WEBVTT - Transforming The Way Kids Learn Through LEGO 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I love to watch

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>some cricket occasionally. Also love to play with Legos, or

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>at least I did an I as a kid, and

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I recently saw that they also have a Seinfeld set,

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so I might get back into it. Has been Stark joins,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>us president of Lego Education to talk to us about

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the pandemics impact on learning and what back to school

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>means um for Lego as well. It has a mission

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to transform the way kids learn. I guess I didn't

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>even realize I was learning when I was doing it,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but I grew up, as did probably everybody around me

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>as been playing with Legos. It must be one of

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the staple toys, at least for American children. Absolutely, I

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>think it's a UM. I think it's a stable toy

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of places around the world, and isn't

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it wonderful that that you can learn without knowing that

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you're learning, and you can learn without being instructed. Has

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>been with the world still dealing with the pandemic, but

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>from an educational perspective, you know, the last year, last

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>academic year was for a lot of places around the

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>world remote learning. How do you think learning is changing

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>evolving as as you guys look at it from your

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>perspective going forward the pandemic? What was the impact that

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it will have going forward? Do you think? Well? I

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>think immediately what we know is we're going to welcome

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of students back into the classroom that that

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>have faced a learning loss. Their social, emotional learning and

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>development has been impacted as in validity they've been at home,

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think also importantly to many, we've seen reduced

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>engagement in learning and and very unfortunately that that the

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>most severe impact of those most severely impacted are often

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>those already most disadvantaged. So of course we have to

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>face how how do we pick up those students and

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>how do we give them a healthy approach to learning

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>while closing those gaps. What kind of learning are we

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about? I mean, I um, I think probably the

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>skills that I picked up the most were with engineering,

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>especially as I became a teenager and started buying the

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>more complicated um you know, like a car sets for example,

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>what what what are? What? Are people learning the most

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>with your products? Our solutions are products are designed of

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>course of all too, the delivered towards the standards and

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>learning goals in the classrooms so that they're really highly

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>re usable. But then of course we're also focused around

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really developing twenty century skillers as well, also things like creativity,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking, problem solving, and important social emotional skills, also

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like collaboration, resilience. So when you have to solve the

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>real world problem in the classroom with with one of

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>your mates, there's a lot of problems solving, there's a

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of negotiations. So it's not the technique because I

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have so my godson in I got I got him

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>recently the Lego Doukati Panagali V four R. And he's

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just a kid, he's only I think seven years old.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But after he got it put together with his daddy

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>said look, if I turned the crank, the cylinders go

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>up and down. And I thought it was so cool

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that there was just that much detail on the set. Yeah,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think imagine that and imagine imagine you know, the

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>imagining of that joy and the engagement that he has.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he spent sort of hours really deeply engaged

0:03:55.720 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in that. And then you layer over intentional content and

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to then take out learning outcomes of that. So while

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not do CARDI we bring into the classroom, it

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is hands on legal based solutions. They are also quoting

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>elements in it where students then solve real world problems

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>having subject based learning, but again also bringing on a

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of those twenty first century skills. And I could

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine that he's also practiced quite a bit of resilience

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>as he's played built that big one and you know,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>finding the right elements and and ultimately succeeding. So I

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>think take that magic, add the purposefulness of delivering towards

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>specific outcomes, and then bring it into the classroom. That's

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>what we look to deliver. So what is Lego Education

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know doing specifically? I mean you think, I'll think

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about the last year we had that remote learning and

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you guys support Lego education supports learning through play.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that took a pretty big hit last year

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>as kids were working remotely. Um, of course, we try

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to do what we can to support teachers to have

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a learning wherever it takes place. But you're right, our

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>solutions are optimized for using in the classroom where the

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>students can engage in collaborative, iterative problem solving. And I

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>think we've also seen through the pandemic actually the magic

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that the classroom has and what students are missing there

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and what's then really important for us to say, how

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>can we make that even stronger? How can we optimize

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the learning potential in the classroom. And that's why we

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the importance of rethinking learning. So again, how

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>can we make learning engaging, personally meaningful, iterative, socially collaborative,

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so we can really press the students with the skills

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they need. It said, a very important healthy approach to them.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Ashman Stark, thank you so much for joining us. Really

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate a fascinating discussion here, ashpan Stark, President of Lego Education.

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And again, kids going back to school, that's the really

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 1>good news, and getting them back into the classroom, getting

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>back into activities after school, activities and clubs and sports,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's the good news. And Lego is a big

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>part of that. We had some better than expected manufacturing

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I s M data came out this morning. Good news

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there for the manufacturing front. Let's break it down with

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Tim Fury, chairman of the Manufacturing Business Survey for the

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Institute of Supply Management based in Miami. Tim, thanks so

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. Better than expected numbers give

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>us the highlights. Yeah, really good demand again and the

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>month of August uh, better than the month of July.

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And plus I mean that's a great number. The new

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>export order number was really strong. To supporting that new

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>order number. Backlog was again near records, second highest number

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>ever since we've been keeping record since the nineties. And

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the customer inventory again was swallow months below forty which

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is a super too low. Empty cells everywhere. If you've

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>been in any of the stores lately, try to buy

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a car, you can't. There's a went to a department store,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>going to a grocery store sells a rampy everywhere, and

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of indicative of what this reporter is signed.

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Our delivery side us a little bit uh, and prices

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are backing off there. There is some positive signs for

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the future go ahead well, I just um spent the

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>my lunch hour trying to order a titanium um connecting

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>pipe for um an a Kropovitch exhaust. And who doesn't

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>do that in their lunch Well, it's just they're impossible

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to find. I called a ton of distributors and dealerships

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and they say, you know what, you're gonna be waiting weeks,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>like hope to get it at the earliest end of October.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And it just feels like that's a long way away

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>from you know, I feel like we just finished August.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Um when is this going to When are we gonna

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>see a recovery? Well, so let's let's expand on that.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, our our number one industry sector that's expanding

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>its furniture. And you go into a furn is to

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>store these days and they'll tell you, well, maybe four weeks,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really know. And even the day before

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we supposed to deliver, they'll call you up and say

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be another three weeks. A lot of

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with poor congestion. I think we're

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be dealing with this uncertainty for quite some time.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You know the fact that the Dela variant raised through

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>UH the US to such an extent it didn't so

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>much impact our panelists, but it's definitely impacting sentiment and

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you can see it in the conference board in the

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>University of Michigan. So, and that's not a good thing.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Our lead times are out so far we set record

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Romatory of lead times again, and what's happening is that's

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>driving up our new order number. How much I can't

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>really tell, but you can probably assume it's five points

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. So, and that's essentially advanced demands. That's if

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you have lead times that are typically six weeks, they're

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>now twelve or fifteen. You're committing to higher prices at

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>some point longer in the future than you normally do.

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of risky. But but I think you know,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>overall suppliedment balances, we're in balance, but we're making progress.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The input side mad some progress price disease that although

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>they're still expanding not as fast rate as they were

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in July and June, the suppliers delibered better. You can

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>see that in the rometary inventory account. We manufacturing inventory account.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>We got to fifty five first time in quite some time.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So but I think We've got a new normal here

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna be dealing with for at least a year.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's the impacts of variants coming out and the

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>attitude that it has on people tim manufacturing. What are

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they saying about their labor force? Are they getting the

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>labor they need? Well, that's the big story for the months.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>We are still struggling attracting people. Hired to fire ratio

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>is still eight or nine to one, Uh no, one is.

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I had one respond in talking about layoffs.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else is talking about trying to hire. Of the people,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I think eight two percent of my comments were higher

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>related and of that, thirty five of those said that

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they were having difficulty, which is up five points from July.

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's that says a lot of The biggest thing

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on the labor side, I think in August is that

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>what started in July turnover is now accelerating. So of

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>those hiring clans is related to turnover, including retirements, and

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a big number. So you hire two, somebody retires,

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to hire three. It's and in most cases

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's people chasing wages, and that's a direct result of

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>people raising wages to try to fill up their staffing levels.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, very interesting stuff. Great to get your take

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on this, Tim, thanks so much for joining us. The

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>usual Tim Fiori, there's the chairman of the Manufacturing Business

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Survey out of the Institute for Supply Management in Miami.

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we've got that number. You can see it

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>if you type eCos space US go UM, or you

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can type w E c O go in the blueboard terminal,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>click on the American flag and you will see I

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>s M Manufacturing came in at fifty nine point function

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of nine from fifty eight the survey was fifty eight

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>point five, so beating the survey and more than the

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>prior reading of point five. We have had a ton

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of stories, well just daily deluge of stories about the

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>changing regulatory environment and China, and a lot of investors

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have just said it's uninvestable at this point, but some

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>are seeing opportunities, and Ashroff huck is among them. Among them.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior portfolio manager at Sands Capital, and he

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>joins us to talk about um the companies that could

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>benefit from the regulatory revisions that we're seeing. Ashroff, thanks

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>very much for joining us. What are you seeing as

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of the overall theme here in terms of what

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>China is doing. Hey, Matt and Paul, thank you for

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>having me on UM. You know, it's been a rocky

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and the regulation has been fast and furious, and you know,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we've taken some hits, but we think the government is

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>focused on strategic priority these improving its demographics, reducing income equality,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>moving to higher value manufacturing industries. And we don't think

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a case where they're trying to destroy capitalism or

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>punish the wealthy. And so the attractive areas that they're pushing, uh,

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're encouraging more athletic participation, better access to

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>affordable drugs and healthcare, and cleaning the environment. But when

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I take a look at big companies like Ali Baba,

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like ten Cent, which have been such winners not just

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>for shareholders but also arguably for China itself on a

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>global scale, seemed to reflect very well on China. It's

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>surprised a lot of people that the government went after

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it was such a heavy hand. Those again, those companies

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that were really representing I thought China well on a

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>global scale. How do you make make out or make

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>peace with kind of how they're viewing some of their

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>traditional stalwart companies. Yeah, I think that those tech companies

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>have gotten so big, and a lot of the issues

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese regulators are dealing with are the same

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>issues that American and European regulators have with the big

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>tech companies. Here the differences that China can regulate them

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>much more efficiently and effectively. UM So, I don't think

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to destroy the ten cents and the baba's,

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>but they want to ensure fair competition. They want to

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>ensure that that the you know, the term that everyone's

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about common prosperity. They want to ensure that there's

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>more equal participation in the growth that's being generated by

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>those platforms. Are you concerned about the fact that, you know,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>things can change in a dime here? I mean it's

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not like, um, we get a plan that's laid out

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and we know in advance, they could just change their

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>mind at any point. Yeah, I mean it is a

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more dynamic. It's complicated, but I also think

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>China's is too compelling to ignore. Um And as I mentioned,

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there are they're you know, right now the tech platforms

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and education, for example, are in the spotlight but there's

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of growth in consumer businesses there that the

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>government will regulate to make sure that it's it's fair competition,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're not trying to control those businesses maybe as much.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh So. For example, we own a business called Anta,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which is one of our largest ways. It's a athletic

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>footwear company. Uh and that's gonna grow as the as

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the government's pushing more uh kids into you know, stop

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>playing video games and play more soccer. Um so uh

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And China's about to host the Winter Olympics. They're encouraging

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>people to go skiing and things like that. So Anta,

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>which you see Clay Thompson wearing, will be a big

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>beneficiary of that. And um you know, it's something that

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we've helped for a long time with growth twenty over

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the next five years per year. So astra in in

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of new capital going into China, my guests would

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be it's gonna go in and demand a much higher

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>risk premium. I'll pay a much lower multiple for my equities,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a called demand a higher yield on my credit. Talk

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to us about what you're seeing in the capital markets there,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the financial markets, the funding markets for China. Yeah, that's

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the case, and you're seeing that even reflected

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in the public company multiples. I mean, you look at

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a business like Ali Baba versus Amazon UM, you know,

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>very similar growth rates. In fact, Baba is growing probably

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>faster in its core business, and it trades that a

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>much lower multiple, higher risk premiums and than Amazon. So

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly something we're seeing, uh, in both private and

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>public funding markets. Interesting when you see UM everyone sort

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of rushing out of China heading for the exit, does

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that provide any kind of UM, any kind of opportunity?

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And I noticed there's some companies I think of ever

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Grand for example, that are having fire sales. Yeah, we're

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not really interested in UM businesses like that. You know,

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we run global growth portfolios or distressed or distressed assets. Now, yeah,

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we're really looking for great growth franchises. Some of those

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are on sale, but I think less than the fire sale.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>We're more interested in how innovation and technology are creating

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>new opportunities, and that's certainly happening in China as well

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>as many other parts. I mean, China is a small

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>part portion of our of our global internationally and portfolios UM,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>so it is I think less you know, the fire

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sell more the opportunity that's been created by innovation invest

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're focused on right now. Alright, as, thank you

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so much. We appreciate that. Getting some thoughts there on China.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And again the real question is to what extent, uh

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is China investable? Is it still investable? But it's such

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the m s c I index

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that you kind of have to be there as astrof,

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>said Ashraff hawk Uh, senior portfolio manager for Sance Capital.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. I love the joint. I love the

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the athletics shoe point. You know, because if kids are

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>going to stop playing video games and yep, I think

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a very big if. Um, they are going to

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have to do something else, and it's probably going to

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>involve running around, um, wearing shoes, especially if they're playing basketball,

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>which they love to do. They're getting pushed down on

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the ski slopes and need new boots. Yeah, it should

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>be interesting it but I'll be like like you said, Mattabie,

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they're going to regulate Uh, the

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>uh kids are gonna have parents can't do it. Good

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>luck to the Chinese government. We'll have more coming up

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg, But we have a good old fashioned

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>price war in the m and a space this time

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>for Kansas City Southern Railway. We've got the two Canadian railways,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Canadian Pacific Railway and Canadian National, both vying for this asset.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Would give them a great Canada through the US into

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Mexico line. There lots of opportunity. Let's dig deep into

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this deal. We can do it with nobody better than

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Tony Hatch. He has been covering these rails and truckers

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for decades on Wall Street, one of the top analysts there.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>He is knee deep in this deal. Tony again, it

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense to buy for one of

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>these Canadian companies to buy Kansas City Southern. What's the

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>problem here for these two players. It seems like Canadian

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>National had a kind of a setback, So Cannadian and

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I saying hey, Paul, Canadian National kind of like a

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>combination in the ring yesterday, a straight left by the

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>STB rejecting their voting truest and then a roundhouse by

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>t c I trying to change the manager team out.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So it was not a good day to be in Montreal.

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Say the deal is that c N was proposing this

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>under new rules, the so called new rules for the

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>STB which came about in two thousand one and require

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>enchanced competition, not not just preventing reduced CP skated by

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>any of the old rules and see and also had

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>horrible timing. This STB is activist and wants to get

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>out to get in the ring and punch it railroads,

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and c N has provided them with that opportunity. Is

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it damaging to have this kind of deal up in

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the air? I mean, um, what does the management do

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>what when there's so much uncertainty. It's a very good question,

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think you would say that there's some

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lost time really maybe all three carriers involved, because certainly

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the top strategy lines were focused on on this and

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C rather than out in the field.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's you know, ultimately damaging. I think

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they all have good prospects. You know, we may see

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 1>change and see ed which would in some ways be unfortunate,

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think they can get past that level of damage.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>These deals would whoever would win, would be transformative and

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>may have been worth the time risk, if not the

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar risk. So Canadian Pacific. Now I guess from a

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>regulatar perspective, seems to be in the driver's seat here.

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But there offers actually lower than what Canadian National did.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So are they have to raise their offer or can

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>there twenty seven billion dollar offers still win the day?

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point it probably wins the day.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So the key thing, and you may remember, Paul, is

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the UH the voting trust issue if if C he

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has approved. If you if you were a Ryott Pennsy Southern,

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>your board and your chry was voted to approve the

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>CP deal, you could get paid almost instantly if you

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>were to continue with the CN deal, which I don't

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>think will happen, but if you work to you would

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>have to take the entire regulatory review process, time and risk.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So the question is is you know it's three hundred

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>today or maybe in a year or more. So that's

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>why they feel they don't need to raise that they

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>can win with a lower face price face price offer,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are there? UH this deal would have gone to Canadian

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>National Railway and maybe it goes to Canadian Pacific now

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>losing Kansas City Southern. It just strikes me as an

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>American that we seem to be seating power to the north.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>The railroaders, you may recall, have always viewed this as

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a North American venture. After all, the CEO of the

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Canadian Pacific UH is an American. Most of the transformation

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of c N under Hunter Harrison and American were Americans. So, um,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, from a rail shipper and a rail investor,

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you could buy Canadian Pacific and sell Union Pacific or

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. That we don't view it that way. In fact,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be more likely if somebody were to go

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>buy an American were trying to buy one of the

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>two Canadian headquartered railroads, that would raise nationalistic fears than

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a fear about somebody buying the smallest American railroad, which

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>really is a play in Mexico, the third country we

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about. Yes, let's talk about this deal strategically.

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's say Canadian Pacific gets Kansas City Southern. Talk to

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>us about the benefits of putting those two roads together. Well,

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I want to say this to if

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>c N had been able to do this without competition

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or under the old rules, they would have gotten this

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the old rules, and this does not reduce competition questions

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>as to enhance it for CP under the rules of

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>nearly presenting that it does and hurt anything that currently exists.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Would link you know, every railroad now wants to get

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>access to more water, so it would get them to

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the US Gulf and get them all the way to Mexico.

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>It would link the autoly industry from parts coming in

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing in Mexico. Detroit as well as in Ontario would

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>all be linked. In addition, corn grown into the code

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is as the largest US import into Mexico and so

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they have infertile growing fields there and the end up

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>single line service. So you know the it would create

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>real power north South and most of the rail industry

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>as you well call as focused east West. You know,

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>containers from l A inbound to Chicago and that type

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Does it, though, um reduce the amount of

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>competition in the industry, I mean it must it's CP

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if CPA were to win at the answer is no,

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because they only touch at one point in Kansas City.

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it does create more competitive options, it

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really reduce rail competition. One of them. You bring

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>up a point the STV views this as railroad competition.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>There's fewer railroads now, etcetera. They ignore the fact that

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>this North South railroad parallels the Mississippi River, which is

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge freight you know highway, as well as the

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>actual highway system, the subsidized you know, interstate highway system.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So from the shipper point of view, really neither reduces

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>competition in a big overall in a big, big way,

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but CP certainly does not. Hey, Tony, we hear a

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>lot are doing adds to it? Yeah, we we we

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot from across the industry's really over the

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>last couple of quarters. And we listen to earnings calls

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>about the supply chain issues in this country. Give us

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a sense of mer perspective from the railroad and the

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>trucker's kind of how bad is it? Uh? When is

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>it going to get better? Do you think? So? It

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is bad, but it's not fatal. Um, you and I

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 1>have lived through worse. Um. This is, you know, a

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>total supply chain issue in which continuing events. Think of

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>this is not a rock and pond, but you know

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the biggest boulder you've seen. So the waves come and

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>then they come again. If you shut a port down

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in China because of a new COVID. You know outbreak

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that affects ships coming into l a Long Beach. They're

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they're forty three stacked outside of the Valley Long, which

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a D Day photo. You have shortages

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of warehouse people, shortage support people. You have railroad issues

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>because the boxes are staying in their terminals which are

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>meant to be through stations, and they're not enough truck

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>drivers or wherehouse people to handle those boxes. So it

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is a system one problem. Rails are not covering themselves

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in glory uh this year. They did pretty well last

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>year in the first stages of the recovery. But they're

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they're they're part of the issue now. They get a

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of press. Remember Churchill's quote, they've let a good

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>crisis go and used So ship or trade associations are

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>piling on on railroads because they can. That's how the

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>game is played. When will it get done? Probably done

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 1>until early next year. But it is not something that

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Wilwoods themselves can solve, and if that they may be done.

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>If you talk to most international shippers, it's the water.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the biggest problem not to land all right, Tony,

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us to appreciate it

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>as always expert opinion Tony Hatch railroad, trucking, transportation, animals

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for a b H Consulting. He's recovering this sector for decades.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>He's got the goods there. We appreciate it. Thanks for

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Radio