WEBVTT - Altice ‘Jenga Tower’ Menaces Global Credit Markets

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crumby. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're very pleased to welcome Aidan Cheslin from

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. How are you Aidenkay?

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, James Hailing very.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Good, Thanks so much for joining us today. We're excited

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to get your thoughts on the telecom sector, especially Altis.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Also delighted to welcome back Irene Garthia Pees with Bloomberg News.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Great to see you again, Ay, Ronny.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>How are you glad to be here?

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>And also from Bloomberg News. Brilliant to see Eleanor Duncan,

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>who covers leverage finance in London. How's it going?

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me. I'm good.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're here to talk about Altis. It's a sprawling

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe based telecoms company with a colorful billionaire at the helm,

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>now tipping into distress. They have about sixty billion dollars

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in debt and there's a fairly high chance of them

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not paying it all back, which will affect a lot

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of different types of investor and will weigh on the

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sector and more broadly on credit markets, particularly in Europe.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a vast debt complex and a frequent issuer. They're

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>also doing some fairly creative maneuvers to try and shift

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>assets around the balance sheet and shield them from claims

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>if things do go bad, so called unrestricted subsidiaries. I'm

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>hoping one of you can help explain that and what

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of precedent is being set here. But the sheer

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>volume of debt in a variety of currencies makes it

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a widely held name by credit investors, hard to avoid

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in the bond and loan market, and there are implications

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>too for collateralized loan obligations. So let's start there. Can

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you speak to that eleanor what's the mood in the

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>market when you ask about Altis?

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>As you mentioned Artisse has, I mean especially Artist France.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 4>So artist has an enormous debt pile of you know,

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of around sixty billion dollars and Artist France has

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 4>about twenty four billion euros of that. So I think

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 4>some bank analysts are estimating that ninety percent of European

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 4>clos are exposed to Artis. So Artisa's troubles are impacting,

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, the entire market. The issue is that when

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 4>you know now Moody's in S and P has downgraded

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Artise France to triple C. The problem is that clos

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 4>are restricted in how much they can hold of, you know,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 4>the kind of riskiest junk debt. I think it's something

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 4>like they're allowed to hold something like seven point five

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 4>percent in terms of their overall portfolios. So now there'll

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 4>be under pressure either you know, to sell Autie's debt

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 4>or maybe some of the higher priced triple C debt

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 4>that they have in their portfolios. The reason that that matters,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I guess in the broader leverage finance market is because

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 4>triples sorry, clos are a crucial cog of the market.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 4>They're the biggest buyers of leverage loan and so this

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 4>might impact, you know, kind of how eager banks are

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 4>to underwrite new LBOs. It might also impact, you know,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 4>how easy it is for some of the riskiest borrowers

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 4>to refinance their debt.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Just to make it easy for some of our readers

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>who don't know, clos, they basically buy leverage loans, which

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>are risky company loans, and they repackaged them into securities

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and sell them at some different levels of risk, right

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, And so in terms of like the impact

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just one single name, one company is having this kind

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of massive effect on Europe and also other parts of

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the world. I mean we be saying the same in

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the US.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I think Bank of America analysts had that when

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Artise France was downgraded to triple C, something like thirteen

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>percent of US clos have already breached that you know,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>triple C requirement. So this is something that we're seeing

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 4>across the world. And again kind of goes to the

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 4>fact that this single credit has built up massive amounts

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 4>of debt mainly during the era of easy money and

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 4>thanks to kind of very aggressive acquisitions, and now you know,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 4>creditors are paying the price of that.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it a big enough event to shut down that market?

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're just so much cash chasing every deal

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. I mean that the yields are so

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>high that investors just seem to love credit generally. But

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>is this name big enough to cause that kind of

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, dislocation.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Celos have had a very good start to

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 4>the year. I think you know, something like record issuance

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 4>at least for you know, a number of years, so

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 4>they've had as opposed to last year when issuance was

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 4>in the doldrums, they've had a very strong start now.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 4>COLO managers and bankers tend to stress the point that

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 4>even if a credit is downgraded into this you know,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 4>junkiest junk territory, they're not forced sellers. So they might

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>choose to you know, hold on to Altis debt and

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe until the prices recover and as in, you know,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of stay in breach of that these kind of

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 4>triple C buckets. They might look to sell other CLO collateral.

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 4>But that means that we're seeing the impacts of Altis's

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 4>troubles on other leverage loan issuers in the market. So

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 4>I think when when you know, France was first downgraded

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 4>into triple C, we saw impacts for example on you know,

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 4>the five billion dollar loan from ZAO, would say a

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 4>US issuer, their prices were hit in the secondary loan market.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 4>So people aren't saying that the CLO market is clogged

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 4>up yet, but it's for sure that a lot of

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 4>managers are going to be impacted by this. I mean

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 4>one CLO manager described alties Front's impact, you know, the

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 4>downgrade as a quote widow maker for some managers in

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 4>the market. We've yet to see that, but you know,

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 4>hold this, hold this.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Page sounds grim widow maker, So there's definitely some contagion there.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the drama at the company level, and

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>it gave us a flavor of what's going on. There's

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a very colorful billionaire there, and there's all sorts of

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 1>stories about artworks and you know, colorful phrases like Dayton switch,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bullyboy tactics. What's going on.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 3>There is a very colorful character controlling the company who's

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>built this empire basically with mergers and acquisitions funded with

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 3>debt at a time when dead was very cheap. And

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 3>it's been a while since this kind of structure has

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>been a concern. Already, back in two thousand and sixteen

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 3>or seventeen, we already had stories that pointed about Eltis

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 3>having sixty elties the whole empire. Now it's divided in

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 3>three seals after an inter all your organization, it's International,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 3>it's Front, and it's alts US and overall, the sixty

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 3>billion has been a concern, in particular for the twenty

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>four billion that they have in Europe. It's the largest

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 3>junk kissure by far, and then he has been very

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 3>open about this. The fact that I'm so big in

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the credit market is not my problem as much as

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the bank's problem, or in this case, bondholders and other

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>investors problem. IF's what's the worst that can happen to me?

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>If I can't repay my mortgage? Well, okay, fine, the

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 3>bank will get back the keys of the house. But

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I've enjoyed all these years and I've been happy in

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 3>that has He said that very very openly. So that's

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 3>that's the mood, and that's the playbook now. He what

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 3>was interesting, The timing is interesting and also the approach.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's go back to last year. August last year, there

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 3>were summer last year there were news that Portugal was

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>investigating Altis Portugal, which is part of Altis International, and

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>in particular they were investigating a few individuals, one of

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>them Aarano Pereda is the co founder of Altis, so

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 3>very very close person to Patrick Dry for corruption and

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Dry whent he appeared on on the company's earnings

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 3>in August to kind of reensure reassured investors that Altis

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 3>was a victim of this corruption case and that well

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>he was not aware of this and that he was very,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 3>very disappointed with the these individuals. Then he went on

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>a road show in September in London and New York

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 3>to tell investors that everything and anything in the Altist

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 3>universe globally US, Portugal, Israel, and France and American Republic

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 3>was up for sale at a price, and that he

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 3>would use that to repay that. So the asset sale

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 3>process started and he for for the French silo. They

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 3>agreed on the on the disposals of two assets. So

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the assumption in the market was that they were going

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 3>to use the proceeds to repay that. But then the

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 3>company had a surprise for creditors, which is that right

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 3>before agreeing on the sale, they removed those assets from

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 3>the restricted group and moved it to unrestricted entities, which

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 3>essentially means that it's out of reach of creditors. If

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 3>it ended up in a bankruptcy case, then yes, as

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 3>in an an insolvency procedure, yes, creditors would have records

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 3>against those assets. But what the company can do in

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the meantime if before it ended in that scenario is

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 3>it can raise debt from third party, for instance, against

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 3>those assets, and that collateral would be for the new

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 3>money provider. And so what the company did was in

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>the last earnings call in March, they told investors about

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 3>this move and also that they would only consider using

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 3>the proceeds to repay that if creditors participated in discounted transactions.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Now that of course shifted the mood because everyone was

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 3>expecting a repayment and all of a sudden taking they

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 3>were told like, actually, you know what, you need to

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>take a haircut. We don't know how big the haircut,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 3>we don't know. That's what's the plan. But there he's

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 3>he's created some bad blood, let's put it that way

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 3>with creditors.

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So these the bully boy tactics you've been writing about.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 3>That's yeah, that's exactly why it does. For a lot

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 3>of people, it does feel like a ransom.

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is he doing this? And I mean, obviously you

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>say that it's a situation where you know, he owes

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, so it's more that the lenders

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>problem at this point because there's so much outstanding. But

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't you know, isn't his company one that has to

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>come back to the market. Aren't they one that you know,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they require a lot of capital to run their business.

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's kind of burning his bridges with creditors. Isn't

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there a long term negative impact for him?

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, although there are different theories about why he is

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>doing it now, and I probably it's not down to

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 3>a single one, but the most likely one is that

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>because everyone was expecting to for the company to starty

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 3>peeing dead, the price of the bonds and the loans

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 3>had had increased, so the window for the comp need

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to take advantage of the discounts to do buybacks, for instance,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>was closing. So it did feel like they wanted to

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 3>send the message that no, no, no, Actually, like the

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 3>only way to solve our leverage problem is if we

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>do this haircut thing, and they want to cut ten billion,

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 3>which means that they will still have about fourteen billion

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 3>outstanding in the French silo. So yes, they will need

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>to come back to the market. But I guess to

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 3>an extent they're betting that creditors will forget in a

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 3>couple of years.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's tony possible. So I do want to bring in aiden,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but before we do that, I'll know what's the kind

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of emotional impact on the market of people furious at

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this billionaire.

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean people are upset, I guess speaking to

0:12:55.240 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 4>high bond investors, and that's you know, I'll tease makes

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 4>up a huge amount of the high old bond market too.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 4>You know, everyone is suffering pain, everyone has exposure. They

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 4>haven't been able to avoid it. You know, they've built

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 4>up exposure to the company over this you know kind

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 4>of era of easy money, when getting a return was

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.359
<v Speaker 4>the priority. I guess they kind of saw what telecoms

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 4>for a long time was like the darling of the

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 4>high old market, and so now they I guess they

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 4>see themselves as having you know, helped Drahi to where

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 4>he's got. He's a he's a billionaire, he lives this,

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of fairly, you know, lavish lifestyle, and

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 4>now he's turning to the secured and they see him

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 4>as you know, having turned to the secured creditors who

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 4>have got him there saying actually, you guys are going

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 4>to have to take the pain. So there's there's a

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of there's a lot of bad feeling in the market,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 4>and they say, you know, there's a number of these

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 4>companies are headed up by I guess similar figures to Drahi,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe like the call sens of this world in the

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 4>case of you know, the ardor chairman that are pulling

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 4>similar tricks, and they're saying, you know, Altisse France was

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 4>the last straw. We're not going to support these kind

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 4>of companies anymore. And you know, as Ernie says, maybe

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 4>in a couple of years time, they'll eat their words

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 4>or you know, kind of least. Memories are sometimes short

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 4>in this market. But for now that they're upset.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk to Aidan Cheslin at Bloomberg Intelligence. You look

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at this stuff in great detail. You have described Alts

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>as teetering like a Jenga tower. So what's the situation

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and aiden how do you view things?

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I I think you know, clearly the company themselves

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>have said that the current debt structure is not sustainable

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>going forward. You could certainly argue they've made that worse

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>by taking assets out of structure. Not just now, by

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the way, but that behavior dates back to twenty twenty

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>one when they sold their tower business. Hevery and yank

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 2>those proceeds out of the company rather than reducing debt.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, you have leverage of six point four times

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>at the end of last year. The company is guiding

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>that ebit DA will be down mid to high single

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>digits this year. They're also interest costs because of where

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>we are in the credit cycle, interest costs are going

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 2>up fast than they're able to cut the capex, which

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 2>means they'll be free cashtro negative this year. So you know,

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>we have on our numbers leverage going from six point

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>four to seven times this year and seven point seven

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the next year. Recent transactions where we've seen European telecoms

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>companies being traded or bought and sold, they've been going

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>for EVY to ebit DAR multiples of close to five

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>five and a quarter times. So clearly, this kind of

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>level of debt we have now there's no equity value

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>in the business is probably you know, if it was

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>to go into into a hard restructuring, you'd probably wipe

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>out the subordinated debt as well, and the and the

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 2>leverage is spiraling. So please, something needs to be done.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's that's the crux of what the

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 2>company was trying to get at on the call. It's

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>just a question of how much gets done and who

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>takes the pain.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And selling the assets. We've talked about that on this show.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they kind of getting rid of the crown duels.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Are they undermining the value by by selling the assets the.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Businesses that have been stripped from the group so far

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 2>a kind of non core. I think the problem is

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally that the leverage of the core s FR business

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 2>is just way too high relative to to the value

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of the company. And that's that's what's kind of hurting them,

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's part of what will form the negotiations between

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 2>the creditors and the the shareholder, because obviously, if the

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 2>company is worth around five to five and a quarter

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 2>times ebit DAR, if you can cut the leverage down

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 2>to four times or below, which is where Artista saying

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 2>they'd like it cut down to through debt haircuts, you

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 2>are recreating equity value to the shareholder when none exists

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>today as well. So that's that's one part of the discussions.

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 2>How much will creditors want to give into the to

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the shareholder and create value there versus preserving value for themselves.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And what about all the shenanigans with moving the debt around?

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is this something that investors should have known

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about because it was in the bond docks or the

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>covenants and they you know, they were warned, but they

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just didn't take any notice, and now it's coming home

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to roost.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's a symptom of weakening and documentation

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen as a process over the last decade

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 2>or more. Companies as clearly entitled to do this. It

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 2>is clearly aggressive, but you know, the limitations were there

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 2>in the documentation. And we're seeing a deal this week

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>with Telecommentalia where they're offering their bondholders the chance to

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>move into the network business, which is essentially being bought

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>out and lbo' by KKR at the starting leverage of

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 2>four point three times, but we think going up to

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>over five times, and they're being offered a security package

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>but otherwise basically the same terms of the largely investment

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>grade style documents they had before. And many investors probably

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 2>will do that switch into the tower company because in

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the long term it's probably a more stable asset, But

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be sitting in a company over five

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 2>times levered, run by KKR with investment grade style documents,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 2>and that's been the way of the market for quite

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 2>some time now.

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And let's say they do come out at the other

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>side of this, you know, they do put some losses

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on creditors, but they they come out at the other

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>end and then they have to come back to the market.

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect there to be any premium on, you know,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>or any you know, having to pay a bit more

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to access the market after that, or is it just

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>such such a big name that investors will forget.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 2>I think investors will remember this one in particular for

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 2>some time. Don't forget through the other silos, whether it's

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Alti's international for example, They basically put, with a very

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 2>few exceptions, the entire company up for sale. So I

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>think the plan is to try and extract as much

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>value as they can and kind of carry on selling

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>assets and taking the value that they can out and

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 2>repaying debt elsewhere. So probably if you if you, you know,

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 2>take a straight line extrapolation of that, and they're probably

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.719
<v Speaker 2>hoping that once this debt haircut is done, they wouldn't

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 2>necessarily need to issue a substantial amount in the next

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 2>two to three years.

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So these aggressive debt management move they've been seen before

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US, for sample J Crew, but fairly new

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>in Europe at this point. Creditors are organizing, right it

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>only just like they do in the US. How does

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that work? What's the next stage? What are we looking for?

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 3>So what they've done so far? There are two in

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 3>the case of all these trands that are too credator groups.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 3>One is a group of crosshold of investors that have

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 3>crossholdings in the unsecured bonds and the secure bonds that

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 3>that one has about four billion of alt is dead.

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 3>And then there's a bigger group of secured lenders and

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 3>bond holders that these ones have signed a cooperation agreement

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 3>so called that basically what is we're going to stick

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 3>together so that the company can't play tricks and can't

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 3>try to to split us and play us against each other.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 3>What is interesting, which is again for Europe, is very

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 3>unusual because it's often seen as uncompetitive, so it's a

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 3>bit of a gray area depending on what they're used for.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 3>The thing here is that we have no idea what

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 3>the company wants to do. We don't know what they

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>will come up with. So they know that they want

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>to band together and push against any potential abuse, which

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 3>is don't know what the abuse is going to look like.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 3>And then the interesting thing about this one is that

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 3>it's six months, which is way longer than they usually

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 3>are because typically it's like ninety day agreement and then

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 3>they get renewed. This one is for six months, which

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 3>you can extend twice for sixty days.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>So do you expect them to be successful in any way?

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there any sign that this might work?

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, the credits can band together and they can

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>defend themselves.

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 3>There have been instances before, like Dish in the US,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 3>where creditors pushing bag was a successful move. The thing

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 3>is that this one is also a very very big group,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 3>so it's also TVD if they will manage to stick

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 3>together given the size of the group.

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So just going back to the impact more broadly, I mean,

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>elen'tor mentioned it and aid and I just wanted to

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>get your take on the kind of ripple effect through telecoms,

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, through other sectors or is it really just

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a standalone Altias story that people just putting this in

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>an Oltis box.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Now we've seen obviously things like the situation with Arda

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 2>at the moment as well. There's a few of these

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of restructurings going on at the moment, and I

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 2>think there's been I think you mentioned it earlier. Ins

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>of the weakness of the documentation and the availability to

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 2>move assets around has been part of the problem for creditors.

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 2>You also have in several of these situationstions in Outis

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 2>France is one of them, even have competing interests between

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 2>different creditor groups. So within out Ease France, there's obviously

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>some creditors that are solely in the senior secure debt

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and there are some that are in the subordinated debt

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>as well. And if you're trying to preserve value in

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 2>one area, it means you have to give up more

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>value in another area, and you end up having some

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 2>creditor on creditor violence as well, and certainly see you

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 2>there's instances where that can happen. You know, every each

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 2>of these restructurings have their own unique circumstances at the

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>root cause of it, although, has been a combination of

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 2>higher interest rates, weak financial performance, poor documentation.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We talked to a big investor in Europe not that

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>long ago, a couple of episodes ago about you know,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the risks to credit markets. We always bring those up,

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's she said her biggest concern she's based in

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Europe was the spread of credits or on credit of

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>violence from the US to Europe. As you just mentioned,

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>aiden this is kind of like, you know, the beginning

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of it potentially. I don't know. Do you think this

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>marks the beginning of the spread of this to Europe.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, we certainly are seeing it in capital structures where

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 3>there is a big US component, as in there are

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of US investors and advisors that are used

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 3>to do these tactics. I don't know if when we

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 3>It's true that one of the issues about doing it

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 3>in Europe is that you never wanted to be the

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 3>first one to try. You wanted someone to try and

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 3>fail first, and then if it didn't fail, then you

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 3>would think about it. We'll see. Another reason why in

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Europe it doesn't tend to work is because the market

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 3>is smaller. That's if that's that's a theory. The market

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 3>is smaller and people tend to be where investors tend

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 3>to be nicer to each other because they see each

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 3>other more often, perhaps than in the US. I don't

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:16.239
<v Speaker 3>know if that's that true, but we'll we'll see if

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 3>that's really the beginning of a more aggressive trend in

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Europe or if it's used an exception for like huge

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 3>capital structures where this is just like more more prone

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 3>to happen.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You'll probably find out, Irony, you're you're here in New

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>York for three months, usually based on your you'll find

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>out whether people here are more aggressive than they are

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. What do you think? Do you think that's

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>reasonable sumption that the market there is a is a

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of one.

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I would just echo what Ironie said, which is

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 4>that I mean there's some fear among investors that you know,

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 4>some of these kind of more aggressive US style tactics

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 4>are coming over here. But you know, the CLO market

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 4>in particular is very small. Everyone knows each other. I mean,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 4>we'll see, right, And.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So as as Aiden said that there may be others

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the same boat, are there any other situations out

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there that we think are going to go the same way?

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 3>In Europe there's introm that could potentially clay or try

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 3>to play creators against each other. It's still early days

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 3>and there's no plan on the table yet, but in

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that case there is. There are two groups as well,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and they have different interests depending on the maturities of

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the dead that they hold. If the company will use

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 3>it to try to extract as much value as possible.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Will we'll see longer term. Does this kind of put

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>pressure on covenants or on documentation or do you think

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>people just kind of will will move on.

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, something that I heard yesterday from some of

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 4>the banks was that at least a few banks are

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 4>being a bit more cautious around underwriting new LBOs after

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of what they're seeing in terms of

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 4>what's going on with alties fronts, so not necessarily on leverage,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 4>but they're being kind of much more cognizant about keeping

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 4>investor protections intact, so you know, maybe in some cases

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 4>stepping back from deals where sponsors are being too aggressive

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 4>on some of the baskets, so especially around dividend distribution

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 4>baskets and you know, company's ability to sell assets without

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 4>paying down debt. So I thought that was kind of

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 4>interesting that this is, you know, spiraling out in some

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 4>senses to the way people are looking at new leverage buyouts.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I think at the end of the day, it will

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 3>depend on offer and demand, because this could be an issue.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 3>It was something known and investors bought it anyways because

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 3>the demand was so strong, they didn't really have the

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 3>negotiating power to push back when they do, like we

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 3>do see it in the market that when they do,

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>they do push back and they get better terms. But

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 3>in general, I wouldn't be surprised if in the next

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 3>months or next year we start seeing loose documentation again

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 3>just because of a matter of for and demand.

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It sounds to me, based on what you're all saying,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>is Altias kind of has the upper hand here. Is

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that fair to an.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Extent, yes, although I was having this discussion with some

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 3>investors and the idea seems to be also that he

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of needs to be not too bad with at

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>least part of his investor is because they're also involved

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 3>in alts Us, so he kind of he can be mean,

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 3>but just to an extent, I guess.

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I think this series that he has the upper hand

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>comes to the point that he's holding the media and

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>then Data Center proceeds as a sort of a carrot

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>for investors to agree to this haircut, and it makes

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 2>a big difference to the size of the haircut that

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 2>you need to take. You know, we ran some scenarios

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 2>in our research. We looked at, well, what's the worst

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>case scenario if they want to get leverage below four times,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and those proceeds from those disposals are not recontributed, then

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>you'd be looking at a subordinated debt haircut of around

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent and a senior debt haircut of around forty.

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Now bear in mind, if you're a senior debt holder,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 2>recovery values probably around eighty percent at the moment if

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>you wiped out the equity and subs, so that would

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 2>be a bitter pill for probably too bitter a pill

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe the senior debt holders to swallow. If you put

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 2>those disposal proceeds back into the group, then the senior

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 2>debt haircut is nearer to twenty five percent. And if

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 2>you said, actually four and a half times leverage is

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 2>okay instead of four times as well, you're getting down

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen to twenty percent, which is, you know, where

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the bonds are kind of already pricing in, so that

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 2>might not be seen as quite such a bit of

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 2>pill by the senior debt holders. So I think that's

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 2>why people are saying that you know, he's holding a

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of the cards because he can decide what to

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>do with those those proceeds, and that will have a

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:46.719
<v Speaker 2>big influence on the negotiation. Bondholders do have some cards

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of their own to play, particularly the senior holders. I

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.959
<v Speaker 2>don't think the subordinated debt holders have a huge amount

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 2>of leverage, but the senior debt holders have maybe two

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 2>things in their favor. One is the fact that if

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>this went into a full restructuring, their recovery value is

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 2>probably eighty percent or better. And the second one is

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>that there is a maturity clock that's ticking that could

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 2>potentially get you there in twenty twenty five if there

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 2>was no agreement.

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And really, why does the US side of the matter.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 3>They will have to negotiate refinancing there as well at

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 3>some point, not that it's urgent in any case, but

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 3>there is part of the investor who is that it's

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 3>involved in Artist France is involved in Altis US as well.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And when you talk to the company, what do

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they say, How do they defend themselves?

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they feel like they need to defend themselves.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 3>And what was interesting was what I was mentioning earlier

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 3>about Drying the calls is that he was in the

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 3>calls last year to explain that Altis was a victim

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 3>of the fraud, but he didn't show up in the

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.479
<v Speaker 3>calls where investors were at all about the haircut, so

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 3>that I found was an interesting move from him. But

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 3>now the company is like, we we need to cut

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 3>leverage and this is how we plan to do it.

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk about bait and switch, bully boy tactics,

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Genger towers, I mean, what do they say.

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 3>They don't seem to disagree. They don't push back at

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the very least.

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I'll ask all of you just to wrap

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>things like what's the next thing to watch for here

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and why? Probably starting with aiden, you know, final thoughts.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's the negotiations between the company and

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the various creditor groups. You know, I ran through the

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>debt haircut scenarios already. We said in our note that

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 2>it feels like that there is, you know, some room

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 2>for compromise, given that that you have those proceeds out there,

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>given that recovery values in the senior dad are probably

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 2>that better than those implied by what would happen if

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 2>if you were to try and force leverage all the

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 2>way down to where the company wants it. So I

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 2>think you need to let those those investor groups forms

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 2>and those negotiations to start between the company to see

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 2>if they can reach a compromise somewhere in the middle.

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there a calendar for that or a trigger or

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>some kind of date that we're looking for particularly or

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is it fluid?

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that's still relatively fluid. Obviously, you have the

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 2>deadlines on that were mentioned before and some of the

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>creditor agreements. But I think it will take some time.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, the maturity cliff is more in twenty twenty

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 2>five rather than this year, so there's time for those

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 2>negotiations to happen.

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they have two once maturing January in February. I

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 3>think it is next year. But the interesting thing is

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 3>that everyone is expecting this to take some time.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so get some popcorns, settle back. But is there

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>anything on your short term radar at any that you're

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Well as at sales, what's happening with the sfar in particular,

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 3>or It's interesting because in that one they were looking

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 3>more into a minority stake sale. You don't really find

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 3>easily someone that is willing to have a minority stake

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 3>in a company where a Dragi has the driving seat.

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 3>That's put it that way.

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know final thoughts.

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I guess I'm interested in how this is

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 4>going to play out on a broader scale. You know,

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of these bloated cap structures out

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 4>in the market, which is having you know, kind of

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 4>an outsized impact on investors. You know, the high yield

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 4>market has shrunk while these capital structures have grown. So

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 4>it would be interesting to see whether this is going

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 4>to hit you know, like I said before, the real

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 4>economy where it's you know, riskier businesses are finding it

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 4>more difficult to refinance, especially at a time when interest

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 4>rates have surged, and if we're going to see a

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 4>lot more investor caution around say other of these kind

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 4>of large say maybe like be three rated structures and

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 4>potential downgrades.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. Ellen Duncan with Bloomberg News, Ierni Garthia Pees

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>also the Bloomberg News, and Aidan Cheslin from Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining.

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Us, Thank you for having us, Thank you, thank you.

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Check out all of Aidan Cheslin's excellent analysis on the

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal, and you really do need to be following

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the great work by Ireni Garthia Pees and Elenor Duncan

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News, Market Moving Scoops on the Terminal and

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. And please do subscribe wherever you

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. We're on Apple, Spotify and all other

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>good podcast providers, including the Bloomberg Terminal. Give us a review,

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>tell your friends, or email me directly at Jcrombie eight

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. I'm James Crombie. It's been a

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>pleasure having you join us again next week on the

0:35:50.760 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Credit Edge