WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How The Enlightenment Works

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey there everyone, it's me Josh, and for this week's

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>s Y s K Selects, I've chosen How the Enlightenment Works.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And the reason we named it works rather than worked,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just because we realized during this episode that this battle

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>between rationalism and superstition is still going on today. The

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment is still going on today. And I've chosen it

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this week because I feel like it explains a lot

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the division in the world today, not

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>just in the United States, not just in the West,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but all over the world where there's a dividing line

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that is separating people. That this gulf, this wedge is

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>getting deeper and deeper, and I think that this is

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the basis of the whole thing. See if you agree,

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>If not, it's fine. It's still an interesting episode either way.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoy. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a production of My Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>w Chuck Bryant and Jerry are So this is Stuff

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you should Know. The Enlightened Ones exactly, the three of us,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>no one else, No, we're the Enlightened Ones. I am

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and preface this what what I just

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>said off the air. This is a very tough subject

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to distill in a thirty to forty five minute podcast

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>because volumes of books can be written on the Age

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>of Enlightenment and have been and have been. So this

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is this is stuff. There's gonna be a very bird's

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>eye view. Yeah, there's a dude named Jonathan Israel who

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>just came out with I think this third volume of

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a three volume set on the Enlightenment, and he wrote

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>literally several thousand pages of it and it's considered an

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>obscure text. Yeah, he probably doesn't even think that he

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>covered it in full. No, Betty doesn't. Although he's for

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>flame coming right. I think he does have another one coming,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it was a second but um he uh

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that that The idea that um, he doesn't think that

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it's done, that it's not finished is actually a pretty

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>standard view of the Enlightenment. Like during research for this,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I realized that there are tons of intellectual arguments going

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on right now, like the Bill Maher thing. Bill Maher

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and Islam. He's been accused of being like a just

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a complete racist, xenophobic dude. Um because of his recent

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>statements on Islam. Did you see him and Ben Ben uh?

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you see them get into it? Okay, that argument

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>is an Enlightenment argument. Yeah, it's like it provided the

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment was so massive that the ripple effects are still

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>being felt on a daily basis because it was such

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>an enormous change in the way humans think that we're

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>still trying to sit there and analyze what the heck happened,

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And that is one manifestation of it. Yeah, is is

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like what Bill Maher is saying is, well, you know,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Islam is a religion or whatever, and therefore it's um

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>an athetical to progress and culture and like real thought

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and rationalism. And Ben Ben yeah, Ben Affleck is saying, like,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't say that about a culture, Like each culture

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is its own thing. So what we're seeing there is

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of moral absolutism arguing with moral relativism, and

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that is like textbook Enlightenment argument. Pretty interesting. Sure. Like

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>researching this article seriously, I tied together probably ten different

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>things that I didn't realize We're connected. Yeah, I love

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it when stuff like that happened. It was the start

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of and you know, the age of Enlightenment. Quote unquote

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>started and ended, but it was the birth of just

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a new kind of thought, a new value system, UH, philosophical, scientific, cultural, intellectual,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>basically saying reason over this previous long held belief that

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>just strict religious dogma is all you need to worry about,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>don't question anything, don't try and think about science and

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>nature and things like that other than just this is

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>God's creation and what does it mean in terms of

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>religion exactly. So of course it's still going on. But

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. It wasn't just that it was definitely Enlightenment

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>was the If you're an Enlightenment UM fan, you would

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>say Enlightenment was the domination of reason over religion or faith.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a value system basically. But there was another

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the Enlightenment, the domination of UM, the will

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of the people over the monarchy, UM, economic economic change, UM,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>huge economic changes. Think. To Adam Smith, there were a

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of like huge monumental changes in the way people thought, UM.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>So much so that modern historians who are trying to

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>unpack the Enlightenment still one of the schools of thought

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is that you can't just call it the Enlightenment. It

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in too many different places under different circumstances. Um.

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And then the again, like the the different aspects of it,

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the fact that one part of it dealt with governmental change,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>one part of it dealt with religious change, another part

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that with economic change. That they it's been kind of

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>distilled into separate compartments. Now, yeah, I mean separate compartments

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>somewhere divergent and contradictory. Uh. Occurred nearly simultaneously in the

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century in France, Great Britain, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Portugal,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>American colonies all over the place. Um. I like to

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>say it's the period of time where the world started

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>waking up, pulled their heads from their rear ends. Right basically, Well,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the the the question now, I mean, if you're a

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>religious type, you're probably happy about the fruits of the Enlightenment.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Like everybody points at, the Industrial Revolution is proof positive

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the Enlightenment was great. Where the American experiment proof positive

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the Enlightenment was great. But you probably don't like the

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>fact that the world completely turned its back on religion,

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or not completely but largely did. If you're a pro

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment type, you're probably saying this was for the best,

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.679
<v Speaker 1>like we were backwards, we emerged from the dark Ages

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the Enlightenment. Um. And this is the argument

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's still going on today, like, yes, the Enlightenment changed everything,

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>but did it go too far? So that's we'll get

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>into all that. But Conger, who wrote this article, I

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think did a very good job of taking the whole

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>thing back further than the eighteenth century out of the

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>French salons and set the stage for what created the

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>basis for this this change in thinking. Yeah, I think

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Kristen did a great job of distilling a complex topic

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>down to like an eight page article, but she does

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>take it back to Um. There were a couple of

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>things that sort of laid the groundwork. Um, well, a

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of things, but a couple of them are Mr

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Sir Isaac Newton and the famous story of the apple

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>falling on his head, which makes a great story. He

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>told a lot of people that I don't know how

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>uh factually exactly true that is, but it makes for

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a great story. But either way you want to look

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at it, Isaac Newton looked at the space at some

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>point between that apple in the ground and said, there's

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>something going on in that empty space. That should be

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>explained because that apple doesn't fall up. Something's keeping us

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>all rooted here on the ground, and I want to

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>look into that. Although if you were a fan of

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>David Humes, you would say, uh, well, actually it could

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>consumably fall up, because we've never proven it won't fall up. Yeah,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and him was one of the proponents, were not proponents,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but uh he was active in the Age of Enlightenment.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that really laid the groundwork was the Thirty

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Years of War from six eighteen to sixty eight, which

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much paved the way for Protestant Reformation, and the

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic Church took a lot of the teeth away

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>from the Roman Catholic Church first time. Yeah, it was.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>There was a huge change. So what you just described, Chuck,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is a the foundation for the intellectual branch of of

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the Enlightenment thinking usurping the power from theological thinking. And

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>then with the Thirty Year War, the political power was

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>taken away from the Church because for the first time

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>now the precedent has been set that you, as a citizen,

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>your allegiance is not split between church and state. Your

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>allegiances first and foremost to the state. And we see

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that still today. Like if somebody uh kills their um,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>their parents or whatever because it's the Seventh Sign and

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Demi Moore's running around and they it turns out that

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they were brother and sister, so you kill them because

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the will of God. State says, I don't care.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>If it's the will of God, you can't kill your parents.

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>The state's law is more powerful and more important than

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>God's law. That's straight out of the Thirty Years War

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that changed everything. Have very seen the Seventh Sign, Man,

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw that, like when it came out. I don't

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>remember anything about it. I just remember like one of

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the characters was this kid with down syndrome and he

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>murdered his parents because he found out that they were

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>brother and sister and he was super religious. They were

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>going to execute him. Yeah, when they execute I think

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>he was like the last martyr. Man. I'll have to

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>check that out again. Yeah, tell me more. Uh So,

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Conger points out even further back about the Dark Ages,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of laying the groundwork which the Dark Ages were

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>dark for many reasons. It one of the big ones

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was that the Roman Catholic Church basically ruled everything. Uh.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Latin was the language, the center of life and academia

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>where monasteries and abbeys, you weren't encouraged to get educated

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of uh theological uh realms. It was not encouraged.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to actually, I want to say, you

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be carefully using the term Dark Ages, because uh,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently it is a disparaging label that people on the

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>pro Enlightenment side of the argument, the humanists, they say,

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they say, these are the Dark Ages. That was back

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>when the Church controlled everything, when everybody was just an ignoramus.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Once the Enlightenment came along, we emerged from the Dark Ages. Technically,

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>once the Renaissance came along, we emerged from the Dark Ages.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you're in a Storian, you call it the

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages. But even the Middle Ages are kind of

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sad because it just says these a just kind of

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>existed between this important age and this important age. We

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just call those the Middle Ages. But it's better than

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dark Ages, like dark Ages. But that's a that's

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a um an argument or a label that a disparaging

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>label that UM humanists use. Yeah, unfairly, because there were

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>scientists working and laying the groundwork for future science in

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the Dark Ages and congret even mentions them in this article,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>like Thomas Aquinas came up with scholasticism. Yeah, And scholasticism

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is basically the idea that you can understand God even

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>more and be even more pure and divine yourself by

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>studying nature. Yeah. Roger Bacon was another monk who as

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a proponent of that, and I think, um, that allowed

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>them and don't I don't think that's the reason they

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>did it, but that allowed them to pursue the scientific

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>avenues because it was still tied to God. Another big

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>change was, uh, Like I said before, in the not

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 1>so Dark Ages, perhaps Latin was the language, and they

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have something called the printing press until Johann Gutenberg

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>came along in fourteen thirty eight and says, you know what,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone should be able to read, start printing stuff in

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>your native tongue. Uh. And that led directly to people

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>starting to educate themselves. It was the democratization of education

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. And all of this didn't happen like out

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the blue, like Roger Bacon and Thomas Aquinas and

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Leonardo Bruney, they didn't necessarily come up

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with their ideas on their own there was some this

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>really seminal thing that happened back in the mid UH

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>century where somebody, I don't know who did somebody translated

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Um Aristotle I believe, his works into Latin, and all

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the Greek rational thinkers of antiquity, their

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas were suddenly available to the West for the first time.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And it just so happened that some people started paying

0:12:55.240 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>attention to these things. Leonardo Bruney read Petrarch and revived

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea of humanism, which was a huge sea change,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because humanism says humans are pretty awesome and the fruit

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of our labors, the fruit of our intellect, the fruit

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of everything that we do comes from human ability, not

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>God Like, we're not just vessels for God's brilliance to

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be shown through. If you create something, you come up

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>with a work of art because God did that. You

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>did that, and let's figure out how you did it.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>That's humanism. And this is what the Renaissance started to

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>revive and was a huge change, like, maybe we should

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>start paying attention to ourselves a little more exactly, let's

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>explore the human condition. Yeah, Um Aristotle was not a

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>heretic because he tied his geocentric universe ideas to God

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um, he thought the universe was composed of

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>ten separate crystal spears, and beyond the tenth sphere that

0:13:54.880 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>was Heaven and God. Uh. Copernicus um Shah pretty said no,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. The universe is infinite. Uh. And he

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was pretty alone in that thinking. Early on, he faced

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of criticism from like every every religion, Protestants

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and Catholics. Yep, it was a They thought it was

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous way of thinking because he didn't make room

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for God in the cosmos. And it definitely was a

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>dangerous way of thinking to the Church. Like the Protestant

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Reformation was going on, you had the Thirty Years War

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>coming down the pike, you had Copernicus Um thanks to

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this revival of interest in astronomy and yeah, starting to

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to look at the the universe around us and finding

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>even like symbolic stuff like, um, who was it? Kepler,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he was an assistant to Tycho Brahe and Kepler figured

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>out that the planets uh revolve around the Sun in

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>an ellipse. Yeah. Well, the Church, the Holy Roman Church,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>said that the circle was a symbol of perfection. So

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of course everything revolves around the Earth in a circle.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Not only did things not revolve around the Earth, it

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>revolved around the Sun. And they didn't even do that

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in a circle. They did an ellipse. So the church

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is just losing its mind because all these people are

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>coming forward saying everything that you're saying over here is

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>starting to prove to smell like bs. And the church

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is losing its power left and right, both politically and intellectually.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's losing its authority. Yeah, Galileo even recanted uh because

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he was accused of heresy for his theory that the

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Earth rotates on its axis. So he said, I'll take

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it all back. I didn't mean that. Please don't kill me,

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>He's like, but just make sure my manuscripts survive. So

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about Bacon. He is a creator of

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method, and he says, you know what, we

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>should use experiments to actually try and explain things, and

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's I think it's high time we have a

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>method for doing so. So that was its is Bacon. Yes,

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he was related to Roger Bacon. I

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know. They were separated by a few centuries, but

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they could have been fam Sure. I think so uh,

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and he was did you ever take philosophy in college? No? Um,

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I might have. I didn't get much out

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of it if I did, because I don't remember. I

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>took one class. We'd studied Descartes um a lot. I've

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>grown to be a little more interested in it, but

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I like them more. I like like existential crisis philosophy,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like Nick Bostrom stuff, and I don't know what that is,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>just basically how the world's gonna end. Okay, this stuff is.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I think like Descartes is interesting, but I'm not like

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a I'm not. It doesn't light my fire. Yeah, it

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was all right. I think I made an a in

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that class actually because it interested me at the time.

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>But I never took a follow up class. It just

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>took the intro. So it clearly didn't mean that much

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. But I get it. Well. Yeah, And what

0:16:53.200 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>dey Cart was saying is our experience is not It's

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not what you thought. Like mind and matter are two

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>different things, and of the human experience as a subjective

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>experience and the mind, what the mind produces is different

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>than what is reality and really kind of um that

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>changed things tremendously too, So You've got all these people

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like contributing to this. We haven't even reached the eighteenth

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>century yet. Like the groundwork is definitely being late and

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it's still being laid. Um as far as the like

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the government goes. John locke Um was one of the

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>people who contributed to the idea of the social contract

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and social contract. There was Hobbes Lock and later on

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Rousso and others contribute to this idea that humans are

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>born with natural rights. You're born free, I'm born free,

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>even Jerry's born free, look at her. And to form

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a society, you give up some of these natural rights.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>For example, one one thing that you give up is

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>your right to kill and retribution. Uh. Any society typically

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>demands a state monopoly on violence, which means that if

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody kills your family member, you don't go kill that person.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You go to the state and say that guy killed

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>my family member, triumph convictim, and kill him on my

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>behalf because there's a state monopoly on violence. So that's

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a natural right that you give up, I think appropriately

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>so and for the better, but as part of the

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>social contract and so uh, the idea that that humans

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>had these rights and that society in turn had rights

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>because humans gave them rights. Um. That was a big

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>basis of enlightenment thinking that would be added to later

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on too. Yeah. And Locke also was one of the

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>first champions of uh, what would kind of become nurture

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>over nature his idea of the tabu larassa that when

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>humans are born, their minds are clean slate and they

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are shaped by experience and education and not some preordained

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that you're born with. And uh, this French intellect

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>gobbled that stuff up. As name was Francois Marie Arouette,

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and he went by a name you might know, Voltaire,

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and he really loved this stuff and went back to

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>France with all these ideals and said, we got to

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>get on this and let's uh, you know, we can't

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>go out in the streets right now and talk about

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the stuff, but we can meet in private and homes

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like a Tupperware party, and we'll call them salons and

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll talk about these radical ideas and um, in

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this new way of thinking in the privacy of homes

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>for those that are willing to host it. So he chuck,

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Voltaire has been lit up. He was in England from

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen twenty nine, living in exile because he was already

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>critical of the French monarchy. While he was there he

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>ran into the ideas of lock of apparently Descartes as well.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>He he basically got turned onto rationalism and he was

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>primed and ready for it. Like this guy was just

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting for these ideas to pour into him, and when

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>they did, he became a lightning rod for what we

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>think of as the Enlightenment. Like Voltaire was the main

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>dude to start from what I understand. Yeah, and um,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>like we mentioned the salons, they had to do this

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in private because Louis the four that right, Yeah, getting

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>better at that. Uh he he was pretty hard on

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to try. He didn't like that kind of talk. It

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>threatened him for a good reason. Uh well, yeah, I

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the reason why. It's like the power was taken

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>from the church in place more in the monarchy. But

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in very short order, people said, you know, we're not

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>really that fond of the monarchy either. We think we

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>should rule ourselves, or at least a leed people to

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>rule ourselves. To this divine right of kings. Things seems

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of hinky now that we think about it. So

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the monarchies were threatened as well by the Enlightenment. So yeah,

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the monarchy, like the dumb masses that stayed under their

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>thumb and any kind of like radical thought or original

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>thought was super dangerous. It sounds familiar exactly. It is

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting how you talked about. I think there are periods

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of time where things like the Age of Enlightenment keep

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>popping up. That's like the nineteen sixties and the United States,

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think, like you said, we're in one right now.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in probably more than even the sixties

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yeah, And I think there are periods where

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that lulls, like maybe the nineteen eighties where they're the seventies,

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>remember Disco, like a dumbing down of things. Yeah, just

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>people not caring or whatever. Yeah, it's weird and cyclical.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I've read I read this article um called Things Fall Apart,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>How social Media leads to a less stable world. It

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>was by a guy named Curtis Howland, H. L and

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>DY and it's on Knowledge at War there like the

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Warton Business School website, and it was basically saying it

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't I thought it was condemning social media and this

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>guy was just basically stating matter of factly that social

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>media erodes the state, and that now we have ways

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to connect with other people in ways that are more

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>important to us than, say, our allegiance to the state.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So you may feel, um, you may feel more connected

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to somebody over Hello Kitty and your fondness for Hello Kitty,

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>more than you would identify yourself as saying American. And

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>with social media, you're able to connect with other people

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>who feel the same way, and so you form on

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>social media basically bodies that supersede the state in your opinion,

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>no boundaries exactly. And as this happens, more and more

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the states, what's called sovereignty erodes more and more

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and more um and it becomes a less and less

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>stable world. The guy's point was that, yes, while it's

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>very unstable and things are much more dangerous streaming periods

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like this, it's it's basically just a period of upheaval

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and change and then eventually things stabilize again. But what

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy was saying, using this as an example, is

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're in a like right now, possibly on the

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>cusp of a period of tremendous fundamental change in the world.

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I see that every day Yeah, it's pretty interesting time

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to be alive. Yeah, a little scary to me. Yeah, well,

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's like the guy said, it's it's more

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>dangerous than your average time because change frequently comes out

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of spasms of violence or um upheaval, like just where

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody's in charge because there's a power struggle going on,

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 1>or our normal structures are being eroded. It's interesting, it's

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>super interesting. Uh So back to the Salons, We're back

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to the age of Enlightenment, the traditional age of Enlightenment. Uh,

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the Salons, the members were known. There was a group

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>of people known as the philosophics. Uh. We've mentioned a

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>few of them. Rousseau, did Hero, Voltaire, Um. How do

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you pronounce that? Is that it's not montgue is it Montesquieu?

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Montesquieu um. And they were they're kind of skeptics and

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>critics of not everything, but the establishment of government or

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the way government was at the time, especially the church.

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Hated the church. Yeah, like Voltaire especially hated the church

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in the very fact that it even existed. And a

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the enlightened Uh ones were deists um and

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>deism basically, I like the way Conger put it, um

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in a big picture way. They believe in a clockmaker God,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>which means maybe God created everything and set things in motion.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>But then I was like, all right, that's it. I'm

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>out right. I'm not getting my fingers and all the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>pies of everyone. And it's you have free will basically

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>after you're born. Um, which again was pretty dangerous to

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the religious establishment. Yeah. So you've got the basis. You've

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>got the foundation of um, the Holy Roman Empire in

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the West losing tons of power, and and um political

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and intellectually, you've got the monarchy now being assaulted by

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the French salons who are planning the seeds of democracy.

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Like Monascu for example. Uh wrote in seventy eight The

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Spirit of the Laws, and he basically proposed the idea

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of a separation of powers. He's like the first guy

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that. He's the French lawyer who was in

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the salon scene. And Um, all of a sudden, it's

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>like separation of power. What are you talking about? No,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got a monarch and what the monarch says is right.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And as a result of this kind of thinking, the

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>seeds of democracy are planted, and then a hostility toward religion, um,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of almost any kind that you still see today, like

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in the form of like Bill Maher or Richard Dawkins

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>or formerly Christopher Hitchens. Um. All of this started coming

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the French salons. Yeah, um, all right, after

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this message, we're going to talk a little bit about

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>how the Age of Enlightenment manifested itself in different parts

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of the world. So we've mainly been in Europe this

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>whole time. Uh. In France there was an emphasis on

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the arts. Uh. In England they had a more emphasis

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>on UM. Science and economics. You mentioned Adam Smith at

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, Uh, Scottish man and night Uh some ninety

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>six in seventeen seventy six wrote his Wealth of Nations,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>which basically said the government should not interfere with matters

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>of finance and economics. There should be uh, the invisible

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>hand guiding all these principles. Yeah. I read this article

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and by this guy who's explaining that change, and thought,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.719
<v Speaker 1>like before that, it was that whole social contract thing,

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like Rousseau saying, you know, the the it's this is

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>an interplay between citizens and citizens and citizens and their government,

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and the government's role is to protect um, the rights

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of people. What Hume said is the government is legitimate,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and so we're not human, but Smith, it's the government's

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>legitimate and so far as it steps out of people's

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>affairs and let's free trade take place. Which that might

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>sound familiar if you um subscribe to republican or conservative

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>or libertarian ideology. You know, like the whole laz A

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:46.479
<v Speaker 1>fair attitude of government is what's what legitimizes government, and

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the government that medals in someone's affairs is an illegitimate

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>government as far as classical economic thought goes. Yeah, and

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about that in our stuff you should know

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Guide to the Economy, Yeah, which we got an email

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>someone bought that the other day. Yeah, that that was

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hours long or something. And then also in Scotland,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>um was David Hume, who's like my favorite philosopher of

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>all time, just because he's like a he's the only

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>when he studied, he's a meeting. Now he's a meeting.

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But he's the only one who's ever really spoken to

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>me of the Enlightenment philosophers. And Hume was this meat

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and potatoes dude who basically said, like, show me the proof. Yeah,

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a skeptic. He was an empiricist. Like he said,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you basically can't believe anything that you can't see with

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>your own eyes. My belief in his philosophy has been

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>eroded with the idea that, like consciousness is a subjective experience,

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like just totally subjective basically. But I like his his idea,

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was like the the cause and effect right,

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I think he used like billiards as an example,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>where you hit a ball like you're playing a ball,

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you hit like the eight ball with the Q ball,

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you can predict where that's gonna go, like where

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball is gonna go based on how you hit

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it with the cue ball. But the Humes point is

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is you can't say for certain that that's what's going

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen. You're basing that strictly on previous experience rather

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 1>than proof that this is what will happen. So we

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can't prove that hitting that cue ball will make this

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>eight ball go in a certain direction ahead of time.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And so therefore we've come up with this thing called

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>cause and effect, which basically serves as a stop gap

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>between what we think will happen and the phenomenon we've

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>already observed like, in other words, you can't say for

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>certain the sun is gonna come up tomorrow just because

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it's already come up so many days before. And the

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>reason why it's because we don't have empirical proof. And

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I liked him for that. So you don't think the

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>sun will come up tomorrow necessarily. That's It's not the

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>point that I think it won't come up tomorrow. It's

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what human is saying, is we we we can't prove

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that it will. We we you can't prove that it

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>will just based on previous experience. Well, Thomas Jefferson and

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>John Adams were on board that train to a certain degree. Uh.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And we mentioned earlier that most of the establishment was

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty threatened by most of these ideas and the people

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in power, but not everybody. Uh. Some people wanted to

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>get on the Enlightenment train because I think it was

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>progressive and maybe made them seem um open to ideas

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and modern perhaps um. Empress of Russia Catherine the Great

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>was one of those who had a lot of dealings

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with the philosophs, and Frederick the Great of Prussia even

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>had Voltaire over and said, you know what, don't you

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>come and live here and he did, Yeah, he said

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for free, and he said for free. He said, Okay,

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to think of Prussian money, but I

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. The prawlers the proval that's way better. Uh.

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It was also happening in Germany, um, all over the

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>world with Emmanuel Kant. He was one of the first

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>champions of freedom of the of the press. And his

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>motto is one that I love, dare to know. And

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>again he was just challenging people go out there and

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>learn about something and don't just accept, uh, what these

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>religious leaders are telling you you have to accept. And actually, um,

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he came up with this idea called the categorical imperative. Basically,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>can't gave the world the idea that there is such

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a thing as moral absolutes right. And I guess he

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't give the world that because the Judeo Christian ethic

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and most religious ethics say that there is such a

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thing as right or wrong. And today you have that

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>argument of is there such a thing as moral absolutism

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or is moral or cultural relativism a thing. That's the

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>argument that's that one of the arguments that's playing out

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>right now in the intellectual world. I just think that's

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to it totally is uh So, what does this

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>all lead to? Eventually, it's going to lead to warm

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>because any time there is well not any time, but

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times, when there's a uprising of radical thought,

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna want to take action. And it happened

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the United States by way of the American Revolution

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and in France by way of the French Revolution. And

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they had different results, to say the least, they were

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>both experimentations in this new idea of democracy. Yeah, pretty much, um,

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, the American one worked out pretty well, some

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>would say the French one not so much, because apparently

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>robes Pierre, who was the head of the Jacobin Party

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that took power during the French Revolution, robes Pierre was

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a follower of Rousseau. Remember, Rousseau contributed to the social

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Contract by saying, um, the people will something and then

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it's up to the people in charge to carry out

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that well. And so rose Pierre took that to mean

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that the people stormed the best deal and overthrew the monarchy.

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it was his job as the head of

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Jacobin Party, which is now a power to kill

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody who wasn't down with the revolution, and so thousands

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of French people lost their lives at the

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>guillotine UM as a result during this reign of terror.

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So some people would say, America, uh, founded itself based

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on democratic principles, and UM, let's not pay attention to

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these darker spots over here and just pay

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>attention to the democratic experiment. And it worked out great.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And then the French one, there's a revolution. They tried

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to install democratic ideals and thousands of people had their

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>heads chopped off, so it didn't work quite as well well.

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And some people say that effectively killed the age of

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment as we know it the French Revolution because the

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>chaos and violence that erupted, uh was in certain circles

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>blamed on the Enlightenment and proof that we can't self

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>govern and these are radical ideas and that's why we

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>got stomped on. UM. Have you ever heard the theory

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that the French Revolution was due to moldy bread? No? Uh,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>there's one theory that people got ahold of bad bread,

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>so it was ergo poisoning. And basically we're tripping on acid.

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>On July fourteen s nine when they decided to storm

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the best deal. That was one of the explanations for

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the sale and witchcraft trials. Ye, crazy, I hadn't heard that.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So they were like, let's it's go time, So let's

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>get this party started. But like I said, some people

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>say that ended the age of Enlightenment as we know it. Uh,

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Romanticism was soon ushered in and was way more appealing

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to the common folk, um than this weird radical thoughts

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that were going on before. Well, it was the Romanticism

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was the first time people questioned the idea on a

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>large scale that maybe the rationalism of and the humanism

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Enlightenment went too far in the other direction,

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Like sure, maybe we were way too religious and the

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>religious organizations had way to too much power, but we

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>swung way over here, and just rationalism had this idea too,

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and it became dogmatic in and of its own right.

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And so this is we still never really figured out

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>if how to how to fine tune it enough, And

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're still figuring out right now. A lot

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of people say, um, the Enlightenment, the idea that you're

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that the course of humanity is always towards civilization and

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>rational thought, and that any culture that's not there is

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>inferior to a culture that does think rationally. So that

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:41.959
<v Speaker 1>means that colonialism and imperialism was supported by Enlightenment thought,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge Like the Enlightenment it's not supposed

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to be about that's supposed to be about good things

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and freedom and all that, but it also uh supported colonialism.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That was a huge that's people are arguing about that

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>right now too. Yeah, let's go conquer these people and

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>make them modern and bring them into today's world exactly.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>So there there's another article I want to recommend. It's

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>called um the Trouble with the Enlightenment. It's by a

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 1>guy named Ali Kussen. It's on Prospect magazine. Awesome, awesome

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 1>article about this that's just he basically reviews a couple

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>of books, one one by Jonathan Israel who I mentioned earlier,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>where he basically says, like, forget the philosophics, you got

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to look at um Baruch Spinoza, who was a Dutch

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>philosopher from I think the seventeenth century. He was the

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 1>one who came up with the Enlightenment ideas and had

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>we followed his Enlightenment ideas there wouldn't have been any

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>governments now, or that there wouldn't be any religion whatsoever.

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>He came up with the real revolutionary Enlightenment, and what

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we got, what we think of as the Enlightenment, was

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>a watered down, moderate version that was changed. Sure, there

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was tons of change, but it was still palatable to

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the elite that the people could still be governed easily

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>even in these new democratic experiments and stuff like that.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:01.959
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people who take issue with his book,

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's um pretty interesting to discuss it. What's it

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>called democratic Enlightenment. I think he's the one who wrote

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that several thousand page trilogy. And then there's another guy

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>in a Storian named Anthony Pageant. He believes um that

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the Enlightenment project is still going on, and basically that

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as long as there's religion in the world, the Enlightenment

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 1>won't be fulfilled entirely, which is again it's it's like

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this this idea that rationalism has become dogmatic, and if

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't, if you're not just strictly rational, if you

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>hold any kind of what could be considered irrational or

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>superstitious belief, you're acting irrationally, you're not thinking correctly and

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>therefore you have to be converted, which is just as dogmatic. Yeah,

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>lots going on right now, huge time of change. And

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>also go read The Dark Age myth and Atheist Reviews

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>God's Philosophers by Tim O'Neil and Strange Oceans dot Com

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Tip O'Neal, and uh, I think that's about it. Huh.

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>That is it for me. If you want to learn

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.919
<v Speaker 1>more about the Enlightnment, go check out those three articles,

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>or check out and check out how the Enlightenment worked

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>by typing that in the search part How stuff works.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And now it's time for listening mail. I'm gonna call

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>this mad cow theory from Seattle. Hey, guys, just listen

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to your podcast on fatal familial insomnia. In it, you

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the late eighteenth century cases in Venice and then

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>wondered about the unrelated cases and what they were eating.

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>This made me finally sit down and write my first email.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>For years, I've had a theory about prion disease and

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 1>mad cow and specific years ago, I was watching a

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>program on Egyptian mummies. They talked about how mummification may

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>have started out with the Pharaoh but the practice eventually

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>made it down to uh call it budget mummification. They

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about how in the late eighteenth nineteen century crips

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>of these early mom is they would be ground up

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and sold as fertilizer, specifically in England. Sometime later, when

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I learned about prions and how nearly indestructible they were,

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I wondered, could ground up mummies have been used to

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 1>fertilize the field? Then a cow comes along and eats

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>grass that has been contaminated with prions, leading to mad

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>cow disease. Human eats the mad cow's brain. Its courts

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>felt yakops. Uh. So I've always wondered it. Could never

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out if you could prove it or disprove it.

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>If CFJ it was a real mummy's curse of desecrated

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian corpses, And that is Darren Gray in Seattle, and man,

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I just like that kind of speaking of radical thought.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I had not heard that one. Darren's having it, Well,

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Darren's own Gray. Is um nice going, Darren? Yeah? Uh,

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>if you have anything to say about that, anybody else

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we would like to hear from you. Can you prove

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>or disprove that Chris to Field yakubs disease is a

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>mommy's curse. You can tweet to us at s y

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 1>s K podcast. You can join us on Facebook dot

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash Stuff you Should Know. You can send us

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>an email which seems appropriate to stuff podcast at how

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com and join us at home on

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com. Stuff you

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.