WEBVTT - Bad TV programming, AP in DC, and early round wide receivers...

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guests dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever m Do to two Do Do

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do dinit do Yeah.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Fantasy best Friends Forever here on the

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports where a network alongside for Reggie Stample, I

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Sauceman. What's going on? How much? Greggy? How

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? All is well? All is well? Tuesday?

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You enjoyed the Colts and the Ravens last night? I

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't watch any of it. Did you enjoy Monday Night? Raw? Uh?

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Not really? No? Um, you have to point in your

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>life where you enjoy anything. Give you honest with you.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I watched a lot of programming last night, none of

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>which I liked. Like I watched Judy had on Bachelor

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in Paradise that wasn't very enjoyable. Yeah, that was pretty terrible.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you do the whole fantasy bachelor thing or no?

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever done it? I haven't. I should I

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think maybe next year? Surprising you don't agree? Agree now,

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>especially now that I live with Judy. I do you

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think I would do it? Um? So? No, didn't do that?

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So then I started. I watched last week's better Call

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Saul because I was not the date. So I watched

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the last week's disagreeable Bona not excellent. It's actually you

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>caught up? Oh I didn't get caught up. I didn't

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>watch last nights. I watched last week. I don't worry.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Kind of boring. I need to figure out

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>where I am in that show right now, because honestly,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. I feel like I think I watched

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the first two seasons. What are we up to now?

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I think it's good? This is season four? I

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>think live on TV right now? Right now? Did they

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>put season three on Netflix yet? I don't know a

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>good question, like that's what I haven't watched yet. I

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just watched it when it goes on Netflix. But I think,

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but what did you think of last week's episode? Did

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you find it boring as well? Um? Bits and pieces

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of it are boring, but really better call Saul is

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>just a more boring kind of Duller show than Breaking Bad.

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 1>That's probably the issue I think you have is that

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're like me, I absolutely adore Breaking Bad because

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it was always just we're ordering loss for lunch. Yeah, exactly,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>seriously though we are. Do you want it? Yes? All right,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have two people. All right, we'll talk about

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that off the air. Um if if it's open now,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, um, but that's one thing, right. So

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>then I fell asleep through with some pieces and again

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a long day. We worked very hard yesterday

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Frankie and I, UM, and you know, I was in

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and out and then I was like, alright, perfect, don't

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>with that, and now I'll start raw and fest forward

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>through a lots like this is boring, boring, boring, boring, boring,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And then Judy's done with bast in Paradise. Like ten o'clock,

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hey, we gotta watch last week's Sharp

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>or last night Sunday Night's Sharp Objects because we're watching that,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you know what, boring, boring? One more episode after of that.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>So we finished that. It's now eleven seventeen. I have

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like the last forty minutes of Raw, which takes me

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about five minutes to watch. Um, so I did that.

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I hated it. It's now eleven five and the night

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>time to go to bed, and that was my night.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg Man, Dude, no pleasing this guy? Did you want?

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you watch Danna Broka? There's no, there's no pleasing

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you would if you watch it wouldn't be please light there.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I was actually watching the Ravings and Colts. Yeah, I

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>forgot that. He was just which boring? How is Jason?

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>How is Jason wentten? He it's going to be a

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>learning process. He's not terrible. Roma He's not terrible. He's

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>not Tony Romo yet. He can probably get there. But

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been terrible to start. I think he's had

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a good start. I think he's going to continue to

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>get better as a season goes on. Luger McFarland is

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>killing it. He's been great the sidelines and the thinking.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>That's really better than Tony Saragosa because Goose was terrible. No,

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, then he's definitely. I don't I don't really

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>remember now Boogers killing it. What's unique about it is

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that he can really chime into the booth whenever he

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>wants from the sideline right of course. Thing he started it,

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it was just that's like unique to me. They didn't

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>do that before on Monday Night Football. It would always

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just be Grouden and Tarko and then Sean McDonough um.

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this is like, this is newer to me.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So they had Saragosa doing it, but Saragosa was like

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>terrible and they didn't provide any interesting analysis of any sort. Boogers.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, okay, cool, I buy it. That's what I'm

0:04:58.200 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>w That's what I was most excited about. I wish

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember it is on I would I would have

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>checked it out. Um. So you know, last night's game,

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the doubt anything interesting? Alex Collins didn't play

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at all? Did you Flac of Blood Joe Flac who

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>did play? Um, which I found very interesting and even today,

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like I'm you know me, I'm rapidly searching Twitter about

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex Collins because this is my guy. Like I'm all

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in on Alix Collins, Like I'm telling people to take

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>him in the third round of draft. There's three scenarios

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that are possible right now with Alex Collins. Either he

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is so firmly interested as their starter that they just

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel the need to play him at all in

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this game. B it was some kind of disciplinary action

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>for something he did or see he's dealing with some

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of injury that no one knows about, and that's

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>why he didn't play. Has he been practicing. I haven't

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>seen anything about an injury or any disciplinary actions, so

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>she's probably reacting. Probably probably just sad. Like you know,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to everyone's talking of connaddiction because he

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>ran well last night, six for thirty two yards. He

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>also had three receptions for twenty four yards. But before

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, Buck Allen looked okay in his limited

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>action to could just be the Cold's defense. Absolutely terrible,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but it was nice to see Kenneth Dixon do his

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>thing after all the injuries that he's battled. Um, assuming

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't disciplinary or injury related, I think Alex

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Collins is firmly entrenched as their starter. If you want

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to handcuff one guy. If anything were to happen to

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Alex Collins, I think it would just be Kenneth Dixon

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>on early downs, right, And I've said this, and I

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>think it would be fuck Alan in the passing game.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>How many times did you go onto Twitter today and

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>rode in Alex Collins. I did it at least three

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>times on the bus today. Maybe I was. I'm kind

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of nervous about this, but I haven't been able to

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>find anything. So I think it's a good thing. I

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's a good sign. On the other side,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck did not look good. Grady, Yeah, that's what

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about. He wouldn't like it. Looks very rusty,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and I look, I think we should expect that him,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, not playing at all last season, hasn't played

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a game since, um it was a January one, twenties six,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventy, certainly I guess when seventeen, but yeah, January one.

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>That was the last game he played January one. He's

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteen whatever, it's been a long time. It's been a

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>long time. But he looks very rusty. Had a really,

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>really bad interception in the red zone yesterday. So I

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think I'm going to lower him in my rankings. I

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't know how far to lower him. What he

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>could get off to a slow start. He's rusty. Of

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>course he's gonna a slow start into the regular season

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>affect your fantasy team. So that being said, you gotta

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you gotta rank him accordingly. But I don't think like

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this isn't do anyone really think Andrew loves is just

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna walk back onto the field and be like the

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck. No, but you want to start to see

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>encouraging signs. I feel like we haven't seen anything in

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the preseason yet that looks really great at him at

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in the past of twenty plus yards on the field yet,

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's very interesting to me. Like the fact that

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>he played one series last week. Okay, cool, I don't care.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But at half last yesterday, so he played in the

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>second quarter yesterday. Fine, you think he's bearings, took a sack.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:06.559
<v Speaker 1>That was good to me. They're not attempting to pass

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>over twenty yards. What scares me that he's afraid to

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>unleash the ball like in a controlled setting in practice. Fine,

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>he knows he's not gonna get hit, he'd launch it here.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit different and and that's kind of scary. Yeah,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>which is why I'm thinking I've moved him behind Deshaun Watson. Now,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I'm not really a Watson guy, but

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>by all accounts, he looks healthy. He had a fine

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.679
<v Speaker 1>second preseason game. He threw a touchdown to Bruce Ellington.

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>So I've moved uh Andrew Luck behind him, and I'm

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of wrestling with the thought of whether i should

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>move him behind Kirk Cousins Andrew Brees. I'm gonna let

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this play out again this week. See what happens in

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the third preseason game. As far as the Colts rushing attack,

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>nobody really looked great here. And then he behinds Funneble

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the opening kickoffs. Four fumbles through two games. Jordan Wilkins

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>fumbled on the goal line. That was terrible, and christ

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and Michael started. So life is good. There you go,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And we still don't know what the deal is with

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Marlon mack as he's battling in dree The one good

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>thing about Jordan Wilkins is that they trusted him enough

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to give him a goal line carry. But it just

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>sucks that he fumbled it, which they did recover for

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. But that's not what you want to see.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>He's in a soft fumble. What is it a soft fumble.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Like soft? Pumbe was like a

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>guy just wouldn't like takes his hand, just like patch

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball. No, So he was being like gang tackled

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>by three dudes and you're trying to fight through contacted out.

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, doesn't bother man. He was like, you're just

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>fighting for extra yards and they just they were just

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>three eyes ripping in. Yeah, okay with that, Okay with that.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of running backs at the goal line, I do

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>think before we get into the wide receivers and we'll

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>go all wide receivers, heavy, all heavy, all the way through.

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson size of the Redskins. Yesterday, Jamal Charles was

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in for a tryout Orleans dark One wasn't for a tryout.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Surprised dark One I didn't get an opportunity instead of

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>goos to ap ap quite obviously a bigger name at

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 1>this point than game. Played well and limited action for

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals until he wore down. Obviously was nothing with

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. I have to imagine they're signing a p

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to give him the opportunity to succeed here. Frank, Yeah,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what you would imagine, right, like, why would they

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sign Adrian Peterson. You know, if they really liked Rob

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and they liked their early down running back situation,

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have went out and signed Adrian Peterson. In

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, Rob Kelly didn't look terrible in his game

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets in the second preseason game. I think

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he's looking more like a fit Rob Kelly rather than

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a fat Rob Kelly. But I guess the Washington football

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>team did not feel the same, so they went out

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and signed Adrian Peterson. And I mentioned this to you downstairs,

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg Is, I don't think you go out and sign

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>this guy unless you're gonna play him. At his age,

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to just bring him into what be

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a goal line back. And I think he has enough

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>money that he doesn't sign if he's not getting the

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>workload I would think. So I moved him up to

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>running back forty five in my standard rankings. That's a

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whole the whole slew of like that tears like handcuff

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>running back like Latavious Murray, pass catching running backs in

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the standard, which is like you don't really love pass

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>catching running backs and standard, So I moved them up

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>there just because I think he'll be like a running

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>back four running back five that is going to be

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent. Maybe he gets like ten to twelve touches

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a week. I don't feel great about him by any means,

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but I just feel like we should have mentioned him

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>because he signed and he probably will have some value,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>albeit not that much. Yeah, I think Adrian Peter. Would

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you rather have Adrian Peterson than any other running back

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in Washington outside Christ Thompson? Yes, okay, I'd rather own

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>him than Rob Kelly. Would you drop Rob Kelly for AP?

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess the answer is yes. He just said that. Yeah.

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And in leagues where I've already drafted the Scott fishball,

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I have Darius Guys. I've already put in a claim

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to pick up Adrian Peterson. We had our first waiver

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>run in my auction yesterday. I was fast. I don't

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>wait around. I mean, normally the draft happens. You wait

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>until like maybe the preseason ends and any start waivers.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Great now waivers ran. Now it's first come, first server alive.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>How many people are going to blow their fab before

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the season. You can start so far, so far. Your

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 1>buddy Max, who doesn't believe in fab but he just

0:11:55.400 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, it's stupid he has spent I think no,

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>he spent seven on Taiwan Taylor bad Bye, and I

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>guess he he also picked up something else. I thought, Max,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean to not believe in FAB or

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>not care about it? Yeah, he spent thirteen dollars. He

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>spent seven on Taylor and six dollars in Courtland Sutton.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean though? What does that mean to

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>not care about fab? Like he doesn't care if he

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any fab by like week four? Probably not

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a good strategy. The strategy believes it's okay. He don't

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like your hair. Tried to do it a little bit better,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>specifically for Max. It was good yesterday for our shows.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought, I appreciate that, Greig. I'm gonna and for

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>those wondering about me, I'll get a hair cut at

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>some point, I promise. I really do think that you

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>should start to do more of like a fox hawk

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to like remember Nono Dafino. But eight four four eight

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>four three six eight seven nine look at a goose

0:12:55.760 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in Cali. What's going on? Goose? Hello? What's up? Man? Hey?

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I're going um so? I had two questions, but I

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the second on if they have time. UM,

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota offensive line and Dallas offensive line. I know

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there UM going through some injuries. I was wondering if

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys had any information about that. Yeah. Yeah, Minnesota

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>has been decimated. Dallas has been decimated UM as well,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and their first round center looks look terrible. It looks

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.479
<v Speaker 1>like Zach Martin is gonna be back. Oh, Carolina also decimated.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Are At Khalil now getting checked out for the Panthers.

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>While McCaffrey has killed it in the preseason. You have

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to imagine, you know, him, with his slider frame running

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>behind that offensive line, it might actually affect him. So

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the obvious questions, has this affec Christi, McCaffrey, Ezekiel Elliott,

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook and their draft stock if it does at all,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I haven't changed anything accordingly. I mean, I think it

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is something worth monitoring, and we appreciate the call. I

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's something that we, you know, we should bring up. Absolutely.

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>But again, I'll always go back to the stat that

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned when we started talking about running backs last year,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>six of the twelve um RB ones average four point

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>zero yards per carry or less. The reason why they

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>were rb Ones is because of volume. So again you know,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>volume trump's efficiency when it comes to workhorse running backs.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I do believe Ezekiel Elliott and Dalvin

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Cook to be uh much more faith in Ezekiel Elliott. Obviously,

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know he could touch the ball four hundred times

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, even if he averages in the low four

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry um, just based on how many times

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going to touch the ball, I think he's easily

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a top five running back this year. And then Dalvin Cook.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You know we mentioned the offensive line last week, even

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, before these injuries, is that it really doesn't

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>look like a great offensive line coming in now year.

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But I do think just based on the volume I

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned last year that they had even after the Dalvin

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Cook injury, I believe it was what like it was

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>over thirty touches per game for both Latavius Murray and

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerk mckinnons. So I still think Dalvin Cook is going

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in that No. Sixteen team may be close

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to twenty touches per game range, while with Tevis Murray

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>gets his eight to ten, and I think that's perfectly

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>fine for Dalvin Cook where he's being drafted at the

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one to turn at the end of

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the first round, four three, six at seven nine. Let's

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>hit up Dylan in North Carolina. What's going on? Dylan?

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, just have a quick question for you guys. Well,

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna be quick, but um,

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>if I can go over my roster right quick. UM.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I just had a draft this past weekend. I have

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Stafford Barkley, c mc allen Robinson, Marvin Jones Jr. Jared Cook,

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Alex Collins. UM in my bench. I have Ingram Bris,

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Shot Penny Calvin, Benjamin Probably Anderson, Cameron Meredith, and Marcus Mariotta. Um,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a twelve team half point ppr UM. I

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>had a trade offer. UM, I was the last person

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to pick a tight end with Jared Cook. Not too

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>happy with that. UM, so I would be sending away

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, Meredith and Jared Cook for Roy Spreeman, Kyle

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph and Josh Gordon. I just wanted y'all's opinion on that,

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. What do you think it was? It was CMC,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook and who was the other player you were

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>going up? Can Meredith and who do you get in

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>return Roy Spreeman, Kyle Rudolph and Josh Gordon. M My

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>initial answer was to take this deal. It's tough to

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>give up CMC based on what he's done in the preseason,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>especially if you believe he's going to be that workhorse

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>running back that North Turner usually employs in his offenses.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think to get Kyle Rudolph, who is a

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>bona fide top eight tight end, maybe has upside to

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be even better. Josh Gordon, I think he's gonna be

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>much better than Can Meredith this year. It's risky, but

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you get that solid RB two and return in Roy

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>s Freeman. I'm taking this trade. I'm doing it. Gregor, Yeah,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it too. I think you have major upgrades

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>at the tight end position. I think you needed a

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver with high upside. You get that in Josh

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Gordon and Roy Streeman, who knows what he can be.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>SE's a lot to give up. That's the main piece

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're giving up here. I think you have to do

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it all right. When we come back your first and

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>second round wide receivers, what's our order? Where are our rankings?

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>The tears, all of it, the debate comes your way next,

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>from the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rodo dot com

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is the place to win millions in daily fantasy. You

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season long

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for a price of one, or dominate the entire Daily

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports realm. Put the Elite package at month. If

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you use the promo code f n T s Y,

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Rodo dot com, pick your NFL or Elite package,

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n T s Y, and you'll

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to remind you, and we've done this before

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>four so let me do it again. Here we go.

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Get your season ticket to fantasy glory right now. Exclusive

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Edge Fantasy Football Package. It's not just a draft kit,

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a full season package. It takes you from draft

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>data Championship Week. It features in depth analysis and some

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of your favorite fantasy sports for radio experts like Frankie

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Snaffle Gonna roto Experts dot com. He's a promo code

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Frank the Tank. Frank the Tank to get temper sent

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>off on the Exclusive Edge package. Set aside of spot

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on the mantel for the eighteen Championship Trophy. It is

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the Rotor Experts Exclusive Package. Promo code is frank the Tank.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I also want to help out my good friend Greg

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>biden Over at Fantasy's Red Felt Breaks h Redfel Breaks,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction with the Black Jaded Wolf, is hosting the

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>inaugural ground Group Break live on the Red Felt Breaks.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>We're breaking open a twenty seventeen Panini National Treasures football

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>case in a random team format. In addition to purchasing

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a spot in the break, all thirty two participants will

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>receive a fur E Rhodo Experts Exclusive ATGE package. There's

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a four dollar value all season long. When you sign

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>up for the Redfelt Breaks Group Break, visit Black Jaded

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Wolf dot com, slash Fan, t s Y and click

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the FNCS white box from more information and to purchase

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>your spot. There you go. That's Redfelt Breaks dot Com,

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>slash f and t S. Why al right, Frankie, for

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you have the wide receivers. The stand of the day

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>has to do with your boy Davante Adams Gregg. In

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the last two seasons that Aaron Rodgers and Jordy Nelson

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>were both healthy together. That's shorty finished as wide receiver

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>one and wide receiver three overall, respectively. Is Davanta Adams

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>underrated as wide receivers seven off the board right now?

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a great question, just crazy. It's

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy to say because he's going in the second round,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but based on where the top target finishes with Aaron Rodgers,

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that Davante Adams could be a top

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>five wide receiver, maybe even better than that. There's definitely

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a chance. And as I look at my eighteen wide

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>receiver rankings, I haven't ranked seventh rank wide receiver. That's

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>exactly where he's being drafted off the board. Break there

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you go, man, DeVante Adams, alright, number one. I don't

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>there's not we talked before and we've broken into like

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>twos or whatnot um with the running backs Girly and

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Bell and then is he David Johnson. I don't think

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you could necessarily do that with the wide receivers because

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown's one. That's it. There's Antonio Brown, there's everybody else.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I have, I have like a top four tier. But honestly,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to make Antonio Brown his own tier.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I have no problem with it Brown. Still, I believe

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>it has that injured calf, but I think he returned

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to practice on Sunday. Fantastic. There you go, so I

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about that anymore. In terms of points per game,

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>he's finished. These are his past five year finishes and

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>points per game and half PPR wide receiver one one, one,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>two seven. That's his last five years. During that span

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>five stret years of a hundred plus receptions each year

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is average season. A hundred and sixteen receptions on a

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy one targets, fifteen seventy yards end point

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns per year over the last five years. That's

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is average season. He's pretty good, pretty good day. So

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>after that, I feel like I know where he's going.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't seem like this, but at least when we have

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>talked Frank, it seems like people are not forgetting about

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins, but I think forgetting just how stupidly good

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>he is. We have talked quite a bit about it's

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>crazy Antonio Brown younger than me about the life. Um, well, Greg,

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you're like fifty. All the wide receivers are younger than you,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>even Lyon Fitzgerald. It's true, but that's not true. It's

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>actually you're just like, yeah, I'm buying it. At this point,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a lot about Julio Jones when we mentioned

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Odell Becka when it comes to his contract and whatnot.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like people are kind of glossing over

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins, like Hopkins is still a number two wide

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>receiver off the board, but there it's was this like

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>assumed thing. I want to make people realize why, because

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins is stupid good and he's never had a

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and when he did for like that breet moment

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>last year with Deshaun Watson, it was sickly amazing. Shaun

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Watson's back healthy. DeAndre Hopkins is back healthy. He is

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a freak of nature and also younger than me. DeAndre

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins clearly for you the number two waters he wroth

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>aboard he is clearly and I know some people are

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna lean towards Odell Beckham, but it's obvious that it

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was just brock Osweiler that crust DeAndre hopkins value. Last

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>year he played I think it was five six games

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with Deshaun Watson, even in the games without Deshaun Watson,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>even with Tom Savage. The guy was worlds better than

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he was two years ago when he finished as the

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver thirty eight in points per game. In the

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>past the two years that he's had at least a

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy four targets. Again, this guy, he's a

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>volume play, but I think he's gonna have that volume

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>once again this year. Greg He's been wide receiver two

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>in points per game, last year, wide receiver five in

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>points per game. In his average season in the two years,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>over seventy targets, one three receptions, fourteen forty nine yards,

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve touchdowns. So you know, you might actually say that

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he is a lot to score more touchdowns than Antonio Brown,

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But the safety of the floor and the reception and

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>yard pace I think favors all Antonio Brown. But I

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if DeAndre Hopkins once again scores more

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns than Antonio Brown. Last year, twenty four end zone

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>targets was third among wide receiver. And again, he's incredibly durable.

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>He's only missed one game in his entire career. For

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>all those reasons, I think it makes sense for him

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to be that wide receiver. To given, Odell Beckham has

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of not been all that durable. There's a lot

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of problems with the other guys. Odell Beckham, Julio Jones

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>typically your three four. Julio Jones struggled in the red

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>zone last year, struggled specifically in the end zone. Odell

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Beckham coming back from the injuries healthy now um, but

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>he had the injury issue. DeAndre Hopkins doesn't struggle in

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the red zone, doesn't have the injury issue, and again

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a freak. And he's still very young too. I don't

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>know that people realize how young DeAndre Hopkins really is.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>For you, Is DeAndre Hopkins another one of these clumps

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and guys. Is DeAndre Hopkins closer to Antonio Brown for

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you or closer to Odell Beckham to you? He is closer?

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. I think so too. That's why

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if it is the number one receiver last year and

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he's he's that good, and I hope I want people

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to remember that. Like I was looking at my draft

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>board and as people now, I have eleven in my

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>home league draft and we have seven this weekend. Oh

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>just graz' um. So we have we have eleventh pick.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I've eleven picked in my draft a couple of weeks.

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And I had said previously, listen, if I had the

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>choose between DeAndre Hopkins and O'Dell like Giants, Fani me

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go Odell. But maybe because I have that

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>one share now, or I have two shares because um yea,

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I have two shares now, Odell, I think yeah, because

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I have the fish bowl. Um I've kind of got

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that fixed. And now it's like, the more I've looked

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>into it and the more I've researched, my heart is

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>not going to take over there. And DeAndre Hopkins is

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the play and DeAndre Hopkins is awesome, and the fact

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that he went for less money in my auction on Sunday,

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very cool for the person that got Todre Hopkins. Yeah,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, one of the questions you first

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>asked when you brought up DeAndre Hopkins is he being

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>overlooked a little bit? And I think you know, you

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>see him fall a little bit in the first round

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>because more and more people like that combination of getting

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the workhorse running back that you could get in the

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>first round and impairing that with an elite wide receiver,

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys that we're gonna talk about going

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in the second round of drafts, like Michael Thomas, Keenan Allen,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Adams. They just like that combination more so than

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>taking a DeAndre Hopkins in the first and then whatever

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>running back you get in the second, whether it's McCaffrey,

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Devanta Uh, Devantay Freeman, Jordan Howard. So they like that

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>combination more. And honestly, I can't really argue it. But

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to just take best player available, you

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>could start DeAndre Hopkins in another wide receiver, but then

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you really have to piece together you're running backs later

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>on in the draft hundred percent. And and we had

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I have said that watching the running backs fly off

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the auction and fly off our NONPVR draft a couple

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago. Um, we saw florio did right. It's twelve.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>He ended up with Hopkins and Beam. Yeah, and at

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that point he had to he said, screw it, I

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>have to take this opportunity. I have to take the

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>best players available and I'll figure out the running backs.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought Florida did a nice job overall figuring

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>out those running backs. So Uh, that's a lesson that

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>you could learn. We keep measuring Odell Beckham Jr. He

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is my third ranked wide receiver. UM. I want people

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to remember when he's on the field just how awesome

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>he is. Uh. Last year, of course an anomaly. He

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>was hurting training camp in a preseason game, doesn't play

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the first couple of weeks, comes back, never truly healthy,

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt two weeks after that. It was a weird

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>season for Odell last year. UM, And I don't think

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we could. I think we could take it for a

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>grain of salt. Basically. Yeah. I mentioned there are some

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>durability concerns with Odell Beckham coming off the injury, but

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of per game production, he has never finished

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.719
<v Speaker 1>lower than wide receiver five in terms of points per game. UM.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Back in he was wide receiver one in points per game,

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>then wide receiver three, wide receiver five. Last year he

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>was wide receiver three in points per game. Again, that

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>was only in four games, but during that four game

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>stretch the average over ten targets per game. He's an

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>absolute target monster. Four hundred nine targets in forty seven

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>career games. That's ten point six targets per game. So

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you know absolutely on the volume will be there. I'm

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not worried about se Kwon Barkley coming in as long

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as he's healthy. He is unquestionably the team's top target

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>last year. In the four games that he played, came

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>back against Detroit on Monday Night football, clearly was not

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy, only at four for thirty six. More of

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a decoy in that game. Uh. Six days later, um

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Philadelphia Eagles nine for seventy nine and two

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>will take that. A week later against Tampa Bay seven

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for ninety and then a week later against the Chargers,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a game that he got hurt in five for ninety

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>seven and a touchdown. That was the Beckham that you expect.

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham Jr. Clearly to me the number three overall

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver on my board eight four four, four three

0:27:57.960 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. Before we gets number four, Let's go to

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Shawn in New York. What's up, Sean? What's up with guys? Uh?

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I just want to ask a couple of questions kind

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of similar. Um, so I got the number two pick

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in my draft. Um, should I go with Gurley or Zeke?

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>You should go with ug Gurley? That's uh, you know,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that's we both project Girle and Bell one and two.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>What if Bell has gone one, you go with Girly.

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>If Curly is gone one, you go Bell. And that's it. Yeah,

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm an agree instant, all right. And now my

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>other PPO league, Um, would you go with David Johnson

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>or Bell? And I know that you just said that

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the long time in the year that he

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>did played yet more receiving yards and similar rushing yards,

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>asked Bell. Plus they don't have a lot of targets

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>with that Cardinals all tense, you should go with Levian Bell.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell is my number one ranked running back in PPR.

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>He's ahead of Todd Gurley. He's pretty much a lock

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>for seventy plus receptions and even the fact that he

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>will not be back to the Seals after this season,

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they have absolutely no incentive to not give him four

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred touches this year. So I think that's a lock

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>um based on that volume. I think the touchdowns come

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit this year as well. Don't think

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>about it too much. It's it's Levian Bell in PPR.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And then take Todd Gurley over zeke Um. In that

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>league where you have the number two pick all right,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>at number of the number four wide receiver here, Frankie Snanville,

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I have it as Julio Jones, he's number four. I

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's a clear top four Julios in it. I

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>said I wouldn't do this again. And the more you

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>look into it, and the more you look at the

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>game logging, more more you look at every wide receiver,

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Julio was better than all of them pretty much last year.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>You hope the redsidence targets go up. You hope the

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>red dozen touches go up. You hope the red zone

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns go up. Julio Jones for me, including number four. Yeah,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>there's positive touchdown regression coming here. Four straight seasons of

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>fourteen hundred plus receiving yards, and I'm not he doesn't

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>even have to get to double digit touchdowns. If he

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>were able to do that, he probably as the wide

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>receiver one overall this year. But he doesn't even have to.

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>If he just gives you six seven touchdowns, he's going

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be firmly entrenched. As you know, a top five,

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe top three wide receiver last year, but he only

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>had three top chowns and he still finished as the

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver eight in points per game UM one season ago.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, nineteen red zone targets. Last year, they

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>said they were going to get him more involved in

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that part of the field. They absolutely did. He had

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>more targets. He had just five receptions, though, so I

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think he needs to be UM a little bit more consistent. Uh.

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>They have to get him better looks inside the red zone.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Only five catches and nineteen targets is a twenty six

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>point three percent catch rate. He's gonna be better than that.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen end zone targets, just one touchdown inside the red zone.

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So I just think UM, based on those red zone targets,

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the end zone targets, the touchdowns absolutely are going to

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>come up. I think the addition of Calvin Ridley being

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there as another wrinkle to this offense where Ridley probably

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>takes away more targets from like Mohammed Sanou and Austin Hooper.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, UM, Julio Jones still gets his, but I

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>think the fact that Calvin Ridley is there and defenses

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>just have to pay a little bit more attention to

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>him ultimately helps. Julio Jones is here. Great. Calvin Ridley

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys. I thinks doing undervalue, which I

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>talked to him racial Berlin about Calvin Ridley and we

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>had a question about it. I think he's been undervalue,

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like like, this is the guy that I I think

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that at least, like I want to think they signed

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that they drafted it early in the first round because

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>they he's extremely talented. And people are talking about Michael

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Gallup and there, and they're talking about h. D J. Moore.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I think more people need to talk about Calvin Ridley.

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I think where he's going in drafts is adequate. I

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think it makes sense right now. I think he's more

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of a best ball play. He's gonna have weeks where

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he pops off, but I think the consistency is just

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to be there. His team still has Mohammed Sanu.

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>He is their possession receiver. I think he's still gonna

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>get his targets as well. Uh and then Austin Hooper

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>still does a little bit in the past game as well. Again,

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there will be big weeks for Calvin Ridley, but that's

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>why he's a better best ball play in my opinion.

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't really know when those are going to happen.

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know that you could even count on

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>him to be a bye week replacement? Would you trust

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>getting Calvin Ridley in there? And as a bye week

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.239
<v Speaker 1>replacement if he's just a boom er bus kind of guy, Well,

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping by the time the bye week's calling, Calvin

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Ridley is gonna be someone you can count on more.

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The chance that can happen, maybe he just overtakes Mohammed

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Sanu and is getting like six targets of games. So

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the idea that's the new moves to the slot.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Calvirualley's really on the other side of Julio, and Julio's

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of attracting all of his attention on defense. Calvin

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Ridley shows up and I think, Uh, people forget how

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>good he was in college in Alabama. I know towards

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of his career it wasn't exactly all roses,

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but really was amazing. Dude, how many targets do you think?

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>How many targets can you realistically get this year? Because like,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna get more than eight? That's the thing.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>It kind of catches upside what you know, what I'd

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>like to know and I can look at up right now,

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>how many targets Julio had his rookie year. We know,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>um Juleo Jones in his rookie season had ninety five targets,

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>so that is what that's the ideal spot. I think

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Julio only played thirteen games as a rookie also, and

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that was what Roddy White was a superstar. We said

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same thing. Is not that Julio was

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on the down side of his career, um, but Roddy

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>White was a bonified superstar with the Atlanta Falcons and

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the drafted Julio, so they have some of the other

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>side who they wound up with ninety five targets, fifty

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>four receptions, almost a thousand yards, and eight touchdowns. Now

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Calvin really a little bit smaller than Julio Jones and

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe not nearly as talented, but I think ninety five

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>targets is a realistic expectation, especially because Juli only played

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>thirteen games. So I will say ninety five targets is

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a fair expectation, and that would be pretty good from

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a rookie too. If he got ninety five targets, that

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>would put him at just around six targets per game.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And if that happens, then yes, you're right, he probably

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is a fair bye week replacement. But you know, maybe

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if he's more so in that you know, four or

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>five targets a game, they really just target him for

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>deep shots down the field, He's not going to have

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that much volume in terms of receptions. Maybe I just

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's more of like that decoy down the field

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that like takes attention away from Julio Jones. He's gonna

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>hit on a few of those big targets every now

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and then. Um, but I just don't think he's gonna

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have the consistency that you're projecting right now. But you

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>could certainly be right. Julio Jones' first season was eleven.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That was Roddy Whites, aged thirty season. This is now

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones, age twenty nine season. So they know what

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they're doing there in Atlanta. Just for the record, in

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that in that season, Um, in that season in two

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven, Roddy White played also teen games. He had

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eighty targets, hundred and eighty targets, a

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred catches, nine six yards and eight touchdowns. So it's

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a totally different offense. And I completely understand that, but

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>they drat the Calvin Ridley and and I can tell

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you this um that tomtf was the general manager there

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and he still is now. So ultimately, I think really

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to get more togets and people realized. I

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be around that hundred number. I think

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the yards will be there. I think touchdowns will be there. Also,

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I think cal really is a really nicely around flyer.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So here's his path to getting those targets. Basically, Mohamed

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>s Knew had ninety seven targets last year, Taylor Gabriel

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>had fifty one. So basically you're swapping those. Yes, you're

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>just imagining that, uh Mohammed san News. More so when

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>that fifty to sixty target range and I haven't really

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>stepping in and getting those, that's so crazy. It's not crazy.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>There is a path there for him to do it.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>How many targets Peerless Price had in two thousand and

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>eleve I just maybe they're closer than that, you know,

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty forty range that we're imagining. Maybe it's like eight

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>for Redley sev Maybe maybe so. And I think I'm

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.479
<v Speaker 1>closer to there than I am closer to a hundred.

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you the upside of the calendar ridley

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>could be Yeah. I mean playing alongside a guy like

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones, like we've seen offenses have too Fantasy Vible

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, It's certainly doable. Of course, was that a

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>break here? When do we come back the earlier round

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver? Conversation continues Michael Thomas, Keenan Allen, Davante, Adams,

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>E J. Green. That's it's here, But how do we

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>order those guys? Frank and I will kind of break

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that down when we return. Those are the second round

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, those all those inning round wide receivers. We'll

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>discuss it next. Fantasy Best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Why pay high rate when you can play daily Fantasy

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Baseball and pay half the rate? Gun Fantasy Draft featuring

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>half the rate GPP and head to head contest exclusive

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>v I P experiences the most flexible lineup structures in

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the game. Fantasy Draft is the only DFS site that

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>puts players first. They're also the only site to offer

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>six of seven pg A scoring, dropping your lowest golfer

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>score registered today with the crew A F N T

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>s y for a free four dollar entry into a

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed winner contest in the sport of your choice, the

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Draft Daily Fantasy on a level playing field. I

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>want I'm gonna be to you. Yeah, I know what

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be. I'm gonna be you walk five hundred miles,

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>walk five more up man who long five thousand miles

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>back with you the Fantasy best Friends Forever Fantasy Sports

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network, Bavona. Did you get what you wanted there?

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course? All right to making sure. I'm just just

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>making sure we can let you down. You guys never

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>let me down. Uh daily duty. I was putting more

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five grand on the Live for subscribers this

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 1>NFL season, entering paid contest on FanDuel and bringing you

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>along for the free roll of the chance to win

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>big this year alongside our CEO, Jeremy Stein, one of

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the only men you have won two separate million dollar

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>prizes each week was selected look at subscribers to sweat

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 1>with us and split the profits. No profits this week

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all good. Your name will be tossed back in that

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the following week. Head to Daily Rotor dot com slash

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Sweat and learn how to get into the action. You

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>can have a chance to share twenty five foulsand dollars

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rotor dot Com. Daily Rotor dot Com slash Sweat.

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Bet ds I is celebrating their at twenty years as

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the industry's biggest and safest betting site. They have great

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>customer service, fast easy payments of winnings. You can play

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>virtually every sport bet ds I with hundreds of wagering options,

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>including live in game wagering on all major sporting events,

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>where you can make your play at any time during

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the game. Bet ds I run signent deposit promotions year

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>round and for a limited time using the promo code

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>f ben t s Why bet d s I is

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>offering up to twenty five dollars on your first deposit

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to addhere to roll over requirements, use

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>promo code f and T s Y and try bet

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 1>d s i dot com and that's bet ds i

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. The promo code is f n t s

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hy Alright, Franklin. The next year of wide receivers is

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 1>where it really gets interesting. How do you break it down?

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas, keenan All and Damote Adams and A. J. Green.

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>For me, there's three guys and then one, and that's

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because I'm like super not high on the Bengals this year.

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the l if I'm wrong, but I just

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, don't like A J. Green. I don't

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>like the Bengals. I'd rather invest in the Saints, the Chargers,

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Packers. That's why A. J. Green is last.

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:50.800
<v Speaker 1>That is my eighth ranked wide receiver this season. He

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is also the last of this tier as well. And

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look at his finishes in terms of points

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>per game over the past few seasons, he doesn't have

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>immense upside, but he has a very very safe floor.

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So I still unders stand why he goes in the

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>second round. Here are his finishes and points per game

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the last five years. Wide receiver fourteen, White receiver six,

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twelve, Wide receiver fourteen, Wide receiver five. Well,

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have him mens upside. Maybe he can't be

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>a top three guy. He's never finished below wide receiver

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>fourteen over the past five years. UM still saw of

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals target share third highest among wide receivers last season.

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>UM I think part of the reason why he struggles

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to produce for fantasy is he hasn't scored many touchdowns

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in recent years. He's only been over twenty red zone

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>targets once in that five year span, so we want

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to see him get more red zone targets. But you know,

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of similarly to the Falcons, that team has John

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Ross now on the other side of him. This is

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 1>what we were expecting last year, is that John Ross

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>can stretch the field, maybe take some defensive attention away

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>from A J. Green. They're talking up Tyler Boyd, Tyler

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Eiffert is healthy or now in in the preseason, and

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>then Joe Mixon UM should be able to help that

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>out as well because defenses have to hopefully focus on

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the run an improved run games. So I think he's

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 1>very safe in the second round. But I will admit

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he has as much upside as

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>these other guys going in this range. Yeah, I I

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think the other guys. I don't

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>want to say A J. Green doesn't have the ability

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to the other guys due to finish as a top

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>five wide receiver or top three wide receivers. I think

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he does. We've seen that before, Um, But I'm just

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kind of obsessed with the upside of UM.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.399
<v Speaker 1>The other three players in this quartet, if you will,

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as A Green is the oldest of this group. May

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you're being a little agist here, I said yes. I

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>said yes. They're in our Fandel programming. You'll see some

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>of those videos live on our YouTube channel coding up

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>later today. UM, but yeah, I think there. Agism is

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>a thing, and I on both sides of it. What

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to pay heed to me is the cut

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>off though, because right after a J Green you get

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>into a whole group of Mike Evans. Stop. Let me

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>stop you there, like he gets the cut off. A

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people believe Mike Evans is the cut off,

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and they have Evans in this group. Why don't you.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he is much more viable of volatile anything

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen out of these guys the past buple

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of years. Michael Thomas has finished wide receiver eight in

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of points per game each of the past two seasons.

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen we finally so the upside last year hit

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>him finishing inside the top five at wide receiver. UM.

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>He's battled injuries in the past, but I think based

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that there are no tight ends there

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.879
<v Speaker 1>and the target volume that Keenan Allen got last year,

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why we trust him more. And then

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Davanta Adams playing with the arguably best quarterback in the

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>league right now in a very potent offense where I

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>read the stat earlier, Jorty Nelson. The past two seasons

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he played healthy with Aaron Rodgers finished wide receiver one

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and wide receiver three, So we think there's a chance

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Davanta Adams to get there too. Mike Evans just last

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>year finished wide receiver twenty and proved that he is

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>purely volume dependent and he's not getting those on seventy

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>plus targets anymore that he was getting just a few

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Because his catch rate isn't all that great.

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston and Ryan Fitzpatrick to start the year, they're

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not the most accurate quarterbacks um and Mike Evans normally

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>sees a ton of defensive attention. We saw we thought

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that he would get more efficient last year. Ultimately it

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't really happen. So with the targets coming down, the

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 1>efficiency not being great, Uh, he could probably score double

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>digit touchdowns, but I don't think he has great reception

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>uh and yard uh upside compared to other guys in

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the second round. I completely agree, ultimately with everything that

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you said, and I think that the the the upside

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is evident. This is why he was an early round

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 1>pick last year. But volatile is a perfect word for

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans, and I think we expected it to be

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this dominant player, almost DeAndre Hopkins, like I think in

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this offense, I think it's clear he's not DeAndre Hopkins. No,

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not that type. He is a physical freak for sure.

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>He could go up, he can make the big catch,

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the contested catch, he could do his thing in the

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>red zone. But to me, he's not as fast as

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>these other guys. He doesn't run as crisp routes as

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 1>these other guys. Maybe he doesn't have as strong hands

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as these other guys. You see like DeAndre Hopkins, Odell Beckham,

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown consistently making that circus, that freak catch, and

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Mike Evans could do it every now and again.

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think that he's in the same caliber of

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>talent as those guys. And it's not a knock on

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans. Those guys are just the best in the world. Yeah,

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you in the world like that. It um

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so that means Michael Thomas, Keenan Allen, and DeVante Adams

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are all above Mike Evans and A. G. Green and

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they're in a tier as well. But for me, as

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 1>clear as A G. Green was that he was the

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>eighth rand wide receiver. For me, that's how clear it

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is that Michael Thomas's ranked number five five. The issues

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that you have with Demante Adams and Keenan Allen probably

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 1>both injury related. Demante Adams had a ton of concussion

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.839
<v Speaker 1>issues and Keenan Allen, while we have already said, listen,

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not injury prone. The injury issues or creeping in

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the back of your mind. I'm not not scared off

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>all the injury issues by Alan, but like they're there,

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a real thing. Michael Thomas doesn't have those.

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have concussion issues, he doesn't have injury issues.

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>He has that the Saints are gonna run the ball

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>whole lot. Michael Thomas is the clear cut wide receiver one,

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and he improved by leaps and balance from his rookie

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>year to you two. And I think that improvement continues

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 1>in year three. UM, he is quiet. He's not one

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of these loud wide receivers like in Odell Beckham Jr. Um.

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>He's not necessarily the physical freak of DeAndre Hopkins or

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones. But he's just really, really damn good. And

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that's why Michael Thomas is my wide receiver. Five consistency, consistency,

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and more consistency out of Michael Thomas. I mentioned it

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:22.839
<v Speaker 1>in terms of points per game two years in a row,

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 1>finishing as the wide receiver eight overall and half point

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>PPR outside of DeAndre Hopkins. Last year, Michael Thomas was

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the most consistent wide receiver, finishing as a top twenty

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:36.280
<v Speaker 1>four wide receiver in seventy five percent of his games.

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins did that in eighty one point three percent

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of his games. So Michael Thomas just really the second

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>most consistent receiver behind DeAndre Hopkins and look Thomas touchdown

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>regression positive regression is coming for him as well. We

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it with Drew Brees based on how many times

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees threw the ball, which took a step back.

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>The Saints passing volume absolutely took a step back in

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of volume but they still threw the ball a

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>decent amount of the completion percentage incredibly high for Drew Brees.

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yet he had just twenty three touchdowns based on how

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>much he threw the ball and threw the ball inside

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the red zone. Uh, and at the efficiency that

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he did, you have to imagine Threw Brees gets somewhere

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:19.439
<v Speaker 1>between twenty and thirty touchdowns. I have to imagine Michael

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is going to get at least two or three

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of those. So two years ago he had nine touchdowns

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on only a hundred and twenty one targets. Last year

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he came back, he only had five touchdowns on a

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty nine targets. So if you look at

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that touchdown pace that he had with the targets who

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>three years ago, if he just comes close to that,

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at eight to ten touchdowns this year out

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of Michael Thomas, and I think, unquestionably another one hundred

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>catches over twelve yards. I said it last year and

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again. I think Michael Thomas is the

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 1>most talented wide receiver that Drew Brees has ever played with.

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:54.879
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing that now. Yeah, I think so too.

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>As good as Marcus Colston. Marques Colston was I think

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas is better. And you're seeing Michael Thomas who

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is still extremely young. He's twenty five years old, um,

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and everything's going to get better. I think like him

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as a player. UM, I think that you know, receptions wise,

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>he'll be at a hundred. I think yards wise will

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>be certainly over a thousand of touchdowns. They're only going

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>up only at five last year. He can do. I

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's realistic that he doubles that. Um. He's consistent.

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And people love Cam Meredith and they like Ted Gain,

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's o Jimmy Graham anymore. Is Brandon Cooks anymore,

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben Watson Greggy. It's Michael Thomas, and that is what

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 1>makes him by far in my opinion, the number five.

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 1>So Frank and I in order the same top five,

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we have the same eight nine? Do we have the

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>same six seven? That's interesting and I've gone back and

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>forth and I don't know the answer to this. When

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Keenan Allen Davante Adams. In our non PBR,

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I took Davante Adams over Keenan Allen. In a p BR,

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I would take Keenan Allen over Deamonte Adams

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the half point, I have no idea I'd want

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the pick right after one of them go, so I

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>could take the other one. That's how close they are

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>for me, Frank, how do you bring it down Keenan

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Allen versus Davante Adams. I think what you said in

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of scoring format makes the most sense. In non PPR,

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams unquestionably going to score more touchdowns and Keenan Allen.

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Danta Adams has twenty two receiving touchdowns over the past

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>two years. Nobody in the NFL has more receiving touchdowns

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>than that during that spand so I think now that

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you take Jordy Nelson out of the equation and Devanta

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Adams is the number one wide receiver, I think his

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>floor is ten touchdowns. And I know it's hard to

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 1>project touchdowns, but in this offense, as much as Aaron

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers throws the ball inside the red zone, as much

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>as he targets wide receivers inside the red zone, I

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>think Devanta Adams is as close to a lock for

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>ten touchdowns as you can possibly get. Keenan Allen on

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the other side, I think you will see more volume

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of targets. He will catch more of his

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>targets than Davanta Adams. Um. So he to me is,

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred and fifty plus targets, a hundred receptions. Uh,

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have more receptions and yards than Devanta Adams,

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but will not have nearly as many touchdowns. And with

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that being said, I think the touchdowns could actually come

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>up because he had six touchdowns last year. He was

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:13.959
<v Speaker 1>second in the NFL in red zone targets. Aunter Henry

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>is not there anymore. Antonio Gates will sign with this team.

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But those guys combine for twenty three red zone targets themselves,

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry and Antonio Gates last season. So you give

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:25.880
<v Speaker 1>some of those to Keenan Allen, You give some of

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>those to Mike Williams, who were all starting to love

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and talk up here as a sleeper for fantasy football.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think Keenan Allen SE's more than six touchdowns

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think his combination of hundred receptions thirteen

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at least thirteen hundred yards, and I'd say at least

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight touchdowns. That combination, to me, is a

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than what we'll get out of Davante Adams.

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But I love Adams in this range as well for

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the reasons I mentioned in the stat of the Day specifically. Yeah,

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really it's really, really hard. I agree with you.

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Keenan Allen touchdowns undoubtedly go up without Hunter

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Henry around, with without Antonio Gates around, I think that

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll rely on him more um in that green zone

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>as they call it. Um. You know, he's a PPR monster.

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>It's so hard between these two guys. Would you say,

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:17.320
<v Speaker 1>who are you more scared of when it comes to

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.800
<v Speaker 1>an injury, Keenan Allen Davanta Adams. It's a good question

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>because Keenan Allen has the torn a c L in

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the past. He's He's dealt with a few nagging injuries,

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But Davontae Adams has the concussion scares as well. I

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think based on everything Dr A has told us about

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the science of injuries and how guys recover from a

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>c LS nowadays, and you know, once you have multiple concussions,

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>it's more likely for you to sustain a concussion. I

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think I'm more worried about Davanta Adams and I agree

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and with that, we're gonna sign off YouTube right now.

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Remember the Fantasy at Football Frenzy comes your way next

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube. You're listening to the podcast form, we

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.359
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Uh, you're listening live on the radio. We're

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not going anywhere for the next four minutes or so.

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>For those listening to the podcast, reminder to you please

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>give us five star a five star rating, E a

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>comment and subscribe. If you're watching on YouTube, thanks for watching.

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>The Frenzy is next rank. Before we finish off, I

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>want remind you the Fantasy Factor is the only exclusive

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 1>single entry DFS site. They keep free roles, they have

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 1>free rolls registering all the time, and great promotions for

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.319
<v Speaker 1>free prizes. Keep a lookout Fantasy Factors free million dollars

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>survivor contest opening about a week before NFL kickoff. Go

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Factor dot com. That's Fantasy Factor dot com.

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>After Mike Evans and after a J Green, I am

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:34.439
<v Speaker 1>injuring Mike Evans to me, there's a clear number ten

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and everybody has the same top ten, which is what

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>order do you have it? And ours is the same order? Right?

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Not pretty much it is. I'm just gonna make Odell

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Beckham wider tim or two for fun to me number ten,

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it it's t Y Hilton, and he's creeping closer and

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>closer to number nine with Mike Evans, especially with the

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>health of Andrew Luck. Nolling Er a question. Sure where

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the talent is We talked about at the top of

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the show that talent, but his ability to get back

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to being Andrew Luck in the bill need to throw

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball deep. But for me, t Y Hilton, he

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>looks healthy, even though he didn't play last night with

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an injury. Um, he seems okay. Luck

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>seems okay. T Y Hilton, Uh rounds out of my

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>top ten. Maybe we should be a little bit more

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>worried about t Y Hilton. I think that Ryan Grant

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>based on the fact that, uh, Andrew Luck is not

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball downfield, and you know, we haven't really

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>seen those guys connect much at all in the preseason

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>UM and Throbs training camp, So maybe we should be

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lowering t Y Hilton a little bit more. I will

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>say this that Ty Hilton's average season with Andrew Luck

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback over the last three that they've played together

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is eighty five receptions nearly yards and six touchdowns. That

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>would have equated to around two hundred and ten Fantasy

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>points and a half PPR last year. That would have

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>been good enough to be wide receiver five overall in

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sen So that just tells you, you know what t

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton's upside is. That's a reminder of it. But

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I think once you get into this range, like it

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>starts to get worrisome, the Mike Evan t Y Hilton range.

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why you know people don't love the early pick

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 1>all that much because then you have to take two

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of those wide receivers and you get one of those

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>guys that your wide receiver one, whereas once you miss

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:10.280
<v Speaker 1>out on a J Green to me, Davante Adams km Nollen,

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna love your wide receiver one. If that

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Great, What do you think about I want

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to go to to this person's team right in my auction?

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about starting a team with Christian McKee?

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 1>So this is basically what he did. He started with

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, Stefon Diggs, and Mike Evans. That's kind of

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about, okay, And those are his three

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>best players. Those are three, I mean those are three

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 1>best players. Now the other two wide receivers he has. UM,

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.320
<v Speaker 1>so he went as I went stars and scrubs obviously

0:52:38.400 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>with Odell Um, with Odell Beckham, Antonio Brand and Joan Howard,

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and you said you like that a lot. Um he

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 1>went with the more balanced approach Christian McCaffrey, Stefon Diggs,

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans, Jarvis Landry, Marvin Jones. So he was able

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to get those four very very solid wide receivers, no

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:57.839
<v Speaker 1>super duper stars, no first round pick on this team. UM,

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>two twos and three threes. Basically, what do you think?

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of different ways to win. Me personally,

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>if I'm doing an auction this year, I have to

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>have one of those top A wide receivers. I'm gonna

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>end up with one of those guys for sure, and

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:12.840
<v Speaker 1>then I'm gonna try and lock down a workhorse running

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>back best as I could. And again, you can win

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 1>taking a balance approach in auction. But me personally, while

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know he has t Y Hilton and Mike Evans,

0:53:23.040 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so that makes you feel a little bit better about

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it because you have both of those guys inside your

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>top ten so you know, if there's weeks where Mike

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Evan struggled a little bit, maybe t Y Hilton picks

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>him up and vice versa. But personally, I need to

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have one of those topy wide receivers, especially an auction

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 1>where I can control who I win. I think the

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:38.879
<v Speaker 1>problem with that team is he doesn't have a top

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>eight wide receiver. It doesn't have an That's what's scary.

0:53:42.880 --> 0:53:46.279
<v Speaker 1>That's what's scary. Uh, we're done. Fantasy Football Frenzy comes

0:53:46.320 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>your way. Next, subscribe to the podcast. Give us like,

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>give us five stars. We really appreciate it. When we

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:55.280
<v Speaker 1>come back tomorrow on the show, the next ten wide Receiver,

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it looks four team. We'll finish out wide receiver one

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and wide receiver too. We hope to have you there.

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stample, I'm Greg Suspon. We'll see tomorrow. We hope

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 1>m