WEBVTT - Tesla, Economy, Tech, and Anti-ESG (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's round table what's

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>going on because there's always an ongoing story with Tesla,

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>twitter elon Musk, We're gonna do that with man Deep

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>singh Uh. He covers technology. Kevin, he's in our studio.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Tynan joins us on the phone. He covers the

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>auto sector for both of them for Bloomberg Intelligence. So

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we're getting our money out of Bloomberg Intelligence this morning,

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>which is the research department for Bloomberg customers. Be I

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>go on the terminal. Kevin, let's start with you here. Um,

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is there a demand problem for Tesla vehicles out there?

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>There is, there's probably a demand problem for everybody, all

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>auto makers. But I think, wait, wait, wait, wait, let

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>before we get started, Kevin, let's set the scene here.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>You're in Vegas. Yeah, Now, the CS is a consumer

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>electronic show for those who don't know. But it's really not.

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's really the auto show, which has some electronic stuff

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>around it. It has become that it is unbelievable decade,

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>which is now why Kevin might not even go to

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Auto Show, which used to be like the

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl and automakers. So Kevin, just before we get

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to Tesla, gives set the set the stage here. What's

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>going on at CES? What do you expect to hear?

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect to hear from the auto companies? Uh?

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>This year? Well, most importantly, where are you staying? Do

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a suite at the Bellagio? Uh? Mike Dean?

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Are European guys at the Bellagio? I actually have time share?

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just come and stay in my league. You've

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gotten share in Vegas. My man, pots and pans, as

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they say, all right, Michael Dean, he's the class act.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>He's got the bags, all right, Kevin, So talk to

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>us about CS. What are you looking for? Yeah, there's

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a hopefully it's a big bounce back from last year.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Last year as a ghost town, c e S was

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely dead. Um, just from the people reaching out and

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>companies reaching out this year. It seems like it should

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>be much better this year. A lot of still a

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of autonomous you know light our self driving software companies.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem like it's going to be as much

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know from the O E M s this year

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about you know, EV products or I think it's going

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of that ancillary businesses, infrastructure, um,

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, autonomous driving. It's gonna be a lot of

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that this year. Nobody with the final solution

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>per se, but a lot of the moving parts up

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to that. All right, so uh man, deep, where do

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>your world's collide here? Why are you not in Vegas?

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, well, I think the AD companies don't

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like to showcase a lot of their stuff when you

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, what alphabet is to wing even

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>though they have a Waymo unit which is also an

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>autonomous driving a lot of their AI. When you think

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about their capabilities, whether it's on the third side or

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>add side that they don't talk about it as much

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, these kind of shows, and

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they are more device driven at the end of the day,

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is um more focused towards devices and

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why, yeah, not something but there's a lot of

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the stuff running on Azure. The cloud. Companies have their

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>own kind of events. You know, both Microsoft and AWS

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have their annual conferences, and they don't. I would just

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine more and more of uh technology is I mean,

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we know more technologies in the cloud. Cars are becoming

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>technological little you know, driving cell phones. So I imagine

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of the stuff that I type

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>into the like Google Pad in my Chevy Silverado is

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>stored in the cloud. Well so us because it's stored

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the cloud doesn't mean you know, it's at the

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge that that ship has selled. You know. Now

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about what can you do next? In terms

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of open chat, GPTs the new craze. Now, the reason

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>why people are excited about it is because it kind

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of disrupts the Google search dominance around showing links and

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>clicking you are else. This is more about generative AI

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>using large language models, and a lot of that was

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>in the academia for all the longest time, but now

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>suddenly it's hitting mainstream because of cloud. Cloud gives you

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the processing power to do a lot of these things,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why we are talking about it.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>All right, Kevin, So we just in terms of maybe

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not just Tesla, but give us your sense of how

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>this demand for electric vehicles is going to roll out,

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the next couple of years. Again a

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a disappointment there for Tesla. Uh, most recently,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about that bigger picture? Yeah, you know,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and I'm and I'm starting to lay out, you know,

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the mindset for the next at least year plus. And

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing I keep coming back to is that,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>arguably you know where we are now in terms of

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>ev discussion, hype, whatever you want to call it. You know,

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it was the germ of the idea

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was was from one person, right, and media and markets

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and investors and governments and other automakers eventually brudging lee,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>kicking and screaming got on board with that. You know.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if the you know, the real science

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>behind the transition completely away from internal combustion completely to electrification. Uh,

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>if we're not getting the full story right that when

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you go from minding of materials for the batteries, who

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>controls those materials, what those materials cost, all the way

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>through the process of how we're going to consistently charge

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that many vehicles UM to the disposal of the battery

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>is something that I don't think anybody's really wanted to

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about. I think the markets and the media is

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>focused on tailpipe versus no tail pipe, and I think

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on in the process that is

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>just sort of glossed over. And I think in this

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>market and in this economy, UH, that due diligence and

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>those questions are gonna be asked more seriously, UM, And

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure people are gonna like those answers no.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, ironically, well, I never know if I'm

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>using the the word ironic correctly because I grew up

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>with a lot it's more a set. But it seems

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ironic to me, UM that the Biden Administration's I r

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a UH legislation is what kind of pulled the curtain aside,

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>right all of a sudden, after the Biden administration put

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this ira A legislation out that's supposed to give um

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>tax rebates or attacks incentives to companies that produce in

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the US, you know, batteries with components and ingredients that

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>come from the US. No one really knows what what

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that was where they where those things came from, or

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't ever really give it a lot of thought. And

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>now the Treasury Department is sitting on this legislation, like

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>what in the heck are we gonna do? Because nobody's

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get this tax credit unless we let you know,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all these American producers use Chinese chemicals in their batteries,

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, And I and I think you know that

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>my concern in terms of ev adoption is that, like

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you said, when you pull back this curtain, or when

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you start asking real questions, which nobody has had to

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>do because the stocks just went up, right, and that

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that that the end justified those means. Is

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that now if we start asking real questions or difficult questions,

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure you know that those answers are what

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily we want to hear. I mean, Tesla does its

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>semi launch. It's a megawatt of power to charge that thing.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Think of a truck stop along the highway. I just

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>drove sixteen hours straight from Florida over the holiday. You know,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think my longest stop was seven minutes, right,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And but think about those truck stops that I pulled

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>into that if those are if those are charging electric center,

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a small city in terms of of a

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>power draw. Um, you know to do yeah, just to

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>do what we already do now. Alright, alright, good stuff, alright,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>good stuff on the auto front, real quick? Uh man deep.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the theme for coming out of tech? Thirty seconds?

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Free cash flow. Everyone is fixated on free cash freelove.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you keep hearing about layoffs because investors

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that these companies are making money,

0:08:53.000 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a marketplace company, think like AI or VR Juicy,

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think of those big juicy margins. Mandy Sing, senior

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>tech analysts Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us here in a Bloomberg

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>interactor broker studio. And Kevin Tyne and senior auto analysts

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. He's at Vegas. He's at the Consumer Electronics Show,

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which is hundreds of thousands of tech geeks get together

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in the desert and see what the new toys are

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's coming up. This is Bloomberg. We want to get

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a preview here. Three outlook on the big banks, the

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>investment banks, the asset managers. There's nobody better to do

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that with. And Alison Williams. She's a senior global analysts

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>covering all the financial services companies for Bloomberg Intelligence. She

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>joins us from Bloomberg's sprawling Princeton, New Jersey campus. Man,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>if you've been to the Princeton office, it's great. And

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they just and they just redid it, right, Allison, just

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>did a big renovation. They did all right good stuff.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean the little bit of Princeton one time. Really, Yes,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>need to get out a little more. There is a

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>university there right. My buddy Brian Sullivan from a network

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that I will not name, lives there. So best hoagies

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world, Hoghaven. Just a little plug there, Allison.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the key theme that you're looking for here in

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know we're gonna have some bank earnings

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>coming up in a few weeks, but what are some

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger themes that you and and and big

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>bank investors are looking at. So so, obviously the big

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>question is going to continue to be recession, right, so

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that the depth of the recession, the length of the recession, um.

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.359
<v Speaker 1>But I think what we're focused on is the overall

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>level of profitability at these banks and just um, you know,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the incredible power that they have to withstand UM even

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a deep recession. Keep in mind that the last two

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>cycles we had were crises, right, So we had the

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic UM and before that it was the global financial crisis. UM.

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So as we go think about session UM, you know,

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that might be sort of in the back of investors minds,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>but we think that the cycle looks a lot more

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like you know, that of two thousand UM, and we

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think that regardless of the provisions, regardless of the change

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in accounting that's going to make those provisions very front loaded. UM,

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the banks are in a great position to weather the storm.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And then specifically to the investment banking unit. You know, UM,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hear more and more stories over the

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks about some of the head COUMP

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>cuts and some of the COMP cuts. But I think

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, again looking back to the global financial crisis,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we will see some reductions, but nowhere near

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what we saw back then. Yet revenue is within that range.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So the profitability UM of these banks is really strong,

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and we think that that's what investors should be focusing on.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So UM, basically, the net interest margin works out too

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>offset the higher loan lost provisions. What if we do

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>see though a ton of defaults coming up in UM,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what if we see that those loan lost provisions aren't

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>just provisions but actually you know, necessary. So I think

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the best way to frame that or think

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>about that is UM. You know, Jamie dimond Um gave

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a great scenary analysis for JP Morgan, the bank that

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>he runs, on the last earnings called you know, if

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we see six unemployment, we could see six billion of

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>added provisions over a couple of quarters. That number for

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>UM in the pandemic was closer to fifteen billion over

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of quarters. UM. So I think that gives

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you a sense of um, you know, sort of the

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>magnitude there and so UM you know, net interest income,

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, the growth that we have last year was tremendous.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>We're not expecting UM similar growth this year, but it

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but again we're at sort of a high level. And

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>then again, as far as trading goes, we think that

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there's still more volatility and fixed income. Could we see

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>some moderation um, you know, from the extraordinary levels of

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this past year, Yes, but we think we remain in

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a historically high range The same is true for equity trading.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Equity trading was down over the past year. But but

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>again historically, high fees are going to be the big question.

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the one thing that we're going

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at this quarter in terms of setting

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a run rate for the year. You know, I p

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>O s um. We're far in few between last year

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>after a record We have pipelines that remained sort of

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>full over the past year, though getting a bit stale.

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Can those be executed? We're entering the year. You know,

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>granted things were choppy in the last fourth quarter, but

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we we did. Stocks did end the year higher versus

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>three Q And will there be companies taking advantage of

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>that um to do public You know, there's still a

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>question around UM, you know, pricing expectations. Obviously those have

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>had to reset compared with a year ago. But that's

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking for in one queue. How much of

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that can come to market? Hey, Alice, when I think

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about you know, um, the Wells, Fargoes of the world,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the city banks, the Bank of America's I think of

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>corporate lending, consumer lending and loan growth was something that

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>has talked about a lot. How is it out there?

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Are companies borrowing? Are are people borrowing to grow to

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>start businesses and things like that. I think, you know

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what we'll see in the most recent quarter, um. You know,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things that so commercial balances um, you know,

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>really slowed last quarter. But a lot of that UM

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was you know, attributed to some of the banks talking

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about trying to restrain their bounty because they had to

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>move up their capital ratios, right, and so the way

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.479
<v Speaker 1>that they moved those up is by reducing the denominator

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to to look a bit healthier. UM. So they said that,

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they expect this quarter that might normalize a

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit um. So, so we will see the capital markets.

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>The bond market did open up a little bit in

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, UM, so perhaps some might have gone

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more might have gone to the capital markets,

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but we expect to see some growth. I think the

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>real question is on the consumer side, and especially on

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the credit card side in general. Fourth quarter is the

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>strongest quarter, obviously due to holiday spending. And we'll see

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>if consumers are borrowing um and then we're gonna be

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one side. Are they borrowing? Is it

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>healthy borrowing or is it constrained borrowing? And what's happening

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on the credit side of things as we head into

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>alson just real quickly. I know you also follow the

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>asset managers, the black rocks of the world that hero prices.

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>What what's the call there for twenty three for those companies.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think things still look healthy. You know,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we sort of face our forecast there. You know, it's

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all about the It's all about the markets in terms

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of the current earnings and our equity strategy team, UM.

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, things were about flat farish value, so not

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>expecting much either way um over the next year or so. UM.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in general, investors want to see flows

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and so while their earnings relate to the markets, flows

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>really can drive evaluations. UM. You know, again, relying on

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>our strategy team's forecast, value looks like um, it has

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the edge. So we expect managers such as t ROW

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>may continue to see pressure in some of their growth

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>funds UM, hopefully offsetting that with hopefully for them off

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>setting that with some of the retirement money. UM. But

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in general that the I guess the one exciting thing

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>will be active versus passive. This is an environment that

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>favors active uh, you know, higher rates, lots of volatility,

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>low correlations. Um. So we'll see if that can give

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>active last All right, good stuff, Allison Williams, thanks so

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We always appreciate getting the overview

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of the big banks, investment banks, asset managers, jillions of

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars under management. Allison has been covering those companies for decades. Uh.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And she's the senior global banks and asset Managers analysts

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's based in our Princeton, New Jersey office.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Lots of good folks down there doing good work. Really

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the backbone of some of the global data that we

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>all depend upon for the Bloomberg terminal. This Chris Bloomberg.

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I s M data came in, uh, you know, kind

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of mixed data. But the new orders came in lower

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>than last quarter. We want to get our last month.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>We want to get the bottom of all this. We

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>welcome Tim Fiuri. He's the chairman of the Institute for

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Supply Management otherwise known as I s M. So Tim

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on the numbers you guys reported this morning, Matt and

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with with the new orders at

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>forty five point too, was that a big concern for you. Yeah,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I got it. Well, it's a bit surprising. I'm waiting

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>for for sellers to come back in and negotiate with

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>buyers to get the new orders flowing again. You know,

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at I look at demand, new orders, new

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>export orders back while I was in customer inventories, and

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the new orders had the single biggest impact on the

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>p m I declining month over a month at a

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>two point loss. So, you know, a bit of a

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>surprise here at forty five point two. I think you know,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>back to your common Paul earlier on the show, that

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>when things get down to forty five, they get a

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>little concerning that. That's been my experience on the p

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>m I overall number. So we're still at forty eight

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>point four. I've been saying now for several months. Forty

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>eight to fifty two is probably the range that we're

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be running in for quite some time. It feels

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like that's exactly where we were in December. I'm makes

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>us to move into January because December was a really

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>weird month. We had a lot of seasonal factors. Take

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>take the numbers up. I think the non seasonal number

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.719
<v Speaker 1>would have been about not unusual, but then a lot

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of people went home early, A lot of people took

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>all the vacation. I think people re up for earlier

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>than they normally do. So yeah, I'm a little concerned

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about the new order number. Our prices have come down

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a month over month. Here seven percent of the respondents

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>indicated same of lower prices, same as in November. Uh,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's probably a more fundamental here. So

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of manufacturing GDP is now in contraction. That means

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>it's nine or less. The alarming numbers that it's contracting,

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's forty five or less. So that's up from six

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>total in November at less. So we're not on a

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>good trend here. But we just finished our forecast. You

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>guys have you know, we believe to each other on

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Business Panel believes is gonna be a lot like

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>two that the second half of twenty three is going

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to be quite a lot of uncertainty here in the

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>first half. I wondered, Tim, I mean, aside from the

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, concerning amount of contractions that you're seeing, Um,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is the data less noisy now me than it was

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>last year? I mean, are we getting back to normal,

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>even if we're talking about, you know, a normal recession. Yeah, definitely.

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I we this is like three or four months, it's

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a normality. I think back in September October I pretty

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>much said, hey, the numbers that we have now, so

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not a supply constraint expansion that that the suppliers

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>delivered much better. Prices started to come down, so I

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>think they're much more normal, but it's gonna take probably

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a little time to get there. At this point, I

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>would say we're in normal economic contract and expansion, meaning

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>we're waiting for demand to come back. If demand doesn't

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>come back in the next two or three months, then

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a lot of suppliers having to release people.

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And nobody really wants to see that. And I think

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason why the new order level isn't accelerating is

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>because we still have very long lead times. There's still

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty five percent above troth Ley times. If we got

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen points of those back, I think bars would be

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>much more inclined to go ahead and negotiate deals because

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the pricing has been coming down, has to come down

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to the right level, and probably not, but you know,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you got delivering Cronser prices coming down, lead times just

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>still stopping lee strong. So buyers are saying, hey, I

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>don't believe these lead times, so I'm not gonna opt in.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Intellers are saying, well, you're gonna need to. This is

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>all going to get itself resolved in the last couple

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of months for sure. All right, Tim, great stuff. I

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate you checking in there on this I s

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>M data that was released this morning. Tim Fury, he's

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of the Institute for Supply Management. All right,

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>let's pivot here and talk tech. And we talk tech

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.479
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people. That means you gotta start

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>with Apple. And I'm looking at the stock here. You know,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it was all twenty nine percent last year. That's up

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>about one today. But we had you know, people are

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely calling the question the ability of Apple to continue

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to grow through what might be a recession looking likely

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in So let's bring in on a rock Ronic. He's

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>a senior technology technology analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. You know,

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the stock down kind of last year, ish, um, that's

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>another performance for you know, the Apple shareholders that they're

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>not used to that. What's your call on the Apple story?

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>These days. So I think, Paul, I think everybody is

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>getting to a realization that Apple cannot grow in double

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>digits forever. And I think this is something we've been

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>hopping on for a while, that this is a company

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>at best on the top line will grow you know,

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around five and on the bottom line with buy

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>bags and uh, you know, I would say a little

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of expansion, you know, EPs somewhere around n I

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>think I think the world is coming to your realization

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not a double digits growth growth story anymore.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the valuation is reflecting that now.

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So can I get back to that story? I mean,

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>what's the great big hope for Apple? Is it a car?

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Is it some sort of virtual reality glasses? Can they

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>sell more of the watch? I mean, what, what's where's

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the growth for them? So? I mean, in all, honestly,

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if the global GDP somewhere around two and a half

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent, you know, growing at you know, six to

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>eight percent is not a bad idea, I mean, in

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>my in my view, but um, this year is going

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to be slow growth because of global consumer spending soda.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Next year there's going to be a rebound on that

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but I would say in the long run, this is

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>still a story that is more of a high single

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>digit growth story. Now when you talk about specific products, UM,

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know you would see the iPhone installed based growth

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>steadily over time. UM, air pods is a very big

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>growth story also. But again you know remember air pods,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>air watches and all these things they are they may

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>grow in double digits, but from a overall you know,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Apple's revenue point of view, they really don't contribute much

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're very small portion of the overall time. All right,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if if, if this is the stock I'm thinking about,

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>as you know, an analysts, portfolio manager and investor, and

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm penciling and high single digit earnings growth And look

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>at the pe today, looking at it's twenty times earnings,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm paying twice the growth rate here. Is

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 1>is that a fair multiple? I think? You know, this

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is where this is a marquee name for you know,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>other reasons. If you were to put a DC evaluation

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on it, I mean, I I think the number you're

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>going to get is slightly different because, um, this is

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a stock that can you know, that should in all

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>logic continue to grow for many years to come. So

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that over the next seven eight years,

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this would you know, be a substantial portion of the

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>overall you know, take framework when it comes to anything

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>consumer devices. You you know, we expect a fair fair

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>larger number of iPhones down the road. So I think

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>this is more of a value at a reasonable price

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than growth name. I think the is was treated

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as a growth name for the last few years. Um.

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be very very much

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like a Coca Cola or a Costco, And I would

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>argue both of them are trade way more than twenty

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>times earnings Baul, Do they have a Does Apple have

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a deep en up bench that you have no concern

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about Tim Cook? I mean, he seems very healthy and

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he's young, but you know who fills his place if

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he needs to go in terms, and has done an

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>amazing job over the last several years. But I would

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that Apple is one of those companies

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that does not need a revolutionary, needed or that big

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of a visionary At this point, the installed base on

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>its products is so wide right now that you know

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it needs to figure out how it's going to sell

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>into that installed base. Most services, more content, more video

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and more accessories. So I I really don't think that

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we need that level of Steve Jobs kind of a

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>person at this point for this company. I'll tell you

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>what they need on or wrong. They need to listen

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to my advice here, and my advice is they need

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 1>to raise their dividends. I mean, they got a dividend

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>yield less than one percent. I mean, are you kidding me?

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to They can do both. I want a

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>two or three four percent of it then yield? Can

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you make that happen? Fair? Fair? Fair point, Paul. But

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that they're going to use close to

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion and buying back their shares. If if

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you are a long term Apple chairholders, you know they

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>would buy close to a hundred billion dollars. I mean,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's there's no company out there that generates that amount

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of free count. They can do both, They can do both.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why they. I don't know why they.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna pay a dividend, now, I guess they're

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>paying it. If you're gonna be a value stock, well

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing they don't want even be paying with

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that brush. But I mean, I guess they pay this

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>token dividends, So dividend funds presumably can buy and own Apple,

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and I guess that's kind of their strategy. But I'm like,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you can afford to do both and put out a

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>nice dividend out there. I think that would be a

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>whole new set of investors. But my advice has been

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>falling on deafit. I'm going to say that Costco pays

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>less than one percent dividends. Okay, So I'm I'm you know,

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I want you to think about Apple not so much

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as a technology stock that somebody can come out and

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>take their business away tomorrow. This is very much like

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a consumer um, you know, discriptionary stock where you know something,

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You're right, Costco same dividend and yield, same dividend yield.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So you've you're you're you're prepared for that question, I know.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's how I think about this company. I don't

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think about this company as a Microsoft or something else.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>This is something This is a brand that will remain

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>with us twenty years from now. It is not going

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to be a tech company that somebody can come and

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>take their market share away from them. That's not going

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen. So the real way to think about this

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>company is something that is going to be able to

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>sell into that install base. And I never understood and

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>when people ask me all the time, why is Costco

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>trading get such a high marketple And the reason for

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that is because somebody like a Costco or a Coca

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Cola will be around twenty years from now and and

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Costco is at thirty one times elearnings. So you you

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>want to look at this not so much from a

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional tech point of view, Paul, but more so into

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>these brands that will remain with us for a very

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>long So is that how the market has a market

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>transitioned from you know, looking at this as a tech

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>s doctor just a big, big consumer name. No, that's

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what that's That is my argument that you have to

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>think of this in a very different way because a

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors get into this with the idea that

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a technique. A car is going

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to come and completely change the nature of this business,

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're going, this is not how you want to

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 1>think about this. This is a brand that is, you know,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a central to our life as what we do on

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis, and this is going to do you

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>logically remained with us for a very long period of time.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>You cannot say that about any software company. Frankly buying

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft perhaps that it is going to be remained with

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you ten years from now. Well, each of them can

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>be unseated tomorrow by somebody you know, new coming in.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Both Apple and Microsoft are a part of your life. Um,

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the differences you enjoy Apple, right? No? I like Microsoft

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as well? Like what dude, not Windows? Surely? No? I

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm talking about enterprise application almost almost you know,

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they're the heart and lung of every enterprise that's out.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And so I saw Ubs down. It did it today,

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think in part due to some concerns about Azure.

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your view of Microsoft here? These days? It will

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>slow down? I mean once again, I mean I'm not

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sure why the stocks start focus on what wouldn't slow

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>down this year? Give me one metric for any in

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise business that's not going to slow down this year.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm sometimes surprised about the stock reaction because

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, all companies have said aws said they're going

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to slow down, So why why are people so surprised

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>about it? So, I mean, I I my my two

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>cents on this entire thing is people, it seems, want

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to be short thing, you know, tech going into this year,

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and how do they do it. They find Apple, they

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>find Microsoft. There is no other real way to do

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it given the large market gap of it. So if

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>if there is a multiple compression on this thing, so

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>be it. And the long run, and I said this recently,

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, look what happened with Southwest. Do you think

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole world is done with enterprise spending on technology?

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>The world is full of legacy applications that are so

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>old and so behind that they need to upgrade. So

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you think there are a lot of I think there

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of Southwest airlines out there that are

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>big companies that maybe have underinvested in technology that for

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, they're gonna have to step it up. Yeah,

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I can give you Like you you could pick any

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>industry out there that is so far behind what you're

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>used to on your iPhone, Audio, Amazon app that is

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>not the benchmark. If you look at those as the

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks for any enterprises, enterprises would get a grade of

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>two to three on a scale of one to ten,

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>whereas your iPhone would get somewhere around our nine or

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a ten. You have to invest. There is no way

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>out of it before We only have a minute left.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But I have to ask you about the Apple car.

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It's due out in six which seems increasingly um you know,

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>around the corner. But you don't seem that pumped about it,

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are you? Don't you think this is going to be

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a revolution. It's not gonna be a game changer. It

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>would love to It will increase the market cap quite

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit. It will be a beautiful car, I'm sure.

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But tell me, in honesty and all honesty, if the

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>price point of this car is fifty how many units

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>will be sold ever year? Well? Think about math point. Yeah,

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but but that's like that's like Rivan Tesla, the Ford Lightning, Uh,

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the electric Selverado. These are all gonna be

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>around there as well. I mean, you can't get into

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a night eleven for less than one oh six. Yeah,

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.479
<v Speaker 1>but but how many nine elevens do you do you

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>sell each year? The Tesla to the Model three can

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be sold many many models. It's not a problem. But

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple is not going to make a car forty thousand dollars.

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple's not going to get into that business. Lamborghini. Apple

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>gets into a business but has a forty percent margins

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>forty percent margin. Is only one company out there, Lamborghini.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>How many units do you think they ten thousand or

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they try, I mean Lamborghini Ferrari, they sell less than

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand. Eleven is about that. Let the answer to

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>every question, the auto question, he comes right back to

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lamborghini example. I mean, you've done this once or twice.

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>They're capped pretty much at a ten thousand. All right,

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna let you go. We're gonna gonna let you

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>go here. But we'll come back to this. I guess

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get him back on tomorrow. Let's get him back

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:00.959
<v Speaker 1>onto when when he's in New York. We'll get him

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in studio. So that's how we do it, because he's

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just you know, he's somewhere else, some undisclosed location.

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>So we'll get back to him. But on a rock Ronda,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>he covers all things technology for Bloomberg Intelligence, giving us

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>his call on Apple. You had a little discussion there

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on Microsoft, but I mean, I think he still remains

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a bowl on Apple. But I'm sticking with my argument

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that they should they don't need to, but they should

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>raise their dividend give shareholders that maybe a two or

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>three percent yield as opposed to the zero point eight

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>percent yield right now. O r f nan Oh yeah,

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's like an et F for orphan stocks

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. I don't know, but we got

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's in charge of this stuff, and he's

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ringing the bell the New York Stock Exchange,

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>which is still a thing. By the way, Um, it's

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a good market. Have you ever shot during the bell

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange? And I worked on New

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange, but I made money on the New

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange floor. Mark Newman, c io at Constrained

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Capital joins us here. Mark Tuck to us about you're

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg and ar actor Brooker studio, so it

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gets the gold star. He's usually based in Atlanta, but

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>he's here in New York today. Mark. What is constraint capit?

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys do? What is O r f

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>N because I'm putting into my terminal. Yeah, thanks a lot.

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So O RFN is the E s G Orphans Index

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>E t F okay, so E s G Orphans Index.

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is companies that don't go into E s

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>G funds. So these sectors, the six sectors that I

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>quantitatively selected, have been routinely excluded from the e s G.

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is like a sin so it's like tobacco.

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So it is a combination of what I call the

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sin stocks, which we would say tobacco, alcohol, and gambling. Firearms, yes, firearms.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's a bit of a nuance there in terms

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of the size of the company because it's a market

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>cap weighted index, so the biggest companies make it, so

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a Smith and Wesson wouldn't make it because it's so small. Um.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other side is the woke sort

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of I call them the woke shame stocks if you will.

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Fossil fuel, nuclear or energy and weapons and these again

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:07.959
<v Speaker 1>all just happing big weapons. So the Lockeed Martins and so,

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, interesting in the weapons area is like the

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine story. We just gave them forty seven billion, we

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>gave them fifty billion earlier in the year, and they

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>turn around and buy you know, battery systems from lockeed

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Martin and raytheon. And the ironic thing is that E

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>s G investors have been excluded from the weapons manufacturers

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>as part of E s G. They're not E s

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>G friendly now right now we're defending democracy, right so

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it gets very nuanced, and that's you know, a tricky

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>part of e SG. And for the last year, my

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal up seventeen. You guys have had good performance. Yes,

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>thankfully we have. UM. The E s G Orphans Index,

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>which is what the E t F is based office,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>returned about twenty two last year, UM, which you know,

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously the SMP was down about nineteen and the NASDAG

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>was down over thirty. So I'm pretty happy with that.

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>And then the orphans or FN launched in mid May

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and has done really well. So I mean, you've got

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>like x on Mobile, Philip mars raytheon Chevron, Boeing and

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>has a Bush Diagio. Those are names, yes, those are

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know these there's a lot of recent talk

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>about the anti E s G if you will, and

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there are sector based stocks and e t F s

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that do that, but this one actually separated the whole

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>E s G factor and sort of it's the isolated

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>E s G factor anti E s G E t

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>F hence the name constrained Capital. I love the name

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>of the firm. Is this Your main focus is the

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:36.919
<v Speaker 1>orphan E T F your main focus there, You're looking

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to put together other products. What's the story? So thank you? Yeah,

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it is the first one out of the gate. And

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea behind constraint capital a hedge fund legend. Cliff

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as Nous of a q R. He wrote a really

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting white paper back in May of two thousand seventeen

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and discussed constraints on capital and how they create, they

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>cause malinvestment and misallocation of capital, and then opportunities and

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>these were secure eties that have been excluded under constraints

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>avoided if you will become high expected return securities. And

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it has to attract investors by lower prices over time.

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And now it's starting to do that thing because it's

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a very uncrowded space and versus And we had Matt

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 1>who's the guy we had in with r L. V Ramaswamy, Yeah,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Viva Rama Swanny is another guy dri drive and d

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 1>R L L His is his thing. And he's saying, basically,

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, by the energy companies, you know, drill, drill, drill,

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, and let don't I don't want my companies

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>making social decisions from me. I want to maximizing shareholder values. Well,

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>let's other parts of society deal with those exactly. So

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>his thing isn't really anti E s G per se,

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think yours is really either. It's just

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the maximization of profits. He's also looking to find those

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that have been kind of discarded by the E

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>s G world. Yeah, So I spoke to the VAC

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a few times, and I really like their approach and

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>their thoughts and the one I call us cousins as

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>opposed to siblings, if you will. And I find that

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they're approaching things from a corporate level. They're gonna approach

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the c suite and say, hey, Google, your your ads

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are biased or your your searches are biased. I've approached

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it from isolating the company's most excluded and really focused

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>at the investor level and saying here, this diversifies your

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>portfolio against what's not crowded. And yes, they've been isolated

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>by the E s G community. And now that there's

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that pushback and that has shined a light in the neighborhood,

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>if you will, UH, taking on black Rock and those

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things, I expect flows to revert and come back,

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and and the the the nuance of E s G

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>become wider, and these malign securities to find more inflows

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>over time. Where do you think we are in that

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 1>whole E s G movement? It feels like it's lost

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some momentum, But some of the folks tell me no,

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you think about it? So this

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is the first year while two thousand two where returns

0:37:54.719 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>really suffered, and I think that you have certain sales points,

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if you will, calling things E s G sort of

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>all things E s G. And when I look at

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a name like Amazon, for example, that has a huge

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>carbon footprint, biggest outside the energy space, and it was

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>down almost what I think, forty five or fifty this

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>past year. And everyone is in Amazon, even a lot

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of big E s G funds own Amazon is like

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a top three holding at black Rock and at Vanguard.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:23.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that people are starting to realize weight

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what do I own and why do I own it?

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And is this really E s G? Or is it

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a failed objective within E s G. And I think

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>that we're in the early innings of people realizing that

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>they've sort of been misled they've paid higher fees, they've

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>had lower returns, and worst of all is the failed objectives.

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think as returns people see their returns and say,

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, what just happened here? That's when they

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of wake up. So I think it's early ends.

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, if I made for one more second, the

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of E. S G from here will be

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional, not two dimensional. It's not going to turn

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>off and turn on. The new word is going to

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>be sustainability. We've seen a lot of that this year

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>already or in the past few weeks. In a month

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>or two, I think that's how it evolves, and they'll

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>be sort of chasing, if you will. I call it

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 1>like the greyhound chasing the hair around the track, right though,

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>he's sort of chasing that thing to find out what

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the next new thing? So to speak. One of

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the big drivers I see big holdings is energy, and

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's had a phenomenal year in two one of the

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>very few sectors that have really put up some performance.

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>What's your energy called? Here? Because if energy goes the

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>other way, obviously you guys are exposed, right And I

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think that we have a twenty allocation fossil fuel and

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>nuclear energy. So that's basket. I think I've always said

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't get to the future of energy without present energy, right.

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We can't do this quantum leap into batteries, into solar

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in the wind without using what we have currently. So

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I do think in the near term there is some

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>concern on energy prices. You know, the recession is a

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of a talk um, but going forward, and I

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>interviewed an expert, a Nasa Haji, an energy expert, and

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>he basically said, if you think we're at peak or

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically the oil situation is we we still

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>need oil to do a lot of things heat our homes,

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>cool our homes, and over time demand is still going

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to be there from developed world along with developing world

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in fossil fuel. So I don't think it's going anywhere

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in the short term. In the short term, it might

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have a little struggle if if the recession comes to

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>play and demand does shrink. What's the nuclear I mean,

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I look at your top holdings. I see Excen, Philip

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Morris raytheon Chevron. Where's the nuclear play there? So next

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Terra Duke Dominion s O Southern Company, American ap So

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>these are that that looks like the energy area excuse me,

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>where I think we really could see some revolutionary change

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>in the next few decades. Because you know, we tried

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it once, we went big into it. Globally, we kind

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>of backed away from it, some people running scared, some

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>people still thinking it's cheap if we already built it,

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's too expensive to build again. Now we're seeing

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>real technological advances that like, you know, this could be

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, free power, that's right. And you know, the

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing is over the past year, part of the

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>constraints on capitol we saw in the EU was Germany

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>shutting down their nuclear plants and then all of a sudden,

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Russia had sort of an advantage and they took advantage

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. Now we've seen a lot of coal burning

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>recently in the last few months, last half of the year,

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>because of the energy situation, the energy crisis, if you will.

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>And in the end, a ton of coal is more

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 1>damaging and pollutant than a marble size piece of uranium.

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>So that's the whole nuclear nuclear tradeoff, if you will.

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's um you know, it's a sustainable carbon free

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, energy source. So I think that, uh, it's

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very big thing going forward. As

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you say, Matt, I mean it seems like a you know,

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>an amazing opportunity for for I wouldn't say limitless energy,

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but cleaner and cleaner and and and and sustainable. Well

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the key, right, the fact that it's going to

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>be sustainable now that they can power reactors with spent

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>fuel um and that they don't create the kind of

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>waste that they did before where we need to find

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:13.240
<v Speaker 1>like a mountain in Utah to stores to all that stuff.

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the part of the image that

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>nuclear has in a bit of the in a bit

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of the media areas is needs a little bit of reworking.

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>If you have three mile Island was a long time ago,

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was. I was. I remember Mark Newman, ce

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>io Constraint Capital, joining us here in the Bloomberg and

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Actor Broker Studio. Who'll be ringing in the New York

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>so Exchange tomorrow. So you'm the lookout for that. Thanks

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. Put on bal Sweeney. I'm on Twitter

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast. You can always catch

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:55.439
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio