WEBVTT - Dunkin’s Travis: Public Companies Profit From Scrutiny

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Tesla

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>is under investigation by the Justice Department over public statements

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>made by the company and CEO Ellen Mosk. The shares

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are down about two percent, making a little bit of

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>gains against the initial losses on that headline. We will

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>monitor it for you. Perhaps it is perfect timing, then

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that we talk about what it is to be a

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>private company rather than a public company, and what it

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>means to be a good manager versus a bad manager.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Here joining us now is Nigel tracks Best, executive chairman

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Duncan Brands Group, also the author of a book,

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>The Culture Challenge or The Challenge Culture. Excuse me why

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the most successful organizations run on pushback? Nigel, thank you

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Delighted to be here.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Decades of experience in this business, you know, just just

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about Tesla and some of the issues that they've

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>had with going private or going public. From your perspective,

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is it better to be a private company? And why?

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Great question, And as a very happy second time Tesla owner,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>really yeah, yeah, I mean I think the machine is awesome.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>As someone said last week, it's artificial intelligence on wheels,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think the product is fantastic, do you No, no, no.

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I bought the stock a long time ago and got

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>out with a very hefty gain. But anyway, um, but

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a fascinating question. It's a it's a question that's

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>discussed in the book. Because I joined Duncan back in

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine and we were private, I think we

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>were helped, which is going to sound slightly contradictory by

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact it was in the middle of the recession.

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't get more in the middle of the recession

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>than January two thousand and nine. And we spent the

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>first year studying the company and our franchisees with several

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>microscopes because everyone was under severe pressure and and in

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>many ways, when I look back, that was good. But

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I was supported with a phenomenal group of private equity firms,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>being Carlisle and thhle. We had an excellent board, and

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>what is interesting is that two of those original board

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>members are still on our board now um uh still

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>on the board um And we went completely public in

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twelve. So I like being private, but

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of the few CEOs that actually likes being

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>public as well, because I truly believe that the questions

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>from people like yourself, or from analysts and certainly investors

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have a role to make you better. They constantly challenged

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the status quo, which is what what my book's all about.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It's about getting input from informed outsiders. It is the

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>outside looking in. And I truly believe you know that

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>good managers, as you say, good leaders, can operate in

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>both private circumstances and public circumstances. Nigel Travis as the

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>author of the Challenge Culture why the most successful organizations

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>run on pushback. In addition to your role at Duncan Brands,

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you previously have experienced as the chief operating officer Blockbuster.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You also worked at Burger King and you've also had

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a career at Papa John's. You've also helped to restructure

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>an English football team, Layton Orients. Can you tell us

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what some of those things have in common. Well, actually

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>cook quite a bit um. Firstly, the English football team,

0:03:55.400 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which UH a consultium led by myself bought the club

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>June last year. We had no bank account, no credit

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>card processing and worst of all, no players. But we

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>applied the challenge culture and everything we did. And the

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>challenge culture is about two things. Is about challenging, which

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is what everyone focuses on, but mostly it's about culture.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>So to link all those companies together over time, I've

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>tried to develop a very positive culture in all the companies.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got an extremely positive culture in Duncan

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>where people have always been encouraged to challenge, pushback too,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>if you like, take all the hierarchical boundaries out the way.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Papa John's, despite some of their recent problems, we had

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a great culture when I was there, and I did

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it there without changing any of the leadership team. You

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>did a whole digital initiative there. Oh yeah, yeah. We

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we became the leaders of online pizza ordering in nineteen sorry,

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, two thousand and six, and I

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>focused on that because when I was at Blockbuster we

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of great things. We had to constantly

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>fight new technology challenges coming towards us all the time.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>We probably didn't tackle Netflix early enough. We certainly didn't

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>tackle Netflix early enough, and we could have bought the

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>company for about fifty million it's now worth I think

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty billions, something like that. But we

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>came back hard and we put them under pressure. And

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>after I left, after my then boss John anti Arco left,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the company struggled and eventually went bankrupts in two thousand

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and ten. But we could have been the leaders. So

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the messages you've got to constantly look at,

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>look where you are, how you challenge going forward, how

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you challenge the status quo, but all within the context

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to answer your question of a very positive, people oriented culture.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's what the books about. It's not just the challenging,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's about creating that culture. We should live every day.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You should set an example of what it's about every day,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>and I truly think we've demonstrated that at Duncan. I

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to something that you were talking

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>about with respect to being a public company, that that

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>actually encourages a challenge culture, and I want to ask

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you about the fact that we've seen a growing number

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of companies go private from being public. Are you concerned

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't foster enough of a challenge culture that

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>potentially companies will end up struggling or being failures because

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting scrutinized and questioned every step of the way.

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great question. And it's interesting that

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the number of public companies, and I think this is

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're referring to, is declining at quite a rapid rate.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's down by something like that may not

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be right, but yeah, it's traumatic. And I think the

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>point you make is fair comment because we all need

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>outsider input looking in. I mean, one of the benefits

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we have in Duncan and we had the same in

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Pupa John's, and we have the same at the football club.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>The football club we have fans rather than franchisees. Duncan

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and Papa John's we have franchisees. They are the ultimate challenges.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But some times you need people standing right outside the

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>organization looking at trends and by the way, analysts, this

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is what people don't realize. Analysts, good analysts like some

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of the people we have in our industry, and by

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the way, we have thirty five analysts who follow Duncan,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which is probably too many, but thirty five. The benefit

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is they talk to the competition, they followed the trends,

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and they make you think the whole time. So the

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Challenge culture, a major part of it has been being

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>pushed to think and say what direction are we going in?

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it right or not? And by the way, just

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>say something on Duncan. Under the new leader, Dave Hoffman,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going in exactly the right direction. Well done, Thank

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you very much for coming in and spending time with us.

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Nigel Travis, the author of The Challenge Culture, Why the

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>most successful organizations run on pushback. He is the executive

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>chairman and the former chief executive of Duncan Donuts and

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Baskin Robins. Don't want to miss out on the imp

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>laeve that he has a lot of doughnuts and ice cream,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>because I will tell you he is not. He's very fit,

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>keep working out, challenged myself every day. All right, we uh,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate it and we look forward to having you

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Much appreciated. China has decided to levy

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>levy tariffs on about sixty billion dollars worth of imports

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>from the United States. This is contingent, of course, on

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the plan tariffs on two billion dollars worth of Chinese goods.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>China plans to slap additional tariffs on over five thousand

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>categories of US products with two levels of tara phrase

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>ten and five percent. Here to tell us more about

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the issue is Leland Miller. He is the chief executive

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of China beige Book International. You can follow their work

0:08:55.880 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at China beige Book. Leland Miller. Always a pleasure,

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for coming in. Do you believe that this

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>back and forth in tariffs will have a meaningful effect

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Chinese economy. I think it will. I think

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it already has. And we've got some new data they're

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out next week that I think will shine a

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>light on on on on what is happening and and

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know not that nothing is hit except the

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty billions so far, and even that is just a

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>few weeks in. If that is showing an effect, then

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it tells you a lot about what two billion will do,

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and what about what will fillion will do? So I

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>do think it is is it's already showing an effect. Uh,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a little bit more on that week. Well,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it's manufacturing. So manufacturing has been going strong for a

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>long time, and in China, in China, and uh and

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the manufacturing sector has gotten skittish

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on next and and uh, and that's

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one of their real concern points. Well, the Shanghai composit

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rallied overnight in the heel on the heels of this news.

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>One theory had been, first of all, it had been

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 1>so beaten up and had been trade at its lowest level.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But also there are some theories out there that China

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>will come back with some kind of infrastructure project that

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>will help bolster the economy. So how does that factor

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in and doesn't that offset this? Yeah, I think that

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's part of it. Um, China is now faced with

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a serious trade threat that looks like it's going through,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in which case the government's gonna have to respond. So

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be all systems go. We're

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>already seeing a little bit of that about that in

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the in the credit world. Uh. And so there's that.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think the other part about this is that

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the two billion didn't come out of nowhere. This was

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>going through. The surprise I think was that they they

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>expedited the process a bit and they moved up the

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>implementation date. But the two billion has been talked about

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for months. It was always going through. Uh even if

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you were to have a deal later this fall, the

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>president wanted that two either hovering right over him or

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>recently into effect in order to negotiate. So the twitter billion,

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's any major surprise. Leland. Tell us

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese economy right now. You spend a lot

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of time time analyzing it, where its strengths and weaknesses. Well,

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the two thousands, sixteen, two thousands seventeen years, we're all

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>about recovering from the early crisis and recovering the economy

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>into a into a period of strength and stability entering

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the Party Congress, and they accomplished that. I think that

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about this throughout twenty seventeen, it was,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, all systems go, things are looking good. They

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't have this trade war hanging over them in seventeen

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and and since then things have gotten a little bit

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>more tricky. So you have this, you have the trade

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>war looming, you have uh A a bunch of sectors

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, the old economy, manufacturing, property and others

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that have been run so hard for so long that

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to weaken. And so you have this possibility

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of a weakening economy with looming tariffs overhead, and it's

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>making people nervous. And so the big question is how

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>accurate official data are on credit, which they're saying there's

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not that much barring yet and investment and they're saying

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is at historic lows. Now, we don't agree

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>with that, and we'll have some different takes on that

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in the coming weeks. I think that official data tells

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you a good story three months earlier, but I think

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some there's some new developments on the horizon right now.

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps credit is expanding pretty quickly as they loosen up

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the strings. I'm just wondering. One thing that we're waiting

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for is details on retaliation from China. What could some

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of those measures be in addition to some of the

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>tariffs that they've put out there on sixty billion dollars

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of US goods, But what could they do as far

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>as basically shifting their supply chains and their lines of

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>business away from the US. Well, they are going to

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have to look into that the same way that the

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>US is looking into it. They're gonna have a harder

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>time because I think that the you know, the US

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>trade with China is very one sided at this point,

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and so the US is other places that can go China.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>China wants to have markets for its goods, it's it's

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be hard to avoid the US. So they

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have a much tougher task here. But the z t

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>E incident was a wake up call for them. I

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think that the the escalation and their of of these

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>tariffs and their apparent weakness in the face of them,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is another wake up call. So, you know what, what

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing right now, independent of tariffs, and independent of

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>whether we somehow see a fall deal or a deal

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in in early twenty nineteen, is a decoupling of the

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>U S and Chinese economies. And I think that that

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is setting itself down a path that's not yet irreversible,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but is looking like this is going to be the

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that defines the next decade. If that is indeed

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what defines the next decade, where will the capital come

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>from in order to continue the accelerated growth that China

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to enjoy. Well, you know, China in some ways

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is a very attractive market. Now. You don't have a

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>very good regulatory structure. You don't trust that the government

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to do what it says it's going to do.

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you have enormous opportunities. You've got

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge consumer base, you've got um interest rates that

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>that should be paying out relatively healthily, and as long

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as you're in a low interest rate world, which we're

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>emerging from right now. So you've got this bod market

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's crying out for foreign capital. So there are

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there. But the Chinese really have to get there,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>get their economy into shape, and they have to be

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>more open, and I think they would be forced into

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that the more they're back into a corner. Leland Miller,

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>such a pleasure having you on. Thank you so much

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for coming in. Thank you. Really interesting him this idea

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that the decoupling of the US and Chinese economies will

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be the defining feature of the next decade. According to

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Leland Miller, chief executive officer of the China Beige Book International,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of money raised recently for real estate,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, Carlisle has raised five and a half billion

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars for its private equity real estate for fund. Black

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Stone has said to raise more than eighteen billion dollars

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for a real estate fund. And now we learned that

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>ox IF is looking to raise two point eight billion

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars for real estate. So our next guest is probably

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a very popular individual. Scott Lawler is the chief executive

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of a way Point Residential and he joins us here

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studios. Scott, thank you very

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Are you at all surprised at

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money that's being raised by private equity

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>firms to invest in real estate? Well, first, thanks for

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>having me, And I would not say I'm surprised because

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a trendline that's been evolving throughout this psycho

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>where you know, after the crash, the manager field, if

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you will, real estate investment manager playing field got shaken

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>up quite a bit and the few survivors capitalized on

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity and suddenly there were a fewer managers and

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>much much larger funds. And that's continued. Obviously now there's

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>more managers back in the game, but the trend towards

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>mega funds, if you will, amongst sort of the all

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the fame name managers has been in place for some

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>time and they've been successful with it all, right, But

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>here we are, two thousand eighteen, some people are seeing

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>some possible wobbles in the US housing market. There isn't

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of dynamism that we saw during the recovery,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly in terms of price increases. Where are the opportunities, right? So,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, ten billion, eighteen billion, that's a

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of money to invest, for sure, But in a week,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is we're talking literally, these are the

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>past week. But it's important to understand how they define

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>their playing field. So you know, you don't deploy a

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>fund like that. And it's not for me to say

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys run their business other than we all know

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they've done it very well. But you know they're thinking

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms First of all, they're thinking globally of course um.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, um, you know, in terms of say larger transactions,

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>say there's been a public to private activity and so

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>on in the reach sector and things like that. So

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they're really in the mega trade business. And when you

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>can't you raise funds at that level, you're kind of

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>playing at a different tier, and the and the competitive

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand dynamics are different. So someone like me

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have to be careful where I play because

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in certain places that could be fifty folks chasing an opportunity,

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to be the fifty one. But

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing at their level, that's not the case.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>We hold on a second, So this is important. These

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are direct competitors to you in certain circumstances. How do

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you ensure that you're not playing in the same sandbox?

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the sandbox that you see the opportunities for a

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>fund of your size? Right, So we're the biggest cut

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously is deal size, Right, So if you read about

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, five billion dollar public to private transaction as

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>an example, it's probably not going to be us, you know,

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>leading the charge there. So we're playing in smaller markets.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>We're doing deals that are maybe fifty million dollars on

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>average of total capitalization, and we would very very rarely

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>cross paths with someone who had a ten billion dollar

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>fund because they're not going to get that money out

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the door efficiently doing fifty million dollar deals. They're going

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to get it out the door doing very very large transactions.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a very different playing field, all right,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>very different playing field residential rental properties, that's that's a

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>specialty for you. That's right. Where are you looking to expand?

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So we've been expanding the last couple of years, UM

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of ways. I define it by geography

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and I define it by strategy. So we really found

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatest opportunity for the most part, not exclusively, but

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>heavily focusing on some smaller markets, UM, which are different

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>than when i've student housing, for example in North Carolina.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.479
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Well, that's as it relates to specialty. So

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we've gone into smaller geographies half a million million person

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>metro areas, and in addition, we've gone into specialty property

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>types such as student and senior, and we find those

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>are more compelling areas right now than say keeping it

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>you know what I call center of the fairway, if

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you stick with just conventional and just in the major metros,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's where you see the fiercest competition and in my view,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the most troublesome pricing. So how much more are you

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>getting with respect to returns to invest in some of

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>these smaller opportunities that have a smaller pool of competitors

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>than the large cat type deals. The spread isn't what

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it used to be, and I wish it was greater.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>There's some I mean, look, if you talk about prime

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>properties and major metros, you know cap rates and you

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>know going in returns are sub four percent frequently. Um,

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we're at least a hundred a hundred fifty basis points

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>higher than that. So I'd rather play a hundred fifty

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>basis points higher and be in Omaha, de Moin or

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>what have you, then pay a three seventy five to

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be in San Francisco. Doesn't mean I'm right. There's a

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart folks. You see it differently. It's just

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>what we do. Are you concerned about the amount of

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>money going into this space and how high valuations have gotten.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm absolutely concerned about the amount of money in the

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>space because it makes our life very difficult, you know.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's why we have to focus on specialty property types,

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>why we focus on smaller markets. Um, we are constantly

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>looking for opportunity. You know, I call outside the center

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the fairway. We have to rummage around in the

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>rough quite a bit. We're in a we're in the

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>one in a hundred business, which is a very tough

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>way to make a living. We look at a hundred

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>deals to do one. But keep in mind our business

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is still quite a bit less efficient than the securities world.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>It's more efficient than it was thirty years ago, but

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>less efficient by far than say, trading securities. And so

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the point is, if you're willing to endure the brain

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>damage and the wheel spinning of the one in a hundred,

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you can find risk adjusted opportunity. That's how we define

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the business is we're looking for miss price risk. You know,

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you to describe what it's like

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to build student housing now compared to what your dorm

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>room looked like back in ninety two. For in a

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, I'm very jealous of those who were

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>born thirty years later. To me, that's one of them.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I was actually at my old school recently. Of course,

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>my daughter is looking at it, and we looked at

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the dorm and she thought I was joking, and it

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>looked more like a prison cell than say the dorm

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>she'd seen at all the other schools we were trying.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Actually was riot proof. It was the biggest cement structure.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Literally it was built for riot proof situations. But if

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>all our kids saw our dorms, they won't believe it.

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And so now the world has changed profoundly, which is

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the opportunity because it's not just a matter

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of existing inventory relative to demand. It's the quality and appropriate.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It's if you will have the existing inventory relative to

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>current taste and preference. And there's been a massive shift.

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Basically the younger kids, you know, demand more and the

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>markets providing it, whether it's the physical layout, the services, amenities,

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. I mean, you really, you,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>as a parent, are you going to pay for it?

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much you're gonna pay for your kids housing?

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that okay with you? That question exactly. We're gonna

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>next time. I'm going to bring an eighteen year old

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>young lady and she's going to join this conversation and

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>she's gonna say, yes, my dad's gonna pay. We welcome that.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>If you buck now probably is hearing this loud and clear, Yeah, sure,

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know, it's just something that's changed profoundly

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>over the course of a generation. And so as a result,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>there's an opportunity even if there's a market with plenty

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of inventory, there's a very good chance the majority that

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>inventory is just not favored by the current generation. Real quick,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. How close are we to the next downturn

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of the housing market? Well, um, that's a tough one.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I call it the end in question. I get asked

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it every day and book and say, Scott, would inning

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>are we in? And you know my answer is, I'm

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's possible to answer the question, bequesse to

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>say we're in the seventh three hinting is to say here,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it's synonymous with asking, if you had just said to me, right, Scott,

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>when is the recession going to hit what? You know,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>what quarter of what year? How long? How bad? My

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>answer will be, I don't exactly. So we are not

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>believers in market timing, and I talked to my investors

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about this lot. We're very, very big believers in doing

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of severe downside sensitivity analysis. And so

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>my answer to the question always is here's what happens

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>if and making sure we're okay when the music stops

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>playing that we're fine, as opposed to here's why it's

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in the third quarter of nineteen or

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>what have you? Scott Lawler, thank you so much. A

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>much more sophisticated, nuanced, and intelligent answer, although you could

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have said, you know. September two thousand and one, Scott Lawler,

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>founder and chief executive officer of Waypoint Residential, thank you

0:22:53.119 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so much. The price of oil moves higher. Brent oil

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight dollars eighty five cents of barrel. West Texas

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>intermediate crude trades at sixty nine dollars and seventy two

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>cents of barrel. What's next for crude? Julian Lee are

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>oil strategies for Bloomberg News joins us from London. Julian

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>what are the implications for increased sanctions against Iran and

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the price of crude oil? Well, I think that we

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to see further declines in Iranian production and

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Iranian exports. We've already seen as of the first half

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of September that those flows coming out of Iran are

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>down by around about a million barrels a day from

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>where they were in April. That's the last full month

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>before President Trump announced that he was pulling the US

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the Iran nuclear deal and that the sanctions

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>would snap back. So we've lost a million barrels a day,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're still a month and a half away from

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the data at which those sanctions are to be fully implemented.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think over the next six weeks or so,

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we will lose more Iranian oil. We could lose easily

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>another half a million barrels a day if you look

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at what is still going to to Europe, to Japan,

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Um and places like Turkey and India, who, even if

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't fully stop buying Uranian oil, are likely to

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>start trimming the amount that they purchase. So, Julian, let's

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>take a step back here, because the broader picture is

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>that oil is going offline in Venezuela, it's going offline

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in Iran, and there is a question of whether Saudia,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Arabia and Russia, some of the biggest producers in the world,

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>are willing to increase their production to offset the declines

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in Venezuela as well as i Ran.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm wondering, from your perspective, do you think that

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Usha and Saudi Arabia are willing to produce more or

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>do they want to see the price rise to increase

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>their profits to shore up their economy is I'm thinking,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly of Russia. I don't think they do particularly want

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to see the price rise. I think they are fairly

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>content with the sort of level that we see at

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment, both of them. Yeah, absolutely, I think that

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the question is not so much whether they want to

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>increase production as to whether they are able to increase production.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia is producing about ten point four million barrels

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a day at the moment. That was our estimate for August.

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>It's never produced more than ten point six ten point seven,

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>so it's getting close to not the theoretical limit of

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>its capacity, but certainly the uh if you like, the

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>tested level of its capacity. We don't know how much

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond that it can go. Russia, too, I think, has

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>increased its production since the early part of this year,

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when it was abiding by the deal it reached with Opeq.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Their oil minister has said they can add another three

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand barrels a day by the end of this year.

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But again that is taking us into uncharted territory for

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>for post Soviet Russia, UM and the Russian government itself.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the the Economy minister UM came

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>out earlier earlier today, their finance minister who said that

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the break even price that Russia needs to balance its

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>budget for is forty dollars a barrel UM. Now, yes,

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they'd like more than that because they would like to

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>pay down some of their debt and build up a

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>UM a sort of a rainy day funds. So they'd

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like more than forty. But I think both Saudi Arabia

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and Russia are very aware that when prices get too high,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>demand starts to suffer, and both of these countries want

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to be exporting oil and selling oil into the market

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for the long term future. Julian, just a little bit

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>more on Iran. They don't just export crude. They also

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>export condensate. This is that super light oil that's used

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in the petrochemical industry. Tell us about condensate and the

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>potential buyers or those that are no longer buyers, Okay,

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean condensate is is interesting this time around because

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it was excluded from the sanctions when they were enacted

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>under President Obama. UM. President Trump has made it very

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>clear that he expects buyers to stop buying both crude

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and condensates. Condensates are if you like a much smaller

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>pool of supply. There are fewer producers of condensates. It's

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially a very light liquid that comes out of gas fields. UM.

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The biggest buyer of irrain and condensate by far is

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>South Korea. They have already stopped. The last ship carrying

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Iranian condensate to South Korea left I think in July.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Um it arrived in early August. May have been June

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and July that it arrived, but certainly for the last

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>month or two, South Korea has not bought any Iranian condensate.

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>That causes a problem for South Korea in terms of

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>finding alternative sources of supply. One of the one of

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the things is that the Iranian condensate is is quite

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>high in sulfur. This is a a an element that

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that has to be removed from the condensate to make

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it consistent with product specifications, so it also makes it cheaper.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I see, well, Julian Lee, We're gonna have to follow

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>up on that next time. We have to leave it there.

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Julian Lee, Bloomberg ot oils strateg is coming to us

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>from London. Definitely an interesting moment. We have a Brent

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>crew climbing back up towards eighty dollars of barrel. Uh

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh. We'll see how that factors into both consumer

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>prices as well as the political calculus. Thanks for listening

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio