WEBVTT - US-China Relations Are The Worst I've Ever Seen: Stephen Orlins

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well, under the Trump administration,

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the tensions the with and the relationships with China have

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>become rather strained. First it was trade tensions, tariffs, uh,

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>and mostly on the economic front. Now it's kind of

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>spilling into the political realm as well. We can get

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the latest on all things he was China. We can

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>do that with Stephen Orleans, president of the National Committee

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on US China Relations based in New York City. Steven,

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. You've had such

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a long history in China, dealing with the US and China,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the relationship they're doing business in China as well. What

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if you could give us maybe your thirty thousand foot

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>view about the US China relationship right now from both sides. Well,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been working on it, i guess for forty three years,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>since my time in the State Department and at Leban

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Brothers in the Carlisle Group and now as President of

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the National Committee on US China Relations. And I think

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to say this is the worst that I've

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ever seen the relationship. And it's a confluence of three factors,

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and you have to look at the factors are related,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but to some degree there's still separate. One. You have

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to remember the April seventeenth memo that leaked from the

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Republican National Committee, which is when when the administration is

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>attacked on coronavirus issues there to say we banned Chinese

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>from coming and then blame China. So there has been

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>this very strong uh statements by the administration to blame

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>China for everything. That's that's one, So electoral politics is

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a role. Second is what are called of the Navarro

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Pompeo parts of the administration um where they really believe

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>China is an existential threat and they want and it's

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>going to change our way of life, and they're trying

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to put in place policies which are irreversible. And the

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>third is Chinese actions where their actions in Hong Kong's,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>their actions in xin Jong in the South China see

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>create an environment in the United States where there is

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>not huge opposition to these policies which get put in place.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing pushback on on TikTok on w chat now,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's um, it's not as strong as it

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>would be if China wasn't acting the way it shouldn't be. Stephen,

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>when you say irreversible policies, what do you mean what

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be reversed? Well, if you take, for instance, the

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>for sale of TikTok, that's irreversible. So if Microsoft and

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>ends up buying TikTok, then either a President Trump that

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>changes his mind or a President Biden can't go to Microsoft.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So how you spent and was just getting you can

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you can now reverse that sale. So those kinds of

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>actions are irreversible, setting kind of a putting in place.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the the Houston consulate closing is not irreversible.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>That actually, you know, a new president or President Trump

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>changes his mind and says, okay, let's reopen the consulate,

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and as a result of the American consulate in cheng

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Doo will reopen. So there's reversible actions in their irreversible actions.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So Stephen, you know, I think maybe one of the

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>most reasonable views I've heard is that uh, okay, we

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we as the United States, need to take a tougher

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>stance on China. A lot of people on both sides

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the ais'll agree upon that China has not been

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>fair and some of its relations, particularly economic and trade

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>relations with the US. But the way that President Trump

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and his administration are going about it, uh is all wrong.

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>What's your view, It needs to be multilateral. To go

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about this unilaterally will not work. So take as an

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>example one which kind of matters to your listeners, the

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>blocking of listings of Chinese companies in the United States.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>When you do that unilaterally, you're playing whack a mole.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>We haven't agreed with Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, London to

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have the same restrictions. So what happens is Nasdaq and

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>ny SE lose that business. The Chinese don't lose anything

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that they basically will will issue in Hong Kong, Singapore, London,

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>or Tokyo. So if you don't have a multilateral approach,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this getting tough is really uh not an effective way

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of of of operating. And a lot of the things

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they want to get tough on our our, our, our

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>fictional You know, we have to have a real analysis.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We have to have a nuanced view of what is

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>going on in China. We don't. We saw today the

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are expanding their digital currency. Central bank digital currency

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is now uh it's in an experimental phase, but it's

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>going to expand greatly. That is a Chinese government competitor

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>to we chat, an alley pay that the Chinese government

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>is putting in place, competitors to these people who we

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>are trying to block in the United States. It's just

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not there's no nuance in these views. What's the right

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>way to proceed. If Joe Biden were to win, and

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's not at all you know, something that we

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>can predict, how would he proceed? I don't well, he

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>will have I mean, the biggest difference will be a

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>multilateral approach that Chinese that a lot of Chinese who

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have a there who who believe China should exceed to

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be the number one power in the world. Like President Trump,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they feel that his unilateral approaches, you know, his tariffs

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>on Canada, his his diminution of NATO, a lot of

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>things where he makes our allies less inclined to work

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>with US is good for China. That basically lays a

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>path for China to operate. What President Biden will operate

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on is a multilateral approach, and that can be very

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>problematic for some of China's plans. So if we had

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>something equivalent to a t p P UH, it would

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>force China to change its trade policies, it's investment policies,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it's protection of data policies. That t p P had

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of things in it which China would have had

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to agree to in the end or would have been

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>excluded from this global training system. So I think the

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>big difference is multilateral versus unilateral. Alright, Steven, thirty seconds left.

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>What is your view or what do you think the

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>view is in with within China as it relates to

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of how they should proceed with the United States

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>over the next ten years. Well, they're they're worried about

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the next eight three days, you know. They they think

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're very focused on not overreacting to the

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>provocations from the Trump administration. They believe that either a

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>re elected President Trump or an elected President Biden would

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>have different policies towards China. I think in the long

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>term they're looking for China. You know, again, there is

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 1>no Chinese government view. It's it's a lack of nuance.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>There are people in the Chinese government with different views.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Some want a very constructive, productive relationship with the United States,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>some want to confront the United States. So we need

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to adopt policies which reward those who want to cooperate

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>with the United States. And again, you need nuance in

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>policy and need people who understand China in government to

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>make those decisions. Stephen, we have to leave it there,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but it is an excellent, you know, chance to speak

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>with you. Steven Orleans as President of the National Committee

0:07:55.560 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in US China Relations. So we know, we tale that's

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>had a tough time. It's been having a tough time,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>as they say. And now bankruptcies have started in earnest.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in somebody who is a bit more at

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the cold face of retail and husband for decades, Craig Johnson,

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>as president of Customer Growth Partners. Craig, where are we

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the bankruptcy you know cycle? Are we halfway through? Yes?

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we? You done well in terms of the bankruptcies

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that occurred so far. We think we're i'd say about

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>halfway done, maybe fifth or sixth spending. Um. This actually

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't a sign of unhealth on the behalf of retailers.

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really a sign of weeding out of the poor

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>performers and the poor players and what has been a

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>vastly overcapacity industry that should have been right sizing normally

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>five every year, weeding out the week stores, the weak competitors,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and has put that up. So what we've had, by

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>dint of the whole cod but closures is a forced

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>right sizing, and that's what we're saying. It's interesting, it

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like when we've listened to a lot of the retailers,

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly the Parker stores, it seems like over the last

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>several years we've been hearing announcements of a hundred stores here,

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred stores there. Are you saying that that's still

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>not enough, that this industry really needs a We're still

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, overstored by maybe thirty in this country. I

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>would maybe not thirty percent, but by a good And yes,

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>there have been cutbacks that the department stars. Remember you

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>go back to generation ago, comprised ten per cent of

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire retail market. Now it's down to zero point

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. So you do the math, Craig, Who's next? Um,

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not sure who is next. We don't

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>like to speculate on on on on people going through

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>chapter eleven. But I can say that you know the

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are that that are the share gainers of

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>these companies? Are you know? Round up that the top

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>six usual suspects, you know, Walmart, Amazon, Costco, Target, Home

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>depoet lows All, had Stour are having stellar quarters, had

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.239
<v Speaker 1>stellar cards, haven't reported still beginning, But we can identify

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>some of those that have been lagging, right, Craig, I

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>mean some of those who just were not prepared for

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a downturn in the economy, who weren't getting consumer tastes right,

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>who were maybe over discounting or not discounting enough. I mean,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what were the mistakes? If we can't, if you can't

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>mention the names, then at least let's mention some of

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the mistakes they make. Absolutely, So you take let's take

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of department stores where the J C. Panni

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>your name and markers are most recently like a day

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>after ago, um Stein mart Um, and the commonality is

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is that they did not shrink their store footprint in commencially,

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>um with the decline in aggregate to man people, just

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what department stores offer, even includings Markman markers, is not

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>as relevant to customers as it was even five years ago,

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>much less twenty years ago. And um so those are few.

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>The other part of it as apparel, apparel is shrunk

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>dramatically over the years in terms of aggregate demand, um,

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet there still seems to be plenty of retail

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>square feet out there even after the closes we've had,

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>uh in the apparel sector. And you know, as the

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>senior brand, you know, a parent of an Taylor and

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Justice and Lost and so forth, they went chapter eleven

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>months and a half or so ago, and you know,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>we're wouldn't be at all surprised, as the other folks

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>go that way as well. So Craig, I was in

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>New York City, UH last week for the first time

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>since the lockdown in March, and I was just shocked

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>at driving in about you know, all the empty storefronts,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>all the sales saying, you know, store front for for

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>rent and for lease and all that type of stuff.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm I really fear for not so much the

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>walmarts and costcos of the world on the on the

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>retail front, but really the mom and pop retailers, it

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're just getting really really impacted here. Yeah,

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you're on Fifth Avenue or your lower Fifth and lower

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Broadway and soho. Um, it's like a retail ghost town.

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, it's really sad in a sense. Um. But

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>if customers don't want to go, Joeghi Barritt used to say,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>if people don't want to go to the ballpark, you're

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to stop them. And that's what we have here,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is that people just don't want to go into the city.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>They don't feel safe, comfortable, and when they see pa

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>boarded up and uh, you know, looting going on with it.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm in Chicago and originally was very sad to

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>see the entire magnivocent mile just trashed a few days ago.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And well, because I live very clost to certain areas

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, there was some looting in the

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>early days, and then there was a little bit of

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>looting in Chicago, but let's not overpainted as as mass looting.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Avenue, for example, back when there are lots of

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>reports that it was being looted, was only in parts damaged,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the inventory had already been taken

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>out of thanks to coronavirus or just putting that out there,

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's too would maybe, but just consumers. Consumers had

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>great confidence and what's going on, and then we would

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>see more traffic, and without traffic, a lot of these

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>stories are not gonna make it. I mean, yes, the

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Sacks will make it, and LV is gonna make it,

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and god knows, Costco and Wombark they're fine. But stories

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that don't have that kind of financial strength or customer

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.359
<v Speaker 1>strength are going to be challenged. So, Craig, this is pandemic.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess the question for a lot of

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>retailers is how permanent has the accelerated shift to online shopping,

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>how permanent wi LEPP be, or when we do get

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>back to quote unquote a normal day to day life,

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>will people go back to stores. What's your view? Well,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>UM last year online comprised about eighteen percent of total

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>retail sales. UH This year at the peak of the

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>pandemic period, UM in April jumped up to about twenty

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and the since ratchet back a little bit as the

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>stories are reopened in May and June et cetera. Um,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so that penetration is down to about But what that

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>means is we have usually online grows about at one

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>point a year ballpark, and what we've done essentially is

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>packed five years of growth into five months. Other with's

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen to and so we think things are going

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize at about and then proceed to the normal

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know about what adding about a point or two

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a point say a penetration a year, uh, and that

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is that we think that is a permanent change with

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this obviously with this ratchet, big ratchet, five point ratchet

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>up this this year very interesting. Really appreciate that. Craig Johnson,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Craig Johnson, President of

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Customer Growth Partners. Well, we are so fortunate to have

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the good folks at Johns Hopkins University lend us their

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>time to hear Bloomberg Radio to help us stay educated

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and stay on the top of the news on what's

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>going on with this virus and remedies and pretend chi vaccines.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Sour has been a great friend to Bloomberg Radio

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and keeping us up to date on all the latest developments.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Lauren is the Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine at John's

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Hopson School of Medicine. I should note that Bloomberg School

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a Public Health is supported by Michael Are Bloomberg, founder

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies, and this radio and

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>TV station. So, Lauren, let's start a little bit with vaccines,

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'm I'm really I'm just kind of wondering what

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is going on in Russia. They say they have a

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID vaccine, they say it's safe, but there really hasn't

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>been any real phase three testing. Has there? No, there hasn't,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And that is one of the biggest concerns that we

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>have right now. UM, when we look at what's happening

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in Russia with their vaccine clan UM, it's being rolled

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>out uh without phase three UM, which can lead to

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of downstream challenges that normally you would see

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>during that phase three process. So UM, different effects that

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine can have on a population, different challenges with

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>rolling out just the operational process of rolling out vaccine,

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and even more safety data is gathered during that phase

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>three as well. And so by skipping that, they not

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>only have the potential to harm the population that is

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>receiving the vaccine, but there are significant downstream effects that

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>can happen as well outside of that specific vaccinated population. Yeah,

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>can you explain a bit further, Lauren as to what

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that might look like. Sure, So, UM, the vaccine can

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>create UM antibody dependent effects. UM that can impact how

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the virus spreads in the community for those who have

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>been vaccine those who haven't been vaccinated. In addition their

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>challenges like, uh, if we find that there are safety

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>effects in this broader population, this more diverse population. When

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we do phase one and phase two studies, we're looking

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for relatively healthy population with certain levels of potential exposure,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and that Phase three moves us into a population that's

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>more representative of the general community, and so we may

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>identify safety challenges that um, we didn't see in those

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>early phases that could could could create dramatic health effects

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for people who are receiving the vaccine more broadly that

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see early. So, Lauren, just we'll just finish

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>up on this Russia aspect, will you? And other folks

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Western the healthcare field, we have the opportunity

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to kind of see what's going on in Russia. Do

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 1>you think they're going to be disclosing credible information so

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>that we can even get a read on how this

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is proceeding. I think that's the hope. You know, we UM,

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we recognize that we may not have the full picture,

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>but I think, UM, some of the safety information, some

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of this potential a D issue will be seen UM,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it's seen through the you know, formally

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>transmitted data or more informally through UM observation external observation. UM.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We are hoping I think that they that they actually

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>consider coming back to the idea of ducting a phase

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>three trial before they push it more broadly UM. And

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think only time will tell them that, Lauren,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>where are we in the sort of evolution of the

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus across the United States? You know, have we hit peak? Yes?

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Will there be further peaks? When does it come back

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to the East coast and in in in bigger numbers.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>But we have a lot to learn about how the

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>virus is UM going to have potential seasonality or how

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it will UM come and go UM from the various populations.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And some of that also will inform us a bit

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>more about likelihood of reinfection and how immunity lasts. UM.

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think in a lot of places across the country,

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to see a leveling off and we

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hope that that maintains, and we hope that UM that

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>buys us time to create some of these pharmaceutical interventions

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and improve some of the pharmaceutical interventions like vaccines and

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>some of our therapeutics. You know, therapeutics don't stop outbreaks,

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.959
<v Speaker 1>they improve outcomes, and so are the vaccine is one

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of our highest priorities. But we are going to see

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>peaks moving UM, you know, and and communities that seem

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to have had the viruses under the virus under control

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have follow on peaks again as people get less get

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>more lenient with their behaviors or their UM, you know,

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>their adherence to these new behaviors, and just the general

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>mixing and the population with the fall UM and the

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>challenges associated with back to school, which were already seeing

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>UM with the potential for UH flu season, and UM

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>with the holidays. So, Lauren, when vaccines do become available,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>hopefully sometime next year, is the expectation within the healthcare

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>community that I guess vulnerable populations will be targeted first

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for distribution and then maybe more broadly after that. Yeah,

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there's several groups working on some different prioritization strategies UM.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that we have done for a

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>long time with a lot of different facts scene. So

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>there are several groups that are are very UM skilled

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in in this and and can use the population data

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to prioritize who should get the vaccine first. UM. We

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>do think a lot about our vulnerable communities. We also

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>think a lot about essential personnel, particularly healthcare workers who

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>have that higher level of exposure. UM. And then some

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccines the early vaccine data in the Phase

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>three data will help us will help inform these groups

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>on how they target UM their priority rollout. Lauren, what

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what is the top things that people should watch now

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's sort of back to school era and UM,

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe there's a little bit of fatigue sitting

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in Yeah. I think it's um, it's a slightly worrying combination.

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So UM, you know, we we as a country sort

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of made the choice to reopen broad broad communities and um,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, things like bars and restaurants, and that I

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think is impacting our ability now to safely reopen school halls.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, up to the up to early July, we

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>had about two hundred thousand pieces of COVID nineteen nine kids,

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and from July to now we have almost the exact

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>same amount. So that's worrisome and I think is indicative

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of some changes that need to happen with how we

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>safely reopened schools. When you think about that, coupled with

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>possible flu season, um, even if it is a later

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>flu season, because of this distancing, we're very worried, um

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and we have to pay really close attention to it.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Sawery Johns Hopkins University. Always an absolute pleasure, and

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your time. So let's bring in the

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>editor of the Bloomberg Brief on Municipal markets, Joe Mysak.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>He comes to us in our Interactive broker's studio in

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>New York. Joe, Obviously, the chat about further stimulus is

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a tiny bit put on polls because actually we're not

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>getting any signals at all out of Washington that there

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>will be further stimulus, but there have to be. Is

0:21:54.400 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the MENI market getting ready? Oh wow? Is the topic

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>on everyone's minds, and some people think that yeah, this

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get done. Others don't. There was one line

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in the story we carried today by Bloomberg Billy House,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it was a quote from Mitch McConnell, and

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>it was this. It was it was bizarre, I think

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote. Democrats think they smell an opening. They

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have wanted for years to make Uncle Sam bailout decades

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of mismanagement at broken policies in places like New York,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, and California. Not just you know, stop right there,

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>New York, New Jersey, California. These three states make up

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent of the nation's GDP. California is what

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, the fifth largest economy in the world if

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>taken on its own. I don't see where McConnell gets that.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, yes, is that some pension problems. Surprise you

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't bring up illinoisa there. Uh, certainly should bring up Kentucky,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which has a notable pension shortfall problem. Anyway, So yeah,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this is this is really the issue on everyone's bend

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. All right, Joe, you mentioned the great state

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>of New Jersey. I'm sitting smack dab in that state

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I saw some news recently that the

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>top court approved the state's planned to borrow up to

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess close to ten billion dollars to cover its deficit.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>What does the meaning bond market think about that? Well,

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll tell you we have almost microscopic yields

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. And to the extent that New Jersey sells

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>all the bonds part of them. Um, and there's any

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of yield at all attached to him. Uh, you know,

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>marketed either right up. Because New Jersey again it's I think,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>uh number eight, eight, eight or nine in the rankings

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of states listed by g d P. So you know,

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey is a is a it's a little financial

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>engine too, if you will, you know, yeah, they've had

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>problems with the pension and problems with the budget. Murphy

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>governor Worthy seems like, you you know, kind of a

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>steady hand at the wheel. Um. So yeah, I had

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to walk. I would eat these up because right now

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the market is uh, you know, we haven't seen a

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of supply, so yeah, these are the marketing

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>got up, Joe. I mean remember when Mary do with

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he made that prediction way back after the financial crisis,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know it sort of could have gone either way.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people believe what she had

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to say and thought that armageddon was coming for municipalities.

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Is there any chance that that something like that is

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon now? You know, Yeah, that's a the

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>doomsday scenario. It always comes around. And I talked to

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this week, I talked to Paul Bolloy and

0:24:55.160 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard Group and he manages twillion dollars plots, which is

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the size and in my market, and uh, he doesn't

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>see it. And the reason it is because uh, states

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and localities of providing funding for essential services, so they're

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>an absolute must for the economic recovery. And he says

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that he sees that Congress will do something, Congress will

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>stop being intransigent and uh, you know, so eventually there

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>will be some some rescue money there some release because

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the alternative is uh, you know, to all we will

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think about uh you know, but but really what would

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean? You would need some of the faults? Uh

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you know he's a couple of Chapter

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>nine bankruptcies at the local level. Um, you know that,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but but a whole the doomsday scenario is so oversold

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 1>and not accurate when it comes to meetings. So I know,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic hit, the taxable municipal bond market was

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>red hot. We had lots of international buyers coming into

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that market, just desperate for yield. How's that market trading

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>right now? How's the fund slows the new issuance? How's

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that market looking to you? Oh? Baby, taxable bonds are

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>are you know, it's like the it's the flavored d

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>jur in the medi market right now. Because municipalities, you know,

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>fund that rates are solo, they could sell taxable bonds,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which as you say, are attractive to uh, out of

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>country buyers as well as in country buyers. Um, they

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>could sell those taxable and refund advanced refund bonds that

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they sold the tax exempt market a few years ago,

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>three four or five years ago. And of course the

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>most recent tax Act prohibited the use of the tax

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>exempt financing for advance refundings. So, yeah, taxables are going crazy,

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know one of they uh you know it's uh,

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a portion of the market. Maybe it's

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and fifty billion out of the point nine

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>truly beauty market. But I read a report this week

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that you are an analyst said, you can easily see

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it go off to you know, nine hundred billion portion

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of the market in the next couple of years here,

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's just we'll keep an eye on that.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mai Sak. Thank you once again, Joe Mesac, edit

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>editor Bloomberg Brief, keeping us up to date on all

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>things going on a must the bond market. Thanks for

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn,

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.