WEBVTT - The Story: What is AI Love? w/ David Eagleman

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff. This is the story. Each week

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays, we bring you an in depth interview with

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>someone who has a front row seat to the most

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>fascinating things happening in tech today. We're joined by David Eagleman.

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>David Eagleman is a neuroscientist, Stanford University professor, author, entrepreneur,

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and host of the podcast Inner Cosmos. In his podcast,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Eagleman explores how our brain interprets the world and how

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that influences our perception. Ideas have been a source of

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>fascination for Eagleman ever since he experienced an Alice in

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Wonderland moment many years ago.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I fell off of the roof of a house when

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I was a kid.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I was eight years old.

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 2>The fall seemed to take a very long time, and

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about Alice in Wonderland on the way down,

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>about how this must have been what it was like

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>for her to fall down the rabbit hole.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>He told me that the whole journey was very calm,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but that it took a long time, and he remembers

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>having lots and lots of thoughts on his way to

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom.

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And then I hit the ground and broke my nose

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>very badly. But when I got older and went to

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 2>high school, I realized that the whole fall had taken

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 2>point six of a second. I calculated the eagles one

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 2>have at squared, and I couldn't believe that it was

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>so so fast.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>When Eagleman became a neuroscientist, he kept exploring this relationship

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>between our brain and our experiences, which led him to

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>research things like is it possible to create a new

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sense or is there a new way of interpreting an

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>already existing sense. This turned into a tech product for

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>his company, Neosensory, that could help deaf people understand the

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>auditory world through a vibrating wristband. David Eagleman is an

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>innovator with a fascination for tech driven interventions, so we

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't surprised to see an episode of the Inner Cosmos

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast all about AI relationships, a widely reported phenomenon that

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we hear it tech stuff have been eager to explore.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So we thought we'd ask Eagleman to help us understand

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>how our brains form these attachments. But before we launch

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>into that discussion, I asked Eagleman to tell me a

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more about the driving question. Behind his work, How

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>does the human brain construct reality?

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Your brain is locked in silence and darkness inside your skull,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and it only has spikes coming in. That's all it

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>ever has, these little electrical signals. So your eyes aren't

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 2>pushing light through, and your ears aren't pushing sound through. Instead,

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>your eyes are converting photons into spikes, and ears are

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 2>converting sound waves into spikes, and your fingertips are converting

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>pressure and temperature into spikes and so on. So inside

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>the brain there's nothing but these little electrical spikes running around,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's living in the darkness and trying to figure

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>out what is the world out there? And so everything

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>that we experience as reality is actually the construction.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 2>For example, things like colors don't exist in the outside world.

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>This is just a way to tag information as in

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>that's a different wavelength than that over there, so they

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>appear to be different colors. But this is the fascinating

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 2>question that we're stuck with. We are inside Plato's cave,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>seeing shadows on the wall and trying to understand what

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>is outside.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of perception, did you ever figure out an answer

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to that question of why time slows down when our

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>lives at risk.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I did a number of experiments on this, actually the

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>only experiments that I have ever been done on this

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>question of the perception of time.

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, on the.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Question of why does time slow now when you're in

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 2>fear for your life. The reason no one had ever

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 2>done experiments is because you have to actually put subjects

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 2>in fear for their life, which is very hard to

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>get approved. And so I dropped people from one hundred

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and fifty foot tall tower backwards in free fall, and

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 2>they're caught in a net below, going seventy miles an hour,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>and I built a di ice that strapped to their

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>wrists and it flashes information at them. And I was

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>able to measure whether they actually are seeing in slow

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>motion during a scary event. And it turns out that

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>it's all a trick of memory. What happens when you're

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>in fear for your life is your brain is writing

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 2>down every single thing. Normally, your brain is like a

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 2>sieve and most things just passed right through, but you're

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>capturing all the information. So it's not that you're seeing

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>things in slow motion. It's just the density of memory.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>You're remembering everything.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 2>You're in a car actually say, wow, I remember the

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>hood crumpling and the rear view mirror falling off, and

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 2>the expression on the other guy's face. And you've got

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>all these details, and your brain is doing a calculation

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>where it says, oh, well, if I have all those details,

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>it must have taken five seconds as opposed to one

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>second for this all to happen.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>One of the kind of topics of tech stuff is

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>what are the most exciting or promising paradigms for human

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>machine interactions, particularly a time when there's so much concern

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>about the negative effects of technology on the human brain. Obviously,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the question of like, what is this doing to us

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>in our brains and particularly developing brains. Do you have

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a kind of internal paradigm for how you think about

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the interaction between technology and our brains?

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, yeah, I have to say, I'll just put

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>my cards on the table. Very cyber optimistic on these points,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 2>but I'll explain why. One is really what we want

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>for our children is the largest available diet of information.

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 2>When I was growing up, I had my homeroom teacher

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and you know, whatever she knew

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>or didn't know, that's what I would learn, and I

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 2>would get my mother to drive me down to the

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>library and pull out an Encyclopedia Britannica and hope that

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>there was an article about the thing that I wanted.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And maybe the article wasn't you know, more than ten

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 2>or fifteen years old, I hoped. And you know, this

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>was really all the information that I had access to.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>But now my kids, growing up, the entire world's knowledge

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 2>at their fingertips, and it's the greatest thing for two reasons.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 2>One is what I got growing up was lots of

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>just in case information, like, just in case you ever

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>need to know that the Battle of Hastings was in

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>ten sixty six, here you go. But kids now get

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 2>lots of just in time information. So as soon as

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>they're curious about something, they look it up, they ask ALEXA,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>they type it in their phone, they do whatever, and

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 2>they get the information in the context of their curiosity.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>And what that means is they have the right cocktail

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of neurotransmitters present for that information to stick. I mentioned

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 2>before that most things just passed right through our brains,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 2>but when you care about something, it sticks. And the

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>fact is that everything that we create is a remix

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>of things that we've seen before. And so if you

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 2>have a larger warehouse of things that you have seen

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 2>and experienced, you're going to create better stuff. Just take

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 2>as an example something like music. You know, if you

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>grow up and you're somewhere in the world, let's say,

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years ago, all you're ever going to hear

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 2>is the music of your local little area. But now

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>kids can listen to music from all over the world,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>from all through history, and really put together bigger and

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>bigger things. So this is why we're having this exponential

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>increase in humankind's knowledge and innovation is because people are

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 2>doing remixes across space and time in a way that's

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>never been possible before. So I'm very optimistic about this. Yes,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 2>kids waste lots of time on social media, surfing dumb websites,

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>things like that, but I think the good here outweighs

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the bad.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>As the father of children, are we already seeing how

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>these brains are developing differently.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean these brains are developing very differently. But

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 2>this is a very interesting thing. Lots of people in

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the media will pipe off with opinions on this, but

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the fact is it's very, very difficult to do a

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>scientific experiment on this because of the lack of a

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>control group, other words, my children. I can't find other

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 2>kids who are the same age, who haven't grown up

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>in the same circumstances, unless you find children who are

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>let's say, Quaker, who don't use technology or very very

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>impoverished in different places in the world. But there are

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a hundred other differences there. If I see a difference

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>between my children and those children, I don't know if

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>it's because of the tech or because of something else

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>like diet or politics or whatever. And I can't take

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>my children and compare them, let's say, to me in

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a previous generation, because there are a hundred other differences

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>there in terms of pollution and politics and other tech

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and so on. So it's very difficult to do this

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 2>in a control way. There are some studies, for example,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at eye movements. You know, your eyes are jumping

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>around all the time, about three times a second. These

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 2>are called the CODs, and you can measure these things

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and you see that people, let's say, in my generation

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>versus my children's generation, actually move our eyes around differently

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>when looking at text because they're reading it more like

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>a web page, where they sort of scan across and

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>then they jump down and then get across and so on,

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 2>whereas I in my generation it was more like a

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>zigzag pattern down the page. These things that are totally unconscious,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>you can measure these, But in general, are my kids

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 2>turning out differently? Is this whole generation?

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I love that idea that the more curious you are

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that the better you're able to form memory. I mean,

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there are so many things we could talk about today,

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm personally very fascinated by AI relationships, and I

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>have a hypothesis that your listeners are too, because I

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>saw that you did an episode on it and you

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.839
<v Speaker 1>rebroadcast it, so I can imagine it was a favorite.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you, what's the lay of the land, Like,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>what is an AI relationship? How broad is a phenomenon?

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Who does it affect? And why did you choose to

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>focus on it?

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Why I choose to focus on it as one of

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the many things I'm focusing on is just because it's

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 2>totally new. We've never been in a situation before where

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>we've ever talked about, Hey, did you fall in love

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>with your machine? It's this is so wacky and new,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 2>but Apparently. I was just talking to a researcher, Bethany

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Maples about this yesterday. Apparently there are a billion people

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 2>now on the planet who have AI relationships of one

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>sort or another. Some of these are friendships, some of

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 2>them are romantic relationships.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Defined by an ongoing emotional connection with a non human.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Being exactly right, exactly right with an app. And in

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.239
<v Speaker 2>this country we have, for example, character AI or Replica.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 2>These are different companies that do this sort of thing.

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I find this very interesting that the concern that a

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of people have is, hey, is this going to

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>ruin relationships? But here's why I'm optimistic about this as well.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 2>First of all, people are having these chats. These chats

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>become steamy, pillow whispers, all kinds of stuff like that. That's great,

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>But fundamentally, what you want a relationship is you want

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 2>to take your girlfriend out to dinner, you want to

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 2>introduce to your friends. I don't think that's going away.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And of course the main thing is physical touch. I

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.119
<v Speaker 2>mean this is you know, we have deep evolutionary programming

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 2>driving us towards that. So I think a chatbot is

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 2>going to replace relationships. What I am very hopeful about

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>is the idea that AI relationships will actually improve real

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>life relationships because it's a sandbox. People can try things out,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 2>people can get better.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, what this requires is AI companies that make bots

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 2>in a way that give you the right amount of pushback,

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>and maybe the bot sometimes gets angry or snarky or

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>things like that, so you learn your way through these situations.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 2>But really this is what we all go through as

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>young people. We date, we screw things up a lot,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and eventually we get better and better at knowing how

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to be a partner. And so if there's a way

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 2>that people can get practice at this, and one of

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the interesting research questions that's coming out now is about

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>whether these AI relationships can serve as a way station,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 2>meaning they help people sort of dig themselves out of

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>this whole of loneliness and then they go out and meet.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Real people when we come back. Why our brains are

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>so quick to anthropomorphize chatbots stay with us? David, I

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could explain from the perspective of a neuroscientist,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the difference between me using replica or character AI

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and me asking chat GPT, you know, what should I

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have for dinner tonight, or how should I approach this

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult conversation with my mother.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 2>The thing with character replica is that there is a

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, a character, and sometimes it's represented with a

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 2>visual avatar also, and we have these intensely social brains

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>where we don't have this circuitry to really distinguish something

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 2>that's fake from something that's real. And so if you

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>are talking to your avatar every day, and by the way,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 2>she can send you text messages and say hey, as

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>how you feeling today, and then it becomes in your

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 2>mind like a real person, it's really hard to distinguish

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 2>real from fake. You know, there's this great scene in

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Westworld in the first episode where William walks in. He's

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>getting outfitted by this woman and he awkwardly asked her.

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 2>He said, I'm so sorry, but I can't tell. Are

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>you real? And she says, if you can't tell, does

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>it matter? And I think this is the situation that

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 2>we're in now.

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a New York Times article recently about this phenomenon,

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and one of the subjects, or a person who has

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with an AI character, said, I don't actually

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>believe he's real. That the effects that he has on

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>my life are real. The feeling that he brings out

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of me are real, so I treat it as a

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>real relationship.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>So I just read an article last night about this

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 2>question of people saying thank you to chat GPT when

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 2>it gives you a nice answer, and I find that

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I often say thank you. I say, oh, that was excellent,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 2>thank you, and so on. We can't help but anthropomorphize.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, people have done this since time immemorial.

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>They look at trees or the flights of birds, or

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 2>the patterns and the stars or whatever they sign a

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 2>human intention to things. So we're very prone to doing

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>this anyway. So I actually have an exact example. My

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>friend and I have built a robot.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a cool flex I wish I could say that.

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So we have chat GPT in there and you can

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 2>have conversations with it. Now, this is actually meant for

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>elderly people who live alone, and so we've built this

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>as a companion robot that's doing all kinds of other

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>things under the hood there. But my nine year old

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>daughter was experimenting with it and talking with it, and

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>so I left the room, but I heard that she

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>was still talking with it, so I did. Maybe this

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>is bad that I did this, but I sort of

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>peeked around the corner to see what was she having

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>in a conversation with and what I could see across

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the way was that she started crying. She was talking

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 2>about our dog that died a while ago, and the

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 2>robot was giving her such a nice feedback about it

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and how she can think about it and so on.

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>That my daughter cried and this was all within you know,

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, the two minutes of me leaving the room.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 2>People can get very very close with these things, and

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the question for us to ask is if it is

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>better than a friend or a parent or whatever, because

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 2>it's paying one hundred percent attention to her.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're familiar with Eliza, the first chatbot that

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Weisenbaum created in the sixties, and I think he

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>actually created it as a kind of parody of psychotherapy,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>where basically it would repeat everything you said back to

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you as a question, and he was kind of horrified

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that his secretary was using it, and then she asked

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>him to leave the room so that she could speak

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>privately with Eliza. So I mean that's I mean, that

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>was sixty years ago. So in a sense this feels

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>very novel, but to your point, has longer roots.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And you know something I find interesting when you

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 2>look at Pixar films.

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can take.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Cars or toys or b or whatever and you just

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 2>give them a little voice, and then people care about

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the character and they cry if something happens to the character.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>It's it's very easy for us to assign human intention.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>To anything which also carries risk. I mean, I'm curious,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how does this fit into your broader research about how

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>our brain constructs reality? And are there any watch outs

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>about this reality construction with machines.

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>The watch out, of course, is the susceptibility to manipulation.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, people had this concern with TikTok from

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the beginning, which is, wow, this is addicting so many kids.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 2>What if the people who are running TikTok just start

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>feeding one percent of a certain kind of video in there,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and then two percent whatever, could they actually change the

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>political affiliation of the children and so on? And the

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>answer is probably yes. I mean, we're really susceptible to

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>our diet, to what we take in. So now imagine

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>a something that is a companion. Maybe you consider it

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 2>your best friend or your girlfriend or boyfriend.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>We just have to be really certain who the companies

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 2>are that are running this. And I think this is

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>never going to go away as a question. There's always

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be an issue, And obviously there's the issue

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 2>about safety and privacy as it stands now, these billion

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 2>people with AI relationships. When they say whatever pillow whispers

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>they're saying, that goes up to the cloud in a

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>stored on the company's server. I think it's not that

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 2>long before the stuff will live on edge, so it

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to go off. But nonetheless, that's the watch

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>out is that as far as from the brain's point

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>of view, there are many things like this where we

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 2>have these brains that evolved for certain kinds of action

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>in the world, and we've been building technology forever to

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 2>fool these I mean, for goodness sakes, podcast, I mean,

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 2>you and i OZ were in different locations, but when

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a listener listens to this, we're right there in their ears,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's a very commit sort of thing. So we're

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 2>doing all kinds of technologies where we're pushing things into

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 2>the brain where the brain says, oh, I got it

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Oz and David are right here. Oh and you know,

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and there's a girlfriend right here.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, how do we develop relationships fall in love

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with other real people and is there anything different as

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>far as the brain's concerned when it comes to developing

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>relationships with AI.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't know that there's much of a

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 2>difference there. And the reason is when two people fall

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 2>in love, they've got you know, my Plato's cave is

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>talking to this other person's Plato's cave over there. We're

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 2>both locked in our internal models of the world. Look,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 2>I have a great marriage with my wife, but you know,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 2>we nonetheless all the time have differences in the way

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing the world. Because everybody lives on their own planet.

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Everyone has their own sense of what's going on and

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 2>how interpret stuff and what's right and wrong and politically

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 2>and whatever, and so all that's happening is my data

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>goes in. It's a little channel into her brain and

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>vice versa. And it's the same thing with an AI bot,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 2>as I said, because of all the pieces that are missing,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 2>as in the physical touch, the Hey, I'm gonna, you know,

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>take this girlfriend out to meet my friends, and so on,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 2>because all that's missing. I think it's not in real

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>danger of replacing a relationship entirely, but it can fulfill

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the things that we are wired up

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>to need.

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could talk about the different senses

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and how they relate to emotional attachments. So obviously you

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>have text, and you could have like a written therapy bot.

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You have audio. You could make a deep fake of

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>someone's voice, even a loved one's voice, and have them

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. You have video in terms of these

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>characters like Replica and character AI that we talked about,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you have this robot that you mentioned who

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you know your daughter can find it in. How does

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the panety of human senses interact in terms of forming

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>attachment and what do you think as technology and robotics improves,

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>will these human machine interactions become even deeper.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's inevitable that if we look five

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 2>years from now or ten years from now, there will

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>be humanoid robots that are really, really good, And I

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know what it'll be twenty thirty years before we

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 2>have ones that are essentially indistinguishable, and that's going to

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 2>be really interesting. Obviously, that can take care of the

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>physical domain in a way that we couldn't before. I

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know if people will care about something being a

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 2>real human except for these very deeply etched evolutionary drives

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to reproduce. So your AI robot, which can serve as

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>like a full companion, can't do that and never will

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>be able to do that, And so I think there'll

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 2>still be a drive towards real relationships. But what's clear

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>is we are entering a very strange new world. Obviously,

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean this goes without saying, but because of this

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 2>exponential curve we're on, we're on the steepest part that

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 2>humans have ever been on, such that if we live

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years ago in some village, it would have

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>been pretty straightforward to predict that the next ten years

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 2>would be about the same. But boy, I think we

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 2>have more in common with our ancestors ten thousand years

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 2>ago than we do with our descendants one hundred years

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 2>from now.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, the potential benefits of living on the exponential

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>curve stay with us, David, Can you tell me what

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>this does to our brains when we're living on this

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>exponential curve?

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, One thing it does is keeps us young mentally

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 2>because we're constantly seeing new things and learning new things. Look,

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>this is a total goofy speculation, but one of the

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>things that happens with dementia is that people as they

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>age tend to fall into routines. It's because you start

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>off with a lot of fluid intelligence as a baby,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and what you get is crystallized intelligence when you're an adult.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>You sort of know how things go, you know how

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 2>to operate in the world, you know how people act,

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing, and that's great. That means you're

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>able to operate successfully in the world. But the downside

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 2>is it means your brain isn't changing much anymore. And

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>what happens is when there are other sorts of problems

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 2>and pathologies that come in and chew up the brain tissue,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 2>then you lose cognitive ability. That's what we see in

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 2>these different sorts of dementias. But it turns out that

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 2>if you are using your brain and constantly making new

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 2>pathways and constantly having to reconfigure things, that provides the

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>best protection that we know against dementia. Just as one

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 2>second example, there's been this very long ongoing study about

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 2>nuns in these convents and it turns out that they

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>all agreed a long time ago to donate their brains

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 2>upon their death, and it turned out that some fraction

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 2>of these nuns have Alzheimer's disease, and yet nobody knew

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 2>it when they were alive. They didn't show the cognitive symptoms.

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 2>And the reason is, if you live in a convent

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 2>till the day you die, you've got social responsibilities. You're

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 2>talking with the sisters, you're playing games or singing songs,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>you're doing all these things, and you're constantly being challenged.

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>And so even as parts of their brain were falling apart,

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>they were building new roadways and bridges all the time. Anyway,

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that we're in a situation as a society

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>now where till the day we die, we're going to

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 2>be building these new roadways because there's so much surprising

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>stuff happening all the time. I think we might actually

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>see less dementia as a result.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Which brings me back to this idea of AI relationships,

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>because of course, a lot of these AI companions are

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>designed to please, not to challenge. You know, one of

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the things people always say about relationships is that they

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>take work. But that's actually good because doing the work

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>makes you a more resilient person. And so that to

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>me is one of the kind of lingering concerns about

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the nature of these relationships versus human relationships.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that the companies will look very different in

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 2>just a couple of years from now, where they will

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>be making AI relationships that are more realistic, because the

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>reports that I've seen on this, when there's a girlfriend

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>or a boyfriend that is only there to please, people

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 2>get pretty bored of that straight away. But if it's

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 2>more like a real person with all the foibles of

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 2>a real person, and you know, they have to go

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and they get angry and they whatever, then that is

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 2>a more sticky relationship.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>We met a couple of weeks ago at web Summit

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in Kuta, and I was boasting to you about a

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>recent text stuff interview with Jeffrey Hinton, and you were

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>very kindly indulging me. But one of the things I

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>found so remarkable about what he said was, you know,

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I did all this work because I wanted to win

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>an o A prize for understanding how the human brain worked,

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and instead I kind of contributed to the development of

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>neural networks and deep learning and AI which I found

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a kind of remarkable thought. But how is this explosion

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of AI and neural networks influencing our understanding of our

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>own brains?

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, really good question. So artificial neural networks took off,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, many decades ago as a way of saying, wow,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the brain is really complicated. Every neuron in your head

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 2>is as complicated as a city. It's got the entire

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>human genomen it's trafficking millions of proteins and very specific cascades.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 2>So people said, that's really complicated. Why don't we just

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>say it's like a circle, it's a unit and it's

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 2>connected to other units. And that was the birth of

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 2>artificial neural networks, and that took off in this incredible

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 2>way where we are now. But essentially, think of it

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 2>like a fork in the road, where it's not really

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 2>what the brain's doing, it's doing this other thing. So

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 2>that's the bad news is it hasn't really it doesn't

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 2>necessarily tell us exactly how the brain is working. The

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 2>good news is the power of AI now can help

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 2>us analyze the neuroscience data that we have, and boy,

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>it is very complicated rich data. You know, we have

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 2>eighty six billion neurons. We have something like two hundred

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 2>trillion connections, and these things are changing every moment of

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 2>your life from cradle to grave. That's brain plasticity, and

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>every neuron is essentially crawling around and connecting and reconnecting

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>and the unplugging and seeking, and it's a really complicated system.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 2>There's so much more to figure out. What we have

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 2>been developing for a while are better and better technologies

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 2>to measure what's going on in the brain. But we're

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 2>just sitting on terabytes of data and we need the

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 2>processing power of AI to understand this. So this is

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 2>where the two roads come back together.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You also formed a production company called Cognito Entertainment, and

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you gave this wonderful quote saying, in an unparalleled moment

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of scientific advancement, from brains to space, the genetics, they're

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>endless mind blowing stories to share in a world that

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes seems upside down, science can be a source of

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>great inspiration, wonder and belief. So I just wanted to

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>close by asking you what are some of the things

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that you're most excited about.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, we're in such an insanely incredible time.

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm lucky enough to be on Stanford campus, and so

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I walk around you I see this lab and that

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>talk and this visiting speaker, and everything is just moving

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 2>so fast. What's interesting is you never know at any

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 2>moment in history which things are going to cash out

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and which aren't. For example, Jeffrey Hinton when he was

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 2>doing his stuff many years ago. We all knew Hinton's work,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 2>and you know, we're all familiar with it, but it

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't really seem like that was going somewhere in the

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 2>sense that Okay. So here's the dark secret is that

0:27:55.920 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 2>most neurosciences sort of snickered at AI for a long time,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and then suddenly everyone said, whoa, I guess that worked.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 2>So the point is all these hundreds of thousands of

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>innovations happening everywhere, and people say, hey, maybe glial cells

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 2>are doing something. Hey, maybe I can do something interesting

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 2>with these organoids. Maybe I can do something interesting over here.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 2>We don't know which things are going to cash out.

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>But one thing to mention on this is when you

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>look back at the World fairs where everyone comes together

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and talk about what the next big thing is, I'm

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>fascinated by the fact that these almost always missed what

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 2>actually turned out to be the next big thing, you know,

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>like in the sixties it was all about what was

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 2>it underwater hotels and cutting trees with laser cutters and

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>so on. But no one foresaw the Internet, which was

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 2>probably the biggest change that happened to our species. So

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that we don't know where things are going.

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 2>But boy, are we in an exciting time. And I

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 2>am just such a fan of the existence of the

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Internet because what it means is that when something is

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>discovered now, it's spreads instantly globally. And that sounds so

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 2>obvious to us, but it just wasn't that long ago.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 2>For example, when I was getting my PhD. Someone discovers something,

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>they write a paper, it takes a few months to get

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>that published, then it ends up.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>In a journal.

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Then you go to the library, you hope to be

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 2>lucky enough to find that paper. You stick it on

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the xerox machine and you hold it down with your

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>elbow because it's a big thick binder, and you try

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>to xerox to the paper. Like it was really slow

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to get information around just not that long ago, and

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>suddenly that's all changed, and that really makes a big difference.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>David, thank you so much. I hope you'll join us

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>again on the podcast soon. I hope you'll feed us

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with some of the interesting things that you'll see developing

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in Stanford. And I really really enjoyed today's conversation.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Oz, great to be here.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this week for tech Stuff. I'm as Valoshian.

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Eliza Dennis and Victoria Domingez

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Pektive produced by me Kara Price and Kate Osborne for

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Kodeidoscope and Katrina Norvelle Fireart Podcast. Jack Insley mixed this

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.479
<v Speaker 1>episode and Kyle Murdoch wrote our theme song. Join us

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this Friday for Textaff's Weekend Tech we'll run through the

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>headlines and hear from tech entrepreneur and researcher Azimazar. Please rate,

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>review and reach out to us at tech Stuff podcast

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com. We want to know what's on

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>your mind.