WEBVTT - The Cycle - Opening Day featuring Kelly Kirby And Chris Welsh (EP. 1)

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle, a brand new Fantasy

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Pros Fantasy Baseball weekly podcast.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I am Ryan Warmley.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I am joined by Mike Mayer, who will be on

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>every show with me, and by Kelly Kirby, who will

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be on many shows here and there throughout the year

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>filling in as a guest lending her expertise to the show.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>You can find her at the Wonky Penguin on Twitter

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're not following her already. Kelly, thank you so

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>much for coming on to the very first episode.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me. It's great to be here.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 2>We are excited to have you.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, Kelly will be on throughout the season

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>very regularly, so we figured let's bring her on for

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a large chunk.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Of the first episode.

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>We will also have Chris Welsh on a bit later

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>in the show to talk about some prospects. He will

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>also be a regular appearer on this show.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Mayor.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>We did our preview episode last week. We are now

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>here for the real thing. We're recording just one day

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>before opening day.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>How are you feeling, I'm feeling great.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Are we sure apeerer is a word? Can we look

0:00:59.520 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 4>that up?

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually was pretty sure it's not, but I had already

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>committed to saying it when I started to say it.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're off to a really excellent start.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to mention it?

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy those sorts of diatribes or this content

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>in general.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 2>The best freeway to show your support and encourage more.

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Content like this is to leave a positive review at

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasypros dot com slash MLB review. And also, if you

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>ever are leaving a review on any of our platforms

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're listening to the show on, go ahead and

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ask a question in there. Mayor and I will be

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>sure to answer it in next week's episode. That's gonna

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be a great way to get your question on the show.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>If you have question about trades or specific player, or

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>really anything fantasy baseball related, Mayor and I will be

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>happy to answer that if it appears in a review.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Guys will start things off with rounding the bases. We'll

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hit on four major headlines here. There will be a

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of weeks where we kind of own in on

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one major headline and do a deep dive. There hasn't

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>been any baseball played outside of a couple of games

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in Korea, so we figured let's just hit on a

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different things here as we are, you know,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on the eve, the precipice of opening Day, we're gonna

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>start off with one of those performances from the Korea series.

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>That was Yamamoto, who I briefly mentioned in our preview

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>episode with may Or how I almost wanted to recommend

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>against drafting him where he was going, and then I

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>was afraid that he would have an excellent first start

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and make me look bad before a first show even

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>came out.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Turns out I should have just stuck with my guns.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>He pitched one inning, about four hits, had one walk,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>five earned runs, did have two strikeouts. Mayor, what is

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>your concern level on Yamamoto after his first ever major

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>league start.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 5>It's non zero, but I don't think it's high. But

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, his spring training numbers are not great either.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 5>His r's over eight in springtraining, and you know we

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 5>always talk about how like, you know, spring training stats

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 5>don't matter, but we all still look at them, and

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 5>so I would like that does come with fourteen strikeouts

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 5>against four walks, So it's they're not all terrible. So

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm a little concerned, but I'm not like very concerned

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 5>because I did expect it would take.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Him a little a little while to get up and running.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 5>And I was listening to the the CBS guys not

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 5>too long ago, and they made a really good point

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 5>about how last year Kodai Sanga actually skipped the World

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 5>Baseball Classic just to start pitching in spring training, to

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 5>get used to the American you know, the ball that

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 5>they use in Major League Baseball. And so I think

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 5>he's got a lot of things going on. You know,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 5>it was his first appearance as a Dodger in a

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 5>real game. He wasn't even at Dodger Stadium. He was

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 5>in Korea, and I'm sure there was a lot of

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 5>things going on there. And you know, I think it's

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 5>going to take him a little bit of time to

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 5>get his feet under eath them. But I am still

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 5>confident that he's going to be.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 4>A very good pitcher.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Kelly, I mean, this is somebody

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>who was, by the end of draft season, was like

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a top seven pitcher off the board, you know, top

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>three round pick in a lot of leagues. His ADP

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on our Fantasy Pros consensus page was thirty fourth overall

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>pitcher number seven.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean this is a guy.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>That play, you know, managers are relying on to be

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>nearly or an actual fantasy ace for them.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 2>He certainly didn't look like that in his first start.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was kind of confused about the ADP. I

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 3>thought it got too high, But then I also looked

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 3>at pitcher injuries, and by that point I think like

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>people who started in the hundreds probably ended up being

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 3>the SP ten. But I'm with Mayor. Unfortunately I don't

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 3>like to agree with him, but I am here. I

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 3>feel like there was so much offense in the in

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 3>those two games, and it's in create right like, so

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>there's so many factors that it's really hard to get

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a feel for it for where he's going to be.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>But yes, I also think the concern is higher than

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 3>zero that he I mean, I don't know if he'll

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 3>return that value this year.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But Kelly, did you find yourself like considering changing him

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>in your draft rankings after that? Or he's kind of

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>still wherever he was for you before, which I don't

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>know where that was.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think I had him. I think I'm

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>a little lower on him to start with, but I'd

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 3>have to look at it for sure. But Yeah, I

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>consider dropping him, maybe just one or two, but again,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>with the injuries, it's just a difficult. It's difficult to

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 3>know where to put him at this point.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, same question, Mary, what about you?

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It looks like in our ECR he was you know,

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>forty two here overall, like I said, ADP is a

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, about eight spots higher than that. Where did

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you have him ranked and was that impacted at all

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of an actual draft ranking?

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Based on that first.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Start, I had him as a top ten sp and

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 5>I think I still have him there. I may have

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 5>dropped him like one spot, but I didn't like actively like,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, go look to drop him after that start.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 4>But you know, I did open my eyes a.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 5>Little bit and try to hedge a little bit based

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 5>on that performance.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, let's go to his teammate for our second headline here.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Not really a ton to spend on here, a ton

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of time, but show he o toddy gambling. I don't

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>even know how to really describe what's going on. It's

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a wild story. Obviously, everybody listening to the show is

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>probably very aware of what's gone with his interpreter, who was,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, reportedly stealing money from him. And using that

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to make very you know, big gambling bets on a

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 1>litany of sports, including baseball.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I saw it.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's similar to, you know, after all the stuff came

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>out with the Astros that you know a lot of

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>these YouTube accounts would go back and find old highlights

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and be like, oh, look here, how like you know,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Altuve wouldn't let them take his jersey off, or you

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>can hear the trash can in these moments. I've seen

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of those similar types of stuff being put

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>together with Otani, like, oh, his interpreter had like a

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollar bet placed in you know, an overseas account

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on this day for the Braves to you know, cover

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>three and a half runs against the Dodgers or against

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the Angels rather and oh look Otani gave up six

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>runs and pitched terribly and struck out twice. You know,

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff like that has started to come out as

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>these sort of internet salute I've been looking into it.

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, mayor what was your just like initial takeaway

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>to all this happening. Again, it's not really like baseball

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>relevant yet, but it just was such a major story

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>with the biggest player in the sport that I felt

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>like we had to at least address it.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's fascinating.

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 5>I feel like I've also changed my mind on what

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 5>I think is the truth, like a dozen times already,

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 5>like over the last week since this came out. I

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 5>think the main thing so far that like you know,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 5>originally Baseball said they didn't you know, they weren't even

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 5>investigating it, and then everyone's like, you have to, you

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 5>have to investigate this, and so they are at least

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 5>going to like.

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Look into it now.

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 5>I did think it was interesting so far, like there's

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 5>no betting on baseball that they know of, unless that's

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 5>changed in the last like twenty four hours, which, like

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, according to like the baseball purists, like that's

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 5>the big thing. The one thing my initial thought was

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 5>like I can't there's no way this guy could be

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 5>betting this much money without Charlie Ottwani like realizing it.

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 5>But I have kind of changed my mind a little

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 5>bit on that. Listening to the I forget the guy's name.

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 5>I want to say it was Daniel Kim, but I

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 5>don't want to misspeak. But he was like a he

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 5>was on the broadcast for the series in Korea, and

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 5>he was like, look, these interpreters are more than just

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 5>like the media presence and like helping them like talk

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 5>to people on their team. He's like, these guys are

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 5>like at the grocery market, grocery store with them. They're

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 5>opening their bank accounts for them. So like he probably

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 5>has access to Otani's bank information because he set up

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 5>the account. So I was like, Okay, that does make

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 5>a little sense. There are still a lot of concerns

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 5>in red flags here. I don't know that it'll be

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 5>that relevant for Fantasy this season because I think even

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 5>I think this is going to take a while for

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 5>them to like dig into and so even if worst

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 5>case scenario there's like some punishment coming from Otani, I

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 5>think it's probably like next season that we see anything happen,

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:28.239
<v Speaker 5>But we'll see.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably right. Kelly. What was going through

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 2>your mind when every twisted turn to this story has

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of dropped.

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I surprised myself with the first one was I

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>was just like, look, if there's any player we should

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 3>just shove this under the rug and ignore, it would

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>be Otani because I love him and I think he's

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 3>great for the game and all of that and then

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 3>of course, you know, I got to the logic side

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>of my brain where, yeah, the stories, it's it's kind

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 3>of the Akam's Razor problem for me, where it's like,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>what's the most plausible with the least amount of complications explanation?

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm just trying to wait and see, like

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>how far off that does this go before it kind

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 3>of like settles into this is what actually happened where. Yeah,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, I'm not worried about him for

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>fantasy this year either, although it does kind of have

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>that feel of when you know, like a rookie gets

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 3>caught with PDS and then all of a sudden he's

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 3>just gone for eighty games, Like like that's kind of

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>where I put this, where that is always going to

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 3>be hanging over his head this summer.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think let's move to an actual, more relevant to

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>this season baseball topic, hopefully more relevant, and the time

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing won't become relevant to fantasy baseball this season.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Montgomery, Yeah, our long national nightmare is over.

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He finally signed one year deal with the Divingbacks, who

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have made an attempt here to kind of revamp the rotation.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, EDWARDO.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez Montgomery obviously E rod is you know, dealing with

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>injuries himself. Clearly Montgomery will not be ready by opening day,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>since by the time people are listening to this, it

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>will already be opening day. Kelly, what kind of time

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>whine do you think we're probably looking at for Montgomery

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>if you even have a sense of it. And on

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>top of that, once he is kind of up and

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, up to speed and you know, arm strength

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>built up, everything like that, what do you think, you know,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the fit really for fantasy

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Diamondbacks.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a decent fit for him. I'm not

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, he doesn't have to necessarily anchor the staff

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 3>or really do anything larger than what he's capable of doing. However, like, yeah,

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to cost him maybe I would

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 3>say three starts at a minimum, possibly four before he's

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 3>really ready to roll. So I wouldn't rely on him

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 3>until maybe the third or fourth week of April at

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 3>this point for him to get stretched out. But yes,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I too, am very glad that the nightmare is over

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 3>and that all of the big named free agents signed

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 3>in the off season is basically what we can say.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 2>Right technically, just in under the buzzer.

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>His ADP was, you know, one sixty four obviously, you know,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>driven by the uncertainty of him not having signed until

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so late and the fact that it was pretty clear

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>by the time we got into draft season that he

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was going to not be ready by the start of

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the season because of this delayed signing. Mayor if you

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>had known from the beginning of draft season that he

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was with the Diamondbacks and he was starting the year early,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>where do you think he would have been going.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Where do you think you would have ranked him?

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, how much of a value do you think

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>people got, if anything, based.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 2>On where he was going because of the uncertainty.

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 4>That's a good question.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 5>I think a lot of people got like several round

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 5>value because of the uncertainty. He actually signed last night

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 5>while I was in the middle of that draft. I

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 5>was telling you about last night that draft champions. So

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 5>I actually got him in the eleventh round like one

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 5>fifty four overall, which is pretty you know, pretty good value.

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 5>He didn't I thought it was interesting, like because he

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 5>didn't sign while I was on the clock, I was

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 5>up in like seven picks and I was like, oh,

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to get him, and then like he

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 5>just didn't go And I assume everyone saw in the

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 5>news because I saw the news, so I just picked

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 5>him up when he came there. I do think there's

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 5>almost like this mystery like fact going on or like

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 5>this mystery effect going on with him or like, and

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 5>it's probably the same thing that like affected his free agency.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 5>Like I think a lot of people think he's better

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 5>than he is. I mean, he's good, he's very solid.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 5>He's not like an ACE and he's going to be

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 5>like a really good innings Zeter, and he has a

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 5>lot of value, but I think people are kind of

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 5>valuing him similarly to like Blake Snell, who I also

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 5>have concerns about, but he's at least more of like

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 5>that ACE level.

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 4>But like I like Jordan Montgomery. He's very solid.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 5>He can like help you in a lot of ways,

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 5>but he's he doesn't strike out a batter per inning.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, last year he threw one hundred and eighty

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 5>eight and two thirds innings one hundred and sixty six strikeouts.

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Like that's fine, that's good.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 5>It was a good er three point two his expected

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 5>numbers are all higher, you know, between three point five

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 5>six and up over four, and like at that point,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 5>how fiable is he?

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, he was also better with Texas, which I think

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>prop might stick in people's minds, you know, maybe you know,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>two seventy nine ERA as opposed to three to twenty

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on the season, one oh nine whip as opposed to

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one point one nine on the season. So, uh, you know,

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he did seem to kind of level up a bit,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 1>you know with the Rangers, Kelly even with.

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 5>Them, though, even with them though two seven nine ERA

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 5>with the Rangers four point zero whit Sierra.

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, I with you, I'm not like,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really trying to play Devil's advocate because I

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>do think he's become.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 2>A bit overrated by being so I.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Think I think I think he's become a bit overrated

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>by being, you know, the last guy available. And it's

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like all these teams that you're pitching, it's like, well,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees should lookt him. Cauzan pitching, well, the Oriil

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>shouldok at him, Caise AINI pitching, well, everybody who needs

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pitching should look at him, because he was the last

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>guy there, you know, alongside Blake Snow for a while,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so I see why people might have kind of put

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>put them together. I am with you on him maybe

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>being a little overrated Kelly, Like if you had to

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>put a rest of season ranking to it, like, are

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what kind of pitcher do you think we're

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at here? Are we're looking at like an SPO

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's you know, maybe too aggressive?

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>What would you say?

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I mean, like right now, I think he's going

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 3>to be like a very good SP three, which like

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I put him behind Meryl Kelly in that in that

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 3>rotation just in terms of how much that are going

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to help you. He has some SP two upside, but

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>not enough where I'd be like beating down the door

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to trade for him or any or anything along those lines,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 3>because yeah, I feel like he he benefited from the

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>scarcity issue right where he was the only one left

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 3>and whether he was good or not, he was experienced

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 3>in a veteran so everyone was like, we have to

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>go get this guy. He was just the one out

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 3>there at the time.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's wrap up the Round of the Bases sort

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of headline segment here with just a general like there's

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of pitching injuries. Early I had a

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>listener of the show reached out to me and asked

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>me my opinion on Hey, you know, pitching kind of

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>got away from you my draft. Here's like five screenshots

0:14:58.640 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of all the pictures that are available.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Is anybody you like?

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, every single player that I like

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>here has an O next to their name, like they're

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just all injured. It's really I mean, the Diamondbacks themselves,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez s all like like already, and it's.

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Across the board, it's everywhere.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Kelly, is there an injury, you know, rather than going

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>through all of them individually because it's so so many

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of them, is there an injury that stands out that

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is creating an opportunity for somebody else, or that you

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>think is going to be really impactful for the rest

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Any of these injuries really significant to

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you in any way?

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I think you know, when Brian with Brian wu going down,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>I looked at Seattle as a very deep rotation that

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 3>you could really count on when you were drafting, and

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I knew he had the elbow problem, but it seemed

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 3>like he was doing okay. So with him going down,

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know necessarily if that creates an opportunity somewhere,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 3>but it does. It caused me to reevaluate sort of

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the Mariners as a whole and to keep an eye

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>on them because it seems like they sort of have

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>like what Tampa used to have. We're the next person

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 3>up just kind of of shows up and does pretty well.

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 3>And I suppose we could also talk about Tampa losing

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 3>what three fifths of their rotation. But yeah, so that

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 3>he was the first one or he was the biggest

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 3>one where I thought, okay, this kind of swings a

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>few things for me.

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, a very popular draft target in you know,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my leagues. He was people were going

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>after from pretty aggressively. Mayor what do you think about

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of the injuries in general? And is there

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one that stands out to you?

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's a couple that stand up. Brian wu was

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 4>one of them.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Dylan Carlson was another one because of what it means

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 5>for Victor Scott. But I think, you know, the Welsh

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 5>will be on a little bit later and he'll he'll

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 5>break that one down. I had a similar situation to

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 5>you where someone on our discord which everyone should join

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 5>fantasypros dot Com slash chat you should join that reached

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 5>out and he was like, I had a bunch of

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 5>picture injuries. Which are these three guys should I pick up?

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 5>And it was like Nathan Valde, Nick Pavetta or Brian Wu.

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 4>And I was like, well, not.

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Brian Wu because he's also hurt, so don't pick him

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 5>up unless you can also stash him. The good news

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 5>for with the Brian Wu injury, you know, pooring out

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 5>for Brian Wu, is that Emerson Hancock is getting called up.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 5>And so that's another name I'm sure we'll ask Welsh

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 5>about later on in the show.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, definitely, everybody will want to stick around for Welsh

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna try and hit on all these rookies

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and prospects that got kept up and sent down and

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>everything like that. Any other thought on the injuries, Kelly, I.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Had something and now it's gone because you know, I'm

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 3>too old for this. Oh yeah, no, that was it

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 3>on discord. I was I was mentioning with may Or

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 3>where we try to get to everybody's questions and it's

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 3>it's totally worth being in there, and it's worth being

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>in the premium channels, which are great. I try to

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 3>be like I always try to be democratic about it,

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 3>like here's how I would look at it, but if

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 3>you look at it differently, e'ta, etcetera. But yeah, so

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 3>many of those screenshots and I'm like, well, that's the

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 3>only guy with a working arm, so I feel like

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 3>that should be the guy. Or you know, it's a

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 3>complete coin flip because we have no idea what to

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 3>expect from them, so.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 2>Everything harder to do advice.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Every time I get like DMed for advice or something,

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm always like, here's what I would do. I'm getting

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be very thoughtful and like give you my

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>full here's what I would do and why.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 2>But I'm probably wrong, so I would ignore me. Anyway.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on to normally. This will be a section

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of the show where we do buy low sell Hi.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>We kind of talked about it before the show because

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't really been any games yet, it makes more sense.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna reference our bold Predictions article that you can

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>find on fantasypros dot com. You know, we had a

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>bunch of writers come together and kind of share their

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite bold predictions for the season. So we're gonna go

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>through and pick our favorites there. Of course, Mayor and

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Kelly contributed to that article, so they'll be picking their own.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm just gonna pick my favorite from the others.

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, typically this will be by low Sell High,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>but for this week only, we're gonna do our bold

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>predictions ahead of the season.

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Mayor, let's start with yours.

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 5>Sure, so, Mayor and Kelly contributed to the article. Worm

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 5>famously did not contribute to the article, so we'll start

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 5>with that. Welcome to though, whenever you'd like to help

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 5>out contribute, you're welcome to join us.

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I will I will contribute at my leisure.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 4>As you as you will with everything.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 5>So my bold prediction, there were there were a lot

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 5>of why at Langford bold predictions which I wasn't going

0:18:59.920 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 5>to go into anyway. I think Kelly we'll touch on

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 5>that a little bit with her answer. I went into

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 5>zach Eflin, and my bold prediction is that zach Eflin

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 5>is a finalist for the al Say Young aboard. I'm

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 5>a big zach Eflin guy, always have been. I was

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 5>sharing with Kelly earlier today that one of my favorite

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 5>things to do several times a year is just like

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 5>pull up Zach Eflin's stackcast page and just like, look

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 5>at what crazy pitch mix he has going on this year,

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 5>or even like this part of the year, because it

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 5>changes so often. Like a couple of years ago, he

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 5>was like, hey, I throw a cutter now. And last

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 5>year his slider became a sweeper, which was probably more

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 5>of a classification thing. But I was really in on

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 5>him last season when he went to the Rais and

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 5>I was like, Oh, this is perfect. Zach Cuffen on

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 5>the Rais is going to be fun. And it was fun.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 5>One hundred and seventy seven innings, one hundred and eighty

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 5>six strikeouts. He won sixteen games. I know we can't

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 5>really count wins, but we won sixteen games. You know,

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 5>the cy young voters still care about that stuff. Three

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 5>point five VR. All of his expected numbers were about

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 5>a half front lower than that, and that was even

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 5>with a hard hit rate that was up a career

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 5>high or not a career high, but his highest hard

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 5>hit rate against in three years. And I just think

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 5>there's so much more room to improve, and that if

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 5>he can stay healthy, because he has been you know,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 5>had some nagging injuries throughout his career. But like, if

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 5>he can stay healthy, I think he takes another step

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 5>forward and I think he's a finalist for the al

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Cy Young Award, and even with someone like Eric Cole

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 5>being out, I think he's the dark horse to win it.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 5>And he's plus four thousand on Betting Bros.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 4>Right away.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know Corbyn Burns is in the ale or

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>now right it's a lock.

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but he's got to go to Fenway Park and

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 5>play that play against that Red Sox lineup.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, how scary? Yeah, No, I know. I think

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned e Flynn on last.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Week's previews show as well as a player you were retargeting,

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>targeting and drafts. So he's definitely a favorite of yours.

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, you know, a top three finish

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>in the Cy Young voting. What do you think this

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>means for fantasy? Is he somebody that you would even

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>be trying to trade for early on in the year.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Because you're a big believer in him.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's going to be more more of

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a real life Cy Young winner as opposed to like

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy league winner.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of him on the fantasy side.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 5>I think he's going to be a high end SP two.

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 5>I don't actually have a ton of shares of him

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 5>this year because I think a lot of people that

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 5>are you know, seem to you know, they saw what

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 5>happened last year, and they're high on him too. I

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 5>have a lot more of Aaron Savali, who's like this

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 5>year is Zach Eflin. He's like this year's fun new toy,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 5>so he's much further down.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 4>But I have Savali too.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I think he's going to be valuable just

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 5>because he's going to be on a good team.

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 4>I think the strikeouts are going to be there.

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 5>He's got really good ratios. But yeah, I think he's

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 5>going to be really solid s P two SB one Upsete, Kelly.

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you are loath to agree with Mayor, but

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>are you siding with him on e Flyn or now? Yeah?

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 3>I actually have a lot of shares of him. So

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Hope or what, I'm on board.

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Who's your bold prediction, Kelly?

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 3>So I think I've been working with Mayor for too

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 3>long because even though I still think it's cute when

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>adult adults catch fall balls and hand them to children

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to evil like he does, I do, I

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 3>believe I've grown some sort of contrarian thing inside of

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 3>my poor little brain. So my bold prediction was because

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I knew everyone was gonna pick why at Langford. My

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>bold prediction is that Evan Carter's actually going to end

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 3>up being more valuable than him in like five by

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 3>five leagues. And I think I'm basing it on a

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 3>couple of things. One is definitely that Carter should have

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 3>a higher opp and be on base just more in

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 3>general with through hitting and and maybe not as much power,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 3>but more consistency. He's also right now, I think he's

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 3>batting third in the lineup, so he gets to be

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 3>behind Corey Seeger and Marcus Simmon and a head of

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 3>a doulas Carsia and Langford. And to me that just

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 3>means like count the runs count. The RBIs like here

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 3>it comes. So I feel like at the end of

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the day, well, Langford is, you know, the talk of

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the town, and everybody wants to already shower him with

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 3>all of the gifts. I feel like Carter may just

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of sneak in there as more valuable. In fantasy,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 3>it's Langford will carry the storyline and probably get Rookie

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 3>of the year, but I think Carter's gonna end up

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the guy you want for much cheaper.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I love Carter, and I mean the other thing that

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you mentioned is that we've seen him

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>do it at the big league level before, which which

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody believes Langford will be very.

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Successful, you know, hitting into the big league level.

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not that I'm doubting that will happen, but we

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have actually seen Evan Carter be very successful, you know,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>hitting major league pitching already. And Carter is I think

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>younger actually too, so theoretically you can build an even

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>more upside that with Langford. It was funny, you know,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>reading through these bull predictions. Every player got one mention

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>except for Langford got four, So like, the hype is there,

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and it was a lot of like like our you know,

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>friend and colleague Pat fitz Morris said, what Langford will

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>hit three twenty or better and win the AL batting

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>title as a rookie. Joey p said he was gonna

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be a top twenty overall player. We had a couple

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>other contributors say top twenty five overall player, top two

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>round player. So the hype is very there for Langford,

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think it is deserved to give some of

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that hype to Carter as well. What do you think

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>about Carter? Not necessarily versus Langford, but is Carter in

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>general as a pick?

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think first off, we're trying to get people

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 5>to read the article, and you just read the whole

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 5>thing on air.

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I just read White Langford. There's still like eight or

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>nine other players.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 4>That's half the article. Half the article, that.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Is like half the article.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 4>What was your question? I wasn't listening.

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 2>The you know, just even Carter in general, just Kelly's pick.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of him?

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And again not necessarily as he relates to Langford, but

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just in general as a guy who could be a

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know something of a league winner.

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I like him and and for reasons you said,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 5>we saw him do it last year. We saw him

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 5>do it on the biggest stage last year. He should

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 5>have pretty good placement in that order and it's going

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 5>to be a very good order. And yeah, I think

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 5>in some of that White Langford hype, he's kind of

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 5>being like forgotten about and maybe you can get him

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 5>like a round or two later, like he should be

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 5>a top one hunter player.

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.479
<v Speaker 4>But I've seen him go outside the top hundred.

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I was going to list some of my choices that

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I liked in here that I didn't end up going

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>with for my favorite Bowl prediction, but I rather than

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>risk Mayor yelling at me again way too many players

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>on this list, I will just list the one that

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I went with, which was Dylan ceased. And it's not

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think we're going to see a repeat of

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two now that he has the new home

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in San Diego. But I do think he was a

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>value where he was going. He was like going in

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the ninety to one hundred range in ADP. You know,

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the writer who mentions him in this article mentions that

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he got him in taut Wars for thirteen dollars. I

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>think that's a value for a guy that, you know,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>assuming health, is going to strike out over two hundred guys.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot more room for improvement in

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>terms of wins this year. I think I know the

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Padres didn't have the best season last year. I think

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly expecting a bounce back from them in the

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>wind department that will be reflected in ceases stat line.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that the era while it won't be what

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>it was in twenty twenty two, I think will be

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>closer to that than it was last year.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 2>It was at you know, four fifty eight.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Last year it was two twenty the year before. I

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see something in the threes and

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in this pitching landscape. If you're giving me a guy

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.239
<v Speaker 1>with an er that starts a three and he's going

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to strike out over two other guys and he's probably

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>going to win double digit games, I think that's a

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>value where he was going. I know, the whip was

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like a lot higher last year. There's a lot of

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff that went into that. His walk rate was slightly

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>lower last year than it was in twenty twenty two.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not like every number got way worse. It was

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a multitude of things. He was playing on

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>a bad team last year, and I do think that

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>actually matters. Kelly, what do you make of Cease as

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a bold prediction to outperform his value?

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think that he's a good choice

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 3>in that regard. He can't do anything that more than

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 3>outperform my prediction for him, because I don't like him,

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 3>so kind of anything higher than that is probably going

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>to be okay, But that walk rate, I don't care

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 3>that it went down point three percent. I'm not touching it.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's yeah, he's the best two hundred plus strikeout

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 3>guy who went the latest, I think, so there will

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 3>definitely be value there.

0:26:56.080 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's reasonable to be anti because that

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two season is the clear outlier if you

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>look at his career, so I think where he was

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>going again, given I mean, the strikeouts are just so intoxicating, right,

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It's so hard to look at those three straight years

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred plus strikeouts and not be really excited

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. I mean, I mentioned the walk rate went down,

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>so did the strikeout, right, So that is worth you know,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioning as well.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 3>I was just gonna say it went down three percent,

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 3>So I mean you know that.

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Too, Mayor what do you think about cease where you

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>know where he was going? Do you think that was

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>too low in drafts?

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? And I like him for a lot of the

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 4>reasons that you were laying out. I had.

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 5>I drafted him in a in an auction keeper league

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 5>that Kelly is in, and it was a league where

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 5>I ended up being able to keep a few like

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 5>really cheap pitchers, and so I used my budget to

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 5>kind of like load up on hitting, and then I

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 5>was like, let me see where where I can get

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 5>some value on pitching. And the first pitcher I ended

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 5>up drafting was Dylan Ceas for like ten bucks, and

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 5>I was like, perfect, let me lock in two hundred strikeouts,

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 5>like last year was a down year, and he struck

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 5>got two hudred fourteen guys, Like, I'm fine with that.

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, I obviously don't want a four point.

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 5>Five eight ERA and a whip almost at one point five,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 5>but I'm assuming it's gonna be a little bit better

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 5>than that. And if it is two hundred strikeouts for

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 5>my SB four, what's right.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Let me just say that in that same league, Mayor

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.719
<v Speaker 3>offered a contract extension to Zach Gallon and he drafted

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Xander Bullgart's and Dylan Sees and that's literally the anti

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Wonky Penguin team.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>So I will be very curious to hear throughout the

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>year who has proven right and who's proven wrong in

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that league. So be sure to keep breaking it up.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to waivers Central. Each of you guys is

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going to give me your favorite hitter. And each of

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys is gonna give me your favorite pitcher that

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is available in a lot of leagues.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, for the purposes of this week.

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'll be somewhat like, not overly reactionary, but

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll be looking at what's happened obviously during the season

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and saying, oh, this is a trend we think can continue.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>This is somebody that'd be willing to pick up or

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>drop or what have you for this week. Since the

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>season hasn't really started, it's more of who do we

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>think is maybe begin to gain some value early that

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to get in before they become a very

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>popular pickup that everybody's going to be trying to add.

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Whose roster percentage do we think is going to be

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot higher a couple of weeks from now the

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>mayor let's start with your favorite hitter to pick up

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>before the season starts.

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>We're kind of as the season is starting.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 5>Sure, So I'm so glad you asked me to keep

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 5>bringing up that league, So I'm gonna bring it up again.

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 5>In that league with Kelly, I massively overpaid for someone

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 5>named Spencer Steere and that's not my waiver Central because

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 5>he's rosters everywhere. But I massively overpaid for Spencer stear

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 5>mostly because you can move him around to play him everywhere.

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Except I didn't draft another first baseman, so he's locked

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 5>as my first baseman. And so my first waiver move

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 5>of the year was to pick up my waiver pickup

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 5>the week, ty France, who's not rostered in a ton

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 5>of places. You can get them all over the place,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 5>and for good reason. His numbers are not that great.

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 5>He only plays first base. He's no longer second base eligible.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 5>I think last year is when he lost second base eligibility.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 5>That's when a lot of his value lost, or is

0:29:58.160 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of his value kind of like you know,

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 5>went away.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 4>And he also only hit twelve runs one hundred fty

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 4>eight games.

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 5>But he did go to a special place called drive

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Line this offseason and focus on his swing and focus

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 5>on cutting down his swing. And I'm all in on

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 5>a tie fans ty Franz bounce back, and not just

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 5>because I need him to be my starting first basement

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 5>so I can move Spencers Tear around, but I am

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 5>a believer. And the other thing is he's really also

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 5>devalued because of where he's going to hit in that

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.479
<v Speaker 5>Mariners lineup because they haven't protected to hit eighth right

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 5>now on roster resource. But I'm looking at the jabbronis

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 5>above him in this order, and it's it's nobody's it's

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 5>it's the ghost of Mitch Hanniger.

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 4>It's cal Raley.

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, Wonky, I know you're a big cal Raley guy.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 5>It's Mitch Garber playing d H and Jorge Polongo. Ty

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 5>France is going to be back in third by the

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 5>end of this year, and you know you can book it.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 5>This is going to be a pickup that's going to

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 5>win your league, I think, or at least I hope

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 5>for my league.

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't maybe, you know, maybe don't alienate us from the

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>players too much calling them Jabebroni's I mean, take it,

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>take it. He's he there there, ty Franz Kelly. Any

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on him, I mean, not a guy that was

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>like you needed to go out and aggressively draft this

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>year if you want to have a chance to ad

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>him now obviously No.

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 3>In fact, this would be the first time I've thought

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>about ty France this entire fantasy season, So I trust

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 3>what Mayer said. I feel like he goes in strings

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>as well. He's certainly no cal Raley, but I guess

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 3>if you want someone else in that lineup, you can

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 3>have him.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Kelly, who's your favorite hitter that you can pick up

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I just like watching Mayor's face when I talk. I

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 3>had this guy last year and he frustrated me NonStop.

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going with MJ. Melndez. And the primary reason

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with him is basically that all of his

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 3>like underlying numbers for sure for the second half of

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 3>the season, were actually really good. His hard hit percentage

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 3>went up like over six percent last year in general,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 3>so it is very confusing why he didn't hit more homers. Why,

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, aside from striking out a bunch, though some

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 3>of those hits should have fallen. Some are gonna leave ballperks,

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 3>and I think they're gonna happen this year, much like

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 3>I feel like lineup matters. He's projected to hit fifth,

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 3>so he's behind the with Pascontino Perez. I could see

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 3>him moving up in that if they would, if they

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 3>decided to kind of flip a couple of people. So yeah,

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm I feel like he's been left out because he's

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>lost catcher eligibility. Pretty much everywhere, but not in Yahoo leagues.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 3>But I think I have catch your eligibility in Yahoo leagues,

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 3>and so it is it's worth it, I think to go.

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I know well and I once drove by drive line,

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 3>so does that count maybe? But anyway, I just think

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 3>he's a good option and he's out there if you

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 3>need an outfielder, especially in like five outfielder leagues. I

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>think that there are a lot of guys that were

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 3>drafted that I'm going to drop in favor of him.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, if you look on his page on Fantasy

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Pros at the roster percentage section, it's Yahoo fifty four percent,

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>ESPN twelve percent. That is very much driven by the

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>catcher eligibility. May any quick thoughts on Melendez.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 5>I haven't really thought about him much this offseason until

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 5>last night and that deep deep draft where I was

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, I went pitching heavy early, and outfield I

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 5>did not. I locked in like two studoutfielders, and then

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 5>I just kind of forgot that I had three more

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 5>to fill. And so once we got started getting into

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 5>like the teen rounds, I kind of had to fill

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 5>those outfield spots. So I did get m J. Melendez

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 5>last night in the twentieth round, it picked two ninety seven,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 5>so I will also this is my first share, and

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 5>it was because for the same reason, I was kind

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 5>of like, well, he's not a catcher anymore.

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 4>What do I care? Now? I care? I care. I

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 4>hope he's a good now.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Both Kelly and Mayor and on MJ. Melendez.

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's those are the guys that are planting their flag

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>on this season. Mayor, who's your favorite pitcher that you

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>can pick up right now?

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 5>My favorite pitcher maybe not my favorite picture, but a

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 5>picture I'm picking up it was available is Michael Kopek.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 5>And it's also a picture I massively overpaid for at

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 5>TGFBI buy a lot of money, which I was was

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 5>talking to Kelly. You know, Waivers run at like ten

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 5>pm Eastern on Sunday nights. I was like, I was

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 5>slacking with Kelly. Like as it happened, I was like,

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm about to massly overpay Michael go back. And I

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 5>did by a lot, not as much as some other

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 5>people who I saw overpay, but like I think the

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 5>next closest bid to me was like one hundred dollars less.

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 5>So I are overpaid by a lot and it's all.

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 5>It's because I'm banking on him being the closer for

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 5>the White Sox. And everyone wants the closer for the

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 5>White Sox because they're going to win one hundred games.

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 4>No they're not, but.

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 5>He's going to be valuable in some leagues if s

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 5>p rpligibility matters. I'm not in a ton of those,

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 5>but you know that absolutely matters in some leagues. It

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 5>matters if you're going to be in a safe ley,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 5>because I do think he's going to be the closer

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 5>for the White Sox, and I think he could be

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 5>a really good closer for the For the White Sox,

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 5>the strikeout ability has always been there. He's been a

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 5>little inconsistently pretty much everywhere else, including staying healthy. But

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 5>even a few years ago, I kind of thought, like,

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 5>this guy is destined to like be a good closer

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 5>and be in be in the bullpen. And maybe I'm

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 5>just fulfilling my own prophecy by overpaying for him to

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 5>make him, you know.

0:34:58.239 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 4>The best closer in baseball.

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 5>But he's available pretty much everywhere, and like saves are

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 5>very viable, especially if you're in saves only leagues, and

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 5>you also don't need to.

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Be on a good team to get a lot of saves,

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because bad teams win games not by blowing them out.

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>That if they're getting win, it's probably a save opportunity,

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so right, if anything, it's it might even be a

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>point in his favor from that perspective.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that is. It was kind of the double edged

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 4>sword there.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Kelly, what do you think about him?

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm a big fan of him. I think that

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna end up closing. I feel like he definitely

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 3>fits the mold for a guy that you want to

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 3>be a closer. And I'm also a big fan of

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 3>closers on bad teams for that exact reason. That's in

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that they're all one run games or two run games.

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And if he's dominant, the White Sox might just be

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>dumb enough to even flip him at the dead line

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 3>to somebody who needs one, so even though he's young

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 3>and under control. But yeah, I like Copec a lot.

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.439
<v Speaker 2>And who's your pitcher pick up of the week?

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was actually gonna I have one that's a

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 3>little lesser known, But I just want to make a

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 3>plug for Mason Miller for exactly all the same reasons

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 3>that we just said everything about Kopec because if Oakland

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make him their closer, I don't really know for

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 3>sure what they're doing with themselves. But I also it's Oakland.

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't ever know what they're doing with themselves. So

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the guy I picked is actually really kind of more

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 3>of a deep deeper league. Look at is Chase still

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 3>seth for the for the Angels. I had him last

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 3>year and he turned in a couple of performances that

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 3>were fantastic before he got injured. I was actually riding

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 3>him into the playoffs pretty well. So he has also

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 3>has good underlying numbers. He struck out twenty five percent

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 3>batters last year in spring training, which you know it

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 3>matters gigantically. He's striking out thirty over thirty percent and

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 3>walking only four So if he can settle in a

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 3>little bit to kind of lower that walk rate, things

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 3>can I think go in his favor. But there's just

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot that I like about him most definitely that

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 3>if he can strike out that twenty four percent batters,

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 3>then he's free like he's he's not. He's not rostered

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.959
<v Speaker 3>anywhere for the most part, so I think he's worth

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 3>going out, especially with pitcher injuries.

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Definitely somebody flying under the radar.

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>When you entered him his name into the outline, I

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>went to pull him up and just check his recent

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>news and notes on our site, and the most recent

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>player news Chase Silseth a place on concussion I l

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>retroacted to August twenty seven, thirty weeks ago.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Was a ubdate. So definitely not reallybuddy that people are, you.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Know, clamoring about right and left marriage. Do you have

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on Chase Silseth.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 5>I'll tell you one thought because while Kelly was talking,

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 5>I looked up where he went in that draft last night.

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 5>He went in the twenty fifth round, three hundred and

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 5>seventy first overall, and the person who drafted him used

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 5>fifty four of their fifty five seconds on the clock,

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 5>so they really thought long and hard about drafting him.

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 2>That's great sign.

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, that'll wrap up our time with Kelly. Kelly,

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on again. Obviously you

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>will fill in for mayor me here and there. You

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 1>will be on as a guest here and there, so

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know you will certainly be back on the show

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>plenty of times. But I appreciate you making the time.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:18.919
<v Speaker 1>How'd you feel about episode one?

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I loved it. I love what you guys are doing,

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 3>and I'm very excited to participate whenever you'd like me to,

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 3>or just have me sit here and stare mayor down

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 3>for you whatever you need.

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So we will be very excited to have you back. Everybody,

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>stick around and we will be right back with Chris Welsh.

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>We are back, joined now by Chris Welsh. Welsh, thank

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you so much for coming on to the first episode.

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 2>You are, of course.

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk about prospects slash rookies because some of

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys are now on big league rosters.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 2>First of all, thank you for coming on.

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 6>Hey, thank you guys for having me. I'm excited for

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 6>the show. I get to hear it every single week,

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 6>be a part of this awesome stuff with to my

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 6>good buddies, two buddies I got to hang with. And

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, when you think of cycles, by the way

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 6>you clearly think of me. You guys got to see

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 6>my athletic skill in person. It was football, not baseball,

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 6>but you definitely think of cycles.

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris the cycle of Welsh as we started calling him recently.

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Mayor.

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You know we talked when we were first trying to

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>plan out this show as we want to have sort

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 1>of a prospect corner element to this show where we're

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about guys in the minors. Maybe it's a dynasty look,

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a prospects to stash kind of look.

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 2>But I know you are also excited to have well, Shan.

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely, and especially like you and I have both

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 5>talked about wanting to do a lot of like dynasty

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 5>stuff too, and so Welsh is a perfect you know,

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 5>expert to have on for that. I'm more of like

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 5>a numbers guy when it comes in when it comes

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 5>to like evaluating prospects, I just look at like their history.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 5>I look at the metrics I'm looking for. But Welsh

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 5>is out there actually like going to spring training games

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.439
<v Speaker 5>in Arizona, so he's seen these guys in person more

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 5>than I definitely haven't, and.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 6>Trying to talk to it and try to talk to

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 6>some of them, you know, some of the guys we're

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.919
<v Speaker 6>going to talk about. I had one of these big names,

0:39:57.920 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 6>one of the biggest names were well not the biggest name,

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 6>but the most exciting recent one I've I did an

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 6>interview with on my Prospect one show.

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I was at the debut of a couple of these guys.

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 6>I was actually in an autograph signing a friend of mine,

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 6>Dennis Siddler, has one of these guys we're gonna talk

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 6>about in an exclusive client and I hung out with

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 6>one of.

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 2>These guys for two hours. So yeah, I.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 6>Definitely bring like in field experience, but I love the

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 6>extracurricular weird stuff of like whether I'm a part of

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 6>a debut or talking to a guy or being around them.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 6>And I do have a history with quite a few

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 6>of these guys.

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Let's jump into some of these names here. We'll start

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 2>with the prospects.

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know what I asked well Sh to do

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for this episode is, you know, in the future, he's

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on a lot this season. If one of

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys gets called up, we're gonna have him on

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and like dive deep if like a top prospect is

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up. For today, I wanted to hit on a

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of names and include the guys who made opening

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 1>day rosters and the guys who did.

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 2>So let's start with the guys who did.

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 1>We talked earlier in this episode about in our Bold

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Predictions article on the site. This week, four of the

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve or so submissions for bold Predictions. Where about why

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>at Langford he is an extremely exciting hitter who did

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>make the Rangers opening day roster, obviously was a one

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of the top picks you know, in that elite top

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>five grouping in last year's draft class has done nothing

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to you know, keep expectations down since being drafted.

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Obviously dominated at Florida.

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So well, I mean, my main question with Langford is like,

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to what degree is this hype actually justified? Is he

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody that a year from now people will be drafting

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the top two or three rounds in their redraft leagues?

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I think so.

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 6>I h one way to equate it. I wouldn't be

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 6>surprised if it went this path is I could see

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 6>this going the Gunner Henderson path, because look at Gunner.

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 6>How high were we drafted Gunner is about last year

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 6>roughly white Langford costs. I would say his path was

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 6>different than my bay Cormyn Carrol's a little bit different

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 6>because Gunner was a real problem. At one point. Gunner

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 6>was potential cut and then he completely bounced back. And

0:41:57.960 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 6>then you go and look and you look at his

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 6>stats and you're like, like these are great. They remember,

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 6>weren't like mine numbing stats and we also, you know,

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 6>clearly had this big bump. I'm pretty critical by the

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 6>way of how fantasy analysts like wipe away the bat.

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 6>Now specifically, what I'm saying is like, oh, we love

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 6>this guy, we love this guy, and then they stink

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 6>to a cuttable level and then they bounce back and

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 6>everyone's like, ah, I was right, and it's like, no,

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 6>you weren't, because this guy stunk and was potentially cuttable.

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 6>And that just happened to me, by the way, So

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 6>like you have to think about like not trying to

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 6>be like accountable, but that's like the thing that goes

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 6>along with some of these guys. So wrapping this all

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 6>around and why I specifically picked on Gunner is that

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 6>I do think there's the possibility that there could be

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of down for Whiteling for this year.

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that's al realma possibility. Early on, he's

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 6>still adjusting to MLB. I think he could get pitched

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 6>to a level of like a lot of high fastballs

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 6>which he might push into the ground. He had some

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 6>ground ball stuff in spring. I just wouldn't be surprised

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 6>if that happens. But here's what I do think. I

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 6>think he's going to adjust. I think he is a

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 6>generational hype talent because of the fast turned the guy

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 6>gets on base. He doesn't strike out at crazy clips.

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 6>He definitely shows some incredible ability to get the ball

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 6>in the air, he can run. It's a five tool

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 6>player I actually like in it. I think it's kind

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 6>of Mike Troutish. I think he looks kind of Mike

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 6>Troutish as well in the game in general. But I

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 6>think the possibility that he could struggle is there, So

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 6>how do we wrap it and come back around that.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 6>I think the cost when you take him in the

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 6>sixties or seventies, I think that's fine because it builds

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 6>the upside. I think him as a prospect uniquely unlike

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 6>some of these other guys, don't have that floor, and

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 6>I think push comes to shove by the end of

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 6>the season. I think he's gonna have pretty wild RBI numbers,

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 6>probably some good run numbers, probably eighty five plus on

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 6>both twenty plus homers, Maybe he touches the twenty stolen bases.

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:47.879
<v Speaker 6>I think it'll all come together, but I don't think

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 6>it'll be this linear path where everyone's.

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Like, uh, look at me. I told you, yeah.

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 4>So you're penciling in twenty twenty, then no, I.

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 6>Actually think the stolen base are gonna be a little

0:43:58.000 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 6>bit lower. Actually, the CBS guys had me come on

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 6>and we created it's this very detailed system. It was

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 6>called Chris Welsh or it was Chris the Welsh projections,

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 6>where I just had to make up my projections for

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 6>prospects and I had Wyatt under the twenty stolen bases.

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't think he's going to steal it a crazy clip.

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 6>If I remember correctly when I was doing the research,

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:18.800
<v Speaker 6>I think the Rangers stole the least amount of basses

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 6>last season, So I don't think he's gonna be the

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 6>guy that's gonna be running like crazy. I liken it

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 6>more to like twenty five fifteen. That's where I think

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 6>it's gonna sit.

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The next guy I want to ask you about is

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>another elite prospect and a guy who has the.

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Speed to run quite a bit.

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's been a true power speed threat in

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the miners, you know, since bursting out of the scene

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. That's Jackson Curio, who got

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the big contract, So we knew there was a really

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:46.720
<v Speaker 1>good chance he was going to be on the opening

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>day roster if he, you know, didn't completely fall on

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 1>his flate face, which he did not in spring training.

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So he, you know, is going to be starting in

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the opening day lineup. They said, uh, just earlier today.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So Jackson Curio uber talented power speed guy. I've said,

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've liken him to like a very very

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>very poor man's Akunya, but like that kind of can

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 1>contribute in those types of categories. Super young, still super inexperience.

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 1>What's your hype level for him?

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And this is the guy, by the way, that

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 6>I hung out with for a little bit, and he's

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 6>so funny. He's actually a really funny guy. Too energetic dude.

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 3>And that.

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 6>Comp that you gave, I remember Chris Blessing telling you

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 6>that a couple of years ago. I've seen Cherio a

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 6>whole bunch out here, but he had kind of thrown

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 6>that comp out there as well. So Cheerio's in a

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 6>unique situation. I do think of like the big big prospects,

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 6>he's the one that has the most susceptibility to bad

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 6>batting average, and it's like he's going to or anything

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 6>like that. And he has cut his strikeouts down, but

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 6>it's been this gradual strikeout cut from the lower levels

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 6>up to the higher When you get to the majors,

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 6>it's gonna be a lot different. You're gonna be jid,

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 6>you know. I mean there's a lot of great prospects

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 6>pictures and the miners and stuff like that, but every

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 6>picture is amazing. And whether they're throwing ninety seven with

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 6>a bunch of ride or they're throwing ninety with elite command, like,

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 6>it's gonna be a different game. So the thing with

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 6>sure you is I trying to build this in like

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 6>I think he's gonna be good. I think these are

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 6>generational type of prospects. I don't I'm trying to not

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 6>trying to throw around all these like euphemisms of oh

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 6>they're all amazing, but like, this is gonna be an

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 6>elite class of guys that we're gonna end up seeing

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 6>that last year Carolyn Gunner were as well. But will

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 6>there be struggles? Yeah, I think there can be. I

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 6>think there could be a much higher strikeout rate than

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 6>people are giving when they look at like, you know,

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 6>a twenty percent.

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Strike cut rate guy.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 6>I think he could struggle with some RBI numbers because

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.959
<v Speaker 6>I think Pat Murphy is going to be a real pain,

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 6>is gonna it's gonna take so much to push him

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 6>up the lineup. It might take every player fracturing their

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.399
<v Speaker 6>wrist like Errett Mitchell for him to gradually move up.

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 6>So it's like, I think the RBI numbers might be

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 6>kind of black. I think he's gonna score decent amount

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 6>of runs. I think he's gonna steal exponentially more bases

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 6>than power and I think I think my projection I

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 6>put him around like there's like eighteen homers and like

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 6>the thirty stolen base mark. Again, this is another player.

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:56.879
<v Speaker 6>Top seventy five is great, but there there there can

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 6>be some up and downs. I would bet more up

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 6>and downs from a like ooh, this is getting bad

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 6>with Churio where Langford's I think up and downs might

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 6>be like does he really only have like one homer

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 6>over the last like thirty games, Like that's the type

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 6>of thing I think with Langford, I just don't think

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 6>he's ever going to struggle. I think those two could

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 6>have a twenty five to thirty point difference in their

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 6>batting average when it's all said and done. But again,

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 6>I think they're worth it. They're both worth it for

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 6>different reasons. If Langford's hitting, if he moves to three

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 6>or is hitting five, his RBI totally he could have

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 6>one hundred rbi. Was it Gunner that had what a

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:32.800
<v Speaker 6>Gunner have a one hundred run or a hundred RBI?

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 6>I think whyatt can be the guy that could have

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 6>like ninety something RBI, but his homerun totals might not

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 6>be monstrous. Turio is the type of guy. I think

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 6>he could score ninety runs. He could steal close to

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 6>forty bases, but there might be, you know, a few

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 6>up and downs. But it's an amazing talent and I

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 6>wouldn't be shocked if he was, you know, a thirty

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 6>thirty guy.

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Gunnar did have one hundred runs, but that's what was

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 2>on the dot.

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Mayor, did you find yourself this draft season in redraft

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of Langford or Churio as the sort

0:47:59.280 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the.

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.840
<v Speaker 4>I have no Langford. I I do have some Cheerio though.

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Did you get him when he was cheaper?

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Yeah, it was.

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 5>It was kind of before the helium hit, you know,

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 5>like the last week or so, he's become more of

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:13.399
<v Speaker 5>a name. But there was a there was a while

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 5>there where like it was again towards the end of draft,

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 5>and I was like, I.

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Guess I'll take Cheerio now, no one's gonna take him.

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it was a good I got him in a

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:23.279
<v Speaker 6>DC early and then I didn't really do any and

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 6>then this is what I did.

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I did like a collective.

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 6>Of those Dinger best balls over an underdog and I

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 6>got I paired Cheerio and Langford together because outfield is

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 6>monstrous in those leagues. It really stinks, and they go

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:39.800
<v Speaker 6>crazy high, and I pivoted away while getting elite picture

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 6>because they do like infield, outfield and pitcher, and I

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.359
<v Speaker 6>did like elite infield and pitching. I would get one

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 6>good outfielder and then I would go and grab Langford

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 6>and Cheerio. And I did that in like three of

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 6>my Dinger drafts. I have a lot of shares in

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 6>best ball of those guys, but you know there's some volatility.

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get a lot of Cheerio and redraft because

0:48:57.800 --> 0:48:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I have him in so many of my Dynasty leagues

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that I like, I'm already kind of you know covered

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:03.839
<v Speaker 1>if he's good, I'm in plenty of leads.

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Ye, I'm really excited about that.

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Another Jackson Jackson Merrill we've already seen actually make his

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:10.720
<v Speaker 1>debut because of that, you know, early Korea series.

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 2>What are your thoughts on him?

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 6>I love Jackson Merril. This was one. This is gonna

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 6>be my Joe moment. Like I've been telling you guys

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 6>about this a long time ago, Like this is one

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 6>I've been saying, Joe.

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.879
<v Speaker 2>I know I did it too. He's blue.

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:25.919
<v Speaker 6>I have been saying this one for quite some time

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 6>that like, watch out for Jackson Merrill. Uh being on

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 6>the roster a lot this year and the outfield stuff

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 6>was kind of looming around so much so that I

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 6>did sprinkle a little tiny Rookie of the Year bet

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 6>when he was plus like seventeen hundred. It's now moved

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 6>to nine point fifty. You know, the only problem with

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 6>him is gonna be like, what are the counting stats

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 6>look like? I think there's some hidden power. I think

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 6>he can steal some bases. What will not work is

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 6>if like Iyamamoto is decent and Churio is like pretty

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 6>dang good, it's just gonna be tough. Where Merrill could

0:49:56.440 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 6>be like a Rookie of the Year guy is if

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 6>he's hitting five and he's able to move up the

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 6>lineup and he's scoring a bunch of runs, and that

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:05.879
<v Speaker 6>kind of brings it back to fantasy, Like I think

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 6>he's a great like post two hundred pick right around there,

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 6>he'll be in field outfield qualified guys like him and

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:14.800
<v Speaker 6>Saddana Rafaela. Those would be two Ruffeli specifically I'm drafting

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:17.280
<v Speaker 6>a lot. Those would be two guys I would be targeting.

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 6>I just don't know which direction it'll go with Meryl.

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 6>I just don't know. Also if he's gonna hit out

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 6>of like ever eight or seven or something like that,

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 6>but there could be some injuries. He's he's a nice

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 6>bet at the end of the draft with really solid

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 6>upside because you know, sky's the limit with him. He

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 6>really could be a guy that ends up stealing thirty

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 6>plus bases or could hit twenty homers. And a lot

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 6>of people don't believe that.

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 5>He's betting ninth ninth right now, but they only really

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 5>have like one other legit left handed bat in that lineup,

0:50:42.680 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 5>and it's cronin Worth betting third right now. So through

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 5>his potential, if he does get up to a hot start,

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 5>they might want to move that lefty bat up higher

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:51.720
<v Speaker 5>than I would love.

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 6>To see, like personally, Meryl leading off, then go into Bogarts,

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 6>then go in Tatis Machado, and then try to throw

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 6>another lefty that's a little too righty heavy, But like

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 6>you could do that with Bogart's Tatisa Machado. And I

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 6>don't think that's out of the realm of possibility because

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:11.439
<v Speaker 6>like they embraced Merrill on this team, the Brewers, Pat

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 6>Murphy's he's just old staunchy, just like you know, like

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 6>he's not embracing Cheerio to that team has embraced Merrill

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:20.399
<v Speaker 6>to the point where it's like if they were having

0:51:20.400 --> 0:51:22.919
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of lineup struggles, I could absolutely see

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 6>if Merrill's hitting well, moving up in that lineup.

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's a positive.

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You talk about being in on a guy early. My

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.839
<v Speaker 1>very good buddy watched Jackson Merrill in high school play

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>in the Maryland State championship game because his alma mater

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>was going up against Saverna Park, and his alma mater

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one that one sure would.

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So he's been he's been watching Jackson Merrill for.

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Like three years, the best two, yeah, and then the

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:49.839
<v Speaker 1>last guy that's on the opening day roster. We've talked

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot about speed in this segment. Victor Scott the second.

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean over under fifty steals this year. I mean,

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what are we looking at here?

0:51:57.719 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 6>And this is a guy I have a great relationship

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 6>with Victor. I interviewed him at the Arizona Fall League.

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 6>We talked like a ton. It was actually me in

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:07.399
<v Speaker 6>Ineno Serris. If you ever listened to the interview, we're

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 6>kind of doing a dual thing, and we were talking

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 6>a lot about the stolen bases. Victor is, first off,

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 6>just like a great guy, an incredible dude, and he

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:18.799
<v Speaker 6>is an immensely talented player all off season long, analytics,

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 6>trying to improve his swing, trying to get more homer

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 6>and power. If people don't know, ninety four stolen bases

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 6>in the minder. One got taken away from him by

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 6>the way, which is crazy. With the Arizona folly, he

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 6>stole over one hundred bases. Here's the tricky part. As

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 6>much of a Victor Scott fan as I am, there

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 6>is no guarantee because it took all these injuries to

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:38.240
<v Speaker 6>get him on the roster, there's no guarantee he sticks around.

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Why he can stick around, for any pessimist about it

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 6>is he's a gold glove defender, one a minor league

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 6>gold glove. He's an incredible defender if the bat stays

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 6>alive outside of just like veteran love, there's no reason

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 6>to get like Carlson or Edmund like Victor Scott's the

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 6>best of all those guys defensively. So does he steal

0:52:57.120 --> 0:52:59.399
<v Speaker 6>fifty bases? If he plays one hundred games, he steals

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:02.760
<v Speaker 6>fifty bases. If he plays eighty games, he might still

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:06.439
<v Speaker 6>still fifty bases. You should my point, and I said

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.319
<v Speaker 6>this a couple of weeks prior, even when he got

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 6>like sent down and it kind of stunk. You should

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 6>draft Victor Scott if this works out, If he makes

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 6>a roster and then he didn't pray to God you

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 6>didn't cut him, because then two days later Carlson slams

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.839
<v Speaker 6>into Walker out here in Phoenix, and then now he's out.

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:26.439
<v Speaker 6>Victor Scott is the type of guy that could never

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 6>let go of this job. But there is a logjam

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 6>of outfielders here. I would hold on to Victor right

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 6>now and see what happens over the next month. He

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 6>could be sent down in two weeks, but when he

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 6>gets on base, this everyone's like a Stury Ruiz or

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 6>Victor Scott. Victor Scott is a contact hitter. He's got

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 6>real power. He is exponentially better than as Sturry Ruiz,

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 6>as Swy Ruiz. But it's just going to be about

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 6>the playing time that they are gonna end up giving him.

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 6>I would hold for a month to see what it

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.439
<v Speaker 6>looks like. Even if he's sent down, I would hold

0:53:57.480 --> 0:53:59.840
<v Speaker 6>on to it because I legit, think over one hundred

0:53:59.840 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 6>and six games and even in his rookie year, Victor

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Scott could steal sixty plus bases, And as this guy grows,

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 6>I would not be shocked to see him at the

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 6>major league level stealing like eighty plus.

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Especially seeing Stone bases Spike, you know, with the new

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>rules in everything, Yeah, exactly setting up so well for

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>him to do that.

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Any thoughts on Scott mayor.

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 5>My only real thought is my only worry, and there's

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 5>this is completely unjustified and not real analysis, but I

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 5>feel like I have like Cardinals outfielder fatigue because we've

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 5>just been doing this for like eight years where they've

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.880
<v Speaker 5>just been cycling. They always have like five good outfielders

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:37.919
<v Speaker 5>and then it turns out like none of them were good,

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 5>and it.

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Feels like we've just been doing that.

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 6>Forever, but none of them are like good defenders like

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 6>Victor vic I've said this, Victor is like Mason win

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:48.800
<v Speaker 6>and Mason Wins deal was if you put him at short,

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 6>the dude has to hit under one hundred to get

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:54.240
<v Speaker 6>him off because he's your best defender. He's the best

0:54:54.239 --> 0:54:56.920
<v Speaker 6>defender on that team. On the infield. Victor's kind of

0:54:56.920 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 6>the same way. He's the fastest guy, he's your best

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:02.360
<v Speaker 6>outfield defender, and he's your best runner. So give me

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 6>the reasons why he can't be on the roster. What

0:55:04.239 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 6>was the reason, Well, we want to see Dylan Carlson

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 6>and we got and you're gonna cut that out. Carlson's hurt. Yes,

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:11.360
<v Speaker 6>it could be like, well, we don't want him to

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 6>lose his job because of injury, but it's gonna be

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 6>a crazy justification for Victor to not stick around. But

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:19.919
<v Speaker 6>guess what if he hits like two ten and maybe

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 6>has an error here or there, they can send him down.

0:55:22.440 --> 0:55:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Even if he's, by the way, hitting three p fifty.

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:26.359
<v Speaker 6>They could send him. They sent Jordan Walker down last

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:29.120
<v Speaker 6>year after hitting two eighty and they sent him down.

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 6>So don't think the Cardinals won't. And that's what's dangerous

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:34.240
<v Speaker 6>about getting into like. I would never bet like Victor

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 6>Scott is going to lead the league in stolen bases

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:38.360
<v Speaker 6>because I don't know it. To your point, it's the fatigue.

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 6>I don't know what the hell the Cardinals are going

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:40.120
<v Speaker 6>to do.

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I uh, you know.

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>The whole time you're talking about Victor Scott, I keep

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:46.280
<v Speaker 1>wanting to ask about Henriy kue Bradfield with the Orioles,

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 1>because he's describing a lot.

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Of him, so he's a Instead.

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Of that, since we don't have time, I'll ask about

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a different oriol who didn't make the opening day roster,

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:57.640
<v Speaker 1>who game close another Jackson Jackson holiday of course number

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:00.879
<v Speaker 1>one prospect in baseball consensus, you know, everywhere you look.

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I was highly disappointed, and make it they are, of course,

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, claiming it's not because of service time manipulation.

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to believe. He clearly would be

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the best second based option on the team. I feel

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 1>strongly about considering they're rolling out like Tony Kemp and

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they had Colton Wong and I don't even know who

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 1>else is playing second, assuming Westburg's at third, So we'll

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:25.919
<v Speaker 1>see kind of how long he's held down. I would

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:28.400
<v Speaker 1>hope he would come up soon. Is he at the

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>top of your prospects to Stash list?

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely?

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 6>I think the article is out by the way, the

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 6>named prospects to stash for the opening week, It is

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 6>absolutely Jackson Holiday. I feel, I can be honest with you,

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 6>a gut feeling, this gut feeling that Jackson's gonna be up,

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 6>like really really soon. Like we did this great show

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:52.399
<v Speaker 6>with Craig Mish on betting Pros talking about futures, and

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 6>he just instantly was saying, Nah, it's still Jackson Holiday.

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:57.840
<v Speaker 6>I think Jackson Holiday he's my number one prospect. And

0:56:57.880 --> 0:56:59.959
<v Speaker 6>I know that's crazy in a world of white length,

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 6>but I think his floor is low. I do think

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:07.399
<v Speaker 6>there's manipulation, and I just would be shocked if May

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 6>first gets here and he's not on the roster. Another

0:57:11.400 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 6>goofy thing. If you just want to pay attention to

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 6>the markets, He's plus four fifty for Rookie of the Year.

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 6>He's the third highest bet and he's not on the

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:21.760
<v Speaker 6>roster right now. I mean like that also tells you

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 6>something about where the market is sitting on a guy

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 6>like this, that he is within, you know, a point

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:30.760
<v Speaker 6>of Evan Carter, two points of Whya at Langford, like

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:33.240
<v Speaker 6>they're still all in the same territory. He is the

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 6>number one stash like Victor Scott, and that's a really

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:39.160
<v Speaker 6>tough one. Who would you rather stash Victor Scott in

0:57:39.240 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 6>that it could be sent down or would you rather

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:45.439
<v Speaker 6>stash to Jackson Holiday? I probably I trust them. When

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 6>Holiday's up, he ain't going back down, and I think

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:49.800
<v Speaker 6>he's gonna I think he's just steal a ton of bases.

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:53.800
<v Speaker 6>I had Welsh projected thirty five stolen bases from him

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 6>this year, and I still think he can do that.

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 6>If he plays over one hundred and thirty one hundred

0:57:57.440 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 6>and forty games, I think he will run like crazy.

0:57:59.720 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 6>My interpretation of Jackson Holiday will be a better batting

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:05.840
<v Speaker 6>average Rookie of the Year Bobby Witt. That's how I

0:58:05.880 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 6>think Jackson Holiday like Bobby Witch rookie season. Bobby Witch

0:58:09.280 --> 0:58:11.959
<v Speaker 6>rookie season. If you remember he was twenty thirty. That's

0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 6>how I think Jackson Holiday can go, but probably higher

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 6>stolen bases, little bit lower power.

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, you can't get me going like that on the show.

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I love Holiday, I love him, My gosh. He wasn't

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the only oriole set Dad, of course, I mean Kowser

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was up, but Kars Dad, Kobe Mayo, Connor Norby. They

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just have so many options that I don't know how

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to find time for these guys. They're gonna

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have to make make moves the other names. We don't

0:58:34.520 --> 0:58:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have to go through these each individually because we're running

0:58:36.160 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a long on time. But you know, Paul Skins Junior, Cameronaro,

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Manzarro, Chased a louder. Any of these stand out

0:58:41.720 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as like, you know, prospects of sash that you're really,

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, excited to have on your roster.

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:47.200
<v Speaker 2>If you have a spot at the end of your bench.

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 6>I think the only one that I'm in stash mode

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 6>for is Cam and Arrow. That's another guy that I

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 6>just don't know how long they're gonna hold him down

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 6>like this is a classic raise also maybe manipulation thing,

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:00.400
<v Speaker 6>because you know, what's your number one thing to do

0:59:00.400 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 6>as soon as a guy gets up, they're gonna trade him,

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:04.200
<v Speaker 6>or as soon as the contract is up, they're gonna

0:59:04.200 --> 0:59:06.360
<v Speaker 6>trade them because they won't pay him. Is camon Aro

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 6>is gonna, I assume be up by like May. But

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 6>they let Austin Shenton, who, by the way, is like

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 6>actually a really good prospect, older guy, but he made

0:59:13.680 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 6>the roster because Ronda was hurt. There's only so long

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 6>that like Ronda and Estok paridies and stuff are going

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 6>to hold him down. Kevin Aro's the.

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Guy would hold But I will tell you all of

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:24.919
<v Speaker 2>those others.

0:59:24.560 --> 0:59:27.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm paying attention to. I've been screaming about de Lauter

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:30.880
<v Speaker 6>for a long time. I really like kle Manzardo. He

0:59:30.960 --> 0:59:32.240
<v Speaker 6>was one of those guys I got to interview in

0:59:32.240 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 6>the Arizona Fall League. Those guys I think can change

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:37.920
<v Speaker 6>the scope of what we know from the Guardians lineup.

0:59:38.160 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 6>So those are two offensive bats. If they get the

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 6>call up, or we get a month into the season

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 6>and they haven't, there's nothing bruin. I would stash them.

0:59:46.080 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 6>Paul Skeins is the unknown. I mean, if you can

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 6>stomach it, absolutely you should. But I think his timeline

0:59:53.000 --> 0:59:56.320
<v Speaker 6>could be April fifteenth, to July fifteenth or longer. I mean,

0:59:56.360 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 6>you just don't know what the pirates and what that

0:59:58.280 --> 0:59:59.920
<v Speaker 6>team is going to look like. I really don't have

1:00:00.160 --> 1:00:03.440
<v Speaker 6>good gauge. It's gonna be more determining of like how

1:00:03.520 --> 1:00:06.480
<v Speaker 6>can you and what is your level of stash. Also,

1:00:06.480 --> 1:00:08.880
<v Speaker 6>it's a pitching guy like pictures are kind of tough. So,

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:11.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Bryce Miller was one of the most uniquely

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:14.680
<v Speaker 6>great rookies last year, but Caminaro is the one I'm

1:00:14.720 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 6>stashing now. The other three are on my hot watch list,

1:00:17.840 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 6>and as the weeks go by, we get into like

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna pick them up like Manzarto in Skeins if

1:00:24.640 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 6>it gets to May first, even if there's no rumblings,

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 6>I am gonna pick them up because I do think

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 6>we are starting to get into like weeks away territory.

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't have time for you to go into detail,

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>but just give me in order how you would rank

1:00:36.600 --> 1:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>these five prospects in ditey because we're talking about so

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>many elite guys, So just give me the names. Why

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at Langford Jackson, Cheerio Jackson, Holliday, Paul Skeins, Junior, Camenaro.

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 6>Okay, I have it Holiday Langford, Cheerio Camonaro schemes. That's

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:55.640
<v Speaker 6>my that's actually my prospect rank, and that is also

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 6>my Dynasty rank because uniquely, all of those guys will

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 6>not prospects by the end of this year. That's what's

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 6>so cool about that, and that's why there's not a

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 6>lot of deviation.

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's move to the end of the show.

1:01:07.200 --> 1:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to wrap up the show each week with

1:01:09.280 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of our what are we most excited for this

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>weekend and for this week since opening day? You can

1:01:14.120 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of be kind of a bigger picture, what are

1:01:15.480 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you most excited for for the season?

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>And Mayor I'll start with you.

1:01:19.920 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 5>So sure, So a guy we already talked about earlier

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:25.560
<v Speaker 5>in the show, I'm excited to see the Tampa Bay

1:01:25.640 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Rays version of Aaron Savali. So we're getting Zach Eflin

1:01:29.160 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 5>on Thursday and Savally on Friday, and I'm ready to

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 5>see the first glimpse of, you know, in a regular

1:01:36.000 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 5>season game of the new Aaron Savali. And I promise

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 5>every week I'm not going to only talk about raise

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:43.320
<v Speaker 5>pictures because I know I've done two weeks of Eflyn now,

1:01:43.360 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 5>so no more Eflyn for a couple of weeks, but

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 5>maybe another week of Savai.

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 4>We'll see how he does this week.

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:51.800
<v Speaker 5>And then the bonus one is that you know, the

1:01:51.840 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 5>main complaint everyone has in Fantasy every year is you know,

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 5>we know all these guys are going.

1:01:56.960 --> 1:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>On the IL this week, but none of them are

1:01:58.800 --> 1:01:59.640
<v Speaker 4>on the IL yet.

1:01:59.640 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 5>But as of like tomorrow, and maybe you have to

1:02:02.280 --> 1:02:04.000
<v Speaker 5>wait till Friday because we already have two games to

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:08.439
<v Speaker 5>postponed that as of tomorrow, a lot of those guys

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 5>will officially be on the injured list and we'll be

1:02:10.360 --> 1:02:12.800
<v Speaker 5>able to make pickups for our teams this weekend.

1:02:13.080 --> 1:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I missed out on picking up Victor Scott in a

1:02:15.880 --> 1:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>league because I was like, I have all these injured

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>guys that I can't drop, but can we please get

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>them on IL so I can go make other pickups.

1:02:23.440 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>So I am right there with you.

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>It is so frustrating to know, like, beyond a shadow

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of doubt, this guy's on IL and not be able

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to do anything with it. On your rosters, Welsh, I

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>know that you were prepared for the prospects segment and

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not this, but anything in particular that you're super excited about.

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, one thing is gonna be just crossing

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 6>my fingers for my number one shared player. I mean,

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:47.840
<v Speaker 6>it's not gonna shock, but it also it's crazy. Corbyn

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 6>Carrol is my number one shared player.

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>That's why. How do you do is that even have?

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:54.640
<v Speaker 6>Well lucky, of course I love him, but I'm saying,

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:56.120
<v Speaker 6>that's a guy that's like a top four or five

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 6>pick hog. And I did a Shares episode. Half of

1:02:59.040 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 6>my leagues I have Gore mc carroll and and they're

1:03:01.080 --> 1:03:03.200
<v Speaker 6>not keeper. I don't even know how it happened, but

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 6>there's some best balls and stuff. I will tell you

1:03:05.200 --> 1:03:08.280
<v Speaker 6>this opening day, this is the most excited I have

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:11.160
<v Speaker 6>ever in my life been for a Royals Twins game,

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:14.560
<v Speaker 6>to watch Paba Lopez and Cole Reagan's go go at

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 6>each other. I'm I'm I don't think I'm betting it.

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 6>I kind of want to bet it. I'm absolutely going

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 6>to be watching it because that is two frontline starters

1:03:22.200 --> 1:03:25.720
<v Speaker 6>and really watching Reagans Reagan's and Trek Scouoble. Getting to

1:03:25.760 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 6>see both of these guys with that are being put

1:03:28.280 --> 1:03:31.240
<v Speaker 6>in like the Tyler Glass now and the Pablo Lopez

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 6>ranged to get to see them kind of go and unleashed.

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:36.280
<v Speaker 6>I'm very very excited about that.

1:03:37.720 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 5>All concerned about the Cole Reagans spring training numbers, No.

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm as concerned as I am Logan Web giving up

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:47.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty six earned runs but only walking three. By the

1:03:47.200 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 6>way in spring train, I'm not at all.

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm exclusively concerned about spring training stats when they

1:03:54.800 --> 1:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>don't fit my narrative.

1:03:55.880 --> 1:03:58.560
<v Speaker 6>And yeah, no, my narrative is super important here, guys actually,

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:00.920
<v Speaker 6>Like so if they're really good and I'm talking positively,

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:02.920
<v Speaker 6>that's what we're going to focus on. But if it

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:05.160
<v Speaker 6>doesn't fit it, then no, no, no, no.

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>The most exciting thing for me, you guys went with

1:04:08.080 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>specific players. Today was pretty much the greatest day of

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>my life because the Orioles sale became official and the

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>bad man John Angelis can't hurt us anymore. Our long

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>national nightmare is indeed over. It's the start of the

1:04:20.840 --> 1:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>David Rubinstein era in Baltimore. New ownership, just kidneans so

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>many things, and I'm so very hopeful. Obviously the Oils

1:04:27.360 --> 1:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to be great this season, like you know, regardless,

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but just having the new ownership, like it's it's going

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a very very very fun opening weekend in

1:04:35.600 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore with people just kind of feeling celebratory and really

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>excited about this new era. The last thing I want

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to mention Mayor and I want to do some kind

1:04:44.440 --> 1:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of competition, maybe a bed of some kind this season.

1:04:47.560 --> 1:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>We have not landed on what that will be, so

1:04:49.680 --> 1:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to sort of solicit the listeners.

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Wels can think on.

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It as well, since you're here while I'm bringing it up,

1:04:55.520 --> 1:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But any ideas for how we want to separate it

1:04:58.640 --> 1:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>from the home run calls contest leading off that's their

1:05:01.080 --> 1:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>own thing, so something different than that.

1:05:02.720 --> 1:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>But we want to do some sort of season long

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:08.600
<v Speaker 2>cycles here cycles predicted predicted hit for the cycle each week.

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:11.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you pick your cycles every single week. It'll be

1:05:11.280 --> 1:05:14.880
<v Speaker 6>great because it'll be like four payoffs. Also every nine

1:05:14.960 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 6>years will hit one. Oh no, I got I got

1:05:17.600 --> 1:05:19.280
<v Speaker 6>a great idea for you. I have one for you.

1:05:19.320 --> 1:05:21.320
<v Speaker 6>How about you pick four players and you have to

1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:22.080
<v Speaker 6>complete a cycle.

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Everyone get one single, one double, one triple. Hover that's

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a really good idea. I don't know how the triples

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be really tough, but that's a really

1:05:30.800 --> 1:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like a draft.

1:05:31.600 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 6>You guys should draft you could draft your players or

1:05:34.280 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 6>just do straight picks for a second.

1:05:35.440 --> 1:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really fun, contending option. We will

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>strongly consider that. If anybody else has ideas, please send

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>them in as well. But we I know this is

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a super sized episode. These will usually be shorter. We

1:05:44.480 --> 1:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to squeeze in both Welsh and Kelly for this

1:05:46.520 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>episode because they're going to both be on the show

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>so often this season.

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 2>We want to kind of introduce everything.

1:05:50.720 --> 1:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But I really appreciate everybody who stuck through for the

1:05:53.080 --> 1:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>full hour plus. Here to our first episode of the

1:05:55.840 --> 1:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>cycle four Mayor and Kelly and Welsh. I'm Ryan Wormley

1:05:59.320 --> 1:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see again next week. Thanks for listening to

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

1:06:04.600 --> 1:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Follow us on x, Instagram

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>channel at YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB