WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Shutdown, SBF, UK Politics

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>anchors all around the world. Straight ahead on the program,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a jobs report or maybe not, we get a preview

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of what to expect. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hepe. You here in London, where we're looking

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>ahead to the UK's party political conferences.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Kaylie Lyons, getting ready to make the trip from

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Washington to New York for the start of the trial

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 3>of Sam Bankman Freed.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Prisner, the first woman to lead the Reserve

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Bank of Australia, will guide a decision on interest rates

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 4>this week.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, the business

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 5>news you need to wrap up your week in just

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 5>one fifteen minute podcast available on Apple, Spotify, The Bloomberg

0:00:48.600 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Business Appen everywhere you get your podcasts.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Who I'm Tom Busby. We begin today's program with a

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the September jobs report coming out this Friday

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>or is it. With the government shut down, a lot

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of data critical to Wall Street investors will not be

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>released until a bill, even a short term stopgap bill

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to fund the federal government is passed. To talk about

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>what we can expect with Washington and to stand still,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we welcome Bloomberg International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee. Michael,

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.839
<v Speaker 6>Happy to be here. At least I'm here.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's right. Someone's working well, Michael, we've all

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>been here before. Twenty government shutdown since nineteen seventy seven,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the latest one thirty five days long. That was in

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>late twenty eighteen. It's horrible, but let's talk. Let's start

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>with what is not affected. Social Security and the Postal Service.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 7>Right right, well, and Medicare goes forward. The programs that

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 7>our entitlements are funded separately from all of this. There

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 7>is no mechanism to reauthorize them, so they will go out.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 7>The problem is if enough people at the Social Security

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 7>Administration come in to lick.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 6>The stamps, I guess.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 7>But the Postal Service is also self funded. The Federal

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 7>Reserve will be open because they are self funded, so

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 7>not everything is closed, and most parts of the government

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 7>that the public would interact with will be closed, although

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 7>there are exceptions for workers in what they call public

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 7>safety facing or jobs like air traffic controllers.

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 6>People like that.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's I think that's a good thing. But there

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are nearly three million workers who will be out of

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>work or told to stay.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 7>Home essentially, whether it's just over two point nine million

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 7>federal workers and about the guess is eight hundred thousand

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 7>or so will be told to stay home. Others will

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 7>come to work but will not get paid. Now that

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 7>includes one point three members of the active duty military

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 7>who are going to be putting their lives on the

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 7>line for you for free for the time being. Now,

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 7>everybody gets paid according to law that was actually adopted

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 7>after that last government shutdown. It was customary before. Now

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 7>it's a law that back pay is made up, so

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 7>they will get paid eventually. But it does create a

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 7>hardship for all those people because they have to tell

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 7>the credit card company, I don't have the money this month.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 6>I'll have it maybe next month.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, call me next month. I mean, that's a lot

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of spending power as we enter the fourth quarter of

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people who and these people need that money.

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's a problem for the economy if it goes

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 7>that long. I'm not the political correspondent in Washington these days,

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 7>but there does seem to be a feeling that this

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 7>one could be longer than the ones in the past,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 7>and if that's the case, then you have an issue

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 7>for the economy. Now, what we find in the past

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 7>is that most of that is made up right away

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 7>because people get their back.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Pay and they go out and spend the things.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 7>The people who get hurt are the people who might say,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 7>run a restaurant or something like that because you don't

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 7>have money, you're not going to go out to dinner.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 7>Well you can't redo that dinner because the day is passed.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 6>So there will be hardships around the country.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 7>And one of the things that people don't realize is

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 7>that the federal government has spread all over These two

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 7>point nine million people are in every fifty states, every

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 7>one of the fifty states. They're all across the country,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 7>so you'll feel it in your own state.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's also you know, like you say, the restaurant

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>right outside Elgin Air Force Base, you know, the store

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>right outside where everybody gets you know.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 7>One of the big problems, of course we laugh about it,

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 7>is that they always close the national parks because that

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 7>provides a sign that says closed that the TV people

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 7>can take a picture of and represent the shutdown. But

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 7>there are a lot of tourist businesses outside of national

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 7>parks that.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 6>Will be in trouble. And in California they're talking.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 7>About using some of the money that they get from

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 7>a state lottery to keep some of those places open

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 7>because they will be in trouble if this goes on

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 7>for a long time.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a real hardship for a lot of business owners,

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not congress members, though they still get paid.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 7>Congress members get paid, and the President gets paid because

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 7>there are constitutional provisions that would keep them from.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 6>Not getting paid.

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 7>But everybody else at the White House and all the

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 7>staffers on Capitol Hill are not getting paid. The interesting

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 7>thing about the law time too, is that people can't volunteer.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 7>You're not allowed to volunteer to work for free. If

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 7>they send you home, your home.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Your home, that's it, and you'll wait until it's over.

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Until it's over. Let's talk about how this could impact

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street investors and the economy. And let's talk about

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>we'll start with Wall Street.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 7>The SEC. You know there's going to be well, the SEC.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 7>Most of their work will shut down. You'll still be

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 7>able to if you have to file, You'll still be

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 7>able to upload files to Edgar and so that work

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 7>will go on, but there won't be anybody in the

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 7>office at the SEC, and so a lot of their

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 7>enforcement stuff will go by the boards for.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 6>The time being.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 7>If you want to get a passport, you're not going

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 7>to be able to do that while it's shut down

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 7>or anything like that. Government records will not.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Be accessible if you need to get.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 7>Your military retirement or a new Medicaid care card or

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 7>something like that. So a lot of things that are

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 7>sort of day to day mundane things won't be happening,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 7>and that'll start to build up some frustration. But history

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 7>shows Wall Street tends to overlook all of this, and

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 7>the last two, which were the longest ones that we've

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 7>had shutdowns, the market's finished up from the time that

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 7>they shut down to the time that they reopened. So

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of the figure this is a temporary thing

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 7>that won't last. If it lasts longer, then maybe you

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 7>do have an effect because investors start thinking that consumers

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 7>aren't going to be able to spend as much money,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 7>and corporate profits go down.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Big concern. Also, I mean there's some critical data coming out.

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's always coming out from the government, But

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>next week, you know, including the biggie, the jobs report,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and after a very dismal I would say September for

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the markets, I mean investors accounting on some of this

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out, but we may not see.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 6>We may not see it.

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 7>All of the September data after today is in, and

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 7>they could release it on time if they got a

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 7>quick deal, or they could release it with only a

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 7>few days delay if they don't, but still get settled

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 7>in the coming way. But if it goes longer than that,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 7>then we won't get the jobs report for a while.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 7>You've got the CPI coming up on October twelfth, the

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 7>PCE inflation data on October twenty seventh. Those numbers could

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 7>in theory not come out, and then the FED is

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:21.119
<v Speaker 7>going to be left flying blind at their November first meeting.

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 7>And as one observer said, quite accurately, how are you

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 7>supposed to have a soft landing if the pilots are blind?

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 6>And so for the Fed it'd be difficult.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 7>Probably means that they don't they don't move on November

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 7>first because they might feel they don't have enough data.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 7>All the private sector data comes out, the isms, the ADPs,

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 7>things like that, but the government data will not come out,

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 7>and that could be a problem. And then longer term,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 7>if everybody's off work, then nobody's collecting data. The way

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 7>the jobs numbers work, most of that data would come in.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 7>But inflation data is what a price is on a

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 7>particular date, and if they don't have that, then if

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 7>they don't collected that date, it would be hard to

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 7>backfill it. So we could end up seeing a month

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 7>without without inflation data, which only makes the fed's job

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 7>even harder.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>That's not good, and we've actually gotten some encouraging data

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about inflation.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 7>And yeah, last week. Last week the PCE numbers came

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 7>in very low. The core PC was up only tenth

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 7>of a percent, and on an annualized basis, that would

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 7>be inflation of about one percent for the year. So

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 7>we've had a dramatic drop in the Fed's favorite inflation indicator.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 7>And if that continues, then that may mean the Fed

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 7>is done and may mean the higher for longer longer

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 7>becomes a little shorter.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 6>But the problems we may not know.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>No, and also, jobless claims have been you know, to

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>four to five for a couple of weeks, and we

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that in a while.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's probably going to change because if you're on strike,

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 7>you can't file for job as claims. But if some

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 7>workers at your plant are on strike and that means

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 7>your plant shuts down so you're just furloughed, then you can.

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 7>And so we will probably see distortions start to come

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 7>in that as the UAW strike expands.

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, we got a lot to look forward to and

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot to be worried about. Michael, thank you so much.

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>In coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we look

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>ahead to the UK's political party conferences. I'm Tom Busby

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>our global look ahead of the top stories for investors

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Up later in our program the rise and fall of

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>FTX and a preview of the trial of its founder

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and former CEO, Sam Bankman Freed. But first, the UK

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>has had a turbulent time with four prime ministers in

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>four years and significant economic challenges. Now a general election

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>emerging into view in the next sixteen months, so the

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>annual party political conference season is getting extra attention. Let's

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg Radio anchor Caroline Hepger and Anna Edwards

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in London, with more tom.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.239
<v Speaker 8>Party leaders, activists, press and all sorts of politicos dispersed

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 8>to various cities across the UK in October for these

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 8>annual party conferences. In the next few days, the Conservatives

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 8>gather in Manchester, and Bloomberg Radio will be there to

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 8>cover it all, including the set piece speeches from the

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 8>Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Well ahead of that, we've been speaking to Bloomberg Opinion

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 2>columnist Adrian Wooldridge about why this year may be different,

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 2>what Wooldridge describes as a feeling of profound change in

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the air in Britain, and we began by asking him firstly,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 2>what party conference season is really like.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, it used to be something that was really serious,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 9>particularly on the Labour side, that policy was actually made

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 9>at the party conferences. Now they don't make policy, policies

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 9>made in secret enclaves, but they do so some quite

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 9>important things. One is that they create a certain momentum.

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, if you have a good party conference, that's

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 9>good for you. Another is that they create enthusiasm amongst

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 9>the party base, the people who actually knock on the

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 9>doors do all the work. You know, the party conference

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 9>is fun, you know, you get that, you have hi

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 9>japes and you come away enthused. And it's also a

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 9>sort of talent show. The Prime Minister or the leader

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 9>of the opposition has to prove themselves with their speech

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 9>that matters, and also all the other people who are

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 9>maneuvering for a preferment also have to show their wares.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so a bit of a showcase then, very much.

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 8>When I've been at these conferences and I've been in

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 8>the sort of large rooms, the larger auditory of where

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 8>they're doing these big set piece speeches, it's really interesting

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 8>because they're talking to the converted, so you'd expect there

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 8>to be lots of applause and appreciation, but sometimes there isn't.

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 8>And I wonder this year with some divisions within the

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 8>Conservative Party, what it is that Suna can Hunt really

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 8>have to get across in their speech is to try

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 8>and win the rooms over.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 9>I think what Hunt has to get over is the

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 9>idea that things are on the mend. That's the process

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 9>of mopping up the mess that was left by predecessor

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 9>has gone on and they have a vision for the

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 9>future that it's not just an endless process of cleaning

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 9>up and cutting people's living standards. What reci has to do.

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 9>What Sunak has to do is to introduce himself to

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 9>the party. This is his first party speech and people

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 9>don't have a very clear idea of who he is.

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 9>They know a few cliches about him, but they don't

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 9>have a sense of him as a person. And he

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 9>needs to introduce himself to the party but also to

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 9>the country, both as a person but also somebod who

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 9>has a vision of where we need to go in

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 9>the future, not just five things to be ticked off,

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 9>but a natural vision of the country.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course there's five pleasures from the start of

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>this year about what is going to do with the economy. Okay,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 2>So look, he's not just the Conservatives. The lib Dems

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>have already had their party conference in Born, with the

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>SMP also a significant force in UK politics overall. And

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>then there's Kiss Darma, the Labor Party, very hotly tipped

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 2>in the polls at least for now. What is he

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be focused on at conference.

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 9>We have a sense of who he is because he's

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 9>been around for some time. We know his sort of

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 9>conventional Stade fairly boring, but a decent sort of guy.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 9>And he's more avoiding mistakes than doing anything else. So

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 9>he has to create confidence that he's capable of delivering change,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 9>that he won't give in to the to the left

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 9>of the party, that he's a safe pair of hands,

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 9>and that he knows how to translate his general vision

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 9>of things into a set of policies that might work.

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 9>His great mistake or his great weakness, I think he's

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 9>talked for too long. I mean the last conference speech

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 9>that I ever that I saw of his life life speech,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 9>it was a good speech, as a well written speech,

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 9>but just went on and on and on and on.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 9>You're just waiting for it to end and then you

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 9>start again.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a danger for the whole.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 9>It is, and I think soon next speeches is being

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 9>trailed as being a very long speech. I think that's

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 9>a mistake. You know, this is not North Korea. You

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 9>know we're supposed to We're supposed to have some sort

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 9>of democratic right to a short attention span.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 8>But I'm sure that's somewhere an unwritten constitution. Absolutely, let

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 8>me ask you about comparisons with Blair. As we're talking

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 8>about labor. We did a big piece just this week

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 8>on the Big Take Peace. On comparisons with Blair, there

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 8>are some, but then there's also a very different fiscal

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 8>situation that he'll be inheriting.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 10>I mean, how far do those comparisons get.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 9>Not very far, really, partly because they're very different people.

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean they're both lawyers and they're both middle of

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 9>the road. Tony Blair is more to the right, but

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 9>both sensible politicians. But they're really quite different people. Blair

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 9>was a showman, you know. He you know, he played

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 9>in a rock band at Oxford. He liked as an actor,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 9>he liked to perform. Kir Starmer isn't like that. He

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 9>is somebody who you know, is more of a sort

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 9>of backroom man in some ways. He doesn't like the

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 9>stage naturally.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 10>A lot for a back room man. He's picked a

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 10>lot of front room.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 9>Jobs he has, indeed, But I don't think it's you know,

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 9>he wants power, but I think, and you know, to

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 9>get power you have to do this sort of thing.

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 9>But I think that actually appearing before large groups of

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 9>people is not natural metire in the way that it

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 9>obviously is with Blair. I think the other big difference

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 9>is that the circumstances in nineteen ninety seven were right

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 9>for Blair. They're right for a progressive realignment, both in

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 9>terms of you know, you had a young president of

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 9>the United States with a new set of ideas. You

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 9>had the talk of the Third Way, You had a

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 9>lot of economic room for an sort of expansionist policy.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 9>All of those things don't exist. We have Joe Biden,

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 9>who's not exactly young in the United States, and we

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 9>have a real shortage of money, not very much room

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 9>to do things. So they keep talking, you know, about

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 9>progressive moment or spending forty billion a year on a

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 9>green revolution and things like that, or you know, getting

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 9>rid of not getting rid of but shoving taxes on

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 9>public schools. And then they come backreat, they retreat, they

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 9>keep retreating, and basically, it's not time for a progressive realignment.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 9>It's time for a set of pragmatic policies to deal

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 9>with with with with particular problems.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, no doubt, we'll hear this phrase working people many

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 2>many times, hard working people indeed, and who doesn't want

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 2>to be that? But I've heard it. We hear a

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>lot from the Labor Party. But actually increasingly. I've heard

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 2>that phrase now from the Prime Minister themselves. So this

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 2>seems to be taking on what are working people and

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 2>voters in the UK do you think, you know, in

0:17:58.119 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 2>as far as we can take of reading, what do

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>you think they're thinking about now? Will they pay any

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 2>attention to party conference?

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 9>Well, one of Tony Blair's great statements was that people

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 9>spend about thirty seconds a year thinking about politics. People

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 9>don't think about politics as much as politicians think that

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 9>they do. And also we're getting a general turn off

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 9>from politics at the moment. I just saw the host

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 9>of the Today program, you know, complaining that people were

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 9>just turning off politics because it's too too awful. So

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 9>I think that people are basically worried about their living

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 9>standards and they want somebody to address those living stats

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 9>that they're want inflation to be brought under control. They

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 9>want the price of food to be more reasonable than

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 9>it might seem at the moment, and I think more broadly,

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 9>they want a sense of order in society. And they

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 9>says if you look at politics, this is chaotic. You know,

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 9>things are falling apart. We go through prime ministers like

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 9>some people go through wives it's.

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Well four and four years, yeah, exactly.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 9>It's an incredibly unstable environment, so I think people do

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 9>wants stability in a sense of practical policy, right.

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 8>And one thing we'll be watching for, I suppose as

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 8>the conferences get underway is some of the wedge issues

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 8>that will likely feature in the campaigns towards the next election.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 8>We've heard a bit about net zero from the Conservatives

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 8>and a different take, shall we say on net zero

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 8>around certainly on EV's is this going to be an

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 8>effective wedge issue? Do you think for dividing the population?

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 10>Adrian? Is that is this going to be the one

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 10>that works for the Tories?

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 9>Yes, but I don't think it will work in the

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 9>sense that they'll win the next election. That seems very

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 9>unlikely to me.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 10>Thanks to Bloomberg's Adrian Wooldridge, I'm Anna.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Edwards and I'm Kroin Hepker here in London and you

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak. You're

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 2>at beginning at six am in London. That's one am

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>on Wall Street.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom, Thanks Caroline and Anna, and coming up on Bloomberg

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak weekend. Sam Bankman Freed is import this week we'll

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>get you the latest. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York with your global look

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankmin Freed is accused of orchestrating one of the

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>biggest white collar crime cases in US history this week.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>The trial starts on Tuesday. For what we can expect,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>let's head to our Bloomberg ninety nine to one newsroom

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in Washington and Bloomberg Sound On. Co host Kaylee lines.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Tom, that's right. Next week, I won't be spending

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 3>the whole week here in Washington because there is a

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 3>big event going on in New York City. Sam Bankman Freed,

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the once billionaire founder of FTX, the now fallen crypto exchange,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 3>is going to be on trial. It starts this coming Tuesday.

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Ava Benny Morrison, who's one of our great legal reporters

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>here at Bloomberg, is joining me to talk about this

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>case and what it could mean for Bankman Freed. But first,

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I need to remind everyone about how

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 3>we got here. Remember, Bankman Freed founded FTX in May

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>of twenty nineteen. By October of twenty twenty one, the

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 3>company raised capital out of valuation of twenty five billion dollars,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 3>and at the end of that year it said it

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 3>had more than five million users globally, about one point

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 3>two million of them in the US. By early twenty

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, its valuation was thirty two billion dollars. Sam

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Bankman Freed, who then was just thirty years old, was

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 3>worth more than twenty six billion dollars, making him one

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 3>of the world's riches people, and FTX was one of

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 3>the world's biggest crypto exchanges. But in November of last year,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 3>it unraveled very quickly. It all started with a report

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>from coindesk about Alimeta Research, which was a crypto hedge

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 3>fund also founded by Bankman Freed in twenty seventeen, and

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.479
<v Speaker 3>the article found a significant portion of Alameda's assets were

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 3>made up of FTT, that is a token that FTX created.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 3>In response, cz the CEO of rival crypto exchange Binance,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 3>said he was going to sell his company's entire holding

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 3>of FTT. That triggered a massive wave of withdrawals, sort

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of like a run on the bank, and FTX didn't

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 3>have the fun to meet them, so in a rescue attempt.

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 3>It reached a deal with Finance to sell itself. Binance

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 3>then backed out and so by November eleventh it was over.

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 3>FTX filed for bankruptcy and bankment. Freed resigned as CEO.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Just over a month later, on December thirteenth, Sam Bankman

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Freed was indicted accused of misappropriating billions of dollars at

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the cryptocurrency exchange. And this is where we pick the

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 3>story backup with Ava so Eva. If you will just

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>remind us of the charges that he is facing.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 11>So Sam Bankman Freed is facing seven charges in total.

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 11>He's pleaded not guilty to all of them. Those charges

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 11>include wyre fraud, conspiracy to commit security fraud, and conspiracy

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 11>to commit money laundering. Among them, I'd say wireford is

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 11>the most serious that he faces, each attracting a maximum

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 11>penalty of twenty years in prison.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>So he could spend a lot of time in prison

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 3>for this. If the prosecution is able to prove this right,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 3>what do they needed to prove for him to be

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 3>found guilty.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 11>One of the key elements they need to prove here

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 11>is intent. But Sam Banateman Freed set out to defraud

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 11>people to steal billions of dollars to co mingle customer funds,

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 11>and that he knew what he was doing was wrong.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 11>This will be the biggest hurdle that they have to overcome.

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 11>Sam Bateman Freed will likely turn around and argue that

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 11>he didn't have that intent and that he acted in

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 11>good space and he didn't know that he was inadvertently

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 11>committing fraud. Yeah.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Remembering here that Sam Bankman Freed was someone who practiced

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>what we call effective altruism, or what he called effective altruism,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 3>the idea that he wanted to do good with all

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 3>this money he had. And I wonder how that's going

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 3>to come up over the course of this trial. How

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>long do we expect this trial is going to last,

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>how long it's going to take his defense team to

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 3>make their case and for the prosecution to make theirs.

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 11>The trial is expected to last at around six weeks.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 11>We heard that the prosecution's case could go from three

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 11>to four weeks and the defense will go for a

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 11>week to a week and a half. So we're looking

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 11>into a way into November.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 3>And so when we think about what's going to happen, First,

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 3>as I said, this trial begins this coming Tuesday. What

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 3>happens on that day? How long is it going to

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 3>be before we start getting into the meaty part of

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 3>these proceedings.

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 11>The first day is set aside for a administrative process,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 11>but a very important one. This is when the jury

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 11>will be impaneled. So a whole bunch of everyday New

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 11>Yorkers will come into a big room at the courthouse

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 11>em Lower Manhattan and they will go through the process

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 11>of being appointed to the jury. The prosecution and the

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 11>defense will have the opportunity to object to specific jurors

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 11>being as part of that trial. By the end of

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 11>the day, hopefully we will have a jury of twelve

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 11>men and women who are ready to get things started.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 11>The following day, on the Wednesday, that's when and we'll

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 11>really see all of the duty details start to emerge.

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 11>That's when the prosecution will open their case and we

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 11>will hear the full extent of the allegations against Sam

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 11>Bateman Freed. The defense will also have an opportunity to

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 11>give an opening statement.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to return to your point about the idea

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 3>of selecting this jury. Given the high profile of this case,

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about something that has been dubbed one of

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 3>the biggest financial fraud cases in history. You know, we

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 3>put this kind of in a basket at least in

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 3>common thought with and Ron or Birdy meat Off. How

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>hard is it going to be to select an unbiased jury?

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 11>That's a good question. We got a little bit of

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 11>an insight into the types of questions the defense and

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 11>the prosecutions want to ask this jury. For the defense,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 11>they have asked the judge if the jury can be

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 11>asked certain questions about the crypto industry. Have they ever

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 11>invested in crypto? Have their friends or family been the

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 11>victims of a financial forward before? Do they think that

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 11>a person who is that the head of a company

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 11>should be held responsible if that company fails. There was

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 11>also a question in there about affect of altruism, what's

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 11>their views on a person a massing wealth? And then

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 11>giving that away, So that gives us a little bit

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 11>of an insight into the kind of jura that sat

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 11>Bankman Freed's defense may want to see as part of

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 11>that trial. On the prosecution side, the questions were a

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 11>lot more general. Have they been a victim of the

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 11>crime of a crime? Do they know anyone within the DOJ?

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 11>What are their views on crypto. So I think there's

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 11>been so much publicity about this case, it'll be hard

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 11>to pick someone who hasn't heard of Sam Bankman Freed.

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 11>The challenge will be really drilling down to see if

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 11>anyone has any very strong views that they can't put

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 11>aside on crypto or on fraud that won't allow them

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 11>to be able to carry out that exercise without bias.

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So it might be a little tough to get

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the jury together, But once it is, let's talk about

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 3>what they're going to hear and who they're going to

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>hear from. Talk to me about the witnesses in this case,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 3>because I know that there's three really important ones, former

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 3>really close associate associates of Sam Bankman Fried, former executives

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 3>of FTX and Alameda related enterprises. Tell us why these

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 3>witnesses may be key.

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 11>They are really at the heart of the prosecution's case here,

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 11>and certainly who we are really looking forward to hearing from.

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 11>The three witnesses Caroline Ellison, who was, like you said,

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 11>the head of Alameda, Mishad Singh who was the director

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 11>of engineering at FTX, and Gary Wong, who was Bateman

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 11>Freed's high school friend and helped co found FTX. The

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 11>three of them together are going to give a very

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 11>powerful insight into what was happening at FTX, almost in

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 11>the foundation, but also in those final days before a

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 11>file for bankruptcy. For Nishad Sing and Gary Wong in particular,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 11>they're going to speak about They're likely to speak about

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 11>the code at FTX, and that they were asked to

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 11>change the code to give Alameter a loophole essentially to

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 11>access customer funds whenever it wanted. Caroline Ellison is a

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 11>little bit different in that she was leading Alameda Research,

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 11>and one of the key allegations in this case is

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 11>that Sam Bateman free misled investors about their relationship between

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 11>FTX and Alameter, that Alimeda was using customer funds however

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 11>it wanted for Irish Trading for lowing two executives. So

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:41.239
<v Speaker 11>she'll be able to give a little bit of an

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 11>insight into how that dynamic actually operated. The prosecutors have

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 11>said that they've got up to fifty potential witnesses that

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 11>they could call. Of course, it is highly unlikely that

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 11>they will call every single one of them, but we

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 11>think we're going to hear from other former employees, investor victims,

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 11>FBI agents, and some forensic accountants as well, who will

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 11>try to walk the jury through Alameda's financials, ftx's financials

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 11>to make it this case as simple as possible.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, the eyes of Washington and probably a

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of other places around the world will be on

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 3>New York for this trial beginning this coming week. Thank

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>you very much to Bloomberg Legal reporter Eva, Benni Morrison,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and Tom. We'll send it back to you.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Kaylee. That was Bloomberg's sound on co host

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Kaylee Lines, reporting from our Bloomberg ninety nine to one

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>newsroom in Washington, and you can hear sound on weekdays

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one to three pm on Bloomberg Radio. Coming up here

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we head to Australia and

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>preview what we can expect from the RBA. This is Bloomberg.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, ourk lobal look ahead

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Australia's monthly inflation gauge

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 1>accelerated in August, So what do we expect from the

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>new Reserve Bank of Australia Bank governor at her first

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>board meeting next week. For more, let's go to Bloomberg

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Asia anchor Doug Krisner, Tom.

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 6>And the week ahead.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 4>The new Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, Michelle Bullock,

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 4>will lead her first meeting of the Central Bank. Bullock,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 4>by the way, is the first woman to serve as

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 4>governor of the RBA. She was appointed back in July,

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 4>and like many central bankers around the world, Bullock is

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 4>being confronted with stubbornly high inflation. For a closer look

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 4>now at the RBA decision, I'm joined by James McIntyre,

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:40.719
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's economist covering Australia and New Zealand. James joins us

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 4>from our studios in Sydney. Thanks for being with us, James.

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Before we get to the story on inflation, I want

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 4>to try to apply a little context here, because Bullock

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 4>is taking over from Phil Lowe. Now, he had been

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 4>facing calls to resign in recent months. Before his departure,

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 4>he had been condemned by the public and accused of

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 4>missus leading Australians about future rate increases. Now I know

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Bullock was at the RBA when those decisions were made.

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 4>But I'm wondering whether restoring credibility is kind of job one.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 12>Well, that's a really good point. Not only was Bullock

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 12>at the RBA, but she was actually as Deputy governor,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 12>was at the board meetings, was at those meetings when

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 12>those decisions were made, not only to raise rates as

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 12>they've done in the fastest height tightening cycle in the

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 12>inflation targeting era. So the RBA has been targeting inflation

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 12>since the nineteen nineties more than thirty years now. So

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 12>not only was she there for those rate hype decisions,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 12>but also part of the decision making around that communication

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 12>that ended up tripping up pil Low. Now, it's been

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 12>tough going the last couple of years for central bankers,

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 12>and if you think that your economy might be locked

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 12>up for three years, you know, you could make an

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 12>a credible case that that was going to be the

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 12>where policy might go. But then as the situation changed,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 12>I think fill those a bit tonity make that communication

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 12>change obviously didn't didn't flow or didn't flow in a

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 12>way that people like who really does like interest rates rising,

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 12>especially on their home loans. The way they work here

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 12>in Australia, so that's been what happened to Low and

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 12>it's also the challenge, it's not the only challenge that

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 12>Governor Bullock faces over her term, which lasts for seven years.

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 12>So her first board meeting this coming week, she will

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 12>be implementing these reforms to the RBA, including this new

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 12>Monetary Policy Committee staffed by external monetary policy experts. That's

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 12>something that the RBA hasn't had to deal with before.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 12>So it's not just a credibility restoration communication challenge for

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 12>Governor Bullock. But as the review rolls in and as

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 12>a term rolls on, communication I think is going to

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 12>be the theme for her home in the chair.

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Well let's take a quick look at the overhaul as

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 4>a result of that government review. What are some of

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 4>the major changes she must implement.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 12>Well, I guess one of the changes is she'll have

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 12>less to do. Rather than monthly meetings eleven of them

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 12>a year, which the RBA used to do, they'll be

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 12>moving to eight. And that's pretty consistent with other central

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 12>banks around the world. You know, the RBA did like

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 12>to have the opportunity to communicate month to month and

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 12>do things a bit more gradually, so that step change.

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 12>That's a communication challenge as to how to nuance what

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 12>might be slightly more lurching changes in communication, in policy direction,

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 12>press conferences after every meeting, that's going to be something

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 12>that will be a little bit different, and we'll get

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 12>to see how Buller candles those. But also this new

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 12>Monetary Policy Committee, the experts or the external appointees, they're

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 12>expected to be out there communicating about monetary policy to

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 12>the community at large and so having a whole range

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 12>of different voices, whereas up until now the RBA has

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 12>been had a monopoly on monetary policy and explaining it

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 12>and explaining the direction.

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 4>James, thank you so much for helping us set up

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the RBA meeting. James McIntyre Bloomberg's economist covering Australia and

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand. I'm Doug Prisner. You can join Brian Curtison

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 4>myself weekdays here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at six

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 4>am in Hong Kong six pm on Wall Street.

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Well, thank you, Doug, and that does it for

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning, five am Wall Street time for the latest

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.479
<v Speaker 1>on markets overseas, and the news you need to start

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your day. I'm Tom Buzby. Stay with US. Top stories

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and global business headlines are coming up right now.