WEBVTT - Why Military Leaders Like Me Are Speaking Out: James Stavridis

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Markets with Bonny Quinn and Paul

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio. Well, over the last couple of weeks,

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>we've seen obviously a rise, a surge, if you will,

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in civil unrest, public demonstrations, uh, stemming from the death

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of George Floyd and the use of police force against minorities.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's actually been the use of various forms of

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the U. S military to deal with this. A number

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of retired generals and animals have spoken out with alarm

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>really about adding active duty military to law enforcement and

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>using the Insurrection Act to get that done. We are

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so fortunate this morning to have retired Admiral UH, Navy

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Admiral James Stavrita's former military commander and NATO and a

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion commons to join US. Admiral, thanks so much

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>for taking your time. You wrote a column uh just

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>recently about uh, you know, using US active duty military

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for some of these civil issues. Give us your thoughts

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and that you're that you want to express as well

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>some of your colleagues in senior military. Sure, let's start,

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul with just kind of doing the numbers around the

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>country and matching the challenges with what resources are available.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So in this country there are close to a million

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement officers and then we also have five hundred

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand National Guard. These are uniformed personnel. They're associated with

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Defense, but key difference they work for governors,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>their citizens soldiers. They're not full time soldiers. So when

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you add up law enforcement and National Guard, it's one

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>point five million. Um. I have not seen anything in

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the challenges of protecting these protesters, making sure these demonstrations

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>stay peaceful, stopping any violent crime, stopping looting, those are

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>all real challenges, but it is a set of challenges

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>one point five million men and women can handle. So

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>my view and that of many of my senior military colleges,

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>don't take the active duty military, who are sworn to

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>uphold the Constitution in the United States, who have a

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>significant role defending the nation outside of our national borders.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't bring those active duty folks inside the country and

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>apply them against protesters. Not an appropriate use of the

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Department of the Defense active duty personnel. Yeah, Admiral's Tavrida's

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's money. Just on that note, I mean, it's very

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>unusual to see retired officers speaking out about a candidate

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or a party, or particularly what a president might say.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>And we saw it this time. We not just saw

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it from one what we saw it from several four

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>former chairman of the Joint chiefs of Staff in fact.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just that it's ill advised, it's actually

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>being condemned, would you say it is? And this is

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a really import and point, Vonnie. I've never seen the

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>entire active duty four star military community so significantly united

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on a key issue. So it goes from people like

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>General Maddis and General Kelly who are actually part of

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the administration at one time and have been very ritiscent

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>about speaking out across the spectrum, to people like Admiral

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>mccraven or General John Allen who have been fairly critical

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of the president. Two people like myself, we're kind of

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>centrists who are in the middle. As you mentioned four

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>chairmen and the Joint chiefs of Staff. That's really quite

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>remarkable to get that unanimity of view across this whole community,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's because it really touches the nerve when you

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>send active duty military against the citizens in this country.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It should only be done in extreme circumstances. Um, And

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this does not appear to be a moment that would

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>call for that Admiral. On Sunday, Colin Palcole and Paliform

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and UH Joint Chiefs and Chairman and Secretary of State

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>call that Republican lawmakers for really having quote nothing to

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>say about President Trump's militarization of protest security. What is

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your sense of kind of what your expectations are for

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what Congress should be doing here as it relates to

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the military's use. Well, I I stand with General Powell

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>on this, and and I think the way to phrase

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it is the way you just did, Paul is Um,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not incumbent just upon Democrats or just upon Republicans

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to stand up in this moment. And this really touches

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on why are these protests occurring. This is a significant

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>moment in American history. We need the Congress to be

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>part of the solutions. And so that runs the gamut

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say from UH initiating appropriate reform in police

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>departments around the country. It includes calling on the administration

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch not to use active duty military against

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>peaceful protesters. UM. It includes providing resources to address the

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>economic impact that comes out of COVID. So we need

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>our Congress to step up on all those kinds of issues.

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I have tried to shine a spotlight on this issue

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of active duty military not being used against these protests. Yeah,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and real stupid, as you've just said a few moments ago,

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is not the moment for it. Do you

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>ever envisage that there might be a moment for it's

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that the active military would be called out against US citizens.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's unlikely, but it has happened a couple

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of times in our history. Um. Once was most recently

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Los Angeles riots in the early nineties. And

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and here's a key distinction, Vonnie, if we are going

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to bring active duty in in a moment like that

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>where a city is on flames, and um, there's really

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>no semblance of order in the city. It's got to

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be under local authorities. It can't be driven from Washington,

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>d C. And a circumstance like that. And then a

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>second example would be back in the sixties when some

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of the southern states refused to integrate their schools and

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>federal truths were required during the Kennedy administration. So yes,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there are extreme circumstances where this might be called for,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>this is not one of them, and never should active

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>duty military be used against peaceful protesters. That's a violation

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of the constitution. Admiral, just about the thirty seconds here,

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what did you think of General Mark Milly, the current

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, accompanying the President Lafayette Square.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a mistake, and I think of

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>General Milly had that one to do over again, he

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>would not have done so short of a direct order. UM.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I know he is uncomfortable being involved in politics and

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>he knows that's not his role. I I thank god

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that he did not appear in the photo op on

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the steps of the church. Um, let's hope that he

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>can stay out of politics. We need the military to

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>stay out of politics the act of duty military. Admiral

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>steud is definitely looking forward to reading more of your opinions.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Always enjoy listening to what you have to say. Of course,

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>former military commander of NATO and a Bloomberg Opinion columnistics

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>ordinarily decorated soldier as well, So thank you in general

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for for joining us so Paul, it is really an

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting time and of course you know a couple of

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>presidents cited, and I think that that moment has passed

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in this particular you know week of social unrest, but

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it came close at one one or two points there

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>last weekend to it definitely escalating for the worst it was.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Admiral's commentary about the kind of

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, mixing politics with the military is it's a

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's something that he's been concerned about, I

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>know really for the last several years and again having uh,

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably come into the four where once again

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>with some of these civil unrest and demonstrations and and

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the use of the military in kind of managing them.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Time for Bloomberg Opinion. Let's turn to Bloomberg Opinion columns

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Tara la Chappelle. She covers entertainment, telecommunications and deals for

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion. Tara, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm a big fan of m and a market.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Like to see deals come across the tape. Usually on

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that Merger Monday, we see some big deals and I

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>always the first thing I do when I see a deal,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>uh story out as I go to the bottom of

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the story to see who the advisors are on the deal.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us a little bit about what's happening in

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the world of M and A. How are bankers getting

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>deals done? Yes, I mean the world of M and

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>A is is very old school, and that it all

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>still revolved around meeting in person. You know, the handshake

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is the final way to steal the deal. And it's

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of travel and you know, I think some

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>bankers you know, would still be willing to get on

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a plane for you know, something a hundred billion dollar

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>deal like the astro Zenica UM talks that were reported

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend with Gill lead. But at the same time,

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, a lot of people are still

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to travel UM. A lot of CEOs, especially at

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that are a bit more tech savvy like Verizon

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we saw this with for instance, are willing to look

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at doing pretty sizeable deals negotiating them over things like

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Zoom video conferences. In the case of Verizon, just a

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, they bought a company called Blue Jeans Networks,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>which happens to be a video conferencing company a lot

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like Zoom, and so they bought a video conferencing company,

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but they also negotiated that deal over video chat, which

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>is really unusual for the M and A world, And

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something more and more bankers and CEOs

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>are going to start to embrace in these next few

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>months and quarters. As you know, people are still a

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit hesitant to go completely back to normal. So Tara,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion piece today, you point out that M

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and A is actually down fift this year, but may

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>pick up eventually when when things start to reopen a

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>little wider across the United States. But in terms of

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>these deals that you are seeing, that four hundred million

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar deal for Blue Jean's networks, for example, are they

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>because of the pandemic or had they been envisaged before

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. I think you know what we're hearing is

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that there were deals that were probably in the works

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just before the pandemic, maybe even some transactions that were

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to getting announced or you know, getting close

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to agreeing on the terms at least, and then the

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>crisis hit and it kind of just puts everything on hold.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It would make sense for bankers to kind of go

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>after those deals first and try to get those across

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the finish line. Now, if the strategic logic is still

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there and if you can still come to some sort

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of agreement on the price, which is obviously difficult. We're

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing that in the case of Tiffany and l V

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>m H, where they probably both still want to do

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the deal, but the price may not make as much

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>sense at this point. Um. But then I think there

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are other industries where, you know, some of these companies

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are still flush with cash, they still have growth needs,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and it probably makes sense if they can get any

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>company is a little bit cheaper because of this, that

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense to do that. Of course, there's not

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of opportunities for it since the market

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is up the way it is, but I still think,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, all roads are going to lead to deals

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>with this. I think there's just a lot of pent

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>up demand and a lot of companies that need the growth. So, Ara,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>what are you hearing about when you when you talk

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to bankers across the street and other sources you have.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is the expectation that the M and A

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>market's really not going to come back until we really,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, get a vaccine and kind of put this

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>pandemic behind us, or is there a sense that you know,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>companies and bankers and lawyers can adapt and can kind

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>of start getting things done even beforehand. Well, we'll see.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think so that bankers are going to try

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>their darndists to try to get deals done. You know,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that they know there are companies that were

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on the lookout for deals before this, So why not

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>keep trying and why not try to adapt to this

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, new normal, if you want to call it that,

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we are seeing you know, and tells that

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a deal over zoom video chat. As more and more

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>companies become comfortable with, you know, not meeting as often

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in person, not doing as much travel, having to do

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>diligence and do due diligence, and new kind of inventive ways,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you could see some companies more comfortable with that than others,

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, some industries that might just be hard to do.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I've heard investor's kind of half jokingly say that

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a big oil giant that wants to survey some land

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for a beleaguered oil company somewhere in America could use

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a drone, let's say, to try to look at that

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>land and look at that property, which I don't know

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>how feasible that is but I do think people are

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to think, you know, how can we look at

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this differently and still get deals done? Yeah? I mean definitely,

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>dnes are being used in all sorts of sectors. Why

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not this one? Right? Talk to us about companies also

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>getting ready for an onslaught of interested buyers. You site

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a statistic which states that more than two dozen public

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>companies adopted so called poison pills between March and mid April.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? Yeah, this is fascinating. So a law firm,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was K and L. They said that

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>more than two dozen US companies have adopted poison pills,

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot more than we saw last year.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that tells you that there are vulnerable companies,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that were probably you know, their businesses were shut

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>during these lockdowns and really affected by the lack of

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>consumer demand. That they are worried about activist shareholders coming

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>in now or opportunistic buyers. You know, pe firms are

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the prow and I think they're

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>starting to put their guards up and say, you know,

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we we don't want to be bought on the sheep.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to be you know, take an advantage

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of in this crisis. So you're starting to see some

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>companies put up their defenses. But I think it's interesting

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>because just the environment that we're in right now, so

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of social activism over inequality. You know,

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we have the unemployment rate as high as it is,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a really touchy thing to have an activist campaign

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>or pe company, you know, using this as an opportunity

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. Tara, thank you so much for we're joining us.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>We always love having you on Terra La Chapelle Entertainment,

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Telecommunications and deals columns for Bloomberg Opinion. You can read

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Terror's work at Bloomberg dot com, Slash Opinion plus all

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the other great opinion columns that we have. You can

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>also get it at O. P. I N Go on

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. The Bloomberger Opinion folks do outstanding work.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend it. Well. Some big news out of

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple today, not necessarily a new product introduction or a

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>new phone or anything like that, but certainly news on

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the back end they're going to make their own chips

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and what does this really mean for Apple and for

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>other players in that tech supply chain. To answer that

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we welcome Dan Ives. He's an equity analyst at wed

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Bush Securities and a Penn State alum. I should know Dan.

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us here. How big is

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this news from Apple about their chips. Yeah, it's great

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to be here. It's big in terms of you know,

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>cooking Coopercino of talk for over a decade about this

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>potential move, and it's really shot across about Intel and

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>other semi players that Apple is just going to have

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>more and more control of their devices. You've seen it

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on the iPhone. Now it goes to the max. And

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is gonna be a trend. You're gonna

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>see more and more as Apple looks from more full

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>control over its devices. So Dan also thinking about do

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they make chips for their other products as well or

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as just just for the back Yeah, if you look

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on the processors side, they've done it from a chip

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>perspective in their iPhones as well as some of their

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>other chord devices. And now there was a view that

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this Mac move maybe could have happened three or four

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago, but in terms of some of the technology

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>innovations on the arms side, wasn't there. This is probably

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>about a year ahead expectations. If you look relative to

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the streets perspective, I viewed as an incremental positive for

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple and incremental negative for Intel, just given what this

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>really says about going forward in terms of how Apple

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is really viewing the chip ecosystem, especially in their own devices.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we knew this was coming for a little bit

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of time done, So why is the market reacting now?

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Because this has really been something it's always on the

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>com I mean, if you go back two thousand and

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>five when Cook talked, you know, and when they were

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the grand vision from Apple, but it

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was thought that this is something from a Mac perspective

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that really couldn't happen. The fact that they ripped the

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>band aid off and now it's going to be likely

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>announcing June at the Virtual Developer Conference. It's a surprise,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think it just shows the innovation that Apple

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>has been taking. More and more, even when you look

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>at some of the five G battle versus Qualcom, more

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and more you're gonna see Apple continue to look to

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>own the chips, build it because they want more control

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>over their devices. And what that says for investors, it's

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>more margins, more cash flow. It also gives more risk

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>though to the company, right, because if it's if there's

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>any kind of supply disruption, you know, in its own ranks,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's worse than than you know, if a supplier

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>has a supply disruption. No doubt it does put more risk.

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But I've about as much confidence in Cook and Cupertino

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>as I do in Selly Cell and turtle Land and Airplane.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think it comes down to the confidence that

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Cook and Apple bill with investors. The more control they have,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they have more control over launches, over timing, and over

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>even profitabile anywhere they could take it. So I think

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this is something, at least from the vestor perspective, you

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>want to see have Apple have a more control. And

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>also it's more differentiation versus the HPS, the Della's traditional

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>PC given it's not the Saame chip. So Dan, you know,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the Apple chart here, another all time

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>high a day. What's the call out there on the

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>street here for Apple in the world of that that's

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>likely to be altered for the certainly the near term,

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe intermediate term, maybe even long term. Yeah, the call

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I continue view a year from now, there's a two

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market cap, and I think the first step

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>is to get through this COVID nineteen dark storm, and

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you've seen it get down through the services business that's

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>about five to six hundred billion weekly. From evaluation perspective,

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>now it's the drum mold to just a massive iPhone

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve products cycle with five G we think about three

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty million of nine fifty million iPhones world wider in

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the window of an upgrade opportunity. You start to put

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the math around it some of the parts. I mean,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a stock has a fore in

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>front of it, and I think you're going to continue

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to see this get re rated. In our view on

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fang stocks and tech, where we're still in the sixth

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>seventh inning, still think there's twenty more in this rallies

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at the rest of the year, what's next

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>for what's the next sort of launch of products, and

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>when we'll look into we'll be ready to eat them up. Yeah,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a proper perspective, we know about iPhone twelve,

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the air pods. If you look at that, they're insulated

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to sell about five million units this year verse sixty

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>five million last year. So I think there'll be a

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>new device there at w launching, but the big thing

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be on services. Right now, the missing

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.959
<v Speaker 1>piece in the puzzle is content for Apple services on

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the streaming side video. I continue to think between now

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of this year they look to acquire

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a major Hollywood studio to fill that content void, especially

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>in what you're seeing from Disney, Netflix and others, HBO,

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Peacock going after this massive streaming opportunity. I think that's

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>probably the next piece in the puzzle that investors are

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>hoping to see. Just Dan thinking about these fang stocks here,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of rip thing once again. What's your thought

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on kind of it's just this group overall, it's had

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>such a great run. Give us your thoughts. Look, my

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>view is that it's a These are safety blanket stocks,

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, category five COVID storm, which is how they've

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>continued to navigate, and many of them hit all time highs.

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately think the second part of that is the rebound.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I think they're stronger, forgotten stronger, and you're seeing it

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>from streaming in Netflix and e commerce and Amazon, social

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>media and engagement with Facebook and advertising and Google, and

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>then you look at Apple that's one where you have

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a massive icepline cycle in their rise. And I still

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>think sang names wed this market higher and overall in tech.

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why we continue to think it's a green light

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to own these names, especially on the second half macro

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>recovery place, which will be the other leg in these stocks.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you so much for joining us today.

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Down always great to speak with you. That is done.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'ves equity analyst Dad web Bush Securities, And the course,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple was higher today by about two and a half percent,

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>not the best performer among the TEX stocks, but in

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred it'd certainly helped. But we saw

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>advanced micro devices of more than five percent today, Poul

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and Video up more than Yeah, it's actually the tech

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>stox getting a lift here and h and as Dan

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>has mentioned, you know, they've been obviously the drivers in

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>this market for more than a decade, both on the

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>upside and the downside. Here. So Apple another all time

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>high today, just extraordinary. Moving to a slightly different asset

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>class now on that Adventure Capital were excited to be

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>joined by Mark Klein, who's president and CEO of st

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Rock Capital. Now, of course, some early backing. That's sort

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of Rock did very profitable exits include Facebook, Twitter, drop Box,

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and Lift. And the current portfolio companies include course Era, Lime,

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>next Door, palant Here among them as well. So clearly

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>some smart guys there with you, Mark, including yourself outside

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of Rock Capital. Mark, give us a picture of the

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>environment right now, because obviously we're looking at private equity,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, really raining in its horns, if you like.

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering if the same is true a venture

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>capital with the market drop earlier this year, did valuations

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>decrease significantly? Are they? Are they still at those levels

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>or are they coming back? Sure? Thanks luck, Um. You know,

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously the market, the public markets collapsed at the beginning

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID crisis, going down, you know, anywhere between

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty and depending on what inducry, and they've subsequently rallied

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>almost all of them back about is you note NAZAC

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>making a new high yesterday. Um. On the venture capital side,

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you had a bifurcation. Um. Venture capital valuations

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>tend to lag in the private valuations tend to lag

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the public markets. And when you do

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>have almost a v in the in the public market.

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The movements are actually pretty quick. So there were some

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>cases where companies were in need of financing and did

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>significantly down rounds UM and as, but there were others

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that continue to perform and actually we're having up rounds

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>during the last couple of months. What we've seen in

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the secondary markets is there is a fair amount of

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>selling that has gone on UM at discounts to UM

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>prior rounds that had occurred in the last three, six

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>or nine months. I think those are fairly fleeting, and

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity set becomes, uh, the ability to move against

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity set is pretty rapid as blocks of stock

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>come up for sale and you have to make a

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>determination whether you want to participate or not, and then

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 1>they move away, especially when you have equity markets rallying

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>like they did over the last couple of weeks. So

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>mark one of the areas as we think about this

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>pandemic world that apps uh you know, maybe as a

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a beneficiaries education technology with this schooling

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>from home, how do you think about that space and

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, where as what are some opportunities do you

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>think going forward? Sure? Um, well, I I actually think

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that unlike simply a covid telwin that some other industries

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>are enjoying. I think you're now seeing a fundamental shift

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in education and online education and just bringing it home

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the idea of having a college student and let's just

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>say they're graduating senior starting as a freshman next year,

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and that you're looking at a private education bill called

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy five dollars a year and the first six months

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be spent virtually UM to go to

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>some very nice liberal arts school. I think that the

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>world is going to shift away a bit from that. UM.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>In the public markets, you see significant performance by some

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of the online education company these like CHEG that's almost

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>doubled since the pandemic started, or to you, which is

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about the same. So I do think the markets starting

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>to recognize in the public markets that the need for

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>online education is actually structurally shifting. We're fortunate that we

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have two of those names in our portfolio, Course Era

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and Course hero Um, both that are experiencing as you

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>can imagine, and this is documented in public information, uh

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>extreme you know, usage of their products and and sort

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of way outside of what they had initially determined from

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, just general understanding of the marketplace. So I

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>do think that there is these tail winds, uh, and

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the structural shift will will lead to more and more

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in the public market for private education. Private education

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>companies actually coming public, and there are several of them

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that are now multibillion dollar privately valued companies right including

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure of course Ero, which is one that you

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>know so many people have signed up for it still

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>private or involved in that. But who wins out here?

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Because there are many, many great companies I'm looking at

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the peer group of CHEG right now, and

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing vite horizons. Strategic education is a very interesting

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one as well. Obviously u K twelve. Does it depend

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on what teachers you get? Doesn't depend on how many

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>people sign up? Does it depend on you know, what

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you get with your certificate at the end, Well, I mean,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think first of all, lumping all of online education

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or even in one bucket is challenging. On one side,

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you have the corporate training side, which is a plural

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>site or a skill soft. Then you go through obviously

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the case you twelve, post secondary and lifelong learning, and

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think in each segment there are clearly folks

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that are executing better than others um I think. In fact,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Plura site announced that they're are doing an offering yesterday

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>after the stocks rallied materially during the pandemic. But I

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of them have an opportunity to be successful.

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the you know, the proverbial butts and seats

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>businesses I think are a little harder than uh, the

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>online side. But if you look at the you know,

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the eu demis of the world, udacities, master classes just copies.

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's plenty of them. Hey, Mark, thanks so

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>much for journing us to really appreciate that Mark client

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>presidency of st Rock Capital based in San Francisco, on

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the venture capital opportunities out there, and spend

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>some time talking about the educational technology and clearly this

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>pandemic world, as we all have kids at home, whether

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's grade school or college, trying to work from home

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on the educational front is a challenge, to say the least,