, It's a great pleasure to be here

0:01:59.476 --> 0:02:01.276
<v Speaker 4>with about Yad said, I've come a rather long way

0:02:01.316 --> 0:02:03.196
<v Speaker 4>from the front lines of the Ukraine conflict because I

0:02:03.276 --> 0:02:05.156
<v Speaker 4>like to see these things with my own eyes for

0:02:05.276 --> 0:02:07.916
<v Speaker 4>myself and to come to my own conclusions. I came

0:02:07.916 --> 0:02:10.436
<v Speaker 4>out through Moldova the other day, through London, then got

0:02:10.436 --> 0:02:12.156
<v Speaker 4>to Toronto and friend of mine said, why are you

0:02:12.196 --> 0:02:15.036
<v Speaker 4>going to Toronto? I said, an invitation to Toronto in

0:02:15.116 --> 0:02:19.396
<v Speaker 4>late November. Who on Earth says no to that? Only

0:02:19.396 --> 0:02:20.796
<v Speaker 4>a madman would say.

0:02:20.596 --> 0:02:20.916
<v Speaker 5>No to that.

0:02:24.836 --> 0:02:28.116
<v Speaker 2>On the other side, defending the mainstream media was the

0:02:28.156 --> 0:02:32.876
<v Speaker 2>New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg, a monk debate veteran

0:02:33.436 --> 0:02:36.036
<v Speaker 2>one of America's strongest liberal voices.

0:02:37.156 --> 0:02:40.756
<v Speaker 6>Think about the big stories of the last five years

0:02:40.836 --> 0:02:44.796
<v Speaker 6>or so, you know, from the Trump presidency to COVID

0:02:45.476 --> 0:02:48.756
<v Speaker 6>to the war in Ukraine. Now, if you had just

0:02:49.076 --> 0:02:53.436
<v Speaker 6>followed the CBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post,

0:02:53.516 --> 0:02:58.116
<v Speaker 6>the BBC, they all got some things wrong, but in

0:02:58.236 --> 0:03:01.596
<v Speaker 6>terms of the big stories, if you paid attention to

0:03:01.636 --> 0:03:06.316
<v Speaker 6>the mainstream media, you were likely to be much safer

0:03:06.716 --> 0:03:10.276
<v Speaker 6>and much closer to the truth then if you followed

0:03:10.396 --> 0:03:12.796
<v Speaker 6>the kind of contrarians, if you followed the people who

0:03:12.836 --> 0:03:16.356
<v Speaker 6>were saying, don't trust the mainstream media, trust these alternative

0:03:16.396 --> 0:03:17.396
<v Speaker 6>sources of information.

0:03:18.396 --> 0:03:22.396
<v Speaker 2>Tayibe Murray Goldberg, and then.

0:03:22.636 --> 0:03:26.996
<v Speaker 1>Michelle's debating partner is a Canadian journalist. Yes, I will

0:03:26.996 --> 0:03:30.436
<v Speaker 1>claim him as one of our own, a veteran New

0:03:30.556 --> 0:03:36.276
<v Speaker 1>Yorker staff writer, a podcasting sensation who doesn't love revisionist history,

0:03:36.996 --> 0:03:42.676
<v Speaker 1>and an internationally acclaimed author. Ladies and gentlemen, Malcolm Gladwell.

0:03:45.156 --> 0:03:48.876
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Revisionist History, my podcast about things overlooked

0:03:48.876 --> 0:03:53.236
<v Speaker 2>and misunderstood. This episode is about what happened when Michelle

0:03:53.316 --> 0:03:56.676
<v Speaker 2>Goldberg and I attempted to defend the honor of the

0:03:56.676 --> 0:04:06.516
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media against its many enemies. I entered this battle

0:04:06.836 --> 0:04:09.996
<v Speaker 2>to cheers from my hometown Craft. I grew up not

0:04:10.116 --> 0:04:12.676
<v Speaker 2>far away, and I went to college in Toronto about

0:04:12.716 --> 0:04:16.236
<v Speaker 2>a mile from the theater. This whole evening was putting

0:04:16.276 --> 0:04:19.036
<v Speaker 2>a pep in my step. I've met with Michelle that

0:04:19.116 --> 0:04:21.596
<v Speaker 2>morning at breakfast at our hotel, I said to her,

0:04:21.836 --> 0:04:24.076
<v Speaker 2>We're going to win this thing. How could we not?

0:04:24.596 --> 0:04:27.796
<v Speaker 2>This is Canada. If anyone is going to trust the

0:04:27.796 --> 0:04:32.676
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media, it's Canadians. I wrote out my opening comments

0:04:32.756 --> 0:04:35.596
<v Speaker 2>on the plane, had a lovely visit with my mom,

0:04:35.876 --> 0:04:39.396
<v Speaker 2>put on my snappiest suit jacket, then strode out on

0:04:39.476 --> 0:04:42.756
<v Speaker 2>stage and warmly shook the moderator's.

0:04:42.196 --> 0:04:45.396
<v Speaker 1>Hand because we want to know, are you open to

0:04:45.556 --> 0:04:48.956
<v Speaker 1>changing your mind over the course of what you're going

0:04:48.996 --> 0:04:51.796
<v Speaker 1>to hear in the next ninety minutes. Can you be

0:04:51.876 --> 0:04:55.036
<v Speaker 1>persuaded to move from the pro camp into the con

0:04:55.076 --> 0:04:57.156
<v Speaker 1>camp or vice versa.

0:04:57.356 --> 0:04:59.676
<v Speaker 2>I should let you know before we get too far

0:04:59.716 --> 0:05:03.436
<v Speaker 2>along that I am not someone who gets nervous. I

0:05:03.476 --> 0:05:06.076
<v Speaker 2>don't get stage fright. I am the son of a

0:05:06.116 --> 0:05:10.196
<v Speaker 2>man whose personal credo was nothing bad will ever happen.

0:05:11.316 --> 0:05:14.156
<v Speaker 2>And that's how I felt on the evening of the

0:05:14.196 --> 0:05:17.876
<v Speaker 2>month today. The room was packed, I felt the surge

0:05:17.876 --> 0:05:21.636
<v Speaker 2>of love from my countryman, and Michelle was on fire.

0:05:22.236 --> 0:05:25.796
<v Speaker 6>However, if you followed the mainstream media, you knew that

0:05:25.836 --> 0:05:29.436
<v Speaker 6>COVID was airborne. You knew that it was more serious

0:05:29.516 --> 0:05:33.836
<v Speaker 6>than the flu, and you knew that the vaccines were

0:05:33.956 --> 0:05:38.596
<v Speaker 6>likely to protect you. The COVID contrarians, the contrarian media,

0:05:38.596 --> 0:05:41.156
<v Speaker 6>the one who we're saying not to trust kind of

0:05:41.156 --> 0:05:44.756
<v Speaker 6>mainstream sources of opinion. We're saying, this is just another flu.

0:05:44.916 --> 0:05:48.756
<v Speaker 6>Deaths are going to be six thousand. The media doesn't

0:05:48.796 --> 0:05:50.716
<v Speaker 6>want to tell you. I mean, Matt wrote this several times.

0:05:50.716 --> 0:05:53.196
<v Speaker 6>The media doesn't want to tell you about Ivermectin.

0:05:53.676 --> 0:05:56.756
<v Speaker 2>She had Tybee and Murray on their heels.

0:05:56.556 --> 0:05:59.396
<v Speaker 6>In the run up to the invasion of Ukraine. Again,

0:05:59.436 --> 0:06:01.716
<v Speaker 6>I think Matt said that, you know, the media is

0:06:01.756 --> 0:06:04.516
<v Speaker 6>over hyping this, that people are kind of taking stenography

0:06:04.596 --> 0:06:07.836
<v Speaker 6>from the Biden administration that Russia actually is probably not

0:06:07.956 --> 0:06:08.836
<v Speaker 6>going to invade.

0:06:09.116 --> 0:06:10.916
<v Speaker 2>When it was my turn to speak, I tried to

0:06:10.956 --> 0:06:14.476
<v Speaker 2>build on what Michelle said. The mainstream media was right

0:06:14.516 --> 0:06:18.116
<v Speaker 2>about things like COVID in Ukraine because it's a profession

0:06:18.596 --> 0:06:22.556
<v Speaker 2>with standards and rules and a long tradition of searching

0:06:22.676 --> 0:06:27.276
<v Speaker 2>for the truth. The non mainstream media is a set

0:06:27.316 --> 0:06:31.156
<v Speaker 2>of institutions that are outside of that tradition, that have

0:06:31.236 --> 0:06:34.236
<v Speaker 2>an open and not a closed platform. And you cannot

0:06:34.356 --> 0:06:38.516
<v Speaker 2>have an open platform and simultaneously adhere to a strict

0:06:38.556 --> 0:06:42.196
<v Speaker 2>set of professional norms. You cannot say anyone can become

0:06:42.236 --> 0:06:45.036
<v Speaker 2>a doctor and then complain when the surgeon takes out

0:06:45.076 --> 0:06:50.156
<v Speaker 2>your spleen and thinking that it's your call pattern right now,

0:06:50.156 --> 0:06:52.036
<v Speaker 2>Why am I making such a big deal about this,

0:06:52.316 --> 0:06:58.196
<v Speaker 2>Because trust is not about content. Trust is about process.

0:06:58.716 --> 0:07:01.556
<v Speaker 2>I got my journalistic training at the Washington Post, one

0:07:01.556 --> 0:07:04.276
<v Speaker 2>of the great newspapers in the world. I learned about

0:07:04.276 --> 0:07:07.236
<v Speaker 2>that process, about what it means to respect the truth

0:07:07.636 --> 0:07:11.316
<v Speaker 2>from some of the greatest journalists of my generation. This

0:07:12.116 --> 0:07:15.916
<v Speaker 2>was from the heart. We're nailing this, I thought to myself.

0:07:17.316 --> 0:07:17.876
<v Speaker 2>And then.

0:07:19.836 --> 0:07:22.636
<v Speaker 4>I can't sit here and listen to Malcolm Gladwell talking

0:07:22.636 --> 0:07:26.116
<v Speaker 4>about fact checking and the importance of it. Not to

0:07:26.156 --> 0:07:30.836
<v Speaker 4>get too mean, Malcolm. I read your book David and Goliath.

0:07:31.756 --> 0:07:35.316
<v Speaker 4>The chapter on Northern Ireland is more filled with inaccuracies

0:07:35.396 --> 0:07:38.196
<v Speaker 4>than any other chapter in a non fiction book I

0:07:38.196 --> 0:07:44.636
<v Speaker 4>have read. It is having written a not very well

0:07:44.676 --> 0:07:49.356
<v Speaker 4>selling but widely acclaimed book on Northern Ireland myself. My

0:07:49.356 --> 0:07:51.636
<v Speaker 4>book on Northern Ireland didn't sell anywhere near as much

0:07:51.636 --> 0:07:55.196
<v Speaker 4>as yours did, Malcolm, but mine was filled with facts.

0:07:57.316 --> 0:08:00.476
<v Speaker 2>Oh God, all of us have had the dream of

0:08:00.556 --> 0:08:03.396
<v Speaker 2>we're walking down our high school corridor and we realize

0:08:03.556 --> 0:08:07.916
<v Speaker 2>suddenly we're not wearing any pants. That was me in

0:08:07.916 --> 0:08:11.396
<v Speaker 2>that moment, the stage of Roy Thompson Hall, in front

0:08:11.436 --> 0:08:17.076
<v Speaker 2>of a few thousand people, suddenly realizing this is not

0:08:17.196 --> 0:08:17.716
<v Speaker 2>going well.

0:08:19.876 --> 0:08:24.476
<v Speaker 4>It's so strange hearing you debate, Malcolm, because you listen

0:08:24.556 --> 0:08:29.516
<v Speaker 4>to nothing that your opponents say. It's quite extraordinary. I've

0:08:29.516 --> 0:08:33.436
<v Speaker 4>met it before, but never quite so badly as it

0:08:33.436 --> 0:08:37.356
<v Speaker 4>occurs in you. You keep saying things that neither of

0:08:37.436 --> 0:08:40.236
<v Speaker 4>us have said, and then you try to pathologize what

0:08:40.276 --> 0:08:43.356
<v Speaker 4>we say. Now, Malcolm, why don't you listen to what

0:08:43.436 --> 0:08:46.436
<v Speaker 4>comes out of our mouths and try to learn something

0:08:46.436 --> 0:08:49.076
<v Speaker 4>from it? As I am with you this evening, But

0:08:49.316 --> 0:08:53.316
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, all I get is you dismissing every

0:08:53.396 --> 0:08:56.996
<v Speaker 4>single story we come up with, every egregious failure of

0:08:57.036 --> 0:08:58.036
<v Speaker 4>the mainstream media.

0:09:00.636 --> 0:09:03.956
<v Speaker 2>A friend of mine afterwards texted me to say, why

0:09:03.956 --> 0:09:06.356
<v Speaker 2>didn't you tell me you were up against Douglas Murray.

0:09:06.876 --> 0:09:09.676
<v Speaker 2>I would have warned you to stay home. A simple

0:09:09.756 --> 0:09:12.316
<v Speaker 2>YouTube search would have shown me that he's a regular

0:09:12.316 --> 0:09:16.316
<v Speaker 2>at the fabled Oxford Debating Union, a master of the

0:09:16.356 --> 0:09:17.796
<v Speaker 2>cut and thrust.

0:09:18.556 --> 0:09:21.636
<v Speaker 4>But I beg you to actually consider the fact that

0:09:21.676 --> 0:09:25.396
<v Speaker 4>what we are describing is, even if you think, not

0:09:25.636 --> 0:09:28.636
<v Speaker 4>as accurate as you would like, an expression of a

0:09:28.716 --> 0:09:34.196
<v Speaker 4>problem that is going on in our societies. Functioning. Functioning

0:09:34.556 --> 0:09:39.356
<v Speaker 4>liberal democracies need to have trust in their media, and

0:09:39.596 --> 0:09:41.436
<v Speaker 4>the best that your site has been able to come

0:09:41.516 --> 0:09:44.036
<v Speaker 4>up with so far tonight is to say, we get

0:09:44.076 --> 0:09:46.716
<v Speaker 4>things wrong quite often, but you should trust us.

0:09:53.116 --> 0:09:56.076
<v Speaker 2>You can't see it listening as you are. But Murray

0:09:56.116 --> 0:09:57.836
<v Speaker 2>had the room in the palm of his hand.

0:09:58.196 --> 0:10:02.476
<v Speaker 4>Take the hunter Biden's story. Oh here we okay, I'm sorry.

0:10:03.916 --> 0:10:05.876
<v Speaker 4>Of course you don't want to no end to that

0:10:05.956 --> 0:10:09.836
<v Speaker 4>kind of of course you don't want to hear it, Malcolm.

0:10:09.916 --> 0:10:13.636
<v Speaker 4>Of course you wouldn't because it goes against your ideological presumptions.

0:10:18.476 --> 0:10:21.156
<v Speaker 2>In the Monk debate, the audience votes on the resolution

0:10:21.356 --> 0:10:24.836
<v Speaker 2>once before the debate and then again after the debate

0:10:24.876 --> 0:10:27.036
<v Speaker 2>is over, and the winner is the side that causes

0:10:27.076 --> 0:10:31.476
<v Speaker 2>the most people to change their minds. Remember the resolution

0:10:31.596 --> 0:10:35.636
<v Speaker 2>that night was be it resolved, do not trust the

0:10:35.676 --> 0:10:36.516
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media.

0:10:37.076 --> 0:10:42.116
<v Speaker 1>Let's just quickly review where we started out tonight's debate.

0:10:42.836 --> 0:10:45.596
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty much a split opinion. If I believe

0:10:45.636 --> 0:10:49.676
<v Speaker 1>it was forty eight in favor, fifty two opposed. We

0:10:49.756 --> 0:10:53.716
<v Speaker 1>then asked you how many could change your mind. So

0:10:53.796 --> 0:10:57.076
<v Speaker 1>let's see what happened of the last ninety minutes. Did

0:10:57.476 --> 0:11:02.396
<v Speaker 1>either team of these debaters swing opinion one way or another?

0:11:02.796 --> 0:11:07.956
<v Speaker 1>There we go sixty seven per set in favor of

0:11:07.996 --> 0:11:11.836
<v Speaker 1>the motion, thirty three percent of post.

0:11:12.876 --> 0:11:16.876
<v Speaker 2>It was the biggest swing in opinion in the history

0:11:17.236 --> 0:11:26.796
<v Speaker 2>of the Monk debates. We got cream. I went back

0:11:26.836 --> 0:11:30.196
<v Speaker 2>to my hotel room, lay down on my bed, stared

0:11:30.236 --> 0:11:33.676
<v Speaker 2>at the ceiling, and made the mistake of checking social media.

0:11:34.876 --> 0:11:38.316
<v Speaker 7>Malcolm gave the perfect talk to show exactly why nobody

0:11:38.316 --> 0:11:42.116
<v Speaker 7>trusts his media. Malcolm Gladwell has failed as an intellectual

0:11:42.156 --> 0:11:42.836
<v Speaker 7>in this debate.

0:11:43.316 --> 0:11:46.476
<v Speaker 8>Wow, you got owned and you were so smug and

0:11:46.596 --> 0:11:49.076
<v Speaker 8>arrogant as you were getting known be better.

0:11:49.476 --> 0:11:50.796
<v Speaker 2>You've lost my respect.

0:11:51.756 --> 0:11:55.236
<v Speaker 9>This was a funeral for Malcolm Gladwell's reputation.

0:11:55.916 --> 0:11:58.036
<v Speaker 5>Gladwell's not half as smart as I thought.

0:11:58.036 --> 0:11:59.436
<v Speaker 7>He was just washed.

0:11:59.516 --> 0:12:03.396
<v Speaker 4>Malk get his butt kicked by Doug and really enjoyed it.

0:12:04.916 --> 0:12:23.836
<v Speaker 2>I had hit rock bottom. What do you do after

0:12:23.876 --> 0:12:27.396
<v Speaker 2>you've been humiliated? You call your mother, of course.

0:12:31.396 --> 0:12:38.596
<v Speaker 5>Tex While Meg style in English It says, when things

0:12:38.676 --> 0:12:43.516
<v Speaker 5>go wrong, convert them to something that is desirable.

0:12:44.676 --> 0:12:47.036
<v Speaker 2>And the first thing my mother did when I asked

0:12:47.036 --> 0:12:51.036
<v Speaker 2>for maternal reassurance was remind me of an expression from

0:12:51.036 --> 0:12:55.796
<v Speaker 2>her native Jamaica. This is my mom's first solo appearance

0:12:55.796 --> 0:12:58.676
<v Speaker 2>on Revisionist History. By the way, what kind of son

0:12:58.796 --> 0:13:02.876
<v Speaker 2>makes his mother wait eight years for a cameo? I

0:13:02.916 --> 0:13:06.556
<v Speaker 2>want to go back over the pronunciation of the of

0:13:06.596 --> 0:13:09.956
<v Speaker 2>the words in dialect. Pronounce it and then spell them

0:13:09.956 --> 0:13:13.516
<v Speaker 2>out for me, just so I can see in my mind. Okay,

0:13:13.556 --> 0:13:14.756
<v Speaker 2>the expression.

0:13:16.076 --> 0:13:22.236
<v Speaker 5>Tech spoil t e K. It's it's a it's a

0:13:22.316 --> 0:13:29.516
<v Speaker 5>version of take take what is spoiled because we do

0:13:29.596 --> 0:13:34.436
<v Speaker 5>not use the rounded vowels in Jamaica. They're all broad

0:13:34.756 --> 0:13:40.276
<v Speaker 5>a vowels. We instead of saying spoil, we say spoil. Yeah,

0:13:41.636 --> 0:13:47.876
<v Speaker 5>but they're all English words. Take, spoil, make style. Those

0:13:47.916 --> 0:13:51.596
<v Speaker 5>are four English words, but they're just pronounced differently.

0:13:52.516 --> 0:13:54.556
<v Speaker 2>It's beautifully economical.

0:13:54.676 --> 0:13:59.556
<v Speaker 5>Exactly that. It's the economy and also the humor which

0:13:59.596 --> 0:14:01.636
<v Speaker 5>is which, which is also striking.

0:14:01.956 --> 0:14:04.836
<v Speaker 2>Put it in a sentence in your best Jamaican dialect.

0:14:06.156 --> 0:14:09.116
<v Speaker 5>We don't use it in a sentence. We use it

0:14:09.316 --> 0:14:14.396
<v Speaker 5>as a commentary on a situation. Here is someone walking

0:14:14.436 --> 0:14:19.156
<v Speaker 5>along in a dress that does not fit with what

0:14:19.436 --> 0:14:28.276
<v Speaker 5>is commonly being used, and she says, well, midare you

0:14:28.516 --> 0:14:32.436
<v Speaker 5>watch and see everybody will be wearing a dress like

0:14:32.556 --> 0:14:36.196
<v Speaker 5>this soon. Maya techspoile make style.

0:14:39.396 --> 0:14:43.476
<v Speaker 2>This was her moral instruction to me in typically elliptical

0:14:43.596 --> 0:14:48.276
<v Speaker 2>choice glabor fashion, Take lemons and make lemonade, take spoil

0:14:48.876 --> 0:14:55.596
<v Speaker 2>and make style. So what did I do? I went

0:14:55.636 --> 0:14:57.876
<v Speaker 2>straight to the top. I got in touch with the

0:14:57.916 --> 0:15:01.396
<v Speaker 2>local legend of New York debating K M. D. Colandria

0:15:01.556 --> 0:15:06.156
<v Speaker 2>aka deca, founder of the Brooklyn Debate League. I told

0:15:06.196 --> 0:15:09.596
<v Speaker 2>Dica about the very public undressing Sid effered on the

0:15:09.596 --> 0:15:13.316
<v Speaker 2>stage of Roy Thompson Hall, and Dico said, you need

0:15:13.356 --> 0:15:16.676
<v Speaker 2>to come to Brooklyn, And so I did, all the

0:15:16.716 --> 0:15:19.156
<v Speaker 2>way to the Crown Heights neighborhood in what used to

0:15:19.196 --> 0:15:23.996
<v Speaker 2>be the old Hebrew Hospital, Narrow Hallway, cats, everyone eating

0:15:24.036 --> 0:15:27.836
<v Speaker 2>big bulls of pasta, Franklin Avenue shuttle lumbering along in

0:15:27.876 --> 0:15:28.436
<v Speaker 2>the background.

0:15:30.436 --> 0:15:33.756
<v Speaker 7>What's all, George, Oh you can't do that?

0:15:33.836 --> 0:15:37.156
<v Speaker 2>During the podcast, really, Dico had put together a dream

0:15:37.196 --> 0:15:40.996
<v Speaker 2>team of three to analyze my performance. Sissan Kuss Rove,

0:15:41.716 --> 0:15:48.476
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Conyers and Dico himself. Jonathan is built like a linebacker,

0:15:48.916 --> 0:15:52.556
<v Speaker 2>Big James hardened Beard works as a respiratory therapist when

0:15:52.556 --> 0:15:59.276
<v Speaker 2>he's not writing books and teaching debate. Cissan is thirty something, extroverted, charismatic.

0:15:59.716 --> 0:16:02.036
<v Speaker 2>In the John Grisham version of his life, he would

0:16:02.036 --> 0:16:04.316
<v Speaker 2>be a trial lawyer who would win a ten billion

0:16:04.356 --> 0:16:09.036
<v Speaker 2>dollar verdict from the jury in Mississippi. Dico is reserved,

0:16:09.396 --> 0:16:13.076
<v Speaker 2>studied philosophy at Yale, Irish and Italian and background, and

0:16:13.236 --> 0:16:16.876
<v Speaker 2>somewhere along the line converted to Judaism and went to

0:16:16.956 --> 0:16:21.316
<v Speaker 2>rabbinical school. I sat down at Deco's kitchen table. Each

0:16:21.356 --> 0:16:25.116
<v Speaker 2>of the three had pages of densely written notes in

0:16:25.156 --> 0:16:30.796
<v Speaker 2>front of them they had prepared. Jonathan was to my left.

0:16:31.276 --> 0:16:34.996
<v Speaker 2>I started with him, Jonathan, can you speak to the

0:16:35.396 --> 0:16:39.556
<v Speaker 2>Was the tone different from the debates you're used to

0:16:39.716 --> 0:16:40.636
<v Speaker 2>with students?

0:16:41.356 --> 0:16:43.876
<v Speaker 7>So that's a very good question. So I'll answer this

0:16:43.916 --> 0:16:47.836
<v Speaker 7>in two ways. The tone that you had throughout the

0:16:47.876 --> 0:16:50.516
<v Speaker 7>debate was very similar to some of the students that

0:16:50.596 --> 0:16:52.836
<v Speaker 7>I do work with, and that's what I teached them.

0:16:55.356 --> 0:16:56.956
<v Speaker 2>I have the thickest kid in the world. No, I

0:16:56.956 --> 0:17:00.076
<v Speaker 2>want to just pile on Oh they piled on.

0:17:00.876 --> 0:17:04.236
<v Speaker 9>So San was next, And I think what I want

0:17:04.276 --> 0:17:08.156
<v Speaker 9>to explore is the sort of disconnect between the things

0:17:08.156 --> 0:17:11.676
<v Speaker 9>that you thought should have mattered to the audience and

0:17:11.796 --> 0:17:14.116
<v Speaker 9>what actually turned out to matter.

0:17:13.916 --> 0:17:14.636
<v Speaker 7>To the audience.

0:17:14.796 --> 0:17:17.276
<v Speaker 2>Bendica, what was your strategy?

0:17:17.316 --> 0:17:18.476
<v Speaker 9>Why do you think you won?

0:17:18.636 --> 0:17:20.596
<v Speaker 10>Like if you talked us through, like your offense on

0:17:20.636 --> 0:17:22.876
<v Speaker 10>that debate, like why do you think you want.

0:17:24.156 --> 0:17:28.876
<v Speaker 2>I thought that that any it was to be honest,

0:17:29.436 --> 0:17:32.476
<v Speaker 2>it began with a certain degree of arrogance that I

0:17:32.516 --> 0:17:36.476
<v Speaker 2>thought I just couldn't imagine how anyone could legitimately argue

0:17:36.516 --> 0:17:39.996
<v Speaker 2>that the mainstream media was worse than the at tournative.

0:17:40.796 --> 0:17:44.356
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, let's start there. If I assume that most

0:17:44.356 --> 0:17:47.196
<v Speaker 2>people were on my side before I began, then why

0:17:47.236 --> 0:17:51.516
<v Speaker 2>was I even debating. Debating is persuasion. It's based on

0:17:51.596 --> 0:17:54.276
<v Speaker 2>the idea that there are people listening who don't agree

0:17:54.316 --> 0:17:57.156
<v Speaker 2>with you, and your job is to change their mind.

0:17:57.716 --> 0:18:01.596
<v Speaker 2>It's not a conversation. It's not you say what you think,

0:18:01.716 --> 0:18:05.516
<v Speaker 2>I say what I think. It's a contest adjudicated by

0:18:05.516 --> 0:18:07.796
<v Speaker 2>a third party, and the winner is a person who

0:18:07.876 --> 0:18:10.756
<v Speaker 2>does the best job of clients inside the head of

0:18:10.796 --> 0:18:11.636
<v Speaker 2>that third party.

0:18:12.236 --> 0:18:17.196
<v Speaker 9>Because Ultimately, the wind condition of debate is the judge

0:18:17.196 --> 0:18:18.076
<v Speaker 9>circle in your name.

0:18:18.676 --> 0:18:20.356
<v Speaker 2>Sissan was the first to respond.

0:18:21.116 --> 0:18:24.156
<v Speaker 9>Ultimately, it's figuring out what's important to that person and

0:18:24.236 --> 0:18:27.476
<v Speaker 9>how do I show them that this thing that I'm

0:18:27.516 --> 0:18:32.916
<v Speaker 9>advocating for functions under a value system that they hold.

0:18:33.996 --> 0:18:37.476
<v Speaker 9>I think that's what's important about debate, and it's.

0:18:37.316 --> 0:18:42.436
<v Speaker 2>An empathetic it's an intellectual exercise in empathy. Empathy. I

0:18:42.636 --> 0:18:45.596
<v Speaker 2>just failed the first test of debating. I should have

0:18:45.676 --> 0:18:48.676
<v Speaker 2>put myself inside the heads of those in the audience

0:18:48.716 --> 0:18:51.676
<v Speaker 2>who didn't trust the mainstream media and then try and

0:18:51.676 --> 0:18:56.116
<v Speaker 2>bring them around. Second related point. If you watch the

0:18:56.156 --> 0:18:59.156
<v Speaker 2>whole ninety minute debate on YouTube, which for the love

0:18:59.196 --> 0:19:01.636
<v Speaker 2>of God I dearly hope you do not, you will

0:19:01.636 --> 0:19:04.436
<v Speaker 2>notice that mister Murray and I did not get along.

0:19:05.396 --> 0:19:08.316
<v Speaker 2>At a few points. I called him Doug, to which

0:19:08.476 --> 0:19:11.436
<v Speaker 2>he took great aense and called me Malk.

0:19:12.436 --> 0:19:21.116
<v Speaker 4>Well, Malk, I'm going to try to take this more

0:19:21.116 --> 0:19:25.716
<v Speaker 4>seriously than you did in your endless creation of straw men,

0:19:25.876 --> 0:19:27.276
<v Speaker 4>which just is ceaseless.

0:19:27.316 --> 0:19:30.796
<v Speaker 2>This evening, after the debate was over, Murray tweeted and

0:19:30.916 --> 0:19:35.436
<v Speaker 2>retweeted word of his victory fourteen times. He's that kind

0:19:35.436 --> 0:19:38.636
<v Speaker 2>of guy. But my advisors at the Brooklyn Debate League

0:19:38.916 --> 0:19:42.796
<v Speaker 2>were not happy about my antipathy towards mister Murray. If

0:19:42.836 --> 0:19:46.556
<v Speaker 2>reading the mind of the judge requires empathy, then how

0:19:46.676 --> 0:19:50.116
<v Speaker 2>is pursuing some personal vendetta going to help matters? How

0:19:50.116 --> 0:19:52.876
<v Speaker 2>do you engage in the delicate art of persuasion if

0:19:52.916 --> 0:19:56.876
<v Speaker 2>you're getting all emotional. I tried to explain, I didn't

0:19:56.916 --> 0:20:00.076
<v Speaker 2>know Douglas Murray much at all, so I did a

0:20:00.116 --> 0:20:03.316
<v Speaker 2>little research into Douglas Murray in terms of the Douglas

0:20:03.436 --> 0:20:07.316
<v Speaker 2>Murray without meaning. I'm not intending to demean him, but

0:20:07.716 --> 0:20:12.316
<v Speaker 2>he is someone. He is one of those english people,

0:20:12.356 --> 0:20:16.356
<v Speaker 2>white english people who objects to the number of non

0:20:16.396 --> 0:20:18.876
<v Speaker 2>white people who have moved to England in the last

0:20:19.076 --> 0:20:22.716
<v Speaker 2>fifty years. I'm actually not exaggerating here. Let me read

0:20:22.756 --> 0:20:25.996
<v Speaker 2>too from a speech Murray once gave. It is late

0:20:26.036 --> 0:20:29.076
<v Speaker 2>in the day, but Europe still has time to turn

0:20:29.116 --> 0:20:32.796
<v Speaker 2>around the demographic time bomb, which will soon see a

0:20:32.836 --> 0:20:37.676
<v Speaker 2>number of our largest cities fall to Muslim majorities. It

0:20:37.756 --> 0:20:42.916
<v Speaker 2>has to All immigration into Europe from Muslim countries must

0:20:43.076 --> 0:20:46.676
<v Speaker 2>stop in the case of a further genocide such as

0:20:46.676 --> 0:20:49.316
<v Speaker 2>that in the Balkans, sanctuary would be given on a

0:20:49.356 --> 0:20:55.156
<v Speaker 2>strictly temporary basis. This should also be enacted retrospectively. Those

0:20:55.196 --> 0:20:58.676
<v Speaker 2>who are currently in Europe having fled tyrannies should be

0:20:58.756 --> 0:21:02.156
<v Speaker 2>persuaded back to the countries which they fled from once

0:21:02.196 --> 0:21:04.676
<v Speaker 2>the tyrannies that were the cause of their flight have

0:21:04.796 --> 0:21:08.716
<v Speaker 2>been removed. That last sentence from Murray is what throws me.

0:21:09.316 --> 0:21:14.436
<v Speaker 2>Immigrants from certain places should be persuaded back to the

0:21:14.476 --> 0:21:17.076
<v Speaker 2>countries from which they fled. Like there's the whole thing

0:21:17.756 --> 0:21:20.756
<v Speaker 2>that he does with on Andrew Sullivan's podcast where he

0:21:20.796 --> 0:21:24.436
<v Speaker 2>talks about his dismay that many there are many cities

0:21:24.436 --> 0:21:27.316
<v Speaker 2>in England now where whites are in the minority. Now.

0:21:27.356 --> 0:21:29.556
<v Speaker 2>My mother happens to be one of those people who

0:21:29.556 --> 0:21:31.956
<v Speaker 2>was a black woman who emigrated to England in nineteen

0:21:33.516 --> 0:21:37.156
<v Speaker 2>sixty three or whatever, sixty two. So she's talking in

0:21:37.156 --> 0:21:41.796
<v Speaker 2>the fifties, he's talking about So he's talking about my mother, right,

0:21:41.876 --> 0:21:45.156
<v Speaker 2>So this is like it was it's street for me.

0:21:45.236 --> 0:21:48.716
<v Speaker 11>It's like that dude is that dude is one of

0:21:48.836 --> 0:21:50.516
<v Speaker 11>you know, people used to shout the.

0:21:50.516 --> 0:21:51.956
<v Speaker 2>End word to my mom when she walked down the

0:21:51.956 --> 0:21:55.436
<v Speaker 2>street in England in nineteen fifty whatever, and I'm in

0:21:55.436 --> 0:21:58.116
<v Speaker 2>my mind, I'm imagining he's one of those people, right,

0:21:58.636 --> 0:22:01.036
<v Speaker 2>So it's like that's what was happening when I was

0:22:01.076 --> 0:22:03.996
<v Speaker 2>getting riled up. I was like, I walked in thinking

0:22:04.596 --> 0:22:08.196
<v Speaker 2>he's a piece of shit. That's I realized now, you

0:22:08.236 --> 0:22:11.796
<v Speaker 2>can't do that. If you do that, you've lost before

0:22:11.796 --> 0:22:14.996
<v Speaker 2>you've even started. This is why in high school debate

0:22:15.236 --> 0:22:18.556
<v Speaker 2>you have to prepare both sides beforehand and you find

0:22:18.596 --> 0:22:21.476
<v Speaker 2>out whether you are for or against the resolution on

0:22:21.516 --> 0:22:23.996
<v Speaker 2>the day of the debate. They don't want you to

0:22:24.036 --> 0:22:24.676
<v Speaker 2>be yourself.

0:22:24.996 --> 0:22:29.276
<v Speaker 7>And again, like you know, Dicoka attested this more than anybody.

0:22:29.356 --> 0:22:33.236
<v Speaker 7>Dico has had students who parents have just been deported

0:22:33.316 --> 0:22:34.756
<v Speaker 7>or on the verge of being deported and didn't have

0:22:34.796 --> 0:22:38.036
<v Speaker 7>to go and speak about open borders and immigration and

0:22:38.076 --> 0:22:39.796
<v Speaker 7>don't know which side of the fence they have to

0:22:39.836 --> 0:22:43.396
<v Speaker 7>debate on. That is tough for fourteen fifteen year olds too.

0:22:43.436 --> 0:22:44.876
<v Speaker 7>After they give a speech, I have to go cry

0:22:44.916 --> 0:22:46.636
<v Speaker 7>because they missed their dad or mom and they don't

0:22:46.676 --> 0:22:48.956
<v Speaker 7>know if ice is coming or I can't do this.

0:22:49.036 --> 0:22:50.836
<v Speaker 7>I can't do that. When I get it, I have

0:22:50.956 --> 0:22:54.596
<v Speaker 7>been there there were times where I felt racism occurring,

0:22:54.676 --> 0:22:57.196
<v Speaker 7>or people told me you can't use your personal story.

0:22:57.436 --> 0:23:00.396
<v Speaker 7>That's not fear. This rich kid don't understand what it's

0:23:00.436 --> 0:23:02.356
<v Speaker 7>like to be poor, so don't talk about that. So

0:23:02.476 --> 0:23:04.556
<v Speaker 7>it happens. We have to come in and understand that

0:23:04.596 --> 0:23:07.196
<v Speaker 7>debates are not personal and we have to talk about

0:23:07.236 --> 0:23:09.556
<v Speaker 7>these topics because if we can't have dialogue, if we

0:23:09.596 --> 0:23:14.436
<v Speaker 7>can't have respect in all this loss. So I'm going

0:23:14.516 --> 0:23:16.396
<v Speaker 7>to challenge you, Malcolm, to say, if they can control

0:23:16.436 --> 0:23:18.596
<v Speaker 7>the opposure and if they can understand that we can

0:23:18.636 --> 0:23:20.556
<v Speaker 7>have real conversations, so can you.

0:23:23.636 --> 0:23:26.596
<v Speaker 2>Our culture tells us to be authentic and put our

0:23:26.716 --> 0:23:29.716
<v Speaker 2>feelings first. But if you're trying to win a debate,

0:23:30.236 --> 0:23:33.716
<v Speaker 2>your focus needs to be on your opponent's feelings, how

0:23:33.796 --> 0:23:38.596
<v Speaker 2>their mind works. That's the number one. Don't be yourself.

0:23:39.156 --> 0:23:49.396
<v Speaker 2>It's a dead end. Okay. Second, lesson, all of my

0:23:49.476 --> 0:23:52.956
<v Speaker 2>advisors at the Brooklyn Debate League were baffled by a

0:23:52.996 --> 0:23:57.476
<v Speaker 2>crucial moment early in the debate, this moment in particular.

0:23:58.156 --> 0:24:02.316
<v Speaker 4>And nobody is saying that non mainstream media don't have frailties.

0:24:02.356 --> 0:24:03.276
<v Speaker 7>Of course they do.

0:24:03.756 --> 0:24:06.236
<v Speaker 4>The simple proposal in front of the audience tonight is

0:24:06.276 --> 0:24:09.756
<v Speaker 4>whether or not you can trust the mainstream media. That

0:24:09.836 --> 0:24:11.476
<v Speaker 4>is that you don't need anything else. You don't need

0:24:11.516 --> 0:24:15.156
<v Speaker 4>any other information from else where. You can just turn

0:24:15.196 --> 0:24:17.036
<v Speaker 4>on CBC in the evening and you know you've got

0:24:17.076 --> 0:24:19.156
<v Speaker 4>your stuff. You can pick up the New York Times

0:24:19.156 --> 0:24:20.676
<v Speaker 4>the Washington Posts in the morning and you know that

0:24:20.716 --> 0:24:23.756
<v Speaker 4>there's no spin on the story. It's absolutely accurate reporting.

0:24:24.156 --> 0:24:28.796
<v Speaker 2>The debate Connoisseuran Sasan loved this little move. What Murray

0:24:28.876 --> 0:24:30.996
<v Speaker 2>was saying was that if you have even the slightest

0:24:31.076 --> 0:24:34.196
<v Speaker 2>doubt about the perfection of the mainstream media, then you

0:24:34.276 --> 0:24:37.916
<v Speaker 2>have to vote for his side, and no institution can

0:24:37.956 --> 0:24:41.876
<v Speaker 2>meet that standard. It's like saying, unless all prescription drugs

0:24:41.916 --> 0:24:45.316
<v Speaker 2>are guaranteed to act perfectly every time without side effects

0:24:45.356 --> 0:24:49.756
<v Speaker 2>or complications, you can't trust prescription drugs. It's nuts.

0:24:52.556 --> 0:24:58.956
<v Speaker 9>They took this topic don't trust mainstream media and made

0:24:59.116 --> 0:25:03.956
<v Speaker 9>the central question of the debate be are there political

0:25:03.996 --> 0:25:08.276
<v Speaker 9>biases in mainstream media? As long as that's the question

0:25:08.516 --> 0:25:12.076
<v Speaker 9>that the audience is asking themselves to make the winner,

0:25:12.116 --> 0:25:12.516
<v Speaker 9>you lose.

0:25:13.116 --> 0:25:16.156
<v Speaker 2>What my side should have said was, wait a minute,

0:25:16.476 --> 0:25:19.476
<v Speaker 2>the way you guys are defining the resolution makes no sense.

0:25:20.276 --> 0:25:22.436
<v Speaker 2>So San said that then I'd be free to offer

0:25:22.596 --> 0:25:24.916
<v Speaker 2>a simple alternative, something like.

0:25:25.076 --> 0:25:32.916
<v Speaker 9>In a scenario where a non mainstream news source and

0:25:33.116 --> 0:25:37.396
<v Speaker 9>a mainstream news source directly disagree with each other, and

0:25:37.436 --> 0:25:40.396
<v Speaker 9>we have no way of discerning who's right based on

0:25:40.476 --> 0:25:42.756
<v Speaker 9>what we have available to us, who should we give

0:25:42.756 --> 0:25:45.036
<v Speaker 9>the benefit of the doubt to? I think that leans

0:25:45.076 --> 0:25:46.396
<v Speaker 9>a lot more your way.

0:25:46.516 --> 0:25:49.356
<v Speaker 2>But we didn't say that. We sat there and let

0:25:49.396 --> 0:25:54.356
<v Speaker 2>our opponents stack the deck against us. Why Dico had

0:25:54.356 --> 0:25:55.116
<v Speaker 2>a hunch.

0:25:55.036 --> 0:25:58.036
<v Speaker 10>Did you write down any notes while your opponents were speaking?

0:25:58.156 --> 0:25:58.796
<v Speaker 7>What were you doing?

0:25:58.916 --> 0:25:59.076
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:25:59.116 --> 0:25:59.476
<v Speaker 3>That was.

0:26:01.036 --> 0:26:03.956
<v Speaker 2>I was scribbling furiously. I was the only one who was.

0:26:03.996 --> 0:26:06.516
<v Speaker 10>But I realized they were saying or what you were thinking.

0:26:06.716 --> 0:26:09.956
<v Speaker 2>Both, But I realized it inhibited my ability to listen

0:26:09.956 --> 0:26:13.196
<v Speaker 2>to them. So I was so busy I was trying

0:26:13.196 --> 0:26:15.196
<v Speaker 2>to conceive of what I would how i'd respond in

0:26:15.196 --> 0:26:17.236
<v Speaker 2>the moment. So while I was doing that, I was

0:26:17.316 --> 0:26:20.836
<v Speaker 2>missing what the next part of the next thing that

0:26:20.836 --> 0:26:22.956
<v Speaker 2>they were saying, do you know? I mean? Dico also

0:26:23.036 --> 0:26:26.036
<v Speaker 2>picked up on what led to my most embarrassing moment

0:26:26.396 --> 0:26:30.596
<v Speaker 2>in the whole debate, the Walter Cronkite thing. A AI

0:26:33.956 --> 0:26:37.636
<v Speaker 2>Cronkite was as I'm sure, you know the legendary CBS

0:26:37.636 --> 0:26:41.716
<v Speaker 2>news anchor and wartime correspondent who for decades stood for

0:26:41.796 --> 0:26:46.316
<v Speaker 2>all that was dignified and trustworthy in American journalism. Matt

0:26:46.396 --> 0:26:48.956
<v Speaker 2>Taibi brought him up in his opening statement.

0:26:49.996 --> 0:26:52.796
<v Speaker 3>Once the commercial strategy of the news business was to

0:26:52.796 --> 0:26:56.716
<v Speaker 3>go for the whole audience. A TV news broadcast was

0:26:56.836 --> 0:27:00.116
<v Speaker 3>aired at dinner time, and it was designed to be

0:27:00.196 --> 0:27:04.036
<v Speaker 3>watched by the entire family, everyone from your crazy right

0:27:04.036 --> 0:27:07.516
<v Speaker 3>wing uncle to the sulking lefty teenager in the corner.

0:27:09.436 --> 0:27:12.796
<v Speaker 3>The system had flaws, but making an effort to talk

0:27:12.836 --> 0:27:17.276
<v Speaker 3>to everybody had benefits for one thing, and inspired trust.

0:27:18.916 --> 0:27:23.436
<v Speaker 3>Gallup polls twice twice showed Walter Cronkite to be the

0:27:23.476 --> 0:27:26.836
<v Speaker 3>most trusted person in all of America. That would never

0:27:26.956 --> 0:27:31.076
<v Speaker 3>happen with a news reader today. With the arrival of

0:27:31.076 --> 0:27:34.156
<v Speaker 3>the Internet, some outlets found that instead of going after

0:27:34.196 --> 0:27:38.036
<v Speaker 3>the whole audience, it made more financial sense to pick

0:27:38.076 --> 0:27:41.356
<v Speaker 3>one demographic and try to dominate it. How do you

0:27:41.436 --> 0:27:44.396
<v Speaker 3>do that? That's easy. You just pick an audience and

0:27:44.436 --> 0:27:48.516
<v Speaker 3>feed it news you know they'll like. Instead of starting

0:27:48.516 --> 0:27:51.596
<v Speaker 3>with a story and following the facts, you start with

0:27:51.636 --> 0:27:55.796
<v Speaker 3>what pleases your audience and work backward to the story.

0:27:56.396 --> 0:28:03.036
<v Speaker 2>Back when we had Cronkite, the system worked. I heard that,

0:28:03.196 --> 0:28:07.196
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, give me an effing break. So when

0:28:07.236 --> 0:28:11.596
<v Speaker 2>it was my turn, I responded, I was greatly amused

0:28:11.636 --> 0:28:14.476
<v Speaker 2>by the affection Matt Tabby has for the age of

0:28:14.556 --> 0:28:17.316
<v Speaker 2>Walter Cronkite, which he seemed to hold up as a

0:28:17.356 --> 0:28:21.156
<v Speaker 2>kind of golden moment. In that moment, the mainstream media

0:28:21.316 --> 0:28:26.956
<v Speaker 2>was pipulated entirely by white men from elite schools. Why

0:28:27.036 --> 0:28:30.796
<v Speaker 2>you would have had such affection and say that's the

0:28:31.076 --> 0:28:34.796
<v Speaker 2>gold standard and we should trust the mainstream media precisely

0:28:34.836 --> 0:28:37.836
<v Speaker 2>at the moment when the mainstream media is least representative.

0:28:38.276 --> 0:28:42.036
<v Speaker 2>Is really puzzling to me. Then Douglas Murray chimed in, of.

0:28:41.956 --> 0:28:46.276
<v Speaker 4>Course, Malcolm, you did a little nasty jab there by

0:28:46.356 --> 0:28:49.076
<v Speaker 4>trying to pretend that Matt Tabi is desperate for the

0:28:49.116 --> 0:28:53.556
<v Speaker 4>era of white men in broadcasting. Takes a certain hutzpur

0:28:53.836 --> 0:28:54.836
<v Speaker 4>to make that claim.

0:28:55.636 --> 0:28:58.716
<v Speaker 2>Tabe then defended himself, and.

0:28:58.756 --> 0:29:03.756
<v Speaker 3>Yes, as I said in my speech, the old system

0:29:03.876 --> 0:29:06.676
<v Speaker 3>under Walter Cronkite had its flaws, but it did have

0:29:06.796 --> 0:29:10.716
<v Speaker 3>its advantages as well. Making the effort to talk to

0:29:10.756 --> 0:29:15.356
<v Speaker 3>everybody garner more trust in the public. There is a

0:29:15.396 --> 0:29:19.956
<v Speaker 3>reason why people trusted newspeople more twenty or thirty or

0:29:19.956 --> 0:29:21.476
<v Speaker 3>forty years ago than they do now.

0:29:21.676 --> 0:29:25.356
<v Speaker 2>And once again I got irritated, this time with that

0:29:25.396 --> 0:29:29.156
<v Speaker 2>phrase making the effort to talk to everyone I just

0:29:29.196 --> 0:29:31.196
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do. Make a short list of the people

0:29:31.476 --> 0:29:34.956
<v Speaker 2>who were not spoken to by journalists in the nineteen

0:29:34.996 --> 0:29:38.836
<v Speaker 2>fifties and sixties. And you may want to add some

0:29:38.956 --> 0:29:43.676
<v Speaker 2>if I miss some black people, a.

0:29:43.676 --> 0:29:54.276
<v Speaker 11>Women, poor people, gay people, people with mildly left wing views.

0:29:54.396 --> 0:30:01.316
<v Speaker 11>I mean, words fell me when somebody, when it presented

0:30:01.356 --> 0:30:05.916
<v Speaker 11>with a critique of his rather adiosyncratic position on Walter Cronkite,

0:30:06.076 --> 0:30:09.076
<v Speaker 11>comes back and says, oh no, no, no, there's more

0:30:09.236 --> 0:30:12.236
<v Speaker 11>or to my great love of this man. So I'm

0:30:12.276 --> 0:30:15.316
<v Speaker 11>on my high horse, waiting my work flag standing up

0:30:15.356 --> 0:30:19.276
<v Speaker 11>for inclusion. But wait, first, back to less than one.

0:30:19.716 --> 0:30:21.196
<v Speaker 11>Don't be myself.

0:30:21.556 --> 0:30:25.156
<v Speaker 2>It's not smart. But that's not even the worst of it.

0:30:25.756 --> 0:30:27.796
<v Speaker 10>Do you remember the context in which Matt brought that

0:30:27.836 --> 0:30:28.916
<v Speaker 10>comment up in his opening?

0:30:30.236 --> 0:30:36.036
<v Speaker 2>It was he was me talking about how that was

0:30:36.076 --> 0:30:41.196
<v Speaker 2>an example the way it was back then was worthy

0:30:41.196 --> 0:30:43.036
<v Speaker 2>of our trust. And it's not like that anymore.

0:30:43.076 --> 0:30:46.116
<v Speaker 10>You Remember why what he was saying in his opening

0:30:46.676 --> 0:30:49.836
<v Speaker 10>was not I am lifting up the nineteen fifties as

0:30:49.836 --> 0:30:52.716
<v Speaker 10>the golden standard of media and Walter Prava blah. Yes,

0:30:52.716 --> 0:30:54.396
<v Speaker 10>that sentencement came out of his mouth, but that's not

0:30:54.436 --> 0:30:56.956
<v Speaker 10>what he was saying. What he was saying was look

0:30:56.996 --> 0:30:59.876
<v Speaker 10>to the nineteen fifties, look to the past. When you

0:30:59.956 --> 0:31:03.996
<v Speaker 10>had a whole family gathered around the TVs watching one show,

0:31:04.636 --> 0:31:07.476
<v Speaker 10>that show had to talk to all of the people

0:31:07.476 --> 0:31:09.476
<v Speaker 10>in that room, to the parents, to the kids, to

0:31:09.516 --> 0:31:13.716
<v Speaker 10>the grandparents, even if they had different interests, different political ideologies, whatever.

0:31:14.076 --> 0:31:15.316
<v Speaker 9>That one show.

0:31:15.516 --> 0:31:18.516
<v Speaker 10>Had to talk to a diverse audience. It could not

0:31:18.916 --> 0:31:21.876
<v Speaker 10>have an agenda in the same way that it does today,

0:31:22.036 --> 0:31:24.836
<v Speaker 10>because today it's not talking to a whole family. It's

0:31:24.876 --> 0:31:27.636
<v Speaker 10>not even talking to a whole neighborhood or a whole household.

0:31:27.796 --> 0:31:30.556
<v Speaker 10>We all have our individual echo chambers that we lean

0:31:30.636 --> 0:31:31.276
<v Speaker 10>really hard into.

0:31:31.556 --> 0:31:31.716
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:31:32.156 --> 0:31:34.276
<v Speaker 10>What he brought up about Walter Cronkite and about the

0:31:34.316 --> 0:31:37.476
<v Speaker 10>nineteen fifties was just a detail.

0:31:37.476 --> 0:31:41.076
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see. Deco's point was that the people in

0:31:41.116 --> 0:31:45.116
<v Speaker 2>the audience, the judges, surely understood what Taibi was saying,

0:31:46.036 --> 0:31:47.756
<v Speaker 2>But I didn't.

0:31:47.596 --> 0:31:51.236
<v Speaker 12>The main point there was totally ignored, and it was

0:31:51.276 --> 0:31:54.036
<v Speaker 12>a really important point for the af offense because their

0:31:54.076 --> 0:31:58.196
<v Speaker 12>whole argument was you can't trust mainstream media because there

0:31:58.196 --> 0:31:59.756
<v Speaker 12>are agendas, because.

0:31:59.476 --> 0:32:01.796
<v Speaker 10>They're not trying to give you the truth. They're trying

0:32:01.836 --> 0:32:03.836
<v Speaker 10>to give you the spin and the story and cater

0:32:03.956 --> 0:32:06.996
<v Speaker 10>to a They call it demographic hunting. I think right

0:32:07.156 --> 0:32:09.116
<v Speaker 10>that they're catering to a specific demographic.

0:32:09.596 --> 0:32:14.116
<v Speaker 2>The Crownkite bit was a provocation waved in front of

0:32:14.156 --> 0:32:17.676
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Gladwell that sent him charging off in the wrong direction.

0:32:17.956 --> 0:32:20.636
<v Speaker 10>It was like a distractor thrown in there that worked,

0:32:20.716 --> 0:32:23.876
<v Speaker 10>and you got totally distracted and went down this whole

0:32:24.036 --> 0:32:26.316
<v Speaker 10>rabbit hole and missed that bigger picture.

0:32:26.676 --> 0:32:38.756
<v Speaker 2>Where did I do anything? Well, no, not really remember

0:32:38.756 --> 0:32:39.996
<v Speaker 2>what Douglas Murray said.

0:32:40.756 --> 0:32:45.356
<v Speaker 4>It's so strange hearing you debate, Malcolm because you listen

0:32:45.436 --> 0:32:46.996
<v Speaker 4>to nothing that your opponents said.

0:32:49.996 --> 0:32:54.116
<v Speaker 2>Turns out he was right. And that was when Deco

0:32:54.276 --> 0:32:57.436
<v Speaker 2>told me I had to come to Brooklyn again for

0:32:57.556 --> 0:33:13.156
<v Speaker 2>listening lessons. I met with the Debate League at Unity Prep,

0:33:13.556 --> 0:33:17.396
<v Speaker 2>a charter high school in Williamsburg. I sat myself down

0:33:17.516 --> 0:33:20.156
<v Speaker 2>in a high school classroom for the first time since

0:33:20.156 --> 0:33:25.436
<v Speaker 2>the late nineteen seventies, Deca, Jonathan, and Sisan were all there,

0:33:25.956 --> 0:33:28.756
<v Speaker 2>along with a dozen or so high school debaters. There

0:33:28.796 --> 0:33:31.876
<v Speaker 2>was a step class in the adjoining room. I was

0:33:31.916 --> 0:33:34.236
<v Speaker 2>a long way from Roy Thompson Hall.

0:33:34.316 --> 0:33:39.596
<v Speaker 7>All right, open for him, look up. Being able to

0:33:39.636 --> 0:33:42.236
<v Speaker 7>listen is the most important skill a debater should have.

0:33:42.956 --> 0:33:46.436
<v Speaker 7>All right, stand up. You know the routine. If you agree,

0:33:46.436 --> 0:33:48.396
<v Speaker 7>you on this side. If you disagree, you on that side.

0:33:48.756 --> 0:33:49.716
<v Speaker 7>Come on, come on.

0:33:49.796 --> 0:33:53.196
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan kicked things off with a warm up exercise, open

0:33:53.276 --> 0:33:56.076
<v Speaker 2>for him, a mini debate on the question of the day.

0:33:56.596 --> 0:34:00.156
<v Speaker 2>What's more important to a debater being a good listener

0:34:00.836 --> 0:34:01.716
<v Speaker 2>or a good talker?

0:34:02.276 --> 0:34:04.956
<v Speaker 7>Agree is always over here, Disagree is always over there. Thanks.

0:34:06.276 --> 0:34:10.076
<v Speaker 7>Being able to listen, I'm so sorry. Being able to listen,

0:34:10.076 --> 0:34:13.476
<v Speaker 7>it's the most important skill that debata could have. Being

0:34:13.556 --> 0:34:15.676
<v Speaker 7>able to listen is the most important skill.

0:34:17.516 --> 0:34:19.996
<v Speaker 8>Is UH one of the most important skills in debating

0:34:20.116 --> 0:34:25.196
<v Speaker 8>because the way the way people read UH read their contentions,

0:34:25.196 --> 0:34:26.716
<v Speaker 8>and at some points you wouldn't be able to gain

0:34:26.876 --> 0:34:28.996
<v Speaker 8>gain and obtain as much information as you can to

0:34:28.996 --> 0:34:31.356
<v Speaker 8>put down in your blow chart. Because debating is not

0:34:31.356 --> 0:34:34.156
<v Speaker 8>only about using information against information, but it's also about

0:34:34.276 --> 0:34:37.836
<v Speaker 8>obtaining It's also about obtaining something and understanding that in

0:34:37.916 --> 0:34:41.636
<v Speaker 8>order to use information to fight it.

0:34:41.756 --> 0:34:44.316
<v Speaker 13>Welly, I do vo, I do agree with what you said.

0:34:44.436 --> 0:34:47.396
<v Speaker 13>I just feel like you can be a good listener.

0:34:47.596 --> 0:34:50.476
<v Speaker 13>But what it really takes is when you have confidence

0:34:50.596 --> 0:34:54.636
<v Speaker 13>and you basically pretend like you know your stuff.

0:34:54.716 --> 0:34:57.716
<v Speaker 14>But you also said you have to listen to your opponent.

0:34:57.996 --> 0:35:01.436
<v Speaker 14>So that's also a very important skill to listen to

0:35:01.476 --> 0:35:03.156
<v Speaker 14>your opponent, cause if you don't listen to it and

0:35:03.236 --> 0:35:05.556
<v Speaker 14>you just drawing stuff down, you might say the wrong

0:35:05.596 --> 0:35:07.556
<v Speaker 14>things or write down the wrong things to what your

0:35:07.556 --> 0:35:10.036
<v Speaker 14>opponent is saying. So I'm saying and that listener is

0:35:10.076 --> 0:35:13.956
<v Speaker 14>more important because, as my other teammate said Jade, she

0:35:14.116 --> 0:35:18.236
<v Speaker 14>also referred to how they read their contentions or their

0:35:18.276 --> 0:35:20.956
<v Speaker 14>sub points. They read fast, and if you can't catch

0:35:20.996 --> 0:35:23.276
<v Speaker 14>those points, then you're not gonna know what you gotta

0:35:23.316 --> 0:35:25.476
<v Speaker 14>write or what you gotta focus on.

0:35:25.716 --> 0:35:28.036
<v Speaker 8>Can I say something real fully? Yes, I have something

0:35:28.036 --> 0:35:33.436
<v Speaker 8>for all the output all accurate A Jay, To start

0:35:33.476 --> 0:35:34.836
<v Speaker 8>with what you said, you need to write in order

0:35:34.916 --> 0:35:36.836
<v Speaker 8>to you need to write in order to listen. But

0:35:37.116 --> 0:35:39.156
<v Speaker 8>it is true that that is true. But you but

0:35:39.276 --> 0:35:41.956
<v Speaker 8>Listening is a prerequisite to writing, because you can write

0:35:41.956 --> 0:35:43.636
<v Speaker 8>a whole but of nonsense. But what if you don't

0:35:43.636 --> 0:35:45.596
<v Speaker 8>have to write accurate information you didn't listen to the

0:35:45.676 --> 0:35:47.796
<v Speaker 8>right numbers, you listen to the racisistics, then what is

0:35:47.836 --> 0:35:48.556
<v Speaker 8>your writing have to do?

0:35:48.716 --> 0:35:49.076
<v Speaker 2>Anything?

0:35:49.196 --> 0:35:51.796
<v Speaker 8>I can sit there and draw up a ferry, but

0:35:51.916 --> 0:35:54.436
<v Speaker 8>that's not going to make my argument any better unless

0:35:54.436 --> 0:35:54.796
<v Speaker 8>you listen.

0:35:55.116 --> 0:35:56.276
<v Speaker 2>Then the hard part began.

0:35:56.756 --> 0:35:57.516
<v Speaker 9>What is this thing?

0:35:57.676 --> 0:35:59.996
<v Speaker 2>This wasn't Someone was standing at the front of the room.

0:36:00.476 --> 0:36:03.876
<v Speaker 2>He told us he would simulate a debate. Our job

0:36:03.996 --> 0:36:07.476
<v Speaker 2>was to keep track of every argument he made. In

0:36:07.556 --> 0:36:11.196
<v Speaker 2>the debate world. This is called flowing. Sassan said. He

0:36:11.196 --> 0:36:12.996
<v Speaker 2>would try and make it easier on us. So we're

0:36:12.996 --> 0:36:15.556
<v Speaker 2>going to do a game with playing cards where.

0:36:15.516 --> 0:36:20.036
<v Speaker 9>I am going to say the name of a card

0:36:20.556 --> 0:36:24.196
<v Speaker 9>in a deck of cards, and you are going to

0:36:24.276 --> 0:36:26.396
<v Speaker 9>flow it like it's a speech. So you're going to

0:36:26.436 --> 0:36:29.756
<v Speaker 9>make a column. So if you have a sheet of

0:36:29.796 --> 0:36:33.196
<v Speaker 9>paper and we have notebooks for you, you're going to

0:36:33.276 --> 0:36:38.436
<v Speaker 9>want five columns, and in this first column, top to bottom,

0:36:38.676 --> 0:36:42.116
<v Speaker 9>you are going to write the cards that I'm going

0:36:42.156 --> 0:36:44.596
<v Speaker 9>to say out loud. You're gonna want to listen carefully

0:36:44.636 --> 0:36:47.636
<v Speaker 9>because I'm not going to repeat anything. The test is

0:36:47.676 --> 0:36:49.516
<v Speaker 9>to see whether you're going to be able to write

0:36:49.556 --> 0:36:51.196
<v Speaker 9>it all down without missing anything.

0:36:52.036 --> 0:36:54.596
<v Speaker 2>Now, if you think this sounds like a silly exercise,

0:36:54.876 --> 0:36:57.916
<v Speaker 2>I encourage you to pause this podcast, get a pen

0:36:57.956 --> 0:36:59.956
<v Speaker 2>and paper and try it for yourself.

0:37:03.356 --> 0:37:07.596
<v Speaker 9>Ready, Hello, my name is Sasan and I'll be speaking

0:37:07.596 --> 0:37:10.996
<v Speaker 9>on the affirmative today. My first argument is the three

0:37:11.116 --> 0:37:13.956
<v Speaker 9>of hearts, and we know that's true because of the

0:37:13.996 --> 0:37:16.476
<v Speaker 9>four of diamonds. And you can't forget about the jack

0:37:16.676 --> 0:37:19.316
<v Speaker 9>of spades. You know, a lot of people tell me

0:37:19.756 --> 0:37:23.836
<v Speaker 9>ten of diamonds, but what those people don't realize is,

0:37:24.036 --> 0:37:28.476
<v Speaker 9>first off, ace of hearts, secondly the six of clubs,

0:37:28.796 --> 0:37:31.156
<v Speaker 9>and finally the nine of spades.

0:37:34.396 --> 0:37:34.836
<v Speaker 7>That's it.

0:37:34.916 --> 0:37:40.596
<v Speaker 9>That's the speech, So you should have these written down. Okay, great,

0:37:41.076 --> 0:37:46.876
<v Speaker 9>now we're going to do the negative speech. Switchbank color.

0:37:49.876 --> 0:37:52.476
<v Speaker 9>All right, I'm the negative and I disagree with everything

0:37:52.516 --> 0:37:55.716
<v Speaker 9>that guy said. He says three of hearts more like

0:37:55.836 --> 0:37:59.116
<v Speaker 9>the seven of diamonds. You know, people like to talk

0:37:59.116 --> 0:38:01.796
<v Speaker 9>about Jack of spades, but what they don't realize is

0:38:01.956 --> 0:38:05.916
<v Speaker 9>king of hearts. Ton of diamonds is okay, if you

0:38:05.956 --> 0:38:09.316
<v Speaker 9>don't remember that the Ace of Spades is there, and

0:38:09.356 --> 0:38:12.116
<v Speaker 9>as far as the Ace of Hearts goes, more like

0:38:12.156 --> 0:38:16.156
<v Speaker 9>the two of hearts. Finally, they brought up the nine

0:38:16.196 --> 0:38:20.316
<v Speaker 9>of spades, nine of spades, nine of seriously, because have

0:38:20.396 --> 0:38:24.556
<v Speaker 9>you never heard of the Queen of clubs? That's my

0:38:24.716 --> 0:38:27.956
<v Speaker 9>old speech. And I'm maybe unnecessarily aggressive here.

0:38:32.756 --> 0:38:36.116
<v Speaker 2>How did I do? I was terrible. I could keep

0:38:36.196 --> 0:38:38.676
<v Speaker 2>up for the first minute or so. Then I fell behind.

0:38:39.036 --> 0:38:43.876
<v Speaker 2>I miss things. Sisan gets up and talks about playing cards,

0:38:44.276 --> 0:38:45.196
<v Speaker 2>and I can't keep up.

0:38:45.796 --> 0:38:50.956
<v Speaker 7>I got I have a question for you? Is this hard? Oh? Yeah,

0:38:51.156 --> 0:38:52.196
<v Speaker 7>people have a question for you.

0:38:52.316 --> 0:38:52.676
<v Speaker 1>Is this hard?

0:38:53.036 --> 0:38:53.556
<v Speaker 13>Really hard?

0:38:53.756 --> 0:38:56.516
<v Speaker 7>This is really hard? And you guys are doing amazing.

0:38:56.556 --> 0:38:59.116
<v Speaker 7>I'll see it all over your face. This is frustrated.

0:38:59.276 --> 0:39:00.796
<v Speaker 7>You don't supposed to be an expert. I don't even

0:39:00.836 --> 0:39:02.356
<v Speaker 7>know what you said half the tom, and I'm been

0:39:02.356 --> 0:39:03.636
<v Speaker 7>doing this for a long tom. Alright.

0:39:03.836 --> 0:39:05.876
<v Speaker 2>This is what happened to me during the month debate.

0:39:06.596 --> 0:39:09.396
<v Speaker 2>I was taking notes, but I didn't know how to

0:39:09.436 --> 0:39:12.596
<v Speaker 2>take notes, So when Murray twisted the terms of the debate,

0:39:12.956 --> 0:39:15.836
<v Speaker 2>I just missed it. And when Tybee made that reference

0:39:15.876 --> 0:39:19.196
<v Speaker 2>to Walter Cronkite, I heard the name cronkite, but I

0:39:19.236 --> 0:39:23.356
<v Speaker 2>missed the context. Am I making excuses for myself? Of

0:39:23.396 --> 0:39:26.596
<v Speaker 2>course I am. But what debate tells us is that

0:39:26.596 --> 0:39:29.436
<v Speaker 2>the failure to listen is not a failure of will

0:39:29.916 --> 0:39:34.196
<v Speaker 2>or motivation or character. That's what we assume when there's

0:39:34.236 --> 0:39:38.276
<v Speaker 2>some breakdown in communication. If someone doesn't listen, we assume

0:39:38.716 --> 0:39:41.476
<v Speaker 2>they don't want to listen. We hear the yelling and

0:39:41.516 --> 0:39:44.076
<v Speaker 2>screaming on the internet, and we see it as evidence

0:39:44.316 --> 0:39:48.036
<v Speaker 2>of some great flaw in our society. But maybe, at

0:39:48.156 --> 0:39:50.676
<v Speaker 2>least some of the time, the person who doesn't listen

0:39:50.756 --> 0:39:53.716
<v Speaker 2>acts that way because they don't know how to listen.

0:39:54.276 --> 0:39:58.436
<v Speaker 2>They haven't practiced, they don't know where to start. Listening

0:39:58.876 --> 0:40:01.876
<v Speaker 2>is a skill like playing the piano or learning to cook.

0:40:02.476 --> 0:40:04.756
<v Speaker 2>I ask us, on how long would it take me

0:40:04.836 --> 0:40:07.516
<v Speaker 2>to listen the way he does, to learn how to flow?

0:40:08.116 --> 0:40:10.316
<v Speaker 9>I think if you really focus on it, a school year,

0:40:10.556 --> 0:40:14.036
<v Speaker 9>I think to be really comfortable with it, probably like

0:40:14.036 --> 0:40:18.076
<v Speaker 9>two school years. Yeah, yeah, and that's half of your

0:40:18.316 --> 0:40:22.036
<v Speaker 9>college competitive career, that's half of your high school competitive career.

0:40:24.436 --> 0:40:28.876
<v Speaker 2>A long time. But imagine if we did it, if

0:40:28.876 --> 0:40:32.236
<v Speaker 2>we all went to debate school, learn those lessons we're

0:40:32.276 --> 0:40:34.476
<v Speaker 2>able to say to ourselves in the middle of a

0:40:34.476 --> 0:40:38.636
<v Speaker 2>heated argument, this isn't about me. Learned how to avoid

0:40:38.676 --> 0:40:42.916
<v Speaker 2>Walter Cronkite's sized rabbit holes. Understood the debating is not

0:40:42.996 --> 0:40:51.556
<v Speaker 2>the art of talking, it's the art of listening. Oh

0:40:51.596 --> 0:40:54.076
<v Speaker 2>and maybe the most important lesson of all. Do you

0:40:54.116 --> 0:40:55.956
<v Speaker 2>know what they teach you to do at the Brooklyn

0:40:55.956 --> 0:40:59.876
<v Speaker 2>Debate League After the debate is over, after one side

0:40:59.876 --> 0:41:01.636
<v Speaker 2>has lost and the other has won.

0:41:03.276 --> 0:41:05.036
<v Speaker 7>All right, you guys, go to culture, tell each other

0:41:05.316 --> 0:41:06.716
<v Speaker 7>compliment why we love each other?

0:41:06.796 --> 0:41:09.076
<v Speaker 8>Go go go compliment?

0:41:09.476 --> 0:41:11.556
<v Speaker 7>Who shout out? Shout out, and.

0:41:11.556 --> 0:41:14.476
<v Speaker 2>All around the room the debaters shouted out happily to

0:41:14.556 --> 0:41:16.516
<v Speaker 2>each other. The idea of how do you just look

0:41:16.516 --> 0:41:16.956
<v Speaker 2>to that attitude?

0:41:16.956 --> 0:41:19.156
<v Speaker 8>Because attitude is in that one word believe is a

0:41:19.316 --> 0:41:22.116
<v Speaker 8>really strong word to use, which gave you such a

0:41:22.116 --> 0:41:23.836
<v Speaker 8>good lead may some arguments.

0:41:23.876 --> 0:41:25.716
<v Speaker 13>And I love how you be coming in like you

0:41:25.756 --> 0:41:28.556
<v Speaker 13>know what, your what your presence, like you're gonna clear

0:41:29.036 --> 0:41:31.076
<v Speaker 13>you know. So then it amps me up, Like when

0:41:31.076 --> 0:41:33.436
<v Speaker 13>you have like that attitude, it amps me up and

0:41:33.476 --> 0:41:34.716
<v Speaker 13>it makes me want to clear too.

0:41:34.876 --> 0:41:38.636
<v Speaker 9>So I like that.

0:41:41.716 --> 0:41:46.756
<v Speaker 2>Matt and Doug my Monk debate antagonists. I appreciate you

0:41:47.236 --> 0:41:50.196
<v Speaker 2>for forcing me to take what was spoiled and give

0:41:50.236 --> 0:41:56.156
<v Speaker 2>it new life. Now, one last question. So I I

0:41:56.196 --> 0:41:58.836
<v Speaker 2>approached you with this because, as I said, I had

0:41:58.836 --> 0:42:03.076
<v Speaker 2>this disastrous experience with the Monk debate, and I so

0:42:03.156 --> 0:42:05.356
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to use this opportunity to learn to be

0:42:05.396 --> 0:42:08.076
<v Speaker 2>a better debater. Do you think this is typical of me?

0:42:08.196 --> 0:42:12.036
<v Speaker 2>That I would am I a take spoil make style

0:42:12.236 --> 0:42:12.876
<v Speaker 2>kind of person.

0:42:12.956 --> 0:42:17.796
<v Speaker 5>In your mind, you are such a highly successful person

0:42:18.276 --> 0:42:22.436
<v Speaker 5>that one would not associate with you many occasions in

0:42:22.476 --> 0:42:24.716
<v Speaker 5>which you needed to do that.

0:42:24.716 --> 0:42:26.356
<v Speaker 2>That's just a much the fact that you.

0:42:28.076 --> 0:42:29.196
<v Speaker 5>I beg your pardon, I.

0:42:29.116 --> 0:42:31.556
<v Speaker 2>Said, that's just a mother speaking you. You will not

0:42:31.596 --> 0:42:34.476
<v Speaker 2>admit to any frailty on the part of your sons.

0:42:35.356 --> 0:42:38.756
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, not only that I'm not aware of them,

0:42:38.796 --> 0:42:42.236
<v Speaker 5>but so so much. But the fact that you have

0:42:42.796 --> 0:42:49.316
<v Speaker 5>risen above in this is remarkable way justifies my my

0:42:49.436 --> 0:42:51.556
<v Speaker 5>faith in you and my confidence in you.

0:42:52.116 --> 0:43:09.076
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's what I meant by maternal reassurance. Revision says

0:43:09.116 --> 0:43:12.316
<v Speaker 2>Street is produced by ben Ada F. Hafrey, Leeman gistdou

0:43:12.676 --> 0:43:16.556
<v Speaker 2>Kiera Powell, and Jacob Smith. Fact checking by Kashaw Williams

0:43:16.596 --> 0:43:19.716
<v Speaker 2>and Tolly Emlin. We are edited by Julia Barton and

0:43:19.756 --> 0:43:24.196
<v Speaker 2>Peter Clowney. Original scoring by Luis Garra, mastering by Sarah Bruguier,

0:43:24.556 --> 0:43:29.716
<v Speaker 2>and engineering by Nina Lawrence. Twitter taunting by Nina Lawrence, Leeman, Gistou,

0:43:29.956 --> 0:43:34.236
<v Speaker 2>Justin Richmond, Ben Holliday, Emily Vaughan, and David jaw Special

0:43:34.276 --> 0:43:38.276
<v Speaker 2>thanks to the Unity Preparatory Charter School and Brooklyn Debate League.

0:43:38.796 --> 0:43:41.756
<v Speaker 2>If you're curious about the league and the fantastic coaches

0:43:41.796 --> 0:43:45.316
<v Speaker 2>behind it, keep an eye out for Jonathan Conyer's's forthcoming

0:43:45.356 --> 0:43:49.876
<v Speaker 2>memoir I Wasn't supposed to be here out this September.

0:43:50.516 --> 0:43:55.316
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan has incredible stories to tell, most of all special

0:43:55.316 --> 0:44:02.916
<v Speaker 2>thanks to my mom, Joyce Scleppo. I'm hersa