WEBVTT - #154 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Footwear Comparison Evidence

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a clear fall day in America's heartland. You sit

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>in a chair outside your trailer contently looking out over

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>your farm. It's cool and the sun is setting behind

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the dense forest that surrounds your property. Everything seems just right.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>That evening, your stepdaughter in Net stops by with her boyfriend.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You and your wife were pretty upset when Annette told

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you she was moving away from the farm and moving

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>in with her boyfriend, Todd and his parents downtown. You

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want a Nette to be caught up with someone

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>from town. All those townies seem to care about his

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>church and gossip. You want nothing to do with them,

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and they don't seem to want anything to do with you.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But in Nette's already eighteen, she's an adult. You can't

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>really control her. You try to act supportive, so you

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>nod to Todd and help a Nette pack the last

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of her things into his trunk. You give her a

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>hug before she gets into the car with him, and

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you watch as Todd pulls away to drive them back

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>into town, and you're feeling a little helpless. The next

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>day is pretty routine for you. You pick up loads

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of hay to bring to your barn. It's strenuous work.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>You work hard all day, you're exhausted, and you go

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to bed early. The next morning, the phone rings. It's

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Tod's mother. She says, are nett in Todd with you?

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You say, I thought they were with you. Tod's mother

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes frantic. She says, the kids went for a walk

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>around four pm yesterday and they never came home last night.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But there's something else going on there. There's a hint

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of something, a tone of accusation in her voice, like

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>she's somehow blaming you. You hang up and call the

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>police immediately. You wait all day, hoping to hear something,

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's nothing. You're just waiting and waiting and the

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>police finally get back to you in the evening. They

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>can't find them. One sleepless night bleeds into another, and

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>then another and another. This is one terrible nightmare for

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you and your wife. Ten days go on like this.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>All you and your wife can do is sit and worry.

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You're not eating, you're not sleeping, you don't know what

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with yourselves. It's raining outside. When you finally

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>get a call from an officer, and you can hear

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>it in the tone of their voice. This is not

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be good. The news I have for you

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be easy to hear. He says,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we found Todd in a net in the Hawking River.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, you can't stand. Your body is trembling.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>You try to restate what the officer just said. You're

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to wrap your head around what this means. You

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>found their bodies, their dead bodies. The officer says, they

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't find their whole bodies, just their torsos. Their bodies

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have been dismembered. You're completely sick. Officers spend two days

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>searching the cornfields between the railroad tracks and the river

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>where the torsos were found. They find Todd in a

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>net's limbs and heads buried in shallow graves. You and

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>your wife drive into town to the police station, and

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you're taken aback by the attitudes of these cops. When

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you're separated from your wife and pulled into an interrogation room,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>officers tell you to take off your boots, your shirt,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>your pants. You sit shivering in your underwear for eight

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half hours, and then a detective comes in.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>He sits down right next to you, puts his finger

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in your face and says you did this. We know

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you did this. We found your bootprint down by the riverbank.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Once we match that boot to the print that was

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>left at that riverbank, it'll prove you were there. You

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>killed your stepdaughter, and then you, sick bastard, you cut

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>off her arms, her legs, her head. You better confess,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'll tell you right now, it's going to get

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>worse for you if you don't. You say, over and

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, what in the world are you

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I didn't murder a net I just came

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>here to help you find out who did. What is

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this all about. They don't have enough evidence to charge

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you for the murder of a net and Todd, so

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to let you go. They impound your car

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so it can be searched for evidence. It's dark and

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>cold when they drive you home. They let you and

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>your wife out of the car and you're still naked

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>except for your underwear. You walk barefoot to your trailer.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Your toes are totally dumb by the time you get

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to the door. Downtown, rumors start to spread. People are

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>saying this murder must have been some kind of cult ritual,

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that it must have been you who did it? The quiet,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>stern stepfather who never says much, never goes to church,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps his family hidden away. Who knows what goes on

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>at that farm. They didn't like you before, but now

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they're straight a hostile. They cross the street to get

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>away from you when they see you coming. It takes

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>them a year to build the case against you. Are

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they even looking at other suspects. The whispering of your

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>name around town grows to a fever pitch. You can

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>hear their accusations ring in your ears. Murderer, molester. You're

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>eventually arrested in charge with the butchering murder of your

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>stepdaughter and net and her boyfriend Todd. When you finally

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>go to court, you do something very out of the ordinary.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>You waive the right to a jury trial. Finding twelve

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>impartial people in Logan, Ohio really not going to happen.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>The newspapers, everyone around town, they all think you're guilty.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Everyone just wants to feel safe again. They won't be

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>satisfied until someone is convicted and they are sure that

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>person is you. Instead of a jury, you put your

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>fate in the hands of a three judge panel. A

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>jury might not see it, but three judges they have to.

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It's their job to apply the facts to the law

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>without any outside influence from the court of public opinion.

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Your lawyer calls to the stand and FBI analyst who

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>says the plaster mold of what the prosecution claims is

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>your bootprint at the riverbank is quote unquote unsuitable. The

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>analyst says it lacks sufficient detail for meaningful comparison, and

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that it looks more like the footprint of someone who

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is walking barefoot. There is no way to claim your

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>boots match that print, so you're optimistic. But then the

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>prosecution calls an anthropology professor to the stand. She says

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>she studied footwear impressions of countless samples. Her delivery is

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>slow and deliberate and really credible. She says, quote, no

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>person's footprints are the same as another. They're as unique

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>as a fingerprint. I've analyzed the wear patterns on the

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>inside of the defendant's boot, and I can say with certainty,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>scientific certainty, that the footprint found by the riverbank was

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>made by the defendant. This sounds unbelievable, but you see

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the judges are nodding along. There's no wather buying. This

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is there After a very short deliberation, the judges apparently

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>believed the testimony of the prosecution's anthropologist who put you

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>right at the scene of the crime. They convict you,

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and you are sentenced to death. The story you just

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>heard is based on the murders of Annette Cooper Johnston

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and Todd Schultz.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Dale.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Johnston was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death in nineteen

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty four. He was exonerated in nineteen ninety, over twenty

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>years after the murder. The true killer finally confessed, but

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>even then the people in the town of Logan still

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>chose to believe that Dale was guilty in one way

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or another. On today's episode, we're going to examine how

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a supposed footprint put an innocent man on death row.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Dubin civil rights and criminal defense attorney, an

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>innocent ambassador to the Innocence Project in New York. Today,

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on Wrongful Conviction Junk Science, we examine footwear comparison evidence.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Even when done correctly, impression analysis of evidence like shoe

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>prints and tire tracks is purely subjective. Many experts recognize

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>its limitations, but one so called expert in particular, pushed

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the limits of this forensic discipline to produce horrific outcomes.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that Dale Johnson wasn't the only innocent

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>person to be convicted of a crime based on faulty

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>footwear comparison evidence.

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 3>The Pacers Foundation is a proud supporter of this episode

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 3>and of the Last Mile organization, which provides business and

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 3>tech training to help incarcerated individuals successfully and permanently re

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>enter the workforce. The Pacers Foundation is committed to improving

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the lives of hoosiers across Indiana, supporting organizations dedicated primarily

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to helping young people and students. For more information on

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the work of the Pacers Foundation or the Last Mile Program,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 3>visit Pacersfoundation dot org or the Lastmile dot org.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy six, archaeologists made one of the most

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>exciting discoveries of our time. They found footprints dating back

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>three point seven million years immortalized in the volcanic ash

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in Tanzania, and they looked like human prints. Archaeologists were thrilled.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>They thought these footprints could shed some light on when

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>human beings began walking upright on two feet. Luis Robbins

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was an anthropology professor at the University of North Carolina

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>at Greensboro. She too was excited about these footprints and

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know exactly who left them behind. Louise had

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>been conducting her own studies in footprint analysis. She started

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>collecting footprints from people who were still alive. Five hundred

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>people put ink onto their feet and then stood on

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a piece of paper. Based on those prints, Louise tried

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>to find characteristics and feet that were specific to age, sex, stature,

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and weight, using her own system of measurement. She would

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>then compare those characteristics to the footprints found in the caves.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Her conclusion, no two footprints are the same. In fact,

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>she thought she could tell a great deal about a

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>person just by looking at their footprint. Her methods were

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>never tested by her peers, nor were they confirmed by

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>other scientists, but Louise she thought she was onto something.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>She claimed to do something no one else could identify

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a person solely through their footprint, and so in nineteen seven,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>when a team of scientists went to excavate the site

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in Tanzania where the prehistoric footprints were found, Louise went too.

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>When she saw the prince. She claimed that one of

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>them was left by a woman that was five and

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a half months pregnant. Now, other scientists on the expedition

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>scratched their heads. It was hard enough to figure out

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>if the prints that they were looking at were even

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>human at all. No one had ever claimed to know

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the gender of the person that made the print, let

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>alone of that person was carrying a child. Then Louise

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>took a dangerous leap. She positioned herself as a forensic expert,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>authoring a book on footprints. She didn't write this book

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with her scientific peers in mind, but she wrote it

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for law enforcement and crime labs. Only five pages in

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this book were dedicated to the analysis of actual shoe prints,

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and yet, based on these five pages, Louise claimed that

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>she was an expert in this area of forensic science.

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Lawyers began to hire her as an expert witness. They

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>told judges that her work was on the cutting edge

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of forensic science. Critics of her work called it Cinderella analysis.

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>After all, she usually made sure that the shoe fit

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>when she matched the suspects foot to the shoe Prince

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>found at a crime scene. In the more than twenty

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>cases for which she testified. Twelve people, some of whom

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>who have since been proven to be innocent, were sent

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to prison, including Dale Johnston, who was sentenced to death.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Dale Johnson and his wife Sarah at the time, came

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.599
<v Speaker 2>down to Logan several days after the bodies had been discovered,

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>and they came to the Logan police department. They wanted

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 2>to be helpful to them, and Dale was immediately taken

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>up to an interrogation room. His boots, his pants, his

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>shirt were all confiscated. So he was sitting there in

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the chair in his underwear and they were bombarding him.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 2>You did it, didn't you? And we know you did it?

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Over and over and over again. He kept saying, no,

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I have nothing. I just came. I came into town

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to try to help.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Here today is Bill Osinski, a journalist who covered the

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Dale Johnson case for years and wrote a book about

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it called Guilty by Popular Demand. So Bill, tell us

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about yourself and how you started covering

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this case.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>For nearly forty years, I was a reporter. I worked

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 2>for eleven different newspapers around the country. I worked for

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the Akron Beacon Journal at that time, which is nearly

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>two hundred miles away from Logan, Ohio, where the murders

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>took place. But in those days, the newspapers valued a

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>major story and would make that kind of an investment

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 2>in time and resources to over a widely publicized case

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So, Bill, you actually went to Logan, Ohio to Coverdale's trial?

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>What was that like?

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I drove into Logan, which is about thirty five miles

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>southeast of Columbus, Ohio, never been there before, and I

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>drove in on a January morning, and it was one

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 2>of the coldest days I can remember. The temperatures were

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 2>well below zero. And I went to the center of

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the little town and found the courthouse. And here, you know,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>eight o'clock on a weekday morning, there was a line

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>outside the courthouse. People were standing in that below zero

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 2>cold waiting for a chance to get in to hear

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>all this salacious details of this horrific murder of a

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 2>teenage couple who were found dismembered, parts of their bodies

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>buried in a cornfield near the Hawking River in Logan, Ohio.

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow, this is a really brutal crime. I mean, you

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have body parts buried in fields, and the prosecutors claimed

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that Dale Johnson committed these murderers, and putting aside what

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>his motive would have been, how do they claim he

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>committed the murderers.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>The prosecutor alleged in his scenario that Dale Johnston had

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 2>kidnapped these two kids in downtown Logan, made a stop

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 2>on his way home at a doctor's office and drove

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>him out to his trailer, where they got into an

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>argument about a little used car that the parents were

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 2>supposed to have given a net but hadn't yet, And

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 2>out of that argument, Dale went into a jealous fit

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>and pulled out a gun which they never found, and

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>shot his stepdaughter and the boyfriend, and then took them outside,

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 2>apparently and butchered them, and then brought them back to

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>downtown Logan where they had last been seen, and put

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>some body parts, heads and limbs in the cornfield. I mean,

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>it just it made absolutely no sense. They had no

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 2>evidence that he was actually back in town at night

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 2>trying to bury these bodies, but that's what they elect.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Dale was not a warm guy. I mean, you know,

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 2>he was the outsider. He didn't have a high opinion

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 2>of the locals. They didn't like him, you know, he

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>was convenient guy for them to hang it on.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So, Bill, did anyone think that Dale was innocent? I mean,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what was your sense of the atmosphere surrounding the case.

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 2>There was such an atmosphere of the case having been

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 2>already tried in the court of public opinion before the

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>trial even started. More than a year passed between the

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 2>murderers and the trial, and obviously the only story coming

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 2>out of him instigation was that Dale Johnston did it.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 2>So that, in fact, was why the defense waived a

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 2>jury trial and asked for a three judge panel, because

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>they knew that people in Hockey County were so predisposed

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 2>to believe that Dale Johnson was the killer.

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, very little evidence was found at the scenes where

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>these body parts were found, but we know investigators found

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>some sort of print in the mud by the riverbank.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And Dale goes down to the police station with his

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>wife Sarah, and he thinks he's going there to help

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>them find the killers, but they confiscate his boots, and

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of course those boots would be compared to the impression

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>found at the scene. So tell us a little bit more.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 2>About what happened. There were so many cops out there that,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>according to the testimony of a Ohio Bureau of Investigation agent,

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 2>they totally ruined the crime scene as far as being

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 2>able to collect any valid evidence. They were cops stopping

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>all over. Well, what happened was the sheriff of Hockeing

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>County had an impression made of a depression in the riverbank,

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and they made it casting, and they sent it off

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 2>to the FBI, and it was examined by a nationally

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>known footprint expert at the FBI, and he was brought

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 2>in to testify to his findings, and he testified that, well,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 2>all he could say that this casting was more likely

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 2>a footprint than any kind of a shoe print or bootprint.

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 2>And however, he forwarded this plaster cast at his own

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 2>volition to a woman anthropologist, Luis Robbins, for her examination.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 2>And she had a the theory of how he could

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>identify footprints from the wear patterns on the inside of

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 2>someone's footwear. She had this Kakamami theory that by examining

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the interior of a footwear she could get wear impressions

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and use that to analyze a casting of a print

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 2>from a shoe or a boot. And so she testified

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 2>and trialed it. Well, you can't really say that Dale

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Johnson's boot fits this, but from the wear patterns that

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 2>she observed from the interior of the boot, when you

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 2>looked at it that way, then yes, this was made

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>by Dale Johnson's boot. And I had never heard of

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that before. It didn't make any sense to me. It

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>was only later, after the damage was done, that it

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 2>came out how irresponsible and unreliable and untrue.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Her testimony was, so let me get this straight. This

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is like, you know, kind of mind blowing here. Louise

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Robbins said that she could match the depression found by

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the riverbank to Dale based on where patterns made by

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>his foot inside his boot. I mean, it just sounds ridiculous.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I've never even heard of that before. This seems to

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>go so far outside the bounds of any verifiable science.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's important for our listeners to keep

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in mind that with impression pattern matching methods, that's that's

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the type of science we're talking about, or alleged science

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. With shoe prints and tires. There's

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a database that experts have and they refer to this

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>database when they're matching a shoe or a tire to

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>an impression at a scene, and tires and shoes are

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>mass produced, so the same rubber mold is used to

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>make them. But that just tells an expert what class

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that piece of evidence came from. So, for instance, they

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>can say that this footwear impression was made by a

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>size ten Nike Air Jordan. But the problem is a

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people own a size ten Nike Air Jordan,

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's not enough to put somebody at the scene.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So impression analysis really comes down to the individual characteristics

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>in the specific shoe or shoes that belong to the accused,

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about things like cracks in the sole

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of the shoe, comes stuck to the bottom of the heel,

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, characteristics that are often caused by routine wear

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and tear. But the problem is there is no standard

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>regarding the number of unique characteristics that are needed to

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>make a positive identification. And it sounds like from the

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>mold they were working with in this case that the

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>FBI analysts couldn't even tell if the impression was made

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>by a bare foot or or a shoe, let alone

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what kind of a shoe. So that should tell you

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>something about the quality of the impression they were working with.

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But miss Robbins makes this huge leap, and it's really

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>really hard to imagine that this could have been allowed

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in a courtroom when someone's freedom was on the line.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And yet he or she is one of the prosecution's

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>key witnesses when it came to analyzing the physical evidence

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of the scene. So how prominently did Miss Robin's testimony

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>play in the prosecution's closing arguments?

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Bill, Well, it was very prominent because it was the

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 2>only piece of evidence that linked Dail Johnson to the

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 2>murder scene. I thought it was a very weak link

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to begin with, but apparently it was strong enough for

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>three judges. His closing line was, murder is the ultimate

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 2>form of molestation, so you must be guilty of murder too.

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>He had, of course, been alleging without evidence, that Dale

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Johnson had inappropriate relationship with Annette.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So after he's convicted and sentence, what happens next?

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 2>Bill? He was sent immediately to death row. But you know,

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 2>it was such a weird, hostile atmosphere in that town.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I will never forget. When it came time

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 2>for the verdict, all the spectators had gathered on the

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 2>lower level of the courthouse, but listened to the verdict

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>by radio, and I will never forget that when the

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>guilty verdict was announced, there was this eerie cheering that

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 2>came from below, you know, that filled up the court room.

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>And these people wanted somebody to pay, and Dale Johnson

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 2>happened to be the guy who they were able to

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 2>hang it on.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems Bill that they didn't even have

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>anything other than a hunch that Dale Johnson did this.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's hard to make sense of this. I mean,

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think that they did this on purpose? Do

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you think that they set out to frame Dale Johnson?

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't think anyone wants to accept that the

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 2>prosecutors and police would knowingly fabricate an entire case against

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>a murder defendant. And I know I came down to

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Logan with no preconceptions. I do remember, you know, having

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the belief that, you know, the state wouldn't bring these

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 2>charges unless they had something against this guy. And by

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.719
<v Speaker 2>the end, I said, where is the case? I was

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 2>shocked at the prosecutor's summary. I mean it it was

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 2>total high opera and total fantasy. Everything that was presented

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 2>in that trial was a lie. I believe somewhere before

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I die, I'm going to learn the truth in this case,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>and that just so happens that I did.

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting that oftentimes, when one of these

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>disciplines of junk science is used in a case and

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the person is convicted, it's not the exposure of that

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>junk science as being total bullshit that leads to the exoneration.

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 1>It's often that DNA testing is used to prove that

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they have the wrong person. What's really interesting about this

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>case is that Dale is eventually released from prison because

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>his lawyers were able to prove that some of the

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence that was used the convictim was not admissible. And

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>oddly enough, it wasn't the shoe evidence that was thrown out,

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>but another witness is testimony. It turns out that a

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>witness had been hypnotized by a detective and was persuaded

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to give this awful testimony against Dale at the trial,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, testimony that he like forcefully put a

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>net in and Todd into a car, and that testimony

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was never supposed to be admitted in court, and that

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>was what was deemed inadmissible, and Dale was let out

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because of that, and of course Louise Robbin's testimony about

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>his you know, the inside wear patterns on his boots,

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, being definitive proof that the impression left on

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the riverbank was his, that was left undisturbed. And everyone

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>still believed he was guilty. But then someone else confessed

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to murdering a net and Todd, so Bill tell us

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>about that. Who actually committed this crime.

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 2>A sorry little fellow named Chester McKnight. Was nicknamed Chester

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the just because apparently because it was weird and was

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 2>an habitual criminal, habitual drunk, even though he had a

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 2>history of assaults against women. And Chester actually got married

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 2>and it lasted a couple of weeks before she kicked

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>him out and left. And it was in that atmosphere

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>where Chester just went over the deep end and was

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 2>drinking day in and day out. He was obviously depressed,

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the wife had left him, and he was just drinking incessantly.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>He came on that afternoon, early evening of October fourth,

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to Kenny Lynn Scott's house, a local drug dealer. You know,

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>they were drinking buddies. Anyway, there was a kind of

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a makeshift party in Kenny's yard and Chester joined in

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and here comes Todd and Annette. So they joined the

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>party for a little while. I think they may have

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>had a beer, and Chester decided to hey, let's keep

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>the party going. I've got some I've got some stuff.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 2>And so they start walking down the railroad tracks and

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 2>according to Chester's account, he wanted to have a group

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>sex with Annette, and she of course know and Todd

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>tried to get her out of the situation, and that's

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 2>when Chester pulled a gun and shot him, and that

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>started screaming. She shot her. At that point, Chester and

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Kenny dragged the bodies down to the riverfront at the

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>edge of the cornfield and dismembered them. And Kenny, maybe

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>with help maybe not, got the bodies back into the

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>cornfield and dug shallow holes and put the limbs and

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the heads into a kind of a bear spot in

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the cornfield that he knew about. And

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Kenny the next few nights he would go out to

0:29:55.760 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that railroad bridge and cry and moan, and friends saying

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>what's wrong, Kenny, And he told him, Yo, you wouldn't understand.

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 2>His neighbors knew what he was doing. His neighbors saw

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 2>his behavior, his neighbors told the police that they should

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 2>be investigating him, but they never did, and they didn't

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>have a record then of this strange call made the

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 2>night before the body parts were found. Kenny Linscott made

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the call and said, have you found the bodies yet?

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>And nobody at that point knew that the kids were

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 2>even dead or that there were bodies to be found,

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 2>And that call was logged and it became the thing

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 2>that led to Kenny and ultimately to Chester. And so

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I have a law enforcement source that helped me with this,

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and he told me that, you know, everybody knew Kenny

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 2>was acting weird after the killings, and he said, well,

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 2>let's go talk to Kenny. And the sheriff says, oh no,

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>we confined him when them we need him. So at

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the very beginning, lin Scott's name came up, but yet

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the police just dismissed him right out of a hand.

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>In reflecting on all this, I just want to go

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>back to Luis Robin's testimony about the shoe print for

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a moment. I understand why jurors would be persuaded by her.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>She's got this anthropology degree, she's a professor, she comes

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>across I'm sure, convincingly she went and studied these ancient

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>footprints in Tanzania. That all makes sense. But the three

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>judges hearing this, you know, the inside wear patterns on

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the boot and that being definitive proof that it was

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Dale Johnson's bootprint. I mean, what did they make of

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>her testimony?

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you how strongly her testimony was accepted.

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Twenty five years later, you know, when the real truth

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>came out. I interviewed two of the three judges on

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the case and they both said, well, we had doctor

0:31:56.440 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Robin's testimony before, so that was very convincing. This was

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>even after they learned the truth, after they learned that

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>everything this woman said was was a lie, they still

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 2>wanted to wanted to believe in her. I have summed

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 2>up this case as a total collapse of a local

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>justice system, and I still believe that it left me

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>with such a sense of outrage that this kind of

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 2>thing can be done in our system of justice toom

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and I mean, you know it was it was not

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 2>even close, but the lies that were told in that

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 2>courtroom were enough to send an into some man to

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:46.239
<v Speaker 2>death row sitting there through the entire trial. Is they

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 2>never they never presented a rational case, and the evidence

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 2>that they did present was you know, challenged very successfully

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 2>by the defense. I mean, what I learned is that

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 2>someone with an academic position and mcclaim of scientific expertise

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 2>is automatically granted some level of believability, even by judges

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and prosecutors and investigators. And they really accepted Louise Robins testimony,

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and as fact I called it in my book Fantasy Forensics,

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and as events have proven it was totally fabricated. I

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 2>can only attribute it to the desire to get a conviction,

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>any conviction. That people in that town were petrified. The

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>judges knew it, They knew what would happen if they

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't get a conviction, and they knew that they wouldn't

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 2>have another crack at Dale Johnson if they acquitted him.

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 2>So they convicted him and just you know, went back home.

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The use of doctor Robins is a forensic expert, is

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>an example of what can go horribly wrong when courts

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>allow unverified signs into our courtrooms. She testified in twenty cases,

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>truly a hired gun by attorneys looking for a particular outcome.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Her work was reviewed by a panel of one hundred

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five anthropologists, forensic scientists, lawyers, and legal scholars

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>sponsored by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, and they

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>concluded that her methodology for identification had no basis in science,

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but the damage had already been done. Dale Johnson spent

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>four years on death row for a double homicide that

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 1>he didn't commit. But he was fortunate and that even

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>though his trial left him impoverished, his attorneys stayed on

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>his case pro bono and took on the appeals. The

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>psychological trauma inflicted on those who were wrongfully convicted, especially

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>for people who are innocent and sit on death row,

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is well documented. It isn't just the conviction that stays

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>with the wrongfully convicted, it's the aftermath. Dale lost it all.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>He lost his stepdaughter, his property, his wife divorced him.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until well into his eighties, actually earlier this year,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that Dale finally received some compensation for his time spent

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in prison. The Innocence Project provides support for therapy and

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>social services for its clients who are forced to cope

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>with the harms associated with their wrongful conviction. You can

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>donate to the Innocence Project by visiting www. Dot Innocenceproject

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dot org slash give. Next week we'll explore the junk

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>science of fingerprint evidence. Wrongful Conviction Junk Science is a

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>production of Lava for Good Podcasts in association with Signal

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Company Number One. Thanks to our executive producer Jason Flamm

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and the team at Signal Company Number one executive producer

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Wardis and senior producers Kara Kornhaber and Britz Spangler.

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Our music was.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Composed by Jay Ralph. You can follow me on Instagram

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>at dubin Josh, follow the Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction and on Twitter at

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong Conviction